1. Introduction
The study of periodic potentials is highly important in condensed matter physics. Band structure engineering has its basis in Bloch’s theorem [
1] and represents a daily quantum mechanical problem, which can be solved by two known methods [
2]: the transfer matrix method, which is valid for all types of periodic potentials, and the variational method, in which weak potentials allow for the approximation of potentials of different corresponding geometries [
3,
4,
5,
6].
The solutions of periodic potentials have been worked out by many authors, but without using Bloch’s theorem [
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14]. The Kronig–Penney model is one of the periodic potentials that has received the most attention because it provides a solution to the Schrödinger equation (SE) that is independent of time and represented by a set of wave plane functions. It is possible to solve the SE by using its transcendental energy equation [
4,
15]. This example is the most known for explaining energy bands and is the easiest for calculating the limits that approach the Dirac delta potential [
5]. This calculation can be performed for a periodic potential with a finite or infinite range of intensities, both positively and negatively [
16,
17]. Nevertheless, only positive intensity cases are considered in this study.
In addition, among the potential wells, the most known one is the rectangular well followed by the triangular well. The solution functions of this potential have been previously evaluated [
18]. This potential is applied in uniform fields such as the gravitational field in neutrons [
19,
20], the triangular potential plus the infinite potential barrier to find the transmission and reflection coefficients, and the electrical conduction through thin polyvinyl butyral (PVB) films. PVB is a polymer that is used in the manufacture of laminated glass [
20,
21,
22]. Previous studies of the periodic triangular potential have resolved problems of this kind, but without connecting the matching null potential [
3,
4].
The aim of this study is to obtain analytical equations for the transcendental equation of energy and the corresponding group speed and effective mass for the studied one-dimensional potential wells, which have a solution to the SE. To do that, we generalize the results of the Kronig–Penney potential with respect to the band theory to various one-dimensional potentials [
5,
15]. Here, we propose a general solution for a group of one-dimensional potential wells that, upon approximation, tends to a Dirac delta potential of positive intensity [
17,
23,
24]. From this general equation, the transcendental energy equation is solved by a detailed mathematical demonstration; the group speed and the corresponding effective mass are calculated as a function of the wave number, representing solutions to the SE for a potential of
[
24,
25]. To verify the results, the approximation is carried out when the barriers are infinitely large and thin, that is the width,
b, of the potential tends to zero and the hieght,
w, of the potential tends to infinity [
17,
23,
24].
2. Theoretical Model and Simulation Details
To find the general solution of an even function whose periodic potential is of the form
, first, the global minima must be satisfied, which are located at the edges of the interval
, with the global maxima located at
:
where
w is the height of the potential
,
a is the separation between the potentials (
),
b is the width of the potential
, and
is the period of the periodic potential.
Figure 1 represents the quantum potentials studied in this paper, which meet the conditions given in Equation (
1). Some potentials are known to have an analytic solution. Examples include the positive-intensity Dirac delta potential, whose solution is a linear combination of complex exponentials, and the rectangular potential, whose solution is a linear combination of real exponentials. However, other types of potentials either lack analytic solutions or depend on special functions. Therefore, the theory of perturbations (small potentials) or numerical analysis (Ritz method) is used, known as the Rayleigh–Ritz method, which is commonly used in quantum mechanics to solve the SE [
26].
To address this problem, we assumed that the SE for a potential of meets the above conditions and has exact solutions ( and ) in the range of , while their corresponding derivatives are represented by ( and ). With the aim of discussing the approximation of a periodic potential of Dirac delta potential, the ideas proposed by Bloch are used. According to Bloch’s theorem, the periodic wave function, , is equal to the product of a periodic function () and a plane wave (). This function is known as the Bloch wave because it has the formula :
The boundary conditions and continuity of the wave functions
and
for the potential of
Figure 1A:
Equations (
2)–(
5) represent the boundary and continuity conditions for the case of a potential of
and a zero potential.
The boundary conditions and continuity of the wave functions
and
for the potential of
Figure 1B:
Equations (
6)–(
11) represent the boundary and continuity conditions for the case of two potentials of
and zero potential. The transcendental energy equation for the Dirac delta potential of positive intensity is given by the following equation [
17,
23,
27]:
where
a is the period of Equation (
12),
P is a finite quantity, and the variable
is a function of energy in Equation (
12).
is expressed as
, where
m and
E denote the mass and the energy of a particle and
ℏ is the reduced Planck’s constant.
Figure 2 shows the energy for the Dirac delta periodic potential as a function of the wave number. This is the graph that the other periodic potentials of different geometries must approximate when the width
b is infinitely small and the height
w is infinitely large.
2.1. Periodic Potential of One Potential and a Zero Potential
The form of the potential
studied in this Section is given by the equation,
where
is a potential of Equation (
13) that satisfies the conditions of Equation (
1).
The wave function
is the potential solution for
in this specific case. Using Bloch’s theory, one can derive the following transcendental energy equation from the secular determinant,
where
,
are solutions of the SE for the potential
. Now, solving the determinant of Equation (
14), one obtains the following solution expressed by the equation,
The form of Equation (
15) matches the Dirac delta potential and the rectangular potential’s transcendental energy equation. The derivation of Equation (
15) can be revised in
Section S1 of the Supplementary Materials to this paper. The variables
, and
are functions of the energy, and they are given by the following equations:
represents the Wronskian of the wave functions for the potential
. The energy variables
, and
(
16)–(
19) must satisfy the following limits:
Since we want to approximate the potential
to the Dirac delta potential, they must satisfy Equations (
20) and (
21).
is a function that depends on
b and
w.
2.2. Periodic Potential of Two Potentials and a Zero Potential
The form of the potential
under study in this Section is given by the following equation:
where
and
are potentials of Equation (
22) that satisfy the conditions of Equation (
1).
The periodic potential involves three potentials
, and
, where the potential
is the zero potential and the potentials
and
that fulfill that the global minimum must be
and the global maximum at
. Now, using Bloch’s theorem, one obtains the following secular determinant:
where
,
are the solutions of the SE for the potential
and
,
are the solutions of the SE for the potential
. The secular determinant (
23) has as a solution
Equation (
24) has the same form as Equation (
16), with the only difference being the energy variables
, and
:
where the energy variables
, and
(
25)–(
28) of Equation (
24) are different energy functions (
16)–(
19) of Equation (
15). The deduction of Equation (
24) is given in
Section S2 of the Supplementary Materials of this paper.
and
represents the Wronskian of the wave functions for the potentials
and
. The energy variables
, and
(
25)–(
28) must satisfy the following limits:
Since we want to approximate the potential
to the Dirac delta potential, the latter must satisfy Equations (
29) and (
30) the same for the case of a potential
with zero potential. Again,
is a function that depends on
b and
w only.
2.3. The Group Speed
The transcendental energy equation is known for any potential
that meets the aforementioned conditions and that has the form of a periodic potential, or a potential
plus a zero or two potentials of the type
together with a zero potential, which are given by Equations (
15) and (
24). The latter potentials can be rewritten as energy functions to facilitate the calculation of the group speed and effective mass, following the equation
where the energy functions
and
are the grouping of the energy variables
, and
of Equation (
15) or
, and
of Equation (
24). Additionally,
and
are shown as a function of
,
,
, and
in
Section S3 of the Supplementary Materials to this paper:
Therefore, the corresponding group speed can be calculated based on Equations (
32) and (
33), which is directly proportional to the derivative of the energy
E with respect to the wave number
k [
24,
25]:
The form of the group speed is obtained by calculating the derivative of the energy with respect to the wave number divided by the Dirac constant found in Equation (
34):
where
is the period of the periodic potential. On the other hand, the energy function
has the following form as a function of the energy variables
and
:
The energy variable
(
36) is also derived in
Section S4 of the Supplementary Materials of this paper. From Equation (
35) of the group speed, one can deduce using the first derivative criterion that, for the values of the wave number
, the group speed is equal to zero, that is actually, no energy is transported [
28]. This is because the group speed lies at the limit between the energy values of the allowed and the forbidden energy bands of the periodic potential, since, by replacing
in the transcendental energy equation, those corresponding limits are
The inequality (
37) describes the bounds that the transcendental energy equation of the periodic potential of Equations (
15) and (
24) must have.
2.4. The Effective Mass
Like the group speed, the effective mass can also be calculated as
The form of the effective mass (
38) is obtained by calculating the inverse of the second derivative of the energy with respect to the wave number multiplied by the square of the Dirac constant. The calcuations give:
where, from Equation (
39),
is the period of the periodic potential. The functions
and
have the following form:
as functions of the variables
and
. Finally,
is the group speed of the periodic potential.
Additionally, the energy variables
and
in Equations (
40) and (
41) are obtained in
Section S5 of the Supplementary Materials of this paper. From the effective mass equation (
39), it can also be deduced that there is a discontinuity at a point of wave number
k. The wave number
k is the solution of the following transcendental equation:
Finally, the value of
k obtained from Equation (
42) represents the existence of an inflection point, that is the change in the concavity of the transcendental energy equation in the domain of the wave number.
4. Discussion
Using the equations for the periodic potential suggested in this study, suitable findings for the potentials known as the positive Dirac delta potential of positive intensity and rectangular potential were found. A transcendental energy equation for potentials other than the triangular potential could also be obtained. The transcendental energy equation was subsequently calculated for asymmetric potentials such the triangular–rectangular and rectangular–triangular potentials, which also approximate the Dirac delta potential.
Figure 9 depicts the periodic potential’s energy bands. The range of permitted and prohibited energies is likewise regarded:
Also, the energy values (black dots in
Figure 9) that are solutions of the transcendental energy equation in the range of
are shown.
Regarding group speed and effective mass, it was observed that the Dirac delta potential and the rectangular potential both have a predetermined shape in the first allowed energy band. Also, it was demonstrated that both potentials are canceled out at the extremes of group speed. This is to be expected given that these values indicate the boundaries of permissible and prohibited energy bands in the periodic potential. The change in group speed orientation for the second energy band is depicted in
Figure 10.
Unlike the first energy band, where the group speed is positive, the group speed in the second energy band is negative and has a higher value. This is visible for both of the analyzed potentials (Dirac delta and rectangular).
The orientation of the group speed will depend on the shape of the proper transcendental energy equation curve. This is written as a function of the derivative of the energy with the wave number as in Equation (
34). If the rate of change is positive then the group speed is positive; on the other hand, if the rate of change is negative, then the group speed will be negative [
32]. This is observed in the first energy band in
Figure 5 and
Figure 6 and for the second energy band in
Figure 10 regarding the periodic Dirac delta and rectangular potentials.
These results must be valid for symmetric periodic potentials in which . However, for asymmetric periodic potentials in which , it is not possible to ensure that this is totally true, since at least in the current study, it has only been verified for asymmetric potentials that can be simulated numerically.
It is also necessary to note that the results of the graphs obtained from the energy trascendental equation—the group speed and the effective mass—are in agreement with those reported in the literature [
32,
33]. The reason why the negative part of the domain of the wave number
k was not simulated for the group speed and effective mass is because it is not trully necessary, since such wave number behavior can be deduced by means of even and odd functions, from the transcendental energy equation, which is an even function.
Figure 11A,C well demonstartes that the value of
P of the Dirac delta function influences the change in the value of the wave number
at which the effective mass discontinuity is observed, whereas
Figure 11B,D show that the width of the rectangular potential also influences the value of the wave number
at which the effective mass discontinuity occurs.
In the case of effective mass, it was demonstrated that there is an energy-dependent discontinuity. This energy is also the transcendental energy equation’s turning point, that is the energy at which the transcendental energy equation equals the change in concavity. The calculation of the discontinuity value
k and the discontinuity energy using Equation (
42) is a complicate task as soon as it requires knowing of at least one of these quantities, because the energy is an implicit function of the wave number, as noted in Equations (
15) and (
24).
Therefore, to calculate these variables, this was performed by means of the average between the maximum k and the minimum k of the effective mass, in the same way as for the case of energy, taking the average of the maximum E and the minimum E from the minimum k and maximum k obtained previously from the effective mass. All this procedure was performed using the high-level programming language Python.
One can see these results in the effective mass for the studied potentials (Dirac delta, rectangular). When the
P values of Dirac delta potentials were changed, that value of the wave number in which it presented discontinuity changed, cf
Figure 7 and
Figure 11C; in the same way, having changed the height of the rectangular potential, the value of the wave number that presents the discontinuity changes, cf
Figure 8 and
Figure 11D. In turn, let us note that the effective mass for both potentials in the second energy band shown in
Figure 11A,B compared to
Figure 7 and
Figure 8 does not show a change in the discontinuity of the effective mass. The height of the potentials is a constant equal to 100 in
Figure 11. The separation between the potential barriers is equal to 1 in
Figure 11.
In
Section S6 of the Supplementary Materials to this paper, the values of
and of the energy
E are presented, where the discontinuity occurs, both for the first and second energy bands for the Dirac delta and rectangular potentials. Although transcendental energy equations were obtained for the periodic triangular potential and its combinations with the rectangular potential, the equations of these potentials for the transcendental energy equation, the speed of the group, and the effective mass are are quite lengthy, so not given here. However, it is possible to perform the numerical simulation of this potential, and the values of those quantities can be found in
Sections S3–S5 of the Supplementary Materials of this paper.
Further on, for the periodic triangular potential,
Figure 12A shows its group speed and
Figure 12B shows its effective mass. It is worth noting that the shape of the group speed and effective mass did not change in relation to the other periodic potentials and, similarly, for the asymmetric periodic potentials presented in
Figures S3 and S4 of the Supplementary Materials of this paper.
Comparing the three examined potentials, as shown in
Figure 13, one makes quite differing observations. The group speed of the rectangular potential is larger than that of the triangular potential in
Figure 13A, but the effective mass of the rectangular potential appears more shifted in
Figure 13B.