Next Article in Journal
A Spatial-Temporal Model for the Evolution of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain Including Mobility
Next Article in Special Issue
Subclasses of Multivalent Analytic Functions Associated with a q-Difference Operator
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Solutions of Fractional Differential Equations by Using Fractional Explicit Adams Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Coefficient Estimates for a Subclass of Starlike Functions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Q-Extension of Starlike Functions Subordinated with a Trigonometric Sine Function

1
Informetrics Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
2
Faculty of Mathematics & Statistics, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
3
Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, 23200 Mardan, Pakistan
4
Government Degree College Mardan, 23200 Mardan, Pakistan
5
Division of Computational Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2020, 8(10), 1676; https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101676
Submission received: 20 August 2020 / Revised: 23 September 2020 / Accepted: 27 September 2020 / Published: 1 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complex Analysis and Geometric Function Theory)

Abstract

:
The main purpose of this article is to examine the q-analog of starlike functions connected with a trigonometric sine function. Further, we discuss some interesting geometric properties, such as the well-known problems of Fekete-Szegö, the necessary and sufficient condition, the growth and distortion bound, closure theorem, convolution results, radii of starlikeness, extreme point theorem and the problem with partial sums for this class.

1. Introduction and Definitions

To understand all the concepts used in this article clearly we need to include and explain all the terms mentioned here. First, let A be the collection of functions which are holomorphic (or analytic) in D : = z C : z < 1 and fulfill the subsequent Taylor series expansion:
f ( z ) = k = 1 a k z k , a 1 = 1 , z D .
In [1,2], Miller and Mocanu generalized the ideas that consist of differential inequalities for real to complex valued functions that laid the foundations for a new theory, known as “the method of differential subordination or admissible functions method”. This technique is used in geometric function theory, as a tool that provides not only new results, but also solves complicated problems in a simple way. In complex valued function the characterization of a function can be obtained from a differential condition, for example, the Noshiro–Warschawski theorem [3]. Said theory is applicable in various fields, including ordinary differential equations, partial differential equations, harmonic functions, integral operators, Banach spaces and functions of several variables.
If f 1 and f 2 is in A , then f 1 is subordinated by f 2 if a holomorphic function w can be find with the properties w 0 = 0 and w z < z so that f 1 ( z ) = f 2 ( w ( z ) ) z D . In addition, if f 1 , f 2 D are univalent, then:
f 1 f 2 f 1 D f 2 D with f 1 0 = f 2 0 .
Additionally, the Hadamard product (or convolution) between the functions f 1 , f 2 A is described by
f 1 * f 2 z = k = 1 a k b k z k , z D ,
where
f 1 ( z ) = k = 1 a k z k a n d f 2 ( z ) = k = 1 b k z k .
In 1994, Ma and Minda [4] introduced the following subset of holomorphic functions:
S * h = f A : z f ( z ) f ( z ) h z , z D ,
with the restriction that the image domain of h (h is a convex function with Re h > 0 in D ) is symmetric along the real axis and starlike about h ( 0 ) = 1 with h ( 0 ) > 0 . They investigated certain useful problems, including distortion, growth and covering theorems.
Now taking some particular functions instead of h in S * h , we achieve many sub-families of the collection A which have different geometric interpretations as for example:
(i)
If h ( z ) = 1 + A z 1 + B z with 1 B < A 1 , then S * [ A , B ] : = S * 1 + A z 1 + B z is the set of Janowski starlike functions; see [5]. Some interesting problems such as convolution properties, coefficient inequalities, sufficient conditions, subordinates results and integral preserving were discussed recently in [6,7,8,9,10] for some of the generalized families associated with circular domains.
(ii)
The class S L * : = S * ( 1 + z ) was introduced by Sokól and Stankiewicz [11], consisting of functions f A such that z f ( z ) / f ( z ) lies in the region bounded by the right-half of the lemniscate of Bernoulli given by | w 2 1 | < 1 .
(iii)
When we take h ( z ) = e z , then we have S e * : = S * e z [12].
(iv)
The family S R * : = S * h ( z ) with h ( z ) = 1 + z k k + z k z , k = 2 + 1 is studied in [13].
(v)
By setting h ( z ) = 1 + 4 3 z + 2 3 z 2 , the family S * ( h ) reduces to S c a r * introduced by Sharma and his coauthors [14], consisting of functions f A such that z f ( z ) / f ( z ) lies in the region bounded by the cardioid given by
( 9 x 2 + 9 y 2 18 x + 5 ) 2 16 ( 9 x 2 + 9 y 2 6 x + 1 ) = 0 ;
see also [15,16]. For more special cases of the set S * ( h ) , see [17,18,19].
Recently in 2019, Cho and his coauthors [20] established the following class S sin * by selecting the function 1 + sin z instead of the function h as:
S sin * = f A : z f z f ( z ) 1 sin z .
Geometrically, the ratio z f z f ( z ) lies in an eight-shaped region in the right half plane. They investigated the inverse inclusion relations of this family with the already known subfamilies of analytic functions. Later on for this family, the third Hankel determinants were studied by the authors in [21].
The classical calculus with no limit is known as quantum calculus or just q-calculus. This exceptional theory emerged via Jackson [22,23]. The readers were influenced by the q-calculus learning owing to its contemporary usage of numerous arguments as for example; in quantum theory, special functions theory, differential equations, number theory, operator theory, combinatorics, numerical analysis and certain other similar theories; see [24,25]. The early work of q-calculus in the field of geometric function theory (GFT) was done by Ismail et al. (see [26]) by generalizing the set of starlike functions into a q-analogue, known as the set of q-starlike functions. Another important development in this direction was the work of Anastassiu and Gal [27,28], who gave the q-generalizations of certain complex operators (particularly Picard and Gauss–Weierstrass singular integral operators). Following the same idea, Srivastava [29] presented some strong footing by giving some applications of q-calculus in this field by using q-analogues of hypergeometric functions. In this direction, some good valuable contributions were made by researchers, including Srivastava [30], Agrawal [31], Seoudy and Aouf [32], Agrawal and Sahoo [33], Arif and Ahmad [34], Kanas and Răducanu [35], Arif, Srivastava and Umar [36] and Haq et al. [37]. See also the articles [38,39,40,41,42,43].
For q 0 , 1 and z D , the q-analog derivative of f is defined by
q f ( z ) = f q z f ( z ) z q 1 .
If we take f ( z ) = n = 1 a n z n , then for n N (natural number set) and z D
q f ( z ) : = q n = 1 a n z n = n = 1 n q a n z n 1 ,
with
n q : = 1 q n 1 q = 1 + l = 1 n 1 q l f o r n 0 and 0 q = 0 .
Using the above mentioned concepts, we now define the following family S sin * q of starlike functions by:
S sin * q = f A : z q f z f ( z ) 1 sin z , z D .
We note that lim q 1 S sin * q S sin * , the class given by Equation (3). In this paper, we study some essential properties, such as the inequality of Fekete-Szegö, convolution problems, necessary and sufficient conditions, coefficient inequality, growth and distortion bounds, closure theorem, extreme point theorem and the partial sums problem.
The following two lemmas are used in the paper. However, before the statements of lemmas we define the class P of functions with a positive real part.
Let P denote the family of all functions p 1 that are analytic in D with positive real parts and have the following series representation:
p 1 ( z ) = 1 + n = 1 c n z n , z D .
Lemma 1.
[4] If f P has the expansion form given in Equation (7), then for ϑ C ,
c 2 ϑ c 1 2 2 max 1 ; 2 ϑ 1 .
Lemma 2.
[4] If f P and is represented by Equation (7), then
c 2 ν c 1 2 4 ν + 2 f o r ν 0 2 f o r 0 ν 1 4 ν 2 f o r ν 1 .

2. Major Contributions

Theorem 1.
Let f S sin * q have the representation given in Equation (1). Then for ϑ C
a 3 ϑ a 2 2 1 q [ 2 ] q max 1 , ϑ [ 2 ] q 1 q .
Proof. 
Let f S sin * q . Then one can conveniently write Equation (6) in terms of the Schwarz function w as
z q f z f ( z ) = 1 + sin w z .
Additionally, if p 1 P , then
p 1 ( z ) = 1 + w z 1 w z = 1 + c 1 z + c 2 z 2 + .
Alternatively
w z = p 1 z 1 p 1 z + 1 = c 1 z + c 2 z 2 + 2 + c 1 z + c 2 z 2 + .
From Equations (1) and (5), we easily have
z q f z f ( z ) = 1 + q a 2 z + q 2 q a 3 a 2 2 z 2 + ,
and on the other hand
1 + sin p 1 z 1 p 1 z + 1 = 1 + 1 2 c 1 + 1 2 c 2 1 4 c 1 2 z 2 + .
From the last two equations, we get
a 2 = 1 2 q c 1 ,
a 3 = 1 2 q 2 q c 2 1 4 q 2 q q 1 q c 1 2 .
Now using Equations (13) and (14), we obtain
a 3 ϑ a 2 2 = 1 2 q 2 q c 2 2 q 2 3 2 q + 2 + ϑ q 2 q 2 q 2 c 1 2 .
By applying Lemma 1 to Equation (15) we get
a 3 ϑ a 2 2 1 q 2 q max 1 , ϑ 2 q 1 q ;
hence, proof is complete. □
If we put λ = 1 , in Theorem 1, we deduce the result below.
Corollary 1.
Let f S sin * q . Then
a 3 a 2 2 1 q 2 q .
By making q 1 in Theorem 1, we achieve:
Corollary 2.
[21] Let f S sin * . Then for ϑ C
a 3 ϑ a 2 2 1 2 max 1 , 2 ϑ 1 .
Theorem 2.
Let f S sin * q and is of the form given by Equation (1). Then
a 3 v a 2 2 1 v 2 q q 2 2 q , f o r v 2 2 q 2 q , 1 q 2 q , f o r 2 2 q 2 q v 1 , v 2 q 1 q 2 2 q , f o r v 1 .
Proof. 
Using Equations (13) and (14), we have
a 3 v a 2 2 = 1 2 q 2 q c 2 2 q 2 3 2 q + 2 + v q 2 q 2 q 2 c 1 2 .
Using Lemma 2 to Equation (16), we obtain the required result. □
Theorem 3.
Let f A . Then f S sin * q if and only if
1 z f z * z H q z 2 1 z 1 q z 0 ,
for all H = H θ = 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ , and also for H = 1 .
Proof. 
If f S sin * q , then f z 0 , z D * = D \ 0 and so 1 z f z 0 , for z D . Thus we achieve an equivalent result to Equation (17) for H = 1 . Now, from Equation (6), there occurs a Schwarz function w such that
z q f z f ( z ) = 1 + sin w z ,
and if we take w z = e i θ , θ 0 , 2 π , we get
z q f z f ( z ) 1 + sin e i θ ,
or
z q f z f ( z ) 1 + sin e i θ 0 .
Using the relations
z q f z = f z * z 1 z 1 q z and f z = f z * z 1 z ,
and Equation (19), becomes
1 z f z * z H q z 2 1 z 1 q z 0 ,
where H is given above and the direct part of the proof is completed.
Conversely, suppose the Equation (17) hold true. Additionally, let Φ z = z q f z f z be holomorphic in D with Φ 0 = 1 . Further, suppose that Ψ z = 1 + sin z , z D . It is clear from Equation (18) that Ψ D Φ D = ϕ . Hence, the simply connected domain Φ D is contained in connected component of C \ Ψ D . The univalence of Ψ " , together with fact Φ 0 = Ψ 0 = 1 , shows that Φ Ψ and this gives f S sin * q . □
Theorem 4.
A necessary and sufficient criteria for a holomorphic function f S sin * q is
n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n z n 1 1 .
Proof. 
In the light of above Theorem 3, we have f S sin * q if and only if
0 1 z f z * z H q z 2 q z 1 z 1 = 1 z f z * z q z 1 z 1 f z * H q z 2 q z 1 z 1 = q f z + H f z z q f z .
Using series form of f and z q f , we have
0 1 z z + n = 2 n q a n z n H n = 2 n q 1 a n z n = 1 n = 2 H 1 n q H a n z n 1 = 1 n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n z n 1 ;
hence the relation (20) is proved. □
Theorem 5.
Let f A be of the type of Equation (1) and satisfy
n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n < 1 .
Then f S sin * q .
Proof. 
In order to establish this theorem, we use relation (20). We have
1 n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n z n 1 > 1 n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n z n 1 a n z n 1 = 1 n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n z n 1 > 1 n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n > 0 ,
and hence by virtue of Theorem 4, the proof is completed. □
Theorem 6.
Let f S sin * q , and z = r . Then
r sin e i θ 2 q 1 + sin e i θ r 2 f z r + sin e i θ 2 q 1 + sin e i θ r 2 .
Proof. 
Consider
| f z | r + n = 2 a n r n r + r 2 n = 2 a n r + sin e i θ 2 q 1 + sin e i θ r 2 .
On other hand,
| f z | r n = 2 a n r n r r 2 n = 2 a n r sin e i θ 2 q 1 + sin e i θ r 2 .
Theorem 7.
Let f S sin * q , and z = r . Then
r 2 q sin e i θ 2 q 1 + sin e i θ r 2 q f z r + 2 q sin e i θ 2 q 1 + sin e i θ r 2 .
Proof. 
The proof is similar to that of Theorem 6 and it is omitted. □
Theorem 8.
Let f k S sin * q , k = 1 , 2 , , l , such that
f k z = z + n = 2 a n , k z n .
Then h z = k = 1 δ k f k z , where k = 1 δ k = 1 is in the class S sin * q .
Proof. 
We have
h z = k = 1 δ k f k z = z + n = 2 k = 1 δ k a n , k z n .
Consider
n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ k = 1 δ k a n , k = k = 1 δ k n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n , k < k = 1 δ k = 1 ;
hence h S sin * q . □
Theorem 9.
The class S sin * q is a convex set.
Proof. 
Let f , g S sin * q with
f z = n = 1 a n z n , g z = n = 1 b n z n , a 1 = b 1 = 1 .
We prove that the function h z = η f z + 1 η g z , with 0 η 1 , is in the class S sin * q . We have
h z = z + n = 2 η a n + 1 η b n z n .
Thus to prove h S sin * q , we show that
n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ η a n + 1 η b n < 1 .
We have, using Theorem 5,
n = 2 η a n + 1 η b n n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ
η n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n + 1 η n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ b n < η 1 + 1 η 1 = 1 ;
hence h S sin * q . □
Theorem 10.
Let f S sin * q . Then, for z < r *
Re z f z f z > α , 0 α < 1 ,
where
r * = inf 1 α n q 1 + sin e i θ n α sin e i θ n , f o r n N \ { 1 } .
Proof. 
To establish inequality (22), it is enough to derive that
f z z f z 2 α 1 f z z f z < 1 .
We have
f z z f z 2 α 1 f z z f z = n = 2 n 1 a n z n 1 α z + n = 2 n + 1 2 α a n z n n = 2 n α 1 α a n z n .
From Equation (21), we have
n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n < 1 .
The relation (23) is bounded by 1 if
n α 1 α z n < n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ ,
it implies that
z < 1 α n q 1 + sin e i θ n α sin e i θ n = r * ,
and hence the proof is completed. □
Theorem 11.
Let us choose the function
f n z = z + sin e i θ n q 1 + sin e i θ z n , f o r n N \ { 1 } .
with f 1 z = z . Then f S sin * q if and only if f can be written as
f z = n = 1 δ n f n z , f o r δ n 0 ,
with n = 1 δ n = 1 .
Proof. 
Let the relation (25) hold true. Then
n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n
= n = 2 n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ sin e i θ n q 1 + sin e i θ δ n < n = 2 δ n = 1 δ 1 < 1 ;
hence by Theorem 5, f S sin * q . Conversely, if f S sin * q , then we have
δ n = n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ a n , for n 2 ,
and δ 1 = 1 n = 2 δ n . Then function is of the form given by Equation (24) and this complete the proof. □

3. Partial Sum Problems

In this section, we examine the partial sum problems of certain analytic functions contained in the family S sin * q . We produce some new findings that have a connection between the analytical functions and their partial sum sequences. If a function f A has the series form given in Equation (1), then the partial sum f m of f is described by
f m z = z + n = 2 m a n z n with f 1 z = z .
In 1928, Szegö [44] proved an interesting result which states that if f S * , then
f m S * f o r z < 1 4 f m C f o r z < 1 8 .
This result motivated researchers to study the problem of partial sums for sub-families of analytic, univalent and multivalent functions. In [45], Silverman determined sharp lower bounds on the real parts of the quotients between the normalized convex or star-like functions and their consequences of partial sums. Additionally, Singh [46], Shiel-Small [47], Robertson [48], Ruscheweyh [49], Ponnusamy et al. [50], Srivastava et al. [25] and Owa et al. [24], have derived some beautiful results involving the partial sums.
Theorem 12.
Let f S sin * q be given by Equation (1) and satisfy condition (21). Then
Re f ( z ) f m ( z ) 1 1 d m + 1 ,
and
Re f m ( z ) f ( z ) d m + 1 d m + 1 + 1 ,
where
d n = n q 1 + sin e i θ sin e i θ
and
d n 1 f o r n = 2 , 3 , , m d m + 1 f o r n = m + 1 , .
The above given results are the best ones.
Proof. 
To prove relation (26), let us write
d m + 1 f ( z ) f m ( z ) 1 1 d m + 1 = 1 + d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n z n 1 1 + n = 2 m a n z n 1 : = 1 + w z 1 w z ,
where
w z = d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n z n 1 2 + 2 n = 2 m a n z n 1 + d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n z n 1 .
Now
w z = d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n 2 2 n = 2 m a n d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n 1
if and only if
n = 2 m a n + d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n 1 .
Finally, to show relation (30), it is sufficient to establish that the left-side of relation (30) is bounded above by n = 2 d n a n and it is equal to
n = 2 m d n 1 a n + n = m + 1 d n d m + 1 a n 0 .
The last inequality is true because of relation (28). To show that the inequality (26) is sharp, let us consider the function
f ( z ) = z + 1 d m + 1 z m + 1 .
Then for z = r e i π m , we have
f ( z ) f m ( z ) = 1 + 1 d m + 1 z m 1 1 d m + 1 r m = d m + 1 1 d m + 1 .
To derive inequality (27), let us write
1 + d m + 1 f m ( z ) f ( z ) d m + 1 d m + 1 + 1 = 1 1 + d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n z n 1 1 + n = 2 m a n z n 1 = 1 + w z 1 w z ,
where
w z = 1 + d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n z n 1 2 + 2 n = 2 m a n z n 1 1 + d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n z n 1 .
Now
w z = 1 + d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n 2 2 n = 2 m a n 1 + d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n 1
if the following inequality holds
n = 2 m a n + 1 + d m + 1 n = m + 1 a n 1 .
Finally, to obtain inequality (31), it is enough to show that the left side of inequality (31) is bounded by n = 2 d n a n and is equivalent to
n = 2 m d n 1 a n + n = m + 1 d n d m + 1 1 a n 0 ,
which is true due to relation (28). □

4. Conclusions

Utilizing the principle of subordinations, we have defined the family of q-starlike functions connected with a particular trigonometric function such as sine functions. The new class generalizes the class of starlike functions subordinated with sine function which was introduced by Cho et al. [20] in which the radii problems were investigated. For the newly defined class, we have first investigated the familiar Fekete-Szegö type problems. After that, we have proved some convolution results which were used in proving the necessary and sufficient condition for the defined class. The problem of partial sums has been established with the help of sufficiency criteria for this newly defined class. Some other problems, such as radii of starlikeness, closure theorem, growth and distortion bounds and extreme point theorem have also been studied here for this class. Moreover, the present idea can be extended to prove some other problems, such as the Hankel determinant, the sufficiency criterion and convolution conditions for this class. Furthermore, these results can also be obtained for starlike functions associated with cosine functions. This class was recently studied in [51].

Author Contributions

These authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Algebra an Applications Research Unit, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.

Acknowledgments

The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks the Algebra an Applications Research Unit, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Miller, S.S.; Mocanu, P.T. Second order differential inequalities in the complex plane. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1978, 65, 289–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Miller, S.S.; Mocanu, P.T. Differential subordinations and univalent functions. Mich. Math. J. 1981, 28, 157–172. [Google Scholar]
  3. Goodman, A.W. Univalent Functions, Vol. I & II; Polygonal Publishing House: Washington, NJ, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ma, W.; Minda, D. A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions. In Proceeding of the Conference on Complex Analysis; Li, Z., Ren, F., Yang, L., Zhang, S., Eds.; International Press of Boston, Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 1994; pp. 157–169. [Google Scholar]
  5. Janowski, W. Extremal problems for a family of functions with positive real part and for some related families. Ann. Pol. Mathematici. 1971, 23, 159–177. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ahmad, K.; Arif, M.; Liu, J.-L. Convolution properties for a family of analytic functions involving q-analogue of Ruscheweyh differential operator. Turk. J. Math. 2019, 43, 1712–1720. [Google Scholar]
  7. Arif, M.; Ahmad, K.; Liu, J.L.; Sokół, J. A new class of analytic functions associated with Sălăgean operator. J. Funct. Spaces 2019, 2019, 5157394. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shi, L.; Khan, Q.; Srivastava, G.; Liu, J.-L.; Arif, M. A study of multivalent q-starlike functions connected with circular domain. Mathematics 2019, 7, 670. [Google Scholar]
  9. Srivastava, H.M.; Khan, B.; Khan, N.; Ahmad, Q.Z. Coeffcient inequalities for q-starlike functions associated with the Janowski functions. Hokkaido Math. J. 2019, 48, 407–425. [Google Scholar]
  10. Srivastava, H.M.; Tahir, M.; Khan, B.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, N. Some general classes of q-starlike functions associated with the Janowski functions. Symmetry 2019, 11, 292. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sokoł, J.; Stankiewicz, J. Radius of convexity of some subclasses of strongly starlike functions. Zesz. Nauk. Politech. Rzesz. Mat. 1996, 19, 101–105. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mendiratta, R.; Nagpal, S.; Ravichandran, V. On a subclass of strongly starlike functions associated with exponential function. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 2015, 38, 365–386. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar, S.; Ravichandran, V. A subclass of starlike functions associated with a rational function. Southeast Asian Bull. Math. 2016, 40, 199–212. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sharma, K.; Jain, N.K.; Ravichandran, V. Starlike functions associated with a cardioid. Afr. Mat. 2016, 27, 923–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ravichandran, V.; Sharma, K. Sufficient conditions for starlikeness. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2015, 52, 727–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sharma, K.; Ravichandran, V. Application of subordination theory to starlike functions. Bull. Iran. Math. Soc. 2016, 42, 761–777. [Google Scholar]
  17. Abdullah, A.; Arif, M.; Alghamdi, M.A.; Hussain, S. Starlikness associated with cosine hyperbolic function. Mathematics 2020, 8, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kargar, R.; Ebadian, A.; Sokół, J. On Booth lemniscate and starlike functions. Anal. Math. Phys. 2019, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raina, R.K.; Sokol, J. On coefficient estimates for a certain class of starlike functions. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 2015, 44, 1427–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cho, N.E.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, S.S.; Ravichandran, V. Radius problems for starlike functions associated with the sine function. Bull. Iran. Math. Soc. 2019, 45, 213–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arif, M.; Raza, M.; Tang, H.; Hussain, S.; Khan, H. Hankel determinant of order three for familiar subsets of analytic functions related with sine function. Open Math. 2019, 17, 1615–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jackson, F.H. On q-definite integrals. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jackson, F.H. On q-difference equations. Am. J. Math. 1910, 32, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Owa, S.; Srivastava, H.M.; Saito, N. Partial sums of certain classes of analytic functions. Int. J. Comput. 2004, 81, 1239–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Srivastava, H.M.; Gaboury, S.; Ghanim, F. Partial sums of certain classes of meromorphic functions related to the Hurwitz-Lerch zeta function. Moroc. J. Pure Appl. Anal. 2015, 1, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ismail, M.E.H.; Merkes, E.; Styer, D. A generalization of starlike functions. Complex Var. Theory Appl. 1990, 14, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anastassiou, G.A.; Gal, S.G. Geometric and approximation properties of some singular integrals in the unit disk. J. Inequalities Appl. 2006, 2006, 17231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Anastassiou, G.A.; Gal, S.G. Geometric and approximation properties of generalized singular integrals in the unit disk. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2006, 43, 425–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Srivastava, H.M. Univalent functions, fractional calculus, and associated generalized hypergeometric functions. In Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus, and Their Applications; Srivastava, H.M., Owa, S., Eds.; Halsted Press: Chichester, UK; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1989; pp. 329–354. [Google Scholar]
  30. Srivastava, H.M. Operators of basic (or q-) calculus and fractional q-calculus and their applications in geometric function theory of complex analysis. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. A Sci. 2020, 44, 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Agrawal, S. Coefficient estimates for some classes of functions associated with q-function theory. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2017, 95, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Seoudy, T.M.; Aouf, M.K. Coefficient estimates of new classes of q-starlike and q-convex functions of complex order. J. Math. Inequal. 2016, 10, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Agrawal, S.; Sahoo, S.K. A generalization of starlike functions of order alpha. Hokkaido Math. J. 2017, 46, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Arif, M.; Ahmad, B. New subfamily of meromorphic multivalent starlike functions in circular domain involving q-differential operator. Math. Slovaca 2018, 68, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kanas, S.; Răducanu, D. Some class of analytic functions related to conic domains. Math. Slovaca 2014, 64, 1183–1196. [Google Scholar]
  36. Arif, M.; Srivastava, H.M.; Umar, S. Some applications of a q-analogue of the Ruscheweyh type operator for multivalent functions. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matemáticas 2019, 113, 1211–1221. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ul-Haq, M.; Raza, M.; Arif, M.; Khan, Q.; Tang, H. q-analogue of differential subordinations. Mathematics 2019, 7, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Arif, M.; Barkub, O.; Srivastava, H.M.; Abdullah, S.; Khan, S.A. Some Janowski type harmonic q-starlike functions associated with symmetrical points. Mathematics 2020, 8, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Arif, M.; Ul-Haq, M.; Liu, J.L. A subfamily of univalent functions associated with q-analogue of Noor integral operator. J. Funct. Spaces 2018, 2018, 3818915. [Google Scholar]
  40. Selvakumaran, K.A.; Purohit, S.D.; Secer, A. Majorization for a class of analytic functions defined by q-differentiation. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, 2014, 653917. [Google Scholar]
  41. Shi, L.; Khan, M.G.; Ahmad, B. Some geometric properties of a family of analytic functions involving a generalized q-operator. Symmetry 2020, 12, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Shi, L.; Khan, Q.; Srivastava, G.; Liu, J.-L.; Arif, M. Some applications of a new integral operator in q-analog for multivalent functions. Mathematics 2019, 7, 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Srivastava, H.M.; Tahir, M.; Khan, B.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, N. Some general families of q-starlike functions associated with the Janowski functions. Filomat 2019, 33, 2613–2626. [Google Scholar]
  44. Szegö, G. Zur theorie der schlichten Abbildungen. Math. Ann. 1928, 100, 188–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Silverman, H. Partial sums of starlike and convex functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1997, 209, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Singh, R. Radius of convexity of partial sums of a certain power series. J. Aust. Math. Soc. 1970, 11, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sheil-Small, T. A note on the partial sums of convex schlicht functions. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 1970, 2, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Robertson, M.S. The partial sums of multivalently star-like functions. Ann. Math. 1941, 42, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ruscheweyh, S. On the radius of univalence of the partial sums of convex functions. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 1972, 4, 367–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ponnusamy, S.; Sahoo, S.K.; Yanagihara, H. Radius of convexity of partial sums of functions in the close-to-convex family. Nonlinear Anal. 2014, 95, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bano, K.; Raza, M. Starlike functions associated with cosine function. Bull. Iran. Math. Soc. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Islam, S.; Khan, M.G.; Ahmad, B.; Arif, M.; Chinram, R. Q-Extension of Starlike Functions Subordinated with a Trigonometric Sine Function. Mathematics 2020, 8, 1676. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101676

AMA Style

Islam S, Khan MG, Ahmad B, Arif M, Chinram R. Q-Extension of Starlike Functions Subordinated with a Trigonometric Sine Function. Mathematics. 2020; 8(10):1676. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101676

Chicago/Turabian Style

Islam, Saeed, Muhammad Ghaffar Khan, Bakhtiar Ahmad, Muhammad Arif, and Ronnason Chinram. 2020. "Q-Extension of Starlike Functions Subordinated with a Trigonometric Sine Function" Mathematics 8, no. 10: 1676. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101676

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop