Next Article in Journal
Improving Energy Efficiency on SDN Control-Plane Using Multi-Core Controllers
Next Article in Special Issue
A Study of Hot Climate Low-Cost Low-Energy Eco-Friendly Building Envelope with Embedded Phase Change Material
Previous Article in Journal
Robust Superhydrophobic Surface on Polypropylene with Thick Hydrophobic Silica Nanoparticle-Coated Films Prepared by Facile Compression Molding
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Efficient Parallel Configuration Based Six Degree of Freedom Machining Bed
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Low-Cost Sustainable Energy Solution for Pristine Mountain Areas of Developing Countries

1
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Sector E-9, Air University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
2
Aerospace Engineering Department, Samuel Ginn College of Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bilkent University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
4
College of Business, Engineering and Technology, Texas A&M University-Texarkana, Texarkana, TX 75503, USA
5
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan
6
Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(11), 3160; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113160
Submission received: 25 April 2021 / Revised: 25 May 2021 / Accepted: 27 May 2021 / Published: 28 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofuels and Sustainable Energy Materials Development)

Abstract

:
The rise in energy requirements and its shortfall in developing countries have affected socioeconomic life. Communities in remote mountainous regions in Asia are among the most affected by energy deprivation. This study presents the feasibility of an alternate strategy of supplying clean energy to the areas consisting of pristine mountains and forest terrain. Southeast Asia has a much-diversified landscape and varied natural resources, including abundant water resources. The current study is motivated by this abundant supply of streams which provides an excellent environment for run-of-river micro vertical axis water turbines. However, to limit the scope of the study, the rivers and streams flowing in northern areas of Pakistan are taken as the reference. The study proposes a comprehensive answer for supplying low-cost sustainable energy solutions for such remote communities. The suggested solution consists of a preliminary hydrodynamic design using Qblade, further analysis using numerical simulations, and finally, experimental testing in a real-world environment. The results of this study show that the use of microturbines is a very feasible option considering that the power generation density of the microturbine comes out to be approximately 2100 kWh/year/m2, with minimal adverse effects on the environment.

1. Introduction

Renewable, or inexpensive energy resources, are the need of the day for the sustainment of daily life [1]. Hydroelectric energy is one of the most abundantly available resource of renewable energy in Southeast Asia, but traditional hydroelectric projects require a huge amount of investment in the form of infrastructure and time. Most rivers/streams originating from the mountainous regions of Southeast Asia, such as the Himalayan ranges, are shallow, but they keep a high velocity during the majority of the year. Within the region, several countries like Pakistan have a large number of such water channels. These are in abundance in the northern part of Pakistan’s rain catchment areas. To limit the scope of the current study, data from the water channels located in Pakistan are taken as the reference. The main aim of this study is to find a possible solution to provide energy to small local communities residing on the banks of these water streams, without disrupting the local ecology. The preliminary hydrodynamic design is made after basic parametric analyses using QBlade. The designed turbine is then validated using numerical simulations, and finally, experimental testing in a real-world environment is completed.
Though this study does not conduct environmental analyses, earlier works have shown that small run-of-the-river hydroelectric power projects do not cause any significant negative impact on the physical or chemical characteristics of the waterways [2] and innovative designs can reduce other ecological effects [3]. The geographical layout of the Indus Basin is given in Figure 1 [4]. The depicted precipitation data shows high precipitation feeding the water channels being studied in this research effort, while the flow rates of the water channels originating in the Northern Regions of Pakistan are shown in Figure 2 [5].
Figure 2 shows that most of these water channels have water flowrates ranging from an average flow rate of 89 m3/s during the winter and higher flowrates averaging at 473 m3/s during the summer and reaching up to highs of around 1200–1700 m3/s in peak precipitation season, as shown in Table 1.
These flow rates (Table 1) in mountain regions translate to water velocities ranging from 1.5–2.5 m/s in the off-peak season and to 3.5–4.5 m/s in the peak rainy season. Such water flowrates are sufficient for the year-round harvesting of hydroelectric energy. However, these water channels are mostly shallow, and during off-peak season, their depth can be less than 1.5 m. In such a scenario, run-of-the-river micro-vertical axis water turbines (μVAWT) supply a more efficient and workable solution for harnessing the kinetic energy of flowing water and converting it into electrical energy than the horizontal axis water turbine (HAWT) options [6].
Alternately, using fossil fuels would cause great harm to the pristine natural environment [7,8,9,10]. Hydrokinetic turbines have the advantage of a smaller footprint than other available renewable options, like solar power, which has a power density of around 0.16–0.25 kW/m2 [11], and would need clearing up large forest areas. Similarly, erecting huge towers to harness wind energy can be disruptive to the natural environment [12,13,14,15,16]. Thus, under the existing conditions of the Southeast Asia region, exploiting the kinetic energy of flowing water seems to be the more environmentally friendly option, as it encompasses many socioeconomic benefits for the region’s population as well [17,18]. Other than being environmentally suitable, μVAWT also have a positive effect on the local and regional economies [19]. It is seen that providing remote off-grid areas with energy through local microgrids is both less expensive and less disruptive to the local ecology than extending the main grid to such areas [20,21,22,23]. This research effort tries to design an efficient μVAWT model with multiple design parameters adjusted to values where the overall performance of the μVAWT is fine-tuned to year-round energy extraction of 2.5–5 kW from the flowing water of rivers and streams found in the mountain regions of Pakistan.

2. Design of Darrieus Type Turbine

Water turbines can be broadly categorized as horizontal axis, vertical axis, and crossflow turbines based on the axis of rotation [24]. The conventional horizontal axis and crossflow water turbines are more developed and have better efficiency compared to the vertical axis turbines, but they are not suited for shallow water channels with a water head of less than 3 m [25,26].
Darrieus turbines use lift force produced by hydrofoil to rotate the shaft, while Savonius turbines rotate because of the drag force experienced by the rotor. Darrieus turbines are selected for this research effort, as it can achieve higher efficiency compared to the Savonius turbines under the given conditions [27,28,29,30,31]. The design is simple and well suited for mountain water streams; it does not require a complex yawing mechanism and its compact nature can allow it to be portable as well. The structural design of the Darrieus μVAWT is simpler and can accommodate most mechanical parts and even the generator on top of the turbine or conveniently close to the stream bank. However, the hydrodynamic design of the rotor blades can be quite complex, as the blades experience interaction with vortices generated by preceding blades as well as the remnants of vortices generated in their earlier cycle. Engineers and researchers have developed different performance prediction models, such as the cascade, vortex, and momentum models [32,33,34], to analyze the power output of the μVAWT. These models estimate relative velocities and incidence angles at every azimuthal location to calculate normal and tangential forces [35]. It is the tangential force which drives the turbine.

3. Design Parameters

The design of a Darrieus rotor depends upon many geometric parameters, which include rotor radius (R), rotor height (H), number of blades (N), blade airfoil, blade camber, blade chord length (c), and blade pitch angle (ϕ). In the current study, the preliminary turbine design is based on the momentum model known as the double multiple stream tube (DMST) model. This model was developed by Paraschivoiu (2002) [35]. The open-source software QBlade, based on DMST, is used for performance evaluation.
DMST is derived from actuator disc theory and blade element theory. The energy extracted from the fluid occurs due to a reduction in the downstream velocity, or the water kinetic energy is converted to rotor mechanical energy. As shown in Figure 3, DMST models the turbine by dividing it into several tubes. Then every stream tube is further divided into two parts, i.e., upstream, and downstream. The turbine performance is separately calculated for both parts and then summed up. As shown in Figure 3, DMST considers five important velocities i.e., inflow velocity V; upwind induced velocity Vu; equilibrium velocity Veq; downwind induced velocity Vd; wake velocity Vw [36,37]. The turbine shaft power produced is calculated as:
P = C p 1 2 ρ A r e f V 3
where, A r e f   = 2RH is the turbine’s normal projected area.
CP is the turbine power coefficient, V is the free stream (inflow) velocity, and ρ is the density of the fluid. The local angle of attack a is calculated using the formula:
α = a r c t a n s i n θ c o s θ + λ
where, λ is an important dimensionless quantity known as the tip-speed ratio (TSR). Angle θ is an azimuthal position of the blade (see Figure 3). TSR is the ratio between the free stream water velocity V and the blade’s tangential velocity due to its rotation. ω is the angular velocity of the turbine. TSR is then given by:
TSR = λ = ω R V
The relationship between the power coefficient and torque ( T ) produced by the rotor is given below:
P = T ω  
C P = 2 T ω ρ A r e f V 3

3.1. Effect of Design Parameters on Power Output

Several studies [38,39,40,41,42,43], have been carried out in past to study the effects of variation in various design parameters of μVAWT. These studies have used a variety of techniques to improve turbine performance.
In the current study, the effect of each design variable on CP as a function of λ, the tip speed ratio (TSR), is studied using the blade element momentum theory [44]. Each parameter is varied while keeping all others constant. Using the results calculated for each design parameter, the design is formulated using the best value of each parameter (intuitive approach). The geometric restrictions (geographical constraints) and simplicity requirements (manufacturing and economic constraints) are maintained, as the aim of the study is to meet the requirements of the remote mountain regions. This back-to-the-basics approach keeps the design process simple, cost-effective, and results in an easy-to-maintain turbine. In these remote areas, traveling to a settled region for repairs, etc., is a very costly and difficult endeavor. Thus, design simplicity is as important as performance.

3.1.1. Effect of Airfoil Type

The airfoil design is the most important variable affecting turbine performance [37]. The design of an airfoil is dependent on its thickness, camber, and camber location. These variables are altered individually to study each one’s impact on the turbine performance. Before the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) formulated the NACA airfoil series, the airfoil design was not standardized, and researchers had to rely on their intuition and experience to determine the geometric characteristics of the airfoil. The NACA airfoil series has been designed using algebraic equations and provides researchers with much-needed details of airfoil performance. The NACA four-digit series airfoil profile is defined by a numbering system where:
  • Digit 1 gives the maximum camber as a percentage of the chord length.
  • Digit 2 gives the distance of maximum camber from the airfoil leading edge (10 × digit in percent of chord length).
  • Digits 3 & 4 give the maximum thickness of the airfoil as a percent of the chord.

3.1.2. Effect of Airfoil Thickness on CP

Traditionally, the NACA four digits and symmetric airfoil are used for most Darrieus type turbine designs [30]. Airfoils with different thicknesses are explored and their influence on CP is studied.
Figure 4 shows that turbine performance is not affected much by the thickness of airfoil; however, if the thickness increases (such as in the case of NACA 0021), the coefficient of power CP starts decreasing because of the increase in the blunt-body drag. Similarly, using very thin airfoil can lead to structural and manufacturing concerns.
Considering these constraints, NACA 0018 is selected for further studies for having better CP at higher TSR values compared to NACA 0021. Moreover, it provides better structural strength when compared with NACA 0012 or 0015.

3.1.3. Effect of Airfoil Camber

Different cambers are introduced to the selected airfoil thickness of 18% to study the effect of variation of airfoil camber. Figure 5 shows that the performance of the highly cambered airfoil is better at low TSR values, hence it can be useful for resolving self-starting issues. However, the largest CP is reduced for the turbine at higher TSR values for the cambered airfoil. Therefore, the introduction of the camber would deteriorate the overall turbine performance. Hence, the choice of symmetric airfoil NACA 0018 is kept for this design as it also satisfies the manufacturing and economic concerns.

3.1.4. Effect of Number of Blades

A turbine performance with 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 blades is studied. The results show better CP values at low TSR values for a turbine with a greater number of blades. It is seen that maximum CP values increase as the number of blades increase. However, the turbine performance readily decreases at higher values of TSR when the turbine solidity increases as more than 5 blades are included in the design.
The analysis of the effect of several blades revealed that the increase in the number of blades improved the turbine efficiency at a low tip-speed ratio, and a higher maximum output was also obtained at the lower TSR values. It was further observed that the CP vs. TSR curve was flatter for the lower number of blades, near the maximum values of CP, which corresponds to less change in power output and better off-design performance as well. Based on the data in Figure 6, it was seen that the turbine with 5 blades keeps higher power output with a CP value of 0.35 to 0.4 for a longer duration within the expected range of TSR variation. Hence, it was concluded that fewer blades not only helped in reducing the overall cost of the turbine manufacturing but also improved the off-design performance. The 5-bladed turbine design was therefore selected for the study.

3.1.5. Effect of the Airfoil Chord Length

The airfoil chord length has a major impact on the turbine performance because it governs the surface area of the blade, hence the values of drag and lift forces. A turbine with different chord lengths is analyzed and the following observations are made:
  • Decreasing chord length improves the maximum value of C.
  • The moderate value of chord length gives better performance at TSR values < 4.5.
  • Larger chord lengths tend to reduce the maximum CP and turbine performance decreases rapidly at higher TSR values.
From the data depicted in Figure 7, the best turbine performance (CP) for most TSR values is achieved for a chord length of 125 mm, and therefore, this value is selected for the study.

3.1.6. Effect of Turbine Radius

The radius (R) of the turbine is not only governed by performance parameters but also according to the available width of the water channel. Turbines with a bigger radius have stable behavior near largest CP, but poor performance at low TSR. From the results shown in Figure 8, the radius of 0.750 m is selected as it supplies a good value of CP (0.35 to 0.40) for the required TSR range.

3.1.7. Effect of Pitch Angle

The pitch control mechanism is quite complex to design. Variable pitch gives improved performance and stable torque output [45], but on the other hand, it increases system complexity [46,47]. Therefore, the fixed-pitch design is selected for experimental testing. Results are obtained for different fixed-pitch angles, as shown in Figure 9, to select the angle for best performance.
Based on the data in Figure 9 above, it was seen that the zero degrees pitch angle gives maximum power out. Hence, a zero-pitch angle is selected for the design.

3.1.8. Effect of Turbine Height

The height of the turbine is a design constraint governed by the depth of the water channel and it has an almost linear relation with CP.
Based on the data seen in Figure 10 above, it was seen that, as expected, CP increases almost linearly with the increase of turbine height, as the blade surface area is directly proportional to the turbine height. However, considering the available height constraint during off-peak season in the water channels under consideration, a height of 0.75 m is selected for the design to ensure year-round stable power output.

4. Final Design Selection

Based on the above-mentioned studies, and keeping in mind the geographical and economic constraints, the following design parameters as depicted in Table 2 are selected for further analysis.

Power Output of Selected Design

The CP and power output curves of the finalized design are given in Figure 11 and Figure 12 below:
The results show that selecting turbine design based on the best performance of each parameter (within the given constraints) can give a good year-round performance. It is seen that turbine performance stays stable within a range of 2.5 < TSR < 4.5 and power out of 4 kW to 6.5 kW is achieved in a velocity range of 3.5 < V < 4.5 m/s which is available during the summer months. However, during the winter months, the power output is likely to remain close to 2 kW only.

5. Fabrication of Turbine

Turbine blades are fabricated by using a five-axis CNC machine using polystyrene as the base material and later coated with polyurethane material. Five inch diameter circular aluminum plates are mounted on top of each blade to avoid tip vortices.
Each blade was mounted by two threaded rods and nuts (Figure 13) on the star-shaped structure with five arms and a central shaft (Figure 14). This arrangement ensured the required rigidity of the blades. A heavy metal structure was made using stainless steel beams to hold the turbine with the ground clearance of one foot. The CAD drawings of the assembly process are shown in Figure 14.
The complete turbine support structure and hub assembly were fabricated using angle iron and stainless-steel pipes, and the actual turbine assembly is shown in Figure 15.

6. Experimental Testing

6.1. Site Selection

The testing site selected is located at Kalpani River (34.073808, 72.022975), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The testing of the turbine, instead of being conducted in a controlled environment, was conducted in an actual water stream, with similar characteristics as the mountain streams in the region of interest, where accurate measurement was not possible. This resulting uncertainty may be questioned from a strictly scientific perspective; however, as the turbines are to be deployed in a real-world environment, which is uncontrolled and unpredictable, authors feel that this provides a better viability study. The turbine was tested at three different sites with different flow velocities and channel depths, as shown in Table 3.

6.2. Velocity & Force Measurement

Water velocity was measured using the simple float method. The time to travel 10 m by a float (Styrofoam piece) was noted multiple times using a stopwatch and the average taken as time t. Velocity was simply calculated as 10 m t . For force measurement, a spring balance attached to a turbine blade was used and the brake force (F) needed to keep the turbine at rest was measured. Force (F) measured by the spring balance is used for torque and power calculations.
C m = r × C T
where C T   is the coefficient of the tangential force generated on the turbine blades, and C m is the coefficient of the moment of the turbine. Then from Equation (6);
C P = λ × C m
τ = 1 2 ρ V 2 A r e f C m
P o u t = τ × ω

7. CFD Analysis

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of our design was carried out to achieve better insight into the fluid flow through the turbine. The turbine was modeled as a rotating mesh domain within the static flow domain. For the CFD analysis, a 2D model of the micro VAWT was created. Five equally spaced blades were placed on the turbine periphery. NACA 0018 symmetric blades 0.125 m chord length was used, and the turbine radius was selected to be 0.75 m (as per Table 3 parameters). ICEM CFD modeling software was used to create a 2D model of the turbine. The mesh was created and read into an ANSYS Fluent solver. The flow domain was selected to be a 30 m-by-30 m square domain. The CFD domain and turbine model are shown in Figure 16. While the computational mesh is shown in Figure 17.
Mesh independence was conducted using mesh sizes as given in Table 4 below. The turbine is modeled as a rotating mesh domain within the static flow domain. This study simulates flow over the turbine using the shear stress transport (SST k-omega) turbulence model. Flow conditions of Site 1 were used during the mesh independence simulations. The simulations were run for 29 turbine revolutions to ensure that stabilized data was achieved.
Based on the data in Table 4, the mesh size of 648,681 nodes was selected. The selected mesh is depicted in Figure 17.
Time step independence study was also carried out. Based on the data in Table 5, the Time-step of 0.00284091 s (representing an increment of 0.75 deg in the azimuthal angle per time-step) was selected.

Discussion on CFD Results

For torque calculations, the total coefficient of the moment (Cm) was calculated by adding the individual blade Cm for all the five blades and the turbine hub structure at each iteration, and then taking the average of the total Cm over a complete turbine rotation cycle of 360°. The Cm of each blade, total turbine Cm, and the average value of Cm, are shown in Figure 18. The turbine torque and power are calculated using equations (8) and (9).
The velocity profiles obtained using CFD simulation for the case with a river inflow rate of 1.5 m/s and turbine rotation rate of 44 RPM are depicted in Figure 19, while the vorticity distribution is shown in Figure 20.

8. Comparison of Results

The results obtained using CFD analysis and QBlade (double multiple stream tube model) are compared with experimental results in Table 6.

9. Conclusions

The results of this study show that the designed μVAWT produces approximately 0.5 kW of electricity. As the calculation was accomplished taking the least flow rates among the available water channels in the off-peak season, it can be considered that this would be the minimum electricity generation year-round. If 85% serviceability is assumed for the turbine, the minimum power generation is expected to be 7325 kWh annually. The area occupied by the microturbine is 1.77 m2. This translates to a power generation density of around 2100 kWh/year/m2. The power density of the proposed design compares favorably with other possible options [48] and the design has minimal adverse environmental effects as it does not cause any emissions, pollution, or disturbance to streams ecology [20,21,22,23]. Hence, the proposed microturbine design is very workable for the population living around the water channels in the region.
The DMST based QBlade results in this study show a difference of 24.2% compared to the experimental values. The experimental values are lower as QBlade does not include the support and hub structure. The preliminary CFD results are found to be much closer to the experimental values as the turbine hub is also included in the model. However, a further detailed CFD analysis is needed to explain these differences. The research suggests that Darrieus rotor type vertical axis water microturbines, which can be easily fabricated with little expense, can be successfully used for power extraction from shallow water streams in mountain regions. Provision of cheap power to off-grid remote mountainous regions using micro VAWT can bring about great socioeconomic benefits [49] without causing any major disruption to the ecosystem [2,3]. Other renewables in these mountainous regions would have a larger footprint and would likely cause more disruption to the local ecosystem. Remote generation would entail the laying of transmission lines, which would damage the environment more severely.
This is a preliminary study carried out to ascertain that run-of-the-river power generation using μVAWT is a viable option for a year-round supply of energy. The study uses the lowest flow rates among these water channels to do so. It is recommended that higher efficiency VAWT designs as have been investigated [45], along with tandem deployment of multiple turbines, be studied, so larger power requirements may also be met for populations residing in these remote areas. It is also suggested that more detailed parametric, sensitivity, and optimization analyses be carried out in future studies. The vortex interaction of the blades operating in the wake may be investigated in detail in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.R.S., S.H.R.S. and Z.K.; methodology, S.R.S.; software, S.H.R.S., U.R. and S.R.S.; validation, F.R., S.R.S. and M.F.S.; formal analysis, S.R.S.; investigation, S.R.S., S.H.R.S., M.B.K.N. and Z.K.; resources, F.R., H.Y., U.A.; data acquisition, S.R.S., U.R. and Z.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.R.S. and S.H.R.S.; writing—review and editing, U.A., M.F.S., M.B.K.N. and H.Y.; visualization, S.H.R.S., and U.R.; supervision, S.R.S.; project administration, Z.K.; funding acquisition, H.Y., F.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Efforts of Rida Waqar Shah, Abdullah Asad, Safdar Gohar, and Raja Ali Abbas are highly appreciated in conducting experimental testing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zou, C.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, G.; Xiong, B. Energy Revolution: From a Fossil Energy Era to a New Energy Era. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2016, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Álvarez, X.; Valero, E.; De La Torre-Rodríguez, N.; Acuña-Alonso, C. Influence of Small Hydroelectric Power Stations on River Water Quality. Water 2020, 12, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Quaranta, E.; Bonjean, M.; Cuvato, D.; Nicolet, C.; Dreyer, M.; Gaspoz, A.; Rey-Mermet, S.; Boulicaut, B.; Pratalata, L.; Pinelli, M.; et al. Hydropower Case Study Collection: Innovative Low Head and Ecologically Improved Turbines, Hydropower in Existing Infrastructures, Hydropeaking Reduction, Digitalization and Governing Systems. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Laghari, A.N.; Vanham, D.; Rauch, W. The Indus Basin in the Framework of Current and Future Water Resources Management. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16, 1063–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ahmad, Z.; Hafeez, M.; Ahmad, I. Hydrology of Mountainous Areas in the Upper Indus Basin, Northern Pakistan with the Perspective of Climate Change. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 184, 5255–5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Balduzzi, F.; Bianchini, A.; Ferrara, G.; Marten, D.; Pechlivanoglou, G.; Nayeri, C.N.; Paschereit, C.O.; Drofelnik, J.; Campobasso, M.S.; Ferrari, L. Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Analysis of a Darrieus Wind Turbine Blade Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Lifting Line Theory. In Volume 2A: Turbomachinery; ASME International: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oluwatoyin, K.; Oluwasegun, A.; Alabi, A. Power Generation and Its Impacts on the Environment. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 2015, 7, 551–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jorgenson, A.K.; Longhofer, W.; Grant, D.; Sie, A.; Giedraitis, V. The Effects of Economic and Political Integration on Power plants’ Carbon Emissions in the Post-Soviet Transition Nations. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 044009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Perera, F. Pollution from Fossil-Fuel Combustion Is the Leading Environmental Threat to Global Pediatric Health and Equity: Solutions Exist. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sovacool, B.K. The Avian and Wildlife Costs of Fossil Fuels and Nuclear Power. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 2012, 9, 255–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lakatos, L.; Hevessy, G.; Kovács, J. Advantages and Disadvantages of Solar Energy and Wind-Power Utilization. World Futur. 2011, 67, 395–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jaber, S. Environmental Impacts of Wind Energy. J. Clean Energy Technol. 2014, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Georgilakis, P.S. Technical Challenges Associated with the Integration of Wind Power into Power Systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2008, 12, 852–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Tummala, A.; Velamati, R.K.; Sinha, D.K.; Indraja, V.; Krishna, V.H. A Review on Small Scale Wind Turbines. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 1351–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Owusu, P.A.; Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. A Review of Renewable Energy Sources, Sustainability Issues and Climate Change Mitigation. Cogent Eng. 2016, 3, 1167990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Topić, D.; Vezmar, S.; Spajić, A.; Šljivac, D.; Jozsa, L. Positive and Negative Impacts of Renewable Energy Sources. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. Syst. 2014, 5, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  17. Arnaiz, M.; Cochrane, T.; Calizaya, A.; Shrestha, M. A Framework for Evaluating the Current Level of Success of Micro-Hydropower Schemes in Remote Communities of Developing Countries. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2018, 44, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaunda, C.S.; Kimambo, C.Z.; Nielsen, T.K. Potential of Small-Scale Hydropower for Electricity Generation in Sub-Saharan Africa. ISRN Renew. Energy 2012, 2012, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jenniches, S. Assessing the Regional Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Sources—A Literature Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hirsch, A.; Parag, Y.; Guerrero, J. Microgrids: A Review of Technologies, Key Drivers, and Outstanding Issues. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mariam, L.; Basu, M.; Conlon, M.F. A Review of Existing Microgrid Architectures. J. Eng. 2013, 2013, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ali, A.; Li, W.; Hussain, R.; He, X.; Williams, B.W.; Memon, A.H. Overview of Current Microgrid Policies, Incentives and Barriers in the European Union, United States and China. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hossain, E.; Kabalci, E.; Bayindir, R.; Perez, R. A Comprehensive Study on Microgrid Technology. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2014, 4, 1094–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khan, M.; Bhuyan, G.; Iqbal, M.; Quaicoe, J. Hydrokinetic Energy Conversion Systems and Assessment of Horizontal and Vertical Axis Turbines for River and Tidal Applications: A Technology Status Review. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 1823–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Elbatran, A.H.; Yaakob, O.; Ahmed, Y.; Shabara, H. Operation, Performance and Economic Analysis of Low Head Micro-Hydropower Turbines for Rural and Remote Areas: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 43, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fraenkel, P.; Paish, O.; Bokalders, V.; Harvey, A.; Brown, A.; Edwards, R. Micro-Hydro Power: A Guide for Development Workers; IT Publications: London, UK, 1999; Available online: https://www.amazon.com/Micro-Hydro-Power-Guide-Development-Workers/Dp/1853390291 (accessed on 28 January 2021).
  27. Chehouri, A.; Younes, R.; Ilinca, A.; Perron, J. Review of Performance Optimization Techniques Applied to Wind Turbines. Appl. Energy 2015, 142, 361–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Howell, R.; Qin, N.; Edwards, J.; Durrani, N. Wind Tunnel and Numerical Study of a Small Vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 412–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chen, W.-H.; Chen, C.-Y.; Huang, C.-Y.; Hwang, C.-J. Power Output Analysis and Optimization of Two Straight-Bladed Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines. Appl. Energy 2017, 185, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shukla, V.; Kaviti, A.K. Performance Evaluation of Profile Modifications on Straight-Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine by Energy and Spalart Allmaras Models. Energy 2017, 126, 766–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Islam, M.; Ting, D.; Fartaj, A. Aerodynamic Models for Darrieus-Type Straight-Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2008, 12, 1087–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Beri, H.; Yao, Y. Double Multiple Streamtube Model and Numerical Analysis of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Energy Power Eng. 2011, 3, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Dai, Y.M.; Gardiner, N.; Sutton, R.; Dyson, P.K. Hydrodynamic Analysis Models for the Design of Darrieus-Type Vertical-Axis Marine Current Turbines. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part M J. Eng. Marit. Environ. 2011, 225, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hirsch, I.H.; Mandal, A.C. A Cascade Theory for the Aerodynamic Performance of Darrieus Wind Turbines. Wind Eng. 1987, 11, 164–175. [Google Scholar]
  35. Paraschivoiu, I. Wind Turbine Design with Emphasis on Darrieus Concept, 1st ed.; Presses Internationales Polytechnique: Paris, France, 2002; Available online: https://www.amazon.com/Turbine-Design-Emphasis-Darrieus-Concept/Dp/2553009313 (accessed on 28 January 2021).
  36. Komass, T. Mathematical Modelling and Calculation of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Pitch System Using Matlab Tools. AASCIT J. Energy 2015, 2, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bhutta, M.M.A.; Hayat, N.; Farooq, A.U.; Ali, Z.; Jamil, S.R.; Hussain, Z. Vertical Axis Wind Turbine—A Review of Various Configurations and Design Techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1926–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, N.; Lei, H.; Han, Z.; Zhou, D.; Bao, Y.; Zhang, K.; Zhou, L.; Chen, C. Airfoil Optimization to Improve Power Performance of a High-Solidity Vertical Axis Wind Turbine at a Moderate Tip Speed Ratio. Energy 2018, 150, 236–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Miller, M.A.; Duvvuri, S.; Brownstein, I.; Lee, M.; Dabiri, J.O.; Hultmark, M. Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Experiments at Full Dynamic Similarity. J. Fluid Mech. 2018, 844, 707–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Li, Q.; Maeda, T.; Kamada, Y.; Murata, J.; Furukawa, K.; Yamamoto, M. Effect of Number of Blades on Aerodynamic Forces on a Straight-Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Energy 2015, 90, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brusca, S.; Lanzafame, R.; Messina, M. Design of a Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine: How the Aspect Ratio Affects the turbine’s Performance. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 2014, 5, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bedon, G.; Castelli, M.R.; Benini, E. Optimization of a Darrieus Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Using Blade Element—Momentum Theory and Evolutionary Algorithm. Renew. Energy 2013, 59, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ferreira, C.S.; Barone, M.F.; Zanon, A.; Kemp, R.; Giannattasio, P. Airfoil Optimization for Stall Regulated Vertical Axis Wind Turbines. In Proceedings of the 33rd Wind Energy Symposium, Kissimmee, FL, USA, 5–9 January 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marten, D.; Wendler, J. QBlade Guidelines v0.6. 2013. Available online: http://q-blade.org/project_images/files/guidelines_v06.pdf (accessed on 10 April 2015).
  45. Sheikh, S.R.; Koreshi, Z.U.; Rauf, U.; Khalil, S.; Aziz, U. A Novel Blade-Pitching Mechanism Design and Testing for Micro Vertical-Axis Water Turbines. Tech. J. 2020, 25, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hwang, I.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, S.J. Optimization of Cycloidal Water Turbine and the Performance Improvement by Individual Blade Control. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 1532–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Elkhoury, M.; Kiwata, T.; Aoun, E. Experimental and Numerical Investigation of a Three-Dimensional Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine with Variable-Pitch. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2015, 139, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fuentes, J.E.; Moya, F.D.; Montoya, O.D. Method for Estimating Solar Energy Potential Based on Photogrammetry from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Electronics 2020, 9, 2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sheikh, S.R.; Sheikh, H.; Koreshi, Z.U. Emerging Smart Community Concept and Microgrid Technology—A Study of Lagging Skill Development in Pakistan. Int. J. Train. Res. 2019, 17 (Suppl. S1), 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Climatology within the Indus basin: average annual precipitation (mm) for the period 1950–2000 [4].
Figure 1. Climatology within the Indus basin: average annual precipitation (mm) for the period 1950–2000 [4].
Energies 14 03160 g001
Figure 2. Flowrates of water channels in the region [5].
Figure 2. Flowrates of water channels in the region [5].
Energies 14 03160 g002
Figure 3. Double multiple stream tube model.
Figure 3. Double multiple stream tube model.
Energies 14 03160 g003
Figure 4. Coefficient of power vs. TSR plot for different airfoil thickness.
Figure 4. Coefficient of power vs. TSR plot for different airfoil thickness.
Energies 14 03160 g004
Figure 5. Coefficient of power vs. TSR plot for different airfoil camber.
Figure 5. Coefficient of power vs. TSR plot for different airfoil camber.
Energies 14 03160 g005
Figure 6. Coefficient of power vs. TSR plot for the different number of blades.
Figure 6. Coefficient of power vs. TSR plot for the different number of blades.
Energies 14 03160 g006
Figure 7. Coefficient of power vs. TSR plot for different chord lengths.
Figure 7. Coefficient of power vs. TSR plot for different chord lengths.
Energies 14 03160 g007
Figure 8. Coefficient of power vs. TSR plot for different turbine radii.
Figure 8. Coefficient of power vs. TSR plot for different turbine radii.
Energies 14 03160 g008
Figure 9. Coefficient of power vs. blade pitch angle.
Figure 9. Coefficient of power vs. blade pitch angle.
Energies 14 03160 g009
Figure 10. Coefficient of power vs. turbine height.
Figure 10. Coefficient of power vs. turbine height.
Energies 14 03160 g010
Figure 11. CP Vs. TSR for selected turbine design.
Figure 11. CP Vs. TSR for selected turbine design.
Energies 14 03160 g011
Figure 12. Power output vs. velocity for selected turbine design.
Figure 12. Power output vs. velocity for selected turbine design.
Energies 14 03160 g012
Figure 13. CAD drawings and pictures of turbine blades.
Figure 13. CAD drawings and pictures of turbine blades.
Energies 14 03160 g013
Figure 14. (ac) Assembly steps of the turbine, (d) complete assembly CAD.
Figure 14. (ac) Assembly steps of the turbine, (d) complete assembly CAD.
Energies 14 03160 g014
Figure 15. The assembled turbine.
Figure 15. The assembled turbine.
Energies 14 03160 g015
Figure 16. (a) The CFD domain and (b) the turbine model.
Figure 16. (a) The CFD domain and (b) the turbine model.
Energies 14 03160 g016
Figure 17. Selected CFD mesh: (a) turbine wheel area, (b) blade trailing edge, and (c) blade leading edge.
Figure 17. Selected CFD mesh: (a) turbine wheel area, (b) blade trailing edge, and (c) blade leading edge.
Energies 14 03160 g017
Figure 18. Turbine coefficient of the moment for individual blades and total turbine Cm.
Figure 18. Turbine coefficient of the moment for individual blades and total turbine Cm.
Energies 14 03160 g018
Figure 19. Velocity profile obtained using CFD simulation of river inflow at 1.5 m/s and turbine rotation rate of 44 RPM.
Figure 19. Velocity profile obtained using CFD simulation of river inflow at 1.5 m/s and turbine rotation rate of 44 RPM.
Energies 14 03160 g019
Figure 20. Vorticity profile obtained using CFD simulation of river inflow at 1.5 m/s and turbine rotation rate of 44 RPM.
Figure 20. Vorticity profile obtained using CFD simulation of river inflow at 1.5 m/s and turbine rotation rate of 44 RPM.
Energies 14 03160 g020
Table 1. Flowrates (m3/s) of rivers and streams in the region.
Table 1. Flowrates (m3/s) of rivers and streams in the region.
River and LocationJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Jhelum, Azad Pattan2163597221336171217401410999623355265234
Snyok, Yogo524643461094761249130954616710177
Hunza, Dainyor52464374186587110710834941677363
Chitra, Chitral8067749522148682473438217411180
Gilgit, Gilgit6656437122470690867135813210887
Shigar, Shigar1814113971329737696334944932
Astore, Doyian28252560186371389253139664938
Swat, Kalam1414235013025324916690382421
Average flowrate per month66781232213556188597393711499779
Average winter months flow89
Average summer months flow473
Table 2. Final selected design parameters for the vertical axis water turbine.
Table 2. Final selected design parameters for the vertical axis water turbine.
AirfoilNACA 0018
Chord length0.125 m
Number of blades5
Height0.75 m
Radius0.75 m
Pitch angle0 deg
Table 3. The data of three sites were selected for the testing of the vertical axis water turbine.
Table 3. The data of three sites were selected for the testing of the vertical axis water turbine.
VelocityChannel DepthChannel WidthHeight of Blade Immersed in Water
Site 11.50 m/s1.10 m22.5 m0.75 m
Site 21.67 m/s1.00 m22.5 m0.75 m
Site 31.67 m/s0.65 m22.5 m0.50 m
Table 4. Mesh independence data.
Table 4. Mesh independence data.
Mesh Size (Nodes)Cm
588,1110.1607
648,6810.1791
729,7560.1805
Table 5. Time-step (Tstep) independence data.
Table 5. Time-step (Tstep) independence data.
Time-Step (s)deg/TstepCm
0.00378789 1.000.1588
0.00284091 0.750.1803
0.00189394 0.500.1812
Table 6. The comparison of experimental and theoretical results of site 1 and site 2.
Table 6. The comparison of experimental and theoretical results of site 1 and site 2.
DMST Model ResultsExperimental ResultsCFD Results% Difference
SiteVel
(m/s)
RPMPower output (Watts)RPMMeasured force (N)Torque
(N-m)
Power output (Watts)RPMPower output (Watts)Expt. vs. DMSTExpt. vs. CFD
11.55167044147110.350844524.124.20%3.10%
21.75795048209156.8787.948799.517.10%1.50%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sheikh, S.R.; Shah, S.H.R.; Rauf, U.; Rauf, F.; Kausar, Z.; Aziz, U.; Shah, M.F.; Yaqoob, H.; Niazi, M.B.K. A Low-Cost Sustainable Energy Solution for Pristine Mountain Areas of Developing Countries. Energies 2021, 14, 3160. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113160

AMA Style

Sheikh SR, Shah SHR, Rauf U, Rauf F, Kausar Z, Aziz U, Shah MF, Yaqoob H, Niazi MBK. A Low-Cost Sustainable Energy Solution for Pristine Mountain Areas of Developing Countries. Energies. 2021; 14(11):3160. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113160

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sheikh, Shakil Rehman, Syed Hassan Raza Shah, Umar Rauf, Fawad Rauf, Zareena Kausar, Umair Aziz, Muhammad Faizan Shah, Haseeb Yaqoob, and Muhammad Bilal Khan Niazi. 2021. "A Low-Cost Sustainable Energy Solution for Pristine Mountain Areas of Developing Countries" Energies 14, no. 11: 3160. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113160

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop