Next Article in Journal
Thermal Tolerance of Spotted Sea Bass (Lateolabrax maculatus) and Pearl Gentian Grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus Female × E. lanceolatus Male) in Different Environmental Temperatures
Previous Article in Journal
Exogenous β-Propeller Phytase and Prebiotic Mannan Oligosaccharide (MOS) Supplementation of Formulated Diets Applied to Juvenile Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus: Impact on Growth Performance and Nutrient Digestibility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fungi and Actinobacteria: Alternative Probiotics for Sustainable Aquaculture

by
Koushik Ghosh
1,*,
Ramasamy Harikrishnan
2,
Abhisek Mukhopadhyay
1 and
Einar Ringø
3
1
Aquaculture Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan 713104, West Bengal, India
2
Department of Zoology, Pachaiyappa’s College for Men Affiliated to University of Madras, Kanchipuram 631501, Tamil Nadu, India
3
Fisheries and Economics, Faculty of Bioscience, Norwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2023, 8(12), 575; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8120575
Submission received: 18 October 2023 / Revised: 16 November 2023 / Accepted: 17 November 2023 / Published: 25 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Aquaculture)

Abstract

:
Aquatic animals are continually being exposed to stressors under farming conditions, increasing risks to gut health that result in dysbiosis. Since restrictions are imposed on the frequent use of antibiotics in aquaculture, there is emerging demand for economically viable, environmentally safe, and sustainable alternatives for the intensive production of aquaculture species. The application of beneficial microorganisms as probiotics has been suggested and widely practiced in recent times. Bacteria and fungi are ubiquitous microorganisms that can grow in various environments where organic substrates are available. Being rich in nutrients, a fish’s aquatic environment and gastrointestinal tract confer a favorable culture milieu for the microorganisms. However, the colonization and probiotic potential of fungi and mycelial bacteria resembling fungi (actinobacteria), either in the culture environment or within the gastrointestinal tracts of fish, have received less emphasis. Apart from bacilli and lactic acid bacteria, as the most conventionally used probiotics in aquaculture, numerous studies have focused on other promising alternatives. Diverse species of yeasts and molds belonging to the kingdom ‘Fungi’ have been characterized for their prospective roles in nutrition, immunomodulation, and disease prevention in fish. Bioactive compounds such as manno-oligosaccharides and β-glucans are recognized as fungal postbiotics that improve innate immunity and disease resistance in fish. Actinobacteria are known to possess different hydrolytic enzymes and novel secondary metabolites representing their probiotic attributes. The application of these groups in water quality amelioration has also been explored. Thus, this paper presents an overview of the present status of knowledge pertaining to the effects of yeasts (Candida, Cryptococcus, Debaryomyces, Geotrichum, Leucosporidium, Pichia, Rhodosporidium, Rhodotorula, Saccharomyces, Sporidiobolus, Sporobolomyces, Trichosporon and Yarrowialipolytica), molds (Aspergillus spp.) and actinobacteria (Streptomyces) as probiotics in finfish aquaculture, as well as their occurrence within the gastrointestinal tracts of finfish. Furthermore, probiotic mechanisms, selection criteria, and future perspectives on using fungi and actinobacteria as promising probiotics are discussed.
Key Contribution: The intensification of aquaculture and antibiotics usage has emphasized the need for alternatives to antibiotics, for example, probiotics applications to make aquaculture more environmentally sustainable and economically viable. The most frequently used probiotics in aquaculture are either Bacillus spp. or lactic acid bacteria, but numerous studies have indicated the potentiality of other organisms as probiotics. This paper summarizes the current knowledge of the prospects of yeasts, molds and actinobacteria as alternatives to widely used conventional bacterial probiotics.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture is expected to lead the global fish supply within the next decade. However, the intensification of aquatic production has led to a significant increase in infectious diseases and growing inefficiency among the antibiotics used to treat these diseases. Several options are available today, including probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics [1]. The use of probiotics as an alternative approach to reduce the opportunity of pathogens to adhere and colonize the larval, fry and juvenile intestine is to modulate the intestinal microbiota with beneficial microorganisms that can be added either to the diet [2] or into the rearing water [3] to facilitate the proportion of health-promoting microorganisms within the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The advantage of these administration methods is they can easily be implemented during early development stages when vaccination via injection is impractical. Numerous Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria are used as probiotics in aquaculture [1,2,4,5,6]. Although the applications of bacilli and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are the most conventionally used probiotics, the search for new probiotic strains is essential to combat the latest, emerging pathogens in aquaculture. As a consequence, a range of other microorganisms, including yeasts [7,8,9,10], molds [11,12], bacteriophages, unicellular algae, and some non-conventional bacteria [13], have been evaluated for their probiotic potential.
Yeasts are unicellular eukaryotic microorganisms taxonomically placed within the phyla ‘Ascomycota’ and ‘Basidiomycota’ within the kingdom ’Fungi’ [14]. In their review devoted to yeast as a sustainable feed resource for use in aquaculture, Øverland and Skrede [15] presented information on chemical composition, digestibility in fish, how processing affects digestibility, and effects on growth performance, nitrogen utilization, carcass composition, and fish health. Gatesoupe, Navarrete and Tovar-Ramírez; Tan et al.; Hayatgheib et al.; and Ceseña et al. [7,8,9,10,16] discussed information on yeast probiotics in their review. To avoid duplicating with those findings presented in the above reviews, these studies are only briefly mentioned in this review to allow a complete overview. Unlike yeasts, molds are multicellular organisms classified under the kingdom ‘Fungi’. The genus Aspergillus consists of common molds reported throughout the environment within soil, water or vegetation and thrives as saprophytes. Aspergillus spp. are recognized as an essential source of diverse enzymes, e.g., alpha-amylase, protease and glucoamylase [12,17], and have been recommended for use as promising probiotic feed supplements for fish, as well as poultry and livestock [18]. However, studies conducted on fungal probiotics and their potential bioactive compounds are still inadequate, suggesting scope to look for alternative probiotics for use in aquaculture. Morphologically, actinobacteria resemble fungi because of their elongated cells that branch into hyphae. However, actinomycete hyphae can be distinguished from fungal hyphae, as the size of actinomycete hyphae is much smaller than that of fungal hyphae. Marine actinobacteria have long been designated as the chemical factory, and many chemical substances are reported from them [19]. Streptomyces, being the most widely studied actinobacteria, have been shown to possess novel secondary metabolites that add a new dimension to microbial natural products [20]. Despite all the significant features of a good probiotic, actinobacteria have hardly been used as probiotics in aquaculture. Recent reports on the efficacy of actinobacteria in realizing multiple applications and their resemblance to the fungal hyphae tempted us to include them in this review for their prospective role in aquaculture.
Understanding the contribution of fungi and actinobacteria as a part of the gut microbiome may improve fish health and nutrition management, as well as the production performance of fish. Thus, the current review presents an overview of yeasts (Candida, Cryptococcus, Debaryomyces, Geotrichum, Leucosporidium, Pichia, Rhodosporidium, Rhodotorula, Saccharomyces, Sporidiobolus, Sporobolomyces, Trichosporon and Yarrowia lipolytica), molds (Aspergillus spp.) and actinobacteria (Streptomyces) as probiotic supplements in aquaculture, with a focus on growth performance, the modulation of the gut microbiota, the gut histology, the effects on the immune system and disease resistance in finfish. However, some reports on shrimp and other aquatic organisms are presented and discussed to give information of vital interest. Furthermore, some general information is provided regarding selecting and validating the fungal and actinobacterial strains as potential probiotics for their likely use in sustainable aquaculture.

2. Yeasts as Probiotics

Yeasts form a part of the normal microbiota in wild and farmed fish, and their role in fish health and nutrition has also been addressed [8]. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the halotolerant Debaryomyces hansenii are two of the most popular and widely studied yeast probiotics in fish [21,22]. Yeast probiotics, as whole-cell or sub-cellular components, modulate the immune and antioxidant systems, enhance gut maturation, and improve the survival, as well as the growth, of fish [8,23,24,25,26]. Even when accounting for less than 1% of the total microbial isolates in the host, yeasts can represent a significant physiological contribution beyond what has been observed for probiotic bacteria; yeast may have a 100-fold larger cell volume than bacteria [7].
The extensive metabolic potential of the yeasts has been reflected in their ability to produce diverse enzymes. Polyamines secreted by the yeasts are known to be involved in the maturation of the digestive tract of fish larvae [7]. Moreover, some yeast species and their components, such as β-glucans and mannoproteins, were found to stimulate the host’s immune response and antioxidant activity. Yeasts can utilize a broad spectrum of simple or complex organic compounds compared to bacteria. Thus, understanding the contribution of yeasts as a part of the gut microbiome may help to improve our knowledge of the probiotic potential of diverse yeast species and the possibility of their use in sustainable aquaculture. This section outlines the current knowledge regarding the use of yeasts as probiotics in aquaculture systems. Table 1 reveals the beneficial effects of yeasts, along with molds and actinobacteria, used as probiotics in aquaculture.

2.1. Saccharomyces

Saccharomyces cerevisiae, known as baker’s yeast, is a unicellular and well-established model system for understanding fundamental cellular processes relevant to higher eukaryotic organisms [58]. The species is commonly used in fermentation and has been instrumental in winemaking, baking and/or brewing since ancient times. S. cerevisiae was the first eukaryotic organism whose genome was sequenced. As it is easy to grow and genetically manipulate, it has always been at the forefront of biotechnological advances. Although yeast cells are primarily reported on ripe fruits, Saccharomyces and some other yeast genera are reported in the GI tracts of finfish [7,59,60,61]. Most published studies involving yeasts as probiotics have demonstrated the beneficial effects of dietary-administered S. cerevisiae in fish. Studies involving S. cerevisiae and its cellular components (β-glucan, oligosaccharides, enzymes) could improve growth and physiological activities in fish or other aquatic organisms, suggesting their prospective applications as functional feed additives like probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics and parabiotics/paraprobiotics [62]. The administration of Saccharomyces is commonly carried out in aquaculture [10], and to avoid overlaps, only the studies discussed in this review are presented in Table 1.
Noh et al. [63] studied the effect of supplementing S. cerevisiae with Streptococcus faecium in the diet of Israeli carp (Cyprinus carpio nudus). They revealed improved growth response and nutrient utilization in fish fed probiotic-supplemented diets vs. diets without probiotic supplementation. Later, Lara-Flores et al. [64] evaluated a probiotic mix consisting of S. faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus and S. cerevisiae as growth promoters in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry and revealed that diet supplemented with S. cerevisiae improved growth performance and feed efficiency, suggesting that yeast might be considered to be an appropriate growth-stimulating additive in tilapia cultivation. Subsequently, S. cerevisiae has been reported to enhance growth performance, immune responses and disease resistance in various finfish, such as rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), [27] common carp (Cyprinus carpio) [65], grouper (Epinephelus coioides) [66], Nile tilapia [67], olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) [68], and hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × M. saxatilis) [69,70,71], as well as and in carp culture [72,73].
Yeasts have been found to show protective effects against a broad range of pathogens, including parasites, bacteria and viruses. Grouper fed a diet containing S. cerevisiae P13 isolated from fermented peaches revealed significantly higher survival rates than the control diet after challenges with Streptococcus sp. and an iridovirus, respectively [66]. A significant increase in lysozyme activity (p < 0.05) was observed in Nile tilapia fed diets containing S. cerevisiae at 10 g kg−1 (Biosal®, KW Alternative Feeds, Leeds, UK) for 21 days [74]. Feeding with Lactobacillus plantarum, L. acidophilus and S. cerevisiae in combination improved growth, feed efficiency, blood biochemistry, survival rate and non-specific immune responses in ciliate parasite (Uronema marinum)-infected olive flounder [68]. The study revealed enhanced superoxide anion production and increased serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels when fed the S. cerevisiae-supplemented diet. A diet supplemented with S. cerevisiae treated with β-mercaptoethanol improved the immune response and growth of juvenile rainbow trout challenged with Yersinia ruckeri more effectively than whole-cell yeast and n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acid (HUFA)-enriched yeast [75]. Similarly, channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) juveniles fed diets supplemented with whole cells of S. cerevisiae (Levucell SB20®) or yeast sub-components, e.g., commercial preparations of β-glucan (MacroGard® and Betagard-A®) revealed significantly higher survival rates after being challenged with Edwardsiella ictaluri than catfish fed the controlled diet [76]. The inclusion of dietary β-glucan (0.5–1.0%) produced from S. cerevisiae was efficient at improving thermal tolerance, immunity, and disease resistance in golden mahseer (Tor putitora) fry [77].
The inclusion of baker’s yeast in the feed was reported to improve the growth rates of Nile tilapia [67], rohu (Labeo rohita) [78] and African sharp-tooth catfish (Clarias gariepinus) [79]. Further, live baker’s yeast supplementation increased carcass protein deposition in Nile tilapia and improved protection against Aeromonas hydrophila [67,80]. Pooramini et al. [81] reported the positive effects of S. cerevisiae on growth parameters, survival and carcass quality in rainbow trout fry. While evaluating the interactive effects of dietary protein (35% or 45% crude protein) and yeast levels (0.0, 0.50, 1.0, 2.0, or 5.0 kg−1 diet) for Nile tilapia fry and their challenge with A. hydrophila, 2.0 g yeast kg−1 diet with 45% CP was determined to be the most suitable for maximum growth and resistance against A. hydrophila infection [82]. However, at higher inclusion levels, 20, 30 and 40% of S. cerevisiae resulted in a decrease in growth performance and nutrient utilization efficiency in Nile tilapia [83]. In a study of rainbow trout fry fed 0, 1, 5 and 10% yeast supplements, a decline in growth performance with supplementation at 10% was recorded in the rainbow trout fry [84]. Further, the study noticed decreased protein and increased ash content in the carcasses with increased yeast supplementation. However, the dietary administration of S. cerevisiae var. elipsoidous enhanced the resistance against salinity stress in rainbow trout fry. Although the specific reasons for the poor performance associated with higher inclusion levels are not properly discussed, the overstimulation of the immune system and consequent misuse of resources may give an explanation.
Caruffo et al. [85] evaluated the probiotic properties of 15 yeast strains (isolated from the gut of diverse fish species) for the protection of zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae following a Vibrio anguillarum challenge. The results indicated that 13 yeast strains, including a strain of S. cerevisiae (Sc86) isolated from yellowtail (Seriola lalandi), significantly increased survival rates with regard to V. anguillarum. Mohammadi et al. [26] evaluated the dietary inclusion of S. cerevisiae (0, 0.5%, 1% and 2% levels) and recorded a significantly improved growth performance of convict cichlid (Amatitlania nigrofasciata) at a 2% inclusion level, but no significant difference was detected in whole-body protein content. However, an inclusion level of 2% S. cerevisiae significantly improved growth, as did an increase in the carcass protein content in three-spot cichlids (Cichlasoma trimaculatum) [86], while the supplementation of S. cerevisiae at a 3 g kg−1 feed improved the growth performance and feed utilization of Java barb (Barbonymus gonionotus) fingerlings [87].
A yeast-based commercial probiotic (Aqualase®) consisting of S. cerevisiae and Saccharomyces elipsoedas improved growth, as well as the modulation of immunity and intestinal microbiota in rainbow trout [21]. The study revealed an increase in intestinal LAB population, elevated lysozyme activity, and the pathogen inhibitory potential of skin mucus in all yeast-fed groups. Moreover, serum lysozyme activity, IgM levels, and the respiratory burst activity of blood leukocytes were elevated, suggesting that the dietary administration of yeasts influenced humoral and cellular immune parameters. An improvement in intestinal microbiota following the addition of S. cerevisiae in the diet (0.6%) was also reported for GIFT tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) [88]. However, analyses of the gut bacterial community were carried out via the culture-dependent method, followed by physiological and biochemical characterization. Previously lyophilized S. cerevisiae was found to enhance cellular innate immune response, e.g., myeloperoxidase, phagocytic, respiratory burst, and cytotoxic activities, of head-kidney leucocytes in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata); however, the humoral response was not influenced [38]. Such immune-modulatory features could be linked to the cellular components of yeasts, principally the β-glucan, which is one of the most well-documented immune stimulants in fish [89]. In addition, yeasts’ nucleic acids and mannan oligosaccharides may be associated with immune-stimulatory effects [38]. Accordingly, Li et al. [90] revealed that dietary supplementation of an oligonucleotide product (Ascogen P) prepared from brewer’s yeast positively influenced the immune responses to and resistance of juvenile hybrid striped bass against S. iniae infection. Abu-Elala et al. [91] evaluated the role of dietary S. cerevisiae as a probiotic (BGY-35®), its extract as a prebiotic (mannan–oligosaccharide, Bio-MOS®) and the mixture of BGY-35® and Bio-MOS® in Nile tilapia. Significant improvement in growth performance and the activation of non-specific cellular, as well as humoral immunological, responses were recorded. Furthermore, increased resistances in probiotic-, prebiotic- and synbiotic fed fish challenged with the pathogenic strains of A. hydrophila, P. fluorescens and Flavobacterium columnare were displayed. Based on their results, the authors suggested using S. cerevisiae in synbiotic form as functional feed additives for Nile tilapia. Furthermore, the groups administrated with S. cerevisiae noticed the colonization of yeast cells in conjunction with the increased length and density of the intestinal villi, facilitating the digestion and absorption of food. Similar results were previously reported by Gatesoupe [7], showing that the intestinal colonization of S. Cerevisiae accelerates the maturation of the digestive system in fish fry, while growth and metabolism were revealed in older fish.
Investigating the importance of viable yeast cells and their secretory metabolites, Ran et al. [29] indicated the advantages of using live yeast as a dietary supplement for Nile tilapia, as evidenced by the improved gut microvilli morphology, reduced hsp70 expression level and reduced intestinal inflammation, suggesting the beneficial role of yeast secretory metabolites. However, secretory metabolites might not play a significant role in growth promotion and disease resistance, as both live and inactivated yeast provide protection against A. hydrophila infection. In contradiction to other reports [21,88], yeast supplementation did not significantly influence the diversity of the autochthonous microbiota evaluated via 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing and gut microbiome analysis [29]. In another study, the supplementation of S. boulardii in diets was revealed to stimulate the growth, feed efficiency and survival rates of common carp fingerlings [92]. Rotifers are important zooplankton that supply trace minerals for finfish larvae in commercial hatcheries. Nematzadeh et al. [93] revealed that using rotifer (Brachionus plicatilis) grown with zinc-enriched S. cerevisiae improved the growth, reproduction and body composition of the rotifer culture. The dietary supplementation of S. cerevisiae enhanced innate immunity, lowered pathogenic bacteria load in fish muscle and modulated the gut microbiota in Nile tilapia reared in low-input ponds, demonstrating that S. cerevisiae was more effective as a probiotic compared to Bacillus subtilis [94,95]. The administration of commercially produced S. cerevisiae as a feed additive improved growth, feed utilization and resistance against P. fluorescens in freshwater catfish (Mystus cavasius) [96].
Hansen et al. [44] adopted the laboratory-scale downstream processing of S. cerevisiae through direct inactivation via spray-drying, autolysis and cell crushing. The post biotics produced via down-stream processing were evaluated for their nutritional value and health effects in the diets of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), and the increased solubility of protein and β-glucan resulted in increased protein digestibility and immune stimulatory effects [44]. In a 60-day study, MajharulIslam et al. [97] reported that S. cerevisiae administration to Nile tilapia significantly improved growth performance, feed utilization, villus structure and the number of goblet cells present when the fish were fed a diet supplemented with 4 g kg−1 S. cerevisiae. Further, adding methionized yeast (methionine @ 50 g kg−1 feed) to the diet positively affected growth and nutrient utilization in the hybrid African catfish Clarias gariepinus × male Heterobranchus longifilis. In a recent study used to evaluate the biochemical and molecular properties of four yeast cell-wall extracts from S. cerevisiae, Rawling et al. [98] revealed that extracts varying in structure and composition differently affected the innate mucosal tissue responses and the innate immunity of zebrafish intestine.

2.2. Candida

Candida belongs to the class Saccharomycetes. Past evaluations of the intestines of diverse fish species have revealed gut-associated Candida, such as Candida albicans within the GI tract of rainbow trout [99]. Further, Candida sp., along with some other yeast species, was described as forming a dominant part of the gut microbiota in some samples of rainbow trout [7]. Later, the tannin-degrading ability of the autochthonous Candida tropicalis (GU911469) and Candida parapsilosis (GU939630) were reported from the GI tracts of tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) and rohu, respectively [59]. The phytase-producing ability of C. tropicalis (JX532154) isolated from climbing perch (Anabas testudineus) and C. tropicalis (JX532155) isolated from silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) were also documented [61]. The authors opined that the tannin- or phytate-degrading microbiota might provide an ecological advantage to the fish by enabling them to conquer the anti-nutritional effects of dietary tannins and phytates. Recently, Siangpro et al. [100] isolated 176 acid-tolerant yeasts from the GI tracts of diverse fish species, of which 15 yeast isolates representing antagonism against pathogenic bacteria of Nile tilapia were characterized for probiotic properties (adhesion potential, biofilm formation, and resistance to acid/bile). Among all yeast isolates, a strain of C. Tropicalis (LC735681) exhibited maximum antipathogenic activity, suggesting its prospective application as an alternative to antibiotics for sustainable fish farming [100]. Regardless, there is no information regarding the use of Candida sp. as a probiotic supplement in finfish aquaculture, but some information is available regarding the use of Candida in shrimp aquaculture [16].

2.3. Cryptococcus

Cryptococcus is often referred to as ‘the sugar yeast’ due to the thick coating of polysaccharides surrounding its cell. Cryptococcus is a genus within the family Cryptococcaceae. It is reported in the GI tracts of several fish species [7,47], but to our knowledge, no information is available regarding its use as a probiotic supplement in aquaculture.

2.4. Debaryomyces

Debaryomyces hansenii is a hemi-ascomycetous yeast commonly reported in natural substrates like soil and food, although it is also reported in the GI tract of rainbow trout [31]. The probiotic and nutritional effects of Debaryomyces in fish were presented in a comprehensive review by Angulo et al. [22], and to avoid overlaps, we recommend that interested readers have a closer look at the papers published before 2020 and discussed in this review, as mentioned above. In the study of Vargas et al. [43], the authors revealed that Debaryomyces hansenii supplemented with a zebrafish diet improved survival against V. anguillarum; modulated the gut microbiota; affected carbohydrate, lipid and amino acid metabolism; and prevented increase of Ensifer (nitrogen-fixing bacteria) and Vogesella (Gram-negative bacteria) unfavorable for larval survival. In another study, Sanahuja et al. [44] reported that D. hansenii administration in a gilthead seabream diet increased growth and improved feed conversion, modulating the gut microbiota without affecting the intestinal cell organization, even though D. hansenii supplementation modified the composition of lectin in the mucinous content of goblet cells. The modulation of gut microbiota was characterized by a reduction in the abundance of the genera Anaerococcus, Ascidiaceihabitans, Hydrogenophaga and Variovora. In a more recent study, Debaryomyces nepalensis and three other autochthonous yeast strains (viz., Cutaneotrichosporon jirovecii, Blastobotrys proliferans and Diutina catenulata) with potential probiotic properties were recorded from the intestine of the goldfish Carassius auratus [101]. The documented strains were noticed to interact with several fish-associated bacterial pathogens, namely A. hydrophila, Lactococcus garvieae, V. anguillarum, Vagococcus salmoninarum and Yruckeri.

2.5. Geotrichum

Geotrichum candidum is a filamentous fungus used in the dairy industry for cheese ripening and flavoring. Still, four recent studies have used G. candidum as probiotic supplements for rohu [45,46,47] and gibel carp [48]. Sanahuja et al. [45] showed that G. candidum supplemented with the rearing water of rohu larvae increased growth performance; digestive enzyme, protease, amylase and cellulase activities; and crude protein in muscle and improved the survival of larvae in response to challenge by Staphylococcus aureus. Ibrar et al. [46] evaluated the application of 109 CFU g−1 of un-encapsulated (free) and encapsulated G. candidum QAUGC01 in rohu diet through an 11-week study and revealed improved growth performance, enzyme activities (protease, amylase and cellulase) and immunity and an upregulated heat shock protein gene in rohu. However, encapsulation had the most profound effect, suggesting its application as a feed additive in practical/commercial semi-intensive earthen pond culture systems.
In the gibel carp study of Noor-Ul et al. [48] seven inclusion levels of G. candidum (0, 106, 107, 108, 109, 1010 and 1011 CFU) revealed that G. candidum displayed higher intestinal α-amylase activity, but no difference was demonstrated for lipase and trypsin activities and those of the control. Gut microbiota were modulated as the relative abundance of the phylum proteobacteria, actinobacteria, firmicutes and bacteroidetes noted in fish-fed filamentous fungi. At the same time, in control-fed fish, a higher percentage of pathogenic bacteria belonging to the order Aeromonadales and Vibrionales were displayed. After the challenge with A. hydrophila, significantly higher respiratory burst activity, IgM levels and aspartate transaminase, lysozyme and alanine transaminase activities were noted in fish fed 106 and 108 CFU of G. candidum. The expression of immune-related genes, namely il-1β, tnf-α, hsp70 and tlr-2, in the fishes’ livers were significantly affected by the administration of G. candidum after the A. hydrophila challenge. This study showed that G. candidum could be a potential probiotic, as productive results can be achieved using the lower doses, in particular 106–108 CFU kg−1. Ghori et al. [47] investigated the effects of G. candidum supplementation on rohu fingerlings and revealed improvements in the growth performance, hematological profile and amylase and cellulase activities and modulated the gut microbiota through the absence of Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Sporobolomyces lactosus, along with the relative abundances of Trichosporon and Cryptococcus.

2.6. Leucosporidium

Leucosporidium is a genus of psychorphilic or asporogenous yeasts and belongs to the family Leucosporidiaceae, order Leucosporidiales, which includes five species, namely L. antarcticum, L. fasciculatum, L. fellii, L. golubevii and L. scottii [102]. All species grew well at subzero temperatures (−1 °C) to the maximum temperature of 18–20 °C, with glucose being the substrate [103]. Although Leucosporidium sp. is frequently reported in rainbow trout intestine, information regarding fish gut-associated Leucosporidium from other fish species is scant [104].
The physiological properties and enzymatic potential of the strains under this genus suggest their likely application for low-temperature and marine water aqua-farming. For example, L. scottii is the only species able to grow richly on marine substrates at mesic temperatures [105] with a heterobasidiomycetous life cycle that is morphologically ascomycetous in nature; like Saccharomyces cerevisiae. L. antarcticum is a widespread, endemic Antarctic marine yeast found in cold marine waters, and it was reported to be used to produce intracellular β-fructofuranosidase, as well as intra- and extracellular glucosidases [106]. A novel extracellular subtilase was reported by L. antarcticum isolated from water from Admiralty Bay [107]. In addition, Leucosporidium spp. was found to produce some other enzymes, like cold-adapted extracellular serine proteinase [108], invertase, α-glucosidase [106], extracellular lipase [109], amylase laccase, pectinases [110] and β-fructofuranosidase [111]. The effects of live yeast and/or the incorporation of exogenous enzymes into diets to improve fish growth and digestive enzyme activity were discussed in previous studies [7,112,113,114].

2.7. Pichia

Pichia is a genus of yeasts in the family Pichiaceae with spherical, elliptical, hat-shaped, hemispherical or round ascospores and oblong acuminate cells. The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris utilizes glucose, glycerol and methanol as a carbon and energy source and is widely used in the biochemical research and biotech industries to manufacture enzymes and pharmaceuticals [115,116]. Since yeast has generally been recognized as safe (GRAS) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Pichia has been cultivated on a commercial scale and sold directly as protein-containing animal feed [117]. In addition, it can utilize a wide range of sources of nitrogen and phosphorus, making it a potential factor in reducing environmental pollution caused by organic wastes from agriculture [118].
Fish gut-associated Pichia spp. and their probiotic attributes were indicated in some previous reports. The tannase-producing ability of P. kudriavzevii (GU939629) was identified in the GI tract of common carp [59]. In another study, P. kudriavzevii (KT582009) isolated from the gut of Nile tilapia displayed an ability to produce diverse exo-enzymes and antagonism against fish pathogenic A. hydrophila [119]. Acosta et al. [120] demonstrated that the immersion of fish into the growth hormone (GH)-rich recombinant Pichia pastoris preparation could be the most efficient and convenient method for GH administration to promote growth in tilapia. The recombinant P. pastoris strain could synthesize mature peptide of crucian carp (Carassius auratus) c-type lysozyme with antibacterial activity and good stability [121]. The dietary application of non-modified P. pastoris at 109 CFU g−1 of feed did not improve the growth performance of jundiá (Rhamdia quelen) larvae, as growth performance was similar to that of the control diet [122]. More recently, the application of the plant endophytic yeasts Pichia fermentans and Meyerozyma caribbica significantly improved the growth, nutrient composition, minerals, hematological parameters, length of intestinal villi and kidney function of the carp Barbonymus gonionotus [123], and P. fermentans at 0.94 × 108 CFU kg−1 feed gave the maximum positive effects of B. gonionotus, indicating its probiotic potential for aquaculture applications. The bioprocessing of oil-cake [124] and aquatic weed [125] through solid-state fermentation (SSF) by the tannase-producing yeast P. kudriavzevii (GU939629) was identified as an effective strategy for the deactivation of anti-nutritional factors and value addition of the plant feedstuffs for their likely utilization in formulated fish feed.
Sealey et al. [126] reported that diets supplemented with P. guilliermondii at 0.3% or 0.6% for juvenile rainbow trout improved growth, food conversion efficiency, feed intake, protein retention efficiency and disease resistance against Yersinia ruckeri and Flavobacterium pyschrophilum through a 16-week study in a recirculating aquaculture system. No effect of Pichia supplementation on mortality was observed. Further, the cell-surface phytase of P. pastoris was highlighted as being a potential feed supplement [127]. P. fermentans improved the growth, hematological–biochemical composition, and morphology of internal organs in Barbonymus gonionotus [123]. P. kudriavzevii had the ability to produce phytase that could, ideally, be useful in the feed and animal industries [128].

2.8. Rhodosporidium

Rhodosporidium is a type of red basidiomycete that accumulates carotenoids, neutral lipids and enzymes relevant to the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. They metabolize all major components of lignocellulosic biomass (cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) and are potential hosts for metabolic engineering to produce terpenes and fatty acids. In fish, a strain of Rhodosporidium babjevae was only isolated from the reared croaker (Cilus gilberti) intestine, whereas Rhodosporidium sphaerocarpum was only isolated from wild croaker intestine [129]. Both R. babjevae and R. sphaerocarpum have previously been identified in marine environments, which also can explain their presence in the fish gut [130,131]. Rhodosporidium spp., as a carotenoid-rich red yeast, has been reported to accumulate intracellular lipids as high as 60% of its cell dry weight using glucose as the carbon source [132]. It has been successfully used as a dietary supplement in aquaculture to reduce oxidative stress in aquatic animals [133].

2.9. Rhodotorula

Rhodotorula spp. belong to the phylum ‘Basidiomycota’, family ‘Cryptococcaceae’, class ‘Microbotryomycetes’, and order ‘Sporidiobolales’, which are pigmented basidiomyceteous yeasts (fungi) commonly reported in different unfavorable ecosystems, as well as in fish [31]. Biomass of Rhodotorula glutinis strains could be used as the natural sources of α-L-arabinofuranosidase, lipases, invertase, pectinases, invertase and tannin acyl hydrolase, particularly phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) [134,135]. More importantly, carotenoids, lipids and industrial enzymes synthesized by R. glutinis strains have advantages, mainly due to their higher biotransformation rates independent of climate and low costs [136,137]. Rhodotorula can metabolize avidly short-chain fatty acids, such as acetic, propionic and butyric acids, essential for the gut epithelium and other physiological functions [138,139]. Rhodotorula spp. secrete various enzymes, such as xylanase, cellulase and amylase [140], contributing to the degradation of the viscosity-generating soluble fibers in foods, and they are considered nutritionally advantageous [141]. Rhodotorula protease has been reported to degrade bacterial toxins [142]. Furthermore, Rhodotorula produces folates, lipids, carotenoids and proteins that are essential nutrients for all living organisms [141,143,144]. Dietary Rhodotorula supplementation “as an alternative to antibiotics” improved growth and disease resistance in juvenile Japanese spiky sea cucumbers [145].
Rhodotorula supplementation was reported in juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to improve growth performance, antioxidant capacity, histomorphology and immune responses [146]. Dietary R. mucilaginosa enhanced the growth performance, immune responses and disease resistance of the juvenile golden pompano Trachinotus ovatus [147]. Carotenogenic Rhodotorula paludigena VA 242 served as a pigment-enhancing feed additive for the ornamental fish koi carp, and improved growth and survival rates were also recorded [148]. Feed supplements with a Rhodotorula cell mass have been proven safe and non-toxic in animals [149,150,151]. The dietary supplementation of Rhodotorula sp. C11 at 105 and 106 CFU g−1 improved growth and resistance against Vibrio splendidus infection in juvenile sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicas) [145]. Pacific white shrimp fed dietary yeast (Rhodotorula sp.) enhanced intestinal health, growth, disease resistance and immune responses [152,153]. Yeasts are often applied to aquaculture as live probiotics or feed ingredients [154]. Dietary hydrolyzed R. mucilaginosa can influence intestinal health, immune response, and the ammonia resistance in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) [155]. Red yeast has excellent industrial potential and has piqued the interest of the food, pharmaceutical, cosmetics and feed industries [156]. Microbial carotenoids have received scholarly attention [157], and Maldonade et al. [158] reported that a maximum of 745 µg L−1 carotenoid can be produced by R. mucilaginosa. R. mucilaginosa, which is one of the most promising pigment-producing yeasts, can be fermented using cheap industrial by-products and wastes as nutrient sources [159,160,161].

2.10. Sporidiobolus pararoseus

The red yeast Sporidiobolus pararoseus is a single-cell microorganism in the class Basidiomycota. In a recent study, Srinual et al. [162] suggested that red yeast (S. pararoseus) supplementation effectively alleviated the toxicity induced by mycotoxins and could be applied as a novel feed additive in the broiler industry. In aquaculture, mycotoxin-related issues are increasing, and in this regard, it is of interest to note that Van Doan et al. [49] investigated the effects of red yeast, a by-product of the biodiesel production process, on the growth, immunity and resistance of Nile tilapia with regard to Streptococcus agalactiae. Fish were fed four different concentrations of dried red yeast, namely T1 (control; T1), T2 (5), T3 (10), and T4 (20) g kg−1 diets for 90 days, and the results revealed the significantly improved growth performance of fish fed with the T3 and T4 compared to the control. A significant increase was observed in total carotenoid content, liver superoxide dismutase activity, serum lysozyme and albumin and disease resistance against S. agalactiae in fish fed with red yeast. The highest bactericidal activity was revealed in the T4 group, but no significant differences were displayed in hematology, blood chemical, malondialdehyde, body chemical composition, organosomatic indices and myeloperoxidase in all treatment groups. Based on their results, the authors concluded that the T4 diet was most promising and could be used to supplement Nile tilapia. Owing to mycotoxin-binding capacity, S. pararoseus has been recognized as a potential feed additive for animals [163].

2.11. Sporobolomyces

Anamorphic basidiomycetous yeasts of the Sporobolomyces taxa are known for their bright red, orange or pink appearances and belong to the order ‘Sporidiobolales’. The main carotenoids produced by the Sporobolomyces yeasts are β-carotene, torulene and torularhodin [164,165]. Some strains of Sporobolomyces yeasts can degrade patuline, a mycotoxin with mutagenic, genotoxic, immunotoxic, teratogenic and cytotoxic properties [166]. Sporobolomyces spp. has shown a potential application in shrimp aquaculture [167,168,169].

2.12. Trichosporon

Trichosporon belongs to the phylum ‘Basidiomycota’, class ‘Hymenomycetes’ and order ‘Trichosporonales’. Industrial interest has focused on the ability of the Trichosporon species to utilize a wide range of substrates, particularly aromatic compounds, aliphatic lipids, amines and complex nitrogenous compounds, as its sole sources of carbon and energy, including uric acid, ethylamine, hydroxyproline, tyramine and l-phenylamine [170]. Trichosporon cells or enzymes might metabolize pollutants and xenobiotics in bioremediation processes [171,172,173]. Furthermore, Trichosporon asahii strains were reported to produce lipase [174], aspartic-type peptidase [175] and antioxidant molecules [176], which could have critical applications in animal farming systems, including aquaculture. Trichosporon cutaneum is commonly reported in the intestines of fish and known to accelerate the development of the digestive system of fish [7]. Previous studies revealed that T. asahii has antioxidant enzymatic activities [176,177].

2.13. Yarrowia lipolytica

Yarrowia lipolytica is one of the “non-conventional” yeast species capable of synthesizing a broad group of valuable metabolites, in particular lipases and other hydrolytic enzymes, microbial oil, citric acid, erythritol and γ-decalactone. In a recent study, Vargas et al. [43] revealed that Y. lipolytica supplemented with a zebrafish diet improved survival against V. anguillarum; modulated the gut microbiota; affected the carbohydrate, lipid and amino acid metabolism; and prevented the increase in Ensifer and Vogesella.

3. Mold (Aspergillus spp.) as Probiotics

Apart from the production of digestive/degradation enzymes, some of the well-recognized functions of Aspergillus are the synthesis of antibacterial substances, the reduction in blood cholesterol levels, the inhibition of bacterial infections, the modulation of immunity and the reconstruction of the gut microbiota [178]. Further, the potential effects of Aspergillus on the mitigation of hypoxia and salinity stress in fish have been indicated [18,179]. Most studies on fish associated with Aspergillus spp. were directed towards the pathophysiological effects of the fungi in numerous fish species [180,181]. Although some molds can produce mycotoxins [182], Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus oryzae are reported to be the predominant species under the genus Aspergillus, conferring health benefits to aquatic animals.

3.1. Aspergillus niger

A. niger is the most common fungi of the genus Aspergillus that can be easily cultivated in laboratory conditions. Diverse strains of A. niger are sources of several enzymes (proteases, α-amylase, cellulase, xylanase, phytase and tannase) and bioactive compounds (citric acid, gluconic acid and itaconic acid); therefore, they are extensively used in the poultry industry [183]. However, reports on the application of A. niger in fish are scant. The dietary supplementation of autochthonous A. niger, along with S. cerevisiae (6 × 106 cells g−1), improved the growth, survivability, immune parameters and ammonia excretion in the juvenile beluga sturgeon Huso huso [184].
In a recent study of common carp, diets containing A. niger (103, T1 and 106, T2) were fed for 60 days [12]. The authors revealed significantly improved effects on growth performance, plasma levels of lysozyme, total immunoglobulin, red blood cell counts, hemoglobin concentrations, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume and lymphocyte counts via the administration of both T1 and T2. The activities of the digestive enzymes (protease, trypsin, amylase, lipase and alkaline phosphatase) and apparent digestibility parameters were significantly improved via the supplementation of 106 of A. niger into the diet (T2). White blood cells, hematocrit values and a number of neutrophils were also higher in treatment T2. Very few strains of A. niger are known to produce ochratoxin A [185]. Thus, the screening of the A. niger strains intended for use in probiotics applications should be conducted with the utmost care.

3.2. Aspergillus oryzae

The supplemental effects of dietary A. oryzae on fish are documented in several studies of Nile tilapia. The dietary supplementation of A. oryzae potentially improved the immune status and disease resistance [186], along with growth performance and intestinal histomorphometry [187], in Nile tilapia. Dawood et al. [188] conducted a 60-day feeding trial with Nile tilapia to determine the effect of dietary A. oryzae (at 106 and 108 CFU g−1 levels). They showed a significant increase in the growth performance and modulation of blood hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cells, white blood cells, total protein and digestive enzymes, villi length and the activity of antioxidative enzymes. However, decreased blood triglyceride and the oxidative enzyme (MDA) were reported in the A. oryzae group. Supplementation enhanced nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT), IgM, lysozyme, bactericidal and phagocytosis, indicating the improved immunity of tilapia. Further, the fish were subjected to a hypoxia challenge, and the addition of A. oryzae to diets significantly improved the defense against hypoxia stress in Nile tilapia.
In addition, the combined application of A. oryzae and β-glucan as synbiotics significantly (p < 0.05) improved the growth, feed efficiency, hematological parameters, digestive enzymes, immunity (NBT, IgM, lysozyme, bactericidal and phagocytosis) and antioxidative capacity of Nile tilapia [11]. Fermented A. oryzae could enhance the growth and hematological parameters of common carp [189]. In another study, Nile tilapia juveniles were fed diets supplemented with A. oryzae (1 g kg−1 diet) for 12 weeks, and after that, they were exposed to different salinity levels for 15 days [18]. Significant increases (p < 0.05) in blood protein levels (albumin, globulin and total protein), non-specific immune responses (lysozyme and phagocytic activities) and antioxidant enzymes (glutathione peroxidase, catalase and superoxide dismutase), along with a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the values of hemato-biochemical indices (e.g., glucose, cortisol, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase and malondialdehyde), were recorded. Moreover, biochemical and gene expression studies support the efficacy of dietary A. oryzae in alleviating salinity stress [18].

4. Actinobacteria as Probiotics

Actinobacteria are Gram-positive filamentous bacteria with high guanine and cytosine (G + C) contents in their genomes. Actinobacteria usually inhabit soil and aquatic ecosystems and are known to have significant functions in biogeochemical cycles, bioremediation and the production of bacteriocins and other potent bioactive compounds, e.g., novel enzymes and antibiotics [190]. These unique and diverse features made actinobacteria a competent candidate for use in the aquaculture industry [191]. The potent actinobacterial genera are Streptomyces, Micromonospora and a later described genus known as Salinispora [19], but Streptomycetes are the most extensively studied among them.
The genus Streptomyces belongs to the phylum ‘actinobacteria’ and constitutes soil-living bacteria with a characterized branching filamentous morphology [9,192,193]. It is an excellent antibiotic producer and produces extracts that inhibit biofilm formation [194]. Members of the genus Streptomyces can produce different hydrolytic enzymes, e.g., amylase, protease and lipase, making them able to break down complex insoluble organic materials [195] and bacteriocin-like substances [196]. These unique physiological features of Streptomyces are believed to make them potential probiotics, as the secretion of exo-enzymes could facilitate feed utilization and digestion in aquaculture animals once they have colonized the host intestine. Diverse strains of Streptomyces isolated from varied sources exhibited different probiotic properties, making them important candidates for application in the aquaculture sector. Potential probiotic attributes of Streptomyces include tolerance to gut conditions, antimicrobial activity against fish pathogens, inducing immune responses in fishes, growth-enhancing effects and water quality amelioration [197]. Thus, despite the production of common semi-volatile terpenoid compounds, e.g., geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol, the genus Streptomyces has been recognized as a prospective probiotic for aquaculture [9]. Although most studies of the probiotic application of Streptomyces strains in aquaculture have been conducted in shrimps [198,199,200], numerous studies are also available in fish, but some limitations to their use as probiotics in aquaculture are reported, producing several compounds with unpleasant odors and tastes, lateral gene transfer and biotoxicity in Artemia salina nauplii [193].
In a study of marine actinobacteria, the potential of Streptomyces strains isolated from sponges revealed the improved growth of an ornamental fish (Xiphophorus hellerii) [56], and the administration of Streptomyces as single cell protein resulted in improved growth of the ornamental fish Southern platy fish (Xiphophorus maculatus) [36]. The potential of Streptomyces as a probiotic in aquaculture was reviewed by Tan et al. [9], and to avoid overlaps, only studies published post-2016 and studies not reported in the review of Tan et al. [9] are discussed in this section. Several strains of the genus Streptomyces were noted to produce bioactive compounds and exhibited antagonistic activities against different fish pathogenic strains, based on which findings, their likely applications in finfish aquaculture could be understood. Sheeja et al. [201] reported that Streptomyces strains isolated from the gut of marine ornamental fishes, viz. red tail butterfly (Chaetodon collare) and orange-lined cardinal (Archamia fucata), produced potential bioactive metabolites against Vibrio cholera. Streptomyces ruber EKH2 isolated from sediments of Bardawil Lake, Egypt, produced phthalate, a non-toxic bioactive dibasic acid that inhibited the fish pathogenic A. hydrophila, Edwardsiella tarda, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Vibrio ordalli [202]. Phthalate activities were superior to commonly known standard antibiotics used in fish therapy, thus suggesting that it is a promising candidate for treating septicemic fish diseases. Marine Streptomyces rubrolavendulae in the form of biogranules was found to inhibit Vibrio alginolyticus, V. fluvialis, V. harveyi and V. parahaemolyticus in an in vitro co-culture experiment [199]. The extensive antibacterial activity of Streptomyces carpaticus MK-01 isolated from seawater collected from Daejeong, Jeju Island, was demonstrated against the Gram-positive fish pathogenic bacteria S. iniae and S. parauberis [203]. The authors recommended the use of the S. carpaticus-MK01 strain, as well as its antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds, as prophylactic measures in aquaculture industries.
A marine isolate (Streptomyces sp. S073) exhibited strong antagonism against the pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus. The isolate S073 could produce non-proteinaceous and thermostable siderophores that created lethal iron-limiting conditions to inhibit the pathogens [204]. Thus, the protective effects of the marine Streptomyces strains indicated their probiotic potential for aquaculture. A similar kind of observation was recorded with Streptomyces sp. SH5 isolated from marine sediment could enhance resistance against A. hydrophila infection in zebrafish [205]. The presence of SH5 in the rearing water strongly prevented colonization by A. hydrophila. Enhanced expression of the immune response genes (tlr3, lysozyme and nos2α) and reduced expression of the inflammatory genes (il-1β, il-6 and myd88) were recorded in zebrafish larvae, indicating the potential application of the strain to prevent pathogen infection [205]. Further, Streptomyces strains isolated from the gut of estuarine milkfish (Chanos chanos) produced antibacterial peptides that exhibited broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against S. aureus, B. cereus, P. aeruginosa and E. coli [206]. In another study, Kumaran et al. [207] recorded Streptomyces enissocaesilis SSASC10, a brown pigment-producing isolate that produced bioactive metabolites against fish pathogens (e.g., Pseudomonas sp., V. anguillarum, A. hydrophila, V. parahaemolyticus and V. harveyi), highlighting their potential use as probiotics for treating infectious fish diseases. A recent study established the probiotic potential of Streptomyces antibioticus EW1 (isolated from the digestive tract of earthworm Eisenia fetida) in juvenile catfish Heteropneustes fossilis [208]. In this study, S. antibioticus exhibited antimicrobial activity against two fish pathogens: Aeromonas veronii (MN602971) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MN602972). Further, diets supplemented with S. antibioticus enhanced the growth, digestibility, muscle protein and survivability of H. fossilis [208].

5. Combined Application of Yeasts or Actinobacteria along with Other Probiotics

The probiotic organisms that are widely used in aquaculture, either as water additives or feed supplements, might include diverse strains of bacteria, bacteriophages, microalgae and yeasts [13]. It is widely accepted that the major benefits associated with applying probiotics in aquaculture are improvement in growth performance, the modulation of immunity, pathogen exclusions and disease resistance [209,210,211]. Regarding yeasts used as probiotics, a recent study by [212] reported that the yeasts had a high survival rate in the GI tract, an exciting finding that needs to be included and confirmed in future yeast studies. Interestingly, most of the reports available on the application of probiotics in fish or shellfish used single-strain probiotics. However, multi-strain probiotics are more effective than a single strain, as reported in a good number of studies during the last two decades [213]. Still, the evaluation of the combined administration of probiotics seemed inadequate in aquaculture compared to single-strain administration [214,215,216]. When compared to single-strain application, applying probiotics as multi-strain or multi-species dietary supplements could create improved benefits, as a combination of probiotics might allow the incorporation of different mechanisms of probiotic action at once [217]. The present section primarily includes the reports in which different strains of bacteria are used in combination with yeasts/actinobacteria.
Commercial diets supplemented with Streptococcus faecium and a mixture of bacteria and yeast have been shown to improve growth and food conversion efficiency in catla (Catla catla) [218] and common carp [219]. Feeding probiotics (L. plantarum and L. acidophilus), along with S. cerevisiae in combination for 4–8 weeks, enhanced superoxide anion production in olive flounder [68]. The study concluded that L. plantarum-, L. acidophilus- and S. cerevisiae-supplemented diets might act as immunostimulants, improving the growth, feed efficiency, blood biochemistry, survival rate and non-specific immune response in Uronema marinum-infected olive flounder [68]. Diets supplemented with two species of bacteria (L. lactis and B. subtilis) and S. cerevisiae in equal proportion at a feed concentration of 1011 CFU kg−1 improved growth and feed efficiency in rohu fingerlings, indicating that the combination of more probiotic organisms in the diet resulted in improved growth performance and nutrient utilization [214]. However, combinations of heat-inactivated probiotics in the diet failed to create positive effects, suggesting that the live probiotic microorganisms could be preferred while formulating the cost-effective nutritionally balanced carp diet [214]. In contrast, the likely application of paraprobiotics (inactivated probiotics) as a component of functional feed additives has received significant interest in recent times [62,220,221]. According to Tran et al. [221], dietary supplementation of the cell structural components as paraprobiotics can trigger anti-biofilm effects and improve growth performance, stress tolerance, immunity and defense against pathogens. Possible utilization of the yeast cells as paraprobiotics in aquaculture has very recently been indicated [62]. In an in vitro evaluation of the effects of single- and multi-strain probiotics on pathogen inhibition, Chapman et al. [222] suggested that the use of a probiotic mixture might be more effective at reducing infections and creating a combination using species with different effects against different pathogens may have a broader spectrum of action than that provided by a single strain. A synergistic effect of the probiotics’ mixture containing B. subtilis E20, Lac. pentosus BD6, S. cerevisiae P13 and Lac. fermentum LW2 was recorded, depicting improved growth performance, immune response and disease resistance in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) against Aeromonas hydrophila [213]. In a more recent observation, the combined dietary application of probiotic yeast, S. cerevisiae (1%) and L. casei (1%) improved growth, immunity and gut health in juvenile Asian seabass [223]. The co-supplementation of S. cerevisiae and L. casei resulted in the upregulation of immune-responsive genes (il-10 and tnf-α), a greater number of goblet cells in the gut mucosa and increased microvilli length. The analysis of the gut microbiome revealed decreased abundances of pathogenic Corynebacterium and Staphylococcus [223]. The combined dietary administration of B. subtilis, A. oryzae and S. cerevisiae improved growth, hemato-immunological parameters, innate immune response and disease resistance in Nile tilapia [186]. In contrast to the above reports, a diet with 50% Lactobacillus mixtures and 50% S. cerevisiae did not improve growth and survivability in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) larvae [224].
As reports on combined applications in finfish aquaculture are limited, some pertinent facts from the shrimp and other aquatic organisms may be discussed because of their impact on the aquatic environment and productivity, apart from the benefit created for the host. The combined application of Streptomyces strains and Bacillus improved growth, immune response and resistance against V. parahaemolyticus in Pacific white shrimp culture, along with modulation of the water microbiota [200]. Application of the dietary hydrolyzed R. mucilaginosa along with B. licheniformis as the synbiotics could improve intestinal morphology and immune response in Pacific white shrimp more than the hydrolyzed yeast or B. licheniformis alone [155]. Liu et al. [225] demonstrated the effect of a commercial microbial agent (consisting of more than ten species of microorganisms, e.g., spore-forming bacteria, LAB, photosynthetic bacteria, actinomycete, etc.) in Pacific white shrimp. The study noted an increased temporal turnover rate among the bacterioplankton community in the culture water and a greater relative abundance of Rhodobacteraceae in shrimp intestine, suggesting that the microbial mixture could accelerate bacterioplankton community turnover and shift intestinal bacterial community in aquatic organisms. However, the commercial microbial combination did not significantly improve the shrimp’s growth rate or survival. Combined oral administration of Rhodotorula sp. H26 and Bacillus sp. BC26 improved digestive enzyme activity (e.g., trypsin and amylase) and innate immune responses (phagocytic activity and lysozyme activity) in the juvenile sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicas [226].

6. Mode of Actions of Probiotic Fungi and Actinobacteria

Yeasts are an excellent source of β-glucan, which is well known for its role in immunostimulation in fish [227]. Yeasts are single-cell protein-rich organisms that can provide several essential vitamins (e.g., Vitamin B and folic acid), essential sulfur-containing amino acids (lysine) and diverse exo-enzymes for the degradation of complex food materials [228]. Along with bacteria and yeasts or other fungi, Actinomycetes are considered to be significant contributors to the breakdown and recycling of organic compounds [19]. Actinomycetes are known to produce many hydrolytic enzymes. Thus, the ecological role of actinobacteria as probiotics in aquaculture cannot be ignored. Like other probiotic microorganisms, actinobacteria were also reported with multiple functions, viz. improved water quality, immunity and growth in aquatic organisms [191]. Further, >50% of the microbial antibiotics are produced by Actinomycetes, of which Streptomyces and Micromonospora are by far the most common [229]. Although the specific modes of action of these microorganisms are inadequately described, like their limited applications in aquaculture, beneficial attributes documented for commonly used probiotics are expected to become applicable.
The modes of action of probiotics are well discussed in previous probiotic reviews, and several hypotheses have been suggested, which are summarized by Ringø et al. [1]. The recommended modes of action are as follows: (a) the competitive adhesion of probiotic microorganisms to epithelial receptors may prevent the attachment of pathogenic bacteria, (b) aggregation of probiotics and pathogenic bacteria preventing growth of the pathogenic organisms, (c) competition for nutrients between probiotic and undesired bacteria, (d) increased synthesis of lactic acid and the reduction in intestinal pH, (e) boost the production of specific antibacterial substances, (f) reduced production of toxic amines and decrease in the level of ammonia in the GI tract, (g) have beneficial effects on the intestinal immune system, (h) interference with quorum sensing, (i) act as a bioremediator, (j) enable improved defense against bacterial and viral infections, (k) alleviate adverse effects induced by crowding stress, and (l) improve antioxidant properties.
The suggested modes of action of the probiotic potential of fungi and actinobacteria likely to be effective in aquaculture are depicted in Figure 1.

7. Selection of Fungi and Actinobacteria as Probiotics

As proposed for bacterial probiotics [230], the selection criteria for the fungi or actinobacteria as putative probiotic organisms should consider functional and safety properties. Along with functionality, the colonization ability and viability of the primarily selected organisms should be considered. Indigenous or fish-gut-associated microorganisms have a better opportunity to colonize the host gut to exhibit probiotic effects. Thus, preference should be given to the autochthonous strains to search for probiotic fungi or actinobacteria, as the commensal organisms are believed to be well adapted to the anticipated ecological niche [231]. In addition, the habitat of the intended fish species can be considered a probable source of the beneficial microorganisms.
Yeast or other fungal strains can be isolated on YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose) culture medium supplemented with antibiotics (chloramphenicol, 150 mg L−1; tetracycline, 150 mg L−1). As chloramphenicol and tetracycline typically inhibit the growth of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, the isolates that grew on the YPD media were likely fungi [111]. Fungal strains can be identified through 5.8S-ITS gene sequencing [232]. Alternatively, 18S rDNA gene sequence analysis may be followed [119]. The ‘Internal Transcribed Spacer’ (ITS) region in the 18S rDNA fragment can be amplified using ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-30′) as the forward and reverse primers.
To isolate actinobacteria, starch casein agar, Kuster’s agar or actinomycete isolation agar medium may be used [233]. The supplementation of nalicidic acid (20 μg mL−1) and nystatin/cycloheximide (100 μg mL−1) will help to inhibit the growth of both Gram-negative bacteria and fungi [234]. Otherwise, the medium may be supplemented with streptomycin (25 μg mL−1) to inhibit bacterial contamination. Actinobacteria may be identified through 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses. The gene encoding 16S rRNA may be amplified using 27f (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492r (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) universal primers. The purified, amplified products may be sequenced, edited, aligned and analyzed to identify the closest homolog using the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database.
The assessment criteria for the selection of probiotic fungi [232] and actinobacteria [235] were demonstrated by considering the functional and safety properties, which are briefly presented in Figure 2. The following steps should be followed to select the probiotic strains:
(a)
Influence of temperature, pH and salt concentration (sodium chloride, NaCl) on growth;
(b)
Functional characterization, e.g., analyses of exo-enzyme production, antagonism against pathogenic bacteria, antioxidant activity, the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and vitamins, etc.;
(c)
Evaluation of growth and strain survivability against gut pH, pepsin, bile, and gut mucus;
(d)
Evaluation of colonization potential (co-cultivation with pathogens to test strain dominance and co-cultivation with other gut microorganisms to test strain compatibility, hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity and auto-aggregation assays);
(e)
Evaluation of safety assessment of strains through an antibiotic sensitivity test and hemolytic activity;
(f)
In vivo evaluation of the putative probiotic strains on the host via intra-peritoneal injection.
Further, it should be assured that the selected strains possess the following properties: (1) being non-pathogenic to the host; (2) being administrable through feed; (3) being effective in vivo; and (4) being non-virulent or possessing antibiotic resistance genes [230,236].

8. Conclusions and Further Directions

Probiotic applications may be extended in aquaculture via the use of exo-enzyme-producing strains in the bioprocessing of the complex feed ingredients and diverse microbial bio-active compounds and/or metabolites (e.g., antimicrobial compounds, quorum quenching enzymes, SCFA) as functional feed additives. Further, apart from S. cerevisiae, gut-associated yeast strains of the genera Candida, Pichia, Debaryomyces, Leucosporidium, Rhodotorula, Cryptococcus, Sporobolomyces and Trichosporon have been described in several studies and need to be explored to determine their full potential. The vast diversity of marine actinobacteria and their novel metabolites were reported. Future research should be directed toward fish-gut-associated actinobacteria from freshwater and brackish water fish species to develop novel probiotics. Likely novel bioactive molecules from the diverse actinobacteria resources should also be considered. Apart from the antibacterial potential exhibited by the fungal and actinobacterial strains, their quorum quenching potential can be utilized to mitigate multidrug-resistant pathogens in aquaculture systems in an environmentally friendly way. Along with probiotic potential, studies should be directed to develop the probiotic products as synbiotics or postbiotics, and their efficacy in culture conditions must be evaluated. The development of paraprobiotics has not been widely considered with regard to fungi and actinobacteria, and this topic merits investigation, as paraprobiotics could represent safe and novel alternatives to the viable cells related to biofilm diseases. Studies addressing the impacts of putative probiotics on the gut microbiome and gut health are other developing areas that require appraisal of their efficacy. Moreover, efforts should be made to establish probiotic consortia comprising efficient and compatible bacteria–yeast–actinobacteria groups to address varied impediments in aquaculture systems. Available reports on probiotics’ applications in diverse aquatic species suggest that the effects of probiotic candidates could be species specific in nature. Thus, exploring the probiotic potential of the microbial candidates for the native commercial fish or other aquatic species in each region and deciphering this issue in feed and feeding technology are worth mentioning. Even though probiotics’ inclusion in diet is the most frequently used administration method, studies need to be conducted to explore the potential of the water administration method. A simple question can be asked regarding fungi and other microorganisms in the fish GI tract: which species are present, and what do they do? Even though numerous probiotic studies of aquatic animals have been conducted, scientists must always ask this question.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.G. and E.R.; methodology, K.G., R.H., E.R. and A.M.; software, K.G., R.H., E.R. and A.M.; validation, K.G., R.H., E.R. and A.M.; formal analysis, K.G.; investigation, K.G., R.H. and E.R.; resources, K.G. and E.R.; data curation, K.G., R.H., E.R. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, K.G., R.H. and E.R.; writing—review and editing, K.G. and E.R.; visualization, K.G. and E.R.; supervision, K.G. and E.R.; project administration, K.G.; funding acquisition, K.G. and E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The first author is grateful to the Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India, and the Department of Science and Technology (FIST and PURSE programmes), New Delhi, India, for providing research and infrastructural support.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ringø, E.; Li, X.; Doan, H.V.; Ghosh, K. Interesting probiotic bacteria other than the more widely used lactic acid bacteria and bacilli in finfish. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 848037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. El-Saadony, M.T.; Saad, A.M.; Soliman, S.M.; Salem, H.M.; Ahmed, A.I.; Mahmood, M.; El-Tahan, A.M.; Ebrahim, A.A.; El-Mageed, A.; Taia, A.; et al. Plant growth-promoting microorganisms as biocontrol agents of plant diseases: Mechanisms, challenges and future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 923880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jahangiri, L.; Esteban, M.Á. Administration of probiotics in the water in finfish aquaculture systems: A review. Fishes 2018, 3, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ringø, E.; van Doan, H.; Lee, S.H.; Soltani, M.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Ramasamy, H.; Song, S.K. Probiotics, lactic acid bacteria and bacilli: Interesting supplementation for aquaculture. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 116–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Soltani, M.; Ghosh, K.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Kumar, V.; Lymbery, A.; Roy, S.; Ringø, E. Genus Bacillus, promising probiotics in aquaculture: Aquatic animal origin, bio-active components, bioremediation in fish and shellfish. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquacult. 2019, 27, 331–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nayak, S.K. Multifaceted applications of probiotic bacillus species in aquaculture with special reference to Bacillus subtilis. Rev. Aquacult. 2021, 13, 862–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gatesoupe, F.J. Live yeasts in the gut: Natural occurrence, dietary introduction, and their effects on fish health and development. Aquaculture 2007, 267, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Navarrete, P.; Tovar-Ramírez, D. Use of yeasts as probiotics in fish aquaculture. Sustain. Aquac. Tech. 2014, 1, 135–172. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tan, L.T.H.; Chan, K.G.; Lee, L.H.; Goh, B.H. Streptomyces bacteria as potential probiotics in aquaculture. Front. Microbial. 2016, 7, 79. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayatgheib, N.; Moreau, E.; Calvez, S.; Lepelletier, D.; Pouliquen, H. A review of functional feeds and the control of Aeromonas infections in freshwater fish. Aquacult. Inter. 2020, 28, 1083–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dawood, M.A.O.; Eweedah, N.M.; Moustafa, E.M.; Sharin, M.G. Synbiotic effects of Aspergillus oryzae and beta-glucan on growth and oxidative and immune responses of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Prob. Antimic. Prot. 2020, 12, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jasim, S.A.; Abdelbasset, W.K.; Shichiyakh, A.; Al-Shawi, S.G.; Jalil, A.T.; Karim, Y.S.; Mustafa, Y.F.; Norbakhsh, M. Probiotic effects of the fungi, Aspergillus niger on growth, immunity, haematology, intestine fungal load and digestive enzymes of the common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Aquacult. Res. 2022, 53, 3828–3840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Llewellyn, M.S.; Boutin, S.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Derome, N. Teleost microbiomes: The state of the art in their characterization, manipulation and importance in aquaculture and fisheries. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kurtzman, C. Molecular taxonomy of the yeasts. Yeast 1994, 10, 1727–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Øverland, M.; Skrede, A. Yeast derived from lingocellulosic biomass as a sustainable feed resource for use in aquaculture. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ceseña, C.E.; Vega-Villasante, F.; Aguirre-Guzman, G.; Luna-Gonzalez, A.; Campa-Cordova, A. Update on the use of yeast in shrimp aquaculture: A mini review. Int. Aquat. Res. 2021, 13, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  17. Machida, M.; Asai, K.; Sano, M.; Tanaka, T.; Kumagai, T.; Terai, G.; Kusumoto, K.I.; Arima, T.; Akita, O.; Kashiwagi, Y.; et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of Aspergillus oryzae. Nature 2005, 438, 1157–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shukry, M.; Abd El-Kader, M.F.; Hendam, B.M.; Dawood, M.A.; Farrag, F.A.; Aboelenin, S.M.; Soliman, M.M.; Abdel-Latif, H.M. Dietary Aspergillus oryzae modulates serum biochemical indices, immune responses, oxidative stress, and transcription of HSP70 and cytokine genes in Nile tilapia exposed to salinity stress. Animals 2021, 11, 1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Das, S.; Lyla, P.S.; Khan, A.S. Distribution and generic composition of culturable marine actinomycetes from the sediments of Indian continental slope of Bay of Bengal. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2008, 26, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jensen, P.R.; Mincer, T.J.; Williams, P.G.; Fenical, W. Marine actinomycete diversity and natural product discovery. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2005, 87, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Adel, M.; Lazado, C.; Safari, R.; Yeganeh, S.; Zorriehzahra, M. Aqualase®, a yeast-based in-feed probiotic, modulates intestinal microbiota, immunity and growth of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquacult. Res. 2017, 48, 1815–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Angulo, M.; Reyes-Becerril, M.; Medina-Córdova, N.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; Angulo, C. Probiotic and nutritional effects of Debaryomyces hansenii on animals. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 7689–7699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Reyes-Becerril, M.; Salina, I.; Cuesta, A.; Meseguer, J.; Tovar-Ramirez, D.; Ascencio-Valle, F.; Esteban, M. Oral delivery of live yeast Debaryomyces hansenii modulates the main innate immune parameters and the expression of immune-relevant genes in the gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008, 25, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tovar-Ramirez, D.; Mazurais, D.; Gatesoupe, J.F.; Quazuguel, P.; Cahu, C.L.; Zambonino-Infante, J.L. Dietary probiotic live yeast modulates antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae. Aquaculture 2010, 300, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Perdichizzi, A.; Meola, M.; Caccamo, L.; Caruso, G.; Gai, F.; Maricchiolo, G. Live Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii) Supplementation in a European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Diet: Effects on the Growth and Immune Response Parameters. Animals 2023, 13, 3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mohammadi, F.; Mousavi, S.M.; Ahmadmoradi, E.; Zakeri, M.; Jahedi, A. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on survival rate and growth performance of convict cichlid (Amatitlania nigrofasciata). Iran. J. Vet. Res. 2015, 16, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  27. Waché, Y.; Auffray, F.; Gatesoupe, F.J.; Zambonino, J.; Gayet, V.; Labbé, L.; Quentel, C. Cross effects of the strain of dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae and rearing conditions on the onset of intestinal microbiota and digestive enzymes in rainbow trout, Onchorhynchus mykiss, fry. Aquaculture 2006, 258, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Essa, M.A.; Mabrouk, H.A.; Mohamed, R.A.; Michael, F.R. Evaluating different additive levels of yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, on the growth and production performances of a hybrid of two populations of Egyptian African catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Aquaculture 2011, 320, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ran, C.; Huang, L.; Liu, Z.; Xu, L.; Yang, Y.; Tacon, P.; Auclair, E.; Zhou, Z. A comparison of the beneficial effects of live and heat-in activated baker`s yeast on Nile tilapia: Suggestions on the role and function of the secondary metabolites released from yeast. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ran, C.; Huang, L.; Hu, J.; Tacon, P.; He, S.; Li, Z.M.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xu, L.; Yang, Y.L.; et al. Effects of dietary live and heat-inactivate baker`s yeast on growth, gut health, and disease resistance of Nile tilapia under high rearing density. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 56, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huyben, D.; Sun, L.; Moccia, R.; Kiessling, A.; Dicksved, J.; Lundh, T. Dietary live yeast and incresed water temperature influence the gut microbiota of rainbow trout. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 124, 1377–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Salah, W.; Gafaar, A.; Tanekhy, M.; Alsenosy, A.; Elbialy, A.A.; Abaza, S.; Soliman, M. Efficacy of dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation with inclusion of Q Z TossTM on Nile tilapia. Damanhour J. Vet. Sci. 2019, 2, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dias, M.K.R.; Yoshioka, E.T.O.; Rodriguez, A.F.R.; Ribeiro, R.A.; Faria, F.S.E.D.V.; Almeida Ozorio, R.O.A.; Tavares-Dias, M. Growth and hematological and immunological responses of Arapaima gigas fed diets supplemented with immunostimulant based on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and subjected to handling stress. Aquacult. Rep. 2020, 17, 100335. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hansen, J.Ø.; Lagos, L.; Lei, P.; Reveco-Urzua, F.E.; Morales-Lange, B.; Hansen, L.D.; Schiavone, M.; Mydland, L.T.; Arntzen, M.Ø.; Mercado, L.; et al. Down-stream processing of baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)—Effect on nutrient digestibility and immune response in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 2021, 530, 735707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jahan, N.; Islam, S.M.M.; Rohani, M.F.; Hossain, M.T.; Shahjahan, M. Probiotic yeast enhances growth performance of rohu (Labeo rohita) through upgrading hematology, and intestinal microbiota and morphology. Aquaculture 2021, 545, 737243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. El-Bab, A.F.F.; Saghir, S.A.M.; El-Naser, I.A.A.; El-Kheir, S.M.M.A.; Abdel-Kader, M.F.; Alruhaimi, R.S.; Alqhtani, H.A.; Mahmoud, A.M.; Naiel, M.A.E.; El-Raghi, A.A. The effect of dietary Saccharamyces cerevisiae on growth preformance, oxidative status, and immune response of sea bream (Sparus aurata). Life 2022, 12, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. He, S.; Zhou, Z.; Meng, K.; Zhao, H.; Yao, B.; Ringø, E.; Yoon, I. Effects of dietary antibiotic growth promoter and Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on production, intestinal bacterial community, and nonspecific immunity of hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus female × Oreochromis aureus male). J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ortuño, J.; Cuesta, A.; Rodríguez, A.; Esteban, M.; Meseguer, J. Oral administration of yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, enhances the cellular innate immune response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2002, 85, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Reda, R.M.; Selim, K.M.; Mahmoud, R.; El-Araby, I.E. Effect of dietary yeast nucleotide on antioxidant activity, non-specific immunity, intestinal cytokines, and disease resistance in Nile tilapia. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 80, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pelusio, N.F.; Parma, L.; Volpe, E.; Ciulli, S.; Errani, F.; Natale, S.; De Cesare, A.; Indio, V.; Carcano, P.; Mordenti, O.; et al. Yeast-extracted nucleotides and nucleic acids as promising feed additives for European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juveniles. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1145660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Barducci, R.S.; de Abreu, V.; Aparecido, A.; Santos, D.; Pacheco, L.G.; Koch, J.F.A.; Florencio, M.; Pilarski, F. Natural feed additive containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae-originated free nucleotides improves innate immunity, gut histology and disease resistance in Nile tilapia. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2022, 289, 115337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, M.; Liang, R.; Mo, J.; Yang, S.; Gu, N.; Wu, Z.; Babu, V.S.; Li, J.; Huang, Y.; Lin, L. Effects of brewer`s yeast hydrolysate on the growth performance and the intestinal bacterial diversity of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Aquaculture 2018, 484, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vargas, O.; Gutiérrez, M.S.; Caruffo, M.; Valderrama, B.; Medina, D.A.; Garcia, K.; Reyes-Jara, A.; Toro, M.; Feijóo, C.G.; Navarrete, P. Probiotic yeasts and Vibrio anguillarum infection modify the microbiome of zebrafish larvae. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 647977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sanahuja, I.; Ruiz, R.; Firmino, J.P.; Reyes-López, F.E.; Ortiz-Delgado, J.B.; Vallejos-Vidal, E.; Tort, L.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; Cerezo, I.M.; Moriñigo, M.S.; et al. Debaryomyces hansenii supplementation in low fish meal diets promotes growth, modulates microbiota and enhances intestinal conditions in juvenile marine fish. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 14, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ibrar, M.; Zuberi, A.; Amir, I.; Imran, M.; Noor, Z. Effect of probiotic Geotrichum candidum on early rearing of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822). Turkish J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 2017, 17, 1263–1270. [Google Scholar]
  46. Amir, I.; Zuberi, A.; Kamran, M.; Imran, M.; Murtaza, M.U.H. Evaluation of commercial application of dietary encapsulated probiotic (Geotrichum candidum QAUGC01): Effect on growth and immunological indices of rohu (Labeo rohita, Hamilton 1822) in semi-intensive culture system. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 95, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ghori, I.; Tubassam, M.; Ahmad, T.; Zuberi, A.; Imran, M. Gut microbiome modulation mediated by probiotics: Positive impact on growth and health status of Labeo rohita. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 949559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huda, N.-U.; Liu, H.; Jin, J.; Zhu, X.; Han, D.; Yang, Y.; Xie, S. Dietary supplementation of Gentrichum candidum improves growth, gut microbiota, immune-related gene expression and disease resistance in gibel carp CAS III (Carassius auratus gibelio). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 99, 144–153. [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Doan, H.; Tapingkae, W.; Chaiyaso, T.; Wangkahart, E.; Panchan, R.; Sutthi, N. Effects of Red Yeast (Sporidiobolus pararoseus) on Growth, Innate Immunity, Expression of Immune-related Genes and Disease Resistance of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Probiot. Antimicrob. Prot. 2022, 15, 1312–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Agboola, J.O.; Mensah, D.D.; Hansen, J.Ø.; Lapeña, D.; Mydland, L.T.; Arntzen, M.Ø.; Horn, S.J.; Øyås, O.; Press, C.M.; Øverland, M. Effects of yeast species and processing on intestinal health and transcriptomic profiles of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed soybean meal-based diets in seawater. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Leeper, A.; Ekmay, R.; Knobloch, S.; Skirnisdóttir, S.; Varunjikar, M.; Dubois, M.; Smárason, B.O.; Arnason, J.; Koppe, W.; Benhaim, D. Torula yeast in the diet of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar and the impact on growth performance and gut microbiome. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Suguna, S.; Rajendran, K. Production of probiotics from Streptomyces sp. associated with fresh water fish and its growth evaluation on Xiphorous helleri. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. Arch. 2012, 3, 601–603. [Google Scholar]
  53. Selvakumar, D.; Jyothi, P.; Dhevendaran, K. Application of Streptomyces as a single cell protein to the juvenile fish Xiphophorus maculatus. World J. Fish Mar. Sci. 2013, 5, 582–586. [Google Scholar]
  54. Arghideh, M.; Hoseinifar, S.H.; Nasrabadi, R.G.; Mazandarani, M.; El-Haroun, E.; Van Doan, H. Evaluation of soil-derived Streptomyces chartreusis KU324443 effects as probiotic on growth performance, antioxidant enzyme activity, mucosal and serum immune parameters, and related gene expression in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings. Aquacult. Nutr. 2022, 2022, 2278130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lewis, J.W.; Morley, N.J.; Drinkall, J.; Jamieson, B.J.; Wright, R.; Parry, J.D. Toxic effects of Streptomyces griseus spores and exudate on gill pathology of freshwater fish. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 72, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shen, Y.F.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, B.; Wang, G.X. Antiviral activity of anisomycin against spring viraemia of carp virus in epithelioma papulosum cyprini cells and zebrafish. Virus Res. 2019, 268, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Dharmaraj, S.; Dhevendaran, K. Evaluation of Streptomyces as a probiotic feed for the growth of ornamental fish Xiphophorus helleri. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2010, 48, 497–504. [Google Scholar]
  58. Galao, R.P.; Scheller, N.; Alves-Rodrigues, I.; Breinig, T.; Meyerhans, A.; Díez, J. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A versatile eukaryotic system in virology. Microb. Cell Fact. 2007, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mandal, S.; Ghosh, K. Isolation of tannase producing microbiota from the gastrointestinal tracts of some freshwater fish. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2013, 29, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Banerjee, S.; Ghosh, K. Enumeration of gut associated extracellular enzyme producing yeasts in some freshwater fishes. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2014, 30, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Das, P.; Ghosh, K. The presence of phytase in yeasts isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of four major carps [Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822), Catla catla (Hamilton, 1822), Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton, 1822), Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844)], climbing perch [Anabas testudineus (Bloch, 1792)] and Mozambique tilapia [Oreochromis mossambicus (Linnaeus, 1758)]. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2014, 30, 403–407. [Google Scholar]
  62. del Valle, J.C.; Bonadero, M.C.; Gimenez, A.V.F. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as probiotic, prebiotic, synbiotic, postbiotics and parabiotics in aquaculture: An overview. Aquaculture 2023, 569, 739342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Noh, H.; Han, K.I.; Won, T.H.; Choi, Y.J. Effect of antibiotics, enzymes, yeast culture and probiotics on the growth performance of Israeli carp. Korean J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 36, 480–486. [Google Scholar]
  64. Lara-Flores, M.; Olvera-Novoa, M.A.; Guzmán-Méndez, B.E.; López-Madrid, W. Use of the bacteria Streptococcus faecium and Lactobacillus acidophilus, and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as growth promoters in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2003, 216, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gopalakannan, A.; Arul, V. Enhancement of the innate immune system and disease-resistant activity in Cyprinus carpio by oral administration of β-glucan and whole cell yeast. Aquacult. Nutr. 2010, 41, 884–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chiu, C.H.; Cheng, C.H.; Gua, W.R.; Guu, Y.K.; Cheng, W. Dietary administration of the probiotic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae P13, enhanced the growth, innate immune responses, and disease resistance of the grouper, Epinephelus coioides. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010, 29, 1053–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Abdel-Rahman, A.M.; Ismael, N.E.M. Evaluation of commercial live bakers’ yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a growth and immunity promoter for fry Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.) challenged in situ with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquaculture 2008, 280, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Harikrishnan, R.; Kim, M.C.; Kim, J.S.; Balasundaram, C.; Heo, M.S. Immunomodulatory effect of probiotics enriched diets on Uronema marinum infected olive flounder. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011, 30, 964–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, P.; Gatlin, D.M., III. Evaluation of brewer’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed supplement for hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × M. saxatilis). Aquaculture 2003, 219, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, P.; Gatlin, D.M., III. Dietary brewer’s yeast and the prebiotic Grobiotic™ AE influence growth performance, immune responses and resistance of hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × M. saxatilis) to Streptococcus iniae infection. Aquaculture 2004, 231, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, P.; Gatlin, D.M., III. Evaluation of the prebiotic GroBiotic®-A and brewer’s yeast as dietary supplements for sub-adult hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × M. saxatilis) challenged in situ with Mycobacterium marinum. Aquaculture 2005, 248, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pal, D.; Joardar, S.N.; Roy, B. Immunostimulatory effects of a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell wall feed supplement on rohu (Labeo rohita), an Indian major carp. Israeli J. Aquacult. Bamidgeh. 2007, 59, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ramakrishnan, C.M.; Haniffa, M.A.; Manohar, M.; Dhanaraj, M.; Arockiaraj, J.; Seetharaman, S.; Arunsingh, S.V. Effects of probiotics and spirulina on survival and growth of juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Israeli J. Aquacult. 2008, 60, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. El-Boshy, M.E.; Ahmed, M.; AbdelHamid, F.M.; Gadalla, H.A. Immunomodulatory effect of dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae, β-glucan and laminaran in mercuric chloride treated Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and experimentally infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010, 28, 802–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tukmechi, A.; Andani, H.R.R.; Manaffar, R.; Sheikhzadeh, N. Dietary administration of beta-mercapto-ethanol treated Saccharomyces cerevisiae enhanced the growth, innate immune response and disease resistance of the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011, 30, 923–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Welker, T.L.; Lim, C.; Yildirim-Aksoy, M.; Klesius, P.H. Effect of short-term feeding duration of diets containing commercial whole-cell yeast or yeast subcomponents on immune function and disease resistance in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2012, 96, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Akhtar, M.S.; Ciji, A.; Tripathi, P.H.; Sharma, P. Dietary β-glucan influences the expression of testicular aquaporins, antioxidative defence genes and sperm quality traits in endangered golden mahseer, Tor putitora (Hamilton, 1822). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 1286–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tewary, A.; Patra, B.C. Oral administration of baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) acts as a growth promoter and immunomodulator in Labeo rohita (Ham.). J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2011, 2, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. El-feky, M.M.; Essa, M.A.; Osman, A.G.M.; Shalaby, S.M.; Moustafa, A.M. Growth Performance of African Catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) treated with Live Baker’s Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) in Egypt. Int. J. Biotech. Bioeng. 2017, 3, 176–187. [Google Scholar]
  80. Osman, H.A.M.; Ibrahim, T.B.; Soliman, W.E.; Monier, M.M. Influence of dietary commercial baker’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance, survival and immunostimulation of Oreochromis niloticus challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila. Nat. Sci. 2010, 8, 96–103. [Google Scholar]
  81. Pooramini, M.; Kamali, A.; Hajimoradloo, A.; Alizadeh, M.; Ghorbani, R. Effect of using yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as probiotic on growth parameters, survival and carcass quality in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss fry. Int. Aquacult. Res. 2009, 1, 39–44. [Google Scholar]
  82. Abdel-Tawwab, M. Interactive effects of dietary protein and live bakery yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.) fry and their challenge against Aeromonas hydrophila infection. Aquacult. Int. 2011, 20, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ozório, R.O.; Portz, L.; Borghesi, R.; Cyrino, J.E. Effects of dietary yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisia) supplementation in practical diets of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animals 2012, 2, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Pooramini, M.; Kamali, A.; Hajimoradloo, A.; Alizadeh, M.; Ghorbani, R.; Hatami, R.; Haghparast, S. The effects of different concentrations of probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance and survival rate of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), fry and resistance against salinity. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 13, 1160–1168. [Google Scholar]
  85. Caruffo, M.; Navarrete, N.; Salgado, O.; Díaz, A.; López, P.; García, K.; Feijóo, C.G.; Navarrete, P. Potential probiotic yeasts isolated from the fish gut protect zebrafish (Danio rerio) from a Vibrio anguillarum challenge. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mohammadi, F.; Mousavi, S.M.; Zakeri, M.; Ebtesam, A. Effect of dietary probiotic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance, survival rate and body biochemical composition of three spot cichlid (Cichlasomatrim aculatum). AACL Bioflux 2016, 9, 451–457. [Google Scholar]
  87. Rachmawati, D.; Hutabarat, J.; Samidjan, I.; Herawati, V.E.; Windarto, S. The effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-enriched dieton feed usage efficiency, growth performance and survival rate in Java barb (Barbonymus gonionotus) fingerlings. AACL Bioflux 2019, 12, 1841–1849. [Google Scholar]
  88. Yasin, R.; Jabeen, F.; Ali, M.; Malik, K.S.; Hussain, S.M. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on the intestinal microbiota of GIFT tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). Int. J. Biosci. 2018, 12, 283–291. [Google Scholar]
  89. Meena, D.K.; Das, P.; Kumar, S.; Mandal, S.C.; Prusty, A.K.; Singh, S.K.; Akhtar, M.S.; Behera, B.K.; Kumar, K.; Pal, A.K.; et al. Beta-glucan: An ideal immunostimulant in aquaculture (a review). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 39, 431–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, P.; Lewis, D.H.; Gatlin III, D.M. Dietary oligonucleotides from yeast RNA influence immune responses and resistance of hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × Morone saxatilis) to Streptococcus iniae infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2004, 16, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Abu-Elala, N.; Marzouk, M.; Moustafa, M. Use of different Saccharomyces cerevisiae biotic forms as immune-modulator and growth promoter for Oreochromis niloticus challenged with some fish pathogens. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2013, 1, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Savin, V.; Patriche, N.; Mocanu, E.; Tenciu, M.; Lăcătuș, M.; Popa, D.; Savin, C. The effect of Saccharomyces boulardii yeast feed supplementation on growth parameters and biochemical composition of carp (Cyprinus carpio). USAMV Iasi 2019, 72, 188–192. [Google Scholar]
  93. Nematzadeh, K.; Ahmadifard, N.; Naser, S.; Agh, N.; Ghaderpour, S. The effects of zinc-enriched Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the growth and mineral composition of marine rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis. Int. J. Aquatic. Biol. 2018, 6, 88–94. [Google Scholar]
  94. Opiyo, M.A.; Jumbe, J.; Ngugi, C.C.; Charo-Karisa, H. Different levels of probiotics affect growth, survival and body composition of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured in low input ponds. Sci. Afr. 2019, 4, e00103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Opiyo, M.A.; Jumbe, J.; Ngugi, C.C.; Charo-Karisa, H. Dietary administration of probiotics modulates non-specific immunity and gut microbiota of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured in low input ponds. Int. J. Vet. Sci. 2019, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Banu, M.R.; Akter, S.; Islam, M.R.; Mondol, M.N.; Hossain, M.A. Probiotic yeast enhanced growth performance and disease resistance in freshwater catfish gulsa tengra, Mystus cavasius. Aquacult. Rep. 2020, 16, 100237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. MajharulIslam, S.M.; Rohani, M.F.; Shahjahan, M. Probiotic yeast enhances growth performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) through morphological modifications of intestine. Aquacult. Rep. 2021, 21, 100800. [Google Scholar]
  98. Rawling, M.; Schiavone, M.; Apper, E.; Merrifield, D.L.; Castex, M.; Leclercq, E.; Foey, A. Yeast cell wall extracts from Saccharomyces cerevisiae varying in structure and composition differentially shape the innate immunity and mucosal tissue responses of the intestine of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1158390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Andlid, T.; Vázquez-Juárez, R.; Gustafsson, L. Yeasts isolated from the intestine of rainbow trout adhere to and grow in intestinal mucus. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1998, 7, 115–126. [Google Scholar]
  100. Siangpro, N.; Chuakrut, S.; Sirimanapong, W.; Tanasupawat, S.; Phongsopitanun, W.; Meksiriporn, B.; Boonnorat, J.; Sarin, S.; Kucharoenphaibul, S.; Jutakanoke, R. Lactiplantibacillus argentoratensis and Candida tropicalis Isolated from the Gastrointestinal Tract of Fish Exhibited Inhibitory Effects against Pathogenic Bacteria of Nile Tilapia. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Taha, M.D.; Didinen, B.I.; Onuk, E.E.; Metin, S.; Yilmaz, S.; Mohamed, A.A.; Pakır, S.; Gülşen, O.; Abdel-Latif, H.M. Identification of four autochthonous yeasts from the intestines of goldfish, Carassius auratus with potential probiotic properties and their effects on the most common fish bacterial pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2023, 184, 106381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Yurkov, A.M.; Schafer, A.M.; Begerow, D. Leucoporidium drummii sp. nov., a member of the Microbotryomycetes isolated from soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr. 2012, 62, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Arthur, H.; Watson, K. Thermal adaptation in yeast: Growth temperatures, membrane lipid, and cytochrome composition of psychrophilic, mesophilic, and thermophilic yeasts. J. Bacteriol. 1976, 128, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Chávez-Crooker, P.; Obreque-Contreras, J. Bioremediation of aquaculture wastes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Summerbell, R.C. The heterobasidiomycetous yeast genus Leucosporidium in an area of temperate climate. Canad. J. Bot. 1983, 61, 1402–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Turkiewicz, M.; Pazgier, M.; Donachie, S.P.; Kalinowska, H. Invertase and a-glucosidase production by the endemic Antarctic marine yeast Leucosporidium antarcticum. Pol. Polar Res. 2005, 26, 125–136. [Google Scholar]
  107. Shivaji, S.; Prasad, G.S. Antarctic yeasts: Biodiversity and potential applications. In Yeast Biotechnology: Diversity and Applications; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  108. Turkiewicz, M.; Pazgier, M.; Kalinowska, H.; Bielecki, S. A cold-adapted extracellular serine proteinase of the yeast Leucosporidium antarcticum. Extremophiles 2003, 7, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Duarte, A.W.F.; Bonugli-Santos, R.C.; Duarte, A.L.F.; Gomes, E.; Sette, L.D. Statistical experimental design applied to extracellular lipase production by the marine Antarctic yeast Leucosporidium scottii CRM 728. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 32, 101954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Azhar, M.A. Cloning, Expression and Analysis of α-Amylase Gene from Psychrophilic Yeast Leucosporidium antarcticum PI12. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  111. Andlid, T.; Vázquez-Juárez, R.; Gustafsson, L. Yeast colonizing the intestine of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Microb. Ecol. 1995, 30, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tovar, D.; Zambonino, J.; Cahu, C.; Gatesoupe, F.J.; Vázquez-Juárez, R.; Lésel, R. Effect of live yeast incorporation in compound diet on digestive enzyme activity in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae. Aquaculture 2002, 204, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Cowieson, A.J.; Adeola, O. Carbohydrases, protease, and phytase have an additive beneficial effect in nutritionally marginal diets for broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 1860–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Fru-Nji, F.; Kluenter, A.M.; Fischer, M.; Pontoppidan, K. A feed serine protease improves broiler performance and increases protein and energy digestibility. J. Poult. Sci. 2011, 48, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ogata, K.; Nishikawa, H.; Ohsugi, M. A yeast capable of utilizing methanol. Agr. Biol. Chem. 1969, 33, 1519–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rebnegger, C.; Vos, T.; Graf, A.B.; Valli, M.; Pronk, J.T.; Daran-Lapujade, P.; Mattanovich, D. Pichia pastoris exhibits high viability and a low maintenance energy requirement at near-zero specific growth rates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 4570–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Cregg, J.M.; Barringer, K.J.; Hessler, A.Y.; Madden, K.R. Pichia pastoris as a host system for transformations. Mol. Cell Biol. 1985, 5, 3376–3385. [Google Scholar]
  118. Passoth, V.; Fredlund, E.; Druvefors, U.Ä.; Schnürer, J. Biotechnology, physiology and genetics of the yeast Pichia anomala. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005, 6, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Ghosh, K.; Banerjee, S.; Moon, U.M.; Khan, H.A.; Dutta, D. Evaluation of gut associated extracellular enzyme-producing and pathogen inhibitory microbial community as potential probiotics in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Int. J. Aquacult. 2017, 7, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Acosta, J.; Morales, R.; Morales, A.; Alonso, M.; Estrada, M.P. Pichia pastoris expressing recombinant tilapia growth hormone accelerates the growth of tilapia. Biotechnol. Lett. 2007, 29, 1671–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yu-Fang, S.; Yan, T.; Jing, X.; Yun-Fang, Q. Biosynthesis of Crucian Carp (Carassius auratus) c-type Lysozyme Based on Recombinant Pichia pastoris and Its Characteristics. J. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 27, 2177–2188. [Google Scholar]
  122. Pinto, V.B.; Costenaro-Ferreira, C.; Oliveira, P.L.S.; Oliveira, R.R.B.D.; Piedras, S.R.N.; Pouey, J.L.O.F. Performance of jundiá larvae, Rhamdia quelen, fed on probiotic supplemented diets. Acta Scientiarum. Anim. Sci. 2015, 37, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Islam, F.; Salam, M.A.; Rahman, M.A.; Paul, S.I.; Das, T.R.; Rahman, M.M.; Shaha, D.C.; Gupta, D.R.; Alam, M.S.; Islam, T. Plant endophytic yeasts Pichia fermentans and Meyerozyma caribbica improve growth, biochemical composition, haematological parameters and morphology of internal organs of premature Barbonymus gonionotus. Aquacult. Rep. 2021, 19, 100575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ghosh, K.; Mandal, S. Nutritional evaluation of groundnut oil cake in formulated diets for rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton) fingerlings after solid state fermentation with a tannase producing yeast, Pichia kudriavzevii (GU939629) isolated from fish gut. Aquac. Rep. 2015, 2, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Mandal, S.; Ghosh, K. Utilization of fermented Pistia leaves in the diet of rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton): Effects on growth, digestibility and whole body composition. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 3331–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sealey, W.M.; Conley, Z.B.; Hinman, B.T.; O’Neill, T.J.; Bowzer, J.; Block, S.S. Evaluation of the ability of Pichia guilliermondii to improve growth performance and disease resistance in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J. World Aquac. Soc. 2022, 53, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Harnpicharnchai, P.; Sornlake, W.; Tang, K.; Eurwilaichitr, L.; Tanapongpipat, S. Cell-surface phytase on Pichia pastoris cell wall offers great potential as a feed supplement. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 302, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Ganapathiwar, S.; Bhukya, B. In vitro assessment for the probiotic potential of Pichia kudriavzevii. Bioinformation 2023, 19, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Raggi, P.; Lopez, P.; Diaz, A.; Carrasco, D.; Silva, A.; Velez, A.; Opazo, R.; Magne, F.; Navarrete, P.A. Debaryomyces hansenii and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa comprised the yeast core gut microbiota of wild and reared carnivorous salmonids, croaker and yellowtail. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 2791–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bass, D.; Howe, A.; Brown, N.; Barton, H.; Demidova, M.; Michelle, H.; Li, L.; Sanders, H.; Watkinson, S.C.; Willock, S.; et al. Yeast forms dominate fungal diversity in the deep oceans. Proc. Royal. Soc. B 2007, 274, 3069–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Chen, Y.S.; Yanagida, F.; Chen, L.Y. Isolation of marine yeasts from coastal waters of northeastern Taiwan. Aqua. Biol. 2009, 8, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Li, Y.H.; Zhao, Z.B.; Bai, F.W. Optimization of culture conditions for lipid production by Rhodosporidium toruloides. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 22, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Scholz, U.; Diaz, G.G.; Ricque, D.; Suarez, L.E.C.; Albores, F.V.; Larchford, J. Enhancement of vibrios resistance in juvenile Penaeus vannamei by supplementation of diets with different yeast products. Aquaculture 1999, 176, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Barron, C.C.; Sponagle, B.J.; Arivalagan, P.; D’Cunha, G.B. Optimization of oligomeric enzyme activity in ionic liquids using Rhodotorula glutinis yeast phenylalanine ammonia lyase. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2017, 96, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zhu, L.; Cui, W.; Fang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gao, X.; Zhou, Z. Cloning, expression and characterization of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase from Rhodotorula glutinis. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Braunwald, T.; Schwemmlein, L.; Graeff-Hönninger, S.; French, W.T.; Hernandez, R.; Holmes, W.E.; Claupein, W. Effect of different C/N ratios on carotenoid and lipid production by Rhodotorula glutinis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 6581–6588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Saenge, C.; Cheirsilp, B.; Suksaroge, T.T.; Bourtoom, T. Potential use of oleaginous red yeast Rhodotorula glutinis for the bioconversion of crude glycerol from biodiesel plant to lipids and carotenoids. Process Biochem. 2011, 46, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Kolouchová, I.; Schreiberová, O.; Sigler, K.; Masák, J.; Řezanka, T. Biotransformation of volatile fatty acids by oleaginous and non-oleaginous yeast species. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Marzocco, S.; Fazeli, G.; Di Micco, L.; Autore, G.; Adesso, S.; Dal Piaz, F.; Heidland, A.; Di Iorio, B. Supplementation of short-chain fatty acid, sodium propionate, in patients on maintenance hemodialysis: Beneficial effects on inflammatory parameters and gut-derived uremic toxins, a pilot study (PLAN Study). J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Xue, D.; Jiang, Y.; Gong, C. Exogenous xylanase expression simultaneously with the indigenous cellulase to increase the cellulose hydrolysis efficiency. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 140, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Korhola, M.; Hakonen, R.; Juuti, K.; Edelmann, M.; Kariluoto, S.; Nyström, L.; Sontag-Strohm, T.; Piironen, V. Production of folate in oat bran fermentation by yeasts isolated from barley and diverse foods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 117, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Limon, J.J.; Skalski, J.H.; Underhill, D.M. Commensal fungi in health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Xue, S.J.; Chi, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.F.; Liu, G.L.; Jiang, H.; Hu, Z.; Chi, Z.M. Fatty acids from oleaginous yeasts and yeast-like fungi and their potential applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 1049–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Hof, H. Rhodotorula spp. in the gut–foe or friend? GMS Infect. Dis. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar]
  145. Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, T.; Lv, Z. Novel branch patterns and anticoagulant activity of glycosaminoglycan from sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 72, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Chen, X.Q.; Zhao, W.; Xie, S.W.; Xie, J.J.; Zhang, Z.H.; Tian, L.X.; Liu, Y.J.; Niu, J. Effects of dietary hydrolyzed yeast (Rhodotorula mucilaginosa) on growth performance, immune response, antioxidant capacity and histomorphology of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 90, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Zhou, C.; Lin, H.; Huang, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, W. Cloning and expression analysis of c-type lysozyme gene in golden pompano, Trachinotus ovatus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 54, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Rekha, R.; Nimsi, K.A.; Manjusha, K.; Sirajudheen, T.K. Marine yeast Rhodotorula paludigena VA 242 a pigment enhancing feed additive for the ornamental fish koi carp. Aquac. Fish. 2024, 9, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Krinsky, N.I. Carotenoid antioxidants. Nutrition 2001, 17, 815–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Costa, I.; Martelli, H.L.; Da Silva, I.M.; Pomeroy, D. Production of β-carotene by a Rhodotorula strain. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 9, 373–375. [Google Scholar]
  151. Iriani, R.M.; Adilma, R.P.; Scamparini.; Delia, B.; Rodriguez, A. Selection and characterization of carotenoid producing yeasts from Campinas region. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2005, 40, 2985–2991. [Google Scholar]
  152. Wang, B.; Liu, Y.; Luo, K.; Zhang, S.; Wei, C.; Wang, L.; Qiu, Y.; Tian, X. ‘Biotic’potential of the red yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa strain JM-01 on the growth, shell pigmentation, and immune defense attributes of the shrimp, Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 2023, 572, 739543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Nimrat, S.; Khaopong, W.; Sangsong, J.; Boonthai, T.; Vuthiphandchai, V. Dietary administration of Bacillus and yeast probiotics improves the growth, survival, and microbial community of juvenile white leg shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. J. Appl. Aquac. 2021, 33, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Jin, J.; Wang, Y.; Yao, M.; Gu, X.; Li, B.; Liu, H.; Ding, M.; Xiao, W.; Yuan, Y. Astaxanthin overproduction in yeast by strain engineering and new gene target uncovering. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Chen, M.; Chen, X.Q.; Tian, L.X.; Liu, Y.J.; Niu, J. Enhanced intestinal health, immune responses and ammonia resistance in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) fed dietary hydrolyzed yeast (Rhodotorula mucilaginosa) and Bacillus licheniformis. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 17, 100385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Xu, J.; Liu, D. Exploitation of genus Rhodosporidium for microbial lipid production. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Nelis, H.J.; De Leenheer, A.P. Microbial sources of carotenoid pigments used in food and feeds. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1991, 70, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Maldonade, I.R.; Rodriguezamaya, D.B.; Scamparini, A.R. Statistical optimisation of cell growth and carotenoid production by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2012, 43, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Squina, F.M.; Yamashita, F.; Pereira1, J.L.; Mercadante, A.Z. Production of carotenoids by Rhodotorula rubra and R. glutinis in culture medium supplemented with sugar cane juice. Food Biotechnol. 2002, 16, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Aksu, Z.; Eren, A.T. Carotenoids production by the yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa: Use of agricultural wastes as a carbon source. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 2985–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Cheng, Y.T.; Yang, C.F. Using strain Rhodotorula mucilaginosa to produce carotenoids using food wastes. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 61, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Srinual, O.; Moonmanee, T.; Lumsangkul, C.; Doan, H.V.; Punyatong, M.; Yachai, M.; Chaiyaso, T.; Kongtong, K.; Tapingkae, W. Can red yeast (Sporidiobolus pararoseus) be used as a novel feed additive for mycotoxin binders in broiler chickens? Toxins 2022, 14, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Tapingkae, W.; Srinual, O.; Lumsangkul, C.; Doan, H.V.; Chiang, H.I.; Manowattana, A.; Boonchuay, P.; Chaiyaso, T. Industrial-Scale Production of Mycotoxin Binder from the Red Yeast Sporidiobolus pararoseus KM281507. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Shi, Q.; Wang, H.; Du, C.; Zhang, W.; Qian, H. Tentative identification of torulene cis/trans geometrical isomers isolated from Sporidiobolus pararoseus by high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection-mass spectrometry and preparation by column chromatography. Anal. Sci. 2013, 29, 997–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Maldonade, I.R.; Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B.; Scamparini, A.R. Carotenoids of yeasts isolated from the Brazilian ecosystem. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ianiri, G.; Idnurm, A.; Wright, S.A.; Durán-Patrón, R.; Mannina, L.; Ferracane, R.; Ritieni, A.; Castoria, R. Searching for genes responsible for patulin degradation in a biocontrol yeast provides insight into the basis for resistance to this mycotoxin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 3101–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Burgents, J.E.; Burnett, K.G.; Burnett, L.E. Disease resistance of Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, following the dietary administration of a yeast culture food supplement. Aquaculture 2004, 231, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Zhao, L.; Wang, W.; Huang, X.; Guo, T.; Wen, W.; Feng, L.; Wei, L. The effect of replacement of fish meal by yeast extract on the digestibility, growth and muscle composition of the shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Xiong, J.; Dai, W.; Qiu, Q.; Zhu, J.; Yang, W.; Li, C. Response of host–bacterial colonization in shrimp to developmental stage, environment and disease. Mol. Ecol. 2018, 27, 3686–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Middlehoven, W.J.; Scorzetti, G.; Fell, J.W. Systematics of the anamorphic basidiomycetous yeast genus Trichosporon Behrend with the description of five novel species: Trichosporon vadense, T. smithiae, T. dehoogii, T. scarabaeorum, and T. gamsii. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Biol. 2004, 54, 975–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Bergauer, P.; Fonteyne, P.A.; Nolard, N.; Schinner, F.; Margesin, R. Biodegradation of phenol and phenol-related compounds by psychrophilic and cold-tolerant alpine yeasts. Chemosphere 2005, 59, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Godjevargova, T.; Ivanova, D.; Alexieva, Z.; Dimova, N. Biodegradation of toxic organic components from industrial phenol production waste waters by free and immobilized Trichosporon cutaneum. Proc. Biochem. 2003, 38, 9150920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Middlehoven, W.J. Catabolism of benzen compounds by ascomycetous and basidiomycetous yeasts and yeast-like fungi—A literature review and an experimental approach. Ant. LeeuwInt. J. Gen. Appl. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 63, 125–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Singh, Y.; Gupta, R. Novel S-enantioselective lipase TALipB from Trichosporon asahii MSR54: Heterologous expression, characterization, conformational stability and homology modeling. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2016, 83, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Valle, R.S.; Ramos, L.S.; Reis, V.J.; Ziccardi, M.; Dornelas-Ribeiro, M.; Sodré, C.L.; Branquinha, M.H.; Santos, A.L. Trichosporon asahii secretes a 30-kDa aspartic peptidase. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 205, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, R.; Wang, C. Study on antioxidant enzymatic activities of Trichosporon asahii. Indian J. Microbiol. 2016, 56, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Zong, L.N.; Li, H.T.; Yong, R.Y.; Ao, J.H.; Wang, W.L.; Zhu, H.; Cong, L.; Wang, C.M. Experimental study on oxidant sensitivity of Trichosporona sahii. J. Pract. Dermatol. 2012, 5, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  178. Dawood, M.A.; Magouz, F.I.; Essa, M.; Mansour, M. Impact of yeast fermented poultry by-product meal on growth, digestive enzyme activities, intestinal morphometry and immune response traits of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Ann. Anim. Sci. 2020, 20, 939–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Dawood, M.A.; Eweedah, N.M.; Moustafa, E.M.; Farahat, E.M. Probiotic effects of Aspergillus oryzae on the oxidative status, heat shock protein, and immune related gene expression of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) under hypoxia challenge. Aquaculture 2020, 520, 734669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Salawudeen, M.T.; Kazeem, H.M.; Raji, M.A.; Oniye, S.J.; Kwanashie, C.N.; Ibrahim, M.J. Isolation and identification of fungi from apparently healthy and diseased Clarias gariepinus from freshwater in Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Microbiol. Res. J. Int. 2017, 5, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Saleemi, M.K.; Ashraf, K.; Gul, S.T.; Naseem, M.N.; Sajid, M.S.; Mohsin, M.; He, C.; Zubair, M.; Khan, A. Toxicopathological effects of feeding aflatoxins B1 in broilers and its ameliosration with indigenous mycotoxin binder. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 187, 109712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Marijani, E.; Kigadye, E.; Okoth, S. Occurrence of fungi and mycotoxins in fish feeds and their impact on fish health. Int. J. Microbiol. 2019, 2019, 6743065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Sharma, M.K.; White, D.L.; Singh, A.K.; Liu, H.; Tan, Z.; Peng, X.; Kim, W.K. Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotic Aspergillus niger on performance and cecal microbiota in hy-line W-36 laying hens. Animals 2022, 12, 2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Fattahi, A.H.; Jafaryan, H.; Khosravi, A.; Arpanahi, D.A. The probiotic effects of dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus niger on the growth and some immunity factors of cultured juvenile beluga sturgeon (Huso huso). ISFJ 2014, 23, 21–33. [Google Scholar]
  185. Frisvad, J.C.; Larsen, T.O.; Thrane, U.; Meijer, M.; Varga, J.; Samson, R.A.; Nielsen, K.F. Fumonisin and ochratoxin production in industrial Aspergillus niger strains. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Iwashita, M.K.P.; Nakandakare, I.B.; Terhune, J.S.; Wood, T.; Ranzani-Paiva, M.J.T. Dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae enhance immunity and disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila and Streptococcus iniae infection in juvenile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 43, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Dawood, M.A.; Eweedah, N.M.; Moustafa, E.M.; Shahin, M.G. Effects of feeding regimen of dietary Aspergillus oryzae on the growth performance, intestinal morphometry and blood profile of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquac. Nutr. 2019, 25, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Dawood, M.A.; Eweedah, N.M.; Khalafalla, M.M.; Khalid, A. Evaluation of fermented date palm seed meal with Aspergillus oryzae on the growth, digestion capacity and immune response of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquac. Nutr. 2020, 26, 828–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Hedayati, S.A. Growth performances and hemato-immunological responses of common carp (Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758) to fermented Aspergillus oryzae. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2020, 19, 1749–1756. [Google Scholar]
  190. Kurtböke, D.İ. Ecology and habitat distribution of actinobacteria. In Biology and Biotechnology of Actinobacteria; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 123–149. [Google Scholar]
  191. James, G.; Geetha, P.P.; Puthiyedathu, S.T.; Jayadradhan, R.K.V. Applications of Actinobacteria in aquaculture: Prospects and challenges. 3 Biotech 2023, 13, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Tarazona, U.; León, J.; Galindo, N.; Vallejo, M.; Marguet, E. Characterization of Actinomycetes of marine sediment and their antagonistic activity against Vibrio sp. isolated from “white leg shrimp” Litopenaeus vannamei (BOONE, 1931). Revista Investig. Vet. Peru. 2018, 29, 676–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Butt, U.D.; Khan, S.; Liu, K.; Sharma, A.; Zhang, K.; Wu, B. Present status, limitations, and prospects of using Streptomyces bacteria as a potential probiotic agent in aquaculture. Probiot. Antimicrob. Prot. 2023, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Balasubramanian, S.; Othman, E.M.; Kampik, D.; Stopper, H.; Hentschel, U.; Ziebuhr, W.; Oelschlaeger, T.A.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Marine sponge-derived Streptomyces sp. SBT343 extract inhibits Staphylococcal biofilm formation. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Chater, K.F.; Biro, S.; Lee, K.J.; Palmer, T.; Schrempf, H. The complex extracellular biology of Streptomyces. FEMS Microbiol.Rev. 2010, 34, 171–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Hernández-Saldaña, O.F.; Barboza-Corona, J.E.; Bideshi, D.K.; Casados-Vázquez, L.E. New bacteriocin-like substances produced by Streptomyces species with activity against pathogens. Folia Microbiol. 2020, 65, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Balagurunathan, R.; Radhakrishnan, M.; Shanmugasundaram, T.; Gopikrishnan, V.; Jerrine, J. Evaluation of Actinobacteria for aquaculture applications. In Protocols in Actinobacterial Research; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  198. Gozari, M.; Mortazavi, M.S.; Bahador, N.; Rabbaniha, M. Isolation and screening of antibacterial and enzyme producing marine actinobacteria to approach probiotics against some pathogenic vibrios in shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2016, 15, 630–644. [Google Scholar]
  199. Augustine, D.; Jacob, J.C.; Philip, R. Exclusion of Vibrio spp. by an antagonistic marine actinomycete Streptomyces rubrolavendulae M56. Aquacult. Res. 2016, 47, 2951–2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. García-Bernal, M.; Medina-Marrero, R.; Rodríguez-Jaramillo, C.; Campa-Córdova, Á.I.; Mazón-Suástegui, J.M. Probiotic effect of Streptomyces strains alone or in combination with Bacillus and Lactobacillus in juveniles of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquacult. Int. 2017, 25, 927–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Sheeja, M.S.; Selvakumar, D.; Dhevendaran, K. Antagonistic potential of Streptomyces associated with the gut of marine ornamental fishes. Middle East J. Sci. Res. 2011, 7, 327–334. [Google Scholar]
  202. Barakat, K.M.; Beltagy, E.A. Bioactive phthalate from marine Streptomyces ruber EKH2 against virulent fish pathogens. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2015, 41, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Subramanian, D.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, D.H.; Heo, M.S. Isolation, characterization, antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic effect of marine actinomycete, Streptomyces carpaticus MK-01, against fish pathogens. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2017, 60, e17160539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Yang, M.; Zhang, J.; Liang, Q.; Pan, G.; Zhao, J.; Cui, M.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, D. Antagonistic activity of marine Streptomyces sp. S073 on pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Fish Sci. 2019, 85, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Liang, Q.; Liu, G.; Guo, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Cui, M.; Zhao, X.; Xu, D. Application of potential probiotic strain Streptomyces sp. SH5 on anti-Aeromonas infection in zebrafish larvae. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 127, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Kurnianto, M.A.; Kusumaningrum, H.D.; Lioe, H.N. Characterization of Streptomyces isolates associated with estuarine fish Chanos chanos and profiling of their antibacterial metabolites-crude-extract. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 2020, 8851947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Kumaran, S.; Bharathi, S.; Uttra, V.; Thirunavukkarasu, R.; Nainangu, P.; Krishnan, V.G.; Renuga, P.S.; Wilson, A.; Balaraman, D. Bioactive metabolites produced from Streptomyces enissocaesilis SSASC10 against fish pathogens. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 101802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Das, S.; Mondal, K.; Sengupta, C. Evaluation of the probiotic potential of Streptomyces antibioticus and Bacillus cereus on growth performance of freshwater catfish Heteropneustes fossilis. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 20, 100752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Qi, Z.; Zhang, X.H.; Boon, N.; Bossier, P. Probiotics in aquaculture of China—Current state, problems and prospect. Aquaculture 2009, 290, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Sun, Y.Z.; Yang, H.L.; Ma, R.L.; Lin, W.Y. Probiotic applications of two dominant gut Bacillus strains with antagonistic activity improved the growth performance and immune responses of grouper Epinephelus coioides. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010, 29, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Rodiles, A.; Rawling, M.D.; Peggs, D.L.; do Vale Pereira, G.; Voller, S.; Yomla, R.; Standen, B.T.; Bowyer, P.; Merrifield, D.L. Probiotic applications for finfish aquaculture. In Probiotics and Prebiotics in Animal Health and Food Safety; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 197–217. [Google Scholar]
  212. Digutä, C.F.; Mihai, C.; Toma, R.C.; Cimpeanu, C.; Matei, F. In vitro assessment of yeast strains with probiotic attributes for aquaculture use. Foods 2022, 12, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Lin, H.L.; Shiu, Y.L.; Chiu, C.S.; Huang, S.L.; Liu, C.H. Screening probiotic candidates for a mixture of probiotics to enhance the growth performance, immunity, and disease resistance of Asian seabass, Lates calcarifer (Bloch), against Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017, 60, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Mohapatra, S.; Chakraborty, T.; Prusty, A.K.; Kumar, K.; Prasad, K.P.; Mohanta, K.N. Fenvalerate induced stress mitigation by dietary supplementation of multispecies probiotic mixture in a tropical freshwater fish, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2012, 104, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Cerezuela, R.; Guardiola, F.A.; González, P.; Meseguer, J.; Esteban, M.Á. Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis, Tetraselmis chuii, and Phaeodactylum tricornutum, singularly or in combination, on the immune response and disease resistance of sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 33, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Geng, X.; Dong, X.H.; Tan, B.P.; Yang, Q.H.; Chi, S.Y.; Liu, H.Y.; Liu, X.Q. Effects of dietary probiotic on the growth performance, non-specific immunity and disease resistance of cobia, Rachycentron canadum. Aquac. Nutr. 2012, 18, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Mukherjee, A.; Chandra, G.; Ghosh, K. Single or conjoint application of autochthonous Bacillus strains as potential probiotics: Effects on growth, feed utilization, immunity and disease resistance in Rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Aquaculture 2019, 512, 734302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Mohanty, S.N.; Swain, S.K.; Tripathi, S.D. Rearing of catla (Catla catla Ham.) spawn on formulated diets. J. Aquac. Trop. 1996, 11, 253–258. [Google Scholar]
  219. Bogut, L.; Milakovic, Z.; Bukvic, Z.; Brkic, S.; Zimmer, R. Influence of probiotics (Streptococcus faecium M74) on growth and content of intestinal micro flora in carp (Cyprinus carpio). Czech J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 43, 231–235. [Google Scholar]
  220. Choudhury, T.G.; Kamilya, D. Paraprobiotics: An aquaculture perspective. Rev. Aquac. 2019, 11, 1258–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Tran, N.T.; Yang, W.; Nguyen, X.T.; Zhang, M.; Ma, H.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chan, K.G.; Li, S. Application of heat-killed probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture 2022, 548, 737700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Chapman, C.M.C.; Gibson, G.R.; Rowland, I. In vitro evaluation of single-and multi-strain probiotics: Inter-species inhibition between probiotic strains, and inhibition of pathogens. Anaerobe 2012, 18, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Siddik, M.A.; Foysal, M.J.; Fotedar, R.; Francis, D.S.; Gupta, S.K. Probiotic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae coupled with Lactobacillus casei modulates physiological performance and promotes gut microbiota in juvenile barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Aquaculture 2022, 546, 737346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Dennis, E.U.; Uchenna, O.J. Use of probiotics as first feed of larval African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822). Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2016, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Liu, Z.; Qiuqian, L.; Yao, Z.; Wang, X.; Huang, L.; Zheng, J.; Wang, K.; Li, L.; Zhang, D. Effects of a commercial microbial agent on the bacterial communities in shrimp culture system. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Ma, Y.X.; Li, L.Y.; Bao, P.Y.; Li, M.; Chen, W.; Chang, Y.Q. Effects of combined dietary administration of Rhodotorula sp. H26 and Bacillus sp. BC26 on growth, immunity and intestinal microbiota in juvenile sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus. Aquac. Res. 2018, 49, 3792–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Machuca, C.; Méndez-Martínez, Y.; Reyes-Becerril, M.; Angulo, C. Yeast β-Glucans as Fish Immunomodulators: A Review. Animals 2022, 12, 2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Mahdy, M.A.; Jamal, M.T.; Al-Harb, M.; Al-Mur, B.A.; Haque, M.F. Use of yeasts in aquaculture nutrition and immunostimulation: A review. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Berdy, J. Bioactive microbial metabolites. J. Antibiot. 2005, 58, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Ghosh, T.; Beniwal, A.; Semwal, A.; Navani, N.K. Mechanistic insights into probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria associated with ethnic fermented dairy products. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Mukherjee, A.; Dutta, D.; Banerjee, S.; Ringø, E.; Breines, E.M.; Hareide, E.; Chandra, G.; Ghosh, K. Potential probiotics from Indian major carp, Cirrhinus mrigala. Characterization, pathogen inhibitory activity, partial characterization of bacteriocin and production of exoenzymes. Res. Vet. Sci. 2016, 108, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Ferrer, C.; Colom, F.; Frasés, S.; Mulet, E.; Abad, J.L.; Alió, J.L. Detection and identification of fungal pathogens by PCR and by ITS2 and 5.8 S ribosomal DNA typing in ocular infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 2873–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Thejaswini, S.; Jojy, S.; Vijayan, A.; Paul, A.M. Isolation of gut Actinobacteria from fishes. In Methods in Actinobacteriology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 61–73. [Google Scholar]
  234. Vignesh, A.; Ayswarya, S.; Gopikrishnan, V.; Radhakrishnan, M. Bioactive potential of Actinobacteria isolated from the gut of marine fishes. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 2019, 48, 1280–1285. [Google Scholar]
  235. Hariharan, S.; Dharmaraj, S. Selection of new probiotics: The case of Streptomyces. In Therapeutic, Probiotic, and Unconventional Foods; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 27–54. [Google Scholar]
  236. Verschuere, L.; Rombaut, G.; Sorgeloos, P.; Verstraete, W. Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 655–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Probiotic potential of the fungi and actinobacteria studied.
Figure 1. Probiotic potential of the fungi and actinobacteria studied.
Fishes 08 00575 g001
Figure 2. Proposed selection criteria of the probiotic fungi and actinobacteria.
Figure 2. Proposed selection criteria of the probiotic fungi and actinobacteria.
Fishes 08 00575 g002
Table 1. Effects of fungi (yeast and mold) and actinobacteria on growth performance and disease resistance in finfish.
Table 1. Effects of fungi (yeast and mold) and actinobacteria on growth performance and disease resistance in finfish.
SpeciesIsolated fromDoses and DurationFinfish Species InvestigatedParameters InvestigatedReferences
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain NCYC Sc 47 (Biosaf_ Sc 47)Commercial strain106 CFU g−1,
31 days
Rainbow trout, fry↑ brush border enzymes, gut microbiota (inclusive of probiont colonization)
→ enzymes like alkaline phosphatase (AP), γ-glutamyl-transpeptidase (GGT) and leucine-amino-peptidase N (LAP) activities
[27]
S. cerevisiaeNI1.0, 1.5 and 2.0%, 214 daysEgyptian African
catfish,
24.3 ± 1.4 g
↑ growth performance at 2% inclusion[28]
S. cerevisiaeCommercial strain1 g kg−1,
8 weeks
Nile tilapia,
0.66 g
↑ growth performance, microvilli length, hsp70 expression in intestine and head kidney, intestinal Lactococcus spp.
↓ gut alkaline phosphatase
[29]
S. cerevisiaeCommercial strain1 g kg−1,
8 weeks
Nile tilapia,
~9.8 g
↑ growth performance, microvilli length, hsp70 expression in intestine and head kidney and resistance towards A. hydrophila
Alleviates negative effects induced via crowding stress
↓ gut alkaline phosphatase
[30]
S. cerevisiaeCommercial strain donated by Jastbolaget AB, Sollentuna, Sweden~log 8 of yeast per g,
6 weeks
Rainbow trout,
~130 g
Yeast-fed fish revealed similar bacterial diversity and lower abundances of Leuconostocaceae and Photobacterium compared to fish-fed fish meal[31]
S. cerevisiaeCommercial strain250 g ton−1,
30 days
Nile tilapia,
50 ± 5 g
↑ growth performance, white blood cell counts and histopathology[32]
S. cerevisiaeCommercial strain4, 6 or 8 g kg−1,
30 days
Pirarucu,
9.8 ± 1.4 g
↑ growth performance
↓ cholesterol
[33]
S. cerevisiaeCommercial strain, Idun industry, Norway300 g kg−1,
21 days
Atlantic salmon, 114 g↑ nutrient digestibility and immune responses[34]
S. cerevisiaeNI0, 1, 2 or 4 g
kg−1,
90 days
Rohu,
5.69 ± 0.02 g
↑ growth performance, feed utilization and hematobiochemical indices
Variations in intestinal microbiota (total viable and LAB counts) and intestinal morphology
[35]
S. cerevisiaeNI0, 1, 2 (SC2) or 4 (SC4) g kg−1,
16 weeks
Sea bream,
31.23 ± 1.2 g
↑ growth performance parameters via SC2 and SC4 feeding and intestinal morphology
SC4 feeding boosted innate immune response
[36]
S. cerevisiae fermentation product (DVAQUA)Commercial fermentation product0.5 g kg−1,
16 weeks
Hybrid tilapia,
~47 g
↑ non-specific immunity and increased intestinal bacterial count and bacterial diversity[37]
Lyophilized whole yeast,
S. cerevisiae
Commercial strain1, 5 or 10 g kg−1,
4 weeks
Gilthead seabream,
166 ± 16 g
↑ phagocytic activity, respiratory burst activity, complement activity and myeloperoxidase activity[38]
S. cerevisiae, nucleotidesNI0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 g kg−1,
30 days
Nile tilapia,
42.9 ± 0.14 g
↑ blood proteins, leukocytes, antioxidant activity, non-specific immunity, cytokine gene expression and disease resistance against Aeromonas sobria[39]
S. cerevisiae, nucleotidesNI500 mg kg−1,
80 days
European sea bass,
14.33 ± 0.18 g
↑ growth performance, lipid efficiency and anti-inflammatory TGF-b
Promoted beneficial lactic acid bacteria Weissella and Leuconostoc
[40]
S. cerevisae-orginated free nucleotidesCommercial product170, 320 or 470 ppm,
60 days
Nile tilapia,
~7.8 g
↑ complement hemolytic activity
Serum lysozyme concentration, intestinal villi height and density and survival toward A. hydrophila via N470 feeding
→ growth performance
[41]
S. cerevisiae, hydrolysateCommercial hydrolysate (Sintun Aquatic Technology
Co., Ltd.)
0.1 and 0.2%,
8 weeks
Large mouth bass,
34 g
→ growth performance, hepatosomic index and organ coefficient
Modulation of gut microbiota
↓ Fusobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Tenericutes and Actinobacteria via 0.2% inclusion
[42]
Debaryomyces hansenii 97Fish intestine5 × 106 CFU mL−1, 3 daysZebrafish larvae↑ survival against Vibrio anguillarum and the modulation of gut microbiota and metabolic pathways[43]
D. hanseniiNI1.1% of D. hansenii (1.7 × 106 CFU),
70 days
Gilthead seabream↑ of somatic growth and improvement in feed conversion
Modulation of gut microbiota, characterized by reduction in abundances of several Proteobacteria, especially opportunistic bacteria
[44]
Geotrichum candidumFermented milk109 CFU L−1,
70 days
Rohu larvae↑ growth performance, protease, amylase and cellulase activities and survival after Staphylococcus aureus challenge[45]
Geotrichum candidum QAUGC01Commercial dairy product yogurt109 CFU g−1, un-encapsulated and encapsulated,
11 weeks
Rohu,
20 ± 2.34 g
↑ growth rate, protease, amylase, cellulase, RBCs, Hb, HCT, WBCs, MCHC, respiratory bursts and phagocytic activity, total protein, lysozyme and IgM
Upregulation of heat shock protein 70 gene in muscle, intestine and liver
↓ serum AST and ALT activities, total cholesterol and triglyceride
Encapsulated diet revealed best results
[46]
Local fermented milk product of curd109 CFU g−1,
90 days
Rohu fingerings ↑ growth performance, hematological profile and digestive enzymes
Modulated the gut microbiota
[47]
Grapes from Hubei Center for Industrial Culture Collection and ResearchC: 0, T1:106, T2:107, T3:108, T4:109, T5:1010, T6:1011 CFU kg−1,
60 days
Gibel carp↑ feed utilization; α-amylase activity immunity; expression of immune related genes; il-1β, tnf-α, hsp70 and tlr-2 in liver; and disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila
Modulation of the gut microbiota
[48]
Sporidiobolus pararoseusBy-product of the biodiesel production processT1 (control), T2 (5), T3 (10), and T4 (20) g kg−1,
90 days
Nile tilapia↑ growth performance (T3 and T4 diets). All treatments improved immune response and disease response against S. agalactiae. [49]
Cyberlindnera jadiniiNI10% inclusion,
42 days
Atlantic salmon,
136 ± 0.25g
↓ inflammation and enterocyte histology[50]
Torula yeast
(Cyberlindnera jadinii)
Commersial product, Arbiom Inc. (Durham, NC, USA)Inclusion level (0, 10 and 20%),
35 days
Atlantic salmon,
1.14 g
→ growth performance (20% inclusion)
Modulated the gut microbiota (decreasing Tepidmicrobium and Lactobacillus, but a slight increase in Weisella was noted with increasing torula levels)
[51]
Yarrowia lipolyticaFish intestine5 × 106 mL−1,
3 days
Zebrafish larvae↑ survival against V. anguillarum and the modulation of the gut microbiota and metabolic pathways[43]
Aspergillus oryzaeNo further information was given, Bio’c company, Uchida, Japan1 g kg−1,
60 days
Nile tilapia↑ growth performance, antioxidative enzymes, GPX and immunity
Modulation of hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cells, white blood cells, total protein, and digestive enzymes
[11]
Aspergillus nigerLaboratory strain, no further information was given0, 103, 106 CFU g−1, 60 daysCommon carp↑ Growth performance, protein efficiency ratio and lipid efficiency ratio, plasma levels of lysozyme and total immunoglobulin, red blood cell counts, haemoglobin concentrations, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume values and lymphocyte counts[12]
Streptomyces sp.CatlaintestineDose not given,
15 days
Swordtail,
0.4 g
↑ growth and food conversion [52]
Streptomyces sp. SedimentDose not specified,
15 days
Common platy,
0.4 g.
↑ food conversion rate, food conversion efficiency and growth [53]
Streptomyces chartreusisSoil ecosystemControl (0), 105 (S1), 106 (S2), and 107 (S3) CFU g−1,
2 months
Common carp,
~14 g
↑ growth performance parameters, regardless of inclusion levels
Different doses of S. chartreusis increased serum total Ig and lysozyme activity compared to those fed the control diet
→ serum antioxidant enzyme activity (CAT, SOD and GPx)
[54]
Streptomyces griseusField sitesExposed to 102–106 spores mL−1 for up to 96 h.Fish gill pathology, with bream and rainbow trout being more sensitive than carp, trench and roach Elicits pathological changes to the gills
These changes include hyperplasia, leading to the fusion of the secondary lamellae and loss of microridging on the filament epithelium of the primary lamellae
[55]
Anisomycin (Ani), a metabolite produced by Streptomyces griseolusNIDose NI,
7 days
Zebrafish,
3.20 ± 0.15 cm
Ani showed strong anti-SVCV activity in vivo, as indicated by inhibiting viral gene expression and the increased survival of zebrafish[56]
Streptomyces fradiae and Streptomyces sp. Marine sponges, Callyspongia diffusa, Mycale mytilorum, Tedaniaanhelans and Dysidea fragilisDose NI,
50 days
Swordtail,
~0.6 g
↑ growth [57]
NI—no information given. ↑—increase; → no effect; ↓—decrease. Rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri); catla (Catla catla); European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax); swordtail (Xiphophorus hellerii); common platy (Xiphophorus maculatus); hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus ♀ × O. aureus ♂); Egyptian African catfish (Clarias gariepinus); Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus); pirarucu (Arapaima gigas); Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata); zebrafish (Danio rerio).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghosh, K.; Harikrishnan, R.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Ringø, E. Fungi and Actinobacteria: Alternative Probiotics for Sustainable Aquaculture. Fishes 2023, 8, 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8120575

AMA Style

Ghosh K, Harikrishnan R, Mukhopadhyay A, Ringø E. Fungi and Actinobacteria: Alternative Probiotics for Sustainable Aquaculture. Fishes. 2023; 8(12):575. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8120575

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghosh, Koushik, Ramasamy Harikrishnan, Abhisek Mukhopadhyay, and Einar Ringø. 2023. "Fungi and Actinobacteria: Alternative Probiotics for Sustainable Aquaculture" Fishes 8, no. 12: 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8120575

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop