Advanced Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Aim:

Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering is essential for the overall success of civil engineering projects, as it plays a fundamental role in ensuring their safety and reliability. Advanced risk assessment methods aim to enhance the understanding and mitigation of risks associated with the uncertain subsurface conditions, relevant for a range of geotechnical structures such as foundations, tunnels, foundation pits, retaining walls, reinforced soil, earthen structures (dams, levees), etc. A number of innovative and sophisticated methodologies and tools have been employed and developed in recent years, with the overall aim of assessing and managing the soil and rock-related uncertainties. Since the risk assessment in geotechnical engineering requires a multidisciplinary approach, this topic considers theoretical aspects and experimental work in domain of geology, hydrogeology, engineering-geology, geotechnics, civil engineering, environmental engineering, as well in other relevant branches of science. In addition to addressing the mentioned uncertainties in subsurface conditions, effective risk assessment ensures the safety of structures and human lives, helps in the identification and mitigation of geo-hazards, provides optimization in the design and construction of geotechnical structures, and ensures compliance with regulations and standards as well as long-term performance and sustainability.

Scope:

The scope of this topic includes a range of innovative aspects which could boost up practitioners' and researchers' awareness of risk assessment importance in geotechnical engineering. These aspects include the following:

• advanced methods for soil and rock characterization and subsurface data collection;
• advanced risk modelling and analysis with focus on probabilistic methods;
• geo-hazard identification and management;
• monitoring (with focus on advanced geotechnical and remote sensing methods) with development of early warning systems;
• identification and incorporation of climate and environmental factors into the risk assessment procedures;
• adherence to relevant industry standards, codes, and regulations in conducting risk assessments;
• development of risk-informed decision support tools for the relevant stakeholders in field of geotechnical engineering.

Prof. Dr. Meho-Saša Kovačević
Dr. Vassilis Marinos
Topic Editors

Keywords

Participating Journals

Journal Name	Impact Factor	CiteScore	Launched Year	First Decision (median)	APC
GeoHazards geohazards	-	2.6	2020	19 Days	CHF 1000	Submit
Geosciences geosciences	2.4	5.3	2011	23.5 Days	CHF 1800	Submit
Geotechnics geotechnics	-	-	2021	14.3 Days	CHF 1000	Submit
Remote Sensing remotesensing	4.2	8.3	2009	23.9 Days	CHF 2700	Submit
Sensors sensors	3.4	7.3	2001	18.6 Days	CHF 2600	Submit
Standards standards	-	-	2021	30.6 Days	CHF 1000	Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results

Content type Publication Date

Result details

Normal Extended Compact

Journals

All GeoHazards Geosciences Geotechnics Remote Sensing Sensors Standards

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Plain Text BibTeX BibTeX (without abstracts) Endnote Endnote (without abstracts) Tab-delimited RIS

Error

Oops... you haven't selected anything for export.

Ok

clear

12 pages, 1438 KiB  

Open AccessArticle

Swell Magnitude of Unsaturated Clay as Affected by Different Wetting Conditions

by Shay Nachum

Standards 2025, 5(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/standards5010001 - 6 Jan 2025

Viewed by 493

Abstract

The wetting of compacted clays and their subsequent swelling often result in damage to structures and infrastructures. Estimations of the swell that is expected to develop during wetting are usually based on standard laboratory tests. The standard procedure requires inundating the test specimens; [...] Read more.

The wetting of compacted clays and their subsequent swelling often result in damage to structures and infrastructures. Estimations of the swell that is expected to develop during wetting are usually based on standard laboratory tests. The standard procedure requires inundating the test specimens; this procedure represents an extreme wetting condition and provides an upper limit to the swell. However, wetting may result from less extreme conditions, for example by the absorption of water due to suction forces, which may result in a smaller swell. This paper describes a laboratory investigation of the swell difference in high-plasticity clay that may result from different wetting conditions. Swell tests were carried out on specimens prepared at different initial conditions and wetted under different wetting conditions of inundation or absorption. The results indicate that as the initial void ratio decreases and the degree of saturation increases, it is more likely that different wetting conditions will result in different swell magnitudes, where inundation may create a larger swell than absorption. The soil at a low initial void ratio and high degree of saturation seems to be characterized by mono-modal pore size distributions in the micropore range. This unique pore size distribution may be the explanation of the different swell magnitudes. Full article

(This article belongs to the Topic Advanced Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering)

►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 9240 KiB  

Open AccessArticle

Identification and Analysis of the Geohazards Located in an Alpine Valley Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data

by Yonglin Yang, Zhifang Zhao, Dingyi Zhou, Zhibin Lai, Kangtai Chang, Tao Fu and Lei Niu

Sensors 2024, 24(13), 4057; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134057 - 21 Jun 2024

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1350

Abstract

Geohazards that have developed in densely vegetated alpine gorges exhibit characteristics such as remote occurrence, high concealment, and cascading effects. Utilizing a single remote sensing datum for their identification has limitations, while utilizing multiple remote sensing data obtained based on different sensors can [...] Read more.

Geohazards that have developed in densely vegetated alpine gorges exhibit characteristics such as remote occurrence, high concealment, and cascading effects. Utilizing a single remote sensing datum for their identification has limitations, while utilizing multiple remote sensing data obtained based on different sensors can allow comprehensive and accurate identification of geohazards in such areas. This study takes the Latudi River valley, a tributary of the Nujiang River in the Hengduan Mountains, as the research area, and comprehensively uses three techniques of remote sensing: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), Small Baseline Subset interferometric synthetic aperture radar (SBAS-InSAR), and UAV optical remote sensing. These techniques are applied to comprehensively identify and analyze landslides, rockfalls, and debris flows in the valley. The results show that a total of 32 geohazards were identified, including 18 landslides, 8 rockfalls, and 6 debris flows. These hazards are distributed along the banks of the Latudi River, significantly influenced by rainfall and distribution of water systems, with deformation variables fluctuating with rainfall. The three types of geohazards cause cascading disasters, and exhibit different characteristics in the 0.5 m resolution hillshade map extracted from LiDAR data. UAV LiDAR has advantages in densely vegetated alpine gorges: after the selection of suitable filtering algorithms and parameters of the point cloud, it can obtain detailed terrain and geomorphological information on geohazards. The different remote sensing technologies used in this study can mutually confirm and complement each other, enhancing the capability to identify geohazards and their associated hazard cascades in densely vegetated alpine gorges, thereby providing valuable references for government departments in disaster prevention and reduction work. Full article

(This article belongs to the Topic Advanced Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering)

►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 17404 KiB  

Open AccessArticle

A Novel Method for Full-Section Assessment of High-Speed Railway Subgrade Compaction Quality Based on ML-Interval Prediction Theory

by Zhixing Deng, Wubin Wang, Linrong Xu, Hao Bai and Hao Tang

Sensors 2024, 24(11), 3661; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113661 - 5 Jun 2024

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1395

Abstract

The high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality is controlled by the compaction degree (K), with the maximum dry density (ρ_dmax) serving as a crucial indicator for its calculation. The current mechanisms and methods for determining the ρ_dmax [...] Read more.

The high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality is controlled by the compaction degree (K), with the maximum dry density (ρ_dmax) serving as a crucial indicator for its calculation. The current mechanisms and methods for determining the ρ_dmax still suffer from uncertainties, inefficiencies, and lack of intelligence. These deficiencies can lead to insufficient assessments for the high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality, further impacting the operational safety of high-speed railways. In this paper, a novel method for full-section assessment of high-speed railway subgrade compaction quality based on ML-interval prediction theory is proposed. Firstly, based on indoor vibration compaction tests, a method for determining the ρ_dmax based on the dynamic stiffness K_rb turning point is proposed. Secondly, the Pso-OptimalML-Adaboost (POA) model for predicting ρ_dmax is determined based on three typical machine learning (ML) algorithms, which are back propagation neural network (BPNN), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest (RF). Thirdly, the interval prediction theory is introduced to quantify the uncertainty in ρ_dmax prediction. Finally, based on the Bootstrap-POA-ANN interval prediction model and spatial interpolation algorithms, the interval distribution of ρ_dmax across the full-section can be determined, and a model for full-section assessment of compaction quality is developed based on the compaction standard (95%). Moreover, the proposed method is applied to determine the optimal compaction thicknesses (H₀), within the station subgrade test section in the southwest region. The results indicate that: (1) The PSO-BPNN-AdaBoost model performs better in the accuracy and error metrics, which is selected as the POA model for predicting ρ_dmax. (2) The Bootstrap-POA-ANN interval prediction model for ρ_dmax can construct clear and reliable prediction intervals. (3) The model for full-section assessment of compaction quality can provide the full-section distribution interval for K. Comparing the H₀ of 50~60 cm and 60~70 cm, the compaction quality is better with the H₀ of 40~50 cm. The research findings can provide effective techniques for assessing the compaction quality of high-speed railway subgrades. Full article

(This article belongs to the Topic Advanced Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering)

►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less

Select all

Export citation of selected articles as:

Plain Text BibTeX BibTeX (without abstracts) Endnote Endnote (without abstracts) Tab-delimited RIS

 

Error

Oops... you haven't selected anything for export.

Ok

clear

Displaying articles 1-3