Next Article in Journal
Convergence of AA-Iterative Algorithm for Generalized α-Nonexpansive Mappings with an Application
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Learning-Based Cyber–Physical Feature Fusion for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Simple Chaotic System with One Nonlinear Term

1
College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
2
Control and Energy Management Laboratory (CEM Lab.), Ecole Nationale d’Ingenieurs de Sfax (ENIS), Institut Superieur de Biotechnologie de Sfax (ISBS), University of Sfax, Sfax 3038, Tunisia
3
Multidisciplinary Center for Infrastructure Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China
4
Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hail, Hail 55476, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hail, Hail 55476, Saudi Arabia
6
Graduate School of Intelligent Data Science, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123 University Road, Section 3, Douliou, Yunlin 640301, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2022, 10(22), 4374; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224374
Submission received: 6 October 2022 / Revised: 9 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 20 November 2022

Abstract

:
In this research article, a simple four-dimensional (4D) chaotic dynamic system with uncomplicated structure and only one nonlinear term is introduced. The features of the proposed design have been conducted with some standard nonlinear dynamic analysis and mathematical tools which show the chaotic nature. One of the most important indicators for detecting complexity of the chaotic systems is the Kaplan-York dimension of the system. Moreover, one of the main criteria of chaotic systems is its simplicity due to the reduction of operating costs. Therefore, it seems necessary to design a system as simple as possible and with high complexity. In this research, a comparison has been made between the proposed system and similar chaotic systems, which has given noticeable results. For the practical implementation of the proposed design, the circuit analysis using Multisim software has been employed. The proposed scheme has been used in the application of image encryption to show the efficiency of the proposed chaotic system and standard encryption tests have been performed. The rest of the numerical results have been conducted using MATLAB/Simulink software.
MSC:
47A16; 39A33; 37D45; 34C28; 68P25; 94A08; 62H35

1. Introduction

Lorenz’s simplified system, which is based on atmospheric convection, was designed and discovered by Lorenz in 1963 [1]. This dynamic system, which is considered the world’s first chaotic attractor, has become a basis for research on nonlinear dynamic systems [2,3]. After this discovery, the research in the field of chaotic dynamic systems using differential equations was expanded and used in many physical and dynamic structures [4,5,6,7,8]. Many hidden attractors can be found in these types of systems, and chaotic systems can be used in different structures based on the type of attractors [9,10]. Due to the complexities of nth nonlinear chaotic dynamic systems, including the sensitivity of these types of systems to parameters, initial conditions and being unpredictable, this type of nonlinear systems can be used in biomedical engineering [11], laser applications [12], secure communications [13], wireless sensor networks [14] and image encryption/decryption [15].
Three main criteria for designing and building a chaotic dynamic system were proposed in 2012 [16]. One of these three mentioned criteria is that the newly designed dynamic system should be simple in comparison with other dynamic systems [17,18,19,20]. Therefore, the system should have dynamic simplicity while being chaotic. In this regard, researchers of chaotic dynamic nonlinear systems have conducted extensive research to achieve the mentioned goals [21,22,23,24]. For example, in [25], a nonlinear chaotic dynamic system with only two nonlinear terms and strange attractors was proposed. In the following, the dynamic characteristics of the novel nonlinear dynamic system, the analysis, and the practical circuit of the novel 4D dynamic system has been implemented. It is shown that the novel 4D nonlinear dynamic system can implement good encryption. In [26], an autonomous 4D nonlinear chaotic system with three nonlinear terms has been implemented with a simple mathematical model and chaotic attractors. This system has only two unstable equilibrium points and the electronic circuit of the nonlinear system has been designed. In [27], a 4D chaotic dynamic system without an equilibrium point with rich dynamics with three nonlinear terms and one fixed term is presented. The dynamic properties of the new system have been shown using nonlinear analysis, including: 2D and 3D chaotic attractors, bifurcation diagrams, and equilibrium points. In [28], using Lorenz equations, a 4D dynamic system with two nonlinear terms and three equilibria is introduced. Standard dynamic analyses, bifurcation diagrams and coexisting behaviors have been analyzed. To prove the effectiveness of the dynamic system, image encryption and standard tests have been performed. In [29], a 4D dynamic system with nonlinear attractors has been introduced, considering the parameters of the system with two nonlinear terms. The exact nonlinear dynamic characteristics of standard chaos have been analyzed and the attractors have been investigated by fixing the initial conditions and parameters of the new nonlinear system. In addition, the practical electronic circuit corresponding to the new dynamic system has also been proposed. For the effectiveness of the chaotic dynamic system, image encryption has been performed using security analysis. In [30], various types of coexisting attractors in the 4D autonomous chaotic systems are presented. In this system, the coexisting attractions are existed, and the system has four unstable equilibria. The results show that the introduced system has many hidden attractors compared to the change of initial conditions and parameters. The bifurcation diagrams show the coexistence attractors and the chaotic attractors have been confirmed with the Lyapunov exponents. In the end, an electronic circuit has been designed and used to understand the dynamic behavior experimentally. In [31], a 4D nonlinear system is proposed in which the hyperbolic cosine nonlinear function is used. The above research has been implemented using a pair of semiconductor-based circuits. After studying the bifurcation diagrams, the Lyapunov exponent and phase portrait, special behaviors of the new system such as periodicity and chaos have been discovered. In this article, the coexistence of hidden attractions and multi-stability phenomenon are analyzed. At the end, the design of the analog circuit is created by PSpice simulations and the practical feasibility is proven with hyperbolic cosine nonlinearity. In [32], a 4D chaotic system is built based on the Sprott-B system. The designed system has two saddle foci. By changing the initial conditions, the system has multiple attractors, which are confirmed by bifurcation diagrams. In the end, a passive controller is used to control the chaos.
Therefore, according to the mentioned contents, the design of a simple chaotic dynamic system with high complexity is worthy of literature. The proposed system in this research article is simple and has only one nonlinear term. The important contributions of this research article can include the following:
  • We introduce a novel and attractive 4D nonlinear chaotic system with only one nonlinear term.
  • We analyze the nonlinear dynamic behavior, mathematical model and chaotic behaviors of the proposed dynamic system.
  • We design and implement the operational model of chaotic dynamic system.
  • We use a chaotic dynamic system in color image encryption and perform standard analyses.
The organization of the rest of this research article is as follows: Section 2 is assigned to introducing the mathematical model of the dynamic system and nonlinear analysis. Section 3 is assigned to system theory analysis. In Section 4, the practical circuit and circuit characteristics of the nonlinear dynamic system are designed. Section 5 is assigned to the engineering applications of chaotic dynamic system in the field of color image encryption/decryption. Finally, in Section 6, the results are introduced.

2. Mathematical Model of the Chaotic System

In the search for nonlinear chaotic systems, we describe the mathematical model of the 4D nonlinear chaotic system:
x ˙ = a 1 + a 2 y + a 3 x ( 0.1 + 0.01 w 2 ) y ˙ = a 4 x + a 5 y + a 6 z + a 7 w z ˙ = a 8 y w ˙ = a 9 x + a 10 z
where x , y , z and w signify the state variables, and [ a 1 , a 2 , , a 10 ] are the constant parameters.
The equilibrium points of the chaotic system (1) are achieved as
a 1 + a 2 y + a 3 x ( 0.1 + 0.01 w 2 ) = 0 a 4 x + a 5 y + a 6 z + a 7 w = 0 y = w z = a 9 a 10 x
Considering many combinations of parameters, a comprehensive computer search of a1, …, a10 and initial conditions is performed. With this method, the constant parameters of the nonlinear system are chosen as
a 1 = 7 , a 2 = 1.3 , a 3 = 9 , a 4 = 7.8 , a 5 = 1.5 , a 6 = 8.5 , a 7 = 2.7 , a 8 = 7.8 , a 9 = 11.6 , a 10 = 5.7 .
For this system, the initial conditions are set as: (−0.4, −0.03, −0.004, −0.001), then the Lyapunov exponents are found as 1.71, 0, −1.08 and −3.42. Therefore, for the parameters (3), the system (1) has a chaotic behavior according to the definitions of the chaos theory; the designed system has a positive Lyapunov exponent. The Kaplan-York dimension is as follows [33]:
D K Y = λ + λ = 1 n L E λ | L E λ n | = 3 + 1.71 + 0 1.08 | 3.42 | = 3.184
It specifies that the designed nonlinear dynamic system (1) has a fractal dimension. One of the most important indicators for diagnosing the complexity of chaotic and hyperchaotic systems is the high Kaplan–York dimensions of the system [34]. As mentioned in Section 1, one of the main criteria of chaotic systems is its simplicity due to the reduction of operational costs. Therefore, it seems necessary to design a system that is as simple as possible and has high complexity. Table 1 is a comparison between the topology of the proposed system and 4D simple chaotic systems.
As it is known, compared to similar systems, the chaotic system (1) is simpler than the above-mentioned systems and has higher Kaplan–York dimension.
The phase portrait and spectrums of the Lyapunov exponents of a typical nonlinear chaotic attractor of mentioned system are illustrated in Figure 1 and Figure 2, correspondingly.
Substituting the constant parameters into dynamical model (2), one obtains
y * = 0 w * 3 + 10 w * = 273.612 x * = 7.7778 1 + 0.1 w * 2 z * = 2.0351 x *
where it is easy to calculate the equation w * 3 + 10 w * = 273.612 , with the roots 5.9797 and 2.9898 ± 6.0678 j . Hence, this chaotic system has one real equilibrium point E 1 ( x * , y * , z * , w * ) = [ 1.6998 , 0 , 3.4593 , 5.9797 ] and two complex equilibrium points as E 2 , 3 ( x * , y * , z * , w * ) = [ 0.8499 ± 1.7248 j , 0 , 1.7297 ± 3.5102 j , 2.9898 ± 6.0678 j ] .
To analyze the state trajectories of the nonlinear dynamic system (1) in the vicinity of the equilibrium points, the Jacobian matrix is found as:
J = [ 0.1 a 3 ( 1 + 0.1 w * 2 ) a 2 0 0.02 a 3 x * w * a 4 a 5 a 6 a 7 0 a 8 0 0 a 9 0 a 10 0 ] ,
where substituting the constant parameters (3) into (6), we have
J = [ 0.9 ( 1 + 0.1 w * 2 ) 1.3 0 0.18 x * w * 7.8 1.5 8.5 2.7 0 7.8 0 0 11.6 0 5.7 0 ] .
For equilibrium point E 1 = [ 1.6998 , 0 , 3.4593 , 5.9797 ] T , the Jacobian matrix is defined as
J 1 = [ 4.1181 1.3 0 1.8296 7.8 1.5 8.5 2.7 0 7.8 0 0 11.6 0 5.7 0 ] .
Hence, the eigenvalues of the linearized system are achieved as
λ I J 1 = λ + 4.1181 1.3 0 1.8296 7.8 λ + 1.5 8.5 2.7 0 7.8 λ 0 11.6 0 5.7 λ           = ( ( λ 0.1408 ) 2 + 66.0156 ) ( ( λ + 2.9499 ) 2 + 10.4846 ) = 0 λ 1 = a , λ 2 , 3 = 1 ± j 3 2 .
Since real parts of two eigenvalues are positive, the equilibrium point E1 is an unstable focus. This system displays strange attractors.
On the other hand, for the equilibrium points E 2 , 3 = [ 0.8499 ± 1.7248 j , 0 , 1.7297 ± 3.5102 j , 2.9898 ± 6.0678 j ] , the Jacobian matrices are calculated as
J 2 , 3 = [ 1.6091 ± 3.2655 j 1.3 0 1.4264 ± 1.8565 j 7.8 1.5 8.5 2.7 0 7.8 0 0 11.6 0 5.7 0 ] .
Therefore, the eigenvalues of the linearized system are obtained as
| λ I J 2 , 3 | = | λ 1.6091 3.2655 j 1.3 0 1.4264 1.8565 j 7.8 λ + 1.5 8.5 2.7 0 7.8 λ 0 11.6 0 5.7 λ | = 0
For the equilibrium point E 2 , the eigenvalues of the linearized system are λ1 = 5.0608 + 4.8336j, λ2 = −0.5963 + 6.7291j, λ3 = −3.8945 − 0.7331j, λ4 = −0.4608 − 7.5641j, and for the equilibrium point E 3 , the calculated eigenvalues are λ1 = 5.0608 − 4.8336j, λ2 = −0.5963 − 6.7291j, λ3 = −3.8945 + 0.7331j, λ4 = −0.4608 + 7.5641j. Since real part of one eigenvalue is positive (for both cases), the equilibrium points E2 and E3 are unstable focus.

3. Theoretical Analysis of Dynamic System Characteristics

In this section, to investigate the dynamic behaviors of the nonlinear dynamic system (1), we increase the value of parameter a2 of dynamic system (1) from 0.85 to 4.4. The bifurcation diagram shown in Figure 3 for the first Lyapunov exponent has three different values with respect to zero. All the numerical simulations related to the chaotic system (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6) have been performed via MATLAB/Simulink toolbox, with step size of 1 ms and by the ode45 solver.
If 0.85 a 2 < 2.66 , the nonlinear dynamic system (1) is in quasi periodic state. In this case, the phase portrait of the system is shown in Figure 4.
If 2.66 a 2 < 3.19 , the dynamic system (1) is in periodic state. In this case, the phase portrait of the system is shown in Figure 5.
If 3.19 a 2 4.4 , the dynamic system (1) is in chaotic state. In this case, the phase portrait of the system is shown in Figure 6.

4. Circuit Implementation

One of the alternative approaches to explore the modeling of chaotic systems is the realization of digital electronic circuits which model the designed systems. The designed circuits are usually simulated by various electronic software in different references [38]. In this section, we simulated the circuit implementation of dynamic system (1) with electronic components in Multisim software. The used electronic components include capacitors, resistors multipliers and operational amplifiers which are proposed based on Kirchhoff’s circuit laws. The circuit design of the proposed chaotic system is implemented as follows:
X ˙ = 1 C 1 1 R 1 V 1 1 R 2 R 14 R 13 Y + 1 R 3 X + 1 10 R 4 X W 2 Y ˙ = 1 C 2 1 R 5 R 16 R 15 X + 1 R 6 Y + 1 R 7 Z 1 R 8 R 18 R 17 W Z ˙ = 1 C 3 1 R 9 R 14 R 13 Y + 1 R 10 X W ˙ = 1 C 4 1 R 11 R 16 R 15 X + 1 R 12 Z
where the element values are selected as follows:
C 1 = C 2 = C 3 = C 4 = 1 n F , V 1 = 1 m V R 1 = 0.05 K Ω , R 2 = 307.69 K Ω , R 3 = R 4 = 444.44 K Ω R 5 = R 9 = R 10 = 51.282 K Ω , R 6 = 266.67 K Ω , R 7 = 47.059 K Ω R 8 = 148.148 K Ω , R 11 = 34.483 K Ω , R 12 = 70.175 K Ω R 13 = R 14 = R 15 = R 16 = R 17 = R 18 = 100 K Ω ,
Figure 7 shows the circuit diagram of the designed nonlinear chaotic system (1).
In the proposed circuit design shown in Figure 7, two AD633AN is used as the multiplier, five TL082CD A-type as the operational amplifier and ±15 Volts power supply is applied to the system. The 2D phase portrait diagrams of the nonlinear dynamic system (1) using the proposed circuit design are shown in Figure 4.
From the comparison between Figure 1 and Figure 8, the realization of the proposed design is determined.

5. Engineering Applications

5.1. Image Encryption

In this section, we will use a 4D nonlinear chaotic system designed to implement an image encryption system. We use an 8-bit RGB color image with Μ × Μ dimensions as the main cryptographic image. The details and steps of encryption include the following:
  • Equation (3) and (x0, y0, z0, w0) = (−0.4, −0.03, −0.004, −0.001), are considered as the parameters and initial conditions for the implementation of cryptography in the cryptographic system. From 4D Rung-Kutta algorithm, chaotic signals [ x s ( i ) , y s ( i ) , z s ( i ) , w s ( i ) ] , i = ( 1 , 2 , , M / 2 ) are generated numerically with an accuracy of 15 decimal places. It should be noted that 15 decimal places of each number in the chaotic sequence are converted to a 64-bit number and 32 low-value bits, but with high accuracy, are selected as ( r n g 4 s ( i ) ,   r n g 2 s ( i ) ,   r n g 3 s ( i ) ,   r n g 1 s ( i ) ) . Using a sequence of defined random bits, we will have:
    r n g ( i ) = b i t x o r ( r n g 4 s ( i ) ,   r n g 2 s ( i ) ,   r n g 3 s ( i ) ,   r n g 1 s ( i ) )
  • Using the chaotic vector sequences x j s ( i ) , j = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4   a n d   i = 1 , 2 , , M / 2 , permutations p x , p y are constructed as follows:
    P x = s o r t { [ x 1 s ; x 2 s ] } P y = s o r t { [ x 3 s ; x 4 s ] }
    The vector Sort is an ascending vector and an indicator for chaotic sequences.
  • Color image I is decomposed into components R, G, B, and then components R, G, and B are transformed into three main matrices. The two substitution vectors p x and p y are used to replace the row and column indices of these principal matrices, respectively. Assuming the matrix is the original image R M × M ( 0 ) , we have:
    R M × M ( 0 ) = [ 1 T , 2 T , , M T ]
    where 1 T , 2 T , , M T are linear vectors. After permitting the row by P x , we will have:
    R M × M ( 1 ) = [ P x ( 1 ) T , P x ( 2 ) T , , P x ( M ) T ] = [ 1 , 2 , , M ]
Similarly, the columns are replaced by the vector P y , and the corresponding chaotic image matrix is transformed as follows after both row and column spatial displacement:
R M × M ( 2 ) = [ P y ( 1 ) , P y ( 2 ) , , P y ( M ) ] = [ ƛ 1 T , ƛ 2 T , , ƛ M T ]
The above steps also apply to the G and B matrices. Finally, we can get the encrypted image. To increase the security of the transmitted data, the pixel values are also changed. At this point, the chaotic image matrix R M × M ( 2 ) is converted to the vector V M × M and decrypted by the random numbers r n g of Equation (14) and the XOR operation:
E R = V M × M ( i ) r n g ( i ) , i = M 2
The above steps apply to the R, G, B matrices. Finally, we can get the encrypted image.

5.2. Image Decryption

To decode the image, we will consider the chaotic keys as [ x 1 m ( i ) , x 2 m ( i ) , x 3 m ( i ) , x 4 m ( i ) ] and reverse the encryption operation. When the synchronization goal is met, the decoding chaotic keys x m ( i ) , y m ( i ) , z m ( i ) , w m ( i )   a n d   i = 1 , 2 , , M / 2 are synchronized with the chaotic keys x s ( i ) , y s ( i ) , z s ( i ) , w s ( i )   a n d   i = 1 , 2 , , M / 2 , and the first original image can be recovered according to the above algorithm using an inverse operation.

5.3. Main Results

In this section, the usefulness and efficiency of the designed method for color image encryption/decryption using numerical simulations is investigated. “Lena” and “patient” images in JPG color image format are used for encryption/decryption in this simulation as the main data (see Figure 9a,d). Cryptographic keys are generated by the cryptographer’s nonlinear chaotic system. Using the encryption method introduced in the previous section and chaotic keys, we encrypt the original color image. Figure 9b,e shows the encrypted color images in the encryption/decryption process. In decoding, the novel dynamic nonlinear system (1) is used to generate decryption keys in the encryption/decryption process. The encrypted image of “Lena” and “patient” can be obtained after the decoding process (see Figure 9c,f). According to the encryption/decryption process and the obtained images, it can be seen that the images obtained in the encryption/decryption process are similar to noise and have a uniform distribution. The proposed method has been shown to have good cryptographic performance in terms of visual impact.
Then, to show the high security of the chaotic cryptography and to show the efficiency of the proposed design, histogram analysis, correlation test, an entropy test and an NIST test were performed.

5.3.1. Histogram Analysis

It is very useful to prevent disclosure and lack of access to image information by unknown sources if the encrypted image in the encryption/decryption process has no statistical similarity with the original color image or is very small. The relationship between the distribution of the color intensity level measurement and the graphical display of pixel elements is expressed by the histogram diagram. The analysis of this diagram shows the uniformity of coding and the distribution of pixel values in the image. When this graph becomes uniform, we have security cryptography. Figure 10 shows the R (red), G (green), and B (blue) channel diagrams of the original “Lena” encrypted images.
Due to the equal and appropriate distribution of pixels in Figure 10d–f, the original color image in Figure 10a will be very difficult and impossible to decode.

5.3.2. Correlation Test

The statistical study of the correlation between adjacent pixels in color images includes horizontal, vertical, and diagonal correlations of other main and standard indicators in the encryption/decryption process. Figure 11 shows this standard which contains 5000 pixels.
The difference between the scatter of the pixels in the original image (Figure 11a–c) and the cryptography in (Figure 11d–f) is clear. According to Figure 11, the horizontal, vertical, and diagonal correlation values of the original image are approximately close to one, indicating a high correlation between the pixels. In addition, this figure shows that there is no relationship between the horizontal, vertical, and diagonal correlation values of the channels and it is close to zero.

5.3.3. Entropy Test

Another standard index in the process of encryption/decryption color images is the entropy index, which shows the information and numerical value of a random variable. To be more precise, the entropy of a random variable is the average value (mathematical expectation) of the amount of information obtained from observing it. In other words, more entropy of a random variable means more ambiguity about it, so the more information we get by looking at the definitive result of that random variable. The information entropy test for a color image is defined as follows:
I E ( ϕ ) = i = 1 255 ( ϕ i ) l o g ( 1 ( ϕ i ) )
where ( ϕ i ) indicates the probability of ϕ i . The maximum entropy value for a truly random source is 8, and the closer the entropy of the encrypted image is to 8, the better the cryptographic quality. In the proposed method, the entropy value is equal to 7.9604.

5.3.4. NIST Test

To use a sequence of random bits (Equation (14)) in cryptography, these sequences of bits must have the appropriate random property. The NIST 800-22 test is a set of internationally accepted and commonly used tests in cryptography that determines the randomness of a sequence of random bits using a variety of different tests. The results of NIST 800-22 test for random bit sequences are shown in Table 2. As is clear, it is observed that the random numbers generated in Equation (15), pass all the tests.

6. Conclusions

This article provides a novel 4D dynamic chaotic system with simple structure and only one nonlinear term. Dynamical features of this nonlinear chaotic system are demonstrated by the Kaplan–York dimension, Lyapunov exponents, bifurcation diagram, and phase portraits. The designed nonlinear dynamic system has three unstable focus equilibrium points. In the continuation of the practical implementation of the proposed dynamic system, with Multisim software its circuit analysis was conducted. At the end, to show the effectiveness of the proposed 4D dynamic system, color image encryption/decryption was performed and chaotic encryption standards were implemented on the new chaotic dynamic system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.B., J.M. and M.K.; formal analysis, R.A., H.J. and S.M.; funding acquisition, Y.B., R.A. and H.J.; investigation, J.M. and M.K.; methodology, M.K., H.J. and S.M.; writing—original draft, S.M. and J.M.; writing—review and editing, and supervision, M.K., R.A., H.J. and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by Deputy for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education through Initiative of Institutional Funding at University of Ha’il, Saudi Arabia, through project number IFP-22 023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lorenz, E.N. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 1963, 20, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, C.; Song, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y. A bounded strategy of the mobile robot coverage path planning based on Lorenz chaotic system. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2016, 13, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chen, C.; Sun, K.; Peng, Y.; Alamodi, A.O. A novel control method to counteract the dynamical degradation of a digital chaotic sequence. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2019, 134, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sampath, S.; Vaidyanathan, S.; Volos, C.K.; Pham, V. An eight-term novel four-scroll chaotic system with cubic nonlinearity and its circuit simulation. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2015, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Castañeda, C.E.; López-Mancilla, D.; Chiu, R.; Villafana-Rauda, E.; Orozco-López, O.; Casillas-Rodríguez, F.; Sevilla-Escoboza, R. Discrete-time neural synchronization between an Arduino microcontroller and a Compact Development System using multiscroll chaotic signals. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2019, 119, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Marwan, M.; Dos Santos, V.; Abidin, M.Z.; Xiong, A. Coexisting Attractor in a Gyrostat Chaotic System via Basin of Attraction and Synchronization of Two Nonidentical Mechanical Systems. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guillén-Fernández, O.; Tlelo-Cuautle, E.; de la Fraga, L.G.; Sandoval-Ibarra, Y.; Nuñez-Perez, J.-C. An Image Encryption Scheme Synchronizing Optimized Chaotic Systems Implemented on Raspberry Pis. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Karami, H.; Mobayen, S.; Lashkari, M.; Bayat, F.; Chang, A. LMI-observer-based stabilizer for chaotic systems in the existence of a nonlinear function and perturbation. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vaseghi, B.; Pourmina, M.A.; Mobayen, S. Finite-time chaos synchronization and its application in wireless sensor networks. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control 2018, 40, 3788–3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Petrzela, J. Chaotic and Hyperchaotic Dynamics of a Clapp Oscillator. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Banerjee, S.; Palit, S.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Ariffin, M.; Rondoni, L. Complexity in congestive heart failure: A time-frequency approach. Chaos Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2016, 26, 033105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cho, J.-H.; Cho, C.-H.; Sung, H.-K. Theoretical performance evaluation of optical complex signals based on optically injection-locked semiconductor lasers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2019, 25, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sham, E.E.; Vidyarthi, D.P. CoFA for QoS based secure communication using adaptive chaos dynamical system in fog-integrated cloud. Digit. Signal Process. 2022, 126, 103523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Anuradha, D.; Subramani, N.; Khalaf, O.I.; Alotaibi, Y.; Alghamdi, S.; Rajagopal, M. Chaotic search-and-rescue-optimization-based multi-hop data transmission protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Sensors 2022, 22, 2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, C.M.; Vidhya, R.; Brindha, M. An efficient chaos based image encryption algorithm using enhanced thorp shuffle and chaotic convolution function. Appl. Intell. 2022, 52, 2556–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sprott, J.C. A proposed standard for the publication of new chaotic systems. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 2011, 21, 2391–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mobayen, S.; Alattas, K.A.; Fekih, A.; El-Sousy, F.F.; Bakouri, M. Barrier function-based adaptive nonsingular sliding mode control of disturbed nonlinear systems: A linear matrix inequality approach. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022, 157, 111918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alattas, K.A.; Mostafaee, J.; Sambas, A.; Alanazi, A.K.; Mobayen, S.; Vu, M.T.; Zhilenkov, A. Nonsingular integral-type dynamic finite-time synchronization for hyper-chaotic systems. Mathematics 2021, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sepestanaki, M.A.; Barhaghtalab, M.H.; Mobayen, S.; Jalilvand, A.; Fekih, A.; Skruch, P. Chattering-Free Terminal Sliding Mode Control Based on Adaptive Barrier Function for Chaotic Systems With Unknown Uncertainties. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 103469–103484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vaseghi, B.; Mobayen, S.; Hashemi, S.S.; Fekih, A. Fast reaching finite time synchronization approach for chaotic systems with application in medical image encryption. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 25911–25925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, X.; Mou, J.; Liu, J.; Ma, C.; Yang, F.; Zhao, X. A novel simple chaotic circuit based on memristor–memcapacitor. Nonlinear Dyn. 2020, 100, 2859–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, X.; Tian, Z.; Li, J.; Cui, Z. A simple parallel chaotic circuit based on memristor. Entropy 2021, 23, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, C.; Yang, Y.; Du, J.; Chen, Z. A simple chaotic circuit with magnetic flux-controlled memristor. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2021, 230, 1723–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mobayen, S.; Fekih, A.; Vaidyanathan, S.; Sambas, A. Chameleon chaotic systems with quadratic nonlinearities: An adaptive finite-time sliding mode control approach and circuit simulation. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 64558–64573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gong, L.; Wu, R.; Zhou, N. A new 4D chaotic system with coexisting hidden chaotic attractors. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 2020, 30, 2050142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lai, Q.; Nestor, T.; Kengne, J.; Zhao, X.-W. Coexisting attractors and circuit implementation of a new 4D chaotic system with two equilibria. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2018, 107, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, X.; Li, Z. Hidden extreme multistability in a novel 4D fractional-order chaotic system. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2019, 111, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Natiq, H.; Said, M.R.M.; Al-Saidi, N.M.; Kilicman, A. Dynamics and complexity of a new 4d chaotic laser system. Entropy 2019, 21, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gong, L.-H.; Luo, H.-X.; Wu, R.-Q.; Zhou, N.-R. New 4D chaotic system with hidden attractors and self-excited attractors and its application in image encryption based on RNG. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2022, 591, 126793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lai, Q.; Akgul, A.; Zhao, X.-W.; Pei, H. Various types of coexisting attractors in a new 4D autonomous chaotic system. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 2017, 27, 1750142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Signing, V.; Kengne, J. Coexistence of hidden attractors, 2-torus and 3-torus in a new simple 4-D chaotic system with hyperbolic cosine nonlinearity. Int. J. Dyn. Control 2018, 6, 1421–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, L.; Ding, M. Dynamical analysis and passive control of a new 4D chaotic system with multiple attractors. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2018, 32, 1850260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Frederickson, P.; Kaplan, J.L.; Yorke, E.D.; Yorke, J.A. The Liapunov dimension of strange attractors. J. Differ. Equ. 1983, 49, 185–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Benkouider, K.; Bouden, T.; Yalcin, M.E. A snail-shaped chaotic system with large bandwidth: Dynamical analysis, synchronization and secure communication scheme. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Singh, J.P.; Roy, B. Coexistence of asymmetric hidden chaotic attractors in a new simple 4-D chaotic system with curve of equilibria. Optik 2017, 145, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sahin, M.E.; Cam Taskiran, Z.G.; Guler, H.; Hamamci, S.E. Application and modeling of a novel 4D memristive chaotic system for communication systems. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 2020, 39, 3320–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Singh, J.P.; Roy, B. Multistability and hidden chaotic attractors in a new simple 4-D chaotic system with chaotic 2-torus behaviour. Int. J. Dyn. Control 2018, 6, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, X.-F.; Chlouverakis, K.E.; Xu, D.-L. Nonlinear dynamics and circuit realization of a new chaotic flow: A variant of Lorenz, Chen and Lü. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 2009, 10, 2357–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. 2D attractors of the nonlinear dynamic system (1) in planes: (a) x1x2, (b) x1x4, and (c) x3x4.
Figure 1. 2D attractors of the nonlinear dynamic system (1) in planes: (a) x1x2, (b) x1x4, and (c) x3x4.
Mathematics 10 04374 g001
Figure 2. Standard nonlinear analysis of chaotic system (1) in a1 ∈ (5, 25) with (a) bifurcation diagram, (b) Lyapunov exponent spectrum for a2 = 1.3, (c) Lyapunov exponent spectrum for a2 = 1.29.
Figure 2. Standard nonlinear analysis of chaotic system (1) in a1 ∈ (5, 25) with (a) bifurcation diagram, (b) Lyapunov exponent spectrum for a2 = 1.3, (c) Lyapunov exponent spectrum for a2 = 1.29.
Mathematics 10 04374 g002
Figure 3. The Lyapunov spectrum of dynamic system (1) for a2 ∈ (0.85, 4.4) in (a) LE1, LE2, and (b) LE3, LE4.
Figure 3. The Lyapunov spectrum of dynamic system (1) for a2 ∈ (0.85, 4.4) in (a) LE1, LE2, and (b) LE3, LE4.
Mathematics 10 04374 g003
Figure 4. 3D phase portraits of the dynamic system (1) in quasi periodic state with a2 = 1.419; (a) x1x2x3, (b) x2x3x4, (c) x1x3x4.
Figure 4. 3D phase portraits of the dynamic system (1) in quasi periodic state with a2 = 1.419; (a) x1x2x3, (b) x2x3x4, (c) x1x3x4.
Mathematics 10 04374 g004
Figure 5. 3D phase portraits of the dynamic system (1) in periodic state with a2 = 2.993; (a) x1x2x3, (b) x2x3x4, (c) x1x3x4.
Figure 5. 3D phase portraits of the dynamic system (1) in periodic state with a2 = 2.993; (a) x1x2x3, (b) x2x3x4, (c) x1x3x4.
Mathematics 10 04374 g005
Figure 6. 3D phase portraits of the dynamic system (1) in chaotic state with (a): a2 = 4.18 and (b): a2 = 3.71.
Figure 6. 3D phase portraits of the dynamic system (1) in chaotic state with (a): a2 = 4.18 and (b): a2 = 3.71.
Mathematics 10 04374 g006
Figure 7. Circuit design of dynamic system (1).
Figure 7. Circuit design of dynamic system (1).
Mathematics 10 04374 g007
Figure 8. 2D phase portrait diagrams of the new 4D chaotic system in: (a) x1 − x2, (b) x1 − x4, and (c) x3 − x4.
Figure 8. 2D phase portrait diagrams of the new 4D chaotic system in: (a) x1 − x2, (b) x1 − x4, and (c) x3 − x4.
Mathematics 10 04374 g008
Figure 9. Original (a,d), encrypted (b,e), decrypted (c,f) images for “Lena” and “patient”.
Figure 9. Original (a,d), encrypted (b,e), decrypted (c,f) images for “Lena” and “patient”.
Mathematics 10 04374 g009
Figure 10. RGB Histogram: Original Image (ac) and Encrypted Image (df) for “Lena” Image.
Figure 10. RGB Histogram: Original Image (ac) and Encrypted Image (df) for “Lena” Image.
Mathematics 10 04374 g010
Figure 11. Correlation test between pixels in the original (ac) and the encrypted (df) images in the Lena image.
Figure 11. Correlation test between pixels in the original (ac) and the encrypted (df) images in the Lena image.
Mathematics 10 04374 g011
Table 1. Comparison between the topology of the proposed system and similar 4D simple chaotic systems.
Table 1. Comparison between the topology of the proposed system and similar 4D simple chaotic systems.
No.SystemTotal No. of TermsNo. of Nonlinear TermsMaximum Kaplan–York
1Gong et al. [25]723.1481
2Lai et al. [26]733.0157
3Natiq et al. [28]1023.152
4Singh and Roy [35]813.0695
5Zhang and Li [27]833.171
6Singning and Kengne [31]813.098
7Sahin et al. [36]712.579
8Singh and Roy [37]813.0860
9System (1)1113.184
Table 2. NIST 800-22 test results.
Table 2. NIST 800-22 test results.
NIST Statistical Testsp-ValueResults
Cumulative-Sums Test0.04821passed
Block-Frequency Test0.0501passed
Frequency (Mono bit) Test0.3031passed
Binary Matrix Rank Test0.1602passed
Maurer’s Universal Statistical Test0.5271passed
Runs Test0.2638passed
Longest-Run Test0.9722passed
Linear-Complexity Test0.7505passed
Discrete Fourier Transform Test0.1325passed
Overlapping Templates Test0.6311passed
Serial Test-10.5893passed
Serial Test-20.1964passed
Overlapping Templates Test0.6197passed
Random-Excursions Variant Test (x = −4)0.7288passed
Random-Excursions Test (x = −4)0.8831passed
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bouteraa, Y.; Mostafaee, J.; Kchaou, M.; Abbassi, R.; Jerbi, H.; Mobayen, S. A New Simple Chaotic System with One Nonlinear Term. Mathematics 2022, 10, 4374. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224374

AMA Style

Bouteraa Y, Mostafaee J, Kchaou M, Abbassi R, Jerbi H, Mobayen S. A New Simple Chaotic System with One Nonlinear Term. Mathematics. 2022; 10(22):4374. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bouteraa, Yassine, Javad Mostafaee, Mourad Kchaou, Rabeh Abbassi, Houssem Jerbi, and Saleh Mobayen. 2022. "A New Simple Chaotic System with One Nonlinear Term" Mathematics 10, no. 22: 4374. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop