Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Oxidative Transformations of New Chiral Pinane-Type γ-Ketothiols: Stereochemical Features of Reactions
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Ability to Produce Pleasant Aromas on Sour Whey and Buttermilk By-Products by Mold Galactomyces geotrichum: Identification of Key Odorants
Previous Article in Journal
Phenoxazine-Dibenzothiophene Sulfoximine Emitters Featuring Both Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence and Aggregation Induced Emission
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 17
10.3390/molecules26175244
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Volatile Terpenes and Terpenoids in the Leaves of Pinus Species—A Potentially Abundant Renewable Resource

by
Wensu Ji
1 and
Xiaoyue Ji
2,*
1
Ordnance Non-Commissioned Officers School, Army Engineering University of PLA, Wuhan 430075, China
2
Advanced Analysis & Testing Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(17), 5244; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175244
Submission received: 4 August 2021 / Revised: 26 August 2021 / Accepted: 26 August 2021 / Published: 29 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis in Various Matrices)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pinaceae plants are widely distributed in the world, and the resources of pine leaves are abundant. In the extensive literature concerning Pinus species, there is much data on the composition and the content of essential oil of leaves. Still, a detailed comparative analysis of volatile terpenes and terpenoids between different species is missing. In this paper, headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to determine the volatile terpenes and terpenoids of typical Pinus species in China. A total of 46 volatile terpenes and terpenoids were identified, and 12 common compounds were found, which exhibited a great diversity in the leaves of Pinus species. According to the structures and properties of the compounds, all those compounds can be classified into four categories, namely monoterpenes, oxygenated terpenes, terpene esters, and sesquiterpenes. The results of principal component analysis and cluster analysis showed that the leaves of the six Pinus species could be divided into two groups. The species and contents of volatile terpenes and terpenoids in the leaves were quite different. The results not only provide a reference for the utilization of pine leaves resource, but also bring a broader vision on the biodiversity.

1. Introduction

Pinus species are widely distributed in the world. Due to their strong adaptability, Pinus species are indispensable tree species in afforestation. They are also a critical timber resource in the forest market [1]. Besides, Pinus species exhibit tremendous exploitation potential for medicinal application [2]. Specifically, the leaves of Pinus species, commonly called pine needles, are an important part of the Pinus species due to their medicinal use. Their medicinal components are higher than other parts of Pinus species. Phytochemistry research has shown that the pine leaves extract is rich in carbohydrate, crude protein, crude fat, various amino acids, vitamins, bimetallism, essential oil, chlorophyll, unsaturated fatty acids, enzymes and coenzymes, and other active substances [3,4]. Modern pharmacological studies showed that pine needle extract has analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antipruritic, sedative, antitussive, expectorant, antiasthmatic, lipid regulating, antioxidant, antimutation, and antitumor bioactivities [5,6,7]. Considering that pine leaves are also very abundant in the world, it is of great significance to develop and utilize this renewable resource in depth.
Forest trees are the primary source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which constitute a large and diverse category of plant secondary metabolites [8]. The main function of these compounds is to protect plants from herbivores and pathogenic microorganisms [9,10,11]. VOCs emitted by plants are mainly terpenes and terpenoids, with about 55,000 different structures [12]. The structures of terpenes are based on the linkage of isoprene unit (C5H8). Two or more C5 components generate various terpenes through a head–tail condensation reaction [13]. Different from terpenes that are hydrocarbons, terpenes containing additional functional groups, usually oxygen-containing, are called terpenoids [14]. Terpenes and terpenoids have different biological activities [15]. Among them, the beneficial effects of terpenes and terpenoids on human health have been concerned by many researchers [16,17]. Their roles in various human diseases, such as inflammatory diseases, tumorigenesis and neurodegeneration, have been studied by cell and animal models for decades, suggesting that terpenes and terpenoids are potential chemopreventive and therapeutic drugs for various diseases [18]. In recent years, some new terpenoids have been isolated or synthesized, providing more terpenoids with potential chemotherapeutic value for clinical research [19].
At present, due to the importance of pine leaves, a large number of studies have reported on the volatile oil of pine leaves, but mainly on the chemical composition of a single kind of pine leaves [20,21]. There are few reports on the comparative study of volatile oils of different pine plants, and the comparative analysis of volatile terpenes and terpenoids in different pine leaves is missing. In this study, volatile terpenes and terpenoids of representative Pinus species (Pinus sylvestris, Pinus tabuliformis, Pinus bungeana, Cedrus deodara, Pinus densiflora, Pinus thunbergii) in China were identified using headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Through a practical principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA), differences of volatile terpenes and terpenoids among different pine leaves were compared. The obtained results will fill the research gap in the comparative analysis of volatile terpenes and terpenoids obtained from the leaves of Pinus species, as well as may provide the reference for the resource utilization of Pinus species leaves. Furthermore, this study could provide more knowledge for understanding biodiversity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Identification and Comparison of Volatile Terpenes and Terpenoids

HS-SPME-GC-MS was used to detect volatile terpenes and terpenoids in six typical pine leaves. The compounds were qualitatively analyzed by searching the spectrum library (Nist14) and combining it with the retention index (RI) of the compounds. The results showed that 46 volatile terpenes and terpenoids were detected in the leaves of six Pinaceae species, including 12 of the same components. According to the structure of compounds, all compounds can be divided into four categories, namely monoterpenes (15), oxygenated terpenes (7), terpene esters (4), and sesquiterpenes (20). Identification and classification of the volatile terpenes and terpenoids were reported in Table 1.
These compounds usually have important biological activities. Among them, monoterpenes are mainly used for analgesia, sterilization, antivirus, and sedation [22]. á-Pinene, and á-myrcene have analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antitussive and expectorant effects [23]. á-Pinene also has an obvious bactericidal and bacteriostatic effect on Candida albicans, and can hinder the deposition of blood lipid in the aorta and heart, as well as prevent atherosclerosis [24]. Limonene has the functions of sterilization, insect repellent, sedative central nervous system, expectorant, cough, antiasthmatic, and gallstone dissolution [25]. Terpinolene and camphene have anthelmintic and antibacterial effects, among which terpinolene can also prevent atherosclerosis [26,27].
Sesquiterpenes usually have the effects of lowering blood pressure, sterilization, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic [28]. For example, caryophyllene has antiasthmatic, antitussive, expectorant, and anti-inflammatory effects. It is clinically used for the treatment of tracheitis. It also shows the sedative effect on intense emotions [29]. Perfume with caryophyllene as the main component has been used in some obstetrics and gynecology hospitals to treat the puerpera’s irritability after childbirth. Besides, caryophyllene also has antitumor activity [30]. Copaene, germacrene D, and α-cadinene can resist insects, bacteria, and fungi [31].
Oxygenated terpenes and terpene esters also have noticeable health care effects, with strong bactericidal, anti-infection, antiviral, and stimulative effects [32]. For example, bornyl acetate has the ability to inhibit pulmonary inflammatory response [33] and inhibit the proliferation of many kinds of cancer cells [34]. It has an anti-inflammatory effect in human chondrocytes [35]. Linaool can slow down the respiratory rate, calm the nerves, reduce blood pressure, and has a good effect on the cardiovascular system and central nervous system [36].

2.2. Comparison of Volatile Terpenes and Terpenoids

Volatile terpenes and terpenoids exhibited a great diversity in the leaves of Pinus species. The analysis results indicated that the fraction of volatile terpenes and terpenoids in the leaves of Pinus species were different (Figure 1). Similar results are documented using the SPME or other pretreatment techniques. For example, Zorica S. Mitić et al. reported that the chemical composition of dominant terpenes of each Pinus species essential oil are different, and the essential oil is generally dominated by monoterpenes [37]. Tayyebeh Ghaffari et al. pointed out that the main component of pine needle essential oil is sesquiterpene grown in Northwestern Iran [38].
In general terms, among the six kinds of pine leaves, sesquiterpenes (20 compounds) were the most abundant, followed by monoterpenes and oxygenated terpenes (15 and 7 compounds, respectively), and terpene esters (4 compounds) were the least. According to the chromatogram, the compound’s content is directly proportional to the peak area, so we use the peak area to compare the content of the compound. It can be clearly seen from Figure 1 that the content of volatile terpenes and terpenoid is the highest in P. densiflora and the lowest in C. deodara. In P. tabuliformis, and P. bungeana, the number of volatile terpenes and terpenoids identified were the largest (27 compounds). Contrastively, the number of volatile terpenes and terpenoids detected was the least in the P. sylvestris (23 compounds) and P. thunbergii (23 compounds).
Concretely, the number of compounds of monoterpenes, oxygenated terpenes, terpene esters, and sesquiterpenes in the leaves of these six Pinus species were directly compared through Figure 2. Firstly, the content and number of monoterpenes compounds were the most in P. thunbergii, and the least C. deodara. Secondly, the content of oxygenated terpenes was the highest in P. thunbergii and the lowest in P. bungeara. The number of oxygenated terpenes compounds was the highest in C. deodara and P. densiflora. No oxygenated terpenes compounds were detected in sample P. bungeara. Interestingly, the content and number of terpene esters was the highest in P. bungeara. Finally, the content of sesquiterpenes compounds were the most in P. densiflora, and the least in sample C. deodara. The number of oxygenated terpenes compounds was the highest in P. thunbergii.

2.3. PCA of SPME-GC-MS

PCA is classic feature extraction and dimension reduction technology, which can be employed to simplify and optimize a large number of data [39]. In this experiment, factor analysis in SPSS software was used, and volatile terpenes and terpenoids in six kinds of pine leaves were used as variables to conduct PCA on six kinds of pine leaves. The results were shown in Figure 3.
The results show that the cumulative variance contribution rate of principal component 1 (66.577%), principal component 2 (22.293%), and principal component 3 (5.231%) in PCA analysis is 94.101%, which can reflect most of the information of the original data of the sample, indicating that PCA can better distinguish pine leaf samples. According to the results of PCA, the six pine leaves tested can be obviously divided into two categories (Figure 3). The volatile terpenes and terpenoids of pine leaves in P. sylvestris, P. tabuliformis, and P. bungeana are similar and have the same resource utilization, so that they can be classified into one category. The volatile terpenes and terpenoids in samples C. deodara, P. densiflora, and P. thunbergii were obviously different from the other three species. They were grouped into one group, which could be treated differently in resource utilization.

2.4. CA of HS-SPME-GC-MS

CA is a multivariate statistical analysis method. It compares the properties of each classification object, where classifies the objects with similar properties into one category, and classifies the objects with different properties into different categories. According to the difference of sample similarity measure or the principle of classification, CA’s means are various [35]. In this study, the Euclidean distance matrix was calculated based on the relative content of volatile terpenes and terpenoids in various pine leaves, and the CA of volatile terpenes and terpenoids was carried out by the complete linkage method. The results were expressed in the form of a thermal graph, which more intuitively reflected the distribution of volatile terpenes and terpenoids in these six kinds of pine leaves. The results were shown in Figure 4.
In Figure 4, the abscissa represents six pine needle samples, and the ordinate represents the volatile terpenes and terpenoids. The color of the thermodynamic diagram represents the relative content of volatile terpenes and terpenoids. The results showed that the results of CA were consistent with that of PCA. P. sylvestris, P. tabuliformis, and P. bungeana were clustered into one group, and the C. deodara, P. densiflora, and P. thunbergii were clustered into one group. In addition, it can be clearly seen from the thermodynamic diagram that the volatile terpenes and terpenoids in each group are different. Specifically, the relative contents of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes varied greatly. Oxygenated terpenes and terpene esters had little difference. The results provided a reference for the utilization of pine needle resources.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material and Reagents

All fresh leaves of the plant were collected during April 2021. P. sylvestris, P. tabuliformis, P. bungeana, C. deodara, P. densiflora, and P. thunbergii were all collected from the campus of Nanjing Forestry University (32°54′ N, 118°50′ E). The samples were taken to the laboratory for analysis immediately after collection. N-alkane C8–C40 was purchased from Shanghai Jieli Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

3.2. Instruments and Equipments

Trace ISQ gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); Manual SPME holder, 65 μm PDMS/DVB SPME fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA); HH.S21-6 electrothermal constant temperature water bath pot (Shanghai Boxun Industrial Co., Ltd. Medical Equipment Factory, Shanghai, China); BSA224s electronic balance (maximum weighing 220 g, minimum weighing 0.0001 g, error 0.1 mg) (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany).

3.3. Test Method

3.3.1. Sample Preparation and Extraction Process for HS-SPME

0.5G sample was accurately weighed and put into a 15 mL sample bottle sealed with a sealing film, and then the fiber was inserted into the bottle (the new fiber needs to be aged at the GC inlet according to the instructions before use). After 30 min of headspace adsorption 40 °C, it was pulled out and then inserted immediately into the GC/MS instrument with the inlet temperature of 250 °C. The desorption time was 3 min for GC/MS analysis. All experiments were repeated three times.

3.3.2. GC/MS Analysis Conditions

Chromatographic conditions: DB-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film thickness) was employed. High purity helium (99.999%) was used as carrier gas with the flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The inlet temperature was adjusted at 250 °C. The solvent delay time was 1 min. The injection mode was the nonreversible injection. The starting column temperature was 50 °C held for 3 min, programmed to 80 °C at 10 °C/min, then rising to 100 °C at 3 °C/min. The oven temperature was ramped 160 °C at 10 °C/min, then ramped to 180 °C at 3 °C/min, and finally ramped to 220 °C at 15 °C/min maintaining it for 2 min.
Mass spectrometry conditions: the ionization mode was electron ionization source (EI), and the electron energy was set at 70 eV. The transfer line temperature and ion source temperature were both set at 250 °C. Full scan mode was employed with a scanning quality range of 33–450 amu. The operating system was Xcalibur (v. 2.2, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

3.3.3. Statistical Analysis

Volatile terpenes and terpenoids from pine leaves were mainly determined by two methods: (1) depending on MS Library search: the volatile terpenes and terpenoids were identified by comparing with the MS literature data (NIST 14); (2) depending on retention index (RI): homologous series of n-alkanes (C8–C40) was injected under the same chromatographic conditions [40]. The RI was calculated by the retention time of compounds to identify volatile terpenes and terpenoids.
Quantitative analysis of the percentage of each volatile terpene and terpenoid was calculated by the peak area normalization measurements.

4. Conclusions

For the first time, volatile terpenes and terpenoids of six representative Pinus species in China were comparatively analyzed. A total of 46 volatile terpenes and terpenoids were identified by HS-SPME-GC-MS. The most diverse compounds were sesquiterpenes with 20 compounds, followed by monoterpenes and oxygenated terpenes with 15 and 7 compounds, respectively. Terpene esters were the least diverse with only four compounds. Most of these volatile terpenes and terpenoids have essential biological activities. In addition, the volatile terpenes and terpenoids in the six pine leaves were analyzed by PCA and CA, and the pine leaves could be divided into two categories. The volatile terpenes and terpenoids in samples C. deodara, P. densiflora, and P. thunbergii were similar in terms of composition and content of compounds, so they were clustered into one category. Other samples (P. sylvestris, P. tabuliformis, and P. bungeana) were clustered into one category. This study may provide the reference for the resource utilization of Pinus species leaves. Further, this study could provide further knowledge for understanding biodiversity.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, W.J.; Methodology, W.J.; Resources, W.J.; Supervision, X.J.; Writing-original draft, W.J.; Writing-review and editing, X.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Analysis and testing of new methods and new research independent subject (Grant No. 6); Innovation fund of advanced analysis and testing center of Nanjing Forestry University (Grant No. 2016-020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data in this article are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Hizume, M.; Shibata, F.; Matsusaki, Y.; Garajova, Z. Chromosome identification and comparative karyotypic analyses of four Pinus species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, H.; Lee, B.; Yun, K.W. Comparison of chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from three Pinus species. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 44, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jung, K.H.; Yoo, S.K.; Moon, S.K.; Lee, U.S. Furfural from pine needle extract inhibits the growth of a plant pathogenic fungus, Alternaria mali. Mycobiology 2007, 35, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Hwang, J.S.; Bae, J.J.; Choo, Y.S. Effects of an aqueous red pine (Pinus densiflora) needle extract on growth and physiological characteristics of soybean (Glycine max). J. Ecol. Field Biol. 2011, 34, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhang, Y.D.; Xin, C.; Cheng, C.L.; Wang, Z.Y. Antitumor activity of nanoemulsion based on essential oil of Pinus koraiensis pinecones in MGC-803 tumor-bearing nude mice. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 8226–8238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, C.; He, L.; Yan, M.; Zheng, G.Y.; Liu, X.Y. Effects of polyprenols from pine needles of Pinus massoniana on ameliorating cognitive impairment in ad-galactose-induced mouse model. Age 2014, 36, 9676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. He, J. Bioactivity-guided fractionation of pine needle reveals catechin as an anti-hypertension agent via inhibiting angiotensin-converting enzyme. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, T.; Song, B.; Cho, K.S.; Lee, I.S. Therapeutic potential of volatile terpenes and terpenoids from forests for inflammatory diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Unsicker, S.B.; Kunert, G.; Gershenzon, J. Protective perfumes: The role of vegetative volatiles in plant defense against herbivores. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Heil, M. Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. N. Phytol. 2008, 178, 41–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goncalves, E.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Henriques, J.; Sousa, E.; Bonifacio, L. Effect of Monochamus galloprovincialis feeding on Pinus pinaster and Pinus pinea, oleoresin and insect volatiles. Phytochemistry 2020, 169, 112159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guimarães, A.G.; Serafini, M.R.; Quintans-Júnior, L.J. Terpenes and derivatives as a new perspective for pain treatment: A patent review. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2014, 24, 243–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dubey, V.S.; Bhalla, R.; Luthra, R. An overview of the non-mevalonate pathway for terpenoid biosynthesis in plants. J. Biosci. 2003, 28, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cho, K.S.; Lim, Y.R.; Lee, K.; Lee, J.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, I.S. Terpenes from forests and human health. Toxicol. Res. 2017, 33, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mitic, Z.S.; Jovanovic, S.C.; Zlatkovic, B.K.; Nikolic, B.M.; Stojanovic, G.S.; Marin, P.D. Needle terpenes as chemotaxonomic markers in Pinus: Subsections Pinus and Pinaster. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1600453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhou, Z.Y.; Xian, J.C.; Wei, W.K.; Xu, C.; Yang, J.; Zhan, R.T.; Ma, D.M. Volatile metabolic profiling and functional characterization of four terpene synthases reveal terpenoid diversity in different tissues of Chrysanthemum indicum L. Phytochemistry 2021, 185, 112687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sayout, A.; Ouarhach, A.; Rabie, R.; Dilagui, I.; Soraa, N.; Romane, A. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of Lavandulapedunculata subsp. atlantica (Braun-Blanq.) Romo essential oil and selected terpenoids against resistant bacteria strains-structure-activity relationships. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17, e1900496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Huang, M.; Lu, J.J.; Huang, M.Q.; Bao, J.L.; Chen, X.P.; Wang, Y.T. Terpenoids: Natural products for cancer therapy. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2012, 21, 1801–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhu, W.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Tong, Y.; Hu, Y. Discovery of a novel series of α-terpineol derivatives as promising anti-asthmatic agents: Their design, synthesis, and biological evaluation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 143, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Remigius, C.; Katharina, M. Variability of volatiles in Pinus cembra L. within and between trees from a stand in the Salzburg Alps (Austria) as assessed by essential oil and SPME analysis. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2021, 68, 567–579. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gulden, D.; Eyup, B. Chemical composition of essential oil of Pinus nigra subsp pallasiana (Pinaceae) twigs, from different regions of Turkey. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2018, 21, 511–519. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zielinska-Blajet, M.; Feder-Kubis, J. Monoterpenes and their derivatives-recent development in biological and medical applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Orhan, I.; Küpeli, E.; Aslan, M.; Kartal, M.; Yesilada, E. Bioassay-guided evaluation of anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activities of pistachio, Pistacia vera L. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 105, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kang, E.; Lee, D.H.; Jung, Y.; Shin, S.Y.; Koh, D.; Lee, Y.H. α-Pinene inhibits tumor invasion through downregulation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB-regulated matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene expression in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2016, 59, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lu, Z.G.; Wang, J.Z.; Qu, L.N.; Kan, G.H.; Zhang, T.L.; Shen, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Niu, Y.W.; Xiao, Z.B.; et al. Reactive mesoporous silica nanoparticles loaded with limonene for improving physical and mental health of mice at simulated microgravity condition. Bioact. Mater. 2020, 5, 1127–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ilardi, V.; Badalamenti, N.; Bruno, M. Chemical composition of the essential oil from different vegetative parts of Foeniculum vulgare subsp. piperitum (Ucria) coutinho (Umbelliferae) growing wild in Sicily. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abdullahi, A.; Ahmad, K.; Ismail, I.S.; Asib, N.; Ahmed, O.H.; Abubakar, A.I.; Siddiqui, Y.; Ismail, M.R. Potential of using ginger essential oils-based nanotechnology to control tropical plant diseases. Plant Pathol. J. 2020, 36, 515–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abu-Izneid, T.; Rauf, A.; Shariati, M.A.; Khalil, A.A.; Imran, M.; Rebezov, M.; Uddin, M.S.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; Rengasamy, K.R.R. Sesquiterpenes and their derivatives-natural anticancer compounds: An update. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 161, 105165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ghelardini, C.; Galeotti, N.; Mannelli, L.D.; Mazzanti, G.; Bartolini, A. Local anaesthetic activity of beta-caryophyllene. Farmaco 2001, 56, 387–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. da Silva, S.L.; Figueiredo, P.M.S.; Yano, T. Chemotherapeutic potential of the volatile oils from Zanthoxylum rhoifolium Lam leaves. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 576, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ishii-Iwamoto, E.L.; Pergo Coelho, E.M.; Reis, B.; Moscheta, I.S.; Bonato, C.M. Effects of monoterpenes on physiological processes during seed germination and seedling growth. Curr. Bioact. Comp. 2012, 8, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dupuy, A.; Athes, V.; Schenk, J.; Jenelten, U.; Souchon, I. Solvent extraction of highly valuable oxygenated terpenes from lemon essential oil using a polypropylene membrane contactor: Potential and limitations. Flavour Frag. J. 2011, 26, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, N.; Sun, G.Q.; Yuan, X.; Hou, J.L.; Wu, Q.C.; Soromou, L.W.; Feng, H.H. Inhibition of lung inflammatory responses by bornyl acetate is correlated with regulation of myeloperoxidase activity. J. Surg. Res. 2014, 186, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Karan, T.; Yildiz, I.; Aydin, A.; Erenler, R. Inhibition of various cancer cells proliferation of bornyl acetate and essential oil from Inula graveolens (Linnaeus) desf. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2018, 12, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, H.; Zhao, R.G.; Chen, H.; Jia, P.; Bao, L.; Tang, H. Bornyl acetate has an anti-inflammatory effect in human chondrocytes via induction of IL-11. IUBMB Life 2014, 66, 854–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Paraschos, S.; Magiatis, P.; Gousia, P.; Economou, V.; Sakkas, H.; Papadopoulou, C.; Skaltsounis, A.L. Chemical investigation and antimicrobial properties of mastic water and its major constituents. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 907–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mitić, Z.S.; Jovanović, B.; Jovanović, S.Č.; Mihajilov-Krstev, T.; Stojanović-Radić, Z.Z.; Cvetkovića, V.J.; Mitrović, T.Lj.; Marin, P.D.; Zlatković, B.K.; Stojanović, G.S. Comparative study of the essential oils of four Pinus species: Chemical composition, antimicrobial and insect larvicidal activity. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 111, 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tayyebeh, G.; Hossein, S.K.; Solmaz, A.; Safar, F.; Abbas, D.; Su, C.B.; Hamed, H.; Ki, H.K. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from the aerial parts of Pinus eldarica grown in Northwestern Iran. Molecules 2019, 24, 3203. [Google Scholar]
  39. Allwood, J.W.; Cheung, W.; Xu, Y.; Mumm, R.; De Vos, R.C.H.; Deborde, C.; Biais, B.; Maucourt, M.; Berger, Y.; Schaffer, A.A.; et al. Metabolomics in melon: A new opportunity for aroma analysis. Phytochemistry 2014, 99, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fan, J.J.; Zhang, W.X.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, D.D.; Zhang, D.L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, G.B.; Cao, F.L. Discrimination of Malus taxa with different scent intensities using electronic nose and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Sensors 2018, 18, 3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Molecules 26 05244 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of volatile terpenes and terpenoids in pine leaves. TA refers to total area. TN refers to total number. The blue dots refers to the TN of volatile terpenes and terpenoids.
Figure 1. Comparison of volatile terpenes and terpenoids in pine leaves. TA refers to total area. TN refers to total number. The blue dots refers to the TN of volatile terpenes and terpenoids.
Molecules 26 05244 g001
Molecules 26 05244 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of monoterpenes, oxygenated terpenes, terpene esters, and sesquiterpenes in pine leaves. TA refers to total area. TN refers to total number.
Figure 2. Comparison of monoterpenes, oxygenated terpenes, terpene esters, and sesquiterpenes in pine leaves. TA refers to total area. TN refers to total number.
Molecules 26 05244 g002
Molecules 26 05244 g003 550
Figure 3. PCA plot of the pine leaf samples. S1–S6 represented P. sylvestris, P. tabuliformis, P. bungeana, C. deodara, P. densiflora, and P. thunbergii respectively.
Figure 3. PCA plot of the pine leaf samples. S1–S6 represented P. sylvestris, P. tabuliformis, P. bungeana, C. deodara, P. densiflora, and P. thunbergii respectively.
Molecules 26 05244 g003
Molecules 26 05244 g004 550
Figure 4. Cluster pedigree diagram of volatile terpenes and terpenoids in the pine leaf samples.
Figure 4. Cluster pedigree diagram of volatile terpenes and terpenoids in the pine leaf samples.
Molecules 26 05244 g004
Table
Table 1. Identification of volatile terpenes and terpenoids components and relative contents of compounds in pine leaves (Means ± SD).
Table 1. Identification of volatile terpenes and terpenoids components and relative contents of compounds in pine leaves (Means ± SD).
NO.ComponentsCAS No.RI b/RIL cRelative Content/%
P. sylvestrisP. tabuliformisP. bungeanaC. deodaraP. densifloraP. thunbergii
Monoterpene
11,7,7-Trimethyl- ricyclo [2.2.1.0(2,6)]heptane508-32-7924/9270.25 ± 0.040.15 ± 0.042.25 ± 0.59N.D. a0.27 ± 0.040.28 ± 0.05
2(1R)-2,6,6-Trimethylbicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene7785-70-8935/93753.81 ± 7.0136.20 ± 5.6225.98 ± 1.236.53 ± 1.2620.54 ± 2.2111.72 ± 1.16
3Camphene79-92-5950/9501.33 ± 0.190.85 ± 0.175.39 ± 0.390.09 ± 0.031.07 ± 0.161.15 ± 0.20
44-Methylene-1-(1-methylethyl)-bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane3387-41-5974/974N.D.0.15 ± 0.01N.D.N.D.0.43 ± 0.020.25 ± 0.01
5á-Pinene127-91-3979/9795.28 ± 0.493.23 ± 0.363.87 ± 0.297.25 ± 1.444.25 ± 0.49N.D.
6á-Myrcene123-35-3991/9926.23 ± 0.1517.54 ± 0.723.95 ± 0.1736.79 ± 9.0122.27 ± 1.9013.02 ± 0.34
71-Methylene-4-(1-methylethenyl)-cyclohexane499-97-81006/1005N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.0.28 ± 0.02N.D.
83-Carene13466-78-91011/1013N.D.0.06 ± 0.00N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.
9Limonene138-86-31030/103110.89 ± 0.214.37 ± 0.181.12 ± 0.053.42 ± 0.90N.D.N.D.
10á-Phellandrene555-10-21032/1031N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.14.75 ± 1.3214.25 ± 0.74
11trans-á-Ocimene3779-61-11038/1041N.D.N.D.0.82 ± 0.02N.D.N.D.N.D.
12á-Ocimene13877-91-31048/10532.46 ± 0.30N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.
13ç-Terpinene99-85-41061/1062N.D.0.05 ± 0.010.19 ± 0.01N.D.0.10 ± 0.010.10 ± 0.01
14Terpinolene586-62-91091/10890.32 ± 0.020.90 ± 0.040.14 ± 0.010.40 ± 0.100.56 ± 0.041.49 ± 0.07
15(E,Z)-2,6-Dimethyl-2,4,6-octatriene7216-56-01134/1131N.D.N.D.0.13 ± 0.01N.D.N.D.N.D.
Oxygenated Terpenes
16Linalool78-70-61103/1103N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.0.10 ± 0.001.62 ± 0.27
17trans-3-Pinanone547-60-41170/11700.07 ± 0.01N.D.0.10 ± 0.01N.D.N.D.N.D.
18endo-Borneol507-70-01178/1172N.D.0.14 ± 0.04N.D.N.D.0.28 ± 0.110.24 ± 0.11
19à-Terpineol98-55-51201/1198N.D.N.D.N.D.0.21 ± 0.13N.D.0.13 ± 0.04
204,6,6-Trimethyl-bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-3-en-2-one80-57-91218/1217N.D.0.04 ± 0.01N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.
21Germacrene D-4-ol198991-79-61595/15781.09 ± 0.79N.D.N.D.0.42 ± 0.610.10 ± 0.050.13 ± 0.03
22Caryophyllene oxide1139-30-61605/1592N.D.0.07 ± 0.010.41 ± 0.08N.D.N.D.N.D.
Terpene esters
23(-)-Bornyl acetate5655-61-81292/12890.91 ± 0.393.63 ± 1.42N.D.0.16 ± 0.028.69 ± 0.159.54 ± 0.63
24trans-Pinocarvyl acetate1686-15-31306/1298N.D.N.D.N.D.0.07 ± 0.01N.D.N.D.
25(Z)-3,7-Dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-ol, acetate141-12-81364/1362N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.0.11 ± 0.03N.D.
26Geranyl acetate105-87-31384/1379N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.1.07 ± 0.412.25 ± 0.57
Sesquiterpenes
27à-Cubebene17699-14-81356/13520.34 ± 0.150.07 ± 0.011.02 ± 0.120.10 ± 0.02N.D.0.16 ± 0.01
28α-Longipinene5989-08-21363/1358N.D.N.D.N.D.0.08 ± 0.01N.D.N.D.
29Ylangene14912-44-81381/1377N.D.N.D.0.60 ± 0.08N.D.N.D.N.D.
30Copaene3856-25-51388/13810.41 ± 0.23N.D.1.73 ± 0.180.28 ± 0.09N.D.N.D.
31(-)-á-Bourbonene5208-59-31398/1393N.D.N.D.0.39 ± 0.03N.D.N.D.N.D.
32Longifolene475-20-71422/14180.55 ± 0.24N.D.N.D.0.13 ± 0.05N.D.0.83 ± 0.25
33Caryophyllene87-44-51434/14307.33 ± 2.0113.98 ± 3.3628.42 ± 0.756.20 ± 2.036.40 ± 1.818.56 ± 1.01
34β-Copaene18252-44-31435/1442N.D.0.32 ± 0.06N.D.0.00 ± 0.000.40 ± 0.12N.D.
35(-)-Aristolene6831-16-91452/14552.19 ± 1.31N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.
36cis-á-Farnesene28973-97-91458/1458N.D.N.D.0.19 ± 0.01N.D.N.D.N.D.
37Humulene6753-98-61469/14681.11 ± 0.372.51 ± 0.525.82 ± 0.421.35 ± 0.491.24 ± 0.621.64 ± 0.15
38cis-Muurola-4(15),5-diene157477-72-01478/14690.11 ± 0.050.14 ± 0.020.13 ± 0.010.18 ± 0.050.16 ± 0.040.30 ± 0.03
39ç-Muurolene30021-74-01489/14800.52 ± 0.200.32 ± 0.046.49 ± 0.230.64 ± 0.210.36 ± 0.110.89 ± 0.02
40Germacrene D23986-74-51498/14892.30 ± 1.0113.50 ± 2.250.23 ± 0.0132.70 ± 9.7814.86 ± 4.1430.19 ± 1.16
41à-Muurolene10208-80-71513/1505N.D.0.32 ± 0.021.66 ± 0.090.39 ± 0.08N.D.N.D.
42α-cadinene39029-41-91528/15212.03 ± 0.920.48 ± 0.032.66 ± 0.150.83 ± 0.150.57 ± 0.110.99 ± 0.03
43Cadina-3,9-diene523-47-71534/1520N.D.N.D.5.73 ± 0.401.43 ± 0.220.96 ± 0.12N.D.
44Cadina-1(10),4-diene483-76-11536/1528N.D.0.81 ± 0.03N.D.N.D.N.D.N.D.
45Cubenene29837-12-51546/15350.12 ± 0.05N.D.0.27 ± 0.030.08 ± 0.02N.D.N.D.
46à-Cadinene24406-05-11551/15420.37 ± 0.280.16 ± 0.010.31 ± 0.030.28 ± 0.050.17 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.02
a N.D. indicates not detected; b RI: Retention index determined experimentally on a DB-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm film thickness); c RTL: Retention indices found in literature or database (NIST 14).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ji, W.; Ji, X. Comparative Analysis of Volatile Terpenes and Terpenoids in the Leaves of Pinus Species—A Potentially Abundant Renewable Resource. Molecules 2021, 26, 5244. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175244

AMA Style

Ji W, Ji X. Comparative Analysis of Volatile Terpenes and Terpenoids in the Leaves of Pinus Species—A Potentially Abundant Renewable Resource. Molecules. 2021; 26(17):5244. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175244

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ji, Wensu, and Xiaoyue Ji. 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Volatile Terpenes and Terpenoids in the Leaves of Pinus Species—A Potentially Abundant Renewable Resource" Molecules 26, no. 17: 5244. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175244

APA Style

Ji, W., & Ji, X. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Volatile Terpenes and Terpenoids in the Leaves of Pinus Species—A Potentially Abundant Renewable Resource. Molecules, 26(17), 5244. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175244

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop