Next Article in Journal
Effect of Soaking Conditions and Fuzzy Analytical Method for Producing the Quick-Cooking Black Jasmine Rice
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Calcium Citrate in the Manufacture of Acid Rennet Cheese Produced from High-Heat-Treated Goat’s Milk from Spring and Autumn Season
Previous Article in Journal
Biochemometry-Based Discovery of Phenylpropanoids from Azadirachta indica Fruits as Inhibitors of In Vitro Osteoclast Formation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Subcritical Water Enhanced with Deep Eutectic Solvent for Extracting Polysaccharides from Lentinus edodes and Their Antioxidant Activities

Molecules 2022, 27(11), 3612; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113612
by Jixian Zhang 1, Zhiqiang Ye 1, Guoyan Liu 1, Li Liang 1, Chaoting Wen 1, Xiaofang Liu 1, Youdong Li 1, Tao Ji 1, Dongming Liu 1, Jiaoyan Ren 2,* and Xin Xu 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2022, 27(11), 3612; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113612
Submission received: 10 May 2022 / Revised: 28 May 2022 / Accepted: 1 June 2022 / Published: 4 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quality Control in Food Processing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

 

I would recommend a few revisions:

Line 47. The reference is missing, or maybe it is Gereniu et al. (2018)

Line 109. The information is not necessary

Line 89. Please separate the sentences from table 2. It appears like a footnote

Line 140. Table 3. Are the results made in duplicate? The design does not ensure the repeatability by Runs 3,4,10, 16, and 18? What does std mean? No means the run?

Line 143. The model was applied for section 2.5, or the optimum extraction condition obtained by the model was applied here? If so, please specify that

Line 237. Please insert the need or explain the application of the single factor experiment (e.g., the selection parameters for the design model??). Provide some information in the material and methods section

Line 280. What LEPD mean?

 Lines 381-382. Move the sentence lower in the text

General remark. Please compare the results with other similar findings from the literature

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The comments are as follows.

  1. Please, revise the text to correct some misprints.
  2. The abbreviations should be defined just the first time they are mentioned in the text and used as such throughout the text.
  3. Please, provide more details regarding the plant material (manipulation after obtaining the material, moisture content, particle size).
  4. The extraction pressure is missing in the section 2.5.2. Please, provide it.
  5. The Results and discussion, and Conclusion sections might be improved by expressing more the importance of the SWE-DES application.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop