Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of Multiscale Sample Entropy and Hierarchical Entropy and Its Application in Feature Extraction for Ship-Radiated Noise
Previous Article in Journal
Blind Frequency Estimation and Symbol Recovery for the Analytically Solvable Chaotic System
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Entropy
Volume 21
Issue 8
10.3390/e21080792
Review Report
entropy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Model of Random Field with Piece-Constant Values and Sampling-Restoration Algorithm of Its Realizations

Entropy 2019, 21(8), 792; https://doi.org/10.3390/e21080792
by Yuri Goritskiy 1, Vladimir Kazakov 2,*, Olga Shevchenko 1 and Francisco Mendoza 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Entropy 2019, 21(8), 792; https://doi.org/10.3390/e21080792
Submission received: 27 June 2019 / Revised: 31 July 2019 / Accepted: 5 August 2019 / Published: 14 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Information Theory, Probability and Statistics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The term SRA should be defined in the first time that is presented

Some equations should be improved, there are symbols not clear.

Why do the authors use the function z=x+y?


Author Response

 

Please see the attachment


Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

A description of the model of a random piecewise constant field formed by the sum of realizations of two Markov processes with an arbitrary number of states and defined along mutually perpendicular axes is proposed.

Please explain the principal contributions of this work; it is seemed that there is presented the repetition of results from ref. 23 and other authors papers in this part of the paper (Sect. 4). Please explain the principal scientific contribution of this current paper and the differences with previously paper published by authors.

 Two examples explained have only academic interest and this reviewer did find any application for image processing problem mentioned in introduction.

 In the manuscript, there are a lot places (eqs. 1, 2, 3, 12, 13, 19, etc.) where in the equations, the  sub-indexes and parentheses are presented in non-correct form. Please revise and correct theses parts of the equations.  Several equations are written in such  form that potential reader could not understand text of the manuscript.

In addition, this review saw that sizes of letters in different equations are changed, this give additional difficulties in reading of the text.

Small grammar and stylistic errors should be corrected, mainly in commas.


Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Revise line 50, page 2; page 14, lines 332 and 339. There are small errors

Back to TopTop