Next Article in Journal
Bias-Modulated High Photoelectric Response of Graphene-Nanocrystallite Embedded Carbon Film Coated on n-Silicon
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Graphene Oxide on the Mechanical Properties, Fracture Toughness, and Microhardness of Recycled Concrete
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 3
10.3390/nano9030326
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TiO2 Nanoparticles/Nanotubes for Efficient Light Harvesting in Perovskite Solar Cells

by
Hwa-Young Yang
1,†,
Won-Yeop Rho
2,†,
Seul Ki Lee
1,
Sang Hoon Kim
1 and
Yoon-Bong Hahn
1,*
1
School of Semiconductor and Chemical Engineering, Solar Energy Research Center, Chonbuk National University, Jeollabuk-do 54896, Korea
2
School of International Engineering and Science, Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 54896, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(3), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030326
Submission received: 18 January 2019 / Revised: 12 February 2019 / Accepted: 20 February 2019 / Published: 1 March 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To enhance the light harvesting capability of perovskite solar cells (PSCs), TiO2 nanoparticles/nanotubes (TNNs) were incorporated into the active layer of PSCs. The TNN-containing cells showed a substantial increase in photocurrent density (JSC), from 23.9 mA/cm2 without nanotubes to 25.5 mA/cm2, suggesting that the TiO2 nanotubes enhanced the charge conduction and harvested more sunlight, which was attributed to the Mie scattering effect. Compared to the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of TiO2 nanoparticles in the active layer (14.16%), the TNN-containing cells with optimal loading of 9 wt % TiO2 nanotubes showed a high PCE of 15.34%.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Since Miyasaka introduced organometal halide perovskites into solar cells in 2009, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have been a hot research topic in next-generation solar cells due to their capacity for absorption across a wide range of visible light [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Perovskite consists of Pb, methylammonium, and halide in a cubic structure with a tolerance factor (t) of 0.87–1.0 [6,14,15,16,17,18]. The structure of a perovskite solar cell consists of transparent conducting oxide (TCO), a compact layer, electron transport materials (ETMs), perovskite, hole-transport materials (HTMs), and a top electrode [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. To improve energy conversion efficiency, zero-dimensional TiO2 nanoparticles have been used as ETMs in perovskite solar cells and dye-sensitized solar cells due to the presence of a large band gap semiconductor and a large surface area [9,26,27,28,29]. Recently, perovskite stability, Au-free back electrodes, Pb-free sensitizers, various additives, additive-free HTMs, large-area modules, and Indium tin oxide (ITO)/Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)-free devices have been studied substantially [1,3,5,30,31,32,33,34,35]. The structure of perovskite is ABX3, which is very weak under humidity, heat, light, and oxygen. To enhance resistance to moisture [30,36], lead (Pb) is replaced by tin (Sn) for a Pb-free sensitizer [37]. To ensure device performance, additives are generally required in HTMs. However, the organic additives reduce the stability of PSCs, and thus they are replaced by metal oxides for long-term stability. Furthermore, the electron transport of zero-dimensional TiO2 nanoparticles is no better than that of higher-dimensional TiO2 nanostructures. It has been reported that TiO2 nanotubes are useful in dye-sensitized solar cells to improve electron transport or to enhance light harvesting because they are three-dimensional nanostructures [38,39,40,41,42]. In general, TiO2 nanotubes are prepared using hydrothermal or electrochemical methods. In hydrothermal methods, many individual TiO2 nanotubes are synthesized. However, in the electrochemical method, also called anodization, highly ordered and well-aligned TiO2 nanotubes are synthesized. The size, length, thickness, and width of the TiO2 nanotubes can be easily controlled on micron and nanometer scales as a function of reaction time, voltage, and concentration of electrolytes [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50].
There are two light scattering theories from Rayleigh and Mie. Rayleigh scattering theory is applicable to small-sized particles, and Mie scattering theory, proposed by German physicist Gustav Mie, is applicable to large-sized particles. According to the Rayleigh theory, scattering by TiO2 nanoparticles (20–30 nm) in the active layer is very weak. However, according to Mie scattering theory, submicrometer-sized TiO2 nanoparticles are used effectively in the light scattering layer [51,52,53,54]. Individual TiO2 nanotubes synthesized by a hydrothermal method are not suitable for light scattering, but the flakes of TiO2 nanotubes synthesized by anodization are suitable for light scattering according to the Mie scattering theory. In this study, TiO2 nanotube arrays were prepared by anodization and applied for perovskite solar cells (PSCs). To enhance the light harvesting capability of PSCs, TiO2 nanoparticles/nanotubes (TNNs) were incorporated into the active layer of PSCs. The TNN-containing cells showed a substantial increase in photocurrent density (JSC), suggesting that the TiO2 nanotubes enhanced the charge conduction and harvested more sunlight, which is attributed to the Mie scattering effect.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of TiO2 Nanotube Arrays

A Ti plate was cleaned with water, ethanol, and acetone several times using a sonicator and was then dried. The anodization of the Ti plates was carried out in an electrolyte composed of 0.8 wt % NH4F and 2 vol % H2O in ethylene glycol at 25 °C at a constant applied voltage of 60 V. The TiO2 nanotube arrays on the Ti plates were sintered at 500 °C for 1 h under ambient conditions to improve their crystallinity. To obtain free-standing TiO2 nanotube arrays, a secondary anodization was carried out at a constant applied voltage of 30 V DC for 10 min, and then the Ti plates were immersed in a 10% H2O2 solution for 20 min.

2.2. Synthesis of Methylammonium Iodide and Preparation of Perovskite Solution

Methylammonium iodide (MAI) was synthesized using a methylamine solution (33 wt % in ethanol) and hydroiodic acid (57 wt % in water). First, methylamine was stirred using a dropwise addition of hydroiodic acid in an ice bath for 2 h. The solvent was evaporated by a rotary evaporator, and then the mixture was solvated in ethanol. After recrystallization with diethyl ether, the white solid was precipitated and then dried under a vacuum for 24 h. The perovskite solution was prepared with MAI and lead (II) chloride (99.999%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a 3:1 molar ratio, 45 wt %, in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF).

2.3. Fabrication of the Perovskite Solar Cells

Figure 1A shows the schematic fabrication process of the PSCs incorporating TiO2 nanotubes into the active layer. First, the compact layer of TiO2 was prepared by spin-coating 12 wt % titanium diisopropoxide bis(acetylacetonate) in butanol on the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrate (a). The flakes of TiO2 nanotubes mixed with TiO2 nanoparticles were spin-coated on the compact TiO2 layer to form a TiO2 nanoparticle/nanotube (TNN) film as an electron acceptor, electron transport, and light harvesting layer (b). The TiO2 nanoparticles were prepared using TiO2 paste (Ti-Nanoxide T/SP, solaronix) diluted in anhydrous ethanol. The TNN films were annealed at 500 °C for 1 h to improve crystallinity. The perovskite film was then coated onto the TNN film by a hot-casting technique at 90 °C, followed by annealing at 130 °C for 1 h (c). The hole-conductor layer of spiro-OMeTAD was formed on the active layer (d). The hole transport material was prepared with 73.52 mg of spiro-OMeTAD (60 mMol), 17 μL of Li [bis-(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide] (Li-TFSI) solution (57.42 mg of Li-TFSI in 1 mL of acetonitrile), and 36.22 μL of 4-tert-bytylpyridine (500 mMol) in 1 mL of chlorobenzene. Finally, the top electrode of gold was formed by thermal evaporation (e). The energy band diagram of the perovskite solar cells with TiO2 inclusion is as shown in Figure 1B. The band gap of the TNN film was similar to that of mesoporous TiO2 film. The main role of the TNN film was to enhance light harvesting via the TiO2 nanoparticles and/or nanotubes.

2.4. Analysis

The photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) plots of the perovskite solar cells were measured using a Keithley series 2400 source meter (Tektronix, Beaverton, Portland, OR, USA) under AM1.5 illumination (100 mW/cm2) provided by a 150-W Xenon solar simulator (Oriel Corp., model 91160A, Irvine, CA, USA). To examine the crystallinity of TiO2 nanotubes, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed with a Rigaku D/max-2500 (Rigaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation. The absorption properties of the films were examined with ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy using a JASCO(V-730) spectrometer (JSACO, Easton, MD, USA). The incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) of the devices was measured using a monochromator coupled with a lock-in amplifier and a 500-W Xenon lamp (PV Measurements Inc., Model QEX7, Washington, DC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images of the TiO2 nanotube arrays (Figure 2a,b) and the TNN film (Figure 2c,d). Pore diameter, wall thickness, interpore distance, and length of the TiO2 nanotubes were approximately 100 nm, 20 nm, 200 nm, and 50 μm, respectively. Figure 2c exhibits the top view of the TiO2 nanoparticle/nanotube (TNN) film formed on the FTO glass, which shows some flakes of TiO2 nanotubes incorporated into the film. Figure 2d shows a cross-sectional SEM image of the perovskite solar cell configuration, obtained using a focused ion beam (FIB) method. The thickness of the TiO2 compact layer, TNN layer, perovskite layer, hole-transport layer, and Au electrode were approximately 50 nm, 230 nm, 450 nm, 250 nm, and 260 nm, respectively.
Figure 3 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the TiO2 nanotube arrays before and after thermal annealing at 500 °C for 1 h (Figure 3a) and the perovskite film on TiO2/FTO (Figure 3b). The as-prepared TiO2 nanotube arrays by anodization (black) were amorphous, but the annealed nanotubes (red) had crystalline phases of (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), and (118) at 2θ values of 25°, 38°, 48°, 53°, 55°, and 62°, respectively. A dominant peak at 25°, i.e., the (101) peak, was attributed to an anatase crystal phase (Figure 3a). The crystallinity and purity of the perovskite films were confirmed with strong peaks of (110) and (220) at 2θ values of 14° and 28°, respectively, without a PbCl2 peak (Figure 3b), indicating that the tetragonal conformation of the perovskite structure was formed.
Figure 4 shows photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) curves of the TNN-based perovskite solar cells as a function of weight percentage of TiO2 nanotubes in the TNN-containing active layer. The corresponding photovoltaic parameters of the cells are summarized in Table 1. Compared to the TiO2 nanoparticles only, the TNN-containing cells showed better performances with higher values of short circuit current density (JSC), fill factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (η). The optimal content of TiO2 nanotubes in TNNs was 9 wt %, resulting in 0.886 V of Voc, 25.5 mA/cm2 of JSC, 67.9% of FF, and 15.335% of η. More interestingly, the TNN-containing cells showed a substantial increase in JSC, from 23.9 mA/cm2 without nanotubes to 25.5 mA/cm2 with 9 wt % nanotubes, suggesting that the micronmeter-sized TiO2 nanotubes enhanced the charge carrier generation by harvesting more sunlight, probably attributed to the Mie scattering effect. To check the stability of TNN-based PSCs, we exposed the devices without encapsulation to an Ar environment at room temperature. Figure S1 (Supplementary Materials) shows Voc, JSC, FF, and η from the J-V test results for 80 days. Overall, the photovoltaic parameters of the devices were stabilized after 40 days and sustained their stability over 80 days, while retaining 95%–99% of their original values. To evaluate the reproducibility of the TNN-based PSCs, we fabricated 20 devices and measured device performance. Figure S2 shows the histogram of the power conversion efficiency distribution for 20 devices, apparently presenting the best performance of the PSCs with 9 wt % of TiO2 nanotubes, i.e., η = 14%–15%.
To confirm the light harvesting effect of TiO2 nanotube flakes in the active layer, the reflectance spectra of the TNN films and the IPCE spectra of the TNN-containing perovskite solar cells were measured. Figure 5 shows the normalized reflectance spectra in the TNN films as a function of weight percentage of TiO2 nanotubes. As the content of TiO2 nanotubes increased, the TNN films showed a similar trend of reflectance, but with some variation in intensity. At wavelengths greater than 570 nm, the intensity of the reflectance decreased with the amount of the TiO2 nanotubes, indicating more light harvesting by TiO2 nanotubes at longer wavelengths (i.e., 570–800 nm), thus enhancing charge carrier generation in the active layer.
Figure 6 shows the normalized IPCE spectra from TNN-containing perovskite solar cells with varying content of the TiO2 nanotubes from 0 to 15 wt %. With increasing amounts of TiO2 nanotubes, the photon-to-current efficiency increased substantially at wavelengths greater than 570 nm, which was in good agreement with Figure 4 and Figure 5, attributed to more light harvesting due to a scattering effect by nanotubes and more generation of charge carriers in the active layer. However, it is worthwhile to note that the incorporation of nanotubes of more than 12 wt % increased the recombination rate and thus decreased the photocurrent density that affected FF and Voc (also see Table 1). Generally, it is known that according to Rayleigh theory, scattering by TiO2 nanoparticles of 20–30 nm is very weak [51,54]. The pore diameter of TiO2 nanotubes was 100 nm (Figure 2a), and the length of nanotubes in the TNN film was in the range of 300–1000 nm in size (Figure 2c): Thus, the enhancement of light harvesting with the TNN films was probably attributed to the Mie scattering effect. In addition, as the TNN films were mesoporous, perovskite solution easily penetrated into the TNN film layer. Thus, it is believed that scattering was toward the perovskite as well as in the direction of the tubes.

4. Conclusions

Perovskite solar cells were fabricated with the inclusion of TiO2 nanoparticles/nanotubes as light harvesting materials and were characterized in terms of the normalized reflectance and IPCE. The TiO2 nanoparticle/nanotube-based cells harvested more sunlight with the content of the nanotubes (attributed to the Mie scattering effect) and thus enhanced the carrier charge generation and conduction. However, a large amount of TiO2 nanotubes did not result in improved energy conversion efficiency because of high levels of recombination and low electron density in the active layer. With the optimal content of the TiO2 nanotubes (i.e., 9 wt %), the devices showed high photocurrent density and a power conversion efficiency of 15.34%. The TNN-based PSCs also showed good stability, retaining 95–99% of their initial photovoltaic parameter values. The obtained results could be applicable to different types of solar cells and photocatalysts and water splitting technology for hydrogen generation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/3/326/s1, Figure S1: The stability of perovskite solar cells with 9wt% of TiO2 nanotubes in a TiO2 composite film, Figure S2: The histograms of PCE with 0, 9 and 15wt% of TiO2 nanotubes in active layer.

Author Contributions

H.-Y.Y. and S.K.L. designed and performed experiments. S.H.K and W.-Y.R. helped in measurements, data acquisition, and analysis. W.-Y.R. and Y.-B.H. co-wrote the manuscript. Y.-B.H. was responsible for project planning and funding. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Y.-B.H. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This paper was supported by research funds from Chonbuk National University in 2017.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Wang, Y.; Mahmoudi, T.; Yang, H.-Y.; Bhat, K.S.; Yoo, J.-Y.; Hahn, Y.-B. Fully-ambient-processed mesoscopic semitransparent perovskite solar cells by islands-structure-MAPbI3-xClx-NiO composite and Al2O3/NiO interface engineering. Nano Energy 2018, 49, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mahmoudi, T.; Wang, Y.; Hahn, Y.-B. Graphene and its derivatives for solar cells application. Nano Energy 2018, 47, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Y.; Mahmoudi, T.; Rho, W.-Y.; Yang, H.-Y.; Seo, S.; Bhat, K.S.; Ahmad, R.; Hahn, Y.-B. Ambient-air-solution-processed efficient and highly stable perovskite solar cells based on CH3NH3PbI3−xClx-NiO composite with Al2O3/NiO interfacial engineering. Nano Energy 2017, 40, 408–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mahmoudi, T.; Seo, S.; Yang, H.-Y.; Rho, W.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Hahn, Y.-B. Efficient bulk heterojunction hybrid solar cells with graphene-silver nanoparticles composite synthesized by microwave-assisted reduction. Nano Energy 2016, 28, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.; Rho, W.-Y.; Yang, H.-Y.; Mahmoudi, T.; Seo, S.; Lee, D.-H.; Hahn, Y.-B. Air-stable, hole-conductor-free high photocurrent perovskite solar cells with CH3NH3PbI3–NiO nanoparticles composite. Nano Energy 2016, 27, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Im, J.-H.; Lee, C.-R.; Lee, J.-W.; Park, S.-W.; Park, N.-G. 6.5% efficient perovskite quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 4088–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lee, M.M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T.N.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient hybrid solar cells based on meso-superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science 2012, 338, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Etgar, L.; Gao, P.; Xue, Z.; Peng, Q.; Chandiran, A.K.; Liu, B.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Gratzel, M. Mesoscopic CH3NH3PbI3/TiO2 heterojunction solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17396–17399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Burschka, J.; Pellet, N.; Moon, S.J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Gao, P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Gratzel, M. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 2013, 499, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nie, W.; Tsai, H.; Asadpour, R.; Blancon, J.-C.; Neukirch, A.J.; Gupta, G.; Crochet, J.J.; Chhowalla, M.; Tretiak, S.; Alam, M.A.; et al. High-efficiency solution-processed perovskite solar cells with millimeter-scale grains. Science 2015, 347, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kazim, S.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Gratzel, M.; Ahmad, S. Perovskite as light harvester: A game changer in photovoltaics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 2812–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xing, G.; Mathews, N.; Sun, S.; Lim, S.S.; Lam, Y.M.; Gratzel, M.; Mhaisalkar, S.; Sum, T.C. Long-range balanced electron- and hole-transport lengths in organic-inorganic CH3NH3PbI3. Science 2013, 342, 344–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mitzi, D.B.; Feild, C.; Harrison, W.; Guloy, A. Conducting tin halides with a layered organic-based perovskite structure. Nature 1994, 369, 467–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Poglitsch, A.; Weber, D. Dynamic disorder in methylammoniumtrihalogenoplumbates (II) observed by millimeter-wave spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 6373–6378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Im, J.-H.; Chung, J.; Kim, S.-J.; Park, N.-G. Synthesis, structure, and photovoltaic property of a nanocrystalline 2H perovskite-type novel sensitizer (CH3CH2NH3) PbI3. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Baikie, T.; Fang, Y.; Kadro, J.M.; Schreyer, M.; Wei, F.; Mhaisalkar, S.G.; Graetzel, M.; White, T.J. Synthesis and crystal chemistry of the hybrid perovskite (CH3NH3)PbI3 for solid-state sensitised solar cell applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 5628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stranks, S.D.; Eperon, G.E.; Grancini, G.; Menelaou, C.; Alcocer, M.J.; Leijtens, T.; Herz, L.M.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H.J. Electron-hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science 2013, 342, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Heo, J.H.; Im, S.H.; Noh, J.H.; Mandal, T.N.; Lim, C.-S.; Chang, J.A.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, H.-j.; Sarkar, A.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; et al. Efficient inorganic–organic hybrid heterojunction solar cells containing perovskite compound and polymeric hole conductors. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jeon, N.J.; Lee, H.G.; Kim, Y.C.; Seo, J.; Noh, J.H.; Lee, J.; Seok, S.I. o-Methoxy substituents in spiro-OMeTAD for efficient inorganic-organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7837–7840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ye, S.; Sun, W.; Li, Y.; Yan, W.; Peng, H.; Bian, Z.; Liu, Z.; Huang, C. CuSCN-Based Inverted Planar Perovskite Solar Cell with an Average PCE of 15.6%. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3723–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Edri, E.; Kirmayer, S.; Cahen, D.; Hodes, G. High open-circuit voltage solar cells based on organic–inorganic lead bromide perovskite. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 897–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ball, J.M.; Lee, M.M.; Hey, A.; Snaith, H.J. Low-temperature processed meso-superstructured to thin-film perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Noh, J.H.; Jeon, N.J.; Choi, Y.C.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M.; Seok, S.I. Nanostructured TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3 heterojunction solar cells employing spiro-OMeTAD/Co-complex as hole-transporting material. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 11842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, K.C.; Jeng, J.Y.; Shen, P.S.; Chang, Y.C.; Diau, E.W.; Tsai, C.H.; Chao, T.Y.; Hsu, H.C.; Lin, P.Y.; Chen, P.; et al. p-type Mesoscopic Nickel Oxide/Organometallic Perovskite Heterojunction Solar Cells. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kay, A.; Gratzel, M. Dye-Sensitized Core-Shell Nanocrystals: Improved Efficiency of Mesoporous Tin Oxide Electrodes Coated with a Thin Layer of an Insulating Oxide. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 2930–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, H.-S.; Im, S.H.; Park, N.-G. Organolead Halide Perovskite: New Horizons in Solar Cell Research. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 5615–5625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. O’regan, B.; Grfitzeli, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, Z.; Pan, J.; Liang, Y.; Li, Q.; Xu, D. Ambient Air Condition for Room-Temperature Deposition of MAPbI3 Films in Highly Efficient Solar Cells. Small 2018, 14, 1802240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bella, F.; Renzi, P.; Cavallo, C.; Gerbaldi, C. Caesium for perovskite solar cells: An overview. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 12183–12205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Abate, A.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Saliba, M.; Su’ait, M.S.; Bella, F. Perovskite solar cells: From the laboratory to the assembly line. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 3083–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, B.; Zhu, X.; Li, S.; Chen, M.; Lu, H.; Yang, Y. Ag@ SiO2 core-shell nanoparticles embedded in a TiO2 mesoporous layer substantially improve the performance of perovskite solar cells. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, Y.; Chen, W.; Chen, G.; Liu, L.; He, Z.; Liu, R. The Impact of Hybrid Compositional Film/Structure on Organic–Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, Y. A Compact and Smooth CH3NH3PbI3 Film: Investigation of Solvent Sorts and Concentrations of CH3NH3I towards Highly Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mahmoudi, T.; Wang, Y.; Hahn, Y.-B. Stability Enhancement in Perovskite Solar Cells with Perovskite/Silver–Graphene Composites in the Active Layer. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 4, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nie, R.; Mehta, A.; Park, B.-w.; Kwon, H.-W.; Im, J.; Seok, S.I. Mixed sulfur and iodide-based lead-free perovskite solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 872–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mor, G.K.; Shankar, K.; Paulose, M.; Varghese, O.K.; Grimes, C.A. Use of highly-ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rho, W.-Y.; Kim, H.-S.; Chung, W.-J.; Suh, J.S.; Jun, B.-H.; Hahn, Y.-B. Enhancement of power conversion efficiency with TiO2 nanoparticles/nanotubes-silver nanoparticles composites in dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 429, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, K.; Neale, N.R.; Miedaner, A.; Frank, A.J. Enhanced charge-collection efficiencies and light scattering in dye-sensitized solar cells using oriented TiO2 nanotubes arrays. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Adachi, M.; Murata, Y.; Okada, I.; Yoshikawa, S. Formation of titania nanotubes and applications for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rho, W.-Y.; Song, D.H.; Lee, S.H.; Jun, B.-H.J.N. Enhanced Efficiency in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells by Electron Transport and Light Scattering on Freestanding TiO2 Nanotube Arrays. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gong, D.; Grimes, C.A.; Varghese, O.K.; Hu, W.; Singh, R.; Chen, Z.; Dickey, E.C. Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation. J. Mater. Res. 2001, 16, 3331–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mor, G.K.; Varghese, O.K.; Paulose, M.; Shankar, K.; Grimes, C.A. A review on highly ordered, vertically oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: Fabrication, material properties, and solar energy applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 2011–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Paulose, M.; Prakasam, H.E.; Varghese, O.K.; Peng, L.; Popat, K.C.; Mor, G.K.; Desai, T.A.; Grimes, C.A. TiO2 nanotube arrays of 1000 μm length by anodization of titanium foil: Phenol red diffusion. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 14992–14997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rho, C.; Min, J.-H.; Suh, J.S. Barrier layer effect on the electron transport of the dye-sensitized solar cells based on TiO2 nanotube arrays. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 7213–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kasuga, T.; Hiramatsu, M.; Hoson, A.; Sekino, T.; Niihara, K. Formation of titanium oxide nanotube. Langmuir 1998, 14, 3160–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, Q.; Zhou, W.; Du, G.; Peng, L.-M. Trititanate nanotubes made via a single alkali treatment. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 1208–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yao, B.; Chan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Z.; Wang, N. Formation mechanism of TiO2 nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 281–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rho, C.; Suh, J.S. Filling TiO2 nanoparticles in the channels of TiO2 nanotube membranes to enhance the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2011, 513, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Q.; Myers, D.; Lan, J.; Jenekhe, S.A.; Cao, G. Applications of light scattering in dye-sensitized solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 14982–14998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hore, S.; Nitz, P.; Vetter, C.; Prahl, C.; Niggemann, M.; Kern, R. Scattering spherical voids in nanocrystalline TiO2–enhancement of efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2011–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Deepak, T.; Anjusree, G.; Thomas, S.; Arun, T.; Nair, S.V.; Nair, A.S. A review on materials for light scattering in dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 17615–17638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, F.; Chen, D.; Zhang, X.L.; Caruso, R.A.; Cheng, Y.B. Dual-Function Scattering Layer of Submicrometer-Sized Mesoporous TiO2 Beads for High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 1301–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Schematic illustration of fabrication processes of perovskite solar cells with TiO2 films, including TiO2 nanoparticles and flakes of TiO2 nanotubes, and (B) an energy band diagram of the device.
Figure 1. (A) Schematic illustration of fabrication processes of perovskite solar cells with TiO2 films, including TiO2 nanoparticles and flakes of TiO2 nanotubes, and (B) an energy band diagram of the device.
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g001
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g002 550
Figure 2. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images: (a) Top view and (b) cross-sectional view of TiO2 nanotube arrays; (c) top view of TiO2 nanoparticle/nanotube (TNN) film; (d) cross-sectional view of the perovskite solar cell structure, obtained via focused ion beam (FIB).
Figure 2. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images: (a) Top view and (b) cross-sectional view of TiO2 nanotube arrays; (c) top view of TiO2 nanoparticle/nanotube (TNN) film; (d) cross-sectional view of the perovskite solar cell structure, obtained via focused ion beam (FIB).
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g002
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD patterns of (a) TiO2 nanotube film before and after annealing and (b) perovskite film on TiO2/fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO).
Figure 3. XRD patterns of (a) TiO2 nanotube film before and after annealing and (b) perovskite film on TiO2/fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO).
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g003
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g004 550
Figure 4. Current density-Voltage (I-V) curves of perovskite solar cells with 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt % of TiO2 nanotube arrays in a TiO2 composite film.
Figure 4. Current density-Voltage (I-V) curves of perovskite solar cells with 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt % of TiO2 nanotube arrays in a TiO2 composite film.
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g004
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g005 550
Figure 5. Normalized reflectance spectra of TiO2 composite films with 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt % of TiO2 nanotubes.
Figure 5. Normalized reflectance spectra of TiO2 composite films with 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt % of TiO2 nanotubes.
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g005
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g006 550
Figure 6. Normalized incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) spectra of perovskite solar cells with 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt % of TiO2 nanotubes in the active layer.
Figure 6. Normalized incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) spectra of perovskite solar cells with 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt % of TiO2 nanotubes in the active layer.
Nanomaterials 09 00326 g006
Table
Table 1. Photovoltaic properties of perovskite solar cells with 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt % of TiO2 nanotube arrays in a TiO2 composite film.
Table 1. Photovoltaic properties of perovskite solar cells with 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 wt % of TiO2 nanotube arrays in a TiO2 composite film.
Voc (V)JSC (mA/cm2)FF (%)η (%)
0 wt %0.88823.90866.69414.162
3 wt %0.88824.70566.01814.489
6 wt %0.88425.30766.33014.834
9 wt %0.88625.50067.90615.335
12 wt %0.86325.88865.74414.684
15 wt %0.86525.22363.99613.960

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, H.-Y.; Rho, W.-Y.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, S.H.; Hahn, Y.-B. TiO2 Nanoparticles/Nanotubes for Efficient Light Harvesting in Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030326

AMA Style

Yang H-Y, Rho W-Y, Lee SK, Kim SH, Hahn Y-B. TiO2 Nanoparticles/Nanotubes for Efficient Light Harvesting in Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(3):326. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030326

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Hwa-Young, Won-Yeop Rho, Seul Ki Lee, Sang Hoon Kim, and Yoon-Bong Hahn. 2019. "TiO2 Nanoparticles/Nanotubes for Efficient Light Harvesting in Perovskite Solar Cells" Nanomaterials 9, no. 3: 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9030326

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop