Next Article in Journal
VFL-Cafe: Communication-Efficient Vertical Federated Learning via Dynamic Caching and Feature Selection
Previous Article in Journal
Wealth Distribution Involving Psychological Traits and Non-Maxwellian Collision Kernel
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Near-Wall Methodology for Large-Eddy Simulation Based on Dynamic Hybrid RANS-LES
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simulation of Flow Around a Finite Rectangular Prism: Influence of Mesh, Model, and Subgrid Length Scale

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester M1 3PL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2025, 27(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/e27010065
Submission received: 28 October 2024 / Revised: 7 December 2024 / Accepted: 17 December 2024 / Published: 13 January 2025

Abstract

This study investigates the flow field around a finite rectangular prism using both experimental and computational methods, with a particular focus on the influence of the turbulence approach adopted, the mesh resolution employed, and different subgrid length scales. Ten turbulence modelling and simulation approaches, including both ‘scale-modelling’ Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models and ‘scale-resolving’ Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES), were tested across six different mesh resolutions. A case with sharp corners allows the location of the flow separation to be fixed, which facilitates a focus on the separated flow region and, in this instance, the three-dimensional interaction of three such regions. The case, therefore, readily enables an assessment of the ‘grey-area’ issue, whereby some DDES methods demonstrate delayed activation of the scale-resolving model, impacting the size of flow recirculation. Experimental measurements were shown to agree well with reference data for the same geometry, after which particle image velocimetry (PIV) data were gathered to extend the reference dataset. Numerical predictions from the RANS models were generally quite reasonable but did not show improvement with further refinement, as one would expect, whereas DDES clearly demonstrated continuous improvement in predictive accuracy with progressive mesh refinement. The shear-layer-adapted (SLA) subgrid length scale (ΔSLA) displayed consistently superior performance compared to the more widely used length scale based on local cell volume, particularly for moderate mesh resolutions commonly employed in industrial settings with limited resources. In general, front-body separation and reattachment exhibited greater sensitivity to mesh refinement than wake resolution. Finally, in order to correlate the observed DDES mesh requirements with the observations from the converged RANS solutions, an approximation for the Taylor microscale was explored as a potential tool for mesh sizing.
Keywords: RANS; hybrid RANS LES; DDES; mesh refinement; grey area; subgrid length scale; external aerodynamics RANS; hybrid RANS LES; DDES; mesh refinement; grey area; subgrid length scale; external aerodynamics

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Savoie, M.; Quinn, M.K.; Parslew, B.; Revell, A. Simulation of Flow Around a Finite Rectangular Prism: Influence of Mesh, Model, and Subgrid Length Scale. Entropy 2025, 27, 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27010065

AMA Style

Zhang X, Savoie M, Quinn MK, Parslew B, Revell A. Simulation of Flow Around a Finite Rectangular Prism: Influence of Mesh, Model, and Subgrid Length Scale. Entropy. 2025; 27(1):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27010065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xutong, Maxime Savoie, Mark K. Quinn, Ben Parslew, and Alistair Revell. 2025. "Simulation of Flow Around a Finite Rectangular Prism: Influence of Mesh, Model, and Subgrid Length Scale" Entropy 27, no. 1: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27010065

APA Style

Zhang, X., Savoie, M., Quinn, M. K., Parslew, B., & Revell, A. (2025). Simulation of Flow Around a Finite Rectangular Prism: Influence of Mesh, Model, and Subgrid Length Scale. Entropy, 27(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/e27010065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop