Next Article in Journal
Vitamin D3 Loaded Niosomes and Transfersomes Produced by Ethanol Injection Method: Identification of the Critical Preparation Step for Size Control
Next Article in Special Issue
Potential Application of Apilactobacillus kunkeei for Human Use: Evaluation of Probiotic and Functional Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Migration of Polypropylene Oligomers into Ready-to-Eat Vegetable Soups
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Components, Microbial Metabolites and Human Health: Reading between the Lines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Latilactobacillus curvatus: A Candidate Probiotic with Excellent Fermentation Properties and Health Benefits

1
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
2
School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
3
International Joint Research Laboratory for Probiotics, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
4
(Yangzhou) Institute of Food Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Yangzhou 225004, China
5
National Engineering Research Center for Functional Food, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
6
Beijing Innovation Centre of Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2020, 9(10), 1366; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101366
Submission received: 24 August 2020 / Revised: 18 September 2020 / Accepted: 21 September 2020 / Published: 25 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microorganisms with Probiotic Properties)

Abstract

:
Latilactobacillus curvatus is a candidate probiotic that has been included in the list of recommended biological agents for certification by the European Food Safety Authority. According to the published genomic information, L. curvatus has several genes that encode metabolic pathways of carbohydrate utilization. In addition, there are some differences in cell surface complex related genes of L. curvatus from different sources. L. curvatus also has several genes that encode bacteriocin production, which can produce Curvacin A and Sakacin P. Due to its ability to produce bacteriocin, it is often used as a bioprotective agent in fermented meat products, to inhibit the growth of a variety of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria. L. curvatus exerts some probiotic effects, such as mediating the production of IL-10 by dendritic cells through NF-κB and extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK) signals to relieve colitis in mice. This review is the first summary of the genomic and biological characteristics of L. curvatus. Our knowledge on its role in the food industry and human health is also discussed, with the aim of providing a theoretical basis for the development of applications of L. curvatus.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Latilactobacillus curvatus is a candidate probiotic that has attracted much attention due to its excellent fermentation properties and health benefits. In 2012, it was listed in the “Catalogue of Microorganisms with Technical Necessity in Fermented Food” of the Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation [1] and was included as a recommended biological agent in the European Food Safety Administration Qualification Certification list in 2013 [2]. L. curvatus was approved by the Chinese government as a new food raw material for processing meat, dairy and fish products in 2019. The rapid development of genomic technologies will facilitate greater progress in research on L. curvatus.
L. curvatus is a member of the genus Latilactobacillus (phylum Firmicutes, class Bacilli). On agar plates, L. curvatus colonies appear milky white (diameter of 1–2 mm) [3], opaque and convex, with a neat and moist edge. As for the cellular morphology, members of this species present as curved, bean-shaped rods with rounded ends (0.7–0.9 × 1–2 μm) [3], occurring in pairs or short chains. Closed rings or horseshoes often form, usually comprising four cells [3]. L. curvatus is one of the major bacterial species associated with poultry products and fermented meat products [4,5] and thus, is often isolated from fermented meat products. This species has also been isolated from dairy products (milk and cheese) [6]; fermented plant products, such as kimchi [7,8,9] and sourdough [10] and other plant-derived materials, such as honey [11]. Accordingly, L. curvatus has been identified in the feces or gut of many animal species that feed on plants or cereals, including snails [12], chickens [13], and humans [14].
L. curvatus was first described under the name Bacterium curvatum by Troili in 1903 [3]. Additionally, in 1965, Abo-Elnaga and Kandler described L. curvatus and the species was renamed Lactobacillus curvatus from Bacterium curvatum. [15,16]. In 2020, the name of L. curvatus was updated again, and Zheng et al. [17] renamed it Latilactobacillus curvatus. (Figure 1) Phylogenetically, L. curvatus is closely related to Latilactobacillus sakei [18]. The two strains have relatively high DNA sequence homology, and their only differences lie in the hydrolysis of arginine and the fermentation of maltose [19]. Due to their similarity, differentiation between the two species is difficult without any molecular technique and often arbitrary. Thus, Petrick et al. developed a specific DNA probe for L. curvatus in 1988 [20]. L. curvatus is unique due to its bacteriocinogenic activity. It is a producer of class II bacteriocins such as Curvacin A and Sakacin P which can inhibit pathogenic bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus [21]. Curvacin A produced by L. curvatus LTH1174 was the first bacteriocin to be purified and characterized by Tichaczed et al. in 1992 [22]. It is a class II bacteriocin with inhibitory effects on various pathogenic bacteria. In 1996, two subspecies, L. curvatus subsp. curvatus and L. cuwatus subsp. melibiosus, were discovered by Torriani et al. [23]. In 2004, molecular studies by Koort et al. [24] revealed that the type strain of L. cuwatus subsp. melibiosus was synonymous with L. sakei subsp. carnosus. With the continuous development of genome sequencing methods, Hebert et al. [25] sequenced L. curvatus for the first time in 2012. L. curvatus CRL705 was the first L. curvatus strain sequenced. This strain, which was isolated from an Argentinean artisanal fermented sausage, is known as a producer of the two-component bacteriocin lactocin 705 and lactocin AL705 [25].
By 2020, the genome sequences of 24 strains of L. curvatus had been published in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Assembly database. Prior to this, little genomic data were available for L. curvatus, due to a lack of large-scale genetic analyses of this species in different geographical regions. The existing genomic data show that L. curvatus has a variety of genes related to multiple carbohydrate metabolic pathways, such as those for glucose and trehalose metabolism [26]. In addition, these data indicate that L. curvatus has multifarious genes related to bacteriocin production [27]. L. curvatus is often used as a biological protective agent in fermented meat products because of its excellent bacteriocin production ability, which can inhibit the growth of spoilage bacteria [21]. What’s more, the bacteriocin produced by this strain can be sprayed onto polyethylene film to produce active food packaging [28]. Besides bacteriocins, organic acids produced by L. curvatus metabolism can reduce the pH of meat product fermentation systems and thus reduce the nitrite content in meat products [29]. The ability of L. curvatus to hydrolyze fatty acids also enables these bacteria to impart desirable flavors to meat products [30].
In addition to its application in the food industry, recent studies have shown that L. curvatus is beneficial to human health. This strain can effectively reduce the effect of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis in mice [31]. It can also relieve obesity and hyperlipidemia [32], but it was more effective when mixed with L. plantarum [33,34]. A recent study showed that L. curvatus can also effectively prevent muscle atrophy induced by dexamethasone, and this was the first study to report on the inhibiting effects of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on muscle atrophy [35]. In this review, we will focus on L. curvatus, discuss its genomic characteristics and physiological and biochemical properties, and introduce its applications in the food industry and human health. This will provide a reference for further studies on L. curvatus.

2. Genomic Characteristics of Latilactobacillus curvatus

With the continuous development of genome sequencing methods, complete genome sequences have been obtained for different LAB isolated from meat products [25,36]. In 2012, Hebert et al. [25] sequenced L. curvatus CRL705, a strain used as a starter culture for sausage fermentation. This was the first L. curvatus strain to be sequenced. Subsequently, other L. curvatus strains were also sequenced, such as L. curvatus FBA2 isolated from fermented vegetables [8], L. curvatus WiKim38 isolated from Kimchi [37], L. curvatus FLEC03 isolated from beef [38] and L. curvatus NFH-Km12 isolated from traditional Japanese fermented fish [39] (Table 1).
The genomes of L. curvatus strains range from 1.804 Mb for L. curvatus RI198 to 2.132 Mb for L. curvatus TMW 1.624. Their genome sizes follow a normal distribution, with an average size of 1.946 Mb. The average G + C content is 41.93%, ranging from 41.63% for L. curvatus TMW 1.624 to 42.1% for L. curvatus FBA2. The average number of predicted coding sequences (CDS) per genome is 1915, ranging from 1711 for L. curvatus FBA2 to 2148 for L. curvatus TMW 1.624. Furthermore, some strains carry up to two plasmids. These general genomic characteristics of L. curvatus highlight some genetic variation among strains.
Teran et al. [26] conducted a comparative analysis of 13 published genomes (L. curvatus NRIC0822, Wikim 38, FBA2, DSM20019, Wikim 52, CRL705, RI-193, RI-198, RI-124, KG6, FLEC03, RI-406, MRS6) and found that the L. curvatus core genome contains 6742 sites of single nucleotide polymorphism, which can be used to distinguish two major lineages. Lineage one is represented by the newly sequenced strain, L. curvatus FLEC03, and lineage two contains two branches, with branch 2A represented by the type-strain L. curvatus DSM20019 and branch 2B represented by L. curvatus KG6. Cluster analysis of the core and accessory genomes of the above strains showed that the strains from the 2B branch recently evolved from lineage two and obtained the functional characteristics of lineage one, and that branch 2B shares a separate source with lineage one. Furthermore, strains of the 2A branch were isolated from Asian foods (sushi and kimchi). Therefore, the patterns of the accessory genomes of L. curvatus indicate that some features affecting environmental adaptability have only recently been acquired. However, eight of the 13 strains of L. curvatus were isolated from fresh or fermented meat, indicating that the isolation sources of these strains are relatively similar, and the number of strains is small. Therefore, it is necessary to compare and analyze more strains from other sources (e.g., gastrointestinal tract, vegetables, silage) to further elucidate the evolutionary model of L. curvatus.
Teran et al. [26] studied 13 strains of L. curvatus with published genomic information and found that three strains in lineage one had eight putative cell-surface complexes groups, two of which were shared with strains RI-124, RI-198, and RI-193 from branch B of lineage two. However, these gene clusters are absent in the branch A of lineage two which are non-meat strains, suggesting that they might be habitat-specific properties.
Eisenbach et al. [27] analyzed the gene clusters of 10 strains of L. curvatus and found that eight strains contained genes related to bacteriocin production which may encode proteins homologous to Sakacin Q. In addition, the genomes of two of the eight strains were found to contain two bacteriocin gene clusters. In addition to sakacin Q, they encode a putative functional type-A lantibiotic. Furthermore, the genome of L. curvatus TMW 1.624 contains four putative bacteriocin gene clusters with genes related to sakacin Q, sakacin Tα, enterocin NKR-5-3a, and a class II lanthipeptide. Based on these data, the genes related to bacteriocin production in L. curvatus seem to have little relationship with the source of the strain.
Eisenbach et al. [27] identified the gene cluster of L. curvatus prophage by PHASTER [43]. These prophages are predicted to be “intact,” “incomplete,” or “questionable”. The “incomplete” or “questionable” described the CDSs related to the prophage gene cluster, but they did not correctly define the prophage. Most L. curvatus strains carry at least one intact prophage. Of note, some phage gene clusters, for example, those in L. curvatus strains TMW 1.167, TMW 1.1381, and TMW 1.439 [27], encode lysin. Moreover, two copies of these gene clusters are present in L. curvatus strains TMW 1.595, TMW 1.1390, and TMW 1.624 [27]. Further research identified all of these phages encoding lysins as “intact” or “questionable” and showed that they are encoded on chromosomes.
CRISPR combines with Cas to form a CRISPR-Cas system that provides adaptive immunity against invading components in bacteria [44]. Eisenbach et al. [27] identified nine different CRISPR-Cas groups in L. curvatus and found that the presence of the CRISPR-Cas system is not correlated with the source of the strain. These clusters are affected by DNA contact between the phage and other bacteria. At present, there is little research published on the CRISPR-Cas system in L. curvatus. The activity of the CRISPR system and its relationship with species evolution have not been studied.
Meat products are rich in arginine, which is often catabolized by arginine diimidase (ADI) pathway. Studies have shown that the L. sakei can degrade arginine with ammonia and ATP production by the ADI pathway, which is the key to the effective survival of this strain in meat products [36,45]. Thus, the ADI pathway is a likely energy source and a mechanism for survival in acidic environments. However, unlike L. sakei, an analysis of the L. curvatus genome has shown that L. curvatus does not have an ADI pathway. In fact, this is the main criterion used to distinguish L. curvatus from L. sakei [46]. An analysis of the L. curvatus genome showed that all strains can convert serine into pyruvic acid and NH3 through serine deaminase and guanine into xanthine and NH3 through guanine deaminase. These enzymes are not encoded in the genome of L. sakei 23K [36]. The generation of NH3 leads to a change in pH and thus enables L. curvatus to be acid resistant in the absence of an ADI pathway.

3. Physiological and Biochemical Properties of Latilactobacillus curvatus

3.1. Carbohydrate Utilization

The ability to metabolize carbohydrates is an important indicator for the cultivation and selection of bacteria. Teran et al. [26] analyzed the L. curvatus genome and found multiple carbohydrate uptake systems (Figure 2). They found that L. curvatus has at least three pathways to utilize maltose. In two of these three pathways, maltodextrins and starch are metabolized using the maltose phosphorylase and intracellular α-amylase pathways, respectively. Moreover, these two metabolic pathways are both associated with an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter. A third mechanism for maltose utilization, the maltose phosphotransferase system, has been found in L. curvatus strains NRIC0822 and MRS6. This system is coupled with the malA gene, which encodes 6-phospho-α-glucosidase. Furthermore, all L. curvatus strains can also utilize glucose through the phosphotransferase system encoded by the manXYZ gene cluster. A fructose phosphotransferase system has also been found in L. curvatus, and this enables the utilization of fructose. Another phosphotransferase system related to fructose utilization has been identified in L. curvatus strains RI-406 and FLEC03. Specifically, the frl gene cluster, encoding a fructose-lysine deglycation pathway, has been detected in these strains [47]. L. curvatus strains CRL705, DSM20019, and Wikim38 contain genes encoding a trehalose phosphotransferase system, which enables them to use the α-glucan-derived disaccharide trehalose. In addition, these strains can use sucrose through two different pathways: a sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolase pathway and a pathway that involves a sucrose phosphotransferase system. Moreover, the rbsUDKR gene cluster, which is involved in ribose catabolism, has also been found in these strains. This gene cluster, which is similar to the gene cluster in L. sakei strains, encodes the ribose transporter rbsU, a protein similar to GltA, the glucose transporter of Staphylococcus xylosus [48]. Experiments by Kask et al. [6] showed that L. curvatus SSR4 and SSR6 could utilize the above six carbohydrates. In addition, these two strains can also utilize lactose, galactose, cellobiose and esculine.
Plant oils are rich in polyols, and a variety of phosphate-transfer enzyme systems specific for these compounds have also been identified in L. curvatus. L. curvatus strains, such as Wikim38 and DSM20019, contain the ula phosphotransferase pathway for ascorbic acid catabolism, which enables them to catabolize ascorbic acid [49]. Concurrently, they can utilize sorbitol and glucosyl/galactosyl alcohol through the srl and gat phosphotransferase pathways.

3.2. Antibiotic Resistance

Many LABs have a high antibiotic susceptibility, which is attributed to intrinsic and nontransmissible characteristics [50]. LABs are generally sensitive to cell wall inhibitors, such as penicillin (ampicillin and piperacillin) and β-lactamase inhibitors [51]. Both L. curvatus DN317 [13] and PA40 [52] show sensitivity to penicillin and ampicillin, but L. curvatus A61 [53] is resistant to ampicillin. The main mechanism of drug resistance seems to be the impermeability of cell walls, which may be the reason for the differences between strains [54]. The differences between strains may also depend on the cooperation of non-specific mechanisms, such as multidrug transporters [55] and defective cell wall autolytic systems.
Furthermore, LABs are usually sensitive to antibiotics that inhibit protein synthesis (erythromycin, tetracycline, clindamycin, and chloramphenicol), but resistant to aminoglycoside drugs (neomycin, kanamycin, streptomycin, and gentamicin) [56]. However, conflicting results have been obtained for L. curvatus strains DN317 [13] and PA40 [52]. L. curvatus DN317 [13] is resistant to chloramphenicol and sensitive to gentamicin and streptomycin, whereas L. curvatus PA40 [52] is moderately resistant to erythromycin and tetracycline. We suspect that the differences in the resistance of L. curvatus to these bacteriocins may be due to differences in resistance genes between the strains. However, there are no published data regarding the resistance genes of L. curvatus. This gap should be addressed in future studies.
In order to identify antimicrobial resistance gene in this species, complete genomes of L. curvatus MARS6 (CP022474), L. curvatus SRCM103465 (CP035110.1) and L. curvatus 20,019 (CP026116.1) were downloaded from NCBI as references and were searched using publicly available database Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD). No hits for AMR genes in those three genomes were identified with the perfect/strict option for CARD [57,58]. However, under a less stringent criterion (perfect/strict/loose option), 186, 185, 167 hits in L. curvatus SRCM103465, L. curvatus MARS6 and L. curvatus 20,019 genomes were found, respectively. Fluoroquinolone, macrolide, rifamycin and elfamycin antibiotic genes with high identify (>60%) were found both the three genomes, which were considered as intraspecific features and intrinsic of L. curvatus species. Besides, the sequence of 5 kbp upstream and downstream of those genes were analyzed and no mobile elements (prophage, transposases and insertion sequences) were found, which suggested a low risk of gene transfer.

3.3. Auto-Aggregation and Co-Aggregation Capacity

It is generally believed that the ability of LAB to form cellular aggregates through self-aggregation (auto-aggregation) or through aggregation between genetically distinct cells (co-aggregation) is a desirable characteristic [59]. Auto-aggregation is a prerequisite for probiotics to settle in the gastrointestinal tract by which they can play a probiotic role. Additionally, probiotics co aggregation is pervasive in several ecological niches, especially in the human gut, where it may interfere with the ability of a pathogenic species to infect the host and may prevent the colonization of foodborne or non-foodborne pathogens [60]. Research by Zommiti [13] and Ahmadova [53] et al. showed that L. curvatus strains DN317 and A61 have higher auto-aggregation abilities than other strains, with auto-aggregation rates exceeding 70%. L. curvatus DN317 also showed higher adhesion ability than other strains. Its adhesion rate to Caco-2 cells reached 16%, which is almost double that of Latilactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) [13]. In most cases, the aggregation ability of bacteria is related to their cell adhesion characteristics [59] and hydrophobicity is considered to be the decisive factor influencing cell adhesion [58]. However, the relationship between auto-aggregation ability, cell adhesion, and hydrophobicity of L. curvatus has not been studied.
The ability of L. curvatus to co-aggregate with pathogenic bacteria is a desirable characteristic. L. curvatus DN317 shows different co-aggregation abilities with different pathogenic bacteria, with the highest co-aggregation ability with L. monocytogenes ATCC7644 (68%) and the lowest co-aggregation ability with Campylobacter jejuni National Collection of Type Cultures (NCTC) 11168 (35%) [13]. Furthermore, L. curvatus A61 shows different co-aggregation abilities with different strains of the same pathogen [53]. This indicates that the co-aggregation ability of L. curvatus with pathogenic bacteria differs by the species and strains of the pathogenic bacteria.

3.4. Resistance to Gastrointestinal Tract Conditions

Resistance to the extreme environment of the gastrointestinal tract is an important characteristic used for the evaluation of bacterial strains. The mouth is the first barrier that must be overcome because saliva contains a high concentration of lysozyme. The next barrier is the stomach, because it maintains a low pH and harbors digestive enzymes. The final barrier is the upper intestine, which contains bile [61,62]. Zommiti et al. [13] treated L. curvatus DN317 with 100 mg/L lysozyme for 30 and 120 min and found that its survival rate was higher than 70%. The resistance of the strain to lysozyme is mainly due to the peptidoglycan structure of the cell wall, the physiological state of the cell, and the lysozyme concentration in the culture medium [63].
Most microorganisms are inactivated by the strong acidic conditions in the stomach [64]. Probiotics must survive the low pH of the stomach to perform their various physiological functions [65]. L. curvatus PA40, which was isolated by Hong et al. [52], shows a high survival rate of 97.8% in 1% pepsin at pH 2.5. Zommiti et al. [13] found a similar result with L. curvatus DN317, which remains viable at pH 2.5. This indicates that L. curvatus may be able to withstand the low pH conditions of the stomach. L. curvatus may prevent the entry of H+ by changing the structure and permeability of the cell membrane [66] or the exopolysaccharides produced by it can provide it with the ability to tolerate an acidic environment [67]. It may also produce NH3 to change the pH of the environment. However, this is only a hypothesis, which needs some research to support it.
Bile acid resistance is also an important characteristic used to evaluate bacterial strains. Mathara et al. [68] determined a limit of 0.3% bile for strain selection, and reported that suitable resistance to bile is indicated by a growth percentage higher than 50% in the presence of 0.3% bile. Erkkilä and Petäjä [69] measured the bile acid tolerance of L. curvatus strains and found that strains derived from commercial meat starter cultures were resistant to 0.3% bile salt at pH 6. Similarly, Ahmadova et al. [53] observed the growth of L. curvatus A61 at bile acid concentrations of 0.2% and 0.3%. At present, the mechanism of bile resistance of L.curvatus is not clear. The efflux of bile salts, the hydrolysis of bile salts [70] and the production of exopolysaccharides and other common mechanisms of resistance to bile salts by lactic acid bacteria can be an entry point for future research on the mechanisms of bile resistance of L. curvatus.

3.5. Generation and Degradation of Biogenic Amines

Biogenic amines are low-molecular weight nitrogen-containing compounds of biological importance [71]. They are mainly formed by amino acid decarboxylation [72] and exist in most fermented foods, such as sausage, wine, cheese, yoghurt, and beer [73,74,75]. In fermentation culture, L. curvatus can hydrolyze proteins to release free amino acids, which are further decarboxylated to produce biogenic amines. In recent years, many studies have shown that L. curvatus has genes encoding tyrosine decarboxylase and ornithine decarboxylase, and thus, it can generate tyramine and putrescine [76,77]. In addition, due to the similar structure of phenylalanine and tyrosine, tyrosine decarboxylase can decarboxylate phenylalanine to produce β-phenylethylamine [76,78]. L. curvatus does not contain a gene encoding lysine decarboxylase but has low cadaverine-forming ability, which may be the result of ornithine decarboxylase activity against lysine, because lysine and ornithine have similar chemical structures [79,80]. Further studies have found that L. curvatus does not contain a gene encoding histidine decarboxylase and thus, has no potential to produce histamine [81].
In the first stage of sausage fermentation, tyramine is the main biogenic amine produced by L. curvatus. In contrast, the production of putrescine occurs at a later stage and at a slower rate than tyramine, yielding lower final levels. Phenylethylamine accumulates at much lower levels than tyramine and putrescine. Its accumulation usually begins in the second half of the maturation process and is accompanied by the production of large quantities of tyramine [82].
LAB not only produce biogenic amines through the decarboxylation of amino acids, but also synthesize amine oxidase to degrade biogenic amines [83,84]. Li et al. [76] found that L. curvatus may possess a multi-copper oxidase that degrades biogenic amines. They also screened a strain with high biological amine degradation ability and low biological amine production ability, namely L. curvatus G-1, a promising candidate for the control of biogenic amine levels in fermented meat products.

3.6. Production of Bacteriocin

Bacteriocins, which are produced by LAB, are peptides synthesized by ribosomes or small proteins secreted into the environment. Their production is the main strategy used by microorganisms to survive and compete for limited space and nutrients in their ecosystem [85]. They usually act on closely related microorganisms and some Gram-positive pathogens associated with food spoilage and diseases [86]. Based on their physicochemical properties, bacteriocins have been divided into two main categories: lanthionine-containing lantibiotics (class I) and nonlanthionine-containing bacteriocins (class II) [87].
In recent years, some bacteriocins produced by L. curvatus have been purified and characterized. These include curvacin A, produced by L. curvatus LTH1174 isolated from fermented sausages [88], sakacin G produced by L. curvatus ACU-1 isolated from artisanal dry fermented sausages [89], sakacin P and sakacin X, produced by L. curvatus MBSa2 and MBSa3 isolated from Italian salami [21], curvaticin 13, produced by L. curvatus SB13 isolated from semidry sausages [90], lactocin AL705, produced by L. curvatus CRL705 isolated from fermented sausages [91] and curvaticin 422, produced by L. curvatus L422 isolated from fermented sausages [92] (Table 2). These are all class II bacteriocins. Their production occurs in the exponential growth phase, during which their activities continue to increase. Moreover, they can tolerate a wide range of pH and temperature conditions [53,93], and have antibacterial activities against a wide spectrum of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria, such as Bacillus cereus, L. monocytogenes, S. aureus and Enterococcus faecium [21,94,95,96]. Their stability and broad antibacterial spectrum make them potential bioprotective agents in the fermentation of meat products [21].
Among the bacteriocins produced by L. curvatus reported thus far, sakacin G and curvacin A have been studied most extensively. Curvacin A was the first bacteriocin identified and characterized from a strain of L. curvatus LTH1174 [22]. Amino acid composition analysis and automated protein sequencing revealed that it is a small peptide of 38–41 amino acid residues. Curvacin A does not contain unusual amino acids, such as lanthionine, but contains an N-terminal alanine. It is degraded by proteinase K and trypsin, but not by pepsin, bovine serum albumin, or RNase. Curvacin A inhibits the growth of the food pathogens L. monocytogenes and E. faecalis and thus can enhance the performance of starter cultures and improve the condition of meat products [102].
In 2002, Simon et al. [103] were the first to isolate sakacin G from L. sakei 2512. It was later identified in L. curvatus ACU-1. Sakacin G is a 37-amino acid class IIa bacteriocin encoded by the duplicated structural genes skgA1 and skgA2. It has two disulfide bonds, of which one (C-terminal) is necessary for antibacterial activity. Due to the existence of double-disulfide bridges that are vital for its antimicrobial activity, sakacin G is unique and is known as an intermediate between pediocin-like bacteriocins. Moreover, it belongs to the mesentericin-like bacteriocins, based on sequence homology and its inhibition spectrum and specific activity. Sakacin G has strong anti-Listeria activity, which make it suitable for use as an antibacterial peptide to reduce or eliminate the growth of pathogenic bacteria and improve the quality, safety, and shelf life of food. In addition, the sakacin G promoter can be used as a tool to induce a high-level expression of other bacteriocins [89].

4. Applications of Latilactobacillus curvatus in Fermented Meat Products and Food Packaging

L. curvatus has a remarkable ability to produce bacteriocins with strong anti-Listeria activity and the ability to inhibit some spoilage bacteria in meat products [21]. As a native bacterium in meat products, it also plays a certain role in the maturation of these products and the formation of desirable flavor [30]. Therefore, L. curvatus is often used in the food industry as a starter for fermented sausages [104] and as a biological protection culture for meat products [30]. In addition, it can be used to produce active food-packaging films [28].

4.1. Starter for Meat Products

Meat fermentation is a preservation technology with a long history. LAB, especially L. plantarum, L. curvatus, Pediococcus acidilactici, L. sakei, and P. pentosaceus, are involved in the processing of all types of fermented sausages. In Europe, fermented sausages are manufactured using starter cultures containing mainly L. sakei and L. curvatus [105]. Recently, many studies have found that some bacteriocin-producing L. curvatus strains, such as LTH1174 [106], 54M16 [107], MBSa2 and MBSa3 [21], can reduce the number of L. monocytogenes, a major problem in fermented sausages [108], by a greater degree than can a nonbacteriocinogenic control culture. Zhang et al. [109] found that L. curvatus can inhibit the growth of the spoilage bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas fragi and Brochothrix thermosphacta, which are common in meat products during storage. It can also inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas putida at the later stage of storage. L. curvatus significantly reduces microbial diversity in meat products and inoculated samples. Ripening has been shown to be almost completely carried out by Latilactobacillus. This indicates that bacteriocin produced by L. curvatus can control the fermentation process by inhibiting the growth of specific bacteria and competitive microbial communities and thus improve the safety of food products [104]. Further research by Stella et al. [110] showed that the inhibitory properties of LAB such as L. curvatus, are closely related to the production of acids (e.g., lactic and acetic acids), bacteriocins and hydrogen peroxide, and the competition of two strains for limited nutrients.
Another potential safety hazard during sausage fermentation is sodium nitrite. Sodium nitrite is a key component in the curing process of meat products. It can promote the formation of color and flavor in meat products and inhibit the growth of harmful bacteria [111,112]. However, when it reacts with secondary amines, it produces amine nitrite, a carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic compound [113]. Sun et al. [29] found that L. curvatus has a strong inhibitory effect against four types of amine nitrites detected in Harbin dry sausage. L. curvatus can decompose nitrosamines and fatty acids through a series of specific enzyme systems. However, it also has a high acid-production capacity, which can reduce the pH of the fermentation system and subsequently cause the reduction of nitrite, nitrite residues, and N-nitrosamines [114,115,116].
As a starter culture, L. curvatus can not only improve the safety of fermented sausage, but also promote the formation of its flavor. Casaburi et al. [101] found that L. curvatus 54M16 was able to hydrolyze sarcoplasmic protein to produce peptides and free amino acids. During the ripening of sausage, these peptides and free amino acids can be used directly as flavor and taste enhancers or as substrates for many meat microorganisms, to produce various aromatic compounds [117]. Furthermore, L. curvatus 54M16 also has the ability to promote the release of short chain fatty acids. Under the environmental conditions used to produce dry fermented sausage, the ability of a meat starter culture to hydrolyze esters and release short-chain and medium-chain free fatty acids may affect the taste and flavor of the sausage.

4.2. Food Packaging

Antimicrobial packaging systems are part of an emerging technology designed to control the number of microorganisms and inhibit the growth of specific microorganisms, thereby increasing the safety and quality of food products. Various chemical preservatives have been used in active antimicrobial-releasing systems. Among these preservatives, bacteriocins are most commonly incorporated into films [118]. Bacteriocins derived from L. curvatus has been widely used in active food packaging. Mauriello et al. [28] and Massani et al. [119] sprayed bacteriocin solutions produced by L. curvatus strains 32Y and CRL705 on polyethylene films to produce active food-packaging films. After a period of time, the films showed stable anti-Listeria activity, and heat treatment at 70 °C did not affect the antibacterial activity of the films. Massani et al. [119] further compared an active polyethylene film adsorbed with lactocin 705 and AL705 produced by L. curvatus CRL705 with a polyethylene film incorporated with nisin, which is the most commonly used antibacterial agent [118]. Compared with nisin-treated film, the lactocin-treated active polyethylene film was shown to inhibit Listeria more effectively, and the functional properties of the film were not affected. Massani et al. then studied the factors affecting the adsorption of L. curvatus bacteriocin on to the polyethylene film [120]. Temperature and time were found to affect bacteriocin adsorption on to the polyethylene film to some extent, with 60 min and 30 °C identified as the best conditions for adsorption. Impurities produced by the growth of L. curvatus strongly affect the adsorption and antibacterial activity of bacteriocins on polyethylene film. Bacteriocin activity decreases with increasing impurity concentration. This may be caused by competitive adsorption between bacteriocins and impurity molecules, which provides an idea for improving the antibacterial activity of food packaging film.

5. Probiotic Function of Latilactobacillus curvatus

Since 2013, researchers have studied the effects of L. curvatus on human health. Although this research is still in the initial stages, results show that L. curvatus can relieve obesity and hyperlipidemia, but it was more effective when mixed with L. plantarum [31,32] and this species can also relieve the symptoms of colitis in mice [33,34]. Recent research shows that L. curvatus can also effectively prevent muscle atrophy induced by dexamethasone [35].

5.1. Obesity

Obesity is defined by the World Health Organization as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that can damage health and is considered a global epidemic. It is a typical metabolic syndrome disease that is closely associated with type two diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [121]. Recent studies have shown that the human gut microbiota may have a critical impact on the onset and development of obesity [122]. Thus, the modification of the gut microbiota has become an important method to treat obesity [123,124]. Probiotics can actively regulate the host gut microbiota to improve metabolic disorders, which is an important asset for the treatment of obesity [125].
In 2013, Yoo et al. [34] were the first to show that a combination of L. curvatus and Latilactobacillus plantarum can be used to treat diet-induced obesity. They used probiotics (L. curvatus HY7601 and L. plantarum KY1032) to treat mice with diet-induced obesity for 10 weeks and found that body weight and gut microbiota diversity both decreased after probiotic treatment. In the gut, probiotics can change the composition of gut microbes in many ways. They can reduce the diversity of gut microbiota by competing with certain nutrients or secreting antibacterial proteins [32]. Recent studies have also shown that low diversity of the gut microbiota has a certain protective effect against diet-induced obesity in mice [126]. However, there is controversy about the effect of probiotic supplementation on gut microbiota and whether there are any long-term consequences of prolonging probiotic supplementation, which need to be further studied. In addition, Jeung et al. [127] found that the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes in the gut of mice increases after treatment, which may be due to the increased abundance of Lachnospiraceae, which belong to the phylum Firmicutes. An increase in the abundance of Lachnospiraceae can result in a greater production of butyrate, thus preventing colon cancer and fat accumulation [128].
Probiotics can not only treat obesity by regulating the gut microbiota, but also play a role in inhibiting adipocyte differentiation and reducing fat accumulation [129]. Shim et al. [130] found that the mixture of L. curvatus HY7601 and L. plantarum KY1032 decreased adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells by regulating the main transcription factors related to adipogenesis and by reducing mitochondrial biogenesis which inhibits the ATP supply required for adipocyte differentiation. In HepG2 cells, the mixture of two Latilactobacillus spp. decreases the expression of SREBP-1c, thus inhibiting the central enzyme in the de novo lipogenesis pathway, fatty acid synthetase and acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Jung et al. [131] found that the weight loss induced by L. curvatus HY7601 was related to a reduction in fat mass, which was associated with changes in Lp-PLA2 activity. Supplementation with L. curvatus reduced Lp-PLA2 activity and oxidized low-density lipoproteins (LDL), increasing the particle size of LDLs and thus reducing fat accumulation.

5.2. Dyslipidemia

Dyslipidemia is characterized by an increase in the blood levels of total or LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides, or a decrease in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. It is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease [132]. Dyslipidemia can be divided into hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia and mixed hyperlipidemia. In the past decade, probiotics have rapidly emerged as a natural therapy with the potential to improve dyslipidemia [133]. Ahn et al. [33,134] first discovered a combination of L. curvatus and L. plantarum can reduce triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia in 2015. The consumption of L. curvatus HY7601 and L. plantarum KY1032 for 12 weeks has been shown to reduce triglyceride levels and increase the particle size of apo A-V and LDL in hypertriglyceridemic subjects. Apo A-V is implicated in triglyceride metabolism and may be a potent factor affecting plasma triglyceride levels in humans. Apo A-V can accelerate the hydrolysis of triglycerides in plasma, by enhancing the activity of LPL, thus reducing plasma triglyceride levels [135]. Choi et al. [136] reported a similar result, that is, L. curvatus HY7601 and L. plantarum KY1032 lower triglycerides in hypertriglyceridemic rats by upregulating ApoA-V, PPARα, and FXR. L. curvatus can also improve hypercholesterolemia to some extent. Park et al. [137] demonstrated that dietary supplementation with the probiotics Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides KDK411 and L. curvatus KFP419, isolated from kimchi, is effective at lowering blood cholesterol levels and alleviating hypercholesterolemia in rats by increasing fecal excretion of cholesterol and coprostanol through cholesterol assimilation by the bacteria.

5.3. Others

Dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis shorten the colon of mice and lead to the destruction of colon mucosal epithelia, severe infiltration of inflammatory cells, and edematous lesions in the submucosa layer. Jo et al. [31] found that the administration of L. curvatus Wikim38 effectively alleviates these symptoms in mice. The mechanism for this effect may be that L. curvatus mediates the production of IL-10 in dendritic cells through NF-κB and extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK) signaling. This is consistent with the mechanism used by L. brevis to alleviate trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis in mice.
Recently, Katsuki et al. [35] found that L. curvatus CP2998 prevents dexamethasone-induced muscle atrophy of C2C12 skeletal muscle cells. This is the first report of the inhibition of muscle atrophy by LAB. After treatment with L. curvatus CP2998, the diameter of the myotubes increased and the mRNA expression levels of MuRF1, MAFbx, and E3 ubiquitin ligase decreased. Meanwhile, L. curvatus CP2998 was also found to inhibit glucocorticoid-dependent transcription. In brief, L. curvatus prevents glucocorticoid-induced muscle atrophy by inhibiting the activation of the glucocorticoid receptor. This indicates that L. curvatus CP2998 may have a new application in the treatment of muscle atrophy.

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

As a candidate probiotic, Latilactobacillus curvatus shown to have a variety of genes associated with carbohydrate utilization and bacteriocin producing, which may enable it strong carbohydrate fermentative ability and antibacterial ability. Besides, this species has suitable auto-aggregation and co-aggregation abilities, which enable it to colonize the intestinal tract and effectively eliminate pathogens. Due to these genomic and physiological characteristics, L. curvatus has great application potential in the food industry and in promoting human health. However, it is worth noting that some L. curvatus are also producers of bioamines, which may be a threat to human health. This is a point that cannot be ignored in its applications.
Currently, research on the L. curvatus genome and population-based genetic analyses of L. curvatus in large sample sets are lacking. Moreover, data regarding the evolution, genetic characteristics, and host effects of L. curvatus are not available. Therefore, it is necessary to study the evolutionary model of L. curvatus, based on population genomics, and to link this evolutionary model with the metabolism, function, and phylogeny of the strain, to lay a foundation for research on the probiotic function of this species. L. curvatus strains with different probiotic functions may also be suitable for use in the development of functional fermented products to broaden their application in the food industry. In addition, the probiotic function of L. curvatus has not been demonstrated clinically. To address the gaps in our understanding of the role of L. curvatus in immune regulation and to use it clinically, further research is needed to clarify the mechanism of L. curvatus in disease treatment.

Author Contributions

Writing—Original Draft, Y.C.; Writing—Reviewing and Editing, L.Y., Q.Z., N.Q.; Supervision, Y.X.; Project administration, F.T.; Funding acquisition, J.Z., H.Z. and W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20180603), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32001665, 31772090, 31820103010, U1903205), the Key Scientific and Technological Research Projects in the Key Areas of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2018AB010), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2018M642166), the General Financial Grant from the Jiangsu Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018K016A), the National first-class discipline program of Food Science and Technology (JUFSTR20180102), Collaborative innovation center of food safety and quality control in Jiangsu Province.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bourdichon, F.; Berger, B.; Casaregola, S.; Farrokh, C.; Frisvad, J.C.; Gerds, M.L.; Hammes, W.P.; Harnett, J.; Huys, G.; Laulund, S.; et al. Safety demonstration of microbial food cultures (MFC) in fermented food products. Bull. Int. Dairy Fed. 2012, 455, 62. [Google Scholar]
  2. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards. Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2013 update). EFSA J. 2013, 11, 3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Hammes, W.P.; Hertel, C. Lactobacillus. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 1–76. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lucquin, I.; Zagorec, M.; Champomier-Verges, M.; Chaillou, S. Fingerprint of lactic acid bacteria population in beef carpaccio is influenced by storage process and seasonal changes. Food Microbiol. 2012, 29, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chaillou, S.; Chaulot-Talmon, A.; Caekebeke, H.; Cardinal, M.; Christieans, S.; Denis, C.; Desmonts, M.H.; Dousset, X.; Feurer, C.; Hamon, E.; et al. Origin and ecological selection of core and food-specific bacterial communities associated with meat and seafood spoilage. ISME J. 2015, 9, 1105–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kask, S.; Adamberg, K.; Orłowski, A.; Vogensen, F.K.; Møller, P.L.; Ardö, Y.; Paalme, T. Physiological properties of Lactobacillus paracasei, L. danicus and L. curvatus strains isolated from Estonian semi-hard cheese. Food Res. Int. 2003, 36, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vogelxy, R.F.; Lohmann, M.; Nguyen, M. MolecuIar characterization of Lactobacillus curvatus and Lact. sake isolated from sauerkraut and their application in sausage fermentations. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1993, 74, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nakano, K.; Shiroma, A.; Tamotsu, H.; Ohki, S.; Shimoji, M.; Ashimine, N.; Shinzato, M.; Minami, M.; Nakanishi, T.; Teruya, K.; et al. First Complete Genome Sequence of the Skin-Improving Lactobacillus curvatus Strain FBA2, Isolated from Fermented Vegetables, Determined by PacBio Single-Molecule Real-Time Technology. Genome Announc. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Jung, J.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, J.M.; Park, M.S.; Bae, J.W.; Hahn, Y.; Madsen, E.L.; Jeon, C.O. Metagenomic analysis of kimchi, a traditional Korean fermented food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 2264–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Michel, E.; Monfort, C.; Deffrasnes, M.; Guezenec, S.; Lhomme, E.; Barret, M.; Sicard, D.; Dousset, X.; Onno, B. Characterization of relative abundance of lactic acid bacteria species in French organic sourdough by cultural, qPCR and MiSeq high-throughput sequencing methods. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2016, 239, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bulgasem, B.Y.; Lani, M.N.; Hassan, Z.; Wan Yusoff, W.M.; Fnaish, S.G. Antifungal Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains Isolated from Natural Honey against Pathogenic Candida Species. Mycobiology 2016, 44, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Koleva, Z.; Dedov, I.; Kizheva, J.; Lipovanska, R.; Moncheva, P.; Hristova, P. Lactic acid microflora of the gut of snail Cornu aspersum. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2014, 28, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zommiti, M.; Connil, N.; Hamida, J.B.; Ferchichi, M. Probiotic Characteristics of Lactobacillus curvatus DN317, a Strain Isolated from Chicken Ceca. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2017, 9, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dal Bello, F.; Walter, J.; Hammes, W.P.; Hertel, C. Increased complexity of the species composition of lactic acid bacteria in human feces revealed by alternative incubation condition. Microb. Ecol. 2003, 45, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kandler, O.; Abo-Elnaga, I.G. On the taxonomy of genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck I. Subgenus Streptobacterium Orla Jensen. Zent. fur Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infekt. Hyg. Zweite Nat. Abt. Allg. Landwirtsch. Tech. Mikrobiol. 1965, 119, 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hammes, W. Lactic acid bacteria in meat fermentation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1990, 87, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zheng, J.S.; Wittouck, S.; Salvetti, E.; Franz, C.M.A.P.; Harris, H.M.B.; Mattarelli, P.; Toole, P.W.O.; Pot, B.; Vandamme, P.; Walter, J.; et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2782–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sun, Z.; Harris, H.M.; McCann, A.; Guo, C.; Argimon, S.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X.; Jeffery, I.B.; Cooney, J.C.; Kagawa, T.F.; et al. Expanding the biotechnology potential of lactobacilli through comparative genomics of 213 strains and associated genera. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Berthier, F.; Ehrlich, S.D. Genetic diversity within Lactobacillus sakei and Lactobacillus curvatus and design of PCR primers for its detection using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1999, 49, 997–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Petrick, H.A.R.; Ambrosio, R.E.; Holzapfel, W.H. Isolation of a DNA Probe for Lactobacillus curvatus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988, 54, 405–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. De Souza Barbosa, M.; Todorov, S.D.; Ivanova, I.; Chobert, J.M.; Haertle, T.; de Melo Franco, B.D.G. Improving safety of salami by application of bacteriocins produced by an autochthonous Lactobacillus curvatus isolate. Food Microbiol. 2015, 46, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tichaczek, P.S.; Nissen-Meyer, J.; Nes, I.F.; Vogel, R.F.; Hammes, W.P. Characterization of the Bacteriocins Curvacin A from Lactobacillus curvatus LTH1174 and Sakacin P from L. sake LTH673. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1992, 15, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Torriani, S.; Reenen, C.A.V.; Klein, G.; Reuter, G.; Dellaglio, F.; Dicks, L.M.T. Lactobacillus curvatus subsp. curvatus subsp. nov. and Lactobacillus curvatus subsp. melibiosus subsp. nov. and Lactobacillus sake subsp. sake subsp. nov. and Lactobacillus sake subsp. carnosus subsp. nov., New Subspecies of Lactobacillus curvatus Abo-Elnaga and Kandler 1965 and Lactobacillus sake Katagiri, Kitahara, and Fukami 1934 (Klein et al. 1996, Emended Descriptions), Respectively. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1996, 46, 1158–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Koort, J.; Vandamme, P.; Schillinger, U.; Holzapfel, W.; Bjorkroth, J. Lactobacillus curvatus subsp. melibiosus is a later synonym of Lactobacillus sakei subsp. carnosus. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1621–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hebert, E.M.; Saavedra, L.; Taranto, M.P.; Mozzi, F.; Magni, C.; Nader, M.E.; Font de Valdez, G.; Sesma, F.; Vignolo, G.; Raya, R.R. Genome sequence of the bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus curvatus strain CRL705. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 538–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Teran, L.C.; Coeuret, G.; Raya, R.; Zagorec, M.; Champomier-Verges, M.C.; Chaillou, S. Phylogenomic Analysis of Lactobacillus curvatus Reveals Two Lineages Distinguished by Genes for Fermenting Plant-Derived Carbohydrates. Genome Biol. Evol. 2018, 10, 1516–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Eisenbach, L.; Janssen, D.; Ehrmann, M.A.; Vogel, R.F. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus curvatus enables prediction of traits relating to adaptation and strategies of assertiveness in sausage fermentation. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2018, 286, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mauriello, G.; Ercolini, D.; La Storia, A.; Casaburi, A.; Villani, F. Development of polythene films for food packaging activated with an antilisterial bacteriocin from Lactobacillus curvatus 32Y. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sun, F.; Kong, B.; Chen, Q.; Han, Q.; Diao, X. N-nitrosoamine inhibition and quality preservation of Harbin dry sausages by inoculated with Lactobacillus pentosus, Lactobacillus curvatus and Lactobacillus sake. Food Control 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fadda, S.; Lopez, C.; Vignolo, G. Role of lactic acid bacteria during meat conditioning and fermentation: Peptides generated as sensorial and hygienic biomarkers. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 66–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jo, S.G.; Noh, E.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, G.; Choi, J.H.; Lee, M.E.; Song, J.H.; Chang, J.Y.; Park, J.H. Lactobacillus curvatus WiKim38 isolated from kimchi induces IL-10 production in dendritic cells and alleviates DSS-induced colitis in mice. J. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yoo, S.R.; Kim, Y.J.; Park, D.Y.; Jung, D.J.; Jeon, S.M.; Ahn, Y.T.; Huh, C.S.; McGrego, R.; Choi, M.S. Probiotics, L. Plantarum and L. Curvatus In Combination Alter Hepatic Lipid Metabolism and Suppress Diet-Induced Obesity. Obesity 2013, 21, 2571–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ahn, H.Y.; Kim, M.; Ahn, Y.T.; Sim, J.H.; Choi, I.D.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, J.H. The triglyceride-lowering effect of supplementation with dual probiotic strains, Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032: Reduction of fasting plasma lysophosphatidylcholines in nondiabetic and hypertriglyceridemic subjects. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015, 25, 724–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Park, D.Y.; Ahn, Y.T.; Park, S.H.; Huh, C.S.; Yoo, S.R.; Yu, R.; Sung, M.K.; McGregor, R.A.; Choi, M.S. Supplementation of Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 in diet-induced obese mice is associated with gut microbial changes and reduction in obesity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Katsuki, R.; Sakata, S.; Nakao, R.; Oishi, K.; Nakamura, Y. Lactobacillus curvatus CP2998 Prevents Dexamethasone-Induced Muscle Atrophy in C2C12 Myotubes. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2019, 65, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chaillou, S.; Champomier-Verges, M.C.; Cornet, M.; Crutz-Le Coq, A.M.; Dudez, A.M.; Martin, V.; Beaufils, S.; Darbon-Rongere, E.; Bossy, R.; Loux, V.; et al. The complete genome sequence of the meat-borne lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus sakei 23K. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 1527–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lee, S.H.; Jung, M.Y.; Song, J.H.; Lee, M.; Chang, J.Y. Complete Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus curvatus Strain WiKim38 Isolated from Kimchi. Genome Announc. 2017, 5, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Teran, L.C.; Coeuret, G.; Raya, R.; Champomier-Verges, M.C.; Chaillou, S. Draft Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus curvatus FLEC03, a Meat-Borne Isolate from Beef Carpaccio Packaged in a Modified Atmosphere. Genome Announc. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Kyoui, D.; Mikami, N.; Yamamoto, H.; Kawarai, T.; Ogihara, H. Complete Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus curvatus NFH-Km12, Isolated from the Japanese Traditional Fish Fermented Food Kabura-zushi. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Jans, C.; Lagler, S.; Lacroix, C.; Meile, L.; Stevens, M.J.A. Complete Genome Sequences of Lactobacillus curvatus KG6, L. curvatus MRS6, and Lactobacillus sakei FAM18311, Isolated from Fermented Meat Products. Genome Announc. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Inglin, R.C.; Meile, L.; Stevens, M.J.A. Draft Genome Sequences of 43 Lactobacillus Strains from the Species L. curvatus, L. fermentum, L. paracasei, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, and L. sakei, Isolated from Food Product. Genome Announc. 2017, 5, e00632-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cousin, F.C.; Lynch, S.M.; Harris, H.M.B.; McCann, A.; Lynch, D.B.; Neville, B.A.; Irisawa, T.; Okada, S.; Endo, A.; O’Toole, P.W. Detection and Genomic Characterization of Motility in Lactobacillus curvatus: Confirmation of Motility in a Species outside the Lactobacillus salivarius Clade. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 81, 1297–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Arndt, D.; Grant, J.R.; Marcu, A.; Sajed, T.; Pon, A.; Liang, Y.; Wishart, D.S. PHASTER: A better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W16–W21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Barrangou, R.; Fremaux, C.; Deveau, H.; Richards, M.; Boyaval, P.; Moineau, S.; Romero, D.A.; Horvath, P. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 2007, 315, 1709–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nyquist, O.L.; McLeod, A.; Brede, D.A.; Snipen, L.; Aakra, A.; Nes, I.F. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus sakei with emphasis on strains from meat. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2011, 285, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Verge, M.-C.C.; Manuel, Z.; Françoise, M.-D.; Perez-Martinez, G.; Zagorec, M.; Ehrlich, S.D. Relationships between arginine degradation, pH and survival in Lactobacillus sakei. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 2, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wiame, E.; Lamosa, P.; Santos, H.; Van Schaftingen, E. Identification of glucoselysine-6-phosphate deglycase, an enzyme involved in the metabolism of the fructation product glucoselysine. Biochem. J. 2005, 392, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Stentz, R.; Zagorec, M. Ribose utilization in Lactobacillus sakei: Analysis of the regulation of the rbs operon and putative involvement of a new transporter. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 1, 165–173. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yew, W.S.; Gerlt, J.A. Utilization of L-ascorbate by Escherichia coli K-12: Assignments of functions to products of the yjf-sga and yia-sgb operons. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Salminen, S.; Wright, A.v.; Morelli, L.; Marteau, P.; Brassart, D.; Vos, W.M.d.; Fonden, R.; Saxelin, M.; Collins, K.; Mogensen, G.; et al. Demonstration of safety of probiotics—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 44, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Danielsen, M.; Wind, A. Susceptibility of Lactobacillus spp. to antimicrobial agents. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 82, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hong, S.W.; Kim, J.H.; Bae, H.J.; Ham, J.S.; Yoo, J.G.; Chung, K.S.; Oh, M.H. Selection and characterization of broad-spectrum antibacterial substance-producing Lactobacillus curvatus PA40 as a potential probiotic for feed additives. Anim. Sci. J. 2018, 89, 1459–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ahmadova, A.; Todorov, S.D.; Hadji-Sfaxi, I.; Choiset, Y.; Rabesona, H.; Messaoudi, S.; Kuliyev, A.; Franco, B.D.; Chobert, J.M.; Haertle, T. Antimicrobial and antifungal activities of Lactobacillus curvatus strain isolated from homemade Azerbaijani cheese. Anaerobe 2013, 20, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ammor, M.S.; Florez, A.B.; Mayo, B. Antibiotic resistance in non-enterococcal lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Food Microbiol. 2007, 24, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Perreten, V.; Schwarz, F.V.; Teuber, M.; Levy, S.B. Mdt(A), a new efflux protein conferring multiple antibiotic resistance in Lactococcus lactis and Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 1109–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Zhou, J.S.; Pillidge, C.J.; Gopal, P.K.; Gill, H.S. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of new probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 98, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alcock, B.P.; Raphenya, A.R.; Lau, T.T.Y.; Tsang, T.T.K.; Bouchard, M.; Edalatmand, A.; Huynh, W.; Nguyen, A.L.V.; Cheng, A.A.; Liu, S.H.; et al. CARD 2020: Antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2020, 48, D517–D525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jia, B.F.; Raphenya, A.R.; Alcock, B.; Waglechner, N.; Guo, P.Y.; Tsang, K.K.; Lago, B.A.; Dave, B.M.; Pereira, S.; Sharma, A.N.; et al. CARD 2017: Expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D566–D573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Collado, M.C.; Meriluoto, J.; Salminen, S. Role of commercial probiotic strains against human pathogen adhesion to intestinal mucus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. García-Cayuela, T.; Korany, A.M.; Bustos, I.P.; Gómez de Cadiñanos, L.; Requena, T.; Peláez, C.; Martínez-Cuesta, M.C. Adhesion abilities of dairy Lactobacillus plantarum strains showing an aggregation phenotype. Food Res. Int. 2014, 57, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Corzo, G.; Gilliland, S.E. Bile Salt Hydrolase Activity of Three Strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Garcia-Ruiz, A.; Gonzalez de Llano, D.; Esteban-Fernandez, A.; Requena, T.; Bartolome, B.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V. Assessment of probiotic properties in lactic acid bacteria isolated from wine. Food Microbiol. 2014, 44, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cunningham, F.E.; Proctor, V.A.; Goetsch, S.J. Egg-white lysozyme as a food preservative: An overview. World Poultry Sci. J. 1991, 47, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fernandez, M.F.; Boris, S.; Barbes, C. Probiotic properties of human lactobacilli strains to be used in the gastrointestinal tract. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gilliland, S.E.; Staley, T.E.; Bush, L.J. Importance of bile tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus used as a dietary adjunct. J. Dairy Sci. 1984, 67, 3045–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jin, J.H.; Zhang, B.; Guo, H.; Cui, J.; Jiang, L.; Song, S.; Sun, M.; Ren, F.Z. Mechanism Analysis of Acid Tolerance Response of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BBMN 68 by Gene Expression Profile Using RNA-Sequencing. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Jiang, Y.; Ren, F.; Liu, S.; Zhao, L.; Guo, H.; Hou, C. Enhanced acid tolerance in Bifidobacterium longum by adaptive evolution: Comparison of the genes between the acid-resistant variant and wild-type strain. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Mathara, J.M.; Schillinger, U.; Kutima, P.M.; Mbugua, S.K.; Guigas, C.; Franz, C.; Holzapfel, W.H. Functional properties of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from Maasai traditional fermented milk products in Kenya. Curr. Microbiol. 2008, 56, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Erkkilä, S.; Petäjä, E. Screening of commercial meat starter cultures at low pH and in the presence of bile salts for potential probiotic use. Meat Sci. 2000, 55, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Piddock, L.J. Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps—Not just for resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bai, X.; Byun, B.Y.; Mah, J.H. Formation and destruction of biogenic amines in Chunjang (a black soybean paste) and Jajang (a black soybean sauce). Food Chem. 2013, 141, 1026–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Santos, M.H.S. Biogenic amines: Their importance in foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1996, 29, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Landete, J.M.; Ferrer, S.; Polo, L.; Parodo, I. Biogenic amines in wines from three Spanish regions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lázaro, C.A.; Conte-Júnior, C.A.; Canto, A.C.; Monteiro, M.L.G.; Costa-Lima, B.; Cruz, A.G.D.; Mársico, E.T.; Franco, R.M. Biogenic amines as bacterial quality indicators in different poultry meat species. Lwt Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Guarcello, R.; De Angelis, M.; Settanni, L.; Formiglio, S.; Gaglio, R.; Minervini, F.; Moschetti, G.; Gobbetti, M. Selection of Amine-Oxidizing Dairy Lactic Acid Bacteria and Identification of the Enzyme and Gene Involved in the Decrease of Biogenic Amines. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 6870–6880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Li, L.; Wen, X.; Wen, Z.; Chen, S.; Wang, L.; Wei, X. Evaluation of the Biogenic Amines Formation and Degradation Abilities of Lactobacillus curvatus From Chinese Bacon. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Pachlová, V.; Buňková, L.; Flasarová, R.; Salek, R.N.; Dlabajová, A.; Butor, I.; Buňka, F. Biogenic amine production by nonstarter strains of Lactobacillus curvatus and Lactobacillus paracasei in the model system of Dutch-type cheese. LWT 2018, 97, 730–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Landete, J.M.; Pardo, I.; Ferrer, S. Tyramine and phenylethylamine production among lactic acid bacteria isolated from wine. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 115, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Latorre-Moratalla, M.L.; Bover-Cid, S.; Bosch-Fuste, J.; Vidal-Carou, M.C. Influence of technological conditions of sausage fermentation on the aminogenic activity of L. curvatus CTC273. Food Microbiol. 2012, 29, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bardócz, S. Polyamines in food and their consequences for food quality and human health. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1996, 6, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Freiding, S.; Gutsche, K.A.; Ehrmann, M.A.; Vogel, R.F. Genetic screening of Lactobacillus sakei and Lactobacillus curvatus strains for their peptidolytic system and amino acid metabolism, and comparison of their volatilomes in a model system. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 34, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cid, S.B.; Miguelez-Arrizado, M.J.; Becker, B.; Holzapfel, W.H.; Vidal-Carou, M.C. Amino acid decarboxylation by Lactobacillus curvatus CTC273 affected by the pH and glucose availability. Food Microbiol. 2008, 25, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dapkevicius, M.L.N.E.; Nout, M.J.R.; Rombouts, F.M.; Houben, J.H.; Wymenga, W. Biogenic amine formation and degradation by potential fish silage starter microorganisms. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 57, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. García-Ruiz, A.; González-Rompinelli, E.M.; Bartolomé, B.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V. Potential of wine-associated lactic acid bacteria to degrade biogenic amines. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 2011, 148, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Riley, M.A.; Wertz, J.E. Bacteriocins: Evolution, ecology, and application. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2002, 56, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Balciunas, E.M.; Castillo Martinez, F.A.; Todorov, S.D.; Franco, B.D.G.D.M.; Converti, A.; Oliveira, R.P.D.S. Novel biotechnological applications of bacteriocins: A review. Food Control 2013, 32, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Bacteriocins: Developing Innate Immunity for food. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 777–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Verluyten, J.; Messens, W.; Vuyst, L.D. Sodium chloride reduces production of curvacin A, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus curvatus strain LTH 1174, originating from fermented sausage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 2271–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Mechoud, M.A.; Álvarez, O.E.; Cayré, M.E.; Castro, M.P.; Minahk, C.; Saavedra, L. Sakacin G is the main responsible bacteriocin for the anti-listerial activity of meat-borne Lactobacillus curvatus ACU-1. Ann. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bouttefroy, A.; Linder, M.; Milliere, J.B. Predictive models of the combined effects of curvaticin 13, NaCl and pH on the behaviour of Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 15313 in broth. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Massani, M.B.; Molina, V.; Sanchez, M.; Renaud, V.; Eisenberg, P.; Vignolo, G. Active polymers containing Lactobacillus curvatus CRL705 bacteriocins: Effectiveness assessment in Wieners. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 178, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xiraphi, N.; Georgalaki, M.; Driessche, G.V.; Devreese, B.; Beeumen, J.V.; Tsakalidou, E.; Metaxopoulos, J.; Drosinos, E.H. Purification and characterization of curvaticin L442, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus curvatus L442. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2006, 89, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Cui, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Shi, J.; Zhang, L.; Ding, Z.; Qu, X.; Cui, H. Class IIa bacteriocins: Diversity and new developments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 16668–16707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Castellano, P.; Belfiore, C.; Fadda, S.; Vignolo, G. A review of bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria used as bioprotective cultures in fresh meat produced in Argentina. Meat Sci. 2008, 79, 483–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Rivas, F.P.; Castro, M.P.; Vallejo, M.; Marguet, E.; Campos, C.A. Sakacin Q produced by Lactobacillus curvatus ACU-1: Functionality characterization and antilisterial activity on cooked meat surface. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Castro, M.P.; Palavecino, N.Z.; Herman, C.; Garro, O.A.; Campos, C.A. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal dry sausages: Characterization of antibacterial compounds and study of the factors affecting bacteriocin production. Meat Sci. 2011, 87, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Garve, K.I.; Murian, P.M. Purification and Partial Amino Acid Sequence of Curvaticin FS47, a Heat-Stable Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus curvatus FS4. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 2191–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Zommiti, M.; Almohammed, H.; Ferchichi, M. Purification and Characterization of a Novel Anti-Campylobacter Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus curvatus DN317. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2016, 8, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Casaburi, A.; Martino, V.D.; Ferranti, P.; Picariello, L.; Villani, F. Technological properties and bacteriocins production by Lactobacillus curvatus 54M16 and its use as starter culture for fermented sausage manufacture. Food Control 2016, 59, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gómez-Sala, B.; Muñoz-Atienza, E.; Diep, D.B.; Feito, J.; del Campo, R.; Nes, I.F.; Herranz, C.; Hernández, P.E.; Cintas, L.M. Biotechnological potential and in vitro safety assessment of Lactobacillus curvatus BCS35, a multibacteriocinogenic strain isolated from dry-salted cod (Gadus morhua). LWT 2019, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dortu, C.; Huch, M.; Holzapfel, W.H.; Franz, C.M.; Thonart, P. Anti-listerial activity of bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus curvatus CWBI-B28 and Lactobacillus sakei CWBI-B1365 on raw beef and poultry meat. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 47, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tiehaczek, P.S.; Vogel, R.F.; Hammes, W.P. Cloning and sequencing of curA encoding curvacin A, the bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus curvatus LTHl174. Arch. Microbiol. 1993, 160, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Simon, L.; Fremaux, C.; Cenatiempo, Y.; Berjeaud, J.M. Sakacin g, a new type of antilisterial bacteriocin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 6416–6420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Papagianni, M.; Anastasiadou, S. Pediocins: The bacteriocins of Pediococci. Sources, production, properties and applications. Microb. Cell Fact. 2009, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Hammes, W.P.; Hertel, C. Selection and improvement of lactic acid bacteria used in meat and sausage fermentation. Dairy Sci. Technol. 1996, 76, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Vogel, R.F.; Pohle, B.S.; Tichaczek, P.S.; Hammes, W.P. The Competitive Advantage of Lactobacillus curvatus LTH 1174 in Sausage Fermentations is Caused by Formation of Curvacin A. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1993, 16, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Giello, M.; La Storia, A.; De Filippis, F.; Ercolini, D.; Villani, F. Impact of Lactobacillus curvatus 54M16 on microbiota composition and growth of Listeria monocytogenes in fermented sausages. Food Microbiol. 2018, 72, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Vogel, B.F.; Hansen, L.T.; Mordhorst, H.; Gram, L. The survival of Listeria monocytogenes during long term desiccation is facilitated by sodium chloride and organic material. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 140, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Dong, P.; Liang, R.; Mao, Y.; Qiu, S.; Luo, X. Bio-protective potential of lactic acid bacteria: Effect of Lactobacillus sakei and Lactobacillus curvatus on changes of the microbial community in vacuum-packaged chilled beef. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 31, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Stella, S.; Bernardi, C.; Cattaneo, P. Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of mixtures of Lactobacillus sakei and L. curvatus isolated from Argentine meat and their application on vacuum-packed beef. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2016, 28, 612–624. [Google Scholar]
  111. Chen, Q.; Kong, B.; Sun, Q.; Dong, F.; Liu, Q. Antioxidant potential of a unique LAB culture isolated from Harbin dry sausage: In vitro and in a sausage model. Meat Sci. 2015, 110, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Maere, H.D.; Fraeye, I.; Mey, E.D.; Dewulf, L.; Michiels, C.; Paelinck, H.; Chollet, S. Formation of naturally occurring pigments during the production of nitrite-free dry fermented sausages. Meat Sci. 2016, 114, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Herrmann, S.S.; Duedahl-Olesen, L.; Christensen, T.; Olesen, P.T.; Granby, K. Dietary exposure to volatile and non-volatile N-nitrosamines from processed meat products in Denmark. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 80, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Hu, Y.; Xia, W.; Ge, C. Effect of mixed starter cultures fermentation on the characteristics of silver carp sausages. World J. Microb. Biot. 2006, 23, 1021–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Nie, X.; Lin, S.; Zhang, Q. Proteolytic characterisation in grass carp sausage inoculated with Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus pentosaceus. Food Chem. 2014, 145, 840–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kim, S.H.; Kang, K.H.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.H.; Ha, E.S.; Sung, N.J.; Kim, J.G.; Chung, M.J. Lactic acid bacteria directly degrade N-nitrosodimethylamine and increase the nitrite-scavenging ability in kimchi. Food Control 2017, 71, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Fadda, S.; Sanz, Y.; Vignolo, G.; Aristoy, M.C.; Toldra, F.; Oliver, G. Hydrolysis of pork muscle sarcoplasmic proteins by Lactobacillus curvatus and Lactobacillus sake. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Joerger, R.D. Antimicrobial films for food applications: A quantitative analysis of their effectiveness. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2007, 20, 231–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Massani, M.B.; Fernandez, M.R.; Ariosti, A.; Eisenberg, P.; Vignolo, G. Development and characterization of an active polyethylene film containing Lactobacillus curvatus CRL705 bacteriocins. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2008, 25, 1424–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Massani, M.B.; Vignolo, G.M.; Eisenberg, P.; Morando, P.J. Adsorption of the bacteriocins produced by Lactobacillus curvatus CRL705 on a multilayer-LLDPE film for food-packaging applications. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 53, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Thaiss, C.A.; Zmora, N.; Levy, M.; Elinav, E. The microbiome and innate immunity. Nature 2016, 535, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Backhed, F.; Ding, H.; Wang, T. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 15718–15723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Jia, W.; Li, H.; Zhao, L. Gut microbiota: A potential new territory for drug targeting. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Komaroff, A.L. The Microbiome and Risk for Obesity and Diabetes. JAMA 2017, 317, 355–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Yoo, J.Y.; Kim, S.S. Probiotics and Prebiotics: Present Status and Future Perspectives on Metabolic Disorders. Nutrients 2016, 8, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Backhed, F.; Manchester, J.K.; Semenkovich, C.F.; Gordon, J.I. Mechanisms underlying the resistance to diet-induced obesity in germ-free mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 979–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Jeung, W.H.; Nam, W.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, J.Y.; Nam, B.; Jang, S.S.; Lee, J.L.; Sim, J.H.; Park, S.D. Oral Administration of Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 with Cinnamomi Ramulus Extract Reduces Diet-Induced Obesity and Modulates Gut Microbiota. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 24, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Meehan, C.J.; Beiko, R.G. A Phylogenomic View of Ecological Specialization in the Lachnospiraceae, a Family of Digestive Tract-associated Bacteria. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Dahiya, D.K.; Renuka; Puniya, M.; Shandilya, U.K.; Dhewa, T.; Kumar, N.; Kumar, S.; Puniya, A.K.; Shukla, P. Gut Microbiota Modulation and Its Relationship with Obesity Using Prebiotic Fibers and Probiotics: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Jeung, W.H.; Shim, J.J.; Woo, S.W.; Sim, J.H.; Lee, J.L. Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 Cell Extracts Inhibit Adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 and HepG2 Cells. J. Med. Food 2018, 21, 876–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jung, S.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, M.; Kim, M.; Kwak, J.H.; Lee, J.-W.; Ahn, Y.-T.; Sim, J.-H.; Lee, J.H. Supplementation with two probiotic strains, Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032, reduced body adiposity and Lp-PLA2 activity in overweight subjects. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 19, 744–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Hunter, P.M.; Hegele, R.A. Functional foods and dietary supplements for the management of dyslipidaemia. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Fuentes, M.C.; Lajo, T.; Carrion, J.M.; Cune, J. Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 7527, 7528 and 7529 in hypercholesterolaemic adults. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 109, 1866–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Ahn, H.Y.; Kim, M.; Chae, J.S.; Ahn, Y.T.; Sim, J.H.; Choi, I.D.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, J.H. Supplementation with two probiotic strains, Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032, reduces fasting triglycerides and enhances apolipoprotein A-V levels in non-diabetic subjects with hypertriglyceridemia. Atherosclerosis 2015, 241, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Nilsson, S.K.; Heeren, J.; Olivecrona, G.; Merkel, M. Apolipoprotein A-V; a potent triglyceride reducer. Atherosclerosis 2011, 219, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Choi, I.D.; Kim, S.H.; Jeong, J.W.; Lee, D.E.; Huh, C.S.; Hong, S.S.; Sim, J.H.; Ahn, Y.T. Triglyceride-Lowering Effects of Two Probiotics, Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 and Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601, in a Rat Model of High-Fat Diet-Induced Hypertriglyceridemia. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Park, M.Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Whang, K.Y. Lactobacillus curvatus KFP419 and Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides KDK411 Isolated from Kimchi Ameliorate Hypercholesterolemia in Rats. J. Med. Food 2018, 21, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Timeline of selected key findings and technical advances related to Latilactobacillus curvatus.
Figure 1. Timeline of selected key findings and technical advances related to Latilactobacillus curvatus.
Foods 09 01366 g001
Figure 2. Carbohydrate utilization map of Latilactobacillus curvatus. Carbohydrates are divided into sugars and polyols. Solid lines represent carbohydrates that have evidence supporting their use by L. curvatus, and dashed lines represent carbohydrates that L. curvatus may use, but for which there is no supporting evidence. PTS: phosphotransferase.
Figure 2. Carbohydrate utilization map of Latilactobacillus curvatus. Carbohydrates are divided into sugars and polyols. Solid lines represent carbohydrates that have evidence supporting their use by L. curvatus, and dashed lines represent carbohydrates that L. curvatus may use, but for which there is no supporting evidence. PTS: phosphotransferase.
Foods 09 01366 g002
Table 1. Genome Sequences of Latilactobacillus curvatus Strains.
Table 1. Genome Sequences of Latilactobacillus curvatus Strains.
StrainSourceGenome Size (Mb)GC Content (%)Number of CDSAccession NumberSequencing Status
(Sequencing Technology)
Reference
L. curvatus FBA2Fermented vegetables1.84942.101711CP016028Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[8]
L. curvatus Wikim38Kimchi1.94041.931885CP017124Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[37]
L. curvatus Wikim52Kimchi1.98742.001875CP016602Complete (PacBio RS II platform)NP
L. curvatus KG6Meat2.00242.031970CP022475Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[40]
L. curvatus MRS6Meat2.11441.701975CP022474Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[40]
L. curvatus NFH-Km12Traditional Japanese fermented fish1.98941.811946AP018699Illumina MiSeq pair-end[39]
L. curvatus TMW 1.421Sausage1.99441.971961CP016221Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[27]
L. curvatus TMW 1.439Sausage1.94842.041939CP015489Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[27]
L. curvatus TMW 1.624Sausage2.13241.632148CP015490Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[27]
L. curvatus TMW 1.595Starter culture2.03241.951991CP016470Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[27]
L. curvatus TMW 1.1381Starter culture1.94942.051993CP015493Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[27]
L. curvatus TMW 1.1390Starter culture1.97742.071949CP015494Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[27]
L. curvatus TMW 1.401Sauerkraut1.88642.001830CP016216Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[27]
L. curvatus TMW 1.407Sauerkraut1.88642.011831CP016218Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[27]
L. curvatus TMW 1.27Unknown2.05641.862027CP016467Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[27]
L. curvatus TMW 1.167Unknown1.95142.031940CP016472Complete (PacBio RS II platform)[27]
L. curvatus FLEC03Beef1.90241.701926GCA_900178545.1Draft (Illumina MiSeq pair-end)[38]
L. curvatus RI-124Meat1.81042.001838MKDR00000000Draft (Illumina MiSeq pair-end)[41]
L. curvatus RI-193Meat1.80542.001862MKGD00000000Draft (Illumina MiSeq pair-end)[41]
L. curvatus RI-198Meat1.80442.001848MKGC00000000 Draft (Illumina MiSeq pair-end)[41]
L. curvatus RI-406Meat2.00141.702020MKDG00000000Draft (Illumina MiSeq pair-end)[41]
L. curvatus CRL705Argentinean fermented sausages1.83841.901830AGBU01000000Draft (454 GS Titanium pyrosequencing)[25]
L. curvatus NRIC0822Kabura-zushi1.94541.801831GCA_000805355.1Draft (Illumina HiSeq pair-end)[42]
L. curvatus DSM20019Milk1.91741.991828GCA_004101845.1Draft (Ion Torrent PGM)NP
NP, no publication available.
Table 2. Bacteriocins Produced by Latilactobacillus curvatus.
Table 2. Bacteriocins Produced by Latilactobacillus curvatus.
Bacteriocin-Producing StrainBacteriocinSourceActive AgainstReference
L. curvatus LTH1174Curvacin AFermented sausagesEnterococcus faecalis, Listeriamonocytogenes[88]
L. curvatus SB13Curvaticin 13Semidry sausagesL. monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus[90]
L. curvatus FS47Curvaticin FS47BeefL. monocytogenes[97]
L. curvatus L422Curvaticin L422Fermented sausagesL. monocytogenes[92]
L. curvatus CRL705Lactocin 705Argentine fermented sausageL. monocytogenes[91]
L. curvatus DN317Curvaticin DN317Chicken CecaCampylobacter jejuni,
L. monocytogenes, Bacillus subtilis
[98]
L. curvatus 54M16Sakacin X, P, TFermented sausagesStaphylococci, Enterobacteriaceae[99]
L. curvatus A61Curvacin AAzerbaijani cheeseL. monocytogenes, B. cereus[53]
L. curvatus BCS35SakacinP-H12Y, Sakacin XDry-salted codL. monocytogenes[100]
L. curvatus ACU-1Sakacin G, P, QArgentine fermented sausageL. monocytogenes[89]
L. curvatus MBSa2Sakacin P, XSalamiL. monocytogenes[21]
L. curvatus CWBI-B28Sakacin PRaw poultry meatL. monocytogenes[101]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Yu, L.; Qiao, N.; Xiao, Y.; Tian, F.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W.; Zhai, Q. Latilactobacillus curvatus: A Candidate Probiotic with Excellent Fermentation Properties and Health Benefits. Foods 2020, 9, 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101366

AMA Style

Chen Y, Yu L, Qiao N, Xiao Y, Tian F, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W, Zhai Q. Latilactobacillus curvatus: A Candidate Probiotic with Excellent Fermentation Properties and Health Benefits. Foods. 2020; 9(10):1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ying, Leilei Yu, Nanzhen Qiao, Yue Xiao, Fengwei Tian, Jianxin Zhao, Hao Zhang, Wei Chen, and Qixiao Zhai. 2020. "Latilactobacillus curvatus: A Candidate Probiotic with Excellent Fermentation Properties and Health Benefits" Foods 9, no. 10: 1366. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101366

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop