An Academic Response to Basel 3.5
AbstractRecent crises in the financial industry have shown weaknesses in the modeling of Risk-Weighted Assets (RWAs). Relatively minor model changes may lead to substantial changes in the RWA numbers. Similar problems are encountered in the Value-at-Risk (VaR)-aggregation of risks. In this article, we highlight some of the underlying issues, both methodologically, as well as through examples. In particular, we frame this discussion in the context of two recent regulatory documents we refer to as Basel 3.5.
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Embrechts, P.; Puccetti, G.; Rüschendorf, L.; Wang, R.; Beleraj, A. An Academic Response to Basel 3.5. Risks 2014, 2, 25-48.
Embrechts P, Puccetti G, Rüschendorf L, Wang R, Beleraj A. An Academic Response to Basel 3.5. Risks. 2014; 2(1):25-48.Chicago/Turabian Style
Embrechts, Paul; Puccetti, Giovanni; Rüschendorf, Ludger; Wang, Ruodu; Beleraj, Antonela. 2014. "An Academic Response to Basel 3.5." Risks 2, no. 1: 25-48.