Next Article in Journal
Deuterium Isotope Effects on 13C-NMR Chemical Shifts of 10-Hydroxybenzo[h]quinolines
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Bio-Guided Fractionation to Explore the Use of Leftover Biomass in Dutch Flower Bulb Production as Allelochemicals against Weeds
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 18
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules18044526
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis, Structure and Cytotoxic Activity of New Acetylenic Derivatives of Betulin

by
Stanisław Boryczka
1,*,
Ewa Bębenek
1,
Joanna Wietrzyk
2,
Katarzyna Kempińska
2,
Maria Jastrzębska
3,
Joachim Kusz
4 and
Maria Nowak
3,4
1
Department of Organic Chemistry, Medical University of Silesia, 4 Jagiellonska Str., 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland
2
Department of Experimental Oncology, Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 R. Weigla Str., 53-114 Wrocław, Poland
3
Department of Solid State Physics, Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, 4 Uniwersytecka Str., 40-007 Katowice, Poland
4
Department of Physics of Crystals, Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, 4 Uniwersytecka Str., 40-007 Katowice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2013, 18(4), 4526-4543; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18044526
Submission received: 21 March 2013 / Revised: 8 April 2013 / Accepted: 11 April 2013 / Published: 17 April 2013
(This article belongs to the Section Medicinal Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A new series of betulin derivatives containing one or two pharmacophores bearing an acetylenic and carbonyl function at the C-3 and/or C-28 positions has been synthesized and characterized by 1H- and 13C-NMR, IR, MS and elemental analyses. The crystal structure of 28-O-propynoylbetulin was determined by X-ray structural analysis. All new compounds, as well as betulin, were tested in vitro for their antiproliferative activity against human SW707 colorectal, CCRF/CEM leukemia, T47D breast cancer, and against murine P388 leukemia and Balb3T3 normal fibroblasts cell lines. Most of the compounds showed better cytotoxicity than betulin and cisplatin used as reference agent. 28-O-Propynoylbetulin was the most potent derivative, being over 500 times more potent than betulin and about 100 times more cytotoxic than cisplatin against the human leukemia (CCRF/CEM) cell line, with an ID50 value of 0.02 μg/mL.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Betulin [lup-20(29)-ene-3β,28-diol, C30H50O2, 1] also known as betulinic alcohol, is a pentacyclic triterpene of the lupane type which was one of the first natural products identified and isolated from plants as a pure chemical substance in 1788 by Lowitz [1]. The still growing interest in betulin (1) and its derivatives results from their wide spectrum of biological activities such as anticancer, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and hepatoprotective properties [2,3,4]. Despite the fact that betulin (1) has been known for over 200 years, the X-ray crystal structure of this compound was investigated for the first time in 2010 by Drebushchak and in 2011 by Boryczka as betulin-EtOH and betulin-DMSO solvates, respectively [5,6]. Betulin (1) has three available sites for simple chemical modification, namely the secondary hydroxyl group at position C-3, the primary hydroxyl group at position C-28 and the isopropenyl side chain at position C-19.
Compound 1 can be easily converted in high yield to betulinic acid (2), which possesses a wide spectrum of biological and pharmacological activities and is now a very attractive and promising agent for clinical treatment for various types of cancer [7,8,9]. The chemical structures of these two compounds differ only in one group at C-17 [betulin (1) R=CH2OH, betulinic acid (2) R=COOH], and they are shown in Figure 1. In contrast to 2, betulin (1) has been described as inactive or less active against cancer cells [3,10]. However, the results of recent reports suggest that betulin (1) shows a significant cytotoxic activity in a similar way as betulinic acid (2) [11,12].
Molecules 18 04526 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of betulin (1) and betulinic acid (2).
Figure 1. Structure of betulin (1) and betulinic acid (2).
Molecules 18 04526 g001
The high content of betulin (1) in white birch bark (up to 30%) compared to betulinic acid (2) (up to 2.5%), make it an important starting material for synthesis of new compounds with various interesting medical properties. In the last few years a large number of betulin derivatives have been reported to possess anticancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-HIV and anti-leishmanial activity [2,13,14,15,16].
It is well known that the carbon-carbon triple bond is one of the most important functional groups in medicinal and organic chemistry [17]. Nevertheless, only a few reports have been described the synthesis of acetylenic derivatives of betulin which possess useful biological activity such as cytotoxic and antiviral properties [18,19,20,21,22]. It is interesting to note that the presence of an alkynyl group offers a possibility for further functionalization of betulins [23,24].
As an extension of our study on the development of novel acetylenic derivatives with potential anticancer activity [25,26], we became interested in the synthesis and evaluation of cytotoxicity of new derivatives of betulin containing one or two pharmacophores including both carbonyl group and a triple bond at the C-3 and/or C-28 positions. In order to investigate structure-activity relationships for the anticancer effects, two types of reagents were used for modifications of the hydroxyl groups of betulin (1), namely acetylene chloroformate and propynoic acids. All new synthesized compounds were tested for cytotoxic activity against human: breast cancer (T47D), leukemia (CCRF/CEM), colorectal adenocarcinoma (SW707), and murine: leukemia (P388) as well as normal fibroblasts (Balb3T3) cell lines in order to obtain more information about the influence of triple bond and carbonyl group on anticancer activity in this class of compounds.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

Synthesis of acetylenic derivatives of betulin 3–9 was accomplished starting with betulin (1). Compound 1 was isolated from birch bark by extraction with dichloromethane. The crude betulin (1) was purified by column chromatography using a mixture of chloroform and ethanol as an eluent. Full structural elucidation of the betulin (1) was performed using 1H- and 13C-NMR and IR spectroscopy, and the assignments were done based on our analysis and related literature [6,27]. The synthesis of acetylenic derivatives of betulin 3–9 is described in Scheme 1 and Scheme 2.
Molecules 18 04526 g004 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of acetylenic derivatives of betulin 3–6.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of acetylenic derivatives of betulin 3–6.
Molecules 18 04526 g004
Treatment of betulin (1) with the corresponding chloroformate in benzene in the presence of pyridine at room temperature gave a mixture of mono- 3 and diesters 4, in which the first isomers 3 were the major products due to the fact that reactivity of the hydroxyl group at C-28 is much higher than that of the C-3 one. The mixtures were separated by column chromatography to afford pure products 3 and 4 in 54%–69% and 23%–28% yields, respectively. The reaction of betulin (1) with propynoic acid or phenylpropynoic acid or propanoic acid in dichloromethane in the presence of catalytic amount of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and 4-dimetylaminopyridine (DMAP) afforded mixtures of mono- 5 and diester 6, which were separated by column chromatography to give pure 5 and 6 in 50%–86% and 11%–27% yields, respectively.
Molecules 18 04526 g005 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of betulin derivatives 7 and 8.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of betulin derivatives 7 and 8.
Molecules 18 04526 g005
For the synthesis of compounds 8 (Scheme 2) the corresponding monoacetylated substrate 7a was prepared, according to the method described in literature [28]. The synthesis of 28-O-acetylbetulin (7a) was achieved by selective acetylation of the primary hydroxyl group of betulin (1) with an equimolar amount of acetic anhydride in dichloromethane in the presence of DMAP and pyridine at room temperature. The reaction also gave small amount of 3,28-O,O'-diacetylbetulin (7b) which was separated by column chromatography.
The 28-O-acetylbetulin (7a) was then treated with corresponding chloroformates in benzene in the presence of pyridine under mild conditions to afford 28-O-acetyl-3-O'-alkynyloxycarbonylbetulins 8 in good yields (63%–89%). The structure of all new compounds 3–8 were determined on the basis of their 1H, 13C-NMR, IR and MS spectra, together with elemental analyses. In addition, crystal structure of 5a was determined by X-ray structural analysis. For the first time, crystal structure of an acetylenic derivative of betulin-DMSO solvate is reported here.

2.2. Crystal Structure

Crystals of 28-O-propynoylbetulin (5a) for X-ray structural analysis were grown from a DMSO solution as a 28-O-propynoylbetulin-DMSO solvate of 1:1 stoichiometry. The crystal structure of 5a is shown in Figure 2. The compound crystallizes in the hexagonal system (space group P65) with a = 2.6511 (1) nm, b = 2.6511 (1) nm, c = 8.3895 (2) nm, α = 90°, β = 90°, γ = 120°, V = 510.6 (1) nm3, Z = 6. The six-membered rings have a chair conformation, while the cyclopentane ring adopts a twisted conformation. All ring junctions in the 28-O-propynoylbetulin-DMSO solvate are trans-fused. A similar ring conformation was also observed in betulin-DMSO solvate [6], 3,28-O,O'-diacetylbetulin [29] and betulinic acid-DMSO solvate [30].
Molecules 18 04526 g002 550
Figure 2. Molecular structure with atomic numbering scheme of 28-O-propynoylbetulin – DMSO solvate 5a with displacement ellipsoids of 50% probability.
Figure 2. Molecular structure with atomic numbering scheme of 28-O-propynoylbetulin – DMSO solvate 5a with displacement ellipsoids of 50% probability.
Molecules 18 04526 g002
The methyl groups at carbon atoms C-24, C-25, C-26, C-27 occupy the axial positions, whereas the methyl group at C-23 and the isopropenyl group at C-19 are equatorial. The torsion angle C29-C20-C19-C21 describing the orientation of the isopropenyl group is equal to 105.4°. This conformation is very similar to that observed for the corresponding angles in 3,28-O,O'-diacetylbetulin (107.18°) [29] and in betulin-ethanol solvate (88.6°) [5] but differs from that observed for the structure of betulin-DMSO solvate (−96.8°) [6], and for betulinic acid-DMSO solvate (−112.2°) [30].
The OH group at C-3 is an equatorial orientation, while the substituted hydroxymethyl group is attached to the atom C-17 in an axial orientation. The oxygen atom O-4 of DMSO and the hydroxyl group at C-3 of betulin (1) are involved in the O1 – H1…O4 bond, which is relatively strong with short H…O distance (1.86 Å) and almost linear directionality (169.4°).

2.3. Cytotoxic Activity

Cytotoxic activities of all newly synthesized compounds including betulin (1) were tested in SRB or MTT (in the case of leukemia cells) assay for their antiproliferative activity in vitro against three human cancer cell lines: SW707 (colorectal adenocarcinoma), CCRF/CEM (leukemia), T47D (breast cancer), and murine leukemia P388 as well as Balb3T3 normal fibroblasts cell lines. The results of the cytotoxic activity in vitro were expressed as an IC50 value (μg/mL), i.e., the concentration of compound which inhibits the proliferation of 50% of tumor cells as compared to the control untreated cells. Cisplatin was used as a reference cytotoxic agent (positive test control). A value of less than 4 μg/mL was considered as an antiproliferative activity criterion for synthetic compounds [31]. The results of the cytotoxicity studies are summarized in Table 1.
Table
Table 1. Cytotoxic activity of betulin (1), acetylenic betulins 3–8 and cisplatin reference compound against the cells of the tested human and murine cancer cell lines.
Table 1. Cytotoxic activity of betulin (1), acetylenic betulins 3–8 and cisplatin reference compound against the cells of the tested human and murine cancer cell lines.
Compd.Cytotoxic activity IC50 [µg/mL]
HumanMurine
R1R2T47DCCRF/CEMSW707P388Balb3T3
1--32.4 ± 10.710.9 ± 5.522.9 ± 15.45.5 ± 3.347.3 ± 7.9
3aCH2C≡CH-7.2 ± 1.73.2 ± 0.49.2 ± 7.12.9 ± 0.23.9 ± 2.8
3bCH2CH2C≡CH-6.9 ± 2.35.2 ± 1.422.6 ± 11.93.6 ± 1.319.5 ± 13.9
3cCH2C≡CCH3-20.1 ± 5.36.8 ± 2.936.9 ± 6.35.5 ± 2.828.4 ± 17.6
3dCH2CH3-6.6 ± 1.34.1 ± 0.220.8 ± 14.73.8 ± 1.919.1 ± 13.5
4aCH2C≡CH-NegNegNeg33.4 ± 1.7Neg
4bCH2CH2C≡CH-NegNegNegNegNeg
4cCH2C≡CCH3-NegNegNeg50.4 ± 31.1Neg
4dCH2CH3-69.1 ± 12.452.6 ± 8.3Neg46.8 ± 21.6Neg
5a-C≡CH9.1 ± 1.90.02 ± 0.00114.9 ± 3.30.4 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.05
5b-C≡CPhNeg49.0 ± 9.8NegNegNeg
5c-CH2CH312.1 ± 4.48.1 ± 0.929.2 ± 24.43.3 ± 0.832.3 ± 23.0
6a-C≡CH16.2 ± 4.39.9 ± 7.09.5 ± 1.931.9 ± 1.421.1 ± 2.6
6b-C≡CPhNeg66.0 ± 2.8NegNegNeg
6c-CH2CH326.6 ± 6.8Neg42.3 ± 9.468.1 ± 14.8Neg
7a--4.9 ± 0.63.4 ± 0.35.1 ± 2.512.5 ± 14.729.7 ± 35.8
7b--Neg34.1 ± 6.4Neg40.2 ± 5.0Neg
8aCH2C≡CH-NegNegNegNegNeg
8bCH2C≡CCH3-NegNegNeg46.7 ± 16.2Neg
8cCH2CH2C≡CH-NegNegNegNegNeg
8dCH2CH3-NegNegNegNegNeg
Cisplatin3.1 ± 1.02.0 ± 0.52.2 ± 0.50.5 ± 0.32.7 ± 0.3
Neg – negative in the concentration used.
As shown in Table 1, betulin (1) exhibited notably lower anticancer activity against the investigated cancer cell lines, with IC50 values in the 10.9–47.3 μg/mL range, except for leukemia P388 cell line (IC50 = 5.5 μg/mL). In this case, the selectivity index (SI) value, expressed as the ratio of IC50 of normal fibroblast/ IC50 on corresponding cancer cell line, is equal to 8.6. The introduction of an acetylenic formate group at the C-28 led to an increase of activity against the tested human and murine cancer lines. In the series of derivatives 3, the most active compound 3a was three to four times more cytotoxic than betulin (1) against cancer cells applied. Moreover, the degree of selectivity of this compound was lower than that of betulin (1) and derivatives 3b–d. By comparing the cytotoxic activities of monoesters 3a–c, it was found that the cytotoxic potency may be dependent on the length of the alkynyl chain and position of the triple bond on the formate group at the C-28 of betulin derivatives 3. The compound, having a shorter alkynyl chain, was found to be more cytotoxic to the cancer cell lines. A terminal triple bond seems to be necessary for a good activity. The cytotoxic activity of compound 3d is similar to that of 3b and it is lower than that observed for 3a. This indicates that ethyl formate and 3-butynyl formate substituents at position 28 had a similar effect on the antiproliferative activity of these compounds. The structure-activity relationships indicated that the rank order of the cytotoxic activity observed in monoesters 3, according to the nature of the formate substituent is as follows: propargyl > 3-butynyl = ethyl > 2-butynyl. The introduction of a second formate group at the C-3 position in monoesters 3 led to the complete loss of the activity (compounds 4).
Replacement of the hydroxyl group at C-28 position in betulin (1) by a propynoyloxy function, i.e., monoester 5a, resulted in increase of activity, especially against the cells of CCRF/CEM, with IC50 value of 0.02 μg/mL. It is interesting to note that compound 5a was 545 times more cytotoxic than betulin (1) and 100 times more cytotoxic than cisplatin against CCRF/CEM leukemia cells. It was also observed that 5a was more selective (SI = 15) towards CCRF/CEM than betulin (1). These results suggest that the propynoyloxy function is important for anti-leukemia activity. On the other hand, addition of a second propynoyl group at C-3 in monoester 5a led to a decrease of activity except for the activity against the SW707 colon cancer cell (compound 6a).
Though the exact reasons for this influence of propynoyl group are not quite well understood, we assume that the cytotoxic activity of compound 5a may be a consequence of the higher electrophilicity of its triple bond. We suggest that due to the strong negative effect of the carbonyl group, the mesomeric formula describing such a delocalization of the electron density of the triple bond has a cumulene structure 5-A and carbene structure 5-B (Figure 3) and it can interact very easily with nucleophilic reactive groups in living systems such as amines or thiols. In order to understand the effect of the triple bond of the propynoyl pharmacophore, derivative 5c was tested. It is interesting to note that replacement of the ethynyl group (compound 5a) by the ethyl group (compound 5c) resulted in a decrease of activity, especially against leukemia (CCRF/CEM and P388) cell lines. These results suggested that the triple bond directly bonded to carbonyl group of the substituent at the C-28 position seem to be essential for anticancer activity. This finding is in a good agreement with results from Csuk and co-workers showing that the 28-etynylbetulin and its carbonyl derivatives exhibited a higher cytotoxic activity compared to betulinic acid [23]. It was also reported that several acetylenic natural products possessing fungicidal properties have a conjugation of the triple bond to an adjacent carbonyl function [32]. However, the mono- 5b and diester 6b containing phenylproynoyl groups are inactive. The structure-activity relationships observed in compounds 5 indicated that the rank order of the cytotoxic activity, against all cancer cell lines applied, according to the nature of the acyloxy substituent, is as follows: propynoyl > propanoyl > phenylpropynoyl. It indicates that the betulins where the carbonyl group (at C-28 position) is directly bonded to triple bond of the ethynyl substituent, show a strong cytotoxic effect especially against human leukemia (CCRF/CEM) cancer cells with SI value equal to 15 and higher than betulin (1).
The 28-O-acetylbetulin 7a showed a higher activity than the parent compound 1. But the introduction of the acetyl group at position C-3 in the compound 7a significantly decreased the cytotoxicity (compound 7b) in all the tested cell lines when compared to betulin (1) and 7a. These results are consistent with the reported data for the anticancer activity in vitro of acetyl derivatives of betulin [33]. On the other hand, esterification of the hydroxyl group at the C-3 of 28-O-acetylbetulin (7a) with acetylenic chloroformates led to the total inactive compounds 8. The obtained results also suggest that the free C-3 hydroxyl function group is important for the cytotoxicity of studied compounds.
Molecules 18 04526 g003 550
Figure 3. Proposed mesomeric structures of propynoyl pharmacophore of 28-O-propynoylbetulin (5a).
Figure 3. Proposed mesomeric structures of propynoyl pharmacophore of 28-O-propynoylbetulin (5a).
Molecules 18 04526 g003

3. Experimental

3.1. General Techniques

Melting points were determined in open capillary tubes on a Boetius melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. NMR spectra (600/150 MHz) were recorded on a Bruker MSL 600 spectrometer in CDCl3 solvents with tetramethylsilane as internal standard; chemical shifts are reported in ppm (δ) and J values in Hz. Multiplicity is designated as singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), multiplet (m). Mass spectra were recorded under EI conditions on a Finnigan MAT 95 instrument, IR spectra (KBr, pellet) on a IRAffinity-1 Shimadzu spectrophotometer. Elemental C, H analyses were obtained on a Carlo Erba Model 1108 analyzer. TLC was performed on silica gel 60 254F plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using a mixture of chloroform and ethanol (20:1 or 40:1, v/v) as an eluent. Spots were visualized by spraying with solution of 5% sulfuric acid, followed by heating. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60, <63 μm (Merck) using a mixture of chloroform and ethanol (40:1, v/v) as an eluent. Solvents were dried and purified according to usual procedures.

3.2. Isolation of Betulin (1)

External bark (100 g) of the white birch (Betula verrucosa), collected in Poland, was soaked in dichloromethane (1 L) and refluxed for 8 hours. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v) to give 1 as a white solid (19 g, 19%): m.p. 250–252 °C (lit. m.p. 252–253 °C [6]; 255–256 °C [27]); Rf 0.42 (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v). The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectral data of 1 were in agreement with those published in the literature [6].

3.3. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Monoesters 3 and Diesters 4

To a mixture of betulin (1, 0.44 g, 1 mmol) and pyridine (2.5 mL) in dry benzene (6 mL) at 0–5 °C, a solution of propargyl chloroformate or 2-butyn-1-yl chloroformate or 3-butyn-1-yl chloroformate or ethyl chloroformate (3.0 mmol) in dry benzene (5 mL) was added. Stirring at this temperature was continued for 4 h. Then the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred over night. At the end of the reaction 5 mL of chloroform was added and the reaction mixture was washed with 1 N sulfuric acid, followed by water, then dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (chloroform/ethanol, 40:1, v/v) to give pure corresponding monoesters 3 and diesters 4.
28-O-Propargyloxycarbonylbetulin (3a). Yield: 69%, m.p. 190–193 °C, Rf 0.49 (chloroform/ethanol, 40:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.76 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.82 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.98 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.06–2.01 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.42 (m, 1H, H-19), 2.53 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, C≡CH), 3.18 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.95 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.38 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.59 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.69 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.74 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H, OCH2). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.9, 15.3, 15.4, 15.9, 16.2, 18.3, 19.1, 20.8, 25.2, 26.9, 27.4, 27.9, 28.0, 29.5, 34.2, 34.3, 37.1, 37.6, 38.7, 38.8. 40.8, 42.7, 46.5, 47.6, 48.8, 50.3, 55.2, 55.4, 67.3, 75.6, 78.9, 109.9, 149.9, 155.1. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3421, 3309, 2132, 1749, 1250, 885. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 524 (M+, 11), 411 (45), 207 (59), 203 (58), 189 (100), 135 (58); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C34H52O4: C, 77.82; H, 9.99; found: C, 77.59; H, 9.84.
28-O-(3-Butynyloxycarbonyl)betulin (3b). Yield: 64%, m.p. 86–88 °C, Rf 0.45 (chloroform/ethanol, 40:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.76 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.82 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.98 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.05–2.02 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.03 (t, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, C≡CH), 2.43 (m, 1H, H-19), 2.59 (m, 2H, J = 2.7 Hz, J = 7.2 Hz, OCH2CH2), 3.19 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.93 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.25 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, OCH2), 4.36 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.59 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.69 (s, 1H, H-29). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.7, 15.3, 15.9, 16.1, 18.2, 19.0, 20.7, 25.1, 26.9, 27.3, 27.9, 29.4, 34.1, 34.3, 37.1, 37.5, 38.6, 38.8, 40.8, 42.6, 46.5, 47.6, 48.7, 50.3, 55.2, 65.3, 66.7, 70.2, 76.7, 78.9, 79.4, 109.9, 150.0, 155.4. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3485, 3310, 2124, 1747, 1248, 884. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 538 (M+, 10), 207 (47), 203 (52), 189 (100), 135 (57); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C35H54O4: C, 78.02; H, 10.10; found: C, 78.32; H, 9.98.
28-O-(2-Butynyloxycarbonyl)betulin (3c). Yield: 54%, m.p. 112–114 °C, Rf 0.48 (chloroform/ethanol, 40:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.76 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.82 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.96 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.06–2.01 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 1.87 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 3H, C≡CCH3), 2.42 (m, 1H, H-19), 3.19 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.94 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.37 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.59 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.69 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.70 (q, 2H, J = 2.4 Hz, OCH2). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 3.7, 14.7, 15.3, 15.9, 16.1, 18.2, 19.0, 20.7, 25.1, 26.9, 27.3, 27.9, 29.4, 29.4, 34.1, 34.3, 37.1, 37.5, 38.6, 38.8, 40.8, 42.6, 46.5, 47.6, 48.7, 50.2, 55.2, 56.1, 66.9, 72.5, 76.7, 78.9, 109.9, 150.0, 155.2. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3462, 2942, 2248, 1748, 1248, 883. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 538 (M+, 14), 207 (48), 203 (53), 189 (100), 135 (60); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C35H54O4: C, 78.02; H, 10.10; found: C, 77.84; H, 10.22.
28-O-Ethoxycarbonylbetulin (3d). Yield: 68%, m.p. 94–96 °C, Rf 0.47 (chloroform/ethanol, 40:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.75 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.81 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.96 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.31 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, OCH2CH3), 1.67 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.05–2.02 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.42 (m, 1H, H-19), 3.18 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.90 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.20 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, OCH2), 4.32 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.58 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.68 (s, 1H, H-29). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.2, 14.7, 15.3, 15.9, 16.0, 18.2, 19.0, 20.7, 25.1, 26.9, 27.3, 27.9, 29.5, 34.1, 34.3, 37.1, 37.5, 38.6, 38.8, 40.8, 42.6, 46.4, 47.6, 48.7, 50.3, 55.2, 63.9. 66.3, 78.9, 109.8, 150.0, 155.7. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3486, 2942, 1744, 1249, 1013, 882. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 514 (M+, 18), 424 (40), 203 (54), 189 (100), 135 (56); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. For C33H54O4: C, 77.00; H, 10.57; found: C, 77.28; H, 10.43.
3,28-O,O'-Di(propargyloxycarbonyl)betulin (4a). Yield: 27%, m.p. 125–127 °C, Rf 0.77 (chloroform/ethanol, 40:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.84 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.85 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.91 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.96 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.02 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.67 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.07–2.02 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.42 (m, 1H, H-19), 2.51 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, C≡CH), 2.53 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, C≡CH), 3.94 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.33 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.37 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.59 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.68 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.73 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H, OCH2), 4.76 (d, J = 2.4, Hz, 2H, OCH2). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 15.9, 16.0, 16.1, 16.2, 16.3, 18.0, 19.0, 20.7, 23.5, 25.1, 27.0, 27.7, 27.9, 29.4, 34.0, 34.3, 37.0, 37.6, 38.0, 38.3, 40.8, 42.7, 46.5, 47.6, 48.7, 50.2, 54.9, 55.2, 55.6, 67.2, 75.6, 75.9, 77.0, 86.2, 109.9, 149.9, 153.9, 154.5. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3305, 2941, 2133, 1730, 1442, 1253. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 606 ((M+, 7), 506 (41), 203 (52), 189 (100), 121 (42); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C38H54O6: C, 75.21; H, 8.97; found: C, 75.03; H 9.12.
3,28-O,O'-Di(3-butynyloxycarbonyl)betulin (4b). Yield: 23%, m.p. 140–142 °C, Rf 0.75 (chloroform/ ethanol, 40:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.84 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.85 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.91 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.05–2.02 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.01 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, C≡CH), 2.03 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, C≡CH), 2.43 (m, 1H, H-19), 2.59 (m, 4H, 2 × OCH2CH2), 3.94 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.24 (m, 4H, 2 × OCH2), 4.31 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.36 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.59 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.69 (s, 1H, H-29). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.6, 15.9, 16.1, 16.3, 18.0, 19.0, 20.7, 23.5, 25.0, 26.9, 27.8, 29.4, 33.9, 34.3, 36.9, 37.5, 38.0, 38.2, 40.8, 42.6, 46.4, 47.6, 48.7, 50.1, 55.3, 64.9, 65.3, 66.7, 70.1, 70.2, 76.7, 79.4, 79.5, 79.4, 85.6, 109.9, 149.9, 154.9, 155.4. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3312, 2951, 2128, 1745, 1249, 884. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 634 (M+, 3), 203 (40), 189 (100), 135 (48), 121 (46); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C40H58O6: C, 75.67; H, 9.21; found: C, 75.89; H, 9.14.
3,28-O,O'-Di(2-butynyloxycarbonyl)betulin (4c). Yield: 28%, m.p. 70–73 °C, Rf 0.78 (chloroform/ ethanol, 40:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.84 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.85 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.91 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.05–2.02 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 1.86 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 3H, C≡CCH3), 1.87 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 3H, C≡CCH3), 2.42 (m, 1H, H-19), 3.94 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.32 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.37 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.59 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.69 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.71 (m, 4H, 2 × OCH2). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 5.1, 5.3, 15.9, 16.1, 16.3, 18.0, 19.0, 20.7, 23.5, 25.0, 26.9, 27.8, 29.4, 33.9, 34.2, 36.9, 37.5, 37.9, 38.2, 40.8, 42.6, 46.4, 47.6, 48.7, 50.1, 55.3, 55.8, 56.1, 56.4, 66.9, 72.5, 72.7, 83.9, 84.1, 84.2, 85.8, 109.9, 149.9, 154.7, 155.2. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 2948, 2241, 1747, 1456, 1265, 884. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 634 (M+, 6), 520 (94), 203 (42), 189 (100), 135 (41); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C40H58O6: C, 75.67; H, 9.21; found: C, 75.42; H, 9.33.
3,28-O,O'-Di(ethoxycarbonyl)betulin (4d). Yield: 24%, m.p. 84–86 °C, Rf 0.76 (chloroform/ethanol, 40:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.86 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.87 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.93 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.99 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.05 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.32 (m, 6H, 2 × OCH2CH3), 1.69 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.81–2.05 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.44 (m, 1H, H-19), 3.92 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.22 (m, 4H, 2 × OCH2), 4.31 (m, 1H, H-3) 4.35 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.60 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.70 (s, 1H, H-29). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.2, 14.7, 16.0, 16.1, 16.4, 18.1, 19.1, 20.8, 23.6, 25.1, 27.0, 27.8, 29.5, 34.1, 34.3, 37.0, 37.6, 38.0, 38.3, 40.9, 42.7, 46.5, 47.6, 48.8, 50.2, 55.4, 63.6, 63.9, 66.4, 85.1, 109.9, 150.0, 155.2, 155.7. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 2948, 1741, 1466, 1265, 1009, 885. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 586 (M+, 4), 496 (70), 203 (42), 189 (100), 135 (41). Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C36H58O6: C, 73.68; H, 9.96; found: C, 73.56; H, 9.85.

3.4. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Monoesters 5 and Diesters 6

To a mixture of betulin (1, 0.44 g, 1 mmol) and propynoic acid (0.08 g, 1.10 mmol), phenylpropynoic acid (0.16 g, 1.10 mmol) or propanoic acid (0.08 g, 1.10 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (5 mL) under argon at −10 °C, a solution of DCC (0.23 g, 1.12 mmol) and DMAP (0.01 g, 0.08 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (1 mL) was added. Stirring at this temperature was continued for 5 h. Then the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred over night. After the reaction was complete, the reaction mixture was filtered and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (chloroform/ethanol 40:1, v/v) to give pure corresponding monoesters 5 and diesters 6.
28-O-Propynoylbetulin (5a). Yield: 60%, m.p. 133–135 °C, Rf 0.46 (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.76 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.82 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.98 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.06–1.98 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.43 (m, 1H, H-19), 2.89 (s, 1H, C≡CH), 3.18 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.99 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.38 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.59 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.69 (s, 1H, H-29). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.7, 15.3, 15.9, 16.0, 18.2, 19.1, 20.7, 25.1, 26.9, 27.3, 27.9, 29.4, 29.5, 34.1, 34.4, 37.1, 37.6, 38.6, 38.8, 40.8, 42.6, 46.3, 47.6, 48.7, 50.3, 55.2, 64.8, 74.6, 74.6, 78.9, 109.9, 149.8, 153.2. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3419, 3302, 2994, 2120, 1715, 1227. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 494 (M+, 32), 207 (66), 203 (50), 189 (100), 135 (59); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C33H50O3: C, 80.11; H, 10.19; found: C, 80.39; H, 10.02.
28-O-Phenylpropynoylbetulin (5b). Yield: 70%, m.p. 204–206 °C, Rf 0.47 (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.76 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.83 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.99 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.05 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.69 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.07–2.05 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.46 (m, 1H, H-19), 3.18 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.04 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.42 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.60 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.70 (s, 1H, H-29), 7.36–7.60 (m, 5H, Ar-H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.7, 15.3, 16.0, 16.1, 18.2, 19.1, 20.7, 25.1, 27.0, 27.3, 27.9, 29.5, 29.6, 34.1, 34.5, 37.1, 37.6, 38.6, 38.8, 40.8, 42.7, 46.4, 47.6, 48.8, 50.3, 55.2, 64.5, 78.9, 80.7, 86.2, 109.9, 119.6, 128.5, 128.5, 130.5, 132.9, 132.9, 149.9, 154.7. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3587, 2993, 2220, 1691, 1287, 1195. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 570 (M+, 15), 189 (71), 135 (42), 129 (100), 95 (41); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C39H54O3: C, 82.06; H, 9.53; found: C, 82.31; H, 9.48.
28-O-Propanoylbetulin (5c). Yield: 86%, m.p. 160–162 °C, Rf 0.46 (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.75 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.81 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.96 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.02 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.15 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 1.67 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.88–1.93 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.34 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, CH2CH3), 2.43 (m, 1H, H-19), 3.18 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.84 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.25 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.58 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.68 (s, 1H, H-29). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.2, 14.7, 15.3, 15.9, 16.0, 18.2, 19.1, 20.7, 25.1, 27.0, 27.3, 27.7, 27.9, 29.5, 29.7, 34.1, 34.5, 37.1, 37.5, 38.6, 38.8, 40.8, 42.6, 46.3, 47.6, 48.7, 50.3, 55.2, 62.5, 78.9, 109.8, 150.1, 174.9. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3357, 2940, 1735, 1276, 1186, 882. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 498 (M+, 17), 207 (52), 203 (54), 189 (100), 135 (58); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C33H54O3: C, 79.46; H, 10.91; found: C, 79.34; H, 10.82.
3,28-O,O'-Dipropynoylbetulin (6a). Yield: 12%, m.p. 102–104 °C, Rf 0.73 (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.86 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.87 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.89 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.98 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.07–2.01 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.43 (m, 1H, H-19), 2.85 (s, 1H, C≡CH), 2.89 (s, 1H, C≡CH), 3.99 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.39 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.59 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.60 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.69 (s, 1H, H-29). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.7, 15.9, 16.1, 16.4, 18.1, 19.1, 20.7, 23.4, 25.1, 26.9, 27.8, 29.4, 29.5, 34.0, 34.4, 37.0, 37.6, 37.9, 38.3, 40.8, 42.6, 46.3, 47.6, 48.7, 50.2, 55.3, 64.8, 74.1, 74.6, 74.7, 75.1, 83.6, 110.0, 149.8, 152.7, 153.2. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3301, 2945, 2119, 1714, 1234, 886. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 546 (M+, 9), 195 (46), 189 (53), 113 (41), 55 (100); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C36H50O4: C, 79.08; H, 9.22; found: C, 79.16; H, 9.28.
3,28-O,O'-Di(phenylpropynoyl)betulin (6b). Yield: 27%, m.p. 91–92 °C, Rf 0.79 (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.88 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.92 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.93 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.99 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.06 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.70 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.06–2.05 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.46 (m, 1H, H-19), 4.04 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.42 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.61 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.66 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.71 (s, 1H, H-29), 7.36–7.60 (m, 10H, 2 × Ar-H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.7, 16.0, 16.1, 16.5, 18.1, 19.1, 20.8, 23.6, 25.1, 25.8, 25.9, 27.0, 27.9, 29.4, 29.5, 29.6, 34.1, 34.5, 37.0, 37.6, 38.0, 38.4, 40.9, 42.7, 46.4, 47.6, 48.8, 50.2, 55.4, 64.5, 80.7, 81.0, 83.2, 85.7, 86.3, 109.9, 119.6, 119.8, 128.4, 128.5, 130.4, 130.5, 132.9, 132.9, 149.9, 154.2, 154.7. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 2945, 2223, 1706, 1490, 1285, 1187. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 698 (M+, 6), 552 (30), 189 (33), 135 (15), 129 (100); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C48H58O4: C, 82.48; H, 8.36; found: C, 82.35; H, 8.27.
3,28-O,O'-Dipropanoylbetulin (6c). Yield: 11%, m.p. 142–144 °C, Rf 0.71 (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.83 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.83 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.84 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.96 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.02 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.15 (m, 6H, 2 × CH2CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.06–1.96 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.34 (m, 4H, 2 × CH2CH3), 2.43 (m, 1H, H-19), 3.83 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.26 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.65 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.58 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.68 (s, 1H, H-29). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 9.2, 9.3, 14.7, 15.9, 16.1, 16.5, 18.1, 19.1, 20.7, 23.6, 25.1, 27.0, 27.7, 27.9, 28.0, 29.5, 29.7, 34.0, 34.5, 37.0, 37.4, 37.8, 38.3, 40.8, 42.6, 46.3, 47.6, 48.7, 50.2, 55.3, 62.5, 80.5, 109.8, 150.1, 174.3, 174.9. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 2960, 1736, 1461, 1261, 1185, 891. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 554 (M+, 7), 480 (100), 203 (45), 189 (98), 135 (37); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C36H58O4: C, 77.93; H, 10.54; found: C, 77.85; H, 10.62.

3.5. Synthesis of 28-O-Acetylbetulin (7a) and 3,28-O,O'-Diacetylbetulin (7b)

To a mixture of betulin (1, 1.0 g, 2.26 mmol), DMAP (0.01 g, 0.07 mmol) and pyridine (1.5 mL) in dry dichloromethane (9 mL) was added dropwise acetic anhydride (0.24 g, 2.26 mmol) at 0 °C, and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature. After being stirred for 18 h, the mixture was washed with 10% aqueous hydrochloric acid (30 mL), water (15 mL), saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution and then brine (20 mL). After separation of phases, the organic layer was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (chloroform/ethanol, 40:1, v/v) to give 28-O-acetylbetulin (7a, 0.77 g, 71%): m.p. 214–215 °C (lit. m.p. 210–212 °C [28]; 217–219 °C [34]); Rf 0.44 (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v) and 3,28-O,O'-diacetylbetulin (7b, 0.21 g, 18%): m.p. 220–222 °C (lit. m.p. 221–223 °C [34]). 1H and 13C-NMR spectral data of 7a and 7b were in agreement with those published in the literature [28,34].

3.6. Synthesis of 28-O-acetyl-3-O'-alkynyloxycarbonylbetulins (8)

To a mixture of 28-O-acetylbetulin (7a, 0.48 g, 1 mmol) and pyridine (2.5 mL) in dry benzene (6 mL) at 0–5 °C, a solution of propargyl chloroformate or 2-butyn-1-yl chloroformate or 3-butyn-1-yl chloroformate or ethyl chloroformate (2.0 mmol) in dry benzene (5 mL) was added. Stirring at this temperature was continued for 4 h. Then the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred over night. At the end of the reaction 5 mL of chloroform was added and the reaction mixture was washed with 1 N sulfuric acid, followed by water, then dried with anhydrous magnesium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using chloroform/ethanol (40:1, v/v) to give pure corresponding esters 8.
28-O-Acetyl-3-O'-propargyloxycarbonylbetulin (8a). Yield: 89%, m.p. 188–189 °C, Rf 0.73 (chloroform/ ethanol, 20:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.84 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.85 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.92 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.06–1.99 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.07 (s, 3H, COCH3), 2.44 (m, 1H, H-19), 2.51 (t, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz, C≡CH), 3.85 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.24 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.33 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.58 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.68 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.71 (d, 2H, J = 2.4 Hz, OCH2). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.6, 16.0, 16.1, 18.1, 19.1, 20.8, 21.0, 23.5, 25.1, 27.0, 27.7, 27.8, 29.5, 29.7, 34.1, 34.5, 37.0, 37.5, 38.0, 40.8, 42.6, 46.3, 47.7, 48.7, 50.2, 54.9, 55.6, 62.7, 75.4, 75.9, 77.2, 86.2, 109.8, 150.1, 154.5, 171.6. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3298, 2997, 2140, 1735, 1243, 889. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 566 (M+, 7), 466 (76), 203 (46), 189 (100), 135 (40); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C36H54O5: C, 76.28; H, 9.60; found: C, 76.49; H, 9.52.
28-O-Acetyl-3-O'-(3-butynyloxycarbonyl)betulin (8b). Yield: 63%, m.p. 118–121 °C, Rf 0.72 (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.83 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.84 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.90 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.96 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.02 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.67 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.06–1.99 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.00 (t, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H, C≡CH), 2.06 (s, 3H, COCH3), 2.44 (m, 1H, H-19), 2.57 (m, J = 2.7 Hz, J = 7.2 Hz 2H, OCH2CH2), 3.84 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.21 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, OCH2), 4.25 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.32 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.58 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.68 (s, 1H, H-29). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.7, 15.9, 16.1, 16.3, 18.0, 19.0, 20.7, 21.0, 23.5, 25.0, 26.9, 27.8, 29.5, 29.6, 34.0, 34.5, 36.9, 37.4, 38.0, 38.2, 40.8, 42.6, 46.2, 47.6, 48.7, 50.2, 55.3, 62.7, 65.0, 65.5, 70.1, 79.4, 85.6, 109.8, 150.1, 154.9, 171.6. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 3284, 2944, 2212, 1741, 1249, 889. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 580 (M+, 7), 466 (66), 203 (42), 189 (100), 135 (46); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C37H56O5: C, 76.51; H, 9.72; found: C, 76.79; H, 9.59.
28-O-Acetyl-3-O'-(2-butynyloxycarbonyl)betulin (8c). Yield: 67%, m.p. 126–129 °C, Rf 0.75 (chloroform/ethanol, 20:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.84 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.85 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.91 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.06–1.99 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 1.86 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 3H, C≡CCH3), 2.07 (s, 3H, COCH3), 2.44 (m, 1H, H-19), 3.84 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.24 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.32 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.59 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.68 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.71 (q, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H, OCH2). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 3.6, 14.7, 16.1, 16.3, 18.0, 19.0, 20.7, 21.0, 23.5, 25.0, 26.9, 27.8, 29.5, 29.6, 34.0, 34.5, 36.9, 37.4, 38.0, 38.2, 40.8, 42.6, 46.2, 47.6, 48.7, 50.2, 55.3, 56.4, 62.7, 72.7, 83.8, 84.2, 85.9, 109.8, 150.1, 154.7, 171.6. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 2956, 2233, 1742, 1457, 1256, 920. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 580 (M+, 3), 466 (64), 203 (37), 189 (100), 187 (47), 135 (40); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C37H56O5: C, 76.51; H, 9.72; found: C, 76.63; H, 9.87.
28-O-Acetyl-3-O'-(ethoxycarbonyl)betulin (8d). Yield: 84%, m.p. 200–202 °C, Rf 0.73 (chloroform/ ethanol, 20:1, v/v); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 0.84 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.85 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.91 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.30 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3), 1.68 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.05–2.00 (m, 25H, CH, CH2), 2.07 (s, 3H, COCH3), 2.44 (m, 1H, H-19), 3.85 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.18 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, OCH2), 4.24 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-28), 4.30 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.59 (s, 1H, H-29), 4.69 (s, 1H, H-29). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ: 14.3, 14.7, 16.0, 16.1, 16.4, 18.1, 19.1, 20.8, 21.0, 23.6, 25.1, 27.0, 27.8, 29.6, 34.1, 34.5, 37.0, 37.5, 38.0, 38.3, 40.9, 42.7, 46.3, 47.7, 48.7, 50.2, 55.4, 62.8, 63.6, 85.1, 109.8, 150.1, 155.2, 171.5. IR (KBr, cm−1) ν: 2941, 1741, 1446, 1253, 1012, 890. EI MS (70 eV) m/z (rel. intensity): 556 (M+, 6), 466 (73), 203 (38), 189 (100), 135 (41); Elemental anal. (%), calcd. for C35H56O5: C, 75.50; H, 10.14; found: C, 75.68; H, 10.04.

3.7. Crystal Structure Determination

X-ray diffraction measurement was performed at 100(1) K. The colorless single crystal was preselected under polarization microscope. The crystal was mounted on a glass capillary and cooled down by a cold, dry nitrogen gas stream (Oxford Cryosystem Equipment). The data were collected using SuperNova kappa diffractometer with Atlas CCD detector and CuKα radiation. Accurate cell parameters were determined and refined with CrysAlis Pro program [35]. Also for the integration of the collected data program CrysAlis Pro was used. The structure was solved using direct methods with SHELXS97 program and then refined using SHELXL-97 program [36]. Nonhydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. The hydrogen atoms were fixed geometrically at calculated distances and allowed to ride on the parent carbon or oxygen atoms.
CCDC-873113 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge at http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: +44-1223-336033; E-Mail: [email protected].

3.8. Antiproliferative Assay in Vitro

3.8.1. Cells

The following established in vitro cell lines were applied: SW707 (human colorectal adenocarcinoma), CCRF/CEM (human leukemia), T47D (human breast cancer), P388 (mouse leukemia) and Balb3T3 (normal mouse fibroblasts). All lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA) and maintained at the Cell Culture Collection of the Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy (Wroclaw, Poland).
Twenty-four hours before addition of the tested agents, the cells were plated in 96-well plates (Sarstedt, Numbrecht, Germany) at a density of 104 cells per well in 100 μL of culture medium. The cells were cultured in the opti-MEM medium supplemented with 2 mM glutamine (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), streptomycin (50 μg/mL), penicillin (50 U/mL) (both antibiotics from Polfa, Tarchomin, Poland) and 5% fetal calf serum (Gibco). The cell cultures were maintained at 37 °C in humid atmosphere saturated with 5% CO2.

3.8.2. Compounds

The compounds were dissolved in DMSO and culture medium (1:9) to the concentration of 1 mg/mL, and subsequently diluted in culture medium to reach the required concentrations (ranging from 1 to 100 mg/mL).

3.9. Antiproliferative Assay

The in vitro cytotoxic effect of all agents was examined using the SRB assay for adherent cells and MTT assay for leukemia cells as described by Wietrzyk et al. [37]. Each compound in given concentration was tested in triplicates in each experiment, which was repeated 3–5 times. The results of cytotoxic activity in vitro were expressed as an IC50 – the concentration of compound (in μg/mL) that inhibits proliferation rate of the tumor cells by 50% as compared to the control untreated cells.

4. Conclusions

New acetylenic derivatives of betulin containing one or two acetylenic formate or propynoyl functions at the C-3 and/or C-28 positions were synthesized. The structures of the title compounds were confirmed by 1H, 13C-NMR, IR, MS, and elemental analyses. Furthermore, the structure of 28-O-propynoylbetulin (5a) was also determined by X-ray crystal analysis. The presented studies demonstrated that a simple modification of the parent structure of betulin (1) can produce new potentially interesting anti-cancer agents. Among all studied compounds, 28-O-propynoylbetulin (5a) exhibited the strongest cytotoxic activity and it was over 500 times more cytotoxic than betulin (1) and 100 times more cytotoxic than cisplatin against CCRF/CEM cancer cells with promising selectivity index (SI = 15) under in vitro conditions. It was found that the betulins which possess a carbonyl group at C-28 position directly bonded to the triple bond of an ethynyl substituent, showed strong cytotoxic effects against human leukemia (CCRF/CEM) and murine leukemia (P388) cancer cells. It was also found that the free C-3 hydroxyl function is a structural requirement for the cytotoxicity of the studied compounds. The compound 5a has been selected for further studies. Noteworthy feature of the obtained results was the observation that leukemia (CCRF/CEM and P388) cells appear to be more sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of the compounds 3 and 5 than the other cancer cells lines applied.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland. Grant No KNW-1-006/P/2/0.

References

  1. Lowitz, J.T. Űber eine neue, fast benzoeartige substanz der briken. Crell’s Chem. Ann. 1788, 1, 312–317. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tolstikov, G.A.; Flekhter, O.B.; Shultz, E.E.; Baltina, L.A.; Tolstikov, A.G. Betulin and its derivatives. Chemistry and biological activity. Chem. Sustain. Develop. 2005, 13, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alakurtti, S.; Mäkelä, T.; Koskimies, S.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J. Pharmacological properties of the ubiquitous natural product betulin. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 29, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tolstikova, T.G.; Sorokina, I.V.; Tolstikov, G.A.; Tolstikov, A.G.; Flekhter, O.B. Biological activity and pharmacological prospects of lupane terpenoids: II. Semisynthetic lupane derivatives. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2006, 32, 261–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Drebushchak, T.N.; Mikhailenko, M.A.; Brezgunova, M.E.; Shakhtshneider, T.P.; Kuznetsova, S.A. Crystal structure of betulin ethanol solvate. J. Struct. Chem. 2010, 51, 798–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Boryczka, S.; Michalik, E.; Jastrzębska, M.; Kusz, J.; Zubko, M.; Bębenek, E. X-ray crystal structure of betulin-DMSO solvate. J. Chem. Crystallogr. 2012, 42, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mukherjee, R.; Kumar, V.; Srivastava, S.K.; Agarwal, S.K.; Burman, A.C. Betulinic acid derivatives as anticancer agents: Structure activity relationship. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pisha, E.; Chai, H.; Lee, I.S.; Chagwedera, T.E.; Farnsworth, N.R.; Cordell, G.A.; Beecher, C.W.W.; Fong, H.H.S.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Brown, D.M.; et al. Discovery of betulinic acid as a selective inhibitor of human melanoma that functions by induction of apoptosis. Nat. Med. 1995, 1, 1046–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eiznhamer, D.A.; Xu, Z.-Q. Betulinic acid: A promising anticancer candidate. Idrugs 2004, 7, 359–373. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mullauer, F.B.; Kessler, J.H.; Medema, J.P. Betulinic acid, a natural compound with potent anticancer effects. Anticancer Drugs 2010, 21, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rzeski, W.; Stepulak, A.; Szymański, M.; Juszczak, M.; Grabarska, A.; Sifringer, M.; Kaczor, J.; Kandefer-Szerszeń, M. Betulin elicits anti-cancer effects in tumour primary cultures and cell lines in vitro. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2009, 105, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dehelean, C.A.; Feflea, S.; Molnar, J.; Zupko, I.; Soica, C. Betulin as an antitumor agent tested in vitro on A431, HeLa and MCF7, and as an angiogenic inhibitor in vivo in the CAM assay. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 981–985. [Google Scholar]
  13. Alakurtti, S.; Heiska, T.; Kiriazis, A.; Sacerdoti-Sierra, N.; Jaffe, C.L.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J. Synthesis and anti-leishmanial activity of heterocyclic betulin derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 1573–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Urban, M.; Vlk, M.; Dzubak, P.; Hajduch, M.; Sarek, J. Cytotoxic heterocyclic triterpenoids derived from betulin and betulinic acid. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 3666–3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pohjala, L.; Alakurtti, S.; Ahola, T.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J.; Tammela, P. Betulin-derived compounds as inhibitors of Alphavirus replication. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 1917–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kommera, H.; Kaluderović, G.N.; Dittrich, S.; Kalbitz, J.; Dräger, B.; Mueller, T.; Paschke, R. Carbamate derivatives of betulinic acid and betulin with selective cytotoxic activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3409–3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ben-Zvi, Z.; Danon, A. Supplement C2: The Chemistry of Triple Bonded Functional Groups. In The Chemistry of Functional Groups; Patai, S., Ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 739–788. [Google Scholar]
  18. Csuk, R.; Barthel, A.; Schwarz, S.; Kommera, H.; Paschke, R. Synthesis and biological evaluation of antitumor-active γ-butyrolactone substituted betulin derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 2549–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kazakova, O.B.; Giniyatullina, G.V.; Yamansarov, E.Y.; Tolstikov, G.A. Betulin and ursolic acid synthetic derivatives as inhibitors of Papilloma virus. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 4088–4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Csuk, R.; Sczepek, R.; Siewert, B.; Nitsche, C. Cytotoxic betulin-derived hydroxypropargylamines trigger apoptosis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Csuk, R.; Barthel, A.; Kluge, R.; Ströhl, D. Synthesis, cytotoxicity and liposome preparation of 28-acetylenic betulin derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 7252–7259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kazakova, O.B.; Yamansarov, E.Yu.; Spirikhin, L.V.; Yunusov, M.S.; Baikova, I.P.; Kukovinets, O.S.; Musin, R.Z. Effective synthesis and transformations of alkyne betulin derivatives. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2011, 47, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Csuk, R.; Barthel, A.; Sczepek, R.; Siewert, B.; Schwarz, S. Synthesis, encapsulation and antitumor activity of new betulin derivatives. Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2011, 1, 37–49. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bori, I.D.; Hung, H.-Y.; Qian, K.; Chen, C.-H.; Morris-Natschke, S.L.; Lee, H.-K. Anti-AIDS agents 88. Anti-HIV conjugates of betulin and betulinic acid with AZT prepared via click chemistry. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1987–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mól, W.; Matyja, M.; Filip, B.; Wietrzyk, J.; Boryczka, S. Synthesis and antiproliferative activity in vitro of novel (2-butynyl)thioquinolines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 8136–8141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Boryczka, S.; Mól, W.; Milczarek, M.; Wietrzyk, J.; Bębenek, E. Synthesis and in vitro antiproliferative activity of novel (4-chloro- and 4-acyloxy-2-butynyl)thioquinolines. Med. Chem. Res. 2011, 20, 1402–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lugemwa, F.L.; Huang, F.-Y.; Bentley, M.D.; Mendel, M.J.; Alford, A.R. A Heliothis zea antifeedant from the abundant birchbark triterpene betulin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990, 38, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deng, Y.; Snyder, J.K. Preparation of a 24-nor-1,4-dien-3-one triterpene derivative from betulin: A new route to 24-nortriterpene analogues. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2864–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mohammed, I.E.; Choudhary, M.I.; Ali, S.; Anjum, S.; Atta-ur-Rahman. 20(29)-Lupene-3β,28β-diacetate. Acta Crystallogr. 2006, E62, o1352–o1354. [Google Scholar]
  30. Boryczka, S.; Bębenek, E.; Jastrzębska, M.; Kusz, J.; Zubko, M. Crystal structure of betulinic acid-DMSO solvate. Z. Kristallogr. 2012, 227, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Geran, R.I.; Greenberg, N.H.; Macdonald, M.M.; Schumacher, A.M.; Abott, B.J. Cell culture technical procedures. Cancer Chemother. Rep. 1972, 3, 59–72. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lamberth, C. Alkyne chemistry in crop protection. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 17, 4047–4063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gauthier, C.; Legault, J.; Lebrun, M.; Dufour, P.; Pichette, A. Glycosidation of lupine-type triterpenoids as potent in vitro cytotoxic agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 6713–6725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bodrikov, I.V.; Borisova, N.V.; Chiyanov, A.A.; Kurskii, Y.A.; Fukin, G.K. Vinylic substitution in the reaction of betulin diacetate with tert-butyl hypochlorite. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 49, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oxford Diffraction, CrysAllis CCD and CrysAllis RED; Versions1.171.32.29; Oxford Diffraction Ltd.: Wrocław, Poland, 2008.
  36. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112–122. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wietrzyk, J.; Chodynski, M.; Fitak, H.; Wojdat, E.; Kutner, A.; Opolski, A. Antitumor properties of diastereomeric and geometric analogs of vitamin D3. Anticancer Drugs 2007, 18, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 3–9 are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boryczka, S.; Bębenek, E.; Wietrzyk, J.; Kempińska, K.; Jastrzębska, M.; Kusz, J.; Nowak, M. Synthesis, Structure and Cytotoxic Activity of New Acetylenic Derivatives of Betulin. Molecules 2013, 18, 4526-4543. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18044526

AMA Style

Boryczka S, Bębenek E, Wietrzyk J, Kempińska K, Jastrzębska M, Kusz J, Nowak M. Synthesis, Structure and Cytotoxic Activity of New Acetylenic Derivatives of Betulin. Molecules. 2013; 18(4):4526-4543. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18044526

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boryczka, Stanisław, Ewa Bębenek, Joanna Wietrzyk, Katarzyna Kempińska, Maria Jastrzębska, Joachim Kusz, and Maria Nowak. 2013. "Synthesis, Structure and Cytotoxic Activity of New Acetylenic Derivatives of Betulin" Molecules 18, no. 4: 4526-4543. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18044526

APA Style

Boryczka, S., Bębenek, E., Wietrzyk, J., Kempińska, K., Jastrzębska, M., Kusz, J., & Nowak, M. (2013). Synthesis, Structure and Cytotoxic Activity of New Acetylenic Derivatives of Betulin. Molecules, 18(4), 4526-4543. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18044526

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop