Metal Recovery and Environment Remediation by Bioleaching Technology

A special issue of Minerals (ISSN 2075-163X). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Mineralogy and Biogeochemistry".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021) | Viewed by 5367

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Interests: bioleaching; microbe-substrata interactions

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals, Beijing 100088, China
Interests: bioremediation of heavy metal pollution; mining and metallurgy waste water treatment; biohydrometallurgy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The process whereby minerals are dissolved into bulk solutions under the effects of microorganisms is called bioleaching. On the one hand, bioleaching can be used for valuable metal recovery from ore deposits and concentrates. On the other hand, bioleaching may cause acidification of water resources, leading to serious environment pollution, such as acid mine/rock drainage (AMD/ARD).

It is assumed that 15% of copper, 5% of gold and smaller amounts of other metals (such as nickel and zinc) are currently produced globally using bioleaching technologies.  As well as base metals, such as copper and nickel, precious metals, such as gold, uranium, and rare-earth elements, have also been exploited from underground ore bodies in situ. Bioleaching is also applied to recover valuable metals from electrical–electronic wastes, spent petroleum and fly ash, oxide ores (i.e., lateritic ores), process waters and water streams. In addition, bioleaching has been actively studied over the last several years as a bioremediation tool for treating heavy metals contained in sewage sludge, sediment, and contaminated soil and mine tailings.

Modern “Omics” techniques, such as genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics, have been used to elucidate diversity and some ecological aspects of acidophilic communities, bioleaching mechanisms, and will be helpful in future attempts to optimize the design, control, and optimization of bioleaching applications. Increased standards for environmental protection and the demand for base and precious metals, as well as rare-earth elements, will definitely intensify the use of bioprocessing of ore minerals and other metal resources.

This Special Issue aims to publish papers of recent advances on bioleaching, bioremediation and related studies. These include mechanisms, methodology, new technology and its applications. Studies on the physiology and phylogeny of bioleaching microorganisms as well as recent omics data relevant to the understanding of bioleaching process are also welcome.

Prof. Dr. Ruiyong Zhang
Dr. Qian Li
Prof. Dr. Xingyu Liu
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Minerals is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • bioleaching
  • acidophiles
  • heavy metals
  • bioremediation
  • acid mine drainage
  • omics

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

11 pages, 1373 KiB  
Article
Bioleaching Coal Gangue with a Mixed Culture of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans
by Zihao Chen, Xinying Huang, Huan He, Jielin Tang, Xiuxiang Tao, Huazhou Huang, Rizwan Haider, Muhammad Ishtiaq Ali, Asif Jamal and Zaixing Huang
Minerals 2021, 11(10), 1043; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11101043 - 26 Sep 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 1973
Abstract
A mixed culture of A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans isolated from a coal gangue dump was used to bioleach coal gangue in a column reactor to investigate the leaching of elements. The changes of metal ions (Fe, Mn and Cr) and sulfate in [...] Read more.
A mixed culture of A. ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans isolated from a coal gangue dump was used to bioleach coal gangue in a column reactor to investigate the leaching of elements. The changes of metal ions (Fe, Mn and Cr) and sulfate in the leaching solution, elemental composition, mineral components and sulfur speciation of the coal gangue before and after bioleaching were analyzed by atomic absorption, anion chromatography, XRF, XRD and XPS. The results show that the mixed culture could promote the release of metal ions in coal gangue, with a leaching concentration of Fe > Mn > Cr. EC and Eh have significantly increased with the increase of metal ion concentrations in the leaching solution. XRF analyses show that the contents of Fe, Mn and S decreased in coal gangue after bioleaching. XRD results suggest that the bioleaching has impacts on minerals in coal gangue, particularly the Fe-containing components. XPS analyses show that sulfur speciation in the raw gangue samples was associated with sulfate, dibenzothiophene and pyrite sulfur. After continuous leaching by the mixed culture, the total sulfur, pyrite sulfur and sulfate sulfur in coal gangue decreased from 2.06% to 1.18%, 0.66% to 0.14% and 1.02% to 0.52%. The desulfurization rates of the pyrite and sulfate were 78.79% and 49.02 %. It is concluded that the mixed culture of these two microorganisms could effectively leach metals from coal gangue coupling with the oxidation of sulfide to sulfate. This study has provided fundamental information as a potential application in the recovery of valuable metals from coal gangue or environmental remediation related to gangue in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Recovery and Environment Remediation by Bioleaching Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 13997 KiB  
Article
Response and Dynamic Change of Microbial Community during Bioremediation of Uranium Tailings by Bacillus sp.
by Chuiyun Tang, Juan Zhong, Ying Lv, Xingyu Liu, Yongbin Li, Mingjiang Zhang, Xiao Yan and Weimin Sun
Minerals 2021, 11(9), 967; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11090967 - 6 Sep 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2305
Abstract
Bacillus sp. is widely used in the remediation of uranium-contaminated sites. However, little is known about the competitive process of microbial community in the environment during bioremediation. The bioremediation of uranium tailings using Bacillus sp. was explored, and the bacterial community was analyzed [...] Read more.
Bacillus sp. is widely used in the remediation of uranium-contaminated sites. However, little is known about the competitive process of microbial community in the environment during bioremediation. The bioremediation of uranium tailings using Bacillus sp. was explored, and the bacterial community was analyzed by high-throughput sequencing at different stages of remediation. Bacillus sp. reduced the leaching of uranium from uranium tailings. The lowest uranium concentration was 17.25 μg/L. Alpha diversity revealed that the abundance and diversity of microorganisms increased with the extension of the culture time. The microbial abundance and diversity were higher in the treatment group than in the control group. The dominant species at the phyla level were Firmicutes and Proteobacteria in the uranium tailings environment, whereas the phylum of Proteobacteria was significantly increased in the treatment group. Based on the genus level, the proportions of Arthrobacter, Rhodococcus and Paenarthrobacter decreased significantly, whereas those of Clostridium sp., Bacillus and Pseudomonas increased dramatically. Hence, the remediation of uranium contamination in the environment was due to the functional microorganisms, which gradually became the dominant strain in the treatment, such as Desulfotomaculum, Desulfosporporosinus, Anaerocolumna, Ruminiclostridium and Burkholderia. These findings provided a promising outlook of the potential for remediation strategies of soil contaminated by uranium. The dynamic characteristics of the microbial community are likely to provide a foundation for the bioremediation process in practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Recovery and Environment Remediation by Bioleaching Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop