Next Article in Journal
Modeling of Chemoperfusion vs. Intravenous Administration of Cisplatin in Wistar Rats: Adsorption and Tissue Distribution
Previous Article in Journal
Flame Retardancy and Thermal Behavior of an Unsaturated Polyester Modified with Kaolinite–Urea Intercalation Complexes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biocatalytic Potential of Native Basidiomycetes from Colombia for Flavour/Aroma Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Strain, Wood Substrate and Cold Treatment on the Yield and β-Glucan Content of Ganoderma lucidum Fruiting Bodies

1
School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 80100 Joensuu, North Karelia, Finland
2
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 80100 Joensuu, North Karelia, Finland
3
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 31600 Tavastia Proper, Jokioinen, Finland
4
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 00790 Uusimaa, Helsinki, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(20), 4732; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204732
Submission received: 16 September 2020 / Revised: 8 October 2020 / Accepted: 14 October 2020 / Published: 15 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Products from Fungi)

Abstract

:
Wood residues from forestry industries can be potential raw materials for specialty and edible mushroom production. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of wood residues for the cultivation of Ganoderma lucidum originating from boreal forests. The substrates tested included sawdust and wood chips of Betula spp., Populus tremula, Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris and Larix sp. The suitability of the substrates and the ability of the strains to develop fruiting bodies and produce β-glucan were evaluated. Fruiting body formation was supported by applying two different cold shock treatments to substrate bags. The highest yields were observed with MUS192 strain and Betula spp. and P. tremula wood-based substrates. β-Glucan content in the fruiting bodies was highest with the MUS75 and P. tremula wood-based substrate. Based on these findings, the combination of P. tremula wood residues and the MUS192 strain is proposed to enhance the yield and β-glucan content of the fruiting bodies. A cold treatment of 5 °C is suggested to induce primordia formation and to increase fruiting probability. This is the first time that strains of G. lucidum originating from boreal forests have been compared and successfully cultivated simulating commercial indoor cultivation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

High volumes of wood-based side streams are generated from wood processing industries in Europe. In Finland, sawmill and plywood industries alone produced in 2016 over 1.2 million cubic meters of side streams [1]. One of the threats associated with the utilization of wood-based side streams is the scarce development of new products and the expensiveness of the process [2]. Wood-based side streams, mainly composed of wood chips, sawdust and bark, are mostly used for energy and pulp production in Northern Europe [2]. The main tree species grown and used in sawmill and plywood industries in Finland are conifer species (Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies) and birch (Betula pendula and Betula pubescens) [1]. Other species available [3] are used on a minor scale such as Populus tremula and Larix sp. The high availability of these resources along with new European policies towards a circular economy [4] have pushed initiatives to find new uses for these side streams. Moreover, wood processing industries are seeking the optimization and revalorization of their resources.
Wood side streams have been found to be a potential raw material for specialty and edible mushroom production [5]. Mushroom cultivation allows the inexpensive transformation of lignocellulosic biomass into high-value products such as polysaccharides. Moreover, the biotechnological process is supported by the large availability and accessibility of the substrate material. In mushroom cultivation, the production of fruiting bodies requires long periods and the quality of the products is affected by the environmental conditions and substrate. Hence, it is very important to select the most suitable strains, growing substrate and environmental conditions for the commercial cultivation of mushrooms. With an adequate cultivation technique, agroforestry and agroindustrial by-products can be recovered for the production of edible and specialty mushrooms. Some of these by-products include sawdust, tea waste, wheat straw, cotton waste, peanut shells, soy residues and olive mill wastewaters, among others [6,7,8,9,10,11].
Among cultivated fungal species, Ganoderma is a popular genus including pathogenic and wood-degrading species that have been studied in regard to their bioactivity [12]. The most extensively produced and economically important specialty mushroom in China (from where its cultivation practices originate) is Ganoderma lucidum [13]. G. lucidum has been cultivated in a wide variety of substrates including sawdust from Acacia sp., Alnus sp., Carpinus sp., Dalbergia sp., Dipterocarpus sp., Fagus sp., Pinus sp., Populus sp., Quercus sp. and Swietenia sp., among others [6,7,8,14,15,16,17]. Ganoderma contains several compounds that define the bioactive and pharmacological properties of the fungus such as antiviral [18], immunomodulatory, antitumor, antioxidant, hepatoprotective or antihypertensive activities [19]. Polysaccharides, along with triterpenoids, are the major bioactive constituents of the Ganoderma genus [12]. Among them, β-glucan is a dominant structural polysaccharide that defines the shape and rigidity of the cell, serving as a reservoir of carbohydrates [20]. This polysaccharide is mainly found in the fungal cell walls, but it can be found inside the cell or secreted in the medium where the fungus grows [21]. Due to its bioactive properties, β-glucan has numerous applications in the pharmaceutical and food industries [20]. To supply its demand, attempts to enhance the production of fungal polysaccharides by modifying and optimizing the cultivation conditions and growing media have been carried out [10,16,22,23,24,25,26,27].
In Asian countries, ‘Ganoderma lucidum’ has been used to name the traditionally cultivated Reishi or Ling-Zhi mushroom [13]. However, the taxonomy of the species is not clear leading to confusion among closely related species [28,29,30]. The genus Ganoderma (P. Karst.) was described by Karsten [31], combining only the species type G. lucidum (W. Curtis) Karst. into the new genus. Curtis, the author of the epitheton, based his description on a specimen from the UK [32]. Since then, the fungus has been reported worldwide based mainly on morphological characteristics [33,34]. Recently, molecular and taxonomic data have confirmed that Asian ‘G. lucidum’ differs from the originally described species from Europe [28,29,30].
Ganoderma lucidum is naturally distributed in Finnish boreal forests. Its distribution is sporadic and it is commonly found in coastal areas [35], but the species can also be found inland; the northernmost findings are above the Arctic Circle [36]. In Finland, G. lucidum has been found in stumps of Alnus glutinosa, Betula sp., P. abies, Quercus robur and P. sylvestris [35]. Currently, the cultivation of G. lucidum in Finland is still in its infancy. An attempt to cultivate Finnish strains of G. lucidum in vitro using wood residues has been carried [37]. However, the suitability of wood side streams for the production of G. lucidum fruiting bodies and β-glucan using strains originating from boreal forests has not been investigated.
In this work, different wood side streams of sawmill and plywood industries were tested as substrate media for the cultivation of G. lucidum strains originating from boreal forests. The aim is to find the most suitable strain, wood substrate and cold treatment for the production of G. lucidum fruiting bodies and β-glucan. The strain selection and cold shock treatment were critical for successful fruiting. The wood substrate had the strongest effect on the yield and β-glucan content of the fruiting bodies. Betula spp. and Populus tremula wood side streams were found the most suitable substrates to enhance the yield of G. lucidum fruiting bodies. The highest content of β-glucan was obtained in the fruiting bodies growing in the P. tremula wood-based substrate.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Strain, Wood Substrate and Cold Treatment on Successful Fruiting

The suitability of strains (MUS192, MUS6, MUS75, MUS9, MUS12 and MUS19), wood substrates (Betula spp., P. tremula, P. abies, P. sylvestris and Larix sp.) and cold treatments (5 °C and −20 °C) for the cultivation of G. lucidum were evaluated by their capability of producing fruiting bodies. From the total substrate bags (N = 300), only 31.7% the produced fruiting bodies (N = 95), of which 89.5% were exposed to 5 °C (N = 85) and 10.5% to −20 °C (N = 10). Substrate bags exposed to −20 °C did not produce fruiting bodies and were susceptible to contamination. Successful fruiting bags exposed to −20 °C were inoculated with the MUS19 strain into P. tremula and P. abies wood-based substrates.
From a total of 50 bags per strain, strains MUS19, MUS192 and MUS6 were more capable of producing fruiting bodies (N = 30, 20 and 18, respectively) than MUS9, MUS12 and MUS75 (N = 14, 9 and 4, respectively). Regarding the wood substrates (60 bags per substrate), P. tremula and Betula spp. were found more suitable for fruiting (N = 27 and 20, respectively) than P. abies, P. sylvestris and Larix sp. (N = 18, 17 and 13, respectively). Substrate colonization was completed within one month for most of the wood substrates except for P. sylvestris and Larix sp. wood-based substrates, in which colonization was slow or uncompleted.
A logistic regression model (Equation (1)) was fitted to predict the probability of the successful fruiting of G. lucidum as a function of strains, wood substrates and cold treatments (Table 1). Treatment significantly predicted the probability of fruiting (Wald χ2 = 58.78, p < 0.001) indicating that cold treatment in +5 °C increased the probability of a successful fruiting body in comparison to treatment at −20 °C. The fungal strain (Wald χ2 = 41.82, p < 0.001), followed by wood substrate (Wald χ2 = 13.97, p < 0.001), significantly predicted the probability of the fruiting of G. lucidum. For instance, the inoculation of MUS75 or MUS12 would significantly decrease the probability of fruiting (using MUS19 as reference). On the contrary, the utilization of the wood substrate based on P. tremula would significantly increase the probability of fruiting (using P. abies as a reference).

2.2. Effect of Strain, Wood Substrate and Cold Treatment on Yield

The effect of strain, wood, treatment and their interactions on the fruiting body yield of G. lucidum was studied using the substrate bags that produced fruiting bodies. The linear regression model expressed in Equation (2) showed that the effect of strain and wood had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on the yield of the fruiting bodies of G. lucidum (Table 2). Wood substrate had the strongest effect on the yield (F (4,69) = 9.71)). The effect of cold treatment and the interaction between the main factors did not show a significant effect on the yield (p > 0.05). For example, the interaction of wood and strain was not significant (F (14,69) = 1.12; p = 0.361).
The effect of strain on the fruiting body yield is presented in more detail in Figure 1. The only significant differences on the estimated yield were observed between the strains MUS192 and MUS19 (p < 0.05). These strains presented fruiting bodies with the highest probability of success fruiting bodies in comparison with other strains (Table 1). The yields per bag were 51.3 g and 37.2 g, respectively, for the MUS192 and MUS19 strains.
In Figure 2, the effect of the wood substrate on the yield of the fruiting body of G. lucidum is shown. The highest estimated yields were obtained with the Betula spp. and P. tremula wood-based substrate (not statistically different from each other). The yields per bag were 59.8 g and 52.1 g, respectively, for Betula spp. and P. tremula. However, the highest yield per bag (90.2 g) was observed in the P. tremula wood-based substrate inoculated with the MUS192 strain. The P. abies and P. sylvestris wood-based substrates were not as suitable as deciduous species for the yield of fruiting bodies. Larix sp. was found the least suitable for the yield of G. lucidum fruiting bodies (not statistically different from P. sylvestris).

2.3. Effect of Strain and Wood Substrate on Glucan Contents

The effect of strain, wood and their interactions on glucan contents of G. lucidum fruiting bodies was studied using the substrate bags treated at +5 °C (Equation (3)). As expected, the strain and wood substrate had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on the contents of total glucan and β-glucan in the fruiting bodies of G. lucidum (Table 3). On the contrary, the factors did not have an effect on the content of α-glucan. Wood had the highest effect on the total glucan and β-glucan content in fruiting bodies (F = 17.28 and F = 15.60, respectively). Similarly to the results of fruiting body yield (Table 2), the interaction between the main factors strain and wood did not have a significant effect on the production of glucans.
In Figure 3, the effect of strains on the β-glucan content of the fruiting bodies of G. lucidum is represented in detail. The MUS75 strain presented the highest β-glucan content (marginal mean of 55.9% of β-glucan; not statistically different from MUS192 and MUS9) even though it was the strain with the lowest probability of fruiting (Table 1) and fruiting body yield (Figure 1). MUS12 and MUS19 presented the lowest β-glucan content (49.5 and 51.2%, respectively; not statistically different from MUS6).
The β-glucan content of the fruiting bodies of G. lucidum was affected by the tree species used as wood substrate (Figure 4). The highest β-glucan content was estimated for the P. tremula wood-based substrate (marginal mean of 55.8% of β-glucan). The P. tremula wood-based substrate also presented a significantly higher probability of fruiting (Table 1) and fruiting body yield (not statistically different from Betula spp.; Figure 2) in comparison with the other species. The P. sylvestris wood-based substrate significantly presented the lowest content of β-glucan in the fruiting bodies (marginal mean of 47.5% of β-glucan).

3. Discussion

The effect of strain, wood substrate and cold treatment on the probability of successful fruiting, yield and β-glucan content of the fruiting bodies of G. lucidum was studied in this work. The strain selection and the cold shock treatment had the strongest effects on the probability of fruiting. The wood substrate had the strongest effect on the yield and β-glucan content in the fruiting bodies. The highest yields were obtained with Betula spp. and P. tremula wood side streams. P. tremula was found to be the most suitable substrate to enhance the β-glucan content in the fruiting bodies.
Cold treatment was needed after full colonization of the substrate bags to induce primordia formation. In this study, the cold treatment was adequate at 5 °C. When a lower temperature (−20 °C) was applied, the substrate bags did not produce fruiting bodies and were susceptible to contamination. In a previous study, a cold treatment at 5 °C decreased the time needed for fruiting and enhanced the biological efficiency of Pleurotus sp. [38]. Fungal strains belonging to the same species may behave differently to temperature depending on the climate conditions of their origin [39]. Due to the boreal climate conditions of the strains’ origin, it is possible that environmental stress (i.e., cold shock) is required to trigger the formation of fruiting bodies.
Previously, the effect of wood sawdust from the same tree species on the mycelial growth of G. lucidum was tested in agar media [37]. In accordance with the results presented in the current study, Betula spp. and P. tremula sawdust-amended media enhanced the mycelial growth of G. lucidum in vitro. Therefore, it is not surprising to observe a higher probability of fruiting using wood residues of those tree species as substrate.
The yield was found also higher in Betula spp. and P. tremula in comparison with conifer species. The interaction of strain and wood did not have a significant effect on the probability of fruiting, yield or β-glucan production. Surprisingly, the maximum yield and biological efficiency of 90.2 g and 9% were achieved with the poplar wood-based substrate. In Finland, G. lucidum has not been reported growing in P. tremula in nature [35]. Higher biological efficiencies, 22.6% (alder sawdust supplemented with gram flour) and 20.7% (oak sawdust supplemented with corn bran), respectively, were obtained by Gurung et al. [7] and Erkel [14]. Biological efficiency is commonly used to determine the efficiency of the substrate and strain combination to produce fruiting bodies. It is possible to increase biological efficiency using a smaller volume (<1 kg dry weight) of the wood-based substrate resulting in a similar fruiting body yield. For instance, Azizi et al. [17] reported a similar yield (80.4 g/kg) using a poplar sawdust substrate but higher biological efficiency (12.9%) in comparison with this study. Supplements to the substrate might increase the yield of Ganoderma fruiting bodies [6,7,14,17].
In this study, G. lucidum fruiting bodies had a very high content of β-glucan (47.5–55.9 g/100 g dm). The high content of β-glucan indicates that G. lucidum fruiting bodies may be a source for bioactive compounds for the food and pharmaceutical industries. Similar levels were obtained by McClearly and Draga [40] using the same Megazyme assay (54–54.8 g/100 g dm). The fruiting bodies analyzed presented a β-glucan content as high as other fungal species such as Trametes versicolor or Piptoporus betulinus (60.8 and 51.8 g/100 g dm, respectively) [26]. However, Cho et al. [41] reported a lower β-glucan content (<20 g/100 g dm) for G. lucidum specimens originating from Korea, Japan, Taiwan, USA and Brazil. Considering the taxonomy confusion of G. lucidum, it is possible that these specimens differ from the European G. lucidum [30]; therefore, differences in β-glucan production could be expected between closely related species. Another possible explanation is the extraction method. For instance, Benito-Román et al. [42] tested different extraction conditions and noted that the temperature and solvent volume played a critical role in the content of β-glucan (range between 24.0 and 62.2%) in G. lucidum using pressurized hot water as a solvent. The material analyzed may have an effect on the β-glucan content. The fruiting bodies analyzed in this study consisted of a mixture of cap and stipe. A higher content of β-glucan was detected in the stipe than in the cap of several wild mushrooms [26] and cultivated fungi, i.e., Lentinula edodes [43]. Differences of β-glucan content within the fruiting body remain to be studied in G. lucidum.
The synthesis of β-glucan is catalyzed by β-1,3-glucan synthase [21]. β-1,3-glucan synthase activity in L. edodes has been hypothesized to be associated with the presence of phenolic compounds in the media [10]. The presence of phenolic compounds in the substrate generates a stressful oxidative environment for some fungi [44]. In response to the stressful event, Reverberi et al. [10] suggested that antioxidative enzymes such as β-glucan synthases are activated in order to preserve the integrity of the cell wall. Therefore, β-glucan synthesis could be related to the defense mechanism of the cell wall [21].
Generally, conifer species contain higher levels of phenolic compounds than deciduous species; therefore, it would be expected that fruiting bodies grown in a conifer wood-based substrate presented higher β-glucan content. However, in this study, β-glucan content in the fruiting bodies was higher in the P. tremula wood-based substrate than in other species, especially when compared to the P. sylvestris wood-based substrate. Similar results were obtained by Kuhar et al. [16]. Moreover, they compared the extracts of poplar and pine wood-based substrates prior to and after mushroom cultivation; poplar contained a higher level of alkaline extract in both scenarios [16]. Alkaline extract was associated with the presence of phenolic compounds in the substrate. Considering that the nature of phenolics in deciduous species differs from conifer species, their composition and structure could be expected to have a different effect on fungal metabolism [45]. Since P. tremula is not a typical host species for G. lucidum in Finland [35], it is possible that wood substrate based on this species causes stress to G. lucidum. Other wood components such as lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose fractions [9,27], fatty acids [22] and resin acids [11,46], among others, could also play a role in fungal polysaccharide production. For instance, the presence of hemicellulose promoted the production of polysaccharides in the mycelia of L. edodes [27]. Variability in polysaccharide content in G. lucidum fruiting bodies and mycelia can be also due to differences pH levels and C:N ratio, carbon, nitrogen, phosphate and magnesium source of the media [23,24,25].
Ganoderma lucidum originating from boreal forest was successfully cultivated using wood side streams of plywood and sawmill industries. Cold shock treatment was required to trigger fruiting body formation. The P. tremula wood-based substrate enhanced β-glucan content in the fruiting bodies. The availability of wood residues and the potential of G. lucidum strains to produce fruiting bodies offer an opportunity to increase the valorization of wood side streams and to produce high valuable mushrooms and compounds such as β-glucan. This is the first study to simulate commercial indoor cultivation of G. lucidum strains originating from boreal forests.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Fungal Strains

Fungal strains were isolated in our previous study from wild fruiting bodies of G. lucidum and identified based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) DNA region sequence data [37]. The specimens were collected from wooden stumps of P. abies and B. pubescens located in the Satakunta and Uusimaa regions, Finland (Table 4). The strains are preserved in the Fungal Culture Collection of Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki. The cultures were maintained at 25 °C in 2% potato dextrose agar (PDA: 20 g potato dextrose agar/L (MP Biomedicals, LLC, Illkrich, France)) and subcultured once a month.

4.2. Spawn Production

Common barley was used as a spawn medium. Barley grains were boiled for 2–3 h and drained to prevent excessive moisture. Preboiled barley was introduced in polypropylene bags of 5 L and autoclaved for 45 min at 125 °C and 1.2 bar. After cooling, 2 mm2 agar sections of the actively growing margin of the mycelium were transferred from PDA plates to the sterilized polypropylene bag. Spawn bags were sealed, shaken and kept at 22 °C in dark conditions until full colonization.

4.3. Substrate Preparation

Wood residues from Betula spp., P. tremula, P. abies, P. sylvestris and Larix sp. were used as substrate. The Betula spp. substrate consisted of a mixture of B. pubescens and B. pendula wood residues obtained from a local plywood company (Joensuu, North Karelia, Finland). Wood residues from P. tremula, P. abies and P. sylvestris and Larix sp. were obtained from small sawmills companies located in North Karelia and South Savo, Finland. Polypropylene bags were filled with a mixture of wood chips (particle size from 20 to 50 mm) and sawdust (ca. 0.8 mm particle size). Dry weight bags (60% wood chips and 40% sawdust by weight) of 1 kg were prepared with P. tremula, P. abies, P. sylvestris and Larix sp. The substrate bags containing Betula spp. were filled entirely with wood chips (particle size from 20 to 50 mm). Ten replicates of 1 kg (dry weight) per each combination of wood type and strain were prepared. Wood moisture content on a dry basis [47] was adjusted to 65–75%.
Substrate bags were autoclaved for 45 min at 125 °C and 1.2 bar. After cooling down, the substrate bags were inoculated with 0.3 L of fully colonized spawn. Substrate bags were sealed, shaken and kept at 22 °C in dark conditions until full colonization. After full colonization, substrate bags were transferred to a cropping greenhouse with a relative humidity of 65 to 75% and light exposure (8/24 h) to induce fruiting body formation.

4.4. Cold Treatment and Fruiting Body Yield

After several weeks, there was no observation of primordia formation. Because of the difficulties of strains to produce fruiting bodies, substrate bags were submitted to two different cold shock treatments. Half of the replicates were kept at 5 °C and the other half at −20 °C for three months. After the cold treatment, the substrate bags were maintained at 25 °C and a relative humidity of 90% until fruiting body formation. Fruiting bodies were harvested, and the yield was determined based on fresh weight (g). Harvested fruiting bodies were kept at −20 °C.

4.5. β-Glucan Content Analysis

The fruiting bodies were freeze-dried (Nature Lyotech Ltd., Finland) and kept at −20 °C. Fruiting bodies including both cap and stipe were cut into pieces and then milled with a hammer mill with a 1 mm sieve (KT-120, Koneteollisuus Oy, Klaukkala, Finland). Total glucan and α-glucan content were measured for each individual fruiting body according to McCleary and Draga [40] and using the Yeast and Mushroom β-glucan assay kit. In brief, the principle of the assay is to solubilize and hydrolyze the total glucan of the sample using sulfuric acid, exo-1, 3-β glucanase and β-glucosidase enzymes. α-Glucan and sucrose were dissolved using sodium hydroxide. Glucose was measured with amyloglucosidase and invertase using GOPOD reagent. β-Glucan was determined by subtracting α-glucan from the total glucan measurements. Total glucan, α-glucan and β-glucan content are expressed as a percentage of the freeze-dried fruiting body (g/100 g of the dry material). Analyses were done as duplicates; two samples from each pulverized fruiting body were measured separately.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The effects of G. lucidum strain, wood substrate and cold treatment on successful fruiting (0/1), yield (g of the fresh fruiting body) and total glucan, α-glucan and β-glucan content (% of freeze-dried material) were evaluated by regression modeling. To avoid overfitting, only the two-way interactions of strain, wood and treatment were considered during modeling.
A logistic regression model was fitted for the probability of successful fruiting (Equation (1)) and a linear regression model was fitted for the yield of fruiting bodies, if any (Equation (2)):
l o g ( p i j l k 1 p i j l k ) = S j + W l + T r k + S j W l + S j T r k + W l T r k
s q r t ( y i j l k ) = S j + W l + T r k + S j W l + S j T r k + W l T r k + e i j l k
where p and y are, respectively, the probability of successful fruiting and the fruiting body yield (g of the fresh fruiting body) of the substrate bag (i = 1, 2, …, 5), which produced fruiting bodies; S is the strain of G. lucidum (j = 1, 2, …, 6); W is the wood substrate (l = 1, 2, …, 5); Tr is cold treatment (k = 1, 2); and e is the random error term with a mean of 0 and constant variance. Square root transformation was needed to meet assumptions for linear regression (i.e., normality and constant variance of random error terms).
The content of glucan was modeled by fitting a linear mixed model (Equation (3)):
% G l u c a n i i j l k = S j + W l + T r k + S j W l + S j T r k + W l T r k + u i j l k + e i i j l k
where %Glucan is the content of total, α or β-glucan (% of freeze-dried material and u is the random substrate bag effect with a mean of 0 and constant variance. A random fruiting body effect was included in the model due to two individual samples (i′ = 1, 2) of each fruiting body.
The models were fitted and the marginal means were estimated for all level combinations of the factors (strains, wood substrates and cold treatments) using the MIXED procedure in IBM SPSS Statistics 25 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). If the model involved random effects (u), the predicted means were computed by averaging the random effects over subjects (i.e., fruiting bodies). Using a given cold treatment, all pairwise comparisons of strain and wood substrates were performed to find out which strains and wood substrates have a statistically significant higher yield and glucan content.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.-E., P.V. and H.V.; methodology, M.C.-E., J.M., P.V. and H.V.; validation and formal analysis, J.M.; investigation, M.C.-E., J.-M.P., P.V. and H.V.; data curation, J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.-E.; writing—review and editing, M.C.-E., J.-M.P., J.M., P.V., R.L. and H.V.; visualization, M.C.-E. and J.M.; supervision, project administration and funding acquisition, H.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European agricultural fund for rural development (EAFRD), SieVi-project and LUKE Leads MushValue project. M.C.E. was funded by the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation (Grant No. 00190042) and the Niemi Säätiö (Grant No. 20180020).

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of Punkaharju research station (Luke) for participating in the greenhouse and laboratory work as well as Satu Örling for β-glucan determinations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hassan, K.; Villa, A.; Kuittinen, S.; Jänis, J.; Pappinen, A. An assessment of side-stream generation from Finnish forest industry. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2018, 21, 265–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Verkasalo, E.; Leppälä, J.; Muhonen, T.; Korpinen, R.; Möttönen, V.; Kurppa, S. Novel industrial ecosystems and value chains to utilize side-streams of wood products industries–Finnish approach. Pro Ligno 2019, 15, 157–165. [Google Scholar]
  3. Korhonen, K.T.; Ihalainen, A.; Ahola, A.; Heikkinen, J.; Henttonen, H.M.; Hotanen, J.P.; Nevalainen, S.; Pitkänen, J.; Strandström, M.; Viiri, H. Suomen Metsät 2009–2013 Ja Niiden Kehitys 1921–2013; Luonnonvarakeskus: Helsinki, Finland, 2017; p. 88. ISBN 978-952-326-466-3. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
  4. European Commission. A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Grimm, D.; Wösten, H.A.B. Mushroom cultivation in the circular economy. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 7795–7803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Peksen, A.; Yakupoglu, G. Tea waste as a supplement for the cultivation of Ganoderma lucidum. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 25, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gurung, O.; Budathoki, U.; Parajuli, G. Effect of Different Substrates on the Production of Ganoderma lucidum (Curt.:Fr.) Karst. Our Nat. 2013, 10, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hsieh, C.; Yang, F.C. Reusing soy residue for the solid-state fermentation of Ganoderma lucidum. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 91, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Philippoussis, A.; Zervakis, G.I.; Diamantopoulou, P. Bioconversion of agricultural lignocellulosic wastes through the cultivation of the edible mushrooms Agrocybe aegerita, Volvariella volvacea and Pleurotus spp. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 17, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reverberi, M.; Di Mario, F.; Tomati, U. β-Glucan synthase induction in mushrooms grown on olive mill wastewaters. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 66, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Croan, S.C. Conversion of conifer wastes into edible and medicinal mushrooms. For. Prod. J. 2004, 54, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  12. Boh, B.; Berovič, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhi-Bin, L. Ganoderma lucidum and its pharmaceutically active compounds. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 2007, 13, 265–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, S.; Dong, C.; Wen, H.; Liu, X. Development of Ling-zhi industry in China—Emanated from the artificial cultivation in the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IMCAS). Mycology 2016, 7, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Erkel, E.I. The effect of different substrate mediums on yield of Ganoderma lucidum (Fr.) Karst. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2009, 7, 841–844. [Google Scholar]
  15. Roy, S.; Jahan, M.A.A.; Das, K.K.; Munshi, S.K.; Noor, R. Artificial Cultivation of Ganoderma lucidum (Reishi Medicinal Mushroom) Using Different Sawdusts as Substrates. Am. J. Biosci. 2015, 3, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kuhar, F.; Postemsky, P.D.; Bianchinotti, M.V. Conditions Affecting Lingzhi or Reishi Medicinal Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum (Agaricomycetes) Basidiome Quality, Morphogenesis, and Biodegradation of Wood By-products in Argentina. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2018, 20, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Azizi, M.; Tavana, M.; Farsi, M.; Oroojalian, F. Yield performance of Lingzhi or Reishi medicinal mushroom, Ganoderma lucidum (W.Curt.:Fr.) P. Karst. (higher Basidiomycetes), using different waste materials as substrates. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2012, 14, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Linnakoski, R.; Reshamwala, D.; Veteli, P.; Cortina-Escribano, M.; Vanhanen, H.; Marjomäki, V. Antiviral Agents From Fungi: Diversity, Mechanisms and Potential Applications. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nie, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, W.; Xie, M.-Y. Current development of polysaccharides from Ganoderma: Isolation, structure and bioactivities. Bioact. Carbohydrates Diet. Fibre 2013, 1, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, F.; Du, B.; Xu, B. A critical review on production and industrial applications of beta-glucans. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 52, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Papaspyridi, L.-M.; Zerva, A.; Topakas, E. Biocatalytic Synthesis of Fungal β-Glucans. Catalysts 2018, 8, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yang, F.-C.; Ke, Y.-F.; Kuo, S.-S. Effect of fatty acids on the mycelial growth and polysaccharide formation by Ganoderma lucidum in shake flask cultures. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2000, 27, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Babitskaya, V.G.; Shcherba, V.V.; Puchkova, T.A.; Smirnov, D.A. Polysaccharides of Ganoderma lucidum: Factors affecting their production. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2005, 41, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hsieh, C.; Tseng, M.-H.; Liu, C.-J. Production of polysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum (CCRC 36041) under limitations of nutrients. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2006, 38, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Skalicka-Wozniak, K.; Szypowski, J.; Łoś, R.; Siwulski, M.; Sobieralski, K.; Głowniak, K.; Malm, A. Evaluation of polysaccharides content in fruit bodies and their antimicrobial activity of four Ganoderma lucidum (W Curt.: Fr.) P. Karst. strains cultivated on different wood type substrates. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2012, 81, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sari, M.; Prange, A.; Lelley, J.I.; Hambitzer, R. Screening of beta-glucan contents in commercially cultivated and wild growing mushrooms. Food Chem. 2017, 216, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, F.; Jia, X.; Yin, L.; Cheng, Y.; Miao, Y.; Zhang, X. The Effect of Hemicellulose and Lignin on Properties of Polysaccharides in Lentinus edodes and Their Antioxidant Evaluation. Mology 2019, 24, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, D.-M.; Wu, S.-H.; Su, C.-H.; Peng, J.-T.; Shih, Y.-H.; Chen, L.-C. Ganoderma multipileum, the correct name for ‘G. lucidum’ in tropical Asia. Bot. Stud. 2009, 50, 451–458. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cao, Y.; Wu, S.-H.; Dai, Y.-C. Species clarification of the prize medicinal Ganoderma mushroom “Lingzhi”. Fungal Divers. 2012, 56, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, X.; Xu, Z.; Pei, H.; Chen, Z.; Tan, X.; Hu, J.; Yang, B.; Sun, J. Intraspecific Variation and Phylogenetic Relationships Are Revealed by ITS1 Secondary Structure Analysis and Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism in Ganoderma lucidum. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Karsten, P.A. Enumeratio Boletinearum et Polyporearum Fennicarum, systemate novo dispositarum. Rev. Mycol. 1881, 3, 16–19. [Google Scholar]
  32. Curtis, W. Flora Londinensis, or, Plates and Descriptions of Such Plants as Grow Wild in the Environs of London; Printed by the author: London, UK, 1781; p. 530. [Google Scholar]
  33. Moncalvo, J.-M.; Wang, H.-F.; Hseu, R.-S. Gene phylogeny of the Ganoderma lucidum complex based on ribosomal DNA sequences. Comparison with traditional taxonomic characters. Mycol. Res. 1995, 99, 1489–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, L.-W.; Cao, Y.; Wu, S.-H.; Vlasak, J.; Li, D.-W.; Li, M.-J.; Dai, Y.-C. Global diversity of the Ganoderma lucidum complex (Ganodermataceae, Polyporales) inferred from morphology and multilocus phylogeny. Phytochemistry 2015, 114, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Niemelä, T.; Kotiranta, H. Polypore survey of Finland 4. Phaeolus, Fistulina, Ganoderma and Ischnoderma. Karstenia 1986, 26, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Niemelä, T.; Kinnunen, J. Käävät, Puiden Sienet; Norrlinia; no. 13; Luonnontieteellinen Keskusmuseon Kasvimuseo: Helsinki, Finland, 2005; p. 319. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
  37. Cortina-Escribano, M.; Veteli, P.; Riikka, L.; Miina, J.; Vanhanen, H. Effect of wood residues on the growth of Ganoderma lucidum. Karstenia 2020, 58, 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ibrahim, R.; Aziz, K.M.; Arshad, A.M.; Hasan, S.M. Enhancing mushroom production using physical treatments prior to fruiting body formation. Malays Appl. Biol. 2015, 44, 68–73. [Google Scholar]
  39. Robinson, C.H. Cold adaptation in Arctic and Antarctic fungi. New Phytol. 2001, 151, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. McCleary, B.V.; Draga, A. Measurement of β-Glucan in Mushrooms and Mycelial Products. J. AOAC Int. 2016, 99, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Cho, J.-H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Lee, M.-J.; Oh, H.-N.; Kang, D.-H.; Jhune, C.-S. Comparative analysis of useful β-glucan and polyphenol in the fruiting bodies of Ganoderma spp. J. Mushrooms 2013, 11, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Benito-Román, Ó.; Alonso, E.; Cocero, M.J.; Goto, M. β-Glucan recovery from Ganoderma lucidum by means of pressurized hot water and supercritical CO2. Food Bioprod. Process. 2016, 98, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bak, W.C.; Park, J.H.; Park, Y.A.; Ka, K.H. Determination of Glucan Contents in the Fruiting Bodies and Mycelia of Lentinula edodes Cultivars. Mycobiology 2014, 42, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Shalaby, S.; A Horwitz, B. Plant phenolic compounds and oxidative stress: Integrated signals in fungal–plant interactions. Curr. Genet. 2014, 61, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Witzell, J.; Martín, J.A. Phenolic metabolites in the resistance of northern forest trees to pathogens—past experiences and future prospects. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38, 2711–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Z.; Chen, T.; Gao, Y.; Breuil, C.; Hiratsuka, Y. Biological degradation of resin acids in wood chips by wood-inhabiting fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 222–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. D07 Committee Test Methods for Direct Moisture Content Measurement of Wood and Wood-Based Materials. ASTM Int. 2016. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of strain on the fruiting body yield of G. lucidum estimated in Equation (2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the estimated square root yields are represented with different letters (a and b).
Figure 1. Effect of strain on the fruiting body yield of G. lucidum estimated in Equation (2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the estimated square root yields are represented with different letters (a and b).
Molecules 25 04732 g001
Figure 2. Effect of the wood substrate on the fruiting body yield of G. lucidum estimated in Equation (2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the square root yields are represented with different letters (a, b and c).
Figure 2. Effect of the wood substrate on the fruiting body yield of G. lucidum estimated in Equation (2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the square root yields are represented with different letters (a, b and c).
Molecules 25 04732 g002
Figure 3. Effect of strain on the β-glucan content of G. lucidum fruiting bodies estimated in Equation (3). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the square root yields are represented with different letters (a, b and c).
Figure 3. Effect of strain on the β-glucan content of G. lucidum fruiting bodies estimated in Equation (3). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the square root yields are represented with different letters (a, b and c).
Molecules 25 04732 g003
Figure 4. Effect of the wood substrate on the β-glucan content of G. lucidum fruiting bodies estimated in Equation (3). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the square root yields are represented with different letters (a, b and c).
Figure 4. Effect of the wood substrate on the β-glucan content of G. lucidum fruiting bodies estimated in Equation (3). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the square root yields are represented with different letters (a, b and c).
Molecules 25 04732 g004
Table 1. The parameter estimates, their standard errors (SE) and Wald χ2 tests for the terms in the logistic regression model (Equation (1)) for the probability of the successful fruiting of G. lucidum. p-values are calculated for the variables in the model based on Wald’s chi-square statistics.
Table 1. The parameter estimates, their standard errors (SE) and Wald χ2 tests for the terms in the logistic regression model (Equation (1)) for the probability of the successful fruiting of G. lucidum. p-values are calculated for the variables in the model based on Wald’s chi-square statistics.
VariablesEstimateSEWald χ2p-Value
Constant−1.300.575.200.023
Strain (df = 5, ref. MU19) 41.82<0.001
MUS192−1.810.657.740.005
MUS6−2.150.6610.540.001
MUS75−4.820.8234.52<0.001
MUS9−2.800.6816.86<0.001
MUS12−3.650.7225.89<0.001
Wood (df = 4, ref. P. abies) 13.970.007
Betula spp.0.300.550.300.583
Larix sp.−0.810.581.980.160
P. sylvestris−0.150.560.080.781
P. tremula1.330.565.610.018
Treatment +5 °C (df = 1, ref. −20 °C)4.140.5458.78<0.001
Table 2. Effect of the factors strain, wood and treatment on the yield of G. lucidum (Equation (2), Type III test).
Table 2. Effect of the factors strain, wood and treatment on the yield of G. lucidum (Equation (2), Type III test).
SourceNumerator dfDenominator dfFp-Value
Intercept169308.99<0.001
Strain5693.400.008
Wood4699.71<0.001
Treatment1690.480.492
Strain * Wood14691.120.361
Wood * Treatment1690.150.697
Note: The interaction between variables is shown with an asterisk between variables names.
Table 3. Effect of the factors strain and wood on the total glucan, α-glucan and β-glucan content of G. lucidum fruiting bodies of the substrate bags treated at +5 °C (Equation (3), Type III test).
Table 3. Effect of the factors strain and wood on the total glucan, α-glucan and β-glucan content of G. lucidum fruiting bodies of the substrate bags treated at +5 °C (Equation (3), Type III test).
SourceNum. DfDen. DfTotal Glucanα-Glucanβ-Glucan
Fp-ValueFp-ValueFp-Value
Intercept16123,708.09<0.001204.55<0.00119,374.09<0.001
Strain5613.630.0061.110.3643.310.010
Wood46117.28<0.0011.370.25615.60<0.001
Strain * Wood14611.150.3351.140.3481.090.385
Note: The interaction between variables is shown with an asterisk between variables names.
Table 4. Ganoderma lucidum strains.
Table 4. Ganoderma lucidum strains.
StrainRegionHost SpeciesIsolation DateITS GenBank ID
MUS192UusimaaP. abies07/2016MT334582
MUS6UusimaaP. abies07/2016MT334583
MUS75UusimaaP. abies07/2016MT334584
MUS9UusimaaP. abies07/2016MT334585
MUS12SatakuntaP. abies10/2016MT334586
MUS19UusimaaB. pubescens03/2017MT334587
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cortina-Escribano, M.; Pihlava, J.-M.; Miina, J.; Veteli, P.; Linnakoski, R.; Vanhanen, H. Effect of Strain, Wood Substrate and Cold Treatment on the Yield and β-Glucan Content of Ganoderma lucidum Fruiting Bodies. Molecules 2020, 25, 4732. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204732

AMA Style

Cortina-Escribano M, Pihlava J-M, Miina J, Veteli P, Linnakoski R, Vanhanen H. Effect of Strain, Wood Substrate and Cold Treatment on the Yield and β-Glucan Content of Ganoderma lucidum Fruiting Bodies. Molecules. 2020; 25(20):4732. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204732

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cortina-Escribano, Marta, Juha-Matti Pihlava, Jari Miina, Pyry Veteli, Riikka Linnakoski, and Henri Vanhanen. 2020. "Effect of Strain, Wood Substrate and Cold Treatment on the Yield and β-Glucan Content of Ganoderma lucidum Fruiting Bodies" Molecules 25, no. 20: 4732. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204732

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop