Next Article in Journal
Refinements of the Converse Hölder and Minkowski Inequalities
Next Article in Special Issue
Exact Traveling Waves of a Generalized Scale-Invariant Analogue of the Korteweg–de Vries Equation
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Industry-Specific Risk Factors on Stock Returns of the Malaysian Oil and Gas Industry in a Structural Break Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Simulation of Cubic-Quartic Optical Solitons with Perturbed Fokas–Lenells Equation Using Improved Adomian Decomposition Algorithm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diverse Multiple Lump Analytical Solutions for Ion Sound and Langmuir Waves

by
Abdulmohsen D. Alruwaili
1,
Aly R. Seadawy
2,*,
Syed T. R. Rizvi
3 and
Sid Ahmed O. Beinane
1
1
Mathematics Department, College of Science, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia
2
Mathematics Department, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah 41411, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Sakaka 72341, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2022, 10(2), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10020200
Submission received: 28 October 2021 / Revised: 14 December 2021 / Accepted: 23 December 2021 / Published: 10 January 2022

Abstract

:
In this work, we study a time-fractional ion sound and Langmuir waves system (FISLWS) with Atangana–Baleanu derivative (ABD). We use a fractional ABD operator to transform our system into an ODE. We investigate multiwaves, periodic cross-kink, rational, and interaction solutions by the combination of rational, trigonometric, and various bilinear functions. Furthermore, 3D, 2D, and relevant contour plots are presented for the natural evolution of the gained solutions under the selection of proper parameters.

1. Introduction

At the present time, various real phenomena have been formulated by integer-order nonlinear partial differential equations (NPDEs). These supermodels are studied in different domains of sciences, such as engineering, chemistry, biology, physics, optics, etc. However, it is not enough to use integer order where the nonlocal property does not appear in these forms, so different models have been systematized in fractional NPDEs to determine that kind of similarity [1]. By using numerical and computational schemes, these models give more familiar properties [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. To use most of these schemes, one needs fractional operator to transform the fractional forms into nonlinear ODEs with integer orders such as conformable fractional derivative, Caputo, Caputo–Fabrizio definition, Riemann–Liouville derivatives, and so on [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. These operators have been applied to estimate the numeric and exact solutions of fractional order NPDEs through different integration schemes, such as ( ϕ 6 ) -model expansion [25], ( G G ) -expansion [26], t a n ( Φ ( ρ ) 2 ) -expansion [27], Kudryashove scheme [28], e x p ( ( Ψ Ψ ) η ) -expansion [29], extended auxiliary equation technique [30], and so many others.
Here, we consider the FISLWS as follows [17],
i A B D t α m + 1 2 m x x n m = 0 , A B D t 2 α n n x x 2 ( | m | 2 ) x x = 0 , t > 0 , 0 < α 1 .
where m e i ω p t and n illustrate the normalized electric-field of the Langmuir oscillation and perturbation of density, respectively. Both x and t are normalized variables and A B D t α is the AB fractional operator in t direction.
ABD operator is well defined as
A B D D a + α F ( t ) = B ( α ) 1 α d d t a t F ( x ) G α α ( t α ) α 1 α d x ,
where G α is Mittag-Leffler function, defined as
G α α ( t α ) α 1 α = n = 0 ( α 1 α ) s ( t x ) α s Γ ( α s + 1 ) ,
and B ( α ) is the normalization function that satisfies B ( 1 ) = B ( 0 ) = 1 . Thus,
A B D D a + α F ( t ) = B ( α ) 1 α n = 0 α 1 α s R L I a α s F ( t ) .
for more properties of this operator. This leads towards the following form,
m ( x , t ) = u ( ξ ) e i ϑ , n ( x , t ) = v ( ξ ) , ϑ = a x + β ( 1 α ) t s B ( α ) s = 0 α 1 α s Γ ( 1 α s ) , ξ = b x + γ ( 1 α ) t s B ( α ) s = 0 α 1 α s Γ ( 1 α s ) ,
where β and γ are arbitrary constants. This wave alteration converts Equation (1) into the following ODE.
1 2 b 2 u + i ( γ + a b ) u 1 2 ( a 2 + 2 β ) u u v = 0 , ( γ 2 b 2 ) v 4 b 2 ( u 2 + u u ) = 0 .
Here, u and v are the functions of ξ . By separating the Img part from the first part of Equation (6),
γ + a b = 0 γ = a b .
and then by integrating the second part of Equation (6) by two times the w.r.t ξ , we obtain
v = 2 b 2 b 2 + γ 2 u 2 = 2 a 2 1 u 2 .
Equations (7) and (8) transform Equation (6) into the following form:
u 4 b 2 ( a 2 1 ) u 3 a 2 + 2 β b 2 u = 0 , o r u = 4 b 2 ( a 2 1 ) u 3 + a 2 + 2 β b 2 u .
The contents of this paper are arranged as follows: In Section 2, we present M-shaped rational solitons. In Section 3, we evaluate M-shaped interaction solutions. In Section 4, we find the multiwaves solution. In Section 5, we study homoclinic breather. In Section 6, we investigate periodic cross-kink solutions. In Section 7, we present results and discussions and Section 8 contains concluding remarks.

2. M-Shaped Rational Solitons

By using the following log transformation,
u = u 0 + 2 ( ln Φ ) ξ .
Equation (10) transforms Equation (9) into the following bilinear form:
u 0 ( a 4 4 u 0 2 + a 2 ( 1 2 β ) + 2 β ) Φ 3 + 4 ( 8 + ( 1 + a 2 ) b 2 ) Φ 3 6 Φ Φ ( 8 u 0 Φ + ( 1 + a 2 ) b 2 Φ ) 2 Φ 2 ( ( a 4 + 12 u 0 2 2 β + a 2 ( 1 + 2 β ) ) Φ ( 1 + a 2 ) b 2 Φ ) = 0 .
We choose M-shaped rational solution in bilinear form for Φ , as follows [31]:
Φ = ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 + b 5 ,
where b i ( 1 i 5 ) all are real-valued parameters to be measured. Inserting Φ into Equation (11) and collecting all powers of ξ , we obtain proper results, as follows (See Figure 1 and Figure 2):
Set I. For b 2 = 0 ,
a = a , b = b , β = a 4 a 2 + 4 u 0 2 2 ( a 2 1 ) , b 1 = i b 3 , b 3 = b 3 , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = b 5 , u 0 = u 0 .
Using this in Equation (12), and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = u 0 + 2 2 b 3 2 ξ + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) b 5 b 3 2 ξ 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 , v ( ξ ) = 2 a 2 1 u 0 + 2 ( 2 b 3 2 ξ + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) ) b 5 b 3 2 ξ 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 2 .
To obtain final results, we use Equation (5):
m 21 ( x , t ) = e i a x t s ( a 4 a 2 + 4 u 0 2 ) ( 1 α ) 2 ( a 2 1 ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) u 0 + 2 ( 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 b 3 2 Ω ) b 5 + ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 b 3 Ω 2 , n 22 ( x , t ) = 2 ( a 2 1 ) u 0 + 2 ( 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 b 3 2 Ω ) b 5 + ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 b 3 Ω 2 2 ,
where Ω = b x a b t s ( 1 α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .
Set II. For b 5 = 0 ,
a = a , b = b , β = a 4 a 2 + 4 u 0 2 2 ( a 1 ) ( a + 1 ) , b 1 = i b 3 , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = b 3 , b 4 = b 4 , u 0 = u 0 .
Using this in Equation (12), and then by using Equations (8) and (10) in Equation (5), we obtain
m 23 ( x , t ) = e i a x t s ( a 4 a 2 + 4 u 0 2 ) ( 1 α ) 2 ( a 2 1 ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) u 0 + 2 ( 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) ) ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 , n 24 ( x , t ) = 2 ( a 2 1 ) u 0 + 2 ( 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) ) ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 2 ,
where Ω = b x a b t s ( 1 α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .
Set III. For u 0 = 0 ,
a = a , b = b , β = 1 2 a 2 , b 1 = i b 3 , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = b 3 , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = b 5 .
Using this in Equation (12), and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = 2 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) b 5 + ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 , v ( ξ ) = 8 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 ( 1 + a 2 ) b 5 + ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 2 .
To obtain final results, we use Equation (5):
m 25 ( x , t ) = 2 e i ( a x a 2 t s ( 1 α ) 2 B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) ) 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) b 5 + ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 , n 26 ( x , t ) = 8 ( a 2 1 ) 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) b 5 + ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 2 ,
where Ω = b x a b t s ( 1 α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .

3. M-Shaped Rational Soliton Interactions with

In this part, we evaluate M-shaped rational interactions with periodic and kink waves by using exponential and cos function in bilinear combinations.

3.1. One-Kink Soliton

For this, the bilinear form for Φ is as follows [31]:
Φ = ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 + c e b 6 + b 5 ξ + b 7 ,
where b i ( 1 i 7 ) , all are real-valued parameters to be measured. Inserting Φ into Equation (11) and collecting all powers of e b 5 ξ + b 6 , e 2 ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , e 3 ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ e b 5 ξ + b 6 , ξ e 2 ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ 2 e b 5 ξ + b 6 , ξ 3 e b 5 ξ + b 6 , ξ 4 e b 5 ξ + b 6 , and ξ , we obtain proper results, as follows (See Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6):
Set I. For b 2 = b 6 = 0 ,
a = a , b = 2 2 1 a 2 1 , β = a 4 a 2 + 4 b 5 2 2 ( a 1 ) ( a + 1 ) , b 1 = i b 3 , b 3 = b 3 , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = b 5 , b 7 = b 7 , u 0 = b 5 .
Using Equation (22) in Equation (21), and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = b 5 + 2 b 5 c e b 5 ξ 2 b 3 2 ξ + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) b 7 + c e b 5 ξ b 3 2 ξ 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 , v ( ξ ) = 2 b 5 ( b 4 2 + b 7 c e b 5 ξ ) + 2 b 3 b 4 ( 2 + b 5 ξ ) 2 ( 1 + a 2 ) ( b 4 2 + b 7 + c e b 5 ξ + 2 b 3 b 4 ξ ) 2 .
Using Equation (5) to obtain the required solution for Equation (1),
m 31 ( x , t ) = e Δ 4 2 a 1 a 2 1 b 3 b 4 b 5 ( α 1 ) + t s b 5 ( b 4 2 + b 7 c e Δ 1 ) + 4 b 3 b 4 ( 1 + 2 1 a 2 1 b 5 x ) Ξ 4 2 a 1 a 2 1 b 3 b 4 ( α 1 ) + t s b 4 2 + b 7 + c e Δ 1 + 4 2 1 a 2 1 b 3 b 4 x Ξ , n 32 ( x , t ) = 2 ( a 2 1 ) 4 2 a 1 a 2 1 b 3 b 4 b 5 ( α 1 ) + t s b 5 ( b 4 2 + b 7 c e Δ 1 ) + 4 b 3 b 4 ( 1 + 2 1 a 2 1 b 5 x ) Ξ 4 2 a 1 a 2 1 b 3 b 4 ( α 1 ) + t s b 4 2 + b 7 + c e Δ 1 + 4 2 1 a 2 1 b 3 b 4 x Ξ 2 ,
where Δ = 1 2 i ( 2 a x + ( a 2 + a 4 + 4 b 5 2 ) t s ( 1 + α ) ( 1 + a ) ( 1 + a ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) ) ,
Δ 1 = 2 2 1 a 2 1 b 5 x + a t s ( 1 + α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) , and Ξ = B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .
Set II. For b 1 = 0 ,
a = a , b = 0 , β = 1 2 a 2 , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = b 3 , b 4 = 2 b 3 u 0 , b 5 = 1 2 u 0 , b 6 = b 6 , b 7 = b 2 2 u 0 2 4 b 3 2 u 0 2 , u 0 = u 0 .
Using Equation (25) in Equation (21), and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = u 0 + 2 1 2 c e b 6 u 0 ξ 2 u 0 + 2 b 3 ( 2 b 3 u 0 + b 3 ξ ) b 2 2 + c e b 6 u 0 ξ 2 b 2 2 u 0 2 4 b 3 2 u 0 2 + ( 2 b 3 u 0 + b 3 ξ ) 2 , v ( ξ ) = 2 b 3 4 e u 0 ξ u 0 6 ξ 4 ( 1 + a 2 ) c e b 6 u 0 2 + b 3 2 e u 0 ξ 2 ( 8 4 u 0 ξ + u 0 2 ξ 2 ) 2 .
Using Equation (5), we obtain the required solution for Equation (1):
m 33 ( x , t ) = e i a x a 2 t s ( 1 α ) 2 B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) u 0 + 2 ( 4 b 3 2 u 0 1 2 c e b 6 u 0 ) b 2 2 + c e b 6 + 4 b 3 2 u 0 2 b 2 2 u 0 2 4 b 3 2 u 0 2 , n 34 ( x , t ) = 0 , ( b = 0 ) .
Set III. For b 2 = b 6 = 0 ,
a = a , b = 2 6 u 0 b 5 + 4 u 0 2 a 2 1 b 5 , β = 4 u 0 2 a 2 + a 4 2 ( a 2 1 ) , b 1 = 1 3 i ( b 7 + b 4 2 ) u 0 b 4 , b 3 = ( b 7 + b 4 2 ) u 0 3 b 4 , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = b 5 , b 7 = b 7 , u 0 = u 0 .
Using Equation (28) in Equation (21), and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = u 0 + 2 b 5 c e b 5 ξ 2 ( b 4 2 + b 7 ) 2 u 0 2 ξ 9 b 4 2 2 ( b 4 2 + b 7 ) u 0 ( b 4 ( b 7 + b 4 2 ) u 0 ξ 3 b 4 ) 3 b 4 b 7 + c e b 5 ξ ( b 4 2 + b 7 ) 2 u 0 2 ξ 2 9 b 4 2 + ( b 4 ( b 7 + b 4 2 ) u 0 ξ 3 b 4 ) 2 , v ( ξ ) = 2 6 b 5 c e b 5 ξ + u 0 ( b 7 3 c e b 5 ξ + 2 b 7 u 0 ξ + b 4 2 ( 1 + 2 u 0 ξ ) ) 2 ( 1 + a 2 ) 3 c e b 5 ξ + b 4 2 ( 3 2 u 0 ξ ) + b 7 ( 3 2 u 0 ξ ) 2 .
Now, using Equation (5), we obtain the required solution for Equation (1):
m 35 ( x , t ) = e Δ 4 2 a ( b 4 2 + b 7 ) u 0 2 Δ 1 ( α 1 ) + t s 6 b 5 2 c e Δ 2 b 5 ( b 4 2 + b 7 3 c e Δ 2 ) u 0 4 2 ( b 4 2 + b 7 ) u 0 2 Δ 1 x Ξ 4 2 a ( b 4 2 + b 7 ) u 0 Δ 1 ( α 1 ) t s 3 b 5 ( b 7 + c e Δ 2 ) 4 2 b 7 u 0 Δ 1 x + b 4 2 ( 3 b 5 4 2 u 0 Δ 1 x ) Ξ , n 36 ( x , t ) = 2 ( a 2 1 ) 4 2 a ( b 4 2 + b 7 ) u 0 2 Δ 1 ( α 1 ) + t s 6 b 5 2 c e Δ 2 b 5 ( b 4 2 + b 7 3 c e Δ 2 ) u 0 4 2 ( b 4 2 + b 7 ) u 0 2 Δ 1 x Ξ 4 2 a ( b 4 2 + b 7 ) u 0 Δ 1 ( α 1 ) t s 3 b 5 ( b 7 + c e Δ 2 ) 4 2 b 7 u 0 Δ 1 x + b 4 2 ( 3 b 5 4 2 u 0 Δ 1 x ) Ξ 2 ,
where Δ = 1 2 i 2 a x + t s ( a 2 + a 4 + 4 u 0 2 ) ( 1 + α ) ( 1 + a ) ( 1 + a ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) , Δ 1 = u 0 ( 3 b 5 + 2 u 0 ) 1 + a 2 ,
Δ 2 = 2 2 t s u 0 ( 3 b 5 + 2 u 0 ) 1 + a 2 a ( 1 + α ) + t s x B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) , and Ξ = B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .

3.2. Two-Kink Soliton

For two-kink interaction, the bilinear solution for Φ is as follows (See Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9):
Φ = ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 + e b 6 + b 5 ξ + e b 8 + b 7 ξ + b 9 ,
where b i ( 1 i 9 ) and all are real-valued parameters to be found. Inserting Φ into Equation (11) and collecting all powers of ξ , and e 3 ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , e 2 ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , e 2 ( b 7 ξ + b 8 ) , ξ e b 5 ξ + b 6 , ξ e 2 ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ e b 7 ξ + b 8 , ξ e 2 ( b 7 ξ + b 8 ) , ξ 2 e b 5 ξ + b 6 , ξ 3 e b 5 ξ + b 6 , ξ 3 e b 7 ξ + b 8 , ξ 4 e b 7 ξ + b 8 , ξ 4 e b 5 ξ + b 6 , we obtain proper results, as follows:
Set I. For u 0 = 0 ,
a = a , b = 2 2 1 a 2 1 , β = a 4 a 2 + 16 b 7 2 2 ( a 1 ) ( a + 1 ) , b 1 = i b 3 , b 2 = i b 4 , b 3 = b 3 , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = b 7 , b 6 = b 6 , b 7 = b 7 , b 8 = b 8 , b 9 = b 9 .
Using Equation (32) in Equation (31), and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = 2 b 7 e b 6 b 7 ξ + b 7 e b 8 + b 7 ξ + 2 i b 3 ( i b 4 + i b 3 ξ ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) b 9 + e b 6 b 7 ξ + e b 8 + b 7 ξ + ( i b 4 + i b 3 ξ ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 , v ( ξ ) = 8 1 + a 2 b 7 e b 6 b 7 ξ + b 7 e b 8 + b 7 ξ + 2 i b 3 ( i b 4 + i b 3 ξ ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) b 9 + e b 6 b 7 ξ + e b 8 + b 7 ξ + ( i b 4 + i b 3 ξ ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 2 .
Using Equation (5), we obtain the required solution for Equation (1),
m 37 ( x , t ) = 2 b 7 e 1 2 i ( 2 a x + ( a 2 + a 4 + 16 b 7 2 ) t s ( 1 + α ) ( 1 + a ) ( 1 + a ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) ) e b 6 e b 8 + 2 Ω e b 6 + e b 8 + 2 Ω + b 9 e Ω , n 38 ( x , t ) = 8 b 7 2 ( a 2 1 ) e b 6 e b 8 + 2 Ω e b 6 + e b 8 + 2 Ω + b 9 e Ω 2 ,
where Ω = 2 2 1 a 2 1 b 7 x + a t s ( 1 + α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .
Set II.
a = a , b = 4 2 + i 2 a 2 1 , β = a 2 a 4 8 i ( 2 i + 2 ) b 7 2 2 ( a 2 1 ) , b 1 = i b 3 , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = b 3 , b 4 = i b 2 , b 5 = ( 1 + 1 2 i 2 ) b 7 , b 6 = b 6 , b 7 = b 7 , b 8 = b 8 , b 9 = 0 .
Using Equation (35) in Equation (31), and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = 2 b 7 e b 8 + b 7 ξ + ( 1 + i 2 ) b 7 e b 6 + ( 1 + i 2 ) b 7 ξ + 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) + 2 b 3 ( i b 2 + b 3 ξ ) e b 8 + b 7 ξ + e b 6 + ( 1 + i 2 ) b 7 ξ + ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) 2 + ( i b 2 + b 3 ξ ) 2 , v ( ξ ) = 8 1 + a 2 b 7 e b 8 + b 7 ξ + ( 1 + i 2 ) b 7 e b 6 + ( 1 + i 2 ) b 7 ξ + 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) + 2 b 3 ( i b 2 + b 3 ξ ) e b 8 + b 7 ξ + e b 6 + ( 1 + i 2 ) b 7 ξ + ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) 2 + ( i b 2 + b 3 ξ ) 2 2 .
Using Equation (5), we obtain the required solution for Equation (1):
m 39 ( x , t ) = b 7 e 1 2 i ( 2 a x + ( a 2 + a 4 + 8 ( 2 + i 2 ) b 7 2 ) t s ( 1 + α ) ( 1 + a 2 ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) ) 2 e b 8 + Ω + ( 2 + i 2 ) e b 6 + ( 1 + i 2 ) Ω e b 8 + Ω + e b 6 + ( 1 + i 2 ) Ω , n 40 ( x , t ) = 2 b 7 2 ( a 2 1 ) 2 e b 8 + Ω + ( 2 + i 2 ) e b 6 + ( 1 + i 2 ) Ω e b 8 + Ω + e b 6 + ( 1 + i 2 ) Ω 2 ,
where Ω = 4 2 + i 2 1 + a 2 b 7 x + a t s ( 1 + α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .

3.3. Periodic Waves

For periodic-wave interaction solutions, the bilinear form for Φ is as follows (See Figure 10 and Figure 11):
Φ = ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 + cos ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) + b 7 ,
where b i ( 1 i 7 ) and all are real-valued parameters to be found. Inserting Φ into Equation (11) and collecting all powers of ξ and cos ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ cos ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ 2 cos ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ 3 cos ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ sin ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ 2 sin ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ 3 sin ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ cos ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) sin ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , ξ 2 cos ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) sin ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) , sin ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) 3 , we obtain proper results as follows:
Set I. For u 0 = 0 ,
a = a , b = 2 2 1 a 2 1 , β = a 4 a 2 + 4 b 5 2 2 ( a 1 ) ( a + 1 ) , b 1 = i b 3 , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = b 3 , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = b 5 , b 6 = b 6 , b 7 = b 4 2 b 2 2 .
By using these parameters in Equation (38), and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = 2 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) b 5 sin ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) b 2 2 b 4 2 + ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 cos ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , v ( ξ ) = 8 1 + a 2 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) b 5 sin ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) b 2 2 b 4 2 + ( b 2 + i b 3 ξ ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) 2 cos ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) 2 .
Now, using Equation (5), we obtain the required solution for Equation (1):
m 1 ( x , t ) = 2 e i a x ( a 2 + a 4 + 4 b 5 2 ) t s ( 1 + α ) 2 ( 1 + a 2 ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) b 5 sin ( b 6 + b 5 Ω ) + 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) b 2 2 b 4 2 + cos ( b 6 + b 5 Ω ) + ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 , n 2 ( x , t ) = 8 ( a 2 1 ) b 5 sin ( b 6 + b 5 Ω ) + 2 i b 3 ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) b 2 2 b 4 2 + cos ( b 6 + b 5 Ω ) + ( b 2 + i b 3 Ω ) 2 + ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 2 ,
where Ω = 2 2 1 1 + a 2 x 2 2 a 1 1 + a 2 t s ( 1 + α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .
Set II. For b 1 = b 2 = 0 ,
a = a , b = 2 2 a 2 1 u 0 b 5 , β = a 4 a 2 + 4 u 0 2 2 ( a 2 1 ) , b 3 = b 3 , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = b 5 , b 6 = b 6 , b 7 = b 7 , u 0 = u 0 .
By using these parameters in Equation (38), and then by using Equations (8) and (10) in Equation (5), we obtain
m 3 ( x , t ) = e i a x t s ( a 2 + a 4 + 4 u 0 2 ) ( 1 + α ) 2 ( 1 + a 2 ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) u 0 + 2 b 5 sin ( b 6 + b 5 Ω ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) b 7 + cos ( b 6 + b 5 Ω ) + ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 , n 4 ( x , t ) = 2 1 + a 2 u 0 + 2 b 5 sin ( b 6 + b 5 Ω ) + 2 b 3 ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) b 7 + cos ( b 6 + b 5 Ω ) + ( b 4 + b 3 Ω ) 2 2 ,
where Ω = 2 2 u 0 1 + a 2 x b 5 2 2 a t s u 0 1 + a 2 ( 1 + α ) b 5 B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .

4. Multiwave Solutions

For multiwave solutions, Φ in bilinear form can be assumed as [32]
Φ = z 0 cosh ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) + z 1 cos ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) + z 2 cosh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ,
where z i s and b i s all are real-valued parameters to be measured. Inserting Φ into Equation (11) and collecting all coefficients of cosh ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) , sinh ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) , cos ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) sinh ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) sinh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , cos ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) , cosh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , sin ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) , cosh ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) sinh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , cosh ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) cos ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) cosh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , and sinh ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) sin ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) sinh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , we obtain proper results, as follows (See Figure 12 and Figure 13):
Case I.
a = a , b = 2 2 1 a 2 1 , β = 4 u 0 2 a 2 + a 4 2 ( a 2 1 ) , b 1 = i 2 u 0 2 , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = 2 u 0 2 , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = i 2 u 0 2 , b 6 = b 6 , u 0 = u 0 , z 0 = z 0 , z 1 = z 1 , z 2 = z 2 .
By using these values in Equation (44) and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = u 0 2 u 0 z 1 sin ( b 4 + u 0 ξ 2 ) i z 0 sinh ( b 2 + i u 0 ξ 2 ) i z 2 sinh ( b 6 + i u 0 ξ 2 ) z 1 cos ( b 4 + u 0 ξ 2 ) + z 0 cosh ( b 2 + i u 0 ξ 2 ) + z 2 cosh ( b 6 + i u 0 ξ 2 ) , v ( ξ ) = 2 a 2 1 u 0 2 u 0 z 1 sin ( b 4 + u 0 ξ 2 ) i z 0 sinh ( b 2 + i u 0 ξ 2 ) i z 2 sinh ( b 6 + i u 0 ξ 2 ) z 1 cos ( b 4 + u 0 ξ 2 ) + z 0 cosh ( b 2 + i u 0 ξ 2 ) + z 2 cosh ( b 6 + i u 0 ξ 2 ) 2 .
Using Equation (5), we obtain the following multiwave solutions for Equation (1):
m 41 ( x , t ) = e i a x + t s ( 4 u 0 2 a 2 + a 4 ) ( 1 + α ) 2 ( a 2 1 ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) u 0 2 u 0 z 1 sin ( b 4 + Λ ) i z 0 sinh ( b 2 + i Λ ) i z 2 sinh ( b 6 + i Λ ) z 1 cos ( b 4 + Λ ) + z 0 cosh ( b 2 + i Λ ) + z 2 cosh ( b 6 + i Λ ) , n 42 ( x , t ) = 2 ( a 2 1 ) u 0 2 u 0 z 1 sin ( b 4 + Λ ) i z 0 sinh ( b 2 + i Λ ) i z 2 sinh ( b 6 + i Λ ) z 1 cos ( b 4 + Λ ) + z 0 cosh ( b 2 + i Λ ) + z 2 cosh ( b 6 + i Λ ) 2 ,
where Λ = 2 1 a 2 1 u 0 x + a t s ( 1 + α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .
Case II.
a = a , b = 2 1 a 2 1 u 0 b 5 , β = 4 u 0 2 + a 4 a 2 2 ( a 1 ) ( a + 1 ) , b 1 = b 5 , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = i b 5 , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = b 5 , b 6 = b 6 , u 0 = u 0 , z 0 = z 0 , z 1 = z 1 , z 2 = z 2 .
By using these values in Equation (44) and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = u 0 + 2 b 5 i z 1 sin ( b 4 + i b 5 ξ ) z 0 sinh ( b 2 b 5 ξ ) + z 2 sinh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) z 1 cos ( b 4 + i b 5 ξ ) + z 0 cosh ( b 2 b 5 ξ ) + z 2 cosh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , v ( ξ ) = 2 1 + a 2 u 0 + 2 b 5 i z 1 sin ( b 4 + i b 5 ξ ) z 0 sinh ( b 2 b 5 ξ ) + z 2 sinh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) z 1 cos ( b 4 + i b 5 ξ ) + z 0 cosh ( b 2 b 5 ξ ) + z 2 cosh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) 2 .
Using Equation (5), we obtain the following multiwave solutions for Equation (1):
m 43 ( x , t ) = e i a x + t s ( 4 u 0 2 a 2 + a 4 ) ( 1 + α ) 2 ( a 2 1 ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) u 0 + 2 b 5 i z 1 sin ( b 4 + i Λ ) z 0 sinh ( b 2 Λ ) + z 2 sinh ( b 6 + Λ ) z 1 cos ( b 4 + i Λ ) + z 0 cosh ( b 2 Λ ) + z 2 cosh ( b 6 + Λ ) , n 44 ( x , t ) = 2 ( a 2 1 ) u 0 + 2 b 5 i z 1 sin ( b 4 + i Λ ) z 0 sinh ( b 2 Λ ) + z 2 sinh ( b 6 + Λ ) z 1 cos ( b 4 + i Λ ) + z 0 cosh ( b 2 Λ ) + z 2 cosh ( b 6 + Λ ) 2 ,
where Λ = 2 1 1 a 2 u 0 x + a t s ( 1 + α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .

5. Homoclinic Breather Approach

To obtain breather solutions, Φ in bilinear form can be assumed as [32]
Φ = e p b 1 ξ + b 2 + z 1 e p b 3 ξ + b 4 + z 2 cos q b 5 ξ + b 6 ,
where p, q, z 1 , z 2 , and b i s all are real-valued parameters to be found. Inserting Φ into Equation (11) and collecting all coefficients of e p ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) , sin ( q ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ) , cos ( q ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ) , e p ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) sin ( q ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ) , e p ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) + p ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) cos ( q ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ) , and cos ( q ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ) sin ( q ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ) , we obtain an algebraic system of equations, then, after solving them, we obtain proper results, as follows (See Figure 14 and Figure 15):
Case I.
a = a , b = 2 2 1 a 2 1 , β = a 4 16 b 5 2 q 2 a 2 2 ( a 2 1 ) , b 1 = i q b 5 p , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = i q b 5 p , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = b 5 , b 6 = b 6 , u 0 = 0 , p = p , q = q , z 1 = z 1 , z 2 = z 2 .
By using these parameters in Equation (51) and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = 2 i b 5 q 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p + 2 i b 5 q ξ z 1 + i e b 2 p + i b 5 q ξ z 2 sin ( q ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ) 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p + 2 i b 5 q ξ z 1 + e b 2 p + i b 5 q ξ z 2 cos ( q ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ) , v ( ξ ) = 8 b 5 2 q 2 a 2 1 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p + 2 i b 5 q ξ z 1 + i e b 2 p + i b 5 q ξ z 2 sin ( q ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ) 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p + 2 i b 5 q ξ z 1 + e b 2 p + i b 5 q ξ z 2 cos ( q ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) ) 2 .
Using Equation (5), we obtain the following breather solutions for Equation (1):
m 51 ( x , t ) = 2 i b 5 e Δ q 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p + 4 i Ω z 1 + i e b 2 p + 2 i Ω z 2 sin ( q ( b 6 + 2 q Ω ) ) 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p + 4 i Ω z 1 + e b 2 p + 2 i Ω z 2 cos ( q ( b 6 + 2 q Ω ) ) , n 52 ( x , t ) = 8 b 5 2 q 2 ( 1 + a 2 ) 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p + 4 i Ω z 1 + i e b 2 p + 2 i Ω z 2 sin ( q ( b 6 + 2 q Ω ) ) 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p + 4 i Ω z 1 + e b 2 p + 2 i Ω z 2 cos ( q ( b 6 + 2 q Ω ) ) 2 ,
where Δ = 1 2 i 2 a x + ( 16 b 5 2 q 2 a 2 + a 4 ) t s ( α 1 ) ( 1 + a ) ( 1 + a ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) ,
Ω = 2 1 1 + a 2 b 5 q x + a t s ( 1 + α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .
Case II.
a = a , b = 2 2 1 a 2 1 , β = a 4 + 4 u 0 2 a 2 2 ( a 2 1 ) , b 1 = u 0 p , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = u 0 p , b 4 = b 4 , b 5 = 0 , b 6 = b 6 , u 0 = u 0 , p = p , q = q , z 1 = z 1 , z 2 = z 2 .
By using these parameters in Equation (51), and then by using Equations (8) and (10) in Equation (5), we obtain the following solutions for Equation (1):
m 53 ( x , t ) = e 1 2 i 2 a x + t s ( 4 u 0 2 a 2 + a 4 ) ( α 1 ) ( 1 + a ) ( 1 + a ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) u 0 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p z 1 e p ( Ω ) z 2 cos ( b 6 q ) 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p z 1 + e p ( Ω ) z 2 cos ( b 6 q ) , n 54 ( x , t ) = 2 u 0 2 ( 1 + a 2 ) 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p z 1 e p ( Ω ) z 2 cos ( b 6 q ) 1 + e b 2 p + b 4 p z 1 + e p ( Ω ) z 2 cos ( b 6 q ) 2 ,
where Ω = b 2 + 2 2 1 1 + a 2 u 0 x + a t s ( 1 + α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) p .

6. The Periodic Cross-Kink Wave Solutions

For this, Φ in bilinear form can be assumed as [33]
Φ = e ( b 1 ξ + b 2 ) + z 1 e b 1 ξ + b 2 + z 2 cos ( b 3 ξ + b 4 ) + z 3 cosh ( b 5 ξ + b 6 ) + b 7 ,
where z i s and b i s all are real-valued parameters to be measured. Inserting Φ into Equation (11) and collecting all coefficients of e b 1 ξ + b 2 , e b 1 ξ b 2 , e b 2 + b 1 ξ + 2 ( b 2 + b 1 ξ ) , e ( b 1 ξ + b 2 ) + 2 ( b 1 ξ + b 2 ) , cos ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) , cos ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) cosh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , e ( b 1 ξ + b 2 ) + 2 ( b 1 ξ + b 2 ) cos ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) , e ( b 1 ξ + b 2 ) + 2 ( b 1 ξ + b 2 ) sin ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) , cos ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) cosh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) sinh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , e ( b 1 ξ + b 2 ) + 2 ( b 1 ξ + b 2 ) cos ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) cosh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , and e ( b 1 ξ + b 2 ) + 2 b 1 ξ + 2 b 2 ) sin ( b 4 + b 3 ξ ) sinh ( b 6 + b 5 ξ ) , after solving them, we attain the following parameters (See Figure 16 and Figure 17):
Case I. For b 4 = 0 ,
a = a , b = 8 2 1 a 2 1 , β = 64 b 1 2 a 2 + a 4 2 ( a 2 1 ) , b 1 = b 1 , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = b 3 , b 5 = 0 , b 6 = b 6 , b 7 = 0 , u 0 = 2 b 1 , z 1 = z 1 , z 2 = 0 , z 3 = z 3 .
By using these values in Equation (57), and then by using Equations (8) and (10), we obtain
u ( ξ ) = 2 b 1 + 2 b 1 e b 2 b 1 ξ + b 1 e b 2 + b 1 ξ z 1 e b 2 b 1 ξ + e b 2 + b 1 ξ z 1 + z 3 cosh ( b 6 ) , v ( ξ ) = 2 a 2 1 2 b 1 + 2 b 1 e b 2 b 1 ξ + b 1 e b 2 + b 1 ξ z 1 e b 2 b 1 ξ + e b 2 + b 1 ξ z 1 + z 3 cosh ( b 6 ) 2 .
Now, using Equation (5), we obtain the following solutions for Equation (1):
m 61 ( x , t ) = 2 b 1 e i 2 2 a x + ( 64 b 1 2 a 2 + a 4 ) t s ( α 1 ) ( a 2 1 ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) 2 + e Ω z 3 cosh ( b 6 ) 1 + e 2 Ω z 1 + e Ω z 3 cosh ( b 6 ) , n 62 ( x , t ) = 8 b 1 2 ( a 2 1 ) 2 + e Ω z 3 cosh ( b 6 ) 1 + e 2 Ω z 1 + e Ω z 3 cosh ( b 6 ) 2 ,
where Ω = b 2 + 8 2 1 a 2 1 b 1 x + a t s ( 1 + α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .
Case II.
a = a , b = 2 2 1 a 2 1 , β = a 4 a 2 16 b 3 2 2 ( a 2 1 ) , b 1 = i b 3 , b 2 = b 2 , b 3 = b 3 , b 5 = i b 3 , b 6 = b 6 , b 7 = 0 , z 1 = z 1 , z 2 = z 2 , z 3 = z 3 .
Now, by using these values in Equation (57), and then by using Equations (8) and (10) in Equation (5), we obtain the following solutions for Equation (1):
m 63 ( x , t ) = 2 i b 3 e Λ 2 + 2 e 2 b 2 + Ω z 1 e b 2 z 2 + e b 2 + Ω z 2 + e b 2 ( 1 + e Ω ) z 3 cosh ( b 6 ) e b 2 ( 1 + e Ω ) z 3 sinh ( b 6 ) 2 + 2 e 2 b 2 + Ω z 1 + e b 2 z 2 + e b 2 + Ω z 2 + e b 2 ( 1 + e Ω ) z 3 cosh ( b 6 ) e b 2 ( 1 + e Ω ) z 3 sinh ( b 6 ) , n 64 ( x , t ) = 8 b 3 2 ( a 2 1 ) 2 2 e 2 b 2 + Ω z 1 + e b 2 z 2 e b 2 + Ω z 2 e b 2 ( 1 + e Ω ) z 3 cosh ( b 6 ) + e b 2 ( 1 + e Ω ) z 3 sinh ( b 6 ) 2 + 2 e 2 b 2 + Ω z 1 + e b 2 z 2 + e b 2 + Ω z 2 + e b 2 ( 1 + e Ω ) z 3 cosh ( b 6 ) e b 2 ( 1 + e Ω ) z 3 sinh ( b 6 ) 2 ,
where Λ = 1 2 i 2 a x + ( 16 b 3 2 a 2 + a 4 ) t s ( α 1 ) ( a 2 1 ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) , and Ω = 4 i 2 1 1 + a 2 b 3 x + a t s ( 1 + α ) B ( α ) s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s Γ ( 1 α s ) .

7. Results and Discussion

The study of new imposed solutions for the ion sound and Langmuir waves (ISLWs) has huge importance among scientists. Much of the work has been carried out on ISLWs, for example, Mohammed et al. constructed new traveling wave solutions for ISLWs by using He’s semi-inverse and extended Jacobian elliptic function method [34]. Shakeel et al. studied new wave behaviors for ISLWs with the aid of modified exp-function approach [35]. Seadawy et al. used direct algebraic and auxiliary equation mapping to obtain the families of new exact traveling wave solutions for ISLWs [36]. Tripathy and Sahoo studied a variety of analytical solutions for ISLWs [37]. Seadawy et al. studied a variety of exact solutions with modified Kudraysov and hyperbolic-function scheme for ISLWs [38].
Here, we obtained a variety of analytical solutions with rational and trigonometric forms for ISLWs, in which some of them are represented graphically in 3D, contour, and 2D shapes. In Figure 1 and Figure 2, we present M-shaped solutions for m 23 and m 25 with contour and 2D plots, respectively. In Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, we see the interactional phenomena with M-shaped and one-kink for m 31 , n 32 , m 35 , and n 36 at different values of the parameters. In these figures, we see M-shaped waves with multiple bright and dark solutions. In Figure 4, waves strongly increased their amplitude according to time. In Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9, we see the interactional phenomena with M-shaped and two-kink for n 38 , m 39 , and n 40 . In Figure 7, multiple bright, dark, and M-size solitons appear. In Figure 8 and Figure 9, large-sized dark and bright waves appear. Figure 10 and Figure 11 represent the evolution of M-shaped and periodic waves for m 3 and n 4 . Figure 12 and Figure 13 represent the evolution of multiwaves solution for m 43 and n 44 at different values. In Figure 14 and Figure 15, two solutions, m 51 and n 54 , of homoclinic breather are presented graphically, and we also see the changes in graphs by varying the value of a. In Figure 16 and Figure 17, we present periodic cross-kink solutions m 63 and n 44 graphically, and we also see the change in waves into bright and dark solutions by varying the value of a. As α ( 0 , 1 ] , in all these solutions, we can see that when α = 1 , s = 0 ( α 1 α ) s does not converge.

8. Conclusions

In this work, we successfully derived some new analytic solutions for FISLWS with Atangana–Baleanu derivative. These exact solutions are derived in the form of bilinear, trigonometric, and exponential functions. As a result, new traveling wave solutions are gained in the form of rational, periodic, multiwaves, multi-kink, solitary waves, bright and dark solitons that are shown graphically in 3D, 2D, and contour structures. These solutions play an important role in different areas of physics, engineering, and other branches of sciences.

Author Contributions

Methodology, S.T.R.R.; Resources, A.D.A.; Supervision, A.R.S.; Writing, S.A.O.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University under grant No (DSR-2021-03-03106).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dalir, M.; Bashour, M. Applications of Fractional Calculus. Appl. Math. Sci. 2010, 4, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar]
  2. Özkan, Y.S.; Seadawy, A.R.; Yaşar, E. Multi-wave, breather and interaction solutions to (3 + 1) dimensional Vakhnenko–Parkes equation arising at propagation of high-frequency waves in a relaxing medium. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2021, 15, 666–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lu, D.; Seadawy, A.R.; Iqbal, M. Mathematical physics via construction of traveling and solitary wave solutions of three coupled system of nonlinear partial differential equations and their applications. Results Phys. 2018, 11, 1161–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Seadawy, A.R.; Ali, A.; Albarakati, W.A. Analytical wave solutions of the (2 + 1)-dimensional first integro-differential Kadomtsev-Petviashivili hierarchy equation by using modified mathematical methods. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seadawy, A.R.; Cheemaa, N. Propagation of nonlinear complex waves for the coupled nonlinear Schrödinger Equations in two core optical fibers. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2019, 529, 121330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kudryashov, N.A. The generalized Duffing oscillator. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 2021, 93, 105526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kudryashov, N.A. Model of propagation pulses in an optical fiber with a new law of refractive index. Optik 2021, 248, 168160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kudryashov, N.A. Solitary waves of the non-local Schrödinger equation with arbitrary refractive index. Optik 2021, 231, 166443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kudryashov, N.A. Almost general solution of the reduced higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Optik 2021, 230, 166347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kudryashov, N.A. Periodic and solitary waves in optical fiber Bragg gratings with dispersive reflectivity. Chin. J. Phys. 2020, 66, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rizvi, S.T.R.; Seadawy, A.R.; Younis, M.; Ahmad, N.; Zaman, S. Optical dromions for perturbed fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with conformable derivatives. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021, 53, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Younas, U.; Younis, M.; Seadawy, A.R.; Rizvi, S.T.R.; Althobaiti, S.; Sayed, S. Diverse exact solutions for modified nonlinear Schrödinger equation with conformable fractional derivative. Results Phys. 2021, 20, 103766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mohammadi, H.; Kumar, S.; Rezapour, S.; Etemad, S. A theoretical study of the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional modeling for hearing loss due to Mumps virus with optimal control. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 144, 110668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nisar, K.S.; Jothimani, K.; Kaliraj, K.; Ravichandran, C. An analysis of controllability results for nonlinear Hilfer neutral fractional derivatives with non-dense domain. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 146, 110915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kaliraj, K.; Thilakraj, E.; Ravichandran, C.; Nisar, K.S. Controllability analysis for impulsive integro-differential equation via Atangana–Baleanu fractional derivative. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Panda, S.K.; Ravichandran, C.; Hazarika, B. Ravichandran, Bipan Hazarika, Results on system of Atangana–Baleanu fractional order Willis aneurysm and nonlinear singularly perturbed boundary value problems. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 142, 110390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Younas, U.; Seadawy, A.R.; Younis, M.; Rizvi, S. Construction of analytical wave solutions to the conformable fractional dynamical system of ion sound and Langmuir waves. Waves Random Complex Media 2020, 32, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Akram, U.; Seadawy, A.R.; Rizvi, S.T.R.; Younis, M.; Althobaiti, S.; Sayed, S. Traveling waves solutions for the fractional Wazwaz Benjamin Bona Mahony model in arising shallow water waves. Results Phys. 2021, 20, 103725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dokuyucua, M.A. Caputo and Atangana-Baleanu-Caputo Fractional Derivative Applied to Garden Equation. Turk. J. Sci. 2020, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  20. Seadawy, A.R. Modulation instability analysis for the generalized derivative higher order nonlinear Schrödinger equation and its the bright and dark soliton solutions. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2017, 31, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, S.; Zong, Q.A.; Liu, D.; Gao, Q. A generalized exp-function method for fractional Riccati differential equations. Commun. Fract. Calc. 2010, 1, 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  22. Seadawy, A.R.; Tariq, K.U. On some novel solitons to the generalized (1 + 1)-dimensional unstable spacetime fractional nonlinear Schrödinger model emerging in the optical fibers. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021, 53, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, C.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, J. Dynamical behavior and exact solutions for time-fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with parabolic law nonlinearity. Optik 2020, 222, 165331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khan, S.A.; Shah, K.; Kumam, P.; Seadawy, A.; Zaman, G.; Shah, Z. Study of mathematical model of Hepatitis B under Caputo-Fabrizo derivative. AIMS Math. 2021, 6, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Seadawy, A.R.; Bilal, M.; Younis, M.; Rizvi, S.; Althobaiti, S.; Makhlouf, M. Analytical mathematical approaches for the double-chain model of DNA by a novel computational technique. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021, 144, 110669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Farah, N.; Seadawy, A.R.; Ahmad, S.; Rizvi, S.T.R.; Younis, M. Interaction properties of soliton molecules and Painleve analysis for nano bioelectronics transmission model. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2020, 52, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Helal, M.A.; Seadawy, A.R. Variational method for the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation with computational applications. Phys. Scr. 2009, 80, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gaber, A.A.; Aljohani, A.F.; Ebaid, A.; Machado, J.T. The generalized Kudryashov method for nonlinear space-time fractional partial differential equations of Burgers type. Nonlinear Dyn. 2019, 95, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ghaffar, A.; Ali, A.; Ahmed, S.; Akram, S.; Junjua, M.-U.-D.; Baleanu, D.; Nisar, K.S. A novel analytical technique to obtain the solitary solutions for nonlinear evolution equation of fractional order. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rizvi, S.T.R.; Ali, K.; Ahmad, M. Optical solitons for Biswas–Milovic equation by new extended auxiliary equation method. Optik 2020, 204, 164181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ahmed, I.; Seadawy, A.R.; Lu, D. M-shaped rational solitons and their interaction with kink waves in the Fokas–Lenells equation. Phys. Scr. 2019, 94, 055205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ahmed, I.; Seadawy, A.R.; Lu, D. Kinky breathers, W-shaped and multi-peak solitons interaction in (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with Kerr law of nonlinearity. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2019, 134, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ma, H.; Zhang, C.; Deng, A. New Periodic Wave, Cross-Kink Wave, Breather, and the Interaction Phenomenon for the (2+1)-Dimensional Sharmo–Tasso–Olver Equation. Complexity 2020, 2020, 4270906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mohammed, W.W.; Abdelrahman, M.A.E.; Inc, M.; Hamza, A.E.; Akinlar, M.A. Soliton solutions for system of ion sound and Langmuir waves. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2020, 52, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shakeel, M.; Iqbal, M.A.; Din, Q.; Hassan, Q.M.; Ayub, K. New exact solutions for coupled nonlinear system of ion sound and Langmuir waves. Indian J. Phys. 2019, 94, 885–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Seadawy, A.R.; Lu, D.; Iqbal, M. Application of mathematical methods on the system of dynamical equations for the ion sound and Langmuir waves. Pramana 2019, 93, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tripathy, A.; Sahoo, S. Exact solutions for the ion sound Langmuir wave model by using two novel analytical methods. Results Phys. 2020, 19, 103494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Seadawy, A.R.; Kumar, D.; Hosseini, K.; Samadani, F. The system of equations for the ion sound and Langmuir waves and its new exact solutions. Results Phys. 2018, 9, 1631–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Plots of m 23 ( x , t ) in Equation (17) for a = 2 , b = 1.2 , u 0 = 2 , b 2 = 3 , b 3 = 5 , b 4 = 3 , α = 0.9 , respectively as three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c).
Figure 1. Plots of m 23 ( x , t ) in Equation (17) for a = 2 , b = 1.2 , u 0 = 2 , b 2 = 3 , b 3 = 5 , b 4 = 3 , α = 0.9 , respectively as three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c).
Mathematics 10 00200 g001
Figure 2. Represented three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of m 25 ( x , t ) in Equation (20) for a = 2 , b = 0.5 , b 2 = 3 , b 3 = 1 , b 4 = 3 , b 5 = 1 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Figure 2. Represented three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of m 25 ( x , t ) in Equation (20) for a = 2 , b = 0.5 , b 2 = 3 , b 3 = 1 , b 4 = 3 , b 5 = 1 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g002
Figure 3. Showed three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of m 31 ( x , t ) in Equation (24) for a = 0.2 , b 3 = 1 , b 4 = 2 , b 5 = 4 , b 7 = 3 , c = 1 , α = 0.6 , respectively.
Figure 3. Showed three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of m 31 ( x , t ) in Equation (24) for a = 0.2 , b 3 = 1 , b 4 = 2 , b 5 = 4 , b 7 = 3 , c = 1 , α = 0.6 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g003
Figure 4. Illustrated three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of n 32 ( x , t ) in Equation (24) for a = 0.2 , b 3 = 1 , b 4 = 5 , b 5 = 4 , b 7 = 3 , c = 1 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Figure 4. Illustrated three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of n 32 ( x , t ) in Equation (24) for a = 0.2 , b 3 = 1 , b 4 = 5 , b 5 = 4 , b 7 = 3 , c = 1 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g004
Figure 5. Clarify three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of m 35 ( x , t ) in Equation (30) for a = 0.5 , u 0 = 1 , b 4 = 2 , b 5 = 4 , b 7 = 3 , c = 1 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Figure 5. Clarify three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of m 35 ( x , t ) in Equation (30) for a = 0.5 , u 0 = 1 , b 4 = 2 , b 5 = 4 , b 7 = 3 , c = 1 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g005
Figure 6. Explain three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of n 36 ( x , t ) in Equation (30) for a = 0.3 , u 0 = 0.8 , b 4 = 2 , b 5 = 5 , b 7 = 3 , c = 0.4 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Figure 6. Explain three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of n 36 ( x , t ) in Equation (30) for a = 0.3 , u 0 = 0.8 , b 4 = 2 , b 5 = 5 , b 7 = 3 , c = 0.4 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g006
Figure 7. Represented three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of n 38 ( x , t ) in Equation (34) for a = 0.5 , b 6 = 1 , b 7 = 2 , b 8 = 2 , b 9 = 6 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Figure 7. Represented three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of n 38 ( x , t ) in Equation (34) for a = 0.5 , b 6 = 1 , b 7 = 2 , b 8 = 2 , b 9 = 6 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g007
Figure 8. Showed three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of m 39 ( x , t ) in Equation (37) for a = 1.5 , b 6 = 8 , b 7 = 1 , b 8 = 2 , α = 0.6 , respectively.
Figure 8. Showed three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of m 39 ( x , t ) in Equation (37) for a = 1.5 , b 6 = 8 , b 7 = 1 , b 8 = 2 , α = 0.6 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g008
Figure 9. Illustrated three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of n 40 ( x , t ) in Equation (37) for a = 1.3 , b 6 = 7 , b 7 = 4 , b 8 = 5 , α = 0.6 , respectively.
Figure 9. Illustrated three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of n 40 ( x , t ) in Equation (37) for a = 1.3 , b 6 = 7 , b 7 = 4 , b 8 = 5 , α = 0.6 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g009
Figure 10. Showed three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of m 3 ( x , t ) in Equation (43) at a = 2 , u 0 = 2 , b 3 = 0.05 , b 4 = 3 , b 5 = 2 , b 6 = 5 , b 7 = 1 , α = 0.9 , respectively.
Figure 10. Showed three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of m 3 ( x , t ) in Equation (43) at a = 2 , u 0 = 2 , b 3 = 0.05 , b 4 = 3 , b 5 = 2 , b 6 = 5 , b 7 = 1 , α = 0.9 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g010
Figure 11. Represented three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of n 4 ( x , t ) in Equation (43) at a = 2 , u 0 = 1 , b 3 = 0.1 , b 4 = 3 , b 5 = 7 , b 6 = 3 , b 7 = 2 , α = 0.5 , respectively.
Figure 11. Represented three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Plots of n 4 ( x , t ) in Equation (43) at a = 2 , u 0 = 1 , b 3 = 0.1 , b 4 = 3 , b 5 = 7 , b 6 = 3 , b 7 = 2 , α = 0.5 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g011
Figure 12. Showed three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of m 43 ( x , t ) in Equation (50), for a = 0.9 , u 0 = 0.1 , b 2 = 5 , b 4 = 5 , b 5 = 3 , z 0 = 2 , z 1 = 1 , z 2 = 2 , α = 0.9 , respectively.
Figure 12. Showed three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of m 43 ( x , t ) in Equation (50), for a = 0.9 , u 0 = 0.1 , b 2 = 5 , b 4 = 5 , b 5 = 3 , z 0 = 2 , z 1 = 1 , z 2 = 2 , α = 0.9 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g012
Figure 13. Represented three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of n 44 ( x , t ) in Equation (50), for u 0 = 0.1 , b 2 = 5 , b 4 = 5 , b 5 = 3 , b 6 = 10 , z 0 = 2 , z 1 = 1 , z 2 = 2 , α = 0.9 , respectively.
Figure 13. Represented three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of n 44 ( x , t ) in Equation (50), for u 0 = 0.1 , b 2 = 5 , b 4 = 5 , b 5 = 3 , b 6 = 10 , z 0 = 2 , z 1 = 1 , z 2 = 2 , α = 0.9 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g013
Figure 14. Explain three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of m 51 ( x , t ) in Equation (54), at b 2 = 4 , b 4 = 7 , b 5 = 10 , b 6 = 3 , z 1 = 2 , z 2 = 2 , p = 3 , q = 0.2 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Figure 14. Explain three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of m 51 ( x , t ) in Equation (54), at b 2 = 4 , b 4 = 7 , b 5 = 10 , b 6 = 3 , z 1 = 2 , z 2 = 2 , p = 3 , q = 0.2 , α = 0.8 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g014aMathematics 10 00200 g014b
Figure 15. Clarify three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of n 54 ( x , t ) in Equation (56), at b 2 = 4 , b 4 = 3 , b 6 = 3 , z 1 = 1.5 , z 2 = 2.5 , p = 1 , q = 1 , u 0 = 1 , α = 0.6 , successively.
Figure 15. Clarify three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of n 54 ( x , t ) in Equation (56), at b 2 = 4 , b 4 = 3 , b 6 = 3 , z 1 = 1.5 , z 2 = 2.5 , p = 1 , q = 1 , u 0 = 1 , α = 0.6 , successively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g015
Figure 16. Showed three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of m 63 ( x , t ) in Equation (62), for b 2 = 5 , b 3 = 1 , b 6 = 5 , z 1 = 1 , z 2 = 3 , z 3 = 0.5 , α = 0.9 , respectively.
Figure 16. Showed three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of m 63 ( x , t ) in Equation (62), for b 2 = 5 , b 3 = 1 , b 6 = 5 , z 1 = 1 , z 2 = 3 , z 3 = 0.5 , α = 0.9 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g016
Figure 17. Represented three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of n 64 ( x , t ) in Equation (62), for b 2 = 5 , b 3 = 1 , b 6 = 5 , z 1 = 1 , z 2 = 3 , z 3 = 0.5 , α = 0.9 , respectively.
Figure 17. Represented three-dimensions in (a); contour in (b) and two-dimensions in (c), Graphical representation of n 64 ( x , t ) in Equation (62), for b 2 = 5 , b 3 = 1 , b 6 = 5 , z 1 = 1 , z 2 = 3 , z 3 = 0.5 , α = 0.9 , respectively.
Mathematics 10 00200 g017aMathematics 10 00200 g017b
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alruwaili, A.D.; Seadawy, A.R.; Rizvi, S.T.R.; Beinane, S.A.O. Diverse Multiple Lump Analytical Solutions for Ion Sound and Langmuir Waves. Mathematics 2022, 10, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10020200

AMA Style

Alruwaili AD, Seadawy AR, Rizvi STR, Beinane SAO. Diverse Multiple Lump Analytical Solutions for Ion Sound and Langmuir Waves. Mathematics. 2022; 10(2):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10020200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alruwaili, Abdulmohsen D., Aly R. Seadawy, Syed T. R. Rizvi, and Sid Ahmed O. Beinane. 2022. "Diverse Multiple Lump Analytical Solutions for Ion Sound and Langmuir Waves" Mathematics 10, no. 2: 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10020200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop