Next Article in Journal
Optimal Analysis of Microgrid with HOMER According to the Existing Renewable Resources in the Sector of El Aromo and Villonaco, Ecuador
Previous Article in Journal
AI-DAS: AI-Based Driving Assistance System for Scooters for Traffic Accident Avoidance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Water Treatment of Manganese Oxides and Organic Matter through Pre-Oxidation and Coagulation/Sedimentation †

1
Program of Biotechnology and Industry, Da-Yeh University, No. 168, University Rd., Dacun, Changhua 515006, Taiwan
2
Department of Tourism Management, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, No. 60, Sec. 1, Erren Rd., Rende Dist., Tainan City 717301, Taiwan
3
Department of Medical Botanicals and Foods on Health Applications, Da-Yeh University, No. 168, University Rd., Dacun, Changhua 515006, Taiwan
4
Department of Marine Environment and Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, No. 70 Lien-hai Road, Kaohsiung 804201, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability, Tainan, Taiwan, 2–4 June 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 55(1), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023055059
Published: 6 December 2023

Abstract

:
We investigated the reducing rate of manganese oxides (MnOs) and organic matter in water by using pre-oxidation and coagulation/sedimentation methods with different chemicals. The reduction rate using NaOCl for organic matter was about 11%, while that of manganese was 12%. The reduction rate using chlorine dioxide (ClO2) was only 7% for organic matter. However, the rate of manganese was 29% when using ClO2. Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) removed organic matter and MnOs more effectively, with a rate of 18 and 71%. Moreover, aluminum sulfate (Al2(SO4)3), ferric chloride (FeCl3), and polysilicate iron (PSI) worked more effectively, with a reduction rate of 99% and 55% for turbidity and organic matter.

1. Introduction

Drinking water in Taiwan is obtained from natural reservoirs. In summer, strong sunlight and abundant nutrients in water trigger frequent eutrophication, which complicates water purification processes. During the dry season, the storage of water in the reservoir decreases, and dissolved oxygen (DO) decreases, which forms an anaerobic environment at the bottom. The microbial reduction of iron and manganese oxides increases the concentration of Fe2+ and Mn2+ in water and turbidity, which makes the water body black and worsens the water quality. This also causes discoloration and a metallic taste in drinking water, and residual manganese ions promote the growth and reproduction of microorganisms. An increase in the number of microorganisms allows manganese oxides to be formed and creates clogging in the pipelines [1,2]. The forms of manganese oxides in water are diverse, including particulate manganese (>0.45 μm), colloidal manganese (<30,000 Da~0.20 μm), and dissolved manganese. Colloidal and particulate manganese can be removed using coagulation and filtration. Dissolved manganese requires oxidants (chlorine, ClO2, and KMnO4) to be removed from water by forming manganese dioxide, which coagulates and can be filtered out.
Natural organic matter is primarily derived from plants, animals, and their degradation products in aquatic, terrestrial, and marine environments [3]. Owing to the diversity of sources, the composition and concentration of natural organic matter in the environment vary depending on backgrounds, locations, climate, and human activities [4]. Natural organic matter is a complex multiphase mixture of organic substances with different molecular sizes and physical and chemical properties, because it contains various functional groups that include aromatic, aliphatic, phenolic, and quinone structures [5].
In the water-chlorination purification process, the phenols and carboxyls of organic matter in water react with chlorine to generate disinfection byproducts (DBPs) such as total trihalomethane, haloacetic acid, haloketone, and haloacetonitrile. The generation of DBPs is determined by the type of organic matter, temperature, inorganic salts, and pH value [6]. In general, pre-oxidation with coagulants for water purification is carried out to remove organic matter. For this, coagulants such as iron and aluminum salts are hydrolyzed into positively charged metal complex ions, which are then adsorbed onto the negatively charged colloidal surface. Consequently, large polymers containing organic matter are coagulated and deposited on the bottom. As the composition of natural organic matter in different water bodies varies, the removal efficiency of organic matter becomes different.
Therefore, the optimal conditions and strategies for removing manganese oxides and organic matter need to be determined. Thus, we performed related tests under different types and doses of oxidants and coagulants to improve the efficiency of water purification in this study. The result provides a basic reference for further investigation and the development of more effective water treatment procedures.

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental process of this study is shown in Figure 1. The water samples were obtained from reservoirs in south Taiwan. The concentrations of iron, manganese, and total organic carbon (TOC) and the collective property of water were analyzed. The characteristics of organic matter were also analyzed. In the pre-oxidation test, NaOCl, ClO2, and KMnO4 were used as oxidants to investigate the effect of oxidants on the TOC concentration in water. Changes in the organic matter composition in pre-oxidation were analyzed using the excitation–emission matrix (EEM). The rate of coagulation and sedimentation was measured using coagulants such as Al2(SO4)3, FeCl3, and PSI. The pH and turbidity of water samples were measured to identify suitable dosing modes of the coagulants. A simulated distribution system (SDS) was used for chlorination, as shown in Figure 2. The SDS simulated the generation of DBPs in the water pipe after the chlorination of treated water.
Water samples were collected in a 100 mL brown bottle, and an appropriate amount of NaOCl was added to it to control the residual chlorine between 0.5 and 1 mg/L. After the bottle was sealed, the samples were left for 24 h for enough of a reaction to be produced (in real situations, drinking water needs a 24 h wait after NaOCl has been added in a water purification station before reaching domestic homes). After 24 h, ascorbic acid was added to terminate the chlorine reaction.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Oxidants on Organic Matter

3.1.1. Types and Doses

As the dose of the oxidant increased, the removal rate of TOC increased (Figure 3). However, an excessive amount of the oxidant decreased the removal rate of TOC. References [7,8] pointed out that certain oxidants and excessive oxidants ruptured algal cells, thus resulting in the release of intracellular organic matter. This increased the organic matter content in water, which was reproduced in the results of the experiment in this study. The water samples in this study were not filtered and directly oxidized. The dominant algae species in the water samples were green and blue-green algae.

3.1.2. Effect of Oxidants on Coagulation and Sedimentation

The composition of particulate and dissolved organic matter in water was determined based on the characteristic interval of the EEM. In this study, the excitation and emission wavelength ranges were set to 200–400 and 250–500 nm, respectively. The spectra were classified into four areas, such as by-product-like soluble microbial (Area I, SMP), humic-acid-like soluble microbial (Area II, HA), fulvic-acid-like soluble microbial (Area III, FA), and aromatic proteins soluble microbial (Area IV, AP).
Figure 4 presents the optimal removal dose of the TOC for different oxidants. In this study, 2 mg/L of NaOCl, 1.5 mg/L of ClO2, and 2.3 mg/L of KMnO4 were added to the water sample for pre-oxidation, and the mixture was stirred for 30 s at 200 rpm. Changes in the organic matter composition before and after stirring were analyzed with EEM. Before oxidation, the spectral intensity of the raw water was the strongest in Area III, followed by Areas II, IV, and I. The organic matter composition in the water was primarily FA-like in composition. With the other three oxidants, the spectral intensities of Areas I, II, and III showed slight changes compared with those before oxidation. Meanwhile, the spectral intensity of Area IV changed significantly after NaOCl was added. Fluorescence data showed a significant weakening trend in Area IV. The decrease in the fluorescence intensity of aromatic proteins was attributed to the generation of DBPs [9]. The addition of ClO2 and KMnO4 also changed the spectral intensity slightly.

3.2. Effect of Oxidants with Coagulants on Coagulation and Sedimentation

In this study, changes in the organic matter content in the water sample were caused by different doses of oxidants. The best treatment method, using oxidants for water purification, completely removed algal cells without rupture, which avoided an increase in dissolved organic matter in water and the generation of DBPs [10]. Therefore, the appropriate doses of oxidants and coagulants needed to be selected for coagulation and sedimentation tests. The selected doses of NaOCl, ClO2, and KMnO4 were 2, 1.5, and 2.3 mg/L in this study.
Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the changes in pH and the content of organic matter with three oxidants and the different doses of Al2(SO4)3 and FeCl3. When the dose of Al2(SO4)3 increased, the removal rate of TOC also increased, while the pH value decreased to 6.7. According to the on-site operation protocol of the water purification plant, the pH of the treated water is maintained above 7 to not exceed the regulatory standards for pH level due to the gradual acidification of drinking water during its transportation in the distribution system. When the dose of FeCl3 increased, the removal rate of TOC kept increasing. The dose of PSI was set independently. From the result, it was found that the appropriate doses of Al2(SO4)3, FeCl3, and PSI were 8 mg/L (as 4.2 mg/L Al), 8 mg/L (as 2.8 mg/L Fe), and 3 mg/L (as 3 mg/L as Fe), respectively. In the test for coagulation and sedimentation, the doses of the three oxidants were used with the doses of the three coagulants to produce nine different dosing modes (Table 1). The result was analyzed to investigate the effects of different dosing modes on pH, the concentration of manganese and iron ions, the content of organic matter, and the generation of DBPs. The water samples in this study were not filtered and pH adjusted.

3.2.1. Manganese Removal

Table 2 shows the removal effects of manganese ions with different dosing modes. With no coagulant, manganese ions were removed only via pre-oxidation with NaOCl, and the removal rate was approximately 12%. When Al2(SO4)3, FeCl3, and PSI were added, the removal rate of manganese ions increased to 37–50% with coagulation and sedimentation but the concentration of manganese ions still exceeded 0.05 mg/L, which is a drinking water standard. The higher concentration over 0.05 mg/L was maintained because NaOCl could not effectively oxidize manganese ions in pre-oxidation, and a trace amount of manganese ions were not oxidized. Consequently, manganese removal in subsequent coagulation and sedimentation became less prominent. When ClO2 was used for pre-oxidation, the removal rate of the manganese ions was approximately 30%. If three types of coagulants were added, then the removal rate of manganese ions in coagulation and sedimentation was 63–72%. Correspondingly, the concentration of residual manganese ions in water was lower than 0.05 mg/L. The high oxidizing ability of ClO2 allowed a considerable removal of manganese ions, which resulted in a better manganese removal effect. When KMnO4 was used for pre-oxidation, the removal rate of manganese ions reached 71%. With KMnO4 and the three coagulants, the removal rate of manganese ions increased to 84–92%. Additionally, the residual manganese concentration was below the drinking water standard. KMnO4 effectively and rapidly oxidized dissolved manganese ions in water to form manganese particles. Coagulation and sedimentation derived an effective removal effect. The experimental results showed that removing manganese ions from water required extensive oxidation in the pre-oxidation process and coagulation and sedimentation. The best oxidant for manganese removal was KMnO4. Appropriate oxidants with coagulants for coagulation and sedimentation guarantee decreased residual manganese in water, which satisfies the quality standards of drinking water.

3.2.2. Turbidity Decrease

Table 3 shows the decrease in turbidity with nine dosing modes. Without coagulants, the turbidity of the water sample was decreased only by pre-oxidation. When NaOCl was used as the oxidant, the decrease rate of turbidity was only 3%, and no significant improvement was indicated. With Al2(SO4)3, FeCl3, and PSI, the turbidity decreased by 98%. Using coagulants and filtration, turbidity was reduced to 0.46 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU). When ClO2 was used for pre-oxidation, turbidity decreased to 20%. Pre-oxidation oxidized metal ions in water and produced metal particles that coagulated and sedimented. If three coagulants were added, turbidity decreased by 98–99% through coagulation and sedimentation. Oxidation by ClO2 did not change the distribution of particle sizes but resulted in the micro-gelation of colloidal particles, thus facilitating particle removal [11]. The maximum decrease rate of turbidity via pre-oxidation using KMnO4 was approximately 36%. Using KMnO4 with the three coagulants, turbidity decreased by 99%, mainly owing to the adsorption of manganese dioxide. Reference [7] discovered that KMnO4 facilitated the removal of organic and inorganic particles. Their experimental results showed that ClO2 and KMnO4 contributed to the removal of colloidal particles in water. Al2(SO4)3 decreased turbidity most significantly. Meanwhile, using ClO2 and KMnO4 with Al2(SO4)3 showed a better effect on turbidity decrease. Using filtration, turbidity could be maintained below the drinking water standard. Therefore, turbidity could be decreased through coagulation, sedimentation, and filtration.

3.2.3. TOC Removal

Table 4 shows the removal rates of TOC in the water sample using oxidants and coagulants. The results showed that TOC was removed by KMnO4 more than by NaOCl and ClO2. Among the coagulants, Al2(SO4)3 was the most effective in removing TOC, with a removal rate of up to 55%. No significant difference was found in the removal of TOC between FeCl3 and PSI. As organic matter was composed of various large- and small-molecule organic components, the removal of different types of organic matter by different coagulants could not be determined based on the removal results of the TOC.

3.2.4. Effect of Organic Matter Composition on Its Removal

Table 5 shows the effect of oxidants and coagulants on the organic matter with different compositions. The spectral intensity of the raw water was the highest in Area III, and Areas II, IV, and I, in that order. Fluorescence intensities decreased according to the degree of coagulation and sedimentation. The fluorescence intensities in Areas II (HA) and III (FA) decreased most significantly. Thus, it was found that coagulation and sedimentation effectively removed organic matter from water, and in particular large-molecule organic matter. Higher removal rates were achieved with modes A, D, and G, in which Al2(SO4)3 was used as a coagulant. Mode G showed the best removal efficiency of organic matter in Areas II (HA) and III (FA), where the fluorescence reduction rates were 60 and 56%, respectively. The fluorescence reduction rates using FeCl3 and PSI were similar to Al2(SO4)3. However, the fluorescence intensity in Area IV with mode E removed more organic matter. The high oxidizing ability of ClO2 allowed the disintegration of large-molecule organic matter containing multiple benzene rings and phenolic groups in Areas II and III into aromatic organic matter with smaller molecular weights. In Ref. [12], the molecular weight changes in organic matter were observed after adding ClO2. It was discovered that ClO2 oxidized and disintegrated large-molecule organic matter into smaller molecules. The combination of KMnO4 and Al2(SO4)3 enabled the most significant decrease in the fluorescence intensity of water after sedimentation. The reduced form of KMnO4 was adsorbed on the surface of algal cells and organic matter, thus increasing the weight. Using coagulants reduced the coagulation and sedimentation of organic matter. When the pH was greater than 7, the hydrolysis products of Al2(SO4)3 became colloidal precipitates of Al(OH)3(s). At this point, the gel plume formed became large [13], and organic matter in the water was removed via sedimentation.

3.2.5. DBPs

With coagulation and sedimentation in different dosage modes, the number of DBPs in water with the SDS chlorination experiment (24 h) was measured as shown in Table 6. When KMnO4 and ClO2 were used as the pre-oxidant, the concentration of DBPs was more effectively decreased than with NaOCl, and the decrease in haloacetic acid was significant. If Al2(SO4)3 was used as the coagulant, the concentration of DBPs (total trihalomethane and haloacetic acid) was lowered compared to those with FeCl3 and PSI. Al2(SO4)3 had the best removal efficiency for organic matter in Areas II and III of the EEM. Since large-molecule organic matter such as HA and FA contained more benzene rings and phenolic groups, their disinfection by-product generation potential was higher than that of small-molecule organic matter [14,15].

4. Conclusions

The experimental results on removing manganese ions from the water samples showed that NaOCl, ClO2, and KMnO4 were effective oxidants. KMnO4 showed the highest manganese removal rate, followed by ClO2. The best removal rate of TOC was observed when using KMnO4. Among the three coagulants, Al2(SO4)3 was better at removing TOC. Using ClO2 and KMnO4 instead of NaOCl as pre-oxidants reduced the generation of trihalomethane (THM) and haloacetic-acid (HAA). The amount of organic matter in Areas II (HA) and III (FA) in the water sample was considerably decreased through coagulation and sedimentation. A 0.45 µm nylon filter was used to simulate the filtration process in this study; filters fabricated using quartz sand, anthracite, or other materials may be used to construct a better water treatment process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-C.W., C.-C.K., S.-C.L.; methodology, Y.-C.W., C.-C.K., S.-C.L., F.-Y.Y.; software, Y.-C.W., F.-Y.Y.; validation, Y.-C.W., C.-C.K., F.-Y.Y.; formal analysis, Y.-C.W., F.-Y.Y.; investigation, Y.-C.W., C.-C.K., S.-C.L., F.-Y.Y.; resources, C.-C.K., S.-C.L.; data curation, Y.-C.W., C.-C.K., S.-C.L., F.-Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-C.W., C.-C.K., F.-Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.-C.W., S.-C.L., F.-Y.Y.; visualization, Y.-C.W.; supervision, C.-C.K., S.-C.L.; project administration, C.-C.K., S.-C.L.; funding acquisition, C.-C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Taiwan Water Corporation, No.2-1, Sec. 2, Shuangshih Rd., North District, Taichung City 404403, Taiwan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cerrato, J.M. Biogeochemical Cycling of Manganese in Drinking Water Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kohl, P.M.; Medlar, S.J. Occurrence of Manganese in Drinking Water and Manganese Control; AWWA: Denver, CO, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Uyguner Demirel, C.; Bekbolet, M.; Swietlik, J. Natural Organic Matter: Definitions and Characterization. Control of Disinfection By-Products in Drinking Water Systems; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 253–277. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dawson, J.J.C.; Malcolm, I.A.; Middlemas, S.J.; Tetzlaff, D.; Soulsby, C. Is the composition of dissolved organic carbon changing in upland acidic streams? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 7748–7753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aliverti, N.; Callegari, A.; Capodaglio, A.G.; Sauvignet, P. Nom removal from freshwater supplies by advanced separation technology. In Advanced Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment: A Road to Safer Society and Environment; Springer: Dordrecht, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. Delpla, I.; Jung, A.V.; Baures, E.; Clement, M.; Thomas, O. Impacts of climate change on surface water quality in relation to drinking water production. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, J.J.; Yeh, H.H. The mechanisms of potassium permanganate on algae removal. Water Res. 2005, 39, 4420–4428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huang, W.J.; Wang, C.C. Evaluation Metabolic Organic Products of Algae-Chlorella sp. and Assessing the Fate of Organic Compounds During Ozonation. Hung Kuang Unversity J. 2004, 43, 159–165. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tian, C.; Guo, T.T.; Liu, R.P.; Jefferson, W.; Liu, H.J.; Qu, J.H. Formation of disinfection by-products by Microcystis aeruginosa intracellular organic matter: Comparison between chlorination and bromination. Huan Jing Ke Xue 2013, 34, 4282–4289. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Plummer, J.D.; Edzwald, J.K. Effects of chlorine and ozone on algal cell properties and removal of algae by coagulation. Water Supply Res. Technol.-Aqua 2002, 51, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, S.H. The Effect of ClO2 Pre-Oxidation on the Coagulation Efficiency of Drinking Water Treatment. Master’s Thesis, Department of Environmental Engineering and Science, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  12. Świetlik, J.; Raczyk-Stanisławiak, U.; Biłozor, S.; Ilecki, W.; Nawrocki, J. Adsorption of natural organic matter oxidized with ClO2 on granular activated carbon. Water Res. 2002, 36, 2328–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kan, C.C.; Huang, C.P.; Pan, J.R. Time requirement for rapid-mixing in coagulation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2002, 203, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, X.; Kang, J.; Shen, J.; Zhao, S.; Wang, B.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Z. EEM–PARAFAC characterization of dissolved organic matter and its relationship with disinfection by-products formation potential in drinking water sources of northeastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pan, Y.J. The Relationship between Organic Fractions of NOM and Disinfection by-Products Formation Potential. Master’s Thesis, Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Experimental procedure of this study.
Figure 1. Experimental procedure of this study.
Engproc 55 00059 g001
Figure 2. Illustration of SDS chlorination.
Figure 2. Illustration of SDS chlorination.
Engproc 55 00059 g002
Figure 3. Effect of different oxidants and doses on TOC removal rate.
Figure 3. Effect of different oxidants and doses on TOC removal rate.
Engproc 55 00059 g003
Figure 4. EEM spectra of organic matter oxidized by oxidants: (a) no oxidation in water sample; (b) 2 mg/L of NaOCl; (c) 1.5 mg/L of ClO2; (d) 2.3 mg/L of KMnO4.
Figure 4. EEM spectra of organic matter oxidized by oxidants: (a) no oxidation in water sample; (b) 2 mg/L of NaOCl; (c) 1.5 mg/L of ClO2; (d) 2.3 mg/L of KMnO4.
Engproc 55 00059 g004
Figure 5. pH changes caused by three oxidants combined with different doses of Al2(SO4)3.
Figure 5. pH changes caused by three oxidants combined with different doses of Al2(SO4)3.
Engproc 55 00059 g005
Figure 6. Changes in TOC removal rates caused by three oxidants combined with different doses of Al2(SO4)3.
Figure 6. Changes in TOC removal rates caused by three oxidants combined with different doses of Al2(SO4)3.
Engproc 55 00059 g006
Figure 7. pH changes caused by three oxidants combined with different doses of FeCl3.
Figure 7. pH changes caused by three oxidants combined with different doses of FeCl3.
Engproc 55 00059 g007
Figure 8. Changes in TOC removal rates caused by three oxidants combined with different doses of FeCl3.
Figure 8. Changes in TOC removal rates caused by three oxidants combined with different doses of FeCl3.
Engproc 55 00059 g008
Table 1. Nine different dosing operation modes.
Table 1. Nine different dosing operation modes.
ModeDosing Operation
A2 mg/L NaOCl + 8 mg/L Al2(SO4)3
B2 mg/L NaOCl + 8 mg/L FeCl3
C2 mg/L NaOCl + 3 mg/L PSI
D1.5 mg/L ClO2 + 8 mg/L Al2(SO4)3
E1.5 mg/L ClO2 + 8 mg/L FeCl3
F1.5 mg/L ClO2 + 3 mg/L PSI
G2.3 mg/L KMnO4 + 8 mg/L Al2(SO4)3
H2.3 mg/L KMnO4 + 8 mg/L FeCl3
I2.3 mg/L KMnO4 + 3 mg/L PSI
Table 2. Changes in manganese removal under nine dosing combinations.
Table 2. Changes in manganese removal under nine dosing combinations.
ModeMn Removal Rate (%)Residual Mn (mg/L)
Raw waterN/A0.134
NaOCl12%0.118
A37%0.085
B54%0.062
C51%0.065
ClO229%0.095
D65%0.047
E72%0.038
F69%0.041
KMnO471%0.039
G84%0.022
H92%0.011
I89%0.015
Table 3. Changes in turbidity removal under nine dosing combinations.
Table 3. Changes in turbidity removal under nine dosing combinations.
ModeTurbidity Removal Rate (%)Residual Turbidity (NTU)
Raw waterN/A213
Only NaOCl3%206
A99%2.86
B98%3.96
C98%4.22
Only ClO220%170
D99%1.43
E98%3.71
F98%3.34
Only KMnO436%136
G100%0.11
H99%2.92
I99%2.69
Table 4. Changes in TOC removal under nine dosing combinations.
Table 4. Changes in TOC removal under nine dosing combinations.
ModeTOC Removal Rate (%)Residual TOC (mg/L)
Raw waterN/A2.82
NaOClA46%1.51
B30%1.98
C28%2.03
ClO2D38%1.75
E23%2.17
F24%2.13
KMnO4G55%1.26
H40%1.69
I37%1.78
Table 5. Analysis results of raw water EEM under different dosing operation modes.
Table 5. Analysis results of raw water EEM under different dosing operation modes.
Organic
Matter Type
Raw WaterMode AMode BMode C
Spectral
Intensity (E0)
Spectral
Intensity (E0)
Removal
Rate * (%)
Spectral
Intensity (E0)
Removal
Rate (%)
Spectral
Intensity (E0)
Removal
Rate (%)
SMP51.17234.84232%36.28629%34.97132%
HA75.36634.63454%49.10835%48.60736%
FA128.2363.38851%88.97531%88.35531%
AP64.50649.50423%49.14024%46.59928%
Organic Matter TypeMode DMode EMode F
Spectral
intensity (E0)
Removal
rate * (%)
Spectral
intensity (E0)
Removal
Rate (%)
Spectral
intensity (E0)
Removal
Rate (%)
SMP33.55034%42.30117%39.55223%
HA35.45453%51.18432%51.95231%
FA62.28251%95.68725%90.62829%
AP43.60532%66.207−3%46.72728%
Organic Matter TypeMode GMode HMode I
Spectral
intensity (E0)
Removal
rate * (%)
Spectral
intensity (E0)
Removal
Rate (%)
Spectral
intensity (E0)
Removal
Rate (%)
SMP29.33743%32.91436%31.94738%
HA29.95960%49.30535%47.35837%
FA56.03456%90.96229%87.15832%
AP39.68138%44.13432%39.89638%
* Removal rate (%) = (E0 − E1)/E0.
Table 6. Generation of DBPs under different dosing operation modes.
Table 6. Generation of DBPs under different dosing operation modes.
ModeDisinfection By-Product
TTHMsHAAs
A0.0770.066
B0.1190.091
C0.1290.088
D0.0790.052
E0.1150.074
F0.1190.079
G0.0710.045
H0.1070.078
I0.1170.086
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, Y.-C.; Kan, C.-C.; Lee, S.-C.; Yang, F.-Y. Water Treatment of Manganese Oxides and Organic Matter through Pre-Oxidation and Coagulation/Sedimentation. Eng. Proc. 2023, 55, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023055059

AMA Style

Wu Y-C, Kan C-C, Lee S-C, Yang F-Y. Water Treatment of Manganese Oxides and Organic Matter through Pre-Oxidation and Coagulation/Sedimentation. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 55(1):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023055059

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Yi-Chang, Chi-Chuan Kan, Shih-Chieh Lee, and Feng-Yu Yang. 2023. "Water Treatment of Manganese Oxides and Organic Matter through Pre-Oxidation and Coagulation/Sedimentation" Engineering Proceedings 55, no. 1: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023055059

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop