Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision-Making Algorithms, Internet of Things Sensing Networks, and Deep Learning-Assisted Smart Process Management in Cyber-Physical Production Systems
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision-Making Algorithms, Smart Factory Performance, and Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems in CPPSs
4. Internet of Things Sensing Networks, Sustainable Product Lifecycle Management, and Real-Time Big Data Analytics in CPPSs
5. Deep Learning-Assisted Smart Process Planning, Internet of Things-Based Real-Time Production Logistics, and Sustainable Industrial Big Data in CPPSs
6. Discussion
7. Synopsis of the Main Research Outcomes
8. Conclusions
9. Limitations, Implications, and Further Directions of Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ma, J.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Zhao, Z. A hybrid modeling methodology for cyber physical production systems: Framework and key techniques. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2021, 15, 773–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Goepp, V.; Siadat, A.; Vernadat, F. A method for supporting the transformation of an existing production system with its integrated Enterprise Information Systems (EISs) into a Cyber Physical Production System (CPPS). Comput. Ind. 2021, 131, 103483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, X.; Zhou, J.; Lin, Y.; Li, Y.; Yu, H.; Liu, Y. Smart manufacturing based on cyber-physical systems and beyond. J. Intell. Manuf. 2019, 30, 2805–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ansari, F.; Khobreh, M.; Seidenberg, U.; Sihn, W. A problem-solving ontology for human-centered cyber physical production systems. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2018, 22, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engel, G.; Greiner, T.; Seifert, S. Ontology-assisted engineering of cyber–physical production systems in the field of process technology. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 2792–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otto, J.; Vogel-Heuser, B.; Niggemann, O. Automatic parameter estimation for reusable software components of modular and reconfigurable cyber-physical production systems in the domain of discrete manufacturing. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, B.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, L.; Xu, W.; Yan, J.; Liu, Q. A function block based cyber-physical production system for physical human–robot interaction. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 48, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biró, M.; Mashkoor, A.; Sametinger, J. Safe and secure cyber-physical systems. J. Softw. Evol. Proc. 2021, 33, e2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, C.; Guo, R.; Liu, C.; Zhong, R.Y.; Xu, X. Data cleansing for energy-saving: A case of cyber-physical machine tools health monitoring system. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 1000–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J.-R. An improved cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0 smart factories. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2018, 10, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leiden, A.; Herrmann, C.; Thiede, S. Cyber-physical production system approach for energy and resource efficient planning and operation of plating process chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 125160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keane, E.; Zvarikova, K.; Rowland, Z. Cognitive automation, big data-driven manufacturing, and sustainable industrial value creation in Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, E. Cognitive automation, business process optimization, and sustainable industrial value creation in artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, A. Internet of Things-enabled smart sustainable cities: Big data-based urban governance, wireless sensor networks, and automated algorithmic decision-making processes. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, E.; Kliestik, T.; Musa, H.; Durana, P. Product decision-making information systems, real-time big data analytics, and deep learning-enabled smart process planning in sustainable Industry 4.0. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, S.; Durana, P.; Konecny, V. Urban Internet of Things systems and interconnected sensor networks in sustainable smart city governance. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balica, R. Automated data analysis in organizations: Sensory algorithmic devices, intrusive workplace monitoring, and employee surveillance. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, G. Sensing, smart, and sustainable technologies in big data-driven manufacturing. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, E. Autonomous vehicle decision-making algorithms and data-driven mobilities in networked transport systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2021, 13, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costea, E.-A. Machine learning-based natural language processing algorithms and electronic health records data. Linguist. Philos. Investig. 2020, 19, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chessell, D.; Neguriță, O. Smart industrial value creation, cyber-physical production networks, and real-time big data analytics in sustainable Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pera, A. Towards effective workforce management: Hiring algorithms, big data-driven accountability systems, and organizational performance. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Throne, O.; Lăzăroiu, G. Internet of Things-enabled sustainability, industrial big data analytics, and deep learning-assisted smart process planning in cyber-physical manufacturing systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyons, N.; Lăzăroiu, G. Addressing the COVID-19 crisis by harnessing Internet of Things sensors and machine learning algorithms in data-driven smart sustainable cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, S. Interconnected sensor networks and decision-making self-driving car control algorithms in smart sustainable urbanism. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekken, G. The algorithmic governance of data driven-processing employment: Evidence-based management practices, artificial intelligence recruiting software, and automated hiring decisions. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, R.; Vochozka, M.; Vrbka, J.; Neguriță, O. Industrial artificial intelligence, smart connected sensors, and big data-driven decision-making processes in Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kral, P.; Janoskova, K.; Podhorska, I.; Pera, A.; Neguriță, O. The automatability of male and female jobs: Technological unemployment, skill shift, and precarious work. J. Res. Gend. Stud. 2019, 9, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nica, E.; Miklencicova, R.; Kicova, E. Artificial intelligence-supported workplace decisions: Big data algorithmic analytics, sensory and tracking technologies, and metabolism monitors. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Davidson, R. Cyber-physical production networks, artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, and big data-driven innovation in Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovacova, M.; Kliestikova, J.; Grupac, M.; Grecu, I.; Grecu, G. Automating gender roles at work: How digital disruption and artificial intelligence alter industry structures and sex-based divisions of labor. J. Res. Gend. Stud. 2019, 9, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Noack, B. Big data analytics in human resource management: Automated decision-making processes, predictive hiring algorithms, and cutting-edge workplace surveillance technologies. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kliestik, T.; Nica, E.; Musa, H.; Poliak, M.; Mihai, E.-A. Networked, smart, and responsive devices in Industry 4.0 manufacturing systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ionescu, L. Digital data aggregation, analysis, and infrastructures in fintech operations. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2020, 19, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyers, T.D.; Vagner, L.; Janoskova, K.; Grecu, I.; Grecu, G. Big data-driven algorithmic decision-making in selecting and managing employees: Advanced predictive analytics, workforce metrics, and digital innovations for enhancing organizational human capital. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, A. Cognitive decision-making algorithms, real-time sensor networks, and Internet of Things smart devices in cyber-physical manufacturing systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popescu, G.H.; Zvarikova, K.; Machova, V.; Mihai, E.-A. Industrial big data, automated production systems, and Internet of Things sensing networks in cyber-physical system-based manufacturing. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, A. Autonomous vehicle driving algorithms and smart mobility technologies in big data-driven transportation planning and engineering. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2021, 13, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, S.O.B.; Lughmani, W.A.; Qureshi, W.S.; Khalid, A.; Mariscal, M.A.; Garcia-Herrero, S. Exploiting visual cues for safe and flexible cyber-physical production systems. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2019, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panetto, H.; Iung, B.; Ivanov, D.; Weichhart, G.; Wang, X. Challenges for the cyber-physical manufacturing enterprises of the future. Annu. Rev. Control 2019, 47, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valaskova, K.; Ward, P.; Svabova, L. Deep learning-assisted smart process planning, cognitive automation, and industrial big data analytics in sustainable cyber-physical production systems. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, E. Smart city software systems and Internet of Things sensors in sustainable urban governance networks. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2021, 13, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konecny, V.; Barnett, C.; Poliak, M. Sensing and computing technologies, intelligent vehicular networks, and big data-driven algorithmic decision-making in smart sustainable urbanism. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2021, 13, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojas, R.A.; Rauch, E. From a literature review to a conceptual framework of enablers for smart manufacturing control. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 104, 517–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Novak, A.; Bennett, D.; Kliestik, T. Product decision-making information systems, real-time sensor networks, and artificial intelligence-driven big data analytics in sustainable Industry 4.0. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mircică, N. Cyber-physical systems for cognitive industrial Internet of Things: Sensory big data, smart mobile devices, and automated manufacturing processes. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, A. Medical wearables and biosensor technologies as tools of Internet of Things-based health monitoring systems. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, M. Artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems, real-time process monitoring, and sustainable industrial value creation in smart networked factories. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, H.; Poliak, M.; Konecny, V. Computationally networked urbanism and data-driven planning technologies in smart and environmentally sustainable cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2021, 13, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordon, A. Autonomous vehicle interaction control software and smart sustainable urban mobility behaviors in network connectivity systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2021, 13, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neubauer, M.; Krenn, F.; Majoe, D.; Stary, C. Subject-orientation as design language for integration across organisational control layers. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 3644–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Donovan, P.; Gallagher, C.; Leahy, K.; O’Sullivan, D.T.J. A comparison of fog and cloud computing cyber-physical interfaces for Industry 4.0 real-time embedded machine learning engineering applications. Comput. Ind. 2019, 110, 12–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, J.; O’Donnell, G. Multi-sensor process analysis and performance characterisation in CNC turning-a cyber physical system approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 92, 855–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossit, D.; Tohmé, F. Scheduling research contributions to smart manufacturing. Manuf. Lett. 2018, 15, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawkins, M. Cyber-physical production networks, Internet of Things-enabled sustainability, and smart factory performance in Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ionescu, D. Deep learning algorithms and big health care data in clinical natural language processing. Linguist. Philos. Investig. 2020, 19, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, A.; Suler, P.; Vrbka, J. Business process optimization, cognitive decision-making algorithms, and artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems in sustainable smart manufacturing. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preuveneers, D.; Ilie-Zudor, E. The intelligent industry of the future: A survey on emerging trends, research challenges and opportunities in Industry 4.0. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 2017, 9, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Edwards, C. Real-time advanced analytics, automated production systems, and smart industrial value creation in sustainable manufacturing Internet of Things. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Townsend, J. Interconnected sensor networks and machine learning-based analytics in data-driven smart sustainable cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2021, 13, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, A. Autonomous vehicle algorithms, big geospatial data analytics, and interconnected sensor networks in urban transportation systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2021, 13, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamilton, S. Real-time big data analytics, sustainable Industry 4.0 wireless networks, and Internet of Things-based decision support systems in cyber-physical smart manufacturing. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popescu Ljungholm, D. Governing self-driving cars: Do autonomous vehicles pose a significant regulatory problem? Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2019, 18, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, J.; Cug, J.; Kolencik, J. Internet of Things-based smart healthcare systems: Real-time patient-generated medical data from networked wearable devices. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suler, P.; Palmer, L.; Bilan, S. Internet of Things sensing networks, digitized mass production, and sustainable organizational performance in cyber-physical system-based smart factories. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, P. Internet of Things sensing infrastructures and urban big data analytics in smart sustainable city governance and management. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2021, 13, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wells, R.; Suler, P.; Vochozka, M. Networked driverless technologies, autonomous vehicle algorithms, and transportation analytics in smart urban mobility systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2021, 13, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghaddam, M.; Cadavid, M.N.; Kenley, C.R.; Deshmukh, A.V. Reference architectures for smart manufacturing: A critical review. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 49, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawson, A. Robotic wireless sensor networks, big data-driven decision-making processes, and cyber-physical system-based real-time monitoring in sustainable product lifecycle management. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovacova, M.; Kliestik, T.; Pera, A.; Grecu, I.; Grecu, G. Big data governance of automated algorithmic decision-making processes. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2019, 18, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, E. Networked and integrated sustainable urban technologies in Internet of Things-enabled smart cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popescu, G.H.; Valaskova, K.; Majerova, J. Real-time sensor networks, advanced robotics, and product decision-making information systems in data-driven sustainable smart manufacturing. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, B. Data-driven Internet of Things systems and urban sensing technologies in integrated smart city planning and management. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2021, 13, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, L.; Zhuravleva, N.A. Autonomous driving perception algorithms and urban mobility technologies in smart transportation systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2021, 13, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jantunen, E.; Gorostegui, U.; Zurutuza, U.; Albano, M.; Ferreira, L.L.; Hegedűs, C.; Campos, J. Remote maintenance support with the aid of cyber-physical systems and cloud technology. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I J. Syst. Control Eng. 2018, 232, 784–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vogel-Heuser, B.; Wildermann, S.; Teich, J. Towards the co-evolution of industrial products and its production systems by combining models from development and hardware/software deployment in cyber-physical systems. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2017, 11, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Suvarna, M.; Yap, K.S.; Yang, W.; Li, J.; Ng, Y.T.; Wang, X. Cyber-physical production systems for data-driven, decentralized, and secure manufacturing—A perspective. Engineering 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, S.; Rowland, Z.; Machova, V. Internet of Things smart devices, sustainable industrial big data, and artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms in cyber-physical system-based manufacturing. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ionescu, D. Semantically enriched Internet of Things sensor data in smart networked environments. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, C. Medical Internet of Things-based healthcare systems: Wearable sensor-based devices, patient-Generated big data, and real-time clinical monitoring. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sinha, D.; Roy, R. Scheduling status update for optimizing age of information in the context of industrial cyber-physical system. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 95677–95695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Q.; Tong, Y.; Wu, S.; Li, D. Modeling, planning, and scheduling of shop-floor assembly process with dynamic cyber-physical interactions: A case study for CPS-based smart industrial robot production. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 3979–3989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Zhou, L.; Ma, Z.; El-Meligy, M.A. Trustworthiness modeling and analysis of cyber-physical manufacturing systems. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 26076–26085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Ouyang, J.; Li, S.; Peng, X. Formal modeling and control of cyber-physical manufacturing systems. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2017, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucker, G. Sustainable product lifecycle management, industrial big data, and Internet of Things sensing networks in cyber-physical system-based smart factories. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wade, K.; Vrbka, J.; Zhuravleva, N.A.; Machova, V. Sustainable governance networks and urban Internet of Things systems in big data-driven smart cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2021, 13, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welch, C. Real-world connected vehicle data, deep learning-based sensing technologies, and decision-making self-driving car control algorithms in autonomous mobility systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2021, 13, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrison, R.; Vera, D.A.; Ahmad, B. A connective framework to support the lifecycle of cyber–physical production systems. Proc. IEEE 2021, 109, 568–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bordel, B.; Alcarria, R.; Robles, T.; Martín, D. Cyber–physical systems: Extending pervasive sensing from control theory to the Internet of Things. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2017, 40, 156–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomiyama, T.; Moyen, F. Resilient architecture for cyber-physical production systems. CIRP Ann. 2018, 67, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weichhart, G.; Panetto, H.; Molina, A. Interoperability in the cyber-physical manufacturing enterprise. Annu. Rev. Control 2021, 51, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, D.; Roy, R. Optimal scheduling for maximizing information freshness and system performance in industrial cyber–physical systems. Comput. Commun. 2021, 169, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pivoto, D.G.S.; de Almeida, L.F.F.; da Rosa Righi, R.; Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.; Baratella Lugli, A.; Alberti, A.M. Cyber-physical systems architectures for industrial internet of things applications in Industry 4.0: A literature review. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 176–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, E. Big data-driven innovation, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, and product decision-making information systems in sustainable Industry 4.0. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graessley, S.; Suler, P.; Kliestik, T.; Kicova, E. Industrial big data analytics for cognitive Internet of Things: Wireless sensor networks, smart computing algorithms, and machine learning techniques. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, S. Wearable Internet of Things healthcare systems: Smart biomedical sensors, wireless connected devices, and real-time patient monitoring. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bergs, T.; Schwaneberg, U.; Barth, S.; Hermann, L.; Grunwald, T.; Mayer, S.; Biermann, F.; Sözer, N. Application cases of biological transformation in manufacturing technology. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2020, 31, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanderson, D.; Chaplin, J.C.; Ratchev, S. A function-behaviour-structure design methodology for adaptive production systems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 3731–3742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Berger, S.; Häckel, B.; Häfner, L. Organizing self-organizing systems: A terminology, taxonomy, and reference model for entities in cyber-physical production systems. Inf. Syst. Front. 2021, 23, 391–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lăzăroiu, G.; Machová, V.; Kucera, J. Connected and autonomous vehicle mobility: Socially disruptive technologies, networked transport systems, and big data algorithmic analytics. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowe, R. Networked and integrated sustainable urban technologies in Internet of Things-enabled smart city governance. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2021, 13, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidson, R. The algorithmic governance of connected autonomous vehicles: Data-driven decision support systems and smart sustainable urban mobility behaviors. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engelsberger, M.; Greiner, T. Dynamic reconfiguration of service-oriented resources in cyber–physical production systems by a process-independent approach with multiple criteria and multiple resource management operations. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 88, 424–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Nie, B.; Zhang, J.; Kumar, P.M.; Muthu, B. Fault detection and diagnosis of cyber-physical system using the computer vision and image processing. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Vengayil, H.; Lu, Y.; Xu, X. A cyber-physical machine tools platform using OPC UA and MTConnect. J. Manuf. Syst. 2019, 51, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durana, P.; Perkins, N.; Valaskova, K. Artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems, real-time advanced analytics, and cyber-physical production networks in sustainable smart manufacturing. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ionescu, L. Big data, blockchain, and artificial intelligence in cloud-based accounting information systems. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, L. Healthcare body sensor networks and smart wearable devices in Internet of Medical Things. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourtzis, D.; Vlachou, E. A cloud-based cyber-physical system for adaptive shop-floor scheduling and condition-based maintenance. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 47, 179–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watkins, D. Real-time big data analytics, smart industrial value creation, and robotic wireless sensor networks in Internet of Things-based decision support systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunningham, E. Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, sustainable organizational performance, and automated production systems in big data-driven smart urban economy. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, S.; Birtus, M. Real-time medical data analytics in Internet of Things-based smart healthcare systems. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cohen, S. Interconnected sensor networks and digital urban governance in data-driven smart sustainable cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2021, 13, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, A. Smart transportation systems: Sustainable mobilities, autonomous vehicle decision-making algorithms, and networked driverless technologies. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mircică, N. Restoring public trust in digital platform operations: Machine learning algorithmic structuring of social media content. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2020, 19, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stehel, V.; Bradley, C.; Suler, P.; Bilan, S. Cyber-physical system-based real-time monitoring, industrial big data analytics, and smart factory performance in sustainable manufacturing Internet of Things. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riley, C.; Vrbka, J.; Rowland, Z. Internet of Things-enabled sustainability, big data-driven decision-making processes, and digitized mass production in Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, H. Sustainable urban governance networks: Data-driven planning technologies and smart city software systems. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, A.; Rowland, Z.; Frajtova Michalikova, K.; Svabova, L. Urban mobility technologies, algorithm-driven sensing devices, and machine learning-based ethical judgments in a connected vehicle environment. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ionescu, L. Robotic process automation, deep learning, and natural language processing in algorithmic data-driven accounting information systems. Anal. Metaphys. 2020, 19, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, H.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Noh, S.D. A dynamic processing methodology of manufacturing data for the automated throughput analysis in cyber-physical production environment. Concurr. Eng. 2019, 27, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cruz Salazar, L.A.; Ryashentseva, D.; Lüder, A.; Vogel-Heuser, B. Cyber-physical production systems architecture based on multi-agent’s design pattern—comparison of selected approaches mapping four agent patterns. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 4005–4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elhabashy, A.E.; Wells, L.J.; Camelio, J.A.; Woodall, W.H. A cyber-physical attack taxonomy for production systems: A quality control perspective. J. Intell. Manuf. 2019, 30, 2489–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gödri, I.; Kardos, C.; Pfeiffer, A.; Váncza, J. Data analytics-based decision support workflow for high-mix low-volume production systems. CIRP Ann. 2019, 68, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coatney, K.; Poliak, M. Cognitive decision-making algorithms, Internet of Things smart devices, and sustainable organizational performance in Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, R.; Poliak, M.; Vrbka, J.; Nica, E. COVID-19 response and recovery in smart sustainable city governance and management: Data-driven Internet of Things systems and Machine learning-based analytics. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, E. Sustainable and smart urban transport systems: Sensing and computing technologies, intelligent vehicular networks, and data-driven automated decision-making. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Jin, C.; Bagheri, B. Cyber physical systems for predictive production systems. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2017, 11, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, G.F.; Wicaksono, H.; Ovtcharova, J. Virtual engineering of cyber-physical automation systems: The case of control logic. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2019, 39, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Francalanza, E.; Borg, J.; Constantinescu, C. A knowledge-based tool for designing cyber physical production systems. Comput. Ind. 2017, 84, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Z.; Jin, Y.; Mingcheng, E.; Li, Q. Method of tasks and resources matching and analysis for cyber-physical production system. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2018, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mladineo, M.; Veza, I.; Gjeldum, N. Solving partner selection problem in cyber-physical production networks using the HUMANT algorithm. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 2506–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duft, G.; Durana, P. Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, automated production systems, and big data-driven innovation in sustainable Industry 4.0. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourke, E.; Kovacova, M.; Kliestikova, J.; Rowland, Z. Smart industrial Internet of Things devices, services, and applications: Ubiquitous sensing and sensory data, predictive analytics algorithms, and cognitive computing technologies. Anal. Metaphys. 2019, 18, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray-Hawkins, M.; Lăzăroiu, G. Industrial artificial intelligence, sustainable product lifecycle management, and Internet of Things sensing networks in cyber-physical smart manufacturing systems. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Cao, S.; Tse, W.; Xu, X. Augmented reality-assisted intelligent window for cyber-physical machine tools. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 44, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vogel-Heuser, B.; Trunzer, E.; Hujo, D.; Sollfrank, M. (Re)deployment of Smart Algorithms in Cyber–Physical Production Systems Using DSL4hDNCS. Proc. IEEE 2021, 109, 542–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penas, O.; Plateaux, R.; Patalano, S.; Hammadi, M. Multi-scale approach from mechatronic to cyber-physical systems for the design of manufacturing systems. Comput. Ind. 2017, 86, 52–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamson, G.; Wang, L.; Moore, P. Feature-based control and information framework for adaptive and distributed manufacturing in cyber-physical systems. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 43, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grundstein, S.; Freitag, M.; Scholz-Reiter, B. A new method for autonomous control of complex job shops—Integrating order release, sequencing and capacity control to meet due dates. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 42, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyers, D. Big data-driven decision-making processes, Industry 4.0 wireless networks, and digitized mass production in cyber-physical system-based smart factories. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2020, 15, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grayson, J. Big data analytics and sustainable urbanism in Internet of Things-enabled smart governance. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, R. Connected and autonomous transport systems: Deep learning-based sensing technologies, data-driven mobilities, and intelligent vehicular networks. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vrabič, R.; Kozjek, D.; Malus, A.; Zaletelj, V.; Butala, P. Distributed control with rationally bounded agents in cyber-physical production systems. CIRP Ann. 2018, 67, 507–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Z.; Jin, Y.; Mingcheng, E.; Li, Q. Distributed dynamic scheduling for cyber-physical production systems based on a multi-agent system. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 1855–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, J.; O’Donnell, G.E. Cyber physical process monitoring systems. J. Intell. Manuf. 2018, 29, 1317–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias-Ferreira, J.; Ribeiro, L.; Akillioglu, H.; Neves, P.; Onori, M. BIOSOARM: A bio-inspired self-organising architecture for manufacturing cyber-physical shopfloors. J. Intell. Manuf. 2018, 29, 1659–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, S.; Wan, J.; Imran, M.; Li, D.; Zhang, C. Cloud-based smart manufacturing for personalized candy packing application. J. Supercomput. 2018, 74, 4339–4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popescu, G.H.; Petreanu, S.; Alexandru, B.; Corpodean, H. Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics, cyber-physical process monitoring systems, and industrial artificial intelligence in sustainable smart manufacturing. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nica, E.; Janoskova, K.; Kovacova, M. Smart connected sensors, industrial big data, and real-time process monitoring in cyber-physical system-based manufacturing. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2020, 8, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, K. Internet of Things-enabled smart devices in medical practice: Healthcare big data, wearable biometric sensors, and real-time patient monitoring. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tang, D.; Zheng, K.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Sang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Espinosa-Oviedo, J.A.; Vargas-Solar, G. Using autonomous intelligence to build a smart shop floor. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 94, 1597–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duffie, N.; Bendul, J.; Knollmann, M. An analytical approach to improving due-date and lead-time dynamics in production systems. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 45, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrower, K. Algorithmic decision-making in organizations: Network data mining, measuring and monitoring work performance, and managerial control. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lăzăroiu, G.; Kliestik, T.; Novak, A. Internet of Things smart devices, industrial artificial intelligence, and real-time sensor networks in sustainable cyber-physical production systems. J. Self Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wingard, D. Data-driven automated decision-making in assessing employee performance and productivity: Designing and implementing workforce metrics and analytics. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 7, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannengiesser, U.; Frysak, J.; Stary, C.; Krenn, F.; Müller, H. Developing an engineering tool for cyber-physical production systems. Elektrotech. Inftech. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreev, V.N.; Charuyskaya, M.A.; Kryzhanovskaya, A.S.; Mursalov, I.D.; Mozharovskaia, A.A.; Chervenkova, S.G. Application of intelligent engineering in the planning of cyber-physical production systems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021, 115, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freier, P.; Schumann, M. Decision support systems in the context of cyber-physical systems: Influencing factors and challenges for the adoption in production scheduling. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 2021, 25, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahid, F.; Tanveer, A.; Kuo, M.M.Y.; Sinha, R. A systematic mapping of semi-formal and formal methods in requirements engineering of industrial cyber-physical systems. J. Intell. Manuf. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, P. Medical big data, body sensor networks, and online patient engagement in artificial intelligence-enabled healthcare delivery. Am. J. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, S.; Kovacova, M.; Valaskova, K. Urban big data and Internet of Things sensing infrastructures in smart and environmentally sustainable cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2020, 12, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, M. Connected and networked driving: Smart mobility technologies, urban transportation systems, and big data-driven algorithmic decision-making. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2020, 12, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhiman, H.; Röcker, C. Middleware for providing activity-driven assistance in cyber-physical production systems. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 2021, 8, 428–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelău, C.; Dabija, D.C.; Ene, I. What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics on the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 122, 106855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valaskova, K.; Durana, P.; Adamko, P. Changes in consumers’ purchase patterns as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kral, P.; Valjaskova, V.; Janoskova, K. Quantitative approach to project portfolio management: Proposal for Slovak companies. Oecon. Copernic. 2019, 10, 797–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kliestik, T.; Belas, J.; Valaskova, K.; Nica, E.; Durana, P. Earnings management in V4 countries: The evidence of earnings smoothing and inflating. Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja 2021, 34, 1452–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ginevicius, R.; Kliestik, T.; Stasiukynas, A.; Suhajda, K. The impact of national economic development on the shadow economy. J. Compet. 2020, 12, 39–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poliak, M.; Svabova, L.; Konecny, V.; Zhuravleva, N.A.; Culik, K. New paradigms of quantification of economic efficiency in the transport sector. Oecon. Copernic. 2021, 12, 193–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanca, L.; Dabija, D.C.; Voj, E. Community of practice: Converting IT graduate students into specialists via professional knowledge sharing. Kybernetes 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Topic | Identified | Selected |
---|---|---|
Cyber-physical production systems | 98 | 42 |
Cyber-physical manufacturing systems | 82 | 30 |
Smart process manufacturing | 63 | 19 |
Smart industrial manufacturing processes | 58 | 16 |
Networked manufacturing systems | 53 | 16 |
Industrial cyber-physical systems | 50 | 15 |
Smart industrial production processes | 46 | 14 |
Sustainable Internet of Things-based manufacturing systems | 39 | 12 |
Type of Paper | ||
Original research | 423 | 159 |
Review | 29 | 5 |
Conference proceedings | 22 | 0 |
Book | 8 | 0 |
Editorial | 7 | 0 |
Intelligent plant modules and smart factory automation have advanced CPPSs that are pivotal in collision identification, impedance monitoring, and assimilating machine learning-based tasks. Wireless sensor technology monitor manufacturing assets and networked production or logistics business operations in real time. Cyber-physical system-based manufacturing configures knowledge-intensive industrial autonomous settings in which smart customized items are produced through deep learning-assisted smart process planning, real-time advanced analytics, and cognitive automation. Groundbreaking technologies furthering cyber-physical enterprise systems regarding real-time decision-making determined from streamlined data necessitate networked sensor and operational systems. The scheduling algorithms can become cognizant of the heterogeneous data coming from the industrial unit in relation to relevance and convenience of the resources when carrying out assignments. | Bell, 2020; Brown et al., 2020; Cohen, 2021; Edwards, 2021; Graessley et al., 2019; Grant, 2021; Hamilton, 2021; Islam et al., 2019; Keane et al., 2020; Lewis, 2020; Ma et al., 2021; Mircică, 2019; Mitchell, 2021; Nelson, 2020; Panetto et al., 2019; Popescu Ljungholm, 2019; Preuveneers and Ilie-Zudor, 2017; Townsend, 2021; Walker, 2020; Wu et al., 2021; Yao et al., 2019 |
Adaptive production systems are crucial in sustainable manufacturing Internet of Things, deriving from the demand for robust characteristics of the system to react to disruption as product changes or alterations to operational parameters. CPPSs autonomously identify and react to inconstant and unplanned situations on the shop floor. Because of the growing volume of modular components and systems, interwoven and heterogeneous factory systems are required for big data-driven decision-making processes and collaborative control in sustainable manufacturing routines. Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics, robotic wireless sensor networks, and deep learning-assisted smart process planning facilitate continuous monitoring of smart shop floors. | Ansari et al., 2018; Balica, 2019; Bennett et al., 2020; Berger et al., 2021; Bergs et al., 2020; Engel et al., 2018; Gibson, 2021; Konecny et al., 2021; Lewis, 2021; Otto et al., 2018; Panetto et al., 2019; Peters et al., 2020; Riley et al., 2021; Sanderson et al., 2019; Stehel et al., 2021; Suler et al., 2021; Suvarna et al., 2021; Valaskova et al., 2021; Wells et al., 2021; Yao et al., 2018 |
In CPPSs, smart connected devices team up automatically to constantly optimize manufacturing processes, manage disturbances, and adjust to variable conditions. The demand for increasingly customized, smart, and sustainable manufactured items and the swift growth of cyber-physical system-based real-time monitoring have resulted in the development of Internet of Things-based decision support systems. The capacity of sustainable cyber-physical production systems to reconfigure in conformity with variable demands enables a rise in deployment and a decrease in expenses and alterations in time. Advancing data-driven monitoring systems and leveraging them across a CPPS platform may result in large-scale supervision and an increase in efficiency during the sustainable product lifecycle management in plants. | Biró et al., 2021; Clarke, 2020; Costea, 2020; Davidson, 2020; Dawson, 2021; Deng et al., 2018; Ionescu, 2019 a; Jiang, 2018; Johnson, 2020; Kovacova et al., 2019; Lăzăroiu et al., 2021; Leiden et al., 2021; Lowe, 2021; Miller, 2020; Mircică, 2020; Moghaddam et al., 2018; Novak et al., 2021; Rojas and Rauch, 2019; Russell, 2020; Taylor, 2021; Walker et al., 2020 |
CPPSs constitute cutting-edge technologies for the adoption of smart manufacturing that is effective only when processing standards and application procedures for the heterogeneous data, which can modify instantaneously due to the character of a factory, are carried out. CPPSs are redesigning hierarchical control arrangements into distributed structures in which the components operate autonomously. Data processing to collect significant information and physical value creation in the production operations can be attained through the assimilation of the enterprise resource coordination and manufacturing execution systems. Embedded and coordinated value networks provide customers with sustainable mass-personalized products and services, and further real-time adaptation to fluid alterations in user demand, shop floor environments, and supply/value networks. | Brown, 2021; Chessell and Neguriță, 2020; Cooper et al., 2021; Cruz Salazar et al., 2019; Dias-Ferreira et al., 2018; Elhabashy et al., 2019; Gordon, 2021; Gödri et al., 2019; Green and Zhuravleva, 2021; Harris, 2021; Jiang et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2019; Morgan and O’Donnell, 2018; Pera, 2019; Popescu et al., 2021; Throne and Lăzăroiu, 2020; Tomiyama and Moyen, 2018; Vrabič et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018 |
Companies expand their product portfolio and try to decrease their manufacturing time to maximize earnings and market presence, indirectly exacerbating the intricacy of the operational processes. The production system has to inspect the tasks to integrate with the smart connected devices and perform them unsupervised and automatically. CPPSs and sustainable manufacturing Internet of Things reconfigure how shop floor operations are designed and carried out. Deployment of artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, real-time sensor networks, and cloud technologies are instrumental in remote maintenance support. | Bekken, 2019; Coatney and Poliak, 2020; Davies, 2020; Jantunen et al., 2018; Lyons and Lăzăroiu, 2020; Miller, 2020; Morgan and O’Donnell, 2017; Neubauer et al., 2017; Nica et al., 2020; O’Donovan et al., 2019; Peters, 2020; Popescu et al., 2020; Rossit and Tohmé, 2018; Scott et al., 2020; Suvarna et al., 2021; Vogel-Heuser et al., 2021 |
Cloud computing and service-oriented designs can network and develop physical factory performance to the cyber world in terms of engineering. By harnessing data-driven modeling, cyber-physical process monitoring systems will reshape manufacturing as intuitive and automated. Smart manufacturing harnesses predictive production systems systematically. In smart industrial units, CPPSs control physical operations, configure a digital duplicate of the physical world, and decisions are decentralized. | Davis et al., 2020; Duffie et al., 2017; Francalanza et al., 2017; Hawkins, 2021; Ionescu, 2020 a, b; Jiang et al., 2018; Kral et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2017; Mladineo et al., 2017; Moore, 2020; Nica et al., 2019; Schneider et al., 2019; Shaw et al., 2021; Tang et al., 2018; Williams, 2020 |
Variable manufacturing systems and product demands derive from inconstant customer behavior. Tools for assessing and managing enhancements in the performance, the soundness, and the responsiveness of manufacturing systems are required. CPPSs improve the flexibility and output of smart manufacturing, adjusting the design and quality of products to fluid market demands and customized requirements. The convergence of standard automation systems within CPPSs, together with service-oriented designs and fog, edge, and cloud computing technologies, are developing sustainable manufacturing Internet of Things and cyber-physical process monitoring systems. | Bourke et al., 2019; Davidson, 2020; Duft and Durana, 2020; Engelsberger and Greiner, 2018; Gray-Hawkins and Lăzăroiu, 2020; Harrower, 2019; He et al., 2021; Kovacova et al., 2019; Lăzăroiu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2019; Noack, 2019; Sinha and Roy, 2019; Tan et al., 2019; Wingard, 2019; Yu et al., 2017 a, b |
Cyber-physical machine tools can develop Industry 4.0-based equipment regarding intelligence and self-governance, by integrating physical devices and machining operations with computation and networking performance. CPPSs provide the technological basis for the digitalization and decentralization of manufacturing processes, and their integration across plant networks. Heterogeneous instantaneous transmission scheduling algorithms handle the distribution of the channel resources, but cyber and physical units have distinct demands to enhance the quality of network performance. The fluid assessment, integration, and positioning of services across CPPSs constitute elements of the process control throughout the consolidated modeling and appraisal of operational phases. | Adamson et al., 2017; Andreev et al., 2021; Durana et al., 2021; Freier and Schumann, 2021; Grundstein et al., 2017; Ionescu, 2019 b; Ionescu, 2020 c; Kannengiesser et al., 2021; Kliestik et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2017; Meyers et al., 2019; Penas et al., 2017; Taylor, 2020; Tucker, 2021; Vogel-Heuser et al., 2017; Wade et al., 2021; Welch, 2021, Zahid et al., 2021 |
CPPSs can be thoroughly and steadily engineered and during their lifecycle in smart manufacturing through Internet of Things sensing networks, real-time process monitoring, and artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms. Artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems necessitate high-performance operations and adjustable production systems by use of flexible and real-time scheduling. Sustainable Industry 4.0 wireless networks can shape effective and robust manufacturing by automatically monitoring production equipment in a flexible fashion. CPPSs ensure a thorough networking of the smart connected devices and resources integrated in manufacturing processes and, consequently, enhanced availability of collected data. Computational devices can be deployed as monitoring and interaction technologies and as heterogeneous collaborative devices and modes of networking to configure crucial tools in operating, maintaining, and upgrading data-driven CPPSs. | Allen, 2020; Bennett, 2021; Bordel et al., 2017; Cunningham, 2021; Davies et al., 2020; Grayson, 2020; Harrison et al., 2021; Hyers, 2020; Mourtzis and Vlachou, 2018; Pivoto et al., 2021; Popescu et al., 2020; Robinson, 2020; Sinha and Roy, 2021; Tomiyama and Moyen, 2018; Smith, 2020; Watkins, 2021; Weichhart et al., 2021; Williams et al., 2020; Wright and Birtus, 2020 Dhiman and Röcker, 2021 |
Intelligent plant modules and smart factory automation have advanced CPPSs that are pivotal in collision identification, impedance monitoring, and assimilating machine learning-based tasks. Wireless sensor technology monitor manufacturing assets and networked production or logistics business operations in real time. Cyber-physical system-based manufacturing configures knowledge-intensive industrial autonomous settings where smart customized items are produced through deep learning-assisted smart process planning, real-time advanced analytics, and cognitive automation. | Brown et al., 2020; Edwards, 2021; Hamilton, 2021; Islam et al., 2019; Mitchell, 2021; Panetto et al., 2019; Popescu Ljungholm, 2019; Preuveneers and Ilie-Zudor, 2017; Townsend, 2021 |
Because of the growing volume of modular components and systems, interwoven and heterogeneous factory systems are required for big data-driven decision-making processes and collaborative control in sustainable manufacturing routines. Internet of Things-based real-time production logistics and deep learning-assisted smart process planning facilitate continuous monitoring of smart shop floors. | Gibson, 2021; Konecny et al., 2021; Lewis, 2021; Suler et al., 2021; Valaskova et al., 2021; Wells et al., 2021 |
In CPPSs, smart connected devices team up automatically to constantly optimize manufacturing processes, manage disturbances, and adjust to variable conditions, articulating the relevance of networking and control systems. The demand for increasingly customized, smart, and sustainable manufactured items and the swift growth of cyber-physical system-based real-time monitoring have resulted in the development of Internet of Things-based decision support systems. | Dawson, 2021; Johnson, 2020; Kovacova et al., 2019; Miller, 2020; Mircică, 2020; Moghaddam et al., 2018; Novak et al., 2021; Rojas and Rauch, 2019 |
Data processing to collect significant information and physical value creation in production operations can be attained through the assimilation of the enterprise resource coordination and manufacturing execution systems. | Brown, 2021; Cooper et al., 2021; Gordon, 2021; Green and Zhuravleva, 2021; Harris, 2021; Popescu et al., 2021 |
CPPSs and sustainable manufacturing Internet of Things reconfigure how shop floor operations are designed and carried out. Deployment of artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, deep learning-assisted smart process planning, real-time sensor networks, and cloud technologies are instrumental in remote maintenance support. | Jantunen et al., 2018; Morgan and O’Donnell, 2017; Neubauer et al., 2017; O’Donovan et al., 2019; Rossit and Tohmé, 2018; Suvarna et al., 2021; Vogel-Heuser et al., 2021 |
Cloud computing and service-oriented designs can network and develop physical factory performance to the cyber world in terms of engineering, monitoring, and Internet of Things sensing networks for increased reliability and resilience. By harnessing data-driven modeling, cyber-physical process monitoring systems will reshape manufacturing as intuitive and automated. | Hawkins, 2021; Ionescu, 2020 a, b; Moore, 2020; Shaw et al., 2021; Williams, 2020 |
CPPSs improve the flexibility and output of smart manufacturing, adjusting the design and quality of products to fluid market demands and customized requirements. The convergence of standard automation systems within CPPSs, together with service-oriented designs and fog, edge, and cloud computing technologies, are developing sustainable manufacturing Internet of Things and cyber-physical process monitoring systems. | Engelsberger and Greiner, 2018; He et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2019; Sinha and Roy, 2019, Tan et al., 2019, Yu et al., 2017 a, b |
Heterogeneous instantaneous transmission scheduling algorithms handle the distribution of the channel resources, but cyber and physical units have distinct demands to enhance the network performance. The fluid assessment, integration, and positioning of services across CPPSs constitute elements of the process control throughout the consolidated modeling and appraisal of operational phases. | Durana et al., 2021; Ionescu, 2019 a; Taylor, 2020; Tucker, 2021; Wade et al., 2021; Welch, 2021 |
CPPSs can be thoroughly and steadily engineered during their lifecycle in smart manufacturing through Internet of Things sensing networks, automated production systems, real-time process monitoring, and artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms. Artificial intelligence data-driven Internet of Things systems necessitate high-performance operations and adjustable production systems by use of flexible and real-time scheduling. | Bordel et al., 2017; Cunningham, 2021; Harrison et al., 2021; Mourtzis and Vlachou, 2018; Pivoto et al., 2021; Sinha and Roy, 2021; Tomiyama and Moyen, 2018, Watkins, 2021; Weichhart et al., 2021; Wright and Birtus, 2020 |
Groundbreaking technologies furthering cyber-physical enterprise systems regarding real-time decision-making determined from streamlined data necessitate networked sensor and operational systems. The scheduling algorithms can become cognizant of the heterogeneous data coming from the industrial unit in relation to relevance and convenience of the resources when carrying out assignments. | Cohen, 2021; Grant, 2021; Graessley et al., 2019; Lewis, 2020; Mircică, 2019; Nelson, 2020 |
Adaptive production systems are crucial in sustainable manufacturing Internet of Things, deriving from the demand for robust characteristics of the system to react to disruption as product changes or alterations to operational parameters. CPPSs autonomously identify and react to inconstant and unplanned situations on the shop floor, enabling interoperable connections among distributed business applications, while rendering supervision of manufacturing processes with first-rate quality and adjustability, and reducing operational risk or unpredictability. | Berger et al., 2021; Bergs et al., 2020; Panetto et al., 2019; Riley et al., 2021; Sanderson et al., 2019; Stehel et al., 2021; Suvarna et al., 2021 |
The capacity of sustainable cyber-physical production systems to reconfigure in conformity with variable demands enables a rise in deployment and a decrease in expenses and alterations in time. Advancing data-driven monitoring systems and leveraging them across a CPPS platform may result in large-scale supervision and an increase in efficiency during sustainable product lifecycle management in plants. | Davidson, 2020; Ionescu, 2019 b; Lăzăroiu et al., 2021; Lowe, 2021; Russell, 2020; Walker et al., 2020 |
CPPSs constitute cutting-edge technologies for the adoption of smart manufacturing that is effective only when processing standards and application procedures for the heterogeneous data that can modify instantaneously due to the character of a factory are carried out. CPPSs are redesigning hierarchical control arrangements into distributed structures in which the components operate autonomously. | Cruz Salazar et al., 2019; Dias-Ferreira et al., 2018; Elhabashy et al., 2019; Gödri et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2019; Morgan and O’Donnell, 2018; Tomiyama and Moyen, 2018; Vrabič et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018 |
Companies expand their product portfolio and try to decrease their manufacturing time to maximize earnings and market presence, indirectly exacerbating the intricacy of the operational processes. The production system has to inspect the tasks to integrate with the smart connected devices and perform them unsupervised and automatically. | Coatney and Poliak, 2020; Miller, 2020; Nica et al., 2020; Peters, 2020; Popescu et al., 2020; Scott et al., 2020 |
Smart manufacturing harnesses predictive production systems systematically: cognitive networked assets can predict, identify cause, and redesign malfunctioning events automatically. In smart industrial units, CPPSs control physical operations, configure a digital duplicate of the physical world, and decisions are decentralized: the virtual world stores and processes networked data in real time. | Duffie et al., 2017; Francalanza et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2017; Mladineo et al., 2017; Schneider et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2018 |
Tools for assessing and managing enhancements in the performance, the soundness, and the responsiveness of manufacturing systems are required, as a decrease in due-date soundness is typically associated with external causes and not with planning behavior. | Bourke et al., 2019; Duft and Durana, 2020; Gray-Hawkins and Lăzăroiu, 2020; Harrower, 2019; Lăzăroiu et al., 2020; Wingard, 2019 |
Cyber-physical machine tools can develop Industry 4.0-based equipment regarding intelligence and self-governance by integrating physical devices and machining operations with computation and networking performance through functional modules. CPPSs provide the technological basis for the digitalization and decentralization of manufacturing processes, and their integration across plant networks. | Adamson et al., 2017; Andreev et al., 2021; Freier and Schumann, 2021; Grundstein et al., 2017; Kannengiesser et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2017; Penas et al., 2017; Vogel-Heuser et al., 2017; Zahid et al., 2021 |
Sustainable Industry 4.0 wireless networks can shape effective and robust manufacturing by automatically monitoring production equipment in a flexible fashion. CPPSs ensure thorough networking of the smart connected devices and resources integrated in manufacturing processes and, consequently, an enhanced availability of collected data. Computational devices can be deployed as monitoring and interaction technologies and as heterogeneous collaborative devices and modes of networking to configure crucial tools in operating, maintaining, and upgrading data-driven CPPSs. | Allen, 2020; Davies et al., 2020; Dhiman and Röcker, 2021; Grayson, 2020; Hyers, 2020; Robinson, 2020; Williams et al., 2020 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Iatagan, M.; Uță, C.; Ștefănescu, R.; Cocoșatu, M. Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision-Making Algorithms, Internet of Things Sensing Networks, and Deep Learning-Assisted Smart Process Management in Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Electronics 2021, 10, 2497. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10202497
Andronie M, Lăzăroiu G, Iatagan M, Uță C, Ștefănescu R, Cocoșatu M. Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision-Making Algorithms, Internet of Things Sensing Networks, and Deep Learning-Assisted Smart Process Management in Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Electronics. 2021; 10(20):2497. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10202497
Chicago/Turabian StyleAndronie, Mihai, George Lăzăroiu, Mariana Iatagan, Cristian Uță, Roxana Ștefănescu, and Mădălina Cocoșatu. 2021. "Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision-Making Algorithms, Internet of Things Sensing Networks, and Deep Learning-Assisted Smart Process Management in Cyber-Physical Production Systems" Electronics 10, no. 20: 2497. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10202497