Next Article in Journal
Partial Replacement of Dimethylformamide with Less Toxic Solvents in the Fabrication Process of Mixed-Halide Perovskite Films
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Deposition and Corrosion Resistance Characterization of FeCoNiCr High-Entropy Alloy Coatings
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Optoelectronic Nanostructures on Silicon and Gold-Coated Silicon via High-Intensity Laser Pulses at Varied Pulse Durations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Annealing on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ni-W/Boron Composite Coatings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Amorphous Boron on the Microstructure and Corrosion Properties of Ni-W Coatings

by
Napat Kiatwisarnkij
1,
Suchet Mahattanatawee
1,
Gobboon Lothongkum
1 and
Jiaqian Qin
2,*
1
Metallurgical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2
Center of Excellence in Responsive Wearable Materials, Metallurgy and Materials Science Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(2), 377; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020377
Submission received: 27 December 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 2 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023

Abstract

:
In this study, a nickel-tungsten/amorphous boron composite coating (Ni-W/B) was successfully deposited on carbon steel using the electrodeposition method. Electrodeposition was performed by dispersing varying quantities of amorphous boron (0, 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L) particles in a Ni-W electrolytic bath. The microstructure and morphology of composite coatings were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The electrochemical properties of the Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B composite coatings were studied using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), polarization curves, and immersion testing. It was found that the addition of amorphous boron particles to Ni-W coatings can significantly smooth the modified composite coatings and improve the corrosion resistance, probably by changing the corrosion from pitting to uniform corrosion with increasing boron content. The boron concentration of 0.5 g/L in the bath provided the highest corrosion resistance among all the modified coatings.

1. Introduction

Nanocomposite coatings are a popular method used to improve properties of materials because of their distinctive mechanical, tribological, and electrochemical properties compared to metal or alloy coatings. The electrodeposition method is commercially used to fabricate the coatings because it is a simple, controllable, and low-cost technique for developing the surface coating with various materials via plating modification [1]. Furthermore, the type and quantity of incorporated materials strongly affect the microstructure and properties of the composite coatings [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
Nickel-tungsten (Ni-W) alloy coatings have been developed as a good alternative to hard chromium coatings to reduce health and environmental problems [8,9]. The coatings are used in various applications, such as automotive, aerospace, petroleum, and electronics industries, because Ni-W alloy exhibits high hardness and wear and corrosion resistance [9,10,11,12]. In previous works, it was reported that the particles incorporated in Ni-W coatings, such as Al2O3 [13], TiO2 [14], diamond [15], SiC [16], TiN [17], CeO2 [18], Y2O3 [19], and TaC [20], can increase the corrosion and wear resistance, hardness, and adhesion strength. The properties of the composite coatings highly depend on the character of the incorporated particles and their content in the deposits. According to the properties of incorporated particles [21,22] and the Ni-W coating application, amorphous boron particles are good choice to add to Ni-W coatings to improve their properties.
In our previous work, we reported that the original Ni-W alloy coatings and composite Ni-W coatings modified by adding amorphous boron particles (Ni-W/B) can be successfully deposited on carbon steel using the electrodeposition method [4,23,24]. The hardness and wear resistance of the coatings are significantly improved via the incorporation of an appropriate content of amorphous boron particles because these particles uniformly distribute and provide a smooth surface [4,23]. Furthermore, the incorporated particles in Ni-W coatings can enhance the corrosion resistance [1,2,3,17,18,19]. Therefore, the addition of amorphous boron also enhances the corrosion resistance of Ni-W coatings. In previous works, the addition of boron to the Ni-W alloy coatings enhanced the corrosion resistance [25,26,27]. However, few studies have examined the influence of various boron additions on the corrosion resistance in Ni-W/B composite coatings. Herein, Ni-W/B nanocomposite coatings were prepared with various contents of amorphous boron particles on carbon steel substrate, which is widely used in piping and automotive parts [28]. In addition, the boron content in Ni-W coatings can be easily controlled by adding amorphous boron particles. The corrosion resistance of the coatings was investigated as the function of boron content in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.

2. Materials and Methods

The Ni-W/B composite coatings were prepared on commercial-grade carbon steel (AISI 1040) substrates in a Ni-W electrolyte bath by adding amorphous boron particles, as described in our previous work [4]. Typically, 18 g/L nickel sulphate hexahydrate (NiSO4·6H2O), 53 g/L sodium tungstate dihydrate (Na2WO4·2H2O), 168 g/L trisodium citrate dihydrate (Na3C6H5O7·2H2O), 31 g/L ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), 18 g/L sodium bromide (NaBr), and various concentrations of amorphous boron particles (0, 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L) were dissolved in DI water. The steel specimens with dimensions of 20 mm × 30 mm × 1 mm were used for all the electrodeposition experiments. Before electrodeposition, the steel substrates were mechanically cleaned to remove impurities. Then, the substrates were immersed in the NaOH and HCl solution, followed by rinsing with DI water. The pre-cleaned substrates and Pt mesh were applied as the cathode and anode for electrodeposition, respectively. During the electrodeposition, a constant current density of 0.1 A/cm2 was applied for 1 h at the bath temperature of 75 °C. All the electrodeposition experiments were carried out in a 250 mL beaker, with a magnetic bar stirrer continuously rotating at the speed of 150 rpm.
A scanning electron microscope, SEM (Hitachi SU3500, Tokyo, Japan), was used to study the surface microstructure and morphology of both Ni-W and Ni-W/B composite coatings. A three-electrode potentiostat (µAutolab/FRA2, Metrohm Autolab B.V, Utrecht, Netherland) using a Ag/AgCl reference electrode, a platinum plate as a counter electrode, and a sample as a working electrode was used to investigate the electrochemical properties of the coatings in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution (pH = 8) via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS, Metrohm Autolab B.V, Utrecht, Netherland) measurement and potentiodynamic polarization testing. All electroplated coatings were cleaned with ultrasonic cleanser, degreased, and immersed in the NaCl solution for 1 h. Then, the open circuit potential (OCP) value was measured for 30 min. EIS testing was performed in the frequency range between 10 mHz and 10 kHz at an amplitude of 10 mV. The potentiodynamic polarization tests were performed at a scan rate of 0.016 mV/s with the potential range within 250 mV (vs. SCE) of the OCP value. The electrochemical testing was conducted using NOVA software (version 2.0).
In addition, the corrosion rate of pure Ni-W (boron concentration of 0 g/L) and modified Ni-W coatings with different boron contents (boron concentrations of 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L) was observed by immersion testing. The testing was performed in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution at ambient temperature. The weight of all samples before and after the immersion testing was measured by an electronic balance with an accuracy of 0.01 mg. All samples after testing were ultrasonically cleaned with ethanol and dried before weighing. The weight loss was calculated from the difference in the samples’ weight before and after testing.

3. Results

According to our previous work [4], the Ni-W/B composite coatings can be successfully prepared. Figure 1 illustrates SEM images of the Ni-W and Ni-W/B coatings. It can be seen that the surface of Ni-W/B composite coatings is smoother than that of the Ni-W alloy coating (see Figure 1), which is in good agreement with the previous work [4]. Moreover, the thickness of the coatings is in the range of 47–49 μm in samples having addition of 1 and 3 g/L of boron [4]. A previous study reported that the boron content in Ni-W coatings does not significantly influence the film thickness. The surface roughness was measured by a surface profilometer. The Ni-W coating has an average surface roughness (Ra) of 1.58 ± 0.1 µm, while the Ni-W/B coatings have Ra values of 1.38 ± 0.05, 1.26 ± 0.07, and 0.93 ± 0.04 µm, for boron concentrations of 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L in the plating solution, respectively. The incorporation of boron provided a smooth surface of the coatings because the incorporated particles act as nucleation sites and enable grain refinement, resulting in smaller grains [19,29,30], as shown in previous works [4,23,31]. In addition, boron particles retard the crystalline growth of the Ni-W matrix coating, leading to a smoother and more uniform surface [4,29,30].
Open-circuit potential (OCP) as a function of time at various boron concentrations in the Ni-W plating bath is shown in Figure 2. The OCP indicates that the potential is significantly changed in the NaCl solution. The OCP obtained from the Ni-W coating is lower than that of the Ni-W/B coating samples, and further decreases slowly with the increase in time. In contrast, the OCP of all Ni-W/B coatings first decreases with increasing time. After 1800 s (30 min) of immersion, the OCP value becomes stable. The OCP results show that the Ni-W/B samples exhibit better chemical stability than the Ni-W sample. Similar results were observed in the Ni-W/MWCNT composite coating system [3].
Moreover, the OCP value shows that the Ni-W coatings modified by the addition of various boron concentrations (Ni-W/B) have higher potential than that of the original (see Figure 2). This indicates that more positive OCP values and increasing galvanic corrosion resistance were achieved by adding boron particles due to retarding the penetration of the NaCl solution on the Ni-W/B coatings. Furthermore, the Ni-W/B coatings prepared by adding 0.5 g/L of boron in the plating bath increased slightly after 500 s immersion in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution, which demonstrates that this sample has the most chemical stability compared to other samples. This is because a passive film of W-rich oxide may form on the Ni-W matrix coating [10] as a very thin coating layer and affect the corrosion resistance together with the boron particles.
The Nyquist plot for the Ni-W and Ni-W/B coatings with various boron concentrations is shown in Figure 3. The impedance spectra shape of all coatings is a single semicircle. The size of the semicircle demonstrates the corrosion resistance of the samples. The incorporation of amorphous boron particles does not change the shapes of the EIS, but it can increase the radius of the Nyquist plot. The real impedance (Z′) of the Ni-W/B coatings is larger than that of the Ni-W coatings, indicating that boron addition can enhance the corrosion resistance of Ni-W coatings. The Ni-W/B coating with a boron concentration of 0.5 g/L has the largest semicircle radius (see Figure 3). From the obtained results, boron particles influence the coating structure modification because the deposited boron particles in Ni-W coatings are uniformly distributed and fill crevices, gaps, and micro-holes of the coatings [26,32,33,34]. This leads to a reduction in surface defects.
The Bode modulus can indicate (1) impedance (Z) in the high-frequency region as the solution resistance (Rs) and (2) Z in the low-frequency region as the polarization resistance (Rp) or corrosion resistance of the samples. Figure 4 depicts the Bode modulus of the Ni-W and Ni-W/B coatings. The results demonstrate that the Ni-W coating has the lowest corrosion resistance, while the highest resistance was obtained from the Ni-W/B coating with the addition of a boron concentration of 0.5 g/L (see Rp at a frequency of 0.01 Hz). The result from the Bode modulus is in good agreement with the Nyquist plot.
Figure 5 shows the Tafel curves of both the Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B composite coating with various boron concentrations obtained by potentiodynamic polarization testing in the 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. Extrapolating the linear segment of the cathodic and anodic curves from the Tafel curve to their intersection was used to calculate the corrosion potential (Ecorr) and corrosion current density (Icorr) values, as shown in Table 1.
According to electrochemical theory, the current density is inversely proportional to the charge transfer resistance (Rct). The obtained data in Table 1 show that Ni-W/B nanocomposite coatings with varying boron concentrations have higher Ecorr and lower Icorr than those of Ni-W coatings. Thus, the incorporation of boron particles can increase Rct and decrease Icorr values [35]. The coating prepared with a boron concentration of 0.5 g/L appears to have the highest corrosion potential, with the value of −0.489 V. Since the optimum boron content affects the uniform boron particle distribution in Ni-W coatings, this leads to maximum corrosion resistance because the particles increase the inactive areas between the NaCl solution and composite coating [36,37]. Second, an increase in boron content provides a smaller grain size leading to a higher grain boundary, and then increases surface energy because boron is a grain-refining element. This accelerates passive film formation, leading to better corrosion resistance [36], which was found in the sample with boron content of 0.5 g/L.
The immersion test was further carried out to evaluate the corrosion behavior for Ni-W and Ni-W/B coatings. The surface color of the Ni-W/B coatings changed. Meanwhile, the Ni-W coating showed a more severe visible change, and its surface become rough and lost brightness. The surface morphology, as shown in Figure 6, can be observed by SEM. The SEM images show that the surface of the Ni-W coating has fewer corroded holes than that of the Ni-W/B coatings. In contrast, the weight loss of the Ni-W coating is higher than that of the Ni-W/B coatings, leading to less corrosion resistance (see Table 2). Therefore, the corroded holes in the Ni-W coating appear to be deeper, which means Ni-W is more susceptible to pitting corrosion. In addition, the corroded surface gradually changed from localized corrosion to uniform corrosion when boron concentration was increased in the plating bath (Figure 6a–d). This trend is beneficial due to uniform corrosion’s predictable failure, compared to the often unpredictable rapid rupture failure of localized corrosion. In Figure 6c,d, no cracking is observed on the surfaces. On the other hand, in Figure 6a,b, cracks are clearly shown along grain boundaries. These cracks reinforce the corrosion process by being channels for mass transfer, thus worsening the corroded surface. Table 2 shows the weight loss data of Ni-W and Ni-W/B coatings obtained from the immersion test for 200 h in the 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. It can be seen that that the presence of boron particles in the Ni-W coating significantly decreases the corrosion rate of the coating, and adding a boron concentration of 0.5 g/L provided the best corrosion resistance compared to the others. Moreover, the coating surface appears to have fewer visible holes as the boron concentration increases, as the condition changed from pitting corrosion to uniform corrosion (see Figure 6). The corrosion resistance of the Ni-W/B coating with a boron concentration of 0.5 g/L is about 10 times better than that of Ni-W. This finding is in good agreement with the result obtained from the electrochemical testing.
Figure 7 shows the relationship between boron concentration, tungsten content in the coating, and corrosion current. Increasing boron concentration from 0 to 3 g/L leads to decreasing the tungsten content in the coating. It also sharply reduces the corrosion current as boron concentration decreases from 0 to 0.5 g/L, with the lowest corrosion current shown at a boron concentration of 1 g/L. In general cases, the grain boundary is highly susceptible to pitting corrosion. Figure 6a clearly illustrates this event, as many large holes can be seen along the grain boundary. Hence, in this experiment, boron particles were added to limit the susceptibility of the grain boundary to corrosion. Furthermore, the coatings obtained with the incorporation of boron become much denser and smoother than that of Ni-W. The densely packed coating can significantly inhibit the corrosion and provide better corrosion protection to the substrate than that of Ni-W. The addition of boron particles to the Ni-W alloy coating can prevent corrosion in two main ways. Firstly, the boron particles fill crevices and micro-holes in the Ni-W matrix, creating a physical barrier against pitting corrosion. This leads to denser and smoother coatings [38]. Secondly, the homogeneous distribution of boron particles raises the corrosion potential and reduces the corrosion current density. This results in uniform corrosion and inhibition of localized corrosion [39].

4. Conclusions

A Ni-W/B composite coating was successfully electroplated on low carbon steel. Addition of amorphous boron particles to the Ni-W plating bath can increase the corrosion resistance of Ni-W-based coatings. Adding a boron concentration of 0.5 g/L provided the highest corrosion resistance since boron particles: were uniformly distributed in the Ni-W matrix coating; refined grains and reduced porosities, leading to a smooth surface and reducing pitting corrosion; and tended to change the corrosion condition to uniform corrosion, which is preferable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Q.; methodology, J.Q., N.K. and S.M.; investigation, J.Q., N.K. and S.M.; resources, J.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Q., N.K. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, J.Q. and G.L.; supervision, G.L. and J.Q.; project administration, J.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation, grant number B16F640190 and Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund Chulalongkorn University (IND66620029). N.K. gratefully acknowledged the Scholarship from the Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University to commemorate the 72nd anniversary of his Majesty King Bhumibol Aduladej.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gurrappa, I.; Binder, L. Electrodeposition of nanostructured coatings and their characterization—A review. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2008, 9, 043001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sangeetha, S.; Kalaignan, G.P. Tribological and electrochemical corrosion behavior of Ni–W/BN (hexagonal) nano-composite coatings. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 10415–10424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, H.; He, Y.; Fan, Y.; Xu, W.; Yang, Q. Pulse electrodeposition and corrosion behavior of Ni–W/MWCNT nanocomposite coatings. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 68890–68899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qin, J.; Zhang, X.; Umporntheep, K.; Auejitthavorn, V.; Li, R.; Wangyao, P.; Boonyongmaneerat, Y.; Limpanart, S.; Ma, M.; Liu, R. Electrodeposition and Mechanical Properties of Ni-W Matrix Composite Coatings with Embedded Amorphous Boron Particles. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2016, 11, 9529–9541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, X.; Qin, J.; Perasinjaroen, T.; Aeksen, W.; Das, M.K.; Hao, R.; Zhang, B.; Wangyao, P.; Boonyongmaneerat, Y.; Limpanart, S.; et al. Preparation and hardness of pulse electrodeposited Ni–W–diamond composite coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 276, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, X.; Qin, J.; Das, M.K.; Hao, R.; Zhong, H.; Thueploy, A.; Limpanart, S.; Boonyongmaneerat, Y.; Ma, M.; Liu, R. Co-electrodeposition of hard Ni-W/diamond nanocomposite coatings. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Das, M.K.; Li, R.; Qin, J.; Zhang, X.; Das, K.; Thueploy, A.; Limpanart, S.; Boonyongmaneerat, Y.; Ma, M.; Liu, R. Effect of electrodeposition conditions on structure and mechanical properties of Ni-W/diamond composite coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 309, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schuh, C.; Nieh, T.; Iwasaki, H. The effect of solid solution W additions on the mechanical properties of nanocrystalline Ni. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Allahyarzadeh, M.H.; Aliofkhazraei, M.; Rezvanian, A.R.; Torabinejad, V.; Rouhaghdam, A.S. Ni-W electrodeposited coatings: Characterization, properties and applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 307, 978–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sriraman, K.; Raman, S.G.S.; Seshadri, S. Corrosion behaviour of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni–W and Ni–Fe–W alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 460, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alimadadi, H.; Ahmadi, M.; Aliofkhazraei, M.; Younesi, S. Corrosion properties of electrodeposited nanocrystalline and amorphous patterned Ni–W alloy. Mater. Des. 2009, 30, 1356–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chianpairot, A.; Lothongkum, G.; Schuh, C.A.; Boonyongmaneerat, Y. Corrosion of nanocrystalline Ni–W alloys in alkaline and acidic 3.5wt.% NaCl solutions. Corros. Sci. 2011, 53, 1066–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Beltowska-Lehman, E.; Indyka, P.; Bigos, A.; Kot, M.; Tarkowski, L. Electrodeposition of nanocrystalline Ni–W coatings strengthened by ultrafine alumina particles. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2012, 211, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, K.A.; Kalaignan, G.P.; Muralidharan, V. Direct and pulse current electrodeposition of Ni–W–TiO2 nanocomposite coatings. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 2827–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hou, K.-H.; Sheu, H.-H.; Ger, M.-D. Preparation and wear resistance of electrodeposited Ni–W/diamond composite coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 308, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yao, Y.W.; Yao, S.W.; Zhang, L. Preparation, mechanical properties and wear resistance of Ni–W/SiC nanocomposite coatings. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2008, 24, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, K.A.; Kalaignan, G.P.; Muralidharan, V.S. Enhanced corrosion resistance of Ni–W alloy with inclusion of TiN nanoparticles by electrodeposition method. Trans. IMF 2013, 91, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, B.; Lu, X. Tribological and anti-corrosion properties of Ni–W–CeO2 coatings against molten glass. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 3251–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xing, S.; Wang, L.; Jiang, C.; Liu, H.; Zhu, W.; Ji, V. Influence of Y2O3 nanoparticles on microstructures and properties of electrodeposited Ni–W–Y2O3 nanocrystalline coatings. Vacuum 2020, 181, 109665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bin Humam, S.; Gyawali, G.; Joshi, B.; Kim, T.H.; Lee, S.W. Influence of WC and TaC particles on the microstructure and scratch resistance of electrodeposited nickel-tungsten alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 893, 162371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Klepper, C.C.; Hazelton, R.C.; Yadlowsky, E.J.; Carlson, E.P.; Keitz, M.D.; Williams, J.M.; Zuhr, R.A.; Poker, D.B. Amorphous boron coatings produced with vacuum arc deposition technology. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2002, 20, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Gu, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, W.; Fu, Z. Synthesis of nano-sized amorphous boron powders through active dilution self-propagating high-temperature synthesis method. Mater. Res. Bull. 2013, 48, 2018–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Harachai, K.; Qin, J.Q.; Boonyongmaneerat, Y.; Jaroenapibal, P. Influences of Boron Concentration on Mechanical Properties of Ni-W-B Composite Coatings. Key Eng. Mater. 2019, 801, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Das, M.K.; Pinitpuwadol, W.; Wonlopsiri, K.; Wangyao, P.; Qin, J. Influence of Annealing on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ni-W/Boron Composite Coatings. Coatings 2022, 12, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Steffani, C.P.; Dint, J.W.; Groza, J.R.; Palazoğlu, A. Electrodeposition and corrosion resistance of Ni-W-B coatings. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 1997, 6, 413–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, L.; Zhong, Q.; Liu, J. Study of corrosion resistance of Ni-WB amorphous alloy deposits. Plat. Surf. Finish. 2000, 87, 74–77. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yildiz, R.A.; Genel, K.; Gulmez, T. Effect of electroless Ni-B and Ni-W-B coatings on the corrosion-fatigue behaviour of 7075 Al alloy. Int. J. Fatigue 2021, 144, 106040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Islam, T.; Rashed, H.M.M.A. Classification and Application of Plain Carbon Steels. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, H.; He, Y.; He, T.; Qing, D.; Luo, F.; Fan, Y.; Chen, X. Ni-W/BN(h) electrodeposited nanocomposite coating with functionally graded microstructure. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 704, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shaik, S.; Basu, A. Effect of multiple dissimilar nanoparticles in Ni–W alloy matrix composite coating and evaluation of surface-mechanical, corrosion, and hydrophobic properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 278, 125585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Robin, A.; de Santana, J.C.P.; Sartori, A.F. Co-electrodeposition and characterization of Cu–Si3N4 composite coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 205, 4596–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Balaraju, J.; Selvi, V.E.; Grips, V.W.; Rajam, K. Electrochemical studies on electroless ternary and quaternary Ni–P based alloys. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 52, 1064–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Z.; Xu, H.; Li, M.-K.; Shi, Y.-L.; Huang, Y.; Li, H.-L. Preparation and properties of Ni/P/single-walled carbon nanotubes composite coatings by means of electroless plating. Thin Solid Films 2004, 466, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, X.; Chen, C.; Xiao, H.; Cheng, F.; Zhang, G.; Yi, G. Corrosion behavior of carbon nanotubes–Ni composite coating. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2005, 191, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Younes, O.; Gileadi, E. Electroplating of Ni /W Alloys. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2002, 149, C100–C111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dehgahi, S.; Amini, R.; Alizadeh, M. Microstructure and corrosion resistance of Ni-Al2O3-SiC nanocomposite coatings produced by electrodeposition technique. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 692, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ahmadiyeh, S.; Rasooli, A.; Hosseini, M.G.; Farhood, A. Superior corrosion and wear resistance of pulse plated Ni–W–B/SiC composite coatings. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 270, 124761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ranganatha, S.; Venkatesha, T.V.; Vathsala, K. Electroless Ni–W–P Coating and Its Nano-WS2 Composite: Preparation and Properties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 7932–7940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ranganatha, S.; Venkatesha, T.V.; Vathsala, K. Development of high performance electroless Ni–P–HNT composite coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 263, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B nanocomposite coatings with varying boron concentrations: (b) 0.5 (c) 1, and (d) 3 g/L after electroplating.
Figure 1. SEM images of (a) Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B nanocomposite coatings with varying boron concentrations: (b) 0.5 (c) 1, and (d) 3 g/L after electroplating.
Coatings 13 00377 g001
Figure 2. Open circuit potential with increasing time of Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B (boron concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L) composite coatings immersed in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Figure 2. Open circuit potential with increasing time of Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B (boron concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L) composite coatings immersed in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution.
Coatings 13 00377 g002
Figure 3. Nyquist plot of the Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B composite coatings with varying boron concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L).
Figure 3. Nyquist plot of the Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B composite coatings with varying boron concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L).
Coatings 13 00377 g003
Figure 4. Bode modulus of the Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B composite coatings with varying boron concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L).
Figure 4. Bode modulus of the Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B composite coatings with varying boron concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L).
Coatings 13 00377 g004
Figure 5. Polarization curves of Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B composite coatings with varying boron concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L).
Figure 5. Polarization curves of Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B composite coatings with varying boron concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, and 3 g/L).
Coatings 13 00377 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of (a) Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B nanocomposite coatings with varying boron concentrations: (b) 0.5 (c) 1, and (d) 3 g/L after immersion testing.
Figure 6. SEM images of (a) Ni-W alloy and Ni-W/B nanocomposite coatings with varying boron concentrations: (b) 0.5 (c) 1, and (d) 3 g/L after immersion testing.
Coatings 13 00377 g006
Figure 7. Corrosion current and tungsten contents of Ni-W and Ni-W/B coatings with varying boron concentrations.
Figure 7. Corrosion current and tungsten contents of Ni-W and Ni-W/B coatings with varying boron concentrations.
Coatings 13 00377 g007
Table 1. OCP value, corrosion potential, and corrosion current density on Ni-W/B and Ni-W/B.
Table 1. OCP value, corrosion potential, and corrosion current density on Ni-W/B and Ni-W/B.
Boron (g/L)OCP vs. SCE(V)Ecorr vs. SCE (V)Icorr (µA/cm2)
0−0.562−0.57925.594
0.5−0.483−0.4895.869
1−0.515−0.5293.070
3−0.502−0.5245.365
Table 2. Weight loss of the Ni-W and Ni-W/B coatings after immersion testing in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution for 200 h.
Table 2. Weight loss of the Ni-W and Ni-W/B coatings after immersion testing in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution for 200 h.
Boron (g/L)Initial Weight (g)After Immersion (g)Weight Loss (g)
04.90384.89250.0113
0.54.86634.86520.0011
14.89624.89430.0019
34.62254.61880.0037
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kiatwisarnkij, N.; Mahattanatawee, S.; Lothongkum, G.; Qin, J. Effect of Amorphous Boron on the Microstructure and Corrosion Properties of Ni-W Coatings. Coatings 2023, 13, 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020377

AMA Style

Kiatwisarnkij N, Mahattanatawee S, Lothongkum G, Qin J. Effect of Amorphous Boron on the Microstructure and Corrosion Properties of Ni-W Coatings. Coatings. 2023; 13(2):377. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020377

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kiatwisarnkij, Napat, Suchet Mahattanatawee, Gobboon Lothongkum, and Jiaqian Qin. 2023. "Effect of Amorphous Boron on the Microstructure and Corrosion Properties of Ni-W Coatings" Coatings 13, no. 2: 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020377

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop