Next Article in Journal
Design Optimization of a Tray Bioreactor for Solid-State Fermentation: Study of Process Parameters through Protein Modification of By-Products
Next Article in Special Issue
Certain Fermented Foods and Their Possible Health Effects with a Focus on Bioactive Compounds and Microorganisms
Previous Article in Journal
Novel, Functional Fermented Dairy Product: Preparation and Evaluation of Dried Kishk-like Products from Fenugreek Seeds with Cow’s Milk, Camel’s Milk, and Goat’s Milk
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modulation of Cereal Biochemistry via Solid-State Fermentation: A Fruitful Way for Nutritional Improvement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Valorization of Fermented Food Wastes and Byproducts: Bioactive and Valuable Compounds, Bioproduct Synthesis, and Applications

by
Douglas José Faria
1,2,3,
Anna Paula Azevedo de Carvalho
1,2,3,4,* and
Carlos Adam Conte-Junior
1,2,3,4
1
Department of Biochemistry, Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941909, RJ, Brazil
2
Research Support Group on Nanomaterials, Polymers, and Interaction with Biosystems (BioNano), Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941909, RJ, Brazil
3
Center for Food Analysis (NAL), Technological Development Support Laboratory (LADETEC), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941598, RJ, Brazil
4
Graduate Program in Chemistry (PGQu), Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941909, RJ, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2023, 9(10), 920; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9100920
Submission received: 1 September 2023 / Revised: 19 October 2023 / Accepted: 20 October 2023 / Published: 22 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health and Bioactive Compounds of Fermented Foods and By-Products)

Abstract

:
Significant amounts of fermented food waste are generated worldwide, promoting an abundance of residual biomass that can be used as raw material to extract bioactive peptides, fermentable sugars, polyphenols, and valuable compounds for synthesizing bioproducts. Therefore, generating these high-value-added products reduces the environmental impact caused by waste disposal and increases the industrial economic value of the final products. This review presents opportunities for synthesizing bioproducts and recovering bioactive compounds (employing wastes and byproducts from fermented sources) with several biological properties to support their consumption as dietary supplements that can benefit human health. Herein, the types of fermented food waste and byproducts (i.e., vegetables, bread wastes, dairy products, brewing, and winery sources), pre-treatment processes, the methods of obtaining products, the potential health benefits observed for the bioactive compounds recovered, and other technological applications of bioproducts are discussed. Therefore, there is currently a tendency to use these wastes to boost bioeconomic policies and support a circular bioeconomy approach that is focused on biorefinery concepts, biotechnology, and bioprocesses.

1. Introduction

The increase in the world’s population has led to more significant waste generation by society. In addition, the lack of public policies for basic sanitation regarding the disposal and reuse of waste makes low-income countries move toward an increase in waste generation [1]. Figure 1 shows that in 2020, the world production of solid waste was 2.24 billion tonnes, which is approximately 0.79 kg per person per day. It is estimated that in 2050, there will be a growth rate of roughly 73%, which will lead to waste generation around the world of 3.88 billion tonnes [2]. This growth in waste generation is projected to increase rapidly in certain regions due to poor waste disposal practices and management. Thus, without a significant improvement in waste management, there is a trend in waste generation growth and an increase in environmental pollution [3,4]. In this context, using biomass residues in fermentation becomes an excellent alternative for synthesizing bioproducts and extracting bioactive compounds with high industrial added value. In addition, they can be seen as a possible way to increase the circular bioeconomy [5,6,7].
Agricultural waste and industry byproducts generate leftovers that are discarded in the trashrejecting a valuable opportunity of environmental and waste management [8,9]. A solution to overcome this challenge is the bioconversion and recovery of these residues in commercial products produced by chemical synthesis or fermentation processes [10]. These residues can be excellent feedstock for biorefinery since residual biomasses are abundant, cheap, readily available, easy to collect from farms or industries, and easy to prepare for their intended use. [11,12]. In this way, two challenges would be solved: the demand for waste disposal sites and the application of these wastes to generate profits [13,14]. World Energy Outlook 2022 reported a truly global energy crisis (higher prices causing painfully high inflation, conflicts, slowing economies, and rising poverty), demanding a larger supply of clean energy sources and technologies [15].
Therefore, biotechnological advances improve synthesis processes, moving toward clean energy, greener bioproducts with high commercial value, clean industrial products (biosources for biodegradable plastics, bio-based solvents, biolubricants, safer food additives, and bioactive compounds with therapeutical and nutraceutical potential) [16,17,18]. Of these, both bioproducts and bioactive compounds stand out. Although both are derived from biological sources, they serve different purposes and have different characteristics. Bioproducts refer to a wide range of products derived from biological sources such as plants, animals, and microorganisms. These can be categorized into different types, including biofuels, bioplastics, biomaterials, and nanomaterials [19,20,21]. Bioactive compounds are diverse natural substances that can significantly support human health and body functions [22,23,24]. These compounds, derived from plants, animals, and microorganisms, gained considerable attention recently due to several biological properties and their potential applications in medicine and healthcare [25,26,27,28]. Our research group has been dedicated to the prospection of and discovery of several secondary metabolites drawn from agro-industrial residues (i.e., fruits, vegetables, and plants) [29] and fermented foods (e.g., kefiran derived from kefir) [30]. Such bioactive compounds can also be recovered by purposing the final application as food and postharvest additives [31] with antioxidant/antimicrobial effects [29,32], which are valuable for dietary supplements, the food packaging industry [32,33], and health improvement [34,35], and offer promising chemotherapy approaches to treating cancer [36,37].
Fossil-source products are of primary environmental concern since CO2 emissions have increased dramatically [38]. Therefore, techniques for using supercritical CO2 in the hydrolysis step of processing lignocellulosic materials are being applied to biomass residues to facilitate the fermentation and synthesis of bioproducts [38,39,40,41]. Fermentation is an ancient process that is widely used in the food industry to produce vinegar, bread, alcoholic beverages (cider, wine, and beers), fermented dairy products (aged cheese, yogurt, and kefir), fermented meats and sausages, fermented fish products, low-alcohol fermented drinks (kombucha, dark tea, and water kefir), fermented soy-based foods (miso, natto, tempeh, soy sauces, and tofu), fermented vegetables (sauerkraut, pickles, kimchi, and other legumes, cereals, and grains that undergo fermentation) [42,43]. Over the years, this process began to be studied in terms of reusing waste from the food and agricultural industry to synthesize products with high added value for industrial commercialization [28,42,43,44]. Figure 1 shows several sources of fermented foods for recovering valuable and bioactive compounds and producing bioproducts, along with their potential applications related to the fossil sources of CO2 emissions and the use of biomass residues to obtain bioproducts and bioactive compounds. Biomass residues have a high content of sugars, starch, proteins, cellulose (35–50%), hemicelluloses (25–30%), or lignocellulosic content (15–25%). All these primary metabolites can be used by microorganisms for metabolization, increasing metabolic activity and, consequently, generating fermentation products and byproducts [34,45].
This review article provides insights into the potential capacity of the processes and mechanisms introduced in the biorefinery to synthesize bioproducts with high economic and environmental impact. The analysis of biotechnological products derived from these processes is presented with a critical review based on the results achieved by the authors. In addition, it explores the prospects for biomass and processes that help in the economic and environmental increment of using residues for synthesizing high-added-value products. Finally, the potential use of waste generated by the fermentation process presents a research gap related to identifying the industrial and health applications that enhance the insertion of food and agro-industrial waste in the industrial matrix to improve the circular bioeconomy approach.

2. From Industrial Waste to Value-Added Bioproducts

The food and agriculture industries generate enormous amounts of waste with chemical characteristics that make it suitable for use as a raw material to obtain a product with high added value, promoting industrial production sustainability [46,47,48]. Obtaining bioproducts and bioactive compounds and reducing the loss of resources from waste bioconversion helps save costs, boost productivity, and reduce the environmental impact caused by industrial waste disposal [46,48].
The global biobased chemicals market was valued at USD 61.61 billion in 2022, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.4% during the forecast period [49]. Bio-based products are a class of chemicals derived from renewable biological sources (plants, crops, and biomass), as opposed to the traditional chemicals derived from fossil fuels [7,50], the major sources of which are basic petrochemical feedstocks including naphtha, oil, and gas (i.e., ethane, propane, butane, and methane, which are converted into chemicals such as ethylene, propylene, butadiene, and methanol). Thus, bioproducts draw the market’s attention, increasing global demand and the potential to reduce environmental impacts by reducing carbon emissions.
Several bioproducts can be synthesized through the fermentation processes of residual biomass, which is rich in primary and secondary metabolites. These include amino acids, bioplastics made from biopolymers [30], oleochemicals made from natural lipids and fats, biofuels, and food wastes that are rich in bioactive compounds, such as terpenoids and flavonoids [7,49]. Acetone and ethanol, for example, are molecules that can now be synthesized through metabolic engineering, developing a vast range of strategies for synthesizing environmentally friendly compounds [7,48,49].
Most bioproducts are derived from sucrose, vegetable oil, and starch, known as first-generation (1G) fuels—produced as bioethanol and obtained by fermenting sugarcane juice [51,52,53,54,55]. Second-generation (2G) processes have garnered research attention since they use lignocellulosic biomass residues as a source of sugars for metabolization and conversion into biofuels [56,57]. The hydrolysis of sugar by microorganisms has been seen as a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels, basic petrochemical feedstocks, and their derivatives. However, the anti-degradation nature of lignocellulosic biomass, the generation of fermentation inhibitors during the hydrolysis step, and the low conversion rates are challenges for large-scale industrial implementation [58,59,60].
Table 1 presents examples of several fermented food sources, the methods for obtaining bioactive compounds, and other valuable compounds from different biomass resources (natural, byproduct, or waste) along with their potential health benefits to ensure human health or their potential applications in the biotechnology, biorefinery, energy, foods, and biomedical fields. Spent yeast from brewing beer has been subjected to conventional solid–liquid extraction (CSLE) to recover flavor-enhancer nucleotides for the food industry [61]. Previously, spent yeast from brewing was also treated with a high-intensity pulsed electric field (PEF) to recover trehalose, a nonreducing sugar commonly found in natural sources that has bioprotectant properties for foods [62].

3. Bioactive and Valuable Compounds

The fermented food industry generates large amounts of residues that are sustainable, providing a rich source of compounds (as primary and secondary metabolites) with valuable nutritional and functional properties, such as proteins, polysaccharides, and polyphenols—from these, bread, brewing, and winery stand out as the most widely fermented sources of byproducts and wastes. They are rich sources of valuable compounds with high potential to ensure human health and to be used as a bioresource in several applications, including the energy, biorefinery, food technology, biomedical, and biotechnology fields. In terms of biorefinery concepts, wine less (the liquid and solid residual fractions, the remaining streams, and alcohol-free nutrient-rich liquid) from Merlot red wine production was employed as a bioresource to produce several added-value products, such as antioxidants, tartrate, ethanol, and bioplastic [97].
The solid waste from soy sauce refuse, when chemically treated with alkali, provides high contents of insoluble fibers and proteins, with the potential for use as food seasoning and food additives [64]. Conversely, when the waste was biologically treated, Nagai et al. (2022) reported its potential as an energy source in methane gas production due to the CH4, CO2, and volatile fatty acids (VCAs) obtained after anaerobic digestion [64].
A circular fermented food waste management system could combine baking and brewing to produce alcoholic beverages from bakery leftovers. One author’s idea was to reduce the waste from the bakery by employing sugars and proteins (from bread wastes and the remnants of bakery products) as malt substitutes in the brewing of lager beer [81]. However, the results indicated a lower amount of malt in the bread-waste samples and a lower number of extracted enzymes from the malt, making the resulting beer’s body weaker and decreasing its level of acceptance in terms of sensory evaluation. The bread alone could not provide the requisite number of enzymes to achieve the fullness of flavor needed for beer [81].
Another study proposed a new way to reduce bread waste, using breadcrumbs as a relatively inexpensive raw material. Breadcrumb extrudates were considered by the authors as promising raw materials in extrusion cooking due to their potential functional properties and higher total dietary fiber content than traditional wheat flour extrudate [83].

Biological Activities, Functional Foods, and Health Benefits

Residual biomass from vegetable-based fermented foods and fermented dairy products have also been highlighted as strong candidates for recovering interesting compounds with several health benefits and potential applications as nutraceuticals in functional foods [104] and dietary supplements [111]. For example, cabbage/radish powder [63] and soybean dregs (okara) [66]—byproducts from kimchi and fermented soybean factories, respectively—were used to successfully recover prebiotic dietary fibers (i.e., oligosaccharides) and proteins, which are valuable for functional foods. Okara is the residual byproduct generated when processing fermented soybean food products such as miso, natto, and tempeh. Likewise, Ichikawa et al. (2022) recently reported the in vivo anti-obesity effects of phenolic compounds and proteins recovered from insoluble residuals derived from okara [65]. Oliveira et al. (2022) recently reported the use of yeast peptide extracts in a circular economy concept, employing membrane filtration to recover peptide fractions (48.3% proteins and 86.4% essential amino acids) [98].
An innovative and sustainable approach to valorizing bioactive compounds and the nutrients of soybean combined ethanolic-isoelectric precipitation and gel filtration chromatography to obtain the naturally occurring bioactive peptide lunasin from tofu whey wastewater [67]. Moreover, the anticancer potential of the bioactive peptide that was recovered was also confirmed as reducing nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) with lipopolysaccharide-activated murine macrophages [67]. Sauerkraut juice from fermented cabbage was valorized in sauerkraut juice powder (SJP) as a strong candidate for replacing NaCl salt in foods since it is rich in phenols, minerals, vitamins, sugars, and NaCl. Moreover, Janosone et al. (2022) showed that SJP conserved the organoleptic properties of foods and the sensory aspects of food when tested. Fermented dairy products also showed potential as functional foods and food additives. For example, deproteinized acid whey from Greek yogurt [70] was subjected to liquid–solid hydrocyclone technology to precipitate calcium phosphate and recover calcium and phosphorous minerals for milk fortification. Calcium phosphate is a food additive that is commonly employed as a baking ingredient, bread enhancer, and acidulant.
Fermented beverage residues generated from wineries and brewing beer are a source of flavonoids and other phenolic compounds, proteins, insoluble and soluble dietary fibers, and other phytochemicals, which have shown biological properties that are essential to ensuring human health, including (1) antioxidant activity [86,89,97,108,109,110]; (2) anti-hyperglycemic [87], anti-hyperlipidemic [88,89], and cardioprotective [92,93,94] effects; (3) anticancer potential [95,96]; (4) immunomodulatory activity [101,102,103]; (5) an in vivo satiating effect provided by grape-seed proanthocyanidin extract (a byproduct from wineries) [90]; (6) gut health balance [91]; (7) prebiotic/probiotic agents [99] for functional foods; and (8) antimicrobial effects [107,108] inhibiting Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogenic bacterial activity, which is responsible for the most prevalent global foodborne diseases.
Acutely administered grape seed-proanthocyanidins were suggested as a beneficial satiating agent under the conditions defined in the study by Serrano et al. (2016). This study reported quite interesting findings, stating that proanthocyanidins without galloyl forms, such as those derived from cocoa extract, were not as effective as grape-seed-derived forms in stimulating the active glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), the most potent stimulator of glucose-induced insulin secretion [90].
Buttermilk, a byproduct obtained in the processing of cultured butter, was chemically characterized as a milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) rich in bioactive proteins and lipids, minerals, lecithin, and lactose [71]. Its consumption by normotensive individuals showed its potential as a functional food, due to an anti-hypertensive effect manifesting in moderately hypercholesterolemic men and women [71].

4. Methods of Obtaining Products

Among the various extraction methods, high temperatures can cause the degradation of these phenolic compounds, generating a loss of bioactive activity, such as antioxidant or antibiotic activities [112]. Thus, to overcome such limitations, solid-state fermentation (SSF) has been shown as an alternative method capable of producing and facilitating the extraction of these compounds from residues and the wastes from several sources of fermented foods [65,77,97]. Such fermented waste can be used as a source of carbohydrates for various microorganisms, which go through the fermentation process and generate metabolites and products that can be extracted and employed in the food industry for human health [113]. There are different methods of extracting bioactive compounds, with conventional methods such as maceration and decoction being replaced by green solvents (i.e., ionic liquids), supercritical fluids, and deep eutectic solvents. In addition, unconventional extraction methods, such as ultrasound-assisted extraction [63,107,108], pulsed electric fields [62], enzymes, autohydrolysis [86], hydrocyclone technology [70], thermocalcic precipitation [69], and microwaves [99], are increasing. These advanced methods allow more efficient and sustainable extraction, reducing time and solvent usage. Extraction with supercritical fluids uses supercritical CO2 as a solvent to extract bioactive compounds. Supercritical CO2 has unique properties, combining the characteristics of a gas and a liquid, which allows the selective and efficient extraction of the desired compounds. Furthermore, supercritical CO2 is considered a green solvent as it is non-toxic, non-flammable, and easily recoverable [114]. Green solvents, such as ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents, are more sustainable alternatives to traditional organic solvents. These solvents have low toxicity and are biodegradable, which makes them more environmentally friendly. Furthermore, they can also improve the extraction efficiency and the quality of the obtained compounds. Table 1 displays the different sources of bioactive compounds and the extraction methods used to improve the yield of the extracted product.
Using efficient and sustainable extraction techniques, understanding the mechanisms of action, and ensuring the quality of the compounds will allow the development of more effective and safer products. Therefore, it is essential to continue investing in research and development in this area to explore the full potential of bioactive compounds in improving human health and well-being.
Ultrafiltration and membrane filtration technology has been widely reported for the separation and concentration of cheese whey protein [69], spent yeast protein, and bioactive peptides since it can be operated under gentle conditions, with low energy consumption, and without compromising the molecular structures and biological activities [98]. Spent yeast, the most frequent fermentation byproduct in brewing, can supply several bioactive compounds and ingredients: mannans and β-glucans. Oliveira et al. (2022) recently described a scalable and low-cost process to obtain yeast peptide extracts within a circular economy concept, using membrane filtration to recover peptide fractions (48.3% proteins and 86.4% essential amino acids) with high potential for nutraceutical applications as dietary supplements and functional foods.

Waste Fermentation: Steps and Optimization Factors

Fermentation is the process by which biomass residues are used as substrates for the metabolism of various microorganisms [115]. Figure 2 outlines the stages of this process and the monitoring and follow-up needed to obtain better results.
The upstream phase comprises the preparation of the substrate and the pre-treatment and sterilization processes, wherein the application of chemical, physical, biological, and combined methods have the purpose of hydrolyzing and separating the components of the lignocellulosic material to facilitate metabolism by microorganisms [115,116,117]. In addition, the choice of the reaction medium and the microorganisms to be used depends on the chosen substrate and the type of final product required [118,119].
In the midstream phase, the fermentation process occurs, and the treated substrate is inserted into the reaction medium, where the inoculum of microorganisms is introduced. From that moment on, the parameters of temperature, rotation, pH, time, and the presence or absence of oxygen are employed to synthesize products with high added value [118,120,121]. The microorganisms then metabolize the substrate by producing intracellular and extracellular enzymes that serve as catalysts for the growth and formation of intermediate compounds and specific products [120,122,123,124].
The growth of microorganisms within this reaction medium initially occurs through a “lag phase” of adaptation to the medium and parameters, followed by an “exponential phase” where the most significant growth and metabolization of biomass residues occur [125,126]. Afterward, there is a “stationary phase” where the synthesis and metabolization are stabilized and, finally, the “decay phase” of the process, where there is a decrease in the production of enzymes and, consequently, in the metabolization of the substrate and the reduced synthesis of products [126,127]. Finally, after the synthesis of products via fermentation, the downstream phase begins, which covers the extraction of the final product from the reaction medium. The purification and packaging of this product would be the final phase in the industry following commercialization [126,127].
The pre-treatment processes of biomass residues aim at the structural breakdown of lignin and hemicelluloses, decrease the crystallinity present in cellulose to facilitate the action of hydrolyzing agents, for example, acids and enzymes, and increase the surface area by increasing the porosity of the structure [77]. They must also provide for the formation of sugar, avoid the deterioration of carbohydrates, avoid the formation of inhibitory products for the subsequent conversion processes that the biomass will undergo, such as fermentation, and lastly, which is of paramount importance for all the production chain, should have an excellent cost–benefit ratio [128,129,130].
Drying is the process of evaporating off the moisture present in the biomass, which can be carried out either at room temperature (in the open air) or by using a heat source to accelerate the process [88,89,92,93,94]. In some cases, this method is also used to separate cellulose from hemicelluloses and lignin because when lignocellulosic biomass is subjected to a temperature range of between 150 and 180 °C, the partial solubilization of these two components occurs, facilitating the separation of cellulose [52]. As an alternative to the heat source, the use of lyophilization also removes moisture from the sample, converting water into ice without passing through the liquid phase [72,73,95,96]. Grinding [88,92,93] reduces the particle size of biomass residues, increasing the surface area and permeability of the agents that will act as part of the conversion process into bioproducts.
Dilute acid hydrolysis [77] uses a dilute acid as a solvent, usually sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, hydrochloric acid, and carbonic acid, under controlled temperature and concentration conditions for a predetermined time. This pre-treatment is intended to increase the enzymatic digestibility of cellulose, facilitating the conversion of, for example, glycans into sugars to facilitate fermentation and bioproduct synthesis [45,131,132]. In turn, hemicellulose is practically hydrolyzed, and cellulose remains practically solid, meaning that the method hydrolyzes hemicelluloses more easily than cellulose [133,134,135,136].
The biological method encompasses enzymes and microorganisms, working together to degrade the cell wall fiber and increase access to the substrate for fermentation. This technique is widely studied because it is less expensive and more environmentally friendly as it uses mild temperature and pressure conditions and does not include chemicals that could generate toxic compounds. On the other hand, it needs continuous monitoring and process optimization, due to the specificity of microbiological metabolism, which makes the process slower than other techniques [51,81,129,137,138,139,140].
In addition to all the methods mentioned above, there is the possibility of combining different techniques to improve the biomass hydrolysis step [141]. For example, a physical (grinding) method coupled with a chemical (acid) method, as adopted by Quintero, Rincón, and Cardona (2011) [52], since the acid would be more likely to catalyze hydrolysis in the already crushed sample, lowering the temperature of the reaction medium. The growth of the microorganism and, consequently, the increase in metabolism due to the greater surface area of the substrate occurred with greater intensity when using an alkaline pretreatment [64], followed by alkaline combined with ozone pretreatment, ozone pretreatment, and, finally, pre-treatment with high-temperature water. Thus, the highest level of cellulose degradation (35.38%) was observed in the alkaline pretreatment group (p < 0.05), while the maximum lignin loss of 28.10% was achieved in the pretreatment group with ozone, which shows the importance of combining processes to achieve higher fermentation yields.
Biomass already has a high market value due to its use in the food industry. Several byproducts and wastes from certain fermented foods have been highlighted as valuable sources of fermentable sugars, such as insoluble residues and dregs (okara) from fermented soybean products, bread wastes, grape pomace (pulp, skins, seeds, and stems), and wine lees from winery byproducts, along with brewing residues (spent yeast, spent hops, and barley malt rootlets) and buttermilk from cultured butter.
In this way, the fermentation of residues from fermented foods emerges as a new technique to manage and take advantage of this biomass. Therefore, biomass residues from fermented dairy products have been widely studied and employed as a substrate to synthesize high-value-added products such as biofuels, antioxidants, biopolymers, and polyphenols.
Lignocellulosic residues have a high content of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, cellulose, lignin, hemicelluloses, and lipids, among other substances and minerals that can be metabolized by various microorganisms [65,66,82,84,86,97]. Figure 3 represents some sources of residues, the culture medium parameters, and the types of fermentation that can be used to generate several commercial products. Thus, understanding the different chemical characteristics of the biomass and the target product is essential for the biorefinery process and, consequently, for synthesizing a product with high added value.
There are two main types of fermentation, namely, aerobic and anaerobic fermentation. These can also be divided according to the reactor’s substrate feed type: batch, fed-batch, and continuous. Batch fermentation occurs when there is no addition of substrates or removal of a product during the process until fermentation is finished, causing an accumulation of byproducts that can increase the toxicity of the fermentation medium [79,142,143]. The fed-batch type of fermentation is one in which a specific feed is introduced during the fermentation process, thus allowing a greater concentration of cells, and is the form of processing most widely used by industries [77,97]. Adding substrates to the fermentation medium allows microorganisms to continue metabolizing and generating products [64,69,80,82]. Continuous fermentation, in turn, occurs when there is the continuous addition of substrate and a continuous removal of products from the medium, resulting in a steady-state operation where the rate of cell growth and the concentrations of metabolites remain constant. However, due to the constant entry and exit of substances from the fermentation broth, the chance of contamination is very high, which leads to a decrease in the reaction yield.
In addition, all processes have specific reaction parameters, such as pH, temperature, agitation, microorganisms, cell density, and the presence or absence of aeration, which define whether the process will comprise aerobic or anaerobic fermentation [64]. As a result, we accept that numerous factors can and will influence the final yield of the fermentation product, making process optimization and the analysis of its variables crucial for the success of the process in laboratory and industrial applications.

5. Applications of Valuable Compounds from Fermented Residues

The fermentation process favors the synthesis of products with high added value. However, the use of fermentation also leads to the production of fermentative residues containing metabolites, extracellular enzymes, and other byproducts generated by microbiological metabolism. In addition to presenting the novelties found in bioproducts, this article aims to show the possibility of processes where the waste that is generated throughout the various stages can be reused to produce outstanding products in the industry, both environmentally and economically. Thus, several studies delve into the reuse of these fermentative residues, their physicochemical characteristics, and the various applications for which they can be reused.

5.1. Animal Feeding

Very recently, phenolic compounds from rich-grape marc (or pomace) from the País winery, an abundant resource suggested as having a possible in animal feed, were considered for potential positive environmental effects on enteric CH4 emissions in Chile by Suescupun-Ospina et al. (2023) [85]. The authors evaluated the effect of the oven- and freeze-drying process and showed that oven-dried grape marc had the highest proanthocyanidin content and lower CH4 production [83].

5.2. Biofuels

The production of cleaner fuels can be accomplished by improving the refining of environmentally friendly technologies and by adding synthetic fuels or ethanol [48]. Within environmentally friendly technologies, we use residual biomass to synthesize bioethanol through the fermentation process of substrates with a high carbohydrate content for degradation. The use of sugarcane juice to synthesize bioethanol is already a reality. However, this substrate competes with the food industry [144]. To resolve this problem, other biomass resources, such as byproducts and wastes from fermented food factories, stand out as substrates since they are also rich in the carbohydrates needed for fermentation [77,79,97].
The cellulose and hemicellulose in lignocellulosic biomass can be chemically or enzymatically degraded, generating hydrolyzed sugars that provide raw materials for microorganisms to act upon during fermentation [145]. Lignin, the third component, is formed by aromatic polymers, and its catabolism generates a mixture of aromatic components that can be enzymatically converted into a set of organic molecules in the form of D-3,2-butanediol [79,143], methane [64], poly(3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) [97] and PHA [69], and tartrate or tartaric acid [97].
Unlike bread waste, which is rich in fermentable sugars for H2, ethanol, methane, and recovery, some biomass residues, such as wood bark, are not easily converted into biofuels through the application of microorganisms. The use of the gasification process with these residues produces a synthesis gas (syngas) that offers a solution to this problem, such as the conversion of CO and H2 (which are present in the syngas) into multicarbon compounds [146]. Such an approach may be extended to other fermented biomass residues.
The production of fuels covers the use of various residues, both from agriculture and the food industry. Food waste occurs in large quantities worldwide; thus, anaerobic digestion can be employed, including H2 in the fermentation stage [76] and CH4 in the methanogenesis stage [77]. This process, also called dark fermentation, uses an environmentally friendly approach to solve the problem of food waste and delivery residue to synthesize industrial products. Several microorganisms can be used, including hydrolytic, acidogenic, and acetogenic bacteria, to form VACs, metabolites, CO2, CH4 [64] alcohols [77], and H2 [76]. The use of residues for H2 synthesis is still being optimized for use on an industrial scale, which brings other possibilities for study and evaluation regarding the topic [147,148].
Moreover, it has already been proven that dual-stage H2 production achieves 20% more biogas than single-stage production [149]. In the methanogenic phase, the VACs thus produced are transformed into CH4 and are recovered as biofuel, whereby part of the methane remains dissolved and can be treated for application in biofertilizers [150]. Dark fermentation encompasses the use of waste to synthesize environmentally friendly products for industrial commercialization. Thus, its optimization is essential for food and agro-industrial waste re-usage [151]. Figure 4 exemplifies the synthesis steps of some biofuels via dark fermentation.
To produce a range of compounds such as acetate, ethanol, butyrate, and butanol, fermentation by microorganisms depends on acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA). The oxidation of H2 to 2H+ with H2O, or of CO with H2O to 2H+, provides the reducing equivalents for the reduction of CO2 to form methanoic acid (HCOOH), from methylene tetrahydrofolate (CH-THF) to methenyl tetrahydrofolate (CH2-THF), from CH2-THF to methyltetrahydrofolate (CH3-THF), and from CO2 to CO. Acetyl-CoA synthase/CO dehydrogenase catalyzes the formation of acetyl-CoA from methyl group bonding, CO group bonding, and coenzyme A (CoA). The metabolic pathways of acetyl-CoA reduction, which are involved in the fermentation of biomass conversion into a range of biofuel compounds, are displayed in Figure 5 [151,152,153].
Hydrogenogenic carboxydotrophic microorganisms (HCM) conserve energy by synthesizing H2, in which a monofunctional CO dehydrogenase oxidizes CO. The electrons from the oxidation process undergo the reduction of protons in hydrogen molecules through an energy-converting hydrogenase (ECH). Furthermore, ECH couples H2 to the membrane translocation of protons/sodium ions, which generates an ion gradient, driving ATP synthesis. HCM use is independent of the acetyl-CoA pathway [151,152,153].
Bread and bakery product wastes have an interesting composition (up to 70% of carbohydrates, mainly starch), which is attractive as a nutrient source for microorganisms and can improve the circular economy by reusing energy-rich food wastes for gas production [77] and energy recovery [76]. Bread waste was employed to produce organic acids by lactic fermentation (Lactobacillus amylovorus DSM 20532) and was sequentially employed for hydrogen (H2) production (3.1 mol H2 mol−1 glucose) and energy recovery (54 MJ t−1 dry waste) by photo-fermentation (Rhodoseudomonas palustris 42OL) [76]. Using biorefinery concepts and a circular economic approach, bread waste was employed to produce bioethanol [77], butanediol [78,79], and biomethane [77]. The fermentable sugars from out-of-date bread supplied by local supermarkets in the United Kingdom were first submitted to acid/enzymatic saccharification to recover glucose-rich hydrolysates, which were sequentially fermented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae KL17 to produce ethanol with higher efficiency, using the fed-batch mode of cultivation [77]. In further experiments, Narisetty et al. (2022) [77] employed solid residues (from acid/enzymatic hydrolysis, along with the respective SSF residues after ethanol production) under anaerobic digestion to yield biomethane, revealing a biochemical methanation potential of up to 379 mL CH4/g. Likewise, other studies have previously reported glucose-rich enzymatic hydrolysate from bread waste being submitted for fermentative production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens [78] and by Enterobacter ludwigii [79] to accumulate D-2,3-butanediol.

5.3. Biopolymers and Bioplastics

The continuous production of plastics from the petrochemical industry has generated an exorbitant amount of waste for disposal. Such waste is part of approximately 140 million tons of plastics produced in 2022, and an estimate of plastic waste in the ocean has reached a level of 150 million tons [154,155]. Figure 6 shows a forecast for global plastics generation from 2002 to 2050 [156,157].
This challenging scenario has motivated researchers to evaluate biodegradable plastics produced by the fermentation of microorganisms to replace petroleum-based plastics [158,159,160,161]. The production of biopolymers from microbial fermentation is a less expensive, adaptable, and environmentally harmless process when compared to producing plastics made from fossil fuels. However, bioplastics are susceptible to water hydrolysis, which reduces their strength and durability [161,162]. The synthesis of bioplastics, such as polylactic acid (PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), derives from renewable sources such as food waste, lignocellulose residues, and vegetable oils [161,162]. The purpose of studies concerning bioplastic production through microbial fermentation is to create plastic with mechanical, physical-chemical, and thermal properties to match the performance of fossil-based plastics. On the other hand, the high biodegradability of bioplastic makes it environmentally friendly, reducing plastic waste due to its shorter product lifetime [162,163].
Although it is possible to produce synthetic biodegradable polymers from petrochemical byproducts such as polycaprolactone (PCL) [164,165], several methods of bioplastic synthesis from renewable resources use natural polysaccharides (lignin, cellulose, and starch), proteins, and lipids. Other examples include polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) [154,166], polyhydroxy butyrate (PHB) [155], and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co 3-hydroxy valerate) (PHBV) [158,167]. The third alternative uses microbiological fermentation, whereby lactic acid is synthesized and polymerized to form a PLA-biobased product [14].
Under biorefinery concepts, wine lees (the liquid and solid residual fractions, remaining streams, and alcohol-free nutrient-rich liquid) from producing Merlot red wine were employed as a bioresource to produce bioplastic poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) synthesis. This included the production of generic fermentation feedstock (ethanol, phenolic compounds, and tartaric acid) [97]. Thus, the crude nutrient-rich hydrolysate from enzymatic hydrolysis was used to initiate PHB production with high efficiency using the strain Cupriavidus necator DSM 7237, while the hydrolysis of pretreated lees was performed using crude enzyme consortia via solid-state fermentation with Aspergillus oryzae [97].
Demirci et al. (2019) and Jung et al. (2022) produced paramylon and xanthan gum biopolymers from fermentable sugars obtained and extracted from bread waste (stale bread that remained unsold and returned goods from shops). After the enzymatic hydrolysis step, the glucose thus obtained was employed in both studies as a bioresource: i) as a carbon substrate for the heterotrophic cultivation of the microalgae Euyglena gracilis to produce the carbohydrate paramylon [80]; ii) as a carbon source in the fermentation of Xanthomonas spp. to obtain the xanthan gum polysaccharide [82]. Xanthan gum is widely used in the food industry as a common additive to stabilize and emulsify food products.
Although up to 50% of residual whey from cheesemaking is being valorized as a source of high-added-value compounds in food/pharmaceutical factories, mainly as proteins with high levels of biological properties, lactose, lactic acid (LA), and minerals, there is still a high proportion of this whey that is discarded, thus promoting environmental pollution [168]. An integrated cheese whey valorization process [69] utilized the wastewater from cheesemaking to produce several added-value products, including lipid recovery via thermocalcic precipitation, protein recovery via ultrafiltration, and lactose valorization through biological processes to obtain polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). Therefore, this circular economic approach can provide lactose as a carbon source for biomolecules, lipids, and proteins to produce bioplastic PHA for use as a flame retardant, along with whey protein concentrates for the food industry. It can also potentially obtain lactic acid (LA), a monomer of PLA derived from natural sources. Thus, LA is produced using the bacterial fermentation of fermentable biomass. Likewise, reducing sugars from bread wastes drawn from Indian bakery wastes were simultaneously submitted to saccharification and SSF by LAB, suggesting bread wastes as potential candidates for lactic acid production [84]. Those findings are interesting because PLA (C3H4O2)n is a biodegradable thermoplastic that can be synthesized using residues such as sugarcane bagasse, corn cobs, starch, and food waste [42,169]. PLA is a well-known biopolymer with many applications and properties, such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, elasticity, moldability, and rigidity. In addition, it is the first polymer produced from renewable sources to be marketed for various applications, such as for grocery bags and food packaging [42]. PLA synthesis has, as an initial step, the production of LA by the fermentation process. Lactic acid comes in the form of a white powder or yellow liquid. Its structural formula incorporates chiral carbon, which leads to the formation of a left-handed (L+) and a right-handed (D) structure. The chemical activity of the LA molecule depends on the acidity in an aqueous medium and the functional activities of groups present in the chemical structure, such as the carboxyl and hydroxyl groups, which promote a wide variety of chemical reactions [13,169]. The global market for PLA is constantly expanding, which causes an increase in its demand due to its widespread use in the packaging, agriculture, and transportation industries. Therefore, an efficient manufacturing method with reduced production costs is needed so as to evaluate other methods that can be employed when using agricultural and food waste [161].

5.4. Nanomaterials

Nanotechnology is being applied in several areas and sectors of industry, such as food, cosmetics, and chemistry. Some studies have demonstrated the importance of nanomaterials based on fermented food residues or byproducts and several applications on health and food. A nanocomposite based on kefiran films has garnered research attention due to the electrospinning and film-forming abilities of the kefiran polysaccharides recovered from kefir grains. Kefiran, an exopolysaccharide, derived from the microflora of kefir grains, which are used to produce fermented milk beverages, has recently attracted research attention due to its biological properties and its potential for use in the nanomedicine and food packaging industries [30]. Recent investigations reported a kefiran biopolymer, manufactured via electrospinning, to produce kefiran nanofiber [170,171]. Kefiran nanofibersis potentially valuable for encapsulating bioactive ingredients in food [172], as matrix for probiotic/drug delivery [72,73,74,173,174], andscaffolds for regenerative medicine and tissue engineering [170].

5.5. Other Applications Using Fermentative Residues

Fermentation residues from Ca/Fe-rich antibiotics, for example, can be considered very hazardous but, at the same time, can be recycled and applied in adsorption resources by using biochar [175]. Despite the possibilities, such hazardous wastes have seldom been explored and require several stages of waste preparation. In one study, residual vancomycin and antibiotic-resistant genes were fully exposed during pyrolysis. The process showed fast kinetics and a maximum adsorption rate of 102 mg p/g. Ca and Fe represented active sites that helped in the adsorption process. Therefore, the use of biochar produced from fermentative residues can be used in the treatment of wastewater to absorb contaminants. Furthermore, biochar can be used as a phosphate fertilizer, as it promotes seed germination (germination rate: 96.7% vs. 80.0% in the control group, p < 0.01) and seedling growth (shoot length was increased by 57.9%, p < 0.01) due to the slow release of the available phosphate. Consequently, hazardous waste was turned into phosphate fertilizer, adding to the benefits of biomass reutilization, and recovering phosphate from wastewater. Biochar from spiramycin (SPI) fermentation residues (SFR) in China, which are dangerous, can also be cited here. The pyrolysis method was adopted to convert SFR to biochar to remove SPI from wastewater, and the results showed no residual SPI, indicating the achievement of SFR detoxification. Furthermore, after recycling 5 times, the SPI removal efficiency was still greater than 80.0%, indicating a promising method for SFR disposal [176].
Lipstatin, a fermentative residue (LFR) from the pharmaceutical industry, can be discarded in the soil after the composting stage due to its high content of organic matter. Generally, residues from such fermentation processes are composed of a high amount of organic matter, which is of high importance in fertilization. The pH value of soil fertilized with composted LFR slightly decreased, without the accumulation of lipstatin. Soil nutrients, including the available phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, and soluble organic matter, increased significantly in soil fertilized with composted LFR, providing excellent application as a biofertilizer [177]. Likewise, the synthesis of doramectin offers another interesting example of the use of fermentative residue from the pharmaceutical industry, which generates a high rate of residues with a large amount of organic matter, resulting in their applicability in agricultural fertilization [178].

6. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Although bioactive compounds and bioproducts have shown great potential in the pharmaceutical and food industries, there are still challenges to be faced. These challenges include the efficient and sustainable sourcing of compounds, the standardization and quality control of products, understanding the mechanisms of action, and ensuring the safety of compounds.
Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Biofuels derived from biosources can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, compared to products derived from fossil fuels. For instance, biofuels and bioplastics have the potential to lower carbon emissions. Circular Economy: Bioproducts based on biorefinery concepts can improve the circular economy by promoting the reuse and recycling of materials. Biodegradable bioplastics, for example, can replace traditional plastics and reduce plastic pollution, also producing safer food packaging materials. Health and Wellness: Several valuable compounds from fermented food wastes and byproducts with antimicrobial/antioxidant activity can be used in the production of functional foods and dietary supplements, to ensure human health by means of cancer prevention and the management of several endocrine/metabolic disorders (i.e., hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesteremia, and cardiovascular diseases), employing novel drug delivery systems for pharmaceutical and cosmetics purposes. For example, probiotics and vegetable fermentation-based ingredients have gained popularity in the food and beauty industries. Bioactive compounds have various health benefits, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties. The producers are interested in developing functional foods, dietary supplements, and nutraceuticals. Biopharmaceuticals: The biopharmaceutical industry continues to grow, with bioproducts playing a significant role in developing vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and other therapeutic agents. In this context, kefiran-based nanomaterials are promising candidates for biomedical applications and tissue engineering. Research and Innovation: Advances in biotechnology, synthetic biology, and genetic engineering are opening up new possibilities for synthesizing and producing bioproducts. Researchers are exploring novel techniques to improve yields, reduce production costs, and expand the range of bioproducts. Pharmaceuticals: bioactive compounds are valuable in terms of drug discovery. They serve as the basis for many pharmaceuticals, including antibiotics, anticancer agents, and drugs to manage various diseases. Research in this area can lead to the discovery of new therapeutic agents. Natural Product Chemistry: The study of active compounds involves natural product chemistry, a rich source of chemical diversity that is of great importance for drug discovery. Advances in analytical techniques and compound isolation methods contribute to discovering new bioactive molecules. Agriculture and Crop Protection: Bioactive compounds can be used for pest control, disease management, and improving crop yields. This can reduce the reliance on synthetic chemicals and promote sustainable agriculture. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering: Advances in biotechnology, including genetic engineering and synthetic biology, offer the potential to enhance the production of active compounds through microbial fermentation or plant engineering. Regulatory Support: Regulatory agencies in many countries recognize the great value of active compounds and provide guidelines and support for their development and use.
The advancement of extraction technologies, such as supercritical fluids and green solvents, will allow a more efficient and sustainable recovery of bioactive and other valuable compounds. Furthermore, developing more advanced analysis methods and understanding the compounds’ mechanisms of action will open up new opportunities for using these substances in industry.

7. Conclusions

In summary, the search for agro-industrial and fermented food residues as sources of bioproducts and bioactive compounds is growing; studying different fermentation processes and mechanisms has proved to be very effective in terms of costs and industrial yields. The fermentation process is very complex and needs specific optimization methods for each type of bioproduct analyzed. Therefore, searching and studying these diverse methods has become fundamental for industrial and technological expansion. The generation of waste is a matter of worldwide concern. Thus, making applications available for such sources enables remarkable commercial growth, generating products with high-added value for industry and society. Since kefiran, a coproduct obtained from the kefir grains used to produce milk-fermented beverages, has demonstrated enormous potential to be applied in nanomedicine, other residual biomass derived from fermented foods is also expected to be investigated as a potential source for developing new bioproducts for health and food purposes.

Author Contributions

D.J.F.: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; software; writing—original draft. A.P.A.d.C.: Writing—original draft; project administration; validation; funding acquisition; supervision. C.A.C.-J.: Visualization; writing—review and editing; validation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundação Carlos Chagas de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) (grant numbers: E-26/200.674/2023, E-26/200.621/2022, E-26/210.385/2022, and E-26/200.891/2021), and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (grant number 313119/2020-1, 152936/2022-0).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. THE WORLD BANK Solid Waste Management. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/brief/solid-waste-management (accessed on 23 July 2023).
  2. STATISTA Global Generation of Municipal Solid Waste by Country. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/916749/global-generation-of-municipal-solid-waste-by-country/ (accessed on 23 July 2023).
  3. Kumar, J.A.; Sathish, S.; Prabu, D.; Renita, A.A.; Saravanan, A.; Deivayanai, V.C.; Anish, M.; Jayaprabakar, J.; Baigenzhenov, O.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A. Agricultural Waste Biomass for Sustainable Bioenergy Production: Feedstock, Characterization and Pre-Treatment Methodologies. Chemosphere 2023, 331, 138680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, Z.; Deng, Z.; Davis, S.; Ciais, P. Monitoring Global Carbon Emissions in 2022. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 205–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Usmani, Z.; Sharma, M.; Awasthi, A.K.; Sivakumar, N.; Lukk, T.; Pecoraro, L.; Thakur, V.K.; Roberts, D.; Newbold, J.; Gupta, V.K. Bioprocessing of Waste Biomass for Sustainable Product Development and Minimizing Environmental Impact. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 322, 124548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stikane, A.; Dace, E.; Stalidzans, E. Closing the Loop in Bioproduction: Spent Microbial Biomass as a Resource within Circular Bioeconomy. N. Biotechnol. 2022, 70, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mujtaba, M.; Fernandes Fraceto, L.; Fazeli, M.; Mukherjee, S.; Savassa, S.M.; Araujo de Medeiros, G.; do Espírito Santo Pereira, A.; Mancini, S.D.; Lipponen, J.; Vilaplana, F. Lignocellulosic Biomass from Agricultural Waste to the Circular Economy: A Review with Focus on Biofuels, Biocomposites and Bioplastics. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 402, 136815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chamorro, F.; Carpena, M.; Fraga-Corral, M.; Echave, J.; Riaz Rajoka, M.S.; Barba, F.J.; Cao, H.; Xiao, J.; Prieto, M.A.; Simal-Gandara, J. Valorization of Kiwi Agricultural Waste and Industry By-Products by Recovering Bioactive Compounds and Applications as Food Additives: A Circular Economy Model. Food Chem. 2022, 370, 131315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fei, Z.; Xie, D.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Du, Q.; Jin, P. Enhanced Biotransformation of Bioactive Components and Volatile Compounds of Bamboo (Phyllostachys glauca McClure) Leaf Juice Fermented by Probiotic Streptococcus Thermophiles. LWT 2023, 173, 114363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Diez-Ozaeta, I.; Astiazaran, O.J. Fermented Foods: An Update on Evidence-Based Health Benefits and Future Perspectives. Food Res. Int. 2022, 156, 111133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. de Oliveira, S.D.; Araújo, C.M.; Borges, G.d.S.C.; Lima, M.d.S.; Viera, V.B.; Garcia, E.F.; de Souza, E.L.; de Oliveira, M.E.G. Improvement in Physicochemical Characteristics, Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Acerola (Malpighia emarginata D.C.) and Guava (Psidium guajava L.) Fruit by-Products Fermented with Potentially Probiotic Lactobacilli. LWT 2020, 134, 110200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Camargo, D.A.; Pereira, M.S.; dos Santos, A.G.; Fleuri, L.F. Isolated and Fermented Orange and Grape Wastes: Bromatological Characterization and Phytase, Lipase and Protease Source. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 77, 102978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gautam, K.; Vishvakarma, R.; Sharma, P.; Singh, A.; Kumar Gaur, V.; Varjani, S.; Kumar Srivastava, J. Production of Biopolymers from Food Waste: Constrains and Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 361, 127650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xiao, X.; Li, S.; Zhou, X.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, H. The Anti-Obesogenic Effects and Underpinning Mechanisms of Fermented Plant-Based Foods: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 136, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. IEA—International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2022; International Energy Agency: Paris, Italy, 2022.
  16. Ortiz-Sanchez, M.; Solarte-Toro, J.C.; Alzate, C.A.C. Food Waste Valorization Applying the Biorefinery Concept in the Colombian Context: Pre-Feasibility Analysis of the Organic Kitchen Food Waste Processing. Biochem. Eng. J. 2023, 194, 108864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. De Guidi, I.; Legras, J.L.; Galeote, V.; Sicard, D. Yeast Domestication in Fermented Food and Beverages: Past Research and New Avenues. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2023, 51, 101032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ranganathan, S.; Dutta, S.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Utilization of Food Waste Streams for the Production of Biopolymers. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, C.; Alqahtani, A.; Sharma, A.; Pugazhendhi, A. A Review on Optimistic Biorefinery Products: Biofuel and Bioproducts from Algae Biomass. Fuel 2023, 338, 127378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gautério, G.V.; da Silva, R.M.; Karraz, F.C.; Coelho, M.A.Z.; Ribeiro, B.D.; Lemes, A.C. Cell Disruption and Permeabilization Methods for Obtaining Yeast Bioproducts. Clean. Chem. Eng. 2023, 6, 100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tavares, C.S.; Martins, A.; Miguel, M.G.; Carvalheiro, F.; Duarte, L.C.; Gameiro, J.A.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Roseiro, L.B. Bioproducts from Forest Biomass II. Bioactive Compounds from the Steam-Distillation by-Products of Cupressus Lusitanica Mill. and Cistus Ladanifer L. Wastes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 158, 112991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sruthi, P.; Naidu, M.M. Cashew Nut (Anacardium occidentale L.) Testa as a Potential Source of Bioactive Compounds: A Review on Its Functional Properties and Valorization. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 3, 100390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cerro, D.; Rojas, A.; Torres, A.; Villegas, C.; Galotto, M.J.; Guarda, A.; Romero, J. Nanoencapsulation of Food-Grade Bioactive Compounds Using a Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Emulsions Process: Effect of Operational Variables on the Properties of Nanocapsules and New Perspectives. LWT 2023, 115115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guan, C.; Tan, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Yamamoto, N.; Zhang, C.; Wang, S.; Chen, J.; Xing, X. Transcriptomic Analysis of Andrias davidianus Meat and Experimental Validation for Exploring Its Bioactive Components as Functional Foods. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2024, 13, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saravanan, A.; Karishma, S.; Senthil Kumar, P.; Rangasamy, G. A Review on Regeneration of Biowaste into Bio-Products and Bioenergy: Life Cycle Assessment and Circular Economy. Fuel 2023, 338, 127221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ashokkumar, V.; Flora, G.; Venkatkarthick, R.; SenthilKannan, K.; Kuppam, C.; Mary Stephy, G.; Kamyab, H.; Chen, W.-H.; Thomas, J.; Ngamcharussrivichai, C. Advanced Technologies on the Sustainable Approaches for Conversion of Organic Waste to Valuable Bioproducts: Emerging Circular Bioeconomy Perspective. Fuel 2022, 324, 124313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kee, P.E.; Cheng, Y.-S.; Chang, J.-S.; Yim, H.S.; Tan, J.C.Y.; Lam, S.S.; Lan, J.C.-W.; Ng, H.S.; Khoo, K.S. Insect Biorefinery: A Circular Economy Concept for Biowaste Conversion to Value-Added Products. Environ. Res. 2023, 221, 115284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, V.; Sharma, N.; Umesh, M.; Selvaraj, M.; Al-Shehri, B.M.; Chakraborty, P.; Duhan, L.; Sharma, S.; Pasrija, R.; Awasthi, M.K.; et al. Emerging Challenges for the Agro-Industrial Food Waste Utilization: A Review on Food Waste Biorefinery. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 362, 127790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lima, R.C.; de Carvalho, A.P.A.; da Silva, B.D.; Torres Neto, L.; de Figueiredo, M.R.d.S.; Chaves, P.H.T.; de Almeida, A.E.C.C.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Green Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Compounds of Babassu (Attalea speciosa) Mesocarp: Effects of Solid-Liquid Ratio Extraction, Antioxidant Capacity, and Antimicrobial Activity. Appl. Food Res. 2023, 3, 100331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. de Carvalho, A.P.A.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Food-Derived Biopolymer Kefiran Composites, Nanocomposites and Nanofibers: Emerging Alternatives to Food Packaging and Potentials in Nanomedicine. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 370–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lima, R.C.; de Carvalho, A.P.A.; Vieira, C.P.; Moreira, R.V.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Green and Healthier Alternatives to Chemical Additives as Cheese Preservative: Natural Antimicrobials in Active Nanopackaging/Coatings. Polymers 2021, 13, 2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vieira, I.R.S.; de de Carvalho, A.P.A.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Recent Advances in Biobased and Biodegradable Polymer Nanocomposites, Nanoparticles, and Natural Antioxidants for Antibacterial and Antioxidant Food Packaging Applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 3673–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. de Carvalho, A.P.A.; Conte Junior, C.A. Green Strategies for Active Food Packagings: A Systematic Review on Active Properties of Graphene-Based Nanomaterials and Biodegradable Polymers. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 130–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Soares Mateus, A.R.; Pena, A.; Sendón, R.; Almeida, C.; Nieto, G.A.; Khwaldia, K.; Sanches Silva, A. By-Products of Dates, Cherries, Plums and Artichokes: A Source of Valuable Bioactive Compounds. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 131, 220–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. de Carvalho, A.P.A.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Health Benefits of Phytochemicals from Brazilian Native Foods and Plants: Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Anti-Cancer, and Risk Factors of Metabolic/Endocrine Disorders Control. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 111, 534–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vieira, I.R.S.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Nano-Delivery Systems for Food Bioactive Compounds in Cancer: Prevention, Therapy, and Clinical Applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vieira, I.R.S.; Tessaro, L.; Lima, A.K.O.; Velloso, I.P.S.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Recent Progress in Nanotechnology Improving the Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols for Cancer. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tossavainen, M.; Edelmann, M.; Lahti-Leikas, K.; Kivimäki, S.; Kymäläinen, M.; Piironen, V.; Lampi, A.-M.; Ojala, A.; Romantschuk, M. Chemical Composition and Biomethane Production Potential of Euglena Gracilis Biomass and Extraction Residue from Supercritical CO2 Extraction. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 19, 101140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Salgado-Ramos, M.; Martí-Quijal, F.J.; Huertas-Alonso, A.J.; Sánchez-Verdú, M.P.; Cravotto, G.; Moreno, A.; Barba, F.J. Sequential Extraction of Almond Hull Biomass with Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) and Supercritical CO2 for the Recovery of Lipids, Carbohydrates and Antioxidants. Food Bioprod. Process. 2023, 139, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Q.; Chen, H.; Li, B.; Pan, P.; Xu, G.; Zhao, Q.; Jiang, X. A Novel System Integrating Water Electrolysis and Supercritical CO2 Cycle for Biomass to Methanol. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 225, 120234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hogan, P.; Otero, P.; Murray, P.; Saha, S.K. Effect of Biomass Pre-Treatment on Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Lipids from Marine Diatom Amphora sp. and Its Biomass Evaluation as Bioethanol Feedstock. Heliyon 2021, 7, e05995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Swetha, T.A.; Ananthi, V.; Bora, A.; Sengottuvelan, N.; Ponnuchamy, K.; Muthusamy, G.; Arun, A. A Review on Biodegradable Polylactic Acid (PLA) Production from Fermentative Food Waste—Its Applications and Degradation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 234, 123703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Woraprayote, W.; Janyaphisan, T.; Adunphatcharaphon, S.; Sonhom, N.; Showpanish, K.; Rumjuankiat, K.; Visessanguan, W.; Elliott, C.T.; Petchkongkaew, A. Bacteriocinogenic Lactic Acid Bacteria from Thai Fermented Foods: Potential Food Applications. Food Biosci. 2023, 52, 102385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ruiz Rodríguez, L.G.; Zamora Gasga, V.M.; Pescuma, M.; Van Nieuwenhove, C.; Mozzi, F.; Sánchez Burgos, J.A. Fruits and Fruit By-Products as Sources of Bioactive Compounds. Benefits and Trends of Lactic Acid Fermentation in the Development of Novel Fruit-Based Functional Beverages. Food Res. Int. 2021, 140, 109854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nunui, K.; Boonsawang, P.; Chaiprapat, S.; Charnnok, B. Using Organosolv Pretreatment with Acid Wastewater for Enhanced Fermentable Sugar and Ethanol Production from Rubberwood Waste. Renew. Energy 2022, 198, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Torres-León, C.; Chávez-González, M.L.; Hernández-Almanza, A.; Martínez-Medina, G.A.; Ramírez-Guzmán, N.; Londoño-Hernández, L.; Aguilar, C.N. Recent Advances on the Microbiological and Enzymatic Processing for Conversion of Food Wastes to Valuable Bioproducts. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 38, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Y.; Dong, J.; Xu, G.; Han, R.; Zhou, J.; Ni, Y. Efficient Production of Hyaluronic Acid by Streptococcus Zooepidemicus Using Two-Stage Semi-Continuous Fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 377, 128896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pfleger, B.F.; Takors, R. Recent Progress in the Synthesis of Advanced Biofuel and Bioproducts. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2023, 80, 102913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mandaokar, A. Market Research Report.Polaris Market Research. 2021, pp. 1–117. Available online: https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/bio-based-chemicals-market/toc (accessed on 20 July 2023).
  50. Santos, J.R.; Viana, G.C.C.; Barbosa, R.S.; Borges, M.d.S.; Rambo, M.K.D.; Bertuol, D.A.; Scapin, E. Effect of Different Pretreatments of Passiflora Edulis Peel Biomass on the Conversion Process into Bioproducts for Biorefineries. Sustain. Chem. Environ. 2023, 2, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cheirsilp, B.; Billateh, A.; Intasit, R.; Upaichit, A.; Boonsawang, P.; Louhasakul, Y. Fungal Pretreatment and Acid Post-Treatment for Fractionation and Biovalorization of Palm Biomass Wastes into Fungal Oil, Bioethanol, and Lactic Acid. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 196, 116503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Quintero, J.A.; Rincón, L.E.; Cardona, C.A. Production of Bioethanol from Agroindustrial Residues as Feedstocks. In Biofuels; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 251–285. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zaafouri, K.; Ziadi, M.; Ben Farah, R.; Farid, M.; Hamdi, M.; Regaya, I. Potential of Tunisian Alfa (Stipa tenassicima) Fibers for Energy Recovery to 2G Bioethanol: Study of Pretreatment, Enzymatic Saccharification and Fermentation. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 94, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sharma, B.; Larroche, C.; Dussap, C.-G. Comprehensive Assessment of 2G Bioethanol Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 313, 123630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Joseph, A.M.; Tulasi, Y.; Shrivastava, D.; Kiran, B. Techno-Economic Feasibility and Exergy Analysis of Bioethanol Production from Waste. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2023, 18, 100358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. de Jesús González-Chavez, J.; Arenas-Grimaldo, C.; Amaya-Delgado, L.; Vázquez-Núñez, E.; Suarez-Vázquez, S.; Cruz-López, A.; Segovia-Hernández, J.G.; Pérez-Vega, S.; Salmerón, I.; Molina-Guerrero, C.E. Sotol Bagasse (Dasylirion sp.) as a Novel Feedstock to Produce Bioethanol 2G: Bioprocess Design and Biomass Characterization. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 178, 114571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Elias, A.M.; Longati, A.A.; de Campos Giordano, R.; Furlan, F.F. Retro-Techno-Economic-Environmental Analysis Improves the Operation Efficiency of 1G-2G Bioethanol and Bioelectricity Facilities. Appl. Energy 2021, 282, 116133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Balasundaram, G.; Banu, R.; Varjani, S.; Kazmi, A.A.; Tyagi, V.K. Recalcitrant Compounds Formation, Their Toxicity, and Mitigation: Key Issues in Biomass Pretreatment and Anaerobic Digestion. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sazuan, N.S.A.; Zubairi, S.I.; Mohd, N.H.; Daik, R. Synthesising Injectable Molecular Self-Curing Polymer from Monomer Derived from Lignocellulosic Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Biomass: A Review on Treating Osteoarthritis. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 104500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Blair, E.M.; Dickson, K.L.; O’Malley, M.A. Microbial Communities and Their Enzymes Facilitate Degradation of Recalcitrant Polymers in Anaerobic Digestion. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2021, 64, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vieira, E.; Brandão, T.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O. Evaluation of Brewer’s Spent Yeast To Produce Flavor Enhancer Nucleotides: Influence of Serial Repitching. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2013, 61, 8724–8729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Jin, Y. Optimization of Extraction Parameters for Trehalose from Beer Waste Brewing Yeast Treated by High-Intensity Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 19144–19152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lee, J.-W.; Kim, B.-R.; Heo, Y.; Bae, G.-S.; Chang, M.B.; Moon, B. Feasibility of Using Kimchi By-Products as a Source of Functional Ingredients. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2016, 59, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nagai, H.; Kobayashi, M.; Tsuji, Y.; Nakashimada, Y.; Kakizono, T.; Nishio, N. Biological and Chemical Treatment of Solid Waste from Soy Sauce Manufacture. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ichikawa, N.; Ng, L.S.; Makino, S.; Goh, L.L.; Lim, Y.J.; Ferdinandus; Sasaki, H.; Shibata, S.; Lee, C.-L.K. Solid-State Fermented Okara with Aspergillus spp. Improves Lipid Metabolism and High-Fat Diet Induced Obesity. Metabolites 2022, 12, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhou, R.; Ren, Z.; Ye, J.; Fan, Y.; Liu, X.; Yang, J.; Deng, Z.-Y.; Li, J. Fermented Soybean Dregs by Neurospora Crassa: A Traditional Prebiotic Food. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 189, 608–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Nieto-Veloza, A.; Zhong, Q.; Kim, W.-S.; D’Souza, D.; Krishnan, H.B.; Dia, V.P. Utilization of Tofu Processing Wastewater as a Source of the Bioactive Peptide Lunasin. Food Chem. 2021, 362, 130220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jansone, L.; Kruma, Z.; Straumite, E. Evaluation of Chemical and Sensory Characteristics of Sauerkraut Juice Powder and Its Application in Food. Foods 2022, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Bosco, F.; Carletto, R.A.; Marmo, L. An Integrated Cheese Whey Valorization Process. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2018, 64, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Crowley, S.V.; Molitor, M.S.; Kalscheuer, R.; Lu, Y.; Kelly, A.L.; O’Mahony, J.A.; Lucey, J.A. Size Classification of Precipitated Calcium Phosphate Using Hydrocyclone Technology for the Recovery of Minerals from Deproteinised Acid Whey. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2019, 72, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Conway, V.; Couture, P.; Gauthier, S.; Pouliot, Y.; Lamarche, B. Effect of Buttermilk Consumption on Blood Pressure in Moderately Hypercholesterolemic Men and Women. Nutrition 2014, 30, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jenab, A.; Roghanian, R.; Emtiazi, G. Encapsulation of Platelet in Kefiran Polymer and Detection of Bioavailability of Immobilized Platelet in Probiotic Kefiran as a New Drug for Surface Bleeding. J. Med. Bacteriol. 2015, 4, 45–55. [Google Scholar]
  73. Piermaria, J.; Diosma, G.; Aquino, C.; Garrote, G.; Abraham, A. Edible Kefiran Films as Vehicle for Probiotic Microorganisms. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2015, 32, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gagliarini, N.; Diosma, G.; Garrote, G.L.; Abraham, A.G.; Piermaria, J. Whey Protein-Kefiran Films as Driver of Probiotics to the Gut. LWT 2019, 105, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Montoille, L.; Morales Vicencio, C.; Fontalba, D.; Ortiz, J.A.; Moreno-Serna, V.; Peponi, L.; Matiacevich, S.; Zapata, P.A. Study of the Effect of the Addition of Plasticizers on the Physical Properties of Biodegradable Films Based on Kefiran for Potential Application as Food Packaging. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 129966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Adessi, A.; Venturi, M.; Candeliere, F.; Galli, V.; Granchi, L.; De Philippis, R. Bread Wastes to Energy: Sequential Lactic and Photo-Fermentation for Hydrogen Production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 9569–9576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Narisetty, V.; Nagarajan, S.; Gadkari, S.; Ranade, V.V.; Zhang, J.; Patchigolla, K.; Bhatnagar, A.; Kumar Awasthi, M.; Pandey, A.; Kumar, V. Process Optimization for Recycling of Bread Waste into Bioethanol and Biomethane: A Circular Economy Approach. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 266, 115784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Maina, S.; Schneider, R.; Alexandri, M.; Papapostolou, H.; Nychas, G.-J.; Koutinas, A.; Venus, J. Volumetric Oxygen Transfer Coefficient as Fermentation Control Parameter to Manipulate the Production of Either Acetoin or D-2,3-Butanediol Using Bakery Waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 335, 125155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Narisetty, V.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Sze Ki Lin, C.; Wah Tong, Y.; Loke Show, P.; Kant Bhatia, S.; Misra, A.; Kumar, V. Fermentative Production of 2,3-Butanediol Using Bread Waste—A Green Approach for Sustainable Management of Food Waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 358, 127381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jung, J.-M.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, S.M.; Jung, S.; Song, H.; Kwon, E.E.; Choi, Y.-E. Zero-Waste Strategy by Means of Valorization of Bread Waste. J. Clean Prod. 2022, 365, 132795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dymchenko, A.; Geršl, M.; Gregor, T. The perspective of circular food waste management in the combined case of bakery and brewery. In Zero Waste Management and Circular Economy; Mendelova Univerzita v Brně: Brno, Czech Republic, 2021; pp. 129–135. [Google Scholar]
  82. Demirci, A.S.; Palabiyik, I.; Apaydın, D.; Mirik, M.; Gumus, T. Xanthan Gum Biosynthesis Using Xanthomonas Isolates from Waste Bread: Process Optimization and Fermentation Kinetics. LWT 2019, 101, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Samray, M.N.; Masatcioglu, T.M.; Koksel, H. Bread Crumbs Extrudates: A New Approach for Reducing Bread Waste. J. Cereal. Sci. 2019, 85, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sadaf, A.; Kumar, S.; Nain, L.; Khare, S.K. Bread Waste to Lactic Acid: Applicability of Simultaneous Saccharification and Solid State Fermentation. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 32, 101934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Suescun–Ospina, S.T.; Ávila–Stagno, J.; Vera-Aguilera, N.; Astudillo-Neira, R.; Trujillo-Mayol, I.; Alarcón-Enos, J. Effects of Drying Method on Bioactive Compounds Contents, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and in Vitro Methane Output of Waste Dried País Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Marc. Food Biosci. 2023, 51, 102154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bassani, A.; Alberici, N.; Fiorentini, C.; Giuberti, G.; Dordoni, R.; Spigno, G. Hydrothermal Treatment of Grape Skins for Sugars, Antioxidants and Soluble Fibers Production. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2020, 79, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Costabile, G.; Vitale, M.; Luongo, D.; Naviglio, D.; Vetrani, C.; Ciciola, P.; Tura, A.; Castello, F.; Mena, P.; Del Rio, D.; et al. Grape Pomace Polyphenols Improve Insulin Response to a Standard Meal in Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Study. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 2727–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yu, J.; Bansode, R.R.; Smith, I.N.; Hurley, S.L. Impact of Grape Pomace Consumption on the Blood Lipid Profile and Liver Genes Associated with Lipid Metabolism of Young Rats. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 2731–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ishimoto, E.Y.; Vicente, S.J.V.; Cruz, R.J.; da Silva Torres, E.A.F. Hypolipidemic and Antioxidant Effects of Grape Processing By-Products in High-Fat/Cholesterol Diet-Induced Hyperlipidemic Hamsters. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 40, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Serrano, J.; Casanova-Martí, À.; Gil-Cardoso, K.; Blay, M.T.; Terra, X.; Pinent, M.; Ardévol, A. Acutely Administered Grape-Seed Proanthocyanidin Extract Acts as a Satiating Agent. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Casanova-Martí, À.; Serrano, J.; Portune, K.J.; Sanz, Y.; Blay, M.T.; Terra, X.; Ardévol, A.; Pinent, M. Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins Influence Gut Microbiota and Enteroendocrine Secretions in Female Rats. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 1672–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Balea, Ş.S.; Pârvu, A.E.; Pop, N.; Marín, F.Z.; Andreicuț, A.; Pârvu, M. Phytochemical Profiling, Antioxidant and Cardioprotective Properties of Pinot Noir Cultivar Pomace Extracts. Farmacia 2018, 66, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Balea, Ş.S.; Pârvu, A.E.; Pop, N.; Marín, F.Z.; Pârvu, M. Polyphenolic Compounds, Antioxidant, and Cardioprotective Effects of Pomace Extracts from Fetească Neagră Cultivar. Oxid Med. Cell Longev. 2018, 2018, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chacar, S.; Hajal, J.; Saliba, Y.; Bois, P.; Louka, N.; Maroun, R.G.; Faivre, J.; Fares, N. Long-term Intake of Phenolic Compounds Attenuates Age-related Cardiac Remodeling. Aging Cell 2019, 18, e12894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pérez-Ortiz, J.M.; Alguacil, L.F.; Salas, E.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I.; Gómez-Alonso, S.; González-Martín, C. Antiproliferative and Cytotoxic Effects of Grape Pomace and Grape Seed Extracts on Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 2948–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Leone, A.; Longo, C.; Gerardi, C.; Trosko, J.E. Pro-Apoptotic Effect of Grape Seed Extract on MCF-7 Involves Transient Increase of Gap Junction Intercellular Communication and Cx43 Up-Regulation: A Mechanism of Chemoprevention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dimou, C.; Kopsahelis, N.; Papadaki, A.; Papanikolaou, S.; Kookos, I.K.; Mandala, I.; Koutinas, A.A. Wine Lees Valorization: Biorefinery Development Including Production of a Generic Fermentation Feedstock Employed for Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) Synthesis. Food Res. Int. 2015, 73, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Oliveira, A.S.; Pereira, J.O.; Ferreira, C.; Faustino, M.; Durão, J.; Pintado, M.E.; Carvalho, A.P. Peptide-Rich Extracts from Spent Yeast Waste Streams as a Source of Bioactive Compounds for the Nutraceutical Market. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 81, 103148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Cejas, L.; Romano, N.; Moretti, A.; Mobili, P.; Golowczyc, M.; Gómez-Zavaglia, A. Malt Sprout, an Underused Beer by-Product with Promising Potential for the Growth and Dehydration of Lactobacilli Strains. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 4464–4472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Vieira, E.; Cunha, S.C.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O. Characterization of a Potential Bioactive Food Ingredient from Inner Cellular Content of Brewer’s Spent Yeast. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 3235–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bastos, R.; Coelho, E.; Coimbra, M.A. Modifications of Saccharomyces Pastorianus Cell Wall Polysaccharides with Brewing Process. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 124, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liepins, J.; Kovačova, E.; Shvirksts, K.; Grube, M.; Rapoport, A.; Kogan, G. Drying Enhances Immunoactivity of Spent Brewer’s Yeast Cell Wall β-d-Glucans. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 206, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tian, X.; Yang, P.; Jiang, W. Effect of Alkali Treatment Combined with High Pressure on Extraction Efficiency of β-d-Glucan from Spent Brewer’s Yeast. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 1131–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mahalingam, R. Analysis of the Barley Malt Rootlet Proteome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cheng, H.-J.; Zhang, L.-M.; Duan, H.-X.; Li, J.; Dai, Y.-J. Optimization of Extraction Technology of the Alkali-Soluble Components of Barley Malt Roots and Its Composition Analysis. In Medicine and Biopharmaceutical; World Scientific: Singapore, 2016; pp. 1497–1505. [Google Scholar]
  106. Budaraju, S.; Mallikarjunan, K.; Annor, G.; Schoenfuss, T.; Raun, R. Effect of Pre-Treatments on the Antioxidant Potential of Phenolic Extracts from Barley Malt Rootlets. Food Chem. 2018, 266, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gandolpho, B.; Almeida, A.; Gandolpho, G.; Freitas, D.; Gasparini, O.; Machado, M.; Barreto, P. Optimization of Brewing Waste’s (Trub) Phenolic Compounds Extraction by Ultrasound Assisted Using Response Surface Methodology. Quim. Nova 2020, 44, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Senna Ferreira Costa, F.; Roquete Amparo, T.; Brandão Seibert, J.; Silveira, B.M.; Gomes da Silva, R.; Inocêncio Pereira, D.; Gontijo Garcia Barbosa, R.; dos Santos, O.D.H.; Brandão, G.C.; de Medeiros Teixeira, L.F.; et al. Reuse of Hot Trub as an Active Ingredient with Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Potential. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 2037–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Anioł, M.; Huszcza, E.; Bartmańska, A.; Żołnierczyk, A.; Mączka, W.; Wawrzeńczyk, C. Trace Analysis of Hop Essential Oils in Spent Hop. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2007, 65, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Anioł, M.; Żołnierczyk, A. Extraction of Spent Hops Using Organic Solvents. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2008, 66, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Rodrigues, R.P.; Gando-Ferreira, L.M.; Quina, M.J. Increasing Value of Winery Residues through Integrated Biorefinery Processes: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 4709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Carvalho, L.C.; Oliveira, A.L.S.; Carsanba, E.; Pintado, M.; Oliveira, C. Phenolic Compounds Modulation in β-Farnesene Fed-Batch Fermentation Using Sugarcane Syrup as Feedstock. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 188, 115721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Leite, P.; Belo, I.; Salgado, J.M. Co-Management of Agro-Industrial Wastes by Solid-State Fermentation for the Production of Bioactive Compounds. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 172, 113990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Melloul, S.; Zehioua, R.; Meniai, A.-H. Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Local Peganum Harmala Plant Seeds and Optimization of the Extraction Yield and the Antioxidant Activities. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 28, 100729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Cheng, F.; Brewer, C.E. Conversion of Protein-Rich Lignocellulosic Wastes to Bio-Energy: Review and Recommendations for Hydrolysis + Fermentation and Anaerobic Digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 146, 111167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sarangi, P.K.; Anand Singh, T.; Joykumar Singh, N.; Prasad Shadangi, K.; Srivastava, R.K.; Singh, A.K.; Chandel, A.K.; Pareek, N.; Vivekanand, V. Sustainable Utilization of Pineapple Wastes for Production of Bioenergy, Biochemicals and Value-Added Products: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 351, 127085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Srimachai, T.; Nuithitikul, K.; O-thong, S.; Kongjan, P.; Panpong, K. Optimization and Kinetic Modeling of Ethanol Production from Oil Palm Frond Juice in Batch Fermentation. Energy Procedia 2015, 79, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Qi, S.; Wang, Y.; Chu, X.; Wang, W.; Zhan, X.; Hu, Z.-H. Food Waste Fermentation for Carbon Source Production and Denitrification in Sequencing Batch Reactors. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhao, L.; Wu, K.-K.; Chen, C.; Ren, H.-Y.; Wang, Z.-H.; Nan, J.; Yang, S.-S.; Cao, G.-L.; Ren, N.-Q. Role of Residue Cornstalk Derived Biochar for the Enhanced Bio-Hydrogen Production via Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Cornstalk. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 330, 125006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Shi, M.J.; Ma, Z.X.; Tian, Y.J.; Ma, C.; Li, Y.D.; Zhang, X.W. Effects of Corn Straw Treated with CaO on Rumen Degradation Characteristics and Fermentation Parameters and Their Correlation with Microbial Diversity in Rumen. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2022, 292, 115403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lal, N.; Seifan, M.; Berenjian, A. The Impact of Key Fermentation Parameters on the Production of the All-Trans Isomer of Menaquinone-7. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 46, 102548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Farias, T.C.; Kawaguti, H.Y.; Bello Koblitz, M.G. Microbial Amylolytic Enzymes in Foods: Technological Importance of the Bacillus Genus. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 35, 102054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sahir, A.H.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, S. Modelling of a Packed Bed Solid-State Fermentation Bioreactor Using the N-Tanks in Series Approach. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 35, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. da Conceição Gomes, A.; Rodrigues, M.I.; de França Passos, D.; Machado de Castro, A.; Maria Mello Santa Anna, L.; Pereira, N. Acetone–Butanol–Ethanol Fermentation from Sugarcane Bagasse Hydrolysates: Utilization of C5 and C6 Sugars. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 42, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. de Morais, W.G.; Kamimura, E.S.; Ribeiro, E.J.; Pessela, B.C.; Cardoso, V.L.; de Resende, M.M. Optimization of the Production and Characterization of Lipase from Candida Rugosa and Geotrichum Candidum in Soybean Molasses by Submerged Fermentation. Protein Expr. Purif. 2016, 123, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Couto, S.R.; Sanromán, M.Á. Application of Solid-State Fermentation to Food Industry—A Review. J. Food Eng. 2006, 76, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Pollice, A.; Laera, G.; Blonda, M. Biomass Growth and Activity in a Membrane Bioreactor with Complete Sludge Retention. Water Res. 2004, 38, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ullah, A.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Qiao, Q.; Shao, Q.; Shi, J. Process Intensification Strategies for Green Solvent Mediated Biomass Pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 369, 128394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Bhushan, S.; Jayakrishnan, U.; Shree, B.; Bhatt, P.; Eshkabilov, S.; Simsek, H. Biological Pretreatment for Algal Biomass Feedstock for Biofuel Production. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tuan Hoang, A.; Phuong Nguyen, X.; Quang Duong, X.; Ağbulut, Ü.; Len, C.; Quy Phong Nguyen, P.; Kchaou, M.; Chen, W.-H. Steam Explosion as Sustainable Biomass Pretreatment Technique for Biofuel Production: Characteristics and Challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 385, 129398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Li, P.; Cai, D.; Luo, Z.; Qin, P.; Chen, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.; Tan, T. Effect of Acid Pretreatment on Different Parts of Corn Stalk for Second Generation Ethanol Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 206, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Malayil, S.; Surendran, A.N.; Kate, K.; Satyavolu, J. Impact of Acid Hydrolysis on Composition, Morphology and Xylose Recovery from Almond Biomass (Skin and Shell). Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 19, 101150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Haldar, D.; Shabbirahmed, A.M.; Mahanty, B. Multivariate Regression and Artificial Neural Network Modelling of Sugar Yields from Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 370, 128519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Jeong, S.-Y.; Koo, B.; Lee, J.-W. Structural Changes in Biomass (Yellow Poplar and Empty Fruit Bunch) during Hydrothermal and Oxalic Acid Pretreatments and Their Effects on Enzymatic Hydrolysis Efficiency. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 178, 114569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wang, Y.; Meng, X.; Jeong, K.; Li, S.; Leem, G.; Kim, K.H.; Pu, Y.; Ragauskas, A.J.; Yoo, C.G. Investigation of a Lignin-Based Deep Eutectic Solvent Using p -Hydroxybenzoic Acid for Efficient Woody Biomass Conversion. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 12542–12553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ouyang, D.; Liu, T.; Astimar, A.A.; Lau, H.L.N.; Teh, S.S.; Nursyairah, J.; Liu, D.; Zhao, X. Model-Based Process Intensification of Dilute Acid Pre-Hydrolysis of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Biomass for Pretreatment and Furfural Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 372, 128626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Srivastava, K.; Mickan, B.S.; O’Connor, J.; Gurung, S.K.; Moheimani, N.R.; Jenkins, S.N. Development of a Controlled Release Fertilizer by Incorporating Lauric Acid into Microalgal Biomass: Dynamics on Soil Biological Processes for Efficient Utilisation of Waste Resources. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 344, 118392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Pendse, D.S.; Deshmukh, M.; Pande, A. Different Pre-Treatments and Kinetic Models for Bioethanol Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Neis, U.; Cleary, R. The Use of Power Ultrasound for Wastewater and Biomass Treatment. In Power Ultrasonics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 817–832. [Google Scholar]
  140. Zhang, J.; Wei, J.; Guo, C.; Tang, Q.; Guo, H. The Spatial Distribution Characteristics of the Biomass Residual Potential in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 338, 117777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Thamizhakaran Stanley, J.; Thanarasu, A.; Senthil Kumar, P.; Periyasamy, K.; Raghunandhakumar, S.; Periyaraman, P.; Devaraj, K.; Dhanasekaran, A.; Subramanian, S. Potential Pre-Treatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for the Enhancement of Biomethane Production through Anaerobic Digestion—A Review. Fuel 2022, 318, 123593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Lee, J.A.; Kim, H.U.; Na, J.-G.; Ko, Y.-S.; Cho, J.S.; Lee, S.Y. Factors Affecting the Competitiveness of Bacterial Fermentation. Trends Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 798–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hazeena, S.H.; Shurpali, N.J.; Siljanen, H.; Lappalainen, R.; Anoop, P.; Adarsh, V.P.; Sindhu, R.; Pandey, A.; Binod, P. Bioprocess development of 2, 3-butanediol production using agro-industrial residues. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2022, 45, 1527–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Henstra, A.M.; Sipma, J.; Rinzema, A.; Stams, A.J. Microbiology of Synthesis Gas Fermentation for Biofuel Production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2007, 18, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Jugwanth, Y.; Sewsynker-Sukai, Y.; Gueguim Kana, E.B. Valorization of Sugarcane Bagasse for Bioethanol Production through Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation: Optimization and Kinetic Studies. Fuel 2020, 262, 116552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Sun, X.; Atiyeh, H.K.; Huhnke, R.L.; Tanner, R.S. Syngas Fermentation Process Development for Production of Biofuels and Chemicals: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 7, 100279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Yu, X.; Chen, G.; Widenmeyer, M.; Kinski, I.; Liu, X.; Kunz, U.; Schüpfer, D.; Molina-Luna, L.; Tu, X.; Homm, G.; et al. Catalytic Recycling of Medical Plastic Wastes over La0.6Ca0.4Co1–Fe O3− Pre-Catalysts for Co-Production of H2 and High-Value Added Carbon Nanomaterials. Appl. Catal. B 2023, 334, 122838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Anniwaer, A.; Chaihad, N.; Choirun Az Zahra, A.; Kurnia, I.; Kasai, Y.; Kongparakul, S.; Samart, C.; Kusakabe, K.; Abudula, A.; Guan, G. Utilization of Fruit Waste for H2-Rich Syngas Production via Steam Co-Gasification with Brown Coal. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2023, 6, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mateus, S.; Carvalheira, M.; Cassidy, J.; Freitas, E.; Oehmen, A.; Reis, M.A.M. Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion System Treating Different Seasonal Fruit Pulp Wastes: Impact on Biogas and Hydrogen Production and Total Energy Recovery Potential. Biomass Bioenergy 2020, 141, 105694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ishak, M.A.M.; Ani, A.Y.; Syed Ismail, S.N.A.; Ali, M.L.M.; Ahmad, R. Conversion of Biomass to Biofuels. In Value-Chain of Biofuels; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 49–67. [Google Scholar]
  151. Villanueva-Galindo, E.; Vital-Jácome, M.; Moreno-Andrade, I. Dark Fermentation for H2 Production from Food Waste and Novel Strategies for Its Enhancement. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 9957–9970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Lu, C.; Wang, G.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, X.; Yu, J.; Liu, T.; Petracchini, F.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, D.; et al. Comparison of Biorefinery Characteristics: Photo-Fermentation Biohydrogen, Dark Fermentation Biohydrogen, Biomethane, and Bioethanol Production. Appl. Energy 2023, 347, 121463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ahmad, A.; K, R.; Hasan, S.W.; Show, P.L.; Banat, F. Biohydrogen Production through Dark Fermentation: Recent Trends and Advances in Transition to a Circular Bioeconomy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, in press. [CrossRef]
  154. Walker, T.R.; Fequet, L. Current Trends of Unsustainable Plastic Production and Micro(Nano)Plastic Pollution. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 160, 116984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Plastics Europe. Plastic-the Facts 2022. Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/ (accessed on 21 September 2023).
  156. Statista Research Department. Statista Annual Production of Plastics Worldwide from 1950 to 2021. 2022. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/282732/global-production-of-plastics-since-1950/ (accessed on 21 September 2023).
  157. GRID Arendal. Global Plastic Production and Accumulation. 2021. Available online: https://www.grida.no/resources/1504.1 (accessed on 21 September 2023).
  158. Hathi, Z.J.; Haque, M.A.; Priya, A.; Qin, Z.; Huang, S.; Lam, C.H.; Ladakis, D.; Pateraki, C.; Mettu, S.; Koutinas, A.; et al. Fermentative Bioconversion of Food Waste into Biopolymer Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) Using Cupriavidus Necator. Environ. Res. 2022, 215, 114323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Hees, T.; Zhong, F.; Stürzel, M.; Mülhaupt, R. Tailoring Hydrocarbon Polymers and All-Hydrocarbon Composites for Circular Economy. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40, 1800608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Zhong, S.; Pearce, J.M. Tightening the Loop on the Circular Economy: Coupled Distributed Recycling and Manufacturing with Recyclebot and RepRap 3-D Printing. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 128, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Sohn, Y.J.; Kim, H.T.; Baritugo, K.; Jo, S.Y.; Song, H.M.; Park, S.Y.; Park, S.K.; Pyo, J.; Cha, H.G.; Kim, H.; et al. Recent Advances in Sustainable Plastic Upcycling and Biopolymers. Biotechnol. J. 2020, 15, 1900489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Madhavan Nampoothiri, K.; Nair, N.R.; John, R.P. An Overview of the Recent Developments in Polylactide (PLA) Research. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 8493–8501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Bhatia, S.K.; Otari, S.V.; Jeon, J.-M.; Gurav, R.; Choi, Y.-K.; Bhatia, R.K.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Kumar, V.; Rajesh Banu, J.; Yoon, J.-J.; et al. Biowaste-to-Bioplastic (Polyhydroxyalkanoates): Conversion Technologies, Strategies, Challenges, and Perspective. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 326, 124733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Oh, Y.-R.; Jang, Y.-A.; Song, J.K.; Eom, G.T. Efficient Enzymatic Depolymerization of Polycaprolactone into 6-Hydroxyhexanoic Acid by Optimizing Reaction Conditions and Microbial Conversion of 6-Hydroxyhexanoic Acid into Adipic Acid for Eco-Friendly Upcycling of Polycaprolactone. Biochem. Eng. J. 2022, 185, 108504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Yagi, H.; Ninomiya, F.; Funabashi, M.; Kunioka, M. Anaerobic Biodegradation Tests of Poly(Lactic Acid) and Polycaprolactone Using New Evaluation System for Methane Fermentation in Anaerobic Sludge. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2009, 94, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Lanfranchi, A.; Tassinato, G.; Valentino, F.; Martinez, G.A.; Jones, E.; Gioia, C.; Bertin, L.; Cavinato, C. Hydrodynamic Cavitation Pre-Treatment of Urban Waste: Integration with Acidogenic Fermentation, PHAs Synthesis and Anaerobic Digestion Processes. Chemosphere 2022, 301, 134624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Kerketta, A.; Vasanth, D. Madhuca Indica Flower Extract as Cheaper Carbon Source for Production of Poly (3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) Using Ralstonia Eutropha. Process Biochem. 2019, 87, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Barba, F.J. An Integrated Approach for the Valorization of Cheese Whey. Foods 2021, 10, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Swetha, T.A.; Bora, A.; Mohanrasu, K.; Balaji, P.; Raja, R.; Ponnuchamy, K.; Muthusamy, G.; Arun, A. A Comprehensive Review on Polylactic Acid (PLA)—Synthesis, Processing and Application in Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 234, 123715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Mehrali, F.; Ziyadi, H.; Hekmati, M.; Faridi-Majidi, R.; Qomi, M. Kefiran/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/Poly(Vinyl Pyrrolidone) Composite Nanofibers: Fabrication, Characterization and Consideration of Effective Parameters in Electrospinning. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Esnaashari, S.S.; Rezaei, S.; Mirzaei, E.; Afshari, H.; Rezayat, S.M.; Faridi-Majidi, R. Preparation and Characterization of Kefiran Electrospun Nanofibers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 70, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Jenab, A.; Roghanian, R.; Emtiazi, G.; Ghaedi, K. Manufacturing and Structural Analysis of Antimicrobial Kefiran/Polyethylene Oxide Nanofibers for Food Packaging. Iran. Polym. J. 2017, 26, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Dadashi, S.; Boddohi, S.; Soleimani, N. Preparation, Characterization, and Antibacterial Effect of Doxycycline Loaded Kefiran Nanofibers. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 52, 979–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Blandón, L.M.; Islan, G.A.; Castro, G.R.; Noseda, M.D.; Thomaz-Soccol, V.; Soccol, C.R. Kefiran-Alginate Gel Microspheres for Oral Delivery of Ciprofloxacin. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 145, 706–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Zhang, M.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F.; He, M.; Guo, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Mu, J. Pyrolysis of Ca/Fe-Rich Antibiotic Fermentation Residues into Biochars for Efficient Phosphate Removal/Recovery from Wastewater: Turning Hazardous Waste to Phosphorous Fertilizer. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 869, 161732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Gao, T.; Shi, W.; Zhao, M.; Huang, Z.; Liu, X.; Ruan, W. Preparation of Spiramycin Fermentation Residue Derived Biochar for Effective Adsorption of Spiramycin from Wastewater. Chemosphere 2022, 296, 133902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Xiao, J.; Wang, G.; Liu, H.; Dai, X. Application of Composted Lipstatin Fermentation Residue as Organic Fertilizer: Temporal Changes in Soil Characteristics and Bacterial Community. Chemosphere 2022, 306, 135637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Pan, M.; Xin, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jia, W.; Lu, H.; Jiang, S.; Wu, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q.; Du, H.; et al. Benign Treatment and Resource Utilization Characteristics of Doramectin Fermentation Residues. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 401, 136777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bioactive compounds and valuable products recovered from several sources of fermented foods and their potential applications.
Figure 1. Bioactive compounds and valuable products recovered from several sources of fermented foods and their potential applications.
Fermentation 09 00920 g001
Figure 2. Process steps of fermentation of residual biomass.
Figure 2. Process steps of fermentation of residual biomass.
Fermentation 09 00920 g002
Figure 3. Sources of residues and wastes, the associated parameters, and the types of fermentation according to its valorization in commercial products.
Figure 3. Sources of residues and wastes, the associated parameters, and the types of fermentation according to its valorization in commercial products.
Fermentation 09 00920 g003
Figure 4. Synthesis steps for some of the biofuels obtained via dark fermentation.
Figure 4. Synthesis steps for some of the biofuels obtained via dark fermentation.
Fermentation 09 00920 g004
Figure 5. Metabolic pathways of acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) reduction, involving the fermentation of biomass conversion into a range of biofuel compounds.
Figure 5. Metabolic pathways of acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) reduction, involving the fermentation of biomass conversion into a range of biofuel compounds.
Fermentation 09 00920 g005
Figure 6. Forecast of plastics use generated worldwide from 2002 to 2050.
Figure 6. Forecast of plastics use generated worldwide from 2002 to 2050.
Fermentation 09 00920 g006
Table 1. A brief overview of the potential health benefits/application of bioactive compounds and valuable compounds recovered by the valorization of fermented food byproducts and wastes.
Table 1. A brief overview of the potential health benefits/application of bioactive compounds and valuable compounds recovered by the valorization of fermented food byproducts and wastes.
Fermented FoodBiomass Resource (Natural, Byproduct, Waste)Bioactive Compounds/Valuable CompoundsObtaining MethodPotential Health Benefit/ApplicationRef.
FERMENTED VEGETABLES
Kimchi factoryCabbage powder and radish powderDietary fibersUAE (H2O:acetonitrile)Functional foodsLee et al., 2016 [63]
Soy sauceSolid waste from soy sauce refuseCH4, CO2 and VFAsAnaerobic digestionClean energy (biomethane)Nagai et al., 2022 [64]
Protein, insoluble fiberNaOH treatmentFood seasonings and additives
Fermented soybean food productsInsoluble residue (okara)Phenolic compounds and proteinsSSF by Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus sojaeAnti-obesity effectsIchikawa et al., 2022 [65]
Fermented soybean food productsSoybean dregs (okara)OligosaccharidesFermentation by Neurospora crassaPrebiotic foodZhou et al., 2019 [66]
TofuWastewater (tofu whey)Peptide lunasinEthanolic-isoelectric precipitation and gel filtration chromatographyCancer preventionNieto-veloza et al., 2021 [67]
Fermented cabbageSauerkraut juicePhenolic compounds, minerals, vitamins, sugars, and NaClSpray-drying to obtain sauerkraut juice powderSalt alternatives in foodsJanosone et al., 2022 [68]
FERMENTED DAIRY PRODUCTS
CheeseWastewater (cheese whey)LactoseBiological processesCarbon sources for biomoleculesBosco et al., 2018 [69]
Lipids and proteinThermocalcic precipitationBioplastics: polyhydroxyalkanoates
ProteinUltrafiltrationWPC for the food industry
Greek yogurtAcid wheyCalcium phosphateLiquid–solid hydrocycloneFood ingredients, food additiveCrowley et al., 2019 [70]
Cultured butterButtermilkMFGM proteins and lipids, minerals, lecithin, lactoseFermentation by LABFunctional foods; Antihypertensive effectsConway et al., 2014 [71]
Milk kefirKefir grainsPolysaccharides, LAB, and yeastsMilk fermentation: aqueous extraction, lyophilizationBiopolymer kefiran for food and medical applicationsJenab et al., 2015 [72]; Piermaria et al., 2015 [73]
Kefir grainsBioactive polysaccharides and proteins; nisinImmobilized platelet encapsulation on kefiranBiomedical applications—drug delivery and tissue engineeringJenab et al., 2015 [72]
Kefir grainsBioactive polysaccharides and proteins; lactobacilliFilm-forming dispersionsProbiotic deliveryGagliani et al., 2019 [74]
Kefir grainsBioactive polysaccharides and proteinsPolymer solution-casting methodBiodegradable films for food packagingPiermaria et al., 2015 [73]; Montoille et al., 2021 [75]
BREAD WASTE
BreadBread wasteOrganic acidsLactic fermentation (Lactobacillus amylovorus DSM 20532)Energy recovery—biohydrogen productionAdessi et al., 2018 [76]
Organic acid from lactic fermentationBiohydrogen (H2)Photo-fermentation (Rhodopseudomonas palustris 42OL)
BreadOut-of-date breadFermentable sugars—glucose (C₆H₁₂O₆)Acid/enzymatic hydrolysisSolid-state fermentationNarisetty, Nagarajan, et al., 2022 [77]
Bread waste hydrolysate (glucose)Bio-based ethanol (C₂H₆O)SSF by Saccharomyces cerevisiae KL17Bioethanol production
Bio-based methane (CH4)Solid residue of SSF in ethanol productionBiomethane production
BreadBread waste hydrolysateD-2,3-ButanediolFermentation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciensButanediol productionMaina et al., 2021 [78]
Fermentation by Enterobacter ludwigiiNarisetty et al., 2022 [79]
BreadBread wasteFermentable sugars—glucose (C₆H₁₂O₆)Enzymatic hydrolysisBiosource for microalgae cultivationJung et al., 2022 [80]
Bread waste hydrolysateParamylon (β(1,3)-glucan)Heterotrophic cultivation of microalga Euglena gracilisBiosource for bioplastic
BreadRemnants of bakery productsSugars and proteinsBread waste as malt substitute in brewingBeer productionDymchenko et al., 2021 [81]
Wheat BreadStale bread (unsold and returns from shops)Fermentable sugars—glucose (C₆H₁₂O₆)Enzymatic hydrolysisBiosource for xanthan gum biosynthesisDemirci et al., 2019 [82]
Bread waste hydrolysateXanthan gum (polysaccharide)Fermentation by Xanthomonas spp. using glucose as a carbon sourceFood additive
BreadcrumbsProcessing bread wasteDietary fiber, starchBread crumble extrudates by an extrusion processWheat flour substitute in extrusion cookingSamray et al., 2019 [83]
BreadIndian’ bakery wastesReducing sugarsSimultaneous saccharification and SSF by LABLactic acid productionSadaf et al., 2021 [84]
FERMENTED BEVERAGES
WineryGrape pomacePhenolic compounds, proanthocyanidinsIn vitro rumen fermentationRuminant feeding with lower CH4 emissionSuescun-Ospina et al., 2023 [85]
WineryGrape skins from winery wasteSoluble dietary fibersHigh-pressure HTT (autohydrolysis)Antioxidant effectBassani et al., 2020 [86]
WineryRed grape pomaceAnthocyanins, flavan-3-ols, flavonols, procyanidins, galloyl glucose, and gallic acidAqueous extract drink of red grape pomace (RGPD)Anti-hyperglicemic effectCostabile et al., 2019 [87]
Winery—Noble MuscadineGrape pomaceAnthocyanins, catechin, epicatechinDrying, grounding, and sievingAnti-hyperlipidemic effectYu et al., 2017 [88]
Winery—Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.)Grape pomaces (skin and seeds)Catechin, epicathecin, rutin, quercetin, kaempeferol, transrerveratrol, cinnamic and benzoic acid derivatives.Dehydration, freeze-drying, and milling to obtain WPFAnti-hyperlipidemic and antioxidant effectsIshimoto et al., 2020 [89]
WineryGrape seedProanthocyanidins—monomer, dimer, trimers, oligomers-Satiating agentSerrano et al., 2016 [90]
Gut healthCasanova-marti 2018 [91]
Winery—Pinot Noir (Vitis vinifera L.)Grape pomaceProanthocyanidins, flavan-3-ol monomers, (+)-catechin, (−)-epicathecin, (−)-epicatechin-3-O-gallate, stillbenesWater-ethanol extraction; freeze-drying; grindingCardioprotective effectBallea et al., 2018 [92]
Winery—Fetească Neagră (Vitis vinifera L.)Grape pomaceBallea et al., 2018 [93]
Winery—Cabernet Sauvignon, Marselan, SyrahGrape pomace (skins, pulp, seeds, and stem)Malvidin, delphinidin, rutin, quercetin, catechin, coumaric acid, kaempferol, trans-cinnamic acidSolvent extract; spray-dryingCardioprotective effectChacar et al., 2019 [94]
WineryRed, white grape pomace/grape seedAnthocyanins, flavan-3-ols, flavonols, stilbenesSolvent extract; lyophilizationCancer preventionPérez-Ortiz et al., 2019 [95]
WineryGrape seedGallic acid, catechin, epicatechin gallate, and epicatechinSolvent extract; lyophilizationCancer preventionLeone et al., 2019 [96]
Winery—Merlot, red wineWine less—liquidEthanolDistillationBiofuel productionDimou et al., 2015 [97]
Alcohol-free nutrient-rich liquidSolid-state fermentation
Wine lees—solidsPhenolic compoundssequential extraction with acetone:H2O (after distillation)Antioxidants
Residual solidsFood additives
Wine lees—Residual solidsTartaric acidFood additives
Remaining stream (yeast cells)Enzymatic hydrolysisSolid-state fermentation
Crude nutrient-rich hydrolysate + crude glycerolPoly (3-hydroxybutyrate)SSF by Aspergillus oryzaeBioplastics
BrewingSpent yeastPeptides (48.3% protein; 86.4% essential amino acids)Membrane filtrationNutraceuticalsOliveira et al., 2022 [98]
BrewingSpent yeastProteins, lipids, and carbohydratesMicrowave-assisted extractionPrebiotic/probiotic functional foodsCejas et al., 2017 [99]
BrewingSpent yeastTrehalosePulsed electric fieldBioprotectant agentJin 2011 [62]
BrewingSpent yeastNucleotidesCSLEFlavor enhancer Vieira et al., 2013 [61]
BrewingSpent yeastProteins and phenolic compounds-Food ingredientVieira et al., 2019 [100]
BrewingSpent yeastβ-glucanCSLEImmunomodulationBastos et al., 2015 [101]; Liepins et al., 2015 [102]; Tian et al., 2019 [103]
BrewingBarley malt rootletsProteinsCSLEFunctional foodsMahalingam, 2019 [104]
BrewingBarley malt rootletsProteins and phenolic compoundsCSLEAntioxidants (functional foods)Cheng et al., 2016 [105]; Budaraju et al., 2018 [106]
BrewingSpent hopsPhenolic compoundsUAE (ethanol)Antioxidant and antimicrobial effectsGandolpho et al., 2020; [107] Senna Ferreira Costa et al., 2021 [108]
BrewingSpent hopsEssential oils;XanthohumolCSLEAntioxidant and anticancer activitiesAnioł et al., 2007 [109]; 2008 [110]
SSF: solid-state fermentation; VFAs: volatile fatty acids; RGPD: 9.8 g/100 mL of soluble carbohydrates and 625 mg/100 mL of total polyphenols; WPC: whey protein concentrate; CLSE: conventional solid-liquid extraction; UAE: ultrasound-assisted extraction; HTT: hydrothermal treatment; WPF: wine pomace flour; -: not reported/not specified; MFGM: milk fat globule membrane; LAB: lactic acid bacteria.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Faria, D.J.; Carvalho, A.P.A.d.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Valorization of Fermented Food Wastes and Byproducts: Bioactive and Valuable Compounds, Bioproduct Synthesis, and Applications. Fermentation 2023, 9, 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9100920

AMA Style

Faria DJ, Carvalho APAd, Conte-Junior CA. Valorization of Fermented Food Wastes and Byproducts: Bioactive and Valuable Compounds, Bioproduct Synthesis, and Applications. Fermentation. 2023; 9(10):920. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9100920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faria, Douglas José, Anna Paula Azevedo de Carvalho, and Carlos Adam Conte-Junior. 2023. "Valorization of Fermented Food Wastes and Byproducts: Bioactive and Valuable Compounds, Bioproduct Synthesis, and Applications" Fermentation 9, no. 10: 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9100920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop