Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchors from Galactomannan and GPI-Anchored Protein Are Synthesized by Distinct Pathways in Aspergillus fumigatus
Previous Article in Journal
Fungi as Endophytes in Artemisia thuscula: Juxtaposed Elements of Diversity and Phylogeny
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Insights into the Paradoxical Effect of Echinocandins
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 4
Issue 1
10.3390/jof4010018
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Members of Glycosyl-Hydrolase Family 17 of A. fumigatus Differentially Affect Morphogenesis

by
Nicolas Millet
,
Jean-Paul Latgé
and
Isabelle Mouyna
*
Aspergillus Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2018, 4(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010018
Submission received: 11 December 2017 / Revised: 24 January 2018 / Accepted: 26 January 2018 / Published: 30 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Cell Wall)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cell wall biosynthesis and remodeling are essential for fungal growth and development. In the fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus, the β(1,3)glucan is the major cell wall polysaccharide. This polymer is synthesized at the plasma membrane by a transmembrane complex, then released into the parietal space to be remodeled by enzymes, and finally incorporated into the pre-existing cell wall. In the Glycosyl-Hydrolases family 17 (GH17) of A. fumigatus, two β(1,3)glucanosyltransferases, Bgt1p and Bgt2p, have been previously characterized. Disruption of BGT1 and BGT2 did not result in a phenotype, but sequence comparison and hydrophobic cluster analysis showed that three other genes in A. fumigatus belong to the GH17 family, SCW4, SCW11, and BGT3. In constrast to Δbgt1bgt2 mutants, single and multiple deletion of SCW4, SCW11, and BGT3 showed a decrease in conidiation associated with a higher conidial mortality and an abnormal conidial shape. Moreover, mycelium was also affected with a slower growth, stronger sensitivity to cell wall disturbing agents, and altered cell wall composition. Finally, the synthetic interactions between Bgt1p, Bgt2p, and the three other members, which support a functional cooperation in cell-wall assembly, were analyzed. Our data suggest that Scw4p, Scw11p, and Bgt3p are essential for cell wall integrity and might have antagonistic and distinct functions to Bgt1p and Bgt2p.

1. Introduction

Aspergillus fumigatus is the most common airborne fungal pathogen, causing fatal invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients [1]. One of the most important characteristics of the fungal cell is the presence of an outer and rigid layer called the cell wall, which surrounds it. This biological coat is both a rigid and protective exoskeleton and a dynamic structure. In A. fumigatus, as in other pathogenic fungi, the cell wall acts as a sieve and reservoir of antigens, enzymes, and toxins that play an active role during infection. Essential for growth, it provides the organism with a resistance from the internal turgor pressure, and protects the cell from its environment (e.g., desiccation and osmotic stress) [2,3]. Moreover, the cell wall is in contact with the external environment and therefore plays an important role in the interaction between the pathogen and the host [4,5]. Because of its absence in humans and its essentiality, the fungal cell wall is a promising target for antifungal drugs and therefore, it is important to elucidate cell wall biosynthesis and organization.
The cell wall of A. fumigatus accounts for about 30% of the cell dry weight and is mainly constituted of different polysaccharides (at least 90%) [6,7]. β(1,3)glucan (glucose polymer bound with β(1,3) bonds) is the main component of the A. fumigatus cell wall. β(1,3)glucan chains are connected together by β(1,6) linkages (4% of branching points), forming a three-dimensional network. It constitutes the primary skeleton of the fungal wall, on which other polysaccharides are covalently linked (e.g., Chitin, Galactomannan). Thus, crosslinking of the β(1,3)glucan chains ensures the rigidity of the wall, which is essential for the survival and growth of the fungus.
During the various stages of the fungal life, the cell wall is a dynamic structure, which is constantly reorganized. The continuous processes of synthesis and degradation of the parietal material are highly regulated in order to ensure the biological functions of the cell wall. β(1,3)glucan is synthesized as a linear polymer by a plasma membrane-bound synthase complex using UDP-glucose as a substrate and extruded as linear β(1-3)glucan chains through the membrane into the periplasmic space [8,9]. Upon arrival in the cell wall space, its remodeling involves extracellular enzymatic activities such as β(1,3)glucanases and transglucosidases, which are known to play an important role in the modification of cell wall glucan [10]. Glycoside-Hydrolases (GH) have been classified by sequence and structure homology within the CAZy (Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes, [11]) database [12]. Several GH families have already been characterized and play an important role in the architecture of the fungal cell wall [13].
The first family of β(1,3)glucanosyltransferase described in A. fumigatus has been the GEL family (GH72) which consists of seven members, named Gel1p to Gel7p (Glucan elongase protein). The enzymatic activity of these glucanosyltransferases has been demonstrated [13,14,15]. These enzymes internally split a β(1-3)glucan chain and transfer the newly generated reducing end to the non-reducing end of another β(1-3)glucan molecule. The generation of a new β(1-3) linkage between the acceptor and donor molecule results in the elongation of the β(1-3)glucan chain [14,15]. These proteins are attached to the plasma membrane by a Glycosyl-Phosphatidyl-Inositol (GPI) anchor and have orthologues in yeasts and other filamentous fungi, GAS for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, PHR for Candida albicans, and EPD for Candida maltosa [16]. The biochemical assays performed on purified recombinant Gas1p, Phr1p, and Phr2p showed that these proteins have a β(1,3)glucanosyltransferase activity similar to that of Gel1p [17]. In A. fumigatus, the mutant Δgel1 has no phenotype compared to the parental strain, whereas the mutant Δgel2 and the double mutant Δgel1gel2 exhibit growth delay, abnormal conidiogenesis, and altered cell wall composition. In addition, Δgel2 and the double mutant Δgel1gel2 show reduced virulence in a murine model of invasive aspergillosis [18]. Moreover, Gel4p is essential for the fungal life (deletion is lethal) [19]. These data showed for the first time that the β(1,3)glucanosyltransferase activity is essential for both the morphogenesis and virulence of A. fumigatus [18,19]. Moreover, despite the fact that these enzymes display the same enzymatic activity, their involvement in cell wall morphogenesis is different.
To date, two other β(1,3)glucanosyltransferase activities have been characterized in A. fumigatus (Bgt1p and Bgt2p) [20,21]. These two proteins cleave and release laminaribiose from the reducing end of linear β(1,3)glucans and transfer the remaining glucan to the non-reducing end of another β(1,3)glucan acceptor with β(1,6) linkage to create a branched polymer. Bgt1p will transfer the donor β(1,3)glucan on the non-reducing end of the chain, whereas Bgt2p will preferentially transfer within the β(1,3)glucan chain. Previously, it has been shown that the single mutants Δbgt1 and Δbgt2, as well as the double mutant Δbgt1Δbgt2, have no distinct phenotype in terms of growth and morphology under tested conditions [21]. Moreover, these mutants show no difference in term of sensitivity to cell wall-disrupting agents such as Congo Red (CR) or Calcofluor White (CFW) and the same amount of branching of the parietal β(1,3)glucan, compared to the parental strain. These results suggest that at least one other branching activity is present in the A. fumigatus cell wall. Bgt1p and Bgt2p belong to the Glycosyl-Hydrolase 17 family (GH17), which possesses three other members named Bgt3p, Scw4p, and Scw11p according to their respective homologies to the protein Bgt1p or the proteins Scw4p and Scw11p (soluble cell wall proteins) of S. cerevisiae [22]. In our study, we analyzed the effect of successive deletions of all the GH17 family members in A. fumigatus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains and Growth Conditions

The parental strain of A. fumigatus used in this study is the A1163 Ku80Δ strain, which comes from a clinical isolate, named CEA17 (pyrG +) [23]. This strain is grown in tubes containing 2% Malt agar medium. For DNA extraction, cultures were grown in Sabouraud liquid medium (2% glucose + 1% mycopeptone). Transformations were performed on minimal medium (10 g/L glucose, 0.92 g/L ammonium tartrate, 0.52 g/L KCl, 0.52 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 1.52 g/L KH2PO4, 1 mL/L trace element solution [24], pH adjusted to 7.0). Hygromycin B (hph) (Sigma®, St Louis, MO, USA) was added to transformation plates in an overlay after one night of incubation at room temperature, resulting in a final concentration of 150 µg/mL. Conidia were collected from agar slants/plates after seven days of growth at room temperature using 0.05% Tween 80 solution. The mutant strains were conserved on 2% Malt medium supplemented with 150 µg/mL of hygromycin B and stored in 30% glycerol at −80 °C.

2.2. RNA Isolation and Analysis of the GH17 Gene Expression by RT-PCR

Mycelium of each strain was grown for 16 h in liquid MM medium and then disrupted with 0.5 mm diameter glass beads in 500 µL, and RNA was then isolated by using the phenol-chloroform method. A first DNase treatment was carried out on an RNeasy column (Qiagen®, Hilden, Germany) using DnaseI (Roche®, Basel, Switzerland) and a second one was performed after elution of the RNA from the column with Turbo DNA-free DNAse (Ambion®, Foster City, CA, USA). One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using a reverse transcriptase Biorad kit (Iscript cDNA synthesis kit, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following the instructions of the manufacturer. Quantitative PCR assays were performed according to BioRad manufacturer’s instructions using 96-well optical plates (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and an iCycler iQ® Real-Time PCR Detection system (170-8740, Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA). Each run was assayed in triplicates in a total volume of 25 µL containing the DNA template at an appropriate dilution, 1× Absolute SYBR green Fluorescein (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and 100 mM of each primer. The primers used were designed using the Beacon Designer 4.0 software and are shown in Table S1. PCR conditions were: 95 °C/15 min for 1cycle; 95 °C/30 s and 55 °C/30 s for 40 cycles. Amplification of one single specific target DNA was checked with a melting curve analysis (+0.5 °C ramping for 10 s, from 55 °C to 95 °C). The generated data was then analyzed using iCycler iQ® Opticla Sytstem Software v3.1 (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA). The expression ratios were normalized to TEF1 expression, and calculated according to the DDCt method [25]. To verify the absence of genomic DNA contamination, negative controls in which reverse transcriptase was omitted were used for each gene set. Three independent biological replicates were performed.

2.3. Construction of the Single and Multiple Mutants of the GH17 Family with the β-Rec/Six System

To conduct single and multiple gene deletion, we transformed A. fumigatus with a the β-Rec/six-Specific Recombination System, which is a self-excising resistance marker cassette [26]. To replace the gene of interest by this marker using homologous recombination, 1 KB of the 5′ and 3′ flanking regions of each gene was amplified by PCR from A. fumigatus genomic DNA using primers (Forw1/Rev1 and Forw2/Rev2) (Table S1). After amplification, 5′ and 3′ fragments were ligated on both sides of the β-Rec System in the pUC19L using the GENEART seamless cloning and assembly kit (Life Technologies, A13288, Carlsbad, CA, USA). To facilitate gene recombination, before transformation, cassettes were released from the plasmid using restriction sites located inside the flanking primer cassette (see Table S1 for restriction site). A. fumigatus conidia were transformed by the electroporation method described by Sanchez and Aguirre [27] with subsequent modifications. Conidia were washed three times with water. 109 conidia were inoculated in 125 mL of YG medium (0.5% yeast extract, 2% glucose) and incubated at 37 °C at 300 rpm for 4 h to obtain swollen conidia. Those conidia were recovered by centrifugation and then inoculated in 12.5 mL of YG medium (1% yeast extract, 1% glucose, 20 mM Hepes, pH 8.0) and incubated for 1 h at 30 °C at 100 rpm. Conidia were centrifuged and resuspended in 1 mL of cold 1 M sorbitol. 10 µg of DNA was added to 50 µL of conidial suspension, incubated for 15 min on ice, and transferred to 0.1 cm electroporation tanks. Electroporation was performed using the Bio-Rad gene pulser (Gene Pulser Xcell, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with the following parameters: voltage, 1 kV; capacitance, 25 microfarads; and resistance, 400 Ω. After transformation, 1 mL of cold YG medium was added to the tank, and conidia were transferred to a 10 mL sterile tube and incubated on ice for 15 min. Tubes were incubated at 30 °C at 100 rpm for 1 h and 30 min. Conidia were plated on minimal medium (500 µL/9 cm diameter Petri dish) and incubated at 20 °C overnight. Hygromycin (150 µg/mL) were added in a 10 mL overlay of minimal medium 0.7% agarose, to allow transformants selection, and plates were incubated at 37 °C for two days. After each deletion step, proper integration of the deletion cassette was verified by PCR and then by Southern Blot (Figure S1). The A. fumigatus single and multiple mutants constructed in this study are listed in Table S2.

2.4. Growth, Sporulation, Germination, Viability, and Morphology of the Mutant Strains

Mycelial growth was tested on different agar media (Malt 2%, Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI), minimal medium (MM), and Glucose 3%-Yeast Extract 1% (YG)) at 37 °C and 50 °C, and the diameter of the colony was measured at different time points (24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h) after inoculation of 3 µL of a conidia solution at 5 × 106 conidia/mL (c/mL). For the liquid condition: 106 conidia were inoculated in 50 mL of liquid medium (3% glucose + 1% yeast extract) at 37 °C ,150 rpm. In order to calculate the dry weight of the fungus at each time point (24 h, 48 h, and 72 h), the mycelium was recovered on a filter (Macherey Nagel® (Hœrdt, France): 0.55 mm), washed with water, dried at 80 °C for 24 h, and weighed.
The conidiation rates were estimated following the inoculation of 105 conidia onto three tubes containing 2% Malt agar (10 mL/tube). After one week of growth at 37 °C, conidia were recovered with 5 mL of an aqueous 0.05% Tween 20 solution and the absorbance of the solution was measured at 600 nm (DO600 nm = 0.620 ≈ 2 × 107 conidia/mL). Conidial germination was followed microscopically every 30 min after 4 h of growth at 37 °C (inoculation of 5 µL of conidia at 106 cell/mL on a glass slide with 2% agar Malt medium). For the viability assays, conidia on agar slants were stored at 37 °C for two months, conidial suspensions were then recovered in 0.05% Tween 80 water, and the viability of conidia was evaluated following dilutions and plating them on 2% malt medium. The sensitivity to Congo Red® and Calcofluor-White® (CR: C6277 and CFW: F3543, Sigma®, St Louis, MO, USA) was estimated on minimal agar medium containing different concentrations of drugs (CR: 0 to 300 µg/mL and CFW: 0 to 200 µg/mL). A total of 3 µL of a suspension of conidia at 5 × 106 cell/mL was inoculated on plates and incubated at 37 °C, and growth was measured at different times.

2.5. Carbohydrate Analysis of the Cell Wall Fractions

After 24 h of growth at 37 °C in liquid medium YG (50 mL) containing 5 × 107 conidia (each strain is cultivated in triplicates), the mycelium was filtered on Buchner with two filter papers (Macherrey Nagel®: 0.55 mm). The resulting mycelial was resuspended in a solution of 200 mM Tris-HCl pH 8 containing glass beads (0.75 to 1 mm diameter) and disrupted in a FastPrep® (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA),two times 1 min at level 4, and centrifuged for 5 min at 4000× g, washed with water and lyophilized. Then, the cell wall was prepared as described by Gastebois et al., 2013 [28]. The neutral hexoses of the parietal fractions were estimated by the phenol sulfuric method [29]. The hexosamines have been identified and quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), after being hydrolysed with 500 µL of 6 N·HCl for 6 h at 100 °C, as described by Johnson et al., in 1971 [30]. Branching level of β(1,3)glucan from the cell wall alkali-insoluble fraction was estimated by HPLC after laminarinase-A digestion. Prior to LamA digestion, 5 mg of AI fraction was treated by 100 mM meta-IO4Na (1 mL) at room temperature in the dark for three days. After the addition of 20 µL of glycerol for neutralization of the excess of periodate, the AI fraction was sequentially washed with water, reduced in the presence of 10 mg/mL BH4Na overnight, neutralized by the addition of acetic acid, washed with water, treated with 10% acetic acid at 100 °C for 1 h, and washed with water. Enzymatic digestion and the HPLC procedure have been previously described [21].

2.6. Phylogenetic Analysis

GH17 protein sequences were downloaded from the PubMed website and used for generating the alignment using MUSCLE v3.8.311 with default parameters. The software trimAl v32 (Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Spain) was then used to trim the alignments generated by MUSCLE (version 3.5, by Robert C. Edgar), with –gt 0.9 (for fraction of sequences with a gap allowed) and –cons 60 (for minimum percentage of the positions in the original alignment to conserve) options. We used ProTest v2.43 (Free Software Foundation (FSF) Boston, MA, USA) to choose the best protein substitution model, namely LG+I+G+F. Finally, maximum likelihood analyses were conducted with PhyML v3.0.14 (FSF, Boston, MA, USA) to reconstruct phylogenetic trees; support for the branches were determined from a bootstrap analysis of 100 resampled datasets.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Results were statistically analyzed by an ANOVA two-way test with a Dunnet’s post-test for conidiation, growth, and survival experiment, using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA), with a p value below 0.05 considered as significant: (ns: not significant) (p < 0.05 *), (p < 0.01 **), (p < 0.001 ***), and (p < 0.0001 ****).

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Characterization of the GH17 Family of A. fumigatus

The Glycosyl-Hydrolase 17 family of A. fumigatus contains five members: Bgt1p, Bgt2p, Bgt3p, Scw4p, and Scw11p (AFUA_1G11460, AFUA_3G00270, AFUA_5G08780, AFUA_6G12380, AFUA_8G05610, respectively [31]). Characteristics and size of the proteins are shown in Table 1. Except Bgt3p, all family members contain a secretory signal peptide at the N-terminus identified by the SignalP predictor [32]. Only Bgt2p has been identified as a GPI anchored protein (BigPI and PredGPI websites) [33,34]. The percentage of identity between the members of the A. fumigatus GH17 family is low and varies between 9% and 28% (Table S3).
A comparative analysis of the GH17 family of A. fumigatus (Af), A. nidulans (An), S. cerevisiae (Sc), and C. albicans (Ca) shows that two putative catalytic sites identified during the study of Bgt1p and Bgt2p are conserved between all proteins (glutamate residues in position 128 and 219 of Bgt1p) (Figure S2). As shown in Figure S3, members of the GH17 family can be assigned to five distinct groups according to their evolutionary relationships based on a phylogenetic analysis with the Maximum likelihood method: Group I comprises Af_Bgt1p and its homologues, Sc_Bgl2p, and Ca_Bgl2p. Group II includes Af_Bgt2p and An_Eg1Cp with 65% of identity, both of which are GPI anchored proteins. Group III comprises Sc_Scw4p, Sc_Scw10p, Ca_Scw4p, and Af_Scw4p proteins. Group IV comprises the Scw11p protein of the three species, and finally, group V comprises only the Af_Bgt3p protein.

3.2. Gene Expression Level of the GH17 Family during Growth

The gene expression levels of the GH17 family have been investigated in dormant, swollen, and germinated conidia by RNA sequencing analysis [35]. BGT3 and SCW4 remain weakly expressed during the three phases. On the other hand, BGT1 and BGT2 have a much stronger and relatively constant expression during the 8 h of growth. Finally, the gene expression of SCW11 has considerably increased during conidial germination (Figure 1a).
The gene expression level of the GH17 family has also been investigated during sporulation (Figure 1b). The GH17 family is differentially expressed during conidiation, during which time BGT1 and BGT2 remain highly expressed. In contrast to the early developmental stages, BGT3 and SCW4 are more highly expressed than SCW11 (Figure 1b).

3.3. Phenotypic Analyses of the Single and Multiple Mutants

3.3.1. Conidiation, Viability, and Morphology of the Mutants

To analyze the function of A. fumigatus GH17 proteins, simple and multiple gene deletion were undertaken. Conidiation of the mutants was determined after one week of culture at 37 °C on 2% Malt agar medium (Figure 2). A decrease of the conidiation has been observed for the single mutants Δbgt3 (20% ± 5.4) and Δscw4 (36% ± 3.5) compared to the parental strain. In contrast, Δbgt1, Δbgt2, and Δscw11 single mutants sporulated like the parental strain. The triple mutant Δscw4scw11bgt3 showed decreased conidiation by 52% ± 5.9. However, additional deletions of BGT2 and BGT1 resulting in the quadruple and quintuple mutants slightly increased sporulation rates.
The long-term conidial survival has been investigated after one and two months of storage at 37 °C. Conidial mortality was estimated by counting the cells able or not able to germ after this period. After one month, we did not observe significant differences. However, after two months, conidial survival decreased for all the mutants between 34% ± 3.6 and 47% ± 3.9 compared to the parental strain, with the exception of Δbgt1 and Δbgt2 mutants (Figure 3). These results showed that the long-term viability of conidia is altered by the deletion of the SCW4, SCW11, and BGT3 genes. In Δbgt1 and Δbgt2 mutants, long-term survival was improved (91% ± 3.6 and 95% ± 1.2 vs 77% ± 3.6 for the parental strain). Germination rates of the mutants were measured on 2% Malt agar medium at 37 °C. No significant difference compared to the parental strain has been observed here.
Microscopic observations of conidia during germination revealed morphological changes. In Δscw4 and Δscw11 single mutants, as well as in the Δscw4scw11 double mutant and the Δscw4scw11bgt3 triple mutant, 10% of the dormant conidia showed a larger size (Figure 4). In the swollen stage (4 h) and in germinated conidia (8 h) (Figure 4B,C), 15% of the cells showed abnormal shapes: conidia clumped together or shriveled but they were still able to germinate. Moreover, following the appearance of a germ tube, we observed irregular CFW deposits (Figure 4C). In contrast, the Δbgt1, Δbgt2, Δbgt3, Δscw4scw11bgt3bgt2 (Δ4), and Δscw4scw11bgt3bgt2bgt1 (Δ5) mutants were similar to the parental strain.

3.3.2. Mycelia Defects

The growth kinetics of the mutants have been investigated. We did not observe any difference in term of biomass in liquid medium (YG). In contrast, on plates, regardless of media (RPMI, MM, YG), single mutants Δbgt1, Δbgt2, Δbgt3, and Δscw11 showed similar growth to the parental strain at different culture times (24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h) (Figure 5). Δscw4 showed a slight growth decrease (23% ± 4). In the Δscw4scw11 double mutant, the growth decrease was more pronounced (40% ± 4, RPMI 48 h) and increased again in the triple mutant Δscw4scw11bgt3 (44% ± 2, RPMI 48 h) (Figure 5). All these results showed that the deletion of the SCW4 and SCW11 genes has an additive effect on the growth rate of A. fumigatus. On the other hand, like for the conidiation, after deletion of the BGT2 and BGT1 genes, in the quadruple and the quintuple mutant, respectively, growth decrease is less pronounced than in the triple mutant (Δ4: 20% ± 2.5 delay and Δ5: 20% ± 4 RPMI 48 h), suggesting that Scw4p/Scw11p/Bgt3p proteins and Bgt1p/Bgt2p proteins might have antagonistic activities in vivo. The results obtained were similar for all the media tested and the addition of 1M of sorbitol did not restore the parental growth rate in Δscw4scw11 and Δscw4scw11bgt3, suggesting that the defect is not due to an osmotic pressure imbalance.
We also analyzed the influence of the SCW deletion on BGT expression by real-time qPCR. GH17 gene expression in the vegetative mycelium of the Δscw4, Δscw11, and Δscw4scw11 mutants and the parental strain shows no significant difference of BGT1, BGT2, and BGT3 expression in those mutants compared to the parental strain (Figure S4). In contrast, in the Δscw4 mutant, SCW11 was significantly upregulated by 2.5-fold, indicating that the lack of SCW4 tends to be compensated by SCW11 overexpression. Like the cumulative effect found on the growth rate, this result suggests that Scw4p and Scw11p can have a similar function.

3.3.3. Sensitivity to Cell Wall Disturbing Agents

Sensitivity to molecules known to interfere with cell wall assembly, such as Calcofluor-White® (CFW) and Congo Red (CR), has been studied. The single mutants Δbgt1 and Δbgt2 and the double Δbgt1bgt2 mutant did not show increased sensitivity to CR and CFW [21], as well as the Δbgt3 single mutant; whereas the Δscw4 and Δscw11 single mutants showed an increased sensitivity (Figure 6). The phenotype was more pronounced for the double mutant Δscw4scw11, as well as for the Δscw4scw11bgt3 triple mutant. In contrast, in the quadruple and quintuple mutants, the sensitivity to CR and CFW is lower than in Δscw4scw11 and Δscw4scw11bgt3 mutants and tends towards a parental phenotype.

3.4. Analysis of the Cell Wall Polysaccharides

Mycelial cell wall monosaccharide compositions of the GH17 deletion strains are shown in the Figure 7. No difference in cell wall composition has previously been observed in the double Δbgt1bgt2 mutant [21]. A decrease in hexose (glucan) levels has been observed in the AI and AS fractions for the Δscw4scw11, Δscw4scw11bgt3, and the Δscw4scw11bgt3bgt2bgt1 quintuple mutants. This reduction is compensated by an increase of GlcNAc (chitin) in the AI and an increase of GalNAc (GAG) in both fractions. The β(1,6) branching point of the β(1,3)glucan in the GH17 cell wall mutants has been investigated. The percentage of trisaccharides β(1,3/1,6)glucan was performed by HPLC from the alkali-insoluble fractions of the double, triple, and quintuple mutants. In these three mutants, no significant decrease in the β(1,6) bonds of β(1,3)glucan has been observed.

4. Discussion

For the first time in filamentous fungi, the role of the complete GH17 family has been investigated. In A. fumigatus, five genes are present in this family of GH: BGT1, BGT2, BGT3, SCW4, and SCW11. In order to understand the role of these proteins in cell wall remodeling, single and multiple mutants were constructed and their phenotypes suggested that these genes have opposite functions.
Except for a beneficial effect on conidial survival, no phenotypic differences were found in the single mutants Δbgt1 and Δbgt2, as well as in the double mutant Δbgt1bgt2, as already described in previous studies [20,21]. In contrast, Δscw4 and Δscw11 single mutants, Δscw4scw11 double mutant, and Δscw4scw11bgt3 triple mutant showed several phenotypic defects: a decrease in conidiation associated with variable conidia size, as well as a high conidial mortality. During germination, conidia are deformed and present CFW labeling patches, suggesting cell wall embrittlement in these mutants. In addition, a reduced growth and an increased sensitivity to agents disturbing the parietal organization have been observed. Moreover, these phenotypes are reinforced after the deletion of the SCW4, SCW11, and BGT3 genes all together, suggesting that these proteins could act synergistically. Our results showed the importance of Scw11p, Scw4p, and Bgt3p in the formation of the conidial and mycelial cell wall. Similar phenotypes were observed in the double mutant Δscw4scw10 of S. cerevisiae, with respect to CR and CFW sensitivity, survival, and cellular shape [22,37,38].
Deletion of SCW4 and SCW11 also induced an alteration of the parietal composition with a decrease in glucan (hexose) content compensated by an increase in chitin (GlcNAc) and GAG (GalNAc), which is a typical compensatory mechanism of cell wall mutants (for example, found in the Δgel2, Δfks1, and Δags mutants) [18,39,40]. These results suggest that these enzymes are involved in cell wall organization. Similar observations have been made in S. cerevisiae. Strains lacking SCW4 and SCW10 showed a decrease in the glucan amount with an increase of chitin in the alkali-insoluble cell wall fraction, suggesting that these proteins have a role in cell wall morphogenesis [22].
Surprisingly, multiple deletions comprising the BGT1 and BGT2 (quadruple and quintuple mutants) lead to an almost restored phenotype suggesting an antagonistic and distinct function of these two proteins with respect to the other three members of the GH17 family. These results are similar to those obtained in S. cerevisiae after the deletion of BGL2 in the Δscw4scw10 background, which also abolished most of the phenotypes of the double mutant. Furthermore, overexpression of Scw10p in Δbgl2 drastically increased the strain’s CFW sensitivity [20]. It has also been reported that overexpression of the Bgl2p protein in S. cerevisiae is harmful for cell viability and appears to be lethal [41].
We investigated the gene expression level of the GH17 family during different growth stages: germination, vegetative growth, and sporulation. Depending on the growth stage, the GH17 members were differentially expressed. Even if BGT1 and BGT2 genes are the most highly expressed genes at every stage, no strong phenotype was associated with their deletion. During conidiation, SCW4 and BGT3 expression was higher than SCW11 expression, which is correlated with the lack of a phenotype observed for the single Δscw11 mutant. In contrast, in the vegetative mycelium of the SCW multiple mutants, we did not observe any variation of gene expression level for the GH17 members. Only SCW11 was significantly upregulated in the Δscw4 mutant, suggesting that SCW11 can compensate SCW4 expression and that the corresponding proteins have a similar function.
The sequence comparison of the GH17 proteins of A. fumigatus, S. cerevisiae, and C. albicans showed that the two glutamic acids corresponding to the putative catalytic sites are conserved between all the proteins, suggesting conserved enzymatic activities between them. However, this family can be subdivided into five subgroups, and the homologies between the subgroups are low (9 to 28% of identity). In S. cerevisiae, it has been shown that punctual mutation of the predicted catalytic residues (Glu326 and Glu380) in Scw10p abolished the in vivo function [13].
Interestingly, transglycosidase activities were identified in groups I and II. Af_Bgt1p and Bgt2p are able to cleave a disaccharide from the reducing end of the β(1,3)glucan polymer and then Bgt1p will transfer the remaining chain to the non-reducing end of a second β(1,3)glucan chain via a β(1,6) linkage, whereas Bgt2p will preferentially transfer within the β(1,3)glucan chain. In the cell wall of Δscw4scw11, Δscw4scw11bgt3, and Δscw4scw11bgt3bgt2bgt1, we did not observe a significant decrease of the β(1,6) branching point, which is in agreement with the recent data published by Aimanianda et al., in 2016 [42]. Indeed, in this study, it has been shown that branched β(1,3)glucan in the yeast S. cerevisiae occurs due to the cooperative activity of two glycosyltransferases, Gas1p and Bgl2p. Gas1p was responsible for 75% of the branching.
In Group III and IV, no enzymatic activity has been demonstrated for Scw4p or Scw11p proteins in S. cerevisiae. An A. fumigatus recombinant protein Scw11p has also been produced in Pichia pastoris, but its enzymatic analysis did not reveal any glucanosyltransferase or glucanase activity. Possibly, unlike Bgt1p and Bgt2p proteins for which we showed enzymatic activity, Scw11p may require additional factors to be active.
Nevertheless, these proteins are not closely related to Bgt1p and Bgt2p. The phenotype of the SCW mutants are reminiscent of the phenotype observed in other families like chitinases and β(1,3)glucanases, which have been found to be important for cell separation [43]. In A. fumigatus, endo β(1,3)glucanases of the GH16 and GH81 families are involved in the conidial chain separation [30] and in S. cerevisiae, the deletion of SCW11 showed a separation defect between daughter cells and mother cells [44]. All of these results could suggest that Scw4p and Scw11p of A. fumigatus may act as β(1,3)glucanases and not as transglycosidase.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2309-608X/4/1/18/s1.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the labex Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases (IBEID) and la Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM).

Author Contributions

Jean-Paul Latgé and Isabelle Mouyna conceived and designed the experiments; Nicolas Millet performed the experiments; Nicolas Millet and Isabelle Mouyna analyzed the data and contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Nicolas Millet and Isabelle Mouyna wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Latgé, J.P. The pathobiology of Aspergillus fumigatus. Trends Microbiol. 2001, 9, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Beauvais, A.; Fontaine, T.; Aimanianda, V.; Latgé, J.-P. Aspergillus Cell Wall and Biofilm. Mycopathologia 2014, 178, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Free, S.J. Fungal Cell Wall Organization and Biosynthesis. In Advances in Genetics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 81, pp. 33–82. ISBN 978-0-12-407677-8. [Google Scholar]
  4. Erwig, L.P.; Gow, N.A.R. Interactions of fungal pathogens with phagocytes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Gresnigt, M.S.; Romani, L.; Netea, M.G.; Latgé, J.-P. Aspergillus fumigatus morphology and dynamic host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 661–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gow, N.A.R.; Latge, J.-P.; Munro, C.A. The Fungal Cell Wall: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fontaine, T.; Simenel, C.; Dubreucq, G.; Adam, O.; Delepierre, M.; Lemoine, J.; Vorgias, C.E.; Diaquin, M.; Latgé, J.P. Molecular organization of the alkali-insoluble fraction of Aspergillus fumigatus cell wall. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 27594–27607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Beauvais, A.; Drake, R.; Ng, K.; Diaquin, M.; Latgé, J.P. Characterization of the 1,3-β-glucan synthase of Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbiology 1993, 139, 3071–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Beauvais, A.; Bruneau, J.M.; Mol, P.C.; Buitrago, M.J.; Legrand, R.; Latgé, J.P. Glucan Synthase Complex of Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 2273–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Latgé, J.-P.; Steinbach, W.J. Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis, 1st ed.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-1-55581-438-0. [Google Scholar]
  11. Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes. Available online: http://www.cazy.org (accessed on 19 January 2018).
  12. Henrissat, B.; Bairoch, A. Updating the sequence-based classification of glycosyl-hydrolases. Biochem. J. 1996, 316, 695–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mouyna, I.; Hartl, L.; Latgé, J.-P. β-1,3-glucan modifying enzymes in Aspergillus fumigatus. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hartland, R.P.; Fontaine, T.; Debeaupuis, J.P.; Simenel, C.; Delepierre, M.; Latgé, J.P. A novel β-(1-3)-glucanosyltransferase from the cell wall of Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 26843–26849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mouyna, I.; Monod, M.; Fontaine, T.; Henrissat, B.; Léchenne, B.; Latgé, J.P. Identification of the catalytic residues of the first family of β(1,3)glucanosyltransferases identified in fungi. Biochem. J. 2000, 347, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Nakazawa, T.; Horiuchi, H.; Ohta, A.; Takagi, M. Isolation and Characterization of EPD1, an Essential Gene for Pseudohyphal Growth of a Dimorphic Yeast, Candida maltosa. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 2079–2086. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Mouyna, I.; Fontaine, T.; Vai, M.; Monod, M.; Fonzi, W.A.; Diaquin, M.; Popolo, L.; Hartland, R.P.; Latgé, J.-P. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored Glucanosyltransferases Play an Active Role in the Biosynthesis of the Fungal Cell Wall. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 14882–14889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mouyna, I.; Morelle, W.; Vai, M.; Monod, M.; Léchenne, B.; Fontaine, T.; Beauvais, A.; Sarfati, J.; Prévost, M.-C.; Henry, C.; et al. Deletion of GEL2 encoding for a β(1–3) glucanosyltransferase affects morphogenesis and virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 56, 1675–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gastebois, A.; Fontaine, T.; Latgé, J.-P.; Mouyna, I. β(1,3)Glucanosyltransferase Gel4p Is Essential for Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 1294–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mouyna, I.; Hartland, R.P.; Fontaine, T.; Diaquin, M.; Simenel, C.; Delepierre, M.; Henrissat, B.; Latge, J.-P. A 1,3-glucanosyltransferase isolated from the cell wall of Aspergillus fumigatus is a homologue of the yeast Bgl2p. Microbiology 1998, 144, 3171–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gastebois, A.; Mouyna, I.; Simenel, C.; Clavaud, C.; Coddeville, B.; Delepierre, M.; Latgé, J.-P.; Fontaine, T. Characterization of a New β(1–3)-Glucan Branching Activity of Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 2386–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Sestak, S.; Hagen, I.; Tanner, W.; Strahl, S. Scw10p, a cell-wall glucanase/transglucosidase important for cell-wall stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 2004, 150, 3197–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Da Silva Ferreira, M.E.; Kress, M.R.V.Z.; Savoldi, M.; Goldman, M.H.S.; Hartl, A.; Heinekamp, T.; Brakhage, A.A.; Goldman, G.H. The akuBKU80 Mutant Deficient for Nonhomologous End Joining Is a Powerful Tool for Analyzing Pathogenicity in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cove, D.J. The induction and repression of nitrate reductase in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1966, 113, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hartmann, T.; Dümig, M.; Jaber, B.M.; Szewczyk, E.; Olbermann, P.; Morschhäuser, J.; Krappmann, S. Validation of a Self-Excising Marker in the Human Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus by Employing the β-Rec/six Site-Specific Recombination System. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 6313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sánchez, O.; Aguirre, J. Efficient Transformation of Aspergillus nidulans by Electroporation of Germinated Conidia. Fungal Genet. Rep. 1996, 43, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gastebois, A.; Aimanianda, V.; Bachellier-Bassi, S.; Nesseir, A.; Firon, A.; Beauvais, A.; Schmitt, C.; England, P.; Beau, R.; Prévost, M.-C.; et al. SUN Proteins Belong to a Novel Family of β-(1,3)-Glucan-modifying Enzymes Involved in Fungal Morphogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 13387–13396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Dubois, M. Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Johnson, A.R. Improved method of hexosamine determination. Anal. Biochem. 1971, 44, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. EnsemblFungi. Available online: http://fungi.ensembl.org/Aspergillus_fumigatusa1163/Info/Index.
  32. SignalP 4.1 Server. Available online: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/ (accessed on 14 August 2017).
  33. Big-PI Fungal Predictor GPI Modification Site Prediction in Fungi. Available online: http://mendel.imp.ac.at/gpi/fungi_server.html (accessed on 12 January 2004).
  34. PredGPI Predictor. Available online: http://gpcr.biocomp.unibo.it/predgpi/pred.htm (accessed on 23 September 2008).
  35. Mouyna, I.; Aimanianda, V.; Hartl, L.; Prevost, M.C.; Sismeiro, O.; Dillies, M.A.; Jagla, B.; Legendre, R.; Coppee, J.Y.; Latgé, J.-P. GH16 and GH81 family β-(1,3)-glucanases in Aspergillus fumigatus are essential for conidial cell wall morphogenesis. Cell. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1285–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Valsecchi, I.; Sarikaya-Bayram, Ö.; Wong Sak Hoi, J.; Muszkieta, L.; Gibbons, J.; Prevost, M.-C.; Mallet, A.; Krijnse-Locker, J.; Ibrahim-Granet, O.; Mouyna, I.; et al. MybA, a transcription factor involved in conidiation and conidial viability of the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Mol. Microbiol. 2017, 105, 880–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cappellaro, C.; Mrsa, V.; Tanner, W. New Potential Cell Wall Glucanases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Their Involvement in Mating. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 5030–5037. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Teparic, R. Increased mortality of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall protein mutants. Microbiology 2004, 150, 3145–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Dichtl, K.; Samantaray, S.; Aimanianda, V.; Zhu, Z.; Prévost, M.-C.; Latgé, J.-P.; Ebel, F.; Wagener, J. Aspergillus fumigatus devoid of cell wall β-1,3-glucan is viable, massively sheds galactomannan and is killed by septum formation inhibitors. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 95, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Henry, C.; Latgé, J.-P.; Beauvais, A. α1,3 Glucans Are Dispensable in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mrsa, V.; Klebl, F.; Tanner, W. Purification and characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae BGL2 gene product, a cell wall endo-β-1,3-glucanase. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 2102–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Aimanianda, V.; Simenel, C.; Garnaud, C.; Clavaud, C.; Tada, R.; Barbin, L.; Mouyna, I.; Heddergott, C.; Popolo, L.; Ohya, Y.; et al. The Dual Activity Responsible for the Elongation and Branching of β-(1,3)-Glucan in the Fungal Cell Wall. mBio 2017, 8, e00619-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kuranda, M.J.; Robbins, P.W. Chitinase is required for cell separation during growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 19758–19767. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Colman-Lerner, A.; Chin, T.E.; Brent, R. Yeast Cbk1 and Mob2 Activate Daughter-Specific Genetic Programs to Induce Asymmetric Cell Fates. Cell 2001, 107, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 04 00018 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Gene expression profile of the GH17 family genes in dormant (T 0 h), swollen (T 4 h), and germinated conidia (T 8 h) in Glucose 3%/YE 1% media, in the parental strain. The data are extracted from RNAseq analysis data [35]. The errors bars represent standard deviation from the mean values of three different experiments; (b) Gene expression level of the GH17 genes in the mycelium during conidiation of the parental strain (WT), values are taken from the RNA-seq data analysis of Valsecchi et al., 2017 [36]. For this RNA-sequencing experiment, the fungus was grown for seven days on malt agar at 37 °C at room temperature.
Figure 1. (a) Gene expression profile of the GH17 family genes in dormant (T 0 h), swollen (T 4 h), and germinated conidia (T 8 h) in Glucose 3%/YE 1% media, in the parental strain. The data are extracted from RNAseq analysis data [35]. The errors bars represent standard deviation from the mean values of three different experiments; (b) Gene expression level of the GH17 genes in the mycelium during conidiation of the parental strain (WT), values are taken from the RNA-seq data analysis of Valsecchi et al., 2017 [36]. For this RNA-sequencing experiment, the fungus was grown for seven days on malt agar at 37 °C at room temperature.
Jof 04 00018 g001
Jof 04 00018 g002 550
Figure 2. Conidiation of the GH17 mutant was measured after one week of growth at 37 °C. Values given were the mean of at least three replicates ± standard error.
Figure 2. Conidiation of the GH17 mutant was measured after one week of growth at 37 °C. Values given were the mean of at least three replicates ± standard error.
Jof 04 00018 g002
Jof 04 00018 g003 550
Figure 3. Conidial survival of different GH17 mutants after two months storage at 37 °C (WT: parental strain). Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Figure 3. Conidial survival of different GH17 mutants after two months storage at 37 °C (WT: parental strain). Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Jof 04 00018 g003
Jof 04 00018 g004 550
Figure 4. Morphology of the dormant (A) 0 h; swollen (B) 4 h; and germinated (C) 8 h conidia of the parental strain, and Δscw4Δscw11 and Δscw4scw11bgt3bgt2bgt1 mutants using fluorescence microscopy (×63) with UV light and Calcofluor white® staining, in 3% Glucose medium +1% yeast extract. Green scale bars (2 µm in panel A), blue scale bars (6 µm in B and C), and yellow arrows highlight dormant conidia with abnormal size.
Figure 4. Morphology of the dormant (A) 0 h; swollen (B) 4 h; and germinated (C) 8 h conidia of the parental strain, and Δscw4Δscw11 and Δscw4scw11bgt3bgt2bgt1 mutants using fluorescence microscopy (×63) with UV light and Calcofluor white® staining, in 3% Glucose medium +1% yeast extract. Green scale bars (2 µm in panel A), blue scale bars (6 µm in B and C), and yellow arrows highlight dormant conidia with abnormal size.
Jof 04 00018 g004
Jof 04 00018 g005 550
Figure 5. Growth kinetics of the parental strain and the GH17 mutants on RPMI agar medium at 37 °C. The diameter of the colonies was measured after 48 h. Values are mean ± SD of three independent determinations. WT, parental strain.
Figure 5. Growth kinetics of the parental strain and the GH17 mutants on RPMI agar medium at 37 °C. The diameter of the colonies was measured after 48 h. Values are mean ± SD of three independent determinations. WT, parental strain.
Jof 04 00018 g005
Jof 04 00018 g006 550
Figure 6. Sensitivity of the family GH17 deletion mutants to cell wall perturbing agents congo red (CR) and calcofluor white (CFW) after 72 h growth at 37 °C on MM agar media (1.5 × 106 conidia were spotted). Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Figure 6. Sensitivity of the family GH17 deletion mutants to cell wall perturbing agents congo red (CR) and calcofluor white (CFW) after 72 h growth at 37 °C on MM agar media (1.5 × 106 conidia were spotted). Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Jof 04 00018 g006
Jof 04 00018 g007 550
Figure 7. Percentage of hexose, N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), and N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) in the alkali-insoluble (A) and alkali-soluble fraction (B) of the cell wall of the double, triple, and quintuple mutants of the GH17 family. Values are mean ± SD of three independent determinations. WT, parental strain.
Figure 7. Percentage of hexose, N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), and N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) in the alkali-insoluble (A) and alkali-soluble fraction (B) of the cell wall of the double, triple, and quintuple mutants of the GH17 family. Values are mean ± SD of three independent determinations. WT, parental strain.
Jof 04 00018 g007
Table
Table 1. Characteristics and size of the GH17 proteins of A. fumigatus.
Table 1. Characteristics and size of the GH17 proteins of A. fumigatus.
ProteinsSize (aa)Signal PeptideGPI AnchorAFUA Gene Number
Bgt1p3051-18NOAFUA_1G11460
Bgt2p4461-18Yes (Ω site: 423)AFUA_3G00270
Bgt3p688NoNoAFUA_5G08780
Scw4p3691-18NoAFUA_6G12380
Scw11p5651-18NoAFUA_8G05610

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Millet, N.; Latgé, J.-P.; Mouyna, I. Members of Glycosyl-Hydrolase Family 17 of A. fumigatus Differentially Affect Morphogenesis. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010018

AMA Style

Millet N, Latgé J-P, Mouyna I. Members of Glycosyl-Hydrolase Family 17 of A. fumigatus Differentially Affect Morphogenesis. Journal of Fungi. 2018; 4(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Millet, Nicolas, Jean-Paul Latgé, and Isabelle Mouyna. 2018. "Members of Glycosyl-Hydrolase Family 17 of A. fumigatus Differentially Affect Morphogenesis" Journal of Fungi 4, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010018

APA Style

Millet, N., Latgé, J. -P., & Mouyna, I. (2018). Members of Glycosyl-Hydrolase Family 17 of A. fumigatus Differentially Affect Morphogenesis. Journal of Fungi, 4(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010018

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop