Next Article in Journal
Valorisation of Prunus avium L. By-Products: Phenolic Composition and Effect on Caco-2 Cells Viability
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Adding Resistant Maltodextrin to Pasteurized Orange Juice on Bioactive Compounds and Their Bioaccessibility
Previous Article in Journal
Phenolic Compounds Profile and Antioxidant Capacity of Pitahaya Fruit Peel from Two Red-Skinned Species (Hylocereus polyrhizus and Hylocereus undatus)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization and Discrimination of Commercial Portuguese Beers Based on Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Capacity
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Modelling the Effects of Roselle Extract, Potato Peel Flour, and Beef Fat on the Sensory Properties and Heterocyclic Amines Formation of Beef Patties Studied by Using Response Surface Methodology

Foods 2021, 10(6), 1184; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061184
by Anna Judith Pérez-Báez 1, Martin Valenzuela-Melendres 1,*, Juan Pedro Camou 1, Gustavo González-Aguilar 1, Orlando Tortoledo-Ortiz 1, Humberto González-Ríos 1 and Manuel Viuda-Martos 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Foods 2021, 10(6), 1184; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061184
Submission received: 27 April 2021 / Revised: 19 May 2021 / Accepted: 20 May 2021 / Published: 25 May 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The effect of roselle extract and potato peel flour on HCA content of beef has been already reported by the authors in a paper with (almost) identical title (Proceedings 70, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods_2020-07656; also a MDPI publication). This must be mentioned in the paper. Data provided on HCA content are identical in both papers, and results of a sensory analysis have been added. Thus, the Title should be modified by adding “… on sensory properties."

Introduction: I suggest to include more recent scientific assessments on the effect of red meat consumption on cancer (e.g. by IARC)

Materials and Methods: I understand that the extract was prepared from Rosella leaves.

Sensory: Are the values given in Table means from the scores of 18 panellists? Was there any interaction between panellists (which may cause bias)? What was the range and SD?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The work is interesting and original. However, there is no hypothesis in the work. It would be worthwhile to enter the pH value of the meat in the "Raw materials" chapter, as it could have influenced the results. It would be worthwhile to estimate the relationship between sensory quality and HCA content. The effect of beef fat supplementation on HCA formation is poorly discussed. This effect is also the weakening of the effect of temperature on the formation of HCA by fat, as the fat absorbs heat.

Author Response

Please see th attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Line 4: I suggest keeping the last words of the Title as in the previous version (…”studied by using Response Surface Methodology). “Beef Patties using Response Surface Methodology” sounds a bit odd.  

Line 14: I understand that only the HCA data have been presented, if so, the word “partially” should be added here

Line 41: perhaps better “intake of meat and processed meat”

Lines 110ff: I would prefer giving a very brief account on the preparation methods, e.g. “was prepared by hot-water extraction of roselle petals and subsequent freeze-drying to 8% moisture, as specified by Perez-Baez et al [30]. … Potato peels were dried to 5% moisture and ground [30].

Line 402: Reference to the publication by Szterk and Jesionkowska is missing from the reference list

Line 464: Fund, W.C.R. should be “World cancer research fund”

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop