Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of Several UAV-Based Multispectral Imageries in Monitoring Rice Paddy (A Case Study in Paddy Fields in Tottori Prefecture, Japan)
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Application of Southern U.S. Pine Water Yield for Prioritizing Forest Management Activities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Big Data Management Algorithms, Deep Learning-Based Object Detection Technologies, and Geospatial Simulation and Sensor Fusion Tools in the Internet of Robotic Things

1
Department of Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, 030045 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Juridical Sciences and Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, 500152 Brașov, Romania
3
Radiology Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
4
Grigore Alexandrescu Children’s Emergency Hospital, 011743 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12020035
Submission received: 26 October 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 21 January 2023

Abstract

:
The objective of this systematic review was to analyze the recently published literature on the Internet of Robotic Things (IoRT) and integrate the insights it articulates on big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools. The research problems were whether computer vision techniques, geospatial data mining, simulation-based digital twins, and real-time monitoring technology optimize remote sensing robots. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were leveraged by a Shiny app to obtain the flow diagram comprising evidence-based collected and managed data (the search results and screening procedures). Throughout January and July 2022, a quantitative literature review of ProQuest, Scopus, and the Web of Science databases was performed, with search terms comprising “Internet of Robotic Things” + “big data management algorithms”, “deep learning-based object detection technologies”, and “geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools”. As the analyzed research was published between 2017 and 2022, only 379 sources fulfilled the eligibility standards. A total of 105, chiefly empirical, sources have been selected after removing full-text papers that were out of scope, did not have sufficient details, or had limited rigor For screening and quality evaluation so as to attain sound outcomes and correlations, we deployed AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews), AXIS (Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies), MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool), and ROBIS (to assess bias risk in systematic reviews). Dimensions was leveraged as regards initial bibliometric mapping (data visualization) and VOSviewer was harnessed in terms of layout algorithms.

1. Introduction

Robot navigation and networked robotic algorithms [1,2,3,4], smart sensors, and machine intelligence [5,6,7,8] typify the Internet of Robotic Things (IoRT). Artificial intelligence techniques for robot communication can enhance the interactive performance of multi-robot teams in terms of real-world applications, complex operations, cognitive decision-making algorithms, and coordinated action, carrying out their tasks efficiently. Robot control and operation through artificial intelligence and Internet of Things (IoT) configure systems having increased potential to complete elaborate tasks autonomously and collaboratively. IoT assists robot networking and data transfer, optimizing automated and autonomous communication capabilities throughout inherent asynchronous performance of complex multi-device systems by use of streamlined prediction techniques. IoRT empowers smart interconnected devices in supervising the surrounding operations, making swift decisions, and taking expedient actions, while interactively dealing with unplanned events. Individual robots typically make decisions according to the specific observations and insufficient intelligence capability, resulting in tremendous decision-making intermission and imprecise feedback to dynamic environments. Federated machine learning can thoroughly harness the computation performance of distributed robots to attain shared intelligence, improving the capability of carrying out elaborate and demanding interactive tasks. Spatial data analytics, virtual mapping and navigation tools, machine data fusion, and interoperable production systems [9,10,11,12] are pivotal in smart factory environments. A massive volume of real-time data can be perpetually shared between robotic technologies and the monitoring hub or cloud services by leveraging open wireless communications and operating systems through swarm coordination and optimized functional and operational capabilities. Cyber-physical production and virtual manufacturing systems [13,14,15,16] develop on spatial computing algorithms, sensor data fusion, industrial cloud robotics, and geospatial mapping technologies. IoT robotic platforms integrate dynamic mechanical configurations and digital encoding. Machine learning technologies [17,18,19,20] develop on sensor data and IoRT devices. Collaborative unmanned systems typify efficient robot cooperation with smart interconnected devices. Autonomous manufacturing systems integrate spatial computing technology, real-time machine data, intelligent sensor networks [21,22,23,24], and augmented reality devices. IoRT develops on cloud computing technologies, machine and deep learning algorithms, and big data analytics. Data mining and acquisition tools [25,26,27,28], spatial cognition and swarm intelligence algorithms, predictive smart manufacturing, and digital twin simulations optimize intelligent production systems. Smart factory data, automated simulation modeling, real-time predictive analytics, and enterprise resource planning [29,30,31,32] shape virtual manufacturing systems. Networked sensor-based robotic devices [33,34,35,36] and fog computing systems develop on swarm intelligence algorithms that assist in data acquisition and sharing.
The objective of this systematic review was to analyze the recently published literature on IoRT and integrate the insights it articulates on big data management algorithms [37,38,39,40], deep learning-based object detection technologies [41,42,43,44], and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools [45,46,47,48]. Cooperative unmanned and decentralized tracking systems require mobile clustering algorithms to optimize sensing capabilities. Smart objects can handle contextual data in relation to infrastructure and users through sensors and actuators to infer the environment within semantic IoRT systems and to seamlessly make autonomous decisions. Context-aware IoRT systems develop on sensor data semantic and action modeling tools and on perception and actuation devices. IoT and robotic systems can be optimized with knowledge-based tools and smart connected devices, by integrating semantic layers and context awareness. The actuality and novelty of this paper are configured by addressing how big data processing systems [49,50,51,52] develop data mining techniques [53,54,55,56], IoRT sensors and devices [57,58,59,60], and deep neural networks. Real-time data tracking and monitoring [61,62,63,64], machine vision technology, sensor data processing algorithms [65,66,67,68], and big geospatial data analytics [69,70,71,72] configure smart product innovation and manufacturing system modeling. Our specific contribution is to clarify how mobile connected IoRT devices [73,74,75,76], cloud and pattern recognition technologies, networked robotics, and automated machines [77,78,79,80] configure autonomous manufacturing units in dynamic simulation environments in terms of robotic behavior control, sensor and actuator interconnections, and real-time data processing and analysis [81,82,83,84]. Correlations with previously published literature comprise analyses on how industrial cloud robotics integrates autonomous production systems, smart manufacturing task management [85,86,87,88], simulation optimization algorithms, and data visualization tools, while disparities encompass our integration of the sources on how autonomous robotized devices develop on virtual simulation tools, real-time monitoring capabilities [89,90,91,92], data fusion techniques, and cloud computing algorithms. The research problems are whether computer vision techniques, geospatial data mining [93,94,95,96], simulation-based digital twins, and real-time monitoring technology [97,98,99,100] optimize remote sensing robots [101,102,103,104,105].
Research Problem 1: Image recognition technologies, machining process performance, real-time sensor data, and visual recognition tools shape virtual manufacturing systems and autonomous robotized devices.
Research Problem 2: Virtual data modeling, computer vision and process planning algorithms, and intelligent remote operations further autonomous robotized devices.
Research Problem 3: Virtual machine and computational object instantiation tools, digital twin technology, and real-time operational data assist robotized manufacturing systems.
The manuscript is organized as follows: methodology (Section 2), big data management algorithms in IoRT (Section 3), deep learning-based object detection technologies in IoRT (Section 4), geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in IoRT (Section 5), deployment of CityGML in IoRT (Section 6), discussion (Section 7), conclusions (Section 8), specific contributions to the literature (Section 9), limitations and further directions of research (Section 10), and practical implications (Section 11).

2. Methodology

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were leveraged by a Shiny app to obtain the flow diagram comprising evidence-based collected and managed data (the search results and screening procedures). Throughout January and July 2022, a quantitative literature review of ProQuest, Scopus, and the Web of Science databases was performed, with search terms comprising “Internet of Robotic Things” + “big data management algorithms”, “deep learning-based object detection technologies”, and “geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools”. As the analyzed research was published between 2017 and 2022, only 379 sources fulfilled the eligibility standards. A total of 105, chiefly empirical, sources have been selected after removing full-text papers that were out of scope, did not have sufficient details, or had limited rigor (Table 1 and Table 2). For screening and quality evaluation so as to attain sound outcomes and correlations, we deployed AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews), AXIS (Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies), MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool), and ROBIS (to assess bias risk in systematic reviews). Dimensions was leveraged as regards initial bibliometric mapping (data visualization) and VOSviewer was harnessed in terms of layout algorithms (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Citation correlations have covered how smart interconnected objects and technologies, IoRT devices and wireless networks, and sensors and actuators are necessitated in performance evaluation and analysis of autonomous robotic and motion capture systems. Product lifecycle data, remote sensor networks, machine vision algorithms, and data visualization and processing capabilities optimize immersive 3D and smart manufacturing technologies. Data monitoring and predictive control algorithms, cognitive computing systems, digital mapping tools, and sensing data fusion shape automated manufacturing and product development processes. Spatial recognition and immersive virtual technologies, data mining tools, neural network and computer vision algorithms, and advanced automation equipment optimize smart production planning and manufacturing environments.

3. Big Data Management Algorithms in IoRT

Cloud computing and wireless communication technologies [1,2,3,4] integrate industrial machines, smart sensors, heterogeneous sensor devices, big data management algorithms, and autonomous robots. Machine learning technologies develop on sensor data and IoRT devices. Robot navigation and networked robotic algorithms, smart sensors, and machine intelligence typify IoRT. Spatial data analytics, virtual mapping and navigation tools, machine data fusion, and interoperable production systems are pivotal in smart factory environments. Cyber-physical production and virtual manufacturing systems develop on spatial computing algorithms, sensor data fusion, industrial cloud robotics, and geospatial mapping technologies. Automated data transmission, sensor data, industrial manufacturing processes, and machine learning techniques [5,6,7,8] configure networked autonomous plants and sensor technologies. Autonomous manufacturing systems integrate spatial computing technology, real-time machine data, intelligent sensor networks, and augmented reality devices. Data mining and acquisition tools, spatial cognition and swarm intelligence algorithms, predictive smart manufacturing, and digital twin simulations optimize intelligent production systems. Real-time monitoring industrial sensing and swarm robotic systems, in addition to cloud computing, imaging, and sensing technologies [9,10,11,12] articulate industrial manufacturing processes. Cloud robotics develops on robotic operating systems and devices and on autonomous industrial and remote sensing robots. Unmanned robotic networks and operating systems optimize industrial robot performance and products. Autonomous robotized devices develop on virtual simulation tools, real-time monitoring capabilities, data fusion techniques, and cloud computing algorithms. Automated simulation modeling, digital twin capabilities, remote sensing and edge intelligence technologies, and spatial cognition algorithms shape virtual robotic environments.
IoRT-based big data mining and analysis, cloud computing and big data technologies, and smart devices [13,14,15,16] shape contextual awareness in uncontrolled environments. Big data processing systems develop on data mining techniques, IoRT sensors and devices, and deep neural networks. Industrial cloud robotics integrate autonomous production systems, smart manufacturing task management, simulation optimization algorithms, and data visualization tools. Robotized manufacturing systems harness cloud computing technologies, intelligent manufacturing equipment, geospatial mapping and decision support tools, and virtual twinning techniques. Collaborative interoperable networked unmanned systems [17,18,19,20] deploy intelligent virtual agents, computation technologies and algorithms, and sensor networks. Cooperative mobile sensing networks require collaborative robots, edge computing technologies, and machine intelligence. Swarm robotic behaviors integrate cognitive robotics, deep and machine learning algorithms, and data communication networks. Real-time data tracking and monitoring, machine vision technology, sensor data processing algorithms, and big geospatial data analytics configure smart product innovation and manufacturing system modeling. Data visualization capabilities and modeling techniques, synthetic data tools, mobility data processing, real-time operational data, and image processing tools articulate autonomous robotic and motion capture systems.
IoRT-based manipulation and 3D object recognition and tracking tasks can be carried out in unstructured environments [21,22,23,24] by leveraging robotic systems, cloud computing technologies, big data analytics, and machine and deep learning algorithms in terms of robust perceptual capabilities and reliable visual data. Robotic systems require effective sensor-based perceptual capabilities in terms of 3D object recognition and visual depth data to carry out manipulation tasks coherently across unstructured environments. Robotic operating systems deploy computer vision and simulation modeling algorithms, cognitive data analytics, and spatial data visualization tools. Computer vision techniques, geospatial data mining, simulation-based digital twins, and real-time monitoring technology optimize remote sensing robots. Machine data mining, dynamic mapping processes, cognitive data visualization, predictive modeling techniques, and real-time data processing optimize autonomous manufacturing control. IoT-based robots and robotic systems [25,26,27,28] necessitate environmental location and sound recognition tools, context awareness data, and artificial neural networks to assist in decision making processes. Context awareness data, environmental location, and inference mechanisms enhance autonomous robot decision-making processes in dynamic environments through sensor-based motion control. Sensor technologies and actuators integrated in IoT-based robots can articulate multi-robot system collective behavior, coordination, and control. Cloud computing tools and sensing and semantic technologies can assess real-time performance of mobile robot swarms. Real-time monitoring of IoT-enabled robotic swarms is enabled by deep learning techniques, cognitive algorithmic processes and automation technologies, and cloud networked robotics. Cognitive manufacturing systems, plant equipment diagnosis, and factory floor data articulate industrial robotic networks. Smart factory data, automated simulation modeling, real-time predictive analytics, and enterprise resource planning shape virtual manufacturing systems. Tracking mobile IoRT devices [29,30,31,32] is instrumental in robotic operating and fog computing network systems. Computer vision-based systems, intelligent sensing devices, industrial product lifecycle management, and digital twin modeling configure networked cloud robotics. Cyber-physical production and robotized manufacturing systems integrate cloud computing technologies, data mining and predictive modeling algorithms, and virtual mapping tools. Multiple robots can interconnect efficiently to complete tasks and have collective operation performance optimized by IoRT and fog computing network systems. Mobile robot devices connected to a fog computing network can transfer several difficult computing operations to the connected fog node and thus having growing processing performance, decreasing computing time intermission and energy use cost, as their communication capabilities are significantly adjustable to carry out complex tasks while organizing and taking measures in unexpected situations. IoRT-based operational technologies [33,34,35,36] are pivotal in robot trajectory tracking in dynamic mobile environments and as regards functional interoperability, data integration complexity, and structural connectivity in industrial systems through big data management algorithms. Image recognition technologies, machining process performance, real-time sensor data, and visual recognition tools shape virtual manufacturing systems and autonomous robotized devices. Cloud computing and spatial data analytics, data-driven decision support, machine learning algorithms, and smart process planning assist virtual equipment systems and robotic environments. Trajectory tracking of mobile robots can be optimized through spatial simulation algorithms. Operational and data technologies assist industrial systems in terms of structural connectivity (Table 3).

4. Deep Learning-Based Object Detection Technologies in IoRT

Spatial clustering of sensing capabilities, deep learning-based object detection technologies, noise algorithms, and networked scheduling mechanisms and communication objects [37,38,39,40] enable robot control and decentralized tracking systems. Virtual data modeling, computer vision and process planning algorithms, and intelligent remote operations further autonomous robotized devices. Predictive modeling and computational prediction tools, sensor data fusion, and digital twin-based monitoring optimize virtual robotic environments. Network scheduling mechanisms assist robotic systems in performing tasks by transferring communication data. Actuation and control methods assist IoRT physical and virtual devices across monitoring and managing context-aware perception and modeling systems [41,42,43,44] by use of multi-agent systems, cloud computing technologies, and failure checking techniques. Robot learning and cloud computing algorithms, cyber-physical cognitive systems, real-time data simulation, and virtual twin modeling configure smart manufacturing plants. Smart production management, remote sensing and immersive visualization systems, virtual simulation algorithms, and data-driven planning technologies articulate autonomous manufacturing processes. Product development processes and intelligent manufacturing equipment require remote sensing and cognitive computing systems, virtual data modeling, synthetic data tools, and smart connected devices. IoRT integrates cloud tools, algorithmic machines, and multi-agent agents.
Remote robotic cooperation and streaming workflow optimize computer simulation and modeling of data sharing processes [45,46,47,48] through networked cloud robotics, robot clusters, and heuristic algorithms. Predictive maintenance tools, simulation modeling processes, smart production systems, and automated assembly machines are pivotal in industrial cloud robotics. Virtual machine and computational object instantiation tools, digital twin technology, and real-time operational data assist robotized manufacturing systems. Computation offloading necessitates networked cloud robotics, task semantics, big data clusters, and heuristic algorithms for energy efficiency, decreased execution times, and low operating costs, leading to relevant performance gains. Remotely monitoring pervasively embedded connected sensors, automation systems, and smart objects [49,50,51,52] enhance accuracy and robustness of wireless sensor networks and ambient intelligence technologies. Mobile connected IoRT devices, cloud and pattern recognition technologies, networked robotics, and automated machines configure autonomous manufacturing units in dynamic simulation environments in terms of robotic behavior control, sensor and actuator interconnections, and real-time data processing and analysis. Deep reinforcement learning algorithms and visual navigation tools assist autonomous robotic systems in real-time intelligent sensor data sharing. Object recognition algorithms in wireless sensor networks require accuracy and robustness of ambient intelligence technologies in terms of computation time and localization techniques by use of virtual simulation modeling tools. Reinforcement learning algorithms and IoRT can improve behavior control and real-time remote monitoring of autonomous robotic systems in smart environments by use of big data technologies, computer vision tools, and connected sensors. Environment mapping algorithms and spatial simulation tools can manage deep learning-based robotic behavior control in uncertain environments through visual perception and navigation technologies, handling real-world task complexities.
Interoperable connected devices and cyber–physical systems shape autonomous robot coordination [53,54,55,56] by use of visual sensors in terms of data sharing, storage, and analysis. Virtual simulation modeling, data mining and reinforcement learning algorithms, product lifecycle monitoring, and smart process planning configure robotic operating systems. Process mining techniques, predictive simulation tools, computer vision algorithms, and digital twin technologies further remote sensing robots. Internet-connected devices and environment mapping algorithms can monitor autonomous robotic systems and processes through networked robot-based data fusion and visual data sensing and processing for improved performance of mobile operation guidance and control. Cyber–physical systems can enhance the interoperability of coordinated devices and of autonomous robots. Robot sensing systems integrate semantic technology for device coordination. Fog, edge, and cloud technologies, big data analysis tools, and sensor devices [57,58,59,60] further IoRT networks and assist in processing, sharing, networking, and storing data. As regards business process interconnection, IoRT require real-time accurate data analysis and deep learning-based object detection technologies while taking into account the computational complexity of sensing data. Intelligent manufacturing environments and cyber-physical production systems develop on decision-making process automation, digital twin and cloud computing technologies, and smart infrastructure sensors. Remote sensing and computing technologies can determine swarm robotic behaviors through spatial data collection and handling across interconnected networks of smart sensors for IoT-based business process efficiency. The computational complexity of edge and cloud intelligence, real-time sensing data analysis, decentralized architecture of smart interconnected devices, and scalable analytic tools typify blockchain-based Industrial IoT networks.
Decision-making and assessment support of data networks, tools, and modeling [61,62,63,64] determine internal states of real-time data processes across IoRT networks. Performance evaluation of perception inference assessment tools in autonomous robotic and motion capture systems requires data-driven techniques, environmental parameters, decision tree algorithms, and simulation data mining. Modeling and simulation tools, real-time data collection, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and sensor measurement shape autonomous robotic and motion capture systems. Virtual simulation modeling and motion capture tools require real-time data collection through artificial intelligence planning software for robotic autonomous systems. IoRT sensor and module networking and operating embedded control systems [65,66,67,68] advance scalable data computation and efficient processes across industrial environments. Digital twin-based product development, virtual data analytics, machining process monitoring, and performance prediction tools articulate industrial robotic networks. Cognitive data visualization, condition monitoring data, virtual modeling technology, and assembly process planning optimize networked cloud robotics. Real-time massive data computation develops on IoT-based measurement unit devices and flexibility and scalability of robotic autonomous systems in industrial environments. (Table 4).

5. Geospatial Simulation and Sensor Fusion Tools in the IoRT

IoRT networks seamlessly integrate autonomous smart devices, geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools, intelligent techniques and machines, and deep and machine learning algorithms [69,70,71,72] that are pivotal in industrial data processing and computation. Smart interconnected objects and technologies, IoRT devices and wireless networks, and sensors and actuators are necessitated in performance evaluation and analysis of autonomous robotic and motion capture systems. Data visualization and virtual simulation tools, remote sensing technologies, and smart product development are pivotal in manufacturing process performance and execution systems. Product lifecycle data, virtual simulation tools, intelligent sensing devices, and augmented reality capabilities articulate process manufacturing and cognitive computing systems. Seamless integration of smart devices in IoT-based embedded systems necessitates object recognition algorithms, multi-sensor fusion technology, and geospatial data mining tools across intelligent industrial infrastructure. Industry 4.0 wireless networks and robotic autonomous systems develop on IoT-based interconnected smart devices and deep and machine learning algorithms. Fog and edge computing technologies assist the decentralized architecture of IoRT devices [73,74,75,76] in terms of data scalability and interoperability. Autonomous robotized devices require immersive visualization systems, real-time operational data, cognitive automation and extended reality technologies, and virtual simulation modeling. Data visualization tools, sensing and computing technologies, predictive maintenance tools, and virtual reality mapping configure virtual robotic environments. Virtual process simulation, edge computing algorithms, interoperable automation systems, and production process modeling articulate remote sensing robots. Predictive simulation and virtual reality modeling tools, remote sensing data, image processing techniques, and fault diagnosis systems shape networked cloud robotics.
Computing task optimization, data processing and replication mechanisms, and sound IoRT techniques and algorithms [77,78,79,80] configure autonomous decentralized robotic systems and functionalities. Blockchain-based robotic and cloud computing technologies optimize data analysis tools in terms of efficiency and accuracy, visual navigation efficiency, situation awareness and control systems, and task allocations across decentralized multi-agent robotic systems. Data accuracy, reliability, and accessibility are instrumental in complex task achievement by swarm robotics systems in unstructured dynamic environments. IoRT data management requires smart autonomous robot systems and networks in complex task distributions. Ground mobile robots integrate distributed situation awareness and control systems in making rapid decisions and performing complex tasks in dynamic unstructured environments by use of mapping and navigation tools in terms of virtual simulation modeling and geospatial data mining. Multi-agent decentralized autonomous robotic systems developed on blockchain and cloud computing technologies require dynamic analysis tools as regards task allocations. Sustainable production and business development can be attained in cyber–physical systems by use of IoRT devices, deep and machine learning-based decision making, and pervasive computing and cloud technologies [81,82,83,84], increasing data monitoring accuracy. Autonomous robotic and motion capture systems integrate computer vision algorithms, context-aware event processing, and data mining techniques. Autonomous monitoring of data governance, collection, and analysis across IoRT networks is pivotal in network connectivity, geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools, remote business process management, and cloud and edge computing systems. Product lifecycle data, remote sensor networks, machine vision algorithms, and data visualization and processing capabilities optimize immersive 3D and smart manufacturing technologies. Data monitoring and predictive control algorithms, cognitive computing systems, digital mapping tools, and sensing data fusion shape automated manufacturing and product development processes. Industrial IoT-based business process management of complex unstructured events integrates object localization algorithms, geospatial mapping tools, and multi-sensor fusion technology.
Routing efficiency and scalability of mobile robots can be achieved through autonomous robot coordination in dynamic decentralized environments and across wireless wearable sensor networks [85,86,87,88] by integrating blockchain technologies, remote sensing environmental data, and sensor-based deep learning techniques. Industrial cloud robotics develops on preventive maintenance scheduling, product condition monitoring, data-driven planning technologies, and augmented reality algorithms. Product simulation models, data mining and spatio-temporal fusion algorithms, remote sensing technologies, and decision support tools optimize robotized manufacturing systems. IoRT devices accurately process and analyze collected data [89,90,91,92] by deploying image recognition technology, geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools, and intelligent optimization algorithms. By collecting and processing heterogeneous networked industrial data, IoRT devices and cyber–physical systems assist in knowledge representation and transfer and in collaborative optimization of production performance throughout pervasive computing environments. Machine learning techniques, real-time data monitoring, interconnected sensor networks, and blockchain technologies configure smart process manufacturing and automation systems. Edge computing and digital manufacturing technologies integrate product lifecycle management, real-time process monitoring, interactive data visualization, and virtual simulation modeling.
Robot-based assistance of IoT-enabled edge computing technologies [93,94,95,96] requires blockchain-enabled edge computing systems, heterogeneous computational collective intelligence and processes, and distributed edge devices and algorithms. Networked sensor-based robotic devices and fog computing systems develop on swarm intelligence algorithms that assist in data acquisition and sharing. Virtual simulation tools, spatial computing technologies, digital twin modeling, and remote sensing data are pivotal in robotic operating systems. Industrial robotic networks integrate virtual machining systems, spatial data visualization tools, data-driven planning technologies, and process mining tools. Edge computing technologies and networking capabilities enable self-organization of computational collective intelligence as regards robotic behavior and multi-agent systems through simulation operations in realistic settings. IoRT integrates fog computing networks for real-time data gathering and sharing. IoRT-enabled edge computing technologies harness swarm intelligence algorithms in intelligent decision-making processes. Data acquisition through collaborative tasks optimize robot network clusters and wireless sensor networks. IoRT-based machine learning techniques and data processing [97,98,99,100] integrate multi-sensor data fusion and deep reinforcement learning algorithms, in addition to cloud, edge, and fog computing technologies. Autonomous robotic and motion capture systems develop on machine and deep learning algorithms and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools as regards big data heterogeneity and complexity. Visual surveillance and data mining tools, virtual modeling technology, production process optimization, and digital twin modeling further smart manufacturing systems. Data mining techniques and processing capabilities, industrial process monitoring, smart spatial planning, and real-time sensor data typify virtual manufacturing systems. Machine learning techniques further IoT data processing and smart device interconnection. Robot visual control systems enhance learning efficiency and decision processes throughout heterogeneous time-varying motion phases. IoRT devices and machine intelligence develop on swarm robot and machine learning-based perception algorithms [101,102,103,104,105] to attain optimal routing path and network performance. Autonomous robotic and motion capture systems harness task scheduling and cloud computing algorithms across wireless sensor networks. Sensor control and visual perception algorithms further industrial data sharing, storage, mining, and analysis. Machine and reinforcement learning algorithms and distributed wireless sensor networks articulate autonomous routing decisions and enhance big data scalability. Spatial recognition and immersive virtual technologies, data mining tools, neural network and computer vision algorithms, and advanced automation equipment optimize smart production planning and manufacturing environments. IoRT requires coherent data transmission, mining, and analysis across task scheduling and operation mechanisms. IoRT integrates wireless sensor networks and machine learning algorithms to complete tasks and connectivity maintenance for data gathering and collaborative movements. (Table 5).

6. Deployment of CityGML in IoRT

CityGML was adjusted to the purposes of our systematic review in relation to IoRT in terms of landscape planning, modelled data objects, and 3D geospatial data configured through sensors and simulations (Figure 6). Artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms, biometric sensor and immersive 3D technologies, and event modeling and forecasting tools articulate big-data-driven cognitive manufacturing. Decision intelligence and modeling tools, visual imagery technologies, and spatial computing algorithms assist interconnected virtual services in cyber-physical management systems [106,107,108]. Predictive modeling tools and visual perception algorithms enable ambient sound recognition software across IoT sensing networks. Spatial cognition algorithms, deep learning-based ambient sound processing, and behavioral predictive analytics configure IoRT-based geospatial simulation systems [109,110,111,112]. Sensing and computing technologies, cognitive artificial intelligence algorithms, and visual imagery tools further immersive digital simulations. Ambient sound recognition and processing tools, visual perception algorithms, and remote sensing technologies articulate predictive geospatial modeling. Remote big data management tools, deep learning-based sensing technologies, and environment mapping algorithms shape visual and spatial analytics in IoRT. Virtual simulation algorithms, visual perception technologies, and geospatial mapping tools optimize behavioral analytics in immersive work environments [113,114,115,116]. Spatial analytics harnesses virtual navigation tools and cognitive artificial intelligence and object tracking algorithms. Object recognition algorithms, machine perception technologies, and data visualization tools enable simulation modeling processes. Spatial cognition and visual perception algorithms and deep neural network and remote sensing technologies are pivotal in IoRT-based geospatial simulation systems. Geospatial mapping technologies, decision and control algorithms, and deep learning artificial intelligence tools assist digital twin modeling in IoRT. Immersive, virtual, and cognitive technologies develop on movement and behavior tracking tools and image processing computational algorithms [117,118,119,120]. Virtual navigation tools, multisensor fusion technologies, and deep learning computer vision and image processing computational algorithms are pivotal in immersive shared spaces. Object perception and motion planning algorithms and spatial data acquisition and ambient scene detection tools further spatial computing and immersive technologies in the virtual economy. Motion control and context awareness algorithms and virtual navigation and data mining tools shape immersive technologies in geospatial simulation systems. IoRT integrates visual cognitive algorithms, dynamic routing technologies, and simulation modeling tools in the virtual economy [121,122,123,124]. Behavioral predictive analytics deploys simulation modeling tools, machine and deep learning algorithms, and spatial computing and immersive technologies. Acoustic environment recognition algorithms and visual imagery and remote sensing tools optimize spatial computing and immersive technologies. Perception and cognition algorithms, vision sensing and image recognition technologies, and spatial awareness tools develop on virtual modeling processes. Movement and behavior tracking tools, computer and machine vision algorithms, and deep learning-based image classification systems are instrumental in haptic and biometric sensor technologies [125,126,127,128].

7. Discussion

Autonomous monitoring of data governance, collection, and analysis across IoRT networks [1,2,3,4] is pivotal in network connectivity [5,6,7,8], geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools [9,10,11,12], remote business process management [13,14,15,16], and cloud and edge computing systems. Modeling and simulation tools [17,18,19,20], real-time data collection, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and sensor measurement [21,22,23,24] shape autonomous robotic and motion capture systems. Machine learning techniques, real-time data monitoring, interconnected sensor networks [25,26,27,28], and blockchain technologies configure smart process manufacturing and automation systems. Virtual process simulation, edge computing algorithms, interoperable automation systems [29,30,31,32], and production process modeling [33,34,35,36] articulate remote sensing robots. Predictive maintenance tools, simulation modeling processes, smart production systems [37,38,39,40], and automated assembly machines [41,42,43,44] are pivotal in industrial cloud robotics. Data visualization capabilities and modeling techniques [45,46,47,48], synthetic data tools, mobility data processing, real-time operational data [49,50,51,52], and image processing tools articulate autonomous robotic and motion capture systems. Data visualization tools, sensing and computing technologies [53,54,55,56], predictive maintenance tools, and virtual reality mapping configure virtual robotic environments. Visual surveillance and data mining tools [57,58,59,60], virtual modeling technology, production process optimization [61,62,63,64], and digital twin modeling further smart manufacturing systems. Cognitive data visualization, condition monitoring data [65,66,67,68], virtual modeling technology, and assembly process planning [69,70,71,72] optimize networked cloud robotics. Cooperative mobile sensing networks [73,74,75,76] require collaborative robots, edge computing technologies, and machine intelligence. Digital twin-based product development, virtual data analytics, machining process monitoring [77,78,79,80], and performance prediction tools articulate industrial robotic networks. Intelligent manufacturing environments and cyber-physical production systems [81,82,83,84] develop on decision-making process automation [85,86,87,88], digital twin and cloud computing technologies, and smart infrastructure sensors. Machine and reinforcement learning algorithms and distributed wireless sensor networks [89,90,91,92] articulate autonomous routing decisions and enhance big data scalability. Swarm robotic behaviors integrate cognitive robotics, deep and machine learning algorithms, and data communication networks. Industrial robotic networks integrate virtual machining systems, spatial data visualization tools, data-driven planning technologies [93,94,95,96], and process mining tools. Smart production management, remote sensing and immersive visualization systems, virtual simulation algorithms, and data-driven planning technologies [97,98,99,100] articulate autonomous manufacturing processes. Cyber-physical production and robotized manufacturing systems [101,102,103,104,105] integrate cloud computing technologies, data mining and predictive modeling algorithms [106,107,108], and virtual mapping tools.
Artificial intelligence techniques for robot communication can enhance the interactive performance of the multi-robot team in terms of real-world applications, complex operations, cognitive decision-making algorithms, and coordinated action, carrying out their tasks efficiently. A massive volume of real-time data can be perpetually shared between robotic technologies and the monitoring hub or cloud services by leveraging open wireless communications and operating systems through swarm coordination and optimized functional and operational capabilities. Context-aware IoRT systems develop on sensor data semantic and action modeling tools and on perception and actuation devices. Real-time monitoring of IoT-enabled robotic swarms is enabled by deep learning techniques, cognitive algorithmic processes and automation technologies, and cloud networked robotics. Computation offloading necessitates networked cloud robotics, task semantics, big data clusters, and heuristic algorithms for energy efficiency, decreased execution times, and low operating costs, leading to relevant performance gains. Remote sensing and computing technologies can determine swarm robotic behaviors through spatial data collection and handling across interconnected networks of smart sensors for IoT-based business process efficiency. Ground mobile robots integrate distributed situation awareness and control systems in making rapid decisions and performing complex tasks in dynamic unstructured environments by use of mapping and navigation tools in terms of virtual simulation modeling and geospatial data mining. Data acquisition through collaborative tasks optimize robot network clusters and wireless sensor networks.
Robot control and operation through artificial intelligence and IoT configure systems having increased potential to complete elaborate tasks autonomously and collaboratively. IoT robotic platforms integrate dynamic mechanical configurations and digital encoding. IoT and robotic systems can be optimized with knowledge-based tools and smart connected devices, by integrating semantic layers and context awareness. Multiple robots can interconnect efficiently to complete tasks and have collective operation performance optimized by IoRT and fog computing network systems. Object recognition algorithms in wireless sensor networks require accuracy and robustness of ambient intelligence technologies in terms of computation time and localization techniques by use of virtual simulation modeling tools. Computational complexity of edge and cloud intelligence, real-time sensing data analysis, decentralized architecture of smart interconnected devices, and scalable analytic tools typify blockchain-based Industrial IoT networks. Multi-agent decentralized autonomous robotic systems developed on blockchain and cloud computing technologies require dynamic analysis tools as regards task allocations. Machine learning techniques further IoT data processing and smart device interconnection.
IoT assists robot networking and data transfer, optimizing automated and autonomous communication capabilities throughout inherent asynchronous performance of complex multi-device systems by use of streamlined prediction techniques. Collaborative unmanned systems typify efficient robot cooperation with smart interconnected devices. Robotic systems require effective sensor-based perceptual capabilities in terms of 3D object recognition and visual depth data to carry out manipulation tasks coherently across unstructured environments. Mobile robot devices connected to a fog computing network can transfer several difficult computing operations to the connected fog node and thus have growing processing performance, decreasing computing time intermission and energy use cost, as their communication capabilities are significantly adjustable to carry out complex tasks while organizing and taking measures in unexpected situations. Reinforcement learning algorithms and IoRT can improve behavior control and real-time remote monitoring of autonomous robotic systems in smart environments by use of big data technologies, computer vision tools, and connected sensors. Virtual simulation modeling and motion capture tools require real-time data collection through artificial intelligence planning software for robotic autonomous systems. Industrial IoT-based business process management of complex unstructured events integrates object localization algorithms, geospatial mapping tools, and multi-sensor fusion technology. Robot visual control systems enhance learning efficiency and decision processes throughout heterogeneous time-varying motion phases.
IoRT empowers smart interconnected devices in supervising the surrounding operations, making swift decisions, and taking expedient actions, while interactively dealing with unplanned events. IoRT develops on cloud computing technologies, machine and deep learning algorithms, and big data analytics. Context awareness data, environmental location, and inference mechanisms enhance autonomous robot decision-making processes in dynamic environments through sensor-based motion control. Trajectory tracking of mobile robots can be optimized through spatial simulation algorithms. Operational and data technologies assist industrial systems in terms of structural connectivity. Environment mapping algorithms and spatial simulation tools can manage deep learning-based robotic behavior control in uncertain environments through visual perception and navigation technologies, handling real-world task complexities. Real-time massive data computation develops on IoT-based measurement unit devices and flexibility and scalability of robotic autonomous systems in industrial environments. Edge computing technologies and networking capabilities enable self-organization of computational collective intelligence as regards robotic behavior and multi-agent systems through simulation operations in realistic settings. IoRT requires coherent data transmission, mining, and analysis across task scheduling and operation mechanisms.
Individual robots typically make decisions according to the specific observations and insufficient intelligence capability, resulting in tremendous decision-making intermission and imprecise feedback to dynamic environments. Cooperative unmanned and decentralized tracking systems require mobile clustering algorithms to optimize sensing capabilities. Sensor technologies and actuators integrated in IoT-based robots can articulate multi-robot system collective behavior, coordination and control. Network scheduling mechanisms assist robotic systems in performing tasks by transferring communication data. Internet-connected devices and environment mapping algorithms can monitor autonomous robotic systems and processes through networked robot-based data fusion and visual data sensing and processing for improved performance of mobile operation guidance and control. Seamless integration of smart devices in IoT-based embedded systems necessitates object recognition algorithms, multi-sensor fusion technology, and geospatial data mining tools across intelligent industrial infrastructure. IoRT integrates fog computing networks for real-time data gathering and sharing. IoRT integrates wireless sensor networks and machine learning algorithms to complete tasks and connectivity maintenance for data gathering and collaborative movements.
Federated machine learning can thoroughly harness the computation performance of distributed robots to attain shared intelligence, improving the capability of carrying out elaborate and demanding interactive tasks. Smart objects can handle contextual data in relation to infrastructure and users through sensors and actuators to infer the environment within semantic IoRT systems and to seamlessly make autonomous decisions. Cloud computing tools and sensing and semantic technologies can assess real-time performance of mobile robot swarms. IoRT integrates cloud tools, algorithmic machines, and multi-agent agents. Cyber–physical systems can enhance the interoperability of coordinated devices and of autonomous robots. Industry 4.0 wireless networks and robotic autonomous systems develop on IoT-based interconnected smart devices and deep and machine learning algorithms. IoRT-enabled edge computing technologies harness swarm intelligence algorithms in intelligent decision-making processes.

8. Conclusions

Significant research has analyzed how IoRT data management requires smart autonomous robot systems and networks in complex task distributions. Autonomous robotic and motion capture systems develop on machine and deep learning algorithms and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools as regards big data heterogeneity and complexity. This systematic literature review inspects outstanding published peer-reviewed sources as regards big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in IoRT. We show how robotic operating systems deploy computer vision and simulation modeling algorithms, cognitive data analytics, and spatial data visualization tools. Predictive simulation and virtual reality modeling tools, remote sensing data, image processing techniques, and fault diagnosis systems shape networked cloud robotics. Industrial cloud robotics develops on preventive maintenance scheduling, product condition monitoring, data-driven planning technologies, and augmented reality algorithms. We clarify that autonomous robotic and motion capture systems harness task scheduling and cloud computing algorithms across wireless sensor networks. Data visualization and virtual simulation tools, remote sensing technologies, and smart product development are pivotal in manufacturing process performance and execution systems. Product development processes and intelligent manufacturing equipment require remote sensing and cognitive computing systems, virtual data modeling, synthetic data tools, and smart connected devices. The findings gathered from the above analyses indicate that robotized manufacturing systems harness cloud computing technologies, intelligent manufacturing equipment, geospatial mapping and decision support tools, and virtual twinning techniques. Data accuracy, reliability, and accessibility are instrumental in complex task achievement by swarm robotics systems in unstructured dynamic environments. Robot learning and cloud computing algorithms, cyber-physical cognitive systems, real-time data simulation, and virtual twin modeling configure smart manufacturing plants.

9. Specific Contributions to the Literature

This systematic review addresses a hot emerging topic (that is, big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in the IoRT) that has not been covered up to the present time in the literature as regards how blockchain-based robotic and cloud computing technologies optimize data analysis tools in terms of efficiency and accuracy, visual navigation efficiency, situation awareness and control systems, and task allocations across decentralized multi-agent robotic systems. Computer vision-based systems, intelligent sensing devices, industrial product lifecycle management, and digital twin modeling configure networked cloud robotics. Edge computing and digital manufacturing technologies integrate product lifecycle management, real-time process monitoring, interactive data visualization, and virtual simulation modeling. No previous research has analyzed how cloud robotics develops on robotic operating systems and devices and on autonomous industrial and remote sensing robots. Autonomous robotic and motion capture systems integrate computer vision algorithms, context-aware event processing, and data mining techniques. Sensor control and visual perception algorithms further industrial data sharing, storage, mining, and analysis. As regards business process interconnection, IoRT require real-time accurate data analysis and deep learning-based object detection technologies while taking into account computational complexity of sensing data.

10. Limitations and Further Directions of Research

As limitations, by analyzing only original research and review articles published in scholarly outlets indexed in ProQuest, Scopus, and the Web of Science between 2017 and 2022, outstanding sources on IoRT sensor and module networking and operating embedded control systems may have been omitted. Subsequent interest should be directed towards how virtual simulation modeling, data mining and reinforcement learning algorithms, product lifecycle monitoring, and smart process planning configure robotic operating systems. The scope of our systematic review does not move forward IoRT-based big data mining and analysis, cloud computing and big data technologies, and smart devices. Practical consequences would be how virtual simulation tools, spatial computing technologies, digital twin modeling, and remote sensing data are pivotal in robotic operating systems. Thus, cognitive manufacturing systems, plant equipment diagnosis, and factory floor data articulate industrial robotic networks. Academic implications of this systematic review chiefly integrate the need of continuing research on mobile connected IoRT devices, cloud and pattern recognition technologies, networked robotics, and automated machines. Future research should investigate computing task optimization, data processing and replication mechanisms, and sound IoRT techniques and algorithms. Subsequent analyses should develop on how deep reinforcement learning algorithms and visual navigation tools assist autonomous robotic systems in real-time intelligent sensor data sharing. Automated simulation modeling, digital twin capabilities, remote sensing and edge intelligence technologies, and spatial cognition algorithms shape virtual robotic environments. Attention should be directed to how autonomous robotized devices require immersive visualization systems, real-time operational data, cognitive automation and extended reality technologies, and virtual simulation modeling.

11. Practical Implications

By collecting and processing heterogeneous networked industrial data, IoRT devices and cyber–physical systems assist in knowledge representation and transfer and in collaborative optimization of production performance throughout pervasive computing environments. Performance evaluation of perception inference assessment tools in autonomous robotic and motion capture systems requires data-driven techniques, environmental parameters, decision tree algorithms, and simulation data mining. Machine data mining, dynamic mapping processes, cognitive data visualization, predictive modeling techniques, and real-time data processing optimize autonomous manufacturing control. Unmanned robotic networks and operating systems optimize industrial robot performance and products. Product simulation models, data mining and spatio-temporal fusion algorithms, remote sensing technologies, and decision support tools optimize robotized manufacturing systems. Process mining techniques, predictive simulation tools, computer vision algorithms, and digital twin technologies further remote sensing robots. Cloud computing and spatial data analytics, data-driven decision support, machine learning algorithms, and smart process planning assist virtual equipment systems and robotic environments. Predictive modeling and computational prediction tools, sensor data fusion, and digital twin-based monitoring optimize virtual robotic environments. Data mining techniques and processing capabilities, industrial process monitoring, smart spatial planning, and real-time sensor data typify virtual manufacturing systems. Product lifecycle data, virtual simulation tools, intelligent sensing devices, and augmented reality capabilities articulate process manufacturing and cognitive computing systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Mihai Andronie and George Lăzăroiu; methodology, Mariana Iatagan and Iulian Hurloiu; validation, Adrian Dijmărescu and Roxana Ștefănescu; investigation, Mihai Andronie and Irina Dijmărescu; resources, Iulian Hurloiu and Mihai Andronie; data curation, Mariana Iatagan and George Lăzăroiu; writing—original draft preparation, Roxana Ștefănescu and Iulian Hurloiu; writing—review and editing, Mihai Andronie and Adrian Dijmărescu; visualization, Adrian Dijmărescu and Irina Dijmărescu; supervision, Mihai Andronie and Mariana Iatagan; project administration, Roxana Ștefănescu and Irina Dijmărescu. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ray, P.P. A survey on Internet of Things architectures. J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci. 2018, 30, 291–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Michalkova, L.; Machova, V.; Carter, D. Digital Twin-based Product Development and Manufacturing Processes in Virtual Space: Data Visualization Tools and Techniques, Cloud Computing Technologies, and Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2022, 17, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alsamhi, S.H.; Ma, O.; Ansari, M.S. Survey on artificial intelligence based techniques for emerging robotic communication. Telecommun. Syst. 2019, 72, 483–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Beckett, S. Machine and Deep Learning Technologies, Location Tracking and Obstacle Avoidance Algorithms, and Cognitive Wireless Sensor Networks, in Intelligent Transportation Planning and Engineering. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2022, 14, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dachyar, M.; Zagloel, T.Y.M.; Saragih, L.R. Knowledge growth and development: Internet of things (IoT) research, 2006–2018. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ključnikov, A.; Civelek, M.; Vozňáková, I.; Krajčík, V. Can discounts expand local and digital currency awareness of individuals depending on their characteristics? Oeconomia Copernic. 2020, 11, 239–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, K.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Z.; Fu, L.; Chen, W. Federated Machine Learning for Intelligent IoT via Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface. IEEE Netw. 2020, 34, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vinerean, S.; Budac, C.; Baltador, L.A.; Dabija, D.-C. Assessing the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on M-Commerce Adoption: An Adapted UTAUT2 Approach. Electronics 2022, 11, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suzuki, D.; Kawano, Y. Flexible terahertz imaging systems with single-walled carbon nanotube films. Carbon 2020, 162, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Valaskova, K.; Nagy, M.; Zabojnik, S.; Lăzăroiu, G. Industry 4.0 Wireless Networks and Cyber-Physical Smart Manufacturing Systems as Accelerators of Value-Added Growth in Slovak Exports. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yaacoub, J.-P.A.; Noura, H.N.; Salman, O.; Chehab, A. Robotics cyber security: Vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and recommendations. Int. J. Inf. Secur. 2022, 21, 115–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Valaskova, K.; Ward, P.; Svabova, L. Deep Learning-assisted Smart Process Planning, Cognitive Automation, and Industrial Big Data Analytics in Sustainable Cyber-Physical Production Systems. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wairagkar, M.; Lima, M.R.; Bazo, D.; Craig, R.; Weissbart, H.; Etoundi, A.C.; Reichenbach, T.; Iyengar, P.; Vaswani, S.; James, C.; et al. Emotive Response to a Hybrid-Face Robot and Translation to Consumer Social Robots. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 3174–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Peters, E. Urban Computing Algorithms, Virtual Sensor Networks, and Geospatial Data Visualization in Digital Twin Cities. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2022, 14, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhong, Y.; Chen, L.; Dan, C.; Rezaeipanah, A. A systematic survey of data mining and big data analysis in internet of things. J Supercomput. 2022, 78, 18405–18453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Ștefănescu, R.; Ionescu, L.; Cocoșatu, M. Neuromanagement decision-making and cognitive algorithmic processes in the technological adoption of mobile commerce apps. Oeconomia Copernic. 2021, 12, 1033–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, F.; Yu, J.; Lin, D.; Zhang, J. UnIC: Towards Unmanned Intelligent Cluster and Its Integration into Society. Engineering 2022, 12, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lăzăroiu, G.; Andronie, M.; Iatagan, M.; Geamănu, M.; Ștefănescu, R.; Dijmărescu, I. Deep Learning-Assisted Smart Process Planning, Robotic Wireless Sensor Networks, and Geospatial Big Data Management Algorithms in the Internet of Manufacturing Things. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Catak, F.O.; Kuzlu, M.; Catak, E.; Cali, U.; Unal, D. Security concerns on machine learning solutions for 6G networks in mmWave beam prediction. Phys. Commun. 2022, 52, 101626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lyons, N. Deep Learning-based Computer Vision Algorithms, Immersive Analytics and Simulation Software, and Virtual Reality Modeling Tools in Digital Twin-driven Smart Manufacturing. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2022, 17, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chae, B. The evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT): A computational text analysis. Telecommun. Policy 2019, 43, 101848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Poliak, M.; Jurecki, R.; Buckner, K. Autonomous Vehicle Routing and Navigation, Mobility Simulation and Traffic Flow Prediction Tools, and Deep Learning Object Detection Technology in Smart Sustainable Urban Transport Systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2022, 14, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Martínez, S.S.; García, A.S.; Estévez, E.E.; Ortega, J.G.; García, J.G. 3D object recognition for anthropomorphic robots performing tracking tasks. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 104, 1403–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Iatagan, M.; Uță, C.; Ștefănescu, R.; Cocoșatu, M. Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision-Making Algorithms, Internet of Things Sensing Networks, and Deep Learning-Assisted Smart Process Management in Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Electronics 2021, 10, 2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rodriguez Lera, F.J.; Rico, F.M.; Olivera, V.M. Neural Networks for Recognizing Human Activities in Home-like Environments. Integr. Comput.-Aided Eng. 2019, 26, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nica, E.; Stan, C.I.; Luțan (Petre), A.G.; Oașa (Geambazi), R.-Ș. Internet of Things-based Real-Time Production Logistics, Sustainable Industrial Value Creation, and Artificial Intelligence-driven Big Data Analytics in Cyber-Physical Smart Manufacturing Systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kamilaris, A.; Botteghi, N. The penetration of Internet of Things in robotics: Towards a web of robotic things. J. Ambient. Intell. Smart Environ. 2020, 12, 491–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Balcerzak, A.P.; Nica, E.; Rogalska, E.; Poliak, M.; Klieštik, T.; Sabie, O.-M. Blockchain Technology and Smart Contracts in Decentralized Governance Systems. Adm. Sci. 2022, 12, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alamer, A. A secure anonymous tracing fog-assisted method for the Internet of Robotic Things. Libr. Hi Tech 2020, 40, 1081–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kliestik, T.; Poliak, M.; Popescu, G.H. Digital Twin Simulation and Modeling Tools, Computer Vision Algorithms, and Urban Sensing Technologies in Immersive 3D Environments. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2022, 14, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aarizou, M.L.; Berrached, N.-E. ROS-based Telerobotic Application for Transmitting High-bandwidth Kinematic Data over a Limited Network. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 2019, 17, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Popescu, G.H.; Petreanu, S.; Alexandru, B.; Corpodean, H. Internet of Things-based Real-Time Production Logistics, Cyber-Physical Process Monitoring Systems, and Industrial Artificial Intelligence in Sustainable Smart Manufacturing. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cho, S.; Shrestha, B.; Jang, W.; Seo, C. Trajectory tracking optimization of mobile robot using artificial immune system. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2019, 78, 3203–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Potcovaru, A.-M.; Majerová, J. Multi-Sensor Fusion Technology, Spatial Simulation and Environment Mapping Algorithms, and Real-World Connected Vehicle Data in Smart Sustainable Urban Mobility Systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2022, 14, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Givehchi, O.; Landsdorf, K.; Simoens, P.; Colombo, A.W. Interoperability for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems: An Approach for Legacy Systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2017, 13, 3370–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Suler, P.; Palmer, L.; Bilan, S. Internet of Things Sensing Networks, Digitized Mass Production, and Sustainable Organizational Performance in Cyber-Physical System-based Smart Factories. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, H.-P.; Yan, J.-L.; Huang, T.-H.; Huang, M.-B. IoT-based networking for humanoid robots. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 2017, 40, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Papík, M.; Papíková, L. Application of selected data mining techniques in unintentional accounting error detection. Equilibrium. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2021, 16, 185–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Farmani, N.; Sun, L.; Pack, D.J. A Scalable Multitarget Tracking System for Cooperative Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2017, 53, 1947–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Ștefănescu, R.; Uță, C.; Dijmărescu, I. Sustainable, Smart, and Sensing Technologies for Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sabri, L.; Bouznad, S.; Rama Fiorini, S.; Chibani, A.; Prestes, E.; Amirat, Y. An Integrated Semantic Framework for Designing Context-aware Internet of Robotic Things Systems. Integr. Comput.-Aided Eng. 2018, 25, 137–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kovacova, M.; Novak, A.; Machova, V.; Carey, B. 3D Virtual Simulation Technology, Digital Twin Modeling, and Geospatial Data Mining in Smart Sustainable City Governance and Management. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2022, 14, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gomez, M.A.; Chibani, A.; Amirat, Y.; Matson, E.T. IoRT cloud survivability framework for robotic AALs using HARMS. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2018, 106, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Małkowska, A.; Urbaniec, M.; Kosała, M. The impact of digital transformation on European countries: Insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2021, 16, 325–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, W.; Yaguchi, Y.; Naruse, K.; Watanobe, Y.; Nakamura, K. QoS-Aware Robotic Streaming Workflow Allocation in Cloud Robotics Systems. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2021, 14, 544–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lăzăroiu, G.; Ionescu, L.; Andronie, M.; Dijmărescu, I. Sustainability Management and Performance in the Urban Corporate Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dmitriev, A.S.; Mokhseni, T.I.; Sierra Teran, K.M. Differentially Coherent Information Transmission Based on Chaotic Radio Pulses. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 2018, 63, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Durana, P.; Krastev, V.; Buckner, K. Digital Twin Modeling, Multi-Sensor Fusion Technology, and Data Mining Algorithms in Cloud and Edge Computing-based Smart City Environments. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2022, 14, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Achroufene, A.; Amirat, Y.; Chibani, A. RSS-Based Indoor Localization Using Belief Function Theory. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2019, 16, 1163–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lăzăroiu, G.; Kliestik, T.; Novak, A. Internet of Things Smart Devices, Industrial Artificial Intelligence, and Real-Time Sensor Networks in Sustainable Cyber-Physical Production Systems. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Pan, S.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y. Analyzing the robotic behavior in a smart city with deep enforcement and imitation learning using IoRT. Comput. Commun. 2020, 150, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pop, R.-A.; Dabija, D.-C.; Pelău, C.; Dinu, V. Usage Intentions, Attitudes, and Behaviors towards Energy-Efficient Applications during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2022, 23, 668–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, C.W. Internet of Video Things: Next-Generation IoT with Visual Sensors. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 6676–6685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Konecny, V.; Jaśkiewicz, M.; Downs, S. Motion Planning and Object Recognition Algorithms, Vehicle Navigation and Collision Avoidance Technologies, and Geospatial Data Visualization in Network Connectivity Systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2022, 14, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nejkovic, V.; Petrovic, N.; Tosic, M.; Milosevic, N. Semantic approach to RIoT autonomous robots mission coordination. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2020, 126, 103438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kovacova, M.; Lăzăroiu, G. Sustainable Organizational Performance, Cyber-Physical Production Networks, and Deep Learning-assisted Smart Process Planning in Industry 4.0-based Manufacturing Systems. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shenkoya, T. Social change: A comparative analysis of the impact of the IoT in Japan, Germany and Australia. Internet Things 2020, 11, 100250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kovacova, M.; Lewis, E. Smart Factory Performance, Cognitive Automation, and Industrial Big Data Analytics in Sustainable Manufacturing Internet of Things. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Singh, S.K.; Rathore, S.; Park, J.H. BlockIoTIntelligence: A Blockchain-enabled Intelligent IoT Architecture with Artificial Intelligence. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 110, 721–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zvarikova, K.; Horak, J.; Downs, S. Digital Twin Algorithms, Smart City Technologies, and 3D Spatio-Temporal Simulations in Virtual Urban Environments. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2022, 14, 139–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lu, J.; Wang, G.; Tao, X.; Wang, J.; Törngren, M. A domain-specific modeling approach supporting tool-chain development with Bayesian network models. Integr. Comput.-Aided Eng. 2020, 27, 153–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Barbu, C.M.; Florea, D.L.; Dabija, D.C.; Barbu, M.C.R. Customer Experience in Fintech. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1415–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sarkar, M.; Homaifar, A.; Erol, B.A.; Behniapoor, M.; Tunstel, E. PIE: A Tool for Data-Driven Autonomous UAV Flight Testing. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2020, 98, 421–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lăzăroiu, G.; Harrison, A. Internet of Things Sensing Infrastructures and Data-driven Planning Technologies in Smart Sustainable City Governance and Management. Geopolit. Hist. Int. Relat. 2021, 13, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Islam, M.S.; Rahman, M.M.; Muhammad, G.; Hossain, M.S. Design of A Social Robot Interact with Artificial Intelligence by Versatile Control Systems. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 22, 17542–17549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nica, E.; Stehel, V. Internet of Things Sensing Networks, Artificial Intelligence-based Decision-Making Algorithms, and Real-Time Process Monitoring in Sustainable Industry 4.0. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2021, 9, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Roda-Sanchez, L.; Olivares, T.; Garrido-Hidalgo, C.; de la Vara, J.L.; Fernández-Caballero, A. Human-robot interaction in Industry 4.0 based on an Internet of Things real-time gesture control system. Integr. Comput. -Aided Eng. 2021, 28, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kliestik, T.; Musa, H.; Machova, V.; Rice, L. Remote Sensing Data Fusion Techniques, Autonomous Vehicle Driving Perception Algorithms, and Mobility Simulation Tools in Smart Transportation Systems. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2022, 14, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mishra, D.; Zema, N.R.; Natalizio, E. A High-End IoT Devices Framework to Foster Beyond-Connectivity Capabilities in 5G/B5G Architecture. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2021, 59, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cug, J.; Suler, P.; Taylor, E. Digital Twin-based Cyber-Physical Production Systems in Immersive 3D Environments: Virtual Modeling and Simulation Tools, Spatial Data Visualization Techniques, and Remote Sensing Technologies. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2022, 17, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Balakrishnan, N.; Rajendran, A.; Pelusi, D.; Ponnusamy, V. Deep Belief Network enhanced intrusion detection system to prevent security breach in the Internet of Things. Internet Things 2021, 14, 100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Markauskas, M.; Baliute, A. Technological progress spillover effect in Lithuanian manufacturing industry. Equilibrium. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2021, 16, 783–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mukherjee, A.; Dey, N.; Mondal, A.; De, D.; Crespo, R.G. iSocialDrone: QoS aware MQTT middleware for social internet of drone things in 6G-SDN slice. Soft Comput. 2021, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Iatagan, M.; Hurloiu, I.; Dijmărescu, I. Sustainable Cyber-Physical Production Systems in Big Data-Driven Smart Urban Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Siriweera, A.; Naruse, K. Internet of Cross-chains: Model-driven Cross-chain as a Service Platform for the Internet of Everything in Smart City. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2021, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Robinson, R. Digital Twin Modeling in Virtual Enterprises and Autonomous Manufacturing Systems: Deep Learning and Neural Network Algorithms, Immersive Visualization Tools, and Cognitive Data Fusion Techniques. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2022, 17, 52–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sun, X.; Wang, G.; Xu, L.; Yuan, H. Data replication techniques in the Internet of Things: A systematic literature review. Libr. Hi Tech 2021, 39, 1121–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wallace, S.; Lăzăroiu, G. Predictive Control Algorithms, Real-World Connected Vehicle Data, and Smart Mobility Technologies in Intelligent Transportation Planning and Engineering. Contemp. Read. Law Soc. Justice 2021, 13, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Opiyo, S.; Zhou, J.; Mwangi, E.; Kai, W.; Sunusi, I. A Review on Teleoperation of Mobile Ground Robots: Architecture and Situation Awareness. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 2021, 19, 1384–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Praitheeshan, P.; Pan, L.; Zheng, X.; Jolfaei, A.; Doss, R. SolGuard: Preventing external call issues in smart contract-based multi-agent robotic systems. Inf. Sci. 2021, 579, 150–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ali, Z.H.; Ali, H.A. Towards sustainable smart IoT applications architectural elements and design: Opportunities, challenges, and open directions. J. Supercomput. 2021, 77, 5668–5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nazerdeylami, A.; Majidi, B.; Movaghar, A. Autonomous litter surveying and human activity monitoring for governance intelligence in coastal eco-cyber-physical systems. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2021, 200, 105478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Alsamhi, S.H.; Almalki, F.; Ma, O.; Ansari, M.S.; Lee, B. Predictive Estimation of Optimal Signal Strength from Drones over IoT Frameworks in Smart Cities. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2021, 22, 402–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bazan, P.; Estevez, E. Industry 4.0 and business process management: State of the art and new challenges. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2022, 28, 62–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fiorini, L.; Mancioppi, G.; Semeraro, F.; Fujita, H.; Cavallo, F. Unsupervised emotional state classification through physiological parameters for social robotics applications. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2020, 190, 105217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Lujak, M.; Sklar, E.; Semet, F. Agriculture fleet vehicle routing: A decentralised and dynamic problem. AI Commun. 2021, 34, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mallaki, M.; Majidi, B.; Peyvandi, A.; Movaghar, A. Off-chain management and state-tracking of smart programs on blockchain for secure and efficient decentralized computation. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2021, 44, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wei, D.; Chen, L.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, H.; Huang, B. A Vision-Based Measure of Environmental Effects on Inferring Human Intention During Human Robot Interaction. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 4246–4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Fang, L.; Sun, M. Motion recognition technology of badminton players in sports video images. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2021, 124, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kar, P.; Misra, S.; Mandal, A.K.; Wang, H. SOS: NDN Based Service-Oriented Game-Theoretic Efficient Security Scheme for IoT Networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2021, 18, 3197–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Costa, S.D.; Barcellos, M.P.; Falbo, R.d.A. Ontologies in human–computer interaction: A systematic literature review. Appl. Ontol. 2021, 16, 421–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hao, X.; Gao, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, J. Multi-objective collaborative optimization in cement calcination process: A time domain rolling optimization method based on Jaya algorithm. J. Process Control. 2021, 105, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Casadei, R.; Viroli, M.; Audrito, G.; Pianini, D.; Damiani, F. Engineering collective intelligence at the edge with aggregate processes. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2021, 97, 104081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Alamer, A.; Basudan, S. Security and privacy of network transmitted system in the Internet of Robotic Things. J. Supercomput. 2022, 78, 18361–18378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tolba, A.; Al-Makhadmeh, Z. Modular interactive computation scheme for the internet of things assisted robotic services. Swarm Evol. Comput. 2022, 70, 101043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gul, O.M.; Erkmen, A.M.; Kantarci, B. UAV-Driven Sustainable and Quality-Aware Data Collection in Robotic Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 25150–25164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, F.; Wang, H.; Dehghan, O.R. Machine Learning Techniques and Big Data Analysis for Internet of Things Applications: A Review Study. Cybern. Syst. 2022, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Heidari, A.; Navimipour, N.J.; Unal, M. Applications of ML/DL in the management of smart cities and societies based on new trends in information technologies: A systematic literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 85, 104089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Biazi-Neto, V.; Marques, C.A.F.; Frizera-Neto, A.; Leal-Junior, A.G. FBG-Embedded Robotic Manipulator Tool for Structural Integrity Monitoring From Critical Strain-Stress Pair Estimation. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 5695–5702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Xu, M.; Wang, J. Learning strategy for continuous robot visual control: A multi-objective perspective. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2022, 252, 109448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Albiero, D.; Pontin Garcia, A.; Kiyoshi Umezu, C.; Leme de Paulo, R. Swarm robots in mechanized agricultural operations: A review about challenges for research. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 193, 106608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ji, X.; Chen, K.; Chen, M.; Li, Y.; Qian, X. Secure olympics games with technology: Intelligent border surveillance for the 2022 Beijing winter olympics. J. Syst. Archit. 2022, 129, 102634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Li, H.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Bu, X.; Li, H.; Lyu, Q. Industrial internet platforms: Applications in BF ironmaking. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2022, 49, 905–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Talmale, R.; Bhat, M.N. Energy Attentive and Pre-fault Recognize Mechanism for Distributed Wireless Sensor Network Using Fuzzy Logic Approach. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 124, 1263–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kumar, R.; Amgoth, T. Reinforcement learning based connectivity restoration in wireless sensor networks. Appl. Intell. 2022, 52, 13214–13231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bal-Domańska, B.; Sobczak, E.; Stańczyk, E. A multivariate approach to the identification of initial smart specialisations of Polish voivodeships. Equilibrium. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2020, 15, 785–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, N.; Xu, Z.; Skare, M. The research on COVID-19 and economy from 2019 to 2020: Analysis from the perspective of bibliometrics. Oeconomia Copernic. 2021, 12, 217–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Świadek, A.; Gorączkowska, J. The institutional support for an innovation cooperation in industry: The case of Poland. Equilibrium. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2020, 15, 811–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lăzăroiu, G.; Androniceanu, A.; Grecu, I.; Grecu, G.; Neguriță, O. Artificial Intelligence-based Decision-Making Algorithms, Internet of Things Sensing Networks, and Sustainable Cyber-Physical Management Systems in Big Data-driven Cognitive Manufacturing. Oeconomia Copernic. 2022, 13, 1045–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nica, E.; Poliak, M.; Popescu, G.H.; Pârvu, I.-A. Decision Intelligence and Modeling, Multisensory Customer Experiences, and Socially Interconnected Virtual Services across the Metaverse Ecosystem. Linguist. Philos. Investig. 2022, 21, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kliestik, T.; Vochozka, M.; Vasić, M. Biometric Sensor Technologies, Visual Imagery and Predictive Modeling Tools, and Ambient Sound Recognition Software in the Economic Infrastructure of the Metaverse. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2022, 21, 72–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Valaskova, K.; Vochozka, M.; Lăzăroiu, G. Immersive 3D Technologies, Spatial Computing and Visual Perception Algorithms, and Event Modeling and Forecasting Tools on Blockchain-based Metaverse Platforms. Anal. Metaphys. 2022, 21, 74–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zvarikova, K.; Cug, J.; Hamilton, S. Virtual Human Resource Management in the Metaverse: Immersive Work Environments, Data Visualization Tools and Algorithms, and Behavioral Analytics. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2022, 10, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Karabolevski, O.L.; Ștefănescu, R.; Hurloiu, I.; Dijmărescu, A.; Dijmărescu, I. Remote Big Data Management Tools, Sensing and Computing Technologies, and Visual Perception and Environment Mapping Algorithms in the Internet of Robotic Things. Electronics 2023, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kliestik, T.; Novak, A.; Lăzăroiu, G. Live Shopping in the Metaverse: Visual and Spatial Analytics, Cognitive Artificial Intelligence Techniques and Algorithms, and Immersive Digital Simulations. Linguist. Philos. Investig. 2022, 21, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zauskova, A.; Miklencicova, R.; Popescu, G.H. Visual Imagery and Geospatial Mapping Tools, Virtual Simulation Algorithms, and Deep Learning-based Sensing Technologies in the Metaverse Interactive Environment. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2022, 21, 122–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Grupac, M.; Husakova, K.; Balica, R.-Ș. Virtual Navigation and Augmented Reality Shopping Tools, Immersive and Cognitive Technologies, and Image Processing Computational and Object Tracking Algorithms in the Metaverse Commerce. Anal. Metaphys. 2022, 21, 210–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Nica, E.; Kliestik, T.; Valaskova, K.; Sabie, O.-M. The Economics of the Metaverse: Immersive Virtual Technologies, Consumer Digital Engagement, and Augmented Reality Shopping Experience. Smart Gov. 2022, 1, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Valaskova, K.; Machova, V.; Lewis, E. Virtual Marketplace Dynamics Data, Spatial Analytics, and Customer Engagement Tools in a Real-Time Interoperable Decentralized Metaverse. Linguist. Philos. Investig. 2022, 21, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zvarikova, K.; Machova, V.; Nica, E. Cognitive Artificial Intelligence Algorithms, Movement and Behavior Tracking Tools, and Customer Identification Technology in the Metaverse Commerce. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2022, 21, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zvarikova, K.; Rowland, Z.; Nica, E. Multisensor Fusion and Dynamic Routing Technologies, Virtual Navigation and Simulation Modeling Tools, and Image Processing Computational and Visual Cognitive Algorithms across Web3-powered Metaverse Worlds. Anal. Metaphys. 2022, 21, 125–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kral, P.; Janoskova, K.; Dawson, A. Virtual Skill Acquisition, Remote Working Tools, and Employee Engagement and Retention on Blockchain-based Metaverse Platforms. Psychosociol. Issues Hum. Resour. Manag. 2022, 10, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Hudson, J. Internet of Medical Things-driven Remote Monitoring Systems, Big Healthcare Data Analytics, and Wireless Body Area Networks in COVID-19 Detection and Diagnosis. Am. J. Med. Res. 2022, 9, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Blake, R. Metaverse Technologies in the Virtual Economy: Deep Learning Computer Vision Algorithms, Blockchain-based Digital Assets, and Immersive Shared Worlds. Smart Gov. 2022, 1, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kovacova, M.; Horak, J.; Higgins, M. Behavioral Analytics, Immersive Technologies, and Machine Vision Algorithms in the Web3-powered Metaverse World. Linguist. Philos. Investig. 2022, 21, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Valaskova, K.; Horak, J.; Bratu, S. Simulation Modeling and Image Recognition Tools, Spatial Computing Technology, and Behavioral Predictive Analytics in the Metaverse Economy. Rev. Contemp. Philos. 2022, 21, 239–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kovacova, M.; Horak, J.; Popescu, G.H. Haptic and Biometric Sensor Technologies, Deep Learning-based Image Classification Algorithms, and Movement and Behavior Tracking Tools in the Metaverse Economy. Anal. Metaphys. 2022, 21, 176–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zvarikova, K.; Horak, J.; Bradley, P. Machine and Deep Learning Algorithms, Computer Vision Technologies, and Internet of Things-based Healthcare Monitoring Systems in COVID-19 Prevention, Testing, Detection, and Treatment. Am. J. Med. Res. 2022, 9, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. VOSviewer mapping of big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in the Internet of Robotic Things regarding co-authorship.
Figure 1. VOSviewer mapping of big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in the Internet of Robotic Things regarding co-authorship.
Ijgi 12 00035 g001
Figure 2. VOSviewer mapping of big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in the Internet of Robotic Things regarding citation.
Figure 2. VOSviewer mapping of big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in the Internet of Robotic Things regarding citation.
Ijgi 12 00035 g002
Figure 3. VOSviewer mapping of big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in the Internet of Robotic Things regarding bibliographic coupling.
Figure 3. VOSviewer mapping of big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in the Internet of Robotic Things regarding bibliographic coupling.
Ijgi 12 00035 g003
Figure 4. VOSviewer mapping of big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in the Internet of Robotic Things regarding co-citation.
Figure 4. VOSviewer mapping of big data management algorithms, deep learning-based object detection technologies, and geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools in the Internet of Robotic Things regarding co-citation.
Ijgi 12 00035 g004
Figure 5. PRISMA flow diagram describing the search results and screening.
Figure 5. PRISMA flow diagram describing the search results and screening.
Ijgi 12 00035 g005
Figure 6. VOSviewer mapping of CityGML deployment in the Internet of Robotic Things regarding co-citation.
Figure 6. VOSviewer mapping of CityGML deployment in the Internet of Robotic Things regarding co-citation.
Ijgi 12 00035 g006
Table 1. Topics and types of identified and selected scientific products.
Table 1. Topics and types of identified and selected scientific products.
TopicIdentifiedSelected
Internet of Robotic Things + big data management algorithms12434
Internet of Robotic Things + deep learning-based object detection technologies12635
Internet of Robotic Things + geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools12936
Type of paper
Original research27278
Review4627
Conference proceedings480
Book70
Editorial60
Source: Processed by the authors. Some topics overlap.
Table 2. Synopsis of cumulative evidence in relation to inspected topics and descriptive results (research findings).
Table 2. Synopsis of cumulative evidence in relation to inspected topics and descriptive results (research findings).
Cloud computing and wireless communication technologies integrate industrial machines, smart sensors, heterogeneous sensor devices, big data management algorithms, and autonomous robots.[1,2,3,4]
Automated data transmission, sensor data, industrial manufacturing processes, and machine learning techniques configure networked autonomous plants and sensor technologies.[5,6,7,8]
Real-time monitoring industrial sensing and swarm robotic systems, in addition to cloud computing, imaging, and sensing technologies articulate industrial manufacturing processes.[9,10,11,12]
IoRT-based big data mining and analysis, cloud computing and big data technologies, and smart devices shape contextual awareness in uncontrolled environments.[13,14,15,16]
Collaborative interoperable networked unmanned systems deploy intelligent virtual agents, computation technologies and algorithms, and sensor networks.[17,18,19,20]
IoRT-based manipulation and 3D object recognition and tracking tasks can be carried out in unstructured environments by leveraging robotic systems, cloud computing technologies, big data analytics, and machine and deep learning algorithms in terms of robust perceptual capabilities and reliable visual data.[21,22,23,24]
IoT-based robots and robotic systems necessitate environmental location and sound recognition tools, context awareness data, and artificial neural networks to assist in decision making processes.[25,26,27,28]
Tracking mobile IoRT devices is instrumental in robotic operating and fog computing network systems.[29,30,31,32]
IoRT-based operational technologies are pivotal in robot trajectory tracking in dynamic mobile environments and as regards functional interoperability, data integration complexity, and structural connectivity in industrial systems through big data management algorithms.[33,34,35,36]
Spatial clustering of sensing capabilities, deep learning-based object detection technologies, noise algorithms, and networked scheduling mechanisms and communication objects enable robot control and decentralized tracking systems.[37,38,39,40]
Actuation and control methods assist IoRT physical and virtual devices across monitoring and managing context-aware perception and modeling systems by use of multi-agent systems, cloud computing technologies, and failure checking techniques.[41,42,43,44]
Remote robotic cooperation and streaming workflow optimize computer simulation and modeling of data sharing processes through networked cloud robotics, robot clusters, and heuristic algorithms.[45,46,47,48]
Remotely monitoring pervasively embedded connected sensors, automation systems, and smart objects enhance accuracy and robustness of wireless sensor networks and ambient intelligence technologies. [49,50,51,52]
Interoperable connected devices and cyber–physical systems shape autonomous robot coordination by use of visual sensors in terms of data sharing, storage, and analysis.[53,54,55,56]
Fog, edge, and cloud technologies, big data analysis tools, and sensor devices further IoRT networks and assist in processing, sharing, networking, and storing data.[57,58,59,60]
Decision-making and assessment support of data networks, tools, and modeling determine internal states of real-time data processes across IoRT networks.[61,62,63,64]
IoRT sensor and module networking and operating embedded control systems advance scalable data computation and efficient processes across industrial environments.[65,66,67,68]
IoRT networks seamlessly integrate autonomous smart devices, geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools, intelligent techniques and machines, and deep and machine learning algorithms that are pivotal in industrial data processing and computation.[69,70,71,72]
Fog and edge computing technologies assist the decentralized architecture of IoRT devices in terms of data scalability and interoperability.[73,74,75,76]
Computing task optimization, data processing and replication mechanisms, and sound IoRT techniques and algorithms configure autonomous decentralized robotic systems and functionalities.[77,78,79,80]
Sustainable production and business development can be attained in cyber–physical systems by use of IoRT devices, deep and machine learning-based decision making, and pervasive computing and cloud technologies, increasing data monitoring accuracy.[81,82,83,84]
Routing efficiency and scalability of mobile robots can be achieved through autonomous robot coordination in dynamic decentralized environments and across wireless wearable sensor networks by integrating blockchain technologies, remote sensing environmental data, and sensor-based deep learning techniques.[85,86,87,88]
IoRT devices accurately process and analyze collected data by deploying image recognition technology, geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools, and intelligent optimization algorithms.[89,90,91,92]
Robot-based assistance of IoT-enabled edge computing technologies requires blockchain-enabled edge computing systems, heterogeneous computational collective intelligence and processes, and distributed edge devices and algorithms.[93,94,95,96]
IoRT-based machine learning techniques and data processing integrate multi-sensor data fusion and deep reinforcement learning algorithms, in addition to cloud, edge, and fog computing technologies.[97,98,99,100]
IoRT devices and machine intelligence develop on swarm robot and machine learning-based perception algorithms to attain optimal routing path and network performance.[101,102,103,104,105]
Table 3. Synopsis of evidence in relation to inspected topics and descriptive results (research findings).
Table 3. Synopsis of evidence in relation to inspected topics and descriptive results (research findings).
Cloud computing and wireless communication technologies integrate industrial machines, smart sensors, heterogeneous sensor devices, big data management algorithms, and autonomous robots.[1,2,3,4]
Automated data transmission, sensor data, industrial manufacturing processes, and machine learning techniques configure networked autonomous plants and sensor technologies.[5,6,7,8]
Real-time monitoring industrial sensing and swarm robotic systems, in addition to cloud computing, imaging, and sensing technologies articulate industrial manufacturing processes.[9,10,11,12]
IoRT-based big data mining and analysis, cloud computing and big data technologies, and smart devices shape contextual awareness in uncontrolled environments.[13,14,15,16]
Collaborative interoperable networked unmanned systems deploy intelligent virtual agents, computation technologies and algorithms, and sensor networks.[17,18,19,20]
IoRT-based manipulation and 3D object recognition and tracking tasks can be carried out in unstructured environments by leveraging robotic systems, cloud computing technologies, big data analytics, and machine and deep learning algorithms in terms of robust perceptual capabilities and reliable visual data.[21,22,23,24]
IoT-based robots and robotic systems necessitate environmental location and sound recognition tools, context awareness data, and artificial neural networks to assist in decision making processes.[25,26,27,28]
Tracking mobile IoRT devices is instrumental in robotic operating and fog computing network systems.[29,30,31,32]
IoRT-based operational technologies are pivotal in robot trajectory tracking in dynamic mobile environments and as regards functional interoperability, data integration complexity, and structural connectivity in industrial systems through big data management algorithms.[33,34,35,36]
Table 4. Synopsis of evidence in relation to inspected topics and descriptive results (research findings).
Table 4. Synopsis of evidence in relation to inspected topics and descriptive results (research findings).
Spatial clustering of sensing capabilities, deep learning-based object detection technologies, noise algorithms, and networked scheduling mechanisms and communication objects enable robot control and decentralized tracking systems.[37,38,39,40]
Actuation and control methods assist IoRT physical and virtual devices across monitoring and managing context-aware perception and modeling systems by use of multi-agent systems, cloud computing technologies, and failure checking techniques.[41,42,43,44]
Remote robotic cooperation and streaming workflow optimize computer simulation and modeling of data sharing processes through networked cloud robotics, robot clusters, and heuristic algorithms.[45,46,47,48]
Remotely monitoring pervasively embedded connected sensors, automation systems, and smart objects enhance accuracy and robustness of wireless sensor networks and ambient intelligence technologies.[49,50,51,52]
Interoperable connected devices and cyber–physical systems shape autonomous robot coordination by use of visual sensors in terms of data sharing, storage, and analysis.[53,54,55,56]
Fog, edge, and cloud technologies, big data analysis tools, and sensor devices further IoRT networks and assist in processing, sharing, networking, and storing data.[57,58,59,60]
Decision-making and assessment support of data networks, tools, and modeling determine internal states of real-time data processes across IoRT networks.[61,62,63,64]
IoRT sensor and module networking and operating embedded control systems advance scalable data computation and efficient processes across industrial environments.[65,66,67,68]
Table 5. Synopsis of evidence in relation to inspected topics and descriptive results (research findings).
Table 5. Synopsis of evidence in relation to inspected topics and descriptive results (research findings).
IoRT networks seamlessly integrate autonomous smart devices, geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools, intelligent techniques and machines, and deep and machine learning algorithms that are pivotal in industrial data processing and computation.[69,70,71,72]
Fog and edge computing technologies assist the decentralized architecture of IoRT devices in terms of data scalability and interoperability.[73,74,75,76]
Computing task optimization, data processing and replication mechanisms, and sound IoRT techniques and algorithms configure autonomous decentralized robotic systems and functionalities.[77,78,79,80]
Sustainable production and business development can be attained in cyber–physical systems by use of IoRT devices, deep and machine learning-based decision making, and pervasive computing and cloud technologies, increasing data monitoring accuracy.[81,82,83,84]
Routing efficiency and scalability of mobile robots can be achieved through autonomous robot coordination in dynamic decentralized environments and across wireless wearable sensor networks by integrating blockchain technologies, remote sensing environmental data, and sensor-based deep learning techniques.[85,86,87,88]
IoRT devices accurately process and analyze collected data by deploying image recognition technology, geospatial simulation and sensor fusion tools, and intelligent optimization algorithms.[89,90,91,92]
Robot-based assistance of IoT-enabled edge computing technologies requires blockchain-enabled edge computing systems, heterogeneous computational collective intelligence and processes, and distributed edge devices and algorithms.[93,94,95,96]
IoRT-based machine learning techniques and data processing integrate multi-sensor data fusion and deep reinforcement learning algorithms, in addition to cloud, edge, and fog computing technologies.[97,98,99,100]
IoRT devices and machine intelligence develop on swarm robot and machine learning-based perception algorithms to attain optimal routing path and network performance.[101,102,103,104,105]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andronie, M.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Iatagan, M.; Hurloiu, I.; Ștefănescu, R.; Dijmărescu, A.; Dijmărescu, I. Big Data Management Algorithms, Deep Learning-Based Object Detection Technologies, and Geospatial Simulation and Sensor Fusion Tools in the Internet of Robotic Things. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12020035

AMA Style

Andronie M, Lăzăroiu G, Iatagan M, Hurloiu I, Ștefănescu R, Dijmărescu A, Dijmărescu I. Big Data Management Algorithms, Deep Learning-Based Object Detection Technologies, and Geospatial Simulation and Sensor Fusion Tools in the Internet of Robotic Things. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2023; 12(2):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12020035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andronie, Mihai, George Lăzăroiu, Mariana Iatagan, Iulian Hurloiu, Roxana Ștefănescu, Adrian Dijmărescu, and Irina Dijmărescu. 2023. "Big Data Management Algorithms, Deep Learning-Based Object Detection Technologies, and Geospatial Simulation and Sensor Fusion Tools in the Internet of Robotic Things" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 12, no. 2: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12020035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop