Next Article in Journal
Coupling Effect of Disconnected Pores and Grain Morphology on the Corrosion Tolerance of Laser-Clad 316L Coating
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning Modeling and Run-to-Run Control of an Area-Selective Atomic Layer Deposition Spatial Reactor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite on Ti6Al4V and Si(100) Surfaces by Pulsed Laser Deposition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Synthetic and Biological-Derived Hydroxyapatite Implant Coatings

1
National Institute for Lasers, Plasma and Radiation Physics, 077125 Magurele, Romania
2
Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Marmara, Istanbul 34722, Turkey
3
Advanced Nanomaterials Research Laboratory (ANRL), University of Marmara, Istanbul 34722, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2024, 14(1), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14010039
Submission received: 17 December 2023 / Revised: 21 December 2023 / Accepted: 24 December 2023 / Published: 27 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthetic and Biological-Derived Hydroxyapatite Implant Coatings)
Bone and joint defects or diseases, coupled with edentation, pose challenging and commonly encountered clinical issues with a significant incidence in the medical domain. These conditions are primarily attributed to factors such as aging, trauma, infections, tumor resection, or congenital/hereditary disorders. It is important to acknowledge that the prevalence of these medical issues is anticipated to rise further due to the global increase in life expectancy [1]. Currently, orthopedic and dental implants predominantly utilize materials crafted from titanium (Ti) and its medical-grade alloys, owing to their exceptional performance attributes [2]. In recent years, there has been a growing interest among researchers in biodegradable materials, specifically magnesium and its alloys [3]. The need for a secondary surgical intervention to remove the implant, once the tissue has adequately healed, is eliminated when employing biodegradable implants. This stands as one of the most notable advantages associated with this type of devices.
A significant challenge in the biomedical field is the development of implants that can seamlessly integrate into the living body [4]. Despite ongoing efforts to enhance the corrosion resistance (an electrochemical process involving both reduction and oxidation reactions) of metallic materials, the underlying issue continues to be persistent. A viable approach to regulating the corrosion process and inhibiting direct interaction between body fluids and implants involves the use of coatings, which function as protective layers at the human body (“host”)–implant interface [5]. To optimize this interface, the surface of the metallic substrate is typically coated with a bioceramic material. The objective of these coatings is to enhance fixation and expedite the osseointegration rate at the living tissue–implant interface, thereby improving its long-term functionality. Currently, the “gold” standard material utilized for coating implants is hydroxyapatite (HA). HA stands as one of the most extensively researched calcium phosphates (CaPs) for osseointegrative applications, owing to its exceptional biocompatibility [6], high biomineralization capacity, thermodynamic stability in body fluid environments [7], good osteoconductivity [8], and chemical–structural similarity to the inorganic component of human bone tissues [9]. HA can be either synthetically produced or derived from natural resources. It is important to highlight that synthetic HA is typically produced using intricate and chemically demanding protocols [1]. Therefore, an alternative and sustainable approach for HA production involves extracting it from abundant biological resources, such as animal bones resulting from the food-processing industry, fish discards, eggshells, sea shells, corals, and so on) [10,11]. Studies have reported that biological-derived HA (BHA), when compared to synthetic HA, comprises a variety of trace elements (e.g., Na, Mg, Sr, and K) that play specific bio-functional roles [12]. Additionally, BHA exhibits enhanced mechanical performance [13], a more dynamic response to the environment, tends to elicit less intense inflammatory reactions, and has demonstrated excellent biocompatibility, bioactivity, and osseoconduction characteristics [14].
It is worth noting that HA constitutes the primary inorganic component of bone tissue, featuring a structure with a unique affinity that permits a broad range of substitutions and ion doping. This resemblance to the composition found in natural, healthy bones includes elements such as Mg, Si, Zn, Sr, Li, and CO32−. The objective is to foster bone remodeling, exhibit antibacterial activity, and promote enhanced bio-integration.
Among the various surface modification methods, the plasma spray technique is commonly employed in commercial applications to coat implants with bioactive ceramics, particularly HA coatings. Nevertheless, issues have arisen concerning the poor clinical performance of traditional plasma-sprayed coatings. Hence, within this Special Issue, various techniques have been introduced as alternative methods to plasma spray for coating metallic implants across diverse medical applications. These methods encompass, but are not limited to, pulsed laser deposition (PLD), magnetron sputtering (MS), electrophoretic deposition, dip-coating, hydrothermal treatment, and biomimetic coating [1,2,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].
The topic of interest for this Special Issue is, therefore, dedicated to the synthesis and characterization techniques of HA-based coatings. Both synthetic and naturally derived HA materials were considered. One should emphasize that a special focus was dedicated to the preparation of bioactive and biodegradable HA-based biomaterials with tunable properties. These biomaterials are intended for applications in bone repair and regeneration, tissue engineering, orthopedics and biosensing, dental implants, and in vivo applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.D.; writing—original draft preparation, L.D.; writing—review and editing, L.D. and F.N.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

L.D. acknowledges the support from the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization under the Romanian National Core Program LAPLAS VII—contract no. 30N/2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

L.D. and F.N.O. thank all the authors for their contributions to this Special Issue, entitled “Synthetic and Biological-Derived Hydroxyapatite Implant Coatings”, and the editorial staff of the journal Coatings.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Duta, L.; Stan, G.E.; Popescu-Pelin, G.; Zgura, I.; Anastasescu, M.; Oktar, F.N. Influence of Post-Deposition Thermal Treatments on the Morpho-Structural, and Bonding Strength Characteristics of Lithium-Doped Biological-Derived Hydroxyapatite Coatings. Coatings 2022, 12, 1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kylychbekov, S.; Allamyradov, Y.; Khuzhakulov, Z.; Majidov, I.; Banga, S.; ben Yosef, J.; Duta, L.; Er, A.O. Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Hydroxyapatite on Ti6Al4V and Si(100) Surfaces by Pulsed Laser Deposition. Coatings 2023, 13, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vranceanu, D.M.; Ionescu, I.C.; Ungureanu, E.; Cojocaru, M.O.; Vladescu, A.; Cotrut, C.M. Magnesium Doped Hydroxyapatite-Based Coatings Obtained by Pulsed Galvanostatic Electrochemical Deposition with Adjustable Electrochemical Behavior. Coatings 2020, 10, 727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mariani, E.; Lisignoli, G.; Borzì, R.M.; Pulsatelli, L. Biomaterials: Foreign Bodies or Tuners for the Immune Response? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dong, J.; Lin, T.; Shao, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Song, K.; Li, Q. Advances in degradation behavior of biomedical magnesium alloys: A review. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 908, 164600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, H.; Xia, K.; Wang, T.; Niu, J.; Song, Y.; Xiong, Z.; Zheng, K.; Wei, S.; Lu, W. Growth, in vitro biodegradation and cytocompatibility properties of nano-hydroxyapatite coatings on biodegradable magnesium alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 672, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, H.; Camata, R.P.; Vohra, Y.K.; Lacefield, W.R. Control of phase composition in hydroxyapatite/tetracalcium phosphate biphasic thin coatings for biomedical applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2005, 16, 961–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vladescu, A.; Pârâu, A.; Pana, I.; Cotrut, C.M.; Constantin, L.R.; Braic, V.; Vrânceanu, D.M. In vitro activity assays of sputtered HAp coatings with SiC addition in various simulated biological fluids. Coatings 2019, 9, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Graziani, G.; Boi, M.; Bianchi, M. A Review on ionic substitutions in hydroxyapatite thin films: Towards complete biomimetism. Coatings 2018, 8, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oktar, F.N.; Unal, S.; Gunduz, O.; Nissan, B.B.; Macha, I.J.; Akyol, S.; Duta, L.; Ekren, N.; Altan, E.; Yetmez, M. Marine-derived bioceramics for orthopedic, reconstructive and dental surgery applications. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 59, 57–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dorcioman, G.; Grumezescu, V.; Stan, G.E.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Gradisteanu, G.P.; Miculescu, F.; Matei, E.; Popescu-Pelin, G.; Zgura, I.; Craciun, V.; et al. Hydroxyapatite Thin Films of Marine Origin as Sustainable Candidates for Dental Implants. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, B.; Feng, C.; Liu, Y.; Mi, F.; Dong, J. Recent advances in biofunctional guided bone regeneration materials for repairing defective alveolar and maxillofacial bone: A review. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2022, 58, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Duta, L.; Oktar, F.; Stan, G.; Popescu-Pelin, G.; Serban, N.; Luculescu, C.; Mihailescu, I. Novel doped hydroxyapatite thin films obtained by pulsed laser deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 265, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Duta, L.; Neamtu, J.; Melinte, R.P.; Zureigat, O.A.; Popescu-Pelin, G.; Chioibasu, D.; Oktar, F.N.; Popescu, A.C. In Vivo Assessment of Bone Enhancement in the Case of 3D-Printed Implants Functionalized with Lithium-Doped Biological-Derived Hydroxyapatite Coatings: A Preliminary Study on Rabbits. Coatings 2020, 10, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aravindakshan, R.; Saju, K.K.; Aruvathottil Rajan, R. Investigation into Effect of Natural Shellac on the Bonding Strength of Magnesium Substituted Hydroxyapatite Coatings Developed on Ti6Al4V Substrates. Coatings 2021, 11, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Al-Arjan, W.S.; Aslam Khan, M.U.; Nazir, S.; Abd Razak, S.I.; Abdul Kadir, M.R. Development of Arabinoxylan-Reinforced Apple Pectin/Graphene Oxide/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Based Nanocomposite Scaffolds with Controlled Release of Drug for Bone Tissue Engineering: In-Vitro Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Cytotoxicity against MC3T3-E1. Coatings 2020, 10, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hsu, H.-C.; Wu, S.-C.; Lin, C.-Y.; Ho, W.-F. Characterization of Hydroxyapatite/Chitosan Composite Coating Obtained from Crab Shells on Low-Modulus Ti–25Nb–8Sn Alloy through Hydrothermal Treatment. Coatings 2023, 13, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ishizaki, C.; Yabutsuka, T.; Takai, S. Development of Apatite Nuclei Precipitated Carbon Nanotube-Polyether Ether Ketone Composite with Biological and Electrical Properties. Coatings 2020, 10, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Florian, P.E.; Duta, L.; Grumezescu, V.; Popescu-Pelin, G.; Popescu, A.C.; Oktar, F.N.; Evans, R.W.; Roseanu Constantinescu, A. Lithium-Doped Biological-Derived Hydroxyapatite Coatings Sustain In Vitro Differentiation of Human Primary Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Osteoblasts. Coatings 2019, 9, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Parau, A.C.; Dinu, M.; Cotrut, C.M.; Pana, I.; Vranceanu, D.M.; Constantin, L.R.; Serratore, G.; Marinescu, I.M.; Vitelaru, C.; Ambrogio, G.; et al. Effect of Deposition Temperature on the Structure, Mechanical, Electrochemical Evaluation, Degradation Rate and Peptides Adhesion of Mg and Si-Doped Hydroxyapatite Deposited on AZ31B Alloy. Coatings 2023, 13, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Predoi, D.; Iconaru, S.L.; Predoi, M.V. Fabrication of Silver- and Zinc-Doped Hydroxyapatite Coatings for Enhancing Antimicrobial Effect. Coatings 2020, 10, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yu, H.-N.; Hsu, H.-C.; Wu, S.-C.; Hsu, C.-W.; Hsu, S.-K.; Ho, W.-F. Characterization of Nano-Scale Hydroxyapatite Coating Synthesized from Eggshells Through Hydrothermal Reaction on Commercially Pure Titanium. Coatings 2020, 10, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Duta, L.; Popescu, A.C. Current Status on Pulsed Laser Deposition of Coatings from Animal-Origin Calcium Phosphate Sources. Coatings 2019, 9, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Duta, L. In Vivo Assessment of Synthetic and Biological-Derived Calcium Phosphate-Based Coatings Fabricated by Pulsed Laser Deposition: A Review. Coatings 2021, 11, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duta, L.; Oktar, F.N. Synthetic and Biological-Derived Hydroxyapatite Implant Coatings. Coatings 2024, 14, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14010039

AMA Style

Duta L, Oktar FN. Synthetic and Biological-Derived Hydroxyapatite Implant Coatings. Coatings. 2024; 14(1):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14010039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duta, Liviu, and Faik Nüzhet Oktar. 2024. "Synthetic and Biological-Derived Hydroxyapatite Implant Coatings" Coatings 14, no. 1: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14010039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop