Some Generalized Properties of Poly-Daehee Numbers and Polynomials Based on Apostol–Genocchi Polynomials

Abstract

Numerous polynomial variations and their extensions have been explored extensively and found applications in a variety of research fields. The purpose of this research is to establish a unified class of Apostol–Genocchi polynomials based on poly-Daehee polynomials and to explore some of their features and identities. We investigate these polynomials via generating functions and deduce various identities, summation formulae, differential and integral formulas, implicit summation formulae, and several characterized generating functions for new numbers and polynomials. Finally, by using an operational version of Apostol–Genocchi polynomials, we derive some results in terms of new special polynomials. Due to the generic nature of the findings described here, they are used to reduce and generate certain known or novel formulae and identities for relatively simple polynomials and numbers.

1. Introduction

The study of special functions is a notable subject of mathematics which has attracted various mathematicians in the recent past. Some known special functions, including Bernoulli numbers, polynomials, hypergeometric functions of Euler and Gauss, Euler’s gamma and beta functions, Abel’s, Weierstrass’ and Jacobi’s elliptic functions, Bessel functions, Legendre polynomials, Jacobi, Laguerre, and Hermite, are thoroughly discussed in the literature. Some of these functions were introduced to solve specific problems and some others were used to solve general problems. In recent years, generalized and multivariable forms of special functions of mathematical physics have also undergone significant evolutions (see [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] for more details). The theory of orthogonal polynomials and special functions is of intrinsic interest to many parts of mathematics. Moreover, it can be used to explain many physical and chemical phenomena. For example, the vibrations of a drum head can be explained in terms of special functions known as Bessel functions. Furthermore, the solutions of the Schrodinger equation for a harmonic oscillator can be described using orthogonal polynomials known as Hermite polynomials. Furthermore, the eigenfunctions for the Schrodinger operator associated with the hydrogen atom are described in terms orthogonal polynomials known as Laguerre polynomials.

The subject of special polynomials of two variables, in particular, enabled the development of novel methods for solving vast classes of partial differential equations that are often encountered in physical issues. The majority of special functions of mathematical physics and their generalization have been inspired by physical problems. There is an abundance of remarkable characteristics and correlations with special generalized polynomials in the literature (see, for details, [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]).

2. Background and Preliminaries

The following polynomials and numbers are required for the current investigation: The $\kappa$-th polylogarithm function ${\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }\left(w\right)$ is defined by (see, e.g., [25], ([26], Section 2.4); see also [21,23])

$$\begin{gathered} {\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }\left(w\right):=\sum _{s=1}^{\infty }\frac{w^s}{s^{\kappa }}(w\in \mathbb{C},|w|⩽1;\kappa \in \mathbb{N}\backslash \left\{1\right\}) \\ ={\int }_0^w\frac{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa -1}\left(t\right)}{t}dt(\kappa \in \mathbb{N}\backslash \left\{1\right\}), \end{gathered}$$

(1)

where

$${\mathrm{Li}}_1\left(t\right):=-log(1-t).$$

(2)

Here and in the following, $\mathbb{N}$ and $\mathbb{C}$ denote the sets of positive integers and complex numbers, respectively. Furthermore, put ${\mathbb{N}}_0:=\mathbb{N}\cup \left\{0\right\}$.

Kim and Kim [27] explored the Daehee polynomials ${\mathcal{D}}_r\left(u\right)$ which are generated by (see also [19,20,27,28,29])

$$\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{D}}_r\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}={(1+\varsigma )}^u\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }.$$

(3)

Here ${\mathcal{D}}_r:={\mathcal{D}}_r\left(0\right)$ are called the Daehee numbers. We find that

$${\mathcal{D}}_r={(-1)}^r\frac{r!}{r+1}\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right).$$

(4)

The first few are

$${\mathcal{D}}_0=1,{\mathcal{D}}_1=-\frac{1}{2},{\mathcal{D}}_2=\frac{2}{3},{\mathcal{D}}_3=-\frac{3}{2},{\mathcal{D}}_4=\frac{24}{5},\dots .$$

Lim and Kwon [28] introduced and investigated the poly-Daehee polynomials ${\mathcal{D}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}\left(u\right)$ which are given by the following generating function:

$$\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{D}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}(\kappa \in \mathbb{N}).$$

(5)

Then ${\mathcal{D}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}:={\mathcal{D}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}\left(0\right)$ are called the poly-Daehee numbers. In view of (2), it is easy to find that

$${\mathcal{D}}_r^{\left(1\right)}\left(u\right)={\mathcal{D}}_r\left(u\right)\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right).$$

(6)

The Bernoulli polynomials ${\mathcal{B}}_r\left(u\right)$ (see, e.g., [15], ([26], Section 1.7)) and their second kind $b_n\left(x\right)$ (see, e.g., [24]) are defined by the following generating functions:

$$\frac{\varsigma }{e^{\varsigma }-1}{e}^{u\varsigma }=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{B}}_r\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}\left(\right|\varsigma |<2\pi ),$$

(7)

and

$$\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{b}_r\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}=\frac{\varsigma }{log(1+\varsigma )}{(1+\varsigma )}^u.$$

(8)

By combining (3) and (8), we get

$$\sum _{s=0}^r\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right)b_{r-s}{\mathcal{D}}_s\left(u\right)=r!\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{2u}{r}\right)\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right).$$

(9)

Kaneko [21] committed their research on the poly-Bernoulli numbers ${\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}$ which are generated by the following function:

$$\frac{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{1-e^{-\varsigma }}=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}.$$

(10)

When $\kappa =1$, ${\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(1\right)}$ are generated by

$$\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(1\right)}\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}=\frac{\varsigma e^{\varsigma }}{e^{\varsigma }-1}=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{B}}_r\left(1\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}.$$

(11)

From (11), the following relationship between the poly-Bernoulli numbers ${\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(1\right)}$ and the Bernoulli polynomials ${\mathcal{B}}_r\left(1\right)$ holds:

$${\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(1\right)}={\mathcal{B}}_r\left(1\right)\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right).$$

(12)

The poly-Bernoulli numbers ${\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}$ are given explicitly by the following identity (see ([21], Theorem 1)):

$${\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}={(-1)}^r\sum _{s=0}^r\frac{{(-1)}^{s}s!S(r,s)}{{(s+1)}^{\kappa }}\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0,\kappa \in \mathbb{Z}\right),$$

(13)

where (elsewhere) $\mathbb{Z}$ denote the set of integers, and $S(r,s)$ are the Stirling numbers of the second kind which are explicitly given by (see, e.g., ([26], Section 1.6))

$$S(r,s)=\frac{{(-1)}^s}{s!}\sum _{j=0}^s{(-1)}^j\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{s}{j}\right)j^r.$$

(14)

The first few of ${\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}$ are

$${\mathcal{B}}_0^{\left(\kappa \right)}=1,{\mathcal{B}}_1^{\left(\kappa \right)}=\frac{1}{2^{\kappa }},{\mathcal{B}}_2^{\left(\kappa \right)}=\frac{2}{3^{\kappa }}-\frac{1}{2^{\kappa }},{\mathcal{B}}_3^{\left(\kappa \right)}=\frac{1}{2^{\kappa }}+\frac{6}{2^{2\kappa }}-\frac{6}{3^{\kappa }}.$$

In the usual way, poly-Bernoulli polynomials ${\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}\left(u\right)$ can be defined by the following function:

$$\frac{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{1-e^{-\varsigma }}{e}^{u\varsigma }=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}.$$

(15)

Then, obviously, ${\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}={\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}\left(0\right)$$\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right)$.

The classical Genocchi polynomials are defined by (see, e.g., [30,31,32], ([26], Section 1.7))

$$\frac{2\varsigma }{e^{\varsigma }+1}{e}^{u\varsigma }=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{G}}_r\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}\left(\right|\varsigma |<\pi ).$$

(16)

As usual, ${\mathcal{G}}_r:={\mathcal{G}}_r\left(0\right)$ are referred to as Genocchi numbers generated by

$$\frac{2\varsigma }{e^{\varsigma }+1}=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{G}}_r\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}\left(\right|\varsigma |<\pi ),$$

(17)

which have a significant role in number theory.

Luo and Srivastava [33] introduced the generalized Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials ${\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(u;\lambda )$ of order $m\in \mathbb{C}$ which are generated by (see also ([26], Section 1.8))

$${\left(\frac{\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }-1}\right)}^m{e}^{u\varsigma }=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(u;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}$$

(18)

$$\left(\left|\varsigma \right|<2\pi ,\mathrm{when}\lambda =1;\left|\varsigma \right|<|log\lambda |,\mathrm{when}\lambda \ne 1;1^m:=1\right).$$

Furthermore, Luo [34,35] investigated the generalized Apostol–Euler polynomials ${\mathcal{E}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(u;\lambda )$ of order $m\in \mathbb{C}$ and the generalized Apostol–Genocchi polynomials ${\mathcal{G}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(u;\lambda )$ of order $m\in \mathbb{C}$ which are defined by

$${\left(\frac{2}{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{u\varsigma }=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{E}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(u;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}$$

(19)

$$\left(\left|\varsigma \right|<\pi ,\mathrm{when}\lambda =1;\left|\varsigma \right|<|log(-\lambda )|,\mathrm{when}\lambda \ne 1;1^m:=1\right).$$

and

$${\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{u\varsigma }=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{G}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(u;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}$$

(20)

$$\left(\left|\varsigma \right|<\pi ,\mathrm{when}\lambda =1;\left|\varsigma \right|<|log(-\lambda )|,\mathrm{when}\lambda \ne 1;1^m:=1\right).$$

Setting $u=0$ in (18)–(20) results in the generalized Apostol–Bernoulli, generalized Apostol–Euler, and generalized Apostol–Genocchi numbers, respectively, which are defined as follows:

$$\begin{gathered} {\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(m\right)}\left(\lambda \right):={\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(0;\lambda ); \\ {\mathcal{E}}_r^{\left(m\right)}\left(\lambda \right):={\mathcal{E}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(0;\lambda ); \\ {\mathcal{G}}_r^{\left(m\right)}\left(\lambda \right):={\mathcal{G}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(0;\lambda ). \end{gathered}$$

(21)

Obviously, the following relations hold:

$$\begin{gathered} {\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(u;1)={\mathcal{B}}_r^{\left(m\right)}\left(u\right); \\ {\mathcal{E}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(u;1)={\mathcal{E}}_r^{\left(m\right)}\left(u\right); \\ {\mathcal{G}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(u;1)={\mathcal{G}}_r^{\left(m\right)}\left(u\right). \end{gathered}$$

(22)

3. Generalized Apostol–Genocchi-Based Poly-Daehee Polynomials

This section introduces and investigates a unified class of polynomials called the Apostol–Genocchi-based poly-Daehee polynomials. Certain identities and explicit formulae for these polynomials are derived.

Definition 1.

The Apostol–Genocchi-based poly-Daehee polynomials ${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )$ (abbreviated by AGPD) are defined by the following generating function:

$$\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}$$

(23)

$$(m,u,v\in \mathbb{C};\kappa \in \mathbb{N};$$

$$\left|\varsigma \right|<1,\mathit{when}\lambda =1;\left|\varsigma \right|<min\left\{\right|log(-\lambda )|,1\},\mathit{when}\lambda \ne 1;1^m:=1).$$

Furthermore, ${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}\left(\lambda \right):={}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(0,0,\lambda )$ are called Apostol–Genocchi-based poly-Daehee numbers.

Remark 1.

Let the generating function on the left-member of (23) be denoted by

$$g(m,u,v,\kappa ,\lambda ;\varsigma )=g_1(\kappa ;\varsigma )g_2(m,u,v,\lambda ;\varsigma ),$$

(24)

where

$$g_1(\kappa ;\varsigma ):=\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}$$

and

$$g_2(m,u,v,\lambda ;\varsigma ):={(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }.$$

The right-member of (23) is the Maclaurin series centered at $\varsigma =0$. So the generating function on the left-member of (23) should be analytic at $\varsigma =0$. In view of (1), ${\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma }){|}_{\varsigma =0}=0$ and $\varsigma =0$ may be a singular point of the generating function. Here we find

$$\frac{d}{d\varsigma }{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma }){|}_{\varsigma =0}=\sum _{s=1}^{\infty }\frac{{(1-e^{-\varsigma })}^{s-1}}{s^{\kappa -1}}{e}^{-\varsigma }{|}_{\varsigma =0}=1.$$

Furthermore, by using L’Hospital’s rule,

$$\underset{\varsigma \to 0}{lim}{g}_1(\kappa ;\varsigma )=\underset{\varsigma \to 0}{lim}\frac{1}{1+\varsigma }/\frac{d}{d\varsigma }{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })=1.$$

Note that $g_2(m,u,v,\lambda ;\varsigma )$ is analytic at $\varsigma =0$. We thus find that $\varsigma =0$ is a removable singular point of the generating function. Therefore, $\varsigma =0$ can be an analytic point of the generating function.

As noted in (25), the poly-Daehee numbers ${\mathcal{D}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}$ are given by the following generating function:

$$\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{D}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}(\kappa \in \mathbb{N}).$$

(25)

In order to use later in this work, we introduce the other sequence of numbers, which are similar to the poly-Daehee numbers, in the following definition.

Definition 2.

The sequence of numbers ${\Omega }_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}$$\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right)$ is defined by the following generating function

$$g(\kappa ;\varsigma ):=\frac{\varsigma }{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}:=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\Omega }_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}{\varsigma }^r(\kappa \in \mathbb{N}).$$

(26)

Remark 2.

We observe the following properties for the numbers ${\Omega }_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}$:

(i)

We find

$$\underset{\varsigma \to 0}{lim}\frac{\varsigma }{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}=1={\Omega }_0^{\left(\kappa \right)}.$$

This means that $g(\kappa ;\varsigma )$ is analytic at $\varsigma =0$ and so can be expanded as the Maclaurin series in a neighborhood (possibly small) of 0 as in the right member of (26).

(ii)

By the help of Mathematica, we compute

$$\begin{array}{l}{\Omega }_1^{\left(\kappa \right)}=\frac{1}{2}-2^{-\kappa },\\ {\Omega }_2^{\left(\kappa \right)}=\frac{1}{6}+2^{1-2\kappa }-2\times 3^{-\kappa },\\ \cdots \end{array}$$

(iii)

Here let

$${\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma }):=\sum _{j=0}^{\infty }{\Lambda }_j^{\left(\kappa \right)}{\varsigma }^j.$$

(27)

By the aid of Mathematica, we find

$$\begin{array}{l}{\Lambda }_0^{\left(\kappa \right)}=0,\\ {\Lambda }_1^{\left(\kappa \right)}=1,\\ {\Lambda }_2^{\left(\kappa \right)}=-\frac{1}{2}+2^{-\kappa },\\ {\Lambda }_3^{\left(\kappa \right)}=\frac{1}{6}-2^{-\kappa }+3^{-\kappa },\\ \cdots \end{array}$$

(iv)

From (26) and (27), we have

$$\varsigma =\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\Lambda }_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}{\varsigma }^r\sum _{s=0}^{\infty }{\Omega }_s^{\left(\kappa \right)}{\varsigma }^s=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }\sum _{s=0}^r{\Lambda }_{r-s}^{\left(\kappa \right)}{\Omega }_s^{\left(\kappa \right)}{\varsigma }^r,$$

from which we obtain

$$\sum _{s=0}^r{\Lambda }_{r-s}^{\left(\kappa \right)}{\Omega }_s^{\left(\kappa \right)}=0\left(r\in \mathbb{N}\backslash \left\{1\right\}\right).$$

(28)

Due to the AGPD’s generic nature, they may reduce to a number of new and known polynomials, some of which are included in

Table 1. Some known polynomials occurring as special cases of AGPD.

Case	$\mathit{m},\mathit{\kappa },\mathit{u},\mathit{v},\mathit{\varsigma }$	Generating Function	Name of the Polynomials
I.	$m=0=v$	$\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u={\mathcal{D}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}$	poly-Daehee polynomials [28]
II.	$m=0=v$; $\kappa =1$	$\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }{(1+\varsigma )}^u={\mathcal{D}}_r\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}$	Daehee polynomials [27,28]
III.	$m=0=v$; $\kappa =1;\lambda \in \mathbb{N}$	${\left(\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }\right)}^{\lambda }{(1+\varsigma )}^u={\mathcal{D}}_r^{\lambda }\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}$	Higher order Daehee polynomials [19]
IV.	$m=0=v$; $\kappa =1;\varsigma =\xi \varsigma$	$\left(\frac{log(1+\xi \varsigma )}{\xi \varsigma }\right){(1+\xi \varsigma )}^u={\mathcal{D}}_{r,\xi }\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}$	r-th twisted Daehee polynomials [29]
V.	$m=0=v$; $\kappa =1;u\to 1-u$	$(1+\varsigma )\left(\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }\right)\frac{1}{{(1+\varsigma )}^u}={\mathcal{D}}_{r,\xi }^{\lambda }\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}$	Daehee polynomials of second kind [27]

.

Theorem 1.

The Apostol–Genocchi-based poly-Daehee polynomials are explicitly given by

$${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )=\sum _{s=0}^r\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right){\mathcal{D}}_{r-s}^{\left(\kappa \right)}\left(u\right){\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda )\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right)$$

(29)

Here, the constraints of parameters and variable would be modified relative to those in (23).

Proof. 

We first recall the following well-known double series manipulation: Let $f,g:{\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}\times {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}\to \mathbb{C}$ be functions and $p\in \mathbb{N}$. Then

$$\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }\sum _{k=0}^{\infty }f(k,n)=\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }\sum _{k=0}^{[n/p]}f(k,n-pk),$$

(30)

where the involved double series is assumed to be absolutely convergent.

It is straightforward from (23) and (20) that

$$\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}=\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }$$

$$=\left(\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{D}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}\right)\left(\sum _{s=0}^{\infty }{\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^s}{s!}\right).$$

Using the series rearrangement for the case $p=1$ in (30), we now obtain

$$\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}=\sum _{r=0}^{\infty }\sum _{s=0}^r{\mathcal{D}}_{r-s}^{\left(\kappa \right)}\left(u\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^{r-s}}{(r-s)!}{\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^s}{s!},$$

which, upon equating the coefficients of like powers of $\varsigma$, immediately yields the desired assertion of Theorem 1. □

Theorem 2.

The following identity for AGPD holds true:

$${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\kappa }(u,v;\lambda )=\frac{{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r+1,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u+1;v)-{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r+1,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v)}{r+1}\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right).$$

(31)

Here, the constraints of parameters and variable would be adjusted with respect to those in (23).

Proof. 

Using (23), we write

$$\begin{array}{l}{\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u+1,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}-{\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}\\ =\left\{\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^{u+1}{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }\right\}\\ -\left\{\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }\right\}\\ ={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^{r+1}}{r!},\end{array}$$

from which, we have

$$\sum _{r=1}^{\infty }\left[{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u+1,v;\lambda )-{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\right]\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}=\sum _{r=1}^{\infty }{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-1,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{(r-1)!}.$$

(32)

Now, equating the coefficients of ${\varsigma }^r$ in both sides of (32) yields the desired identity (31). □

Theorem 3.

AGPD satisfy the following addition property:

$${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u+\alpha ,v;\lambda )=\sum _{s=0}^r\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right){\langle \alpha \rangle }_s{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v)\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right),$$

(33)

where ${\langle \alpha \rangle }_s$ is the well known falling factorial defined as

$${\langle \alpha \rangle }_s:=\alpha (\alpha -1)\cdots (\alpha -s+1).$$

(34)

Here $\alpha \in \mathbb{C}$, and the restrictions of the other parameters and variable would be modified in light of those in (23).

Proof. 

Substituting $u+\alpha$ for u in (23) gives

$$\begin{array}{ll}{\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(r+\alpha ,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}& =\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }{(1+\varsigma )}^{\alpha }\\ & =\left({\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}\right)\left({\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^{\infty }}{\langle \alpha \rangle }_s\frac{{\varsigma }^s}{s!}\right)\\ & ={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda ){\langle \alpha \rangle }_s\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{(r-s)!s!},\end{array}$$

for the last equality of which the case $p=1$ in (30) is used. Finally, comparing the coefficient of ${\varsigma }^r$ on both sides offers the desired identity. □

Theorem 4.

For $r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0$, the following correlation holds true:

$$\sum _{s=0}^r\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right){\mathcal{B}}_s{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}(u,v;\lambda )=\sum _{s=0}^r\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right){\mathcal{B}}_s^{\left(\kappa \right)}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda ).$$

(35)

Here, the restrictions of the parameters and variable would be modified in light of those in (23).

Proof. 

Using (10) and (23) reveals

$$\begin{array}{l}\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{e^{\varsigma }-1}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }\\ =\left\{\frac{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{e^{\varsigma }-1}\right\}\left\{\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }\right\}\\ =\frac{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{e^{\varsigma }-1}\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{L_{i\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2u}{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }\\ ={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}\left\{{\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right){\mathcal{B}}_s^{\left(\kappa \right)}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\right\}\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}.\end{array}$$

(36)

Using (7) and rewriting the left hand side of (36) leads to the Apostol–Genocchi-based poly-Daehee polynomials

$$\begin{array}{l}\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{e^{\varsigma }-1}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }\\ =\frac{\varsigma }{e^{\varsigma }-1}\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2u}{\lambda e^u+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }\\ =\left({\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^{\infty }}{\mathcal{B}}_s\frac{{\varsigma }^s}{s!}\right)\left({\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}\right)\\ ={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}\left\{{\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right){\mathcal{B}}_s{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-m,m}(u,v;\lambda )\right\}\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}.\end{array}$$

(37)

Therefore, in view of (36) and (37), we can easily arrive at the desired result. □

Theorem 5.

For $r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0$, the following relation holds true:

$${\mathcal{G}}_{r,m}(v;\lambda )={\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right)b_s^{\left(\kappa \right)}(-u){}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v,\lambda ).$$

(38)

Proof. 

From (20) and (23), we can write

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill {\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\mathcal{G}}_{r,m}(v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}=& {\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }\hfill \\ \hfill =& \frac{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{log(1+\varsigma )}{(1+\varsigma )}^{-u}{\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\kappa }(u,v,\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}.\hfill \end{array}$$

Now using (8), we have

$$\begin{array}{ll}{\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\mathcal{G}}_{r,m}(v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}& =\left({\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^{\infty }}{b}_s^{\left(\kappa \right)}(-u)\frac{{\varsigma }^s}{s!}\right)\left({\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v,\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}\right)\\ & ={\displaystyle \sum _{n=0}^{\infty }}\left\{{\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right)b_s^{\left(\kappa \right)}(-u){}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-z,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v,\lambda )\right\}\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}.\end{array}$$

(39)

Using the series rearrangement technique in (30) and equating the coefficients of like powers of $\varsigma$ in (39), yields (38). □

Theorem 6.

The following formula for the Apostol–Genocchi-based poly-Daehee polynomials holds

$${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m+\beta }^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v+\mu ;\lambda )={\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right){}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v+\mu ;\lambda )G_s^{\left(\beta \right)}(\mu ;\lambda ).$$

(40)

Proof. 

By replacing v by $v+\mu$ and m by $m+\beta$ in (23) and using (20), we get

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill {\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m+\beta }^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v+\mu ;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}=& \frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^{m+\beta }{e}^{(v+\mu )\varsigma }\hfill \\ \hfill =& \left({\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}\right)\left({\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^{\infty }}{\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(\beta \right)}(\mu ;\lambda )\frac{varsigm{a}^s}{S1}\right)\hfill \\ \hfill =& {\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda ){\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(\beta \right)}(\mu ;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{(r-s)!s!}\hfill \end{array}$$

which yields the required result (40). □

Theorem 7.

The following correlation holds

$${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )={\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right){\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v-\alpha ){\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(m\right)}(\alpha ;\lambda ).$$

(41)

Proof. 

By (23), we can write

$$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill & \frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{(v-\alpha )\varsigma +\alpha \varsigma }\hfill \\ \hfill & =\left({\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\mathcal{D}}_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v-\alpha )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}\right)\left({\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^{\infty }}{\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(m\right)}(\alpha ;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^s}{s!}\right).\hfill \end{array}$$

By using the series manipulation for the case $p=1$ in (30), we get

$${\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}\left({\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right){\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v-\alpha ){\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(m\right)}(\alpha ;\lambda )\right)\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!},$$

which, upon equating the coefficients of the similar powers of $\varsigma$, leads to the desired identity. □

Theorem 8.

The following summation formula holds true:

$${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v+1;\lambda )={\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{r}{s}\right){}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda ).$$

(42)

Proof. 

Replace the parameter v with $v+1$ in (23). By using similar process as those in previous theorems, we can get the identity (42). Therefore, the details are omitted. □

4. Differential Formulas

This section establishes two differential formulas for AGPD with respect to the parameters u and v.

Theorem 9.

The following differential formula holds true.

$$\frac{\partial }{\partial u}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )={\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^{r-1}}\frac{{(-1)}^{r-s-1}r!}{(r-s)s!}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\left(r\in \mathbb{N}\right).$$

(43)

Proof. 

Differentiating both sides of (23) with respect to u and using the notation in (24), with the aid of the case $p=1$ in (30), we have

$$\begin{array}{l}{\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}\frac{\partial }{\partial u}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}=log(1+u)·g(m,u,v,\kappa ,\lambda ;\varsigma )\\ =\left({\displaystyle \sum _{r=1}^{\infty }}\frac{{(-1)}^{r-1}}{r}{\varsigma }^r\right)\left({\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^s}{s!}\right)\\ ={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^{r-1}}\frac{{(-1)}^{r-s-1}}{r-s}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{s,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{\varsigma }{s!},\end{array}$$

which, upon equating the coefficients of ${\varsigma }^r$, yields the desired identity. □

Theorem 10.

The following differential formula holds true.

$$\frac{\partial }{\partial v}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )=r{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-1,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\left(r\in \mathbb{N}\right).$$

(44)

Proof. 

Differentiating both sides of (23) with respect to v and using the similar process as in the proof of Theorem 10, we may obtain (44). So the specifics are omitted. □

5. Integral Formulas

This section establishes two integral formulas for AGPD.

Theorem 11.

The following integral formula holds true.

$${\int }_0^1{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )dv=\frac{1}{r+1}\left\{{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r+1,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,1;\lambda )-{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r+1,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,0;\lambda )\right\}\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right).$$

(45)

Proof. 

Integrating both sides of (23) with respect to the parameter v from 0 to 1, we by using (44) get

$$\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m·\frac{1}{\varsigma }\left(e^{\varsigma }-1\right)={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\int }_0^1{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )dv\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}.$$

(46)

Multiplying both sides of (46) by $\varsigma$ and using (23), we obtain

$${\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}\left\{{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,1;\lambda )-{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,0;\lambda )\right\}\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}={\displaystyle \sum _{r=1}^{\infty }}{\int }_0^1{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-1,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )dv\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{(r-1)!}.$$

(47)

Equating the coefficients of ${\varsigma }^r$ on both sides of (47), we derive

$${\int }_0^1{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r-1,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )dv=\frac{1}{r}\left\{{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,1;\lambda )-{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,0;\lambda )\right\},$$

which, upon setting $r=r^{\prime }+1$ and dropping the prime on r, yields the desired formula. □

Theorem 12.

The following integral formula holds true.

$${\int }_0^1{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )du={\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}\frac{r!}{s!}{\Omega }_{r-s}^{\left(\kappa \right)}{\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda )\left(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_0\right),$$

(48)

where ${\mathcal{G}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(u;\lambda )$ are the polynomials in (20) and ${\Omega }_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}$ are the numbers in (26).

Proof. 

We find

$${\int }_0^1{(1+\varsigma )}^{u}du=\frac{\varsigma }{log(1+\varsigma )}.$$

(49)

Integrating both sides of (23) with respect to the parameter u from 0 to 1 and using (49), we obtain

$$\frac{\varsigma }{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}·{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{e}^{v\varsigma }={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\int }_0^1{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )du\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}.$$

(50)

Employing (26) and (20) for the first and the second factors, respectively, in the left-member of (50), with similar process of proofs of the previous formulas, we derive

$$\begin{array}{ll}{\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\int }_0^1{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )du\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!}& ={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\Omega }_r^{\left(\kappa \right)}{\varsigma }^r{\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^{\infty }}{\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^s}{s!}\\ & ={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{\displaystyle \sum _{s=0}^r}\frac{1}{s!}{\Omega }_{r-s}^{\left(\kappa \right)}{\mathcal{G}}_s^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda ){\varsigma }^r,\end{array}$$

(51)

on the first and last members of which, upon equating the coefficients of ${\varsigma }^r$, we obtain the desired formula. □

6. An Implicit Summation Formula

This section explores an implicit summation formula for AGPD.

Theorem 13.

The Apostol–Genocchi-based poly-Daehee polynomials satisfy the following implicit summation formula:

$${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,\alpha ;\lambda )={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^q}{\displaystyle \sum _{p=0}^l}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{q}{r}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{l}{p}\right){(\alpha -v)}^{r+p}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l-p-r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )$$

(52)

$$\left(l,q\in {\mathbb{N}}_0;\alpha \in \mathbb{C}\right).$$

Here the restrictions of the other parameters and variable would be modified in light of those in (23).

Proof. 

We first recall the following series manipulation formula (consult, for example, ([36], p. 52, Equation (2)) and [37,38,39,40,41]):

$${\displaystyle \sum _{R=0}^{\infty }}f\left(R\right)\frac{{(u+v)}^R}{R!}={\displaystyle \sum _{r,s=0}^{\infty }}f(r+s)\frac{u^r}{r!}\frac{v^s}{s!}.$$

(53)

Replacing $\varsigma$ by $\varsigma +\mu$ in (23) gives

$$\begin{gathered} \frac{log(1+(\varsigma +\mu \left)\right)}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-(\varsigma +\mu )})}{(1+(\varsigma +\mu ))}^u{\left(\frac{2(\varsigma +\mu )}{\lambda e^{\varsigma +\mu }+1}\right)}^m \\ =e^{-v(\varsigma +\mu )}{\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{(\varsigma +\mu )}^r}{r!}. \end{gathered}$$

(54)

Employing (53) in the series on the right-hand side of (54), we obtain

$$\begin{gathered} \frac{log(1+(\varsigma +\mu \left)\right)}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-(\varsigma +\mu )})}{(1+(\varsigma +\mu ))}^u{\left(\frac{2(\varsigma +\mu )}{\lambda e^{\varsigma +\mu }+1}\right)}^m \\ =e^{-v(\varsigma +\mu )}{\displaystyle \sum _{q,l=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v,\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^q}{q!}\frac{{\mu }^l}{l!}. \end{gathered}$$

(55)

Note that the left-member of (55) is independent of the parameter v and so, for any $\alpha \in \mathbb{C}$,

$$e^{-v(\varsigma +\mu )}{\displaystyle \sum _{q,l=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v,\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^q}{q!}\frac{{\mu }^l}{l!}=e^{-\alpha (\varsigma +\mu )}{\displaystyle \sum _{q,l=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,\alpha ,\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^q}{q!}\frac{{\mu }^l}{l!}.$$

Or, equivalently,

$$e^{(\alpha -v)(\varsigma +\mu )}{\displaystyle \sum _{q,l=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^q}{q!}\frac{{\mu }^l}{l!}={\displaystyle \sum _{q,l=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,\alpha ;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^q}{q!}\frac{{\mu }^l}{l!},$$

(56)

for any $\alpha \in \mathbb{C}$. Using (53), we get

$$e^{(\alpha -v)(\varsigma +\mu )}={\displaystyle \sum _{R=0}^{\infty }}\frac{{\left[(\alpha -v)(\varsigma +\mu )\right]}^R}{R!}={\displaystyle \sum _{r,p=0}^{\infty }}\frac{{(\alpha -v)}^{r+p}{\varsigma }^r{\mu }^p}{r!p!}.$$

(57)

Setting (57) in (56), we have

$${\displaystyle \sum _{q,r=0}^{\infty }}{\displaystyle \sum _{l,p=0}^{\infty }}\frac{{(\alpha -v)}^{r+p}{\varsigma }^r{\mu }^p}{r!p!}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^q}{q!}\frac{{\mu }^l}{l!}={\displaystyle \sum _{q,l=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,\alpha ;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^q}{q!}\frac{{\mu }^l}{l!}.$$

(58)

Here, using the series manipulation technique for the case $p=1$ in (30) in each one of two double series in the left-member of (58), we find

$$\begin{array}{l}{\displaystyle \sum _{q,l=0}^{\infty }}{\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^q}{\displaystyle \sum _{p=0}^l}{(\alpha -v)}^{r+p}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l-r-p,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^q}{r!(q-r)!}\frac{{\mu }^l}{p!(l-p)!}\\ ={\displaystyle \sum _{q,l=0}^{\infty }}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,\alpha ;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^q}{q!}\frac{{\mu }^l}{l!}.\end{array}$$

(59)

Finally, equating the coefficients of ${\varsigma }^q{\mu }^l$ on both sides of (59), we prove the desired identity. □

Remark 3.

It may be interesting to observe that the left-member of (52) is independent of the parameter v in the right-member of (52). In particular,

$$\begin{gathered} {\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^q}{\displaystyle \sum _{p=0}^l}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{q}{r}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{l}{p}\right){(\alpha -v)}^{r+p}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l-p-r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda ) \\ ={\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^q}{\displaystyle \sum _{p=0}^l}\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{q}{r}\right)\left(\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{l}{p}\right){\left(\alpha \right)}^{r+p}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{q+l-p-r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,0;\lambda ). \end{gathered}$$

for any $v\in \mathbb{C}$.

7. Concluding Remarks

The polynomials defined in (23) arises from the well known Apostol–Genocchi polynomials defined in (20). They exhibit a close relationship with Apostol–Euler and Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials. Therefore, we can explore other hybrid polynomials and obtain their corresponding properties as well as some new results.

Table 2. Members similar to the polynomials ${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )$.

S. No.	Name of Polynomial	$\mathcal{A}\left(\mathit{\varsigma }\right)$	Generating Function
I.	Apostol–Euler-based
	poly-Daehee polynomials	${\left(\frac{2}{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u$	$$\begin{gathered} {\displaystyle {\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}}{}_{\mathcal{E}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!} \\ ={\left(\frac{2}{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{e}^{v\varsigma } \end{gathered}$$
II.	Apostol–Bernoulli-based
	poly-Daehee polynomials	${\left(\frac{\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }-1}\right)}^m\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u$	$$\begin{gathered} {\displaystyle {\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!} \\ ={\left(\frac{\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }-1}\right)}^m\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{e}^{v\varsigma } \end{gathered}$$
III.	Apostol–Bernoulli-based
	Daehee polynomials	${\left(\frac{\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }-1}\right)}^m\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }{(1+\varsigma )}^u$	$$\begin{gathered} {\displaystyle {\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}}{}_{\mathcal{B}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!} \\ ={\left(\frac{\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }-1}\right)}^m\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }{(1+\varsigma )}^u{e}^{v\varsigma } \end{gathered}$$
IV.	Apostol–Euler-based
	Daehee polynomials	${\left(\frac{2}{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }{(1+\varsigma )}^u$	$$\begin{gathered} {\displaystyle {\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}}{}_{\mathcal{E}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!} \\ ={\left(\frac{2}{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }{(1+\varsigma )}^u{e}^{v\varsigma } \end{gathered}$$
V.	Apostol–Genocchi-based
	Daehee polynomials	${\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }{(1+\varsigma )}^u$	$$\begin{gathered} ={\displaystyle {\displaystyle \sum _{r=0}^{\infty }}}{}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}(u,v;\lambda )\frac{{\varsigma }^r}{r!} \\ ={\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{\varsigma }{(1+\varsigma )}^u{e}^{v\varsigma } \end{gathered}$$

below illustrates some hybrid polynomials similar to the Apostol–Genocchi-based poly-Daehee polynomials in (23).

Example 1 may show how to define some polynomials by means od operational forms.

Example 1.

Using the ordinary derivative operator ${\widehat{D}}_u$, an operational form to define the generalized Apostol–Genocchi polynomials in (20) could be

$${\left(\frac{2{\widehat{D}}_u}{\lambda e^{{\widehat{D}}_u}+1}\right)}^m{v}^r={\mathcal{G}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda ).$$

(60)

Similarly, the generalized Apostol–Euler polynomials in (19) can be cast as

$${\left(\frac{2}{\lambda e^{{\widehat{D}}_u}+1}\right)}^m{v}^r={\mathcal{E}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda ),$$

(61)

which, on comparing with (60), provides the relation

$${\mathcal{G}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda )={\left({\widehat{D}}_u\right)}^m{\mathcal{E}}_r^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda )={\langle r\rangle }_m{\mathcal{E}}_{r-m}^{\left(m\right)}(v;\lambda ).$$

(62)

From (23) and (60), we can write

$${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )=\frac{log(1+\varsigma )}{{\mathrm{Li}}_{\kappa }(1-e^{-\varsigma })}{(1+\varsigma )}^u{\left(\frac{2\varsigma }{\lambda e^{\varsigma }+1}\right)}^m{v}^r,$$

(63)

which, in view of (62), provides

$${}_{\mathcal{G}}{\mathcal{D}}_{r,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda )={\langle r\rangle }_m{\mathcal{E}}_{r-m,m}^{\left(\kappa \right)}(u,v;\lambda ).$$

(64)