Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of Fresh Pork Colour Measurements by Using Four Commercial Handheld Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Increased Provision of Bioavailable Mg through Vegetables Could Significantly Reduce the Growing Health and Economic Burden Caused by Mg Malnutrition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Pressure Level and Time Treatment of High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP) on Inulin Gelation and Properties of Obtained Hydrogels

1
Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 159c Nowoursynowska Street, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Microbiology, Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology—State Research Institute, 36 Rakowiecka Street, 02-532 Warsaw, Poland
3
Institute of High Pressure Physics of Polish Academy of Sciences, 29/37 Sokołowska Street, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(11), 2514; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112514
Submission received: 11 September 2021 / Revised: 15 October 2021 / Accepted: 15 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Food Physics and (Bio)Chemistry)

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was the evaluation of the influence of different HHP levels (150 and 300 MPa) and time treatment (5, 10, 20 min) on the gelation and properties of hydrogels with different inulin concentration (15, 20, 25 g/100 g). High-pressure treatment, in tested ranges, induces inulin gels and allows obtaining gel structures even at a lowest tested inulin content (i.e., 15 g/100 g). Selecting the pressure parameters, it is possible to modify the characteristics of the created hydrogels. The use of higher pressure (i.e., 300 MPa) allows to increase the stability of the hydrogels and change their structure to more compressed, which results in higher yield stress, lower spreadability, harder and more adhesive structure. For example, increasing the inulin gelling induction pressure (concentration 20 g/100 g) from 150 to 300 MPa with a time treatment of 10 min resulted in an increase in yield stress from 38.1 to 711.7 Pa, spreadability force from 0.59 to 4.59 N, firmness from 0.11 to 1.46 N, and adhesiveness from −0.06 to −0.65 N. Extending the time treatment of HHP increases this effect, but mainly when higher pressure and a higher concentration of inulin are being used. For example, extension of time treatment at 300 MPa pressure from 5 to 20 min resulted in an increase in yield stress from 774.8 to 1273.8 Pa, spreadability force from 6.28 to 8.43 N, firmness from 1.87 to 2.98 N, and adhesiveness from −0.94 to −1.27 N. The obtained results indicate the possibility of using HHP to create inulin hydrogels tailored to the characteristics in a specific food product.

1. Introduction

Hydrogels are a group of polymeric materials of three dimensional cross-linked polymeric networks capable of absorbing and retaining a significant amount of aqueous solvents and biological fluids in their structures [1]. They are listed as “smart structures” whose tailor-made design gives them various functional features for use in the designing, synthesis and self-assembly of novel biomaterials and drug delivery systems. Hydrogels were used for the first time in the production of contact lenses. Since then, they have been widely used, among others in controlled drug delivery, agriculture, water purification and food technology [2]. Hydrogels can be obtained by physical cross-linking [3], chemical cross-linking [4], polymerization grafting [5], and radiation cross-linking [6]. Commonly in the food industry physical cross-linking is being used due to their relatively facile production and the advantage of not using the cross-linkers. Methods, described in the literature, to produce physically cross-linked hydrogels include: heating or cooling a polymer solution [7], ionic interactions [8], complex coacervation [9], hydrogen bonding [10], maturation or aggregation resulting from heat [11], and cryogelation [12]. Other methods that have recently gained popularity in the food industry include high hydrostatic pressure (HHP). HHP is being used to disorder biopolymers, due to the modifications of non-covalent intermolecular interactions resulting in inducing gelatinization [13]. The HHP processing on an industrial scale in food production is being used for improving the efficiency of food production, or as non-thermal pasteurization or blanching technique to inactivate microorganism in juices, fruits, vegetables, seafood, and eggs. The reason why HHP is gaining popularity is that changes in nutritional and sensorial properties of food are minimize during that treatment. There is a particular need in using HHP as gelation inducers because the pressure-induced gelatinization is considered significantly different from heat-induced gelatinization [14]. HHP treatment is known to make morphological and structural changes in polysaccharides, resulting in production food with novel texture and hydrogels with different properties compared to conventional methods. In general, HHP does not accelerate chemical reactions, but rather causes physical changes in molecules microscopically and/or macroscopically. Among others things, movements are limited while hydrogen bonds are broken and the molecules are packed together toward filling the gaps between them [15]. HHP is usually carried out under pressures ranging from 50 to 1000 MPa [16]. In the available literature the range of tested HHP levels on gelation of polysaccharides are between 100 and 600 MPa, as it is for starch [17,18], glucomannan [19] and carrgeenan [20]. The selection of process parameters depends on the type of polymer, pressure level, time of treatment and temperature. Those parameters can play an important role in determining the presence and degree of hydrogel formation as well as its properties.
Hydrogels used in food products are produced mostly from natural polysaccharides such as alginate, gelatine, cellulose, chitosan and starch [21]. Inulin, by its chemical composition and structure can, similarly to other polysaccharides, undergo physical or chemical crosslinking into tri-dimensional polymeric networks resulting in obtaining hydrogels [22]. The widespread use of inulin is due to its properties such as: being a prebiotic food ingredient with textural properties, non-toxic proved by its Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status granted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), biocompatible, water soluble, biodegradable and relatively low cost polymer [23]. It is known that inulin can also form hydrogels after HHP (500 MPa) treatment [24]. However, it is not known whether lower pressure also allows them to induce gelation, and if so, what influence the pressure parameters (pressure level and time treatment) have on the characteristics of the gels formed. This could allow for the optimization of the food production process with inulin, where the use of high pressures at the level of 500 MPa is not required (obtaining a microbiological effect) or is not recommended due to unfavorable changes in the product. That is why the aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of different HHP levels (150 and 300 MPa) and time treatments (5, 10, 20 min) on the induction and properties of inulin hydrogels with different inulin concentration (15, 20, 25 g/100 g).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The material used in the experiment was inulin Orafti® HPX (average degree of polymerization DP ≥ 23) purchased from BENEO GmbH (Mannheim, Germany).

Formation of Inulin Gels

Inulin hydrogels were induced by high hydrostatic pressure (HHP); firstly inulin (15, 20, 25 g/100 g) was suspended in distilled water (20 °C) using a magnetic stirrer (for approximately 5 min). Then the solution were pour into plastic cylindrical bottles (50 mL; high 0.075 m; ø 0.035 m) and exposed to pressure of 150 and 300 MPa at a temperature of 20 °C for 5, 10 and 20 min. Pressure build-up time was 100 s and the release time was 2–4 s. The tested pressurization times did not include the build-up and release times. The working volume of the treatment chamber was 0.95 L. Distilled water and polypropylene glycol in a ratio of 1 : 1 were used as the pressure-transmitting fluid. Samples were subjected to high pressure at the Institute of High Pressure Physics, The Polish Academy of Science, using U 4000/65 (Unipress, designed and produced by the Laboratory of High Pressure Equipment) apparatus. In the apparatus U4000/65 the pressure was generated by a hydraulically driven high-pressure pump (boxer-type) and was released by means of a hydraulically driven high-pressure value. The pressure limit of U4000/65 apparatus was 600 MPa and the temperature of HP chamber was controlled by water circulation through the wall of the chamber.
After pressurization samples were stored at refrigerated temperature (8 °C) for 24 h until the structure was build and the inulin gels were formed, than quality feature of induced gels were tested.
Samples were prepared in three experimental separate replicates.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Volumetric Gel Index (VGI)

For valuation of the of degree of hydrogels formation the VGI was used. VGI was measured in a plastic cylindrical bottles (50 mL) in which inulin solutions were exposed for pressure treatment. The volumetric gel index (VGI) was expressed as [25]:
V G I = V G V T × 100   [ % ]
where: VG—volume of formulated gel, VT—total volume of sample.
For hydrogel samples in which gel structure is not formed VGI is equal 0, and for the completely gelled samples VGI will equal 100%.

2.2.2. Determination of Physical Stability

Physical stability has been demonstrated as a space and time related transmission profiles. The physical stability of inulin hydrogels was analyzed with LUMiSizer 6120-75 (L.U.M. GmbH, Berlin, Germany). During the analysis the following parameters were used for the measurement: wavelength 870 nm, volume 1.8 mL of dispersion; light factor: 1; 1500 rpm; experiment time, 15 h 10 min; interval time 210 s; temperature 20 °C. The instability index was calculated using the SepView 6.0; LUM (Berlin, Germany) software. It was quantified by dividing the clarification of the sample at a given separation time, by the maximum sample clarification. The instability index took values in the range 0 and 1, where 0 indicates a stable system and 1 an unstable system [26].

2.2.3. Microstructure

The differences in hydrogels microstructure was analyzed using an electron scanning microscope (FEI Quanta 200 ESEM, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) and digital image recording. Hydrogels were previously freeze-dried and attached to a band made of carbon and covered with gold, and then microscopically examined. Specimens were observed at pressures of 100–133 Pa, under accelerating voltage of 25 or 30 kV. Analyses of images of the gel structure were done using MultiScan v.18.03 software (Computer Scanning System).

2.2.4. Yield Stress

Yield stress (Pa) of hydrogels through steady state viscometry was measured using a rheometer (DV3T, Brookfield, Middleboro, MA, USA) at 20 °C, equipped with a vane four knife spindles V74 with a torque range HA. The constant share rate was 0.1 s1. The reported values represent the averages of six replicates. The values of yield stress were analyzed using the equipment software.

2.2.5. Textural Properties

Selected texture parameters (firmness, adhesivness and spreadability) of hydrogels were measured using TA.XT Plus (Stable Microsystems, Surrey, UK) with a 5 kg load cell at 20 °C. The firmness (N) and adhesiveness (Ns) were measured with a cylindrical of 0.5-cm diameter (P/0.5R) probe penetrating the gel for 8 cm distance, the measurement speed was 1.0 mm/s, and trigger force was 0.01 N. The spreadability was measurement with a TTC Spreadability Rig. The test speed and distance were set to 3.0 mm/s and 20 mm, respectively. Force [N] was measured for the duration of the test, and spreadability [N*s] was equated to the area under the curve. The reported values in all textural parameters represent the averages of six replicates. The data were analyzed using the Exponent version 6.1.16.0 equipment software.

2.2.6. Color Parameters

The L*, a*, and b* color components of inulin hydrogels were analyzed at the surface of inulin gels, with a Minolta CR-200 colorimeter (Minolta, Japan; light source D65, a measuring head hole of 8 mm). In order to determine the color differences between inulin hydrogels prepared with different pressures and time treatment the total color difference ΔE was calculated according to formula [27]:
Δ E = ( L H H P 1 * L H H P 2 * ) 2 + ( a H H P 1 * a H H P 2 * ) 2 + ( b H H P 1 * b H H P 2 * ) 2
where: L H H P 1 * ,   a H H P 1 * , b H H P 1 * and L H H P 2 * ,   a H H P 2 * , b H H P 2 * refers to the color parameters of compared hydrogels.
Depending on the ΔE values the color difference between the samples can be estimated as not noticeable for the observer (0 < ∆E < 1), only experienced observer can notice the difference (1 < ∆E < 2), unexperienced observer also notices the difference (2 < ∆E < 3.5), clear difference in color is noticed (3.5 < ∆E < 5) and observer notices two different colors (5 < ∆E) [27].

2.2.7. Statistical Analysis

The obtained results were analyzed statistically using Statistica13.3 (TIBICO Software Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). To determine the significance of differences between the average values of yield stress, firmness, adhesiveness, spreadability, color parameters of inulin hydrogels one-way Anova analysis of variance was used. Significant differences between different HHP treatments: pressure level, time treatment for particular inulin concentration, and differences between inulin concentrations for the same HHP treatment were verified using Tukey’s test at significant level α = 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Influence of HHP Level and Time Treatment on Formation and Stability of Inulin Hydrogels

Inulin suspensions with concentrations in the range 15–25 g/100 g were used to investigate gel formation under high pressure levels (150, 300 MPa) at different times treatment (5, 10, 20 min). On the basis of the conducted research, it was found that the use of even the lowest from the tested pressures (150 MPa) and lasting for a shorter time (5 min) allowed us to induce the gelation process and, as a result, to create a gel structure (VGI = 100 %, Table 1). This effect was found in all tested inulin concentrations, even the smallest, i.e., 15 g/100 g. According to the available literature data, this concentration was insufficient for other induction methods (thermally or with the use of shear forces) where the lowest concentration forming a gel structure (VGI = 100%) was 20 g/100 g [28,29,30]. This may indicate the potential possibility of using high pressures to create inulin gel structures in food products even in lower inulin concentration.
It is known from previously published results [24] that with a pressure of 500 MPa it is possible to induce a hydrogel structure, however, the present studies show that this structure can be obtained also at much lower pressures. Lower levels of pressure (e.g., 300 MPa) are being indicated in publications considering using HHP as potential shelf life prolonger in typical food application [31,32,33]. What is more, different properties of food product might be obtained using pressure in range between 100–300 MPa. For example, such an effect was found in the case of viscosity of mango pulp, which increased after HHP treatments at 100 or 200 MPa (20 °C/15 or 30 min), and was reduced after HHP treatments at 300 and 400 MPa (20 °C/15 or 30 min) [34].
The research showed that although at each tested concentration of inulin and all applied pressurization parameters, hydrogels were formed, they were characterized by different stability. The effect of pressurization parameters on hydrogels stability was examined with the multi-sample analytical centrifuge based on the STEP technology (space-time resolved extinction profiles). The transmission profiles of hydrogels showed high start transmissions over 80%. The evaluation of transmission profiles indicated particle movement toward the sedimentation process. Gels induced at lower pressures (150 MPa) were less stable than those induced at higher (300 MPa) pressures (Figure 1 and Figure 2 show space-time resolved extinction profiles).
A faster destabilization process was observed in hydrogels induced by lower pressure level and in shorter time treatment, as shown by decrease of the transmission profiles. The Instability Index values for hydrogels induced with pressure of 150 MPa were 0.6 and higher (Figure 3) whereas those induced with pressure of 300 MPa were below 0.6 (Figure 4). Additionally, it was observed that time of pressure treatment also had an impact on the stability of hydrogels. Extending the time (from 5 to 20 min) of holding the solutions at a conducted pressure resulted in the production of more stable hydrogels. Such trends were observed regardless of the inulin concentration, although it was found that gels obtained from solutions with higher inulin concentrations were more stable. The observed trends in the influence of pressure parameters were in accordance with the observations made for other polysaccharides—starch [35] and pectin [36].

3.2. The Influence of HHP Level and Time Treatment on Microstructure of Inulin Hydrogels

The inulin hydrogels structure was investigated basing on the images made with the scanning electron microscopy (Figure 5 and Figure 6). As it was improved in previous researches, pressure treatment changes morphologically hydrogels structure, by disorganization its original granular structure. After HHP with 500 MPa treatment the microstructure of gels is compressed, aggregated and with larger areas of disordered structures [24]. A similar effect was found during analyzing scanning electron microscopy images of hydrogels induced by 300 MPa pressure level, whereas gels induced by 150 MPa were packed loosely with no visible melting on the surface of granules, and less compressed structure, as well as visibly less smooth. It was also found that for higher inulin concentration (20–25 g/100 g) the time of HHP treatment also had influence on the hydrogel structure. The structure of hydrogels obtained with longer (20 min) HHP treatment time was almost flat as the granulated structure was almost invisible.

3.3. The Influence of HHP Level and Time Treatment on Yield Stress and Textural Properties of Inulin Hydrogels

In order to determine the pressurization parameters on the structure of hydrogels, yield stress was determined. Yield stress is an initial resistance to flow under stress. Below the yield stress the sample will deform elastically, above the yield stress the sample will flow. It was found that the pressure had influence on gels resistance to stress (Table 1). Shear stress curve measurements at constant shear rate for two extreme measurement results: 150 MPa/10 min-20 g/100 g inulin concentration and 300 MPa/20 min-25 g/100 g concentration are presented in Figure 7. Generally, using lower pressure (150 MPa) made the gels more delicate (some of them were even semi-solid), characterized by much lower yield stress values than gels obtained at 300 MPa. These trends were found at each tested concentration of inulin, but at a lower analyzed concentration of inulin (15 g/100 g), higher pressure values changed their characteristic from liquid to solid regime. Similar changes were found also in the literature for glucomannan gels [19] or starch [20]. It was also found that at 300 MPa extending the pressurization time from 5 to 20 min caused gels to have greater resistance to the flow. Other authors also noticed the increase of consistency of tested polysaccharide products, after HHP treatment, what is more the increase depended on the pressure level as well as on time treatment [37,38]. This was probably due to the fact that higher pressure caused that the gel structure was more compressed and showed intact or partly disintegrated granular appearance. The changes are also confirmed by the microstructure analysis, and are in accordance to other authors’ researches in which polysaccharides such as starch [39] and cellulose [40] were suspended to HHP treatment.
The yield stress is also related to spreadability, as when the yield stress is achieved the gel displays irrecoverable deformation. Spreadability is described as a subjective, textural term and very often is defined as a stress required to create a uniform distribution over a surface [41]. It was found that, as in the case of yield stress, the pressure parameters affected the spreadability. Regardless of inulin concentration, the obtained gels were less spreadable (higher values of spreadability) after the inulin sols were subjected to higher values of pressure (Table 1). Moreover, it was found that at a concentration of 25 g/100 g of inulin, the pressurization time had a clear effect on the spreadability, the longer the pressurization time, the less spreadable the obtained gels were. At a lower concentration of inulin (20 g/100 g), this effect was observed only at a pressure of 300 MPa, while at a concentration of 15 g/100 g, significant changes caused only the extension of the pressure time (at a pressure of 300 MPa) from 5 to 20 min. This phenomenon might be due to the structural arrangement and intramolecular interactions of inulin as it is in case of other polysaccharides e.g., Alyssum homolocarpum seed gum [42].
When analyzing the influence of pressure parameters on firmness, it was found that exposure of sols to a higher pressure of 300 MPa as compared to 150 MPa resulted in the formation of gels with a stronger structure and higher firmness parameters (Table 1). This effect was observed regardless of the inulin concentration. At the same time, at the pressure of 300 MPa and higher inulin concentrations of 20 and 25 g/100 g, a tendency was found to strengthen the structure of the obtained gels along with the extension of the pressure time. Similar trends as in the case of the firmness regarding the pressure effect and its operating time were found for adhesiveness. Adhesiveness is a feature that is defined as the work essential to remove the probe from the gel sample, and in the food products it is very important to characterize its adherence to a spoon or tongue [43]. Regardless of the inulin concentration, exposure of the sols to higher pressure resulted in the formation of gels with higher adhesiveness. At the same time, for gels produced at a pressure of 300 MPa and a higher inulin concentration (>20 g/100 g), it was found that the extension of the pressurization time resulted in the formation of gels with higher adhesiveness. Based on literature data on the physical principles of HHP [44] it can be hypothesized that in high-pressure-induced inulin gels [24], as in other polysaccharides such as starch [45,46], the physical non-covalent interactions increased and became stronger with longer processing times.

3.4. The Influence of HHP Level and Time Treatment on Colour Parameters of Inulin Hydrogels

Some authors have reported that final color of polysaccharide gels’ samples is highly dependent on the operation pressure [19,47]. However analyzing the influence of pressure parameters on the color of the induced inulin gels, it was found that the pressure level (150–300 MPa) had no significant effect on the lightness of the color of the gels (L* color parameter values) (Table 2). Most of the gels obtained as a result of the higher pressure treatment were characterized by slightly lower average values of the color parameters a* and b*, although these differences were not always statistically significant. In order to comprehensively determine the influence of the pressure parameters on the gels’ color, the total color difference parameter (ΔE) was also determined. It was found that in most cases the ΔE values determined between the gels obtained after the 150 and 300 MPa pressure treatment were in the range of 1.0–2.0 (Table 3), which means that the only experienced observer could notice the differences in colors between such gels. There was also found a slight tendency to weaken the influence of the applied pressure on the color of the gels with increasing inulin concentration.
Regarding the effect of the pressure time (5–20 min) on the color of the gels, no clear influence of this pressure treatment parameter on the any of the determined parameters of the color of gels was found (Table 2). Analyzing the total color difference parameter, it was found that the pressure duration had a greater effect on the color of the gels formed after the treatment with lower than with higher pressure. This is indicated by higher values of the ΔE parameter of gels obtained after submitting the sols to a pressure of 150 MPa than 300 MPa (Table 3).
At the same time, a slight tendency was observed to weakening the effect of the pressure time on the color of gels with increasing inulin concentration in the sol. According to literature data, even when higher pressure levels are applied for inulin gels’ induction there is observed no influence of the pressurization on L* color parameter [24]. However according to other studies some polysaccharides gels such as starch [48], glucomannan [19] or Jerusalem artichoke extracts [49] might darker after HHP treatment.

4. Conclusions

High-pressure treatment, even with relatively low parameters as for this technique (i.e., 150 MPa/5 min of time treatment), induces gelation of inulin and allows obtaining gel structures even at a lower concentration of inulin than required for other induction methods used in food industry. This gives the potential for wider use of HHP to also create inulin gel structures in products with a lower inulin content (i.e., 15 g/100 g) and where the use of higher pressures and longer time treatment is inadvisable. At the same time, by selecting the pressure parameters, it is possible to modify the characteristics of the created hydrogels and obtain gels with the required characteristics in a specific food product. The use of higher pressure (i.e., 300 MPa) allows us to increase the stability of the created gels and change their structure to more compressed, which results in higher yield stress, lower spreadability, harder and more adhesive gels. Extending the time treatment of HHP increases this effect, but mainly when higher pressure and a higher concentration of inulin are being used.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.; methodology, A.F.; formal analysis, A.F. and T.F.; investigation, A.F., B.S., L.A., I.S.; data curation, A.F. and T.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F. and T.F.; writing—review and editing, A.F. and T.F.; supervision, A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science Center (NCN Krakow, Poland), grant number DEC-2017/01/X/NZ(/01589.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ahmed, E.M. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 6, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Mahinroosta, M.; Farsangi, Z.J.; Allahverdi, A.; Shakoori, Z. Hydrogels as intelligent materials: A brief of synthesis, properties and applications. Mater. Today Chem. 2018, 8, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hennink, W.E.; Nostrum, C.F. Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002, 54, 13–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Barbucci, R.; Leone, G.; Vecchiullo, A. Novel carboxymethyl cellulose based microporous hydrogels suitable for drug delivery. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2004, 15, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Said, H.M.; Alla, S.G.A.; El-Naggar, A.W.M. Synthesis and characterization of novel gels based on carboxymethyl cellulose/acrylic acid prepared by electron beam irradiation. React. Funct. Polym. 2004, 61, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fei, B.; Wach, R.A.; Mitomo, H.; Yoshii, F.; Kume, T. Hydrogel of biodegradable cellulose derivatives. I. Radiation induced crosslinking of CMC. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000, 78, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Funami, T.; Hiroe, M.; Noda, S.; Asai, I.; Ikeda, S.; Nishimari, K.; Ikeda, S.; Nishimari, K. Influence of molecular structure imaged with atomic force microscopy on the rheological behavior of carrageenan aqueous systems in the presence or absence of cations. Food Hydrocoll. 2007, 21, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, Q.S.; Ji, Q.X.; Xing, K.; Li, X.Y.; Liu, C.S.; Chen, X.G. Preparation and characteristics of novel porous hydrogel films based on chitosan and glycerophosphate. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 76, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Magnin, D.; Lefebvre, J.; Chornet, E.; Dumitriu, S. Physicochemical and structural characterization of a polyionic matrix of interest in biotechnology, in the pharmaceutical and biomedical fields. Carbohydr. Polym. 2004, 55, 437–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ibrahim, S.M.; El Salmawi, K.M. Preparation and Properties of Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC)/Sodium alginate (SA) Blends Induced by Gamma Irradiation. J. Polym. Environ. 2013, 21, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Williams, P.A.; Phillips, G.O. Physicochemical characterisation of gum Arabic arabinogalactan protein complex. Foods Food Ingred. J. Jpn. 2006, 211, 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  12. Giannouli, P.; Morris, E.R. Cryogelation of xanthan. Food Hydrocoll. 2003, 17, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Balny, C. High pressure and protein oligomeric dissociation. High Press. Res. 2002, 22, 737–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rahman, S.M. Food preservation methods. In Handbook of Food Preservation; Rahman, S.M., Ed.; CRC Press: London, UK; Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 8–10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kazutaka, Y. Food processing by high hydrostatic pressure. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Considine, K.M.; Kelly, A.L.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Hill, C.; Sleator, R.D. High-pressure processing effects on microbial food safety and food quality. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 281, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bauer, B.A.; Knorr, D. The impact of pressure, temperature and treatment time on starches: Pressure-induced starch gelatinisation as pressure time temperature indicator for high hydrostatic pressure processing. J. Food Eng. 2005, 68, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Colussi, R.; Kaur, L.; Zavareze, E.R.; Dias, A.R.G.; Stewart, R.B.; Singh, J. High pressure processing and retrogradation of potato starch: Influence on functional properties and gastro-small intestinal digestion in vitro. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 75, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moreno, H.M.; Herranz, B.; Borderías, A.J.; Tovar, C.A. Effect of high pressure treatment on the structural, mechanical and rheological properties of glucomannan gels. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 60, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Steyer, B.; Bera, F.; Massaux, M.; Sindic, M.; Blecker, C.; Deroanne, C. Carrageenan Gelification Under High Hydrostatic Pressure: Preparation and Processing of Solutions. In Advances in High Pressure Bioscience and Biotechnology; Ludwig, H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ismail, H.; Irani, M.; Ahmad, Z. Starch-based hydrogels: Present status and applications. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2013, 62, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Afinjuomo, F.; Barclay, T.G.; Song, Y.; Parikh, A.; Petrovsky, N. Synthesis and characterization of a novel inulin hydrogel crosslinked with pyromellitic dianhydride. React. Funct. Polym. 2019, 134, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Florowska, A.; Krygier, K.; Florowski, T.; Dłuzewska, E. Prebiotics as functional food ingredients preventing diet-related diseases. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 2147–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Florowska, A.; Florowski, T.; Sokołowska, B.; Janowicz, M.; Adamczak, L.; Pietrzak, D. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on formation and rheological properties of inulin gels. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 121, 108995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, Y.; Faqih, M.N.; Wang, S.S. Factors affecting gel formation of inulin. Carbohydrate Polym. 2001, 46, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lerche, D.; Sobisch, T. Direct and accelerated characterization of formulation stability. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2011, 32, 1799–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mokrzycki, W.; Tatol, M. Colour difference ∆E—A survey. Mach. Graph. Vis. 2011, 20, 383–411. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gehrich, K.; Wouters, R.; Zielbauer, B.; Beccard, S.; Mezger, M.; Bernard, J.; Vilgis, T.A. Alteration of the structural properties of inulin gels. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 89, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Glibowski, P.; Pikus, S.; Jurek, J.; Kotowoda, M. Factors affecting inulin crystallization after its complete dissolution. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 110, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Glibowski, P. Effect of thermal and mechanical factors on rheological properties of high performance inulin gels and spreads. J. Food Eng. 2010, 99, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Heinz, V.; Buckow, R. Food preservation by high pressure. J. Verbrauch. Lebensm. 2009, 5, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, H.W.; Lung, H.M.; Binghuei, B.Y.; Wang, C.Y. Responses of microorganisms to high hydrostatic pressure processing. Food Control 2014, 40, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, H.-W.; Hsu, C.P.; Wang, C.Y. Healthy expectations of high hydrostatic pressure treatment in food processing industry. J. Food Drug Anal. 2019, 28, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ahmed, J.; Ramaswamy, H.S.; Hiremath, N. The effect of high pressure treatment on rheological characteristics and colour of mango pulp. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 40, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, G.; Zhu, F. Effect of high pressure on rheological and thermal properties of quinoa and maize starches. Food Chem. 2018, 241, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jolie, R.P.; Christiaens, S.; De Roeck, A.; Fraeye, I.; Houben, K.; Van Buggenhout, S.; Van Loey, A.M.; Hendrickx, M.E. Pectin conversions under high pressure: Implications for the quality characteristics of plant-based foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 24, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Opazo-Navarrete, M.; Tabilo-Munizaga, G.; Vega-Gálvez, A.; Miranda, M.; Pérez-Won, M. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP ) on the rheological properties of Aloe vera suspensions (Aloe barbadensis Miller ). Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2012, 16, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lopez-Sánchez, P.; Svelander, C.; Bialek, L.; Schumm, S.; Langton, M. Rheology and microstructure of carrot and tomato emulsions as a result of high-pressure homogenization conditions. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, W.; Bai, Y.; Mousaa, S.A.S.; Zhang, Q.; Shen, Q. Effect of High Hydrostatic Pressure on Physicochemical and Structural Properties of Rice Starch. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 2233–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gonçalves, S.M.; Chavez, D.W.H.; Oliveira LM de Sarantopoulos CIG de, L.; de Carvalho, C.W.P.; de Melo, N.R.; Rosenthal, A. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure processing on structure and functional properties of biodegradable film. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Daubert, C.R.; Tkachunk, J.A.; Truong, V.D. Quantitative measurement of food spreadability using the vane method. J. Texture Stud. 1998, 29, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ghaderi, S.; Hesarinejad, A.M.; Shekarforoush, E.; Mirzababaee, M.S.; Karimpour, F. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on the rheological properties and foams / emulsions stability of Alyssum homolocarpum seed gum. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 6, 5571–5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bourne, M. Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2002; pp. 427–456. ISBN 0-12-119062-5. [Google Scholar]
  44. Larrea-Wachtendorff, D.; Sousa, I.; Ferrari, G. Starch-Based Hydrogels Produced by High-Pressure Processing (HPP): Effect of the Starch Source and Processing Time. Food Eng. Rev. 2021, 13, 622–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Knorr, D.; Heinz, V.; Buckow, R. High pressure application for food biopolymers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 2006, 1764, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pei-Ling, L.; Xiao-Song, H.; Qun, S. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on starches: A review. Starch-Stärke 2010, 62, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vega-Gálvez, A.; Giovagnoli, C.; Pérez-Won, M.; Reyes, J.E.; Vergara, J.; Miranda, M.; Di Scala, K. Application of high hydrostatic pressure to aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) gel: Microbial inactivation and evaluation of quality parameters. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2012, 13, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tabilo-Munizaga, G.; Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V. Color and textural parameters of pressurized and heat-treated surimi gels as affected by potato starch and egg white. Food Res. Int. 2004, 37, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, D.; Fan, J.P.; Chung, H.C.; Han, G.D. Changes in Extractability and Antioxidant Activity of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) Tubers by Various High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatments. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 19, 1365–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Influence of time treatment at pressure 150 MPa on inulin gel transmission profiles presented enabling LUMiSizer® analysis.
Figure 1. Influence of time treatment at pressure 150 MPa on inulin gel transmission profiles presented enabling LUMiSizer® analysis.
Foods 10 02514 g001
Figure 2. Influence of time treatment at pressure 300 MPa on inulin gel transmission profiles presented enabling LUMiSizer® analysis.
Figure 2. Influence of time treatment at pressure 300 MPa on inulin gel transmission profiles presented enabling LUMiSizer® analysis.
Foods 10 02514 g002
Figure 3. Influence of time treatment at pressure 150 MPa on inulin gel instability index.
Figure 3. Influence of time treatment at pressure 150 MPa on inulin gel instability index.
Foods 10 02514 g003
Figure 4. Influence of time treatment at pressure 300 MPa on inulin gel instability index.
Figure 4. Influence of time treatment at pressure 300 MPa on inulin gel instability index.
Foods 10 02514 g004
Figure 5. Influence of HHP time treatment under 150 MPa on inulin gel structure.
Figure 5. Influence of HHP time treatment under 150 MPa on inulin gel structure.
Foods 10 02514 g005
Figure 6. Influence of HHP time treatment under 300 MPa on inulin gel structure.
Figure 6. Influence of HHP time treatment under 300 MPa on inulin gel structure.
Foods 10 02514 g006
Figure 7. Sample shear stress curve measurements at constant share rate for two extreme measurement results: 150 MPa/10 min-20 g/100 g inulin concentration and 300 MPa/20 min-25 g/100 g concentration.
Figure 7. Sample shear stress curve measurements at constant share rate for two extreme measurement results: 150 MPa/10 min-20 g/100 g inulin concentration and 300 MPa/20 min-25 g/100 g concentration.
Foods 10 02514 g007
Table 1. Physical properties of inulin gels obtained by different parameters of HHP induction.
Table 1. Physical properties of inulin gels obtained by different parameters of HHP induction.
Inulin ConcentrationHHP ParametersVGI
[%]
Yield Stress
[Pa]
Spreadability
[N*s]
Firmness
[N]
Adhesiveness
[N*s]
15 g/100 g150 MPa/5 min100 aA0 aA ± 00.1 aA ± 0.00.0 aA ± 0.00.0 bC ± 0.0
150 MPa/10 min100 aA0 aA ± 00.1 aA ± 0.00.1 aA ± 0.00.0 bC ± 0.0
150 MPa/20 min100 aA0 aA ± 00.2 aA ± 0.00.1 aA ± 0.00.0 bC ± 0.0
300 MPa/5 min100 aA367 bA ± 242.4 bA ± 0.00.8 bA ± 0.1−0.3 aC ± 0.1
300 MPa/10 min100 aA434 cA ± 122.4 bA ± 0.10.9 bA ± 0.3−0.3 aC ± 0.1
300 MPa/20 min100 aA598 dA ± 102.7 cA ± 0.11.0 bA ± 0.1−0.3 aC ± 0.0
20 g/100 g150 MPa/5 min100 aA0 aA ± 00.6 aB ± 0.00.1 aA ± 0.0−0.1 cB ± 0.0
150 MPa/10 min100 aA38 bB ± 10.6 aB ± 0.00.1 aAB ± 0.0−0.1 cB ± 0.0
150 MPa/20 min100 aA28 bB ± 10.6 aB ± 0.00.1 aA ± 0.0−0.1 cB ± 0.0
300 MPa/5 min100 aA759 dB ± 44.2 bB ± 0.11.2 bB ± 0.0−0.6 bB ± 0.0
300 MPa/10 min100 aA712 cB ± 74.6 cB ± 0.01.5 cB ± 0.0−0.6 aB ± 0.0
300 MPa/20 min100 aA875 eB ± 54.8 dB ± 0.01.5 cA ± 0.0−0.7 aB ± 0.0
25 g/100 g150 MPa/5 min100 aA41 aB ± 41.2 aC ± 0.10.3 aB ± 0.1−0.1 dA ± 0.0
150 MPa/10 min100 aA68 aC ± 31.5 bC ± 0.10.2 aB ± 0.1−0.1 dA ± 0.0
150 MPa/20 min100 aA65 aC ± 21.6 cC ± 0.00.2 aB ± 0.0−0.1 dA ± 0.0
300 MPa/5 min100 aA775 bB ± 76.3 dC ± 0.11.9 bC ± 0.1−0.9 cA ± 0.0
300 MPa/10 min100 aA932 cC ± 48.0 eC ± 0.02.1 bC ± 0.1−1.0 bA ± 0.0
300 MPa/20 min100 aA1274 dC ± 508.4 fC ± 0.03.0 cB ± 0.6−1.3 aA ± 0.0
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Values followed by the same lower or uppercase letters do not differ significantly according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Lowercase letters (a–f) indicate the effect of pressure parameters at a given concentration of inulin; uppercase letters (A–C) indicate the effect of inulin concentration at given pressure parameters.
Table 2. Color parameters of inulin gels obtained by different parameters of HHP induction.
Table 2. Color parameters of inulin gels obtained by different parameters of HHP induction.
Inulin ConcentrationHHP ParametersL*a*b*
15 g/100 g150 MPa/5 min85.8 bA ± 1.5−1.5 bA ± 0.20.9 cdA ± 0.0
150 MPa/10 min84.0 abA ± 0.1−1.6 bA ± 0.11.1 dA ± 0.0
150 MPa/20 min83.3 aA ± 1.0−1.7 abA ± 0.10.7 cA ± 0.1
300 MPa/5 min85.3 abA ± 1.1−1.8 abA ± 0.10.4 bA ± 0.0
300 MPa/10 min85.8 bA ± 0.2−1.9 aA ± 0.00.0 aA ± 0.0
300 MPa/20 min85.1 abA ± 0.4−1.8 abA ± 0.10.0 aA ± 0.2
20 g/100 g150 MPa/5 min87.5 abA ± 1.5−1.4 dA ± 0.00.9 bA ± 0.0
150 MPa/10 min87.1 abB ± 0.2−1.5 bcA ± 0.01.6 dB ± 0.1
150 MPa/20 min85.5 aA ± 1.5−1.6 bB ± 0.01.2 cB ± 0.1
300 MPa/5 min86.3 abAB ± 0.1−1.7 aAB ± 0.00.3 aA ± 0.0
300 MPa/10 min88.13 bC ± 0.1−1.4 cdC ± 0.00.9 bB ± 0.0
300 MPa/20 min86.3 abB ± 0.1−1.7 aB ± 0.00.3 aB ± 0.0
25 g/100 g150 MPa/5 min87.8 aA ± 0.3−1.4 cdA ± 0.02.7 bcB ± 0.1
150 MPa/10 min87.8 aB ± 1.5−1.3 eB ± 0.03.1 dC ± 0.2
150 MPa/20 min88.4 aB ± 0.6−1.4 cA ± 0.02.7 cC ± 0.1
300 MPa/5 min87.0 aB ± 0.0−1.6 bB ± 0.02.3 abB ± 0.1
300 MPa/10 min86.8 aB ± 0.1−1.8 aB ± 0.02.1 aC ± 0.1
300 MPa/20 min87.2 aC ± 0.1−1.3 deC ± 0.02.3 aC ± 0.0
Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). Values followed by the same lower or uppercase letters do not differ significantly according to Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Lowercase letters (a,b) indicate the effect of pressure parameters at a given concentration of inulin; uppercase letters (A,B) indicate the effect of inulin concentration at given pressure parameters.
Table 3. The color differences parameter (ΔE) between inulin hydrogels prepared with different HHP parameters.
Table 3. The color differences parameter (ΔE) between inulin hydrogels prepared with different HHP parameters.
Inulin Concentration and HHP ParametersInulin 25 g/100 gInulin 20 g/100 gInulin 15 g/100 g
300 MPa150 MPa300 MPa150 MPa300 MPa150 MPa
20 min10 min5 min20 min10 min5 min20 min10 min5 min20 min10 min5 min20 min10 min5 min20 min10 min5 min
inulin
15 g/100 g
150 MPa5 min2.111.812.083.193.412.751.362.291.320.961.541.642.001.681.732.611.91-
10 min3.492.963.274.754.374.182.504.182.451.603.173.561.712.181.691.00-
20 min4.323.774.115.585.155.023.074.883.032.313.954.252.052.612.09-
300 MPa5 min2.802.322.693.983.733.521.042.890.971.412.252.400.961.07-
10 min2.832.352.703.903.973.450.712.590.671.902.142.210.65-
20 min3.222.693.064.374.263.881.263.161.231.952.592.76-
inulin
20 g/100 g
150 MPa5 min1.801.861.922.163.192.131.641.311.632.071.37-
10 min0.780.680.801.792.111.331.511.251.531.81-
20 min2.201.822.123.353.022.901.612.621.55-
300 MPa5 min2.241.822.163.283.362.860.101.97-
10 min1.681.851.851.952.571.811.93-
20 min2.221.822.153.263.342.84-
Inulin
25 g/100 g
150 MPa5 min0.741.300.940.591.40-
10 min1.571.861.651.54-
20 min1.281.841.50-
300 MPa5 min0.390.41-
10 min0.71-
20 min-
Values are mean (n = 3).
0 < ΔE < 11 < ΔE < 22< ΔE < 3.53.5 < ΔE < 55 < ΔE
observer does not notice the differenceonly experienced observer can notice the differenceunexperienced observer also notices the differenceclear difference in color is noticedobserver notices two different colors
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Florowska, A.; Florowski, T.; Sokołowska, B.; Adamczak, L.; Szymańska, I. Effects of Pressure Level and Time Treatment of High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP) on Inulin Gelation and Properties of Obtained Hydrogels. Foods 2021, 10, 2514. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112514

AMA Style

Florowska A, Florowski T, Sokołowska B, Adamczak L, Szymańska I. Effects of Pressure Level and Time Treatment of High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP) on Inulin Gelation and Properties of Obtained Hydrogels. Foods. 2021; 10(11):2514. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112514

Chicago/Turabian Style

Florowska, Anna, Tomasz Florowski, Barbara Sokołowska, Lech Adamczak, and Iwona Szymańska. 2021. "Effects of Pressure Level and Time Treatment of High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP) on Inulin Gelation and Properties of Obtained Hydrogels" Foods 10, no. 11: 2514. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112514

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop