Next Article in Journal
The Lysozyme Inhibitor Thionine Acetate Is Also an Inhibitor of the Soluble Lytic Transglycosylase Slt35 from Escherichia coli
Next Article in Special Issue
Nitrile Synthesis with Aldoxime Dehydratases: A Biocatalytic Platform with Applications in Asymmetric Synthesis, Bulk Chemicals, and Biorefineries
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of Supercapacitors via Atomic Layer Deposition of ZnO on the Activated Carbon Electrode Material
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient One-Pot Synthesis of 3,4-Dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones via a Three-Component Biginelli Reaction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 14
10.3390/molecules26144190
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chiral Imidazolium Prolinate Salts as Efficient Synzymatic Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction

by
Raúl Porcar
1,2,
Eduardo García-Verdugo
2,*,
Belén Altava
1,
Maria Isabel Burguete
1 and
Santiago V. Luis
1,*
1
Departamento de Química Inorgánica y Orgánica, Universitat Jaume I, E-12071 Castellón de la Plana, Spain
2
Departamento de Química Orgánica y Bio-Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, UNED, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(14), 4190; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144190
Submission received: 9 June 2021 / Revised: 30 June 2021 / Accepted: 7 July 2021 / Published: 9 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalysts for a Green Chemistry: A Themed Issue Honoring Professor Roger Sheldon for His Contribution in the Field of the Green Chemistry with the Introduction of the E Factor)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chiral imidazolium l-prolinate salts, providing a complex network of supramolecular interaction in a chiral environment, have been studied as synzymatic catalytic systems. They are demonstrated to be green and efficient chiral organocatalysts for direct asymmetric aldol reactions at room temperature. The corresponding aldol products were obtained with moderate to good enantioselectivities. The influence of the presence of chirality in both the imidazolium cation and the prolinate anion on the transfer of chirality from the organocatalyst to the aldol product has been studied. Moreover, interesting match/mismatch situations have been observed regarding configuration of chirality of the two components through the analysis of results for organocatalysts derived from both enantiomers of prolinate (R/S) and the trans/cis isomers for the chiral fragment of the cation. This is associated with differences in the corresponding reaction rates but also to the different tendencies for the formation of aggregates, as evidenced by nonlinear effects studies (NLE). Excellent activities, selectivities, and enantioselectivities could be achieved by an appropriate selection of the structural elements at the cation and anion.

1. Introduction

Asymmetric organocatalysis has become an important area of research in recent years for the preparation of chiral products, being an efficient alternative to enantioselective metal-based catalysis [1,2,3]. Since List and Barbas III reported the direct aldol reaction catalyzed by l-proline [4,5], a variety of different organocatalysts have been evaluated for this reaction, but l-proline derivatives still represent some of the best catalysts in this regard [6,7] and have been used successfully in a variety of other reactions [8]. The aldol reaction continues to be a key carbon–carbon bond-forming reaction, allowing the preparation of enantiomerically enriched β-hydroxy ketones, which are important building blocks for the synthesis of structurally complex molecules with biological activity, and numerous efforts are devoted to improving both yields and stereoselectivities for this reaction [9,10,11].
In recent years, room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) have been intensively studied for the development of ‘‘green’’ synthetic processes [12,13,14,15]. Their modular character represents a key feature and facilitates introducing chirality elements into their structure. Thus, the design and synthesis of chiral ionic liquids (CILs) opens the possibility of developing new chiral media for application in separation technologies [16,17], for their use as chiral media in asymmetric synthesis, or as new enantioselective organocatalysts [18,19]. As in the case of ILs, CILs present, in general, a high degree of supramolecular organization [20], which can be exploited to enhance the resulting chirality transfer when used as chiral media, chiral additives, or organocatalysts in enantioselective processes [21]. In this regard, imidazolium-based CILs are relatively simple to prepare and have been studied in different organic transformations, including aldol reactions [22,23,24,25]. Many examples of organocatalytic CILs belong to the so-called “Ion-Tagged Ionic Liquids”, in which the chiral fragment is attached to an “onium” fragment (i.e., imidazolium) through an inert spacer [25,26,27]; although, the opposite approach is also possible—introducing the chiral organocatalytic fragment in the counteranion [28,29].
Recently, a variety of imidazolium ILs, including chiral and nonchiral compounds, have been studied as efficient reaction media or additives for the aldol reaction catalyzed by l-proline, with the results highlighting the importance of the involved supramolecular noncovalent interactions [30,31,32]. These results suggested the presence of well-defined supramolecular structures based on the correct disposition, including the correct configuration, of the functional elements located in the different components assembled. This situation mimics the one found in the active centers of enzymes and represents the key element defining synzymatic catalysts [33,34,35].
Following our previous contributions in the field of synzymes [36,37], and to better understand the phenomena taking place at the molecular and supramolecular levels in enantioselective aldol processes, as well as to advance in the rationalization of the design vectors for this kind of organocatalyst, here, we present the preparation of a series of chiral imidazolium cations containing prolinate as the counteranion and their study as organocatalysts for the aldol reaction. The resulting CILs contain chiral elements in both the anion and the cation, and the results show that both components are relevant for the enhancement in chirality transfer, with the observation of interesting match/mismatch arrangements for the configuration being present in both components.

2. Results and Discussion

The general structure of the considered imidazolium prolinates is presented in Figure 1, highlighting the main structural elements that were considered relevant in their design. Such features are expected to implement supramolecular interactions, leading to the formation of the corresponding supramolecular complexes and the selective stabilization of the transition state for an enantioselective aldol reaction. A complex network of noncovalent forces such as ionic interactions, hydrogen bonds, Van der Waals forces, cation-π interactions, etc. can be implemented in those structures.
The synthesis of those prolinates was carried out by a chloride anion exchange with l-proline (Figure 2). The starting chiral imidazolium chlorides were prepared as previously reported [38,39]. This simple metathesis process allowed the preparation—with excellent yields and purity and without needing any chromatographic purification—of a variety of organocatalysts. They differed in the relative configuration of the stereogenic centers in the imidazolium cation, in the presence of hydrogen bond donor (HBD) or hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) groups in the chiral fragment, and in the size of the cycloalkyl ring in this fragment. The compound [BMIM][l-Pro] was also prepared from [BMIM][Cl], as an analogue displaying a nonchiral cation, for comparison purposes. In the same way, the diastereomeric salts (not shown in Figure 2) could also be prepared using d-proline. All these compounds were liquid at room temperature (RTILs). Although, in the case of [BMIM], the exchange of chloride by l-prolinate led to a significant reduction in the melting temperature (−33 °C vs. 48 °C, Tmonset as obtained by DSC) the change was less relevant for the salts derived from the chiral imidazolium cations. Thus, for (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-, the change was from 19 °C to 2 °C, while for (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-, the change was from 3 to 4 °C. In this last case, replacing l-prolinate by d-prolinate led to a similar behavior (Tmonset = 2 °C).
The 1H-NMR spectra of these compounds in DMSO-d6 revealed the presence of proton signals corresponding to the prolinate anion as well as some interesting differences highlighting the importance of the structural parameters considered in the structure and noncovalent interactions present in these salts. Some illustrative examples are presented in Figure 3 (see also ESI, Figures S1–S5). Thus, signals corresponding to protons C2-H, C4-H, and C5-H of the imidazolium ring are shifted downfield in (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro (9.32, 7.87, 7.80 ppm) and (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro (9.44, 7.95, 7.90 ppm) relative to [BMIM][l-Pro] (9.22, 7.81, 7.70 ppm), suggesting a more intense interaction of the anion with these relatively acidic protons. In the case of the anion, the signal for the stereogenic CH appears at 3.61 ppm in [BMIM][l-Pro], while it is slightly more unshielded in (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro (3.65 ppm) and (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro (3.71 ppm). Overall, this also suggests the presence of a stronger ion pair in the case of the salt (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro.
The room temperature aldol reaction of p-nitrobenzaldehyde with acetone was selected as the benchmark reaction to assess the organocatalytic potential of the prepared imidazolium salts (Figure 4) [40,41]. The initial experiments were carried out at room temperature, using toluene as the solvent, as this was expected to favor the formation of an intimate ion pair between the cation and the l-prolinate anion, and using a 40% molar loading of the catalyst and a 10:1 molar ratio acetone:aldehyde. Two different salts were firstly evaluated to analyze the influence of the hydroxy or ester fragments in the chiral moiety of the cation: (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro and (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro (Table 1). Under the same conditions (Table 1, entry 1), l-proline only afforded a low yield of the aldol product, which can be associated to its low solubility in this solvent. This was solved with the use of the two selected chiral salts that afforded higher yields and maintained very good selectivities. Besides, significantly higher enantioselectivities were obtained (up to 70% ee, R major enantiomer, entry 4, Table 1). It must be noted that the yields and enantioselectivities were also higher than those obtained for [BMIM][l-Pro] (43% yield, 60% ee, entry 2, Table 1).
A second set of experiments were carried out in DMSO-d6, again using an excess (10 equiv.) of acetone over aldehyde and a 40% molar loading of the catalyst (0.02 M concentration) (Table 2). This allowed monitoring the progress of the reaction by 1H-NMR spectroscopy at room temperature. Under these conditions, higher conversions were obtained after 24 h, but the formation of significant amounts of side products was found in most cases, leading to low yields of the desired products. Analysis of the corresponding 1H-NMR spectra allowed us to identify some of those products, in agreement with the structures reported by Blackmond and coworkers [42]. They include oxazolidinones (4, Figure 4) formed by the reaction between proline and the aldehyde that subsequently can decarboxylate and react with an additional equivalent of aldehyde to produce 1-oxapyrrolizidines (5, Figure 4). An illustrative 1H-NMR spectrum from a crude reaction is shown in Figure S8. Formation of the side products took place almost instantly upon adding the aldehyde to the catalyst solution, and only increased slightly during the reaction. Carrying out the process in the absence of acetone allowed us to obtain those oxazolidinones and oxapyrrolizidines as the major products.
The kinetic profiles obtained provided additional information. Figure 5a shows the evolution of the concentration of the aldol product (3) with time for the different systems studied. Thus, the prolinate salts (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro and (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro were slightly more active than l-proline, [BMIM][l-Pro] and the catalyst based on the racemic cation ((±)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro). This agrees well with the yields presented in Table 2 and suggests that the prolinate salts of the two enantiomers of trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro can display significantly different activities, with the (R,R) enantiomer being catalytically less active. For comparison purposes, the left side in Figure 5a also includes the kinetic profile for the reaction catalyzed by l-proline in the presence of four equivalents of the CIL (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-Cl. In this case, a significant suppression of the formation of the side products was observed, leading to a quantitative conversion of the aldehyde and a 73% yield of the aldol product (Table 2, entry 6), in agreement with results obtained previously for the solventless reaction studied using mixtures of CILs and l-proline [31].
The enantioselectivities observed are presented in the last column in Table 2. In all cases, the presence of an imidazolium cation significantly increased the enantioselectivity achieved by l-proline (36% ee). Besides, the presence of chirality in the imidazolium cation clearly improved the resulting ee values (from 56% for [BMIM] to up to 81%). The presence in the cyclohexyl chiral fragment attached to the imidazolium of the acetate group, instead of the hydroxy group, was beneficial in this regard (Table 2, compare entries 3 and 5). The use of the racemic cation was reflected in a decrease of the enantioselectivity achieved in comparison with the enantiopure counterpart (Table 2, entries 3 and 4). Interestingly, the enantioselectivity afforded by the mixture between l-proline and (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-Cl provided a lower ee value than the l-prolinate of (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-Cl under the same conditions (Table 2, entries 5 and 6).
The controlled addition of water has been reported to reduce some of the side reactions in this kind of aldol reactions [42,43,44,45]. This possibility was analyzed using initially [BMIM][l-Pro] as the catalytic system, adding acetone first to minimize oxazoline formation and using from 0 to 1000 equivalents of water relative to the aldehyde. The kinetic profiles for the formation of the aldol product 3 catalyzed by [BMIM][l-Pro] reveal that the presence of water accelerates the reaction (Figure 5b). As seen in Figure 5c, some improvement in the yields for 3 was observed, reaching values of up to 40%, although significant amounts of side products 4 and 5 were still formed (30–40%). The use of a large excess of acetone (30 equiv.), in the presence of 1000 equiv. of water allowed improving aldol yields up to 89%, with a considerable reduction in the side products (10%). The addition of water did not have, however, a significant influence on the enantiomeric excess obtained (67–70% ee). In contrast, the reaction using 30 equiv. of acetone, although more selective, afforded some decrease in the observed induction (60% ee). Similar patterns were observed for catalysts containing chiral imidazolium cations. The kinetic profiles were very similar in the presence of water (Figure S9) and yields for aldol 3 increased to 65–70% with the formation of less than 15% of side products 4 and 5. Nevertheless, the ee values, being higher than those for [BMIM][l-Pro], were lower than under the conditions reported in Table 2 (i.e., 72% ee for (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro).
In a third set of experiments, the same reaction was studied under solventless conditions, using a 1:10 p-nitrobenzaldehyde:acetone-d6 molar ratio and, again, a molar catalyst loading of 40%. Results in Table 3 show that quantitative conversions were achieved after 24 h, with excellent selectivities to the aldol 3 in most instances. The only side product detected was the enone 6 resulting from the dehydration of the aldol. Under these conditions, the use of [BMIM][l-Pro] provided a low enantiomeric excess (20% ee). In contrast, the use of l-prolinates from chiral imidazolium cations achieved significantly higher ee values. In most instances, they were in the 60–70% range. A detailed analysis of the influence of chiral hydroxy- or acetoxycycloalkyl moiety on enantioselectivity is not easy because the starting enantiopure amino alcohols or amino acetates are obtained through the enzymatic kinetic resolution of the racemic amino acetates, which provides accessibility only to some of the possible configurations [30]. Comparison between entries 2 and 6 as well as between entries 3 and 7 in Table 3 suggests that compounds containing cyclopentyl rings provide higher enantioselectivities than those with cyclohexyl rings, which can be assigned to the higher conformational flexibility of the six-membered rings. The most relevant observation, however, was that the selectivity achieved by organocatalysts containing 1-β-hydroxycyclohexyl-3-butyl-imidazolium cations depended greatly on the configuration of the C-OH carbon. A much less selective (79%) and enantioselective process (43% ee) was observed for (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro than for (R,S)-cis-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro (95% selectivity, 64% ee) (Table 3, entries 3 and 4). This was confirmed by the results for the racemic cation (±)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu (Table 3, entry 5). The selectivity (96%) and enantioselectivity (64%) for the prolinate of this racemic cation indicate that the (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro organocatalyst displays a high activity, selectivity, and enantioselectivity, suggesting the presence of a “match/mismatch” effect between the configuration of the C-OH carbon atom and the one of l-prolinate. Related “match/mismatch” effects have been reported for asymmetric catalytic systems containing two chiral components, as is the case in the use of chiral cocatalysts, chiral activators, or two chiral ligands in catalytic metal complexes [32,46,47,48,49,50].
In order to analyze in more detail this “match/mismatch” effect, a similar reaction was carried out using different molar mixtures of the catalysts (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro and (R,S)-cis-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro (Table S1, Figure 6a). All mixtures were active with a quantitative conversion of the aldehyde after 23 h and providing the compound resulting from the dehydration of the aldol as the only detected side product, with the observation of a pronounced nonlinear effect (NLE) [51,52]. The presence of (R,S)-cis-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro, even as a minor component of the mixture, resulted in an excellent selectivity and increased enantiomeric excesses (>60). Both the formation of dimers or other aggregates and kinetic factors have been used to rationalize nonlinear effects [51,52], though the simpler explanation for a simple NLE, such as the one in Figure 6a, involves that the organocatalyst (R,S)-cis-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro is both more active and enantioselective than (S,S)-trans-OH-Cy6-Im-Bu-l-Pro, as found in other diastereomeric mixtures [53,54,55].
A better “match” between the configurations at the cation and the anion was achieved for the (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu cation when combined with the d-prolinate. The (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-d-Pro salt afforded a significantly higher selectivity (96% vs. 79%) and enantioselectivity than the l-prolinate (50% ee vs. 40% ee with a reversal in the topicity of the aldol, the (S)-enantiomer being the major product). This confirms that the combination between the d-prolinate and the (S,S)-cation represents a better match than the l/(S,S) combination. When using different molar mixtures of the two salts with d- and l-prolinate, a complex nonlinear effect was observed (Figure 6b, Table S2). Such relationships have been often observed in diastereomeric systems and are associated to a complex aggregation behavior with the participation of homo- and/or heteroaggregates [56,57]. Interestingly, a 10% ee (S) was obtained for the equimolecular mixture, while for the region where (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro was the major component, the enantioselectivity remained essentially constant (ca. 20% ee towards the (R)-aldol) for the region where this salt represented ca. 60–90% of the mixture. These results suggest that (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro favors aggregation, leading to stable and less-reactive heteroaggregates. It is worth mentioning that for diastereomeric mixtures, homoaggregates can also have significantly different stabilities and activities [58].
Cyclohexanone represents a more demanding substrate for aldol reactions and is quite sensitive to environmental factors. Though the enantioselectivities achieved tend to be higher than with acetone, this ketone is less reactive and can provide four different products as a consequence of the formation of anti and syn diastereomers [30]. When the reaction was carried out in DMSO (1:10 aldehyde(1):ketone ratio), the results with (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro and (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro were very similar to those with l-proline or with [BMIM][l-Pro]. Thus, anti:syn diastereoselectivities close to 45:55, with enantiomeric excesses of ca. 70% ee (anti) and 95% ee (syn), were observed (Table S3). When this solvent (DMSO) was substituted by [BMIM][NTF2], improved results were obtained, with aldol yields of 75–80%, anti:syn selectivities of ca. 65:35, and excellent enantioselectivites (ca. 98% ee for the anti products and ca. 90% ee for the syn). Finally, when the conditions optimized for acetone were used (1:10 aldehyde(1):ketone, in the absence of solvent), excellent yields were obtained for some of the prolinates assayed (Table 4). Anti:syn selectivities also were significantly enhanced, ranging from 75:25 to 90:10. Interestingly, the catalysts containing cyclopentyl fragments not only achieved quantitative yields, but also the highest selectivities (90:10) and enantioselectivities, reaching 96% ee (anti) and 79% ee (syn) when using (S,S)-trans-Cy5-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro. It must be noted that for Cy5 catalysts, the topicity of the major enantiomer for the syn pair was reversed relative to the one found with Cy6 and [BMIM][l-Pro] catalysts, while the same topicity was obtained for the anti pair.
In order to further analyze the former “match/mismatch” effects observed, the reaction was also studied using (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-d-Pro. Under the same conditions used with (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro, in the absence of solvent, comparable results were obtained in terms of yield (88 vs. 80%) and anti/syn selectivity (80:20 vs. 82:18) and a similar value with topicity reversal was achieved for the enantioselectivity of the anti pair (−91 vs. 89% ee). The situation, however, was fully different when the selectivity of the syn pair was analyzed. No topicity reversal was observed in this case and the substitution of the l-prolinate by the d-prolinate led to an increase in the ee towards the same enantiomer (−40% vs. −23% ee). The enantioselectivities observed for different molar mixtures of (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro and (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-d-Pro are presented in Figure 7 (see also Table S4) and show that, for the anti pair, a clear correlation exists between the l-prolinate/d-prolinate ratio and the observed ee. This relationship, however, is not fully linear; for instance, for a 50:50 ratio an ee value of −10 was obtained. For the syn pair, no clear correlation is observed with the l-prolinate/d-prolinate ratio in the catalytic mixture. The same major enantiomer is produced for all mixtures, indicating that the configuration of the prolinate anion is not the structural element defining the topicity of the major syn enantiomer and suggesting the presence of a complex aggregation behavior, which is also substrate dependent [59,60].
Finally, the scope of the aldol reaction between some additional aldehydes and cyclohexanone was explored with some of these catalytic systems using the optimized conditions: 1:10 aldehyde:ketone ratio, rt, solventless, 40% catalyst loading, 24 h (Table 5). Results show a clear improvement over those for l-proline. Only the least-activated aldehyde (4-methoxybenzaldehyde) provided lower yields, selectivities, and enantioselectivities than 4-nitrobenzaldehyde. For the other aldehydes, anti:syn selectivities ranged between 73:25 and 81:19, with enantioselectivities being clearly higher for the anti pair (up to 99% ee). Similar trends were observed when the aldol reaction between acetone and several aldehydes was studied (Table S4).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Experimental Section

All reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Flash chromatography was performed using silica gel 60 (230–240 mesh). 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR experiments were obtained using a Varian INOVA 500 (1H, 500 MHz and 13C, 125 MHz) spectrometer. Chemical shifts are given in delta (δ, ppm) values and the coupling constants (J) in Hertz (Hz). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses were carried out on a Merck HITACHI LaChrom chromatograph with an UV detector at 254 nm, 210 nm, or 230 nm, using the chiral chromatography columns Daicel Chiralcel OJ, Daicel Chiralcel OD-H, or Chiralpak AD (25 cm × 4.6 mm I.D.).

3.2. General Procedure for the Preparation of Imidazolium Prolinates

To a solution of the corresponding imidazolium salt (1.21 mmol) in MeOH (5 mL), l- or d-proline was added (140.9 mg, 1.21 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24–72 h. After this time, the solvent was removed by distillation under reduced pressure to obtain the corresponding imidazolium salts as whitish, viscous liquids.

3.3. General Procedure for the Aldol Reactions

Over a mixture of 0.4 mmol of the corresponding CIL (as organocatalyst) and 10 mmoles of acetone or cyclohexanone, 1 mmol of p-nitrobenzaldehyde was added. The resulting mixture was stirred for 20–24 h at room temperature, following the reaction by TLC (Hex:AcOEt, 2:1). After that time, 10 mL of chloroform were added, and the mixture was washed with deionized water (3 × 5 mL). The organic phase was dried with anhydrous magnesium sulphate and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting crude was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (Hex:AcOEt, 2:1). Details for the characterization of the different products and the HPLC methods used are given in the Supporting information.

4. Conclusions

Chiral room temperature ionic liquids derived from chiral imidazolium cations and prolinate anions can be efficiently used as organocatalysts for direct aldol reactions. The presence of chirality in both the cation and the anion not only increment the structural optimization vectors but allows the formation of spatially well-defined supramolecular complexes with the substrates and reaction intermediates in a truly synzymatic approach. The complex network of supramolecular interactions is able to selectively stabilize some of the intermediates and transition states leading to significant improvements in activity, selectivity, and particularly enantioselectivity, and to efficiently work under solventless conditions. Results were always improved over the use of l-Pro or its salts with nonchiral cations. Thus, for instance, in the case of the benchmark reaction between 4-nitrobenzaldehyde and acetone, the salt (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro showed faster kinetics than other salts and, besides, the enantioselectivity was significantly improved relative to the ones observed for salts with achiral cations: 66% ee vs. 13% ee for [BMIM][l-Pro]. Important match/mismatch effects are present regarding the configurations of the anion and the cation. Such effects are not only associated with the supramolecular organization of the two components of the catalytic system alone and that of the complexes formed with the substrates and intermediates during the reaction, but also affect the formation of aggregates, as suggested by the observed nonlinear effects. Enantioselectivity was significantly enhanced when sterically more-demanding substrates are used, reaching, for instance, 96% ee for the major anti pair (90:10 anti:syn selectivity) in the case of cyclohexanone and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde ((S,S)-trans-Cy5-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro) or 99% for the major anti pair (76:24 anti:syn selectivity) in the case of cyclohexanone and benzaldehyde ((S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro). Thus, the high diversity achievable with these systems allows for simple fine-tuning of the optimal catalytic structure for each of the specific substrates considered.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Characterization of imidazolium salts including Figures S1–S5. Additional catalytic experiments including Figures S8 and S9 and Tables S1–S4. Characterization of aldol products including Figures S10–S18 with HPLC chromatograms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.G.-V. and S.V.L.; methodology, E.G.-V., B.A. and S.V.L.; validation, R.P., M.I.B. and B.A.; formal analysis, B.A., M.I.B. and R.P.; investigation, R.P. and E.G.-V.; resources, M.I.B. and S.V.L.; data curation, R.P. and E.G.-V.; writing—original draft preparation, R.P. and E.G.-V.; writing—review and editing, R.P., E.G.-V. and S.V.L.; visualization, R.P. and E.G.-V.; supervision, S.V.L. and E.G.-V.; project administration, M.I.B.; funding acquisition, E.G.-V., M.I.B. and S.V.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by MINISTERIO DE CIENCIA, INNOVACIÓN Y UNIVERSIDADES, grant number RTI2018-098233-B-C22 (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE) and Pla de Promoció de la Investigació de la Universitat Jaume I, grant UJI-B2019-40.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Technical support from the SECIC of the UJI is acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Han, B.; He, X.H.; Liu, Y.Q.; He, G.; Peng, C.; Li, J.L. Asymmetric organocatalysis: An enabling technology for medicinal chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 1522–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dondoni, A.; Massi, A. Asymmetric organocatalysis: From infancy to adolescence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4638–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Berkessel, A.; Groger, H. Asymmetric Organocatalysis; Wiley: Weinhein, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. List, B. Enamine catalysis is a powerful strategy for the catalytic generation and use of carbanion equivalents. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Notz, W.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas III, C.F. Enamine-based organocatalysis with proline and diamines: The development of direct catalytic asymmetric aldol, Mannich, Michael, and Diels-Alder reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alarcon-Matus, E.; Alvarado, C.; Romero-Ceronio, N.; Ramos-Rivera, E.M.; Lobato-Garcia, C.E. Proline-derived Long-aliphatic-chain Amphiphilic Organocatalysts (PDLACAOs) for Asymmetric Reactions in Aqueous Media. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2020, 9, 1667–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jimeno, C. Amino Acylguanidines as Bioinspired Catalysts for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Molecules 2021, 26, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, J.; Wang, L. Recent Advances in Asymmetric Reactions Catalyzed by Proline and Its Derivatives. Synthesis 2017, 49, 960–972. [Google Scholar]
  9. Trost, B.M.; Brindle, C.S. The direct catalytic asymmetric aldol reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1600–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Meyer, C.C.; Ortiz, E.; Krische, M.J. Catalytic Reductive Aldol and Mannich Reactions of Enone, Acrylate, and Vinyl Heteroaromatic Pronucleophiles. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 3721–3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schoevaart, R.; van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R.A. Stereochemistry of nonnatural aldol reactions catalyzed by DHAP aldolases. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 70, 349–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shiflett, M.B. (Ed.) Commercial Applications of Ionic Liquids; Springer-Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Montolio, S.; Altava, B.; Garcia-Verdugo, E.; Luis, S.V. Supported ILs and Materials Based on ILs for the Development of Green Synthetic Processes and Procedures. In Green Synthetic Processes and Procedures; Ballini, R., Ed.; RSC: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sheldon, R.A. Green and sustainable manufacture of chemicals from biomass: State of the art. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 950–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R.A. Biocatalysis in ionic liquids. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2757–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Flieger, J.; Feder-Kubis, J.; Tatarczak-Michalewska, M. Chiral Ionic Liquids: Structural Diversity, Properties and Applications in Selected Separation Techniques. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. González-Rodríguez, J.; Valls, A.; Arias Abrodo, P.; Gutiérrez Álvarez, M.D.; González-Álvarez, J.; Altava, B.; Luis, S.V. Polymeric Ionic Liquids Derived from L-Valine for the Preparation of Highly Selective Silica-Supported Stationary Phases in Gas Chromatography. Polymers 2020, 12, 2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Karimi, B.; Tavakolian, M.; Akbari, M.; Mansouri, F. Ionic Liquids in Asymmetric Synthesis: An Overall View from Reaction Media to Supported Ionic Liquid Catalysis. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 3173–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gaertner, P.; Bica, K. Applications of Chiral Ionic Liquids. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 2008, 3235–3250. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gonzalez, L.; Altava, B.; Bolte, M.; Burguete, M.I.; Garcia-Verdugo, E.; Luis, S.V. Synthesis of Chiral Room Temperature Ionic Liquids from Amino Acids-Application in Chiral Molecular Recognition. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 4996–5009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gauchot, V.; Gravel, J.; Vidal, M.; Charbonneau, M.; Kairouz, V.; Schmitzer, A.R. Imidazolium and Benzimidazolium Salts: A Veritable Playground for Organic and Supramolecular Chemists. Synlett 2015, 26, 2763–2779. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ou, W.H.; Huang, Z.Z. An efficient and practical synthesis of chiral imidazolium ionic liquids and their application in an enantioselective Michael reaction. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ni, B.; Headley, A.D. Novel imidazolium chiral ionic liquids that contain a urea functionality. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 7331–7334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ni, B.; Headley, A.D.; Li, G. Design and synthesis of C-2 substituted chiral imidazolium ionic liquids from amino acid derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10600–10602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Miao, W.; Chan, T.H. Ionic-Liquid-Supported Organocatalyst: Efficient and Recyclable Ionic-Liquid-Anchored Proline for Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1711–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Siyutkin, D.E.; Kucherenko, A.S.; Zlotin, S.G. Hydroxy-α-amino acids modified by ionic liquid moieties: Recoverable organocatalysts for asymmetric aldol reactions in the presence of water. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1366–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kucherenko, A.S.; Perepelkin, V.V.; Zhdankina, G.M.; Kryshtal, G.V.; Srinivasan, E.; Inanib, H.; Zlotin, S.G. Ionic liquid supported 4-HO-Pro-Val derived organocatalysts for asymmetric aldol reactions in the presence of water. Mendeleev Commun. 2016, 26, 388–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qian, Y.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Y. A Green and Efficient Asymmetric Aldol Reaction Catalyzed by a Chiral Anion Modified Ionic Liquid. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 3672–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fukumuto, K.; Yoshizawa, M.; Ohno, H. Room Temperature Ionic Liquids from 20 Natural Amino Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2398–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Porcar, R.; Ríos-Lombardía, N.; Busto, E.; Gotor-Fernández, V.; Gotor, V.; García-Verdugo, E.; Burguete, M.I.; Luis, S.V. Chemoenzymatic synthesis of optically active 2-(2- or 4-substituted-1H-imidazol-1-yl)cycloalcanols. Chiral additives for (L)-proline. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 2596–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. González, L.; Escorihuela, J.; Altava, B.; Burguete, M.I.; Luis, S.V. Chiral Room Temperature Ionic Liquids as Enantioselective Promoters for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 2014, 5356–5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Porcar, R.; Burguete, M.I.; Lozano, P.; Garcia-Verdugo, E.; Luis, S.V. Supramolecular Interactions Based on Ionic Liquids for Tuning of the Catalytic Efficiency of (L)-Proline. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 6062–6071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hollfelder, F.; Kirby, A.J.; Tawfik, D.S. Efficient Catalysis of Proton Transfer by Synzymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9578–9579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Haimov, A.; Cohen, H.; Neumann, R. Alkylated polyethyleneimine/polyoxometalate synzymes as catalysts for the oxidation of hydrophobic substrates in water with hydrogen peroxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11762–11763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Roux, Y.; Ricoux, R.; Avenier, F.; Mahy, J.P. Bio-inspired electron-delivering system for reductive activation of dioxygen at metal centres towards artificial flavoenzymes. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8509–8517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Esteve, F.; Altava, B.; Burguete, M.I.; Bolte, M.; Garcia-Verdugo, E.; Luis, S.V. Pseudopeptidic macrocycles as cooperative minimalistic synzyme systems for the remarkable activation and conversion of CO2 in the presence of the chloride anion. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 4697–4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Andres, S.; Escuder, B.; Domenech, A.; Garcia-Espana, E.; Luis, S.V.; Marcelino, V.; Llinares, J.M.; Ramirez, J.A.; Soriano, C. CO2 fixation and activation by metal complexes of small polyazacyclophanes. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2001, 14, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ríos-Lombardía, N.; Busto, E.; Gotor-Fernández, V.; Gotor, V.; Porcar, R.; García-Verdugo, E.; Luis, S.V.; Alfonso, I.; Garcia-Granda, S.; Menéndez-Velázquez, A. From salts to ionic liquids by systematic structural modifications: A rational approach towards the efficient modular synthesis of enantiopure imidazolium salts. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 836–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Busto, E.; Gotor-Fernández, V.; Ríos-Lombardía, N.; García-Verdugo, E.; Alfonso, I.; García-Granda, S.; Menéndez-Velázquez, A.; Burguete, M.I.; Luis, S.V.; Gotor, V. Simple and straightforward synthesis of novel enantiopure ionic liquids via efficient enzymatic resolution of (±)-2-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)cyclohexanol. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5251–5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lombardo, M.; Pasi, F.; Easwar, S.; Trombini, C. An improved protocol for the direct asymmetric aldol reaction in ionic liquids, catalysed by onium ion-tagged prolines. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2061–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gruttadauria, M.; Riela, S.; Aprile, C.; Lo Meo, P.; D’Anna, F.; Noto, R. Supported ionic liquids. New recyclable materials for the L-proline-catalyzed aldol reaction. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zotova, N.; Franzke, A.; Armstrong, A.; Blackmond, D.G. Clarification of the Role of Water in Proline-Mediated Aldol Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15100–15101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nyberg, A.I.; Usano, A.; Pihko, P.M. Proline-Catalyzed Ketone-Aldehyde Aldol Reactions are Accelerated by Water. Synlett 2004, 2004, 1891–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pihko, P.M.; Laurikainen, K.M.; Usano, A.; Nyberg, A.I.; Kaavi, J.A. Effect of additives on the proline-catalyzed ketone-aldehyde aldol reactions. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jimeno, C. Water in asymmetric organocatalytic systems: A global perspective. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 6147–6164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. North, M.; Villuendas, P. A Chiral solvent effect in asymmetric organocatalysis. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2378–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kalow, J.A.; Doyle, A.G. Mechanistic investigations of cooperative catalysis in the enantioselective fluorination of epoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16001–16012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mashiko, T.; Kumagai, N.; Shibasaki, M. Managing highly coordinative substrates in asymmetric catalysis: A catalytic asymmetric amination with a lanthanum-based ternary catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14990–14999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ding, K.; Ishii, A.; Mikami, K. Super high throughput screening (SHTS) of chiral ligands and activators: Asymmetric activation of chiral diol–Zinc catalysts by chiral nitrogen activators for the enantioselective addition of diethylzinc to aldehydes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kobayashi, S.; Kawamura, M. Catalytic enantioselective 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions between nitrones and alkenes using a novel heterochiral Ytterbium(III) catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5840–5841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Satyanarayana, T.; Abraham, S.; Kagan, H.B. Nonlinear Effects in Asymmetric Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 456–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Blackmond, D.G. Kinetic Aspects of Nonlinear Effects in Asymmetric Catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Blackmond, D.G.; Rosner, T.; Neugebauer, T.; Reetz, M.T. Kinetic Influences on Enantioselectivity for Non-Diastereopure Catalyst Mixtures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2196–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bolm, C.; Muñiz, K.; Hildebrand, J.P. Planar−Chiral Ferrocenes in Asymmetric Catalysis: The Impact of Stereochemically Inhomogeneous Ligands. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 491–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. McCleland, B.W.; Nugent, W.A.; Finn, M.G. Mechanistic Studies of the Zirconium-Triisopropanolamine-Catalyzed Enan-tioselective Addition of Azide to Cyclohexene Oxide. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6656–6666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zarotti, P.; Knöpfel, T.F.; Aschwanden, P.; Carreira, E.M. Nonlinear Effects with Diastereomeric Ligand Mixtures in Enan-tioselective, Catalytic Additions of Terminal Alkynes Involving Copper−PINAP Complexes. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1232–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ay, S.; Ziegert, R.E.; Zhang, H.; Nieger, M.; Rissanen, K.; Fink, K.; Kubas, A.; Gschwind, R.M.; Bräse, S. NMR-Spectroscopic and Solid-State Investigations of Cometal-Free Asymmetric Conjugate Addition: A Dinuclear Paracyclophaneimine Zinc Methyl Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12899–12905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Binder, C.M.; Bautista, A.; Zaidlewicz, M.; Krzemiński, M.P.; Oliver, A.; Singaram, B. Dual Stereoselectivity in the Dialkylzinc Reaction Using (-)-β-Pinene Derived Amino Alcohol Chiral Auxiliaries. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 2337–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Chen, Y.K.; Costa, A.M.; Walsh, P.J. Substrate Dependence of Nonlinear Effects: Mechanistic Probe and Practical Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5378–5379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Buono, F.; Walsh, P.J.; Blackmond, D.G. Rationalization of Anomalous Nonlinear Effects in the Alkylation of Substituted Benzaldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13652–13653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 26 04190 g001 550
Figure 1. Main structural elements considered in the design of chiral imidazolium prolinates for their implementation as organocatalysts for aldol processes.
Figure 1. Main structural elements considered in the design of chiral imidazolium prolinates for their implementation as organocatalysts for aldol processes.
Molecules 26 04190 g001
Molecules 26 04190 g002 550
Figure 2. Preparation of chiral imidazolium prolinates through anion metathesis and structures for the CILs studied in this work (only l-prolinates shown).
Figure 2. Preparation of chiral imidazolium prolinates through anion metathesis and structures for the CILs studied in this work (only l-prolinates shown).
Molecules 26 04190 g002
Molecules 26 04190 g003 550
Figure 3. Partial 1H-NMR in DMSO-d6 for some imidazolium prolinates derived from l-proline.
Figure 3. Partial 1H-NMR in DMSO-d6 for some imidazolium prolinates derived from l-proline.
Molecules 26 04190 g003
Molecules 26 04190 g004 550
Figure 4. Benchmark aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde (1) and acetone (2). General mechanisms for the formation of aldol and side products in the aldol reaction catalyzed by l-proline derivatives (adapted from Ref. [38]).
Figure 4. Benchmark aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde (1) and acetone (2). General mechanisms for the formation of aldol and side products in the aldol reaction catalyzed by l-proline derivatives (adapted from Ref. [38]).
Molecules 26 04190 g004
Molecules 26 04190 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Evolution of the concentration of the aldol product (3) with time for the different systems studied in DMSO-d6 (aldehyde(1):ketone(2) = 1:10) Catalytic systems: l-proline (★); [BMIM][l-Pro] (□); (±)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro (♦); (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro (●); (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro (▲); inset: l-Pro:(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-Cl (1:4) (●). (b) Evolution of the concentration of 3 with time for the reaction catalyzed by [BMIM][l-Pro] in DMSO-d6 under different conditions; 1:2:cat:H2O: 1:10:0.4:0 (●); 1:10:0.4:10 (▲); 1:30:0.4:10 (■). (c) Effect of water on the yield and enantioselectivity of the aldol product (top) and on the amount of side products ((4) and (5)) formed (bottom) after 24 h for the reaction catalyzed by [BMIM][l-Pro] (1:2:cat = 1:10:0.4, water molar excess relative to 1, DMSO-d6).
Figure 5. (a) Evolution of the concentration of the aldol product (3) with time for the different systems studied in DMSO-d6 (aldehyde(1):ketone(2) = 1:10) Catalytic systems: l-proline (★); [BMIM][l-Pro] (□); (±)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro (♦); (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro (●); (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro (▲); inset: l-Pro:(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-Cl (1:4) (●). (b) Evolution of the concentration of 3 with time for the reaction catalyzed by [BMIM][l-Pro] in DMSO-d6 under different conditions; 1:2:cat:H2O: 1:10:0.4:0 (●); 1:10:0.4:10 (▲); 1:30:0.4:10 (■). (c) Effect of water on the yield and enantioselectivity of the aldol product (top) and on the amount of side products ((4) and (5)) formed (bottom) after 24 h for the reaction catalyzed by [BMIM][l-Pro] (1:2:cat = 1:10:0.4, water molar excess relative to 1, DMSO-d6).
Molecules 26 04190 g005
Molecules 26 04190 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Influence of the configuration at the C-OH carbon of the imidazolium cation on the enantioselectivity observed. (b) Influence of the configuration at the prolinate anion on the enantioselectivity observed towards the R aldol product. Conditions: rt, 23 h; 1:10 aldehyde(1):acetone(2) ratio; constant concentration of catalyst (0.55 M).
Figure 6. (a) Influence of the configuration at the C-OH carbon of the imidazolium cation on the enantioselectivity observed. (b) Influence of the configuration at the prolinate anion on the enantioselectivity observed towards the R aldol product. Conditions: rt, 23 h; 1:10 aldehyde(1):acetone(2) ratio; constant concentration of catalyst (0.55 M).
Molecules 26 04190 g006
Molecules 26 04190 g007 550
Figure 7. Influence of the configuration at the prolinate anion on the enantioselectivity observed for the anti (blue squares) and syn (red circles) pairs formed in the aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and cyclohexanone using different molar ratios of (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro:(S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-d-Pro (40% molar loading) at room temperature under solventless conditions: 27 h, 1:10 aldehyde(1):cyclohexanone ratio, constant concentration of catalyst (0.38 M).
Figure 7. Influence of the configuration at the prolinate anion on the enantioselectivity observed for the anti (blue squares) and syn (red circles) pairs formed in the aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and cyclohexanone using different molar ratios of (S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro:(S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-d-Pro (40% molar loading) at room temperature under solventless conditions: 27 h, 1:10 aldehyde(1):cyclohexanone ratio, constant concentration of catalyst (0.38 M).
Molecules 26 04190 g007
Table
Table 1. Results for the aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and acetone with different imidazolium l-prolinates (40% catalyst loading) at room temperature in toluene 1.
Table 1. Results for the aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and acetone with different imidazolium l-prolinates (40% catalyst loading) at room temperature in toluene 1.
EntryImidazolium SaltsConversion (%) 2Selectivity (%) 2Yield (%) 2ee (%) 3
1 4-10991050
2[BMIM][l-Pro]45954360
3(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro73946966
4(S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro68936370
1 Conditions: 1:10:0.4 aldehyde(1):acetone(2):cat ratio, toluene (1 mL), rt, 44 h; constant concentration of catalyst (0.04 M). 2 Conversion, selectivity (percentage of aldol compounds in the products of transformation of the aldehyde), and aldol yield calculated by 1H-NMR in the crude of the reaction. 3 Enantiomeric excess calculated by HPLC for the R enantiomer (major peak) [ee = (peak area (R) − peak area (S)) × 100/total area (R + S)]. 4 l-proline was used as the catalyst (40%).
Table
Table 2. Results for the aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and acetone with different imidazolium l-prolinates (40% catalyst loading) at room temperature in DMSO-d6 1.
Table 2. Results for the aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and acetone with different imidazolium l-prolinates (40% catalyst loading) at room temperature in DMSO-d6 1.
EntryCatalystConv.
(%) 2		Yield
(%) 2		Side Products
(4 + 5)(%) 3		ee (%) 4
1 5l-Pro7093236
2[BMIM][l-Pro]63112356
3(S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro70172673
4(±)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro6492762
5(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro80173281
6 6l-Pro + (R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-Cl99731470
1 Conditions: 1:10:0.4 aldehyde(1):acetone(2):cat ratio, DMSO-d6, rt, 24 h; constant concentration of catalyst (0.02 M). 2 Conversion, selectivity, and yield calculated by 1H-NMR in the crude of the reaction. 3 Overall molar percentage for the four side products (4 + 5) detected. 4 Enantiomeric excess calculated by HPLC for the R enantiomer (major peak) [ee = (peak area (R) − peak area (S)) × 100/total area (R + S)]. 5 l-proline was used as the catalyst (40%). 6 l-proline:(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-Cl (1:4).
Table
Table 3. Results for the aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and acetone-d6 with different imidazolium l-prolinates (40% catalyst loading) at room temperature under solventless conditions 1.
Table 3. Results for the aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and acetone-d6 with different imidazolium l-prolinates (40% catalyst loading) at room temperature under solventless conditions 1.
EntryImidazolium SaltsConversion (%) 2Selectivity (%) 2ee (%) 3
1[BMIM][l-Pro]>999120
2(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro>999866
3(S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro>997943
4(R,S)-cis-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro>999564
5(±)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro>999664
6(R,R)-trans-Cy5-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro>999068
7(S,S)-trans-Cy5-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro>999060
1 Conditions: 1:10 aldehyde(1):acetone-d6(2) ratio, rt, 24 h, constant concentration of catalyst (0.55 M). 2 Conversion, selectivity (percentage of aldol compounds in the products of transformation of the aldehyde), and aldol yield calculated by 1H-NMR in the crude of the reaction. 3 Enantiomeric excess calculated by HPLC for the enantiomer R (major peak) [ee = (peak area (R) − peak area (S)) × 100/total area (R + S)].
Table
Table 4. Results for the aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and cyclohexanone using different prolinates (40% catalyst loading) at room temperature in the absence of solvent 1.
Table 4. Results for the aldol reaction between p-nitrobenzaldehyde and cyclohexanone using different prolinates (40% catalyst loading) at room temperature in the absence of solvent 1.
EntryCatalystYield (%) 2Selectivity
anti:syn 2		eeanti (%) 3eesyn (%) 3
1[BMIM][l-Pro]8686:1490−3
2(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro7975:2586−74
3(S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro8082:1890−23
4(R,R)-trans-Cy5-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro9990:109573
5(S,S)-trans-Cy5-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro9990:109679
1 Conditions: 1:10 aldehyde(1):cyclohexanone ratio, rt, 27 h, constant concentration of catalyst (0.38 M). 2 Selectivity and yield calculated by 1H-NMR in the crude of the reaction. 3 Enantiomeric excess calculated by HPLC; the peak at [ee = (peak area (B) − peak area (A)) × 100/total area (A + B)], where peak (A) is the one displaying a shorter retention time in the HPLC chromatogram (for each anti or syn pair).
Table
Table 5. Results of the aldol reaction between different aldehydes and cyclohexanone at room temperature for 24 h 1.
Table 5. Results of the aldol reaction between different aldehydes and cyclohexanone at room temperature for 24 h 1.
Molecules 26 04190 i001
EntryR1CatalystYield (%) 2Selectivity
anti:syn 2		eeanti
(%) 3		eesyn
(%) 3
1Hl-proline7864:3641n.d
(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro8976:248819
(S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro7976:249971
2Cll-proline6363:3754n.d
(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro9581:199331
(S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro9279:216857
3OMel-proline----
(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro6169:318647
(S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro6068:325437
4Fl-proline3864:366560
(R,R)-trans-Cy6-OAc-Im-Bu-l-Pro9077:239251
(S,S)-trans-Cy6-OH-Im-Bu-l-Pro9373:274727
1 Conditions: 1:10 aldehyde:cyclohexanone ratio, rt, 27 h, constant concentration of catalyst (0.38 M). 2 Selectivity and yield calculated by 1H-NMR in the crude of the reaction. 3 Enantiomeric excess calculated by HPLC; the peak at [ee = (peak area (B) − peak area (A)) × 100/total area (A + B)], where peak (A) is the one displaying a shorter retention time in the HPLC chromatogram (for each anti or syn pair). n.d: not detected.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Porcar, R.; García-Verdugo, E.; Altava, B.; Burguete, M.I.; Luis, S.V. Chiral Imidazolium Prolinate Salts as Efficient Synzymatic Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Molecules 2021, 26, 4190. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144190

AMA Style

Porcar R, García-Verdugo E, Altava B, Burguete MI, Luis SV. Chiral Imidazolium Prolinate Salts as Efficient Synzymatic Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Molecules. 2021; 26(14):4190. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Porcar, Raúl, Eduardo García-Verdugo, Belén Altava, Maria Isabel Burguete, and Santiago V. Luis. 2021. "Chiral Imidazolium Prolinate Salts as Efficient Synzymatic Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction" Molecules 26, no. 14: 4190. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144190

APA Style

Porcar, R., García-Verdugo, E., Altava, B., Burguete, M. I., & Luis, S. V. (2021). Chiral Imidazolium Prolinate Salts as Efficient Synzymatic Organocatalysts for the Asymmetric Aldol Reaction. Molecules, 26(14), 4190. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144190

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop