2.1. Optimization of the Acid Decomposition Process of Grinding Waste
The granulometric compositions of the particles of the initial and heat-treated grinding wastes according to the sieve analysis were determined. The size distribution of the grinding waste particles based on the sieve analysis is presented in
Table 1. The powder in its bulk consists of two fractions in the range of 0.2–0.5 and 0.1–0.2 mm. There is also a small number of particles with sizes of 0.063–0.1 mm and 0.5–1 mm.
The morphology and dispersed composition of the grinding waste particles obtained by scanning electron microscopy at different magnifications are shown in
Figure 1. It can be seen from the obtained microphotographs that the powder under study was heterogeneous in its dispersed and morphological compositions and contained mainly irregularly shaped particles with a loose surface and a size in the range of 10–100 microns.
According to the results of X-ray energy dispersion spectroscopy (
Table 2) in the initial sample, the main element was nickel. Also, chromium, tungsten, and molybdenum were present. In addition, aluminum, titanium, and cobalt were also found in insignificant amounts. The presence of carbon indicated the occurrence of carbides of these metals and organic impurities. The presence of oxygen was due to the presence of oxidized forms of metals.
For a more complete analysis of the powder by the content of metals, especially those present in microquantities, the method of inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy was used. For this, the sample was dissolved in hydrochloric acid when exposed to microwave radiation. From the data obtained (
Table 3), it can be seen that in addition to the above basic elements, valuable elements were also present in the powder, i.e., rhenium, iridium, vanadium, and ruthenium. It was also noted that the high content of rhenium in the grinding waste was 5.9 g/kg. Both methods of elemental analysis used in this case were evaluative and complementary since the first method allowed us to determine the elemental composition of individual sections of the sample surface. In the second, there was an incomplete dissolution of the powder, resulting in a certain amount of undissolved residue. Therefore, in general, the results are somewhat different, especially in the content of trace impurities. In addition, the uneven distribution of impurities over the volume of the alloy also led to a difference in the results.
Since the grinding waste always contains lubricating and cooling fluids, which is confirmed by the results of elemental analysis, according to which the carbon content was almost 15 wt.% (
Table 2), their presence made it difficult for the reagent to access the components to be opened. In addition, the transition of organic impurities into the solution will eventually significantly worsen the quality of the final product. Indeed, after opening the waste with a solution of sulfuric acid at a temperature of 100 °C, the COD index indicating the content of organic carbon in the solution was 40,000 mg/L. To remove organic impurities, the initial powder was subjected to heat treatment at 600 °C for 2 h. As a result, during its subsequent acid treatment under the same conditions, the content of organic carbon in the solution decreased three times and amounted to 12,000 mg/L.
Repeated sieve analysis of heat-treated grinding waste showed (
Table 1) that this operation contributes to an increase in the proportion of particles of a smaller fraction; a fraction with a particle size of less than 0.05 mm was also formed, the proportion of which was 27.36 wt.%. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of the material (
Figure 2c,d) indicate that after heat treatment of the powder, as a result of the removal of organic impurities, the particle structure became looser. According to X-ray energy dispersion spectroscopy data, as a result of heat treatment of the grinding waste sample, it is possible to remove most of the organic impurities, while the carbon content was significantly reduced (
Table 2).
To study the process of chemical dissolution of the grinding waste powder, seven solutions were selected, including sulfuric, hydrochloric, and nitric acids and their mixtures. Due to the fact that the basis of the grinding waste was nickel, the control of its dissolution was analyzed by the concentration of nickel (II) ions in the solution. The data obtained by dissolving the powder at room temperature are shown in
Figure 3.
It was found that in solutions containing a mixture of nitric and hydrochloric acids (curves 6 and 7), in the first hours of processing, the speed of the powder dissolution process was maximal due to the formation of the active form of HNO2. After 100 h, the dissolution rate slowed down and the kinetic curve reached a plateau, while the concentration of nickel in a solution of 6.0 mol/L HNO3 + 0.3 mol/L HCl did not exceed 42 g/L (at the same time Ni leaching efficiency of 65.6%), and in a solution of 6.0 mol/L HCl + 0.3 mol/L HNO3 − 51 g/L (Ni leaching efficiency of 79.7%). The slowing of the processing speed was due to the passivation of the powder surface by an oxide film. In solutions containing nitric acid, as well as a mixture of sulfuric and nitric acid, the dissolution process was the slowest and generally the least effective, as a result of which the nickel concentration in the solution did not exceed 20 g/L (Ni leaching efficiency of 1.3%) even after 220 h of treatment. The maximum concentration of nickel ions in the solution was observed after processing the metal powder in a solution containing a mixture of 3.0 mol/L H2SO4 and 0.3 mol/L HCl and was 60 g/L (Ni leaching efficiency of 93.8%). A slightly lower nickel ion content of 56 g/L (leaching efficiency of 87.5%) was obtained in a solution of 3.0 mol/L H2SO4. To reduce the corrosive activity of the solution due to the presence of hydrochloric acid, further studies were carried out using sulfuric acid.
The temperature of the process is an important parameter for increasing the efficiency of dissolution. On the one hand, its increase contributes positively to the increase in the degree of extraction. On the other hand, its high value can lead to increased energy consumption. Experiments to find the optimal temperature of the process were carried out in a solution of sulfuric acid with a concentration of 3 mol/L. The efficiency of the process was evaluated by the extraction of nickel from the solution, and the results are shown in
Figure 4.
From the data obtained, it can be seen that when solutions were heated from room temperature to 70 °C for the first 6 h, the nickel concentration in the solution increased from 2–3 g/L to 30–50 g/L (at the same time, Ni leaching efficiency was 46.9–78.1%). An increase in temperature to 100 °C increased the concentration of nickel ions in solution to 56 g/L in the first 4 h from the start of dissolution; in 6 h of contact, the concentration of nickel ions reaches 64 g/L. This is almost 100% leaching efficiency. At a temperature of 70 °C, a similar leaching efficiency was achieved in a time interval of more than 36 h. Thus, in terms of time and energy costs, the process should be carried out at boiling point. The implementation of autoclave leaching at 130 °C reduced the process time to 2 h while maintaining the efficiency of nickel leaching at almost 100%. Despite the fact that the autoclave process is more complicated in hardware design, it is probably the autoclave process that should be used in industrial conditions.
Along with the main component of the nickel alloy, other components and impurities are extracted into the solution during leaching, to varying degrees due to their solubility under these conditions (
Table 4).
For example, chromium, cobalt, aluminum, titanium, and iron were leached very efficiently, while rhenium practically remained undissolved. It can be noted that with comparable amounts of iron and rhenium in the initial powder, when leached with sulfuric acid, rhenium passed into the solution at a concentration 20 times lower than iron. According to the literature data [
6], indeed, as a result of the treatment of the alloy with sulfuric acid at a temperature of 85 °C, the leaching of rhenium into the solution did not exceed 5%. For effective leaching of rhenium, it is necessary to carry out electrochemical dissolution of the grinding waste, while the efficiency of rhenium extraction into solution reaches about 80% [
28], or use oxidants such as chlorine, in which case the degree of rhenium extraction increases to 90% [
29]. However, in our case, the preservation of vision in the undissolved residue allows you to concentrate it, separating it from the soluble elements, thereby making it possible to carry out its subsequent processing. The concentration of molybdenum in the solution was extremely low. Which is also consistent with literary sources [
9]. Vanadium, iridium, ruthenium, and calcium were not detected in the solution, respectively. They remained in the undissolved residue, while niobium, tantalum, and sodium appeared in the solution.
As a result of the studies conducted on the effect of acid concentration on the efficiency of metal leaching from the grinding waste, it was established (
Figure 5,
Table 5) that at a concentration of sulfuric acid of 1.5 mol/L, the concentration of nickel ions in solution after 10 h at a temperature of 100 °C was 50 g/L, while with an increase in the concentration of sulfuric acid to 3.0 mol/L, the concentration of nickel ions increased to 64 g/L.
With an increase in the ratio of the mass of the powder to the volume of the solution (
Figure 5,
Table 5), the concentration of nickel ions increased more than twice and reached 146 g/L with a ratio of solid to liquid phases of 3:10 and an acid concentration of 3.0 mol/L, while the use of dilute acid under the same conditions made it possible to obtain a concentration of nickel ions in solution twice as low (67 g/L). The nature of the changes in the concentrations of the main components and the impurities was similar to the change in the concentration of nickel, viz., a threefold increase in the mass of the solid phase. The concentration of metal ions passing into the solution increased by an average of 2.5 times. However, the degree of their extraction decreased to about 75%. It should be noted that the complete dissolution of the grinding waste sample and the transition of all its components into the solution did not occur, even with an increase in the duration of treatment in boiling solution of up to 20 h. The choice of the ratio of solid and liquid phases was determined by the goal to be achieved, i.e., either the most complete extraction of the main components into the solution or obtaining a solution containing a high concentration of the main component.
The size of the grinding waste powder fraction also affected the leaching process. The larger the size of the powder particles, the lower the concentrations of the main elements in the solution for a certain period. Thus, when the 0.063–0.1 mm fraction was dissolved after 5 h of contact, the concentration of nickel ions reached 65 g/L. Acid treatment of the 0.5–1 mm fraction allowed for a lower concentration—only 53 g/L for the same period.
2.2. Kinetics of Acid Decomposition of Grinding Waste
The leaching of nickel and other metals into the solution when they interact with sulfuric acid occurs by the following reaction:
Acid leaching of grinding waste is a heterogeneous process, the rate of which is determined by the rate of diffusion transfer and the rate of chemical reaction of dissolution. When sulfuric acid interacts with metals, hydrogen bubbles are formed, which promote the mixing of the solution near the surface of the solid phase. In addition, given the intensive mechanical mixing of the solution, it can be assumed that the processes of external mass transfer do not affect the speed of the process as a whole. Thus, to assess the limiting stage that determines the rate of leaching of metals from grinding waste, using the example of nickel, kinetic data were processed using equations describing the processes occurring in the diffusion and kinetic regions, and the diffusion region means internal diffusion.
The Gray–Weddington equation describes a reaction on the surface of a spherical solid particle, which decreases in size during the reaction, while an insoluble porous layer of the product is formed, which does not affect the diffusion of reagents during the process. The linearization of the kinetic leaching curves of the grinding waste obtained at different temperatures according to the Gray–Weddington equation, as well as the velocity constants, are reflected in
Figure 5 and
Table 4. In the case of the formation of a dense nonporous layer of the product, the Gistling–Brownstein equation was used (
Figure 6,
Table 4). Application of the generalized kinetic Kazeev–Erofeev equation (data are presented in
Figure 7 and
Figure 8 and
Table 6) allowed us to identify the limiting stage of the process by evaluating the values of the indicator n in the equation. In a physical sense, this equation describes the transformation probability function both in topochemical reactions and in reactions of a different nature [
6].
Judging by the results obtained, the Gray–Weddington and Gistling–Brownstein equations similarly describe the process of leaching grinding waste. The determination coefficients were close except for the data at a temperature of 25 °C. In the first case, the value of R2 was slightly higher and was 0.9771, compared with the second case, where R2 = 0.9105. Hence, it can be concluded that the process was influenced by both the chemical reaction and the diffusion of reagents through the product layer on the surface of particles (for example, calcium sulfate and rare earth element sulfates) and through a layer of components that are poorly soluble under these conditions. The apparent activation energy calculated by the Arrhenius equation in the temperature range under study using the reaction rate constants of the Gray–Weddington equation was 27.8 kJ/mol. A similar calculation based on the rate constants of the Gistling–Brownstein equation allowed for a close value of 28.6 kJ/mol, which, in both cases, indicated the process in the transition region.
The Kazeev–Erofeev equation most adequately describes the proces, as a result of the approximation of kinetic data. Higher determination coefficients were obtained, which were in the range of 0.9902–0.8772. It should be noted that in all cases, the velocity constant increased significantly with increasing temperature, and the coefficient of determination decreased. The value of the parameter ‘n’ of the Kazeev–Erofeev equation at a temperature of 25 °C was 1.55, that is, more than one, which indicates the predominance of the kinetic component in the speed of the process. With increasing temperature, the value of the coefficient ‘n’ decreased to 0.61 and 0.91 at temperatures of 70 °C and 100 °C, respectively, which indicated that internal diffusion through the product film begins to have a limiting effect on leaching. To remove intra-diffusion inhibition during leaching, the material must be crushed to a fraction less than 0.1 mm in size.