Critical Insights on Tenure Security in the Global South

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Land Socio-Economic and Political Issues".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 February 2024) | Viewed by 2551

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Anthropology, Center for Integrative Conservation Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
Interests: land governance; critical agrarian, legal and development studies; political and ontological roots of global inequality; the commons

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Afroamerican and African Studies, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA
Interests: agricultural policy; property right formalization; rural poverty and inequality; institutional economics

Special Issue Information

Interventions carried out in the name of development are typically guided by theories of change, “a structured set of assumptions regarding how an intervention works (or is expected to work) and how it influences (or is expected to influence) processes of change” (Vaessen 2016). Yet these theories often fail to hold up against the evidence, rest on ontological assumptions that are deeply situated (historically, culturally) rather than universal, and often mask the real underlying agendas driving change. In the land governance arena, “tenure (in)security” is perhaps the key concept animating a suite of recent interventions, from legislative changes to land titling campaigns, new voluntary codes of conduct, performance metrics, and related flows of funding and claims to expertise. Yet the questions of what exactly tenure security is, and whether interventions in its name have yielded the outcomes promised (and to whom the costs and benefits flow), remain contested in spite of development discourses that tend to render these things as settled facts.

This Special Issue will take a critical look at the assumptions driving land governance interventions in the Global South, with a focus on the ideas and practices surrounding tenure (in)security; the impacts these ideas generate for the purported beneficiaries; and other interests advanced and undermined in the process. Current papers explore theories of change guiding land governance interventions; the impacts of land titling campaigns on conflict, poverty and productivity; the consequences of the effective coupling of titling, collateralization and credit; gendered securities; and the ontological assumptions underlying dominant notions of tenure security and other ways of conceiving of security that are obscured in the process. We welcome additional theoretical papers, case studies and comparative work that draw on any of the relevant strands of critical social and economic theory: coloniality/decolonization; critical agrarian, development and legal studies; feminist and queer theory; ontological anthropology; political economy; heterodox economic theory; and others.  Papers that dig below the surface, illustrate connections to the real agendas driving change, and/or interrogate fundamental questions surrounding security (what it is, and whose security is being advanced) are particularly welcome, as are contributions from academics from the Global South.

It should be noted that waivers or partial waivers of the publication fees will be available to papers from institutions from the Global South.

Prof. Dr. Laura German
Prof. Dr. Howard Stein
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

31 pages, 390 KiB  
Article
Land Titling and Microcredit in Cambodia: Examining the Reality of Hernando de Soto’s ‘Three Steps to Heaven’
by Milford Bateman
Land 2024, 13(4), 502; https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040502 - 12 Apr 2024
Viewed by 544
Abstract
Starting with the work of Hernando de Soto in the 1980s, the role of land tenure soon attracted the attention of the international development community as a neoliberal-oriented theory of change rooted in the possession and use of private individual land titles by [...] Read more.
Starting with the work of Hernando de Soto in the 1980s, the role of land tenure soon attracted the attention of the international development community as a neoliberal-oriented theory of change rooted in the possession and use of private individual land titles by the poor. One of the central mechanisms proposed by de Soto was a three-step process that involves the poor (1) “securing” their tenure with land titles, (2) using their newly acquired land titles as collateral to leverage large amounts of microcredit to be used to establish a functioning microenterprise, and then (3) escaping from their poverty due to the jobs and income associated with founding and running a microenterprise. This paper explores what I call de Soto’s “three steps to heaven” theory of change, a concept that was taken on board with gusto by leading Western governments and virtually all of the main international development institutions, particularly the World Bank. I argue that Cambodia provides the ideal setting for evaluating de Soto’s concept because, since around 2020, it has possessed the largest microcredit sector in the world (on a per capita basis), thanks largely to the obligatory use of land titles as the collateral required to obtain microcredit. While the first two of de Soto’s “three steps to heaven” have been realized, the evidence shows that the assumptions related to step three have proved to be extremely problematic: the ubiquity of microcredit that was achieved since the early 2010s via steps one and two has not, in general, improved the lives and communities of Cambodia’s poor through accelerated microenterprise development. It appears, instead, to have contributed to deeper poverty, insecurity, vulnerability and inequality. I conclude that de Soto’s “three steps to heaven” theory reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the real institutional drivers of sustainable local economic development and poverty reduction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Insights on Tenure Security in the Global South)
16 pages, 671 KiB  
Article
Time as the Enemy? Disjointed Timelines and Uneven Rhythms of Indigenous Collective Land Titling in Paraguay and Cambodia
by Cari Tusing and Esther Leemann
Land 2023, 12(8), 1620; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081620 - 17 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1316
Abstract
Indigenous Land law reforms in Paraguay and Cambodia proposed collective land titling to secure land tenure through community ownership. When we look at land formalization through a temporal lens, we see the on-the-ground dynamics of how communal title may or may not be [...] Read more.
Indigenous Land law reforms in Paraguay and Cambodia proposed collective land titling to secure land tenure through community ownership. When we look at land formalization through a temporal lens, we see the on-the-ground dynamics of how communal title may or may not be achieved by examining the ethnographic case studies of Guarani and Bunong land titling. We argue that the temporality of land titling processes creates disjointed, shifting timelines mediated by relationships of power and disrupted by fast-tracked private and state concessions. This uneven relationship between time and titling interrupts, undermines and fragments Indigenous land possession with serious ecological and livelihood impacts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Insights on Tenure Security in the Global South)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop