An Evidence-Based Rapid Review of Surgical Techniques for Correction of Prolapsed Nictitans Glands in Dogs
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Search Strategy
2.2. Inclusion Criteria
2.3. Exclusion Criteria
2.4. Application of Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.5. Data Extraction
2.6. Study Design
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Techniques Identified
3.1.1. Techniques Involving Fixing the Gland to the Third Eyelid
3.1.2. Techniques Involving Fixing the Gland to Other Ocular or Adnexal Structures
3.1.3. Combination of Techniques
3.1.4. Excision
3.2. Study Characteristics
3.2.1. Design and Sampling
3.2.2. Reporting
3.3. Study Outcomes
3.3.1. Surgical Failure
3.3.2. Complications
3.3.3. Lacrimal Outcomes
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hendrix, D.V.H. Veterinary Ophthalmology, 5th ed.; Gelatt, K.N., Gilger, B.C., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-0-470-96040-0.s. [Google Scholar]
- Saito, A.; Izumisawa, Y.; Yamashita, K.; Kotani, T. The effect of third eyelid gland removal on the ocular surface of dogs. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2001, 4, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Crispin, S.M. Notes on Veterinary Ophthalmology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; ISBN 1-4051-4544-7. [Google Scholar]
- Maggs, D.J.; Miller, P.; Ofri, R. Slatter’s Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology, 5th ed.; Elsevier Health Sciences: New York, NY, USA, 2012; ISBN 1-4377-2368-3. [Google Scholar]
- Edelmann, M.L.; Miyadera, K.; Iwabe, S.; Komáromy, A.M. Investigating the inheritance of prolapsed nictitating membrane glands in a large canine pedigree. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2013, 16, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guandalini, A.; Di Girolamo, N.; Santillo, D.; Andreani, V.; Corvi, R.; Bandini, M.; Peruccio, C. Epidemiology of ocular disorders presumed to be inherited in three large Italian dog breeds in Italy. Vet Ophthalmol. 2016, 20, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maggs, D.J.; Miller, P.E.; Ofri, R.; Slatter, D.H. Slatter’s Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology; Saunders Elsevier: St. Louis, MI, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-0-7216-0561-6. [Google Scholar]
- Barnett, K.C. Diseases of the nictitating membrane of the dog. J. Small Anim. Pr. 1978, 19, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelatt, K.N.; Peiffer, R.L., Jr.; Erickson, J.L.; Gum, G.G. Evaluation of tear formation in the dog, using a modification of the Schirmer tear test. J. Am. Vet. Med Assoc. 1975, 166, 368–370. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Helper, L.C.; Magrane, W.G.; Koehm, J.; Johnson, R. Surgical induction of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in the dog. J. Am. Vet. Med Assoc. 1974, 165, 172–174. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Sapienza, J.S.; Mayordomo, A.; Beyer, A.M. Suture anchor placement technique around the insertion of the ventral rectus muscle for the replacement of the prolapsed gland of the third eyelid in dogs: 100 dogs. Vet Ophthalmol. 2014, 17, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodriguez Gómez, J.B. Repairing nictitans gland prolapse in dogs. Vet. Rec. 2012, 171, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moore, C.P.; Constantinescu, G.M. Surgery of the Adnexa. Vet. Clin. Small Anim. Pr. 1997, 27, 1011–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plummer, C.E.; Kllberg, M.E.; Gelatt, K.N.; Gelatt, J.P.; Barrie, K.P.; Brooks, D.E. Intranictitans tacking for replacement of prolapsed gland of the third eyelid in dogs. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2008, 11, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martin, C.L. Ophthalmic Disease in Veterinary Medicine; Manson Publishing Ltd.: London, UK, 2005; ISBN 1-84076-016-8. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, S.M. Small Animal Ophthalmology; Elsevier Health Sciences: New York, NY, USA, 2008; ISBN 0-7020-2872-4. [Google Scholar]
- Dehghan, M.M.; Pedram, M.S.; Azari, O.; Mehrjerdi, H.K.; Azad, E. Clinical evaluation of the pocket technique for replacement of prolapsed gland of the third eyelid in dogs. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2012, 36, 352–356. [Google Scholar]
- Rankin, A.J. Prolapsed third eyelid gland replacement: A modified Morgan pocket technique. Vet. Med. 2013, 108, 462–466. [Google Scholar]
- Ramsey, D.T. Why your cherry-eye surgery “popped”. In Proceedings of the North American Veterinary Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 19–23 January 2008; p. 958. [Google Scholar]
- Sargeant, J.M.; O’Connor, A.M.; Cullen, J.N.; Makielski, K.M.; Jones-Bitton, A. What’s in a name? The incorrect use of case series as a study design label in studies involving dogs and cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2017, 31, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mathes, T.; Pieper, D. Clarifying the distinction between case series and cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies: Potential impact on body of evidence and workload. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2017, 17, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lefebvre, S.L.; Matushek, K.J. New guidance for reporting of case series in the JAVMA. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2018, 252, 8–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agha, R.A.; Fowler, A.J.; Rajmohan, S.; Barai, I.; Orgill, D.P. Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines. Int. J. Surg. Lond. Engl. 2016, 36, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Song, J.W.; Chung, K.C. Observational studies: Cohort and case-control studies. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2010, 126, 2234–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nyaga, V.N.; Arbyn, M.; Aerts, M. Metaprop: A Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch. Public Health 2014, 72, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barendregt, J.J.; Doi, S.A.; Lee, Y.Y.; Norman, R.E.; Vos, T. Meta-analysis of prevalence. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 2013, 67, 974–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morgan, R.V.; Duddy, J.M.; McClurg, K. Prolapse of the gland of the third eyelid in dogs: A retrospective study of 89 cases (1980 to 1990). J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc. 1993, 29, 56–60. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhary, P.S.; Varshney, J.P.; Desai, S.N.; Deshmukh, V.V. Cherry eye in puppies and its surgical correction via repositioning of prolapsed third eyelid gland. Intas Polivet 2009, 10, 345–350. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, A.K.; Kushwaha, R.B.; Bhadwal, M.S.; Sharma, A.; Dwivedi, D.K.; Arafath, I. Management of Cherry eye using different surgical techniques—A study of 10 dogs. Intas Polivet 2016, 17, 411–413. [Google Scholar]
- Kelawala, D.N.; Parulekar, E.A.; Ratnu, D.A.; Parikh, P.V.; Patil, D.B. Surgical management of prolapse of nictitans gland—A clinical study of 12 dogs. Intas Polivet 2016, 17, 408–410. [Google Scholar]
- Mazzucchelii, S.; Vaillant, M.D.; Wéverberg, F.; Arnold-Tavernier, H.; Honegger, N.; Payen, G.; Vanore, M.; Liscoet, L.; Thomas, O.; Clerc, B.; et al. Retrospective study of 155 cases of prolapse of the nictitating membrane gland in dogs. Vet. Rec. 2012, 170, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Multari, D.; Perazzi, A.; Contiero, B.; De Mattia, G.; Iacopetti, I. Pocket technique or pocket technique combined with modified orbital rim anchorage for the replacement of a prolapsed gland of the third eyelid in dogs: 353 dogs. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2016, 19, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vani, G.; Lakshmi, N.D. Surgical management of cherry eye–A report of 2 dogs. Intas Polivet 2016, 17, 414–415. [Google Scholar]
- Blogg, J.R. Surgical replacement of a prolapsed gland of the third eyelid (‘cherry eye’). A new technique. Aust. Vet. Pract. 1979, 9, 75. [Google Scholar]
- Gross, S.L. Effectiveness of a modification of the Blogg technique for replacing the prolapsed gland of the canine third eyelid. In Proceedings of the American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists, Chicago, IL, USA, 1983; Volume 14, pp. 38–42. [Google Scholar]
- Kaswan, R.L.; Martin, C.L. Surgical correction of third eyelid prolapse in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1985, 186, 83. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Dugan, S.J.; Severin, G.A.; Hungerford, L.L.; Whiteley, H.E.; Roberts, S.M. Clinical and histologic evaluation of the prolapsed third eyelid gland in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1992, 201, 1861–1867. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Prémont, J.E.; Monclin, S.; Farnir, F.; Grauwels, M. Perilimbal pocket technique for surgical repositioning of prolapsed nictitans gland in dogs. Vet. Rec. 2012, 171, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arora, N.; Chaudhary, R.N.; Pandey, A.K.; Potliya, S.; Singh, K. Surgical management of cherry eye in dogs. Intas Polivet 2014, 15, 129–130. [Google Scholar]
- Sarma, B. Cherry eye in dogs. Intas Polivet 2010, 11, 80–81. [Google Scholar]
- Greenwald, D.; Shumway, S.; Albear, P.; Gottlieb, L. Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation. J. Surg. Res. 1994, 56, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanz, L.E.; Patterson, J.A.; Kamath, R.; Willett, G.; Ahmed, S.W.; Butterfield, A.B. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988, 71, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- McEvoy, V.; Williams, D. Effect on ocular health of removing glandular tissue in cases of prolapsed canine nictitans glands: Preliminary findings in ten dogs. In Scientific Proceedings Veterinary Programme, Proceedings of the BSAVA Congress 2015, Birmingham, UK, 2–5 April, 2015; British Small Animal Veterinary Association: Gloucester, UK, 2015; pp. 463–464. [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez, R.F.; Innocent, G.; Mould, J.; Billson, F.M. Canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca: Disease trends in a review of 229 cases. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2007, 48, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sansom, J.; Barnett, K.C. Keratoconjunctivitis sicca in the dog: A review of two hundred cases. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1985, 26, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murad, M.H.; Sultan, S.; Haffar, S.; Bazerbachi, F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid. Based Med. 2018, 23, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chalmers, T.C.; Celano, P.; Sacks, H.S.; Smith, H. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983, 309, 1358–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vandenbroucke, J.P.; Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Pocock, S.J.; Poole, C.; Schlesselman, J.J.; Egger, M. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 2007, 147, W-163–W-194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haukoos, J.S.; Newgard, C.D. Advanced statistics: Missing data in clinical research—Part 1: An introduction and conceptual framework. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2007, 14, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aragon, C.L.; Budsberg, S.C. Applications of evidence-based medicine: Cranial cruciate ligament injury repair in the dog. Vet. Surg. 2005, 34, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baird-Heinz, H.E.; Van Schoick, A.L.; Pelsor, F.R.; Ranivand, L.; Hungerford, L.L. A systematic review of the safety of potassium bromide in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2012, 240, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bergh, M.S.; Budsberg, S.C. A systematic review of the literature describing the efficacy of surgical treatments for canine hip dysplasia (1948–2012). Vet. Surg. 2014, 43, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boerman, I.; Selvarajah, G.T.; Nielen, M.; Kirpensteijn, J. Prognostic factors in canine appendicular osteosarcoma—A meta-analysis. BMC Vet. Res. 2012, 8, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. PLoS Med. 2007, 4, e296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sargeant, J.M.; O’Connor, A.M. Issues of reporting in observational studies in veterinary medicine. Prev. Vet. Med. 2014, 113, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agha, R.A.; Fowler, A.J.; Lee, S.-Y.; Gundogan, B.; Whitehurst, K.; Sagoo, H.K.; Jeong, K.J.L.; Altman, D.G.; Orgill, D.P. Systematic review of the methodological and reporting quality of case series in surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2016, 103, 1253–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sargeant, J.M.; O’Connor, A.M.; Dohoo, I.R.; Erb, H.N.; Cevallos, M.; Egger, M.; Ersbøll, A.K.; Martin, S.W.; Nielsen, L.R.; Pearl, D.L.; et al. Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology—Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2016, 30, 1887–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nuijten, M.B.; Hartgerink, C.H.J.; van Assen, M.A.; Epskamp, S.; Wicherts, J.M. The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behav. Res. Methods 2016, 48, 1205–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vickers, A.J. Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials. Trials 2006, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Burke, D.L.; Ensor, J.; Riley, R.D. Meta-analysis using individual participant data: One-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ. Stat. Med. 2017, 36, 855–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barros, R.; Sampaio, G.R.; Kitamura Kawamoto, F.Y.; Curti, F.; de Faria, L.G.; Gibson, K. Duplo sepultamento de glândula da terceira palpebra; modificacao da ténica de Morgan e Moore em 10 caes. Arch. Vet. Sci. 2012, 17, 338–340. [Google Scholar]
- Delgado, E. Recolocação cirúrgica da glândula da membrana nictitante em canídeos pela técnica de bolsa conjuntival-23 casos clínicos Surgical replacement of the third eyelid gland in dogs using the conjuntival mucosa pocket procedure-23 clinical cases. Rev. Port. Ciênc. Veterinárias Lisb. 2005, 100, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
- Peixoto, R.V.R.; Galera, P.D. Evaluation of 67 cases of prolapse of the third eyelid gland in dogs (2005–2010). Arq. Bras. Med. Veterinária E Zootec. 2012, 64, 1151–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López, C.; Giraldo, C.E.; Carmona, J.U. Conjuntivectomía periglandular: Una nueva alternativa para el tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso de la glándula del tercer párpado en caninos. Arch. Med. Vet. 2011, 43, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Capak, D.; Biggi, J.; Bali, R.; Pirkic, B.; Borosak, H. Comparison of treatment methods for prolapse of the gland of the third eyelid in dogs. Usporedba Metoda Lijecenja Prolapsusa Zlijezde Trece Ocne Vjee U Pasa 2008, 39, 79–90. [Google Scholar]
- Dirzinauskas, E.; Noreika, A. Comparison of the different therapy methods of prolapsed gland of the nictitating membrane in dogs. Sunu Treciojo Voko Issivertusios Liaukos Gydymo Metodu Patikimumas 2006, 34, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
- Lazard, P. Chirurgie de la luxation de la glande lacrymale superficielle de la membrane nictitante chez le chien: Nouvelle technique microchirurgicale. Rev. Méd. Vét. 2004, 155, 82–86. [Google Scholar]
Publication | Procedure(s) | Study Design | Patient Source and Selection Method |
---|---|---|---|
Arora et al., 2014 [39] | Gland excision | Case series | NR |
Chaudery et al., 2009 [28] | Morgan pocket | Case series | R |
Dehghan et al., 2012 [17] | Morgan pocket | Case series | NR |
Dugan et al., 1992 [37] | 1. Periosteal anchor 2. Gland excision | Crossover trial | NA |
Gupta et al., 2016 [29] | 1. Gland excision 2. Periosteal anchor 3. Morgan pocket | Case series | NR |
Kaswan and Martin, 1985 [36] | Periosteal anchor | Case series | NR |
Kelawala et al., 2016 [30] | Morgan pocket | Case series | NR |
Mazzucchelli et al., 2012 [31] | Morgan pocket | Retrospective case series/prevalence study | R |
Morgan et al., 1993 [27] | 1. Inferior scleral anchor 2. Gland excision 3. Morgan pocket | Retrospective case series with cohort analysis | R |
Multari et al., 2016 [32] | 1. Morgan pocket 2. Morgan pocket combined with periosteal anchor | Retrospective case series with cohort analysis | R |
Plummer et al., 2008 [14] | Intranictitans tack | Prospective case series | NR |
Prémont et al., 2012 [38] | Perilimbal pocket | Prospective case series | PR |
Sapienza et al., 2014 [11] | Ventral rectus anchor | Retrospective case series | R |
Sarma, 2010 [40] | Gland excision | Case series | NR |
Vani and Lakshmi, 2016 [33] | Morgan pocket | Case series | NR |
Publication | Follow-Up Time | Surgical Failure (Reprolapse) | Surgical Failure (Reprolapse) by Breed | STT | KCS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arora et al. [39] | NR | NA | NA | NR | NR |
Chaudery et al. [28] | R (3–4 months) | PR 4 | NR | NR | NR |
Dehghan et al. [17] | R (≥6 months) | R | NR | NR | R |
Dugan et al. [37] | R (24 weeks) | R | NA 6 | R | NR |
Gupta et al. [29] | PR (≤3 years) | Unclear 5 | NR | PR 10 | R |
Kaswan and Martin [36] | NR | PR 4 | NR | NR | NR |
Kelawala et al. [30] | R (1 month) | R | NR | NR | NR |
Mazzucchelli et al. [31] | R (≥1 year 1) | R | PR 7 | NR | R |
Morgan et al. [27] | PR (33/89 ≥ 2 years) | R | NR | NR | PR 11 |
Multari et al. [32] | NR | R | PR 8 | NR | NR |
Plummer et al. [14] | R (0.5–33 months 2) | R | R | R | NR |
Prémont et al. [38] | R (2–62 months 3) | R | R | R | R |
Sapienza et al. [11] | R (≥1 year 1) | R | NA 9 | NR | R |
Sarma [40] | NR | NA | NA | NR | NR |
Vani and Lakshmi [33] | R (6 months) | R | NA 9 | NR | NR |
Procedure | Publication | Preoperative Steroid | Postoperative Steroid | Surgery Notes | Operated Eyes | Reprolapse | Reprolapse (%) | 95% CI 1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Morgan pocket | Chaudery et al. [28] | Yes | Yes | 2-layer closure 5–0 Vicryl Cartilage excision NR | 24 | 2 3 | 8.3 | 2.3–25.8 |
Dehghan et al. [17] | NR | No | 2-layer closure 6–0 to 7–0 PDS or Vicryl Cartilage excision NR | 38 | 1 | 2.6 | 0–13.5 | |
Gupta et al. [29] | NR | Yes | 2-layer closure 6–0 Vicryl Cartilage excision NR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0–49.0 | |
Kelawala et al. [30] | Yes | Yes | 1-layer closure 5–0 Vicryl Cartilage excision NR | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0–20.4 | |
Mazzucchelli et al. [31] | NR | NR | NR | 144 | 18 | 12.5 | 8.1–18.9 | |
Morgan et al. [27] | NR | NR | 1- or 2-layer closure 5–0 Dexon or 6–0 Vicryl Cartilage excision NR | 18 | 1 2 | 5.9 | 1–27.0 | |
Multari et al. [32] | NR | No | Conjunctivectomy 1-layer closure 5–0 Monosyn Cartilage excised if everted | 234 | 12 | 5.1 | 3.0–8.7 | |
Vani and Lakshmi [33] | NR | No | 1-layer closure 3–0 catgut Cartilage excision NR | 2 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.0–65.8 | |
Periosteal anchor | Dugan et al. [37] | NR | Yes | 3–0 Ethilon | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0–32.4 |
Kaswan and Martin [36] | NR | Yes | 3–0 monofilament | 83 | 0 | 0 | 0–32.4 | |
Gupta et al. [29] | NR | Yes | 3–0 Prolene | 4 | 1 4 | 25.0 | 4.6–70.0 | |
Inferior scleral anchor | Morgan et al. [27] | NR | NR | 4–0 silk | 51 | 30 | 58.9 | 45.2–71.2 |
Morgan pocket with periosteal anchor | Multari et al. [32] | NR | No | 3–0 to 1 nylon for periosteum Cartilage excised if everted | 186 | 9 | 4.8 | 2.6–8.9 |
Intranictitans tack | Plummer et al. [14] | Yes | Yes (6–8 weeks) | 4–0 nylon Cartilage excised subsequently on one patient who developed eversion | 15 | 1 | 6.7 | 1.2–29.8 |
Perilimbal pocket | Prémont et al. [38] | Yes in some | No | 6–0 braided Vicryl Cartilage excised if everted | 44 | 4 | 9.1 | 3.6–21.2 |
Ventral rectus anchor | Sapienza et al. [11] | NR | No | 5–0 Ethilon Cartilage excised routinely | 122 | 0 | 0.0 | 0–3.1 |
Publication | STT-1 Data | Procedure | Eyes | Follow-Up | Statistics Method | Preoperative STT-1 mm | Postoperative STT-1 mm | Mean Difference (mm) | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dugan et al. [37] | Mean difference 1 | Excision (group 1) | 3 | 15 weeks | Repeat measures ANOVA | NR | NR | −2.0 | <0.01 |
Excision (group 2) | 3 | 24 weeks | NR | NR | −1.6 | <0.001 | |||
Excision (group 3) | 3 | 15 weeks | NR | NR | −1.1 | <0.01 | |||
Periosteal anchor | 6 | 8 weeks | NR | NR | −0.7 | NR | |||
Periosteal anchor | 3 | 16 weeks | NR | NR | −0.8 | NR | |||
Plummer et al. [14] | Raw data | Intranictitans tack | 11 | NR | None | 18.5 ± 3.1 2 | 21.2 ± 3.7 2 | 2.7 | 0.1454 2 |
Prémont et al. [38] | Least square means 3 | Perilimbal pocket | 19 | 5.5 months median range 0.5–48 mo. | Linear mixed model | 19.6 ± 1.1 | 23.7 ± 1.1 | 4.1 | 0.003 |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
White, C.; Brennan, M.L. An Evidence-Based Rapid Review of Surgical Techniques for Correction of Prolapsed Nictitans Glands in Dogs. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5030075
White C, Brennan ML. An Evidence-Based Rapid Review of Surgical Techniques for Correction of Prolapsed Nictitans Glands in Dogs. Veterinary Sciences. 2018; 5(3):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5030075
Chicago/Turabian StyleWhite, Constance, and Marnie L. Brennan. 2018. "An Evidence-Based Rapid Review of Surgical Techniques for Correction of Prolapsed Nictitans Glands in Dogs" Veterinary Sciences 5, no. 3: 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5030075
APA StyleWhite, C., & Brennan, M. L. (2018). An Evidence-Based Rapid Review of Surgical Techniques for Correction of Prolapsed Nictitans Glands in Dogs. Veterinary Sciences, 5(3), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5030075