Next Article in Journal
Group B Streptococcus Early-Onset Disease: New Preventive and Diagnostic Tools to Decrease the Burden of Antibiotic Use
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance in Veterinary Medicine, a Complex Phenomenon: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Editorial for the Special Issue: Colistin Resistance—The Need for a One Health Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/antibiotics12030488
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of mcr-1 Genes and Characterization of Resistance Mechanisms to Colistin in Escherichia coli Isolates from Colombian Hospitals

by
Elsa De La Cadena
1,
Mateo Mahecha
2,
Ana María Velandia
2,
Juan Carlos García-Betancur
1,
Laura J. Rojas
3,4,
Jessica Porras
1,
Christian Pallares
1,5 and
María Virginia Villegas
1,5,*
1
Grupo de Investigación en Resistencia Antimicrobiana y Epidemiologia Hospitalaria, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá 110121, Colombia
2
Grupo de Investigación REMA, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Programa de Bacteriología y Laboratorio Clínico, Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca, Bogotá 110311, Colombia
3
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7164, USA
4
Research Service, Louis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106-7164, USA
5
Comité de Infecciones y Vigilancia Epidemiológica, Clínica Imbanaco, Cali 760031, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(3), 488; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030488
Submission received: 24 January 2023 / Revised: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 25 February 2023 / Published: 1 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Colistin Resistance: The Need for a One Health Approach)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We report the presence of the mcr-1 gene among 880 Escherichia coli clinical isolates collected in 13 hospitals from 12 Colombian cities between 2016 and 2019. Seven (0.8%) isolates were colistin resistant (MIC ≥ 4 µg/mL). These colistin-resistant isolates were screened for the presence of the mcr-1 gene; five carried the gene. These five isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS) to identify additional resistomes and their ST. In addition, antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed that all E. coli isolates carrying mcr-1 were susceptible to third generation-cephalosporin and carbapenems, except one, which carried an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (CTX-M-55), along with the fosfomycin resistance encoding gene, fosA. WGS indicated that these isolates belonged to four distinct sequence types (ST58, ST46, ST393, and a newly described ST14315) and to phylogroups B1, A, and D. In this geographic region, the spread of mcr-1 in E. coli is low and has not been inserted into high-risk clones such as ST131, which has been present in the country longer.

1. Introduction

The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pan drug-resistant (PDR) bacterial species in the clinical setting has significantly reduced available antimicrobial agents [1]. Polymyxins, particularly colistin (polymyxin E), are some of the few remaining antibiotics, and considered drugs of last resort for treating infections caused by MDR, XDR, and PDR gram-negative bacteria [2]. Unfortunately, the increasing use of colistin has led to a growing number of reports of colistin resistance worldwide, particularly in low- and mid-income countries ranging from the Mediterranean to South-East Asia, where resistance is higher than the global 10% [3].
The most common resistance mechanism to colistin in Enterobacterales is the structural modification of the lipid A moiety of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) via cationic substitution [4]. The addition of cationic phosphoethanolamine (pEtN) or 4-amino-l-arabinose neutralizes the negative charge of the LPS and reduces and causes a decrease in the negative charge on the bacterial surface, which alters the binding affinity of colistin to the bacterial outer membrane [5]. Initially, this resistance was linked to mutations in chromosomally encoded genes of the two-component regulatory systems phoP/Q, pmrA/B, crrA/B, and the regulator mgrB [6,7]. Additionally, the plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance determinant mcr-1 (mobilized colistin resistance), which encodes for a phosphoethanolamine (PEtN) transferase enzyme that adds PEtN to the lipid A [8], was originally reported in 2015 from an Escherichia coli isolated at a swine farm in China. Since then, more than 10 different mcr variants have been reported in 27 bacterial species from all six continents [9,10].
Among these variants, mcr-1 is the most widely distributed, particularly in E. coli, accounting for approximately 91% of the total mcr-harboring isolates worldwide [11]. High prevalence rates of mcr-1 isolates have been observed in many countries, especially in animals and farm environments, which can be caused by exposure to colistin. The spread of mcr genes from animals to humans challenges the clinical use of polymyxins. Recent evidence has considered animals and aquatic environments as sources and reservoirs of clinically relevant antibiotic resistance [12,13].
In Latin America, reports indicate that the prevalence of mcr genes in different bacterial species is low. Of a total 18,705 isolates across 48 studies, only 2.9% carried an mcr gene, mcr-1 being the most frequent variant. For the particular case of Colombia, a study by Saavedra et al. found that of 513 isolates of Enterobacterales, only 2.3% carried mcr-1 [11]. Additionally, Rada et al. found two isolates of Enterobacter cloacae complex with mcr-9, mcr-5 was reported only in Colombia, and mcr-3 only in Brazil [14,15,16]. In general, mcr-harboring isolates show high susceptibility to carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, fosfomycin, and tigecycline [17]. However, the mcr-1 gene has been found to co-occur with other resistance genes, such as various ESBLs and NDM [18]. In Colombia, blaCMY-2 and blaSHV-12 genes were identified in E. coli isolates harboring mcr-1 that were resistant to colistin, and third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins. Of interest, one of these isolates was also resistant to carbapenems and monobactams [11].
The aim of this study was to characterize a set of colistin-resistant E. coli clinical isolates recovered from 13 hospitals in 12 Colombian cities during a four-year period (2016 to 2019). The results presented here will contribute to updating the status of colistin resistance in the country and improve the monitoring and surveillance of MDR E. coli-mcr-1 within Colombian hospitals.

2. Results

2.1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility

A total of 880 E. coli clinical isolates recovered from 13 hospitals in 12 Colombian cities from 2016 to 2019 were analyzed. Of those, 7/880 (0.8%) were found to have MIC values > 4 µg/mL using the colistin broth disk elution method (CBDE) and confirmed via broth macrodilution. PCR confirmed the presence of mcr-1 in 5/7 of these clinical isolates. Most mcr-1 harboring isolates were susceptible to all of the other antibiotics tested, with the exception of one (28EC) that showed resistance to ciprofloxacin and a second (26EC) that showed an elevated MIC to fosfomycin (>64 µg/mL) due to the presence of the fosA, and exhibited an ESBL-phenotype associated with CTX-M-55 (but remained susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam, carbapenems, and ciprofloxacin) (Table 1).

2.2. Whole Genome Sequencing

To further characterize the mcr-1-harboring E.coli clinical isolates, we performed WGS. Across the five isolates, the average genome size was 5.0 Mbp, with a median number of 5095 genes. In silico MLST and phylogroup analyses showed that these five isolates belonged to four different sequence types (ST) (ST58, ST46, ST393, and ST14315), and were distributed among three different phylogroups A (1), B1 (3), and D (1) (Table 2). Virulence factors play a fundamental role in conferring selective advantages and defining pathogenicity profiles in E. coli. Independently of their MLST, our results showed that the most frequent virulence factors among mcr-1-harboring isolates were: cia, cvaC, etsC, fyuA, gad, hlyF, iroN, irp2, iss, iucC, iutA, ipfA, mchF, ompT, sitA, terC, and traT (Table 2).
All isolates were found to carry the mcr-1.1 variant; genetic context comparative analyses revealed that all five isolates had the pap2 gene downstream of mcr-1.1. However, only isolates 26EC, 29EC, and 30EC had the mobile element ISApl1 upstream of mcr-1.1 (Figure 1). Interestingly, our analyses suggested that isolates 27EC and 28EC harbor mcr-1.1 in an IncI2 plasmid, previously associated with the mobilization of mcr genes. In isolate 27EC (ST58), we found the mcr-1.1 gene in the same contig with the sequence determinants of a ~60 kb IncI2 plasmid, whereas 28EC (ST46) carried mcr-1.1 in a contig most likely representing a ~61 kb IncI2 plasmid. Additional BLAST analyses showed a sequence similarity > 99% of these two genomic contigs with the IncI2 mcr-1-harboring plasmid pPK8277-3 (GenBank accession number CP016187). No other resistance genes were identified within these contigs. Unfortunately, in the remaining three isolates it was not possible to establish a direct link with a particular Inc type, as the Illumina reads assembly placed the mcr-1.1 in a separate contig from any of the plasmid replicons identified. However, several replicon types were found (Col, IncFIA, IncFIB, IncFII, IncFIC (II), IncN, IncI1, IncHI1A, IncHI1B, IncI2, IncX4, IncI1-1, IncQ1, and IncX1), but a particular replicon type could not be co-localized with the mcr-1.1 gene. Nonetheless, these results are consistent with previous findings suggesting that three plasmid replicon types, InHI2, IncI2, and IncX4, are primarily responsible for the global spread of mcr-1 [19,20].
Additionally, we explored mutations in other colistin resistance-associated genes in order to identify co-determinants of colistin resistance, namely mgrB, pmrA/B, and phoP/Q. Our genomic analysis revealed that all five mcr-1.1-harboring isolates exhibited a wild type mgrB gene; however, three amino acid substitutions (S29G, R138H, and G144S) were found on PmrA. Of note, only the G144S substitution found on isolate 29EC was previously reported as a contributor to colistin resistance [21]. Additionally, three amino acid substitutions were detected in PmrB (H2R, D283G, and I361L), none of which were previously associated with colistin resistance. Sequence analysis of PhoP revealed one missense mutation (I44L) in four isolates, and amino acid substitutions were found on two sites, I175F and V386L. These mutations are frequently reported in E. coli, but their impact on colistin resistance has not been determined (Table 2) [21,22].

3. Discussion

The emergence and dissemination of the plasmid-mediated colistin-resistant gene mcr-1 in E. coli represents a potential threat to public health. However, its real impact at the clinical level is certainly unknown [23]. In Colombia, the mcr-1 gene was initially detected in 2016 on clinical Enterobacterales (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and E. coli) isolates [24]. Similarly, a previous study found twelve colistin-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates harboring mcr-1, including eight E. coli (belonging to seven different STs), which were shown to be unrelated to one another [11]. Globally, mcr-1 and mcr-9 are the most widely disseminated variants [25]. In Colombia, both mcr-1 and mcr-9 have been reported in Enterobacterales, including E. coli and Enterobacter cloacae complex [13,25,26]. Nonetheless, a potential limitation of our study is that no other mcr alleles (e.g., mcr-2–mcr-10) were screened using PCR [27]. Of note, the study carried out by Saavedra et al. found that among 513 polymyxin-resistant Enterobacterales only 2.3% of isolates carried mcr-1 [11]. Our study also found a low resistance to colistin in E. coli (only 7/880, representing 0.8%); however, most of the resistant isolates (5/7) carried the mcr-1.1 gene. This could potentially indicate that the prevalence of mcr-1 in the country remains low, as previously reported by Saavedra et al. [11] and other studies in Latin America [14,28,29].
Notably, one common limitation associated with the determination of susceptibility to colistin is difficulty in screening due to the cationic nature of the compound [30]. False-resistant isolates have been reported using broth microdilution due to the use of plastic panels [31]. The CBDE method, although recommended by the CLSI guidelines, is not routinely performed in clinical microbiology laboratories, as it is laborious and time-consuming. In this study, 32 resistant isolates were identified via broth microdilution using Sensititre custom panels. The isolates were confirmed using the CBDE method and broth macrodilution (the gold-standard method); only seven isolates were colistin resistant, which highlights the difficulty in clearly establishing the real prevalence of resistance at the routinary clinical level.
Of concern, reports of clinical isolates with resistance to colistin together with resistance to other antimicrobials, such as cephalosporins and carbapenems, are increasing [32]. Notably, we did not find the co-existence of mcr-1.1 with any carbapenemase genes, although co-carriage is being increasingly reported worldwide, including mcr-1 with blaNDM in Enterobacterales from the United States and China [33,34], and with blaKPC in isolates from Singapore [35]. There is a high prevalence of ESBLs in E. coli in Colombia (up to 20%), notably of CTX-M-15 [36,37]. However, in this study, only 1/5 isolates with mcr-1.1 showed resistance to third generation cephalosporins, due to the presence of CTX-M-55. Convergence of CTX-M and mcr-1 genes in E. coli may lead to potentially widespread transmission of such resistance genes [38]. Several isolates carrying CTX-M-55 and mcr-1 genes from animal and human origin have been reported to be increasing rapidly in geographically distinct regions [39,40]. E. coli ST131 is a worldwide pandemic clone, and reports have confirmed the worldwide prevalence of ST131 harboring a broad range of virulence and resistance genes on a transferable plasmid, usually associated with CTX-M-types [41]. Expansion of ST131 has been observed in both community and clinical settings, and the rapid spread of colistin-resistant ST131 is a major concern in treating MDR and XDR isolates [21]. Previous studies found a significant spread of ST131 in Colombia [36]. Fortunately, we did not find ST131 in this study, which is in agreement with results reported by other authors [13]. A wide variety of STs described in E. coli carriers of mcr-1, ST46, and ST58 reported in this study were previously found in isolates from chickens and the environment [42,43].
The mcr-1 gene has been characterized in a variety of genomic backgrounds [44]. However, a previous study established that mcr-1 elements derived from an initial mobilization of mcr-1 by an ISApl1 transposon in the mid-2000s, which was followed by its global dissemination [45]. This mobile element also contained a downstream ORF encoding a putative PAP2 protein; the presence of these sequences could imply a role in mcr-1’s continued mobilization [45]. To date, mcr-1 has been observed in a wider variety of plasmid types. A systematic review published by Mendes Oliveira et al. found that the plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene most frequently in Latin America are IncI2, IncHI1, IncHI2, IncP, IncFII, IncFIB, and IncX4 [17]. Notably, in two of our colistin-resistant mcr-1.1-harboring E. coli isolates, we identified the IncI2 replicon sequence type in the same contig as mcr-1.1, which might indicate its physical link within an IncI2. IncI2 plasmids are considered important drivers of the rapid mobilization and acquisition of mcr genes [46]. In fact, a recent study observed significant geographic clustering in the regional spread of mcr-1-bearing IncI2 plasmids in Asia and Brazil [47,48].
In most cases reported to date, mcr-1 has been mobilized by the composite transposon Tn6330, containing the mcr-1 gene, a region containing a putative open reading frame (ORF) encoding a PAP2 protein (2609 bp) flanked by two ISApl1 insertion sequences, although many sequences have been identified without ISApl1 or with just a single copy [44]. In this study, three isolates had the mcr-1 gene embedded within an ISApl1-mcr-1-pap2-ISApl1 cassette. Interestingly, EC27 and EC28 did not show any ISApl1 adjunct to the mcr-1 gene. The plasmid sequences were identical in both isolates (27EC and 28EC), which were isolated from the same hospital during the same month in 2018; however, they had different STs and phylogroups, which could indicate plasmid dissemination. The other three isolates were collected from three different cities in 2017. Even though the number of E. coli isolates collected during the four years was uniform, isolates carrying mcr-1 genes were only found in 2017 and 2018. This could be due to the low prevalence that has been reported in the country. Additionally, in 2018, Colombia prohibited the use of additives containing polymyxin or its derivatives as growth promoters in animal husbandry.
Our study faced some limitations, including that PCR detection could only be performed for mcr-1 due to lack of controls for the other gene variants. Additionally, due to budgetary restrictions, we decided to focus on sequencing only the mcr-1 harboring isolates, and not all colistin-resistant isolates.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

E. coli clinical isolates were collected between 2016 and 2019, as part of a prospective surveillance study by the clinical laboratories of 13 hospitals in 12 Colombian cities. All E. coli isolates causing infection were collected, regardless of their susceptibility profile. Isolates were sent from all participating hospitals and stored at −80 °C until further processing. Upon reception at the research lab, antimicrobial testing for susceptibility to ceftriaxone (CRO), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (FEP), piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ), ertapenem (ETP), ciprofloxacin (CIP), fosfomycin (FOS), and colistin (COL) was conducted via broth microdilution (BMD) using customized Sensititre panels (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cleveland, OH, USA). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ciprofloxacin was determined using the E-test™ (BioMerieux, Etoile, France). Colistin’s MIC was confirmed using the colistin broth disk elution method (CBDE) [49] and broth macrodilution using E. coli ATCC 25922; mcr-1 isolate (BioSample: SAMN05806786) was included as a quality control. Results were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, 2022 [49]. Isolates with colistin MIC values > 2 µg/mL were PCR screened for mcr-1, as previously described [27].

4.2. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)

For isolates found to harbor mcr-1 using PCR, genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA quality was verified using agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Life Technologies Italia, Monza, Italy). WGS was performed using a MiSeq™ platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) with 250 nucleotides (nt) paired end reads to achieve a minimum coverage of 30× per nucleotide, using a MiSeq V3 flow cell. Raw reads underwent a series of steps for quality filtering, which included a general quality check and the trimming of low-quality ends; de novo assembly was performed using Spades v3.13 [50]. Assemblies were analyzed using ResFinder 4.1, PlasmidFinder 2.1, VirulenceFinder 2.0, and MLST 2.0 (according to the Achtman scheme (http://mlst.warwick.ac.uk/mlst/dbs/Ecoli, accessed on 15 July 2022) [51] from the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (http://www.genomicepidemiology.org, accessed on 15 July 2022). Furthermore, the presence of additional antibiotic resistance determinants was examined using online BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 24 January 2023) [52]. Phylogroups were determined using Clermont typing (http://clermontyping.iameresearch.center/, accessed on 1 August 2022). Amino acid substitutions in additional determinants for colistin resistance PhoP/Q, PmrA/B, and MgrB were also investigated using the NCBI BLASTX tool and the genome of E. coli K-12 MG1655 (NC_000913.3648.1) as a reference.

5. Conclusions

The results presented herein suggest that colistin resistance due to the spread of mcr-1 genes in clinical E. coli isolates in Colombia is still low. Fortunately, although Colombia is a country with high rates of ESBLs and KPC, mcr-1 genes do not appear to have disseminated to high-risk clones; those mcr-1.1 harboring E. coli isolates described showed high susceptibility to ertapenem, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, fosfomycin, and tigecycline. Nonetheless, our study highlights the importance of routine and continuous monitoring and surveillance of colistin resistance secondary to the presence of the mcr-1 gene in E. coli to trace, survey, and understand its dissemination dynamics in Colombia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.D.L.C.; methodology, M.M. and A.M.V.; validation, E.D.L.C.; formal analysis, E.D.L.C., L.J.R., M.M., A.M.V. and J.C.G.-B.; investigation, E.D.L.C., M.M. and A.M.V.; data curation, E.D.L.C. and L.J.R.; writing, E.D.L.C.; writing—review and editing, J.P., C.P., L.J.R. and M.V.V.; supervision, M.V.V.; project administration, E.D.L.C.; funding acquisition, M.V.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by an educational grant from Pfizer Co., MAPP-095939.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Collection of the microbiological isolates was part of the regular diagnostic process established by each of the participating healthcare institutions. All information associated with the patients was anonymous, protecting the identification of the patients. Therefore, ethical approval was not required.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All genome assemblies were deposited in the NCBI database and identified as SAMN29231639, SAMN29231636, SAMN29231637, SAMN29231638, and SAMN16793260.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge to Pfizer for financial support of the Colombian Nosocomial Resistance Study Group of the Universidad El Bosque.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Wang, S.H.; Yang, K.Y.; Sheu, C.C.; Lin, Y.C.; Chan, M.C.; Feng, J.Y.; Chen, C.M.; Chen, C.Y.; Zheng, Z.R.; Chou, Y.C.; et al. The prevalence, presentation and outcome of colistin susceptible-only Acinetobacter Baumannii-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit: A multicenter observational study. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Falagas, M.E.; Kasiakou, S.K. Colistin: The revival of polymyxins for the management of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 40, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bialvaei, A.Z.; Samadi Kafil, H. Colistin, mechanisms and prevalence of resistance. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2015, 31, 707–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stefaniuk, E.M.; Tyski, S. Colistin resistance in Enterobacterales strains—A current view. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Gogry, F.A.; Siddiqui, M.T.; Sultan, I.; Haq, Q.M.R. Current Update on Intrinsic and Acquired Colistin Resistance Mechanisms in Bacteria. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 677720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jayol, A.; Nordmann, P.; Brink, A.; Poirel, L. Heteroresistance to colistin in Klebsiella pneumoniae associated with alterations in the PhoPQ regulatory system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 2780–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Blair, J.M.A.; Webber, M.A.; Baylay, A.J.; Ogbolu, D.O.; Piddock, L.J.V. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stojanoski, V.; Sankaran, B.; Prasad, B.V.V.; Poirel, L.; Nordmann, P.; Palzkill, T. Structure of the catalytic domain of the colistin resistance enzyme MCR-1. BMC Biol. 2016, 14, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Payne, M.; Croxen, M.A.; Lee, T.D.; Mayson, B.; Champagne, S.; Leung, V.; Bariso, S.; Hoang, L.; Lowe, C. Mcr-1–positive colistin-resistant escherichia coli in traveler returning to Canada from China. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 22, 1673–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Macesic, N.; Green, D.; Wang, Z.; Sullivan, S.B.; Shim, K.; Park, S.; Whittier, S.; Furuya, E.Y.; Gomez-Simmonds, A.; Uhlemann, A.-C. Detection of mcr-1-Carrying Escherichia coli Causing Bloodstream Infection in a New York City Hospital: Avian Origins, Human Concerns? Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2017, 4, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Xu, L.; Wan, F.; Fu, H.; Tang, B.; Ruan, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Luo, Q. Emergence of Colistin Resistance Gene mcr—10 in Enterobacterales Isolates Recovered from Fecal Samples of Chickens, Slaughterhouse Workers, and a Nearby Resident. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e00418-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cherak, Z.; Loucif, L.; Moussi, A.; Rolain, J.M. Epidemiology of mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes in aquatic environments. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 27, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Saavedra, S.Y.; Diaz, L.; Wiesner, M.; Correa, A.; Alejandra Arévalo, S.; Reyes, J.; Hidalgo, A.M.; De La Cadena, E.; Perenguez, M.; Montaño, L.A.; et al. Genomic and molecular characterization of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae harboring mcr-1 in Colombia, 2002 to 2016. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00841-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wise, M.G.; Estabrook, M.A.; Sahm, D.F.; Stone, G.G.; Kazmierczak, K.M. Prevalence of mcr-type genes among colistinresistant Enterobacteriaceae collected in 2014-2016 as part of the INFORM global surveillance program. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kieffer, N.; Nordmann, P.; Moreno, A.M.; Moreno, L.Z.; Chaby, R.; Breton, A.; Tissières, P.; Poirel, L. Genetic and functional characterization of an MCR-3-like enzyme-producing Escherichia coli isolate recovered from Swine in Brazil. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00278-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Rada, A.M.; de la Cadena, E.; Agudelo, C.; Capataz, C.; Orozco, N.; Pallares, C.; Dinh, A.Q.; Panesso, D.; Ríos, R.; Diaz, L.; et al. Dynamics of blaKPC-2 Dissemination from Non-CG258 Klebsiella pneumoniae to Other Enterobacterales via IncN Plasmids in an Area of High Endemicity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01743-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mendes Oliveira, V.R.; Paiva, M.C.; Lima, W.G. Plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in Latin America and Caribbean: A systematic review. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 31, 101459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, R.; Feng, Y.; Lv, X.; Duan, J.; Chen, J.; Fang, L.; Xia, J.; Liao, X.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y. ST648 and ST156 from a Single Muscovy Duck (Cairina moschata). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 6899–6902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wu, R.; Yi, L.X.; Yu, L.F.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Lv, L.; Yang, J.; Liu, J.H. Fitness advantage of mcr-1-bearing IncI2 and IncX4 plasmids in vitro. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Monte, D.F.; Mem, A.; Fernandes, M.R.; Cerdeira, L.; Esposito, F.; Galvão, J.A.; Franco, B.D.G.M.; Lincopan, N.; Landgraf, M. Chicken meat as a reservoir of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli strains carrying mcr-1 genes in South America. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sato, T.; Shiraishi, T.; Hiyama, Y.; Honda, H.; Shinagawa, M.; Usui, M.; Kuronuma, K.; Masumori, N.; Takahashi, S.; Tamura, Y.; et al. Contribution of novel amino acid alterations in PmrA or PmrB to colistin resistance in mcr-negative Escherichia coli clinical isolates, including major multidrug-resistant lineages O25b:H4-ST131-H30Rx and Non-x. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00864-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Delannoy, S.; Devendec, L.L.; Jouy, E.; Fach, P.; Drider, D.; Kempf, I. Characterization of colistin-resistant escherichia coli isolated from diseased pigs in France. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Rossi, F.; Girardello, R.; Morais, C.; Cury, A.P.; Martins, L.F.; Da Silva, A.M.; Abdala, E.; Setubal, J.C.; Da Silva Duarte, A.J. Plasmid-mediated mcr-1 in carbapenem-susceptible escherichia coli ST156 causing a blood infection: An unnoticeable spread of colistin resistance in Brazil? Clinics 2017, 72, 642–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Organización Panamericana de la Salud/Organización Mundial de la Salud. Alerta Epidemiológica: Enterobacterias con Resistencia Transferible a Colistina, Implicaciones para la Salud Publica en las Américas, 10 de Junio de 2016, Washington, DC. OPS/OMS. 2016. Available online: https://www.paho.org/es/documentos/10-junio-2016-enterobacterias-con-resistencia-transferible-colistina-implicaciones-para (accessed on 24 January 2023).
  25. Ling, Z.; Yin, W.; Shen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Shen, J.; Walsh, T.R. Epidemiology of mobile colistin resistance genes mcr-1 to mcr-9. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3087–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rada, A.M.; Hernández-Gómez, C.; Restrepo, E.; Villegas, M.V. Distribución y caracterización molecular de betalactamasas en bacterias Gram negativas en Colombia, 2001–2016. Biomédica 2019, 39, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X.; et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pillonetto, M.; Mazzetti, A.; Becker, G.N.; Siebra, C.A.; Arend, L.N.V.S.; Barth, A.L. Low level of polymyxin resistance among nonclonal mcr-1–positive Escherichia coli from human sources in Brazil. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 93, 140–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Castanheira, M.; Griffin, M.A.; Deshpande, L.M.; Mendes, R.E.; Jones, R.N.; Flamm, R.K. Detection of mcr-1 among Escherichia coli clinical isolates collected worldwide as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program in 2014 and 2015. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 5623–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Velkov, T.; Roberts, K.D.; Nation, R.L.; Thompson, P.E.; Li, J. Pharmacology of polymyxins: New insights into an ‘old’ class of antibiotics. Futur. Microbiol. 2013, 8, 711–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chew, K.L.; La, M.V.; Lin, R.T.P.; Teo, J.W.P. Colistin and polymyxin B susceptibility testing for carbapenem-resistant and mcr-positive enterobacteriaceae: Comparison of Sensititre, MicroScan, Vitek 2, and Etest with broth microdilution. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 2609–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Dalmolin, T.V.; Martins, A.F.; Zavascki, A.P.; Daiana de Lima-Morales, A.L.B. Acquisition of the mcr-1 gene by a high-risk clone of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST437/CC258, Brazil. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 90, 132–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shen, Z.; Hu, Y.; Sun, Q.; Hu, F.; Zhou, H.; Shu, L.; Ma, T.; Shen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Emerging Carriage of NDM-5 and MCR-1 in Escherichia coli From Healthy People in Multiple Regions in China: A Cross Sectional Observational Study. EClinicalMedicine 2018, 6, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Mediavilla, J.R.; Patrawalla, A.; Chen, L.; Chavda, K.D.; Mathema, B.; Vinnard, C.; Dever, L.L.; Kreiswirth, B.N. Colistin- and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli harboring mcr-1 and blaNDM-5, causing a complicated urinary tract infection in a patient from the United States. MBio 2016, 7, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Teo, J.Q.; Ong, R.T.; Xia, E.; Koh, T.; Khor, C.; Lee, S.J.; Lim, T. Enterobacteriaceae Isolates in Singapore. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 6435–6437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ruiz, S.J.; Montealegre, M.C.; Ruiz-Garbajosa, P.; Correa, A.; Briceño, D.F.; Martinez, E.; Rosso, F.; Muñoz, M.; Quinn, J.P.; Cantón, R.; et al. First characterization of CTX-M-15-producing Escherichia coli ST131 and ST405 clones causing community-onset infections in South America. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 1993–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cadena, E.D.L.; Mojica, M.F.; Castillo, N.; Correa, A.; Appel, T.M.; García-Betancur, J.C.; Pallares, C.J.; Villegas, M.V. Genomic analysis of ctx-m-group-1-producing extraintestinal pathogenic e. Coli (expec) from patients with urinary tract infections (uti) from colombia. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, R.; Lu, X.; Munir, A.; Abdullah, S.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, X.; Wang, Z.; Mohsin, M. Widespread prevalence and molecular epidemiology of tet(X4) and mcr-1 harboring Escherichia coli isolated from chickens in Pakistan. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, C.; Wang, Y.; Shi, X.; Wang, S.; Ren, H.; Shen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Lin, J.; Wang, S. Rapid rise of the ESBL and mcr-1 genes in Escherichia coli of chicken origin in China, 2008–2014. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Nakayama, T.; Le Thi, H.; Thanh, P.N.; Minh, D.T.N.; Hoang, O.N.; Hoai, P.H.; Yamaguchi, T.; Jinnai, M.; Do, P.N.; Van, C.D.; et al. Abundance of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli harbouring mcr-1 and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli co-harbouring bla CTX-M-55 or -65 with bla TEM isolates from chicken meat in Vietnam. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mathers, A.J.; Peirano, G.; Pitout, J.D.D. The role of epidemic resistance plasmids and international high- risk clones in the spread of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 565–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Loucif, L.; Chelaghma, W.; Bendjama, E.; Cherak, Z.; Khellaf, M.; Khemri, A.; Rolain, J.M. Detection of blaOXA-48 and mcr-1 Genes in Escherichia coli Isolates from Pigeon (Columba livia) in Algeria. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sacramento, A.G.; Fernandes, M.R.; Sellera, F.P.; Muñoz, M.E.; Vivas, R.; Dolabella, S.S.; Lincopan, N. Genomic analysis of MCR-1 and CTX-M-8 co-producing Escherichia coli ST58 isolated from a polluted mangrove ecosystem in Brazil. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 15, 288–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Snesrud, E.; He, S.; Chandler, M.; Dekker, J.P.; Hickman, A.B.; McGann, P.; Dyda, F. A model for transposition of the colistin resistance gene mcr-1 by ISApl1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 6973–6976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, R.; Van Dorp, L.; Shaw, L.P.; Bradley, P.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Jin, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Rieux, A.; et al. The global distribution and spread of the mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Petrillo, M.; Angers-Loustau, A.; Kreysa, J. Possible genetic events producing colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Matamoros, S.; Van Hattem, J.M.; Arcilla, M.S.; Willemse, N.; Melles, D.C.; Penders, J.; Vinh, T.N.; Thi Hoa, N.; Bootsma, M.C.J.; Van Genderen, P.J.; et al. Global phylogenetic analysis of Escherichia coli and plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene indicates bacterial diversity but plasmid restriction. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Paiva, Y.; Nagano, D.S.; Cotia, A.L.F.; Guimarães, T.; Martins, R.C.R.; Neto, L.V.P.; Côrtes, M.F.; Marchi, A.P.; Corscadden, L.; Machado, A.S.; et al. Colistin-resistant Escherichia coli belonging to different sequence types: Genetic characterization of isolates responsible for colonization, community- and healthcare-acquired infections. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 2021, 63, e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing M100; 32th Informational Supplement; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wirth, T.; Falush, D.; Lan, R.; Colles, F.; Mensa, P.; Wieler, L.H.; Karch, H.; Reeves, P.R.; Maiden, M.C.J.; Ochman, H.; et al. Sex and virulence in Escherichia coli: An evolutionary perspective. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 60, 1136–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Bortolaia, V.; Kaas, R.S.; Ruppe, E.; Roberts, M.C.; Schwarz, S.; Cattoir, V.; Philippon, A.; Allesoe, R.L.; Rebelo, A.R.; Florensa, A.F.; et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3491–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 12 00488 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparative analysis of the genomic context of mcr-1.1. hp: hypothetic protein. Arrows represent the position and transcriptional direction of the open reading frames (ORF) regions, and mcr-1.1 genes are indicated by red arrows.
Figure 1. Comparative analysis of the genomic context of mcr-1.1. hp: hypothetic protein. Arrows represent the position and transcriptional direction of the open reading frames (ORF) regions, and mcr-1.1 genes are indicated by red arrows.
Antibiotics 12 00488 g001
Table
Table 1. Demographic and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for colistin and additional antimicrobial agents in E. coli isolates tested harboring the mcr-1 gene.
Table 1. Demographic and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for colistin and additional antimicrobial agents in E. coli isolates tested harboring the mcr-1 gene.
IDCityIsolation DateMIC (µg/mL)
CROCTXCAZFEPTZPETPCIPFOSCOL
27ECBogotá2018<=0.5<=0.5<=2<=2<=2/4<=0.250.5<=8>32
28ECBogotá2018<=0.5<=0.5<=2<=2<=2/4<=0.25≥64<=8>32
29ECCali2017<=0.5<=0.5<=2<=2<=2/4<=0.250.25<=8>32
26ECIbagué2017>4488<=2/4<=0.25<0.2564>32
30ECPereira2017<=0.5<=0.5<=2<=232/4<=0.251<=8>32
MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; CRO: ceftriaxone; CTX: cefotaxime; CAZ: ceftazidime; FEP: cefepime; TZP: piperacillin/tazobactam; ETP: ertapenem; CIP: ciprofloxacin; FOS: fosfomycin. MIC values in bold indicate resistance as per CLSI 2022 guidelines.
Table
Table 2. Genomic characteristics the mcr-1.1-harboring E. coli isolates.
Table 2. Genomic characteristics the mcr-1.1-harboring E. coli isolates.
IDMLSTPhylogroupmcr-VariantResistance GenesPlasmid Incompatibility TypesVirulence Factors
26EC14315B1mcr-1.1CTX-M-55, TEM-1B, aph(4)-Ia, aac(3)-IV, aadA1, mdf(A), drfA1, fosA, tet(B), floRCol, IncFIA, IncFIB, IncFII, IncN, IncI1cia, cvaC, etsC, hlyF, iroN, iss, iucC, iutA, IpfA, ompT, tsh, sitA, terC, traT
27EC58B1mcr-1.1TEM-1B, qnrS1, Sul3, drfA15, tet(A), mdf(A), cm1A1Col, IncFIB, IncFIC (II), IncI2cea, cib, cma, cvaC, fyuA, gad, hlyF, iroN, irp2, iss, iucC, iutA, ipfA, ompT, sitA, terC, tratT
28EC46Amcr-1.1TEM-1B, sull2, sul3, aac(3)-Iid, aph(3′)-Ia, aadA1, tet(A), tet(M), dfrA12, mdf(A)Col, IncFIB, IncI2, IncX4celb, fyuA, gad, irp2, ompT, sitA, terC, traT
29EC393Dmcr-1.1qnrB19, sul2, aadA1, aadA5, mdf(A), drfA17, tet(A), floRIncFIA, IncFII, IncHI1A, IncHI1BchuA, eilA, fyuA, gad, hra, iha, irp2, iss, iucC, iutA, kpsE, kpsMII, lpfA, mcmA, ompT, papA, papC, sat, sitA, terC, traT
30EC58B1mcr-1.1TEM-1B, qnrB19, aph(6)-Id, aadA12, aph(3″)-IIb, drfA5, sul2, floRInFIB, IncFII, IncI1-1, IncQ1, IncX1cia, cvaC, etsC, fyuA, gad, hlyF, iroN, irp2, iss, iucC, iutA, ipfA, mchF, ompT, sitA, terC, traT
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De La Cadena, E.; Mahecha, M.; Velandia, A.M.; García-Betancur, J.C.; Rojas, L.J.; Porras, J.; Pallares, C.; Villegas, M.V. Identification of mcr-1 Genes and Characterization of Resistance Mechanisms to Colistin in Escherichia coli Isolates from Colombian Hospitals. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030488

AMA Style

De La Cadena E, Mahecha M, Velandia AM, García-Betancur JC, Rojas LJ, Porras J, Pallares C, Villegas MV. Identification of mcr-1 Genes and Characterization of Resistance Mechanisms to Colistin in Escherichia coli Isolates from Colombian Hospitals. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(3):488. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030488

Chicago/Turabian Style

De La Cadena, Elsa, Mateo Mahecha, Ana María Velandia, Juan Carlos García-Betancur, Laura J. Rojas, Jessica Porras, Christian Pallares, and María Virginia Villegas. 2023. "Identification of mcr-1 Genes and Characterization of Resistance Mechanisms to Colistin in Escherichia coli Isolates from Colombian Hospitals" Antibiotics 12, no. 3: 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030488

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop