Advancing Organisational Management and Innovation Through Systems Science

A Special Issue of Systems (ISSN 2079-8954) belonging to the section "Systems Practice in Social Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 November 2026 | Viewed by 2478

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
Interests: human resource management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Inner City Learning, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, College Road, Carmarthen SA31 3EP, UK
Interests: systems science; socio technical AI; organisational management and innovation; applied artificial intelligence (AI); evolutionary computation and neuro evolution; machine learning and deep learning; telecommunication networks

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue will explore how systems models and the systems sciences that underpin them can illuminate, diagnose, and improve the socio‑technical complexity of contemporary organisations. We invite contributions that make systemic structures and mechanisms explicit, including interdependencies, feedback loops, non‑linear behaviours, emergence, boundary choices, recursion, and viability. Submissions should demonstrate how systems modelling enhances decision‑making, organisational design, strategy development, innovation performance, and resilience across private, public, and third‑sector contexts.

We particularly welcome research that (i) advances or integrates systems theories (e.g., system dynamics, viable system models, sociotechnical and complex adaptive systems perspectives, etc.), (ii) develops or applies modelling methodologies (e.g., Soft Systems Methodology, causal‑loop and stock–flow modelling, agent‑based models, network and multiscale system models, mixed‑methods designs, etc.), (iii) provides empirical, simulation‑based, or design‑science evidence of improved organisational outcomes, or (iv) offers translational artefacts such as reusable models, architectures, datasets, formal specifications, modelling workflows, or diagnostic tools that support practitioner adoption.

Illustrative themes include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Systemically informed strategy, governance, and organisational redesign; and viability, agility, and adaptive capacity under uncertainty.
  • Innovation systems, portfolios, and ecosystems; ambidexterity; and system‑level drivers of diffusion and adoption.
  • AI‑ and data‑enabled management as socio‑technical systems (human–AI teaming, assurance, interpretability, and organisational safety).
  • Operations, supply‑network and service‑system dynamics; digital twins; and systemic risk propagation and mitigation.
  • Learning, capabilities, and culture as feedback‑rich organisational systems; and continuous improvement architectures.
  • Sustainability, circularity, and responsibility, understood as system properties spanning environmental, economic, and social domains.

Dr. Dennis Pepple
Dr. Aliyu Sambo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Systems is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • systems science
  • systems thinking
  • systems modelling
  • system dynamics
  • viable system model
  • complex adaptive systems
  • sociotechnical systems
  • organisational systems
  • innovation systems
  • modelling and simulation
  • AI‑enabled socio‑technical systems
  • governance, assurance and ethics
  • organisational resilience and viability
  • digital transformation
  • learning and capability systems
  • sustainability and circularity

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 2386 KB  
Article
What Choices Do Employees Have When Facing Destructive Leaders, and What Are the Odds of a Good Outcome for the Employees? A Systemic Perspective
by Jan Emblemsvåg and Marianne Synnes Emblemsvåg
Systems 2026, 14(8), 937; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14080937 - 3 Aug 2026
Viewed by 1003
Abstract
The destructive leadership evolution model derives from the centuries-old Gresham’s Law, and it states that “bad” leaders drive out “good” leaders, but “good” leaders cannot drive out “bad” leaders when “bad” leaders are allowed to operate with impunity. Employees will therefore face a [...] Read more.
The destructive leadership evolution model derives from the centuries-old Gresham’s Law, and it states that “bad” leaders drive out “good” leaders, but “good” leaders cannot drive out “bad” leaders when “bad” leaders are allowed to operate with impunity. Employees will therefore face a choice between becoming a colluder, a conformer, or a leaver unless top management successfully resolves the situation. This paper analyzes the situation from the employees’ perspective using Gresham’s Law as the starting point. The principal advantage of using Gresham’s Law lies in its systemic perspective: it treats corporations as complex adaptive systems and therefore makes explicit the conditions under which particular outcomes are likely to arise. The analysis itself consists of using a random choice model and Monte Carlo simulations. The study is therefore exploratory in nature, and it demonstrates that the probability of averting destructive leadership tendencies remains low unless top management intervenes deliberately. These results align with empirical results of other researchers, indicating that managers are not any more effective at curbing destructive leaders than can be predicted by a simple random choice model. Consequently, the model suggests that for most employees a rational course of action is to exit the organization except where other compelling considerations outweigh the costs of staying. Full article
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

40 pages, 837 KB  
Article
Government–Market Synergy and Deep Integration of Technological and Industrial Innovation: Empirical Evidence from China
by Ya Li, Hua Feng and Yihang Sun
Systems 2026, 14(5), 555; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14050555 - 14 May 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 881
Abstract
Against the backdrop of deep integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation, this study constructs a theoretical model incorporating market and government behavior. Utilizing panel data from 284 prefecture-level cities across China from 2013 to 2023, it empirically analyzes the roles and mechanisms [...] Read more.
Against the backdrop of deep integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation, this study constructs a theoretical model incorporating market and government behavior. Utilizing panel data from 284 prefecture-level cities across China from 2013 to 2023, it empirically analyzes the roles and mechanisms of efficient market and proactive government in facilitating the deep integration. Findings indicate that the market’s “push–pull mechanism” promotes the deep integration of technological and industrial innovation, enhancing output performance. However, market mechanism exhibits diminishing marginal output performance: beyond a certain threshold, the force to drive further performance improvements weakens. The government’s role can positively influence the market mechanism’s ability to drive deep integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation, and growth in output performance. In coordinating government and market efforts, the following principles should be observed: as market mechanism matures, gradually enhance technological innovation by allocating human capital to research activities, particularly basic research; formulate industrial policies that progressively prioritize science and technology innovation activities; and advance the development of public goods, such as technology transfer and commercialization platforms. To advance the deep integration of technological and industrial innovation, policy implications include consistently leveraging market mechanisms, coordinating government and market efforts to design policies for capital and talent mobility, and promoting the construction of conversion platforms like concept-validation centers and science incubators. Full article
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop