Next Article in Journal
Acoustic Cavitation and Ionic Liquid Combined: A Modeling Investigation of the Possible Promises in Terms of Physico-Chemical Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Performance of Student Workgroups in Online Wiki Activities with and without AI
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Electrical and Optical Properties of Controlled Reduced Graphene Oxide Prepared by a Green and Facile Route †

by
Parsa Hooshyar
1,
Atieh Zamani
1,2,*,
Deniz Rezapour Kiani
1,
Shayan Fakhraeelotfabadi
1 and
Mehdi Fardmanesh
1,*
1
Superconductive Electronics Research Laboratory (SERL), Electrical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 14588-89694, Iran
2
Department of Converging Technologies, Khatam University, Tehran 19916-33357, Iran
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 10th International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications (ECSA-10), 15–30 November 2023; Available online: https://ecsa-10.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 58(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-10-16175
Published: 15 November 2023

Abstract

:
Three distinct homogeneous multilayer self-standing thin films, composed of stacked reduced graphene oxide (rGO) planes, were produced by the improved Hummer’s method. In order to investigate their structural, electrical, and optical properties, the samples were characterized by Raman spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), four-point probe measurements, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The Raman spectra of the samples indicate the presence of minor surface defects and a relatively low oxygen content of rGOs. The FESEM images obtained from the samples reveal a smooth sheet-like surface with few wrinkles. Additionally, the cross-sectional images provide confirmation of the presence of multi-stacked layer structures. Based on the resistance decreasing by about 0.35 to 0.65 percent per kelvin within the region of ambient temperature, the electrical resistance vs. temperature curves imply semiconducting behavior in the rGOs. The FTIR analysis of the samples conducted within the wavelength range of 2.5 to 25 µm demonstrates a significant absorption value exceeding 90%. This observation shows that the developed materials possess favorable characteristics, making them an excellent absorber candidate for sensing detectors in the infrared range. We systematically analyzed and confirmed that the structural as well as optical and electrical properties of our obtained rGOs may be fine-tuned by adjusting the initial reactants concentration and annealing temperature.

1. Introduction

Since the emergence of graphene in 2004, numerous studies have been conducted on graphene and its derivatives due to their remarkable properties. As a monolayer of carbon atoms held together by sp2 covalent bonds in a honeycomb-resembling lattice, graphene was first extracted from graphite by Geim and Novoselov [1,2]. Graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) are considered the two main derivatives of graphene. GO, the oxidized form of graphene, comprises a variety of oxygen-containing functional groups, including hydroxyl and carboxyl moieties. Meanwhile, rGO is produced through the reduction process of GO, resulting in fewer oxygen-containing groups [3]. Additionally, when arranged in a stacked configuration, they form many other derivatives, including monolayer, few-layer, and multilayer graphene-based materials, each exhibiting distinct characteristics and properties [4].
Graphene and its derivatives possess distinctive characteristics that render them promising subjects for research across different applications. For instance, graphene has high electron mobility, high electrical conductivity, high thermal conductivity, and high optical transparency [2,5,6,7]. These distinct characteristics make graphene-based materials appropriate for an extensive range of applications. For instance, graphene is utilized in a variety of thermal, optical, and electrical systems, such as temperature sensors [8,9], transparent electrodes [10], conductive composites (electrically, thermally, or both) [11,12,13], solar cells [14], and thermal imaging [15].
Most graphene synthesis methods involve the utilization of complex and costly techniques, as well as the need for three-dimensional crystal, posing difficulties for its operation and investigation [16]. On the other hand, free-standing samples offer more flexibility and versatility. In this regard, we have developed a green and facile route towards the synthesis of free-standing rGO samples. This eco-friendly route is based on the modified Hummer’s method, which uses the least possible chemicals. In addition to structural analyses, the obtained samples were subjected to electrical and optical examinations to ascertain their distinct features. The interesting properties of these samples, along with their low chemical content, make them a great candidate for many applications, including medical uses such as biomedical imaging, contrast agents, and monitoring electrodes [17,18].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Aqueous GO solution has been initially prepared by a modified Hummers method. The pre-treatment of graphite powder favored a lower amount of reactants during synthesis. Also, the reaction time was prolonged to 34 h, which provides good GO exfoliation without compromising the quality of the dispersion [19,20,21,22]. The concentration of the solution was 12 mg/mL, which was then air-dried overnight. This was followed by thermal reduction processes to obtain rGO free-standing layers [23]. This provides an eco-friendly and safer yet facile rGO synthesis and oxygen reduction route, which also enables mass production.
We produced three distinct rGO samples, designated rGO1, rGO2, and rGO3, using the described method. Notably, this approach makes no use of any mechanical or shear force. Finally, it should be mentioned that these three rGO samples were fine-tuned by adjusting the initial reactant concentration and annealing temperature. In this work, the following chemical species were used: graphite flakes (99.0%, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium), sodium nitrate (84.99, R&M Chemicals, Chandigarh, India), sulfuric acid (98.0%, Sigma-Aldrich, Sofia, Bulgaria), potassium permanganate (99.0%, Sigma Aldrich, Sofia, Bulgaria), and hydrogen peroxide (27% w/w, Alfa Aesar graded, provided by a local company).

2.2. Methods

The experimental approaches used in this work necessitated the use of specialized instruments to perform the relevant measurements. The Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) images of the samples were taken using a TESCAN MIRA 3 LMU (TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic). A four-point probe technique was used to conduct electrical measurements. The four-point probe measurement was performed utilizing a KEITHLEY 6221 (Keithley Instruments, Solon, OH, USA)current source (with sub pico ampere resolution) and a KEITHLEY 2182A NANOVOLTMETER (Keithley Instruments, Solon, OH, USA). Finally, The Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of the samples were obtained using Bruker’s VERTEX 70 FT-IR Spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) for the purpose of analyzing their optical absorption values.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Properties

Finding a sample’s structural properties is always the initial step in learning about its properties. In order to accomplish this, our samples were initially analyzed by FESEM and Raman spectroscopy, two powerful techniques in the field of material characterization. FESEM facilitates the acquisition of high-resolution images, allowing for the detailed examination of the morphology and structural characteristics of diverse materials at the nanoscale level [24]. The images of the rGO samples obtained through FESEM are presented in Figure 1. The multi-stacked layer architectures of these free-standing thin films are immediately apparent from these cross-sectional views. Each stacked layer is approximately between 2 µm and 3 µm thick and is made up of multiple rGO planes. Moreover, while looking at the surface morphology of the samples, it can be seen that they have a relatively smooth sheet-like surface with few wrinkles.
Raman spectroscopy complements the capabilities of FESEM by providing information on chemical structures and physical forms. Based on the Raman effect, irradiating a sample with monochromatic light and measuring the scattered light has revealed that all the materials derived from graphene exhibit a G peak in their Raman spectra, which corresponds to the first-order scattering of the E2g mode. Additionally, when examining the oxidized derivatives of graphene, such as GO and rGO, a D band is also detected. The presence of this D band signifies a decrease in the size of the in-plane sp2 domains due to the process of oxidation [25,26]. The Raman spectra obtained from our rGO samples confirm these findings and also disclose a shift of the G bands towards lower wavenumbers when compared to the G bands of the GO, which is indicative of a lower oxygen content in the rGOs. In addition, the intensity ratio between the D band and the G band (ID/IG) shows that the number of surface defects is small [27].

3.2. Electrical Properties

To evaluate the electrical properties of the rGO samples, we first conducted resistance measurements using the four-point probe technique at room temperature. The samples were tested in various directions to ensure comprehensive analysis. Additionally, the measurements were performed on different days to assess the stability of the samples under varying conditions. The recorded measurements demonstrate a remarkable homogeneity as the resistance values for each sample differ only slightly across different directions.
Upon analyzing the data, we found that rGO1 exhibited an average resistance of approximately 19.38 Ω, with a deviation of ±1.6 Ω, representing a variation of about ±8.2% from the average. For rGO2, the average resistance was approximately 294.25 Ω, with a deviation of ±12 Ω, corresponding to a variation of around ±4.1% from the average. Finally, rGO3 displayed an average resistance of 5849.7 Ω, with a deviation of ±9.5 Ω, indicating a variation of less than ±0.2% from the average. These minimal variations in resistance values, ranging from 0.2% to 8.2%, across different directions and measurements conducted on various days are indicative of the low degree of uncertainty associated with our measurements. The consistent and stable resistance values obtained underscore the environmental and thermal stability of the samples.
According to this result, rGO1 has the highest conductivity and is interpreted to be the most oxygen-reduced sample, while rGO3 has high resistivity and behaves the least like conductors. These results indicate that rGO samples can be produced with any desired conductivity. This brings us the versatility and tunability needed to synthesize rGO samples that have distinct resistances over a broad spectrum of electrical conductivity by modifying the fabrication steps. These samples were also analyzed by AC measurements, and no phase change was observed between the voltage and current passing through them. As a result, these free-standing homogeneous thin films are laterally pure-resistive.
Given the potential applications of graphene-based materials as electrothermal devices, it becomes imperative to exert precise control over the impact of temperature on electrical parameters, specifically their resistivity [28]. To acquire the electrical resistance versus temperature (RT) curves for the samples at temperatures exceeding room temperature, we progressively increased their temperature with a heater while simultaneously monitoring their resistance. These curves are presented in Figure 2, where all the resistance values have been normalized to each sample resistance value at 300 K. With an increase in temperature, the resistance of rGO1, rGO2, and rGO3 decreases at a rate of 0.35, 0.55, and 0.65 percent per Kelvin, in turn implying semiconducting behavior in the rGOs. It is worth noting that the sample with higher conductivity and therefore a higher reduction degree, suggesting a higher carbon to oxygen ratio, has a lower temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR), implying a decrease in its semiconducting energy gap [29].

3.3. Optical Properties

rGO1 and rGO2 were measured and analyzed by FTIR spectroscopy in order to investigate their optical properties. The analysis was conducted within the wavelength range of 2.5 to 25 µm. The resulting absorbance spectra of rGO1 and rGO2 are shown in Figure 3, indicating that both rGO1 and rGO2 exhibit exceptional performance across the whole spectrum. To be more specific, for rGO1, the absorption value exceeds 93% at wavelengths shorter than 4 µm, and its minimum absorption, observed around 12.5 µm, remains at a remarkable value of 91%. Similarly, rGO2 demonstrates excellent absorption, with values surpassing 91.5% before 4 µm and maintaining a minimum absorption of approximately 90% at wavelengths around 12 µm and above. These results highlight the significant absorption values of the samples exceeding 90% across the entire spectrum, indicating their potential use as spectrally wide absorbers.

4. Conclusions

The findings presented in this study provide a valuable understanding of the electrical and optical properties of three multilayer rGO thin films. By using a modified version of Hummer’s method, which is a facile, versatile, and environmentally friendly approach, these self-standing samples were successfully synthesized. Despite the absence of shear stress in the production process of these samples, their cross-sectional FESEM images validate the commendable attainment of a well-organized stacking arrangement. Although all samples displayed minor surface defects and a smooth sheet-like structure with few wrinkles, suggesting their high quality and uniformity, additional morphological analyses, such as Grazing-Incidence Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (GISAXS), are required to investigate the structures of the samples in more detail.
According to our electrical investigations, the semiconducting behavior of the samples was evidenced by a temperature-dependent decrease in their electrical resistance, and according to the optical investigations, they showcased substantial absorption values exceeding 90% in a wide infrared range. Different electrical and optical characteristics exhibited by each sample indicate that it is possible to fine-tune the properties of rGO samples by adjusting the reactants’ concentration and annealing temperature, thereby enhancing their potential for a variety of applications, including electronics, thermoelectric, and optoelectronics devices. For instance, the fact that as few chemicals as possible were used to produce the samples, coupled with their high optical absorption even in electrically conductive ranges, makes them a clean and favorable option for many biomedical applications.

Author Contributions

P.H. and A.Z. have shared the first authorship, and all the authors have contributed to writing and preparing the manuscript; the samples were synthesized by A.Z., and the sample preparation and measurements were conducted by P.H., S.F., and D.R.K. under the supervision of M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.-E.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tahriri, M.; Del Monico, M.; Moghanian, A.; Yaraki, M.T.; Torres, R.; Yadegari, A.; Tayebi, L. Graphene and its derivatives: Opportunities and challenges in dentistry. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 102, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Parvin, N.; Kumar, V.; Joo, S.W.; Park, S.-S.; Mandal, T.K. Recent Advances in the Characterized Identification of Mono-to-Multi-Layer Graphene and Its Biomedical Applications: A Review. Electronics 2022, 11, 3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Balandin, A.A.; Ghosh, S.; Bao, W.; Calizo, I.; Teweldebrhan, D.; Miao, F.; Lau, C.N. Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ghosh, S.; Calizo, I.; Teweldebrhan, D.; Pokatilov, E.P.; Nika, D.L.; Balandin, A.A.; Bao, W.; Miao, F.; Lau, C.N. Extremely high thermal conductivity of graphene: Prospects for thermal management applications in nanoelectronic circuits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 151911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rokmana, A.W.; Asriani, A.; Suhendar, H.; Triyana, K.; Kusumaatmaja, A.; Santoso, I. The optical properties of thin film reduced graphene oxide/poly (3, 4 ethylenedioxtriophene): Poly (styrene sulfonate)(pedot: Pss) fabricated by spin coating. Proc. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1011, 012007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zeng, Y.; Li, T.; Yao, Y.; Li, T.; Hu, L.; Marconnet, A. Thermally conductive reduced graphene oxide thin films for extreme temperature sensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1901388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, G.; Tan, Q.; Kou, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Lv, W.; Dong, H.; Xiong, J. A flexible temperature sensor based on reduced graphene oxide for robot skin used in internet of things. Sensors 2018, 18, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rana, K.; Singh, J.; Ahn, J.-H. A graphene-based transparent electrode for use in flexible optoelectronic devices. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 2646–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, P.; Yu, S.; Shahzad, F.; Hong, S.M.; Kim, Y.-H.; Koo, C.M. Ultrahigh electrically and thermally conductive self-aligned graphene/polymer composites using large-area reduced graphene oxides. Carbon 2016, 101, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, H.; Chen, C.; Sun, J.; Zhang, H.; Feng, Y.; Qin, M.; Feng, W. Highly thermally conductive polymer/graphene composites with rapid room-temperature self-healing capacity. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yu, S.; Li, N.; Higgins, D.; Li, D.; Li, Q.; Xu, H.; Spendelow, J.S.; Wu, G. Self-assembled reduced graphene oxide/polyacrylamide conductive composite films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 19783–19790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Das, S.; Sudhagar, P.; Kang, Y.S.; Choi, W. Graphene synthesis and application for solar cells. J. Mater. Res. 2014, 29, 299–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hsu, A.L.; Herring, P.K.; Gabor, N.M.; Ha, S.; Shin, Y.C.; Song, Y.; Chin, M.; Dubey, M.; Chandrakasan, A.P.; Kong, J. Graphene-based thermopile for thermal imaging applications. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 7211–7216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dato, A.; Radmilovic, V.; Lee, Z.; Phillips, J.; Frenklach, M. Substrate-free gas-phase synthesis of graphene sheets. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 2012–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nurunnabi, M.; Parvez, K.; Nafiujjaman, M.; Revuri, V.; Khan, H.A.; Feng, X.; Lee, Y.-k. Bioapplication of graphene oxide derivatives: Drug/gene delivery, imaging, polymeric modification, toxicology, therapeutics and challenges. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 42141–42161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cui, T.-R.; Li, D.; Huang, X.-R.; Yan, A.-Z.; Dong, Y.; Xu, J.-D.; Guo, Y.-Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.-K.; Shao, W.-C. Graphene-based flexible electrode for electrocardiogram signal monitoring. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Paulchamy, B.; Arthi, G.; Lignesh, B. A simple approach to stepwise synthesis of graphene oxide nanomaterial. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 1. [Google Scholar]
  20. Segal, M. Selling graphene by the ton. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 612–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sharma, N.; Sharma, V.; Jain, Y.; Kumari, M.; Gupta, R.; Sharma, S.; Sachdev, K. Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) for gas sensing application. Macromol. Symp. 2017, 376, 1700006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, X.; Qu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Ren, G. Mechanism of oxidization of graphite to graphene oxide by the hummers method. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 23503–23510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Roy Chowdhury, S.; Maiyalagan, T. CuCo2S4@B, N-doped reduced graphene oxide hybrid as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 19183–19192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Akhtar, K.; Khan, S.A.; Khan, S.B.; Asiri, A.M. Scanning electron microscopy: Principle and applications in nanomaterials characterization. In Handbook of Materials Characterization; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 113–145. [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith, E.; Dent, G. Introduction, Basic Theory and Principles. In Modern Raman Spectroscopy—A Practical Approach; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.A.; Piner, R.D.; Kohlhaas, K.A.; Kleinhammes, A.; Jia, Y.; Wu, Y.; Nguyen, S.T.; Ruoff, R.S. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 2007, 45, 1558–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Palaniselvam, T.; Aiyappa, H.B.; Kurungot, S. An efficient oxygen reduction electrocatalyst from graphene by simultaneously generating pores and nitrogen doped active sites. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 23799–23805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sibilia, S.; Bertocchi, F.; Chiodini, S.; Cristiano, F.; Ferrigno, L.; Giovinco, G.; Maffucci, A. Temperature-dependent electrical resistivity of macroscopic graphene nanoplatelet strips. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 275701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jung, I.; Dikin, D.A.; Piner, R.D.; Ruoff, R.S. Tunable electrical conductivity of individual graphene oxide sheets reduced at “low” temperatures. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4283–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FESEM images of (a) rGO1, (b) rGO2, and (c) rGO3.
Figure 1. FESEM images of (a) rGO1, (b) rGO2, and (c) rGO3.
Engproc 58 00068 g001
Figure 2. Resistance versus temperature curves of rGO1, rGO2, and rGO3.
Figure 2. Resistance versus temperature curves of rGO1, rGO2, and rGO3.
Engproc 58 00068 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of (a) rGO1 and (b) rGO2.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of (a) rGO1 and (b) rGO2.
Engproc 58 00068 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hooshyar, P.; Zamani, A.; Rezapour Kiani, D.; Fakhraeelotfabadi, S.; Fardmanesh, M. Electrical and Optical Properties of Controlled Reduced Graphene Oxide Prepared by a Green and Facile Route. Eng. Proc. 2023, 58, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-10-16175

AMA Style

Hooshyar P, Zamani A, Rezapour Kiani D, Fakhraeelotfabadi S, Fardmanesh M. Electrical and Optical Properties of Controlled Reduced Graphene Oxide Prepared by a Green and Facile Route. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 58(1):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-10-16175

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hooshyar, Parsa, Atieh Zamani, Deniz Rezapour Kiani, Shayan Fakhraeelotfabadi, and Mehdi Fardmanesh. 2023. "Electrical and Optical Properties of Controlled Reduced Graphene Oxide Prepared by a Green and Facile Route" Engineering Proceedings 58, no. 1: 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-10-16175

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop