ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Healthcare Policy and Population Health: Unpacking the Connections

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Care Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2025 | Viewed by 3739

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Health Systems, School of Population Health University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Interests: health policy; public policy; health services research; evaluation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

How does health services policy improve population health? Most of the determinants of population health outcomes lie outside the health care system. However, ‘downstream’ health system settings and policies can still make a significant impact, positively or negatively, on health outcomes, while governments increasingly frame health policy reform objectives in terms of population health., most reforms typically focus on ‘intermediate’ system objectives such as improved access, fair financing, and improved service quality. Improved distribution of accessible and quality services (i.e., equity), and allocative efficiency of health system resources also have the potential to improve population health. Nevertheless, health policy reform designed to improve broader health outcomes frequently encounters significant institutional inertia and active resistance from within the health sector, and policy reform typically involves some trade-offs between competing health system goals and objectives. This Special Issue invites contributions to address the questions of whether and how healthcare policy shapes population health. Contributions are invited that address this question at the conceptual level and/or through empirical analysis. We welcome country and regional case studies of the link between health policy reform and population health, as well as comparative papers. 

Dr. Tim Tenbensel
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • health policy
  • health systems
  • population health
  • access
  • equity
  • efficiency
  • quality
  • policy implementation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 429 KiB  
Article
Comparing Health Workforce Policy during a Major Global Health Crisis: A Critical Conceptual Debate and International Empirical Investigation
by Ellen Kuhlmann, Jean-Louis Denis, Nancy Côté, Gabriela Lotta and Stefano Neri
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(6), 5035; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065035 - 13 Mar 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3220
Abstract
Background: The health workforce is central to healthcare systems and population health, but marginal in comparative health policy. This study aims to highlight the crucial relevance of the health workforce and contribute comparative evidence to help improve the protection of healthcare workers and [...] Read more.
Background: The health workforce is central to healthcare systems and population health, but marginal in comparative health policy. This study aims to highlight the crucial relevance of the health workforce and contribute comparative evidence to help improve the protection of healthcare workers and prevention of inequalities during a major public health crisis. Methods: Our integrated governance framework considers system, sector, organizational and socio-cultural dimensions of health workforce policy. The COVID-19 pandemic serves as the policy field and Brazil, Canada, Italy, and Germany as illustrative cases. We draw on secondary sources (literature, document analysis, public statistics, reports) and country expert information with a focus on the first COVID-19 waves until the summer of 2021. Results: Our comparative investigation illustrates the benefits of a multi-level governance approach beyond health system typologies. In the selected countries, we found similar problems and governance gaps concerning increased workplace stress, lack of mental health support, and gender and racial inequalities. Health policy across countries failed to adequately respond to the needs of HCWs, thus exacerbating inequalities during a major global health crisis. Conclusions: Comparative health workforce policy research may contribute new knowledge to improve health system resilience and population health during a crisis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Healthcare Policy and Population Health: Unpacking the Connections)
Back to TopTop