Next Article in Journal
Four-Objective Optimizations of a Single Resonance Energy Selective Electron Refrigerator
Next Article in Special Issue
Tsallis Entropy for Loss Models and Survival Models Involving Truncated and Censored Random Variables
Previous Article in Journal
Maximum Efficient Power Performance Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimization of Two-Stage Thermoelectric Generators
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stochastic Properties of Fractional Generalized Cumulative Residual Entropy and Its Extensions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Weighted Cumulative Past Extropy and Its Inference

Entropy 2022, 24(10), 1444; https://doi.org/10.3390/e24101444
by Mohammad Reza Kazemi 1, Majid Hashempour 2 and Maria Longobardi 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Entropy 2022, 24(10), 1444; https://doi.org/10.3390/e24101444
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 4 October 2022 / Accepted: 8 October 2022 / Published: 11 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Measures of Information II)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See the attached review report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

In attachment our reply. Thank you for your useful suggestions.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Read carefully before final publication.  Please see attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your useful suggestions

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The article ''Weighted Cumulative Past Extropy and its Inference'' presents a measure of uncertainty based on the concepts of empirical weighted cumulative past extropy (WCPJ) to deal with hypothesis testing issues. The topic is of interest to data scientists who work with the estimation of parameters from observed data sets. The manuscript is well written, and the objectives are achieved and enough presented. However, although not mandatory, graphic illustrations are desirable in order to help readers visualize the main results. In addition, perspectives for the development of the present methodology and possible applications are desirable in section Conclusion. The above points must be addressed before the manuscript can be considered for publication.

Author Response

Thank you for useful suggestions

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have revised the paper carefully based on my previous comments. I recommend its publication at the present form.

Back to TopTop