Next Article in Journal
Induction of Apoptosis in Human Breast Adenocarcinoma Cells MCF-7 by Monapurpyridine A, a New Azaphilone Derivative from Monascus purpureus NTU 568
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of New Liquid Crystalline Diglycidyl Ethers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Prenylated Flavanone from Derris trifoliata Lour.

1
Department of Pharmacy, Medical College, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410006, China
2
Key Laboratory of Marine Bio-resourses Sustainable Utilization, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 164 West Xingang Road, Guangzhou 510301, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2012, 17(1), 657-663; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17010657
Submission received: 30 October 2011 / Revised: 26 December 2011 / Accepted: 27 December 2011 / Published: 11 January 2012
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)

Abstract

:
A new flavanone, 4′,5,7-trihydroxy-6,8-di-(2-hydroxy-3-methylbut-3-enyl)- flavanone, was isolated from the aerial parts of Derris trifoliate, together with eleven known compounds: rotenone, tephrosin, 12a-hydroxyrotenone, deguelin, 6a,12a-dehydro-rotenone, dehydrodeguelin, 7a-O-methyldeguelol, 7a-O-methylelliptonol, 5,7,3',4'-tetra-hydroxy-6,8-diprenylisoflavone, daidzein and 4'-hydroxy-7-methoxyflavanone. 7a-O-Methylelliptonol was isolated for the first time from the genus Derris. Their structures were characterized on the basis of spectral data. Eight of the isolated compounds were found to be significantly toxic to brine shrimp (LC50 range 0.06–9.95 μg/mL). The new compound showed weak toxicity (LC50 = 211.31 μg/mL).

1. Introduction

Derris trifoliata Lour., a mangrove associate occurring in the tropical regions of Asia and East Africa [1], belongs to the Leguminosae, subfamily Papilionoideae. D. trifoliata is a poisonous plant, used locally for catching fish, and nowadays also used extensively for the control of insect pests [2]. Different parts of the plant were used in traditional medicine for treatment of wounds, calculus, rheumatism and dysmenorrhea and asthma [3]. Extracts and metabolites from this plant have been found to possess significant larvicidal, pesticidal, cytotoxic, anti-fungal, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, nitric oxide inhibitory, and cancer chemopreventive activities [4,5,6,7]. Previous phytochemical investigations on D. trifoliata show that flavonoids, including rotenoids, are the most characteristic compounds of this plant [8].
The brine shrimp lethality assay (BSLA) is considered a useful tool for assessment of toxicity, and has been widely used in chemical ecology studies on chemical defense in plants. The extract from aerial part of D. trifoliata was found to be toxic to brine shrimp (LC50 = 10.00 μg/mL) [9]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on brine shrimp toxicity of compounds from D. trifoliata. As a part of our search for chemical defence compounds of mangrove plants in South China, a chemical investigation of the brine shrimp toxic extract from D. trifoliata has been carried out. In this study, we report the structural elucidation of a new prenylated flavanone, together with 11 known compounds from the aerial part of D. trifoliata, as well as their toxicity against brine shrimp.

2. Results and Discussion

Compound 1, a light yellow, optically active oil ([α]D20 −17.3°, MeOH; c 0.3) oil, gave a molecular ion peak at m/z 440.1795 in the HREIMS, indicating a molecular formula of C25H28O7 (calc. 440.1835). The 1H-NMR spectrum of 1 showed three proton resonances at δH 2.76 (1H, m), 3.04 (1H, m), and 5.29 (1H, m), assignable to the typical H-2 and H-3 of a flavanone skeleton. The signals of H-3 overlapped with those of protons of other two methylenes (δH 2.82, 2H, m; and δH 2.95, 2H, m), but could be distinguished by HSQC spectra. In addition, resonances for an AA’XX’ spin system that is comprised of four protons (δH 6.82, 2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-3′, 5′ and δH 7.25, 2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-2′, 6′) assignable to a 4-subtituted B-ring were observed. Furthermore, together with HSQC spectrum, the 1D NMR (13C, 1H and DEPT) spectra of 1 revealed the presence of one ketone (δC 196.5, C-4), six aromatic carbons (δC 160.4, C-5; δC 106.5, C-6; δC 163.9, C-7; δC 105.2, C-8; δC 158.9, C-9; δC 102.6, C-10), two olefinic methylenes (δH 4.99, 1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4″a, δH 4.85, 1H, s, H-4″b, δc 110.3, C-4″; δH 4.90, 1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4a, δH 4.78, 1H, s, H-4b, δc 110.2, C-4), two quaternary olefinic carbons (δc 146.8, C-3″; δc 147.0, C-3), two methyls (δH 1.69, 3H, s, H-5″, δc 18.4, C-5″; δH 1.83, 3H, s, H-5, δc 18.3, C-5), two oxygenated methines (δH 4.28, 1H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, H-2, δc 77.0, C-2″; δH 4.28, 1H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, H-2″, δc 77.0, C-2), and a hydroxyl (δH 12.41, 1H, s, OH-5). Comparison of the 1D NMR spectral data of compound 1 with those of 6-(2-hydroxy-3-methyl-3-butenyl)-8-prenyleriodictyol suggested that 1 was a flavnanone with two isoprenyls on ring A [10]. In the HMBC spectrum of 1, the correlations from H-4 to C-2, 3, from H-5 to C-3, 4, and 2, and from H-1 to C-2, 3 confirmed the identity of the 2-hydroxy-3-methylbut-3-enyl moiety. The partial structure of another 2-hydroxy-3-methylbut-3-enyl in 1 was confirmed by HMBC correlation peaks of H-4″ with C-2″, 3″; H-5″ with C-3, 4; and H-1 with C-2, 3. Moreover, the substitution pattern of ring A was unambiguously established by HMBC correlations (Figure 1), which gave evidence for the placement of the two isoprenyls at C-6 and C-8, respectively. Thus, 1 was characterized as 4',5,7-trihydroxy-6,8-di-(2-hydroxy-3-methylbut-3-enyl)-flavanone. The absolute configuration of 1 was not determined.
Figure 1. Structure of compound 1 and selected HMBC correlations.
Figure 1. Structure of compound 1 and selected HMBC correlations.
Molecules 17 00657 g001
Besides the new compound, 11 known compounds: Rotenone (2) [11], tephrosin (3) [12], 12a-hydroxyrotenone (4) [13], deguelin (5) [12], 6a,12a-dehydrorotenone (6) [11], dehydrodeguelin (7) [12], 7a-O-methyldeguelol (8) [14], 7a-O-methylelliptonol (9) [15], 5,7,3',4'-tetrahydroxy-6,8-diprenyl-isoflavone (10) [16], daidzein (11) [17], and 4'-hydroxy-7-methoxyflavanone (12) [18], were isolated from the plant and their structures elucidated by comparing their spectroscopic data with those reported in literature. As far as know, 7a-O-methylelliptonol is isolated for first time from the genus Derris.
Prenyl substitution is common among all known classes of flavonoids in D. trifoliata. However, the prenylation pattern in 1 is relatively rare. To the best of our knowledge, besides 1, only two other flavonoids, 6,3'-di-(2-hydroxy-3-methylbut-3-enyl)-flavone, and 3,5'-di-(2-hydroxy-3-methylbut-3-enyl)-4,2',4'-trihydroxychalcone, were found to contain two 2-hydroxy-3-methylbut-3-enyls [19], and additionally compound 1 is the first flavonoid with two such groups on the same aromatic ring.
Results of the brine shrimp lethality assay on three crude extracts and nine isolated compounds are shown in Table 1. Eight flavonoids exhibited significant brine shrimp toxicity (LC50 < 30 μg/mL) [20]. The LC50 value obtained in present study for 2 was similar to those reported in literature: 0.049~1.8 μg/mL for rotenone [21,22]. The LC50 values for 3 and 4 reported here were somewhat lower than literature data, 2.2 μg/mL for tephrosin, and 1.9 μg/mL for 12a-hydroxyrotenone [10]. The brine shrimp toxicity of compounds 1, 5–8, and 12 had never been reported in literature. The rotenonoids with sp3 hybridizaiton at C-6a and C-12a, namely compounds 2–5, showed extreme toxicity with LC50 values less than 1 μg/mL, and this is consistent with the previously reported cytotoxic effects of compounds from D. trifoliata [14].
Table 1. The mean LD50 values ± S.D for crude extracts and compounds screened against brine shrimp larvae (Artemia salina).
Table 1. The mean LD50 values ± S.D for crude extracts and compounds screened against brine shrimp larvae (Artemia salina).
Extract/CompoundLC50 ± S.D. (μg/mL)
Petroleum ether extract7.61 ± 1.62
Ethyl acetate extract5.78 ± 1.18
n-Butanol extract>500.00
Compound 1211.31 ± 12.5
Rotenone0.06 ± 0.03
Tephrosin0.24 ± 0.05
12a-Hydroxyrotenone0.37 ± 0.15
Deguelin0.73 ± 0.12
6a,12a-Dehydrorotenone9.95 ± 1.05
Dehydrodeguelin5.32 ± 0.6
7a-O-Methyldeguelol2.75 ± 0.76
4'-Hydroxy-7-methoxyflavanone3.97 ± 0.63

3. Experimental

3.1. General

Optical rotations were measured on a Jasco 1020 polarimeter. NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker AVANCE 500 spectrometer (operating at 500 MHz for 1H-NMR, 125 MHz for 13C-NMR). HREIMS spectra were recorded on a Finnigan MAT TSQ 700 mass spectrometer. UV spectra were obtained in a Beckman DU-640 UV spectrophotometer. Semipreparative HPLC was carried out using a Phenomenex Luna 5 μL C18 100A ODS column (250 × 20 mm) on a system comprised of a Waters 600E Multisolvent Delivery System and a Waters 996 Photodiode Array Detector.

3.2. Plant Material

The aerial parts of D. trifoliata were collected in September 2008 from the mangrove area of Sanya, Hainan Province, Southern China. The material was identified by Prof. Si Zhang, Key Laboratory of Marine Bio-resourses Sustainable Utilization, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. A voucher specimen (No. GKLMMM22) is deposited at the herbarium of South China Sea Institute of Oceanology.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The dry powdered aerial part of D. trifoliata (7.0 kg) was extracted three times with ethanol-water (1:1, v/v, 40 L) at room temperature for 10 days. The pooled extracts were evaporated in vacuo. The resulting residue was suspended in H2O, and subsequently extracted with petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, and n-BuOH (7.5 L, room temperature, 10 h). After removal of solvent, the ethyl acetate extracts (65 g) was fractionated into 10 fractions (Fr-I~Fr-X) by column chromatography using a gradient of mixtures of CHCl3-MeOH (100:1 to 65:35). Fr-III (3.5 g) was subjected to a column chromatography eluting with a gradient of petroleum ether-ethyl acetate (5:1 to 2:1) to give four fractions (Fr-III-A~Fr-III-D). Fr-IV (2.5 g) was separated by column chromatography (petroleum ether-ethyl acetate (5:1 to 2:1 2.0 L)) to give four fractions (Fr-IV-A~Fr-IV-D). Fractions Fr-III-B (300mg), Fr-III-D (362 mg), and Fr-IV-A (400 mg) were further separated by semipreparative HPLC (liner gradient within 40 min from MeOH-H2O 7:3 to 10:0), respectively, to give 1 (7.0 mg; tR = 14.5 min), 2 (14.0 mg; tR 16.8 min), 3 (40.0 mg; tR 18.1 min), 4 (20.0 mg; tR 16.4 min), 5 (3.5 mg; tR 17.9 min), 6 (2.5 mg; tR 24.4 min), 7 (2.5 mg; tR 26.4 min), 8 (4.0 mg; tR 10.9 min), and 9 (5.0 mg; tR 21.4 min). Fr-V (5.3 g) was separated by column chromatography over a silica gel using gradient elution of CHCl3-ethyl acetate (9:1 to 7:3) to give four fractions (Fr-V-A~Fr-V-D). Fr-V-A (250 mg) and Fr-V-B (120 mg) were further purified by semipreparative HPLC with liner gradient within 40 min from MeOH-H2O from 1:1 to 1:0 to afford 10 (2.5 mg; tR 32.6 min). 11 (4.0 mg; tR 8.7 min) and 12 (4.3 mg; tR 13.7 min).
4’,5,7-Trihydroxy-6,8-di-(2-hydroxy-3-methylbut-3-enyl)-flavanone (1): A light yellow oil, [α]D20 −17.3° (MeOH; c 0.3), HREIMS m/z: 440.1795 [M]+; UV (MeOH) λmax nm: 298.3, 345.9; 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δH = 5.29 (1H, m, H-2), 2.76 (1H, m, H-3a), 3.04 (1H, m, H-3b), 6.82 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-3′, 5′), 7.25 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-2′, 6′), 2.82 (1H, m, H-1″a), 3.08 (1H, m, H-1″b), 4.31 (1H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, H-2″), 4.99 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4″a), 4.85 (1H, s, H-4″b), 1.69 (3H, s, H-5″), 2.82 (1H, m, H-1a), 3.08 (1H, m, H-1b), 4.28 (1H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, H-2), 4.90 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4a), 4.78 (1H, s, H-4b), 1.83 (3H, s, H-5″), 12.41 (1H, s, OH-5); 13C-NMR (CDCl3): δc = 78.8 (C-2), 43.0 (C-3), 196.5 (C-4), 160.4 (C-5), 106.5 (C-6), 163.9 (C-7), 105.2 (C-8), 158.9 (C-9), 102.6 (C-10), 130.5 (C-1′) 127.7 (C-2′,6′), 115.6 (C-3′,5′), 156.3 (C-4′), 29.4 (C-1″), 77.0 (C-2″, C-2, interchangeable with C-2), 146.8 (C-3″), 110.3 (C-4″), 18.4 (C-5″), 28.6 (C-1), 77.0 (C-2, interchangeable with C-2″), 147.0 (C-3), 110.2( C-4), 18.3 (C-5).

3.4. Brine Shrimp Assay

Toxicity against brine shrimp was evaluated using the method reported by Wanyoike [20]. Artificial seawater was prepared by dissolving sea salt (38 g) in distilled water (1 L). The 60-mm culture dishe were used for hatching. To seawater (50 mL), brine shrimp eggs (10 mg) were added. The culture dish was placed in the light incubator at 25 °C for 48 h. The larvae were attracted to one side of the vessel with a light source and collected with pipette. Nauplii were separated from eggs by aliquoting them three times in small beakers containing seawater. The brine shrimp are then put in wells of a 96 flat-bottom well plate (Nunc Microwell plate). Each column (12 per plate) contains a two-fold dilution series representing 8 doses. Potassium dichromate was used as a positive control, as well as the solvent DMSO was used as a negative control. Each sample was repeated six times (columns) in each experiment. After 24 hours of exposure to the samples, the number of died and total (determined after killing by freezing) brine shrimp for each well were determined. The data were analyzed by probit regression (SPSS) to calculate the LC50.

4. Conclusions

A new prenylated flavanone 1 was isolated from aerial parts of D. trifoliata, and its structure was elucidated on the basis of spectroscopic analysis as 4′,5,7-trihydroxy-6,8-di-(2-hydroxy-3-methylbut-3-enyl)-flavanone. Among the isolated compounds, all rotenoids 2–9, and a flavanone 12 exhibited significant toxicity against brine shrimp, while the new flavanone 1 showed low brine shrimp lethality.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/17/1/657/s1.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant: KZCX2-YW-JC202); Guangdong Province Natural Science Foundation (grant: 91510301000001); Project 41176149 supported by NSFC; National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, grant: 2010CB833800); the Open Project Program of the Key Laboratory of Marine Bio-resources Sustainable Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant: LMB091004); and Research project of Hunan Province Education Bureau (Grant: 10A071).

References and Notes

  1. Shah, D.G.; Bhatt, S. First Record of the Mangrove Associate Derris Trifoliata Lour. from Gujarat. JBNHS 2008, 105, 359–360. [Google Scholar]
  2. Witt, J.D.; Warren, S.L.; Ranney, T.G.; Baker, J.R. Biorational and Conventional Plant Protectants Reduce Feeding by Adult Japanese Beetles. J. Environ. Hortic. 1999, 17, 203–206. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirtikar, K.R.; Basu, B.D. Indian Medicinal Plants; International Book Distributors: Dehradun, India, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhattacharyya, A.; Babu, C.R. Purification and Biochemical Characterization of a Serine Proteinase Inhibitor from Derris trifoliata Lour. Seeds: Insight into Structural and Antimalarial Features. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, M.R.; Omoloso, A.D.; Barewai, Y. Antimicrobial Activity of the Derris Elliptica, Derris Indica And Derris Trifoliata Extractives. Fitoterapia 2006, 77, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tewtrakul, S.; Cheenpracha, S.; Karalai, C. Nitric Oxide Inhibitory Principles from Derris trifoliata Stems. Phytomedicine 2009, 16, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yenesew, A.; Twinomuhwezi, H.; Kabaru, J.M.; Akala, H.M.; Kiremire, B.T.; Heydenreich, M.; Peter, M.G.; Eyase, F.L.; Waters, N.C.; Walsh, D.S. Antiplasmodial and Larvicidal Flavonoids from Derris trifoliata. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2009, 23, 409–414. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gomes, C.M.R.; Gottlieb, O.R.; Bettolo, G.B.M.; Dellemonache, F.; Polhill, R.M. Systematic Significance of Flavonoids in Derris and Lonchocarpus. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1981, 9, 129–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mamoon, S.A.; Azam, M.G. Diuretic Activity and Brine Shrimp Toxicity of Derris trifoliata Lour. IJPLS 2011, 2, 1029–1032. [Google Scholar]
  10. Seo, E.K.; Silva, G.L.; Chai, H.B.; Chagwedera, T.E.; Farnsworth, N.R.; Cordell, G.A.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghorn, A.D. Cytotoxic Prenylated Flavanones from Monotes engleri. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Carlson, D.G.; Weislede, D.; Tallent, W.H. Nmr Investigations of Rotenoids. Tetrahedron 1973, 29, 2731–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Andrei, C.C.; Viera, P.C.; Fernandes, J.B.; daSilva, M.F.D.F.; Fo, E.R. Dimethylchromene Rotenoids from Tephrosia candida. Phytochemistry 1997, 46, 1081–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Magalhaes, A.F.; Tozzi, A.M.G.A.; Sales, B.H.L.N.; Magalhaes, E.G. Twenty-three Flavonoids from Lonchocarpus subglaucescens. Phytochemistry 1996, 42, 1459–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chantrapromma, S.; Fun, H.K.; Pullaput, Y.; Wongtap, H.; Dejmanee, S.; Chantrapromma, K. 7a-O-methyldeguelol. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E Struct. Rep. Online 2005, E61, O2340–O2342. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheenpracha, S.; Karalai, C.; Ponglimanont, C.; Chantrapromma, K. Cytotoxic rotenoloids from the stems of Derris trifoliata. Can. J. Chem. 2007, 85, 1019–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singhal, A.K.; Sharma, R.P.; Thyagarajan, G.; Herz, W.; Govindan, S.V. New Prenylated Isoflavones and a Prenylated Dihydroflavonol from Millettia pachycarpa. Phytochemistry 1980, 19, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, H.-Y.; Liang, J.-Y.; Yu, P.; Qu, W.; Zhao, L. Isoflavones and their Derivatives from the Root of Derris elliptica (Roxb.) Benth. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2008, 6, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Camarda, L.; Merlini, L.; Nasini, G. Novel 4-styrylflavans from Gum Accroides. Can. J. Chem. 1977, 30, 873–878. [Google Scholar]
  19. Barron, D.; Ibrahim, R. Isoprenylated Flavonoids-a Survey. Phytochemistry 1996, 53, 921–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wanyoike, G.N.; Chhabra, S.C.; Lang’at-Thoruwa, C.C.; Omar, S.A. Brine Shrimp Toxicity and Antiplasmodial Activity of Five Kenyan Medicinal Plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 90, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Colman-Saizarbitoria, T.; Montilla, L.; Rodriguez, M.; Castillo, A.; Hasegawa, M. Xymarginatin: A New Acetogenin Inhibitor of Mitochondrial Electron Transport From Xylopia Emarginata Mart., Annonaceae. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2009, 19, 871–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alali, F.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, Q.; Craig Hopp, D.; Schwedler, J.T.; McLaughlin, J.L. 4-deoxyannomontacin and (2,4-cis and trans)-annomontacinone, new bioactive mono-tetrahydrofuran annonaceous acetogenins from Goniothalamus giganteus. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1997, 5, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of compounds 1–12 are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, C.; Liu, S.; He, W.; Luo, X.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, Z.; Qiu, X.; Yin, H. A New Prenylated Flavanone from Derris trifoliata Lour. Molecules 2012, 17, 657-663. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17010657

AMA Style

Jiang C, Liu S, He W, Luo X, Zhang S, Xiao Z, Qiu X, Yin H. A New Prenylated Flavanone from Derris trifoliata Lour. Molecules. 2012; 17(1):657-663. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17010657

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Cheng, Shengzi Liu, Weihong He, Xiongming Luo, Si Zhang, Zhihui Xiao, Ximin Qiu, and Hao Yin. 2012. "A New Prenylated Flavanone from Derris trifoliata Lour." Molecules 17, no. 1: 657-663. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17010657

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop