Next Article in Journal
Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections and Antibiotic Resistance—Epidemiological and Mechanistic Aspects
Next Article in Special Issue
Acquired Class D β-Lactamases
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Evolution of Metallo-β-lactamases: Trends Revealed by Natural Diversity and in vitro Evolution
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 3
Issue 3
10.3390/antibiotics3030317
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

by
Juan Carlos Palomino
* and
Anandi Martin
Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Gent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2014, 3(3), 317-340; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics3030317
Submission received: 8 April 2014 / Revised: 20 June 2014 / Accepted: 23 June 2014 / Published: 2 July 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious public health problem worldwide. Its situation is worsened by the presence of multidrug resistant (MDR) strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of the disease. In recent years, even more serious forms of drug resistance have been reported. A better knowledge of the mechanisms of drug resistance of M. tuberculosis and the relevant molecular mechanisms involved will improve the available techniques for rapid drug resistance detection and will help to explore new targets for drug activity and development. This review article discusses the mechanisms of action of anti-tuberculosis drugs and the molecular basis of drug resistance in M. tuberculosis.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) remains as an important infectious disease and public health concern worldwide. According to the latest World Health Organization (WHO) report, there were an estimated 8.6 million incident cases of TB in 2012 and 1.3 million deaths were attributed to the disease. More than half a million cases occurred in children and 320,000 deaths were reported among HIV-infected persons [1]. However, even more disturbing is the emergence of drug resistance. In 2012, there were an estimated 450,000 cases of multidrug resistant (MDR)-TB and 170,000 deaths were due to it. MDR-TB is caused by strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that are resistant to at least rifampicin and isoniazid, two key drugs in the treatment of the disease. Since 2006, it has been recognized the presence of even more resistant strains of M. tuberculosis labelled as extensively drug resistant (XDR)-TB [2,3,4]. These strains in addition to being MDR are also resistant to any fluoroquinolone and to at least one of the injectable second-line drugs: kanamycin, capreomycin or amikacin. More recently, a more worrying situation has emerged with the description of M. tuberculosis strains that have been found resistant to all antibiotics that were available for testing, a situation labelled as totally drug resistant (TDR)-TB [5,6,7]. Early detection of all forms of drug resistance in TB is a key factor to reduce and contain the spread of these resistant strains. A better knowledge of the mechanisms of action of anti-TB drugs and the development of drug resistance will allow identifying new drug targets and better ways to detect drug resistance. The following sections will review the mode of action and resistance mechanisms of the main anti-TB drugs as well as new drugs recently described with anti-TB activity.

2. First-Line Anti-TB Drugs

2.1. Rifampicin

Rifampicin is a rifamycin derivative introduced in 1972 as an antituberculosis agent. It is one of the most effective anti-TB antibiotics and together with isoniazid constitutes the basis of the multidrug treatment regimen for TB. Rifampicin is active against growing and non-growing (slow metabolizing) bacilli [8]. The mode of action of rifampicin in M. tuberculosis is by binding to the β-subunit of the RNA polymerase, inhibiting the elongation of messenger RNA [9]. The majority of rifampicin-resistant clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis harbor mutations in the rpoB gene that codes for the β-subunit of the RNA polymerase. As a result of this, conformational changes occur that decrease the affinity for the drug and results in the development of resistance [10].
In about 96% of M. tuberculosis isolates resistant to rifampicin, there are mutations in the so-called “hot-spot region” of 81-bp spanning codons 507–533 of the rpoB gene. This region is also known as the rifampicin resistance-determining region [11]. Mutations in codons 516, 526 and 531 are the most commonly associated mutations with rifampicin resistance in the majority of studies [12,13]. Although less frequent, some reports have also noted the occurrence of mutations outside of the hot-spot region of rpoB [14,15]. Cross-resistance with other rifamycins can occur. Mutations in some codons (e.g., 518 or 529) have been associated with low-level resistance to rifampicin but still susceptible to other rifamycins, such as rifabutin or rifalazil [16,17]. This is important for TB patients that need to receive antiretroviral therapy since rifabutin is a less effective inducer of the cytochrome P450 CYP3A oxidative enzyme [18]. On the other hand, monoresistance to rifampicin is quite rare and almost all rifampicin-resistant strains are also resistant to other drugs, especially to isoniazid. This is the reason why rifampicin resistance is considered as a surrogate marker for MDR-TB [19].
Recent genome sequencing studies have uncovered the acquisition of compensatory mutations in rpoA and rpoC, encoding the α and β' subunits of RNA polymerase, in rifampicin-resistant strains with mutations in rpoB [20]. These compensatory mutations would be responsible for restoring the fitness of these strains in vivo and have also been associated with a higher transmissibility in some settings [21,22].

2.2. Isoniazid

Isoniazid was introduced in 1952 as an anti-TB agent and it remains, together with rifampicin, as the basis for the treatment of the disease. Unlike rifampicin, isoniazid is only active against metabolically-active replicating bacilli. Also known as isonicotinic acid hydrazide, isoniazid is a pro-drug that requires activation by the catalase/peroxidase enzyme KatG, encoded by the katG gene, to exert its effect [23]. Isoniazid acts by inhibiting the synthesis of mycolic acids through the NADH-dependent enoyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP)-reductase, encoded by inhA [24]. Although simple in its structure, resistance to this drug has been associated with mutations in several genes, such as katG, inhA, ahpC, kasA and NDH.
The two main molecular mechanisms of isoniazid resistance are associated with gene mutations in katG and inhA or its promoter region. Indeed, numerous studies have found mutations in these two genes as the most commonly associated with isoniazid resistance [25,26]. Among these, the most prevalent gene mutation has been identified as S315T in katG resulting in an isoniazid product deficient in forming the isoniazid-NAD adduct needed to exert its antimicrobial activity [27,28]. This mutation has been consistently associated with high-level resistance (MIC > 1 µg/mL) to isoniazid [29] and occurs more frequently in MDR strains [26]. The second most common mutation occurs in the promoter region of inhA causing an overexpression of InhA or less frequently, a mutation in its active site, which decreases its affinity for the isoniazid-NAD adduct [28]. The most prevalent mutation found is at position −15C/T and is more commonly associated with low level resistance to isoniazid (MIC < 1 µg/mL). Mutations in inhA not only cause resistance to isoniazid but also to the structurally related drug ethionamide, which shares the same target [30,31]. A recent study found that a mutation in the inhA regulatory region together with a mutation in the inhA coding region produced high-level isoniazid resistance and also cross-resistance to ethionamide [32].
One recent interesting finding showed that the 4R isomer of the isoniazid-NADP adduct causes inhibition of the dihydrofolate reductase (DfrA) in M. tuberculosis, suggesting that mutations in dfrA could possibly play a role in resistance to isoniazid [33]. Moreover, an analysis of the proteome of isoniazid targets in M. tuberculosis identified 16 other proteins, in addition to InhA and DfrA, that were bound by these adducts with high affinity, which could signal other not yet clearly defined actions of isoniazid on the bacteria [34]. Two recent studies, however, have failed to identify any mutation in dfrA associated with resistance to isoniazid [35,36].
In M. tuberculosis, ahpC encodes an alkyl hydroperoxidase reductase that is implicated in resistance to reactive oxygen intermediates and it was initially proposed that mutations in the promoter of ahpC could be used as proxy markers for isoniazid resistance [37]. It is now better understood that mutations in the promoter of ahpC are compensatory mutations for the loss of catalase/peroxidase activity rather than the cause for isoniazid resistance [38]. Moreover, overexpression of AhpC does not confer resistance to isoniazid [39].
Several studies have found single nucleotide polymorphisms in other genes in isoniazid resistant clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis, including kasA and the oxyR-ahpC and furA-katG intergenic regions [26,40,41]. However, their direct role as a cause of isoniazid resistance has not been fully demonstrated. On the other hand, co-resistance to isoniazid and ethionamide has been clearly demonstrated to be caused by mutations in ndh in M. smegmatis and M. bovis BCG, by altering the NADH/NAD ratios inside the cell, leading to a competitive inhibition of the INH-NAD adduct [42,43]. A recent study has also found that a silent mutation in mabA conferred isoniazid resistance through upregulation of inhA in M. tuberculosis [44].

2.3. Ethambutol

Ethambutol was first introduced in the treatment of TB in 1966 and is part of the current first-line regimen to treat the disease. Ethambutol is bacteriostatic against multiplying bacilli interfering with the biosynthesis of arabinogalactan in the cell wall [45]. In M. tuberculosis, the genes embCAB, organized as an operon, code for arabinosyl transferase, which is involved in the synthesis of arabinogalactan, producing the accumulation of the intermediate d-arabinofuranosyl-P-decaprenol [46].
The recognized mechanism of resistance to ethambutol has been linked to mutations in the gene embB with mutations at position embB306 as the most prevalent in most of the studies performed [47,48]. Some studies, however, have also found mutations in embB306 in ethambutol susceptible isolates [49]. Moreover, a study with a large number of M. tuberculosis isolates found that mutations in embB306 were not necessarily associated with resistance to ethambutol but with a predisposition to develop resistance to increasing number of drugs and to be transmitted [50]. In fact, allelic exchange studies have shown that individual mutations causing certain amino acid substitutions produced ethambutol resistance, while other amino acid substitutions had little or no effect on ethambutol resistance [51]. The same authors have more recently reported that mutations in the decaprenylphosphoryl-B-d-arabinose (DPA) biosynthetic and utilization pathway genes, Rv3806c and Rv3792, together with mutations in embB and embC accumulate, giving rise to a range of MICs of ethambutol depending on mutation type and number [52]. These findings could have influence on the correct detection of ethambutol resistance by current molecular methods. Mutations in embB306 then, cause variable degrees of ethambutol resistance and are required but are not enough to cause high-level resistance to ethambutol. There remain about 30% ethambutol resistant strains that do not present any mutation in embB stressing the need to identify other possible mechanisms of drug resistance to this drug.

2.4. Pyrazinamide

Pyrazinamide was introduced into TB treatment in the early 1950s and constitutes now part of the standard first-line regimen to treat the disease. Pyrazinamide is an analog of nicotinamide and its introduction allowed reducing the length of treatment to six months. It has the characteristic of inhibiting semi-dormant bacilli residing in acidic environments such as found in the TB lesions [53]. Pyrazinamide is also a pro-drug that needs to be converted to its active form, pyrazinoic acid, by the enzyme pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase coded by the pncA gene [54,55]. The proposed mechanism of action of pyrazinamide involves conversion of pyrazinamide to pyrazinoic acid, which disrupts the bacterial membrane energetics inhibiting membrane transport. Pyrazinamide would enter the bacterial cell by passive diffusion and after conversion to pyrazinoic acid it is excreted by a weak efflux pump. Under acid conditions, the protonated pyrazinoic acid would be reabsorbed into the cell and accumulated inside, due to an inefficient efflux pump, resulting in cellular damage [56]. One study has also found that pyrazinoic acid and its n-propyl ester can inhibit the fatty acid synthase type I in replicating M. tuberculosis bacilli [57,58].
A recent study, however, has challenged the previous model by proposing that pyrazinoic acid inhibits trans-translation, a process of ribosome-sparing in M. tuberculosis [59]. The study was performed in pyrazinamide-resistant strains lacking mutations in pncA but that had mutations in rpsA identifying the ribosomal protein 1 (RpsA) as the proposed target. Overexpression of RpsA conferred increased resistance to pyrazinamide and pyrazinoic acid was confirmed to be bound to RpsA [59]. While a very intriguing hypothesis as a target for pyrazinamide, the failure to perform allelic transfers in this study makes it difficult to conclude that in fact mutations in rpsA are the target of pyrazinamide.
Mutations in the gene pncA remain as the most common finding in pyrazinamide resistant strains. These mutations, however, are scattered throughout the gene but most occur in a 561-bp region in the open reading frame or in an 82-bp region of its putative promoter [60,61]. Some few studies have reported the occurrence of pyrazinamide resistant strains without any mutation in pncA stating that the resistance could be due to mutations in another not yet identified regulatory gene [62]. Based on the current evidence, the contribution of mutations in rpsA to pyrazinamide resistance remains limited [63,64,65].

2.5. Streptomycin

Originally isolated from the soil microorganism Streptomyces griseus, streptomycin was the first antibiotic to be successfully used against TB. Unfortunately, as soon as it was prescribed, resistance to it emerged, a result of being administered as monotherapy [66]. Streptomycin is an aminocyclitol glycoside active against actively growing bacilli and its mode of action is by inhibiting the initiation of the translation in the protein synthesis [67]. More specifically, streptomycin acts at the level of the 30S subunit of the ribosome at the ribosomal protein S12 and the 16S rRNA coded by the genes rpsL and rrs, respectively [68].
Consequently, mutations in rpsL and rrs are the major mechanisms of resistance to streptomycin but account for 60%–70% of the resistance found [69]. Among the mutations reported in rpsL, a substitution in codon 43 from lysine to arginine has been the most commonly reported. This mutation produces high-level resistance to streptomycin. In rrs the most common mutations occur around nucleotides 530 and 915. There remain an important percentage of strains resistant to streptomycin that lack mutations in either of these two genes, suggesting additional mechanisms of resistance.
In the last years, it has also been reported that mutations in gidB, a gene encoding a conserved 7-methylguanosine methyltransferase specific for the 16S rRNA, confers low-level resistance to streptomycin [70,71].

3. Second-Line Anti-TB Drugs

3.1. Fluoroquinolones

Fluoroquinolones are currently in use as second-line drugs in the treatment of MDR-TB. Both ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin are synthetic derivatives of the parent compound nalidixic acid, discovered as a by-product of the antimalarial chloroquine [72]. Newer-generation quinolones such as moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin are being evaluated in clinical trials and proposed as first-line antibiotics with the purpose of shortening the length of treatment in TB [73,74].
The mode of action of fluoroquinolones is by inhibiting the topoisomerase II (DNA gyrase) and topoisomerase IV, two critical enzymes for bacterial viability. These proteins are encoded by the genes gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE, respectively [75]. In M. tuberculosis, only type II topoisomerase (DNA gyrase) is present and, thus, is the only target of fluoroquinolone activity [76]. Type II topoisomerase is a tetramer formed by two α and β subunits, coded by gyrA and gyrB, respectively, which catalyzes the supercoiling of DNA [77]. The main mechanism of development of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. tuberculosis is by chromosomal mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA or gyrB. The most frequent mutations found are at position 90 and 94 of gyrA but mutations at position 74, 88 and 91 have also been reported [78,79]. A recent systematic review of fluoroquinolone-resistance-associated gyrase mutations in M. tuberculosis has been published [80].
One interesting finding in M. tuberculosis is the presence of a natural polymorphism at position 95 in gyrA that is not related to fluoroquinolone resistance since it is also found in fluoroquinolone-susceptible strains [81]. Another interesting finding has been the report that the simultaneous occurrence of mutations T80A and A90G in gyrA led to hypersusceptibility to several quinolones [82]. This finding could point out that the problem of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. tuberculosis might be more complex than was thought initially.
Cross-resistance is assumed to occur between fluoroquinolones although isolated reports have acknowledged the presence of strains resistant to gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin that were still susceptible to ofloxacin [83]. Also, the involvement of efflux mechanisms has been suggested as a possible cause for fluoroquinolone resistance in M. tuberculosis [84].

3.2. Kanamycin, Capreomycin, Amikacin, Viomycin

These four antibiotics have the same mechanism of action by inhibiting the protein synthesis but, while kanamycin and amikacin are aminoglycosides, capreomycin and viomycin are cyclic peptide antibiotics. All four are second-line drugs used in the management of MDR-TB.
Kanamycin and amikacin inhibit protein synthesis by alteration at the level of 16S rRNA. The most common mutations found in kanamycin-resistant strains are at position 1400 and 1401 of the rrs gene, conferring high-level resistance to kanamycin and amikacin. However, mutations at position 1483 have also been reported [85,86]. Full cross-resistance between kanamycin and amikacin is not complete, as previously thought. Some studies have shown variable levels and patterns of resistance suggesting that other mechanisms of resistance might be possible [87]. In concordance with this, a low-level resistance to kanamycin has been associated with mutations in the promoter region of the eis gene, encoding an aminoglycoside acetyltransferase [88]. Mutations at position −10 and −35 of the eis promoter led to an overexpression of the protein and low-level resistance to kanamycin but not to amikacin. These mutations were found in up to 80% of clinical isolates showing low-level resistance to kanamycin [88,89].
Capreomycin and viomycin, on the other hand, have a similar structure and bind at the same site in the ribosome, at the interface of the small and large subunits [90]. They show full cross-resistance as reported in previous studies [91]. Mutations in the tlyA gene have also been associated with resistance to capreomycin and viomycin. TlyA is an rRNA methyltransferase specific for 2'-O-methylation of ribose in rRNA. Mutations in tlyA determine the absence of methylation activity [92]. Although some studies did not find this association, a recent meta-analysis, evaluating the association of genetic mutations and resistance to second-line drugs, has confirmed the presence of tlyA mutations in addition to mutations in rrs and eis [93].

3.3. Ethionamide

Ethionamide is a derivative of isonicotinic acid structurally similar to isoniazid. It is also a pro-drug requiring activation by a monooxygenase encoded by the ethA gene. It interferes with the mycolic acid synthesis by forming an adduct with NAD that inhibits the enoyl-ACP reductase enzyme. EthA is regulated by the transcriptional repressor EthR [94]. Resistance to ethionamide occurs by mutations in etaA/ethA, ethR and also mutations in inhA, which cause resistance to both isoniazid and ethionamide [95,96]. Moreover, studies with spontaneous isoniazid- and ethionamide-resistant mutants of M. tuberculosis found that they map to mshA, encoding an enzyme essential for mycothiol biosynthesis [97].

3.4. Para-Amino Salicylic Acid

Although it was one of the first anti-tuberculosis drugs used in the treatment of the disease, together with isoniazid and streptomycin, para-amino salicylic acid or PAS is now considered as a second-line drug part of the treatment regimen for MDR-TB. Until recently, its mechanism of action was not completely defined. It has been proposed that being an analog of para-amino benzoic acid, it must compete with it for dihydropteroate synthase, interfering in the process of folate synthesis. A study using transposon mutagenesis identified mutations in the thyA gene associated with resistance to PAS that were also present in clinical isolates resistant to PAS [98]. A recent study has also identified various missense mutations in folC encoding dihydrofolate synthase that conferred resistance to PAS in laboratory isolates of M. tuberculosis [99]. In a panel of 85 clinical MDR-TB isolates, mutations in folC were identified in five isolates resistant to PAS. Nevertheless, just less than 40% of PAS-resistant strains had mutations in thyA indicating that still other mechanisms of resistance to the drug might exist [100].

3.5. Cycloserine

Cycloserine is an oral bacteriostatic second-line anti-tuberculosis drug used in MDR-TB treatment regimens. It is an analog of d-alanine that by blocking the activity of d-alanine: d-alanine ligase inhibits the synthesis of peptidoglycan. It can also inhibit d-alanine racemase (AlrA) needed for the conversion of l-alanine to d-alanine [101]. Although the actual target of cycloserine in M. tuberculosis is not completely elucidated, in previous studies in M. smegmatis it was shown that overexpression of alrA led to resistance to cylcoserine in recombinant mutants [102]. More recently, it has also been shown that a point mutation in cycA, which encodes a d-alanine transporter, was partially responsible for resistance to cycloserine in M. bovis BCG [103].

3.6. Thioacetazone

Thioacetazone is an old drug that was used in the treatment of TB due to its favourable in vitro activity against M. tuberculosis and its very low cost. It has toxicity problems, however, especially in patients co-infected with HIV. It belongs to the group 5 drugs of the WHO and acts by inhibiting mycolic acid synthesis [104].

3.7. Macrolides

Macrolides are more frequently recommended for the treatment of other mycobacterial infections due to their limited activity against M. tuberculosis. Among them, clarithromycin is considered as part of the group 5 drugs of the WHO. Intrinsic resistance to macrolides has been attributed to low cell wall permeability and the expression of emr37, a gene that codifies for a methylase at a specific site in the 23S rRNA, blocking the binding of the antibiotic. In studies performed with M. tuberculosis and Mycobacterium microti it was found that this intrinsic resistance was inducible with sub-inhibitory concentrations of clarithromycin, leading to four- to eight-fold increase in MIC values [105]. Moreover, in studies performed with clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis, sub-inhibitory concentrations of ethambutol reversed resistance to clarithromycin, signalling a permeability barrier as the cause of the intrinsic resistance to the macrolide [106].

3.8. Clofazimine

Clofazimine is a riminophenazine compound reported long ago as having anti-TB activity [107]. Due to the availability of other effective anti-TB drugs at the time and some undesirable side-effects, such as pigmentation of the skin, its use was more limited to the treatment of leprosy [108]. It is now considered in the group 5 drugs of the WHO for the management of MDR-TB. Until recently, the exact mode of action of this antibiotic was not completely understood. Recent studies, however, have signalled the outer membrane as the possible target of clofazimine [109]. Another study found that in M. tuberculosis clofazimine is reduced by NADH dehydrogenase and subsequently after spontaneous reoxidation liberates bactericidal levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [110].
Resistance to clofazimine has not yet been fully characterized; however, a recent study has found that in spontaneous mutants of the reference strain H37Rv, mutations in the transcriptional regulator Rv0678 caused an upregulation of MmpL5, a multisubstrate efflux pump, which not only caused resistance to clofazimine but also to bedaquiline [111].

3.9. Linezolid

Also part of the category 5 drugs of second-line anti-TB drugs, linezolid is an oxazolidinone originally approved for clinical use in the treatment of skin infections and nosocomial pneumonia caused by Gram-positive bacteria [112]. The mode of action of linezolid is by inhibition of an early step in the synthesis of proteins, binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit [101]. Resistance to linezolid in M. tuberculosis is still unusual, but a study analyzing 210 MDR strains found 1.9% of strains being resistant to linezolid [113]. Further analysis of in vitro selected linezolid-resistant mutants found that strains with mutations in the 23S rRNA had MICs of 16–32 µg/mL, while strains with MICs of 4–8 µg/mL or susceptible strains showed no mutations [114]. A more recent study using next-generation sequencing has also found the mutation T460C in rplC, encoding the 50S ribosomal L3 protein, in in vitro-selected mutants and clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis resistant to linezolid [115]. Previous studies have also found evidence of the possible involvement of efflux pumps in the resistance of M. tuberculosis to linezolid [84].
Table 1 gives an overview of the first- and second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs currently in use and target of action.
Table
Table 1. First- and second-line TB drugs, genes involved in their activation and mechanisms involved.
Table 1. First- and second-line TB drugs, genes involved in their activation and mechanisms involved.
DrugGeneMechanism InvolvedReference
IsoniazidkatG, inhACatalase/peroxidase; enoyl reductase[26]
RifampicinrpoBRNA polymerase[11,12,13]
PyrazinamidepncA, rpsAPyrazinamidase; ribosomal protein 1
EthambutolembBArabinosyl transferase[40,41]
StreptomycinrpsL, rrs, gidBS12 ribosomal protein, 16A rRNA, 7-methylguanosine methyltransferase[59,60,61]
QuinolonesgyrA, gyrBDNA gyrase[67,68]
Capreomycinrrs, tlyA16S rRNA, rRNA methyltransferase[80,81]
Kanamycin/Amikacinrrs16S rRNA[83]
EthionamideethAEnoyl-ACP reductase[85,86]
Para-aminosalicylic acidthyA, folCThymidylate synthase A[87,88,89]

4. New Anti-TB Drugs

Notwithstanding the alleged lack of interest of the pharmaceutical industry for the development of new antibiotics, there are several anti-tuberculosis drugs in the pipeline and some of them are already being evaluated in clinical trials and in new combinations with the purpose of reducing the length of TB treatment.

4.1. Bedaquiline

Formerly known as TMC207 or R207910, bedaquiline is a new antibiotic belonging to the class of diarylquinolines with specific activity against M. tuberculosis, which has also shown in vitro activity against other non-tuberculous mycobacteria [116]. Bedaquiline was discovered after a high-throughput evaluation of thousands of compounds using Mycobacterium smegmatis in a whole-cell assay [117]. The drug showed in vitro and in vivo activity against M. tuberculosis and then entered into clinical evaluation for drug susceptible and MDR-TB [74,118,119]. Based on the results of two phase II clinical trials, bedaquiline has recently received conditional approval for the treatment of MDR-TB under the trade name Sirturo. A “black box” warning is, however, accompanying this authorization due to the reported unexplained deaths and QT interval prolongation. Recent reviews and evaluation of this new drug have been published [120,121]. A phase III clinical trial was scheduled to begin in 2013 but has not yet started. Bedaquiline is also being evaluated in new combination regimens with the purpose of reducing the length of treatment [122].
The mode of action of bedaquiline is by inhibiting the ATP synthase of M. tuberculosis, which was a completely new target of action for an antimycobacterial drug. This mode of action was discovered by analyzing M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis mutants resistant to bedaquiline. By sequencing the genome of these mutants and comparing to that of the susceptible strains, the only mutation found was in the atpE gene, which encodes the c part of the F0 subunit of the ATP synthase [117]. This is a complex structure that generates the ATP needed by the mycobacterial cell [123] for which bedaquiline has a favored specificity compared to mitochondrial ATP synthase [124]. The structure of bedaquiline is shown in Figure 1.
Antibiotics 03 00317 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of bedaquiline.
Figure 1. Structure of bedaquiline.
Antibiotics 03 00317 g001
The most prevalent mutation in the atpE gene found in bedaquiline resistant mutants is A63P but also I66M has been found. The latter introduces a modification that interferes the proper binding of bedaquiline to its target [125,126]. Nevertheless, in a study to further assess the mechanisms of resistance to bedaquiline in M. tuberculosis, it was found that only 15 out of 53 resistant mutants had mutations in atpE. The other 38 strains lacked mutations in atpE or even in the F0 or F1 operons, which suggests that other mechanisms of resistance are still possible [127].

4.2. Delamanid

Delamanid, previously known as OPC-67683, is a derivative of nitro-dihydro-imidazooxazole with activity against M. tuberculosis that acts by inhibiting the synthesis of mycolic acid and is undergoing clinical evaluation in a phase III trial [74]. The structure of delamanid is shown in Figure 2. Delamanid was previously shown to have a very good in vitro and in vivo activity against drug-susceptible and drug-resistant M. tuberculosis [128], as well as good early bactericidal activity comparable to that of rifampicin [129]. Delamanid has more recently shown its safety and efficacy in a clinical evaluation for MDR-TB [130].
Antibiotics 03 00317 g002 550
Figure 2. Structure of delamanid.
Figure 2. Structure of delamanid.
Antibiotics 03 00317 g002
The specific mode of action of delamanid is by inhibition of the mycolic acid synthesis but it differs from isoniazid in that, it only inhibits methoxy- and keto-mycolic acid while isoniazid also inhibits α-mycolic acid [128].
Delamanid also requires reductive activation by M. tuberculosis to exert its activity. In experimentally generated delamanid-resistant mycobacteria, a mutation was found in the Rv3547 gene, suggesting its role in the activation of the drug [128].

4.3. PA-824

PA-824 is a bicyclic derivative of nitroimidazole that showed specific activity against M. tuberculosis [131]. The structure of PA-824 is shown in Figure 3. This small-molecule compound showed a very good in vitro and in vivo activity in animal models [132] and it also showed to be safe and well tolerated [133]. PA-824 is currently undergoing further clinical evaluations [122,134].
Antibiotics 03 00317 g003 550
Figure 3. Structure of PA-824.
Figure 3. Structure of PA-824.
Antibiotics 03 00317 g003
PA-824 needs to be activated by a nitroreductase to exert its activity and it inhibits the synthesis of protein and cell wall lipids [131]. The mechanism of resistance to PA-824 has been shown to be most commonly associated with loss of a specific glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (FGD1) or the dezaflavin cofactor F420. More recently, a nitroimidazo-oxazine-specific protein causing minor structural changes in the drug has also been identified [135].

4.4. SQ-109

Compound SQ-109 is a synthetic analogue of ethambutol that has shown in vitro and in vivo activity against drug-susceptible and drug-resistant M. tuberculosis [136]. The structure of SQ-109 is shown in Figure 4. It has also been shown to possess synergistic in vitro activity when combined with first-line drugs, and more interestingly, when combined with bedaquiline and the oxazolidinone PNU-10048 [137,138,139]. SQ-109 is currently being evaluated in a phase II clinical trial [74].
The mode of action of SQ-109 is by interfering with the assembly of mycolic acids into the bacterial cell wall core, resulting in accumulation of trehalose monomycolate, a precursor of the trehalose dimycolate. Transcriptional studies have shown that, similar to other cell wall inhibitors such as isoniazid and ethambutol, SQ-109 induces the transcription of the iniBAC operon required for efflux pump functioning [140]. Moreover, by producing spontaneously generated resistant mutants to SQ-109 analogs and performing whole-genome sequencing, mutations in the mmpL3 gene were identified, suggesting MmpL3 as the target of SQ-109 and signaling MmpL3 as transporter of trehalose monomycolate [141].
Antibiotics 03 00317 g004 550
Figure 4. Structure of SQ-109.
Figure 4. Structure of SQ-109.
Antibiotics 03 00317 g004

4.5. Benzothiazinones

A new class of drug with antimycobacterial activity, 1,3-benzothiazin-4-one or benzothiazinone (BTZ), was recently described [142]. The lead compound, 2-[2-S-methyl-1,4-dioxa-8-azaspiro[4.5]dec-8-yl]-8-nitro-6-(trifluoromethyl)-4H-1,3-benzothiazin-4-one (BTZ043) was found to have in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo activity against M. tuberculosis. It was also found to be active against drug-susceptible and MDR clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis [143]. Structure of BTZ043 is shown in Figure 5.
Antibiotics 03 00317 g005 550
Figure 5. Structure of BTZ043.
Figure 5. Structure of BTZ043.
Antibiotics 03 00317 g005
By transcriptome analysis, the mode of action of BTZ043 was initially spotted at the cell wall biogenesis level. By further genetic analysis, using in vitro generated mutants, the target of the drug was identified at the level of the gene rv3790, which together with rv3791 encode proteins that catalyze the epimerization of decaprenylphosphoryl ribose (DPR) to decaprenylphosphoryl arabinose (DPA), a precursor for arabinan synthesis needed for the bacterial cell wall [144]. DprE1 and DprE2 were proposed as names for these two key enzymes [142]. More recent studies have characterized more precisely the mechanism of action of BTZ043 by showing that the drug is activated in the bacteria through reduction of an essential nitro group to a nitroso derivative, which can react with a cysteine residue in DprE1 [145]. In studies with M. smegmatis, an alternative mechanism of resistance has been suggested. The overexpression of a nitroreductase NfnB led to the inactivation of the drug by reducing an essential nitro group to an amino group [146]. Although M. tuberculosis apparently lacks nitroreductases able to reduce the drug, this finding could be important for development of new BTZ analogues with improved activity.
Just recently a series of piperazine-containing BTZs has been reported. The lead compound PBTZ169 has improved activity, safety and efficacy in animal models and has shown in vitro synergy with bedaquiline signaling it as an attractive new candidate for further clinical development [147].

5. Concluding Remarks

Drug resistance in TB remains a man-made phenomenon. It emerges as a result of spontaneous gene mutations in M. tuberculosis that render the bacteria resistant to the most commonly used anti-TB drugs. Among the reasons for this, the non-compliance with the treatment regimens is signaled as the first cause. The standard treatment of TB calls for a six-month regimen of four drugs that in the case of MDR-TB is extended to 18–24 months involving second-line drugs. This makes compliance with the treatment regimens very challenging and the rates of non-adherence could be high, resulting in poor outcomes and further dissemination of MDR strains.
Notwithstanding the fact that mutations in a number of genes are clearly associated with drug resistance in M. tuberculosis, there are still many cases where resistant strains do not harbor any known mutation. For example, a recent study using whole-genome sequencing identified new genes and intergenic regions that were associated with drug resistance and its evolution, showing that TB drug resistance is a phenomenon more complex than previously assumed [148]. More clarification is needed on the role of specific gene mutations and the development of MDR- or XDR-TB, or the relation between drug resistance and fitness of the bacteria. A better knowledge is also required on the role of efflux pump mechanisms and the development of clinical drug resistance, or the role of porins, if any, on the intrinsic resistance to certain antibiotics. It is, thus, quite important to further our knowledge of additional mechanisms of drug resistance to the available anti-TB drugs. This could have a major impact on the dynamics of TB transmission and for the discovery and development of new anti-TB drugs.

Author Contributions

J.C.P. and A.M. contributed equally to the concept and writing of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2013; WHO/HTM/TB/2013.11: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with extensive resistance to second-line drugs—worldwide, 2000–2004. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2006, 55, 301–305. [Google Scholar]
  3. World Health Organization. Multidrug and Extensively Drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB); 2010 Global Report on Surveillance and Response; WHO/HTM/TB/2010.3: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gandhi, N.R.; Moll, A.; Sturm, A.W.; Pawinski, R.; Govender, T.; Lalloo, U.; Zeller, K.; Andrews, J.; Friedland, G. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. Lancet 2006, 368, 1575–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Velayati, A.A.; Masjedi, M.R.; Farnia, P.; Tabarsi, P.; Ghanavi, J.; Ziazarifi, A.H.; Hoffner, S.E. Emergence of new forms of totally drug-resistant tuberculosis bacilli: Super extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis or totally drug-resistant strains in Iran. Chest 2009, 136, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Udwadia, Z.F.; Amale, R.A.; Ajbani, K.K.; Rodrigues, C. Totally drug-resistant tuberculosis in India. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 579–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Migliori, G.B.; Centis, R.; D’Ambrosio, L.; Spanevello, A.; Borroni, E.; Cirillo, D.M.; Sotgiu, G. Totally drug-resistant and extremely drug-resistant tuberculosis: The same disease? Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 1379–1380. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mitchison, D.A. Basic mechanisms of chemotherapy. Chest 1979, 76, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Blanchard, J.S. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1996, 65, 215–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Telenti, A.; Imboden, P.; Marchesi, F.; Lowrie, D.; Cole, S.; Colston, M.J.; Matter, L.; Schopfer, K.; Bodmer, T. Detection of rifampicin-resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet 1993, 341, 647–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ramaswamy, S.; Musser, J.M. Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: 1998 update. Tuber. Lung Dis. 1998, 79, 3–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Somoskovi, A.; Parsons, L.M.; Salfinger, M. The molecular basis of resistance to isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Respir. Res. 2001, 2, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Caws, M.; Duy, P.M.; Tho, D.Q.; Lan, N.T.; Hoa, D.V.; Farrar, J. Mutations prevalent among rifampin and isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from a hospital in Vietnam. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 2333–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Heep, M.; Rieger, U.; Beck, D.; Lehn, N. Mutations in the beginning of the rpoB gene can induce resistance to rifamycins in both Helicobacter pylori and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 1075–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Siu, G.K.; Zhang, Y.; Lau, T.C.; Lau, R.W.; Ho, P.L.; Yew, W.W.; Tsui, S.K.; Cheng, V.C.; Yuen, K.Y.; Yam, W.C. Mutations outside the rifampicin resistance-determining region associated with rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 730–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, B.; Koga, H.; Ohno, H.; Ogawa, K.; Fukuda, M.; Hirakata, Y.; Maesaki, S.; Tomono, K.; Tashiro, T.; Kohno, S. Relationship between antimycobacterial activities of rifampicin, rifabutin and KRM-1648 and rpoB mutations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1998, 42, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cavusoglu, C.; Karaca-Derici, Y.; Bilgic, A. In-vitro activity of rifabutin against rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with known rpoB mutations. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2004, 10, 662–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Burman, W.J.; Jones, B.E. Treatment of HIV-related tuberculosis in the era of effective antiretroviral therapy. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 164, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Traore, H.; Fissette, K.; Bastian, I.; Devleeschouwer, M.; Portaels, F. Detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from diverse countries by a commercial line probe assay as an initial indicator of multidrug resistance. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2000, 4, 481–484. [Google Scholar]
  20. Comas, I.; Borrell, S.; Roetzer, A.; Rose, G.; Malla, B.; Kato-Maeda, M.; Galagan, J.; Niemann, S.; Gagneux, S. Whole-genome sequencing of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains identifies compensatory mutations in RNA polymerase genes. Nat. Genet. 2011, 44, 106–110. [Google Scholar]
  21. Brandis, G.; Hughes, D. Genetic characterization of compensatory evolution in strains carrying rpoB Ser531Leu, the rifampicin resistance mutation most frequently found in clinical isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 2493–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. De Vos, M.; Müller, B.; Borrell, S.; Black, P.A.; van Helden, P.D.; Warren, R.M.; Gagneux, S.; Victor, T.C. Putative compensatory mutations in the rpoC gene of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis are associated with ongoing transmission. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Y.; Heym, B.; Allen, B.; Young, D.; Cole, S. The catalase-peroxidase gene and isoniazid resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature 1992, 358, 591–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rawat, R.; Whitty, A.; Tonge, P.J. The isoniazid-NAD adduct is a slow, tight-binding inhibitor of InhA, the Mycobacterium tuberculosis enoyl reductase: Adduct affinity and drug resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13881–13886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ramaswamy, S.V.; Reich, R.; Dou, S.J.; Jasperse, L.; Pan, X.; Wanger, A.; Quitugua, T.; Graviss, E.A. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 1241–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hazbón, M.H.; Brimacombe, M.; Bobadilla del Valle, M.; Cavatore, M.; Guerrero, M.I.; Varma-Basil, M.; Billman-Jacobe, H.; Lavender, C.; Fyfe, J.; García-García, L.; et al. Population genetics study of isoniazid resistance mutations and evolution of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 2640–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vilchèze, C.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr. The mechanism of isoniazid killing: Clarity through the scope of genetics. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 61, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rozwarski, D.A.; Grant, G.A.; Barton, D.H.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr.; Sacchettini, J.C. Modification of the NADH of the isoniazid target (InhA) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 1998, 279, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fenner, L.; Egger, M.; Bodmer, T.; Altpeter, E.; Zwahlen, M.; Jaton, K.; Pfyffer, G.E.; Borrell, S.; Dubuis, O.; Bruderer, T.; et al. Effect of mutation and genetic background on drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3047–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Banerjee, A.; Dubnau, E.; Quemard, A.; Balasubramanian, V.; Um, K.S.; Wilson, T.; Collins, D.; de Lisle, G.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr. InhA, a gene encoding a target for isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 1994, 263, 227–230. [Google Scholar]
  31. Larsen, M.H.; Vilchèze, C.; Kremer, L.; Besra, G.S.; Parsons, L.; Salfinger, M.; Heifets, L.; Hazbon, M.H.; Alland, D.; Sacchettini, J.C.; et al. Overexpression of inhA, but not kasA, confers resistance to isoniazid and ethionamide in Mycobacterium smegmatis, M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 46, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Machado, D.; Perdigão, J.; Ramos, J.; Couto, I.; Portugal, I.; Ritter, C.; Boettger, E.C.; Viveiros, M. High-level resistance to isoniazid and ethionamide in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis of the Lisboa family is associated with inhA double mutations. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 1728–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Argyrou, A.; Vetting, M.W.; Aladegbami, B.; Blanchard, J.S. Mycobacterium tuberculosis dihydrofolate reductase is a target for isoniazid. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Argyrou, A.; Jin, L.; Siconilfi-Baez, L.; Angeletti, R.H.; Blanchard, J.S. Proteome-wide profiling of isoniazid targets in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 13947–13953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ho, Y.M.; Sun, Y.J.; Wong, S.Y.; Lee, A.S. Contribution of dfrA and inhA mutations to the detection of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 4010–4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, F.; Jain, P.; Gulten, G.; Liu, Z.; Feng, Y.; Ganesula, K.; Motiwala, A.S.; Ioerger, T.R.; Alland, D.; Vilchèze, C.; et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis dihydrofolate reductase is not a target relevant to the antitubercular activity of isoniazid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 3776–3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rinder, H.; Thomschke, A.; Rüsch-Gerdes, S.; Bretzel, G.; Feldmann, K.; Rifai, M.; Löscher, T. Significance of ahpC promoter mutations for the prediction of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1998, 17, 508–511. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sherman, D.R.; Mdluli, K.; Hickey, M.J.; Arain, T.M.; Morris, S.L.; Barry, C.E., 3rd.; Stover, C.K. Compensatory ahpC gene expression in isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 1996, 272, 1641–1643. [Google Scholar]
  39. Heym, B.; Stavropoulos, E.; Honoré, N.; Domenech, P.; Saint-Joanis, B.; Wilson, T.M.; Collins, D.M.; Colston, M.J.; Cole, S.T. Effects of overexpression of the alkyl hydroperoxide reductase AhpC on the virulence and isoniazid resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 1997, 65, 1395–1401. [Google Scholar]
  40. Cardoso, R.F.; Cardoso, M.A.; Leite, C.Q.; Sato, D.N.; Mamizuka, E.M.; Hirata, R.D.; de Mello, F.F.; Hirata, M.H. Characterization of ndh gene of isoniazid resistant and susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2007, 102, 59–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ando, H.; Kitao, T.; Miyoshi-Akiyama, T.; Kato, S.; Mori, T.; Kirikae, T. Downregulation of katG expression is associated with isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 79, 1615–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Miesel, L.; Weisbrod, T.R.; Marcinkeviciene, J.A.; Bittman, R.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr. NADH dehydrogenase defects confer isoniazid resistance and conditional lethality in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 2459–2467. [Google Scholar]
  43. Vilcheze, C.; Weisbrod, T.R.; Chen, B.; Kremer, L.; Hazbón, M.H.; Wang, F.; Alland, D.; Sachettini, J.C.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr. Altered NADH/NAD+ ratio mediates coresistance to isoniazid and ethionamide in mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 708–720. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ando, H.; Miyoshi-Akiyama, T.; Watanabe, S.; Kirikae, T. A silent mutation in mabA confers isoniazid resistance on Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 2014, 91, 538–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Takayama, K.; Kilburn, J.O. Inhibition of synthesis of arabinogalactan by ethambutol in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1989, 33, 1493–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mikusová, K.; Slayden, R.A.; Besra, G.S.; Brennan, P.J. Biogenesis of the mycobacterial cell wall and the site of action of ethambutol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995, 39, 2484–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Telenti, A.; Philipp, W.J.; Sreevatsan, S.; Bernasconi, C.; Stockbauer, K.E.; Wieles, B.; Musser, J.M.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr. The emb operon, a gene cluster of Mycobacterium tuberculosis involved in resistance to ethambutol. Nat. Med. 1997, 3, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sreevatsan, S.; Stockbauer, K.E.; Pan, X.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Moghazeh, S.L.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr.; Telenti, A.; Musser, J.M. Ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Critical role of embB mutations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1677–1681. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ahmad, S.; Jaber, A.A.; Mokaddas, E. Frequency of embB codon 306 mutations in ethambutol-susceptible and -resistant clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Kuwait. Tuberculosis (Edinb.). 2007, 87, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hazbón, M.H.; Bobadilla del Valle, M.; Guerrero, M.I.; Varma-Basil, M.; Filliol, I.; Cavatore, M.; Colangeli, R.; Safi, H.; Billman-Jacobe, H.; Lavender, C.; et al. Role of embB codon 306 mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis revisited: A novel association with broad drug resistance and IS6110 clustering rather than ethambutol resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 3794–3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Safi, H.; Sayers, B.; Hazbón, M.H.; Alland, D. Transfer of embB codon 306 mutations into clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains alters susceptibility to ethambutol, isoniazid, and rifampin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 2027–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Safi, H.; Lingaraju, S.; Amin, A.; Kim, S.; Jones, M.; Holmes, M.; McNeil, M.; Peterson, S.N.; Chatterjee, D.; Fleischmann, R.; et al. Evolution of high-level ethambutol-resistant tuberculosis through interacting mutations in decaprenylphosphoryl-β-d-arabinose biosynthetic and utilization pathway genes. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1190–1197. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mitchison, D.A. The action of antituberculosis drugs in short-course chemotherapy. Tubercle 1985, 66, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Konno, K.; Feldmann, F.M.; McDermott, W. Pyrazinamide susceptibility and amidase activity of tubercle bacilli. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1967, 95, 461–469. [Google Scholar]
  55. Scorpio, A.; Zhang, Y. Mutations in pncA, a gene encoding pyrazinamidase/nicotinamidase, cause resistance to the antituberculous drug pyrazinamide in tubercle bacillus. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Y.; Mitchison, D. The curious characteristics of pyrazinamide: A review. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2003, 7, 6–21. [Google Scholar]
  57. Zimhony, O.; Vilchèze, C.; Arai, M.; Welch, J.T.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr. Pyrazinoic acid and its n-propylester inhibit fatty acid synthase type I in replicating tubercle bacilli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 752–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zimhony, O.; Cox, J.S.; Welch, J.T.; Vilchèze, C.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr. Pyrazinamide inhibits the eukaryotic-like fatty acid synthetase I (FASI) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Med. 2000, 6, 1043–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shi, W.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, X.; Yuan, H.; Lee, J.S.; Barry, C.E., 3rd.; Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y. Pyrazinamide inhibits trans-translation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 2011, 333, 1630–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Scorpio, A.; Lindholm-Levy, P.; Heifets, L.; Gilman, R.; Siddiqi, S.; Cynamon, M.; Zhang, Y. Characterization of pncA mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 540–543. [Google Scholar]
  61. Juréen, P.; Werngren, J.; Toro, J.C.; Hoffner, S. Pyrazinamide resistance and pncA gene mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 1852–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cheng, S.J.; Thibert, L.; Sanchez, T.; Heifets, L.; Zhang, Y. pncA mutations as a major mechanism of pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Spread of a monoresistant strain in Quebec, QC, Canada. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 528–532. [Google Scholar]
  63. Alexander, D.C.; Ma, J.H.; Guthrie, J.L.; Blair, J.; Chedore, P.; Jamieson, F.B. Gene sequencing for routine verification of pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A role for pncA but not rpsA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 3726–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Simons, S.O.; Mulder, A.; van Ingen, J.; Boeree, M.J.; van Soolingen, D. Role of rpsA gene sequencing in diagnosis of pyrazinamide resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 382. [Google Scholar]
  65. Tan, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, T.; Cai, X.; Kuang, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Yang, F.; Zhang, K.; Tan, S.; et al. Role of pncA and rpsA gene sequencing in detection of pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from southern China. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Crofton, J.; Mitchison, D.A. Streptomycin resistance in pulmonary tuberculosis. Br. Med. J. 1948, 2, 1009–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Moazed, D.; Noller, H.F. Interaction of antibiotics with functional sites in 16S ribosomal RNA. Nature 1987, 327, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Finken, M.; Kirschner, P.; Meier, A.; Wrede, A.; Böttger, E.C. Molecular basis of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Alterations of the ribosomal protein S12 gene and point mutations within a functional 16S ribosomal RNA pseudoknot. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 9, 1239–1246. [Google Scholar]
  69. Gillespie, S.H. Evolution of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Clinical and molecular perspective. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Okamoto, S.; Tamaru, A.; Nakajima, C.; Nishimura, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Tokuyama, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Ochi, K. Loss of a conserved 7-methylguanosine modification in 16S rRNA confers low-level streptomycin resistance in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 1096–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Spies, F.S.; da Silva, P.E.; Ribeiro, M.O.; Rossetti, M.L.; Zaha, A. Identification of mutations related to streptomycin resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and possible involvement of efflux mechanism. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 2947–2949. [Google Scholar]
  72. Goss, W.A.; Deitz, W.H.; Cook, T.M. Mechanism of action of nalidixic acid on Escherichia coli. II. Inhibition of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 1965, 89, 1068–1074. [Google Scholar]
  73. Rustomjee, R.; Lienhardt, C.; Kanyok, T.; Davies, G.R.; Levin, J.; Mthiyane, T.; Reddy, C.; Sturm, A.W.; Sirgel, F.A.; Allen, J.; et al. A Phase II study of the sterilising activities of ofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2008, 12, 128–138. [Google Scholar]
  74. Palomino, J.C.; Martin, A. Tuberculosis clinical trial update and the current anti-tuberculosis drug portfolio. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 3785–3796. [Google Scholar]
  75. Fàbrega, A.; Madurga, S.; Giralt, E.; Vila, J. Mechanism of action of and resistance to quinolones. Microb. Biotechnol. 2009, 2, 40–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Aubry, A.; Pan, X.S.; Fisher, L.M.; Jarlier, V.; Cambau, E. Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA gyrase: Interaction with quinolones and correlation with antimycobacterial drug activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar]
  77. Takiff, H.E.; Salazar, L.; Guerrero, C.; Philipp, W.; Huang, W.M.; Kreiswirth, B.; Cole, S.T.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr.; Telenti, A. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrA and gyrB genes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994, 38, 773–780. [Google Scholar]
  78. Cheng, A.F.; Yew, W.W.; Chan, E.W.; Chin, M.L.; Hui, M.M.; Chan, R.C. Multiplex PCR amplimer conformation analysis for rapid detection of gyrA mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 596–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sun, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C. Comparison of gyrA gene mutations between laboratory-selected ofloxacin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and clinical isolates. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2008, 31, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Maruri, F.; Sterling, T.R.; Kaiga, A.W.; Blackman, A.; van der Heijden, Y.F.; Mayer, C.; Cambau, E.; Aubry, A. A systematic review of gyrase mutations associated with fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and a proposed gyrase numbering system. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 819–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Musser, J.M. Antimicrobial agent resistance in mycobacteria: Molecular genetic insights. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 8, 496–514. [Google Scholar]
  82. Aubry, A.; Veziris, N.; Cambau, E.; Truffot-Pernot, C.; Jarlier, V.; Fisher, L.M. Novel gyrase mutations in quinolone-resistant and -hypersusceptible clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Functional analysis of mutant enzymes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 104–112. [Google Scholar]
  83. Von Groll, A.; Martin, A.; Jureen, P.; Hoffner, S.; Vandamme, P.; Portaels, F.; Palomino, J.C.; da Silva, P.A. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and mutations in gyrA and gyrB. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 4498–4500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Escribano, I.; Rodríguez, J.C.; Llorca, B.; García-Pachon, E.; Ruiz, M.; Royo, G. Importance of the efflux pump systems in the resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to fluoroquinolones and linezolid. Chemotherapy 2007, 53, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Alangaden, G.J.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Aouad, A.; Khetarpal, M.; Igno, F.R.; Moghazeh, S.L.; Manavathu, E.K.; Lerner, S.A. Mechanism of resistance to amikacin and kanamycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 1295–1297. [Google Scholar]
  86. Suzuki, Y.; Katsukawa, C.; Tamaru, A.; Abe, C.; Makino, M.; Mizuguchi, Y.; Taniguchi, H. Detection of kanamycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by identifying mutations in the 16S rRNA gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 1220–1225. [Google Scholar]
  87. Krüüner, A.; Jureen, P.; Levina, K.; Ghebremichael, S.; Hoffner, S. Discordant resistance to kanamycin and amikacin in drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2971–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zaunbrecher, M.A.; Sikes, R.D., Jr.; Metchock, B.; Shinnick, T.M.; Posey, J.E. Overexpression of the chromosomally encoded aminoglycoside acetyltransferase eis confers kanamycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 20004–20009. [Google Scholar]
  89. Campbell, P.J.; Morlock, G.P.; Sikes, R.D.; Dalton, T.L.; Metchock, B.; Starks, A.M.; Hooks, D.P.; Cowan, L.S.; Plikaytis, B.B.; Posey, J.E. Molecular detection of mutations associated with first- and second-line drug resistance compared with conventional drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 2032–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Stanley, R.E.; Blaha, G.; Grodzicki, R.L.; Strickler, M.D.; Steitz, T.A. The structures of the anti-tuberculosis antibiotics viomycin and capreomycin bound to the 70S ribosome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. McClatchy, J.K.; Kanes, W.; Davidson, P.T.; Moulding, T.S. Cross-resistance in M. tuberculosis to kanamycin, capreomycin and viomycin. Tubercle 1977, 58, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  92. Johansen, S.K.; Maus, C.E.; Plikaytis, B.B.; Douthwaite, S. Capreomycin binds across the ribosomal subunit interface using tlyA-encoded 2'-O-methylations in 16S and 23S rRNAs. Mol. Cell 2006, 23, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Georghiou, S.B.; Magana, M.; Garfein, R.S.; Catanzaro, D.G.; Catanzaro, A.; Rodwell, T.C. Evaluation of genetic mutations associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to amikacin, kanamycin and capreomycin: A systematic review. PLoS One 2012, 7, e33275. [Google Scholar]
  94. Carette, X.; Blondiaux, N.; Willery, E.; Hoos, S.; Lecat-Guillet, N.; Lens, Z.; Wohlkönig, A.; Wintjens, R.; Soror, S.H.; Frénois, F. Structural activation of the transcriptional repressor EthR from Mycobacterium tuberculosis by single amino acid change mimicking natural and synthetic ligands. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 3018–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. DeBarber, A.E.; Mdluli, K.; Bosman, M.; Bekker, L.G.; Barry, C.E., 3rd. Ethionamide activation and sensitivity in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 9677–9782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Brossier, F.; Veziris, N.; Truffot-Pernot, C.; Jarlier, V.; Sougakoff, W. Molecular investigation of resistance to the antituberculous drug ethionamide in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 355–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Vilchèze, C.; Av-Gay, Y.; Attarian, R.; Liu, Z.; Hazbón, M.H.; Colangeli, R.; Chen, B.; Liu, W.; Alland, D.; Sacchettini, J.C.; et al. Mycothiol biosynthesis is essential for ethionamide susceptibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 69, 1316–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rengarajan, J.; Sassetti, C.M.; Naroditskaya, V.; Sloutsky, A.; Bloom, B.R.; Rubin, E.J. The folate pathway is a target for resistance to the drug para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) in mycobacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 53, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhao, F.; Wang, X.D.; Erber, L.N.; Luo, M.; Guo, A.Z.; Yang, S.S.; Gu, J.; Turman, B.J.; Gao, Y.R.; Li, D.F.; et al. Binding pocket alterations in dihydrofolate synthase confer resistance to para-aminosalicylic acid in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mathys, V.; Wintjens, R.; Lefevre, P.; Bertout, J.; Singhal, A.; Kiass, M.; Kurepina, N.; Wang, X.M.; Mathema, B.; Baulard, A.; et al. Molecular genetics of para-aminosalicylic acid resistance in clinical isolates and spontaneous mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 2100–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, Y. The magic bullets and tuberculosis drug targets. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005, 45, 529–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cáceres, N.E.; Harris, N.B.; Wellehan, J.F.; Feng, Z.; Kapur, V.; Barletta, R.G. Overexpression of the d-alanine racemase gene confers resistance to d-cycloserine in Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 5046–5055. [Google Scholar]
  103. Chen, J.M.; Uplekar, S.; Gordon, S.V.; Cole, S.T. A point mutation in cycA partially contributes to the d-cycloserine resistance trait of Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine strains. PLoS One 2012, 7, e43467. [Google Scholar]
  104. Grzegorzewicz, A.E.; Korduláková, J.; Jones, V.; Born, S.E.; Belardinelli, J.M.; Vaquié, A.; Gundi, V.A.; Madacki, J.; Slama, N.; Laval, F.; et al. A common mechanism of inhibition of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis mycolic acid biosynthetic pathway by isoxyl and thiacetazone. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 38434–38441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Andini, N.; Nash, K.A. Intrinsic macrolide resistance of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex is inducible. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 2560–2562. [Google Scholar]
  106. Bosne-David, S.; Barros, V.; Verde, S.C.; Portugal, C.; David, H.L. Intrinsic resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to clarithromycin is effectively reversed by subinhibitory concentrations of cell wall inhibitors. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2000, 46, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Barry, V.C.; Belton, J.G.; Conalty, M.L.; Denneny, J.M.; Edward, D.W.; O’Sullivan, J.F.; Twomey, D.; Winder, F. A new series of phenazines (rimino-compounds) with high antituberculosis activity. Nature 1957, 179, 1013–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Browne, S.G.; Hogerzeil, L.M. “B 663” in the treatment of leprosy. Preliminary report of a pilot trial. Lepr. Rev. 1962, 33, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  109. Cholo, M.C.; Steel, H.C.; Fourie, P.B.; Germishuizen, W.A.; Anderson, R. Clofazimine: Current status and future prospects. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yano, T.; Kassovska-Bratinova, S.; The, J.S.; Winkler, J.; Sullivan, K.; Isaacs, A.; Schechter, N.M.; Rubin, H. Reduction of clofazimine by mycobacterial type 2 NADH: Quinone oxidoreductase: A pathway for the generation of bactericidal levels of reactive oxygen species. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 10276–10287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hartkoorn, R.C.; Uplekar, S.; Cole, S.T. Cross-resistance between clofazimine and bedaquiline through upregulation of MmpL5 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 2979–2981. [Google Scholar]
  112. Leach, K.L.; Brickner, S.J.; Noe, M.C.; Miller, P.F. Linezolid, the first oxazolidinone antibacterial agent. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2011, 1222, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Richter, E.; Rüsch-Gerdes, S.; Hillemann, D. First linezolid-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 1534–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hillemann, D.; Rüsch-Gerdes, S.; Richter, E. In vitro-selected linezolid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 800–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Beckert, P.; Hillemann, D.; Kohl, T.A.; Kalinowski, J.; Richter, E.; Niemann, S.; Feuerriegel, S. rplC T460C identified as a dominant mutation in linezolid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2743–2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Huitric, E.; Verhasselt, P.; Andries, K.; Hoffner, S.E. In vitro antimycobacterial spectrum of a diarylquinoline ATP synthase inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 4202–4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Andries, K.; Verhasselt, P.; Guillemont, J.; Göhlmann, H.W.; Neefs, J.M.; Winkler, H.; van Gestel, J.; Timmerman, P.; Zhu, M.; Lee, E.; et al. A diarylquinoline drug active on the ATP synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 2005, 307, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rustomjee, R.; Diacon, A.H.; Allen, J.; Venter, A.; Reddy, C.; Patientia, R.F.; Mthiyane, T.C.P.; de Marez, T.; van Heeswijk, R.; Kerstens, R.; et al. Early bactericidal activity and pharmacokinetics of the diarylquinoline TMC207 in treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 2831–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Diacon, A.H.; Pym, A.; Grobusch, M.; Patientia, R.; Rustomjee, R.; Page-Shipp, L.; Pistorius, C.; Krause, R.; Bogoshi, M.; Churchyard, G.; et al. The diarylquinoline TMC207 for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 2397–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Chahine, E.B.; Karaoui, L.R.; Mansour, H. Bedaquiline: A novel diarylquinoline for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Ann. Pharmacother. 2014, 48, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Palomino, J.C.; Martin, A. TMC207 becomes bedaquiline, a new anti-TB drug. Future Microbiol. 2013, 8, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Diacon, A.H.; Dawson, R.; von Groote-Bidlingmaier, F.; Symons, G.; Venter, A.; Donald, P.R.; van Niekerk, C.; Everitt, D.; Winter, H.; Becker, P.; et al. 14-day bactericidal activity of PA-824, bedaquiline, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin combinations: A randomised trial. Lancet 2012, 380, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Koul, A.; Dendouga, N.; Vergauwen, K.; Molenberghs, B.; Vranckx, L.; Willebrords, R.; Ristic, Z.; Lill, H.; Dorange, I.; Guillemont, J.; et al. Diarylquinolines target subunit c of mycobacterial ATP synthase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 323–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Haagsma, A.C.; Abdillahi-Ibrahim, R.; Wagner, M.J.; Krab, K.; Vergauwen, K.; Guillemont, J.; Andries, K.; Lill, H.; Koul, A.; Bald, D. Selectivity of TMC207 towards mycobacterial ATP synthase compared with that towards the eukaryotic homologue. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 1290–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Petrella, S.; Cambau, E.; Chauffour, A.; Andries, K.; Jarlier, V.; Sougakoff, W. Genetic basis for natural and acquired resistance to the diarylquinoline R207910 in mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 2853–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Segala, E.; Sougakoff, W.; Nevejans-Chauffour, A.; Jarlier, V.; Petrella, S. New mutations in the mycobacterial ATP synthase: New insights into the binding of the diarylquinoline TMC207 to the ATP synthase C-ring structure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2326–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Huitric, E.; Verhasselt, P.; Koul, A.; Andries, K.; Hoffner, S.; Andersson, D.I. Rates and mechanisms of resistance development in Mycobacterium tuberculosis to a novel diarylquinoline ATP synthase inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1022–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Matsumoto, M.; Hashizume, H.; Tomishige, T.; Kawasaki, M.; Tsubouchi, H.; Sasaki, H.; Shimokawa, Y.; Komatsu, M. OPC-67683, a nitro-dihydro-imidazooxazole derivative with promising action against tuberculosis in vitro and in mice. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, e466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Diacon, A.H.; Dawson, R.; Hanekom, M.; Narunsky, K.; Venter, A.; Hittel, N.L.; Geiter, J.; Wells, C.D.; Paccaly, A.J.; Donald, P.R. Early bactericidal activity of delamanid (OPC-67683) in smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2011, 15, 949–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Gler, M.T.; Skripconoka, V.; Sanchez-Garavito, E.; Xiao, H.; Cabrera-Rivero, J.L.; Vargas-Vasquez, D.E.; Gao, M.; Awad, M.; Park, S.K.; Shim, T.S.; et al. Delamanid for multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2151–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Stover, C.K.; Warrener, P.; van Devanter, D.R.; Sherman, D.R.; Arain, T.M.; Langhorne, M.H.; Anderson, S.W.; Towell, J.A.; Yuan, Y.; McMurray, D.N.; et al. A small-molecule nitroimidazopyran drug candidate for the treatment of tuberculosis. Nature 2000, 405, 962–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lenaerts, A.J.; Gruppo, V.; Marietta, K.S.; Johnson, C.M.; Driscoll, D.K.; Tompkins, N.M.; Rose, J.D.; Reynolds, R.C.; Orme, I.M. Preclinical testing of the nitroimidazopyran PA-824 for activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a series of in vitro and in vivo models. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2294–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ginsberg, A.M.; Laurenzi, M.W.; Rouse, D.J.; Whitney, K.D.; Spigelman, M.K. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PA-824 in healthy subjects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 3720–3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Diacon, A.H.; Dawson, R.; du Bois, J.; Narunsky, K.; Venter, A.; Donald, P.R.; van Niekerk, C.; Erondu, N.; Ginsberg, A.M.; Becker, P.; et al. Phase II dose-ranging trial of the early bactericidal activity of PA-824. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3027–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Manjunatha, U.H.; Boshoff, H.; Dowd, C.S.; Zhang, L.; Albert, T.J.; Norton, J.E.; Daniels, L.; Dick, T.; Pang, S.S.; Barry, C.E., 3rd. Identification of a nitroimidazo-oxazine-specific protein involved in PA-824 resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Protopopova, M.; Hanrahan, C.; Nikonenko, B.; Samala, R.; Chen, P.; Gearhart, J.; Einck, L.; Nacy, C.A. Identification of a new antitubercular drug candidate, SQ109, from a combinatorial library of 1,2-ethylenediamines. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 56, 968–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Reddy, V.M.; Einck, L.; Andries, K.; Nacy, C.A. In vitro interactions between new antitubercular drug candidates SQ109 and TMC207. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 2840–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Reddy, V.M.; Dubuisson, T.; Einck, L.; Wallis, R.S.; Jakubiec, W.; Ladukto, L.; Campbell, S.; Nacy, C.A. SQ109 and PNU-100480 interact to kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1163–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sacksteder, K.A.; Protopopova, M.; Barry, C.E., 3rd; Andries, K.; Nacy, C.A. Discovery and development of SQ109: A new antitubercular drug with a novel mechanism of action. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 823–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Boshoff, H.I.; Myers, T.G.; Copp, B.R.; McNeil, M.R.; Wilson, M.A.; Barry, C.E., 3rd. The transcriptional responses of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to inhibitors of metabolism: Novel insights into drug mechanisms of action. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 40174–40184. [Google Scholar]
  141. Tahlan, K.; Wilson, R.; Kastrinsky, D.B.; Arora, K.; Nair, V.; Fischer, E.; Barnes, S.W.; Walker, J.R.; Alland, D.; Barry, C.E., 3rd; et al. SQ109 targets MmpL3, a membrane transporter of trehalose monomycolate involved in mycolic acid donation to the cell wall core of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1797–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Makarov, V.; Manina, G.; Mikusova, K.; Möllmann, U.; Ryabova, O.; Saint-Joanis, B.; Dhar, N.; Pasca, M.R.; Buroni, S.; Lucarelli, A.P.; et al. Benzothiazinones kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis by blocking arabinan synthesis. Science 2009, 324, 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Pasca, M.R.; Degiacomi, G.; Ribeiro, A.L.; Zara, F.; De Mori, P.; Heym, B.; Mirrione, M.; Brerra, R.; Pagani, L.; Pucillo, L.; et al. Clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in four European hospitals are uniformly susceptible to benzothiazinones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1616–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mikusová, K.; Huang, H.; Yagi, T.; Holsters, M.; Vereecke, D.; D’Haeze, W.; Scherman, M.S.; Brennan, P.J.; McNeil, M.R.; Crick, D.C. Decaprenylphosphoryl arabinofuranose, the donor of the d-arabinofuranosyl residues of mycobacterial arabinan, is formed via a two-step epimerization of decaprenylphosphoryl ribose. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 8020–8025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Trefzer, C.; Rengifo-Gonzalez, M.; Hinner, M.J.; Schneider, P.; Makarov, V.; Cole, S.T.; Johnsson, K. Benzothiazinones: Prodrugs that covalently modify the decaprenylphosphoryl-β-d-ribose 2'-epimerase DprE1 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13663–13665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Manina, G.; Bellinzoni, M.; Pasca, M.R.; Neres, J.; Milano, A.; Ribeiro, A.L.; Buroni, S.; Skovierová, H.; Dianišková, P.; Mikušová, K.; et al. Biological and structural characterization of the Mycobacterium smegmatis nitroreductase NfnB, and its role in benzothiazinone resistance. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 77, 1172–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Makarov, V.; Lechartier, B.; Zhang, M.; Neres, J.; van der Sar, A.M.; Raadsen, S.A.; Hartkoorn, R.C.; Ryabova, O.B.; Vocat, A.; Decosterd, L.A.; et al. Towards a new combination therapy for tuberculosis with next generation benzothiazinones. EMBO Mol. Med. 2014, 6, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhang, H.; Li, D.; Zhao, L.; Fleming, J.; Lin, N.; Wang, T.; Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Galwey, N.; Deng, J.; et al. Genome sequencing of 161 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from China identifies genes and intergenic regions associated with drug resistance. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1255–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palomino, J.C.; Martin, A. Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antibiotics 2014, 3, 317-340. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics3030317

AMA Style

Palomino JC, Martin A. Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antibiotics. 2014; 3(3):317-340. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics3030317

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palomino, Juan Carlos, and Anandi Martin. 2014. "Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis" Antibiotics 3, no. 3: 317-340. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics3030317

APA Style

Palomino, J. C., & Martin, A. (2014). Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antibiotics, 3(3), 317-340. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics3030317

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop