Next Article in Journal
Role of Photoactive Phytocompounds in Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Engineering Enhances the Charge Carriers Transport in Wide Band-Gap Polymer Donors Based Polymer Solar Cells
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Design of Dual-Band Terahertz Perfect Metamaterial Absorber Based on Circuit Theory

Molecules 2020, 25(18), 4104; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184104
by Zhongmin Liu 1,2, Liang Guo 1,2 and Qingmao Zhang 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2020, 25(18), 4104; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184104
Submission received: 30 July 2020 / Revised: 27 August 2020 / Accepted: 5 September 2020 / Published: 8 September 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors proposed a design of perfect absorber using graphene metasurface. The authors should answer the following questions:

  1. The proposed perfect absorber is narrowband, what is the advantage of it compared to other narrowband perfect absorber?
  2. In the paper, the author assumed the conductivity of gold is a constant. In the reality, the conductivity changes with frequency. Will the results change a lot considering the varying conductivity?
  3. Although it is a theoretical work, the author should discuss the potential way to fabricate this perfect absorber.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

  • The authors should clarify the following sentence (see page 4):

"To better material selection and geometry optimization, we consider a central frequency defined as ω0 = (ω1 + ω2)/2 and apply an additional condition on the structure by setting β|ω=ω0d = π/2"

The authors should explain why they apply this additional condition. What is its physical meaning?

  • In order to demonstrate the polarization-insensitive behavior of the proposed metamaterial absorber, the absorption spectrum should be evaluated for different values of the azimuthal angle (ranging from 0° up to 360°) of the impinging plane wave. Please include this information.

 

  • Figure 3 is incomplete; I cannot see part (b). Please, add Fig. 3(b).

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The English language is not always adequate, so I suggest to find a fluent English speaker to revise the whole manuscript.

Back to TopTop