Next Article in Journal
A Novel Nomogram Based on Quantitative MRI and Clinical Features for the Prediction of Neonatal Intracranial Hypertension
Previous Article in Journal
10-Year Clinical Follow-Up after Decompression of Lipofibromatous Hamartoma of the Median Nerve in a 3-Year-Old Patient: Case Report and Review of the Literature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

More Than Three Years for Normalisation of Routine Laboratory Values after Gluten Withdrawal in Paediatric Coeliac Patients

by
Ignacio Ventura
1,2,
Belén Rodriguez
1,
Sandra Suescum
1,
Fernando Revert
1,2,
Francisco Revert-Ros
1,2,
María Antonia Moreno
1,3,
Jesús A. Prieto-Ruiz
1,2 and
Marcelino Pérez-Bermejo
4,*
1
Molecular and Mitochondrial Medicine Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad Católica de Valencia ‘San Vicent Mártir’, 46001 Valencia, Spain
2
Translational Research Center “San Alberto Magno” CITSAM, Universidad Católica de Valencia ‘San Vicente Mártir’, 46001 Valencia, Spain
3
Department of Pediatrics, Manises Hospital, 46940 Manises, Spain
4
SONEV Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, 46001 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(9), 1580; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10091580
Submission received: 3 September 2023 / Revised: 18 September 2023 / Accepted: 20 September 2023 / Published: 21 September 2023

Abstract

:
The assessment of the nutritional and inflammatory status of paediatric patients with coeliac disease is an interesting approach to early diagnosis and functional follow-up. Most authors agree that the normalisation of symptoms takes about one year. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical manifestation and normalisation of routine analytics in Spanish children diagnosed with celiac disease. Methods: We performed a retrospective case–control study in Spanish paediatric patients, including 21 celiac patients and 20 healthy controls. The 21 patients selected in the case–control study were followed for 5 years after starting a gluten-free diet (GFD). All patients had type 3 villous atrophy according to the Marsh–Oberhuber classification. A total of 39 blood samples were taken before the start of the GFD, and 109 were taken after. Twenty control sera from healthy donors were used for comparison. Results: We found that patients had a subclinical but statistically significant increase in blood calcium, transaminases, and white blood cells, and a decrease in serum iron, at the time of diagnosis. Our study also shows that analytical values normalise within five years on a gluten-free diet. Conclusions: The use of a combination of subclinical changes, including low iron, high calcium, elevated leukocytes, lymphocytes, and ALT levels in blood samples, together with a low growth percentile, is pertinent in detecting coeliac disease. This set of parameters could help in the diagnosis of patients without clinical symptoms. We can also show that the levels of Fe, Ca, transaminases, and leucocytes remain subclinically altered after 3 years, despite the gluten-free diet.

1. Introduction

Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by enteropathy and the presence of circulating autoantibodies, with symptoms dependent on gluten intake. Histopathological abnormalities can lead to malabsorption, nutritional deficiencies, and malignancy. An early and strict gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only way to treat the disease and avoid complications. Gluten ingestion causes CD in genetically predisposed individuals with the HLA DQ2 or DQ8 haplotypes [1,2,3,4,5,6]. However, although 30% of the general population carry these alleles, only 1 in 3 of them will develop the disease [7]. This leads to parents misinterpreting the significance of a positive or negative DQ2/8 test in their children [8]. In CD, circulating autoantibodies of the transglutaminase (TG) family have been found to be deposited in the small intestinal mucosa and other tissues affected by the disease [9].
The signs and symptoms of CD are varied. The classic ones include diarrhoea, bloating, and weight loss, and nausea or flatulence may also occur [10]. Extra-gastrointestinal symptoms, such as iron-deficiency anaemia [11], dermatitis herpetiformis [12], or thrombotic events [13], may also occur, and an asymptomatic development of the disease is possible [14,15].
The diagnosis of CD requires compatible symptoms, some degree of villous atrophy on duodenal biopsy, and positive anti-TG2 IgA antibodies in individuals on a gluten-containing diet. The European Society for the Study of Celiac Disease states that serology is indicated in the presence of compatible clinical manifestations, concomitant organ involvement, autoimmune disease, and unexplained elevated biomarkers, such as liver transaminases. Endoscopy and duodenal biopsy are indicated if the serology result is positive and if gastrointestinal symptoms or dermatitis herpetiformis are persistent and unexplained, even if the serology result is negative, as anti-TG2 IgA may be negative in 5–15% of patients with biopsy-confirmed CD [16]. However, biopsy is not required if the anti-TG2 IgA titer is ≥10 times the upper limit of normal. In this case, the diagnosis is confirmed via a positive endomysial antibody (EMA-IgA) test in a second serum sample [17]. The histological findings are graded according to the Marsh–Oberhuber scale, which measures lymphocytic infiltration, crypt hyperplasia, and villous atrophy [18,19].
Follow-up is performed via serological analysis, which measures anti-TGt2 antibodies. However, the usefulness of serology for follow-up is limited because, although a positive test result indicates active damage to the intestinal mucosa or exposure to gluten, a negative test result does not necessarily indicate the healing, or progress toward healing, of the intestinal mucosa [20,21]. In addition, serology is not sensitive enough to assess occasional dietary violations or environmental contamination, which can be detected via gliadin peptide determination in faeces or urine [22].
Iron ions are absorbed in the intestinal villi of the proximal duodenum, so serum iron levels may be a relevant marker of CD-related malabsorption. Iron deficiency is common at diagnosis, and anaemia is a marker of the severity of CD [23]. For this reason, CD should be suspected in all patients with iron-deficiency anaemia of unknown cause, with serological testing [24,25] and biopsy undertaken if they are to undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for other causes [26]. This is the recommendation, although up to 25% of patients do not have villous atrophy [27].
Other complications in CD have been associated with hyperparathyroidism, classified as both primary, caused by a benign adenoma [28], and secondary, due to malabsorption of vitamin D and calcium. The latter is common in 12–54% of coeliac patients [29]. Both hyper- [30] and hypocalcaemia have been reported in CD patients [31]. Osteoporosis may be the only presentation of undiagnosed CD [32]. Abnormal liver tests are common in untreated CD patients [33,34]. Historical series have documented elevated transaminase levels (1.5–2 times the upper limit of normal) in 27–40% of patients with CD [35]. Therefore, patients with unexplained liver profile changes should be considered for CD testing [16,36]. Leukopenia/neutropenia has been reported but is rare and idiopathic, possibly secondary to folate or copper deficiency [37].
Many patients with CD remain undiagnosed, are misdiagnosed, or experience a significant delay in diagnosis due to the wide variability in the clinical manifestations of CD [38]. Approximately 25% of patients are diagnosed at the age of 60 years or later, and it has been suggested that 60% may remain undiagnosed due to mild symptoms [39]. This misdiagnosis has detrimental consequences for patients. The histological changes are progressive and can lead to complications such as refractory CD, enteropathy associated with T-lymphoma, or ulcerative jejunoileitis [18,40,41,42,43,44]. To prevent complications and improve symptoms and quality of life, the only effective treatment currently available is a strict, lifelong GFD [45,46].
This type of diet generally leads to a significant improvement in clinical symptoms and intestinal lesions. However, the duration required for symptoms to completely normalise from the start of the gluten-free diet is a subject of research and debate. Most authors agree that the duration of symptom normalisation in coeliac children from the onset of the gluten-free diet is a highly variable and multifactorial process. Factors such as the severity of the disease [47], the adherence to the diet [48], and the age of the child [49] can influence the time it takes to achieve complete improvement, and it is agreed that the normalisation of symptoms takes about one year [50,51]. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical manifestation and normalisation of routine analytics in Spanish children diagnosed with coeliac disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

We conducted an observational, retrospective, case–control study of paediatric patients from the Gastroenterology Unit of the Manises Hospital (Valencia, Spain). The study was approved by the Ethics and Clinical Research Committee of the University Hospital of La Fe (registration number 2020-226-1). This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
For the diagnosis and inclusion of paediatric CD patients, we followed the updated criteria described by Raiteri et al. [52]. The confirmatory diagnosis of CD was made via small bowel biopsy. The study included 21 patients aged between 1 and 12 years with positive specific antibodies. All patients had type 3 villous atrophy according to the Marsh–Oberhuber classification. Patients were excluded if they were iron-deficient, IgA-deficient, had a normal intestinal biopsy, were being treated for CD, or had a chronic disease other than CD.

2.2. Variables

The variables included in the study were age, height, and weight, as well as blood transaminases (AST, ALT), white blood cells (leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes) and iron and calcium ions. Patients were followed from the first blood test to diagnosis and the subsequent initiation of a GFD.
Then, the 21 patients selected for the case–control study were followed for 5 years after starting a GFD. A total of 39 blood samples were taken before the start of the GFD, and 109 were taken after. For comparison, 20 control sera from healthy donors were analysed in the same facilities. The patients’ adherence to the gluten-free diet was monitored through interviews and blood tests conducted between 3 and 6 months after the initiation of the diet.

2.3. Data Analysis

The means and standard deviations (SD) are presented. For the analysis of continuous variables, the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test was used to compare two groups. Two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The data were analysed using SPSS v.23 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The statistical analysis of the patient follow-up data was performed using the ANOVA test and Tukey’s post hoc test to compare the indicated pairs of data (GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA, USA); all the follow-up data series passed a normality test.

3. Results

In the first part of our study, we analysed a set of 40 blood samples taken from 21 diagnosed CD patients just before the start of gluten deprivation, as well as 20 samples from 20 CD-free individuals (the controls). According to the histological grade of the Marsh criteria classification [53], all patients were in Marsh stage 3. Table 1 describes the socio-demographic characteristics of the sample.
The analysis revealed subclinical but statistically significant differences in several blood parameters between patients and controls. Table 2 shows that iron levels showed a statistically significant decrease in patients, while calcium, AST, and ALT levels increased. With regard to white blood cells, both the total leukocyte and lymphocyte counts and the lymphocyte percentage increased significantly in patients. Non-significant increases in the monocyte count and total leukocyte percentage were found, although the p-value obtained from the analysis was close to the significance level (0.05). These results reflect the prevalence of iron-deficiency anaemia in patients with CD. The calcium elevations in the CD patients compared may indicate the onset of bone decalcification due to inadequate calcium absorption; 23.8% of the patients had high plasma calcium levels. Table 2 shows the variation in the blood markers analysed in this study. It shows the decrease in iron levels and the increase in the other markers in the case group.
On the other hand, in the second part of the study, we analysed the data from the blood samples taken from the same 21 patients before and after the start of gluten withdrawal. Thirty-nine blood samples were taken before gluten withdrawal, and 109 were taken after. All the patients stuck to the gluten-free diet. The samples were collected over an average of 5 years after diagnosis, at the same hospital where the patients had been diagnosed and treated, and were grouped into two different sets: one with samples collected within the first 42 months after the start of GFD treatment (post-GFD, <42 months), and another with samples collected later (post-GFD, >42 months). The grouping was based on the observed progression of the parameters analysed. The results (Figure 1) showed that iron levels normalised after 42 months of gluten elimination, whereas ALT levels normalised before 42 months. In contrast, calcium levels remained slightly and subclinically elevated 5 years after gluten withdrawal, a finding that could explain the osteopenia and osteopathy that some CD patients show in the long term. In addition, the total leukocyte count showed a significant and progressive decrease with GFD treatment but did not reach normality. The lymphocyte count also decreased after the start of a GFD and, after 42 months, the values were not significantly different from those of the control group. Finally, a GFD also caused an apparent, but small and non-significant, decrease in the number of monocytes. Overall, the data suggest that iron, calcium, and ALT could be used as biomarkers for the early diagnosis and follow-up of CD patients.

4. Discussion

Our results show subclinical changes in haematological biomarkers (Fe, Ca, ALT, lymphocytes) that normalize after several years of a GFD, suggesting that subclinical levels are, indeed, clinical.
The diagnosis of CD is usually delayed. A US study observed a mean delay of 42 months (3.5 years) in biopsy-based diagnosis in CD patients without extra-gastrointestinal symptoms, while the delay was only 2.3 months in patients with intestinal symptoms [54]. In Switzerland, Vavricka et al. observed a significantly longer delay of 7.3 years on average, although 84.7% of the subjects had gastrointestinal symptoms [55]. The delay in diagnosis has also been analysed and criticised in other studies as being too long [56] and, therefore, unacceptable [57]. An early and correct diagnosis of CD is necessary, as it implies an early implementation of the gluten-free diet, the only currently available treatment, which is also able to reduce the risk of complications such as refractory CD, small bowel adenocarcinoma, or T-cell lymphoma enteropathy [58].
In the early stages of CD, the wall of the small intestine begins to swell, altering the absorption of nutrients and leading to nutrient deficiencies and, possibly, malnutrition. A weight loss of 10% of normal over three months indicates mild malnutrition. Physiological complications, such as poor wound healing, anaemic syndromes, diarrhoeal syndromes, and anatomical changes due to atrophy and weight loss, are associated with this type of malnutrition. With prolonged malnutrition, muscle wasting occurs, leading to weakness, muscle fatigue, and general malaise [59]. Patients have been shown to suffer from caloric deficit, anaemia due to iron deficiency, hypercalcemia due to osteopenia/osteoporosis, hepatic cytolysis, and systemic inflammation. Many of these symptoms characteristic of malnutrition are also seen in CD.
In our study, 38.1% and 28.57% of patients were below the IOTF-defined 15th percentile of growth curves for height and weight for age, respectively, at the time of diagnosis, reflecting the caloric intake deficit caused by the disease. For this reason, the growth trajectory must be used as a marker throughout the diagnostic process for CD [60,61,62,63,64,65]. Our results agree with the study by Comba et al. [66] on the level of development at the time of diagnosis in a sample of 73 paediatric CD patients, 35 (47.9%) of whom were short for their age.
One of the first nutrients to be affected in CD is iron. When iron absorption is reduced, the body firstly uses iron stored in the liver as haemosiderin and ferritin to maintain normal function [67]. When these stores are depleted, the plasma iron levels fall, and the levels of ferritin, transferrin, and haemoglobin (the iron transporter protein in plasma) decrease [67,68]. When stores are depleted, iron-dependent metabolic processes are altered, resulting in fatigue, tiredness, and a lack of concentration [69]. We observed a significant decrease in iron levels in the CD patient group. As ferritin is an iron reserve system, iron, ferritin, and haemoglobin levels should be measured together, as the assessment of a single parameter may lead to analytical bias [68,69,70,71]. Shahriari et al. [25] conducted a study measuring CD-specific antibodies in children whose only complication was iron-deficiency anaemia. In this work, 18 of 139 children with anaemia were carriers of specific antibodies. This group underwent an intestinal biopsy, which showed that the condition of the intestinal mucosa had not changed. Therefore, in cases of refractory iron-deficiency anaemia of unknown cause, a serological study, such as the one proposed in this paper, should be carried out [24,25].
Another marker that should be investigated for the early diagnosis of CD is calcium. This is of particular interest, as early-onset osteopenia and osteoporosis are among the most common complications in coeliac patients [61,62,68,72,73,74]. The increase in serum calcium may reflect the onset of bone decalcification.
Regarding transaminase parameters, elevated AST and ALT suggest the presence of ongoing hepatic cytolysis, i.e., inflammation. Hypertransaminasemia is a clinical sign of CD that has been described previously. In historical series, such as those of Castillo et al. [33], Volta et al. [35], or Sainsbury et al. [75], transaminase elevation was documented in 27–40% of patients, with an elevation of 1.52 times the upper limit of normal, which is consistent with our study. This change in the liver profile would represent a case of hepatitis, which could be caused by CD (“celiac liver”), by autoimmune mechanisms, or by non-alcoholic steatosis [34,76], although the origin is uncertain in 4% of patients [33].
White blood cell analyses showed statistically significant differences between patients and controls for total leukocytes and lymphocytes, indicating inflammation. For monocytes, a CD-associated, but not statistically significant, increase was found. However, the proximity of the p-value to the 0.05 significance level suggests that a study with larger groups of patients and controls may reveal a significant CD-associated increase in monocyte counts.
It can be argued that CD causes systemic inflammation, although CD-associated local inflammation, mainly caused by intraepithelial lymphocytes, is observed. This may suggest that the only useful test to make a definitive diagnosis is biopsy. This is a widely accepted idea, although the debate about whether a biopsy is necessary is still open. There are already studies defending the absence of biopsy, arguing that it is not necessary for a valid diagnosis in selected cases, such as first-degree relatives of coeliac patients with positive serology [77] or infants with TG2 levels > 10 times the upper limit of normal and anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA+) [16]. Nevertheless, biopsy remains the gold standard diagnostic procedure for this disease, as noted by Robert et al. [17] and Charlesworth et al. [78], among others [79,80], who claim that a diagnosis of CD without biopsy is now suboptimal, because the ability to predict small bowel atrophy is lost. However, biopsies typically allow the analysis of small pieces of tissue, and the results are subject to interpretation. In contrast, blood parameters, such as iron and others, are systemic in nature and can be easily measured as the disease progresses. Other authors confirm the findings of subclinical anaemia and hypercalcaemia in other European populations and support the idea of functional monitoring as a good strategy for functional surveillance and early diagnosis [81]. The rapid loss at follow-up is worrying. Children often do not follow the diet properly and may have persistent mucosal damage [82].
Therefore, the combined study of the parameters proposed in our work would allow easier monitoring. The limitations of the study include its retrospective nature, the small sample size, and the lack of multivariate analysis to analyse the possible influence of other parameters that are not included. The strength of our work is in showing that, 5 years after diagnosis, even though the selected patients are on a gluten-free diet, they still have mild subclinical changes in iron, calcium, and leukocytosis.

5. Conclusions

A combination of subclinical changes, including low iron levels, high calcium, elevated total leukocytes and lymphocytes, and slightly elevated ALT levels in blood samples, together with a low growth percentile, is suspicious for coeliac disease. The assessment of this set of parameters could help in the diagnosis of patients who do not yet show clinical symptoms. It may also be useful in the follow-up of diagnosed patients who have started a gluten-free diet. Subclinical changes in the blood, including a decrease in serum iron and an increase in calcium, ALT, and AST, as well as an increased white blood cell count, accompanied by abdominal distension and a low growth percentile, are markers that correlate with coeliac disease and could be used for early detection and follow-up. We can observe that, after 42 months, the patients still have subclinical levels of decreased serum Fe and slightly elevated calcium, although they have been gluten-free for more than three years. This finding may indicate that coeliac patients have absorption problems because the inflammatory environment may not allow the proper absorption of nutrients. This suggests that more research is needed to explain this phenomenon.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, I.V., J.A.P.-R. and M.P.-B.; methodology, I.V., J.A.P.-R. and F.R.-R.; software, M.P.-B.; formal analysis, I.V., M.P.-B. and F.R.; data curation, I.V., B.R., M.P.-B. and F.R.; writing—original draft preparation, I.V., B.R., J.A.P.-R., S.S., M.A.M., M.P.-B., F.R. and F.R.-R.; writing—review and editing, I.V., J.A.P.-R., M.P.-B., F.R. and F.R.-R.; supervision, I.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics and Clinical Research Committee of La Fe University Hospital (registration number 2020-226-1) on 14 July 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Catholic University of Valencia San Vicente Mártir for its contribution and help in the payment of the open access publication fee.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pennazio, M.; Spada, C.; Eliakim, R.; Keuchel, M.; May, A.; Mulder, C.J.; Rondonotti, E.; Adler, S.N.; Albert, J.; Baltes, P.; et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2015, 47, 352–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ludvigsson, J.F.; Bai, J.C.; Biagi, F.; Card, T.R.; Ciacci, C.; Ciclitira, P.J.; Green, P.H.; Hadjivassiliou, M.; Holdoway, A.; Van Heel, D.A.; et al. Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: Guidelines from the British society of gastroenterology. Gut 2014, 63, 1210–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Coeliac Disease: Recognition, Assessment and Management. 2015. Available online: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng20/resources/coeliac-disease-recognition-assessment-and-management-pdf-1837325178565 (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  4. Husby, S.; Koletzko, S.; Korponay-Szabó, I.R.; Mearin, M.L.; Phillips, A.; Shamir, R.; Troncone, R.; Giersiepen, K.; Branski, D.; Catassi, C.; et al. European society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2012, 54, 136–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rubio-Tapia, A.; Hill, I.D.; Kelly, C.P.; Calderwood, A.H.; Murray, J.A. ACG clinical guidelines: Diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 108, 656–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Snyder, J.; Butzner, J.D.; DeFelice, A.R.; Fasano, A.; Guandalini, S.; Liu, E.; Newton, K.P. Evidence-informed expert recommendations for the management of celiac disease in children. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20153147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Anderson, R.P. Coeliac disease: Current approach and future prospects. Intern. Med. J. 2008, 38, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wessels, M.M.; Vriezinga, S.; Koletzko, S.; Werkstetter, K.; Castillejo-De Villasante, G.; Shamir, R.; Hartman, C.; Putter, H.; Van Der Pal, S.M.; Wijmenga, C.; et al. Impact on parents of HLA-DQ2/DQ8 genotyping in healthy children from coeliac families. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2015, 23, 405–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Granito, A.; Muratori, P.; Cassani, F.; Pappas, G.; Muratori, L.; Agostinelli, D.; Veronesi, L.; Bortolotti, R.; Petrolini, N.; Bianchi, F.B.; et al. Anti-actin IgA antibodies in severe coeliac disease. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2004, 137, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murray, J.A.; Watson, T.; Clearman, B.; Mitros, F. Effect of a gluten-free diet on gastrointestinal symptoms in celiac disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mahadev, S.; Laszkowska, M.; Sundström, J.; Björkholm, M.; Lebwohl, B.; Green, P.H.R.; Ludvigsson, J.F. Prevalence of Celiac Disease in Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia—A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zone, J.J. Skin manifestations of celiac disease. Gastroenterology 2005, 128, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pantic, N.; Pantic, I.; Jevtic, D.; Mogulla, V.; Oluic, S.; Durdevic, M.; Nordin, T.; Jecmenica, M.; Milovanovic, T.; Gavrancic, T.; et al. Celiac Disease and Thrombotic Events: Systematic Review of Published Cases. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Choung, R.S.; Larson, S.A.; Khaleghi, S.; Rubio-Tapia, A.; Ovsyannikova, I.G.; King, K.S.; Larson, J.J.; Lahr, B.D.; Poland, G.A.; Camilleri, M.J.; et al. Prevalence and Morbidity of Undiagnosed Celiac Disease from a Community-Based Study. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 830–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. West, J.; Logan, R.F.A.; Hill, P.G.; Lloyd, A.; Lewis, S.; Hubbard, R.; Reader, R.; Holmes, G.K.; Khaw, K.T. Seroprevalence, correlates, and characteristics of undetected coeliac disease in England. Gut 2003, 52, 960–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Al-Toma, A.; Volta, U.; Auricchio, R.; Castillejo, G.; Sanders, D.S.; Cellier, C.; Mulder, C.J.; Lundin, K.E. European Society for the Study of Coeliac Disease (ESsCD) guideline for coeliac disease and other gluten-related disorders. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2019, 7, 583–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Husby, S.; Koletzko, S.; Korponay-Szabó, I.; Kurppa, K.; Mearin, M.L.; Ribes-Koninckx, C.; Shamir, R.; Troncone, R.; Auricchio, R.; Castillejo, G.; et al. European Society Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Guidelines for Diagnosing Coeliac Disease 2020. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2020, 70, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Robert, M.E.; Crowe, S.E.; Burgart, L.; Yantiss, R.K.; Lebwohl, B.; Greenson, J.K.; Guandalini, S.; Murray, J.A. Statement on best practices in the use of pathology as a diagnostic tool for celiac disease: A guide for clinicians and pathologists. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018, 42, e44–e58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pisano, R.; Weitz, J.C. Clasificación de Marsh. Gastroenterol. Latinoam. 2011, 22, 268–270. [Google Scholar]
  20. Husby, S.; Murray, J.A.; Katzka, D.A. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Monitoring of Celiac Disease—Changing Utility of Serology and Histologic Measures: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 885–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leonard, M.M.; Weir, D.C.; Degroote, M.; Mitchell, P.D.; Singh, P.; Silvester, J.A.; Leichtner, A.M.; Fasano, A. Value of IgA tTG in Predicting Mucosal Recovery in Children with Celiac Disease on a Gluten-Free Diet. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 64, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Comino, I.; Fernández-Bañares, F.; Esteve, M.; Ortigosa, L.; Castillejo, G.; Fambuena, B.; Ribes-Koninckx, C.; Sierra, C.; Rodríguez-Herrera, A.; Salazar, J.C.; et al. Fecal Gluten Peptides Reveal Limitations of Serological Tests and Food Questionnaires for Monitoring Gluten-Free Diet in Celiac Disease Patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 111, 1456–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abu Daya, H.; Lebwohl, B.; Lewis, S.K.; Green, P.H. Celiac disease patients presenting with anemia have more severe disease than those presenting with diarrhea. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 11, 1472–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Martín-Masot, R.; Nestares, M.T.; Diaz-Castro, J.; López-Aliaga, I.; Alférez, M.J.M.; Moreno-Fernandez, J.; Maldonado, J. Multifactorial etiology of anemia in celiac disease and effect of gluten-free diet: A comprehensive review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shahriari, M.; Honar, N.; Yousefi, A.; Javaherizadeh, H. Association of Potential Celiac Disease and Refractory Iron Deficiency Anemia in Children and Adolescents. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2018, 55, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Goddard, A.F.; James, M.W.; McIntyre, A.S.; Scott, B.B. Guidelines for the management of iron deficiency anaemia. Gut 2011, 60, 1309–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lasa, J.S.; Olivera, P.; Soifer, L.; Moore, R. Iron-deficiency anemia as a subclinical celiac disease presentation in an Argentinian population. Rev. Gastroenterol. México Engl. Ed. 2017, 82, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ludvigsson, J.F.; Kämpe, O.; Lebwohl, B.; Green, P.H.; Silverberg, S.J.; Ekbom, A. Primary hyperparathyroidism and celiac disease: A population-based cohort study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Keaveny, A.P.; Freaney, R.; McKenna, M.J.; Masterson, J.; O’Donoghue, D.P. Bone remodeling indices and secondary hyperparathyroidism in celiac disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1996, 91, 1226–1231. [Google Scholar]
  30. Maida, M.J.; Praveen, E.; Crimmins, S.R.; Swift, G.L. Coeliac disease and primary hyperparathyroidism: An association? Postgrad. Med. J. 2006, 82, 833–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zanchi, C.; Di Leo, G.; Ronfani, L.; Martelossi, S.; Not, T.; Ventura, A. Bone Metabolism in celiac disease. J. Pediatr. 2008, 153, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jafri, M.R.; Nordstrom, C.W.; Murray, J.A.; Van Dyke, C.T.; Dierkhising, R.A.; Zinsmeister, A.R.; Melton, L.J. Long-term fracture risk in patients with celiac disease: A population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2008, 53, 964–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Castillo, N.E.; Vanga, R.R.; Theethira, T.G.; Rubio-Tapia, A.; Murray, J.A.; Villafuerte, J.; Bonder, A.; Mukherjee, R.; Hansen, J.; Dennis, M.; et al. Prevalence of abnormal liver function tests in celiac disease and the effect of a gluten-free diet in the US Population. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 110, 1216–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Majumdar, K.; Sakhuja, P.; Puri, A.S.; Gaur, K.; Haider, A.; Gondal, R. Coeliac disease and the liver: Spectrum of liver histology, serology and treatment response at a tertiary referral centre. J. Clin. Pathol. 2017, 71, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Volta, U.; Granito, A.; De Franceschi, L.; Petrolini, N.; Bianchi, F.B. Anti tissue transglutaminase antibodies as predictors of silent coeliac disease in patients with hypertransaminasaemia of unknown origin. Dig. Liver Dis. 2001, 33, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ghozzi, M.; Ben Salem, M.A.; Mbarki, F.; Jmaa, A.; Baccouch, A.; Sakly, N.; Ben Jazia, E.; Ghedira, I. Screening for celiac disease, by endomysial antibodies, in patients with unexplained hypertransaminasaemia. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2017, 77, 454–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Malamut, G.; Cellier, C. Refractory celiac disease: Epidemiology and clinical manifestations. Dig. Dis. 2015, 33, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schiepatti, A.; Savioli, J.; Vernero, M.; Borrelli de Andreis, F.; Perfetti, L.; Meriggi, A.; Biagi, F. Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease and Gluten-Related Disorders. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Collin, P.; Vilppula, A.; Luostarinen, L.; Holmes, G.K.T.; Kaukinen, K. Review article: Coeliac disease in later life must not be missed. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 47, 563–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gülseren, Y.D.; Adiloğlu, A.K.; Yücel, M.; Dağ, Z.; Eyerci, N.; Berkem, R.; Filik, L.; Çaydere, M. Comparison of non-invasive tests with invasive tests in the diagnosis of celiac disease. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2019, 33, e22722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rashtak, S.; Ettore, M.W.; Homburger, H.A.; Murray, J.A. Comparative Usefulness of Deamidated Gliadin Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008, 6, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Oxentenko, A.S.; Grisolano, S.W.; Murray, J.A.; Burgart, L.J.; Dierkhising, R.A.; Alexander, J.A. The insensitivity of endoscopic markers in celiac disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 97, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kamboj, A.K.; Oxentenko, A.S. Clinical and Histologic Mimickers of Celiac Disease. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2017, 8, e114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hanevik, K.; Wik, E.; Langeland, N.; Hausken, T. Transient elevation of anti-transglutaminase and anti-endomysium antibodies in Giardia infection. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 53, 809–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. See, J.A.; Kaukinen, K.; Makharia, G.K.; Gibson, P.R.; Murray, J.A. Practical insights into gluten-free diets. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 12, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. See, J.; Murray, J.A. Gluten-free diet: The medical and nutrition management of celiac disease. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2006, 21, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pekki, H.; Kurppa, K.; Mäki, M.; Huhtala, H.; Sievänen, H.; Laurila, K.; Collin, P.; Kaukinen, K. Predictors and Significance of Incomplete Mucosal Recovery in Celiac Disease After 1 Year on a Gluten-Free Diet. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 110, 1078–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rodrigo, L.; Pérez-Martinez, I.; Lauret-Brañaa, E.; Suárez-González, A. Descriptive Study of the Different Tools Used to Evaluate the Adherence to a Gluten-Free Diet in Celiac Disease Patients. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vivas, S.; Vaquero, L.; Rodríguez-Martín, L.; Caminero, A. Age-related differences in celiac disease: Specific characteristics of adult presentation. World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 6, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gidrewicz, D.; Trevenen, C.L.; Lyon, M.; Butzner, J.D. Normalization Time of Celiac Serology in Children on a Gluten-free Diet. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 64, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Majsiak, E.; Choina, M.; Gray, A.M.; Wysokiński, M.; Cukrowska, B. Clinical Manifestation and Diagnostic Process of Celiac Disease in Poland-Comparison of Pediatric and Adult Patients in Retrospective Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Raiteri, A.; Granito, A.; Giamperoli, A.; Catenaro, T.; Negrini, G.; Tovoli, F. Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 28, 154–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Marsh, M.N. Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’). Gastroenterology 1992, 102, 330–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Paez, M.A.; Gramelspacher, A.M.; Sinacore, J.; Winterfield, L.; Venu, M. Delay in Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Patients without Gastrointestinal Complaints. Am. J. Med. 2017, 130, 1318–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Vavricka, S.R.; Vadasz, N.; Stotz, M.; Lehmann, R.; Studerus, D.; Greuter, T.; Frei, P.; Zeitz, J.; Scharl, M.; Misselwitz, B.; et al. Celiac disease diagnosis still significantly delayed—Doctor’s but not patients’ delay responsive for the increased total delay in women. Dig. Liver Dis. 2016, 48, 1148–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Green, P.H.R. The many faces of celiac disease: Clinical presentation of celiac disease in the adult population. Gastroenterology 2005, 128 (Suppl. S1), 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Pulido, O.; Zarkadas, M.; Dubois, S.; MacIsaac, K.; Cantin, I.; La Vieille, S.; Godefroy, S.; Rashid, M. Clinical features anmptovery on a gluten-free diet in Canadian adults with celiac disease. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 27, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Eigner, W.; Bashir, K.; Primas, C.; Kazemi-Shirazi, L.; Wrba, F.; Trauner, M.; Vogelsang, H. Dynamics of occurrence of refractory coeliac disease and associated complications over 25 years. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 45, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ibrahim, M.K.; Zambruni, M.; Melby, C.L.; Melby, P.C. Impact of childhood malnutrition on host defense and infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 919–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Freeman, H.J.; Chopra, A.; Clandinin, M.T.; Thomson, A.B. Recent advances in celiac disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 17, 2259–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lionetti, E.; Catassi, C. New clues in celiac disease epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and treatment. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 30, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cederholm, T.; Jensen, G.L.; Correia, M.I.T.D.; Gonzalez, M.C.; Fukushima, R.; Higashiguchi, T.; Baptista, G.; Barazzoni, R.; Blaauw, R.; Coats, A.J.S.; et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition—A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019, 10, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. WHO. Child Growth Standards: Growth Velocity Based on Weight, Length and Head Circumference: Methods and Development. (Internet). Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241547635 (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  64. Hollon, J.; Puppa, E.L.; Greenwald, B.; Goldberg, E.; Guerrerio, A.; Fasano, A. Effect of gliadin on permeability of intestinal biopsy explants from celiac disease patients and patients with non-Celiac gluten sensitivity. Nutrients 2015, 7, 1565–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fernández, C.B.; Varela-Moreiras, G.; Úbeda, N.; Alonso-Aperte, E. Nutritional status in Spanish children and adolescents with celiac disease on a gluten free diet compared to non-celiac disease controls. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Comba, A.; Çaltepe, G.; Yüce, Ö.; Eren, E.; Kalayci, A.G. Effects of age of diagnosis and dietary compliance on growth parameters of patients with celiac disease. Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 2018, 116, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Rondanelli, M.; Faliva, M.A.; Gasparri, C.; Peroni, G.; Naso, M.; Picciotto, G.; Riva, A.; Nichetti, M.; Infantino, V.; Alalwan, T.A.; et al. Micronutrients dietary supplementation advices for celiac patients on long-term gluten-free diet with good compliance: A review. Medicina 2019, 55, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hentze, M.W.; Muckenthaler, M.U.; Galy, B.; Camaschella, C. Two to Tango: Regulation of Mammalian Iron Metabolism. Cell 2010, 142, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tulewicz-Marti, E.; Moniuszko, A.; Rydzewska, G. Management of anemia in inflammatory bowel disease: A challenge in everyday clinical practice. Prz. Gastroenterol. 2017, 12, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Deora, V.; Aylward, N.; Sokoro, A.; El-Matary, W. Serum Vitamins and Minerals at Diagnosis and Follow-up in Children with Celiac Disease. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017, 65, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Forrellat Barrios, M.; Gautier Du Défaix Gómez, H.; Fernández Delgado, N. Metabolismo del hierro. Rev. Cuba. Hematol. Inmunol. Hemoter. 2000, 16, 149–160. [Google Scholar]
  72. Nardecchia, S.; Auricchio, R.; Discepolo, V.; Troncone, R. Extra-intestinal manifestations of coeliac disease in children: Clinical features and mechanisms. Front. Pediatr. 2019, 7, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Polanco, I.; Ribes, C. Protocolos Diagnóstico-Terapéuticos de Gastroenterología, Hepatología y Nutrición Pediátrica; SEGHNP-AEP. Enfermedad Celíaca: Madrid, Spain, 2010; pp. 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  74. Yeste, D.; Carrascoca, A. Patología del Metabolismo del Calcio; Asociación Española de Pediatría: Madrid, Spain, 2011; Volume 1, pp. 177–192. [Google Scholar]
  75. Sainsbury, A.; Sanders, D.S.; Ford, A.C. Meta-analysis: Coeliac disease and hypertransaminasaemia. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 34, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Rubio-Tapia, A.; Murray, J.A. The liver in celiac disease. Hepatology 2007, 46, 1650–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Vaquero, L.; Rodriguez-Martín, L.; Alvarez-Cuenllas, B.; Hernando, M.; Iglesias-Blazquez, C.; Menéndez-Arias, C.; Vivas, S. Coeliac disease and gastrointestinal symptom screening in adult first-degree relatives. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 32, 1931–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Charlesworth, R.P.G. Diagnosing coeliac disease: Out. with the old and in with the new? World J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 26, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ianiro, G.; Bibbò, S.; Bruno, G.; Ricci, R.; Arena, V.; Gasbarrini, A.; Cammarota, G. Prior misdiagnosis of celiac disease is common among patients referred to a tertiary care center: A prospective cohort study. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2016, 7, e139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Efthymakis, K.; Serio, M.; Milano, A.; Laterza, F.; Bonitatibus, A.; Di Nicola, M.; Neri, M. Application of the Biopsy-Sparing ESPGHAN Guidelines for Celiac Disease Diagnosis in Adults: A Real-Life Study. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2017, 62, 2433–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Bogaert, L.; Cauchie, M.; Van Hoovels, L.; Vermeersch, P.; Fierz, W.; De Hertogh, G.; Hoffman, I.; Bossuyt, X. Optimization of serologic diagnosis of celiac disease in the pediatric setting. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 19, 102513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Blansky, B.A.; Hintze, Z.J.; Alhassan, E.; Leichtner, A.M.; Weir, D.C.; Silvester, J.A. Lack of Follow-up of Pediatric Patients with Celiac Disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Off. Clin. Pract. J. Am. Gastroenterol. Assoc. 2019, 17, 2603–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The follow-up of CD patients shows a slow and impaired recovery after the initiation of a GFD. Shown are the values (mean ± SD) of the indicated analytes found in healthy donors (the control), and patients. The samples of the patients were collected in the indicated stages of the disease: before the start of the GFD, in the first 42 months (3.5 years) after the start of the GFD, and later. ns: not significant; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001; ****: p < 0.0001.
Figure 1. The follow-up of CD patients shows a slow and impaired recovery after the initiation of a GFD. Shown are the values (mean ± SD) of the indicated analytes found in healthy donors (the control), and patients. The samples of the patients were collected in the indicated stages of the disease: before the start of the GFD, in the first 42 months (3.5 years) after the start of the GFD, and later. ns: not significant; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001; ****: p < 0.0001.
Children 10 01580 g001
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample.
Mean ± SD or n (%)
TotalControlCases
Male22 (53.7%)11 (55.0%)11 (52.4%)
Female19 (46.3%)9 (45.0%)10 (47.6%)
Age (years)5.81 ± 2.856.15 ± 1.815.49 ± 3.59
Male age (years)6.43 ± 2.856.09 ± 1.976.77 ± 3.59
Female age (years)5.10 ± 2.756.22 ± 1.724.09 ± 3.19
Table 2. Summary table of the results.
Table 2. Summary table of the results.
Parameter Mean (SD)Mean Alteration (Cases) (IC95%)p-Value *
Iron ions
(µg/dL)
Control100.65 (4.27)34.47 (21.49–47.44)0.000
Cases66.19 (28.36)
Calcium ions
(mg/dL)
Control9.80 (0.32)2.01 (1.54–2.47)0.000
Cases11.80 (0.99)
AST
(mU/mL)
Control31.2 (9.27)20.1 (10.53–29.67)0.000
Cases51.3 (19.11)
ALT
(mU/mL)
Control30.35 (6.0)8.73 (1.87–15.59)0.014
Cases39.08 (14.0)
Leukocytes
(U/µL)
Control4566.4 (1859.7)4445.13 (2833.4–6056.4)0.000
Cases9011.5 (3064.5)
Lymphocytes %
(%)
Control32.51 (4.38)10.96 (6.58–15.34)0.016
Cases43.47 (8.69)
Lymphocytes T
(U/µL)
Control2715.4 (1405.6)1226.5 (245.5–2297.5)0.000
Cases3941.9 (1679.7)
Monocytes %
(%)
Control5.63 (1.01)0.82 (0.03–1.67)0.061
Cases6.45 (1.59)
Monocytes T
(U/µL)
Control456.75 (133.0)90.13 (4.5–184.8)0.057
Cases546.88 (164.1)
* Mann–Whitney test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ventura, I.; Rodriguez, B.; Suescum, S.; Revert, F.; Revert-Ros, F.; Moreno, M.A.; Prieto-Ruiz, J.A.; Pérez-Bermejo, M. More Than Three Years for Normalisation of Routine Laboratory Values after Gluten Withdrawal in Paediatric Coeliac Patients. Children 2023, 10, 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10091580

AMA Style

Ventura I, Rodriguez B, Suescum S, Revert F, Revert-Ros F, Moreno MA, Prieto-Ruiz JA, Pérez-Bermejo M. More Than Three Years for Normalisation of Routine Laboratory Values after Gluten Withdrawal in Paediatric Coeliac Patients. Children. 2023; 10(9):1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10091580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ventura, Ignacio, Belén Rodriguez, Sandra Suescum, Fernando Revert, Francisco Revert-Ros, María Antonia Moreno, Jesús A. Prieto-Ruiz, and Marcelino Pérez-Bermejo. 2023. "More Than Three Years for Normalisation of Routine Laboratory Values after Gluten Withdrawal in Paediatric Coeliac Patients" Children 10, no. 9: 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10091580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop