Next Article in Journal
Raman Spectroscopy Studies on the Barocaloric Hybrid Perovskite [(CH3)4N][Cd(N3)3]
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Benzimidazole–Based Analogs as Anti Alzheimer’s Disease Compounds and Their Molecular Docking Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Gut/Oral Bacteria Variability May Explain the High Efficacy of Green Tea in Rodent Tumor Inhibition and Its Absence in Humans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Merging Ligand-Based and Structure-Based Methods in Drug Discovery: An Overview of Combined Virtual Screening Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Molecular Imaging of Glutamate Receptors

1
Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea
2
Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Science and Technology, Graduate School, Incheon 21565, Korea
3
Department of Psychiatry, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea
4
ABX Advanced Biochemical Compounds, Biomedizinische Forschungsreagenzien GmbH, Heinrich-Glaeser-Strasse 10-14, D-1454 Radeberg, Germany
5
Centre for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences ETH, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 4, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
6
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
7
School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane QLD 4059, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(20), 4749; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204749
Submission received: 24 September 2020 / Revised: 13 October 2020 / Accepted: 14 October 2020 / Published: 16 October 2020

Abstract

:
Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a well-established and important in vivo technique to evaluate fundamental biological processes and unravel the role of neurotransmitter receptors in various neuropsychiatric disorders. Specific ligands are available for PET/SPECT studies of dopamine, serotonin, and opiate receptors, but corresponding development of radiotracers for receptors of glutamate, the main excitatory neurotransmitter in mammalian brain, has lagged behind. This state of affairs has persisted despite the central importance of glutamate neurotransmission in brain physiology and in disorders such as stroke, epilepsy, schizophrenia, and neurodegenerative diseases. Recent years have seen extensive efforts to develop useful ligands for molecular imaging of subtypes of the ionotropic (N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), kainate, and AMPA/quisqualate receptors) and metabotropic glutamate receptors (types I, II, and III mGluRs). We now review the state of development of radioligands for glutamate receptor imaging, placing main emphasis on the suitability of available ligands for reliable in vivo applications. We give a brief account of the radiosynthetic approach for selected molecules. In general, with the exception of ligands for the GluN2B subunit of NMDA receptors, there has been little success in developing radiotracers for imaging ionotropic glutamate receptors; failure of ligands for the PCP/MK801 binding site in vivo doubtless relates their dependence on the open, unblocked state of the ion channel. Many AMPA and kainite receptor ligands with good binding properties in vitro have failed to give measurable specific binding in the living brain. This may reflect the challenge of developing brain-penetrating ligands for amino acid receptors, compounded by conformational differences in vivo. The situation is better with respect to mGluR imaging, particularly for the mGluR5 subtype. Several successful PET ligands serve for investigations of mGluRs in conditions such as schizophrenia, depression, substance abuse and aging. Considering the centrality and diversity of glutamatergic signaling in brain function, we have relatively few selective and sensitive tools for molecular imaging of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors. Further radiopharmaceutical research targeting specific subtypes and subunits of the glutamate receptors may yet open up new investigational vistas with broad applications in basic and clinical research.

1. Introduction

The first identification of the amino acid glutamate/glutamic acid (1) as a neurotransmitter was in the insect nervous system [1,2]. Glutamate occurs at a concentration of approximately 10 mM in mammalian brain [3], making it the most abundant amino acid, which reflects its presence both in metabolic and neurotransmitter pools [4]. Perhaps in keeping with its ancient evolutionary lineage as a neurotransmitter, glutamate possesses a wide variety of receptors, which have abundant expression on neurons and glia. The glutamate receptors fall into two broad categories, namely the ionotropic receptors, which are ligand-gated ion channels, and the metabotropic receptors (mGluRs), which have coupling to intracellular second messenger systems. The mGluRs have further subtypes, namely the excitatory type I receptors (mGluR1/mGluR5), the adenylate cyclase-inhibiting type II receptors (mGluR2, mGluR3), and the type III receptors (mGluR4, mGluR6, mGluR7, mGluR8). The ionotropic glutamate receptors, which are designated according to their excitatory amino acid ligands (Figure 1), i.e., N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA, 3), kainate (4), and AMPA (5)/quisqualate (6) receptors, are ligand gated ion channels permissive to cation flux across the cell membrane. Given this enormously diverse pharmacology, no particular or singular action can be attributed to glutamate receptors the nervous system. In general, however, the ionotropic receptors mediate fast excitatory synaptic signaling and have a key role in synaptic plasticity, although their excessive activation provokes excitotoxicity, whereas the mGluRs are modulators/shapers of neuronal activity via their effects on intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels and other second messengers.
There are various reviews of the pharmacology of ionotropic [5,6] and metabotropic glutamate receptors [7,8]. There is also a burgeoning literature on the involvement of glutamate receptors in the pathophysiology and therapeutics of Alzheimer’s dementia [9], Parkinson’s disease [10], ischemic stroke [11], epilepsy [12], autoimmune diseases of the nervous system [13], and neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia [14,15,16], depression [17,18], and substance abuse/addiction [19]. As such, the glutamate receptors present a diverse range of important targets for molecular brain imaging by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). While there have been several reviews of this topic in recent years [20,21,22,23], we now present a systematic review of the state of development of glutamate receptor imaging, placing our emphasis on the findings of clinical studies, and on the lacunae remaining in the literature due to lack of specific tracers for many of these molecular targets. In selected cases, we give an account of the procedures for radiopharmaceutical synthesis.

A Brief Note on the Various Endpoints and Units of Binding Studies

The comparison of findings with various PET and SPECT tracers in vivo requires some consideration of the various units and measures used to quantify radiotracer uptake and binding in the living brain. A neurochemist can measure the binding to membranes or brain sections of the radioligand over a range of concentrations in vitro. After subtracting the non-specific binding, the neurochemist can then calculate the saturation binding parameters, namely the Bmax, which is the absolute concentration of the binding sites in the sample (pmol g−1 or mols per liter of tissue), and KD, the affinity or half-saturating ligand concentration (mols per liter of solvent). Here, the experimentalist has full control of the free ligand concentrations and incubation conditions, which generally do not change during the binding experiment.
In PET and SPECT studies of the living organism, the radiotracer distributes throughout the various tissues of the body after its administration as an intravenous bolus injection. This immediately introduces a time-dependence of the concentration in blood, and further influences of hepatic metabolism and renal elimination on the radiotracer bioavailability. In the simplest form of quantitation, the PET or SPECT instrument reports the time–radioactivity curve in semiquantitative units of standard uptake value (SUV). This has units of percentage of the total injected dose per gram of brain tissue, sometimes with scaling to the corresponding uptake in a reference tissue devoid of specific binding (SUVR), if such a tissue exists for a given target. The SUV is a time-dependent parameter and is furthermore a composite index of specific and non-specific binding. Nonetheless, SUV serves as a convenient marker of how effectively the tracer can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Successful SPECT or PET tracers usually attain an SUV of at least 1% of the total injected dose per gram of rodent brain and show higher SUV in brain regions enriched with the targeted binding site. Knowing the arterial input function by serial sampling with correction for radioactive metabolites, compartmental analysis of the dynamic brain curve gives estimates of microparameters in brain. Chief among these are the unidirectional blood–brain clearance of the radiotracer (K1), which has units of blood flow (ml g−1 min−1), the fractional rate constant for clearance of unbound tracer from brain (k2; min−1), and the association/dissociation rate constants with the cerebral target binding sites (k3/k4; min−1). Compartmental analysis also gives estimates of macroparameters, which are the composite of several microparameters, notably the net blood–brain clearance inclusive of irreversible trapping in brain (Kin; mL g−1 min−1), which is defined as (K1*k3)/(k2 + k3). Calculated by linear graphical (Patlak-Gjedde) analysis of dynamic PET/SPECT data, Kin is quite distinct from the similarly named inhibition constant (Ki; mols per liter) derived from a blocking study in vitro, which is more akin to the IC50, i.e., the plasma concentration of a competitor displacing 50% of the specific ligand binding in brain. Steady-state distribution volume ratios of a tracer concentration in brain to that in the blood (mL g−1) include the nonspecific binding (VND), which is equal to the ratio K1/k2, and the total distribution volume (VT), which also includes the specific binding component, defined by the ratio k3/k4. The dimensionless binding potential (BPND) represents specific binding as [(VT − VND)/VND]. This returns us to the first principles of autoradiography, in that the BPND derived from PET measurements should be proportional to the ratio of the saturation binding parameters Bmax/KD measured in vitro. If there is a brain region devoid of specific binding, this can serve for the reference tissue calculation of BPND, thus avoiding the need for arterial sampling.

2. Glutamate Receptors

2.1. Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors (iGluR)

2.1.1. Pharmacology of NMDA Receptor Ligands

The first phase of molecular brain imaging dates to the late 1970s, with initial efforts to prepare radiopharmaceuticals labelled with iodine-123 for SPECT, or with short-lived positron-emitting radionuclides carbon-11 (t1/2 of 20 min) or fluorine-18 (t1/2 of 109 min) for PET brain imaging. The great preponderance of neurotransmitter molecular imaging studies have employed radioligands for dopamine, serotonin, and opioid binding sites, and progress in developing glutamate receptor ligands has picked up pace only in recent years. The first glutamate receptor studies targeted the NMDA receptor, which is a tetraheteromer consisting of two obligatory GluN1 and two GluN2 and/or GluN3 subunits, forming together a transmembrane pore for Na+/Ca2+ influx and K+ efflux. The receptor subunits are encoded by seven genes, with a single gene for GluN1, its transcript being subject to alternative splicing. Four GluN2 subunits (GluN2A, 2B, 2C, 2D) and two GluN3 subunits (GluN3A, 3B) encoded by different genes, respectively, further contribute to receptor diversity. There are many splice variants and several GluN2 transcripts, but the NMDA receptors are generally subject to allosteric modulation by Zn2+, the polyamines spermine (11) and spermidine (12), other proteins, and voltage dependent blockade of the cation channel by Mg2+ (for review, [24]). Activation of the NMDA receptor requires binding of the co-substrate amino acid L-glycine (13) to the GluN1 subunit and glutamate (1) (or NMDA, 3) to the GluN2 subunit, at specific sites in the extracellular domain. In addition to NMDA (3) and glutamate (1), other agonists of NMDA receptors include D-cycloserine (14) (at the glycine-binding site), homocysteic acid (9), the Amanita muscaria toxin, ibotenic acid (15), and quinolinic acid (16). Among its antagonists are the endogenous tryptophan metabolite, kynurenic acid (17), the over-the-counter cough suppressant, dextromethorphan (19), and the antihypertensive agent ifenprodil (21). Figure 2 depicts some key structures.

Ligands for NMDA Receptor Ion Channels (PCP/MK801 Binding Site)

The NMDA receptor is a dimer of dimers, namely the GluN1 type paired with four known subtypes of GluN2 proteins, designated as A, B, C, and D. While the GluN1 confers the binding site for glycine/D-serine to the NMDA receptor complex, its association with the different glutamate-binding GluN2 sites results in ligand gated ion channels with distinct physiological properties. These properties differ with respect to Mg2+ block and cation conductance, as well as the kinetics of channel deactivation after prolonged agonism and concerning their intracellular trafficking pathways (for review see Willey et al. [25] and Vieira et al. [26]). The most abundant subunits in adult telencephalon are GluN2A and GluN2B, which seemingly act via distinct signaling pathways (Sun et al. [27]). There is relatively little knowledge about the functional properties of the GluN2C subunit, but its association with GluN1 results in an exclusively glycine-gated receptor. The GluN2D subunit is perhaps even more mysterious but may modulate cellular responses to ketamine that are relevant in the context of schizophrenia models ([28]). As shall be seen, the great preponderance of radioligands discussed in this section target the GluN2B subunit, thus leaving a vast territory of molecular imaging yet unexplored.
As a typical ligand gated ion channel, the NMDA receptor possesses an extracellular ligand-binding domain and an ion-conducting transmembrane domain, which is only open upon receptor activation. The NMDA receptor is pharmacologically complex, presenting at least four distinct binding sites, which are targetable by distinct classes of ligands. These sites include (A) the phencyclidine (PCP)/MK801 binding site in the transmembrane pore, (B) the glutamate binding sites on the extracellular side GluN2, (C) the co-agonist binding site for glycine (13) on the GluN1 subunit, and (D) allosteric modulator sites at the interface of the dimers comprising the complete tetramer. All of these sites present potential targets for PET/SPECT imaging. To this list might also be added the polyamine binding site, which modulates the binding of [3H]MK801 [29] and other intrachannel ligands.
While the synthetic opioid derivatives levorphan (18, Hoffmann-La-Roche, 1952), dextrometorphan (19, Hoffmann-La-Roche, 1954), and dextrorphan (20) share the same morphinan-skeleton, they differ significantly in their pharmacological profiles with respect to selectivity for the PCP/MK801 binding site in the NMDA channel. These compounds were synthesized from cyclohexanone in a ten-step procedure [30]. Levorphan (18), which has an R-absolute configuration at all of its asymmetric centres, is a potent opioid receptor agonist with an approximately seven-fold higher affinity than morphine [31]. Dextrometorphan (19), which is the (9S,13S,14S)-isomer, has no analgesic activity, but is commonly used as cough suppressant. Dextromethorphan (19) and its main metabolite dextrorphan (20) also show anticonvulsant and neuroprotective effects, which are apparently obtained by antagonism of NMDA glutamate receptors. Thus, stereochemistry of morphinan compounds determines their selectivity between opioid and NMDA receptors, and, as presented below, also with respect to sigma receptors.
The prototypic NMDA antagonist ligand [3H]MK801 binds to the inside of the channel with a KD of 6 nM and Bmax of 250 nM in rat brain membranes [32]. Its binding in cryostat sections from gerbil brain was most abundant in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex, and was substantially displaced by ketamine (22) and phencyclidine (23), but was unaffected by glutamate (1) or NMDA (3) [33]. The success of [3H]MK801 as a ligand in vitro led to the testing of [18F]fluoro-methyl-MK801 by PET (25), which showed slightly heterogeneous uptake in brain of living baboon [34]. However, its binding in vivo was not displaceable by challenge with phencyclidine (23) or excess non-radioactive MK801 (24), indicating a lack of specific binding.
Another widely used ligand for autoradiographic studies of NMDA receptors is the phencyclidine derivative [3H]-N-(1-[thienyl]cyclohexyl)3,4-piperidine ([3H]TCP), which binds to a single site in rat brain cryostat sections with an apparent affinity of 127 nM [35]. Its highest binding density was in the hippocampus, where it showed a complex laminar distribution; the specific binding of [3H]TCP (20 nM) was 320 nM in stratum radiatum membranes (assuming 10% protein). Neocortical binding was only about 160 nM, and striatal and thalamic binding was approximately 80 nM. Parallel studies with [3H]glutamate binding under supposedly NMDA-specific conditions (i.e., in the presence of quisqualic acid) showed an affinity of 160 nM, and a five-fold excess stoichiometry, which suggested that several glutamate molecules were required to fully activate the receptor. However, these studies were conducted in the absence of the co-ligand glycine, and so may not reflect the binding properties of glutamate in vivo.
Rodent studies with the phencyclidine derivative [3H]fluorothienyl-cyclohexylpiperidine indicated a small specific binding component in living brain, which was substantially increased by treatment with NMDA by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection, suggesting a certain degree of activation-dependence of the binding [36]. Indeed, the normally low fraction of open channels in living brain is a key limitation of radioligands targeting the PCP/MK801 site. Around the same time, 1-[1-(2-thienyl)-4-([18F]fluoro)-cyclohexyl]-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine (27) was prepared for imaging of the NMDA ion channel. Despite high affinity in vitro, there was only moderate uptake in brain of living rat (0.1% injected dose (ID) at 30 min post-injection [p.i.]), and little evidence of specific binding in brain of living rat or rhesus monkey [37], perhaps due to its dependence on activation of the NMDA receptors. Similarly, despite an IC50 value of 5 nM for blocking activation of the GluN1(A)/2B receptor subtype in vitro, 5-[3-(4-benzylpiperidin-1-yl)prop-1-ynyl]-1,3-dihydrobenzoimidazol-2-one (“[11C]TCS 46b”, 28) labelled with carbon-11 on the benzoimidazolone ring had globally low uptake in brain of living rat, without any displacement by ifenprodil [38]. Some key structures of NMDA channel ligands are depicted in Figure 3.
Logan analysis of the uptake of [N-methyl-11C]ketamine enantiomers ((R)-(−)-29, (S)-(+)-30) in brain of living baboons showed a VT of approximately 8 mL g−1 relative to the metabolite-corrected arterial input function. There was slightly preferential binding of the (S)-(+)-enantiomer (30), which was somewhat obscured by rapid washout of both tracers due to their rapid metabolism in vivo [39]. Others reported a transient stereoselective binding of [N-methyl-11C]ketamine ((S)-(+)-30) in brain of rhesus monkey, corresponding to an unusably low binding potential (BPND) of 0.2–0.4 [40]. Nonetheless, by modifying the specific activity of their tracer, the authors were able to estimate a KD of 7 µM in living brain, and a Bmax of about 2 µM in living brain, which is about ten-fold higher abundance than NMDA receptor density in rat brain membranes. This discrepancy is doubtless due to various methodological factors, as well as physiological aspects of the state of binding sites occurring in the living organism.
In 2015, Salabert et al. published the radiosynthesis of the memantine (31) analogue [18F]fluoroethylnormemantine ([18F]FNM, 33) and its biodistribution in rat brain [41]. The radiosynthesis of [18F]FNM (33) was achieved from 1-(N-Boc)-3-(2-tosyloxyethyl)-adamantane precursor in an automated radiochemical synthesis. The two-step procedure was realized using a Raytest SynChrom R & D fluorination module. In the first step of the radiosynthesis, the precursor, carrying a tosyloxy leaving-group was reacted in a nucleophilic substitution reaction with 18F (K2CO3, cryptand222, DMSO, 125 °C, 20 min). In the second step, the N-Boc protecting group was removed by hydrolysis with 6 N hydrochloric acid (110 °C, 10 min). The radiochemical yield was 10.5 ± 3% and the molar activity was > 355 GBq/μmol. [18F]FNM (33) had a Ki of 350 nM for the displacement of [3H]TCP from rat brain membranes, which was comparable to the values reported for memantine [42]. Uptake in brain of living rats was spatially uniform, with and DUV of 0.3% ID/g at 30 and 60 min post injection.
Others investigated the memantine derivative 1-amino-3-[18F]fluoromethyl-5-methyl-adamantane ([18F]-memantine, 32), which had a high SUV in mouse brain (2.5% ID/g at 60 min), but was only 20% displaceable in vivo by pretreatment with MK801 [43]. Nonetheless, the authors proceeded to test their tracer in PET studies on healthy volunteers, finding a rather uniform binding throughout grey matter (VT 15–20 mL g−1), which somewhat exceeded the accumulation in white matter [44]. They concluded that the tracer distribution in living human brain did not match the expected heterogeneous distribution of NMDA receptors.
A series of N,N′-diphenyl and N-naphthyl-N′-phenyl guanidine derivatives were prepared as potential PET ligands for the open state of the NMDA receptor, among which the 3-thiomethyl derivative had a Ki of 2 nM against [3H]MK801 binding (1 nM) in rat brain membranes [45]. Others tested a series of 80 N′-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl derivatives of N-aryl-N′-methylguanidines as displacers of [3H]MK801 binding, of which several were identified as having suitably high affinity [46]. Among these candidate tracers, [11C]N-(2-chloro-5-thiomethylphenyl)-N′-(3-methoxy-phenyl)-N′-methylguanidine ([11C]GMOM, 34) showed a VT in the range of 13–17 mL g−1 in baboon brain [47]. While this uptake in baboon brain was unaffected by MK801 treatment, there was some displacement in rat brain studies, and pretreatment with the glycine site ligand D-serine tended to increase the binding in vivo.
The fluorine-18 labelled analogue of GMOM, [18F]PK-209 (35) ([3-(2-chloro-5-(methylthio) phenyl)-1-(3-([18F]fluoromethoxy)phenyl)-1-methylguanidine] displaced [3H]MK801 from membranes with a Ki of about 20 nM, similar to that of [11C]GMOM (34) [48]. Preclinical PET studies in non-human primates showed extensive [18F]PK-209 (35) uptake in brain, slow washout, and rather rapid formation of radioactive plasma metabolites (only 20% parent at 20 min p.i.) [49]. The VT was rather uniformly about 11 mL g−1 (including in the cerebellum), and pretreatment with MK-801 (24) (0.3 mg/kg) was without consistent effect on VT in the three test monkeys. PET studies with [18F]PK-209 (35) in a group of ten healthy volunteers showed relatively high uptake, peaking at 20 min post injection, followed by washout with a half-life of about 90 min [50]. SUV images showed some spatial heterogeneity, with thalamus > striatum, cerebral cortex > cerebellum > white matter. The authors chose to model its uptake assuming irreversible binding relative to a metabolite-corrected arterial input, which yielded three parameters: the unidirectional blood–brain clearance K1 (0.45 mL g−1 min−1), non-specific distribution volume VND (7.8 mL g−1), and Kin, the net blood-brain influx (0.016 mL g−1 min−1). There was no consistent effect of ketamine challenge on any of the endpoint parameters. Therefore, the authors were pessimistic about the reliability of the tracer for measuring NMDA receptor availability in vivo.
Tritiated (N-(2-chloro-5-methylthiophenyl)-N′-(3-methylthio-phenyl)-N′-methyl guanidine) (CNS-5161) bound to the NMDA receptor open channel with a KD of 6 nM and a Bmax of 330 nM (assuming 10% protein) in rat brain membranes; addition of glycine and glutamate to the medium increased the apparent affinity without altering the Bmax [51]. Ex vivo studies showed time-dependent accumulation in rat forebrain regions, attaining a cortex/cerebellum ration of 1.4, which increased upon NMDA treatment and declined after MK-801 (24) treatment. Radiation dosimetry of [11C]CNS5161 (36) in humans was similar to that of widely used PET tracers, and a pilot investigation showed moderate uptake in human brain, peaking at 20 min post injection (effective dose equivalent: 0.0106 mSv/MBq (0.0392 REM/mCi)) [52]. The corresponding SPECT tracer N-(1-napthyl)-N′-(3-[123I]-iodophenyl)-N-methylguanidine ([123I]CNS-1261, 37) showed high selectivity for NMDA receptors in rat brain, and its cerebral uptake was substantially higher on the side of a middle cerebral artery occlusion [53]. The authors suggested that this result indicated binding to the open state of NMDA receptors, which predominated in the infarcted and depolarized tissue on the side of the occlusion. [123I]CNS-1261 (37) uptake showed well-behaved kinetics in brain of healthy volunteers, attaining a VT ranging from 9 mL g−1 in white matter to 16 mL g−1 in thalamus [54]. In a rare clinical investigation of NMDA receptors, [123I]CNS-1261 (37) was used to measure occupancy by ketamine in healthy individuals [55]. Clinical correlation analysis showed an association between the negative symptom scores of the brief psychiatric rating scale with higher occupancy by ketamine. In a study conducted in schizophrenia patients stably treated with clozapine, the VT of [123I]CNS-1261 (37) was globally reduced by a third as compared to untreated patients and healthy controls [56]. This could indicate either simple competition of clozapine at NMDA sites, a treatment effect, or a disease-related down-regulation of binding. Using a binding index normalized to cortical tracer uptake, Pilowsky et al. found a significant reduction in NMDA binding in the left hippocampus in drug-free patients with schizophrenia, which was less prominent in patients taking clozapine or typical antipsychotics [57]. Furthermore, there was a significant inverse correlation between [123I]CNS-1261 binding and the severity of psychotic symptoms in those patients who were treated with typical antipsychotics. In drug-free patients, there was a significant positive correlation between tracer uptake in the middle inferior frontal cortex with illness duration. These results are generally in line with the NMDA hypofunction hypothesis of schizophrenia and suggest that antipsychotics may modulate the disease-related alterations.
[18F]GE-179 (38) is another bisarylguanidine NMDA receptor blocker, with structural resemblance to CNS5161 and GMOM. Preliminary blocking studies indicated a Ki of 2 nM for the displacement of [3H]tenocyclidine from the (phencyclidine, 23) intrachannel binding site [58]. PET studies with [18F]GE-179 (38) in healthy humans showed good uptake and washout characteristics, and a VT in the range of 8–14 mL g−1 in different brain regions of healthy human volunteers [59]. However, the authors were cautious about attributing its rather homogeneous distribution in brain to NMDA receptor binding. Indeed, rodent/non-human primate studies with displacement by MK-801 (24) and other drugs did not give compelling evidence for specific binding [60]. That discrepant finding provoked a lively discussion in the literature, with reference to the likely confounding effects of isoflurane + ketamine anesthesia, which is apt to reduce the availability of open channel binding sites in vivo [61]. With that in mind, others tested [18F]GE-179 (38) binding in living pig brain in the context of electrical stimulation of the hippocampus, while avoiding administration of ketamine as a potential competing anesthetic [62]. The stimulation apparently provoked an increase in the grey matter VT from about 3.5 mL g−1 to 5 mL g−1, in the absence of any effect on perfusion as measured by [15O]-water PET in the same session. Autoradiographic studies ex vivo with [18F]GE-179 (38) showed persistent increases in binding in rat cerebral cortex after traumatic brain injury, which were interpreted to indicate activation of NMDA receptors in the injured tissue [63].
BIII 277 CL [(−)-(1R,5S,2″R)-3′-Hydroxy-N-(2″-methoxypropyl)-5,9,9-trimethyl-6,7-benzomorphan] with its 6,7-benzomorphan skeleton is a structural analogue of classical pharmacologically important compounds such as pentazocine, phenazocine, metazocine and N-allylnormetazocine (SKF10,047). The stereochemistry of receptor SKF10,047 isomers has a large effect on selectivity for different receptor types. Thus, the (−)-epimer prefers the μ- and κ-opioid receptors, the (+)-epimer binds to the sigma receptors and both epimers have some affinity for the NMDA receptors. Based on these findings, BIII 277 CL was developed at the pharmaceutical company Boehringer Ingelheim in the 1990s as a specific ion-channel blocker of the NMDA receptor-channel complex [64,65]. BIII 277 CL contains a phenolic hydroxyl group in position-3′and a 2″-R-methoxypropyl substituent on the nitrogen (N2).
In 2002, Kokic et al. described the preparation of [11C]methyl-BIII 277 CL (39) [66]. The radiosynthesis was accomplished by O-methylation of the 3′-O-desmethyl precursor (free base of BIII 277 CL) with [11C]iodomethane (K2CO3, DMSO, under nitrogen, 120 °C, 10 min). The tracer was prepared with a radiochemical yield of 15 ± 5% at the end of synthesis (EOS). The total synthesis took 45–50 min. The molar activity was 35–70 GBq/μmol and the chemical and radiochemical purity > 98%. Binding studies with [11C]methyl-BIII 277 CL (39) in rat brain membranes indicated KD of 6 nM and Bmax of 70 nM (assuming 10% protein), but very fast washout from brain of living pig, where the VT was uniformly close to 1 mL g−1, indicating a lack of specific binding in vivo [66].
Based on the binding of bis(phenylalkyl)amines to the polyamine sites on NMDA subunits (more specifically the glycine-independent polyamine modulatory site), N-(3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) butyl-3-(4-[11C]methoxyphenyl)butylamine was tested as a potential PET tracer [67]. This tracer showed rather uniform binding in rat brain sections but was partially displaceable by spermine and by divalent cations in vitro.

Ligands for GluN2B Sites of the NMDA Receptor

The general failure of earlier efforts to develop useful NMDA-channel binding PET tracers inspired a search for ligands targeting the GluN2B subunit of the NMDA receptor. Representative structures are shown in Figure 4. In one such study, the CP-101,606 analogue (+/−)threo-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-[4-hydroxy-4-(p-[11C]methoxyphenyl) piperidino]-1-propanol (40) was prepared [68]. The ligand had very high binding to the cortex, hippocampus and striatum in rat brain sections, but absent binding in the cerebellum, as expected for the GluN2B subtype [69]. However, PET examination in an awake rhesus monkey showed completely homogeneous uptake in living brain. Results of competition binding studies suggested that displacement by endogenous polyamines might interfere with its binding in vivo. The Glu2B-selective compound N-(2-[11C]-methoxy)benzyl-4-trifluoromethoxy-phenylamidine (41) showed forebrain-selective binding in rat brain in vitro, and moderate uptake in living brain (1% ID/g at 40 min), but the brain signal contained substantial amounts of labelled metabolites, which does not favor quantitation of specific binding [70].
In 2010, Wünsch and associates [71] reported the development of a new GluN2B-selective NMDAR antagonist, 7-methoxy-3-(4-phenylbutyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepin-1-ol (WMS-1405), based on bond cleavage and reconstruction in the piperidine ring of ifenprodil (21). The preparation of WMS-1405 entailed a six-step reaction sequence starting from 3-methoxy-phenethylamine. The amine was reacted with four equivalents of tosyl chloride to yield N-(3-methoxyphenethyl)-4-toluenesulfonamide (pyridine, RT, 1.5 h, 97%), which was treated with ethyl bromoacetate (reflux, 20 h, 94%). Next, the resulting intermediate was converted to the corresponding free acid with sodium hydroxide (EtOH, H2O, reflux, 5 h, 91%). Cyclisation of the latter compound with P2O5 gave the desired 7-methoxy-3-benzazepine-1-one derivative as the main product. 9-Methoxy-3-benzazepine-1-one regioisomer and also 6-methoxy-N-tosyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline were isolated from the product mixture as minor by-products. The 7-methoxy-1H-3-benzazepine-1-one derivative was reduced with sodium borohydride to the corresponding 1H-3-benzazepine-1-ol compound. The latter compound was treated with Mg/MeOH to cleave the N-tosyl group and the formed secondary amine was N-alkylated to the desired WMS-1405 bearing a (CH2)4Ph substituent on the nitrogen.
In 2018, Krämer et al. [72] described the radiosynthesis and the evaluation of WMS-1405, which was codenamed [11C]Me-NB1 (42a), for the PET imaging of GluN1/GluN2B receptors. The radiosynthesis was preformed by selective alkylation of the desmethyl precursor NB1 [3-(4-phenylbutyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine-1,7-diol]. NB1 was prepared by 7-O-demethylation of WMS-1405 (Me-NB1) using boron tribromide in dichloromethane. NB1 was treated with [11C]iodomethane in the presence of Cs2CO3 as base in N,N-dimethylformamide (90 °C, 3 min). The molar activity was 290 ± 90 GBq/μmol at the end of synthesis and the radiochemical purity was > 99%. In PET imaging studies in rats, [11C]Me-NB1 exhibited a peak SUV value of four with a slightly faster washout from cerebellum than in forebrain structures. Blockade with various doses of eliprodil indicated a dose of 1.5 µg/kg at 50% of maximal occupancy (ID50), and a specific binding of about 50% of the total uptake. Various lines of evidence indicate insignificant interaction of the tracer with σ-receptors in vitro, whereas treatment with the σ1-receptor agonist (+)-pentazocine abolished the specific binding [11C]Me-NB1 (42a) in living rats, indicating an indirect effect of σ1-receptors on [11C]Me-NB1 binding. Very recently, Haider et al. [73] described the separation of the NB1 enantiomers by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography. Radiolabelling of the enantiopure precursors ((R)-NB1 and (S)-NB1) was achieved analogously to the method described earlier by the Ametamey-group for racemic [11C]Me-NB1 [72]. In addition to the radiochemical and radiopharmaceutical investigations, the absolute configuration of the reference standards (R)-Me-NB1 as well (S)-Me-NB1 was determined by X-ray crystallography and the stereostructure of the precursors was confirmed by circular dichroism spectroscopy. The in vivo results of the two enantiomers revealed for the R-enantiomer, (R)-[11C]Me-NB1, a high and a heterogenous accumulation in GluN2B-rich forebrain regions and dose-dependency of blockade by eliprodil. In contrast, the S enantiomer, (S)-[11C]Me-NB1, exhibited a homogenous distribution and no dose-response when eliprodil was applied as a GluN2B blocker.
Seeking to develop a fluorine-18 labelled analogue of [11C]Me-NB1 due to the inherently brief physical half-life of carbon-11, which limits its use only to centers with an on-site cyclotron, the Ametamey group evaluated a series of fluorinated analogues of Me-NB1 [74,75,76]. Two fluorine-18 labelled compounds, [18F]OF-NB1 (42b) and [18F]PF-NB1) (42c) (Figure 4) emerged as promising radioligands for imaging the GluN2B receptor. The binding affinity (KD) values for OF-NB1 and PF-NB1 towards the GluN2B subunits were 10.4 ± 4.7 nM and 10.4 ± 3.9 nM, respectively. Fluorine-18 labelling of both compounds was accomplished via copper-mediated radiofluorination in good radiochemical yields and molar activities ranging from 88–228 GBq/µmol using appropriate pinacol boronic ester precursors. Both radioligands displayed a heterogeneous and specific binding in GluN2B subunit-rich brain regions such as the cortex, striatum, hypothalamus and hippocampus in autoradiography experiments. PET imaging studies in Wistar rats showed a similar heterogeneous uptake. For both radioligands, a dose-dependent blocking effect was observed with CP-101,606 and resulted in an ID50 of 8.1 µmol/kg for [18F]OF-NB1 (42b) and 31 µmol/kg for [18F]PF-NB1 (42c).
Ro 04-5595 is a close structural analogue of the non-narcotic analgesic Versidyne [77] (Methofoline, Ro 4-1778/1). Both compounds are tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives first synthesized in the early 1960s at Hoffmann-La-Roche. Versidyne, which has the same analgesic efficacy as codeine, had an indication for treatment of postoperative pain, but was withdrawn from the pharmaceutical market due to its opthalmic side effects. Ro 04-5595 contains a free phenolic hydroxyl group in position-7 instead of methoxy (Versidyne). In 2019, Jakobsson et al. [78] reported the synthesis of a new subtype selective GluN2B NMDA radiotracer, 1-(4-chlorophenethyl)-7-hydroxy-6-methoxy-2-[11C]methyl-1,2,3,4-tetra hydroisoquinoline ([11C]Ro 04-5595, 43). The precursor for the radiosynthesis was N-desmethyl-Ro-04-5595 (1-(4-chlorophenethyl)-7-hydroxy-6-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro isoquinoline). N-Methylation was performed with [11C]iodomethane in DMF (40 °C, 1 min) by application of the captive solvent method of Wilson et al. [79]. ([11C]Ro 04-5595, 43) was synthesized with a radiochemical yield of 13 ± 3%, a radiochemical purity of 99%, and a molar activity of 12–43 MBq/nmol. The new tracer (43) showed a Ki of 2 nM relative to [3H]ifenprodil at GluN2B receptors in rat brain slices [78]. In brain of living rats, the tracer rapidly obtained a peak SUV of about 0.7, followed by rapid washout (t1/2 20 min), which did not indicate much in the way of specific binding in vivo.
Enantiomers of (44) [S-Methyl-11C](±)-7-methoxy-3-(4-(4-(methylthio)phenyl)butyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-benzo[d]azepin-1-ol ([11C]GluN2B-SMe) were prepared and tested as GluN2Bsubunit ligands [80]. The compound exhibited 2 nM KD for GluN2B receptors expressed in mouse fibroblasts. Of special interest was their demonstration that the ligand did not interact with σ1 receptors, which has been a limitation of several GluN2B ligands, including a series of tetra-hydro-1H-3-benzazepines [81] and fluorinated benzo[7]annulen-7-amines [82]. No radiolabelled metabolites of [11C]GluN2B-SMe (44) were detected in rat brain at 30 min after tracer injection, and preblocking with ifenprodil decreased the cerebral SUV from 3 to about 0.5. Of the two enantiomers, (S)-[11C]NR2B-SMe (44) seemed to have a somewhat superior binding signal in brain.
The benzamidazole 2-{[4-(4-iodobenzyl)piperidin-1-yl]methyl}benzimidazol-5-ol showed high affinity for the GluN2B subunit, with a Ki of 7 nM against [3H]ifenprodil binding to rat cortical synaptic membranes [83]. When labelled with iodine-125 it showed excellent properties for autoradiography in vitro, but only moderate cerebral uptake in rats (0.5% ID/g at 30 min post injection). Its binding in vivo was about 50% displaceable by treatment with the potent NR2B antagonist Ro 256,981.
The N-benzyl amidine derivatives 2-[11C]methoxybenzyl) cinnamamidine ([11C]CBA, 45), N-(2-[11C]methoxybenzyl)-2-naphthamidine ([11C]NBA, 46), and N-(2-[11C]methoxybenzyl)quinoline-3-carboxamidine ([11C]QBA, 47) were tested as PET radioligands for GluN2B binding sites [84]. The three compounds were strongly displaced from rat brain sections by addition of the GluN2B blocker CP-101,606, and by spermine and Zn2+, but were unaffected by σ-ligands. However, the three tracers showed only moderate uptake in living rodent brain, attaining an SUV of about 0.33 at ten minutes, but showing little sign of specific binding in vivo.
Others have prepared an 18F-labelled potent antagonist, 2-((1-(4-[18F]fluoro-3-methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-methoxy-pyrimidine ([18F]N2B-0518, 48) as a ligand for PET imaging of the GluN2B subunits [85]. Autoradiography with [18F]N2B-0518 (48) gave excellent delineation of GluN2B sites in rat brain, with highest binding in frontal cortex and hippocampus, intermediate binding in striatum and thalamus, and nearly absent specific binding in cerebellum. Autoradiography in non-human primate brain revealed a laminar distribution in cortex, with highest binding in the superficial and deep layers. Despite these promising results in vitro, biodistribution studies in mice showed very rapid washout from brain, and little evidence of specific binding.
N-((5-(4-fluoro-2-[11C]methoxyphenyl)pyridin-3-yl)methyl)cyclopentanamin ([11C]HACH242, 49) had a Ki of 12 nM relative to the displacement of [3H]ifenprodil from rat brain membranes [86]. Although its binding was only 30% displaceable by Ro25,6981 in mouse brain sections, binding measured ex vivo was consistently two-fold higher in the forebrain than in cerebellum, suggesting specific binding. PET imaging with [11C]HACH242 (49) was undertaken in a group of three nonhuman primates [87]. There was no consistent effect on the cerebral uptake upon treatment with radiprodil, which is a GluN2B negative allosteric modifier expected to reduce ligand binding to GluN2B sites. The authors did not attempt kinetic modelling but noted slower washout in frontal cortex (t1/2 circa 90 min) than in cerebellum (t1/2 circa 60 min), which they deemed consistent with a specific binding component in cortex.

Glycine Binding Site on the GluN1 Subunit of NMDA Receptors

A series of 2-carboxytetrahydroquinolines were screened as ligands for the glycine-binding site of the GluN1 subunit of the NMDA receptor [88] by measuring the displacement of [3H]-5,7-dichlorkynurenic acid from rat brain membranes. Others prepared [11C]-3-[2-[(3-methoxyphenylamino)carbonyl]ethenyl]-4,6-dichloroindole-2-carboxylic acid ([11C]3MPICA, 50) as a potential PET radiotracer for the NMDA receptor glycine site [89]. See Figure 5 for structures.
The tracer had low uptake, attaining a rather uniform distribution of 0.15% ID/g at 60 min; the authors reported 25–50% displacement by pretreatment with non-radioactive 3MPICA, but attributed this to effects related to ligand binding at warfarin sites on serum albumin, rather than indication of specific binding. Intravenous co-injection of the 4-hydroxyquinolone tracer [11C]L-703,717 (51) along with warfarin increased the tracer uptake in mouse cerebellum, apparently due to competition against warfarin binding sites on plasma albumin [90]. Other mouse studies with [11C]L-703,717 (51)/warfarin co-injection showed selective labelling of the glycine binding site of a cerebellum-specific NMDAR ex vivo, but showed only telencephalic binding when measured in vitro, irrespective of the presence of the ε3 subunit responsible for the high cerebellar binding in vivo [91]. The discrepancy was attributed to regional differences in the brain concentration of D-serine, which is absent in cerebellum due to the high local activity of D-amino acid oxidase.

NMDA Allosteric Modulators

N,N-dimethyl-2-(1H-pyrrolo[3,2-b]″pyridin-1-yl)acetamide allosteric modulator ligands of the GluN2B subunit were prepared as potential PET tracers, among which [11C]N2B-1810 (52) showed “moderate” displaceable autoradiographic binding in rat telencephalon, and absent binding in cerebellum [92]. However, the tracer showed low (0.2% ID/g) and spatially uniform uptake in brain of living rats.

2.1.2. AMPA Receptors

Formerly known as quisqualate receptor, the AMPA receptor is so-named for its selective agonist, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (5). For relevant structures, see Figure 6. The AMPA receptor is a ligand gated ion channel composed of four types of subunits, designated GluA1, 2, 3, and 4 (for review, [93]). Like the NMDA receptor, AMPA receptors are dimers of dimers, composed of a GluA2 dimer and one of the other dimers; changes in their composition, functional properties and trafficking across development critically determine synaptic plasticity [94]. Unlike NMDA receptors, each subunit of the AMPA receptor can bind its agonist, and pore opening requires binding to two or more subunits. The GluA2 subunit imparts to the channel a low permeability to Ca2+, so the open channel only supports Na+/K+ flux, and furthermore a voltage-dependent binding of polyamines to the GluA2 subunit modulates the K+ current. AMPA activation acts in concert with NMDA receptors to mediate long-term synaptic potentiation, whereby initial depolarization due to AMPA channel opening expels the Mg2+ that would otherwise block NMDA receptor-mediated currents. This allows an influx of Ca2+ that ultimately upregulates AMPA expression to increase the sensitivity of the membrane to glutamate.
5-Fluorowillardiine (53) is a natural product from the Willard acacia that acts as an excitotoxin in vivo. Rat brain membrane binding studies with (S)-[3H]-5-fluorowillardiine indicate a KD of 7 nM (in the presence of KSCN) for AMPA receptors, and a Bmax of about 120 nM (assuming 10% protein) [95]. Low concentrations of NBQX, domoic acid (generally considered a kainate ligand), AMPA, and glutamate displace its high affinity binding. Autoradiographic Bmax of (S)-[3H]-5-fluorowillardiine ranged from 60 nM in thalamus to 440 nM in hippocampus. There was a 60% decline in (S)-[3H]-5-fluorowillardiine binding in cortex of rats with end stage hepatic failure, and parallel reductions in [3H]kainic acid binding sites, whereas NMDA binding sites labelled with [3H]MK-801 were unaffected [96]. Even if fluorowillardiine (53) and kainic acid (4) were available as PET tracers of high molar activity, their excitoxicity might preclude their use as imaging agents in vivo.
The first 5H-2,3-benzodiazepine derivative, (5-ethyl-1-(3,4-dimethoxyplenyl)-7,8-dimethoxy-4-methyl-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine) was prepared by Körösi and Láng [97] from 2-benzopyrylium salt via a monohydrazine-type intermediate. The 5H-2,3-benzodiazepine scaffold was formed in a base-catalyzed cyclocondensation. 1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine (GYKI-52466, 54) [98,99,100], GYKI-53773 (55, talampanel) and GYKI-53784 (56) are structurally 2,3-benzodiazepine derivatives that represent selective non-competitive AMPA antagonists [101,102]. GYKI52466 (54), the first representative of this class of compounds, was first synthesized at the Institute for Drug Research (Budapest, Hungary, Gyógyszerkutató Intézet) and soon became the pharmacological standard of the field. The non-competitive mechanism of its action is important because these types of compounds act independently from glutamic acid (1), which is always present under endogenous conditions.
[11C]- and [18F]-labelled N-acetyl-1-aryl-6,7-dimethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives (57, 58, 59) were prepared as potential AMPA receptor ligands for PET imaging [103] based on findings reported by Gitto. However, there are no reports on binding properties in vivo for these compounds. Very recently, [11C]-labeled 4-cyclopropyl-7-(3-methoxyphenoxy)-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[e][1,2,4]thiadiazine 1,1-dioxide ([11C]AMPA-1905, 60) was prepared as non-competitive AMPA antagonist ligand for PET imaging [104]. [11C]AMPA-1905 (60) was prepared from an N-Boc protected phenolic precursor, applying a one-pot two-step procedure. The precursor was reacted with [11C]iodomethane in N,N-dimethylformamide in the presence of tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH) (80 °C, 5 min), followed by deprotection with 6 N HCl (80 °C, 5 min). The labelling was performed with a radiochemical yield of 22–28%, >99% radiochemical purity, and molar activity of 37 GBq/μmol. Its uptake in mouse brain was about 0.5% ID/g at 30 min post injection, with a rather uniform distribution to autoradiography ex vivo. Blocking studies with talampanel (55), an orally active AMPA antagonist, resulted in globally increased cerebral uptake, a finding that often indicates confounding effects of ligand displacement from peripheral binding sites. Very recently, Miyazaki et al. [105] developed a novel radioligand: 2-(2,6-difluoro-4-(2-(N-[11C]methylsulfonamido)ethylthio)-phenoxy)acetamide ([11C]K-2) for the PET imaging of AMPA receptors in the living human brain. The new radiotracer was prepared from a secondary amine type precursor (PEPA, K-1) with [11C]iodomethane in DMF (0.5 M NaOH, 80 °C, 5 min) in a simple radiosynthesis in high yield. [11C]K-2 is a potential tool to examine the role of AMPA receptors in neuropsychiatric disorders.

2.1.3. Kainate Receptors

The kainate receptors are ionotropic non-NMDA receptors, which are selective to activation by the algal excitotoxic compound kainic acid (4, Figure 1). Kainate (4) is the most toxic of the excitatory amino acids, with a rank order of potency upon injection to the hippocampus kainate > ibotenate > NMDA > dihydrokainate > d,l-homocysteate > l-cysteate > l-aspartate > l-glutamate [106]. As such, kainic acid is a useful tool for neurochemical lesion studies. Like the other ionotropic glutamate receptors, the kainate receptor is a homomeric or heteromeric tetramer assembled from five possible subunits [107]. The ion channel of the kainate receptor is permissive to Na+/K+ flux, but the receptor seems also to possess coupling with a G-protein cascade, which is an unusual property for ionotropic receptors. Native kainate receptors expressed on neurons mediate slow excitation, distinct from the rapid depolarizations mediated by NDMA and AMPA receptors [108]. This property may be critically involved in encoding of temporal information and modulation of local and network spike activity, under the influence of auxiliary proteins like neuropilin and tolloid-like protein 1 (Neto1).
Autoradiography with [3H]kainic acid showed abundant specific binding in rat brain, which peaked at postnatal day 20 and declined slightly in adulthood [109]. The binding site was 50% more abundant in striatum than in cortex or cerebellum. Mean receptor densities labelled with [3H]kainic acid in rat telencephalon membranes were about 200 nM (assuming 10% protein), which is roughly similar to the corresponding concentrations of NMDA receptors labelled with [3H]MK-801, and about two-fold higher than the [3H]AMPA binding [110]. Displacement studies with the excitotoxin L-beta-oxalyl-amino-alanine (L-BOAA) (which is responsible for neurolathyrism) showed regional differences in the displacement of [3H]kainic acid binding in hippocampus, with lowest affinity in regions with high affinity for the shellfish excitotoxin domoic acid [111]. These findings indicate the presence of pharmacological heterogeneity of kainate receptors, despite the rather uniform displacement of [3H]kainate by the natural agonist glutamate, which showed an in vitro Ki of 1 µM across all hippocampal regions. So far, there has been no success in developing kainate receptor ligands with suitable properties for molecular imaging in vivo.

2.2. Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors (mGluRs)

The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are not ligand-gated ion channels but are typical members of the class C family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The class C receptors consist of an N-terminal signal sequence that guides insertion into the plasma membrane, a hydrophilic extracellular agonist-binding domain that contains several cysteine residues, the seven transmembrane domains, and a C-terminal sequence dangling in the cytoplasm. Glutamate binding at mGluRs initiates dissociation of the intracellular heterotrimeric complex of GTP-binding protein subunits, which ultimately alters various metabolic processes in the post-synapatic neuron. There are eight known mGluR genes, which fall into three categories based on their sequence homology, i.e., the predominantly post-synaptic Group I (mGluR 1 and 5), the pre-and post-synaptic Group II (mGluR 2 and 3), and the predominantly presynaptic Group III (mGluR 4, 6, 7, and 8) [7]. The mGluRs are functional dimers in which the two “Venus flytrap” N-terminal domains have an open, inactive state, which converts to a closed state upon binding glutamate or other agonists; thus, the mGluRs have three functional states: open-open, open-closed, and closed-closed. The agonist-induced closure propagates a conformational change through the cytsteine-rich domain to the heptahelical transmembrane domain. Here, the transmembrane loops impart specificity for G-protein coupling, and present binding sites for allosteric modulators and phosphorylation sites for G-protein receptor kinases. Ultimately, agonist-induced conformational change propagates to the intracellular side, coupling to (inter alia) Gq/G11 to activate phospholipase Cβ and various downstream pathways (Group I mGluRs) or Gi/o proteins to inhibit adenylate cyclase or regulate ion channels (Group II and III mGluRs). The story of mGluRs is complicated further by possibilities for alternative splicing, and for protein–protein interactions through the C-terminal sequences, notably with Homer proteins of the post-synaptic density. The C-terminus of mGluR3 interacts with calmodulin and presents a phosphorylation site for protein kinase A [112].
The mGluRs interact importantly with ionotropic glutamate receptors. Notably, activation of protein kinase C by (Group I) mGluR5 participates in the long-term potentiation of ion currents mediated by NMDA receptors in the synapses between mossy fibers and CA3 pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus [113]. NMDA receptors in cerebral cortex undergo an activity-dependent developmental shift in their subunit composition from GluN2B in the first postnatal week of rats to predominantly GluN2A, which have faster kinetics; this shift requires co-activation of the mGluR5 and NMDA receptors [114]. The mGluR3 antagonist β-NAAG blocked the establishment of long-term depression in the dentate gyrus, whereas treatment with the putative endogenous agonist NAAG down-regulated long-term potentiation [115]. Treatment of rats with the (Group II) mGluR2/3 agonist LY379268 rescued the disruption of NMDA receptors induced by treatment with MK-801, and enhanced NMDA-provoked inward currents in rat brain slices [116]. The two receptors did not co-precipitate, but mGlu2/3R-activation of the Akt/GSK-3β pathway mediated the observed effects on NMDA receptors. On the other hand, treatment with LY379268 did not rectify working memory impairments in rats treated with MK801 (24) [117].
The functional association of mGluRs with NMDA receptors may present them as potential targets for the treatment of schizophrenia. Indeed, there have been tests of various mGluR ligands and allosteric modulators in animal models of schizophrenia and some such compounds have entered clinical trials [16]. Various lines of evidence imply that mGluR5 may also present a therapeutic target in Alzheimer’s disease [118]. In particular, mGluR5 seems to be a receptor of the neurotoxic amyloid-β42 peptide, and genetic deletion of mGluR5 interfered with the progression of amyloid deposition and mTOR phosphorylation and rescued cognitive impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease [119]. The mGluRs are also potential therapeutic targets in diverse other conditions, including Parkinson’s disease [120], Huntington’s disease [121], fragile-X syndrome [122], seizure disorders [123,124], and substance abuse [125].

2.2.1. Group I (mGluR1) Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

(3-Ethyl-2-[11C]methyl-6-quinolinyl)(cis-4-methoxycyclohexyl)methanone, known as [11C]JNJ16567083 (61, Figure 7), shows high affinity for mGlu1 receptor (Ki = 0.87 nM) in rats and much lower affinity for the mGlu5 receptor (Ki = 2.4 µM). The radiotracer containing a 11CH3 group in position-2 of the quinoline scaffold was prepared from the corresponding 2-trimethylstannyl precursor. The reaction of the precursor with [11C]iodomethane under catalytic conditions (Pd2(dba)3, P(o-tolyl)3, DMF, 120 °C, 5 min) resulted in the radioligand with a radiochemical yield of 47 ± 17% and molar activity of 22.4 ± 8.4 GBq/μmol (607 ± 228 Ci/mmol). Dynamic rat PET studies with 61 revealed persistently two-fold higher uptake in the cerebellum than in forebrain regions, but this heterogeneity was blocked by treatment with an mGluR1 antagonist, whereas the mGluR5 antagonist was without any such effect [126].
N-cyclohexyl-6-{[N-(2-methoxyethyl)-N-methylamino]methyl}-N-methylthiazolo[3,2-a]-benzimidazole-2-carboxamide (YM-202074) had selectivity and high affinity for mGluR1 (Ki 5 nM), and autoradiography with [11C]YM-202074 (62) showed ten-fold higher binding in the rat cerebellum than in pons [127]. However, HPLC analysis of rat brain extracts showed considerable quantities of labelled radiometabolites at 30 min post injection. While pretreatment with JNJ16259685 globally displaced the specific binding, the uptake was relatively low, and the metabolite profile was not encouraging for its further use.
[O-methyl-11C]dimethylamino-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3H-pyrido[3′,2′:4,5]thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-4-one ([11C]MMTP, 63) showed a Ki of 8 nM for mGluR1 in vitro [128], and was tested further using autoradiography in human brain sections, where it showed high specific binding in cerebellum [129]. PET studies in monkey brain showed high uptake in cerebellum, attaining 2% ID/g within minutes of injection, followed by rapid washout; the cerebellar binding was two-fold higher than in telencephalon.
[18F]MK-1312 was synthesized by the reaction of the chloro precursor with [18F]KF using microwave heating. Saturation binding studies with [18F]MK-1312 (64) indicated a KD of 0.5 nM and a Bmax of 53 nM in rhesus monkey cerebellum membranes, versus a KD of 1 nM and Bmax of 82 nM in human cerebellum [130]. PET recordings with [18F]MK-1312 (64) in rhesus monkey showed peak SUV of 2.5% ID/g at 20 min, followed by washout; two-tissue compartment kinetic analysis indicated rapid unidirectional clearance to cerebellum (K1; 0.33 mL g−1 min−1) and moderately fast association kinetics to its binding sites in living brain (k3; 0.03 min−1). Self-blocking studies indicated 50% occupancy at brain mGluR1 with a plasma concentration of 76 nM.
The non-competitive mGluR1 antagonist [18F]EFQ (65) (3-ethyl-2-[18F]fluoroquinolin-6-yl-(4-methoxycyclohexyl)methanone) exhibits a Ki of 2 nM for receptors in rat brain membranes, but only 25 nM Ki for cloned human receptors [131]. The tracer showed displaceable binding in rat cerebellum ex vivo, but rather homogeneous uptake (VT 2.5–3.7 mL g−1) in a PET examination of baboon brain. This might have been due to rapid metabolism in baboon, where only 10% untransformed tracer remained in plasma at 15 min post injection, or possibly reflected insufficient binding affinity in humans and non-human primates. The two enantiomers of [18F]EFQ (65) were prepared and tested in mice and rats [132]. At ten minutes after injection of [18F]cisEFQ (66), the brain concentration was 3% ID/g in cerebellum and 2% ID/g in telencephalon, whereas [18F]transEFQ (67) showed relatively little uptake. The cerebral uptake of [18F]cisEFQ (66) was blocked by pretreatment with cisEFQ or JNJ16259685, but was unaffected by pretreatment with the mGluR5 ligand ABP688. Ex vivo autoradiography suggested relatively high binding in the thalamus. The most lipophilic of its main radiometabolites in mouse plasma constituted up to 20% of the brain activity, which is unfavorable for absolute quantitation of the PET signal.
N-[4-[6-(isopropylamino)pyrimidin-4-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]-4-[11C]methoxy-N-methyl-benzamide ([11C]ITMM, 68), which was derived from the a potent negative allosteric modulator of mGluR1, has a KD of 13.6 nM in vitro [133]. Analysis of the uptake of high molar activity [11C]ITMM (68) in rats with 90 min PET recordings gave VT ranging from 2 mL g−1 in pons to 8 mL g−1 in striatum and 15 mL g−1 in cerebellum, calculated relative to a metabolite-corrected input function [134]. In a preclinical stroke study, declining [11C]ITMM (68) binding was indicative of the extent and progression of the ischemic brain injury [135].
The mGluR1 ligand 6-[1-(2-[18F]fluoro-3-pyridyl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl]quinolone ([18F]FPTQ, 73) was prepared for PET studies [136], having shown high selectivity and affinity for human (IC50 = 3.6 nM) and murine (IC50 = 1.4 nM) mGluR1 in vitro. [18F]FPTQ (73) showed good binding properties in vitro, with 20-fold higher binding in mouse cerebellum than in pons, and no displacement by mGluR5 antagonists. PET examination showed rapid influx into cerebellum, attaining 2.5% ID/g within minutes, followed by a rapid washout (t1/2 20 min), with complete blockade upon treatment with MPEP (74). Less than 10% of plasma radioactivity was unmetabolized tracer at 30 min post injection, when only 67% of cerebellar activity was unmetabolized parent. A structurally similar compound bearing a triazole moiety, 1-(2-[18F]fluoro-3-pyridyl)-4-(2-isopropyl-1-oxo-isoindoline-5-yl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole ([18F]FPIT, 71) showed binding in rat and monkey brain sections at a concentration of only 8 pM, although the saturation binding parameters were not presented [137]. The tracer showed slower brain kinetics in living rats, with a BPND of two in cerebellum calculated relative to cerebral cortex. However, the authors did not report on the metabolic stability of [18F]FPIT (71) in plasma, or the presence of labelled metabolites in the brain.
PET studies with 4-[18F]fluoro-N-[4-[6-(isopropylamino)pyrimidin-4-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]-N-methylbenzamide ([18F]FITM, 69) showed progressive accumulation of radioactivity to at least 60 min post injection in telencephalic structures, when there was a 15:1 ratio of cerebellum relative to pons activity [138]. At 60 min post injection, 25% percent of plasma radioactivity remained as the parent tracer, and only traces of labelled metabolites were present in mouse brain, all of which favors quantitation of the PET signal. Dynamic PET recordings with [18F]FITM (69) showed faster kinetics in monkey brain, where peak radioactivity concentration (3.5% ID g−1) occurred at 30 min post injection. The ratio of cerebellum to pons activity was about 4:1 in monkey, but there was complete displacement of specific binding by pretreatment with JNJ16259685. Compartmental analysis indicated a VT ranging from 2.4 in pons to 11.5 mL g−1 in cerebellum. The microparameters from a two-tissue compartment model indicated good blood–brain clearance (K1; 0.14 mL g−1 min−1) and rapid association to its binding sites in living brain (k3; 0.13 min−1).
In the first clinical application of [11C]ITMM PET (68), mGluR1 availability was compared in a patient with type VI spinocerebellar ataxia versus a group of healthy controls [139]. Relative to the pons, which is said to be devoid of mGluR1, the BPND of [11C]ITMM (68) in cerebellum ranged from two in the flocculus to six in the vermis of the healthy controls, and was reduced by 50% in the patient, reflecting the degeneration of Purkinje cells. A subsequent comparison of [11C]ITMM (68) and conventional [18F]FDG in a group of 12 patients with cerebellar ataxias gave similar sensitivities for disease detection, but the mGluR1 tracer BPND correlated better with clinical scores, suggesting a better depiction of the pathology [140]. A [11C]ITMM (68) PET study in a group of ten Alzheimer’s disease patients and age-matched healthy elderly controls did not indicate any AD-related difference in BPND anywhere in brain, nor did the binding in patients correlate with mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores [141]. A comparison of 15 young (aged 26 years) and 24 elderly (aged 70 years) healthy controls did not reveal any group differences in [11C]ITMM (68) BPND, nor were there any differences between men and women of either age group [142].
A comparison of N-[4-[6-(isopropylamino)-pyrimidin-4-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]-N-methyl-4-[11C]-methylbenzamide ([11C]ITDM, 70) with [11C]ITMM (68) in nonhuman primates showed generally higher cerebral uptake for the former compound [143]. Both compounds had favorable metabolite profiles, with 60% parent fraction remaining at 15 min. However, the relative VTs between regions scarcely differed between the two tracers. Reference tissue quantitation obviously presents logistic advantages for any PET tracer, but its valid use depends on having a reference region nearly devoid of specific binding. Blocking studies with YM-202074 showed dose-dependent displacement of [11C]ITDM (70) in brain of living mice, including −36% in pons [144]. Indeed, Lassen graphical analysis relative to VT gave a VND of 1.4 mL g−1, thus indicating a BPND of about five in cerebellum and calling into question the validity of pons as a non-binding reference region. That study was notable for comparing the non-invasive (image derived) input function with population-based metabolite correction, and a serial arterial sampling approach, which showed nearly identical VT results.
A [11C]ITDM (70) study in mice in which VT was calculated relative to an image-derived input function showed an approximately 20% decline across various brain regions in aged mice (16 months) compared to younger mice (6 months) [145], which stands in contrast to the [11C]ITMM (68) findings across human aging, cited above. In that same rodent study, examination of the Q175DN mouse model of Huntington’s disease showed persistently 17% higher [11C]ITDM (70) VT compared to healthy wild type mice, indicating high levels of mGluR1 availability during the course of disease progression. In the A53T transgenic synclein model of Parkinson’s disease, deficits in motor behavior first manifest at 6–8 months of age, coincident with the start of nigrostriatal degeneration [146]. In a multitracer PET study of these A53T mice, there was over-expression of striatal mGluR1 at four months of age as measured by [11C]ITMM (68) PET, followed by a rapid decline at eight months, and nearly complete disappearance in elderly mice compared to non-carrier controls. Strikingly, the motor deficits in the transgenic mice correlated better with the loss of mGluR1 binding sites than with nigrostriatal degeneration measured with the dopamine transporter ligand [18F]FE-PE2I (72). The transgenic mice showed no abnormality in striatal binding of the selective mGluR5 [11C]ABP688 (82), which is discussed in detail in the following section. In a longitudinal [11C]ITDM (70) PET study of rats with pilocarpine-induced seizures, there was an acute 33% decline in the anterior part of the cerebellum, and a 20% decline after three weeks that was confined to the thalamus [147]. The mGluR1 findings were thus fairly restricted as compared to microglia PET examinations in the same mice with a TSPO ligand, which was nearly doubled at one and three weeks after the seizures.

2.2.2. Group I (mGluR5) Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

Early efforts towards developing mGluR5 PET ligands focused on diaryl alkynes, such as 2-methyl-6-(phenyl-ethynyl) pyridine (MPEP, 74) and 3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl] pyridine (MTEP, 75). Fore structures, see Figure 8. Autoradiographic studies with 3-[3H]methoxy-5-(pyridin-2-ylethynyl) pyridine ([3H]MPEPy) showed a KD of 4 nM for binding to rat cortical membranes; the Bmax ranged from 21 nM in hypothalamus to 83 nM in striatum, and specific binding was nearly absent in the rat cerebellum [148]. However, PET studies with 3-[11C]methoxyPEPy (76) showed little cerebral uptake in anesthetized baboons or rats [149]. Having excluded effects of anesthesia, the authors speculated that failure of the tracer in vivo was due to P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux. Ametamey et al. described the synthesis and biodistribution of 2-[11C]methyl-6-(3′-fluoro-phenylethynyl)-pyridine ([11C]M-FPEP, 77), which obtained a rather homogeneous distribution in living rat brain [150]. [11C]MPEP (78) showed slightly higher uptake in rat cerebral cortex than in cerebellum at 60 min post-injection, and six-fold higher uptake in olfactory bulb, which was partially blocked by pretreatment with MPEP (74) (10 mg/kg) [151]; they found globally lower uptake of the methoxyphenyl derivative [11C]M-MPEP (79) and with [11C]methoxyPyEP (76). Blocking tended to increase globally the cerebral uptake of these tracers, suggesting displacement of the ligands from peripheral binding sites in rat. M-MTEB and F-MTEB showed sub-nM Ki against mGluR5 binding sites in vitro. The corresponding PET tracers [11C]M-MTEB (80) and [18F]F-MTEB (81) had rapid uptake in brain of living monkey, attaining SUV values as high as three, which was 75% displaced by pretreatment with MTEP (75) (1 mg/kg). However, displacement and autoradiographic saturation binding studies indicated an abundant binding density in rhesus cerebellum (Bmax 24 nM), albeit less than in striatum (63 nM). This apparent species difference indicates that reference tissue quantitation is unsuitable for PET studies of mGluR5 in primate brain.
Based on these findings, Ametamey et al. developed (3-(6-methyl-pyridin-2-ylethynyl)-cyclohex-2-enone-O-[11C]-methyl-oxime) ([11C]ABP688, 82), as a noncompetitive and highly selective antagonist molecular imaging of mGluR5 [152]. Saturation binding studies indicated a KD of 2 nM and Bmax of 23 nM (assuming 10% protein) in rat brain membranes. Initial small animal PET studies showed nearly four-fold higher uptake in rat hippocampus and striatum of wild type mice compared with mGluR5 knockout mice, thus confirming its specificity in vivo. [11C]ABP688 (82) has found application in numerous preclinical studies. PET and β-microprobe studies showed an effect of increasing mass on the apparent BPND in brain of isoflurane-anesthetized rats [153].
However, pharmacological challenge with MK801 (24) or N-acetylcysteine, both of which treatments increase glutamate release, were without discernible effect on the binding in vivo. This result was in contrast to earlier findings of 10–20% reductions in [11C]ABP688 (82) BPND in rat brain following N-acetylcysteine challenge [154]. Other studies in isofluorane-anesthetized rats showed no effect on cerebral binding after challenge with ketamine (30 mg/kg) [155], despite results of human studies reported below that ketamine-challenge modulated [11C]ABP688 (82) via altered glutamate release. Similarly, rat PET studies with [18F]PSS232 (83), an [18F]-labelled analogue of ABP688, failed to show any effect of challenge with ketamine or ceftriaxone in vivo, nor was there any evidence for direct competition in brain slices [156]. On the other hand, treatment of anesthetized baboons with the glutamate releaser N-acetylcysteine decreased the magnitude of [11C]ABP688 (82) VT by 20% in three of four animals, but only at the higher of two doses (100 vs. 50 mg/kg) [157]. Heterozygous knockout of the glutamate-synthesizing enzyme glutaminase has increased extracellular glutamate levels, which might be expected to reduce binding of [11C]ABP688 (82) to the allosteric site. However, glutaminase knockout mice showed unchanged mGluR5 availability in vivo, but decreased protein levels compared to Western blot analysis [158]. This was interpreted to be indicative of masking of the reduced mGluR5 expression by stimulated [11C]ABP688 (82) binding due to increased endogenous glutamate levels. A study of rats treated with ceftriaxone, an activator of the GLT-1 transporter that decreases extracellular glutamate levels, showed the expected increase in cerebral [11C]ABP688 (82) binding (+40%), consistent with an allosteric modulation of the PET tracer binding by glutamate [159]. Conversely, reductions of [11C]ABP688 (82) VT in brain of living baboons could be used to detect the occupancy by different doses of intravenous fenobam [160]. Representative images of [11C]ABP688 PET in healthy humans are presented in Figure 9.
An alternate mGluR5 tracer of atypical structure, [11C]AZD9272 (84) had globally higher specific binding in brain of non-human primates as compared to [11C]ABP688 (82) [161]. Examined in detail by autoradiography with tritiated compounds, AZD9272 has distinctly higher binding in the ventral striatum, the substantial nigra, and some thalamic nuclei. Displacement studies showed complete displacement of [11C]AZD9272 (84) in vivo by fenobam, but only partial displacement by ligands of the MPEP (74) structure. Subsequent work showed it to have off-target binding to monoamine oxidase B, a property, shared with fenobam [161].
A study of AβPP transgenic mice showed no particular association between mGluR5 availability in vivo with Alzheimer’s disease model pathology, although post-mortem immunoblotting showed increases in mGluR5 protein levels that had been invisible to PET [162]. The 5xFAD mice, which bear five mutations linked to human Alzheimer’s disease, showed a 35% decrease in [18F]FPEB (86) BPND in hippocampus, cortex, and striatum, but this reduction only presented at the age of nine months, when severe amyloid pathology and behavioral deficits had already developed [163,164]. A longitudinal PET study in Huntington’s disease model mice showed a significant 14% reduction in striatum [18F]FPEB BPND, and a somewhat lesser reduction throughout cerebral cortex compared to WT mice that was constant at three, six, and nine months [165]. The mGluR immunoreactivity was 37% lower in striatum and 17% lower in cortex of the transgenic mice, which might suggest some change in compartmental distribution of the receptor, such that the reductions measured in vivo were of lesser magnitude. In the pilocarpine model of seizure disorder there were 20–30% reductions in [11C]ABP688 (82) binding in striatum acutely after status epilepticus that had normalized in the chronic phase [166]; focal reductions persisted in the hippocampus and amygdala in the chronic phase, perhaps indicating a loss of neurons. Interestingly, an [18F]FPEB (86) PET study in transgenic mice with a mutation of superoxide dismutase occurring in human cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) showed trebling of the BPND in striatum, hippocampus and doubling in cortex with progression to a neurologically advanced disease stage [167]. In the same mice there was a doubling of the specific binding of the TSPO ligand [11C]PBR28, a marker of activated microglia, thus linking the neurodegeneration of the ALS model with neuroinflammation and increased mGluR5 availability. Furthermore, PET studies with [18F]PSS232 (83) showed 20% increases in the distribution volume ratio (DVR) in various brain regions of mouse brain the day after challenge with lipopolysaccharide, which had completely normalized at five days in CD1 mice (which lack certain components of innate immune responses), while persisting in C57BL/6 mice [168]. In the same study, the authors reported three-fold high binding of [18F]PSS232 (83) in cryostat sections from cortex and basal ganglia samples from patients dying with ALS compared with control tissues.
PET studies in sapap3 knockout mice, which show progressive exaggeration of grooming behavior that models obsessive compulsive disorder, showed widespread 20% decreases in [11C]ABP688 (82) binding in association with their worsening behavior at nine months of age [169]. In this case, the decline in binding seen with small animal PET was not captured by semiquantitative autoradiography with [3H]ABP688 in vitro or by mGuR5 immunohistochemisty. An [18F]FPEB (86) PET study in Shank3B knockout mice, which present a behavior phenotype linked to autism spectrum disorder, showed 25% higher BPND compared to wild type mice in striatum, hippocampus and amygdala [170]; Western blotting confirmed these increases in protein level. A pilot human PET study showed higher [18F]FPEB BPND in the postcentral gyrus and cerebellum of male subjects with autism [171].
A retrospective analysis of a large series of [11C]ABP688 (82) studies in human subjects showed that the product was not stereochemically pure, but consisted of about 8% (Z)-isomer [172], which tended to reduce the magnitude of the BPND estimate, as had been shown earlier in rat studies [173]. Presumably, this effect may have accounted for the relatively high 11–21% test-retest variability reported in healthy volunteers [174]. Others investigated the within-subject variability of mGluR5 availability in a comparative PET study with [11C]ABP688 (82) and [18F]FPEB (86). The test-retest reproducibility of [11C]ABP688 (82) was lower when scans were not repeated on the same day, as was likewise seen with [18F]FPEB (86) PET, using a correction for residual radioactivity from a scan earlier in the day [175]. These results indicated that mGluR5 availability is inherently variable in the course of a single day, as had been first described for the [11C]ABP688 (82) VT, which tended to increase by 30% relative to a baseline scan two hours previously [176]. Forced sleep deprivation only slightly (+2.5%) increased the group mean magnitude of [11C]ABP688 (82) DVnorm, but the increase was more pronounced in the subgroup with low baseline mGluR5 availability [177]. There were very high correlations between mGluR5 availability and electroencephalographic slow wave (0.25–1.0 Hz) oscillation power during non-rapid-eye-movement sleep, both in the baseline and rebound after sleep-deprivation conditions.
Other studies from the same research group showed that the whole brain [11C]ABP688 (82) BPND was 17% higher in men than in women, irrespective of the menstrual phase or hormonal contraceptive use of the female subjects [178]. Another [11C]ABP688 (82) study in 18 men and 13 women did not show any significant gender difference, and only a hint of a decline in BPND as a function of age [179]. That study employed a partial volume correction, making the results robust to any age-related loss of cortical volume. The authors of that study found some evidence of systematic asymmetry, with very slightly higher BPND in left hemispheric structures of healthy controls.
The binding of [11C]ABP688 (82) (DVR) was 27% lower in bilateral hippocampus of a group of (n = 9) patients with Alzheimer’s disease, and by about 20% in amygdala of the same patients, relative to a significantly younger non-demented control group (69 vs. 77 years) [180]. In a [18F]FPEB (86) PET study using a constant infusion design, the BPND was reduced by 43% in hippocampus of (n = 16) Alzheimer’s disease patients, compared to healthy age-matched and amyloid-negative controls [181]. The patients had early disease, as indicated by the mean MMSE score of 25. In a study with [18F]FPEB (86), patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) had 20% higher BPND in putamen, hippocampus, and amygdala compared to healthy controls [182]. In the patients, there was a significant negative correlation (r = −0.51) between mGluR5 availability and dopamine transporter density in putamen. The results in human Parkinson’s disease patients are in contrast to findings in rats with parkinsonism due to a selective (6-OHDA) dopamine lesion, which showed reduced [18F]FPEB (86) binding in motor cortex and dorsolateral striatum [183], and in contrast to the unaltered [11C]ABP688 (82) binding in transgenic Parkinson’s disease model mice, cited above.
The binding of [11C]ABP688 (82) was reduced by about 20% in the hippocampus and amygdala of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy; these reductions persisted after successful surgical resection for alleviation of seizures [184]. The authors argued that the asymmetry index with this tracer was greater than that for [18F]FDG PET, thus indicating a role for mGluR5 PET in epileptogenic lesion localization. Another [11C]ABP688 (82) PET study from the same group showed reduced BPND in association with focal cortical dysplasia. Immunohistochemical examination of the resected cortical tissue confirmed loss of the normal cortical architecture [185].
A human PET study in ten healthy, non-smoking volunteers showed a mean 21% reduction in [11C]ABP688 (82) binding upon challenge with ketamine (22) infusions amounting to 0.8 mg/kg, which sufficed to produce a dissociative mental state [186]. A subsequent study by the same group using [18F]FPEP (87) showed lesser effects of ketamine on the magnitude of binding (VT/fp), but similar effect size as seen with [11C]ABP688 (82) [187]. The binding of [11C]ABP688 (82) was globally about 20% lower in a group of major depression patients of mean age 35 years as compared with age-matched healthy controls (in whom males were under-represented) [188]. Intravenous ketamine challenge rapidly improved mood in the patients, but provoked a similar decline in [11C]ABP688 binding (−14%) as that seen in healthy controls. The ketamine-induced reductions in BPND had returned to baseline in follow-up scans the next day.
An [11C]ABP688 (82) study showed no binding differences between (n = 20) patients with late-life depression and (n = 22) elderly healthy controls [189]. The authors conceded that their use of reference tissue quantitation might have compromised the reliability of their results. A PET study with [11C]ABP688 (82) showed widespread clusters of reduced mGluR5 availability in patients with major depressive disorder [190]. In that study, lower subcortical binding correlated with worse scores in the Beck anxiety inventory. Furthermore, post-mortem western blot analysis of individuals dying with major depressive disorder showed reduced mGluR5 protein levels in the cortical region BA 10. Likewise, another [11C]ABP688 (82) PET study showed 20% lower BPND (relative to cerebellum) in prefrontal cortex and in various cortical voxel clusters of a group of (n = 16) never-medicated young patients with major depressive disorder [191]. In that study, seed-based fMRI connectivity studies of the same patients reduced negative connectivity between certain cortical areas compared to that in the control group. In an [18F]FPEB (86) study of groups of (n = 29) individuals, the subgroup of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) sufferers with suicidal ideation showed 25% higher VT in amygdala, hippocampus, and frontal cortical regions compared to the healthy control group [192]. However, mGluR5 availability in major depressive disorder patients did not differ from that in the healthy control group, irrespective of suicidal ideation.
In a group of (n = 15) medicated patients with schizophrenia there were no regional differences in [11C]ABP668 (82) relative to age and (oversampled) smoking-matched healthy controls; smokers in both groups showed similar 24% lower global availability [193]. There was no group difference in [11C]ABP668 (82) binding in a contrast of patients with obsessive compulsive disorder compared with healthy controls, although there were some correlations with Yale–Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) scores [194]. In a group of (n = 16) patients with PTSD, the [18F]FPEB (86) VT was 20% higher in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and ventral striatum than in healthy controls, and the increases correlated with avoidance subscores in the patients [195]. A post-mortem arm of that study indicated elevated expression brain of the synaptic scaffolding protein SHANK1 in brain from PTSD patients, consistent with a more robust engagement of the mGluR5 with signal transduction pathways and NMDA receptor coupling.
Current smoking was associated with 20% lower [11C]ABP688 (82) binding (DVR) throughout the brain [196]. Studies in non-smoking patients with alcohol dependence showed 25% higher DVR in various brain regions, most notably in the amygdala, which DVR correlated inversely with craving scores [197]. A PET study with [11C]ABP688 (82) in groups of (n = 9) cocaine-dependent subjects and healthy age matched volunteers showed 20–30% lower BPND in the extended striatum and in amygdala and insula [198], with more pronounced reductions in those with longer abstinence. Another [11C]ABP688 (82) study of 15 cocaine-addicted subjects and healthy volunteers, matched for gender and smoking status likewise showed widespread 20% reductions in BPND relative to the (imperfect) cerebellum reference region [199]. MR spectroscopy of the same subjects did not show any group difference in the Glx (glutamate + glutamine) peak but did show a significantly higher N-acetylaspartate peak in the cocaine-addicted subjects.
A PET study with [11C]ABP688 reported higher mGluR5 availability in temporal lobe regions in male patients with alcohol use disorder (mean alcohol abstinence period: 25 ± 18 days) than in controls [197]. A longitudinal PET study with [18F]FPEB PET showed lower mGlu5 availability in the limbic regions, posterior cingulate cortex, caudate of recently abstinent alcohol-dependent subjects (mean alcohol abstinence period: 7.3 ± 4.0) than in controls; however, after six months of alcohol abstinence, subjects showed increased mGluR5 availability comparable to the levels observed in controls, suggesting a possible reversibility [200]. A very recent [11C]ABP688 PET study showed that mGluR5 availability is low in the striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, and insula in youth (age range: 18–20) at elevated risk for substance use disorders, particularly those who frequently used cannabis [201].
(E)-3-(pyridin-2-ylethynyl)cyclohex-2-enone-O-2-(2-[18]F-fluoroethoxy)ethyl-oxime, ([18F]-FDEGPECO, 88) is a promising mGluR5 ligand of somewhat distinct structure compared the diaryl compounds discussed above. It showed good binding properties in rat brain slices and dose-dependent displacement in hippocampus and striatum by treatment with M-MPEP [202]. The closely related compound (E)-3-(pyridine-2-yletheynyl-1)-cyclohex-2-enon-O-(3-(2-[18F]-fluoroethoxy)propyl)-oxime ([18F]PSS232, 83) had a KD of 3 nM in vitro [203]. Ex vivo studies with [18F]PSS232 in rats showed rapid kinetics favorable for evaluation within 70-min PET recordings, despite the presence of some displaceable binding in the cerebellum reference region. The first [18F]PSS232 (83) study in humans showed well-behaved cerebral kinetics relative to the arterial input function, which was stably quantifiable with dynamic recordings lasting only 45 min [204]. The considerable metabolic stability of the tracer, which remained 60% intact in plasma samples collected at 90 min after injection, presents a distinct advantage for PET studies with this tracer.

2.2.3. Group II (mGluR2 and mGluR3) Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

The first successful Group II ligand was the antagonist [3H]-2S-2-amino-2-(1S,2S-2-carboxycyclopropan-1-yl)-3-(xanth-9-yl) propionic acid ([3H]LY341495, which had a binding affinity (KD) of 1.7 nM for mGluR2 and a 0.75 nM for mGluR3 [205]. For structures, see Figure 10. Evaluations in rats showed only a hint of displaceable binding ex vivo, due to the tracer’s poor permeability to the BBB, which the authors attributed to hindering effects of the carboxylic acid moiety [206]. Ma et al. reported the radiosynthesis of 1-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4-(4-[11C]methoxyphenyl)-piperidin-1-yl-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carbonitrile ([11C]CMDC, 89) for the PET imaging of mGluR2 [207]. The compound is a methoxy-analogue of the compound JNJ-40068782, with a KD value of 10 nM for recombinant human mGluR2 in vitro [208]. Autoradiographic studies with [11C]CMDC (89) in vitro showed abundant displaceable binding in rat brain sections. Dynamic PET acquisitions in rats showed an early peak uptake of about 0.5 SUV units, followed by slow washout. Displacement studies and examinations in transgenic knockout mice showed only traces of specific binding in brain. About 75% of the brain radioactivity was untransformed by parent compound at 30 min post injection, which may be too low for reliable quantitation of the PET data.
A series of 7-(phenylpiperidinyl)-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]pyridines were also tested as positive allosteric modulator ligands of mGluR2 [209]. Among these, 8-chloro-3-(cyclopropylmethyl)-7-[4-(3,6-difluoro-2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperidinyl]-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]pyridine ([11C]JNJ-42491293, (90) showed promise in small animal PET studies. Further studies of 90 showed a KD of 10 nM at human mGluR2 in vitro (23), and good binding properties in rat brain cryosections [210] and showed moderate cerebral uptake and self-displaceable binding in rat PET studies. However, there was no difference between uptake in wild type and mGluR2 knockout rats, indicating that the preponderance of cerebral binding was to some unidentified off-target site.
The negative allosteric modulator 7-((2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl)methyl)-4-(2-fluoro-4-[11C]methoxyphenyl)-quinoline-2-carboxamide ([11C]QCA, 91) was prepared and tested as a tracer for imaging mGluR2 [211]. Using a functional assay involving calcium influx, QCA treated specifically modulate the effect of glutamate at mGluR2, exerting no such effect at mGluR3 [211]. In vitro autoradiographic studies showed high binding in cerebral cortex, hippocampus, striatum and cerebellum, but little displaceable binding in the midbrain and pons. Unfortunately, [11C]QCA (91) PET examination showed practically no influx into brain of living rats. Another mGluR2 negative allosteric modulator, 4-(2-fluoro-4-[11C]methoxyphenyl)-5-((2-methylpyridin-4-yl)methoxy) picolinamide (92), showed displaceable binding in rat brain sections [212]. PET examination showed it to have good initial uptake in rat brain, rapidly attaining a peak SUV of about 0.8, followed by rapid washout, but little sign of heterogenous or displaceable binding in vivo. Uptake was higher in mice lacking the P-glycoprotein, but still without significant specific binding.
The peptide N-acetlyaspartylglutamate (NAAG), which is among the most abundant neurotransmitters in the brain, acts with a low potency agonist at NMDA receptors, but more potently activates mGluR3 on post-synaptic neurons and astrocytes [213], although others have noted that contamination of NAAG samples by glutamate may lead to spurious findings [214]. The activation of mGluR3 generally inhibits the formation of cAMP, with net effects depending on its association with inhibitory or excitatory synapse. Activation of mGluR3 potentiates the effects of mGluR5 signaling on neuronal Ca2+ influx, thus indicating a functional partnership to the two subtypes [215]. In turn, the mGluR5 has functional linkages to NMDA receptors via intracellular scaffolding proteins, such as Homer, Shank, and postsynaptic density-95, which are key regulators of synaptic function [216]. The present lack of specific ligands for mGluR3 is unfortunate, given the reported and varying interactions between mGluR3, mGluR5 and NMDA receptors.

2.2.4. Group III (mGluR4, mGluR6, mGluR7 and mGluR8) Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

Immunohistochemical examination with specific antisera against mGluR4 showed a rank order of staining intensity cerebellar cortex > striatum = substantia nigra > cortex = thalamus [217]. Electron microscopic examination localized the receptor to presynpaptic boutons of type I and type II synapses. Activation of the mGluR4 inhibits the release of GABA and glutamate in parts of the basal ganglia, while tending to decrease excitatory transmission in cerebral cortex, thus drawing attention to it as a possible therapeutic target in Parkinson’s disease (see [218]).
The N-(methylthiophenyl)picolinamide mGluR4 positive allosteric modulator ligand [11C]PXT012253 (formerly [11C]KALB012, 93) was characterized as having a Ki of 3 nM in a competition binding assay in vitro, and showed promising properties for brain imaging in rodent studies [219,220]. For structures, see Figure 10. The PET tracer also had rapid uptake in non-human primate brain, attaining a peak SUV of about five within five minutes after tracer administration, followed by rapid, but heterogeneous, washout [221]. Analysis by a one-tissue compartment model indicated VT ranging from 4.4 mL g−1 in cerebellum to 6.3 mL g−1 in striatum, and 7.7 mL g−1 in thalamus. Brain penetration of the mGluR4 positive allosteric modulator PXT002331 was confirmed in occupancy studies using [11C]PXT012253 (93) in macaque monkeys [218]. Recently, the Brownell group developed a [18F]-labelled version, namely N-(4-chloro-3-(([18F]fluoromethyl-d2)thio)phenyl)picolinamide for imaging mGluR4 in the brain [220]. In that study, preliminary PET examination in rats showed good brain uptake and considerable spatial heterogeneity.
There are considerable discrepancies between the cerebral distribution of the picolinamide binding sites described above and the immunohistochemical localization of group III mGluRs, thus suggesting the occurrence of off-target binding of that class of ligands. With this disagreement in mind, others have tested the positive allosteric modulator ligand 5-methyl-N-(4-[11C]methyl pyrimidin-2-yl)-4-(1H-pyrazol-4-yl)thiazol-2-amine ([11C]ADX88178, 94), based on findings that the non-radioactive compound potentiated the response of mGluR4 to glutamate with an EC50 of 4 nM [222]. Rat studies ex vivo showed adequate tracer uptake in brain, but little in the way of specific binding.
Activation of the mGluR6 inhibits forskolin-stimulated cAMP production, with L-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate (L-AP4) and L-serine-O-phosphate having ten-fold greater agonist potency than L-glutamate [223]. In situ hybridization indicated that mGluR6 expression is restricted to the retina. The mGluR7 receptor, which is also sensitive to L-AP4, showed moderate mRNA expression in neocortex, limbic cortex, hippocampus, and many other regions including septum, amygdala, specific hypothalamic nuclei and locus coeruleus [224]. The selective mGluR8 agonist (S)-3,4-dicarboxyphenylglycine has analgesic properties, perhaps in-keeping with the distribution across the pain neuraxis [225]. There are no reports of ligands or allosteric modulators suitable for imaging of mGluR6, 7, or 8.

3. Conclusions and Outlook

We have reviewed the present state of development of PET/SPECT probes for glutamate receptor imaging, including both ionotropic and metabotropic receptors, and discussed the suitability of the various tracers for reliable quantitation in the living brain. The diverse pharmacology of glutamate receptors, together with the central role of glutamatergic neurotransmission in brain function present a multitude of targets for molecular imaging. Quantitative imaging of ionotropic receptors is still difficult, despite early success with the intrachannel NMDA receptor SPECT ligand, [123I]CNS-1261 in clinical studies of schizophrenia. There has been some recent progress in developing suitable radioligands for PET imaging of the GluN2B subtype of the NMDA receptor. There has been some success in preclinical development of ligands for AMPA receptors in the living brain, but molecular imaging of kainite receptors remains unattainable; this seems remarkable, given their central role in synaptic plasticity. There has been rather better progress in mGluR imaging, particularly for the mGluR5 subtype, which has a functional link to NMDA receptors via intracellular scaffolding proteins. This has enabled rather extensive clinical investigations of mGluR5 availability in disorders such as drug abuse/addiction, depression, and PTSD. It is important to note that these disorders are heterogeneous and have high comorbidity with each other. For example, smoking history must be strictly controlled in PET studies with the most widely used mGluR5 ligand, [11C]ABP688, and there is some evidence of rapid diurnal changes in mGluR5 availability. However, several members of the mGluR family including mGluR3, mGluR6, mGluR7, and mGluR8 remain uninvestigated by molecular imaging.

Funding

This research was supported by the Brain Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2016M3C7A1914451).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations: Acronym

CompoundNo.Name: Synonyms
[11C]ABP688823-(6-methyl-pyridin-2-ylethynyl)-cyclohex-2-enone-O-[11C]methyl-oxime
[11C]ADX88178945-methyl-N-(4-[11C]methylpyrimidin-2-yl)-4-(1H-pyrazol-4-yl) thiazol-2-amine
[11C]AMPA-1905604-cyclopropyl-7-(3-[11C]methoxyphenoxy)-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[e][1,2,4] thiadiazine 1,1-dioxide
BIII 277 CL (−)-(1R,5S,2″R)-3′-Hydroxy-N-(2″-methoxypropyl)-5,9,9-trimethyl-6,7-benzomorphan
Bmax maximal binding capacity
Boc t-Boc, tert-butoxycarbonyl group
BPND binding potential relative to the no displaceable compartment
Bq Becquerel
cAMP cyclic adenosine monophosphate
[11C]CBA45N-(2-[11C]methoxybenzyl) cinnamamidine
[11C]CMD891-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4-(4-[11C]methoxyphenyl)-piperidin-1-yl-2-oxo- 1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carbonitrile
[*I]CNS126137N-(1-napthyl)-N′-(3-[*I]-iodophenyl)-N-methylguanidine ([*I]CNS-1261
[11C]CNS-516136N-(2-chloro-5-methylthiophenyl)-N′-(3-methylthio-phenyl)-N′-[11C]methylguanidine
Dextrometorphan19(+)-3-methoxy-N-methyl-morphinan, (9S,13S,14S)-dextrometorphan, CAS RN: [125-71-3]
Dextrorphan20(+)-3-hydroxy-N-methyl-morphinan, (9S,13S,14S)-dextrorphan, CAS RN: [125-73-5]
EEAs excitatory amino acids
[18F]EFQ653-ethyl-2-[18F]fluoroquinolin- 6-yl-(4-methoxycyclohexyl)methanone
[18F]FE-PE2I72(E)-N-(3-iodoprop-2-enyl)-2β-carbo-[18F]fluoroethoxy-3β-(p-tolyl)-nortropane
[18F]FDG 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose, CAS RN: [86783-82-6]
[18F]FITM694-[18F]fluoro-N-[4-[6-(isopropylamino)pyrimidin-4-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]- N-methylbenzamide
[18F]FMEM321-amino-3-[18F]fluoromethyl-5-methyl-adamantane, [18F]-memantine,
[18F]FNM33[18F]fluoroethylnormemantine
EOS end of synthesis
[18F]FPEB863-[18F]fluoro-5-[(pyridin-3-yl)ethynyl]benzonitrile
[18F]FPEP872-[18F]fluoro-6-[(3-fluorophenyl)ethynyl]pyridine
[18F]FPIT711-(2-[18F] fluoro-3-pyridyl)-4-(2-isopropyl-1-oxo-isoindoline-5-yl)- 5-methyl-
1H-1,2,3-triazole
[18F]FPTQ736-[1-(2-[18F]fluoro-3-pyridyl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl]quinolone
[11C]GMOM34N-(2-chloro-5-thiomethylphenyl)-N′-(3-[11C]methoxy-phenyl)-N′-methylguanidine
GYKI-52466541-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine,
CAS RN: [192065-56-8, as hydrochloride]
GYKI-5377355(R)-(−)-1-(4-aminophenyl)-3-acetyl-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-3,4,dihydro-5H-
benzodiazepine, talampanel, LY-300164, CAS RN: [161832-65-1]
GYKI-5378456(R)-(−)-1-(4-aminophenyl)-3-methylcarbamoyl-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-
3,4,dihydro-5H-benzodiazepine, LY-303070, CAS RN: [161832-71-9]
[11C]HACH24249N-((5-(4-fluoro-2-[11C]methoxyphenyl)pyridin-3-yl)methyl)cyclopentanamine
IC50 inhibition constant required for displacement of 50% of radioligand
ID injected dose
iGluR ionotropic glutamate receptors
[11C]ITDM70N-[4-[6-(isopropylamino)-pyrimidin-4-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]-N-methyl-
4-[11C]-methylbenzamide
[11C]ITMM68N-[4-[6-(isopropylamino)pyrimidin-4-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]-4-[11C]methoxy-
N-methyl-benzamide
[11C]JNJ1625968561(3-ethyl-2-[11C]methyl-6-quinolinyl)(cis- 4-methoxycyclohexyl)methanone
KD dissociation constant or half-saturation concentration
Ki inhibition constant in vitro
[11C]L-703717517-chloro-4-hydroxy-3-[3-(4-[11C]methoxybenzyl)phenyl-2-(1H)-quinolone
L-AP4 L-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate
Levorphan18levorphanol, (−)-3-hydroxy-N-methyl-morphinan, (9R,13R,14R)-levorphan,
CAS RN: [77-07-6]
MDD major depressive disorder
mGluR metabotropic glutamate receptor
[11C]methyl-BIII 277 CL39(−)-(1R,5S,2″R)-3′-[11C]methoxy-N-(2″-methoxypropyl)-5,9,9-trimethyl-6,7-benzomorphan; [2R-[2α,3(R), 6α]-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydro-3-(2-methoxypropyl)-6,11,11-trimethyl-2,6-methano-9-[11C]methoxy-3-benzazocine
[11C]M-FPEP772-[11C]methyl-6-(3′-fluoro-phenylethynyl)-pyridine
[11C]Me-NB142a7-[11C]methoxy-3-(4-phenylbutyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine-1-ol
[18F]MK-1312641-(2-[18F]fluoro-3-pyridyl)-4-(2-propyl-1-oxo-isoindoline-5-yl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole
[11C]M-MPEP792-(2-(3-[11C]methoxyphenyl)ethynyl)pyridine
[11C]MMTP63dimethylamino-3(4-[11C]methoxyphenyl)-3H-pyrido[3′,2′:4,5]thieno-
[3,2-d]pyrimidin-4-one
[11C]MPEP782-[11C]methyl-6-(2-phenylethynyl)pyridine
[11C]3MPICA503-[2-[(3-[11C]methoxyphenylamino)carbonyl]ethenyl]-4,6-dichloroindole-2-carboxylic acid
NAAG N-acetylaspartylglutamic acid, CAS RN: [3106-85-2]
[18F]N2B-0518482-((1-(4-[18F]fluoro-3-methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)-5-methoxypyrimidine
NB1 3-(4-phenylbutyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine-1,7-diol
[11C]NBA46N-(2-[11C]methoxybenzyl)-2-naphthamidine
NMDA N-methyl-D-aspartic acid, CAS RN: [6384-92-5]
NMDAR N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor
[11C]N2B-1810522-(6-(5-chloro-4-methylthiophen-2-yl)-1H-pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridin-1-yl)-N-(λ1-methyl-11C)-N-methyl-acetamide
[11C]NR2B-SMe44[S-methyl-11C](±)-7-methoxy-3-(4-(4-(methylthio)phenyl)butyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-benzo[d]azepin-1-ol
[18F]OF-NB142b3-(4-(2-[18F]fluoro-phenyl)butyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine-1,7-diol
[18F]PF-NB142c3-(4-(4-[18F]phenyl)butyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine-1,7-diol
PCP23phencyclidine, CAS RN: [77-10-1]
[18F]FPDEGPECO88(E)-3-(pyridin-2-ylethynyl)cyclohex-2-enone O-2-(2-[18]F-fluoroethoxy)ethyl oxime
PET positron emission tomography
[18F]PK-20935([3-(2-chloro-5-(methylthio)phenyl)-1-(3-([18F]fluoromethoxy)phenyl)-
1-methylguanidine]
[18F]PSS23283(E)-3-(pyridine-2-yl-etheynyl-1)-cyclohex-2-enon-O-(3-(2-[18F]-fluoroethoxy)propyl) oxime
PTSD post-traumatic stress disorder
[11C]PTX01225393N-(4-chloro-3-([11C]methylthio)phenyl)picolinamide, [11C]KALB012
[11C]QBA47N-(2-[11C]methoxybenzyl)quinoline-3-carboxamidine
[11C]QCA917-((2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl)methyl)-4-(2-fluoro- 4-[11C]methoxyphenyl) quinoline-2-carboxamide
[11C]Ro 04-5595431-(2-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl)-7-hydroxy-6-methoxy-2-[11C]methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
isoquinoline
SCAAs sulfur-containing amino acids
SKF10,047 N-allyl-normetazocine; 2′-hydroxy-5,9-dimethyl-N2-allyl-6,7-benzomorphan;
CAS: [825594-24-9]
SPECT single photon emission computed tomography
SUV standard uptake value
TBAOH tetrabutylammonium hydroxide, CAS RN: [2052-49-5]
TCP N-(1-[thienyl]cyclohexyl)3,4-piperidine, tenocyclidine, CAS RN: [2150098-1]
Versidyne 1-(2-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl)-6,7-dimethoxy-2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-isoquinoline, methopholin, NIH-7672, CAS RN: [2154-02-1]
VT total distribution volume
[11C]YM-20207462N-cyclohexyl-6-{[N-(2-methoxyethyl)-N-[11C]methylamino]methyl}-N-methyl-
thiazolo[3,2-a]-benz imidazole-2-carboxamide

References

  1. Kerkut, G.A.; Walker, R.J. The effect of L-glutamate, acetylcholine and gamma-aminobutyric acid on the miniature end-plate potentials and contractures of the coxal muscles of the cockroach, Periplaneta Americana. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1966, 17, 435–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gerschenfeld, H.M. Chemical transmission in invertebrate central nervous systems and neuromuscular junctions. Physiol. Rev. 1973, 53, 1–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schousboe, A. Transport and metabolism of glutamate and GABA in neurons and glial cells. In International Review of Neurobiolog; Smythies, J.R., Bradley, R.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1981; Volume 22, pp. 1–45. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhou, Y.; Danbolt, N.C. Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the healthy brain. J. Neural. Transm. (Vienna) 2014, 121, 799–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Traynelis, S.F.; Wollmuth, L.P.; McBain, C.J.; Menniti, F.S.; Vance, K.M.; Ogden, K.K.; Hansen, K.B.; Yuan, H.; Myers, S.J.; Dingledine, R. Glutamate receptor ion channels: Structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol. Rev. 2010, 62, 405–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Liu, W.; Jiang, X.; Zu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, X.; Xu, Z.; Ding, H.; Zhao, Q. A comprehensive description of GluN2B-selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 200, 112447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niswender, C.M.; Conn, P.J. Metabotropic glutamate receptors: Physiology, pharmacology, and disease. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010, 50, 295–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Roth, B.L. Molecular pharmacology of metabotropic receptors targeted by neuropsychiatric drugs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2019, 26, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, R.; Reddy, P.H. Role of glutamate and NMDA receptors in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017, 57, 1041–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Fu, P.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, K.; Ko, J.K.-S.; Yung, K.K.-L. Roles of glutamate receptors in Parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Fern, R.; Matute, C. Glutamate receptors and white matter stroke. Neurosci. Lett. 2019, 694, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hanada, T. Ionotropic glutamate receptors in epilepsy: A review focusing on AMPA and NMDA receptors. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Levite, M. Glutamate receptor antibodies in neurological diseases: Anti-AMPA-GluR3 antibodies, anti-NMDA-NR1 antibodies, anti-NMDA-NR2A/B antibodies, anti-mGluR1 antibodies or anti-mGluR5 antibodies are present in subpopulations of patients with either: Epilepsy, encephalitis, cerebellar ataxia, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and neuropsychiatric SLE, Sjogren’s syndrome, schizophrenia, mania or stroke. These autoimmune anti-glutamate receptor antibodies can bind neurons in few brain regions, activate glutamate receptors, decrease glutamate receptor’s expression, impair glutamate-induced signaling and function, activate blood brain barrier endothelial cells, kill neurons, damage the brain, induce behavioral/psychiatric/cognitive abnormalities and Ataxia in animal models, and can be removed or silenced in some patients by immunotherapy. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna) 2014, 121, 1029–1075. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Balu, D.T. The NMDA receptor and schizophrenia: From pathophysiology to treatment. In Advances in Pharmacology; Schwarcz, R., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; Volume 76, pp. 351–382. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dean, B.; Gibbons, A.S.; Boer, S.; Uezato, A.; Meador-Woodruff, J.; Scarr, E.; McCullumsmith, R.E. Changes in cortical N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and post-synaptic density protein 95 in schizophrenia, mood disorders and suicide. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2016, 50, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Maksymetz, J.; Moran, S.P.; Conn, P.J. Targeting metabotropic glutamate receptors for novel treatments of schizophrenia. Mol. Brain 2017, 10, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Murrough, J.; Abdallah, C.; Mathew, S. Targeting glutamate signalling in depression: Progress and prospects. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 472–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kalmoe, M.C.; Janski, A.M.; Zorumski, C.F.; Nagele, P.; Palanca, B.J.; Conway, C.R. Ketamine and nitrous oxide: The evolution of NMDA receptor antagonists as antidepressant agents. J. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 412, 116778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ueno, F.; Suzuki, T.; Nakajima, S.; Matsushita, S.; Mimura, M.; Miyazaki, T.; Takahashi, T.; Uchida, H. Alteration in AMPA receptor subunit expression and receptor binding among patients with addictive disorders: A systematic review of human postmortem studies. Neuropsychopharmacol. Rep. 2019, 39, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Mu, L.; Schubiger, P.A.; Ametamey, S.M. Radioligands for the PET imaging of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5). Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 1558–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Majo, V.J.; Prabhakaran, J.; Mann, J.J.; Kumar, J.S. PET and SPECT tracers for glutamate receptors. Drug Discov. Today 2013, 18, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gruber, S.; Ametamey, S.M. Imaging the glutamate receptor subtypes-Much achieved, and still much to do. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2017, 25, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fu, H.; Chen, Z.; Josephson, L.; Li, Z.; Liang, S.H. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Ligand Development for Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors: Challenges and Opportunities for Radiotracer Targeting N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid (AMPA), and Kainate Receptors. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 62, 403–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Glasgow, N.G.; Siegler Retchless, B.; Johnson, J.W. Molecular bases of NMDA receptor subtype-dependent properties. J Physiol. 2015, 593, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wyllie, D.J.A.; Livesey, M.R.; Hardingham, G.E. Influence of GluN2 subunit identity on NMDA receptor function. Neuropharmacology 2013, 74, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Vieira, M.; Yong, X.L.H.; Roche, K.W.; Anggono, V. Regulation of NMDA glutamate receptor functions by the GluN2 subunits. J. Neurochem. 2020, 154, 121–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Sun, Y.; Xu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Chen, X.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L.; Hu, J.; Gao, Z. The differences between GluN2A and GluN2B signaling in the brain. J. Neuro. Res. 2018, 96, 1430–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sapkota, K.; Mao, Z.; Synowicki, P.; Lieber, D.; Liu, M.; Ikezu, T.; Gautam, V.; Monaghan, D.T. GluN2D N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit contribution to the stimulation of brain activity and gamma oscillations by ketamine: Implications for schizophrenia. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 2016, 356, 702–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Williams, K.; Pullan, L.M.; Romano, C.; Powel, R.J.; Salama, A.I.; Molinoff, P.B. An antagonist/partial agonist at the polyamine recognition site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor that alters the properties of the glutamate recognition site. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 1992, 262, 539–544. [Google Scholar]
  30. Casy, A.F.; Parfitt, R.T. Opioid Analgesics: Chemistry and Receptors; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986; ISBN 0-306-42130-5. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mohacsi, E.; Leimgruber, W.; Baruth, H. Synthesis and pharmacology of metabolically stable tert-butyl ethers of morphine and levorphanol. J. Med. Chem. 1982, 25, 1264–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wong, E.H.F.; Knight, A.R.; Woodruff, G.N. [3H]MK-801 Labels a Site on the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Channel Complex in Rat Brain Membranes. J. Neurochem. 1988, 50, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bowery, N.; Wong, E.; Hudson, A. Quantitative autoradiography of [3H]-MK-801 binding sites in mammalian brain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1988, 93, 944–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Blin, J.; Denis, A.; Yamaguchi, T.; Crouzel, C.; MacKenzie, E.T.; Baron, J.C. PET studies of [18F]methyl-MK-801, a potential NMDA receptor complex radioligand. Neurosci. Lett. 1991, 121, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Maragos, W.F.; Penney, J.B.; Young, A.B. Anatomic correlation of NMDA and 3H-TCP-labeled receptors in rat brain. J. Neurosci. 1988, 2, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ferrarese, C.; Guidotti, A.; Costa, E.; Miletich, R.S.; Rice, K.C.; de Costa, B.R.; Fulham, M.J.; Di Chiro, G. In vivo study of NMDA-sensitive glutamate receptor by fluorothienylcyclohexylpiperidine, a possible ligand for positron emission tomography. Neuropharmacology 1991, 30, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ouyang, X.; Mukherjee, J.; Yang, Z.-Y. Synthesis, radiosynthesis, and biological evaluation of fluorinated thienylcyclohexyl piperidine derivatives as potential radiotracers for the NMDA receptor-linked calcium ionophore. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1996, 23, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Roger, G.; Lagnel, B.; Besret, L.; Bramoullé, Y.; Coulon, C.; Ottaviani, M.; Kassiou, M.; Bottlaender, M.; Valette, H.; Dollé, F. Synthesis, radiosynthesis and In vivo evaluation of 5-[3-(4-Benzylpiperidin-1-yl)prop-1-ynyl]-1,3-dihydrobenzoimidazol-2-[11C]one, as a potent NR1A/2B subtype selective NMDA PET radiotracer. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 5401–5408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shiue, C.-Y.; Vallabhahosula, S.; Wolf, A.P.; Dewey, S.L.; Fowler, J.S.; Schlyer, D.J.; Arnett, C.A.; Zhou, Y.-G. Carbon-11 labelled ketamine-synthesis, distribution in mice and PET studies in baboons. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1997, 24, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hartvig, P.; Valtysson, J.; Antoni, G.; Westerberg, G.; Långström, B.; Moberg, E.R.; Øye, I. Brain kinetics of (R)- and (S)-[N-methyl-11C]ketamine in the rhesus monkey studied by positron emission tomography (PET). Nucl. Med. Biol. 1994, 21, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Salabert, A.-S.; Fonta, C.; Fontan, C.; Adel, D.; Alonso, M.; Pestourie, C.; Belhadij-Tahar, H.; Tafani, M.; Payoux, P. Radiolabeling of [18F]fluoroethylnormemantine and initial in vivo evaluation of this innovative PET tracer for imaging the PCP sites of NMDA receptors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2015, 42, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salabert, A.-S.; Mora-Ramirez, E.; Beaurain, M.; Alonso, M.; Fontan, C.; Tahar, H.B.; Boizeau, M.L.; Tafani, M.; Bardiès, M.; Payoux, P. Evaluation of [18F]FNM biodistribution and dosimetry based on whole-body PET imaging of rats. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2018, 59, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ametamey, S.M.; Samnick, S.; Leenders, K.L.; Vontobel, P.; Quack, G.; Parsons, C.G.; Schubiger, P.A. Fluorine-18 radiolabelling, biodistribution studies and preliminary PET evaluation of a new memantine derivative for imaging the NMDA receptor. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res. 1999, 19, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ametamey, S.M.; Bruehlmeier, M.; Kneifel, S.; Kokic, M.; Honer, M.; Arigoni, M.; Buck, A.; Burger, C.; Samnick, S.; Quack, G.; et al. PET studies of 18F-memantine in healthy volunteers. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2002, 29, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dumont, F.; Sultana, A.; Waterhouse, R.N. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of N,N′-diphenyl and N-naphthyl-N′-phenylguanidines as N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor ion-channel ligands. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 1583–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Naumiec, G.R.; Jenko, K.J.; Zoghbi, S.S.; Innis, R.B.; Cai, L.; Pike, V.W. N’-3-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl Derivatives of N-Aryl-N’-methylguanidines as Prospective PET Radioligands for the Open Channel of the N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) Receptor: Synthesis and Structure-Affinity Relationships. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 9722–9730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Waterhouse, R.N.; Slifstein, M.; Dumont, F.; Zhao, J.; Chang, R.C.; Sudo, Y.; Sultana, A.; Balter, A.; Laruelle, M. In vivo evaluation of [11C]N-(2-chloro-5-thiomethylphenyl)-N′- (3-methoxy-phenyl)-N′-methylguanidine ([11C]GMOM) as a potential PET radiotracer for the PCP/NMDA receptor. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2004, 31, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Klein, P.J.; Schuit, R.C.; Metaxas, A.; Christiaans, J.A.M.; Kooijman, E.; Lammertsma, A.A.; van Berckel, B.N.M.; Windhorst, A.D. Synthesis, radiolabeling and preclinical evaluation of a [11C]GMOM derivative as PET radiotracer for the ion channel of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2017, 51, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Golla, S.S.V.; Klein, P.J.; Bakker, J.; Schuit, R.C.; Christiaans, J.A.M.; van Geest, L.; Kooijman, E.J.M.; Oropeza-Seguias, G.M.; Langermans, J.A.M.; Leysen, J.E.; et al. Preclinical evaluation of [18F]PK-209, a new PET ligand for imaging the ion-channel site of NMDA receptors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2015, 42, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. van der Aart, J.; Golla, S.S.V.; van der Pluijm, M.; Schwarte, L.A.; Schuit, R.C.; Klein, P.J.; Metaxas, A.; Windhorst, A.D.; Boellaard, R.; Lammertsma, A.A.; et al. First in human evaluation of [18F]PK-209, a PET ligand for the ion channel binding site of NMDA receptors. EJNMMI Res. 2018, 8, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Biegon, A.; Gibbs, A.; Alvarado, M.; Ono, M.; Taylor, S. In vitro and in vivo characterization of [3H]CNS-5161—A use-dependent ligand for the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in rat brain. Synapse 2007, 61, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dhawan, V.; Robeson, W.; Bjelke, D.; Chaly, T.; Graf, K.; Hellman, M.; Zhuo, L.; Mackay, M.; Eidelberg, D. Human radiation dosimetry for the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor radioligand 11C-CNS5161. J. Nucl. Med. 2015, 56, 869–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Owens, J.; Tebbutt, A.A.; McGregor, A.L.; Kodama, K.; Magar, S.S.; Perlman, M.E.; Robins, D.J.; Durant, G.J.; McCulloch, J. Synthesis and binding characteristics of N-(1-naphthyl)-N′-(3-[125I]- iodophenyl)-N′-methylguanidine ([125I]-CNS 1261): A potential SPECT agent for imaging NMDA receptor activation. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2000, 27, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Erlandsson, K.; Bressan, R.A.; Mulligan, R.S.; Gunn, R.N.; Cunningham, V.J.; Owens, J.; Wyper, D.; Ell, P.J.; Pilowsky, L.S. Kinetic modelling of [123I]CNS 1261—A potential SPET tracer for the NMDA receptor. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2003, 30, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stone, J.M.; Erlandsson, K.; Arstad, E.; Squassante, L.; Teneggi, V.; Bressan, R.A.; Krystal, J.H.; Ell, P.J.; Pilowsky, L.S. Relationship between ketamine-induced psychotic symptoms and NMDA receptor occupancy: A [123I]CNS-1261 SPET study. Psychopharmacology 2008, 197, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bressan, R.A.; Erlandsson, K.; Stone, J.M.; Mulligan, R.S.; Krystal, J.H.; Ell, P.J.; Pilowsky, L.S. Impact of schizophrenia and chronic antipsychotic treatment on [123I]CNS-1261 binding to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in vivo. Biol. Psychiatry 2005, 58, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pilowsky, L.S.; Bressan, R.A.; Stone, J.M.; Erlandsson, K.; Mulligan, R.S.; Krystal, J.H.; Ell, P.J. First in vivo evidence of an NMDA receptor deficit in medication-free schizophrenic patients. Mol. Psychiatry 2006, 11, 118–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Robins, E.G.; Zhao, Y.; Khan, I.; Wilson, A.; Luthra, S.K.; Årstad, E. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of 18F-labelled S-fluoroalkyl diarylguanidines: Novel high-affinity NMDA receptor antagonists for imaging with PET. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 1749–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. McGinnity, C.J.; Hammers, A.; Riaño Barros, D.A.; Luthra, S.K.; Jones, P.A.; Trigg, W.; Micallef, C.; Symms, M.R.; Brooks, D.J.; Koepp, M.J.; et al. Initial evaluation of 18F-GE-179, a putative PET tracer for activated N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptors. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Schoenberger, M.; Schroeder, F.A.; Placzek, M.S.; Carter, R.L.; Rosen, B.R.; Hooker, J.M.; Sander, C.Y. In vivo [18F]GE-179 brain signal does not show NMDA-specific modulation with drug challenges in rodents and nonhuman primates. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2018, 9, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. McGinnity, C.J.; Årstad, E.; Beck, K.; Brooks, D.J.; Coles, J.P.; Duncan, J.S.; Galovic, M.; Hinz, R.; Hirani, E.; Howes, O.D.; et al. Comment on “In Vivo [18F]GE-179 Brain Signal Does Not Show NMDA-Specific Modulation with Drug Challenges in Rodents and Nonhuman Primates”. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 768–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Vibholm, A.K.; Landau, A.M.; Alstrup, A.K.O.; Jacobsen, J.; Vang, K.; Munk, O.L.; Dietz, M.J.; Orlowski, D.; Sørensen, J.C.H.; Brooks, D.J. Activation of NMDA receptor ion channels by deep brain stimulation in the pig visualised with [18F]GE-179 PET. Brain Stimul. 2020, 13, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. López-Picón, F.; Snellman, A.; Shatillo, O.; Lehtiniemi, P.; Grönroos, T.J.; Marjamäki, P.; Trigg, W.; Jones, P.A.; Solin, O.; Pitkänen, A.; et al. Ex vivo tracing of NMDA and GABA-A receptors in rat brain after traumatic brain injury using 18F-GE-179 and 18F-GE-194 autoradiography. J. Nucl. Med. 2016, 57, 1442–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Carter, A.J.; Bechtel, W.D.; Grauert, M.; Harrison, P.; Merz, H.; Stransky, W. BIII 277 CL is a potent and specific ion-channel blocker of the NMDA receptor-channel complex. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 1995, 275, 1382–1389. [Google Scholar]
  65. Grauert, M.; Bechtel, W.D.; Ensinger, H.A.; Merz, H.; Carter, A.J. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 6,7-benzomorphan derivatives as antagonists of the NMDA receptor-channel complex. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 2922–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kokic, M.; Honer, M.; Kessler, L.J.; Grauert, M.; Schubiger, P.A.; Ametamey, S.M. Synthesis and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of [11C]methyl-BIII277CL for imaging the PCP-binding site of the NMDA receptor by PET. J. Recept. Signal Transduc. Res. 2002, 22, 123–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sasaki, S.; Kurosaki, F.; Haradahira, T.; Yamamoto, F.; Maeda, J.; Okauchi, T.; Suzuki, K.; Suhara, T.; Maeda, M. Synthesis of 11C-labelled bis(phenylalkyl)amines and their in vitro and in vivo binding properties in rodent and monkey brains. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Haradahira, T.; Maeda, J.; Okauchi, T.; Zhang, M.-R.; Hojo, J.; Kida, T.; Arai, T.; Yamamoto, F.; Sasaki, S.; Maeda, M.; et al. Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo pharmacology of a C-11 labeled analog of CP-101,606, (±)threo-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-[4-hydroxy-4-(p-[11C]methoxyphenyl)piperidino]-1-propanol, as a PET tracer for NR2B subunit-containing NMDA receptors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2002, 29, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rigby, M.; Bourdellès, B.L.; Heavens, R.P.; Kelly, S.; Smith, D.; Butler, A.; Hammans, R.; Hills, R.; Xuereb, J.H.; Hill, R.G.; et al. The messenger RNAs for the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits show region-specific expression of different subunit composition in the human brain. Neuroscience 1996, 73, 429–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Årstad, E.; Platzer, S.; Berthele, A.; Pilowsky, L.S.; Luthra, S.K.; Wester, H.-J. Towards NR2B receptor selective imaging agents for PET-synthesis and evaluation of N-[11C]-(2-methoxy)benzyl (E)-styrene-, 2-naphthyl- and 4-trifluoromethoxyphenylamidine. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 6307–6313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tewes, B.; Frehland, B.; Schepmann, D.; Schmidtke, K.U.; Winckler, T.; Wünsch, B. Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of 3-Benzazepin-1-ols as NR2B-Selective NMDA Receptor Antagonists. ChemMedChem 2010, 5, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Krämer, S.D.; Betzel, T.; Mu, L.; Haider, A.; Adrienne, M.H.; Boninsegni, A.K.; Keller, C.; Szermerski, M.; Schibli, R.; Wünsch, B.; et al. Evaluation of 11C-Me-NB1 as a potential PET radioligand for measuring GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors, drug occupancy, and receptor cross talk. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 698–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Haider, A.; Herde, A.M.; Krämer, S.D.; Varisco, J.; Keller, C.; Frauenknecht, K.; Auberson, Y.P.; Temme, L.; Robaa, D.; Sippl, W.; et al. Preclinical Evaluation of Benzazepine-Based PET Radioligands (R)- and (S)-11C-Me-NB1 Reveals Distinct Enantiomeric Binding Patterns and a Tightrope Walk Between GluN2B- and σ1-Receptor-Targeted PET Imaging. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 60, 1167–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Haider, A.; Iten, I.; Ahmed, H.; Müller Herder, A.; Gruber, S.; Krämer, S.D.; Keller, C.; Schibli, R.; Wünsch, B.; Mu, L.; et al. Identification and preclinical evaluation of a radiofluorinated benzazepine derivative for imaging the GluN2B subunit of the ionotropic NMDA receptor. J. Nucl. Med. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Ahmed, H.; Haider, A.; Varisco, J.; Stanković, M.; Wallimann, R.; Gruber, S.; Iten, I.; Häne, S.; Müller Herde, A.; Keller, C.; et al. Structure-affinity relationships of 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine and 6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-benzo[7]annulen-7-amine analogues and the discovery of a radiofluorinated 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine congener for imaging GluN2B subunit-containing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 9450–9470. [Google Scholar]
  76. Ahmed, H.; Wallimann, R.; Haider, A.; Hosseini, V.; Gruber, S.; Robledo, M.; Nguyen, T.; Herde, A.M.; Iten, I.; Keller, C.; et al. Preclinical development of 18F-OF-NB1 for imaging GluN2B-containing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and its utility as a biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Nucl. Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Schwartz, D.E.; Bruderer, H.; Rieder, J.; Brossi, A. Metabolic studies of Versidyne, a new analgesic, in the rabbit and in man. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1964, 13, 777–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jakobsson, J.E.; Gourni, E.; Khanapur, S.; Brito, B.; Riss, P.J. Synthesis and characterization in rodent brain of the subtype-selective NR2B NMDA receptor ligand [11C]Ro04-5595 as a potential radiotracer for positron emission tomography. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 9925–9931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wilson, A.A.; Garcia, A.; Jin, L.; Houle, S. Radiotracer synthesis from [11C]iodomethane: A remarkably simple captive solvent method. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2000, 27, 529–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Cai, L.; Liow, J.-S.; Morse, C.; Telu, S.; Davies, R.; Frankland, M.; Zoghbi, S.; Cheng, K.; Hall, M.; Innis, R.B.; et al. Evaluation of 11C-NR2B-SMe and its enantiomers as PET radioligands for imaging the NR2B subunit within the NMDA receptor complex in rats. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61, 1212–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Thum, S.; Schepmann, D.; Ayet, E.; Pujol, M.; Nieto, F.R.; Ametamey, S.M.; Wünsch, B. Tetrahydro-3-benzazepines with fluorinated side chains as NMDA and sigma1 receptor antagonists: Synthesis, receptor affinity, selectivity and antiallodynic activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 177, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Thum, S.; Schepmann, D.; Reinoso, R.F.; Alvarez, I.; Ametamey, S.M.; Wünsch, B. Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of fluorinated benzo[7]annulen-7-amines as GluN2B-selective NMDA receptor antagonists. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2019, 62, 354–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fuchigami, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Ogawa, M.; Biao, L.; Nakayama, M.; Haratake, M.; Magata, Y. Synthesis and biological evaluation of radio-iodinated benzimidazoles as SPECT imaging agents for NR2B subtype of NMDA receptor. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 7497–7506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Fuchigami, T.; Fujimoto, N.; Haradahira, T.; Nojiri, Y.; Okauchi, T.; Maeda, J.; Suhara, T.; Yamamoto, F.; Nakayama, M.; Maeda, M.; et al. Synthesis and characterization of 11C-labeled benzyl amidine derivatives as PET radioligands for GluN2B subunit of the NMDA receptors. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2018, 61, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fu, H.; Tang, W.; Chen, Z.; Belov, V.V.; Zhang, G.; Shao, T.; Zhang, X.; Yu, Q.; Rong, J.; Deng, X.; et al. Synthesis and preliminary evaluations of a triazole-cored antagonist as a PET imaging probe ([18F]N2B-0518) for GluN2B subunit in the brain. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 2263–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Christiaans, J.A.M.; Klein, P.J.; Metaxas, A.; Kooijman, E.J.M.; Schuit, R.C.; Leysen, J.E.; Lammertsma, A.A.; van Berckel, B.N.M.; Windhorst, A.D. Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of carbon-11 labelled N-((5-(4-fluoro-2-[11C]methoxyphenyl)pyridin-3-yl)methyl)cyclopentanamine as a PET tracer for NR2B subunit-containing NMDA receptors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2014, 41, 670–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. van der Aart, J.; Yaqub, M.; Kooijman, E.J.M.; Bakker, J.; Langermans, J.A.M.; Schuit, R.C.; Hofman, M.B.M.; Christiaans, J.A.M.; Lammertsma, A.A.; Windhorst, A.D.; et al. Evaluation of the novel PET Tracer [11C]HACH242 for imaging the GluN2B NMDA receptor in non-human primates. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2019, 21, 676–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Dannhardt, G.; Gruchalla, M.; Kohl, B.K.; Parsons, C.G. A Novel Series of 2-Carboxytetrahydro quinolines Provides New Insights into the Eastern Region of Glycine Site NMDA Antagonists. Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 2000, 333, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Waterhouse, R.N.; Sultana, A.; Laruelle, M. In vivo evaluation of [11C]-3-[2-[(3-methoxyphenylamino) carbonyl]ethenyl]-4,6-dichloroindole-2-carboxylic acid ([11C]3MPICA) as a PET radiotracer for the glycine site of the NMDA ion channel. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2002, 29, 791–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Haradahira, T.; Zhang, M.-R.; Maeda, J.; Okauchi, T.; Kawabe, K.; Kida, T.; Suzuki, K.; Suhara, T. A strategy for increasing the brain uptake of a radioligand in animals: Use of a drug that inhibits plasma protein binding. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2000, 27, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Haradahira, T.; Okauchi, T.; Maeda, J.; Zhang, M.R.; Kida, T.; Kawabe, K.; Mishina, M.; Watanabe, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Suhara, T. A positron-emitter labeled glycineB site antagonist, [11C]L-703,717, preferentially binds to a cerebellar NMDA receptor subtype consisting of GluR epsilon3 subunit in vivo, but not in vitro. Synapse 2002, 43, 131–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sun, J.-Y.; Kumata, K.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.-D.; Chen, J.-H.; Hatori, A.; Fu, H.-L.; Rong, J.; Deng, X.-Y.; Yamasaki, T.; et al. Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of novel 11C-labeled GluN2B-selective NMDA receptor negative allosteric modulators. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Greger, I.H.; Watson, J.F.; Cull-Candy, S.G. Structural and functional architecture of AMPA-type glutamate receptors and their auxiliary proteins. Neuron 2017, 94, 713–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Henley, J.; Wilkinson, K. Synaptic AMPA receptor composition in development, plasticity and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 17, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Hawkins, L.; Beaver, K.; Jane, D.; Taylor, P.; Sunter, D.; Roberts, P. Characterization of the pharmacology and regional distribution of (S)-[3H]-5-fluorowillardiine binding in rat brain. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1995, 116, 2033–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Michalak, A.; Butterworth, R.F. Selective loss of binding sites for the glutamate receptor ligands [3H]kainate and (S)-[3H]5-fluorowillardiine in the brains of rats with acute liver failure. Hepatology 1997, 25, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Körösi, J.; Láng, T. Heterocyclische Verbindungen, I. Synthese des ersten 5H-2,3-Benzodiazepins, des 5-Äthyl-1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-7,8-dimethoxy-4-methyl-5H-2,3-benzodiazepins. Chem. Ber. 1974, 107, 3883–3893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Láng, T.; Körösi, J.; Andrasi, F.; Botka, P.; Hamori, T.; Berzsenyi, P.; Goldschmidt, K.; Zólyomi, G.; Elekes, I.; Láng-Rihmer, Z. 5H-2, 3-benzodiazepine Derivatives and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing the Same. US Patent 4,614,740, 30 September 1986. [Google Scholar]
  99. Tarnawa, I.; Farkas, S.; Berzsenyi, P.; Pataki, Á.; Andrási, F. Electrophysiological studies with a 2,3-benzodiazepine muscle relaxant: GYKI 52466. Eur. J. Pharm. 1989, 167, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Donevan, S.D.; Rogawski, M.A. GYKI 52466, a 2,3-benzodiazepine, is a highly selective, noncompetitive antagonist of AMPA/kainate receptor responses. Neuron 1993, 10, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tarnawa, I.; Vizi, S.E. 2,3-Benzodiazepine AMPA antagonists. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 1998, 13, 41–57. [Google Scholar]
  102. Sólyom, S.; Tarnawa, I. Non-competitive AMPA Antagonists of 2,3-Benzodiazepine Type. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2002, 8, 913–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gao, M.; Kong, D.; Clearfield, A.; Zheng, Q.-H. Synthesis of carbon-11 and fluorine-18 labeled N-acetyl-1-aryl-6,7-dimethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives as new potential PET AMPA receptor ligands. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 2229–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chen, J.; Gan, J.; Sun, J.; Chen, Z.; Fu, H.; Rong, J.; Deng, X.; Shang, J.; Gong, J.; Shao, T.; et al. Radiosynthesis and preliminary evaluation of 11C-labeled 4-cyclopropyl-7-(3-methoxyphenoxy)-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[e] [1,2,4] thiadiazine 1,1-dioxide for PET imaging AMPA receptors. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020, 61, 151635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Miyazaki, T.; Nakajima, W.; Hatano, M.; Shibata, Y.; Kuroki, Y.; Arisawa, T.; Serizawa, A.; Sano, A.; Kogami, S.; Yamanoue, T.; et al. Visualization of AMPA receptors in living human brain with positron emission tomography. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Nadler, J.V.; Evenson, D.A.; Cuthbertson, G.J. Comparative toxicity of kainic acid and other acidic amino acids toward rat hippocampal neurons. Neuroscience 1981, 6, 2505–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Evans, A.J.; Gurung, S.; Henley, J.M.; Nakamura, Y.; Wilkinson, K.A. Exciting times: New advances towards understanding the regulation and roles of kainate receptors. Neurochem. Res. 2019, 44, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Straub, C.; Hunt, D.L.; Yamasaki, M.; Kim, K.S.; Watanabe, M.; Castillo, P.E.; Tomita, S. Distinct functions of kainate receptors in the brain are determined by the auxiliary subunit Neto1. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14, 866–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Behuet, S.; Cremer, J.N.; Cremer, M.; Palomero-Gallagher, N.; Zilles, K.; Amunts, K. Developmental changes of glutamate and GABA receptor densities in Wistar rats. Front. Neuroanat. 2019, 13, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Cremer, J.N.; Amunts, K.; Graw, J.; Piel, M.; Rösch, F.; Zilles, K. Neurotransmitter receptor density changes in Pitx3ak mice—A model relevant to Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience 2015, 285, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Künig, G.; Hartmann, J.; Krause, F.; Deckert, J.; Heinsen, H.; Ransmayr, G.; Beckmann, H.; Riederer, P. Regional differences in the interaction of the excitotoxins domoate and L-beta-oxalyl-amino-alanine with [3H]kainate binding sites in human hippocampus. Neurosci. Lett. 1995, 187, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Flajolet, M.; Rakhilin, S.; Wang, H.; Starkova, N.; Nuangchamnong, N.; Nairn, A.C.; Greengard, P. Protein phosphatase 2C binds selectively to and dephosphorylates metabotropic glutamate receptor 3. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 16006–16011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Kwon, H.-B.; Castillo, P.E. Role of glutamate autoreceptors at hippocampal Mossy fiber synapses. Neuron 2008, 60, 1082–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Matta, J.A.; Ashby, M.C.; Sanz-Clemente, A.; Roche, K.W.; Isaac, J.T.R. mGluR5 and NMDA receptors drive the experience- and activity-dependent NMDA receptor NR2B to NR2A subunit switch. Neuron 2011, 70, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Pöschel, B.; Wroblewska, B.; Heinemann, U.; Manahan-Vaughan, D. The metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR3 is critically required for hippocampal long-term depression and modulates long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus of freely moving rats. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15, 1414–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Xi, D.; Li, Y.-C.; Snyder, M.A.; Gao, R.Y.; Adelman, A.E.; Zhang, W.; Shumsky, J.S.; Gao, W.-J. Group II Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Agonist Ameliorates MK801-Induced Dysfunction of NMDA Receptors via the Akt/GSK-3β Pathway in Adult Rat Prefrontal Cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011, 63, 1260–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Li, M.-L.; Yang, S.-S.; Xing, B.; Ferguson, B.R.; Gulchina, Y.; Li, Y.-C.; Li, F.; Hu, X.-Q.; Gao, W.-J. LY395756, an mGluR2 agonist and mGluR3 antagonist, enhances NMDA receptor expression and function in the normal adult rat prefrontal cortex, but fails to improve working memory and reverse MK801-induced working memory impairment. Exp. Neurol. 2015, 273, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Kumar, A.; Dhull, D.K.; Mishra, P.S. Therapeutic potential of mGluR5 targeting in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 215. [Google Scholar]
  119. Hamilton, A.; Esseltine, J.L.; DeVries, R.A.; Cregan, S.P.; Ferguson, S.S.G. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 knockout reduces cognitive impairment and pathogenesis in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Brain 2014, 7, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Vahlquist, A. Etretinate pharmacokinetics in chronic renal failure. A preliminary study in psoriasis patients. Dermatologica 1987, 175, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Ribeiro, F.M.; Vieira, L.B.; Pires, R.G.; Olmo, R.P.; Ferguson, S.S. Metabotropic glutamate receptors and neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2017, 115, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Thomson, S.R.; Seo, S.S.; Barnes, S.A.; Louros, S.R.; Muscas, M.; Dando, O.; Kirby, C.; Wyllie, D.J.A.; Hardingham, G.E.; Kind, P.C.; et al. Cell-Type-Specific Translation Profiling Reveals a Novel Strategy for Treating Fragile X Syndrome. Neuron 2017, 95, 550–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Bianchi, R.; Wong, R.K.S.; Merlin, L.R. Glutamate receptors in epilepsy: Group I mGluR-mediated epileptogenesis. In Jasper’s Basic Mechanisms of the Epilepsies, 4th ed.; Noebels, J.L., Avoli, M., Rogawski, M.A., Olsen, R.W., Delgado-Escueta, A.V., Eds.; National Center for Biotechnology Information (US): Bethesda, MD, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  124. Ebrahimi-Ghiri, M.; Khakpai, F.; Zarrindast, M.R. Combined treatment of scopolamine and group III mGluR antagonist, CPPG, exerts antidepressant activity without affecting anxiety-related behaviors. Physiol. Behav. 2020, 224, 113034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Yu, F.; Zhong, P.; Liu, X.; Sun, D.; Gao, H.Q.; Liu, Q.S. Metabotropic glutamate receptor I (mGluR1) antagonism impairs cocaine-induced conditioned place preference via inhibition of protein synthesis. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 1308–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Huang, Y.; Narendran, R.; Bischoff, F.; Guo, N.; Zhu, Z.; Bae, S.-A.; Lesage, A.S.; Laruelle, M. A positron emission tomography radioligand for the in vivo labeling of metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor: (3-ethyl-2-[11C]methyl-6-quinolinyl)(cis- 4-methoxycyclohexyl)methanone. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 5096–5099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Konno, F.; Odawara, C.; Yamasaki, T.; Kawamura, K.; Hatori, A.; Yui, J.; Wakizaka, H.; Nengaki, N.; Takei, M.; Zhang, M.R. Radiosynthesis and evaluation of [11C]YM-202074 as a PET ligand for imaging the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2010, 37, 615–624. [Google Scholar]
  128. Sasikumar, T.K.; Qiang, L.; Burnett, D.A.; Greenlee, W.J.; Li, C.; Heimark, L.; Pramanik, B.; Grilli, M.; Bertorelli, R.; Lozza, G.; et al. Tricyclic thienopyridine-pyrimidones/thienopyrimidine- pyrimidones as orally efficacious mGluR1 antagonists for neuropathic pain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 3199–3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Prabhakaran, J.; Majo, V.J.; Milak, M.S.; Kassir, S.A.; Palner, M.; Savenkova, L.; Mali, P.; Arango, V.; Mann, J.J.; Parsey, R.V.; et al. Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of [11C]MMTP: A potential PET ligand for mGluR1 receptors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3499–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Hostetler, E.D.; Eng, W.; Joshi, A.D.; Sanabria-Bohórquez, S.; Kawamoto, H.; Ito, S.; O’Malley, S.; Krause, S.; Ryan, C.; Patel, S.; et al. Synthesis, characterization, and monkey PET studies of [1⁸F]MK-1312, a PET tracer for quantification of mGluR1 receptor occupancy by MK-5435. Synapse 2011, 65, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Huang, Y.; Narendran, R.; Bischoff, F.; Guo, N.; Bae, S.A.; Hwang, D.R.; Lesage, A.S.; Laruelle, M. Synthesis and characterization of two PET radioligands for the metabotropic glutamate 1 (mGlu1) receptor. Synapse 2012, 66, 1002–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lee, B.; Kim, Y.K.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, Y.-S.; Lee, D.S.; Chung, J.-K.; Jeong, J.M. Preclinical anaylses of [18F]cEFQ as a PET tracer for imaging metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1 (mGluR1). J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017, 37, 2283–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Satoh, A.; Nagatomi, Y.; Hirata, Y.; Ito, S.; Suzuki, G.; Kimura, T.; Maehara, S.; Hikichi, H.; Satow, A.; Hata, M.; et al. Discovery and in vitro and in vivo profiles of 4-fluoro- N-[4-[6-(isopropylamino)pyrimidin-4-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]-N-methylbenzamide as novel class of an orally active metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) antagonist. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 5464–5468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Yamasaki, T.; Fujinaga, M.; Yui, J.; Wakizaka, H.; Ohya, T.; Nengaki, N.; Ogawa, M.; Ikoma, Y.; Hatori, A.; Xie, L.; et al. Improved Visualization and Specific Binding for Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 1 (mGluR1) Using [11C]ITMM with Ultra-High Specific Activity in Small-Animal PET. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yui, J.; Xie, L.; Fujinaga, M.; Yamasaki, T.; Hatori, A.; Kumata, K.; Nengaki, N.; Zhang, M.R. Monitoring neuroprotective effects using positron emission tomography with [11C]ITMM, a radiotracer for metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor. Stroke 2013, 44, 2567–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Fujinaga, M.; Yamasaki, T.; Kawamura, K.; Kumata, K.; Hatori, A.; Yui, J.; Yanamoto, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Ogawa, M.; Nengaki, N.; et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 6-[1-(2-[18F]fluoro-3-pyridyl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl]quinoline for positron emission tomography imaging of the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1 in brain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Fujinaga, M.; Maeda, J.; Yui, J.; Hatori, A.; Yamasaki, T.; Kawamura, K.; Kumata, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Nagai, Y.; Higuchi, M.; et al. Characterization of 1-(2-[18F]fluoro-3-pyridyl)- 4-(2-isopropyl-1-oxo- isoindoline-5-yl)-5-methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole, a PET ligand for imaging the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1 in rat and monkey brains. J. Neurochem. 2012, 121, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Yamasaki, T.; Fujinaga, M.; Maeda, J.; Kawamura, K.; Yui, J.; Hatori, A.; Yoshida, Y.; Nagai, Y.; Tokunaga, M.; Higuchi, M.; et al. Imaging for metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1 in rat and monkey brains using PET with [18F]FITM. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 39, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Ishibashi, K.; Miura, Y.; Ishikawa, K.; Ishii, K.; Ishiwata, K. Decreased metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1 availability in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: A (11)C-ITMM PET study. J. Neurol. Sci. 2015, 355, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Ishibashi, K.; Miura, Y.; Toyohara, J.; Ishii, K.; Ishiwata, K. Comparison of imaging using 11C-ITMM and 18F-FDG for the detection of cerebellar ataxia. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 375, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ishibashi, K.; Miura, Y.; Toyohara, J.; Ishiwata, K.; Ishii, K. Unchanged type 1 metabotropic glutamate receptor availability in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A study using 11C-ITMM positron emission tomography. NeuroImage Clin. 2019, 22, 101783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sakata, M.; Toyohara, J.; Ishibashi, K.; Wagatsuma, K.; Ishii, K.; Zhang, M.R.; Ishiwata, K. Age and gender effects of 11C-ITMM binding to metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1 in healthy human participants. Neurobiol. Aging 2017, 55, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Yamasaki, T.; Maeda, J.; Fujinaga, M.; Nagai, Y.; Hatori, A.; Yui, J.; Xie, L.; Nengaki, N.; Zhang, M.R. PET brain kinetics studies of 11C-ITMM and 11C-ITDM, radioprobes for metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1, in a nonhuman primate. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2014, 4, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  144. Bertoglio, D.; Verhaeghe, J.; Korat, Š.; Miranda, A.; Wyffels, L.; Stroobants, S.; Mrzljak, L.; Dominguez, C.; Liu, L.; Skinbjerg, M.; et al. In vitro and In vivo Assessment of Suitable Reference Region and Kinetic Modelling for the mGluR1 Radioligand [11C]ITDM in Mice. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2020, 22, 854–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Bertoglio, D.; Verhaeghe, J.; Korat, Š.; Miranda, A.; Cybulska, K.; Wyffels, L.; Stroobants, S.; Mrzljak, L.; Dominguez, C.; Skinbjerg, M.; et al. Elevated Type 1 Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Availability in a Mouse Model of Huntington’s Disease: A Longitudinal PET Study. Mol. Neurobiol. 2020, 57, 2038–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Yamasaki, T.; Fujinaga, M.; Kawamura, K.; Furutsuka, K.; Nengaki, N.; Shimoda, Y.; Shiomi, S.; Takei, M.; Hashimoto, H.; Yui, J.; et al. Dynamic Changes in Striatal mGluR1 but Not mGluR5 during Pathological Progression of Parkinson’s Disease in Human Alpha-Synuclein A53T Transgenic Rats: A Multi-PET Imaging Study. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Yamasaki, T.; Fujinaga, M.; Mori, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wakizaka, H.; Nengaki, N.; Xie, L.; Hatori, A.; Zhang, M.R. In Vivo Monitoring for Regional Changes of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 1 (mGluR1) in Pilocarpine-Induced Epileptic Rat Brain by Small-Animal PET. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Patel, S.; Krause, S.M.; Hamill, T.; Chaudhary, A.; Burns, D.H.; Gibson, R.A. In vitro characterization of [3H]MethoxyPyEP, an mGluR5 selective radioligand. Life Sci. 2003, 73, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Severance, A.J.; Parsey, R.V.; Kumar, J.S.; Underwood, M.D.; Arango, V.; Majo, V.J.; Prabhakaran, J.; Simpson, N.R.; Van Heertum, R.L.; Mann, J.J. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of [11C]MPEPy as a potential PET ligand for mGlu5 receptors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2006, 33, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ametamey, S.M.; Kessler, L.; Honer, M.; Auberson, Y.; Gasparini, F.; Schubiger, P.A. Synthesis and evaluation of [11C]M-FPEP as a PET ligand for imaging the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5). J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2003, 46, S188. [Google Scholar]
  151. Yu, M.; Tueckmantel, W.; Wang, X.; Zhu, A.; Kozikowski, A.P.; Brownell, A.L. Methoxyphenylethynyl, methoxypyridylethynyl and phenylethynyl derivatives of pyridine: Synthesis, radiolabeling and evaluation of new PET ligands for metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 receptors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2005, 32, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ametamey, S.M.; Kessler, L.J.; Honer, M.; Wyss, M.T.; Buck, A.; Hintermann, S.; Auberson, Y.P.; Gasparini, F.; Schubiger, P.A. Radiosynthesis and preclinical evaluation of 11C-ABP688 as a probe for imaging the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5. J. Nucl. Med. 2006, 47, 698–705. [Google Scholar]
  153. Wyckhuys, T.; Verhaeghe, J.; Wyffels, L.; Langlois, X.; Schmidt, M.; Stroobants, S.; Staelens, S. N-acetylcysteine- and MK-801-induced changes in glutamate levels do not affect in vivo binding of metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor radioligand 11C-ABP688 in rat brain. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 1954–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Miyake, N.; Skinbjerg, M.; Easwaramoorthy, B.; Kumar, D.; Girgis, R.R.; Xu, X.; Slifstein, M.; Abi-Dargham, A. Imaging changes in glutamate transmission in vivo with the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 tracer [11C] ABP688 and N-acetylcysteine challenge. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 69, 822–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kosten, L.; Verhaeghe, J.; Wyffels, L.; Stroobants, S.; Staelens, S. Acute Ketamine Infusion in Rat Does Not Affect In Vivo [11C]ABP688 Binding to Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 5. Mol. Imaging 2018, 17, 1536012118788636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Müller Herde, A.; Boss, S.D.; He, Y.; Schibli, R.; Mu, L.; Ametamey, S.M. Ketamine and Ceftriaxone-Induced Alterations in Glutamate Levels Do Not Impact the Specific Binding of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 5 Radioligand [18F]PSS232 in the Rat Brain. Pharmaceuticals (Basel Switz.) 2018, 11, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Sandiego, C.M.; Nabulsi, N.; Lin, S.F.; Labaree, D.; Najafzadeh, S.; Huang, Y.; Cosgrove, K.; Carson, R.E. Studies of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 radioligand [11C]ABP688 with N-acetylcysteine challenge in rhesus monkeys. Synapse 2013, 67, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Kosten, L.; Deleye, S.; Stroobants, S.; Wyffels, L.; Mingote, S.; Rayport, S.; Staelens, S. Molecular Imaging of mGluR5 Availability with [11C]ABP68 in Glutaminase Heterozygous Mice. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 39, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Zimmer, E.R.; Parent, M.J.; Leuzy, A.; Aliaga, A.; Aliaga, A.; Moquin, L.; Schirrmacher, E.S.; Soucy, J.P.; Skelin, I.; Gratton, A.; et al. Imaging in vivo glutamate fluctuations with [11C]ABP688: A GLT-1 challenge with ceftriaxone. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2015, 35, 1169–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Mathews, W.B.; Kuwabara, H.; Stansfield, K.; Valentine, H.; Alexander, M.; Kumar, A.; Hilton, J.; Dannals, R.F.; Wong, D.F.; Gasparini, F. Dose-dependent, saturable occupancy of the metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 receptor by fenobam as measured with [11C]ABP688 PET imaging. Synapse 2014, 68, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Varnäs, K.; Juréus, A.; Finnema, S.J.; Johnström, P.; Raboisson, P.; Amini, N.; Takano, A.; Stepanov, V.; Halldin, C.; Farde, L. The metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 radioligand [11C]AZD9272 identifies unique binding sites in primate brain. Neuropharmacology 2018, 135, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Fang, X.T.; Eriksson, J.; Antoni, G.; Yngve, U.; Cato, L.; Lannfelt, L.; Sehlin, D.; Syvänen, S. Brain mGluR5 in mice with amyloid beta pathology studied with in vivo [11C]ABP688 PET imaging and ex vivo immunoblotting. Neuropharmacology 2017, 113 Pt A, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Lee, M.; Lee, H.J.; Jeong, Y.J.; Oh, S.J.; Kang, K.J.; Han, S.J.; Nam, K.R.; Lee, Y.J.; Lee, K.C.; Ryu, Y.H.; et al. Age dependency of mGluR5 availability in 5xFAD mice measured by PET. Neurobiol. Aging 2019, 84, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Lee, M.; Lee, H.J.; Park, I.S.; Park, J.A.; Kwon, Y.J.; Ryu, Y.H.; Kim, C.H.; Kang, J.H.; Hyun, I.Y.; Lee, K.C.; et al. Aβ pathology downregulates brain mGluR5 density in a mouse model of Alzheimer. Neuropharmacology 2018, 133, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Bertoglio, D.; Kosten, L.; Verhaeghe, J.; Thomae, D.; Wyffels, L.; Stroobants, S.; Wityak, J.; Dominguez, C.; Mrzljak, L.; Staelens, S. Longitudinal Characterization of mGluR5 Using 11C-ABP688 PET Imaging in the Q175 Mouse Model of Huntington Disease. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59, 1722–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Choi, H.; Kim, Y.K.; Oh, S.W.; Im, H.-J.; Hwang, D.W.; Kang, H.; Lee, B.; Lee, Y.-S.; Jeong, J.M.; Kim, E.E.; et al. In Vivo Imaging of mGluR5 Changes during Epileptogenesis Using [11C]ABP688 PET in Pilocarpine-Induced Epilepsy Rat Model. PLoS ONE 2014, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Brownell, A.-L.; Kuruppu, D.; Kil, K.-E.; Jokivarsi, K.; Poutiainen, P.; Zhu, A.; Maxwell, M. PET imaging studies show enhanced expression of mGluR5 and inflammatory response during progressive degeneration in ALS mouse model expressing SOD1-G93A gene. J. Neuroinflamm. 2015, 12, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Müller Herde, A.; Schibli, R.; Weber, M.; Ametamey, S.M. Metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 is altered in LPS-induced murine neuroinflammation model and in the brains of AD and ALS patients. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Glorie, D.; Verhaeghe, J.; Miranda, A.; Kertesz, I.; Wyffels, L.; Stroobants, S.; Staelens, S. Progression of obsessive compulsive disorder-like grooming in Sapap3 knockout mice: A longitudinal [11C]ABP688 PET study. Neuropharmacology 2020, 177, 108160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Cai, G.; Wang, M.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, M.; Guo, B.; Yao, H.; et al. Brain mGluR5 in Shank3B-/- Mice Studied With in vivo [18F]FPEB PET Imaging and ex vivo Immunoblotting. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Fatemi, S.H.; Wong, D.F.; Brašić, J.R.; Kuwabara, H.; Mathur, A.; Folsom, T.D.; Jacob, S.; Realmuto, G.M.; Pardo, J.V.; Lee, S. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 tracer [18F]-FPEB displays increased binding potential in postcentral gyrus and cerebellum of male individuals with autism: A pilot PET study. Cerebellum Ataxias 2018, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Smart, K.; Cox, S.; Kostikov, A.; Shalai, A.; Scala, S.G.; Tippler, M.; Jaworska, N.; Boivin, M.; Séguin, J.R.; Benkelfat, C.; et al. Effect of (Z)-isomer content on [11C]ABP688 binding potential in humans. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 1175–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Kawamura, K.; Yamasaki, T.; Kumata, K.; Furutsuka, K.; Takei, M.; Wakizaka, H.; Fujinaga, M.; Kariya, K.; Yui, J.; Hatori, A.; et al. Binding potential of (E)-[11C]ABP688 to metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 is decreased by the inclusion of its 11C-labelled Z-isomer. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2014, 41, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Smart, K.; Cox, S.; Nagano-Saito, A.; Rosa-Neto, P.; Leyton, M.; Benkelfat, C. Test-retest variability of [11C]ABP688 estimates of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 availability in humans. Synapse 2018, 72, e22041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. DeLorenzo, C.; Gallezot, J.D.; Gardus, J.; Yang, J.; Planeta, B.; Nabulsi, N.; Ogden, R.T.; Labaree, D.C.; Huang, Y.H.; Mann, J.J.; et al. In vivo variation in same-day estimates of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 binding using [11C]ABP688 and [18F]FPEB. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017, 37, 2716–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. DeLorenzo, C.; Kumar, J.S.; Mann, J.J.; Parsey, R.V. In vivo variation in metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 binding using positron emission tomography and [11C]ABP688. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2011, 31, 2169–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Holst, S.C.; Sousek, A.; Hefti, K.; Saberi-Moghadam, S.; Buck, A.; Ametamey, S.M.; Scheidegger, M.; Franken, P.; Henning, A.; Seifritz, E.; et al. Cerebral mGluR5 availability contributes to elevated sleep need and behavioral adjustment after sleep deprivation. eLife 2017, 6, e28751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  178. Smart, K.; Cox, S.; Scala, S.G.; Tippler, M.; Jaworska, N.; Boivin, M.; Séguin, J.R.; Benkelfat, C.; Leyton, M. Sex differences in [11C]ABP688 binding: A positron emission tomography study of mGlu5 receptors. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 1179–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. DuBois, J.M.; Rousset, O.G.; Rowley, J.; Porras-Betancourt, M.; Reader, A.J.; Labbe, A.; Massarweh, G.; Soucy, J.P.; Rosa-Neto, P.; Kobayashi, E. Characterization of age/sex and the regional distribution of mGluR5 availability in the healthy human brain measured by high-resolution [11C]ABP688 PET. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2016, 43, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Treyer, V.; Gietl, A.F.; Suliman, H.; Gruber, E.; Meyer, R.; Buchmann, A.; Johayem, A.; Unschuld, P.G.; Nitsch, R.M.; Buck, A.; et al. Reduced uptake of [11C]-ABP688, a PET tracer for metabolic glutamate receptor 5 in hippocampus and amygdala in Alzheimer’s dementia. Brain Behav. 2020, 10, e01632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  181. Mecca, A.P.; McDonald, J.W.; Michalak, H.R.; Godek, T.A.; Harris, J.E.; Pugh, E.A.; Kemp, E.C.; Chen, M.K.; Salardini, A.; Nabulsi, N.B.; et al. PET imaging of mGluR5 in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer Res. Ther. 2020, 12, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Kang, Y.; Henchcliffe, C.; Verma, A.; Vallabhajosula, S.; He, B.; Kothari, P.J.; Pryor, K.O.; Mozley, P.D. 18F-FPEB PET/CT Shows mGluR5 Upregulation in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neuroimaging 2019, 29, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Crabbé, M.; Van der Perren, A.; Weerasekera, A.; Himmelreich, U.; Baekelandt, V.; Van Laere, K.; Casteels, C. Altered mGluR5 binding potential and glutamine concentration in the 6-OHDA rat model of acute Parkinson’s disease and levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Neurobiol. Aging 2018, 61, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Lam, J.; DuBois, J.M.; Rowley, J.; González-Otárula, K.A.; Soucy, J.P.; Massarweh, G.; Hall, J.A.; Guiot, M.C.; Rosa-Neto, P.; Kobayashi, E. In vivo metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 abnormalities localize the epileptogenic zone in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann. Neurol. 2019, 85, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. DuBois, J.M.; Rousset, O.G.; Guiot, M.C.; Hall, J.A.; Reader, A.J.; Soucy, J.P.; Rosa-Neto, P.; Kobayashi, E. Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Type 5 (mGluR5) Cortical Abnormalities in Focal Cortical Dysplasia Identified In Vivo With [11C]ABP688 Positron-Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging. Cereb. Cortex 2016, 26, 4170–4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. DeLorenzo, C.; DellaGioia, N.; Bloch, M.; Sanacora, G.; Nabulsi, N.; Abdallah, C.; Yang, J.; Wen, R.; Mann, J.J.; Krystal, J.H.; et al. In vivo ketamine-induced changes in [11C]ABP688 binding to metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5. Biol. Psychiatry 2015, 77, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  187. Holmes, S.E.; Gallezot, J.D.; Davis, M.T.; DellaGioia, N.; Matuskey, D.; Nabulsi, N.; Krystal, J.H.; Javitch, J.A.; DeLorenzo, C.; Carson, R.E.; et al. Measuring the effects of ketamine on mGluR5 using [18F]FPEB and PET. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Esterlis, I.; DellaGioia, N.; Pietrzak, R.H.; Matuskey, D.; Nabulsi, N.; Abdallah, C.G.; Yang, J.; Pittenger, C.; Sanacora, G.; Krystal, J.H.; et al. Ketamine-induced reduction in mGluR5 availability is associated with an antidepressant response: An [11C]ABP688 and PET imaging study in depression. Mol. Psychiatry 2018, 23, 824–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  189. DeLorenzo, C.; Sovago, J.; Gardus, J.; Xu, J.; Yang, J.; Behrje, R.; Kumar, J.S.; Devanand, D.P.; Pelton, G.H.; Mathis, C.A.; et al. Characterization of brain mGluR5 binding in a pilot study of late-life major depressive disorder using positron emission tomography and [11C]ABP688. Transl. Psychiatry 2015, 5, e693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Deschwanden, A.; Karolewicz, B.; Feyissa, A.M.; Treyer, V.; Ametamey, S.M.; Johayem, A.; Burger, C.; Auberson, Y.P.; Sovago, J.; Stockmeier, C.A.; et al. Reduced metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 density in major depression determined by [11C]ABP688 PET and postmortem study. Am. J. Psychiatry 2011, 168, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Kim, J.H.; Joo, Y.H.; Son, Y.D.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, H.K.; Lee, S.Y.; Ido, T. In vivo metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 availability-associated functional connectivity alterations in drug-naïve young adults with major depression. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019, 29, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Davis, M.T.; Hillmer, A.; Holmes, S.E.; Pietrzak, R.H.; DellaGioia, N.; Nabulsi, N.; Matuskey, D.; Angarita, G.A.; Carson, R.E.; Krystal, J.H.; et al. In vivo evidence for dysregulation of mGluR5 as a biomarker of suicidal ideation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 11490–11495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Akkus, F.; Treyer, V.; Ametamey, S.M.; Johayem, A.; Buck, A.; Hasler, G. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 neuroimaging in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2017, 183, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Akkus, F.; Terbeck, S.; Ametamey, S.M.; Rufer, M.; Treyer, V.; Burger, C.; Johayem, A.; Mancilla, B.G.; Sovago, J.; Buck, A.; et al. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 binding in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 17, 1915–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Holmes, S.E.; Girgenti, M.J.; Davis, M.T.; Pietrzak, R.H.; DellaGioia, N.; Nabulsi, N.; Matuskey, D.; Southwick, S.; Duman, R.S.; Carson, R.E.; et al. Altered metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 markers in PTSD: In vivo and postmortem evidence. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 8390–8395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  196. Akkus, F.; Ametamey, S.M.; Treyer, V.; Burger, C.; Johayem, A.; Umbricht, D.; Gomez Mancilla, B.; Sovago, J.; Buck, A.; Hasler, G. Marked global reduction in mGluR5 receptor binding in smokers and ex-smokers determined by [11C]ABP688 positron emission tomography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  197. Akkus, F.; Mihov, Y.; Treyer, V.; Ametamey, S.M.; Johayem, A.; Senn, S.; Rösner, S.; Buck, A.; Hasler, G. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 binding in male patients with alcohol use disorder. Transl. Psychiatry 2018, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Milella, M.S.; Marengo, L.; Larcher, K.; Fotros, A.; Dagher, A.; Rosa-Neto, P.; Benkelfat, C.; Leyton, M. Limbic system mGluR5 availability in cocaine dependent subjects: A high-resolution PET [11C]ABP688 study. NeuroImage 2014, 98, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Fekete, S.; Simko, J.; Gradosova, I.; Malakova, J.; Zivna, H.; Palicka, V.; Zivny, P. The effect of levetiracetam on rat bone mass, structure and metabolism. Epilepsy Res. 2013, 107, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ceccarini, J.; Leurquin-Sterk, G.; Crunelle, C.L.; de Laat, B.; Bormans, G.; Peuskens, H.; Van Laere, K. Recovery of Decreased Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Availability in Abstinent Alcohol-Dependent Patients. J. Nucl. Med. 2020, 61, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Cox, S.; Tippler, M.; Jaworska, N.; Smart, K.; Castellanos-Ryan, N.; Durand, F.; Allard, D.; Benkelfat, C.; Parent, S.; Dagher, A.; et al. mGlu5 Receptor availability in youth at risk for addictions: Effects of vulnerability traits and cannabis use. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Wanger-Baumann, C.A.; Mu, L.; Honer, M.; Belli, S.; Alf, M.F.; Schubiger, P.A.; Krämer, S.D.; Ametamey, S.M. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of [18F]-FDEGPECO as a PET tracer for imaging the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5). NeuroImage 2011, 56, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Sephton, S.M.; Dennler, P.; Leutwiler, D.S.; Mu, L.; Wanger-Baumann, C.A.; Schibli, R.; Krämer, S.D.; Ametamey, S.M. Synthesis, radiolabelling and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel fluorinated ABP688 derivative for the PET imaging of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 2, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  204. Warnock, G.; Sommerauer, M.; Mu, L.; Pla Gonzalez, G.; Geistlich, S.; Treyer, V.; Schibli, R.; Buck, A.; Krämer, S.D.; Ametamey, S.M. A first-in-man PET study of [18F]PSS232, a fluorinated ABP688 derivative for imaging metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2018, 45, 1041–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Johnson, B.G.; Wright, R.A.; Arnold, M.B.; Wheeler, W.J.; Ornstein, P.L.; Schoepp, D.D. [3H]-LY341495 as a novel antagonist radioligand for group II metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors: Characterization of binding to membranes of mGlu receptor subtype expressing cells. Neuropharmacology 1999, 38, 1519–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Waterhouse, R.N.; Schmidt, M.E.; Sultana, A.; Schoepp, D.D.; Wheeler, W.J.; Mozley, P.D.; Laruelle, M. Evaluation of [3H]LY341495 for labeling group II metabotropic glutamate receptors in vivo. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2003, 30, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Ma, Y.; Kumata, K.; Yui, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yamasaki, T.; Hatori, A.; Fujinaga, M.; Nengaki, N.; Xie, L.; Wang, H.; et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 1-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4-(4-[11C]methoxyphenyl)- piperidin-1-yl-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridine-3-carbonitrile ([11C]CMDC) for PET imaging of metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 in the rat brain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017, 25, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Lavreysen, H.; Langlois, X.; Ahnaou, A.; Drinkenburg, W.; te Riele, P.; Biesmans, I.; Van der Linden, I.; Peeters, L.; Megens, A.; Wintmolders, C.; et al. Pharmacological Characterization of JNJ-40068782, a New Potent, Selective, and Systemically Active Positive Allosteric Modulator of the mGlu2 Receptor and Its Radioligand [3H]JNJ-40068782. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 2013, 346, 514–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  209. Andrés, J.I.; Alcázar, J.; Cid, J.M.; De Angelis, M.; Iturrino, L.; Langlois, X.; Lavreysen, H.; Trabanco, A.A.; Celen, S.; Bormans, G. Synthesis, evaluation, and radiolabeling of new potent positive allosteric modulators of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 as potential tracers for positron emission tomography imaging. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 8685–8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Leurquin-Sterk, G.; Celen, S.; Van Laere, K.; Koole, M.; Bormans, G.; Langlois, X.; Van Hecken, A.; Te Riele, P.; Alcázar, J.; Verbruggen, A.; et al. What We Observe In Vivo Is Not Always What We See In Vitro: Development and Validation of 11C-JNJ-42491293, A Novel Radioligand for mGluR2. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  211. Zhang, X.; Kumata, K.; Yamasaki, T.; Cheng, R.; Hatori, A.; Ma, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, L.; Wang, L.; Kang, H.J.; et al. Synthesis and Preliminary Studies of a Novel Negative Allosteric Modulator, 7-((2,5-Dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl)methyl)-4-(2-fluoro-4-[11C]methoxyphenyl) quinoline-2-carboxamide, for Imaging of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 2. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017, 8, 1937–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Kumata, K.; Hatori, A.; Yamasaki, T.; Zhang, Y.; Mori, W.; Fujinaga, M.; Xie, L.; Nengaki, N.; Zhang, M.R. Synthesis and evaluation of 4-(2-fluoro-4-[11C]methoxyphenyl)-5-((2-methylpyridin-4-yl)methoxy) picolinamide for PET imaging of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 in the rat brain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Neale, J.H.; Bzdega, T.; Wroblewska, B. N-Acetylaspartylglutamate. J. Neurochem. 2000, 75, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Fricker, A.C.; Mok, M.H.; de la Flor, R.; Shah, A.J.; Woolley, M.; Dawson, L.A.; Kew, J.N. Effects of N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) at group II mGluRs and NMDAR. Neuropharmacology 2009, 56, 1060–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Di Menna, L.; Joffe, M.E.; Iacovelli, L.; Orlando, R.; Lindsley, C.W.; Mairesse, J.; Gressèns, P.; Cannella, M.; Caraci, F.; Copani, A.; et al. Functional partnership between mGlu3 and mGlu5 metabotropic glutamate receptors in the central nervous system. Neuropharmacology 2018, 128, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Tu, J.C.; Xiao, B.; Naisbitt, S.; Yuan, J.P.; Petralia, R.S.; Brakeman, P.; Doan, A.; Aakalu, V.K.; Lanahan, A.A.; Sheng, M.; et al. Coupling of mGluR/Homer and PSD-95 complexes by the Shank family of postsynaptic density proteins. Neuron 1999, 23, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Corti, C.; Aldegheri, L.; Somogyi, P.; Ferraguti, F. Distribution and synaptic localisation of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 (mGluR4) in the rodent CNS. Neuroscience 2002, 110, 403–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Charvin, D.; Di Paolo, T.; Bezard, E.; Gregoire, L.; Takano, A.; Duvey, G.; Pioli, E.; Halldin, C.; Medori, R.; Conquet, F. An mGlu4-Positive Allosteric Modulator Alleviates Parkinsonism in Primates. Mov. Disord. 2018, 33, 1619–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Kil, K.E.; Poutiainen, P.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, A.; Choi, J.K.; Jokivarsi, K.; Brownell, A.L. Radiosynthesis and evaluation of an 18F-labeled positron emission tomography (PET) radioligand for metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4 (mGlu4). J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 9130–9138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Kil, K.E.; Poutiainen, P.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, A.; Kuruppu, D.; Prabhakar, S.; Choi, J.K.; Tannous, B.A.; Brownell, A.L. Synthesis and evaluation of N-(methylthiophenyl)picolinamide derivatives as PET radioligands for metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  221. Takano, A.; Nag, S.; Jia, Z.; Jahan, M.; Forsberg, A.; Arakawa, R.; Grybäck, P.; Duvey, G.; Halldin, C.; Charvin, D. Characterization of [11C]PXT012253 as a PET Radioligand for mGlu4 Allosteric Modulators in Nonhuman Primates. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2019, 21, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Fujinaga, M.; Yamasaki, T.; Nengaki, N.; Ogawa, M.; Kumata, K.; Shimoda, Y.; Yui, J.; Xie, L.; Zhang, Y.; Kawamura, K.; et al. Radiosynthesis and evaluation of 5-methyl-N- (4-[11C]methylpyrimidin-2-yl)-4-(1H-pyrazol-4-yl)thiazol-2-amine ([11C]ADX88178) as a novel radioligand for imaging of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4 (mGluR4). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Laurie, D.J.; Schoeffter, P.; Wiederhold, K.H.; Sommer, B. Cloning, distribution and functional expression of the human mGlu6 metabotropic glutamate receptor. Neuropharmacology 1997, 36, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Ohishi, H.; Akazawa, C.; Shigemoto, R.; Nakanishi, S.; Mizuno, N. Distributions of the mRNAs for L-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate-sensitive metabotropic glutamate receptors, mGluR4 and mGluR7, in the rat brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 1995, 360, 555–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Palazzo, E.; Marabese, I.; Luongo, L.; Guida, F.; de Novellis, V.; Maione, S. Nociception modulation by supraspinal group III metabotropic glutamate receptors. J. Neurochem. 2017, 141, 507–519. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of excitatory amino acids (EAAs), sulfur-containing amino acids (SCAAs), and polyamines.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of excitatory amino acids (EAAs), sulfur-containing amino acids (SCAAs), and polyamines.
Molecules 25 04749 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structures of some prototypic N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor ligands.
Figure 2. Chemical structures of some prototypic N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor ligands.
Molecules 25 04749 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of labelled NMDA receptor ligands developed for the MK801/phencyclidine (PCP)-binding site of the NMDA ion channel.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of labelled NMDA receptor ligands developed for the MK801/phencyclidine (PCP)-binding site of the NMDA ion channel.
Molecules 25 04749 g003
Figure 4. Structure of selected radioligands for the GluN2B subunit of NMDA receptors.
Figure 4. Structure of selected radioligands for the GluN2B subunit of NMDA receptors.
Molecules 25 04749 g004
Figure 5. Structures of radiotracers for the glycine-binding site of the NMDA receptor.
Figure 5. Structures of radiotracers for the glycine-binding site of the NMDA receptor.
Molecules 25 04749 g005
Figure 6. Structures of selected AMPA receptor ligands and non-competitive AMPA antagonists with 2,3-benzodiazepine scaffold.
Figure 6. Structures of selected AMPA receptor ligands and non-competitive AMPA antagonists with 2,3-benzodiazepine scaffold.
Molecules 25 04749 g006
Figure 7. Structures of selected metabotropic glutamate receptor radiotracers (Group I, mGluR1).
Figure 7. Structures of selected metabotropic glutamate receptor radiotracers (Group I, mGluR1).
Molecules 25 04749 g007
Figure 8. Structures of radiotracers for metabotropic glutamate receptors (Group I, mGluR5).
Figure 8. Structures of radiotracers for metabotropic glutamate receptors (Group I, mGluR5).
Molecules 25 04749 g008
Figure 9. Representative mean images of [11C]ABP688 PET and corresponding MRI in a group of 23 healthy human subjects (Courtesy of the Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea).
Figure 9. Representative mean images of [11C]ABP688 PET and corresponding MRI in a group of 23 healthy human subjects (Courtesy of the Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea).
Molecules 25 04749 g009
Figure 10. Structures of radiotracers for Group II (mGluR2 and mGluR3) and Group III (mGluR 4, 6, 7 and 8).
Figure 10. Structures of radiotracers for Group II (mGluR2 and mGluR3) and Group III (mGluR 4, 6, 7 and 8).
Molecules 25 04749 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.-H.; Marton, J.; Ametamey, S.M.; Cumming, P. A Review of Molecular Imaging of Glutamate Receptors. Molecules 2020, 25, 4749. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204749

AMA Style

Kim J-H, Marton J, Ametamey SM, Cumming P. A Review of Molecular Imaging of Glutamate Receptors. Molecules. 2020; 25(20):4749. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204749

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Jong-Hoon, János Marton, Simon Mensah Ametamey, and Paul Cumming. 2020. "A Review of Molecular Imaging of Glutamate Receptors" Molecules 25, no. 20: 4749. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204749

APA Style

Kim, J. -H., Marton, J., Ametamey, S. M., & Cumming, P. (2020). A Review of Molecular Imaging of Glutamate Receptors. Molecules, 25(20), 4749. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204749

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop