Next Article in Journal
Study of the Water-Resistant Properties of New Eco-Friendly Gypsum Composites with Additions from Single-Use Plastic Waste
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Particle Fluidization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Characterising the Physicochemical Properties of Selected Geophagic Clay from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to Investigate Their Potential Applications †

by
Mukuna Patrick Mubiayi
*,
Thabo Nkambule
and
Bhekie Brilliance Mamba
Institute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 27 October–10 November 2023; Available online: https://asec2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 56(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15295
Published: 26 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
Clay and clay composites have been used for numerous applications around the world, for example, as construction materials, cosmetics, and absorbents. Since clay is easy to find, abundant, and sustainable, understanding its quality is crucial. This study focuses on the characterization of geophagic clay samples from various locations in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to investigate their potential uses in various sectors. Geophagic clays have different colors, morphologies, and properties. Many characterizations were carried out including X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Microstructure and chemical analyses were carried out using scanning electron microscopy combined with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS). UV–Vis spectroscopy was also carried out to investigate reflectance. XRD revealed the presence of muscovite, kaolinite, illite, and quartz. On the other hand, XRF showed the presence of SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2, and Fe2O3 as major chemical compounds. A flake-like surface morphology was observed in all samples and the EDS analyses exhibited similar results to the XRF. The XRF, XRD, and EDS results were in agreement. The zeta potential was negative for all the clay samples. The properties exhibited by the selected geophagic clay were compared with the properties of various samples used for different applications. It was concluded that the selected geophagic clays demonstrated properties that could lead to their use in water and wastewater treatments and other applications, including as a sunblock (cosmetic industry) due to their mineralogical/chemical composition and UV–Vis reflectance.

1. Introduction

Around the world, there is a substantial amount of raw clay materials, which are considered to be sustainable. Clay and clay materials have numerous applications in a number of sectors, including construction, cosmetics, ceramics, and water treatment [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. To be able to investigate the suitability of specific clay and clay materials for specific applications, proper characterizations are required.
There are not many studies on the characteristics of geophagic clay [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Geophagia is universally recognized as a deliberate habit of consuming earthy materials including clays, soils, and sediments [11]. Choquenaira-Quispe et al. [16] carried out a study on the characterization and health risks of geophagic clay. They indicated that a weekly intake of clay represented an appreciable health risk. The characterized clay mainly contained silica. Alumina, iron, sodium, magnesium, calcium, and potassium were present in smaller quantities [16]. Ekosse and Jumbam [13] also investigated the health risks of consuming clay. They concluded that people consuming clays may benefit from the possible medicinal and nutritional values of the chemical elements that they contain, even though there are possibilities of human health risks. Most studies on geophagic clay are focused on the health risk of consumers; therefore, it is important to also look at other usages of geophagic clay materials.
This study presents the characteristics of selected geophagic clay samples from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to evaluate their suitability for various applications besides being consumed by human beings. A number of properties, including surface morphology and physicochemical properties, are presented.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Clay samples were collected at three different locations and exhibited different morphologies and colors, as depicted in Figure 1. The colors displayed by the samples were light grey/yellow, reddish, and dark grey for BUK, LUB, and KIN, respectively. Reddish and yellowish colors were mostly associated with the presence of iron oxide. Those locations were Lubumbashi (11°39′51″ S 27°28′58″ E), Bukavu (2°30′ S 28°52′ E), and Kinshasa (4°19′30″ S 15°19′20″ E). The samples were coded as LUB, BUK, and KIN for Lubumbashi, Bukuvu, and Kinshasa, respectively.

2.2. Methods

A Rigaku, ZSX Primus II X-ray Fluorescence spectrometer was used for chemical composition, while the phases were identified using a Rigaku, Ultima IV X-ray Diffractometer. Surface morphology analysis and sample mapping were carried out using scanning electron microscopy combined with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS), for which a JEOL JSM-IT300 was utilized. A UV–Vis (Lambda 650S, Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA) spectrometer was used to analyze the UV–visible spectrophotometric of the clay samples. The zeta potential was measured using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano series (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK). The zeta potential measurements were carried out at a neutral pH.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. X-ray Fluorescence and X-ray Diffraction Analyses

The chemical composition using X-ray fluorescence (XRF), as depicted in Table 1, indicates that SiO2 and Al2O3 are the major compounds in all three samples. K2O was present, with the BUK sample having the highest percentage (8.1733 wt%), followed by KIN (2.8707 wt%), and then LUB (1.5754 wt%). Furthermore, the highest percentage of TiO2 was found in the LUB sample (4.0406 wt%). This shows that the LUB sample will exhibit good photocatalytic properties [8] and can be used for the removal of pollutants in water and wastewater. The XRD results show the presence of muscovite, kaolinite, illite, and quartz (BUK), quartz, dickite, kaolinite, and montmorillonite (KIN), and quartz, kaolinite, muscovite and calcium iron aluminum oxide (LUB) (Figure 2).

3.2. Surface Morphology and Chemical Composition Mapping

The surface morphology of the three samples was analyzed and it was observed that the clay samples had similar surface morphologies as other clay materials investigated in other studies [12]. The surface morphology of all the clay samples exhibited a flake-like morphology, which could be due to the presence of amorphous materials in the samples (Figure 3). EDS mapping analysis was carried out and it was observed that Si, Al, K, and Fe were present in the analyzed spot (Figure 4). The obtained result was in agreement with the XRF and the XRD results. Furthermore, the chemical content of the examined geophagic clay samples was similar to those presented in the literature [10].

3.3. Zeta Potential and UV–Vis Spectroscopy Analyses

The zeta potential values of all three geophagic clay sample are negative, which indicate good absorbance capacity with more negative zeta potential linked to higher absorbance capacity [18]. The analysis of zeta potential is proven to be a helpful indicator of the surface charge of particles and is directly associated with their composition. The zeta potential values of the BUK, KIN, and LUB were −11.20, −23.60, and −15.00, respectively. The KIN sample had a higher absorbance capacity when compared with BUK and LUB. UV–Vis spectroscopy analyses were carried out to study the usage of clay materials in the cosmetic industry as sunblock (Figure 5). It was observed that the three samples contained TiO2, which is used in sunscreen products, acts as a physical ultraviolet filter, and can block sunlight and reflect the ultraviolet light.

4. Conclusions

Three geophagic clay samples were collected in three different locations in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The clay samples were analyzed to assess their various potential applications. The samples mainly contained SiO2 and Al2O3, and the XRF, XRD, and EDS results were in agreement. The UV–Vis results indicate that these clay materials can block and reflect light. It was concluded that the analyzed geophagic clay samples can be used in the cosmetic industry and for water/wastewater treatment. The analyzed clay samples showed the potential of being used as a substitute in cosmetic creams such as sunblock. Furthermore, those clay samples can also be used for water and wastewater treatments in various forms including ceramic filters. Further studies need to be conducted to analyze more properties and further investigate their applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P.M.; methodology, M.P.M.; validation, M.P.M., T.N. and B.B.M.; formal analysis, M.P.M.; investigation, M.P.M.; resources, T.N. and B.B.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P.M.; writing—review and editing, M.P.M., T.N. and B.B.M.; funding acquisition, T.N. and B.B.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The financial support from the University of South Africa and the Institute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability (iNanoWS) is acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Institute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, the University of South Africa, for providing the facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Boulingui, J.E.; Nkoumbou, C.; Njoya, D.; Thomas, F.; Yvon, J. Characterization of clays from Mezafe and Mengono (Ne-Libreville, Gabon) for potential uses in fired products. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 115, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Delinière, R.; Aubert, J.E.; Rojat, F.; Gasc-Barbier, M. Physical, mineralogical and mechanical characterization of ready-mixed clayplaster. Build. Environ. 2014, 80, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Masheane, M.; Nthunya, L.; Mubiayi, M.; Thamae, T.; Mhlanga, S. Physico-chemical characteristics of some Lesotho’s clays and their assessment for suitability in ceramics production. Part. Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Milošević, M.; Logar, M. Properties and characterization of clay raw material from Miličinica (Serbia) for use in the ceramicindustry. Clay Miner. 2017, 52, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Morekhure-Mphahlele, R.; Focke, W.W.; Grote, W. Characterization of vumba and ubumba clays used for cosmetic purposes. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2017, 113, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mattioli, M.; Giardini, L.; Roselli, C.; Desideri, D. Mineralogical characterization of commercial clays used in cosmetics and possiblerisk for health. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 119, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khatem, R.; Miguel, R.O.; Bakhti, A. Use of synthetic clay forRemoval of Diclofenac Anti-inflammatory. Eurasian J. Soil Sci. 2015, 4, 126–136. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mubiayi, M.P.; Muleja, A.A.; Nzaba, S.K.; Mamba, B.B. Geochemical and physicochemical characteristics of clay materials from congo with photocatalytic activity on 4-Nitrophenol in aqueous solutions. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 29943–29954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Idrees, M.; Akbar, A.; Saeed, F.; Gull, M.; Eldin, S.M. Sustainable production of Low-Shrinkage fired clay bricks by utilizing waste plastic dust. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 68, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Olisa, O.G.; Olajide-Kayode, J.O.; Adebayo, B.O.; Ajayi, O.A.; Odukoya, K.; Olalemi, A.A.; Uyakunmor, T.D.M. Mineralogy and geochemical characterization of geophagic clays consumed in parts of southern Nigeria. J. Trace Elem. Miner. 2023, 4, 100063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ekosse, G.I.E.; Ngole-Jeme, V.M.; Diko, M.L. Environmental geochemistry of geophagic materials from free state province in South Africa. Open Geosci. 2017, 9, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ekosse, G.I.; Anyangwe, S. Mineralogical and particulate morphological characterization of geophagic clayey soils from Botswana. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2012, 26, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ekosse, E.G.I.; Jumbam, N.D. Geophagic clays: Their mineralogy, chemistry and possible human health effects. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 6755–6767. [Google Scholar]
  14. Diko, M.L.; Diko, C. Physico-chemistry of geophagic soils ingested to relief nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 11, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bernardo, B.; Candeias, C.; Rocha, F. Geophagic materials characterization and potential impact on human health: The case study of maputo city (Mozambique). Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Choquenaira-Quispe, C.; Yucra Condori, H.R.; Villanueva Salas, J.A.; Gonzales-Condori, E.G. In vitro release of aluminum from the geophagic clay “Chacco” in the Peruvian highlands: Chemical characterization and health risk assessment. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2023, 58, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mashao, U.; Ekosse, G.I.; Odiyo, J.; Bukalo, N. Geophagic practice in mashau village, limpopo province, South Africa. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Serrano-Lotina, A.; Portela, R.; Baeza, P.; Alcolea-Rodriguez, V.; Villarroel, M.; Ávila, P. Zeta potential as a tool for functional materials development. Catal. Today 2023, 423, 113862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. BUK, LUB, and KIN geophagic clay samples.
Figure 1. BUK, LUB, and KIN geophagic clay samples.
Engproc 56 00060 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of BUK, LUB, and KIN geophagic clay samples.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of BUK, LUB, and KIN geophagic clay samples.
Engproc 56 00060 g002
Figure 3. SEM micrograph of the BUK sample.
Figure 3. SEM micrograph of the BUK sample.
Engproc 56 00060 g003
Figure 4. EDS mapping for the KIN sample.
Figure 4. EDS mapping for the KIN sample.
Engproc 56 00060 g004
Figure 5. Ultraviolet reflectance percentage variation in the BUK, KIN, and LUB geophagic clay samples.
Figure 5. Ultraviolet reflectance percentage variation in the BUK, KIN, and LUB geophagic clay samples.
Engproc 56 00060 g005
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt%) of the geophagic samples.
Table 1. Chemical composition (wt%) of the geophagic samples.
ComponentLUBKINBUK
Na2O0.03341.08550.0821
MgO0.5541.07031.1812
Al2O329.890829.926430.389
SiO260.254459.389352.2636
P2O50.04110.09990.05
SO30.03810.0720.327
Cl0.02141.43820.0134
K2O1.57542.87078.1733
CaO0.03610.16150.1024
TiO24.04061.42171.5949
Cr2O30.03120.01610.0366
MnO0.01020.01270.028
Fe2O33.04542.23515.4643
NiO0.02040.00640.0155
CuO0.01160.00380.0097
ZnO0.00480.00730.0102
Ga2O30.00660.00630.0091
GeO20.0031--
As2O30.0021-0.0027
Rb2O0.02020.01990.0517
SrO0.0040.00690.0055
Y2O30.0889-0.0008
ZrO20.12350.0620.0544
BaO0.08110.07460.1312
ThO20.0034-0.0035
Nb2O5-0.0053-
PbO -0.0079 -
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mubiayi, M.P.; Nkambule, T.; Mamba, B.B. Characterising the Physicochemical Properties of Selected Geophagic Clay from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to Investigate Their Potential Applications. Eng. Proc. 2023, 56, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15295

AMA Style

Mubiayi MP, Nkambule T, Mamba BB. Characterising the Physicochemical Properties of Selected Geophagic Clay from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to Investigate Their Potential Applications. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 56(1):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mubiayi, Mukuna Patrick, Thabo Nkambule, and Bhekie Brilliance Mamba. 2023. "Characterising the Physicochemical Properties of Selected Geophagic Clay from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to Investigate Their Potential Applications" Engineering Proceedings 56, no. 1: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15295

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop