Next Article in Journal
The Fellini Museum of Rimini in Italy and the Genetic Algorithms-Based Method to Optimize the Design of an Integrated System Network and Installations
Next Article in Special Issue
To Replicate, or Not to Replicate? The Creation, Use, and Dissemination of 3D Models of Human Remains: A Case Study from Portugal
Previous Article in Journal
The Pigments of the Painter Fleury Richard (1777–1852), a Model for Multidisciplinary Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Integrated Study of the Mesolithic Skeleton in Theopetra Cave, Greece: From the Skeleton Analysis to 3D Face Reconstruction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

3D Reconstruction & Modeling of the Traditional Greek Trechadiri: “Aghia Varvara”

by
Andreas Arapakopoulos
1,*,
Orestis Liaskos
2,
Sofia Mitsigkola
2,
Georgios Papatzanakis
2,
Sofia Peppa
1,
Georgios Remoundos
3,
Alexandros Ginnis
2,
Christos Papadopoulos
2,
Dimitrios Mazis
4,
Odysseas Tsilikidis
4 and
Yannis Yighourtakis
2
1
Department of Naval Architecture, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece
2
School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682 Athens, Greece
3
Department of Shipping, Trade and Transport, School of Business, University of the Aegean, 82132 Chios, Greece
4
Green Maritime Technology Group, 16562 Glyfada, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Heritage 2022, 5(2), 1295-1309; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5020067
Submission received: 5 May 2022 / Revised: 12 June 2022 / Accepted: 13 June 2022 / Published: 16 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Modeling for Cultural Heritage and Applications)

Abstract

:
3D modeling techniques have grown increasingly prevalent in a variety of disciplines, including cultural heritage and ship design. The methodology used in the 3D reconstruction of a traditional Greek boat with the Trechadiri hull type named “Aghia Varvara” is presented in this study. The original boat was built in 1925 and is characterized as a modern cultural heritage monument by the Greek Ministry of Culture. The digital reconstruction of the boat is explained in detail, including 3D laser scanning and computer aided geometric design (CAGD), as well as the description of the 3D printing process. The boat’s 3D digital model has been used for the enrichment of the NAVS Project’s digital library, demonstrating the unique geometrical, typological, and cultural characteristics of Greek traditional shipbuilding, a living craft which listed on Greece’s National Inventory of Intangible Cultural Heritage.

1. Introduction

1.1. Related Works

3D modeling and reconstruction of cultural artifacts is becoming increasingly popular, supporting, amongst others, the preservation and promotion of cultural heritage (CH) [1,2,3]. The use of advanced 3D technologies provides the means of preserving items of cultural heritage [4]. Currently, 3D modelling, 3D visualization, virtual reality, and augmented reality are the most commonly used methods for documenting, recovering and presenting cultural heritage artifacts [5]. The results of 3D modeling can be used to assist and fulfill research efforts on cultural heritage [6].
As far as maritime cultural heritage is concerned, 3D modeling of historical and traditional vessels may be used as an effective and innovative means of depicting and highlighting maritime history [7,8,9] and traditional shipbuilding [10].
Different techniques have been employed to carry out the digital documentation of ships, but there is no standard [11]. Many research studies used laser scanning to document traditional ships, including those of [12,13,14].
Cultural institutions and museums use new media to engage with new audiences and provide new ways to impart historical facts, expanding the reach of knowledge to visitors [15,16,17]. Furthermore, 3D printing technology can be used to recreate and preserve historical and traditional artifacts [18,19,20].

1.2. Greek Traditional Shipbuilding & Trechadiri

Wooden shipbuilding (or traditional shipbuilding) is the handcrafted construction of a vessel using natural wood [21] involving the vessel’s conception, design, construction, equipment, and ornamentation, as well as the associated cultural activities, social practices and values [22,23,24]. In 2013, the National Inventory of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Greece added wooden shipbuilding (or traditional shipbuilding) to its list of intangible cultural heritage [25].
Trechadiri is one of the most known traditional Greek vessels. The first evidence of Trechadiri boat building is from the mid-seventeenth century. Trechadiri was first constructed in 1658 on the Greek island of Hydra. This boat type was common in the 19th century [26] in the islands of the Argosaronic Gulf. Hydra and Spetses were the islands where the majority of the Trechadiri crafts were erected in the 18th and 19th centuries. Boats with a Trechadiri hull type were built in nearly every small shipyard of the Aegean Sea in the beginning of the twentieth century. Most Trechadiri hull boats today have an overall length of 8 to 20 m and a carrying capacity of 4 to 50 tons. The concave curving shape of the stem post is the most distinguishing feature of the hull of a Trechadiri. Another characteristic feature is that the stern post is raked aft and is practically straight. Older drawings, on the other hand, depict the stern post as having a gentle curve. A smooth curve of the hull at the bilge level characterizes the middle section of a Trechadiri. The two upper sides of this section are shaped on a bow and buttock plan with an angle of around 15 degrees [22,23,24].

1.3. “Aghia Varvara”

“Aghia Varvara” is a former fishing boat which was declassified and withdrawn about 20 years ago, turning into a museum exhibit, within the framework of the Community legislation for the reduction of overfishing [27]. The boat has a corresponding certificate from the Ministry of Rural Development [28] and is owned by the Municipality of Perama (hosted by Maritime Tradition Museum [29] since 2011). The general characteristics of this boat are the following:
  • Type: Trechadiri,
  • Place of Construction: Perama, Greece,
  • Year of Construction: 1925
  • Length Overall: 10.60 m, Beam: 4.55 m
In Figure 1, a perspective view of the Trechadiri “Aghia Varvara” in its present state is illustrated. Figure 2 also depicts the boat’s deck as well as its appendages (propeller and rudder). A close examination of the hull reveals multiple cracks in the deck timber and the boat’s stern.
The internal structure of the hull where the frames and longitudinal strengthening components are shown in Figure 3. Many unnecessary objects are observed, which are not generated during the reconstruction process.

1.4. Objectives

This paper presents the implementation of consolidated methods and procedures for 3D recreation of the hull of a traditional boat. The actions, decisions, and methodology of the reconstruction process are all described and analyzed in detail. The reconstruction of “Aghia Varvara” aims toward the creation of a digital model and a printed model under scale. The models are created to show the boat in its original shape, ignoring any existing damage, and providing as much comprehensive and precise design information as possible to highlight the unique hull type and retain traditional shipbuilding’s cultural features. This is significant since traditional shipbuilding is not documented, as ships were ‘built by eye’ using ‘rules-of-thumb’ [30], and most hulls are only partially preserved, lacking major structural elements, as a result of deformation processes.
The research’s main goals and objectives are as follows:
  • to analyze and present the digital model reconstruction techniques using 3D technology: 3D laser scanning and editing of point clouds, Rhino3D Design, texturing, and 3D printing
  • to contribute to culture preservation by recreating a digital model of a Trechadiri type boat with as much detailed and precise design information as feasible.
The results of this research may be useful to researchers in cases of developing digital databases for determining traditional hull types and improving 3D modeling to be utilized in digital libraries and virtual museums.

2. 3D Reconstruction Process

2.1. 3D Laser Scanning

3D laser scanning is a non-contact, non-destructive technology that digitally captures the shape of physical objects using a line of laser light. 3D laser scanners create “point clouds” [31] of data from the surface of an object. In other words, 3D laser scanning is a way to capture a physical object’s exact size and shape into the computer world as a digital 3D representation.
A state-of-the-art 3D laser scanner has been used by the G.M.T Group [32] engineers during the present onboard survey. The 3D laser scanner (Faro Focus S70, Lake Mary, FL, USA) [33] is shown on the left of Figure 4, spherical targets are used to register the spot scans, and are shown on the middle of Figure 4. Further, checkerboard targets (shown on the right of Figure 4) are also used as additional targets, mainly for plane surfaces, to ensure the overall accuracy of the registration process.
The 3D laser scan procedure was carried out as part of the NAVS project on the grounds of the Maritime Tradition Museum [29] under the consent and kind support of its administration. Vibration and noise issues have not influenced the scanned data. Other barriers in the area, such as the boat’s supports in Figure 5, could have altered the scanned data. However, the point cloud of “Aghia Varvara” has millimeter-level accuracy.
Upon 3D scan survey completion [34], Autodesk ReCap [35] was used in order to process data and produce the final registration files in which all scanned areas are depicted in a point cloud format for further use and post-processing. In Figure 5, a representative point cloud produced is presented in Autodesk ReCap concerning the areas of interest of the particular vessel.
The bubbles, which are depicted in Figure 5, correspond to the spots in which a scan has been done. The total number of scan positions is 26.
In the next step, the unnecessary objects from the surrounding area around the boat are erased (Figure 6) and a .e57 [36] file is exported from Autodesk ReCap and imported to Rhino3D [24], as also shown in Figure 6.

2.2. Design in Rhino3D

The design in Rhino3D [37] initiates by processing the imported point cloud (Figure 6). The outcome of this process is red interpolation curves, which are shown at the top of Figure 7. Afterwards, green smooth NURBS [38,39] curves are generated from the red ones to represent the ship sections. These are the control curves of the outer hull surface, which is depicted at the bottom of Figure 7. Following the information of the point cloud and the hull surface a solid (closed polysurface) is generated together with proper openings, as seen at the bottom of Figure 7.
In addition, Figure 7 (bottom) shows a visual surface analysis using the Rhino3d Zebra command [40] to highlight the smoothness and continuity of the entire closed polysurface. The hull surface indicates G2 (position + tangency + curvature) continuity on the entire surface. At the connection between the hull surface and the adjacent surfaces G0 (position) continuity is indicated.
Based on the aforementioned visual surface, the transverse stiffeners were designed, as depicted in green and red color. The differentiation on the color indicates the existence of two different wooden strips. The red ones are longer and visible above the deck. Both red and green stiffeners end on the keel with blue color, as shown in Figure 8, and they correspond to the pair of sections at the top of Figure 3.
In Figure 9 the cyan colored wooden strips are depicted. These strips support the entire deck and connect the transverse stiffeners for extra durability. The vertical stiffeners were also colored cyan. The purple and the gold wooden strips support the transverse stiffeners. The colors’ variation represents the different kind of stiffeners supporting the boat’s structure.
The final model together with the rudder, the propeller and the deck parts designed in Rhino3D is appeared in Figure 10. Due to lack of information about the model of the propeller, a Wageningen B3-60 [41] was chosen (as a conventional approach to the unknown original one) and it was designed by the parametric modeler presented on [42].
Figure 11 shows the small deviation between the 3D model and the point cloud. A visual comparison can also be done between the original boat (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3) and the 3D model (Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10).
Figure 12 is a rendering of the boat without its hull, to further illustrate the complexity of its stiffener arrangement.
Once the solid is completed, it needs to be retopologized [43]. Rhino3D offers a built-in tool for such purpose, QuadRemesh [44], which produces a mesh that is useful in the following step (texturing) since the generated topology is rather simple, as shown in Figure 13.

2.3. Texturing

After “Aghia Varvara” was retopologized (Figure 13) and UV unwrapped using Blender [45], detailed maps were created with the use of Adobe Substance 3D Painter [46]. The process followed for this is similar to the one followed for “The Ships of Navarino”, although “Aghia Varvara” is much less demanding in materials, and due to the fact that this is not a Virtual Reality project reducing the texture quality is not deemed necessary [47]. Reference pictures taken from the existing boat were used in the creation of texture maps (Figure 14). A matter of historical significance is the positioning of the waterline that needs to be hand painted in order to reassure resemblance to the actual boat.

3. 3D Rendering & 3D Printing

After the 3D textured model has been generated, the Cycles [48] render engine of Blender was used to apply the 3D rendering process. 3D rendering is a computer graphics technique that converts a digital three-dimensional scene into a two-dimensional image. The developed photorealistic images of “Aghia Varvara” with proper lightning are shown in Figure 15 and Figure 16.
In particular, Figure 15 depicts two perspective views of the final rendered model in Blender, while Figure 16 depicts the inner area of the boat, illustrating the completed 3D model. Once again, a visual comparison between the rendered model and the real boat is provided (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Furthermore, the ship model was printed on an SLA [49] 3D printer named iSLA300 [50]. Generally, the printing process in the case of “Aghia Varvara” is similar with the one followed for “The Ships of Navarino” [47], since the same printer was used in both cases.
There is a slight increment on the scaling ratio (1:25) of the printed model compared to the one used for printing the models of “The Ships of Navarino” (1:125), due to the fact that there is a rather large difference between the overall length of the respective ships.
Due to the printing volume constraints of the specific printer (300 mm × 300 mm × 300 mm), the hull was printed into parts in order to generate the model as large as feasible, while part of the hull was omitted, as illustrated in Figure 17 and Figure 18, facilitating, in that way, the visibility for the visitors of the exhibition.
During the printing process supports on the printed parts were generated for better stability, as shown in Figure 17 and later they were removed (Figure 18).
In addition, the printed parts were brushed and rinsed in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and afterwards they were placed in a UV Curing Chamber [51] to improve their hardness and stability. The SLA parts were painted and then assembled by an artist, as shown in Figure 19.

4. Discussion

This paper describes how the 3D laser scanning, CAD, texturing, and 3D printing may be combined to recreate a historical and traditional boat, such as the Trechadiri “Aghia Varvara”. The entire 3D reconstruction process was presented in detail. In addition, an accurate digital model of the “Aghia Varvara” with 3D geometry was created and a physical model of the boat was produced using a 3D printer.
This work was carried out as part of the NAVS Project and the 3D geometric of “Aghia Varvara” vessel was used for the development of the digital database of geometric ship models for the NAVS Project accompanied by digital documentation (3D designs, point clouds), photographs, and historical information [52]. One of the project’s goals was to digitally capture designs of traditional boat hull types, such as the Trechadiri hull type, contributing toward the preservation of Greek wooden shipbuilding heritage. Also, the 3D-printed model of “Aghia Varvara” was painted in the original boat’s colors in order to be presented in an exhibition titled “The NAVS Project: a novel way to study and preserve traditional shipbuilding heritage” hosted at the Eugenides Foundation in Athens, Greece.
Furthermore, keeping in mind that virtual and augmented reality may provide a more immersive experience, digital ship models generated according to the presented process, such as the one of “Aghia Varvara”, might be used in the development of a virtual museum in which visitors have the opportunity to explore the distinctive geometry of the hull types of the traditional Greek boats, online, via a WebGl application [53].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.L., S.M., A.A., A.G., C.P. and S.P.; Data curation, O.L., S.M., A.A., A.G., C.P. and S.P.; Funding acquisition, A.G., C.P. and G.R.; Investigation, O.L., S.M., A.A., S.P. and G.R.; Methodology, O.L., S.M., G.P. and S.P.; Project administration, O.L., A.A., A.G. and C.P.; Resources, O.L., S.M., A.A., G.P., A.G. and C.P.; Software, O.L., G.P., A.G., D.M. and O.T.; Supervision, O.L., G.R. and S.P.; Validation, S.M. and G.P.; Visualization, O.L., S.M., A.A., G.P. and Y.Y.; Writing—original draft, O.L., S.M., A.A., S.P. and G.R.; Writing—review & editing, O.L., S.M., A.A., G.P., A.G., C.P., S.P., G.R., D.M., O.T. and Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The NAVS Project—promotion, documentation, and technical support of “The Greek shipbuilding legacy—the Battles of Navarino and Salamis” launched in June 2020, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH–CREATE–INNOVATE (project code: T1EDK-05103).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all those who participated in the project. In particular, Green Maritime Technology (GMT) who contributed to the 3D laser scanning of the ship model. Additionally, the team would like to thank E. Nomikou and C. Troumpetari from the Eugenides Foundation for commenting on drafts of this paper, as well as associate researcher A. Pagonas for his support on the 3D reconstruction & modeling of “Aghia Varvara”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kadi, H.; Anouche, K. Knowledge-based parametric modeling for heritage interpretation and 3D reconstruction. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 2020, 19, e00160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Papagrigorakis, M.J.; Maravelakis, E.; Kyparissi-Apostolika, N.; Stravopodi, E.; Konstantaras, A.; Apostolikas, O.; Toulas, P.; Potagas, C.; Papapolychroniou, T.; Mastoris, M.; et al. An Integrated Study of the Mesolithic Skeleton in Theopetra Cave, Greece: From the Skeleton Analysis to 3D Face Reconstruction. Heritage 2022, 5, 881–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hernández-Muñoz, Ó.; Gabrielli, D.A.; Palacín, A.M.; Moga, E.S.; Sánchez-Ortiz, A. 3D Digital Technologies for the Elaboration of a Replica of a Dermatological Didactic Model Belonging to the Olavide Museum from the Original Mould. Heritage 2022, 5, 702–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anderson, E.F.; McLoughlin, L.; Liarokapis, F.; Peters, C.; Petridis, P.; De Freitas, S. Developing serious games for cultural heritage: A state-of-the-art review. Virtual Real. 2010, 14, 255–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Skublewska-Paszkowska, M.; Milosz, M.; Powroznik, P.; Lukasik, E. 3D technologies for intangible cultural heritage preservation—Literature review for selected databases. Herit. Sci. 2022, 10, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Remondino, F.; Girardi, S.; Rizzi, A.; Gonzo, L. 3D modeling of complex and detailed cultural heritage using multi-resolution data. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 2009, 2, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Galili, E.; Rosen, B. Preserving the maritime cultural heritage of the Mediterranean, a cradle of cultures, religions and civilizations—The holy land perspective. J. Coast. Conserv. 2010, 14, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Andreou, G.M.; Fradley, M.; Blue, L.; Breen, C. Establishing a baseline for the study of maritime cultural heritage in the Gaza Strip. Palest. Explor. Q. 2022, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bruno, F.; Lagudi, A.; Ritacco, G.; Agrafiotis, P.; Skarlatos, D.; Cejka, J.; Kouril, P.; Liarokapis, F.; Philpin-Briscoe, O.; Poullis, C.; et al. Development and Integration of Digital Technologies Addressed to Raise Awareness and Access to European Underwater Cultural Heritage. An Overview of the H2020 i-MARECULTURE Project. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2017, Aberdeen, UK, 19–22 June 2017; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  10. Menna, F.; Nocerino, E.; Scamardella, A. Reverse Engineering and 3D Modelling for Digital Documentation of Maritime Heritage. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2011, XXXVIII-5/W16, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Colson, A. Digital Documentation of Ships in Cultural Heritage: A European Review. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2017, XLII-2/W5, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cooper, J.P.; Wetherelt, A.; Zazzaro, C.; Eyre, M. From Boatyard to Museum: 3D laser scanning and digital modelling of the Qatar Museums watercraft collection, Doha, Qatar. Int. J. Naut. Archaeol. 2018, 47, 419–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Tanner, P. 3D laser scanning for the digital reconstruction and analysis of a 16th century clinker built sailing vessel. In ACUA Underwater Archaeology Proceedings; Advisory Council on Underwater Archaeology: Pensacola, FL, USA, 2013; pp. 137–149. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/4948046/3D_Laser_Scanning_for_the_Digital_Reconstruction_and_Analysis_of_a_16th_century_Clinker_Built_Sailing_Vessel (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  14. Afshar, R.; Alavyoon, N.; Ahlgren, A.; Gamstedt, E. Full scale finite element modelling and analysis of the 17th-century warship Vasa: A methodological approach and preliminary results. Eng. Struct. 2021, 231, 111765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Morlando, G.; Lamera, L.; Guidi, G. Temporary made permanent: Turning temporary exhibitions into fixed memories. In Proceedings of the 2012 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, Milan, Italy, 2–5 September 2012; pp. 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liritzis, I.; Volonakis, P.; Vosinakis, S. 3D Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage Sites as an Educational Approach. The Sanctuary of Delphi. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ringas, C.; Tasiopoulou, E.; Kaplanidi, D.; Partarakis, N.; Zabulis, X.; Zidianakis, E.; Patakos, A.; Patsiouras, N.; Karuzaki, E.; Foukarakis, M.; et al. Traditional Craft Training and Demonstration in Museums. Heritage 2022, 5, 431–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, J.; Ding, L.; Love, P. Digital reproduction of historical building ornamental components: From 3D scanning to 3D printing. Autom. Constr. 2017, 76, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zabulis, X.; Partarakis, N.; Meghini, C.; Dubois, A.; Manitsaris, S.; Hauser, H.; Thalmann, N.M.; Ringas, C.; Panesse, L.; Cadi, N.; et al. A Representation Protocol for Traditional Crafts. Heritage 2022, 5, 716–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grieco, G.; Fix, P.; Kennedy, C.; Herbst, J.; Shultz, L.; Borrero, R.; Dostal, C. Integrating digital and conventional recording techniques for the documentation and reconstruction of an 18th-Century wooden ship from Alexandria, VA. Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Herit. 2020, 16, e00136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fragassa, C. Industrialising a Wooden Boat; NAUTECH: Auckland, New Zealand, 2015; Available online: https://www.academia.edu/25809719/Industrialising_a_Wooden_Boat (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  22. Damianidis, K. Vernacular Boats and Boatbuilding in Greece. Ph.D. Thesis, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK, 1991. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/7116 (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  23. Damianidis, K.; Zivas, A. Trehadiri Boat: An Example of The Greek Shipbuilding Tradition; HOMMEH Publications: Athens, Greece, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  24. Damianidis, K. Greek Traditional Boatbuiding; Cultural Technological Institution ETBA Publications: Athens, Greece, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  25. Intangible Cultural Heritage of Greece: The Craft of Wooden Shipbuilding. Available online: https://ayla.culture.gr/en/xilonaupigiki_wooden_shipbuilding/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  26. Delis, A. Mediterranean Wooden Shipbuilding in the nineteenth century: Production, Productivity and Ship Types in Comparative Perspective. Cah. Méditerranée 2012, 84, 349–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. European Parliament. Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No. 2328/2003, (EC) No. 861/2006, (EC) No. 1198/2006 and (EC) No. 791/2007 and Regulation (EU) No. 1255/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council; Article 34; European Parliament: Strasbourg, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hellenic Republic: Ministry of Rural Development and Food. Available online: http://www.minagric.gr/index.php/en/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  29. Maritime Tradition Museum. Available online: https://www.maritime-museum.gr/index.php (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  30. Indruszewski, G.; Farin, G.; Razdan, A.; Simon, A.; Van Alfen, D.; Rowe, J. Application of 3D Modeling in Ship Reconstruction and Analysis: Tools and Techniques. 2004. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/3270023/APPLICATION_OF_3D_MODELING_IN_SHIP_RECONSTRUCTION_AND_ANALYSIS_TOOLS_AND_TECHNIQUES (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  31. What Are Points Clouds? Available online: https://tech27.com/resources/point-clouds/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  32. Green Maritime Technology—GMT. Available online: https://gmtech.gr/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  33. FARO Focus Premium. Available online: https://www.faro.com/en/Products/Hardware/Focus-Laser-Scanners/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  34. Digital Capture of a Traditional Boat Maria Pagida. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHWqGUwXgiE (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  35. What Is Autodesk Recap? Available online: https://www.chetu.com/blogs/construction/what-is-autodesk-recap-digital-simulation-for-business.php (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  36. Software Tools for Managing E57 Files. Available online: http://www.libe57.org/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  37. Rhinoceros [Computer Software]. 2021. Available online: https://www.rhino3d.com (accessed on 8 December 2021).
  38. Piegi, L.; Tiller, W. The NURBS Book; Springer Publications: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. What Are NURBS? Available online: https://www.rhino3d.com/features/nurbs/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  40. Zebra|Rhino3D—Modeling. Available online: https://docs.mcneel.com/rhino/6/help/en-us/commands/zebra.htm (accessed on 4 May 2022).
  41. Van Lammeren, W.P.A.; Van Manen, J.D.; Oosterveld, M.W.C. The Wageningen B-Screw Series; The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Washington, DC, USA, 1969; Volume 77, 43p, Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view/354 (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  42. Arapakopoulos, A.; Polichshuk, R.; Segizbayev, Z.; Ospanov, S.; Ginnis, A.; Kostas, K. Parametric models for marine propellers. Ocean Eng. 2019, 192, 106595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Retopology. Available online: http://people.wku.edu/joon.sung/edu/anim/3d/modeling/retopology/retopology.html (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  44. Rhinoceros Help—QuadRemesh. Available online: https://docs.mcneel.com/rhino/7/help/en-us/index.htm#commands/quadremesh.htm (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  45. Blender. Available online: http://www.blender.org (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  46. Adobe Substance 3D Painter. Available online: https://www.adobe.com/products/substance3d-painter.html (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  47. Liaskos, O.; Mitsigkola, S.; Arapakopoulos, A.; Papatzanakis, G.; Ginnis, A.; Papadopoulos, C.; Peppa, S.; Remoundos, G. Development of the Virtual Reality Application: “The Ships of Navarino”. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cycles Open Source Production Rendering. Available online: https://www.cycles-renderer.org/about/ (accessed on 4 May 2022).
  49. Stereolithography/SLA 3D Printing—Simply Explained|All3DP. Available online: https://all3dp.com/2/stereolithography-3d-printing-simply-explained/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  50. ZRapid Tech-Innovator of 3D Printing Technologies. Available online: http://www.zero-tek.com/en/sla300.html (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  51. Zguris, Z. How Mechanical Properties of Stereolithography 3D Prints Are Affected by UV Curing. Available online: https://formlabs.com/ (accessed on 15 March 2022).
  52. E-Navs.eu: Digital Repository. Available online: https://e-navs.eu/repository-2/?lang=en (accessed on 4 May 2022).
  53. WebGL: 2D and 3D Graphics for the Web. Available online: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WebGL_API (accessed on 4 May 2022).
Figure 1. The Greek Trechadiri “Aghia Varvara” (perspective view).
Figure 1. The Greek Trechadiri “Aghia Varvara” (perspective view).
Heritage 05 00067 g001
Figure 2. Deck of the “Agia Varvara” (left/middle photos); stern side with propeller and rudder (right photo).
Figure 2. Deck of the “Agia Varvara” (left/middle photos); stern side with propeller and rudder (right photo).
Heritage 05 00067 g002
Figure 3. Internal structure of the hull: frame sections and longitudinal strengthening components (right, left photos).
Figure 3. Internal structure of the hull: frame sections and longitudinal strengthening components (right, left photos).
Heritage 05 00067 g003
Figure 4. Left—FARO Laser scanner Focus 3D; Middle—Sphere targets; Right—Checkboard target.
Figure 4. Left—FARO Laser scanner Focus 3D; Middle—Sphere targets; Right—Checkboard target.
Heritage 05 00067 g004
Figure 5. Scanned boat-model in Autodesk ReCap.
Figure 5. Scanned boat-model in Autodesk ReCap.
Heritage 05 00067 g005
Figure 6. Point cloud from the laser scanner show the image of the Trechadiri: Four views of the boat imported in Rhino3D.
Figure 6. Point cloud from the laser scanner show the image of the Trechadiri: Four views of the boat imported in Rhino3D.
Heritage 05 00067 g006
Figure 7. Hull design in Rhino3D: ship sections (top); hull surfaces & solid (bottom).
Figure 7. Hull design in Rhino3D: ship sections (top); hull surfaces & solid (bottom).
Heritage 05 00067 g007
Figure 8. Pair of structural sections.
Figure 8. Pair of structural sections.
Heritage 05 00067 g008
Figure 9. Hull design in Rhino3D: skeleton (top); details of inner area (bottom).
Figure 9. Hull design in Rhino3D: skeleton (top); details of inner area (bottom).
Heritage 05 00067 g009
Figure 10. 3D model of “Aghia Varvara”.
Figure 10. 3D model of “Aghia Varvara”.
Heritage 05 00067 g010
Figure 11. Comparison between 3D model and point cloud.
Figure 11. Comparison between 3D model and point cloud.
Heritage 05 00067 g011
Figure 12. Rendering of the “Aghia Varvara” without its hull.
Figure 12. Rendering of the “Aghia Varvara” without its hull.
Heritage 05 00067 g012
Figure 13. 3D model before QuadRemesh (Top); 3D model after QuadRemesh (Bottom).
Figure 13. 3D model before QuadRemesh (Top); 3D model after QuadRemesh (Bottom).
Heritage 05 00067 g013
Figure 14. “Aghia Varvara” 3D model: UV Layout (left); Model View in Blender (right).
Figure 14. “Aghia Varvara” 3D model: UV Layout (left); Model View in Blender (right).
Heritage 05 00067 g014
Figure 15. Two views of the rendered model of “Aghia Varvara” in Blender.
Figure 15. Two views of the rendered model of “Aghia Varvara” in Blender.
Heritage 05 00067 g015
Figure 16. Rendered details of inner area in Blender.
Figure 16. Rendered details of inner area in Blender.
Heritage 05 00067 g016
Figure 17. Hull parts during the printing process: bow (left); stern (middle); deck parts (right).
Figure 17. Hull parts during the printing process: bow (left); stern (middle); deck parts (right).
Heritage 05 00067 g017
Figure 18. Finished products after alcohol rinse and UV cure.
Figure 18. Finished products after alcohol rinse and UV cure.
Heritage 05 00067 g018
Figure 19. 3D printed model of “Aghia Varvara” after the painting process.
Figure 19. 3D printed model of “Aghia Varvara” after the painting process.
Heritage 05 00067 g019
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arapakopoulos, A.; Liaskos, O.; Mitsigkola, S.; Papatzanakis, G.; Peppa, S.; Remoundos, G.; Ginnis, A.; Papadopoulos, C.; Mazis, D.; Tsilikidis, O.; et al. 3D Reconstruction & Modeling of the Traditional Greek Trechadiri: “Aghia Varvara”. Heritage 2022, 5, 1295-1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5020067

AMA Style

Arapakopoulos A, Liaskos O, Mitsigkola S, Papatzanakis G, Peppa S, Remoundos G, Ginnis A, Papadopoulos C, Mazis D, Tsilikidis O, et al. 3D Reconstruction & Modeling of the Traditional Greek Trechadiri: “Aghia Varvara”. Heritage. 2022; 5(2):1295-1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5020067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arapakopoulos, Andreas, Orestis Liaskos, Sofia Mitsigkola, Georgios Papatzanakis, Sofia Peppa, Georgios Remoundos, Alexandros Ginnis, Christos Papadopoulos, Dimitrios Mazis, Odysseas Tsilikidis, and et al. 2022. "3D Reconstruction & Modeling of the Traditional Greek Trechadiri: “Aghia Varvara”" Heritage 5, no. 2: 1295-1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5020067

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop