Next Article in Journal
The Gibbs Paradox
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimal Placement of Pressure Gauges for Water Distribution Networks Using Entropy Theory Based on Pressure Dependent Hydraulic Simulation
Previous Article in Journal
Information Geometry of Nonlinear Stochastic Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Virtual Network Embedding Based on Graph Entropy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Graph and Network Complexity from an Algorithmic Information Perspective

by
Hector Zenil
1,2,3,4,5,*,
Narsis A. Kiani
1,2,3,4 and
Jesper Tegnér
2,3,4,5
1
Algorithmic Dynamics Lab, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
2
Unit of Computational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
3
Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab), 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
4
Algorithmic Nature Group, Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique (LABORES) for the Natural and Digital Sciences, 75005 Paris, France
5
Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2018, 20(8), 551; https://doi.org/10.3390/e20080551
Submission received: 21 June 2018 / Revised: 18 July 2018 / Accepted: 20 July 2018 / Published: 25 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Graph and Network Entropies)

Abstract

Information-theoretic-based measures have been useful in quantifying network complexity. Here we briefly survey and contrast (algorithmic) information-theoretic methods which have been used to characterize graphs and networks. We illustrate the strengths and limitations of Shannon’s entropy, lossless compressibility and algorithmic complexity when used to identify aspects and properties of complex networks. We review the fragility of computable measures on the one hand and the invariant properties of algorithmic measures on the other demonstrating how current approaches to algorithmic complexity are misguided and suffer of similar limitations than traditional statistical approaches such as Shannon entropy. Finally, we review some current definitions of algorithmic complexity which are used in analyzing labelled and unlabelled graphs. This analysis opens up several new opportunities to advance beyond traditional measures.
Keywords: algorithmic information theory; complex networks; Kolmogorov-Chaitin complexity; algorithmic randomness; algorithmic probability; biological networks algorithmic information theory; complex networks; Kolmogorov-Chaitin complexity; algorithmic randomness; algorithmic probability; biological networks

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zenil, H.; Kiani, N.A.; Tegnér, J. A Review of Graph and Network Complexity from an Algorithmic Information Perspective. Entropy 2018, 20, 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20080551

AMA Style

Zenil H, Kiani NA, Tegnér J. A Review of Graph and Network Complexity from an Algorithmic Information Perspective. Entropy. 2018; 20(8):551. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20080551

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zenil, Hector, Narsis A. Kiani, and Jesper Tegnér. 2018. "A Review of Graph and Network Complexity from an Algorithmic Information Perspective" Entropy 20, no. 8: 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20080551

APA Style

Zenil, H., Kiani, N. A., & Tegnér, J. (2018). A Review of Graph and Network Complexity from an Algorithmic Information Perspective. Entropy, 20(8), 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20080551

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop