Next Article in Journal
Protective Effects of Sal B on Oxidative Stress-Induced Aging by Regulating the Keap1/Nrf2 Signaling Pathway in Zebrafish
Next Article in Special Issue
Semisynthetic Derivatives of Selected Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids as a New Class of Antimycobacterial Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis, and In Vitro Evaluation of Novel Indolyl DiHydropyrazole Derivatives as Potential Anticancer Agents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structure Elucidation and Cholinesterase Inhibition Activity of Two New Minor Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 17
10.3390/molecules26175240
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress on Biological Activity of Amaryllidaceae and Further Isoquinoline Alkaloids in Connection with Alzheimer’s Disease

by
Lucie Cahlíková
1,*,
Rudolf Vrabec
2,
Filip Pidaný
1,
Rozálie Peřinová
1,
Negar Maafi
1,
Abdullah Al Mamun
1,
Aneta Ritomská
1,
Viriyanata Wijaya
1 and
Gerald Blunden
3
1
ADINACO Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Heyrovskeho 1203, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
2
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Heyrovskeho 1203, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
3
School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire P01 2DT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(17), 5240; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175240
Submission received: 12 July 2021 / Revised: 22 August 2021 / Accepted: 27 August 2021 / Published: 29 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alkaloids and Their Synthetic Derivatives as Inspiration for Medicinal Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive age-related neurodegenerative disease recognized as the most common form of dementia among elderly people. Due to the fact that the exact pathogenesis of AD still remains to be fully elucidated, the treatment is only symptomatic and available drugs are not able to modify AD progression. Considering the increase in life expectancy worldwide, AD rates are predicted to increase enormously, and thus the search for new AD drugs is urgently needed. Due to their complex nitrogen-containing structures, alkaloids are considered to be promising candidates for use in the treatment of AD. Since the introduction of galanthamine as an antidementia drug in 2001, Amaryllidaceae alkaloids (AAs) and further isoquinoline alkaloids (IAs) have been one of the most studied groups of alkaloids. In the last few years, several compounds of new structure types have been isolated and evaluated for their biological activity connected with AD. The present review aims to comprehensively summarize recent progress on AAs and IAs since 2010 up to June 2021 as potential drugs for the treatment of AD.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a multifactorial neurodegenerative disease that affects the elderly population, is the most common form of dementia that is generally diagnosed in individuals over the age of 65 years, and the one with the strongest societal impact with regard to incidence, prevalence, mortality rate, and cost of care [1,2,3]. The prevalence of AD is growing rapidly, in line with an increase in the age of the population. AD currently affects over 50 million people worldwide and is estimated to nearly triple by 2050 [4]. The exact cause of AD is constantly under debate and review. Several hypotheses have been put forward, including cholinergic, amyloid beta (Aβ), hyperphosphorylation of τ-protein, calcium dyshomeostasis, and oxidative stress [5,6]. Pathological changes in the brain of a patient with AD can occur more than twenty years before clinical symptoms are apparent [7]. From a neuropathological point of view, the most pronounced selective cholinergic neuronal loss is accompanied by the formation of intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of hyperphosphorylated τ-protein and extracellular senile plaques (SPs) formed by β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) [8]. SPs are extracellular deposits composed of various peptide fragments (Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42)) derived from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) [9]. These proteins generate deposits in specific areas of the brain and are considered critical factors for memory loss and cognitive impairment in AD patients [10].
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE, EC 3.1.1.7) is a serine-protease that plays a pivotal role in cholinergic transmission in the central nervous system and at the neuromuscular junctions (NMJ). The physiological function of AChE is to hydrolyze acetylcholine (ACh) to afford choline (Chol) and acetic acid, thus playing a key role in cholinergic neurotransmission within the autonomic and somatic nervous system [11]. AChE is mainly expressed in nervous tissue, neuromuscular junctions, plasma and red blood cells [2,12]. In the human brain, there are two structural types of AChE: type G4 (tetramer, highly prevalent) and monomer G1 (in minor amount). The proportion of G1 (monomer) is significantly increased in AD [13].
Similar to AChE, another cholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE, EC 3.1.1.8) can also inactivate ACh. Whilst, under normal conditions, BuChE is responsible for 20% of the total brain cholinesterase activity, in the later stages of AD the activity of BuChE increases to 40–90% in certain brain regions. This dramatic switch between the AChE/BuChE ratio implies a change from a supportive role to a leading role for BuChE in hydrolyzing the excess of ACh [14]. The two enzymes have different abilities to hydrolyze substrates. These differences are probably caused by changes in the arrangement of amino acids in the aromatic cavity. Altered expression of AChE in the brain of patients with AD suggests that AChE activity increases at the periphery of the amyloid plaque (around the Aβ plaques) and Aβ may actually affect the levels of AChE. It has been found that different forms of AChE in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with AD are changed in connection with abnormal glycosylation [15]. While the role of AChE in neurodegenerative diseases is relatively well known, that of BuChE is still not completely clarified. This pseudocholinesterase does not have natural substrates in the organism [13]. Some studies have shown that BuChE may indirectly contribute to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by causing insulin resistance [16]. Sharing the pathological similarities between AD and T2DM (enhanced amyloid beta aggregation, abnormal levels of cholinesterase) gave rise to the hypothesis that cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) can potentially treat both these disorders. Although ChEIs afford mostly a symptomatic response to AD patients, the development of new ChEIs (e.g., multifunctional ligands, selective BuChE inhibitors) remains of interest to treat neurodegenerative diseases. ChEIs may also be used as a treatment for an autoimmune disease named myasthenia gravis, by targeting nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction, and as a prophylactic treatment against organophosphorus nerve agent poisoning [17,18].
Excitatory glutamatergic neurotransmission via the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) is critical for synaptic plasticity and the survival of neurons. Glutamate is the most abundant excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian CNS. It is extensively distributed in the CNS, where it is almost exclusively located intracellularly [19]. However, excessive NMDAR activity causes excitotoxicity and promotes cell death, underlying a potential mechanism of neurodegeneration that occurs in AD. The glutamatergic hypothesis postulates that the progressive cognitive decline seen in AD patients is due to neuronal cell death caused by the overactivation of NMDA receptors and the subsequent pathological increase in intracellular calcium. Several studies have shown that both soluble Aβ oligomers and τ-protein can interact with several glutamate signaling proteins, such as NMDA receptors and proteins involved in glutamate uptake and recycling, leading to glutamate excitotoxicity [20]. Several current AD treatments target glutamatergic signaling, including memantine, which is an FDA-approved low-affinity NMDA receptor antagonist.
As mentioned above, one of the neuropathological characteristics of AD is the presence of NFTs, in which the formation enzyme glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β, EC 2.7.11.26) plays an important role. GSK-3β is a multifunctional serine/threonine kinase, which is recognized as a key component of multiple signaling pathways [2]. It plays a crucial role in cellular functions, including cell-cycle regulation, differentiation, and proliferation. More recently, GSK-3β has been found to play a crucial role in neurodegeneration in general and AD in particular [21]. In AD, the overactivity and/or overexpression of GSK-3β accounts for memory impairment, tau hyperphosphorylation, increased β-amyloid production and local plaque-associated microglial-mediated inflammatory responses, which are hallmarks of the disease [22]. Since the phosphorylation of τ-proteins is primarily dependent on GSK-3β and cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5, EC 2.7.11.22) [23], inhibition of GSK-3β and CDK5 is accepted as a promising strategy for the treatment of AD [24].
In pathological processes such as neurodegeneration and depression, low levels of monoamine neurotransmitters have been found. Studies have shown that activated monoamine oxidase (MAO) in the brain of patients with AD is a biomarker for the disease, and it is presumed to induce overproduction of hydroxyl radicals in the brain triggering a biochemical cascade connected to the deposition of Aβ plaques [25,26]. MAO exists as two isoenzymes in humans—MAO-A and MAO-B—which are distinct due to different amino acid sequences, three-dimensional structures, distribution in organs and tissue, inhibitor sensitivities and substrate specificity. Activated MAO-B leads to cognitive dysfunction, destroys cholinergic neurons, causes disorder of the cholinergic system and contributes to the formation of amyloid plaques [27]. MAO inhibitors have neuroprotective effects related to oxidative stress, which are desirable properties for the development of multi-target drugs for AD.
In recent years, the enzyme prolyl oligopeptidase (POP, EC 3.4.21.26) has gained importance as a target for the treatment of schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar affective disorder (BD) and cognitive disturbances, such as those present in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). POP is a serine protease of the S9 protein family that cleaves peptide bonds at the carboxyl end of proline [28]. POP is primarily expressed in the hippocampus, hypothalamus, amygdala, cortex and striatum regions of the brain [29]. It has been discussed that reduced POP activity correlated to the tau pathology and severity of AD [30]. Moreover, POP is associated with learning and memory because it degrades several neuro-peptides; thus, inhibition of POP can impose an interesting alternative for AD treatment [31].
The current treatment, based on the cholinergic hypothesis, is only symptomatic and mainly involves the restoration of ACh levels through AChE inhibition [11]. Three AChE inhibitors, namely, donepezil, galanthamine, and rivastigmine, and one fixed-combination of donepezil and memantine (approved in 2014) are currently used as the main therapeutic option for AD treatment [32,33]. These available drugs are marketed for mild to severe stages of AD. They are able to alleviate cognitive and behavioral symptoms for only a limited period (few months after the start of treatment) [32].
In June 2021, a new AD drug named aducanumab, sold under the brand name Aduhelm, was approved in the USA by the FDA. Aducanumab, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody, is the first drug with a putative disease-modifying mechanism for the treatment of this devastating disorder, namely, the removal of β-amyloid (or Aβ) plaques from the brain [34]. The decision was highly controversial and led to the resignation of three FDA advisers because of the absence of evidence that the drug is effective, as clinical trials gave conflicting results on its effectiveness [35,36].
Natural products represent an important source of clinical drugs, especially for their structural diversity and a wide range of biological activities [37]. Alkaloids are, without a doubt, the most intriguing templates of natural origin [38]. Given the fact that Alzheimer’s disease has become an important topic in recent years, and a large number of papers have been published on this subject, this review covers the recent progress on Amaryllidaceae alkaloids and further isoquinoline alkaloids, and their biological activity related to AD published between 2010 and 2021. Previous results can be found in the following review articles [39,40,41,42]. Recently, a detailed review on cholinesterase inhibitors from marine organisms has been published [41].

2. Isolation of Alkaloids from Plant Material for Biological Evaluation

The critical step in the biological evaluation of AAs is their isolation from plant materials, and thus much of the activity has been directed towards the development of optimum methods for the isolation of alkaloids and alkaloid mixtures. Because the alkaloids usually occur in plants as salts of organic plant acids and inorganic acids, together with complex mixtures of water-soluble compounds, it is often a problem to remove all of these non-alkaloidal compounds during isolation and purification [43,44,45]. Most alkaloids are insoluble in water and more or less soluble in such organic solvents as ether, chloroform, dichloromethane, and ethyl acetate, whereas their salts have just the opposite solubility characteristics [46].
The general methods of extraction and isolation of alkaloids include the separation of them from the main bulk of the non-alkaloidal substances with solvents such as methanol and ethanol; in some studies, n-butanol has also been used [44,47]. The crude concentrated extract is often subjected to successive extractions with ether, ethyl acetate, chloroform or dichloromethane using the acid-base properties of alkaloids. When the crude extract is exposed to an alkaline medium, the alkaloidal salts are readily converted to the corresponding alkaloid bases to form a concentrated alkaloidal extract. These concentrated alkaloidal extracts are subsequently separated by either silica gel or aluminum oxide column chromatography (CC), flash chromatography (FC), preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), preparative thin layer chromatography (TLC), and crystallization [43,46]. CC is used especially when a higher amount of plant material is available for the isolation of AAs (normally over 1 kg). Because of the possible formation of isolation artifacts of alkaloids (like N-chloromethyl-, methoxy-, ethoxy- and butoxy-derivatives), it is necessary to specify the used solvents within all steps of the phytochemical study to identify if the isolated compound is really a natural product [48,49,50]. Alcohols can react with a carboxylic group to form esters, and with hemiacetals to form acetals. As a result of the interaction of alcoholic solvents (e.g., methanol and ethanol) with hydroxy groups, methoxy and ethoxy functions can be detected within isolated products. Within Amaryllidaceae alkaloids (AAs), butoxy-derivatives have also been described when n-butanol has been used within the phytochemical study [49,51]. Halogen-containing solvents are very unstable, because of their direct interaction with molecules, and because of the presence of contaminants as well [52]. It has been reported that chloroform can directly react with alkaloids, as in the case of AAs and protoberberine-type isoquinoline alkaloids [53]. Furthermore, chloroform can accelerate the decomposition processes of compounds, especially when the solutions of fractions and subfractions are not stored in the dark [52].

3. Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids

AAs are one of the most studied groups of secondary metabolites in connection with AD. Chemically, they represent a large group of isoquinoline alkaloids, which are produced exclusively by plants of the Amaryllidaceae family and are reported as a separate group of alkaloids. These alkaloids are derived from the aromatic acids phenylalanine and tyrosine, which are used to produce key intermediates in the biosynthesis of the AA 4-O-methylnorbelladine [54]. This compound subsequently undergoes different types of intramolecular oxidative couplings, which leads to the formation of the basic structural types of AAs: galanthamine, lycorine, haemanthamine, crinine, homolycorine, tazettine, and montanine.
The biological activity of Amaryllidaceae plants is connected with the presence of AAs, which demonstrate a wide range of biological activities, including antitumor, antibacterial, antioxidant, antiparasitic, antifungal, anti-inflammatory and insect antifeedant effects, as well as acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activities [47,55,56]. The most known AA is galanthamine, originally isolated from Galanthus woronowii Losinsk. [57], which is a reversible, competitive acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Additionally, galanthamine binds to the allosteric sites of nicotinic receptors, which causes a conformational change [58]. This allosteric modulation increases the nicotinic receptor’s response to acetylcholine. The activation of presynaptic nicotinic receptors increases the release of acetylcholine, further increasing its availability [59].
Galanthamine was approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in 2001 for the treatment of mild to moderate stages of AD. In the early 21st century, it was reported that the acetylcholinesterase activity of AAs is mainly associated with the galanthamine- and lycorine- structural types [60], but in the last decade, new structural types of AAs have been identified as interesting cholinesterase inhibitors (Table 1).
Two new structural types of AAs, named narcikachnine- and carltonine-type, have been isolated in the last five years from various Amaryllidaceae plants. The former combines in its structure both the galanthamine- and galanthindole-type. So far, five AAs of this structural type have been isolated from Zephyranthes citrina, Narcissus pseudonarcissus cv. Carton, N. pseudonarcissus cv. Dutch Master, and N. poeticus cv. Pink Parasol [61,62,63,64], and four of them were screened for hAChE/hBuChE inhibition potential (Table 1, Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Before the results of the inhibition potency of newly isolated and tested alkaloids are discussed, it is worth mentioning that, for the determination of cholinesterase inhibition potential, it is important that the source of the used enzymes is reported, e.g., electric eel acetylcholinesterase (EeAChE), human acetylcholinesterase hAChE, mouse brain acetylcholinesterase, equine serum BuChE (EqBuChE), and human BuChE (hBuChE). The use of different types of enzyme can result in dramatic differences in the obtained IC50 values. This can be demonstrated with acetylcaranine, which showed interesting activity against EeAChE (IC50 = 11.7 ± 0.7 μM) [65]. When hAChE was used for the study, acetylcaranine was evaluated as a weak inhibitor (IC50 = 443.7 ± 62.4 μM) [66]. This phenomenon has also been described recently for 1-O-acetyllycorine [66], reported as a strong EeAChE inhibitor (IC50 = 0.96 ± 0.04 μM) [67,68], but inactive against hAChE (IC50 = > 1000 μM) [66]. In Table 1 and Table 2, the source of enzyme for each IC50 value is stated.
The recently isolated narcibaduliine from N. pseudonarcissus cv. Carton demonstrated a similar inhibitory activity towards both cholinesterases, with IC50 values of 3.29 ± 0.73 μM for hAChE, and 3.44 ± 0.02 μM for hBuChE [64]. The best hBuChE inhibition activity within the narcikachnine-type AAs has been demonstrated by narcieliine (IC50 = 1.3 ± 0.3 μM) [63]. The only structural difference from narciabduliine was found in a C-3′,C-4′-substitution in the galanthindole moiety (Figure 1; differences marked in red). Narcieliine was also subjected to enzyme kinetics analysis to determine the kinetics of hAChE/hBuChE inhibition. Enzyme velocity curves were recorded at several concentrations of narcieliine, and analysis of them revealed a competitive type of inhibition for hAChE and a mixed type of inhibition for hBuChE. Due to the isolation of only a low amount of narciabduliine, the type of inhibition of this alkaloid has not been studied. To determine the critical structure aspects responsible for the hAChE/hBuChE activities of narcieliine and narciabduliine, molecular modeling studies were applied [63,64]. In the case of narciabduliine, the top-scored position in the cavity of hAChE revealed that the galanthamine moiety is bound to the catalytic anionic site (CAS), whereas the galanthindole core is lodged peripherally. Interaction of narciabduliine with the oxyanion hole, formed by Gly120-122 residues, is mediated via hydrogen bonds to both the hydroxyl group of the cyclohex-2-en-1-ol moiety and the methoxy group of the phenyl ring. Moreover, the hydroxyl group seems to stand aside from the Ser203 residue, and rotation of Ser203 to a plausible interaction with the hydroxyl moiety may occur. The galanthindole moiety is sandwiched between Tyr337 and Tyr341 by parallel π–π stacking, hampering the hydrogen-bond donor contact between the hydroxyl group of Tyr337 to nitrogen from an azepine ring in narciabduliine. In general, the overall topology of narciabduliine in hAChE shares a high similarity to that of galanthamine, but the galanthindole core allowed additional spanning of narciabduliine into the peripheral anionic site (PAS) of the enzyme. The best scoring pose of narciabduliine in the active site of hBuChE indicated that the ligand adopted an inverse accommodation to that observed for the hAChE complex. The galanthindole moiety is buried inside the enzyme’s cavity, whereas the galanthamine core of narciabduliine is situated distally. The critical interaction for galanthindole is distorted π–π stacking between the 1-methyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-indole moiety of narciabduliine and Trp82, a hydrogen bond between the oxygen of the methoxy group and hydrogen at the 1-methyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-indole moiety, two hydrogen bonds between the phenolic hydroxyl functionality of narciabduliine and glycine residues 116 and 117, and plausible hydrogen contact to Ser198 from the catalytic triad. The galanthamine moiety seems to contribute less to the overall ligand anchoring, forming hydrophobic contacts with Tyr332 and Gln119 only (Figure 2) [64].
Similar interactions have been observed for narcieliine, which expands the catalytic anionic site (CAS) of hAChE entirely, with several apparent interactions. The “galanthamine” core is lodged centrally, and the “galanthindole” part is protruding out of the gorge, contacting several other amino acid residues. A closer view of the interaction between narcieliine and hBuChE revealed that the galanthindole moiety is anchored in the vicinity of the catalytic triad, but not involved in direct contact with this part of the enzyme [63].
Narcieliine was also tested for its POP inhibition potential, reaching the same magnitude of inhibition (IC50 = 163 ± 13 μM) as that of berberine, which is recognized as a natural POP inhibitor (IC50 = 142 ± 21 μM) [75]. The highest POP inhibition potential within the isolated narcikachnine type alkaloids has been shown by narcimatuline, isolated from N. poeticus cv. Dutch Master, with an IC50 value of 29.1 ± 1.0 μM (Table 1, Figure 1). This alkaloid also showed interesting hBuChE activity (IC50 = 5.9 ± 0.2 μM) and has been identified as a mild GSK-3β inhibitor (IC50 = 20.7 ± 2.4 μM) [62].
Since the prediction of CNS availability is critical for the development of drugs for neurodegenerative diseases, the logBB values of the most active compounds have been calculated. This value predicts the logarithmic ratio between the concentration of the compound in the brain (Cbrain) and blood (Cblood) [76]. The obtained logBB values for narciabduliine and narcieliine (Figure 1) indicated that both alkaloids should be able to reach the target area in the CNS. Moreover, the PAMPA-BBB screening method was also applied for narcieliine to predict passive diffusion through biological membranes, employing a brain lipid porcine membrane [77,78]. The obtained result for the in vitro permeability of narcieliine (Pe = 14.1 ± 1.0 10−6 cm s−1) indicated that it can cross the BBB by passive diffusion. Narciabduliine was unable to be studied for in vitro permeability due to the isolation of only a low amount of this alkaloid [64].
Taken together, the narcikachnine type is an interesting group of AAs with promising biological activities in connection with the potential treatment of AD. Unfortunately, these compounds are present in plants only in low concentration; thus, the development of a synthetic route is of interest.
The second newly discovered structural type of AAs, the carltonine-type, contains in its structure a belladine moiety combined with a lycosinine fragment (Figure 3). In the hAChE assay, all members of the carltonine-type displayed marginal inhibition potency (Table 1). On the other hand, these compounds showed promising inhibition activity towards hBuChE (Table 1). Carltonine A and carltonine B displayed IC50 values in the nanomolar range (hBuChE IC50 = 910 nM, and 31 nM, respectively). From the structural perspective, both AAs are endowed with the same core structure, differing only in the substitution at positions C-5′and C-6′, respectively (Figure 3). The presence of a 1,3-dioxalane ring in carltonine B compared with its opened dimethoxybenzene analogue carltonine A is plausibly responsible for the almost 30 times drop in hBuChE inhibition activity (Figure 3; the differences marked in blue). The last carltonine-type alkaloid, carltonine C, contains in its structure an additional lycosinine fragment (Figure 3); this additional part of the structure is connected with a dramatic decline in the hBuChE inhibition activity (IC50 = 14.8 ± 1.1 μM) [56].
Molecular modeling studies were applied to reveal fundamental interactions and to identify structure details responsible for the dramatic drop in hBuChE inhibition activity. The in silico observations deduced that the higher inhibition potency of carltonine B over carltonine A might be attributed to the presence of the 2H-1,3-benzodioxole moiety for its “extended” aromatic properties that, especially in the pseudo-enantiomer, broaden the range of hydrophobic interactions between ligand and enzyme [56].
Due to the isolated amounts, only carltonine A has been studied for POP inhibition potency. It showed activity in the same range as that of berberine (Table 1). The significant hBuChE inhibition activity of alkaloids of this structural type and the fact that these alkaloids are present in plants only in trace amounts (from 30 kg of fresh bulbs of N. pseudonarcissus cv. Carlton, 70 mg of carltonine A, 6 mg of carltonine B, and 7 mg of carltonine C were isolated) mean that the total synthesis of these compounds is a future challenge for medicinal chemistry.
Close derivatives with a norbelladine framework (N-benzyl-2-phenylethan-1-amine congeners) have been developed by Carmona-Viglianco et al. [79] and screened for their AChE/BuChE potency (Figure 4). Generally, these derivatives yielded moderate to weak inhibition potency against both cholinesterases with IC50 values above 10 µM. The structure of the best AChE/BuChE inhibitor within this study (1) is displayed in Figure 3, together with belladine-type AAs. The latest study published by Al Mamun et al. [80] reported synthesis of compounds with the same fundamental unit, but the developed compounds possessed different substitution patterns within the A-ring (Figure 3). Seven compounds of the twenty synthesized possessed a strong and selective hBuChE inhibition profile, with IC50 values below 1 μM [80]. The most potent one showed nanomolar range activity with an IC50 value of 72 nM and an excellent selectivity pattern over AChE, reaching almost 1400 (Figure 3). The top-ranked compound (2) was further studied by enzyme kinetics, along with in silico techniques, to reveal the mode of inhibition. The prediction of CNS availability estimates that all synthesized compounds within the survey can pass through the blood–brain barrier (BBB), as disclosed by the BBB score. These synthetic compounds, inspired by the norbelladine structural type of AAs, display an interesting structure scaffold for further development of selective hBuChE inhibitors [80].
A phytochemical study of bulbs of Lycoris longituba yielded thirteen AAs that have been screened for their neuroprotective, and electric eel AChE (EeAChE) inhibition activity [70]. The natural existence of isolated alkaloids with a N-chloromethyl moiety in the structure, as in N-(chloromethyl)galanthamine and N-(chloromethyl)lycoramine isolated from this plant must be first reinvestigated, because when halogenated solvents are used during the isolation process, this can result in the formation of N-chloromethyl alkaloid derivative artifacts (Figure 4) [48,49]. The best EeAChE inhibitors belong to the galanthamine type (e.g., N-norgalanthamine (IC50 = 2.76 ± 0.65 μM) and 11β-hydroxygalanthamine (IC50 = 3.04 ± 0.61 μM)). Interesting activity was also obtained for AAs of further structural types (e.g., narciclassine type AA N-methylcrinasiadine (IC50 = 4.23 ± 1.13 μM; Table 1)) [70]. Some of the isolated alkaloids also showed promising neuroprotective effects against CoCl2, H2O2, and Aβ25–35-induced neuronal cell death in dopaminergic neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Incartine, trisphaeridine, N-(chloromethyl)galanthamine, sanguinine, O-demethyllycoramine, and deoxypretazettine showed significant neuroprotective effects against all three injury models [70]. Lycolongirine C and N-methylcrinasiadine exhibited significant neuroprotective activities against H2O2 and Aβ25–35-induced cell death [70]. Homolycorine- and galanthamine-type AAs isolated from the bulbs of L. aurea showed significant neuroprotective effects against CoCl2-induced SH-SY5Y cell injury, while N-norgalanthamine, N-(chloromethyl)galanthamine, N-(chloromethyl)lycoramine, 2α-hydroxy-6-O-methyloduline, 2α-hydroxy-6-O-n-butyloduline, O-n-butyllycorenine, O-methyllycorenine-N-oxide and pluviine showed obvious neuroprotective effects against H2O2-induced SH-SY5Y cell death [51]. The same models have been used for the evaluation of neuroprotective alkaloids isolated from L. sprengeri. Two alkaloids, namely, O-methyllycorenine and hippadine, exhibited significant neuroprotective effects against H2O2-induced SH-SY5Y cell death; lycosprenine, O-methyllycorenine, and tortuosine showed obvious neuroprotective effects against CoCl2-induced SH-SY5Y cell injury [81]. The results obtained within the mentioned studies indicate that AAs of homolycorine-, lycorine-, and galanthamine-type may have potential for further development as neuroprotective compounds. The cited studies are one of the few that have addressed the neuroprotective activity of individual AAs. Most of the studies dealing with the neuroprotective activity of AAs have used complex alkaloidal extracts accompanied by GC/MS analysis [82,83,84]. However, studies performed on mixtures are not able to identify which compound is responsible for the studied activity. Moreover, synergistic effects can occur. It is highly unlikely that a complex mixture will be used for the treatment of AD, and thus studies of individual compounds are required.
Under pathological conditions, such as in AD, the imbalance of the neurotransmitter leads to excitotoxic processes. There is an increase in the intraneuronal concentrations of Ca+, which causes mitochondrial dysfunction, the activation of proteases and the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [85]. The brain is particularly vulnerable to damage caused by ROS and RNS, due to the high consumption of oxygen and its high lipid content [86]. Galanthamine is able to stabilize free radicals due to the presence of the enol group in its structure [87]. It is well known that molecules with phenolic groups have a greater capacity to stabilize ROS and RNS. On the other hand, it has been shown that these groups are inefficient when crossing the BBB [88], a pharmacokinetic limitation for drugs which should reach the CNS area, as in the treatment of AD. Recently, the antioxidant activity of several fractions of alkaloids isolated from Amaryllidaceae species has been studied using a model of glutamate (Glu) excitotoxicity in rat cortical neurons [89]. The study showed a possible neuroprotective mode of action of the alkaloidal fractions of Eucharis bonplandii bulbs, E. caucana bulbs and Clivia miniata leaves due to the presence of phenol and enol groups in the structures of the AAs. Additionally, the pair of free electrons on the N is spatially close to hydroxyl groups, which benefits the cleavage of this group and consequently the stabilization of the generated O· [89].
The alkaloidal extract of Hippeastrum reticulatum bulbs (AHR) has been studied for its ameliorating effects on memory and cognitive dysfunction in a scopolamine-induced rodent model of AD using a Y-maze, the novel object recognition test (NORT), and the Morris water maze (MWM) test [90]. Sixty Swiss male mice, divided into six groups, received samples for 15 days. The normal group received saline and the scopolamine-treated group scopolamine (1.5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection). The test group received AHR (5, 10 and 15 mg/kg, per os) and the positive control group donepezil (5 mg/kg, per os), administered 1 h before the test; scopolamine was injected 30 min prior to testing. The results of in vivo studies showed that AHR (15 mg/kg) significantly increased spontaneous alternation performance in the Y-maze test, and significantly increased the time spent exploring the novel object compared with the scopolamine-treated group. In the MWM test, the administration of AHR at doses of 10 and 15 mg/kg significantly decreased escape latency and swimming distance to the platform, which indicates learning and spatial memory abilities of the mice [90].
Two standardized alkaloidal extracts of Zephyranthes carinata (bulbs and leaves) were evaluated for their in vitro and in vivo neuroprotective potential. In order to select the most promising extract for in vivo study in a triple transgenic mouse model of AD (3xTg-AD), an in vitro excitotoxicity model was used. The extract of bulbs of Z. carinata (BZC) protected neurons against a Glu-mediated toxic stimulus in vitro, and consequent in vivo experiments showed the effects of the intraperitoneal administration of BZC extract (10 mg/kg) every 12 h for 1 month on learning and spatial memory of 3xTg-AD (18 months old) [91]. Histopathologically, a significant reduction in tauopathy and astrogliosis was observed, as well as a significant decrease in the proinflammatory marker COX-2, which indicates the potential of BZC alkaloids for further biological evaluation.
Further AAs, isolated and tested in the last decade, with interesting biological activity related to AD are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 4 and Figure 5.

4. Further Isoquinoline Alkaloids

Isoquinoline alkaloids (IAs) belong to one of the most complex families of plant alkaloids. They are widely distributed in plants coming from the families Papaveraceae, Rutaceae, Berberidaceae, Menispermaceae, Ranunculaceae, and Annonaceae [92]. Several species of Magnoliaceae and Convolvulaceae are also rich in these alkaloids and have been intensively investigated for their various biological activities [93]. Based on different degrees of oxygenation, intramolecular rearrangements, distribution, and the presence of additional rings connected to the main system, they may be divided into eight subgroups: benzylisoquinoline, aporphine, protoberberine, benzo[c]phenanthridine, protopine, phthalideisoquinoline, morphinan, and emetine alkaloids. The largest and most studied group among the listed subgroups is protoberberines, the activity of which on cholinesterases has been evaluated by numerous authors, mainly regarding the quaternary compounds berberine and palmatine [94,95,96]. In the last decade, several new IAs with interesting biological activity towards AD have been isolated.
The detailed phytochemical study of the alkaloidal extract of the root bark of Berberis vulgaris (Berberidaceae) led to the isolation of ten isoquinoline alkaloids. Compounds isolated in sufficient amounts were evaluated for their in vitro hAChE, hBuChE, POP and GSK-3β inhibitory activities [97]. Significant hBuChE inhibition potential was demonstrated by the newly isolated bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloids aromoline (IC50 = 0.82 ± 0.10 μM), and berbostrejdine (IC50 = 6.9 ± 1.0 μM). Both alkaloids were only weak hAChE inhibitors. On the other hand, aromoline showed only slightly lower POP inhibition potency than the used standard, berberine (Table 2). The balanced hBuChE and POP inhibitory abilities of aromoline initiated its screening for GSK-3β inhibition activity at a concentration of 10 μM. Unfortunately, the assayed compound showed only weak inhibition potency (Table 2). Kinetic studies of aromoline indicated that it acts as a mixed inhibitor of hBuChE. To identify structural determinants responsible for the ligand binding, a molecular modeling simulation exploiting the crystal structure of hBuChE (PDB ID: 4BDS) was carried out [98]. Aromoline was seen to be lodged near all of the catalytic triad residues establishing parallel π–π interactions of the phenolic moiety with His438. This part of the molecule of aromoline was implicated in a conventional hydrogen bond with Ser198. Additionally, Glu197 showed van der Waals forces with aromoline, and Tyr332, enabling the formation of T-shaped π–π stacking with one of the 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline moieties.
The whole plant of Berberis vulgaris is generally considered a rich source of the quaternary protoberberine alkaloids berberine and palmatine, which have been identified as AChE inhibitors. The biological activities of these compounds in relation to AD have been recently summarized in various articles and detailed information can be found in the following reviews [38,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108].
Extensive phytochemical study of whole plants of Corydalis mucronifera (Papaveraceae) yielded previously undescribed IAs, named mucroniferanines A-M, together with 26 known IAs [109,110]. The isolated alkaloids were evaluated using EeAChE [110] and selected IAs also with equine serum BuChE [109]. Of the newly isolated compounds, the most promising activities have been shown by the quaternary protoberberine alkaloid mucroniferanine H, with IC50 values of 2.31 ± 0.20 μM for EeAChE, and 36.71 ± 1.12 μM for EqBuChE. Interesting inhibition potency has also been obtained for further mucroniferanines (Table 2). The type of inhibition and identification of structural determinants responsible for the ligand binding have not been determined.
Twelve IAs were isolated from the whole plant of Corydalis saxicola (Papaveraceae) and screened for their EeAChE and EqBuChE inhibition potential [96]. Six of the isolated IAs, including berberine and palmatine, showed potent inhibition of EeAChE activity (Table 2). Structure-activity studies demonstrated that the nitro substituent in the structure of protoberberines, such as in 1-nitroapocavidine, increases AChE inhibition potency. All of the studied alkaloids were inactive against EqBuChE (IC50 > 200 μM) [96].
Table
Table 2. Biological activities of further IAs, isolated and tested in connection with potential treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, from 2010 (alkaloids only included with an IC50 value ≤ 30 μM for AChE or BuChE; an IC50 ≤ 200 μM for POP; all results for MAO-A and inhibition of Aβ-aggregation are included).
Table 2. Biological activities of further IAs, isolated and tested in connection with potential treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, from 2010 (alkaloids only included with an IC50 value ≤ 30 μM for AChE or BuChE; an IC50 ≤ 200 μM for POP; all results for MAO-A and inhibition of Aβ-aggregation are included).
Isoquinoline AlkaloidStructural-TypePlant SourceIC50 AChE (μM)IC50 BuChE (μM)IC50 POP
(μM)		IC50 MAO-A
(μM)		IC50 Aβ
(μM)		Ref.
avicinebenzophenanthridineZanthoxylum rigidum0.15 ± 0.01 a
0.52 ± 0.05 b		0.88 ± 0.08 cn.s0.41 ± 0.025.56 ± 0.94[111]
nitidinebenzophenanthridineZanthoxylum rigidum0.65 ± 0.09 a
1.25 ± 0.09 b		5.73 ± 0.60 cn.s1.89 ± 0.171.89 ± 0.40[111]
6-ethoxydihydrochelerythrinebenzophenanthridineChelidonium majus0.83 ± 0.04 b4.20 ± 0.19 dn.s.n.s.n.s.[112]
chelerythrinebenzophenanthridineChelidonium majus1.54 ± 0.07 b
3.78 ± 0.15 a		6.33 ± 0.93 c 10.34 ± 0.24 dn.s.0.55 ± 0.044.20 ± 0.43[113,114]
sanguinarinebenzophenanthridineCorydalis saxicola1.93 ± 0.01 a>200 cn.s.n.s.n.s.[96]
mucroniferanine H (racemic mixture)protoberberineCorydalis mucronifera2.31 ± 0.20 a36.71 ± 1.12 cn.s.n.s.n.s.[109]
6-ethoxydihydrosanguinarinebenzophenanthridineChelidonium majus3.25 ± 0.24 b4.51 ± 0.31 dn.s.n.s.n.s.[112]
hydrohydrastininesimple isoquinolineCorydalis mucronifera9.13 ± 0.15 a>100 cn.s.n.s.n.s.[109]
dehydrocavidineprotoberberineCorydalis saxicola9.92 ± 0.24 *>200 *n.s.n.s.n.s.[96]
mucroniferanine G (diastereoisomeric mixture 1:1)phthalideisoquinolineCorydalis mucronifera11.3 ± 0.8 an.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.[110]
mucroniferanine F (diastereosomeric mixture 1:1)phthalideisoquinolineCorydalis mucronifera12.2 ± 0.2 an.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.[110]
(+)-canadineprotoberberineCorydalis cava12.4 ± 0.9 b>100 d152.0 ± 12.5n.s.n.s.[115,116,117]
hendersine BbenzylisoquinolineCorydalis mucronifera14.22 ± 0.34 a>100 cn.s.n.s.n.s.[109]
7,8-dihydro-[1,3]-dioxolo[4,5-g]isoquinolinesimple isoquinolineStephania rotunda18.4 ± 1.4 en.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.[95]
caryachinepavinaneEschscholzia californica19.6 ± 0.4 b>100 dn.s.n.s.n.s.[118]
(+)-canadalinebenzylisoquinolineCorydalis cava20.1 ± 1.1 b85.2 ± 2.2 dn.s.n.s.n.s.[115]
remerineaporphineStephania rotunda20.7 ± 1.3 en.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.[95]
chelidoninebenzophenanthridineChelidonium majus26.8 ± 1.2 b31.9 ± 1.4 dn.s.n.s.n.s.[112]
(−)-mucroniferanine DphthalideisoquinolineCorydalis mucronifera28.3 ± 0.4 an.s.n.s.n.s.n.s.[110]
aromolinebisbenzylisoquinolineBerberis vulgaris>100 b0.82 ± 0.10 d189 ± 32n.s.n.s.[97]
berbostrejdinebisbenzylisoquinolineBerberis vulgaris66.0 ± 8.0 b6.9 ± 1.0 dn.s.n.s.n.s.[97]
N-methylcoclaurinebenzylisoquinolinePeumus boldus>100 b15.0 ± 1.4 dn.s.n.s.n.s.[119]
1-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl)-2-methyl-6,7-methylenedioxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinolinebenzylisoquinolineEschscholzia californica>100 b27.8 ± 0.4 dn.s.n.s.n.s.[118]
sinactineprotoberberineFumaria offcinalis>100 b>100 d53 ± 2n.s.n.s.[120]
californidine iodidepavinaneEschscholzia californica36.7 ± 0.9 b>100 d55.6 ± 3.5n.s.n.s.[118,121]
bersavinebisbenzylisoquinolineBerberis vulgaris68.0 ± 11.0 b>100 d67 ± 6n.s.n.s.[97]
parfumidinespirobenzylisoquinolineFumaria offcinalis>100 b>100 d99 ± 5n.s.n.s.[120]
dihydrosanguinarinebenzophenanthridineMacleaya cordata, Corydalis mucronifera>100 bn.s.99.1 ± 7.6n.s.n.s.[110,121]
corypalmineprotoberberineCorydalis cava>100 b>100 d128.0 ± 10.5n.s.n.s.[117,121]
N-methyllaurotetanineaporphinePeumus boldus>100 b>100 d135.0 ± 11.7n.s.n.s.[119,121]
sinoacutinemorphinanePeumus boldus>100 b>100 d143.1 ± 25.4n.s.n.s.[119]
bicucullinephthalideisoquinolineFumaria offcinalis>100 b>100 d190 ± 50n.s.n.s.[120]
aEeAChE; bhAChE; cEqBuChE; dhBuChE; e rat cortex AChE; * origin of used enzymes not specified within this study.
Multi-step chromatography was used for the isolation of alkaloids from the root extract of Zanthoxylum rigidum (Rutaceae) [111]. Eight purified IAs were isolated, which were tested for EeAChE, hAChE and EqBuChE inhibitory activity, as well as for monoamine oxidase (MAO-A and B) and Aβ aggregation. Two quaternary benzophenanthridine alkaloids, nitidine and avicine, were identified as multi-target candidates. Both alkaloids presented inhibitory activities against both forms of AChE with IC50 values in the (sub)micromolar concentration range (Table 2) and showed preferential activity for AChE. Moreover, avicine also demonstrated significant EqBuChE activity (IC50 = 0.88 ± 0.08 μM), with an EqBuChE/hAChE selectivity index of 1.67, confirming the dual inhibitory character of this compound. Kinetic studies indicated that avicine and nitidine are reversible-mixed inhibitors of both cholinesterases. In the MAO inhibition assay, both alkaloids demonstrated inhibition potency against isoform A of human recombinant monoaminooxidase in micromolar concentrations (Table 2) but were inactive against MAO-B (IC50 > 100 μM). In addition, these alkaloids presented moderate Aβ1-42 anti-aggregation activity (Table 2).
Seven IAs isolated from Chelidonium majus and Corydalis yanhusuo were evaluated for their potency to inhibit isoforms of recombinant MAOs. All alkaloids were first screened at a concentration of 20 μM; chelerythrine was selected for the determination of the IC50 for MAO-A, and corydaline for MAO-B. Chelerythrine showed similar selective MAO-A inhibition potency (IC50 = 0.55 ± 0.042 μM) as avicine, as discussed above [113]. The time-dependence, reversibility and kinetic study of MAO-A inhibition by chelerythrine was also studied. No changes in activity were observed after up to 30 min preincubation; thus, chelerythrine interacts with MAO-A instantaneously and acts as a reversible competitive inhibitor of MAO-A (Ki = 0.22 ± 0.033 μM). Docking simulation implied that Cys323 and Tyr444 of MAO-A are key residues for hydrogen-bond interaction with chelerythrine [113].
For the next study, roots and aerial parts of Chelidonium majus (Papaveraceae) were used; eight AAs of different structural types were isolated and screened for hAChE/hBuChE inhibitory activity [112]. Two compounds, identified as 6-ethoxydihydrosanguinarine and 6-ethoxydihydrochelerythrine, should be recognized as isolation artifacts, as in the presence of common solvents such as MeOH, EtOH and CHCl3, the free benzophenanthridine alkaloids (sanguinarine and chelerythrine) easily produce adducts [122]. On the other hand, these artifacts showed balanced cholinesterase inhibition activity, with IC50 values lower than 5 μM; 6-ethoxydihydrochelerythrine was the more potent (Table 2). These compounds can be used as templates for further development of antidementia drugs bearing a benzophenanthridine scaffold in the structure.
Column chromatography and preparative TLC of the alkaloid extract of dried tubers of Corydalis cava (Papaveraceae) led to the isolation of fifteen IAs belonging to six structural types [117]. Two protoberberine alkaloids, (+)-canadine and (+)-canadaline, were recognized as moderate hAChE inhibitors (IC50 = 12.4 ± 0.9 and 20.1 ± 1.1 μM, respectively; Table 2). As a part of an ongoing study, (+)-canadine showed POP inhibition potency comparable with that of the used standard, berberine [115].
Repeated column chromatography, preparative TLC, and crystallization led to the isolation of fourteen IAs from the roots and aerial parts of Eschscholzia californica (Papaveraceae). Most of the isolated alkaloids were recognized as weak inhibitors of hAChE/hBuChE. Moderate hAChE activity was shown by the pavinane-type alkaloid caryachine (IC50 = 19.6 ± 0.4 μM), and moderate hBuChE inhibition potency by the newly isolated benzylisoquinoline alkaloid 1-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl)-2-methyl-6,7-methylenedioxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (IC50 = 27.8 ± 0.4 μM) [118].
Extensive purification of the alkaloidal extract of whole plants of Fumaria officinalis (Papaveraceae) afforded twenty alkaloids. Compounds isolated in sufficient amounts have been screened for hAChE, hBuCh, POP and GSK-3β inhibition activity. Of the studied alkaloids, only parfumidine and sinactine exhibited interesting inhibition potency against POP (IC50 = 99 ± 5 and 53 ± 2 μM, respectively) [120]. The other isolated IAs have been considered inactive.
Two benzophenanthridine IAs (sanguinarine, chelerythrine) were evaluated for their potential to inhibit Aβ1-42 aggregation [123]. The obtained results indicate that the benzophenanthridine nucleus of both alkaloids is directly involved in the inhibitory effect on Aβ1-42 aggregation.
Dauricine, a bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid isolated from the rootstock of Menispermum dauricum (Menispermaceae) [124], has been studied for its neuroprotective effects in a murine neuroblastoma cell line (N2a) stably transfected with the human Swedish mutant form of amyloid protein precursor (APP), an AD-like cell model [125]. Employing this cell model, which overexpresses APP and hyperphosphorylates tau protein [126], and ELISA and Western blot analysis, it has been revealed that dauricine inhibited APP processing and reduced Aβ accumulation [125].
Another bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloid, tetrandrine, originally isolated from the dried root of Stephania tetrandra [127], attenuated spatial memory impairment and hippocampal inflammation by inhibiting NF-κB activation in a rat model of AD induced by Aβ1–42 [128].
Pronuciferine, a naturally occurring proaporphine alkaloid isolated from Berberis coletioides [129], has been investigated for its neuroactive effect against H2O2-induced apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells [130]. It did not show any toxicity when SH-SY5Y cells were treated with a concentration of 100 μM or less. The effect of pronuciferine on cell metabolites and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) level in SH-SY5Y has been also investigated. Pronuciferine significantly increased the intracellular BDNF protein expression at 10 μM, and thus this alkaloid can be recognized as a neuroactive molecule that might act as a neuroprotective agent to prevent apoptosis in neurodegenerative diseases.
An overview of the IAs isolated and tested in the last decade, with interesting biological activity related to AD, are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8.

5. Selected Semisynthetic Derivatives of Amaryllidaceae and Isoquinoline Alkaloids as Inspiration for Drug Development for Neurodegenerative Diseases

Since AAs and IAs display promising biological activities and some of them are available from plant material in gram amounts [56,62,73], different semisynthetic derivatives have been developed in the last ten years and screened for biological activities connected with AD.
Two series of aliphatic and aromatic esters of haemanthamine were synthesized by Kohelová et al. [131] and Peřinová et. al. [132]. The free hydroxyl group on C-11 of haemanthamine was esterified with different anhydrides and also acylated with differently substituted benzoyl chlorides affording the corresponding esters [131]. The strongest hAChE inhibition capacity within twenty-four haemanthamine derivatives was demonstrated by the 11-O-(2-nitrobenzoyl- (3), 11-O-(3-nitrobenzoyl)- (4) and 11-O-(2-chlorobenzoyl)- (5) derivatives of haemanthamine with IC50 values of 9.9 ± 0.5 μM for 3, 4.0 ± 0.3 μM for 4, and 13 ± 1 μM for 5 (Figure 9). More interestingly, compounds 3 and 4 displayed a selective hAChE inhibition profile with a selectivity index (SI) higher than 10 (Figure 9) [132]. From hBuChE data, two derivatives exerted low micromolar inhibition activity, namely, 11-O-(2-methoxybenzoyl)haemanthamine (6) with an IC50 value of 3.3 ± 0.4 μM and 11-O-(2-chlorobenzoyl)haemanthamine (5) with an IC50 value of 5.6 ± 0.6 μM (Figure 9). Moreover, compound 5 also showed interesting hAChE inhibition potency and can be considered a dual non-selective cholinesterase inhibitor. The BBB permeability was investigated applying the PAMPA assay to predict CNS availability.The obtained results indicated that all developed derivatives should be centrally active, crossing the BBB by passive diffusion [132].
The same procedure for preparation of semisynthetic derivatives has been used in the case of ambelline, which differs from haemanthamine only in the orientation of the 5,10b-ethano bridge and by possessing an additional methoxy group at C-7 (Figure 9). Comparison of the hAChE/hBuChE inhibition potencies of the analogues with the same substitution related to both ambelline and haemanthamine show the critical role of the absolute configuration of the 5,10b-ethano bridge in terms of its biological activity [133]. Within twenty ambeline derivatives, only three of them were identified as hAChE inhibitors, namely, 11-O-(2-methylbenzoyl)- (7), 11-O-(2-nitrobenzoyl)- (8), and 11-O-(4-nitrobenzoyl)ambelline, but these revealed only rather moderate inhibition, with IC50 values of 55 ± 4, 54 ± 2, and 48 ± 2 μM, respectively. On the other hand, four aromatic derivatives with either different substitutions on the aromatic ring or with a naphthyl ring exerted strong inhibitory potency against hBuChE (IC50 < 1 μM). The strongest hBuChE inhibition was shown by 11-O-(1-naphthoyl)ambelline (9), 11-O-(2-methylbenzoyl)ambelline (7), and 11-O-(2-methoxybenzoyl)ambelline (10) with IC50 values of 0.10 ± 0.01, 0.28 ± 0.02, and 0.43 ± 0.04 μM, respectively (Figure 9). Moreover, the results for 7 and 10 showed a selective inhibition pattern for hBuChE with a selectivity index (SI) higher than 100 (Figure 9) [133]. The in vitro results were supported by computational studies predicting plausible binding modes of the strongest inhibitors in the active site of hBuChE [133].
As discussed earlier, berberine possesses an interesting multipotent pharmacological profile potentially applicable for AD treatment. Hence, a series of twenty-two berberine derivatives was developed by Sobolová et al. in 2020 and tested in vitro for inhibition potential against hAChE/hBuChE and POP [134]. The berberine core was substituted at position 9-O of its aromatic ring region. All the derivatives displayed hAChE inhibition ability in the micromolar to sub-micromolar range. The most active compound, 9-O-(α-methylbenzyl)berberine bromide (11), displayed inhibitory activity, with an IC50 value of 0.79 ± 0.02 μM [134]. In the hBuChE assay, all derivatives exerted inhibition activity with IC50 values in the micromolar range (1.26–21.5 μM), all being more potent than the parent, berberine (IC50 = 47.2 ± 3.3 μM). The top-ranked compound was 9-O-(napht-2-yl)berberine bromide (IC50 = 1.26 ±0.02 μM) (12). All the berberine derivatives were also screened for their POP inhibition activity; 9-O-(4-methylbenzyl)berberine bromide (13) was the best POP inhibitor with an IC50 value of = 10.7 ± 1.2 μM (Figure 9) [134].

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The present review demonstrates that, during the last decade, a number of AAs and IAs have been isolated and tested against various targets connected with the potential treatment of AD. Two new structural types of AAs have been isolated, identified and screened for biological activity connected with AD. Compounds of the carltonine-type have been identified as strong selective inhibitors of BuChE, and compounds of the narcikachnine-type showed inhibitory activity against both cholinesterases. Several IAs have been identified as multitarget ligands for AD. Moreover, some of the active compounds have also been investigated through molecular docking studies to identify the sites of interaction between the chemical scaffold and the enzymatic amino acid residues.
As described in Chapter 5, several AAs and IAs can be isolated in gram amounts, allowing for their structure modification, as demonstrated for ambelline, haemanthamine (both AChE/BuChE inactive) and berberine. Thus, the preparation of derivatives of major AAs and IAs may be a new direction in the development of AD drugs. In the case of a low presence of AAs and IAs in plant material, their structures can be used as structural scaffolds for the total synthesis of new compounds, as discussed in the case of molecules structurally inspired by alkaloids isolated from N. pseudonarcissus cv. Carlton.
Conclusively, we have shown that AAs and IAs still have promising neuropharmacological potential for further exploration and structure optimalization into multi-target-directed drugs for AD. Nowadays, in vivo and clinical trials are especially needed to be more adequately addressed in order to generate a more coordinated and focused means of developing new AD drugs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C. and G.B.; Methodology, L.C. and R.V., Formal analysis, R.V., F.P., R.P., A.A.M., V.W. and A.R.; Investigation R.V., F.P. and N.M., Writing—original draft preparation, L.C., R.V., F.P., R.P., N.M., A.A.M., A.R. and V.W., Writing—reviewing and editing, L.C., R.V. and G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by Charles University grants (SVV UK 260 548, GA UK 328121) and by pre-application research into innovative medicines, and the medical technologies project is co-funded by the European Union (reg. No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/18_069/0010046).

Acknowledgments

In this section, you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Marešová, P.; Klímová, B.; Novotný, M.; Kuča, K. Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases: Expected economic impact on Europe—A call for a Uniform European Strategy. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2016, 54, 1123–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Silva, T.; Reis, J.; Teixeira, J.; Borges, F. Alzheimer’s disease, enzyme targets and drug discovery struggles: From natural products to drug prototypes. Ageing Res. Rev. 2014, 15, 116–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ballard, C.; Gauthier, S.; Corbett, A.; Brayne, C.; Aarsland, D.; Jones, E. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2011, 377, 1019–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nichols, E.; Szoeke, C.; Vollset, S.; Abbasi, N.; Abd-Allah, F.; Ebro, J.; Aichour, M.; Akinyemi, R.; Alahdab, F.; Asgedom, S.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 88–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hardy, J.; Selkoe, D.J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: Progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 2002, 297, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mehta, D.C.; Short, J.L.; Hilmer, S.N.; Nicolazzo, J.A. Drug access to the central nervous system in Alzheimer’s disease: Preclinical and clinical insights. Pharm. Res. 2015, 32, 819–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Anand, R.; Gill, K.D.; Mahdi, A.A. Therapeutics of Alzheimer’s disease: Past, present and future. Neuropharmacology 2014, 76, 27–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dubey, H.; Gulati, K.; Ray, A. Recent studies on cellular and molecular mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease: Focus on epigenetic factors and histone deacetylase. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 29, 241–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hampel, H.; Schneider, L.S.; Giacobini, E.; Kivipelto, M.; Sindi, S.; Dubois, B.; Broich, K.; Nisticò, R.; Aisen, P.S.; Lista, S. Advances in the therapy of Alzheimer’s disease: Targeting amyloid beta and tau and perspectives for the future. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2015, 15, 83–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Garcia, M.L.; Cleveland, D.W. Going new places using an old MAP: Tau, microtubules and human neurodegenerative disease. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001, 13, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hampel, H.; Mesulam, M.M.; Cuello, A.C.; Farlow, M.R.; Giacobini, E.; Grossberg, G.T.; Khachaturian, A.S.; Vergallo, A.; Cavedo, E.; Snyder, P.J.; et al. The cholinergic system in the pathophysiology and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2018, 141, 1917–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. De Almeida, J.P.; Saldanha, C. Nonneuronal cholinergic system in human erythrocytes: Biological role and clinical relevance. J. Membr. Biol. 2010, 234, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cahlíková, L.; Macáková, K.; Benešová, N.; Chlebek, J.; Hošťálková, A.; Opletal, L. Chapter 6—Natural compounds (small molecules) as potential and real drugs of Alzheimer’s disease: A critical review. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, 1st ed.; Rahman, A., Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2014; Volume 42, pp. 153–194. ISBN 978-0-444-63281-4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ciro, A.; Park, J.; Burkhard, G.; Yan, N.; Geula, C. Biochemical differentiation of cholinesterases from normal and Alzheimer’s disease cortex. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2012, 9, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. García-Ayllón, M.S.; Silveyra, M.X.; Sáez-Valero, J. Association between acetylcholinesterase and beta-amyloid peptide in Alzheimer’s cerebrospinal fluid. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2008, 175, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sridhar, G.R.; Nirmala, G.; Apparao, A.; Madhavi, A.S.; Sreelatha, S.; Rani, J.S.; Vijayalakshmi, P. Serum butyrylcholinesterase in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A biochemical and bioinformatics approach. Lipids Health Dis. 2005, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Paz, M.L.; Barrantes, F.J. Autoimmune attack of the neuromuscular junction in myasthenia gravis: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and other targets. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 2186–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bajgar, J. Organophosphates/nerve agent poisoning: Mechanism of action, diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2004, 38, 151–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, R.; Reddy, P.H. Role of glutamate and NMDA receptors in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2017, 57, 1041–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kornhuber, J.; Wiltfang, J. The role of glutamate in dementia. J. Neural. Transm. Suppl. 1998, 53, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hernández, F.; Avila, J. The role of glycogen synthase kinase 3 in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 3848–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hooper, C.; Killick, R.; Lovestone, S. The GSK3 hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2008, 104, 1433–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Plattner, F.; Angelo, M.; Giese, K.P. The roles of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and glycogen synthase kinase 3 in tau hyperphosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 25457–25465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Martinez, A.; Perez, D.I. GSK-3 inhibitors: A ray of hope for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease? J. Alzheimers Dis. 2008, 15, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cai, Z. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: Promising therapeutic agents for Alzheimer’s disease (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 9, 1533–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ramsay, R.R.; Popovic-Nikolic, M.R.; Nikolic, K.; Uliassi, E.; Bolognesi, M.L. A perspective on multi-target drug discovery and design for complex diseases. Clin. Transl. Med. 2018, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Schedin-Weiss, S.; Inoue, M.; Hromádková, L.; Teranishi, Y.; Yamamoto, N.G.; Wiehager, B.; Bogdanovic, N.; Winblad, B.; Sandebring-Matton, A.; Frykman, S.; et al. Monoamine oxidase B is elevated in Alzheimer disease neurons, is associated with γ-secretase and regulates neuronal amyloid β-peptide levels. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2017, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Svarcbahs, R.; Jäntti, M.; Kilpeläinen, T.; Julku, U.H.; Urvas, L.; Kivioja, S.; Norrbacka, S.; Myöhänen, T.T. Prolyl oligopeptidase inhibition activates autophagy via protein phosphatase 2A. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 151, 104558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Szeltner, Z.; Polgár, L. Structure, function and biological relevance of prolyl oligopeptidase. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2008, 9, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Laitinen, K.S.; van Groen, T.; Tanila, H.; Venäläinen, J.; Männistö, P.T.; Alafuzoff, I. Brain prolyl oligopeptidase activity is associated with neuronal damage rather than beta-amyloid accumulation. Neuroreport 2001, 12, 3309–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. García-Horsman, J.A.; Männistö, P.T.; Venäläinen, J.I. On the role of prolyl oligopeptidase in health and disease. Neuropeptides 2007, 41, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zemek, F.; Drtinová, L.; Nepovimová, E.; Šepsová, V.; Korábečný, J.; Klimeš, J.; Kuča, K. Outcomes of Alzheimer’s disease therapy with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2014, 13, 759–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Matsunaga, S.; Kishi, T.; Iwata, N. Combination therapy with cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 18, pyu115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lalli, G.; Schott, J.M.; Hardy, J.; De Strooper, B. Aducanumab: A new phase in therapeutic development for Alzheimer’s disease? EMBO Mol. Med. 2021, 13, e14781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mahase, E. Three FDA advisory panel members resign over approval of Alzheimer’s drug. BMJ 2021, 373, n1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Servick, K. Alzheimer’s drug approval spotlights blood tests. Science 2021, 373, 373–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, S.; Dong, G.; Sheng, C. Structural simplification of natural products. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 4180–4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Konrath, E.L.; Passos Cdos, S.; Klein, L.C., Jr.; Henriques, A.T. Alkaloids as a source of potential anticholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013, 65, 1701–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Murray, A.; Faraoni, M.; Castro, M.; Alza, N.; Cavallaro, V. Natural AChE inhibitors from plants and their contribution to Alzheimer’s disease therapy. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2013, 11, 388–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dos Santos, T.C.; Gomes, T.M.; Pinto, B.A.S.; Camara, A.L.; Paes, A.M.D.A. Naturally occurring acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and their potential use for Alzheimer’s disease therapy. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Moodie, L.W.K.; Sepčić, K.; Turk, T.; Frangež, R.; Svenson, J. Natural cholinesterase inhibitors from marine organisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2019, 36, 1053–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Panda, S.S.; Jhanji, N. Natural products as potential anti-Alzheimer agents. Curr. Med. Chem. 2020, 27, 5887–5917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Svendsen, A.B.; Verpoorte, R. (Eds.) Chapter 4—Isolation of alkaloids. In Chromatography of Alkaloids; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1983; Volume 23A, pp. 51–58. ISBN 978-0-444-42145-6. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee, K.T. Quantitative isolation of alkaloids from plant materials. Nature 1960, 188, 65–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sasidharan, S.; Chen, Y.; Saravanan, D.; Sundram, K.M.; Latha, L.Y. Extraction, isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds from plants’ extracts. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Maldoni, B. Alkaloids: Isolation and purification. J. Chem. Educ. 1991, 68, 700–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kornienko, A.; Evidente, A. Chemistry, biology, and medicinal potential of narciclasine and its congeners. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1982–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Cahlíková, L.; Breiterová, K.; Opletal, L. Chemistry and biological activity of alkaloids from the genus Lycoris (Amaryllidaceae). Molecules 2020, 25, 4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Berkov, S.; Osorio, E.; Viladomat, F.; Bastida, J. Chapter Two—Chemodiversity, chemotaxonomy and chemoecology of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Biology; Knölker, H.J., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; Volume 83, pp. 113–185. ISBN 978-0-12-820981-3. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu, T.; Chen, W.; Zhou, J.; Dai, J.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Y. Virtual screening for reactive natural products and their probable artifacts of solvolysis and oxidation. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jin, A.; Li, X.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Yu, H.Y.; Pi, H.F.; Zhang, P.; Ruan, H.L. Four new compounds from the bulbs of Lycoris aurea with neuroprotective effects against CoCl₂ and H₂O₂-induced SH-SY5Y cell injuries. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2014, 37, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Maltese, F.; van der Kooy, F.; Verpoorte, R. Solvent derived artifacts in natural products chemistry. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2009, 4, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Miana, G.A. Tertiary dihydroprotoberberine alkaloids of Berberis lycium. Phytochemistry 1973, 12, 1822–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kilgore, M.B.; Kutchan, T.M. The Amaryllidaceae alkaloids: Biosynthesis and methods for enzyme discovery. Phytochem. Rev. 2016, 15, 317–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Nair, J.J.; Wilhelm, A.; Bonnet, S.L.; van Staden, J. Antibacterial constituents of the plant family Amaryllidaceae. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 4943–4951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Al Mamun, A.; Maříková, J.; Hulcová, D.; Janoušek, J.; Šafratová, M.; Nováková, L.; Kučera, T.; Hrabinová, M.; Kuneš, J.; Korábečný, J.; et al. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids of belladine-type from Narcissus pseudonarcissus cv. carlton as new selective inhibitors of butyrylcholinesterase. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fulton, B.; Benfield, P. Galanthamine. Drugs Aging 1996, 9, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Raskind, M.A.; Peskind, E.R.; Wessel, T.; Yuan, W. Galantamine in AD: A 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 6-month extension. The Galantamine USA-1 Study Group. Neurology 2000, 54, 2261–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kotra, L.P.; Park, J. 5.14—Therapeutic approaches to MS and other neurodegenerative diseases. In Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry III; Chackalamannil, S., Rotella, D., Ward, S.E., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 439–473. ISBN 978-0-12-803201-5. [Google Scholar]
  60. López, S.; Bastida, J.; Viladomat, F.; Codina, C. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of some Amaryllidaceae alkaloids and Narcissus extracts. Life Sci. 2002, 71, 2521–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Šafratová, M.; Hošťálková, A.; Hulcová, D.; Breiterová, K.; Hrabcová, V.; Machado, M.; Fontinha, D.; Prudêncio, M.; Kuneš, J.; Chlebek, J.; et al. Alkaloids from Narcissus poeticus cv. Pink Parasol of various structural types and their biological activity. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2018, 41, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hulcová, D.; Maříková, J.; Korábečný, J.; Hošťálková, A.; Jun, D.; Kuneš, J.; Chlebek, J.; Opletal, L.; De Simone, A.; Nováková, L.; et al. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids from Narcissus pseudonarcissus L. cv. Dutch Master as potential drugs in treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Phytochemistry 2019, 165, 112055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kohelová, E.; Maříková, J.; Korábečný, J.; Hulcová, D.; Kučera, T.; Jun, D.; Chlebek, J.; Jenčo, J.; Šafratová, M.; Hrabinová, M.; et al. Alkaloids of Zephyranthes citrina (Amaryllidaceae) and their implication to Alzheimer’s disease: Isolation, structural elucidation and biological activity. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 107, 104567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Maříková, J.; Mamun, A.A.; Shammari, L.A.; Korábečný, J.; Kučera, T.; Hulcová, D.; Kuneš, J.; Malaník, M.; Vašková, M.; Kohelová, E.; et al. Structure elucidation and cholinesterase inhibition activity of two new minor Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. Molecules 2021, 26, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sibanyoni, M.N.; Chaudhary, S.K.; Chen, W.; Adhami, H.-R.; Combrinck, S.; Maharaj, V.; Schuster, D.; Viljoen, A. Isolation, in vitro evaluation and molecular docking of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from South African Amaryllidaceae. Fitoterapia 2020, 146, 104650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Vaněčková, N.; Hošťálková, A.; Šafratová, M.; Kuneš, J.; Hulcová, D.; Hrabinová, M.; Doskočil, I.; Štěpánková, Š.; Opletal, L.; Nováková, L.; et al. Isolation of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids from Nerine bowdenii W. Watson and their biological activities. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 80114–80120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Elgorashi, E.E.; Stafford, G.I.; van Staden, J. Acetylcholinesterase enzyme inhibitory effects of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. Planta Med. 2004, 70, 260–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nair, J.J.; Aremu, A.O.; van Staden, J. Isolation of narciprimine from Cyrtanthus contractus (Amaryllidaceae) and evaluation of its acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 137, 1102–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Orhan, I.E.; Senol Deniz, F.S.; Eren, G.; Sener, B. Molecular approach to promising cholinesterase inhibitory effect of several Amaryllidaceae alkaloids: Further re-investigation. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 136, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhu, Y.Y.; Li, X.; Yu, H.Y.; Xiong, Y.F.; Zhang, P.; Pi, H.F.; Ruan, H.L. Alkaloids from the bulbs of Lycoris longituba and their neuroprotective and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2015, 38, 604–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Cahlíková, L.; Hrabinová, M.; Kulhánková, A.; Benešová, N.; Chlebek, J.; Jun, D.; Novák, Z.; Macáková, K.; Kuneš, J.; Kuča, K.; et al. Alkaloids from Chlidanthus fragrans and their acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase and prolyl oligopeptidase activities. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2013, 8, 1541–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Hulcová, D.; Breiterová, K.; Siatka, T.; Klímová, K.; Davani, L.; Šafratová, M.; Hošťálková, A.; De Simone, A.; Andrisano, V.; Cahlíková, L. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids as potential glycogen synthase kinase-3β inhibitors. Molecules 2018, 23, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Al Shammari, L.; Hulcová, D.; Maříková, J.; Kučera, T.; Šafratová, M.; Nováková, L.; Schmidt, M.; Pulkrábková, L.; Janoušek, J.; Soukup, O.; et al. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids from Hippeastrum X hybridum cv. Ferrari, and preparation of vittatine derivatives as potential ligands for Alzheimer’s disease. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Šafratová, M.; Novák, Z.; Kulhánková, A.; Kuneš, J.; Hrabinová, M.; Jun, D.; Macákova, K.; Opletal, L.; Cahlíková, L. Revised NMR data for 9-O-demethylgalanthine: An alkaloid from Zephyranthes robusta (Amaryllidaceae) and its biological activity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 787–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Tarrago, T.; Kichik, N.; Seguí, J.; Giralt, E. The natural product berberine is a human prolyl oligopeptidase inhibitor. ChemMedChem 2007, 2, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Muehlbacher, M.; Spitzer, G.M.; Liedl, K.R.; Kornhuber, J. Qualitative prediction of blood-brain barrier permeability on a large and refined dataset. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2011, 25, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Di, L.; Kerns, E.H.; Fan, K.; McConnell, O.J.; Carter, G.T. High throughput artificial membrane permeability assay for blood–brain barrier. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 38, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zenaro, E.; Piacentino, G.; Constantin, G. The blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2017, 107, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Carmona-Viglianco, F.; Zaragoza-Puchol, D.; Parravicini, O.; Garro, A.; Enriz, R.D.; Feresin, G.E.; Kurina-Sanz, M.; Orden, A.A. Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling studies of substituted N-benzyl-2-phenylethanamines as cholinesterase inhibitors. N. J. Chem. 2020, 44, 9466–9476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mamun, A.A.; Pidaný, F.; Hulcová, D.; Maříková, J.; Kučera, T.; Schmidt, M.; Catapano, M.C.; Hrabinová, M.; Jun, D.; Múčková, L.; et al. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids of norbelladine-type as inspiration for development of highly selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors: Synthesis, biological activity evaluation, and docking studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Wu, W.M.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Li, H.R.; Yu, H.Y.; Zhang, P.; Pi, H.F.; Ruan, H.L. Two new alkaloids from the bulbs of Lycoris sprengeri. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 16, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Trujillo-Chacón, L.M.; Alarcón-Enos, J.E.; Céspedes-Acuña, C.L.; Bustamante, L.; Baeza, M.; López, M.G.; Fernández-Mendívil, C.; Cabezas, F.; Pastene-Navarrete, E.R. Neuroprotective activity of isoquinoline alkaloids from of Chilean Amaryllidaceae plants against oxidative stress-induced cytotoxicity on human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells and mouse hippocampal slice culture. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 132, 110665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cortes, N.; Posada-Duque, R.A.; Alvarez, R.; Alzate, F.; Berkov, S.; Cardona-Gómez, G.P.; Osorio, E. Neuroprotective activity and acetylcholinesterase inhibition of five Amaryllidaceae species: A comparative study. Life Sci. 2015, 122, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ibrakaw, A.S.; Omoruyi, S.I.; Ekpo, O.E.; Hussein, A.A. Neuroprotective activities of Boophone haemanthoides (Amaryllidaceae) extract and its chemical constituents. Molecules 2020, 25, 5376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yang, E.J.; Park, G.H.; Song, K.S. Neuroprotective effects of liquiritigenin isolated from licorice roots on glutamate-induced apoptosis in hippocampal neuronal cells. Neurotoxicology 2013, 39, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Niedzielska, E.; Smaga, I.; Gawlik, M.; Moniczewski, A.; Stankowicz, P.; Pera, J.; Filip, M. Oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 4094–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Traykova, M.; Traykov, T.; Hadjimitova, V.; Krikorian, K.; Bojadgieva, N. Antioxidant properties of galantamine hydrobromide. Z. Naturforsch. C J. Biosci. 2003, 58, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bakhtiari, M.; Panahi, Y.; Ameli, J.; Darvishi, B. Protective effects of flavonoids against Alzheimer’s disease-related neural dysfunctions. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 93, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cortes, N.; Castañeda, C.; Osorio, E.H.; Cardona-Gomez, G.P.; Osorio, E. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids as agents with protective effects against oxidative neural cell injury. Life Sci. 2018, 203, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Hoang, T.H.X.; Ho, D.V.; Van Phan, K.; Le, Q.V.; Raal, A.; Nguyen, H.T. Effects of Hippeastrum reticulatum on memory, spatial learning and object recognition in a scopolamine-induced animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Pharm. Biol. 2020, 58, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Cortes, N.; Sabogal-Guaqueta, A.M.; Cardona-Gomez, G.P.; Osorio, E. Neuroprotection and improvement of the histopathological and behavioral impairments in a murine Alzheimer’s model treated with Zephyranthes carinata alkaloids. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 110, 482–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Bisset, N.G. Plants as a source of isoquinoline alkaloids. In The Chemistry and Biology of Isoquinoline Alkaloids. Proceedings in Life Sciences; Phillipson, J.D., Roberts, M.F., Zenk, M.H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1985; pp. 1–22. ISBN 978-3-642-70130-6. [Google Scholar]
  93. Kukula-Koch, W.A.; Widelski, J. Chapter 9—Alkaloids. In Pharmacognosy: Fundamentals, Applications and Strategies; Badal, S., Delgoda, R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 163–198. ISBN 978-0-12-802104-0. [Google Scholar]
  94. Ingkaninan, K.; Phengpa, P.; Yuenyongsawad, S.; Khorana, N. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from Stephania venosa tuber. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2006, 58, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hung, T.M.; Nguyen, H.D.; Kim, J.C.; Jang, H.S.; Ryoo, S.W.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, J.S.; Bae, K.H.; Min, B.S. Alkaloids from roots of Stephania rotunda and their cholinesterase inhibitory activity. Planta Med. 2010, 76, 1762–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Huang, Q.Q.; Bi, J.L.; Sun, Q.Y.; Yang, F.M.; Wang, Y.H.; Tang, G.H.; Zhao, F.W.; Wang, H.; Xu, J.J.; Kennelly, E.J.; et al. Bioactive isoquinoline alkaloids from Corydalis saxicola. Planta Med. 2012, 78, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Hošťálková, A.; Maříková, J.; Opletal, L.; Korábečná, J.; Hulcová, D.; Kuneš, J.; Nováková, L.; Perez, D.I.; Jun, D.; Kučera, T.; et al. Isoquinoline alkaloids from Berberis vulgaris as potential lead compounds for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nachon, F.; Carletti, E.; Ronco, C.; Trovaslet, M.; Nicolet, Y.; Jean, L.; Renard, P.Y. Crystal structures of human cholinesterases in complex with huprine W and tacrine: Elements of specificity for anti-Alzheimer’s drugs targeting acetyl- and butyryl-cholinesterase. Biochem. J. 2013, 453, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Zhao, C.; Su, P.; Lv, C.; Guo, L.; Cao, G.; Qin, C.; Zhang, W. Berberine alleviates amyloid β-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and synaptic loss. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 7593608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Wai, A.; Yeung, A.W.K.; Erdogan Orhan, I.; Aggarwal, B.; Battino, M.; Belwal, T.; Bishayee, A.; Daglia, M.; Devkota, H.; El-Demerdash, A.; et al. Berberine, a popular dietary supplement for human and animal health: Quantitative research literature analysis—A review. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2020, 38, 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  101. Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liang, Y.; Chen, H.; Ji, X.; Huang, M. Berberine mitigates cognitive decline in an Alzheimer’s Disease Mouse Model by targeting both tau hyperphosphorylation and autophagic clearance. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 121, 109670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Dahua, F.; Liping, L.; Zhengzhi, W.; Meiqun, C. Combating neurodegenerative diseases with the plant alkaloid berberine: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2019, 17, 563–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cai, Z.; Wang, C.; Yang, W. Role of berberine in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2016, 12, 2509–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Liang, Y.; Huang, M.; Jiang, X.; Liu, Q.; Chang, X.; Guo, Y. The neuroprotective effects of Berberine against amyloid β-protein-induced apoptosis in primary cultured hippocampal neurons via mitochondria-related caspase pathway. Neurosci. Lett. 2017, 655, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Huang, M.; Jiang, X.; Liang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Chen, S.; Guo, Y. Berberine improves cognitive impairment by promoting autophagic clearance and inhibiting production of β-amyloid in APP/tau/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Exp. Gerontol. 2017, 91, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ahmed, T.; Gilani, A.H.; Abdollahi, M.; Daglia, M.; Nabavi, S.F.; Nabavi, S.M. Berberine and neurodegeneration: A review of literature. Pharmacol. Rep. 2015, 67, 970–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ji, H.F.; Shen, L. Berberine: A potential multipotent natural product to combat Alzheimer’s disease. Molecules 2011, 16, 6732–6740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Long, J.; Song, J.; Zhong, L.; Liao, Y.; Liu, L.; Li, X. Palmatine: A review of its pharmacology, toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Biochimie 2019, 162, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Xu, F.C.; Quesheng; Zhang, Q.Y.; Tu, P.F.; Liang, H. Cholinesterase inhibitory isoquinoline alkaloids from Corydalis mucronifera. Phytochemistry 2019, 159, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Tu, P.F.; Xu, F.C.; Liang, H. Mucroniferanines A–G, isoquinoline alkaloids from Corydalis mucronifera. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Plazas, E.; Hagenow, S.; Avila Murillo, M.; Stark, H.; Cuca, L.E. Isoquinoline alkaloids from the roots of Zanthoxylum rigidum as multi-target inhibitors of cholinesterase, monoamine oxidase A and Aβ1-42 aggregation. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 98, 103722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cahlíková, L.; Opletal, L.; Kurfürst, M.; Macáková, K.; Kulhánková, A.; Hošťálková, A. Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory compounds from Chelidonium majus (Papaveraceae). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 1751–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Baek, S.C.; Ryu, H.W.; Kang, M.G.; Lee, H.; Park, D.; Cho, M.L.; Oh, S.R.; Kim, H. Selective inhibition of monoamine oxidase A by chelerythrine, an isoquinoline alkaloid. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 2403–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Brunhofer, G.; Fallarero, A.; Karlsson, D.; Batista-Gonzalez, A.; Shinde, P.; Gopi Mohan, C.; Vuorela, P. Exploration of natural compounds as sources of new bifunctional scaffolds targeting cholinesterases and beta amyloid aggregation: The case of chelerythrine. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 6669–6679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chlebek, J.; Simone, A.; Hošťálková, A.; Opletal, L.; Perez, C.; Perez, D.; Havlíková, L.; Cahlíková, L.; Andrisano, V. Application of BACE1 immobilized enzyme reactor for the characterization of multifunctional alkaloids from Corydalis cava (Fumariaceae) as Alzheimer’s disease targets. Fitoterapia 2016, 109, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Chlebek, J.; Macáková, K.; Cahlíková, L.; Kurfürst, M.; Kuneš, J.; Opletal, L. Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory compounds from Corydalis cava (Fumariaceae). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011, 6, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Siatka, T.; Adamcová, M.; Opletal, L.; Cahlíková, L.; Jun, D.; Hrabinová, M.; Kuneš, J.; Chlebek, J. Cholinesterase and prolyl oligopeptidase inhibitory activities of alkaloids from Argemone platyceras (Papaveraceae). Molecules 2017, 22, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Cahlíková, L.; Macáková, K.; Kuneš, J.; Kurfürst, M.; Opletal, L.; Cvačka, J.; Chlebek, J.; Blunden, G. Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory compounds from Eschscholzia californica (Papaveraceae). Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 1035–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Hošťálková, A.; Opletal, L.; Kuneš, J.; Novák, Z.; Hrabinová, M.; Chlebek, J.; Čegan, L.; Cahlíková, L. Alkaloids from Peumus boldus and their acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase and prolyl oligopeptidase inhibition activity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 577–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Chlebek, J.; Novák, Z.; Kassemová, D.; Šafratová, M.; Kostelník, J.; Malý, L.; Ločárek, M.; Opletal, L.; Hošťálková, A.; Hrabinová, M.; et al. Isoquinoline alkaloids from Fumaria officinalis L. and their biological activities related to Alzheimer’s disease. Chem. Biodivers. 2016, 13, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cahlíková, L.; Hulová, L.; Hrabinová, M.; Chlebek, J.; Hošťálková, A.; Adamcová, M.; Šafratová, M.; Jun, D.; Opletal, L.; Ločárek, M.; et al. Isoquinoline alkaloids as prolyl oligopeptidase inhibitors. Fitoterapia 2015, 103, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Toušek, J.; Dommisse, R.; Dostál, J.; Žák, Z.; Pieters, L.; Marek, R. Configurations and conformations of sanguinarine and chelerythrine free bases stereoisomers. J. Mol. Struct. 2002, 613, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Marasco, D.; Vicidomini, C.; Krupa, P.; Cioffi, F.; Huy, P.D.Q.; Li, M.S.; Florio, D.; Broersen, K.; de Pandis, M.F.; Roviello, G.N. Plant isoquinoline alkaloids as potential neurodrugs: A comparative study of the effects of benzo[c]phenanthridine and berberine-based compounds on β-amyloid aggregation. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2021, 334, 109300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sugimoto, Y.; Yoshida, A.; Uchida, S.; Inanaga, S.; Yamada, Y. Dauricine production in cultured roots of Menispermum dauricum. Phytochemistry 1994, 36, 679–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Liu, P.; Chen, X.; Zhou, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, X.; Zhu, F.; Guo, Y.; Huang, X.; Liu, J.; et al. The isoquinoline alkaloid dauricine targets multiple molecular pathways to ameliorate Alzheimer-like pathological changes in vitro. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 2025914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Thinakaran, G.; Teplow, D.B.; Siman, R.; Greenberg, B.; Sisodia, S.S. Metabolism of the “Swedish” amyloid precursor protein variant in neuro2a (N2a) cells. Evidence that cleavage at the “beta-secretase” site occurs in the golgi apparatus. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 9390–9397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Chen, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, T.; Xiao, H.; Yin, C. Effects of tetrandrine on cAMP and cGMP levels in rabbit corpus cavernosum in vitro. Nat. Prod. Res. 2010, 24, 1095–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. He, F.Q.; Qiu, B.Y.; Zhang, X.H.; Li, T.K.; Xie, Q.; Cui, D.J.; Huang, X.L.; Gan, H.T. Tetrandrine attenuates spatial memory impairment and hippocampal neuroinflammation via inhibiting NF-κB activation in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease induced by amyloid-β(1-42). Brain Res. 2011, 1384, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Fajardo, V.; Araya, M.; Cuadra, P.; Oyarzun, A.; Gallardo, A.; Cueto, M.; Diaz-Marrero, A.R.; Darias, J.; Villarroel, L.; Álvarez, C.; et al. Pronuciferine N-oxide, a proaporphine N-oxide alkaloid from Berberis coletioides. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 1355–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Bayazeid, O.; Nemutlu, E.; Eylem, C.C.; Yalçın, F.N. Neuroactivity of naturally occurring proaporphine alkaloid, pronuciferine. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2020, 34, e22601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Kohelová, E.; Peřinová, R.; Maafi, N.; Korábečný, J.; Hulcová, D.; Maříková, J.; Kučera, T.; Martínez González, L.; Hrabinová, M.; Vorčáková, K.; et al. Derivatives of the β-crinane Amaryllidaceae alkaloid haemanthamine as multi-target directed ligands for Alzheimer’s disease. Molecules 2019, 24, 1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Peřinová, R.; Maafi, N.; Korábečný, J.; Kohelová, E.; De Simone, A.; Al Mamun, A.; Hulcová, D.; Marková, J.; Kučera, T.; Jun, D.; et al. Functionalized aromatic esters of the Amaryllidaceae alkaloid haemanthamine and their in vitro and in silico biological activity connected to Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 100, 103928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Maříková, J.; Ritomská, A.; Korábečný, J.; Peřinová, R.; Al Mamun, A.; Kučera, T.; Kohelová, E.; Hulcová, D.; Kobrlová, T.; Kuneš, J.; et al. Aromatic esters of the crinane Amaryllidaceae alkaloid ambelline as selective inhibitors of butyrylcholinesterase. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 1359–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Sobolová, K.; Hrabinová, M.; Hepnarová, V.; Kučera, T.; Kobrlová, T.; Benková, M.; Janočková, J.; Doležal, R.; Prchal, L.; Benek, O.; et al. Discovery of novel berberine derivatives with balanced cholinesterase and prolyl oligopeptidase inhibition profile. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 203, 112593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 05240 g001 550
Figure 1. Newly isolated narcikachnine-type AAs together with biological activities connected with AD.
Figure 1. Newly isolated narcikachnine-type AAs together with biological activities connected with AD.
Molecules 26 05240 g001
Molecules 26 05240 g002 550
Figure 2. The top-scored docking poses of narciabduliine in hAChE ((A,B); PDB ID: 4EY6) and hBuChE ((C,D); PDB ID: 4BDS) active sites, with important interactions. Spatial orientation for each ligand is presented as three-dimensional (A,C) and two-dimensional (B,D) diagrams, respectively (taken from [64]).
Figure 2. The top-scored docking poses of narciabduliine in hAChE ((A,B); PDB ID: 4EY6) and hBuChE ((C,D); PDB ID: 4BDS) active sites, with important interactions. Spatial orientation for each ligand is presented as three-dimensional (A,C) and two-dimensional (B,D) diagrams, respectively (taken from [64]).
Molecules 26 05240 g002
Molecules 26 05240 g003 550
Figure 3. Recently isolated belladine-type Amaryllidaceae alkaloids and the selected synthetic compounds inspired by AAs together with biological activities connected with Alzheimer’s disease.
Figure 3. Recently isolated belladine-type Amaryllidaceae alkaloids and the selected synthetic compounds inspired by AAs together with biological activities connected with Alzheimer’s disease.
Molecules 26 05240 g003
Molecules 26 05240 g004 550
Figure 4. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids of galanthamine- and lycorine-type with interesting biological activity in connection with AD.
Figure 4. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids of galanthamine- and lycorine-type with interesting biological activity in connection with AD.
Molecules 26 05240 g004
Molecules 26 05240 g005 550
Figure 5. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids of homolycorine-, tazettine-, narciclassine-, crinine, and montanine-type with interesting biological activity in connection with AD.
Figure 5. Amaryllidaceae alkaloids of homolycorine-, tazettine-, narciclassine-, crinine, and montanine-type with interesting biological activity in connection with AD.
Molecules 26 05240 g005
Molecules 26 05240 g006 550
Figure 6. Isoquinoline alkaloids of protoberberine- and benzophenathridine-type with interesting biological activity in connection with AD.
Figure 6. Isoquinoline alkaloids of protoberberine- and benzophenathridine-type with interesting biological activity in connection with AD.
Molecules 26 05240 g006
Molecules 26 05240 g007 550
Figure 7. Isoquinoline alkaloids of bisbenzylisoquinoline- and pavinane-types and simple isoquinoline alkaloids with interesting biological activity in connection with AD.
Figure 7. Isoquinoline alkaloids of bisbenzylisoquinoline- and pavinane-types and simple isoquinoline alkaloids with interesting biological activity in connection with AD.
Molecules 26 05240 g007
Molecules 26 05240 g008 550
Figure 8. Isoquinoline alkaloids of phthalideisoquinoline-, spirobenzylisoquinoline-, benzylisoquinoline-, morphinane-, proaporphine-, and aporphine-type with interesting biological activity in connection with AD.
Figure 8. Isoquinoline alkaloids of phthalideisoquinoline-, spirobenzylisoquinoline-, benzylisoquinoline-, morphinane-, proaporphine-, and aporphine-type with interesting biological activity in connection with AD.
Molecules 26 05240 g008
Molecules 26 05240 g009 550
Figure 9. Derivatives of selected AAs and IAs together with biological activities connected with Alzheimer’s disease.
Figure 9. Derivatives of selected AAs and IAs together with biological activities connected with Alzheimer’s disease.
Molecules 26 05240 g009
Table
Table 1. Biological activities of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids, either newly isolated or tested in the last decade, in connection with Alzheimer’s disease (includes only alkaloids with an IC50 value ≤ 30 μM for AChE or BuChE; IC50 ≤ 200 μM for POP; any results for GSK-3β are included).
Table 1. Biological activities of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids, either newly isolated or tested in the last decade, in connection with Alzheimer’s disease (includes only alkaloids with an IC50 value ≤ 30 μM for AChE or BuChE; IC50 ≤ 200 μM for POP; any results for GSK-3β are included).
AlkaloidStructural TypeSourceIC50 AChE (μM)IC50 BuChE (μM)IC50 POP (μM)GSK-3β (μM)Ref.
N-norgalanthaminegalanthaminePancratium maritimum
Lycoris longituba		2.76 ± 0.65 a
8.85 ± 0.58 b		76.4 ± 3.7 cn.s.n.s.[69,70]
11β-hydroxygalanthaminegalanthamineLycoris longituba3.04 ± 0.61 an.s.n.s.n.s.[70]
narciabduliinenarcikachnineNarcissus pseudonarcissus cv. Carlton3.29 ± 0.73 b3.44 ± 0.02 cn.s.n.s.[64]
N-methylcrinasiadinenarciclassineLycoris longituba4.23 ± 1.13 an.s.n.s.n.s.[70]
N-(chloromethyl)galanthaminegalanthamineLycoris longituba5.55 ± 0.6 an.s.n.s.n.s.[70]
O-demethyllycoraminegalanthamineLycoris longituba8.13 ± 1.49 an.s.n.s.n.s.[70]
deoxypretazzetinetazettineLycoris longituba8.44 ± 0.83 an.s.n.s.n.s.[70]
acetylcaraninelycorineAmaryllis belladona11.7 ± 0.7 a
>30 b		n.s.>200n.s.[65,66]
narcieliinenarcikachnineZephyranthes citrina18.7 ± 2.3 b1.34 ± 0.31 c163 ± 13n.s.[63]
undulatinecrinineChlidanthus fragrans
Nerine bowdenii		23.5 ± 1.2 b>100 c>20043.3 ± 4.0 e[66,71,72]
8-hydroxy-9-methoxycrininecrininePancratium maritimum25.3 ± 1.8 a>365 dn.s.n.s.[69]
N-(chloromethyl)lycoraminegalanthamineLycoris longituba25.76 ± 1.09 an.s.n.s.n.s.[70]
powellinecrinineNerine bowdenii29.1 ± 1.6 b>30 c>200n.s.[66]
carltonine BbelladineNarcissus pseudonarcissus cv. Carlton>30 b0.031 ± 0.001 cn.s.n.s.[56]
carltonine AbelladineNarcissus pseudonarcissus cv. Carlton>30 b0.913 ± 0.020 c143 ± 12n.s.[56]
narcimatulinenarcikachnineNarcissus pseudonarcissus cv. Dutch Master>30 b5.9 ± 0.2 c29.2 ± 1.020.7 ± 2.4[62]
carltonine CbelladineNarcissus pseudonarcissus cv. Carlton>30 b14.8 ± 1.1 cn.s.n.s.[56]
narcipavlinenarcikachnineNarcissus poeticus cv. Pink Parasol>30 b24.4 ± 1.2 cn.s.n.s.[61]
zephyranthinelycorineHippeastrum hybridum cv. Ferrari>30 b>30 c142 ± 10n.s.[73]
9-O-demethylgalanthinelycorineZephyranthes robusta>30 b>30 c150 ± 2050.9 ± 8.9 e[74]
homolycorinehomolycorineNarcissus poeticus cv. Pink Parasol>30 b>30 c173 ± 4154.4 ± 8.9 e[61]
nerininehomolycorineZephyranthes citrina>30 b>30 c190 ± 10n.s.[63]
masoninehomolycorineNarcissus poeticus cv. Pink Parasol>30 b>30 c>20027.81 ± 0.05[61,72]
caraninelycorineNerine bowdenii>30 b>30 c>20030.75 ± 0.04[66,72]
9-O-demethylhomolycorinehomolycorineNarcissus poeticus cv. Pink Parasoln.s.n.s.n.s.30.01 ± 0.04[72]
aEeAChE; bhAChE; chBuChE; dEqBuChE; e % inhibition at concentration of 50 μM HPTLC bio-autography assay.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cahlíková, L.; Vrabec, R.; Pidaný, F.; Peřinová, R.; Maafi, N.; Mamun, A.A.; Ritomská, A.; Wijaya, V.; Blunden, G. Recent Progress on Biological Activity of Amaryllidaceae and Further Isoquinoline Alkaloids in Connection with Alzheimer’s Disease. Molecules 2021, 26, 5240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175240

AMA Style

Cahlíková L, Vrabec R, Pidaný F, Peřinová R, Maafi N, Mamun AA, Ritomská A, Wijaya V, Blunden G. Recent Progress on Biological Activity of Amaryllidaceae and Further Isoquinoline Alkaloids in Connection with Alzheimer’s Disease. Molecules. 2021; 26(17):5240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cahlíková, Lucie, Rudolf Vrabec, Filip Pidaný, Rozálie Peřinová, Negar Maafi, Abdullah Al Mamun, Aneta Ritomská, Viriyanata Wijaya, and Gerald Blunden. 2021. "Recent Progress on Biological Activity of Amaryllidaceae and Further Isoquinoline Alkaloids in Connection with Alzheimer’s Disease" Molecules 26, no. 17: 5240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175240

APA Style

Cahlíková, L., Vrabec, R., Pidaný, F., Peřinová, R., Maafi, N., Mamun, A. A., Ritomská, A., Wijaya, V., & Blunden, G. (2021). Recent Progress on Biological Activity of Amaryllidaceae and Further Isoquinoline Alkaloids in Connection with Alzheimer’s Disease. Molecules, 26(17), 5240. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175240

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop