Next Article in Journal
Cold Atmospheric Plasma Improves Shear Bond Strength of Veneering Composite to Zirconia
Previous Article in Journal
Peer Mentoring as a Tool for Developing Soft Skills in Clinical Practice: A 3-Year Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Profiling of Microbiota at the Mouth of Bottles and in Remaining Tea after Drinking Directly from Plastic Bottles of Tea

1
Division of Clinical Chemistry, Niigata University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata 951-8518, Japan
2
Division of Oral Ecology and Biochemistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai 980-8575, Japan
3
Division of Anaerobic Research, Life Science Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These three authors share first authorship.
Dent. J. 2021, 9(6), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9060058
Submission received: 25 April 2021 / Revised: 19 May 2021 / Accepted: 20 May 2021 / Published: 21 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Oral Hygiene, Periodontology and Peri-implant Diseases)

Abstract

:
It has been speculated that oral bacteria can be transferred to tea in plastic bottles when it is drunk directly from the bottles, and that the bacteria can then multiply in the bottles. The transfer of oral bacteria to the mouth of bottles and bacterial survival in the remaining tea after drinking directly from bottles were examined immediately after drinking and after storage at 37 °C for 24 h. Twelve healthy subjects (19 to 23 years of age) were asked to drink approximately 50 mL of unsweetened tea from a plastic bottle. The mouths of the bottles were swabbed with sterile cotton, and the swabs and the remaining tea in the bottles were analyzed by anaerobic culture and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Metagenomic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene was also performed. The mean amounts of bacteria were (1.8 ± 1.7) × 104 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL and (1.4 ± 1.5) × 104 CFU/mL at the mouth of the bottles immediately after and 24 h after drinking, respectively. In contrast, (0.8 ± 1.6) × 104 CFU/mL and (2.5 ± 2.6) × 106 CFU/mL were recovered from the remaining tea immediately after and 24 h after drinking, respectively. Streptococcus (59.9%) were predominant at the mouth of the bottles immediately after drinking, followed by Schaalia (5.5%), Gemella (5.5%), Actinomyces (4.9%), Cutibacterium (4.9%), and Veillonella (3.6%); the culture and metagenomic analyses showed similar findings for the major species of detected bacteria, including Streptococcus (59.9%, and 10.711%), Neisseria (1.6%, and 24.245%), Haemophilus (0.6%, and 15.658%), Gemella (5.5%, and 0.381%), Cutibacterium (4.9%, and 0.041%), Rothia (2.6%, and 4.170%), Veillonella (3.6%, and 1.130%), Actinomyces (4.9%, and 0.406%), Prevotella (1.6%, and 0.442%), Fusobacterium (1.0%, and 0.461%), Capnocytophaga (0.3%, and 0.028%), and Porphyromonas (1.0%, and 0.060%), respectively. Furthermore, Streptococcus were the most commonly detected bacteria 24 h after drinking. These findings demonstrated that oral bacteria were present at the mouth of the bottles and in the remaining tea after drinking.

1. Introduction

Japanese people often drink tea in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles to stay hydrated. It has been speculated that oral bacteria can be transferred to the tea when it is drunk directly from bottles, and that the bacteria can then multiply in the bottles. In general, it is recommended that any remaining tea in plastic bottles should be discarded after drinking [1,2]; thus, there is currently limited scientific information on the concentration and composition of bacteria in the remaining tea in plastic bottles after drinking directly from the bottles. However, some consumers may be inclined to store or leave the remaining tea in plastic bottles after drinking and then drink it later, especially in the summertime or in hot weather to prevent dehydration. In fact, it has been reported that some bacteria can remain in plastic bottles after drinking [1,2]; however, most of these studies focused mainly on general (water resource-related) bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, and the detailed profiles of microbes in the bottles of remaining tea have not yet been clarified.
In this study, in order to understand the characteristics of the bacteria in the remaining tea in plastic bottles after drinking directly from the bottles, analyses of the bacteria at the mouth of bottles and in the remaining tea in the bottles both immediately after drinking from the bottles and after storage at 37 °C for 24 h were performed under culture conditions suitable for the growth of oral microbiota, since the obtained bacteria are assumed to originate from the oral cavity. In addition, the obtained data were confirmed by metagenomic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

Twelve healthy subjects (19 to 23 years of age) were asked to drink approximately 50 mL of unsweetened tea from a PET bottle (Sokenbicha®; Coca-Cola (Japan) Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). All subjects were considered healthy based on their medical history, and none had received antibiotics during the three months before sampling.
Both immediately after drinking and after storage at 37 °C for 24 h, the mouth of each bottle was wiped with a sterile cotton swab. The swab was suspended in 1.0 mL of sterilized 40 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and dispersed by vortexing. Samples (1.0 mL each) of the remaining tea were also dispersed by vortexing. Serial 10-fold dilutions (0.1 mL each) of the samples in sterilized buffer were spread on the surfaces of CDC Anaerobe 5% Sheep Blood Agar plates (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C. After incubation of seven days, the colony-forming units (CFU) were determined, and all colonies from suitably diluted plates having <100 colonies (mean, 21.1 colonies; range, 4 to 38 colonies) were sub-cultured. Because the CFU was higher after anaerobic (approximately 104 CFU/mL) than after aerobic incubation (approximately 103 CFU/mL) at the mouth of the plastic bottles and in the remaining tea immediately after drinking, colonies for further inspections were selected only from plates incubated anaerobically.

2.2. pH Measurement

The pH of the tea was measured using a pH meter (HM-25R; DKK-TOA Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Identification of Isolates by DNA Sequence Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from single colonies using an InstaGene Matrix Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, USA), and the 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified by PCR using universal primers, 27F and 1492R, and Taq DNA polymerase (HotStarTaq Plus Master Mix Kit; Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), as described before [3,4]. The PCR products were separated on 2% agarose gels (High Strength Analytical Grade Agarose; Bio-Rad Laboratories) as described before [3,4].
Isolates were tentatively identified according to PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis [3,4]. Then, representative isolates were conclusively identified by sequence analysis, as described before [3,4].

2.4. Metagenomic Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from the swab samples that were suspended in 40 mM potassium phosphate buffer (as described above) using a Mora-Extract Kit (Cosmo Bio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification, library construction, and Illumina MiSeq sequencing were performed at the Oral Microbiome Center (Takamatsu, Japan) using a MiSeq Reagent Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina) according to the 16S Metagenomics Sequencing Library Preparation guide supplied by Illumina. The primer sequences were as follows: 341F, 5′- TCG TCG GCA GCG TCA GAT GTG TAT AAG AGA CAG CCT ACG GGN GGC WGC AG -3′, and 806R, 5′- GTC TCG TGG GCT CGG AGA TGT GTA TAA GAG ACA GGG ACT ACH VGG GTW TCT AAT -3′. Microbiome analysis was performed using Qiime (ver. 1.9.1, http://qiime.org/, accessed on 24 April 2021), and the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA sequences in the human oral microbiome database (ver. 14.51, http://www.homd.org/, accessed on 24 April 2021).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Dunn’s test was used to determine the statistical significance differences using StatFlex statistical software (ver. 6; Artech Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). p-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

The mean amounts of bacteria were (1.8 ± 1.7) × 104 CFU/mL and (1.4 ± 1.5) × 104 CFU/mL at the mouth of the plastic bottles immediately after drinking and one day after drinking, respectively (Table 1). In contrast, (0.8 ± 1.6) × 104 CFU/mL and (2.5 ± 2.6) × 106 CFU/mL were recovered from the remaining tea immediately after drinking and 24 h after drinking, respectively (Table 1); the levels immediately after drinking and 24 h after drinking were significantly different (p < 0.05). The bacterial levels increased 100-fold (from 104 to 106) after storage at 37 °C for 24 h; this was likely due to the neutral pH (range, pH 5.77 to 6.08) of the tea in the present study, and indicated that the remaining drinks (such as tea drinks) should be preserved in a refrigerator from the viewpoint of bacterial growth. In a preliminary study, no drastic increase in the bacterial amounts, (4.2 ± 5.2) × 103 and (2.5 ± 3.7) × 104 CFU/mL, was observed in tea after storage at 4 °C and 24 °C, respectively, and also, no bacteria were detected in the tea in plastic bottles before drinking.
From the cultures (Table 1), Streptococcus species (59.9%) were predominant at the mouth of bottles immediately after drinking, followed by Schaalia (5.5%), Gemella (5.5%), Actinomyces (4.9%), Cutibacterium (4.9%), and Veillonella (3.6%). From the metagenomic analysis (Table 2), Delftia (34.506%), Neisseria (24.245%), Haemophilus (15.658%), Streptococcus (10.711%), Rothia (4.170%), Lautropia (3.083%), Sphingomonas (1.745%), Ralstonia (1.436%), and Veillonella (1.130%) were predominant, followed by Fusobacterium (0.461%), Prevotella (0.442%), Actinomyces (0.406%), Agrobacterium (0.394%), and Gemella (0.381%). The culture and metagenomic analyses revealed similar findings for the major species of bacteria isolated from the tea, including Streptococcus, Neisseria, Haemophilus, Gemella, Cutibacterium, Rothia, Veillonella, Actinomyces, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Capnocytophaga, and Porphyromonas (Table 2).
Furthermore, the culture and the metagenomic analyses showed that Streptococcus species were the most commonly detected bacteria at the mouth of bottles 24 h after drinking (Table 1 and Table 2), and Delftia, Neisseria, Haemophilus, Rothia, Sphingomonas, and Ralstonia were also detected by the metagenomic analysis (Table 2).
In the remaining tea immediately after drinking (Table 1), Streptococcus (65.7%) and Actinomyces (14.4%) were predominant, followed by Veillonella (6.0%), Prevotella (3.5%), Schaalia (3.0%), Gemella (1.5%), and Rothia (1.0%). In contrast, Streptococcus (85.9%) and Cutibacterium (12.7%) were the major species of isolated bacteria from the remaining tea 24 h after drinking (Table 1). The figure format of Table 1 and Table 2 can be found in Supplementary Materials.
The bacterial contaminations of foods [5,6] and drinks in PET bottles after drinking [1,2] have been reported, although most of these studies focused mainly on E. coli and other general (water resource-related) bacteria. However, no information is available on the impact of bacteria at the mouth of plastic bottles after drinking directly from the bottles, as it is generally recommended that any remaining beverage should be discarded. In the present study, to obtain scientific evidence of the bacterial contamination of plastic-bottled drinks, analyses of the bacteria at the mouth of plastic bottles after drinking directly from the bottles and in the remaining tea in the plastic bottles were performed under suitable culture conditions for oral microbiota, i.e., an appropriate culture medium, incubation temperature, and gaseous environment, since the obtained bacteria are assumed to originate from the oral cavity. The culture data were compared to and confirmed by the data from the metagenomic analysis in the present study (Table 2). In addition, analyses of the remaining tea after storage at 37 °C for 24 h were performed under culture conditions suitable for the growth of oral microbiota, which are similar to the storage conditions of remaining bottled drinks in the summertime or in hot weather. The findings of the present study demonstrated that oral bacteria were present at the mouth of the bottles, as well as in the remaining tea after drinking, and that Streptococcus species were predominant bacteria in the tea 24 h after drinking. Although the unsweetened tea used in the present study contains little catechins and caffeine, it has been reported that Japanese green tea containing substantial amounts of catechins inhibited the growth of bacteria after storage at 23.4–25.6 °C for 8 h [7].
Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Veillonella, Cutibacterium, Prevotella, Schaalia, Gemella, Rothia, and Neisseria were the predominant bacteria immediately after drinking, and among them, the reason why Streptococcus species can specifically survive 24 h after drinking was unknown.
Analyses of the microbiota profiles of a sport-drink (sweetened, pH < 4.0) and orange juice (pH < 4.0) are currently in progress in our laboratory. To date, we have found predominant bacteria, such as Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Rothia, Prevotella, Neisseria, Veillonella, Schaalia, and Gemella from a sport-drink; and Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Gemella, Veillonella, and Prevotella from orange juice) similar to those found in the present study (Table 1) (Kawachi M et al., unpublished data).
In summary, approximately 10,000 cells/mL of oral bacteria, including Streptococcus, Actinomyces, Schaalia, Gemella, Cutibacterium, and Veillonella, were found at the mouth of plastic bottles and in the remaining tea in the bottles immediately after drinking, and the composition of the bacteria was confirmed by metagenomic analysis. The bacterial levels increased 100-fold after storage at 37 °C for 24 h, and Streptococcus species were the predominant bacteria isolated from the mouth of the plastic bottles and in the remaining tea in the bottles, suggesting that any remaining tea in plastic bottles should be discarded or preserved in a refrigerator after drinking directly from the bottle.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/dj9060058/s1, Figure S1: Data of Table 1 presented as a figure format, Figure S2: Data of Table 2 presented as a figure format.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.W., H.S., Y.H. and T.S.; methodology, A.W., H.S., Y.H., M.K., A.A., J.W., Y.A., G.M., K.Y., K.T., N.T. and T.S.; software, T.S.; validation, A.W., H.S., Y.H. and T.S.; formal analysis, A.W., H.S., Y.H. and T.S.; investigation, A.W., H.S., Y.H. and T.S.; resources, A.W., H.S., Y.H. and T.S.; data curation, T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.W., H.S., Y.H. and T.S.; writing—review and editing, T.S.; visualization, T.S.; supervision, T.S.; project administration, T.S.; funding acquisition, H.S., J.W., K.Y., N.T. and T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (17H04420, 17K11698, 17K12006, 20K10241, 21H03151, 21H03247, and 21K10266) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry (No. 26-8, 19 December 2014).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy reasons for the subjects in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ohnishi, T.; Goto, K.; Kanda, T.; Kanazawa, Y.; Ozawa, K.; Sugiyama, K.; Watanabe, M.; Konuma, H.; Hara-Kudo, Y. Microbial contamination associated with consumption and the growth in plastic bottled beverage. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2013, 48, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Watanabe, M.; Ohnishi, T.; Araki, E.; Kanda, T.; Tomita, A.; Ozawa, K.; Goto, K.; Sugiyama, K.; Konuma, H.; Hara-Kudo, Y. Characteristics of bacterial and fungal growth in plastic bottled beverages under a consuming condition model. J. Environ. Sci. Health A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2014, 49, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ishida, N.; Sato, T.; Hoshikawa, Y.; Tanda, N.; Sasaki, K.; Kondo, T.; Takahashi, N. Microbiota profiling of bronchial fluids of patients with pulmonary carcinoma. J. Oral. Biosci. 2015, 57, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sato, T.; Yamaki, K.; Ishida, N.; Hashimoto, K.; Takeuchi, Y.; Shoji, M.; Sato, E.; Matsuyama, J.; Shimauchi, H.; Takahashi, N. Cultivable anaerobic microbiota of infected root canals. Int. J. Dent. 2012, 2012, 609689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kim, M.J.; Kim, S.A.; Kang, Y.S.; Hwang, I.G.; Rhee, M.S. Microbial diversity and prevalence of foodborne pathogens in cheap and junk foods consumed by primary schoolchildren. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 57, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kim, S.A.; Oh, S.W.; Lee, Y.M.; Imm, J.Y.; Hwang, I.G.; Kang, D.H.; Rhee, M.S. Microbial contamination of food products consumed by infants and babies in Korea. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 53, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Morioka, I.; Uenaka, A.; Tanigawa, A.; Matsumoto, Y. Microbial growth in unfinished beverages in plastic bottles and the awareness of nursing students in a university about microbial contamination. Jpn. J. Hyg. 2018, 73, 373–378. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Bacteria isolated from plastic bottles of tea immediately after drinking and 24 h after drinking.
Table 1. Bacteria isolated from plastic bottles of tea immediately after drinking and 24 h after drinking.
Tea Drink of Plastic BottlesAt the Mouth of Plastic Bottles
Immediately after Drinking
(n = 10)
24 h after Drinking
(n = 12)
Immediately after Drinking
(n = 11)
24 h after Drinking
(n = 8)
Mean ± SD (CFU/mL)(0.8 ± 1.6) × 104(2.5 ± 2.6) × 106(1.8 ± 1.7) × 104(1.4 ± 1.5) × 104
Total201(%)213(%)309(%)141(%)
Anaerobes28(13.9)27(12.7)41(13.3)0(0)
Cutibacterium9(4.5)27(12.7)15(4.9)
C. acnes9 27 15
Veillonella12(6.0) 11(3.6)
V. parvula/tobetsuensis12 11
Prevotella7(3.5) 5(1.6)
P. loescheii1 4
P. melaninogenica6 1
Fusobacterium 3(1.0)
F. periodonticum 3
Porphyromonas 3(1.0)
P. pasteri/bronchialis 3
Selenomonas 1(0.3)
S. noxia 1
Leptotrichia 1(0.3)
L. sp 1
Solobacterium 1(0.3)
S. moorei 1
Facultative anaerobes162(80.6)178(83.6)259(83.8)137(97.2)
Streptococcus132(65.7)183(85.9)185(59.9)136(96.5)
S. mitis/oralis/infantis102 172 129 120
S. parasanguinis12 5 30 7
S. australis8 5 8 1
S. salivarius5 13
S. cristatus5 1 5 8
Actinomyces29(14.4) 15(4.9)
A. oris/naeslundi28 15
A. johnsonii1
Schaalia6(3.0) 17(5.5)
S. odontolytica6 17
Gemella3(1.5) 17(5.5)
G. sanguinis 10
G. haemolyssans/parahaemolyssans3 7
Staphylococcus 2(0.9)7(2.3)1(0.7)
S. epidermidis 2 5 1
S. warneri/pasteuri 2
Neisseria1(0.5) 1 (0.5)5(1.6)
N. mucosa 2
N. perflava1 1 2
N. oralis 1
Rothia2(1.0) 8(2.6)
R. aeria1 3
R. mucilaginosa 5
R. dentocariosa1
Haemophilus 2(0.6)
H. parainfluenzae 2
Capnocytophaga 1(0.3)
C. gingivalis 1
Abiotrophia 1(0.3)
A. defectiva 1
Unknown8(4.0)2(0.9)4(1.3)2(1.4)
Lost3(1.5)6(2.8)5(1.6)2(1.4)
Table 2. Culture and metagenomic analyses of the bacterial compositions (percentages) at the mouth of plastic bottles immediately after and 24 h after drinking.
Table 2. Culture and metagenomic analyses of the bacterial compositions (percentages) at the mouth of plastic bottles immediately after and 24 h after drinking.
Immediately after Drinking24 h after Drinking
Culture
(n = 11)
Metagenomic
(n = 3)
Culture
(n = 8)
Metagenomic
(n = 3)
Streptococcus59.87010.71196.45446.586
Delftia 34.506 17.907
Neisseria1.61824.245 14.608
Haemophilus0.64715.658 8.926
Schaalia5.502
Gemella5.5020.381 0.320
Cutibacterium4.8540.041 0.308
Rothia2.5894.170 4.509
Veillonella3.5601.130 0.651
Actinomyces4.8540.406 0.351
Lautropia 3.083 0.328
Sphingomonas 1.745 2.374
Prevotella1.6180.442 0.352
Ralstonia 1.436 1.090
Fusobacterium0.9710.461 0.214
Capnocytophaga0.3240.028
Agrobacterium 0.394 0.185
Porphyromonas0.9710.060 0.114
Abiotrophia0.324
Bergeyella 0.344 0.142
Burkholderia 0.320
Corynebacterium 0.289 0.074
Ochrobactrum 0.208 0.123
TM7 [G-1] 0.031 0.142
Granulicatella 0.010 0.126
Bradyrhizobium 0.099 0.098
Bosea 0.026 0.076
Bacillus 0.072
Peptostreptococcus 0.019
Alloprevotella 0.019
Ruminococcaceae [G-1] 0.012
Aggregatibacter 0.012
Tannerella 0.011
Campylobacter 0.009 0.002
Escherichia 0.009
Catonella 0.005
Cardiobacterium 0.003
TM7 [G-3] 0.002
Fretibacterium 0.002
Selenomonas 0.001
Peptostreptococcaceae [XI] [G-1] 0.001
Unknown1.294 1.418
Lost1.618 1.418
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wakui, A.; Sano, H.; Hirabuki, Y.; Kawachi, M.; Aida, A.; Washio, J.; Abiko, Y.; Mayanagi, G.; Yamaki, K.; Tanaka, K.; et al. Profiling of Microbiota at the Mouth of Bottles and in Remaining Tea after Drinking Directly from Plastic Bottles of Tea. Dent. J. 2021, 9, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9060058

AMA Style

Wakui A, Sano H, Hirabuki Y, Kawachi M, Aida A, Washio J, Abiko Y, Mayanagi G, Yamaki K, Tanaka K, et al. Profiling of Microbiota at the Mouth of Bottles and in Remaining Tea after Drinking Directly from Plastic Bottles of Tea. Dentistry Journal. 2021; 9(6):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9060058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wakui, Anna, Hiroto Sano, Yuka Hirabuki, Miho Kawachi, Ayaka Aida, Jumpei Washio, Yuki Abiko, Gen Mayanagi, Keiko Yamaki, Kaori Tanaka, and et al. 2021. "Profiling of Microbiota at the Mouth of Bottles and in Remaining Tea after Drinking Directly from Plastic Bottles of Tea" Dentistry Journal 9, no. 6: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9060058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop