Nonleptonic Decays of Doubly Charmed Baryons

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper discusses Nonleptonic decays of doubly charmed baryons with very suitable tools and I think the author does a very good job to clarify delicate issues.

The subject is also very interesting and discussed  in the literature but it is rarely so thorough and clear

I reccomend for publication

Author Response

We appreciate the referee for the positive estimate of our paper.

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is a "lecture" which provides a very concise overview
on weak hadronic two-body decays of doubly charmed baryons.
In order to evaluate the hadronic matrix elements a specific model
("covariant constituent quark model") is used. Many technical details
are explained. The article satisfies the standards for publication, and
I have only minor comments.

Introduction, 3rd line: "if hadrons were composed of two of three quarks".
I know what the author means, but recommend to write more precisely e.g.
"if hadrons were composed of a quark-antiquark pair or three quarks (or three antiquarks)".

Introduction, 3rd paragraph: "masses of of" ---> "masses of"

If the type-setting was done in latex, then in the last sentence
of Sec.4 I would recommend to replace <Q_i(\mu)> by
\langle Q_i(\mu) \rangle

Author Response

The first suggestion:

Introduction, 3rd line: "if hadrons were composed of two of three quarks".
I know what the author means, but recommend to write more precisely e.g.
"if hadrons were composed of a quark-antiquark pair or three quarks (or three antiquarks)".

Done.

The second remark:

Introduction, 3rd paragraph: "masses of of" ---> "masses of"

Done.

The third remark:

If the type-setting was done in latex, then in the last sentence
of Sec.4 I would recommend to replace <Q_i(\mu)> by
\langle Q_i(\mu) \rangle

Done