Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Proteomics Explore the Potential Targets and Action Mechanisms of Hydroxychloroquine
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Supplemental Light Spectra on the Composition, Production and Antimicrobial Activity of Ocimum basilicum L. Essential Oil
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Class of Cyclometalated Platinum(II) Complexes for Solution-Processable OLEDs
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Chemical Composition and Biological Activities of Essential Oil from Korean Native Thyme Bak-Ri-Hyang (Thymus quinquecostatus Celak.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential Action Mechanism and Inhibition Efficacy of Morinda citrifolia Essential Oil and Octanoic Acid against Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum Infestations

by
Mateus S. Dalcin
1,
Bruna L. Dias
2,
Luis O. Viteri Jumbo
3,4,
Ana C. S. S. Oliveira
4,
Sabrina H. C. Araújo
5,6,
Wellington S. Moura
2,
Dalmarcia S. C. Mourão
1,
Talita P. S. Ferreira
4,
Fabricio S. Campos
4,
Alex Sander R. Cangussu
4,
Marcos V. G. Alves
1,
Bruno S. Andrade
7,
Javier G. Mantilla-Afanador
6,8,
Raimundo W. A. Aguiar
1,4,
Eugênio E. Oliveira
4,6,* and
Gil R. Santos
1,4,*
1
Programa de Pós-Graduação Produção Vegetal, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Gurupi 77402-970, TO, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia—Rede Bionorte, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Gurupi 77402-970, TO, Brazil
3
Carrera de Agronomia, Universidad Nacional de Loja (UNL), Loja 110103, Ecuador
4
Programa de Pós-Graduação Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Gurupi 77410-530, TO, Brazil
5
Programa de Pós-Graduação Ciências Florestais e Ambientais, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Gurupi 77402-970, TO, Brazil
6
Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil
7
Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequié 45206-190, BA, Brazil
8
Research Institute in Microbiology and Agroindustrial Biotechnology, Universidad Católica de Manizales, Carrera 23 No. 60-63, Manizales 170002, Colombia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(16), 5173; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165173
Submission received: 24 June 2022 / Revised: 2 August 2022 / Accepted: 9 August 2022 / Published: 13 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Essential Oil Research and Product Development)

Abstract

:
The use of plant-based products has been shown to efficiently inhibit fungi-mediated diseases in agricultural crops. Here, we extracted and evaluated the composition of noni, Morinda citrifolia L., essential oil and assessed its activities against Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum in Cucumis melo L. Using in silico molecular approaches, potential interactions between the essential oil major components and S. cucurbitacearum tyrosine–tRNA ligase were predicted. Finally, we also measured the potential interference of plant physiology (the stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis) mediated by the application of the M. citrifolia essential oil. Chromatographic analysis revealed that octanoic acid (75.8%), hexanoic acid (12.8%), and isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate (3.1%) were the major essential oil compounds. Octanoic acid and noni essential oil, when used as preventive measures, reduce fungal mycelial growth at a concentration of 5 mg/mL without causing significant damage to the treated leaves, which reinforces their efficacies as preventive tools against S. cucurbitacearum. Molecular docking analyses predicted very stable interactions between the major essential oil constituents and S. cucurbitacearum tyrosine–tRNA ligase, suggesting the interference of these plant-based molecules upon enzyme activation. Octanoic acid and M. citrifolia essential oil at concentrations of 20 mg/mL decreased the stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis rate of melon plants, resulting in robust phytotoxicity. Collectively, our findings indicated that despite the phytotoxicity risks at higher concentrations, M. citrifolia essential oil and octanoic acid, have potential as alternative tools for the integrative management of S. cucurbitacearum.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The use of plant-based extracts and essential oils (EOs) has shown to be an effective alternative to the use of synthetic compounds for controlling phytopathogens [1,2]. Noni, Morinda citrifolia L., a member of the Rubiaceae family, is among the plants that produce EOs that can act as potential fungicides without detrimentally affecting beneficial fungi [3,4]. Although previous investigations suggested that the fungicidal activities of M. citrifolia essential oil may rely on the actions of its major components—i.e., the octanoic and hexanoic acids [5,6], the confirmation of such statements still requires investigations using other fungal species, and with the emergence of new in silico analysis tools, such as molecular docking, it is possible to define potential targets for the major and minor compounds of EOs [7,8], including those of M. citrifolia.
Among the pathogens that attack agricultural crops, fungi have been recognized as the main disease-causing agents, infecting plant tissues at different growth stages, which generally leads to losses in the quality and quantity of agricultural products [9,10]. One of the main pathogens of the plants of the Cucurbitaceae family is the fungus Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum (Fr.) (syn: Didymella bryoniae) [11]. This pathogen can infect at least 12 genera and 23 species of Cucurbitaceae, including watermelon (Citrullus lanatus), cucumber (Cucumis sativus), cantaloupe and muskmelon (Cucumis melo), squashes (Cucurbita pepo), and gourds (Cucurbita spp.) [12,13]. Moreover, this fungus is the causal agent of gummy stem blight (GSB) disease, whose main symptoms can be characterized as the falling over of seedlings, circular lesions on the leaves, and canker formation on the stem and tendrils [14,15].
Currently, the application of chemical agents, including fungicides with both specific (difenoconazole, tebuconazole, and thiophanate-methyl) and broad (chlorothalonil and mancozeb) [16,17] modes of action, remains the most commonly used method for GSB control [18]. One of the disadvantages of such a strategy is the fact that these pesticides lose their ability to control the pathogen owing to its increased resistance to these compounds [19,20,21]. In addition, the high frequency of pesticide use has detrimental effects on human health due to its residual effect on food and the environment after reaching the target organism [22,23].
Although alternative options based on natural fungicidal compounds are continuously explored to establish control practices against plant pathogens [24,25], the potential of these natural products for control GSB still is an unresolved task. Thus, the present investigation was conducted aiming to evaluate the efficiency of noni EO and its major compound, octanoic acid, for controlling S. cucurbitacearum. By applying in silico approaches, we analyzed the potential molecular interactions of these alternative fungicide products with potential targets of the phytopathogen. Lastly, considering the fact that the misuse of EOs or of the compounds isolated from them can also cause detrimental effects such as phytotoxicity [22,23] and in order to establish acceptable physiological standards of phytotoxicity of noni EO in melon plants, different concentrations were applied, and potential physiological changes in the melon plants were evaluated.

2. Results

2.1. Chromatographic Analysis of M. citrifolia EO

The ripened fruits yielded an average of 3% of essential oil when extracted by the hydrodistillation method. Chromatographic analyses indicated that M. citrifolia EO is mainly composed of carboxylic acids, and octanoic acid (75.8%) and hexanoic acid (12.8%) were the main EO compounds (Table 1). Additionally, isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate (3.1%) and 15 other components were identified in the EO sample. The chromatographic profile can be seen in Figure S1.

2.2. Interactions of Noni EO Components and Fungal Tyrosine–tRNA Ligases

The identities and validation results (including those for the corresponding Ramachandran-favored values and QMEAN) highlighted the quality of the templates selected for homology modeling (Table 2 and Figure S2).
The major compounds present in noni EO complexed with the fungal tRNA ligase and formed various types of interactions with varying affinity energies (Table 3). The octanoic acid and isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate showed better affinity energies (−5.1 kcal/mol) with the target of S. cucurbitacearum than other components.
The interactions between octanoic acid and the S. cucurbitacearum tRNA ligase active site included van der Waals (GLY93, PRO97, PHE225, GLY226, ASP229, ASN254, PRO255, MET256, GLY259), conventional hydrogen bonds (TRP82, GLY227), and alkyl bonds (VAL96, VAL257) (Figure 1). Similar binding patterns were recorded for the complexes formed between butanoic acid, where van der Waals (GLY93, VAL96, VAL257, GLY259, ASP271, SER272, GLY301, PHE305) and conventional hydrogen bonds (PRO258, LEU260) were recorded (Figure 1). Regarding the interactions with isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate, our molecular docking revealed van der Waals (TRP82, PRO97, PHE225, GLY227, ASP229, ASN257, ASP271) and alkyl (VAL96, MET256, VAL257) interactions (Figure 1)
In a dynamic molecular simulation environment, the spatial RMSD was calculated from the average position of each amino acid residue of the complexes formed by the ligand octanoic acid, hexanoic acid, and isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate with the protein tyrosine-tRNA ligand from Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum to confirm structural stabilization (Figure S3). The highest values of RMSD were less than 1.0 Å and indicated that the residues that underwent the greatest changes are in the regions corresponding to the loops, not having major conformational changes in the residues of the region of the active site where there is a lower value of RMSD, thus revealing the stability of these areas.

2.3. Noni EO and Octanoic Acid Toxicity to S. cucurbitacearum Mycelial Growth and Melon Leaves

The noni essential oil and octanoic acid similarly inhibited S. cucurbitacearum in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2). When applied at a concentration of 20 mg/mL, both noni essential oil and octanoic acid almost completely eliminated mycelial growth.
However, at such concentrations, both alternative compounds were highly phytotoxic to melon leaves, causing an injured leaf area of approximately 30% (Figure 3), which led to chlorosis and necrosis. The injured leaf area decreased with the reduction of EO and octanoic acid concentration, where no phytotoxic actions were recorded for concentrations as low as 1 mg/mL (Figure 3).
Noni EO and octanoic acids seemed to differentially affect the stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis rate of the melon leaves (Figure 4). While increasing concentrations of both of these alternative products reduced stomatal conductance (Figure 4A), only octanoic acid was able to detrimentally affect the photosynthesis rate (Figure 4B).

2.4. Evaluation of Preventive Controls of Noni EO in Melon Plants

Noni essential oil and octanoic acid exhibited preventive control actions against S. cucurbitacearum in melon plants, where DFAs were reduced in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 5). Leaves treated with concentrations as low as 1 mg/mL, which is the maximum concentration without any phytotoxic effect recorded, showed a diseased foliar area that was 30% lower for both noni essential oil and octanoic acid (Figure 5). Similarly, for leaves treated with a concentration of 5 mg/mL of noni essential oil, which caused phytotoxic damage of less than 10%, GSB development occurred in an area of 10% approximately (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

Under in vitro conditions, the essential oil of M. citrifolia and its main compound octanoic acid inhibited the mycelial growth of the fungus S. cucurbitacearum. This inhibition is due to the three major compounds that show affinities for the enzyme tyrosine–tRNA ligase. Although high concentrations of these products cause physiological changes in treated plants, lower concentrations also prevent gummy blast melon, completely inhibiting disease development without causing phytotoxicity. Therefore, our study reinforces the potential of noni EO and its compounds to inhibit and prevent phytopathogenic diseases in C. melo.
Based on the results obtained from phytochemical analysis, the octanoic acids, hexanoic acids, and isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate are the main compounds (>91%) in M. citrifolia EO, as reported in previous studies [5,6]. However, it was also demonstrated in other investigations [27] that these same compounds represent less than 13% of the EO composition, which shows a strong variation in their chemical composition and consequently in their biological activity. Essential oil bioactivities are generally attributed to their main compounds without neglecting the possible effects of synergism/antagonism with minor compounds [28,29]. Here, we found that M. citrifolia EOs completely inhibited the mycelial growth of S. cucurbitacearum. Octanoic acid was the most efficient, as it maintained the same effect at half of the concentration. Thus, the fungicide activity can be attributed to this compound. Although there are no reports of the antagonistic effects of octanoic acid and the other compounds identified in this study, negative interactions have been reported between the compounds of EOs when tested with microorganisms, such as fungi [30,31] and bacteria [32].
On the one hand, previous studies have reported bactericidal, fungicidal, and insecticidal effects [4,33,34] of M. citrifolia EO, as well as their main compound octanoic acid, [35,36] and fungicidal activities, slowing or inhibiting mycelial growth and conidial germination of the fungi Penicillium roqueforti, Aspergillus niger, and Zygosaccharomyces bailii [37,38,39]. On the other hand, the susceptibility of S. cucurbitacearum to EOs has also been reported [40,41].
Although the mechanism of action of EOs in fungi has not been completely elucidated, our molecular docking predicted stable interactions between octanoic acid and the S. cucurbitacearum tyrosine–tRNA ligase, indicating the interference of this compound in the enzyme. Similarly, in silico analyses demonstrated the affinity of the main components of noni EO, including octanoic and hexanoic acids, with the tyrosine–tRNA ligase of Sclerotium rolfsii [4], suggesting a possible impairment of fungal protein synthesis as a mechanism of fungitoxicity. The authors [42,43] suggested that the damage occurs in the fungal cell envelope, with evident changes in the endomembrane system, particularly in the mitochondria. Likewise, studies by [39] showed that octanoic acid increases the plasma membrane fluidity by physical disruption; when applied to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a significant leakage of intracellular material from the cells was observed.
How proteins are simulated that can occur within a simulated time, as molecular results, has been used to study how simulation models occur in a simulated way as simulated results [44]. The complexes formed by the ligands octanoic acid, hexanoic acid, and isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate with the protein tyrosine-tRNA ligand from Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum de showed low values of RMSD in the region of the active site, indicating that the proposed models present good stability in this region, not showing major deviations as proposed by [45].
Here, phytotoxic responses (e.g., the presence of chlorosis followed by necrosis) in melon plant leaves when the essential oil was applied at high concentrations were demonstrated, which can lead to alterations in plant physiological activity. Indeed, despite their efficacy to inhibit fungal infestations, some essential oils and their major constituents have been shown to cause phytotoxic effects when applied at higher concentrations [46,47,48]. These interactions with the physiology of plants have been attributed to their interference with some processes in the plant cells, such as the inhibition of mitosis, decrease in cellular respiration and chlorophyll content, membrane depolarization and ion leakage, removal of cuticular waxes, oxidative damage, and microtubule polymerization [49,50,51]. Although this phytotoxicity is also dependent on the compound [52] and the receptor plants, dicotyledonous species are more susceptible than monocotyledonous plants [53,54].
Stomata play a key role in plants as they control both water loss and CO2 uptake, and their function can be altered by EO compounds to increase the stomatal aperture [55,56] or induce a total closure [51] with lethal effects on the plants. This relationship is measured by stomatal conductance (mmol m−2 s−1), which in turn is correlated with the rate of photosynthesis [57,58]. Here, we observed a decrease in the stomatal conductance and photosynthesis rates depending on the applied concentrations, which was most evident in octanoic acid. The decrease in stomatal conductance affects the ability of a plant to perform photosynthesis by decreasing the gas passage through the stomata, and the amount of carbon available for fixation is reduced, thus decreasing the plant photosynthetic rate [59,60]. The evaluation of the relationship between photosynthetic rates, leaf conductivity of CO2, and yield in different melon genotypes showed that in fact those genotypes that presented higher photosynthetic rates had higher yields [61].Therefore, adjustment of phytotoxicity-acceptable changes to parameters caused by alternative treatments should be considered so that the productivity of the crop is not compromised.
Treatment strategies are expected to inhibit or control the growth of pathogens, without harming the host plants. Here, phytotoxicity was observed at both EO and various octanoic acid concentrations, thereby limiting their application in the field. However, when applied at lower concentrations and as a preventive measure for GSB control in young (15 days after emergence) melon plants, these products prevented the colonization of S. cucurbitacearum. Such statements need to be taken carefully into consideration, as we only used young melon plants and did not apply the essential oil during other plant phases (e.g., blooming, fruitification, fruit ripening). However, considering the fact that it is not common, under Brazilian Cerrado biome conditions, the occurrence of GSB symptoms in melon fruits, because it is a disease of leaves and stems, the use of noni EO to control such a phytopathogen in other phases would address objectives other than those aimed here. Collectively, the findings described here demonstrate that noni EO and octanoic acid can be used as alternative tools to prevent the growth of S. cucurbitacearum under field conditions.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. EO Extraction and Chemical Analysis

We collected ripe M. citrifolia plants cultivated in a pesticide-free environment in Gurupi County (11°43′4′′ S, 49°04′07′′ W, Gurupi, TO, Brazil). The samples were deposited in the herbarium located in Universidade Estadual do Tocantins-UNITINS, Brazil, under the identification number 8035. The EO was obtained by the hydrodistillation method, following previously described procedures [4]. Briefly, 500 g of ripe fruit and 500 mL of distilled water were placed in a 1000 mL round-bottom flask and then coupled to a Clevenger apparatus. After a 2-h extraction period, EO was collected in an amber bottle and stored at 4 °C. Octanoic acid was purchased from a commercial chemical company (Sigma–Aldrich®, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). We identified and quantified the EO constituents by conducting gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC–MS), following previously described procedures [3].
The chromatograph used was the Shimadzu model GC-210 equipped with a selective mass detector model QP2010 Plus operated under the following conditions: RTX-5MS fused silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25-μm-thick film); temperature programming 60–240 °C (3 °C/min); injector temperature 220 °C; helium carrier gas; splitless injection with an injected volume of 1 μL of a 1:1000 solution in hexane. For the mass spectrometer, we used an impact energy of 70 eV and an ion source and interface temperature of 200 °C. The spectra were compared with the Nist and Wiley 229 library database and the retention index, calculated for each constituent, and compared with tabulated values, according to [26], and the quantification of the contents of the compounds was expressed as a percentage.

4.2. In Silico Studies of the Interactions among Noni EO Major Compounds and the Fungal Tyrosine–tRNA Ligase

4.2.1. Ligands and Modeling Targets

We constructed 3D structures of EO major compounds (i.e., octanoic acid, hexanoic acid, and isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate) in their neutral forms, using Marvin Sketch 18.10, ChemAxon software (accessed on 4 March 2022 at http://www.chemaxon.com).
Amino acid sequences of tyrosine–tRNA ligase from S. cucurbitacearum were obtained from previous investigations [62]. The protein 3D structure was constructed using a homology modeling approach with the Swiss Model Workspace (accessed on 13 April 2022 at https://swissmodel.expasy.org/) after the selection of its respective templates using the Protein Basic Local Align Search Tool. Templates were downloaded from the Protein Databank (accessed on 13 April 2022 at https://www.rcsb.org/), and the experimental method, resolution, R-value, and its complexing with a ligand were taken as the quality parameters. We used the Swiss model to check the protein structure crashes and amino acid positioning in the active sites, as previously suggested by [63]. By inspecting the Ramachandran plots [64,65], we validated the generated models and analyzed the distribution of the torsion angles of the backbone Φ and ψ, which are responsible for the stereochemical quality of the proteins studied as well as the QMEAN factor [66].

4.2.2. Molecular Docking Calculations

We prepared the targets and ligands using molecular docking processes available at Autodock Tools 1.5.7 [67], according to the methodology proposed elsewhere [68]. We used AutoDock Vina [69] in the docking calculations, which resulted in nine docking positions for ligand–target interactions, which provided the affinity energy values (kcal/mol). To select the best position for each ligand inside the protein target, we analyzed the docking position results using PyMOL 2.0 Schrödinger, LLC (San Carlos, USA) [70] and Discovery Studio 4.5 Dassault Systemes BIOVIA (Vélizy-Villacoublay, France) [71], as previously proposed by [68].

4.2.3. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Molecular dynamics simulations were performed using the MDWeb server [72], and the molecular docking PDB files were used to prepare the simulation base. The structure was prepared using the Gromacs full MD Setup with the AMBER-99SB * force field, as it satisfactorily describes the molecular behavior of proteins. The molecular dynamics simulation process was carried out according to the set of steps that include cleaning the structure, fixing the side chains of the complex, adding the solvent box, minimizing energy, and balancing the system to receive the minimized structure as an outlet [45]. These simulations were performed in constant volume (NVT) [73,74]. In the equilibrium stage, the systems were subjected to a simulation of 2.5 ps with a temperature of 300 K and constant pressure. After the generation of the protein–ligand complex, the water molecules and ions were removed to reduce the size of the system, and the dry trajectory was recovered to trace the mean quadratic deviation (RMSD).

4.3. In Vitro Activities of Noni EO against S. cucurbitacearum

Bioassays were performed in commercial potato-dextrose-agar culture medium contained in Petri dishes (70 mm in diameter). Five concentrations (1, 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/mL) of noni EO and octanoic acid were diluted in a mixture of distilled water and 1.0 % (v/v) Tween 20 (Êxodo Científica, Hortolândia, São Paulo, Brazil). The test solutions were applied (at a volume of 200 µL) to cover the inner surfaces of Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter). Disks (4 mm in diameter) containing fungal mycelium were added to the center of each Petri dish and placed in an incubation chamber at 25 °C for 10 d. Four replicates were used for each compound and concentration combination. As a positive control, we used a commercial formulation containing a mixture of synthetic fungicides, thiophanate-methyl (200 g/kg), and chlorothalonil (500 g/kg) at an application rate of 2 g/L, and the negative control consisted of distilled water–Tween 80 (1.0% v/v).

4.4. Toxicity and Physiological Parameters of the Melon Plants Treated with Noni EO

Melon, Cucumis melon L., plants of the cultivar Eldorado 300, were individually cultivated in pots (5 L) filled with a commercial substrate (Germinar XI; Bioflora Ltd.a, Prata, MG, Brazil) and sieved soil in a greenhouse environment. Then, 15 d after emergence, plants were sprayed up to the leaf drip point with EO-containing solutions at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 20 mg/mL. Plants were kept under controlled conditions (25 °C, 70 ± 5% humidity) for 24 h to evaluate their phytotoxic actions. We used the phytotoxicity scale adapted from [75]: 1–25% = slight leaf or plant chlorosis; 26–50% = moderate leaf or plant chlorosis; 51–75% = high leaf or plant chlorosis; 76–100% = plants wilt and die. We used five plants (replicates) for each fungicide (EO and octanoic acid) and concentration combination. The control treatment consisted of plants sprayed with distilled water and Tween (1% v/v) solutions.
We further evaluated whether noni EO and octanoic acid would interfere with the melon plant physiology (e.g., stomatal conductance and gas exchange rates). Stomatal conductance (gl; mol m−2 s−1) and CO2 net assimilation (A; μmol m−2 s−1), which is a photosynthesis indicator, were measured under environmental CO2 conditions using a portable infrared gas analyzer (model LI-6400 XT, Li-color, Inc. Lincoln, Dearborn, MI, USA). The leaf chamber was adjusted to work under artificial light saturation of 1200 mmol m−2 s−1, the internal temperature of the chamber was adjusted to 30 °C, and the CO2 concentration was standardized to that in the environment.

4.5. Preventive Control of S. cucurbitacearum by Noni EO

The melon plants used and the fungicide (noni EO and octanoic acid) treatments were similar to those described in the phytotoxicity bioassay section. Briefly, 30 days after emergence, plants were sprayed up to the leaf drip point, and after a 2-h period, we inoculated the pathogen into the leaves. We used disks (5 mm in diameter) containing S. cucurbitacearum mycelium with the aid of a sterilized pin for fixation. The plants were then kept in a humid and dark chamber for 48 h. Subsequently, the melon plants were placed in a natural environment with a temperature ranging from 24 °C to 34 °C to allow disease development. Seven days after inoculation, the disease severity was evaluated using the grading scale adopted by [76]: 0 = healthy plant; 1 = diseased foliar area (DFA) less than 1%; 3 = 1% to 5% DFA; 5 = 6% to 25% DFA; 7 = 26% to 50% DFA; 9 = DFA greater than 50%.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The results of the mycelial growth inhibition, phytotoxicity, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and curative actions of noni EO and octanoic acid were subjected to regression analysis using the curve-fitting procedures available in SigmaPlot 12.5 software (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The regression model was chosen based on parsimony, and the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were also checked.

5. Conclusions

Morinda citrifolia essential oil and its major constituent, octanoic acid, were effective in the control of S. cucurbitacearum mycelial growth. Although phytotoxic effects in melon plants were recorded when these compounds were applied at 20 mg/mL, lower concentrations of M. citrifolia essential oil and octanoic acids were effective in preventing S. cucurbitacearum infections without affecting these plants‘ physiology. By using in silico approaches, the involvement of tyrosine–tRNA ligase as a potential target for M. citrifolia essential oil constituents, especially octanoic acid was demonstrated. Together, the findings described here highlight the potential of plant-based biorational products to be integrated into the management of S. cucurbitacearum in melon fields.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27165173/s1, Figure S1: Chromatographic profile from Morinda citrifolia essential oil. Figure S2: Homology data from (A) Ramachandran plots, (B) QMEAN plots, and (C) sequence alignment. Figure S3. Dynamic simulation graph of the molecular representation of the structural deviation of RMSD by treatment of the complex formed by the ligand (A) octanoic acid, (B) hexanoic acid, and (C) isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate and without ligand (D) with the protein tyrosine-tRNA ligand from Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.D., R.W.A.A., M.V.G.A., E.E.O., B.S.A., J.G.M.-A., G.R.S.; Investigation, M.S.D., B.L.D., L.O.V.J., A.C.S.S.O., D.S.C.M., S.H.C.A., W.S.M., J.G.M.-A., E.E.O., G.R.S.; Writing—Reviewing and Editing, M.S.D., B.L.D., A.C.S.S.O., L.O.V.J., S.H.C.A., E.E.O., F.S.C., G.R.S.; Funding Acquisition, M.S.D., T.P.S.F., R.W.A.A., E.E.O., B.S.A., A.S.R.C., G.R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. The authors would like to thank the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, 308576/2018-7, 427304/2018-0, 305666/2019-3, 163178/2020-8 and 152366/2022-9), Tocantins State Foundation for Research Aid (FAPTO), Minas Gerais State Foundation for Research Aid (FAPEMIG, APQ 03771-18), Federal University of Tocantins (CTC-UFT/PROPESQ), and The Secretariat of Higher Education, Science, Technology, and Innovation (SENESCYT- Ecuador for LOVJ) for funding provided during the development of this research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Similarly, the funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Duarte, J.A.D.; Fiaux, S.B.; Barbosa, E.; Toledo, P.F.S.; Silva, A.C.F.; Oliveira, E.E.; Leite, J.P.V.; Santos, M.G.; Rocha, L. Antifungal potential and biosafety of native plants from the Brazilian Restinga ecosystem. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 8, 100493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, X.; Cao, A.; Yan, D.; Ouyang, C.; Wang, Q.; Li, Y. Overview of mechanisms and uses of biopesticides. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2021, 67, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Osorio, P.R.A.; Leão, E.U.; Veloso, R.A.; Mourão, D.D.S.C.; Santos, G.R. Essential oils for alternative teak rust control. Floresta Ambiente 2018, 25, e20160391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Osorio, P.R.A.; Dias, F.R.; Mourão, D.S.C.; Araujo, S.H.C.; Toledo, P.F.S.; Silva, A.C.F.; Viera, W.A.S.; Câmara, M.P.S.; Moura, W.S.; Aguiar, R.W.A.; et al. Essential oil of Noni, Morinda citrifolia L., fruits controls the rice stem-rot disease without detrimentally affect beneficial fungi and ladybeetles. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Holanda, L.; Bezerra, G.B.; Ramos, C.S. Potent Antifungal Activity of Essential Oil from Morinda Citrifolia Fruits Rich in Short-chain Fatty Acids. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2020, 20 (Suppl. 2), S448–S454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dos Santos, P.R.; Alves, M.V.G.; dos Santos, G.R. Botanical and chemical fungicides in the treatment of commercial seeds of Brachiaria brizantha and Panicum maximum. J. Basic Microbiol. 2021, 61, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fan, J.; Fu, A.; Zhang, L. Progress in molecular docking. Quant. Biol. 2019, 7, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kumar, A.; Suravajhala, R.; Bhagat, M. Bioactive potential of Cedrus deodara (Roxb.) Loud essential oil (bark) against Curvularia lunata and molecular docking studies. Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Luchi, N.; Ioos, R.; Santini, A. Fast and reliable molecular methods to detect fungal pathogens in woody plants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 2453–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fones, H.N.; Bebber, D.P.; Chaloner, T.M.; Kay, W.T.; Steinberg, G.; Gurr, S.J. Threats to global food security from emerging fungal and oomycete crop pathogens. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Van Laethem, S.; Frans, M.; Aerts, R.; Ceusters, J. pH modulation of the environment by Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum, an important pathogen causing fruit rot in Cucurbitaceae. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 159, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stewart, J.E.; Turner, A.N.; Brewer, M.T. Evolutionary history and variation in host range of three Stagonosporopsis species causing gummy stem blight of cucurbits. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 370–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Keinath, A.P. From native plants in central Europe to cultivated crops worldwide: The emergence of Didymella bryoniae as a cucurbit pathogen. HortScience 2011, 46, 532–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Santos, G.; Leão, E.; de Castro, H.; do Nascimento, I.; Sarmento, R.D.A.; Sarmento-Brum, R. Gummy stem blight of watermelon: Etiology, epidemiology and control measures. J. Biotechnol. Biodivers. 2011, 2, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ruangwong, O.-U.; Wonglom, P.; Phoka, N.; Suwannarach, N.; Lumyong, S.; Ito, S.-I.; Sunpapao, A. Biological control activity of Trichoderma asperelloides PSU-P1 against gummy stem blight in muskmelon (Cucumis melo). Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 115, 101663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kefialew, Y.; Kunwar, S.; Abate, D.; Ayalew, A.; Colee, J.; Ritchie, L.; Olson, S.M.; Paret, M.L. Direct antifungal activity of tiadinil, a systemic acquired resistance inducer, and thymol formulations on Stagonosporopsis citrulli and control of watermelon gummy stem blight. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2018, 84, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Santos, G.R.; Tschoeke, P.; Sarmento, R.; Oliveira, E.; Rodrigues-Silva, N.; Dalcin, M.; Haddi, K.; Silva, R. Impact of growing seasons and pesticides used on the occurrence and severity of the gummy stem blight in melon cultivation in Brazil. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 161, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jones, J.G.; Korir, R.C.; Walter, T.L.; Everts, K.L. Reducing Chlorothalonil Use in Fungicide Spray Programs for Powdery Mildew, Anthracnose, and Gummy Stem Blight in Melons. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 3213–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, H.X.; Nuckols, T.A.; Harris, D.; Stevenson, K.L.; Brewer, M.T. Differences in fungicide resistance profiles and multiple resistance to a quinone-outside inhibitor (QoI), two succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHI), and a demethylation inhibitor (DMI) for two Stagonosporopsis species causing gummy stem blight of cucurbits. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 3093–3101. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhao, Q.; Wu, J.; Zhang, L.; Yan, C.; Jiang, S.; Li, Z.; Sun, D.; Lai, Y.; Gong, Z. Genome-scale analyses and characteristics of putative pathogenicity genes of Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum, a pumpkin gummy stem blight fungus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, H.-X.; Stevenson, K.L.; Brewer, M.T. Differences in sensitivity to a triazole fungicide among Stagonosporopsis species causing gummy stem blight of cucurbits. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 2106–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chaza, C.; Sopheak, N.; Mariam, H.; David, D.; Baghdad, O.; Moomen, B. Assessment of pesticide contamination in Akkar groundwater, northern Lebanon. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 14302–14312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tosi, S.; Costa, C.; Vesco, U.; Quaglia, G.; Guido, G. A 3-year survey of Italian honey bee-collected pollen reveals widespread contamination by agricultural pesticides. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rahimian, F.; Eisvand, H.R. Effects of savory essential oil on germination parameters of Fusarium infected-seeds of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 6, 1745–1750. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, B.; Li, P.; Yang, J.; Yong, X.; Yin, M.; Chen, Y.; Feng, X.; Wang, Q. Inhibition efficacy of Tetradium glabrifolium fruit essential oil against Phytophthora capsici and potential mechanism. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 176, 114310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing Corporation: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007; Volume 456. [Google Scholar]
  27. Piaru, S.P.; Mahmud, R.; Abdul Majid, A.M.S.; Ismail, S.; Man, C.N. Chemical composition, antioxidant and cytotoxicity activities of the essential oils of Myristica fragrans and Morinda citrifolia. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Haddi, K.; Turchen, L.M.; Viteri Jumbo, L.O.; Guedes, R.N.; Pereira, E.J.; Aguiar, R.W.; Oliveira, E.E. Rethinking biorational insecticides for pest management: Unintended effects and consequences. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 2286–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Isman, M.B. Botanical insecticides in the twenty-first century—Fulfilling their promise? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 233–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Radulović, N.; Mišić, M.; Aleksić, J.; Đoković, D.; Palić, R.; Stojanović, G. Antimicrobial synergism and antagonism of salicylaldehyde in Filipendula vulgaris essential oil. Fitoterapia 2007, 78, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Herman, A.; Tambor, K.; Herman, A. Linalool affects the antimicrobial efficacy of essential oils. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 72, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ultee, A.; Slump, R.; Steging, G.; Smid, E. Antimicrobial activity of carvacrol toward Bacillus cereus on rice. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 620–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Brophy, J.; Devi, R.; Ali, S.; Rao, D.; Sotheeswaran, S. Chemistry and Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oils from Ripe and Unripe fruits of the Fijian Morinda citrifolia (noni/kura) Rubiaceae. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2008, 11, 598–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Andrade López, J.M.; Lanno, S.M.; Auerbach, J.M.; Moskowitz, E.C.; Sligar, L.A.; Wittkopp, P.J.; Coolon, J.D. Genetic basis of octanoic acid resistance in Drosophila sechellia: Functional analysis of a fine-mapped region. Mol. Ecol. 2017, 26, 1148–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mayser, P. Medium chain fatty acid ethyl esters—Activation of antimicrobial effects by Malassezia enzymes. Mycoses 2015, 58, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huang, C.B.; Alimova, Y.; Myers, T.M.; Ebersole, J.L. Short-and medium-chain fatty acids exhibit antimicrobial activity for oral microorganisms. Arch. Oral Biol. 2011, 56, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jelen, H.H.; Mildner, S.; Czaczyk, K. Influence of octanoic acid addition to medium on some volatile compounds and PR-toxin biosynthesis by Penicillium roqueforti. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 35, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kishimoto, M.; Nakamura, K.; Tasaki, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakano, R.; Tanimoto, M. Fungal growth inhibition by cheese prepared using milk-clotting crude enzymes from the edible mushroom Hericium erinaceum. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2020, 26, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fujita, K.-I.; Fujita, T.; Kubo, I. Antifungal activity of alkanols against Zygosaccharomyces bailii and their effects on fungal plasma membrane. Phytother. Res. 2008, 22, 1349–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marchese, A.; Orhan, I.E.; Daglia, M.; Barbieri, R.; Di Lorenzo, A.; Nabavi, S.F.; Gortzi, O.; Izadi, M.; Nabavi, S.M. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of thymol: A brief review of the literature. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moumni, M.; Romanazzi, G.; Najar, B.; Pistelli, L.; Ben Amara, H.; Mezrioui, K.; Karous, O.; Chaieb, I.; Allagui, M.B. Antifungal activity and chemical composition of seven essential oils to control the main seedborne fungi of cucurbits. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Oliveira, L.; Batista, A.; Fernandes, F.; Sales, G.; Nogueira, N. Antifungal activity and potential action mechanisms of essential oil of Ocimum gratissimum (Linn.) leaves against Candida species. Rev. Bras. Plantas Med. 2016, 18, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nogueira, J.H.; Gonçalez, E.; Galleti, S.R.; Facanali, R.; Marques, M.O.; Felício, J.D. Ageratum conyzoides essential oil as aflatoxin suppressor of Aspergillus flavus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 137, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jacob, K.S.; Ganguly, S.; Kumar, P.; Poddar, R.; Kumar, A. Homology model, molecular dynamics simulation and novel pyrazole analogs design of Candida albicans CYP450 lanosterol 14 α-demethylase, a target enzyme for antifungal therapy. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2017, 35, 1446–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chaudhary, M.; Kumar, N.; Baldi, A.; Chandra, R.; Arockia Babu, M.; Madan, J. Chloro and bromo-pyrazole curcumin Knoevenagel condensates augmented anticancer activity against human cervical cancer cells: Design, synthesis, in silico docking and in vitro cytotoxicity analysis. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 38, 200–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhou, L.; Li, J.; Kong, Q.; Luo, S.; Wang, J.; Feng, S.; Yuan, M.; Chen, T.; Yuan, S.; Ding, C. Chemical composition, antioxidant, nntimicrobial, and phytotoxic potential of Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla leaves essential oils. Molecules 2021, 26, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abd-ElGawad, A.M.; El Gendy, A.E.-N.G.; Assaeed, A.M.; Al-Rowaily, S.L.; Alharthi, A.S.; Mohamed, T.A.; Nassar, M.I.; Dewir, Y.H.; Elshamy, A.I. Phytotoxic effects of plant essential oils: A systematic review and structure-activity relationship based on chemometric analyses. Plants 2021, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ibrahim, M.A.; Kainulainen, P.; Aflatuni, A.; Tiilikkala, K.; Holopainen, J.K. Insecticidal, repellent, antimicrobial activity and phytotoxicity of essential oils: With special reference to limonene and its suitability for control of insect pests. Agric. Food Sci. Finl. 2001, 10, 243–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Raveau, R.; Fontaine, J.; Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui, A. Essential Oils as Potential Alternative Biocontrol Products against Plant Pathogens and Weeds: A Review. Foods 2020, 9, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chaimovitsh, D.; Shachter, A.; Abu-Abied, M.; Rubin, B.; Sadot, E.; Dudai, N. Herbicidal activity of monoterpenes is associated with disruption of microtubule functionality and membrane integrity. Weed Sci. 2017, 65, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Verdeguer, M.; Sánchez-Moreiras, A.M.; Araniti, F. Phytotoxic effects and mechanism of action of essential oils and terpenoids. Plants 2020, 9, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Karamaouna, F.; Kimbaris, A.; Michaelakis, A.; Papachristos, D.; Polissiou, M.; Papatsakona, P.; Τsora, Ε.; Miller, T. Insecticidal activity of plant essential oils against the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus. J. Insect Sci. 2013, 13, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hazrati, H.; Saharkhiz, M.J.; Moein, M.; Khoshghalb, H. Phytotoxic effects of several essential oils on two weed species and Tomato. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 13, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Campiglia, E.; Mancinelli, R.; Cavalieri, A.; Caporali, F. Use of essential oils of cinnamon, lavender and peppermint for weed control. Ital. J. Agron. 2007, 2, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schulz, M.; Kussmann, P.; Knop, M.; Kriegs, B.; Gresens, F.; Eichert, T.; Ulbrich, A.; Marx, F.; Fabricius, H.; Goldbach, H.; et al. Allelopathic monoterpenes interfere with Arabidopsis thaliana cuticular waxes and enhance transpiration. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kriegs, B.; Jansen, M.; Hahn, K.; Peisker, H.; Šamajová, O.; Beck, M.; Braun, S.; Ulbrich, A.; Baluška, F.; Schulz, M. Cyclic monoterpene mediated modulations of Arabidopsis thaliana phenotype: Effects on the cytoskeleton and on the expression of selected genes. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 832–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Damour, G.; Simonneau, T.; Cochard, H.; Urban, L. An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 1419–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yamori, W.; Kusumi, K.; Iba, K.; Terashima, I. Increased stomatal conductance induces rapid changes to photosynthetic rate in response to naturally fluctuating light conditions in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 1230–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Farquhar, G.D.; Sharkey, T.D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1982, 33, 317–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ainsworth, E.A.; Rogers, A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: Mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. De, N.; Ram, D.; Pandey, S. Physiological traits as determinant of yield in muskmelon under field conditions. Indian J. Hortic 2008, 65, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang, F.; Qi, J.; Tian, M.; Gao, Y.; Xiong, X.; Wang, J.; Song, F.; Li, D. Genome sequence resource for Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum, a cause of gummy stem blight disease of watermelon. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2021, 34, 977–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Waterhouse, A.; Bertoni, M.; Bienert, S.; Studer, G.; Tauriello, G.; Gumienny, R.; Heer, F.T.; de Beer, T.A.P.; Rempfer, C.; Bordoli, L. SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W296–W303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ramachandran, G.T.; Sasisekharan, V. Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 1968, 23, 283–437. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Haas, J.; Barbato, A.; Behringer, D.; Studer, G.; Roth, S.; Bertoni, M.; Mostaguir, K.; Gumienny, R.; Schwede, T. Continuous automated model evaluation (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 2018, 86, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Benkert, P.; Biasini, M.; Schwede, T. Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sanner, M.F. Python: A programming language for software integration and development. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 1999, 17, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Moura, W.; de Souza, S.R.; Campos, F.S.; Cangussu, A.S.R.; Santos, E.M.S.; Andrade, B.S.; Gomes, C.H.B.; Viana, K.F.; Haddi, K.; Oliveira, E.E. Antibacterial activity of Siparuna guianensis essential oil mediated by impairment of membrane permeability and replication of pathogenic bacteria. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 146, 112142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Schrödinger, L.; DeLano, W. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0; San Carlos, CA, USA, 2022.
  71. BIOVIA, Dassault Systèmes. Discovery Studio, Version 4.5; San Diego, CA, USA, 2022.
  72. Hospital, A.; Andrio, P.; Fenollosa, C.; Cicin-Sain, D.; Orozco, M.; Gelpí, J.L. MDWeb and MDMoby: An integrated web-based platform for molecular dynamics simulations. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1278–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. de Oliveira, M.S.; da Cruz, J.N.; Gomes Silva, S.; da Costa, W.A.; de Sousa, S.H.B.; Bezerra, F.W.F.; Teixeira, E.; da Silva, N.J.N.; de Aguiar Andrade, E.H.; de Jesus Chaves Neto, A.M.; et al. Phytochemical profile, antioxidant activity, inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and interaction mechanism of the major components of the Piper divaricatum essential oil obtained by supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 145, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Santana de Oliveira, M.; da Cruz, J.N.; Almeida da Costa, W.; Silva, S.G.; Brito, M.d.P.; de Menezes, S.A.F.; de Jesus Chaves Neto, A.M.; de Aguiar Andrade, E.H.; de Carvalho Junior, R.N. Chemical composition, antimicrobial properties of Siparuna guianensis essential oil and a molecular docking and dynamics molecular study of its major chemical constituent. Molecules 2020, 25, 3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dequech, S.; Ribeiro, L.d.P.; Sausen, C.; Egewarth, R.; Kruse, N. Fitotoxicidade causada por inseticidas botânicos em feijão-de-vagem (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivado em estufa plástica. Rev. FZVA 2008, 15, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  76. Santos, G.R.D.; Café-Filho, A.C.; Leão, F.F.; César, M.; Fernandes, L.E. Disease progress and crop losses due to watermelon gummy stem blight. Hort. Bras. 2005, 23, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Protein structure of Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum tyrosine-tRNA (gray) and the active site (yellow) interacting with octanoic acid (red), hexanoic acid (blue), and isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate (green). (B) 3D interaction and (C) 2D interaction map representation of Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum tyrosine-tRNA with octanoic and hexanoic acids and isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate. All amino acids belonging to the lipid environment binding site are represented.
Figure 1. (A) Protein structure of Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum tyrosine-tRNA (gray) and the active site (yellow) interacting with octanoic acid (red), hexanoic acid (blue), and isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate (green). (B) 3D interaction and (C) 2D interaction map representation of Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum tyrosine-tRNA with octanoic and hexanoic acids and isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate. All amino acids belonging to the lipid environment binding site are represented.
Molecules 27 05173 g001
Figure 2. In vitro mycelial growth of the fungus Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum under the effect of different concentrations of octanoic acid and Morinda citrifolia essential oil.
Figure 2. In vitro mycelial growth of the fungus Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum under the effect of different concentrations of octanoic acid and Morinda citrifolia essential oil.
Molecules 27 05173 g002
Figure 3. Leaf area damage (phytotoxicity) in Cucumis melo plants as a function of different concentrations of the octanoic acid and Morinda citrifolia essential oil.
Figure 3. Leaf area damage (phytotoxicity) in Cucumis melo plants as a function of different concentrations of the octanoic acid and Morinda citrifolia essential oil.
Molecules 27 05173 g003
Figure 4. Stomatal conductance (A) and net photosynthesis rate (B) in Cucumis melo plants submitted to the application of octanoic acid and Morinda citrifolia essential oil.
Figure 4. Stomatal conductance (A) and net photosynthesis rate (B) in Cucumis melo plants submitted to the application of octanoic acid and Morinda citrifolia essential oil.
Molecules 27 05173 g004
Figure 5. Severity of gummy stem blight in Cucumis melo leaves treated with octanoic acid and Morinda citrifolia essential oil.
Figure 5. Severity of gummy stem blight in Cucumis melo leaves treated with octanoic acid and Morinda citrifolia essential oil.
Molecules 27 05173 g005
Table 1. Chemical composition of Morinda citrifolia essential obtained by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
Table 1. Chemical composition of Morinda citrifolia essential obtained by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
PeakCompoundsRT a (min)RI bRI cPeak Area (%)Chemical ClassCAS Number
12-hexanone,5-methyl-3.5573.6673.5250.22Ketone110-12-3
2Hexanoic acid, methyl ester3.9734.1253.9331.27Fatty acid106-70-7
3Hexanoic acid5.1135.5504.80012.75Fatty acid142-62-1
4Benzene, tert-butyl-5.4545.5425.3830.08Aromatic hydrocarbon98-06-6
5Butanoic acid,4-pentenyl ester6.0126.1255.9830.19Fatty acid30563-31-6
62-Hexanone, 5-methyl-6.4176.5006.3750.03Ketone110-12-3
7(E)-2-Methylbut-2-en-1-yl isobutyrate6.5376.6336.5000.05Ester95654-17-4
8Octanoic acid, methyl ester6.3637.0586.8252.91Fatty acid111-11-5
9Cyclopropane,1,2,3-trimethyl-7.3337.4087.2420.07Hydrocarbon42984-19-0
10Octanoic acid8.1308.6427.62575.77Fatty acid124-07-2
11Citronellol8.4428.5088.4170.03Monoterpenoid106-22-9
12Hexanoic acid, 4-pentenyl ester8.8619.0088.7672.57Fatty acid30563-33-8
131-Pentene, 5-(pentyloxy)-9.3199.3929.2500.37Ether56052-88-1
14Pentane, 2,2′-oxybis-9.4259.4679.3920.05Ether56762-00-6
15Decanoic acid, methyl ester9.7199.7839.6830.15Fatty acid110-42-9
16Hexanoic acid, hexyl ester10.55910.61710.5080.07Fatty acid6378-65-0
17Isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate11.49011.82511.4333.12Carbonate0-00-0
18Dodecanoic acid, 2-penten-1-yl ester11.97712.20811.8250.31Fatty acid0-00-0
Total 100
a Retention time, b Retention indices calculated on an RTX-5MS column, c Retention indices according to the literature [26].
Table 2. Model of Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum t-RNA ligase used to analyze the molecular docking with the noni essential oil major compounds.
Table 2. Model of Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum t-RNA ligase used to analyze the molecular docking with the noni essential oil major compounds.
OrganismTargetPDB
Template
Identity (%)Ramachandran Favored (%)QMEAN
Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearumTyrosine—tRNA ligase(EVM0001193.1) *5THH52.7%93.97%0.74
* BioProject (PRJNA694739) in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
Table 3. Molecular docking results for complexes between noni essential oil major compounds and Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum t-RNA ligase.
Table 3. Molecular docking results for complexes between noni essential oil major compounds and Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum t-RNA ligase.
OrganismLigandAffinity Energy (kcal/mol)
Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearumOctanoic acid−5.1
Isobutyl pent-4-enyl carbonate−5.1
Hexanoic acid−4.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dalcin, M.S.; Dias, B.L.; Viteri Jumbo, L.O.; Oliveira, A.C.S.S.; Araújo, S.H.C.; Moura, W.S.; Mourão, D.S.C.; Ferreira, T.P.S.; Campos, F.S.; Cangussu, A.S.R.; et al. Potential Action Mechanism and Inhibition Efficacy of Morinda citrifolia Essential Oil and Octanoic Acid against Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum Infestations. Molecules 2022, 27, 5173. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165173

AMA Style

Dalcin MS, Dias BL, Viteri Jumbo LO, Oliveira ACSS, Araújo SHC, Moura WS, Mourão DSC, Ferreira TPS, Campos FS, Cangussu ASR, et al. Potential Action Mechanism and Inhibition Efficacy of Morinda citrifolia Essential Oil and Octanoic Acid against Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum Infestations. Molecules. 2022; 27(16):5173. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165173

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dalcin, Mateus S., Bruna L. Dias, Luis O. Viteri Jumbo, Ana C. S. S. Oliveira, Sabrina H. C. Araújo, Wellington S. Moura, Dalmarcia S. C. Mourão, Talita P. S. Ferreira, Fabricio S. Campos, Alex Sander R. Cangussu, and et al. 2022. "Potential Action Mechanism and Inhibition Efficacy of Morinda citrifolia Essential Oil and Octanoic Acid against Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum Infestations" Molecules 27, no. 16: 5173. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165173

APA Style

Dalcin, M. S., Dias, B. L., Viteri Jumbo, L. O., Oliveira, A. C. S. S., Araújo, S. H. C., Moura, W. S., Mourão, D. S. C., Ferreira, T. P. S., Campos, F. S., Cangussu, A. S. R., Alves, M. V. G., Andrade, B. S., Mantilla-Afanador, J. G., Aguiar, R. W. A., Oliveira, E. E., & Santos, G. R. (2022). Potential Action Mechanism and Inhibition Efficacy of Morinda citrifolia Essential Oil and Octanoic Acid against Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum Infestations. Molecules, 27(16), 5173. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165173

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop