Next Article in Journal
Fruit Decay to Diseases: Can Induced Resistance and Priming Help?
Previous Article in Journal
Fast Regulation of Hormone Metabolism Contributes to Salt Tolerance in Rice (Oryza sativa spp. Japonica, L.) by Inducing Specific Morpho-Physiological Responses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differential Mechanisms of Photosynthetic Acclimation to Light and Low Temperature in Arabidopsis and the Extremophile Eutrema salsugineum
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 7
Issue 4
10.3390/plants7040076
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Heat Stress and Water Deficit on the Photosynthetic and Stomatal Physiology of Olive (Olea europaea L.)—A Case Study of the 2017 Heat Wave

by
Matthew Haworth
1,*,
Giovanni Marino
1,
Cecilia Brunetti
1,2,
Dilek Killi
3,
Anna De Carlo
1 and
Mauro Centritto
1
1
Tree and Timber Institute, National Research Council of Italy (CNR-IVALSA), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Firenze, Italy
2
Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences (DiSPAA), University of Florence, Viale delle Idee 30, 50019 Firenze, Italy
3
Institute of Biometeorology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR-IBIMET), Via Giovanni Caproni 8, 50145 Firenze, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2018, 7(4), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040076
Submission received: 14 August 2018 / Revised: 16 September 2018 / Accepted: 18 September 2018 / Published: 20 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photosynthesis under Stress: Selective Pressures, Adaptation and Mitigation of Environmental Change)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Heat waves are predicted to increase in frequency and duration in many regions as global temperatures rise. These transient increases in temperature above normal average values will have pronounced impacts upon the photosynthetic and stomatal physiology of plants. During the summer of 2017, much of the Mediterranean experienced a severe heat wave. Here, we report photosynthetic leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of olive (Olea europaea cv. Leccino) grown under water deficit and full irrigation over the course of the heat wave as midday temperatures rose over 40 °C in Central Italy. Heat stress induced a decline in the photosynthetic capacity of the olives consistent with reduced ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) activity. Damage to photosystem II was more apparent in plants subject to water deficit. In contrast to previous studies, higher temperatures induced reductions in stomatal conductance. Heat stress adversely affected the carbon efficiency of olive. The selection of olive varieties with enhanced tolerance to heat stress and/or strategies to mitigate the impact of higher temperatures will become increasingly important in developing sustainable agriculture in the Mediterranean as global temperatures rise.

1. Introduction

As mean global temperatures rise, the frequency of more extreme climatic events such as droughts and heat waves will increase [1]. This will have severe consequences for agriculture in areas such as the Mediterranean that are presently characterized by hot dry summers, where vegetation experiences high evapotranspirative demand and photo-oxidative stress. Olive (Olea europaea L.) is cultivated across the Mediterranean and is the basis for agro-industrial products worth more than €11 billion each year [2]. In late July to August 2017, much of Europe experienced a pronounced heat wave resulting in extensive forest die-back and loss of crops [3]. Analysis of the physiological response of olive to extreme climatic events will elucidate the likely impacts of future climatic change.
Drought events are often associated with transient anomalous increases in temperature above normal levels known as heat waves. However, the effects of drought and heat stress on plant physiology are often considered in isolation in experimental studies. Both drought and heat stress adversely affect the carbon and water efficiency of plants [4,5,6], and as such their combined effects on plant physiology warrant greater attention. As the availability of water within the soil declines, free ABA in the leaf rises inducing stomatal closure to reduce stomatal conductance (Gs H2O) and transpirative water-loss [7,8,9]. During drought, the amount of energy utilized for photochemistry declines [10], and if not dissipated safely via protective processes such as non-photochemical quenching [11], this excess energy may induce oxidative stress through the production of reactive oxygen species [12]. The thylakoid membranes of the chloroplast are particularly sensitive to oxidative stress; an effect apparent in reduced photosystem II (PSII) electron transport when assessed using chlorophyll fluorescence (ChlF) [13,14]. The conductance of CO2 across the mesophyll layer (Gm CO2) also frequently declines under drought stress [4,15,16] due to stomatal closure reducing CO2 uptake, lower CO2 assimilation within the chloroplast and biochemical changes in the mesophyll layer that reduce transport of CO2 [17,18,19]. Elevated temperature exacerbates the effects of drought by reducing the ratio of photosynthesis relative to respiration ratio, and as a consequence the carbon balance. Moreover, heat stress increases the soil water content threshold (i.e., the amount of water that the plant can extract) at which point plant functions decrease [20].
The thylakoid membranes are also extremely sensitive to heat stress [21]. However, the accumulation of heat shock proteins can act to stabilize the thylakoid membranes during exposure to high temperature [22]. Heat stress can also affect photosynthetic CO2 assimilation via reduced specificity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) for CO2 (i.e., an increase in rates of photorespiration relative to photosynthesis (PN)), lower solubility of CO2 and reduced activity of RubisCO activase [23,24,25,26]. The lower photochemistry associated with reduced RubisCO activity during heat stress [25] would also reduce the capacity of photosystem I to act as an electron receiver from PSII, potentially exacerbating the negative impact of high temperature on PSII [27]. Heat stress may also adversely affect plant water relations by increasing Gs H2O [28,29]. However, longer-term stomatal adaptation to growth at higher temperatures (as oppose to instantaneous increases in leaf temperature) may result in no increase in Gs H2O [20,27,30,31]. More detailed analysis of the photosynthetic and stomatal responses to temperature of plants from contrasting environments would enable a greater understanding of the likely impacts of heat waves on different vegetation types.
Combined drought and heat wave events are likely to have an increasing influence on the productivity of agricultural and natural vegetation [32]. Through analysis of the photosynthetic responses of olive grown under full irrigation and water deficit during the heat wave of summer 2017, we aimed to: (i) assess the impact of heat stress on the carbon and water efficiencies of olive; (ii) quantify the impact of heat stress on the biochemical and diffusive constraints to photosynthetic CO2 uptake; (iii) investigate the interaction of heat stress with plant water status and their impact on photosynthetic performance; and (iv) discuss the likely impact of future increased drought and heat wave events on the viability of olive production in the Mediterranean region.

2. Results

From 25 to 31 of July 2017 (day 206 to 212) mean daily temperatures in Sesto Fiorentino rose from 23 to 32 °C. During this period, the maximum daily temperature increased from 31 to 41 °C (Figure 1a). This increase in daily average and maximum temperatures coincided with respective 63.9 and 75.4% reductions of PN and Gs H2O in olive plants receiving full irrigation (Figure 1b,c). The effect of higher temperatures was less apparent on the already low values of PN and Gs H2O observed in olive subject to water deficit. The maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) of both the well-watered and water deficit olive plants declined respectively by 2.2 and 9.7% from t0 to t1 as the heat wave developed (Figure 1d). A significant difference in Fv/Fm values between the irrigated and water deficit plants was only observed at t2 (day 219) during the heat wave (one-way ANOVA F1,8 = 9.800; P = 0.035).
Instantaneous measurements of leaf gas exchange indicate that the rate of PN was positively related to Gs H2O, Gs CO2, Gm CO2, and Gtot CO2 prior to and during the heat wave (Figure 2). However, the relationships between PN and diffusive conductances to CO2 became less steep during the heat wave. The lower PN observed during the heat wave may have been associated with biochemical impairment of CO2 assimilation (Figure 3a). Analysis of the response of PN to Ci in well-watered plants during and after the heat wave indicated that Vcmax and Jmax were reduced by 17.6 and 31.6% respectively. The maximum rate of PN was 36.3% lower in well-watered plants assessed during the heat wave. The conductance of CO2 across the mesophyll layer when assessed from the PN-Ci curve utilizing the curve fitting method of Ethier and Livingston [33] was 33.3% lower during the heat wave (Figure 3b). A similar 36.4% reduction was observed in Gm CO2 values calculated using the variable J method of olive plants receiving full irrigation during the heat wave (Figure 2c).
Analysis of the OJIP transient of chlorophyll a fluorescence suggests that photochemical PSII electron transport was reduced in both irrigated and water deficit olive plants during the heat wave (Figure 4a). The impact of the heat wave on PSII was most apparent in the olive plants grown under water deficit at t1, where the quantum yield of energy dissipated (ΦDo) and the flux of energy dissipated for each reaction center (DIo/RC) were respectively 42.9% and 97.4% greater than well-watered plants at t0 (Figure 4b). The fluorescence maximum (Fm) (−22.0%), the activity of the oxygen evolving complex on the donor side of PSII (Fv/Fo) (−28.6%), the use of harvested excitation energy for electron transport to the primary plastoquinone A acceptor of PSII (ΨEo) (−16.6%), the quantum yield of the reduction of the final stage acceptors at the PSI stage (δRo) (−24.4%), the efficiency of the electron chain flux in the I to P phase (∆VIP) (−16.9%) and photochemical and non-photochemical energy absorption of both chlorophyll antennae (PIABS) (−33.6%) and PSII reaction centers (PITOT) (−43.8%) were all reduced in olive plants grown under water deficit during the initial stages of the heat wave at t1. Heat stress also induced respective reductions of 17.4% and 21.0% in PIABS and PITOT values of olives grown under full irrigation at t1. The impact of heat stress on OJIP parameters was less apparent at t2 than t1 in both the well-watered and water deficit treated olive plants (Figure 4b).
Instantaneous increases in leaf temperature from 20 to 41.5 °C resulted in respective 67.0% and 69.0% reductions in PN (Figure 5a) and Gs H2O (Figure 5b). The sub-stomatal concentration of CO2 declined by 27.8% as leaf temperature rose from 20 to 35 °C, before increasing to 219.1 μmol mol−1 [CO2] at a leaf temperature of 41.5 °C (Figure 5c). The actual quantum efficiency of PSII in the light adapted state (ΦPSII) remained relatively constant between 0.147 to 0.184 at all leaf temperatures (Figure 5d).

3. Discussion

Olive is highly adapted to environments characterized by low water availability and high evapotranspirative demand [16,34,35,36]. However, the results of this study suggest that the significant heat wave experienced during summer 2017 had a pronounced detrimental impact on the photosynthetic physiology of olive plants subject to both well-watered and water deficit treatments. This interaction between heat stress and plant water status is likely to play an increasingly prominent role in the productivity of olive trees as heat waves and droughts become more prevalent in the Mediterranean. Transcriptome analysis suggests that the genetic expression pathways involved in plant responses to drought and heat stress are largely distinct, despite the common coincidence of these abiotic stresses [37]. Our findings would suggest that the impact of heat stress on olive varies depending upon the water status of the plant.
Photosynthesis declined in well-watered olive plants both during the heat wave (Figure 1b) and when exposed to instantaneous increases in leaf temperature (Figure 5a). The retention of ΦPSII in the well-watered olive plants exposed to an instantaneous increase in leaf temperature (Figure 5d) would indicate that in this instance the reduction in PN is largely the result of a corresponding increase in photorespiration [23]. However, the well-watered olive plants exposed to the heat wave exhibited reductions in PIABS and PITOT (Figure 4b), indicative of lower photochemistry [14]. This is consistent with reductions in the photosynthetic capacity of the well-watered olive plants during the heat wave (Figure 3b). Similar reductions in Vcmax and Jmax have also been observed in crop [27] and tree [20,38] species when grown at higher temperatures, and is likely the result of reductions in RubisCO activase [25]. It was not possible to fully remove diffusive limitations from the olive plants grown under water deficit cf. [39] during the heat wave to accurately assess photosynthetic capacity [40]. It is noteworthy that instantaneous gas exchange measurements of PN were not further reduced during the heat wave in the plants subject to water deficit (Figure 1b). Analysis of the ChlF OJIP transient indicated that PSII was more strongly impaired, with more energy dissipated per reaction center, in the water deficit plants than in their well-watered counterparts. Indeed the reduced capacity for photochemical energy usage in the water deficit plants may have exacerbated the deleterious impact of heat stress on the thylakoid membranes of the olives e.g., [6]. Lower ΨEo, ∆VIP, ΦRo, and δRo in the water deficit olive plants during heat stress would be consistent with reduced plastoquinone A to B electron transport and PSI electron acceptors (e.g., Figure 3b in the well-watered plants) [41,42]. This disruption to intersystem electron transport and PSI end electron acceptor associated with heat stress likely resulted in the generation of reactive oxygen species exacerbating the oxidative stress experienced by the thylakoid membranes of water deficit plants [43,44]. The absence of any reduction in PN in the water deficit olive plants during the heat wave may suggest that PN was largely determined by diffusive rather than biochemical constraints e.g., [45,46,47].
Previous studies have observed increases in Gs H2O associated with higher temperatures in herbaceous plants [28,48,49] and woody trees [29,50,51]. As temperatures rise, the increase in transpirative cooling associated with higher Gs H2O may serve to prevent leaf temperatures reaching harmful levels [52]. In contrast, we observed a reduction in Gs H2O in olive during both the heat wave (Figure 1c) and, similar to results obtained in adult olive trees growing in field conditions [53], when exposed to an instantaneous increase in leaf temperature within the leaf cuvette (Figure 5b). Longer-term adaptation to temperature likely affects the response of Gs H2O to instantaneous variations in leaf temperature [27,30,31,54]. An increase in leaf to air vapor pressure deficit (VPD) with temperature [50] may have induced stomatal closure in the well-watered olive plants through ABA synthesis [55]. Higher leaf to air VPD induces reduced Gs H2O [8], and this likely played a role in the physiological response of the plants as the maximum daily temperature rose from 35 to ~40 °C (Figure 1a). However, leaf to air VPD was maintained constant throughout the assessment of the impact of instantaneous increases in leaf temperature on leaf gas exchange (Figure 5b); therefore, the results of the present study may suggest that short and longer-term stomatal responses to higher temperatures may be species specific when considered in the context of contrasting short and long term stomatal responses to heat stress e.g., [27,28,31]. The reduction in Gs H2O observed in the well-watered olives during the heat wave (Figure 1c) and instantaneous increases in leaf temperature (Figure 5b) may reflect an adaptation to minimize the risk of xylem embolism e.g., [32,56,57]. Selective pressures exerted by growth in an environment characterized by low water availability and high evapotranspirative demand may favor a reduction in Gs H2O with temperature (rather than the positive relationship between Gs H2O and temperature reported in other studies: [28,29]), as higher transpiration rates would result in lower xylem vessel pressures potentially leading to cavitation e.g., [58]. It is noteworthy that the higher temperatures associated with the heat wave did not induce further reductions in the Gs H2O values of olive plants subject to water deficit treatment. Stomatal conductance of the well-watered and water deficit treated olive plants was identical at t1 and t2 (Figure 1c), raising the possibility that this represents the limit of stomatal closure e.g., [59,60] in this variety of olive.
Heat stress associated with the heat wave generally impaired photosynthetic CO2 transport (Figure 2) [21]. Similar reductions in the relationship between PN and CO2 uptake were observed in C3 species grown at high temperatures (but not plants with C4 photosynthesis, where CO2 is concentrated within the bundle sheath to minimize the impact of the reduced CO2-specificity of RubisCO) [27,30]. The conductance of CO2 across the mesophyll layer was reduced during the heat wave (Figure 2c and Figure 3b). This was likely associated with greater biochemical limitations to assimilation of CO2 (Figure 3a) and stomatal closure (Figure 1c and Figure 2a) reducing the flux of CO2 across the mesophyll [18]. The reduction in the relationship between PN and total conductance to CO2 may reflect an increase in photorespiration relative to PN [23] and non-photochemical energy usage (Figure 4b) in the olive plants subject to heat stress [61].
The results of this study indicate that heat stress will result in impaired photosynthetic carbon gain in olives as heat waves increase in frequency, duration and severity. In contrast to other studies, heat stress did not adversely affect the water balance of olive leaves, as Gs H2O declined as temperatures rose. Nonetheless, damage to PSII was more apparent in olive plants subject to water deficit (Figure 4). As the yield of olive fruit is closely related to water availability during fruit development (specifically: flower formation, flowering/fruit set, and rapid fruit growth) [34,62], exposure to heat stress during this period would likely have further negative impacts on productivity by exacerbating any pre-existing diffusive and biochemical limitations to PN e.g., [63]. Physiological analysis of the impact of drought and heat stress provides a valuable insight into the photosynthetic and stomatal adaptation of olive to growth under conditions characterized by low water availability, elevated temperatures, and high evapotranspirative demands. Treatments such as the application of kaolin to olive trees (which covers the leaf surface in clay particles)—e.g., [64]—may have additional benefits in reducing energy interception of the leaf by increasing surface albedo, and could be an effective mitigation strategy to reduce leaf thermal stress during heat waves. Phenotyping studies to identify olive varieties with attributes conducive to tolerance of heat and drought stress may also be effective in ensuring the sustainability of olive production in the Mediterranean.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Ten two-year-old olive (Olea europaea L. var. Leccino) plants were potted in 10 dm3 pots filled with sand. The plants were grown outside for two months prior to the experiment in full sunlight in Sesto Fiorentino, Central Italy, and watered each day to pot capacity and supplied each week with 100 mL full strength Hoagland nutrient solution (equivalent to an electrical conductivity of 2.0 dS m−1) to provide nutrients at free access rates [65]. The evening prior to the instigation of the water deficit treatment on day 200 (19 July 2017), the plants were watered to pot water capacity. The pot capacity (PC) water content was determined gravimetrically. The pots were weighed each day and the amount of water lost via evapotranspiration was replaced after the well-watered (80% of PC) and water deficit (when plants had reached 20% of the starting Gs H2O values, this was approximately 30% of PC) weight targets had been achieved in five replicate plants for each water treatment. On the evening of day 220 (8 August 2017), the plants subject to the water deficit treatment were ‘re-watered’ to 80% PC and this pot water content was maintained for the remainder of the experiment. The minimum, maximum, and mean daily temperatures were recorded by a nearby weather station (~100 m from the experimental site) managed by the Institute of Biometeorology of the National Research Council of Italy.

4.2. Leaf Gas Exchange Analysis

Point measurements of leaf gas exchange and ChlF were performed on the uppermost fully expanded leaf of each replicate plant (five replicates for each water treatment) between 09:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. using a LiCor Li6400XT fitted with a 6400-40 2 cm2 leaf cuvette (Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Conditions in the leaf cuvette were set to a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 2000 μmol m−2 s−1, leaf temperature of 30 °C, [CO2] of 400 μmol mol−1 and relative humidity of 60%. The multi-phase fluorescence setting was used with an initial saturating pulse of 8000 μmol m−2 s−1 [66]. The quantum efficiency of PSII under steady state conditions in the light (ΦPSII) was determined following Genty et al. [67]. Mesophyll conductance (GmCO2) was calculated using the variable J method described by Harley et al. [68]. Total conductance to CO2 (GtotCO2) was calculated as [4]
G tot CO 2 = G S CO 2 ∗ G m CO 2 G S CO 2 + G m CO 2
The response of PN to increasing [CO2] within the internal sub-stomatal air-space (Ci) was determined during the heat wave on day 216 (4 August 2017) and after the heatwave on day 226 (14 August 2017) on well-watered olive plants using a LiCor Li6400-40 attached to a 6 cm2 LiCor 6400-02B leaf cuvette. To remove stomatal limitations to PN, the concentration of [CO2] within the leaf cuvette was lowered to 50 μmol mol−1 for 60 min to fully open stomata (thus removing any diffusive limitations to PN: [39]) before [CO2] was increased in stages when after 3 to 4 min PN had stabilized ([CO2] steps: 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000 μmol mol−1). Leaf temperature was 25 °C and relative humidity 60% throughout the PN-Ci response curve. Exhaust air from the LiCor Li6400 was fed into an air-space between the leaf gasket and a supplementary external gasket to reduce the impact of diffusive leaks [69]. The maximum carboxylation rate of RubisCO (Vcmax), the maximum rate of electron transport for regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) (Jmax), and Gm CO2 were calculated from the PN-Ci curves following Ethier and Livingston [33]. The maximum rate of PN (PNmax) was considered to be PN at a PPFD of 2000 μmol m−2 s−1 and [CO2] of 2000 μmol mol−1. To assess the impact of instantaneous increases in leaf temperature on leaf gas exchange parameters, the uppermost leaf from five well-watered plants was assessed using a LiCor Li6400XT and 6400-40 2 cm2 leaf cuvette fitted with a 6400-88 Expanded Temperature Kit that allows hot/cold water to cool/heat the Peltier thermoelectric blocks in the cuvette. A Thermo Fisher Haake A28 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) water bath was used to pass water through the blocks adjacent to the Peltiers. Following Bunce [28], the water passing through the blocks was below that of the desired leaf temperature, so that the Li6400 was always in the heating mode. Leaf gas exchange and ChlF parameters were recorded at leaf temperatures of 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 41.5 °C (this was the maximum leaf temperature achievable with this system). Conditions in the leaf cuvette were: PPFD of 1000 μmol m−2 s−1, [CO2] of 400 μmol mol−1 and leaf to air vapor pressure deficit was maintained constant at 2.0 ± 0.2 KPa by altering the amount of vapor within the reference gas stream entering the leaf cuvette.

4.3. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Chlorophyll fluorescence analyses were performed between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. on the same leaves used in the leaf gas exchange analyses. Transient analysis of chlorophyll a fluorescence was undertaken using a Hansatech Pocket-PEA (plant efficiency analyser) fluorimeter (Hansatech, King’s Lynn, UK). Leaves were dark adapted for 30 min and then exposed to a saturating light pulse (intensity >3000 μmol m−2 s−1, excitation light of 650 nm) [70]. This results in a polyphasic transient of chlorophyll fluorescence: O (20–50 µs), J (2 ms), I (30 ms), and P (peak). The theoretical basis and analysis of OJIP curves is given in Strasser et al. [70]. The OJIP curves were analyzed using Biolyzer 4 HP v.3 (Bioenergetics Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland). The parameters extrapolated from the OJIP curve and analyzed in this study are listed and defined in Appendix A.

Author Contributions

Investigation, M.H., G.M., C.B., M.C., and D.K.; Resources, M.C.; Data Curation, M.H., G.M., and D.K.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.H.; Writing—Review & Editing, M.H., G.M., C.B., D.K., A.D.C, and M.C.

Funding

Regione Toscana programma di sviluppo rurale 2014/2020, Misura 16.2-PIF 16/2015: Indirizzi di Sanità, Sostenibilità ed Eccellenza della olivicoltura Mediterranea (SEMIA); Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali: Programma triennale 2017–2019 per la conservazione, caratterizzazione, uso e valorizzazione delle risorse genetiche vegetali per l’alimentazione.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Parameters calculated from the ChlF OJIP transient from Strasser [70].
Fominimum fluorescence yield in dark-adapted conditions.
Fmmaximum fluorescence yield in dark-adapted conditions.
ΦDoquantum yield of energy dissipation.
Fv/Fmmaximum quantum yield of PSII photochemistry.
Fv/Foan indicator of the activity of the oxygen evolving complex on the donor side of PSII.
ABS/RCabsorption of chlorophyll antennae per reaction center.
DIo/RCflux of energy dissipated for each reaction center.
TRo/RCflux of trapped energy per reaction center leading to the reduction of plastoquinone A.
ETo/RCelectron flux beyond plastoquinone A per reaction center.
ΦEoinitial quantum yield of electron transport.
ΨEoprobability that harvested excitation energy is utilized for electron transport to the primary plastoquinone A acceptor of PSII.
δRoefficiency of electron carriers in reducing end electron acceptors at the PSI acceptor.
ΦRoquantum yield of the reduction of final stage acceptors at the PSI stage.
PIABSa performance index based on the photochemical and non-photochemical energy absorption of chlorophyll antennae.
PITOTperformance index incorporating the concentration of reaction centers.
ΔVIPefficiency of the electron chain flux in the I to P phase of the chlorophyll a fluorescence.

References

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability; Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. International Olive Council (IOC). World Olive Oil Figures; International Olive Council: Madrid, Spain, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Teuling, A.J. A hot future for European droughts. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 364–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lauteri, M.; Haworth, M.; Serraj, R.; Monteverdi, M.C.; Centritto, M. Photosynthetic diffusional constraints affect yield in drought stressed rice cultivars during flowering. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Haworth, M.; Cosentino, S.L.; Marino, G.; Brunetti, C.; Scordia, D.; Testa, G.; Riggi, E.; Avola, G.; Loreto, F.; Centritto, M. Physiological responses of Arundo donax ecotypes to drought: A common garden study. GCB Bioenergy 2017, 9, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Crafts-Brandner, S.J.; Salvucci, M.E. Sensitivity of photosynthesis in a C4 plant, maize, to heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 1773–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Davies, W.J.; Zhang, J.H. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 42, 55–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haworth, M.; Cosentino, S.L.; Marino, G.; Brunetti, C.; Riggi, E.; Avola, G.; Loreto, F.; Centritto, M. Increased free abscisic acid during drought enhances stomatal sensitivity and modifies stomatal behaviour in fast growing giant reed (Arundo donax L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 147, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marino, G.; Brunetti, C.; Tattini, M.; Romano, A.; Biasioli, F.; Tognetti, R.; Loreto, F.; Ferrini, F.; Centritto, M. Dissecting the role of isoprene and stress-related hormones (ABA and ethylene) in Populus nigra exposed to unequal root zone water stress. Tree Physiol. 2017, 37, 1637–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Meyer, S.; Genty, B. Heterogeneous inhibition of photosynthesis over the leaf surface of Rosa rubiginosa L. during water stress and abscisic acid treatment: Induction of a metabolic component by limitation of CO2 diffusion. Planta 1999, 210, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Demmig-Adams, B.; Adams, W.W. Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1992, 43, 599–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pinheiro, C.; Chaves, M.M. Photosynthesis and drought: Can we make metabolic connections from available data? J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 869–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Killi, D.; Haworth, M. Diffusive and metabolic constraints to photosynthesis in quinoa during drought and salt stress. Plants 2017, 6, E49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kalaji, H.M.; Jajoo, A.; Oukarroum, A.; Brestic, M.; Zivcak, M.; Samborska, I.A.; Cetner, M.D.; Łukasik, I.; Goltsev, V.; Ladle, R.J. Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a tool to monitor physiological status of plants under abiotic stress conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Centritto, M.; Lauteri, M.; Monteverdi, M.C.; Serraj, R. Leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and grain yield in contrasting rice genotypes subjected to water deficits during the reproductive stage. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2325–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Marino, G.; Pallozzi, E.; Cocozza, C.; Tognetti, R.; Giovannelli, A.; Cantini, C.; Centritto, M. Assessing gas exchange, sap flow and water relations using tree canopy spectral reflectance indices in irrigated and rainfed Olea europaea L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 99, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sorrentino, G.; Haworth, M.; Wahbi, S.; Mahmood, T.; Zuomin, S.; Centritto, M. Abscisic acid induces rapid reductions in mesophyll conductance to carbon dioxide. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tholen, D.; Ethier, G.; Genty, B.; Pepin, S.; Zhu, X.-G. Variable mesophyll conductance revisited: Theoretical background and experimental implications. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 2087–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Miyazawa, S.-I.; Yoshimura, S.; Shinzaki, Y.; Maeshima, M.; Miyake, C. Deactivation of aquaporins decreases internal conductance to CO2 diffusion in tobacco leaves grown under long-term drought. Funct. Plant Biol. 2008, 35, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Centritto, M.; Brilli, F.; Fodale, R.; Loreto, F. Different sensitivity of isoprene emission, respiration and photosynthesis to high growth temperature coupled with drought stress in black poplar (Populus nigra) saplings. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Velikova, V.; Tsonev, T.; Barta, C.; Centritto, M.; Koleva, D.; Stefanova, M.; Busheva, M.; Loreto, F. BVOC emissions, photosynthetic characteristics and changes in chloroplast ultrastructure of Platanus orientalis L. exposed to elevated CO2 and high temperature. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 2629–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Heckathorn, S.A.; Downs, C.A.; Sharkey, T.D.; Coleman, J.S. The small, methionine-rich chloroplast heat-shock protein protects photosystem II electron transport during heat stress. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jordan, D.B.; Ogren, W.L. The CO2/O2 specificity of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase: Dependence on ribulosebisphosphate concentration, pH and temperature. Planta 1984, 161, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Crafts-Brandner, S.J.; Salvucci, M.E. Rubisco activase constrains the photosynthetic potential of leaves at high temperature and CO2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13430–13435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Feller, U.; Crafts-Brandner, S.J.; Salvucci, M.E. Moderately high temperatures inhibit ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco) activase-mediated activation of rubisco. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Law, R.D.; Crafts-Brandner, S.J. Inhibition and acclimation of photosynthesis to heat stress is closely correlated with activation of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase. Plant Physiol. 1999, 120, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Killi, D.; Bussotti, F.; Raschi, A.; Haworth, M. Adaptation to high temperature mitigates the impact of water deficit during combined heat and drought stress in C3 sunflower and C4 maize varieties with contrasting drought tolerance. Physiol. Plant. 2016, 159, 130–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bunce, J.A. Acclimation of photosynthesis to temperature in eight cool and warm climate herbaceous C3 species: Temperature dependence of parameters of a biochemical photosynthesis model. Photosynth. Res. 2000, 63, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Urban, J.; Ingwers, M.; McGuire, M.A.; Teskey, R.O. Stomatal conductance increases with rising temperature. Plant Signal. Behav. 2017, 12, e1356534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Haworth, M.; Belcher, C.M.; Killi, D.; Dewhirst, R.A.; Materassi, A.; Raschi, A.; Centritto, M. Impaired photosynthesis and increased leaf construction costs may induce floral stress during episodes of global warming over macroevolutionary timescales. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Fares, S.; Mahmood, T.; Liu, S.; Loreto, F.; Centritto, M. Influence of growth temperature and measuring temperature on isoprene emission, diffusive limitations of photosynthesis and respiration in hybrid poplars. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Centritto, M.; Tognetti, R.; Leitgeb, E.; Střelcová, K.; Cohen, S. Above ground processes—Anticipating climate change influences. In Forest Management and the Water Cycle: An Ecosystem-Based Approach; Ecological Studies 212; Bredemeier, M., Cohen, S., Godbold, D.L., Lode, E., Pichler, V., Schleppi, P., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2011; pp. 31–64. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ethier, G.J.; Livingston, N.J. On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dbara, S.; Haworth, M.; Emiliani, G.; Mimoun, M.B.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Centritto, M. Partial root-zone drying of olive (Olea europaea var. ‘Chetoui’) induces reduced yield under field conditions. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Dichio, B.; Xiloyannis, C.; Angelopoulos, K.; Nuzzo, V.; Bufo, S.A.; Celano, G. Drought-induced variations of water relations parameters in Olea europaea. Plant Soil 2003, 257, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Connor, D.J. Adaptation of olive (Olea europaea L.) to water-limited environments. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2005, 56, 1181–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rizhsky, L.; Liang, H.; Shuman, J.; Shulaev, V.; Davletova, S.; Mittler, R. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1683–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Killi, D.; Bussotti, F.; Gottardini, E.; Pollastrini, M.; Mori, J.; Tani, C.; Papini, A.; Ferrini, F.; Fini, A. Photosynthetic and morphological responses of oak species to temperature and [CO2] increased to levels predicted for 2050. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 31, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Centritto, M.; Loreto, F.; Chartzoulakis, K. The use of low [CO2] to estimate diffusional and non-diffusional limitations of photosynthetic capacity of salt-stressed olive saplings. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aganchich, B.; Wahbi, S.; Loreto, F.; Centritto, M. Partial root zone drying: Regulation of photosynthetic limitations and antioxidant enzymatic activities in young olive (Olea europaea) saplings. Tree Physiol. 2009, 29, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Schansker, G.; Tóth, S.Z.; Strasser, R.J. Methylviologen and dibromothymoquinone treatments of pea leaves reveal the role of photosystem I in the Chl a fluorescence rise OJIP. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2005, 1706, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ceppi, M.G.; Oukarroum, A.; Çiçek, N.; Strasser, R.J.; Schansker, G. The IP amplitude of the fluorescence rise OJIP is sensitive to changes in the photosystem I content of leaves: A study on plants exposed to magnesium and sulfate deficiencies, drought stress and salt stress. Physiol. Plant. 2012, 144, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pospíšil, P. Production of reactive oxygen species by photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2009, 1787, 1151–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pospíšil, P. Production of reactive oxygen species by photosystem II as a response to light and temperature stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Flexas, J.; Bota, J.; Loreto, F.; Cornic, G.; Sharkey, T. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol. 2004, 6, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bongi, G.; Loreto, F. Gas-exchange properties of salt-stressed olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves. Plant Physiol. 1989, 90, 1408–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Loreto, F.; Centritto, M.; Chartzoulakis, K. Photosynthetic limitations in olive cultivars with different sensitivity to salt stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Raschke, K. Temperature dependence of CO2 assimilation and stomatal aperture in leaf sections of Zea mays. Planta 1970, 91, 336–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Drake, B.; Raschke, K.; Salisbury, F. Temperature and transpiration resistances of Xanthium leaves as affected by air temperature, humidity, and wind speed. Plant Physiol. 1970, 46, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Schulze, E.-D.; Lange, O.; Evenari, M.; Kappen, L.; Buschbom, U. The role of air humidity and leaf temperature in controlling stomatal resistance of Prunus armeniaca L. under desert conditions: I a simulation of the daily course of stomatal resistance. Oecologia 1974, 17, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Schulze, E.-D.; Lange, O.; Kappen, L.; Buschbom, U.; Evenari, M. Stomatal responses to changes in temperature at increasing water stress. Planta 1973, 110, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Crawford, A.J.; McLachlan, D.H.; Hetherington, A.M.; Franklin, K.A. High temperature exposure increases plant cooling capacity. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, R396–R397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Centritto, M.; Wahbi, S.; Serraj, R.; Chaves, M. Effects of partial rootzone drying (PRD) on adult olive tree (Olea europaea) in field conditions under arid climate: II. Photosynthetic responses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 106, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Drake, B.; Salisbury, F. After effects of low and high temperature pre-treatment on leaf resistance, transpiration, and leaf temperature in Xanthium. Plant Physiol. 1972, 50, 572–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bauerle, W.; Whitlow, T.; Setter, T.; Vermeylen, F. Abscisic acid synthesis in Acer rubrum L. leaves—A vapour-pressure-deficit-mediated response. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2004, 129, 182–187. [Google Scholar]
  56. Jones, H.G.; Sutherland, R.A. Stomatal control of xylem embolism. Plant Cell Environ. 1991, 14, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Haworth, M.; Centritto, M.; Giovannelli, A.; Marino, G.; Proietti, N.; Capitani, D.; De Carlo, A.; Loreto, F. Xylem morphology determines the drought response of two Arundo donax ecotypes from contrasting habitats. GCB Bioenergy 2017, 9, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sperry, J.S. Relationship of xylem embolism to xlem pressure potential, stomatal closure, and shoot morphology in the palm Rhapis excelsa. Plant Physiol. 1986, 80, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Elliott-Kingston, C.; Haworth, M.; Yearsley, J.M.; Batke, S.P.; Lawson, T.; McElwain, J.C. Does size matter? Atmospheric CO2 may be a stronger driver of stomatal closing rate than stomatal size in taxa that diversified under low CO2. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Haworth, M.; Scutt, C.P.; Douthe, C.; Marino, G.; Gomes, M.T.G.; Loreto, F.; Flexas, J.; Centritto, M. Allocation of the epidermis to stomata relates to stomatal physiological control: Stomatal factors involved in the diversification of the angiosperms and development of amphistomaty. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 151, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sun, P.; Wahbi, S.; Tsonev, T.; Haworth, M.; Liu, S.; Centritto, M. On the use of leaf spectral indices to assess water status and photosynthetic limitations in Olea europaea L. during water-stress and recovery. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gucci, R.; Lodolini, E.; Rapoport, H. Productivity of olive trees with different water status and crop load. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2007, 82, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Angelopoulos, K.; Dichio, B.; Xiloyannis, C. Inhibition of photosynthesis in olive trees (Olea europaea L.) during water stress and rewatering. J. Exp. Bot. 1996, 47, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Benincasa, C.; Bati, C.B.; Iannotta, N.; Pellegrino, M.; Pennino, G.; Rizzuti, B.; Romano, E. Efficacy of kaolin and copper based products on olive-fruit fly (B. aloea Gmelin) and effects on nutritional and sensory parameters of olive oils. Sci. Appl. Aliment. 2008, 4, 21–31. [Google Scholar]
  65. Hoagland, D.R.; Arnon, D.I. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. 1950, 347, 32. [Google Scholar]
  66. Loriaux, S.; Avenson, T.; Welles, J.; McDermitt, D.; Eckles, R.; Riensche, B.; Genty, B. Closing in on maximum yield of chlorophyll fluorescence using a single multiphase flash of sub-saturating intensity. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 1755–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Genty, B.; Briantais, J.-M.; Baker, N.R. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1989, 990, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Harley, P.C.; Loreto, F.; Dimarco, G.; Sharkey, T.D. Theoretical considerations when estimating the mesophyll conductance to CO2 flux by analysis of the response of photosynthesis to CO2. Plant Physiol. 1992, 98, 1429–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rodeghiero, M.; Niinemets, Ü.; Cescatti, A. Major diffusion leaks of clamp-on leaf cuvettes still unaccounted: How erroneous are the estimates of Farquhar et al. model parameters? Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 1006–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Strasser, R.J.; Tsimilli-Michael, M.; Srivastava, A. Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. In Chlorophyll a Fluorescence; Papageorgiou, G., Govindjee, F.C., Gantt, E., Golbeck, J., Golden, S., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; Volume 19, pp. 321–362. [Google Scholar]
Plants 07 00076 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Daily mean (solid black line), maximum and minimum (dashed lines either side of the mean) temperature during the experiment coinciding with the heat wave of summer 2017 (marked in light grey shading) which occurred from day 213 to 221. The darker grey shading marks the point at which the water deficit plants were ‘re-watered’ to receive full irrigation. Point measurements of photosynthesis (PN) (b), stomatal conductance (Gs H2O) (c) and the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) (d) of olive plants subject to full irrigation (white fill symbols, solid line) and water deficit (black fill symbols, broken line) were recorded at intervals during the experimental treatment. Error bars indicate one standard deviation either side of the mean. Time periods t0 (day 206), t1 (day 215) and t2 (day 219) marked above panel a refer to OJIP analysis in Figure 4.
Figure 1. (a) Daily mean (solid black line), maximum and minimum (dashed lines either side of the mean) temperature during the experiment coinciding with the heat wave of summer 2017 (marked in light grey shading) which occurred from day 213 to 221. The darker grey shading marks the point at which the water deficit plants were ‘re-watered’ to receive full irrigation. Point measurements of photosynthesis (PN) (b), stomatal conductance (Gs H2O) (c) and the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) (d) of olive plants subject to full irrigation (white fill symbols, solid line) and water deficit (black fill symbols, broken line) were recorded at intervals during the experimental treatment. Error bars indicate one standard deviation either side of the mean. Time periods t0 (day 206), t1 (day 215) and t2 (day 219) marked above panel a refer to OJIP analysis in Figure 4.
Plants 07 00076 g001
Plants 07 00076 g002 550
Figure 2. The relationship between photosynthesis (PN) and stomatal conductance to water vapor (Gs H2O) (a), and stomatal (Gs CO2) (b), mesophyll (Gm CO2) (c) and total (Gtot CO2), (d) conductance to CO2 of olive plants during (square symbols, dashed best fit line) and after (circle symbols, solid best fit line) the heat wave (marked in light grey shading in Figure 1) subject to full irrigation (white fill symbols) and water deficit (grey fill symbols) treatment.
Figure 2. The relationship between photosynthesis (PN) and stomatal conductance to water vapor (Gs H2O) (a), and stomatal (Gs CO2) (b), mesophyll (Gm CO2) (c) and total (Gtot CO2), (d) conductance to CO2 of olive plants during (square symbols, dashed best fit line) and after (circle symbols, solid best fit line) the heat wave (marked in light grey shading in Figure 1) subject to full irrigation (white fill symbols) and water deficit (grey fill symbols) treatment.
Plants 07 00076 g002
Plants 07 00076 g003 550
Figure 3. The response of photosynthesis (PN) to increasing [CO2] within the internal leaf air-space (Ci) (a) and physiological parameters calculated from the PN-Ci response curve utilizing the method of Ethier and Livingston [33] (b) in well-watered olive plants during (grey fill symbols) and after (white fill symbols) the heat wave. Y-axis units for Vcmax, Jmax, and PN max are μmol m−2 s−1, and Gm CO2 is measured in mmol m−2 s−1. * indicates significant difference between measurements conducted during and after the heat wave using a one-way ANOVA: Vcmax (F1,7 = 11.0; P = 0.013), Jmax (F1,7 = 199.1; P = 2.1 × 10−6), Gm CO2 (F1,7 = 7.3; P = 0.031) and PN max (F1,7 = 151.1; P = 1.8 × 10−5). Error bars indicate one standard deviation either side of the mean.
Figure 3. The response of photosynthesis (PN) to increasing [CO2] within the internal leaf air-space (Ci) (a) and physiological parameters calculated from the PN-Ci response curve utilizing the method of Ethier and Livingston [33] (b) in well-watered olive plants during (grey fill symbols) and after (white fill symbols) the heat wave. Y-axis units for Vcmax, Jmax, and PN max are μmol m−2 s−1, and Gm CO2 is measured in mmol m−2 s−1. * indicates significant difference between measurements conducted during and after the heat wave using a one-way ANOVA: Vcmax (F1,7 = 11.0; P = 0.013), Jmax (F1,7 = 199.1; P = 2.1 × 10−6), Gm CO2 (F1,7 = 7.3; P = 0.031) and PN max (F1,7 = 151.1; P = 1.8 × 10−5). Error bars indicate one standard deviation either side of the mean.
Plants 07 00076 g003
Plants 07 00076 g004 550
Figure 4. Analysis of the chlorophyll fluorescence transient of olive plants at t0 (circle symbol), t1 (square symbol) and t2 (triangle symbol) (see Figure 1 for sampling intervals) subject to full irrigation (white fill symbols) and water deficit (grey fill symbols) treatments: (a) average OJIP induction curves; (b) spider plot of parameters (see Materials and Methods for definitions and descriptions) extrapolated from the OJIP transient expressed in relation to values of plants receiving full irrigation at t0. Error bars indicate one standard deviation either side of the mean.
Figure 4. Analysis of the chlorophyll fluorescence transient of olive plants at t0 (circle symbol), t1 (square symbol) and t2 (triangle symbol) (see Figure 1 for sampling intervals) subject to full irrigation (white fill symbols) and water deficit (grey fill symbols) treatments: (a) average OJIP induction curves; (b) spider plot of parameters (see Materials and Methods for definitions and descriptions) extrapolated from the OJIP transient expressed in relation to values of plants receiving full irrigation at t0. Error bars indicate one standard deviation either side of the mean.
Plants 07 00076 g004
Plants 07 00076 g005 550
Figure 5. Response of photosynthesis (PN) (a), stomatal conductance (Gs H2O) (b), intercellular sub-stomatal air-space [CO2] (Ci) (c), and the actual quantum efficiency of PSII under steady state conditions in the light (ΦPSII) (d) to an instantaneous increase in leaf temperature over a range of 20 to 41.5 °C of well-watered olive plants. Error bars indicate one standard deviation either side of the mean.
Figure 5. Response of photosynthesis (PN) (a), stomatal conductance (Gs H2O) (b), intercellular sub-stomatal air-space [CO2] (Ci) (c), and the actual quantum efficiency of PSII under steady state conditions in the light (ΦPSII) (d) to an instantaneous increase in leaf temperature over a range of 20 to 41.5 °C of well-watered olive plants. Error bars indicate one standard deviation either side of the mean.
Plants 07 00076 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haworth, M.; Marino, G.; Brunetti, C.; Killi, D.; De Carlo, A.; Centritto, M. The Impact of Heat Stress and Water Deficit on the Photosynthetic and Stomatal Physiology of Olive (Olea europaea L.)—A Case Study of the 2017 Heat Wave. Plants 2018, 7, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040076

AMA Style

Haworth M, Marino G, Brunetti C, Killi D, De Carlo A, Centritto M. The Impact of Heat Stress and Water Deficit on the Photosynthetic and Stomatal Physiology of Olive (Olea europaea L.)—A Case Study of the 2017 Heat Wave. Plants. 2018; 7(4):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haworth, Matthew, Giovanni Marino, Cecilia Brunetti, Dilek Killi, Anna De Carlo, and Mauro Centritto. 2018. "The Impact of Heat Stress and Water Deficit on the Photosynthetic and Stomatal Physiology of Olive (Olea europaea L.)—A Case Study of the 2017 Heat Wave" Plants 7, no. 4: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040076

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop