Next Article in Journal
Variation of Adolescent Snack Food Choices and Preferences along a Continuum of Processing Levels: The Case of Apples
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomic Screening of Anti-Inflammatory Compounds from the Leaves of Actinidia arguta (Hardy Kiwi)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preventive Effect of Blueberry Extract on Liver Injury Induced by Carbon Tetrachloride in Mice

1
Chongqing Collaborative Innovation Center for Functional Food, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing 400067, China
2
Chongqing Engineering Research Center of Functional Food, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing 400067, China
3
Chongqing Engineering Laboratory for Research and Development of Functional Food, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing 400067, China
4
College of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing 400067, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2019, 8(2), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8020048
Submission received: 3 January 2019 / Revised: 25 January 2019 / Accepted: 29 January 2019 / Published: 1 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Food Nutrition)

Abstract

:
The blueberry is a common fruit that is rich in nutritional value and polyphenol substances. In this study, the blueberry polyphenol content in extract was analysed by spectrophotometry. The results showed that the blueberry polyphenol content in the extract reached 52.7%. A mouse model of liver injury induced by carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) was established to study the preventive effect of blueberry extract (BE) on liver injury in mice and the experimental animals were examined using biochemical and molecular biological methods. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are important clinical liver function indicators; the changes of triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) are observed after liver injury; interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) are important inflammatory indexes; superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) are important changes of oxidative stress indexes. The in vivo animal experiment results showed that BE decreased the liver index of mice with liver injury, BE could reduce the AST, ALT, TG and TC levels and also could reduce the serum cytokine IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ levels in mice with liver injury. Moreover, BE increased the SOD activity and decreased the TBARS level in the gastric tissues of mice with liver injury. After treatment with the highest concentration of BP in liver injury mice, these levels returned close to those obtained after treatment with the standard drug of silymarin. Detection of messenger RNA (mRNA) in liver tissue showed that BE upregulated the Cu/Zn-SOD, Mn-SOD and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) expression levels and downregulated cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression. The effect of BE on mice with liver injury was positively correlated with the BE concentration and was similar to that of silymarin, which is a drug for liver injury, suggesting that BE had a good preventive effect on liver injury. Thus, BE rich in polyphenols is a bioactive substance with value for development and utilization.

1. Introduction

Blueberry belongs to family Ericaceae and genus Vaccinium L. It is a perennial deciduous or evergreen shrub. The fruit is dark blue with white frost and is nearly round, has a delicate pulp, tastes sweet and sour and is rich in nutrients. The range of blueberry processing and applications is not extensive [1]. Blueberries are rich in nutrients as well as conventional sugars, acids and vitamin C (VC) and contain plenty of vitamin E (VE), vitamin A (VA), vitamin B (VB), superoxide dismutase (SOD), arbutin, proteins, anthocyanin, dietary fibre and many mineral elements, such as K, Fe, Zn, Ca, etc [2]. The polyphenol content in the blueberry is the highest among fruits and vegetables and mainly includes anthocyanins, procyanidins, flavonoids, tannins and phenolic acids. There is clear evidence that blueberries contain catechins, lycopene, pycnogenol and resveratrol, although the presence of some phenolic flavonoids is not fully proven [3]. Some studies have noted that the main component of polyphenols in blueberry leaves is oligoanthocyanidin, although chlorogenic acid, quercetin glycoside, flavonoid glycoside, flavanol, catechin and other polyphenols are also present [4]. Blueberries have antimutagenic, anti-tumour, antiviral and antioxidative effects, which are mainly mediated by the high polyphenol content [5]. Studies have shown that the scavenging ability of blueberry polyphenol extract for hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical and oxygen free radical increases with the increase in the blueberry polyphenol concentration and that the reducing capacity and scavenging ability for superoxide anion reach the level of VC [6]. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory mechanism of blueberry polyphenol can interrupt oxidative stress via the antioxidant stress pathway, which is accomplished mainly through promoting arachidonic acid metabolism, phagocytic cell accumulation at the inflammatory loci under action of proinflammatory factors and release of a large number of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Free radicals can cause lipid peroxidation and promote lysosome release, thereby reducing the release of various inflammatory mediators [7].
Free radicals are intermediate products of energy transfer, free radicals participate in various physiological and biochemical reactions in the human body and the dynamic balance of the free radical content has great significance for maintaining the stability and health of the human internal environment. Now methods such as antioxidant/oxidant balance (AOB) are used to assess the oxidative balance, which is directly related to the health of the body [8]. When stimulated by external environmental factors or increasing age, the accumulation rate of free radicals in cells is greater than the clearance rate, resulting in oxidative stress; this stress is manifested as tumourigenesis of cells, tissues and organs, loss of function, chromosomal mutations and even death [9]. Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) can cause liver injury and the main mechanism is related to CCl4 itself and its free radical metabolites. CCl4 is metabolized by cytochrome P4502El in the liver to form toxic metabolites [10]. The lysozyme effect of CCl4 itself can lead to hepatocyte damage. The liver damage caused by the free radicals produced by CCl4 is thought to be the main mechanism [11]. Oxidative stress induced by ROS can damage hepatocytes to a certain extent and may play a key role in the pathogenesis of various liver injuries. ROS are mainly derived from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production by the mitochondrial respiratory chain complex via electron transfer. The liver is rich in mitochondria and therefore, the liver is the main organ attacked by ROS. Oxidative stress can cause acute liver damage and affect the body [12].
Blueberry polyphenol had been paid attention to and the research on them had been gradually carried out. Previous studies focused on the extraction methods of blueberry, it was found that the content of anthocyanins and total polyphenols in the extract was higher than other extraction methods with the assistance of hydrodynamic cavitation [13,14]. In this study, blueberry extract (BE) was extracted, and the preventive effect of BE on acute liver injury in mice was evaluated in a CCl4-induced liver injury model. The sera and liver tissues of experimental mice were examined. The biochemical and molecular biological test results showed that BE had a good preventive effect on experimental acute liver injury. The experimental results provide a theoretical basis for further utilization of the blueberry resource.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Extraction of BE

A total of 100 g of freeze-dried fresh blueberries were weighed and blended into a powder. The powder was added to 200 mL of a 45% ethanol solution, then the powder and ethanol solution were mixed, placed in water bath at 90 °C for 30 min for extraction and re-extracted one more time. The two extraction solutions were combined and then filtered. The blueberry polyphenol extract was obtained by rotating evaporation of the extraction solution after filtration [15].

2.2. Determination of the Polyphenol Content in BE

Different amounts of the chlorogenic acid standard were weighed and added to deionized water to prepare chlorogenic acid standard solutions with different concentrations. For each concentration, 1.0 mL of chlorogenic acid standard solution was pipetted into 25 mL flasks and then 3.0 mL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added and mixed well. After 5 min of reaction, 4.5 mL of a saturated Na2CO3 solution was added to the flask. After adding an equal volume of water, the reaction was carried out at 30 °C for 30 min in the dark. Finally, the absorbance value was measured at 747 nm and a chlorogenic acid standard curve was graphed [16]. BE was serially diluted to 10−4 and the absorbance values of BE were determined by the above method. The BE content was calculated according to the standard curve.

2.3. Mouse Experiment

Fifty 6-week-old specific pathogen-free (SPF) grade Kunming mice (male, body weight 20 ± 2 g) were used in the experiment. The experimental conditions were as follows: room temperature 25 °C, relative humidity of 60%, feed (basic feed) and drinking water ad libitum, cage padding changed every 2 day and adaptive feeding for 1 week. The mice were divided into five groups as follows with 10 mice per group: Normal group, model group, low concentration BE group (BEL group), high concentration BE group (BEH group) and silymarin group. The normal and model groups were intragastrically administered saline solution, the BEL and BEH mice were intragastrically administered 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg BE, respectively, and the silymarin group was intragastrically administered 200 mg/kg of silymarin; all treatments were performed for 14 days. On day 14, all mice except for those in the normal group were injected with the CCl4 inducer (CCl4 and olive oil at a volume ratio of 1:1, 0.1 mL/10 g) 1 hour after gavage administration [17]. After intraperitoneal injection of the CCl4 solution, all experimental mice were fasted for 24 h, and the liver and blood were collected. The liver tissue index was determined simultaneously as follows: liver tissue index = liver mass (g)/mouse body mass (kg) × 100. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Collaborative Innovation Center for Functional Food (201803001B).

2.4. Determination of the Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Triglyceride (TG) and Total Cholesterol (TC) Levels

The collected blood samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min and the upper serum layer was collected. The serum AST, ALT, TG and TC levels were determined according to the kit instructions (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) [18].

2.5. Determination of The Serum Cytokine Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) and Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) Levels

The collected blood samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min and the upper serum layer was collected. The serum cytokine IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ levels were determined according to the kit instructions (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) [18].

2.6. Determination of the SOD and TBARS Levels in Liver Tissue

The mouse liver samples were prepared as a 10% homogenate and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were collected to determine the SOD and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels in the liver tissue according to the kit instructions (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) [18].

2.7. Pathological Observation of Liver Tissue

Liver tissue (0.5 cm2) was fixed in 10% formalin solution for 48 h. The liver tissue was dehydrated, cleared, immersed in wax, embedded, sliced and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (HE). The tissue morphological changes were observed under a light microscope (BX43, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.8. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) Assay

The tongue tissue of the mice was pulverized and total RNA in the tongue tissue was extracted using RNAzol. The extracted total RNA was diluted to 1 μg/μL and 5 μL of the diluted total RNA solution was used for the reverse transcription reaction according to the kit instructions to obtain the complementary DNA (cDNA) template. A total of 2 μL of the cDNA template was mixed with 10 μL of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix and 1 μL of the upstream and downstream primers (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (Table 1). The qPCR reaction setting (StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was as follows: 95 °C for 60 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 55 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 35 s and a final step of 95 °C for 30 s and 55 °C for 35 s. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal control. The 2−ΔΔCt method was employed to calculate the relative gene expression levels [19].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Three parallel experiments were performed for the serum and tissue assays for each mouse, and the average values were calculated. The data were analysed using the SAS 9.1 statistical software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences among the groups at the p < 0.05 level [20].

3. Results

3.1. Polyphenol Content in the BE Extract

The regression equation of the chlorogenic acid standard solution standard curve obtained in the experiment is Y = 197.03X − 3.7561 (Figure 1), where Y is the chlorogenic acid concentration and X is the absorbance value. The polyphenol content (chlorogenic acid) in BE was 52.7% according to the standard curve, indicating that the most main functioning component in the subsequent animal experiments was polyphenols.

3.2. The Body Weight, Liver Weight and Liver Index

As shown in Table 2, the body weights of the model group mice were lower than those of the other groups (p < 0.05), whereas the liver weights of the normal group mice were lower than those of the other groups. The liver index was highest for the model group mice and lowest for the normal group mice. The liver indexes of the mice with liver injury treated with BEH and silymarin were lower than that of the model group (p < 0.05).

3.3. Mouse Serum AST, ALT, TG and TC Levels

As shown in Table 3, the serum AST, ALT, TG and TC levels were lowest in the normal group mice and highest in the model group mice. After BE treatment, the AST, ALT, TG and TC levels were decreased in the mice with liver injury, and the effect was promoted by the increasing BE concentration. The effect of BE at 200 mg/kg (BEH) was not significantly different from that of silymarin (p > 0.05).

3.4. Serum Cytokine IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ Levels

As shown in Table 4, the serum cytokine IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ levels were lowest in the normal group mice and significantly increased after CCl4-induced liver injury. The BE and silymarin treatments significantly inhibited the increase in the cytokine levels caused by liver injury (p < 0.05). The IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ levels were lower in the silymarin treatment group mice than in the BEH treatment group mice, whereas the cytokine levels in the BEL treatment group mice were only lower than those in the model group.

3.5. SOD Activity and TBARS Level in Mouse Liver Tissue

Table 5 shows that the SOD activity was lowest and the TBARS level was highest in the liver tissue of the model group mice, whereas the liver tissue of the normal group showed the opposite trend, with the highest SOD activity and the lowest TBARS level. BE treatment restored the SOD activity and TBARS level in the liver tissue of the mice with liver injury to values close to those of the normal group, with the higher concentration having a more obvious effect. The high BE concentration had an effect similar to that of the drug silymarin.

3.6. Pathological Observation of Mouse Liver

Figure 2 shows that the liver lobule structure of the normal group mice was clear, the hepatocytes were arranged in a radial manner centred on the central vein, the hepatocytes were free of degeneration and necrosis and no inflammatory cell infiltration was visible in the portal area. The hepatocytes of the model group mice showed diffuse oedema and fat degeneration and the hepatocytes around the central vein demonstrated massive necrosis. Compared with that of the BEL group, the necrotic area in the BEH group was smaller and some hepatocytes were still swelling. The liver tissue structure of the BEH and silymarin groups was normal, but hepatocyte oedema was still visible. Most of the liver cells showed no obvious necrosis and only a small portion of the liver tissue showed dotted hepatocyte necrosis; however, the degree of oedema was significantly reduced compared with that of the model group. No balloon-like changes were detected and the degree of hepatocyte necrosis was significantly reduced.

3.7. Cu/Zn-SOD mRNA Expression in Mouse Liver Tissue

Figure 3 showed that Cu/Zn-SOD expression was lowest in the model group mice. After BE treatment, Cu/Zn-SOD expression was significantly increased in the liver tissue of the mice with liver injury (p < 0.05). The effect of BEH was better than that of BEL and was similar to that of silymarin.

3.8. Mn-SOD mRNA Expression in Mouse Liver Tissue

Figure 4 shows that Mn-SOD mRNA expression in the liver tissue was highest in the normal group mice and decreased significantly after CCl4-induced liver injury (p < 0.05). Both BE and silymarin significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited the decrease in Mn-SOD expression in the liver tissue induced by CCl4 and the effect of BE in enhancing Mn-SOD expression became stronger with increasing concentration.

3.9. CAT mRNA Expression in Mouse Liver Tissue

Figure 5 showed that CAT mRNA expression in the liver tissue was significantly higher in the normal group than in the other groups (p < 0.05). The CAT expression levels in the liver tissues of the BEH and silymarin group mice were lower than that in the normal group, and no significant difference in CAT expression was found between the two groups (p > 0.05), although the levels were higher than those of the BEL and model group mice.

3.10. COX-2 mRNA Expression in Mouse Liver Tissue

Figure 6 shows that COX-2 mRNA expression in the liver tissue of the normal group of mice demonstrated an opposite trend compared to the Cu/Zn-SOD, Mn-SOD and CAT expression levels and was significantly lower than those of the other groups (p < 0.05). COX-2 expression in the liver tissue was highest in the model group mice. BE significantly affected the abnormal COX-2 expression in the liver tissue caused by CCl4 (p < 0.05) and decreased COX-2 expression in liver tissue to a level close to that of the normal group mice. At the same concentration, the effects of BE and silymarin were not significantly different (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

The liver is one of the most important organs of the human body. Liver damage affects the health of the body and even endangers life. At present, the liver and serum function indexes are used clinically to evaluate liver lesions. The liver index, which is also known as the liver coefficient, is one pathological indicator that is used to measure liver damage and has been widely applied to evaluate the extent of experimental liver injury; changes in the liver index can directly reflect the extent of liver damage in experimental animals [21]. Therefore, determination of the liver index of mice can directly reflect the structural changes and functions of the liver and can be applied to evaluate the degree of liver damage in mice with liver injury. The results of this study also showed that CCl4 increased the organ index in mice and that BE effectively alleviated the increase and even decreased the liver index of mice with liver injury to a level close to that of normal mice. The effect of the BE was similar to that of silymarin, which is a drug for liver injury.
AST and ALT are the most sensitive indicators for the diagnosis of liver cell damage. During amino acid synthesis and catabolism, AST and ALT play vital roles as endo-enzymes in hepatocytes. Under the circumstance of the normal working condition of the body, ALT and AST levels in the blood are very low and, thus, the activity of these two enzymes in normal serum is very low. When the liver tissue is damaged and the cell membrane permeability increases, these two enzymes penetrate into the blood in large quantities, leading to a significant increase in the activity of the enzymes in the sera. Therefore, an increase in serum AST and ALT can reflect the extent of liver cell damage [22]. When CCl4 enters the animal body, liver microsomal lipids and hepatocyte membrane phospholipid molecules are attacked by free radicals generated by CCl4, which in turn trigger changes in the TC and TG levels in the liver [23]. The increase in the AST, ALT and TBIL levels indicates an exaggeration of liver damage. The experimental data from this study also confirmed that CCl4 resulted in an increase in the AST, ALT, TC and TG levels in mice, whereas BE led to a significant reduction of the same levels in the serum and thus exerted a preventive effect on liver damage.
TNF-α is a polypeptide mediator with a wide range of biological activities that mediates liver damage resulting from various causes. Liver damage is directly related to the increase in TNF-α [24]. IL-6 can stimulate the synthesis of acute phase proteins in hepatocytes to participate in the inflammatory response. IL-6 can also effectively promote the cachexia induced by TNF and IL-1 and, thus, exaggerate the degree of tissue damage [25]. IFN-γ can mediate the damage to non-target cells caused by intracellular viruses and participate in the injury response with TNF-α to promote liver damage and the liver tissue inflammatory response [26]. This study confirmed that BE could prevent and reduce liver damage by reducing the IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ levels in mice.
CCl4 causes oxidative stress in mouse liver tissue, resulting in the production of many free radicals [27]. SOD activity in the liver tissue can be used to evaluate the extent of liver damage. Regulated enhancement of SOD activity is the main mechanism of enzymatic antioxidation in the body; therefore, SOD activity reflects the liver tissue damage to a certain extent [28]. TBARS is the metabolic end product of oxidative damage and accumulates in the body after liver injury. The TBARS level can reflect the degree of cell damage caused by free radical attack. Therefore, TBARS is also a sensitive indicator of liver injury [29]. In this study, BE enhanced SOD activity and reduced the TBARS level in the liver tissue of mice with liver injury, thereby protecting the liver from the damage caused by oxidative stress induced by CCl4.
SOD is classified according to its different metal prosthetic groups. Cu/Zn-SOD containing the Cu and Zn metal prosthetic groups is the most common enzyme and mainly resides in the cytoplasm. Mn-SOD containing the Mn metal prosthetic group is localized in the mitochondria of eukaryotic cells and in prokaryotic cells [30]. As the major SOD isoenzyme in the human body, Cu/Zn-SOD is widely distributed in the extracellular matrix and on the cell surface. Its main function is to remove extracellular O2−. Mn-SOD is also a SOD isoenzyme that functions to eliminate O2− [31]. CAT is an enzyme scavenger that decomposes hydrogen peroxide into molecular oxygen and H2O and thereby removes hydrogen peroxide from the body to protect cells from toxicity. It can also alleviate the tissue inflammation and damage caused by oxidative stress [32]. COX-2 promotes inflammatory reactions and causes tissue damage and is one of the key enzymes that cause inflammatory reactions [33]. COX-2 can induce the production of many inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, which in turn can interact with COX-2 to aggravate liver damage. Moreover, COX-2 can play a positive role under the state of oxidative stress in the liver and ROS can cause tissue damage by regulating COX-2 to induce inflammatory reactions [34]. In this study, determination of the SOD, CAT and COX-2 mRNA levels in mouse liver revealed that BE could effectively inhibit COX-2 expression resulting from oxidative stress in the liver tissue of mice with liver injury. Thus, BE protected the liver by inhibiting oxidative stress through increasing the Cu/Zn-SOD, Mn-SOD and CAT expression levels.
In this study, we preliminarily found that blueberry polyphenols have good biological activity and extracting more polyphenols from blueberry is also the focus of making better use of this resource. Hydrodynamic cavitation has been applied as a technology in the extraction of active substances, which can effectively improve the extraction rate of active substances [35]. The application of this technology in the extraction of blueberry polyphenols can also become a research focus in the future.

5. Conclusions

This study shows that BE can inhibit inflammation and oxidative stress in mice with liver injury, regulate liver function indexes and inflammatory cytokine levels, modulate the mRNA expression levels of genes related to oxidative stress and inflammation in liver tissue and, thereby, comprehensively prevent the liver injury caused by CCl4. Therefore, BE is rich in polyphenols, it has good liver protection function and has the value of further development and utilization. In this study, the role of BE is verified using basic animal experiments and the biological activity of BE awaits comprehensive validation by detailed human experiments in the future.

Author Contributions

B.L. and Y.F. performed the majority of the experiments; R.Y. contributed to the data analysis; X.Z. designed and supervised the study.

Funding

The present research was supported by the Program for Innovation Team Building at Institutions of Higher Education in Chongqing [CXTDX201601040], China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wilson, M.A.; Shukitt-Hale, B.; Kalt, W.; Ingram, D.K.; Joseph, J.A.; Wolkow, C.A. Blueberry polyphenols increase lifespan and thermotolerance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 2006, 5, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kang, B.H.; Racicot, K.; Pilkenton, S.J.; Kwon, Y.I.; Apostolidis, E. Blueberry extract inhibits carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes and these inhibitory activities are not proanthocyanidin dependent. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2015, 58, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rimando, A.M.; Khan, S.I.; Mizuno, C.S.; Ren, G.; Mathews, S.T.; Kim, H.; Yokoyama, W. Evaluation of PPARα activation by known blueberry constituents. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 96, 1666–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhan, W.W.; Si, Z.J.; Wang, C.P.; Zeng, Q.P. Study on extracting and separation technology of proanthocyanidins from blueberry leaves. J. Cereal Oil 2010, 2010, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  5. Correa-Betanzo, J.; Allen-Vercoe, E.; McDonald, J.; Schroeter, K.; Corredig, M.; Paliyath, G. Stability and biological activity of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) polyphenols during simulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Food Chem. 2014, 165, 522–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Giacalone, M.; Di Sacco, F.; Traupe, I.; Topini, R.; Forfori, F.; Giunta, F. Antioxidant and neuroprotective properties of blueberry polyphenols: a critical review. Nutr. Neurosci. 2011, 14, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Su, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Xu, J.; He, J.; Liu, L.; Zhang, T.; Chen, R.; Kang, J. Phenolic acid profiling, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities, and miRNA regulation in the polyphenols of 16 blueberry samples from China. Molecules 2017, 22, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Soccio, M.; Laus, M.N.; Alfarano, M.; Dalfino, G.; Panunzio, M.F.; Pastore, D. Antioxidant/Oxidant Balance as a novel approach to evaluate the effect on serum of long-term intake of plant antioxidant-rich foods. J. Funct. Food 2018, 40, 778–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Harman, D. Free radical theory of aging: The “free radical” diseases. Age 1984, 7, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. DiSilvestro, R.A.; Carlson, G.P. Inflammation, an inducer of metallothionein, inhibits carbon-tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Toxicol. Lett. 1992, 60, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Slater, T.F.; Cheeseman, K.H.; Ingold, K.U. Carbon tetrachloride toxicity as a model for studying free-radical mediated liver injury. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 1985, 311, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muriel, P. Role of free radicals in liver diseases. Hepatol. Int. 2009, 3, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Martynenko, A.; Astatkie, T.; Satanina, V. Novel hydrothermodynamic food processing technology. J. Food Eng. 2015, 152, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Satanina, V.; Kalt, W.; Astatkie, T.; Havard, P.; Martynenko, A. Comparison of anthocyanin concentration in blueberries processed using hydrothermodynamic technology and conventional processing technologies. J. Food Process Eng. 2014, 37, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Song, J.L.; Zhu, K.; Feng, X.; Zhao, X. Protective effect Malus pumila Mill leaf polyphenols in reserpineinduced gastric ulcer in mice. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2015, 58, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, X.; Qian, Y. Preventive effects of Kuding tea crude polyphenols in DSS-induced C57BL/6J mice ulcerative colitis. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2017, 38, 357–362. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, R.; Feng, X.; Zhu, K.; Zhao, X.; Suo, H. Preventive activity of banana peel polyphenols on CCl4-induced experimental hepatic injury in Kunming mice. Exp. Ther. Med. 2016, 11, 1947–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, J.; Chen, B.; Liu, B.; Zhou, X.; Mu, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, X.; Yang, Z. Preventive effect of Lactobacillus fermentum CQPC03 on activated carbon-induced constipation in ICR mice. Medicina 2018, 54, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qian, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, X.; Yi, R.; Mu, J.; Long, X.; Pan, Y.; Zhao, X.; Liu, W. Lactobacillus plantarum CQPC11 isolated from sichuan pickled cabbages antagonizes D-galactose-induced oxidation and aging in mice. Molecules 2018, 23, 3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qian, Y.; Zhang, J.; Fu, X.; Yi, R.; Sun, P.; Zou, M.; Long, X.; Zhao, X. Preventive effect of raw liubao tea polyphenols on mouse gastric injuries induced by HCl/ethanol via anti-oxidative stress. Molecules 2018, 23, 2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, L.; Cheng, D.; Wang, H.; Di, L.; Zhou, X.; Xu, T.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y. The hepatoprotective and antifibrotic effects of Saururus chinensis against carbon tetrachloride induced hepatic fibrosis in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 126, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Pan, Y.; Long, X.; Yi, R.; Zhao, X. Polyphenols in Liubao tea can prevent CCl4-Induced hepatic damage in mice through its antioxidant capacities. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lv, Y.L.; Zhang, B.; Xing, G.; Wang, F.; Hu, Z. Protective effect of naringenin against acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury in metallothionein (MT)-null mice. Food Funct. 2013, 4, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ohta, Y.; Kongo, M.; Sasaki, E.; Nishida, K.; Ishiguro, I. Therapeutic effect of melatonin on carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury in rats. J. Pineal Res. 2000, 28, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Masaki, T.; Chiba, S.; Tatsukawa, H.; Yasuda, T.; Noguchi, H.; Seike, M.; Yoshimatsu, H. Adiponectin protects LPS-induced liver injury through modulation of TNF-alpha in KK-Ay obese mice. Hepatology 2004, 40, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yao, H.W.; Yue, L. Effect and mechanisms of FR167653, a dual inhibitor of TNF-alpha and IL-1, on BCG plus LPS induced-liver injury. Inflamm. Res. 2005, 54, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ohta, A.; Sekimoto, M.; Sato, M.; Koda, T.; Nishimura, S.; Iwakura, Y.; Sekikawa, K.; Nishimura, T. Indispensable role for TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma at the effector phase of liver injury mediated by Th1 cells specific to hepatitis B virus surface antigen. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 956–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Campo, G.M.; Squadrito, F.; Ceccarelli, S.; Calò, M.; Avenoso, A.; Campo, S.; Squadrito, G.; Altavilla, D. Reduction of carbon tetrachloride-induced rat liver injury by IRFI 042, a novel dual vitamin E-like antioxidant. Free Radic. Res. 2001, 34, 379–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sipes, I.G.; el Sisi, A.E.; Sim, W.W.; Mobley, S.A.; Earnest, D.L. Reactive oxygen species in the progression of CCl4-induced liver injury. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1991, 283, 489–497. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mihas, A.A.; Kanji, V.K.; Mihas, T.A.; Joseph, R.M.; Markov, A.K.; Heuman, D.M. Fructose diphosphate attenuates the acetaminophen-induced liver injury in the rat evidence for involvement of nitric oxide. Res. Commun. Mol. Pathol. Pharmacol. 2003, 113–114, 253–266. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhong, Z.; Froh, M.; Wheeler, M.D.; Smutney, O.; Lehmann, T.G.; Thurman, R.G. Viral gene delivery of superoxide dismutase attenuates experimental cholestasis-induced liver fibrosis in the rat. Gene Ther. 2002, 9, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Maczewski, M.; Duda, M.; Pawlak, W.; Beresewicz, A. Endothelial protection from reperfusion injury by ischemic preconditioning and diazoxide involves a SOD-like anti-O2- mechanism. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2004, 55, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Deng, X.; Wu, K.; Wan, J.; Li, L.; Jiang, R.; Jia, M.; Jing, Y.; Zhang, L. Aminotriazole attenuated carbon tetrachloride-induced oxidative liver injury in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 3073–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kimmey, M.B.; Lanas, A. Review article: Appropriate use of proton pump inhibitors with traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 selective inhibitors. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004, 19, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ciriminna, R.; Albanese, L.; Di Stefano, V.; Delisi, R.; Avellone, G.; Meneguzzo, F.; Pagliaro, M. Beer produced via hydrodynamic cavitation retains higher amounts of xanthohumol and other hops prenylflavonoids. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 91, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Standard curve of polyphenol content (chlorogenic acid).
Figure 1. Standard curve of polyphenol content (chlorogenic acid).
Foods 08 00048 g001
Figure 2. H&E pathological observation of liver in mice. Magnification 100×. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Figure 2. H&E pathological observation of liver in mice. Magnification 100×. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Foods 08 00048 g002
Figure 3. The Cu/Zn-SOD mRNA expression in liver of mice. a–d Mean values with different letters in the same bar are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Figure 3. The Cu/Zn-SOD mRNA expression in liver of mice. a–d Mean values with different letters in the same bar are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Foods 08 00048 g003
Figure 4. The Mn-SOD mRNA expression in liver of mice. a–d Mean values with different letters in the same bar are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Figure 4. The Mn-SOD mRNA expression in liver of mice. a–d Mean values with different letters in the same bar are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Foods 08 00048 g004
Figure 5. The CAT mRNA expression in liver of mice. a–d Mean values with different letters in the same bar are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Figure 5. The CAT mRNA expression in liver of mice. a–d Mean values with different letters in the same bar are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Foods 08 00048 g005
Figure 6. The COX-2 mRNA expression in liver of mice. a–d Mean values with different letters in the same bar are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Figure 6. The COX-2 mRNA expression in liver of mice. a–d Mean values with different letters in the same bar are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Foods 08 00048 g006
Table 1. Sequences of primers used in this study.
Table 1. Sequences of primers used in this study.
Gene NameSequence
Cu/Zn-SODForward: 5′-AACCAGTTGTGTTGTCAGGAC-3′
Reverse: 5′-CCACCATGTTTCTTAGAGTGAGG-3′
Mn-SODForward: 5′-CAGACCTGCCTTACGACTATGG-3′
Reverse: 5′-CTCGGTGGCGTTGAGATTGTT-3′
CATForward: 5′-GGAGGCGGGAACCCAATAG-3′
Reverse: 5′-GTGTGCCATCTCGTCAGTGAA-3′
COX-2Forward: 5′-GGTGCCTGGTCTGATGATG–3′
Reverse: 5′-TGCTGGTTTGGAATAGTTGCT–3′
GAPDHForward: 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG-3′
Reverse: 5′-GGGGTCGTTGATGGCAACA-3′
Cu/Zn-SOD: cuprozinc-superoxide dismutase; Mn-SOD: manganese superoxide dismutase; CAT: catalase; COX-2: cyclooxygenase 2; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Table 2. Effects of blueberry polyphenols on body weight, liver weight and liver index of mice with hepatic injury induced by CCl4 (N = 10).
Table 2. Effects of blueberry polyphenols on body weight, liver weight and liver index of mice with hepatic injury induced by CCl4 (N = 10).
GroupBody Weight (g)Liver Weight (g)Liver Index
Normal46.58 ± 1.42 a1.94 ± 0.22 b4.16 ± 0.3 c
Model37.11 ± 1.31 b2.20 ± 0.22 ab5.93 ± 0.4 a
BEL45.87 ± 1.12 a2.44 ± 0.38 a5.32 ± 0.4 ab
BEH46.63 ± 1.08 a2.25 ± 0.24 ab4.83 ± 0.3 b
Silymarin47.26 ± 1.22 a2.18 ± 0.17 ab4.61 ± 0.4 b
Values presented are the mean ± standard deviation (N = 10/group). a–c Mean values with different letters over the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin.
Table 3. The levels of AST, ALT, TG and TC in serum of mice (N = 10).
Table 3. The levels of AST, ALT, TG and TC in serum of mice (N = 10).
GroupAST (U/L)ALT (U/L)TC (mg/dL)TG (mg/dL)
Normal12.37 ± 3.85 d5.36 ± 0.87 d108.32 ± 5.22 d5265.32 ± 87.35 d
Model149.83 ± 18.32 a28.91 ± 3.36 a635.28 ± 31.88 a16387.20 ± 233.15 a
BEL109.86 ± 5.25 b19.32 ± 3.08 b487.36 ± 25.87 b11538.69 ± 256.32 b
BEH58.36 ± 4.82 c11.18 ± 2.12 c245.23 ± 19.68 c8325.05 ± 315.24 c
Silymarin53.20 ± 6.22 c10.65 ± 2.31 c239.58 ± 23.89 c8158.95 ± 298.23 c
Values presented are the mean ± standard deviation (N = 10/group). a–d Mean values with different letters over the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin. AST: Aspartate Aminotransferase; ALT: Alanine Aminotransferase TG: Triglyceride; TC: Total Cholesterol.
Table 4. The cytokine levels of IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ in serum of mice (N = 10).
Table 4. The cytokine levels of IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ in serum of mice (N = 10).
GroupIL-6 (pg/mL)TNF-α (pg/mL)IFN-γ (pg/mL)
Normal23.01 ± 2.13 d312.65 ± 11.08 e39.12 ± 1.52 d
Model59.33 ± 3.87 a733.48 ± 29.38 a81.30 ± 4.72 a
BEL46.30 ± 2.81 b541.69 ± 25.63 b65.17 ± 5.25 b
BEH33.05 ± 2.26 c409.71 ± 16.78 c51.36 ± 3.97 bc
Silymarin30.87 ± 3.01 c367.97 ± 11.36 d47.36 ± 3.32 c
Values presented are the mean ± standard deviation (N = 10/group). a–e Mean values with different letters over the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin. IL-6: interleukin-6; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α; IFN-γ: interferon-γ.
Table 5. The levels of SOD and TBARS in hepatic tissue of mice (N = 10).
Table 5. The levels of SOD and TBARS in hepatic tissue of mice (N = 10).
GroupSOD (U/mg)TBARS (nmol/mg)
Normal126.86 ± 8.33 a1.51 ± 0.44 d
Model28.39 ± 6.28 d4.83 ± 0.52 a
BEL69.35 ± 5.59 c3.75 ± 0.31 b
BEH92.79 ± 5.36 b2.27 ± 0.25 c
Silymarin95.02 ± 6.30 b2.11 ± 0.29 c
Values presented are the mean ± standard deviation (N = 10/group). a–d Mean values with different letters over the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) according to Duncan’s multiple range test. BEL: mice treated with low concentration of blueberry polyphenols (100 mg/kg); BEH: mice treated with high concentration of blueberry polyphenols (200 mg/kg); Silymarin: mice treated with 200 mg/kg silymarin; SOD: superoxide dismutase; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, B.; Fang, Y.; Yi, R.; Zhao, X. Preventive Effect of Blueberry Extract on Liver Injury Induced by Carbon Tetrachloride in Mice. Foods 2019, 8, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8020048

AMA Style

Liu B, Fang Y, Yi R, Zhao X. Preventive Effect of Blueberry Extract on Liver Injury Induced by Carbon Tetrachloride in Mice. Foods. 2019; 8(2):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8020048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Bihui, Yuan Fang, Ruokun Yi, and Xin Zhao. 2019. "Preventive Effect of Blueberry Extract on Liver Injury Induced by Carbon Tetrachloride in Mice" Foods 8, no. 2: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8020048

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop